{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":24,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"548fe427fbf8","filters":{"venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2052006286","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01336.x","title":"INTUITIVE NON‐NATURALISM MEETS COSMIC COINCIDENCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuitionism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Face (sociological concept); Natural (archaeology)","authors":[{"name":"Matthew S. Bedke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02129149548421103,"gpt":0.2379685841833593,"spread":0.2166770886991483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002985561,0.0003792672,0.0004544807,0.0001503855,0.0006755859,0.0001554461,0.0004620482,0.0001977589,0.001500031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004085847,0.0003243707,0.0002230846,0.00007502746,0.0008381844,0.0004793632,0.00001602164,0.0006670951,0.001120731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004210704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000399016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001238913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001587967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997926,0.0001397708,0.000457478,0.0005515851,0.0003410139,0.0005841741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987404,0.0002020524,0.0001549971,0.000467711,0.0001749081,0.0002598712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001527597,0.0001664401,0.000004171399,0.000009594633,0.0000363851,0.0001064858,0.02040272,4.824471e-7,0.0003763576,0.9716787,0.002328906,0.00473704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005374589,0.001509486,0.0003918995,0.00006376936,0.00003602723,0.00005915766,0.000978734,0.00006163877,0.00005397125,0.9812155,0.01464243,0.000449963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08569621,0.0005575019,0.00007733375,0.1557725,0.001789507,0.0004878685,0.0001073854,0.0004437911,0.7550679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925551,0.000009833915,0.00006010434,0.003150015,0.002569671,0.00001864758,0.00003191393,0.00002179034,0.001582962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","authors":[{"name":"Karolina Hübner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06398916241848439,"gpt":0.2429104741561115,"spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002682512,0.0002642942,0.0004045089,0.0001183251,0.0001628591,0.00007847066,0.0002148707,0.0001170075,0.0002912104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007918393,0.0002097431,0.0001179448,0.00007768674,0.0008601674,0.0002070155,0.000028412,0.0003104165,0.0001324127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003502889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003836905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004848168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004674291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981685,0.0001274568,0.0003961503,0.0004046277,0.0004958304,0.0004074743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986851,0.0001871037,0.0001155862,0.0003113212,0.0001553998,0.0005455225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700885,0.0002645982,0.00004466404,0.00003793272,0.00003233302,0.00001964216,0.006953686,2.698669e-7,0.00002093701,0.9899276,0.0007593519,0.001768818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007861787,0.00210176,0.00006740575,0.0001128237,0.00003782461,0.000009863204,0.003954269,0.00007438393,0.00005777762,0.941645,0.05085172,0.0003009805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2766165,0.0005576208,0.00002109868,0.04949172,0.001104833,0.000355843,0.0001895251,0.0001979172,0.671465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975821,0.0000149513,0.00004304235,0.0003628643,0.001291831,0.000007106112,0.0000184901,0.00002290742,0.0006566762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8553076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Tim Kenyon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03470307404019345,"gpt":0.2508384244666748,"spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003056796,0.0001349029,0.0001697855,0.00006016494,0.0003595845,0.0001335118,0.00007715879,0.0001353679,0.0003239214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003354266,0.0001177222,0.00005992917,0.00002090325,0.0005135765,0.0002449005,0.000006818027,0.0004992225,0.00009929106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006030821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001687814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003106528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002580117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991061,0.00006004412,0.0002185591,0.0002488199,0.000160974,0.0002054759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993814,0.0001070346,0.00007135645,0.0002180258,0.0001051673,0.0001170267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001344738,0.00005760137,0.0001039489,0.000020423,0.00001255646,0.000002422555,0.02180299,7.396079e-8,0.002701399,0.9716896,0.0001808919,0.003414607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002737994,0.0002774363,0.0009516908,0.000008812921,0.00002491523,0.000009374951,0.002183547,0.0002445627,0.00005248654,0.961288,0.03447315,0.0002122291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8014076,0.00005720661,0.0001025156,0.01847683,0.002169652,0.000185738,0.00002514066,0.0001740902,0.1774012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967876,0.00000303023,0.00008416593,0.0001948783,0.001982153,0.00001335675,0.00002604471,0.00001545053,0.0008933417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1953799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4800572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104958832","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00180.x","title":"THE TROUBLE WITH MARY","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Physicalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Consciousness; Modal; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Victoria McGeer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01575516668011224,"gpt":0.2591353873303521,"spread":0.2433802206502398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007698778,0.0002259315,0.000201812,0.00003837964,0.0006594959,0.0001029067,0.0004549559,0.0001281853,0.0007622993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005116028,0.000125026,0.00009607205,0.0004017972,0.001029029,0.0001143898,0.000009704984,0.0004299177,0.001118302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002644683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003853371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002649349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001573252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976717,0.0003729405,0.0002792759,0.0005137492,0.0004064671,0.0007558306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982826,0.0004999976,0.00007218516,0.0007593058,0.00005176407,0.0003341071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002026356,0.0001502257,0.00006457001,0.000002025152,0.00003221094,0.00005041553,0.0006568864,2.348485e-7,0.00006261542,0.9952114,0.0003138412,0.003252902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005695164,0.001044931,0.0005180138,0.000007857991,0.00001430929,0.0001204771,0.0006085877,0.00000902065,0.00002896111,0.9836864,0.01317033,0.0002216294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059026,0.0002092165,0.0009469124,0.02019325,0.0005974555,0.000228233,0.000006199195,0.0001188222,0.9671097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976925,0.000002695501,0.0001219817,0.0003522792,0.0002524508,0.00008459352,0.000001509755,0.00002175441,0.001470217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Rachel McKinnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09897644136040398,"gpt":0.2738701778148647,"spread":0.1748937364544607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001265449,0.0008121778,0.001023628,0.0002619461,0.0008607547,0.0008692794,0.0006712226,0.0005497951,0.0004284691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001109442,0.0006820343,0.0005903002,0.0001058705,0.001604749,0.001188429,0.00008246361,0.001345448,0.001026752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009542533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008131579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008229771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001093793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958411,0.0006173962,0.0004119796,0.0009704294,0.0006618733,0.001497157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968668,0.0004699398,0.0003274844,0.00122694,0.0003766985,0.0007321872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807343,0.0008047586,0.00009283974,0.0002755822,0.0002156864,0.00001820919,0.1241667,4.947856e-8,0.00007043329,0.830664,0.003960403,0.03967315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006929277,0.0007549122,0.0001140807,0.000154062,0.0001479426,0.0000299656,0.03854527,0.00001227552,0.00004139291,0.2673382,0.6913401,0.0008287888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0145661,0.07332521,0.0001193384,0.1922027,0.009462404,0.0009445158,0.0002463117,0.0007385977,0.7083948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651775,0.001078621,0.00007022938,0.0001899301,0.01417675,0.0001103478,0.00004369163,0.0001269623,0.01902593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Eze Paez","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0519382189520884,"gpt":0.2740827046406117,"spread":0.2221444856885234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006714308,0.0004288988,0.0006231412,0.0001384863,0.001032254,0.0005816386,0.00058232,0.0003211864,0.001385371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003652296,0.0003966358,0.0005537425,0.0001144425,0.0009518215,0.0005338019,0.00009815091,0.0007406502,0.0001156854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006704142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001528124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001219418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005870038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966955,0.0002406539,0.00070162,0.000865171,0.0006680884,0.0008289525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975226,0.0003581952,0.0002055588,0.0008262417,0.0007217784,0.0003656175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481266,0.0004808131,0.000005021205,0.00008241281,0.0001877207,0.00003496627,0.01368032,2.402439e-7,0.0002074955,0.9805342,0.003567659,0.001071051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001505372,0.000396675,0.00001140054,0.00003286914,0.00007853096,0.00001385431,0.001537948,0.000176944,0.00002015278,0.8352277,0.1605454,0.0004531231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02174676,0.0004460838,0.001346948,0.3979443,0.004579488,0.001012263,0.001732059,0.0007717003,0.5704204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872541,0.000006829078,0.0002120396,0.002626242,0.007387447,0.0001563089,0.0002253894,0.0000888915,0.002042754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anna Brinkerhoff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05132110497605342,"gpt":0.2606192914173379,"spread":0.2092981864412845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008461738,0.0001570633,0.0002635747,0.00005698784,0.001700828,0.00006379071,0.0003085703,0.00004693337,0.0005694155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006797446,0.0001155196,0.0001907009,0.00006674771,0.001249001,0.00008517707,0.00004356004,0.0006228508,0.00004310603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002105236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006264377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001705524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003290746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982232,0.0003775735,0.0003931871,0.0002554987,0.0004203351,0.0003301693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983413,0.0009339236,0.000188591,0.0002836036,0.0001672504,0.00008536106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001097969,0.000141667,0.00003679078,0.00001880908,0.00006889548,0.000007412972,0.0451783,4.750253e-7,0.00003110714,0.9515458,0.0004696454,0.002391262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003936034,0.001157861,0.0000655369,0.00001058889,0.00005009614,0.00000759091,0.04872525,0.0000380508,0.00002459755,0.8936685,0.05568645,0.0001718618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1078053,0.0008720644,0.00008980185,0.02575424,0.002594219,0.0004257953,0.0003860739,0.0001325977,0.8619399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970412,0.000006859027,0.000005159376,0.0002806282,0.0008067002,0.00009773829,0.00002435632,0.00002026629,0.001717105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8892359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Wesley Buckwalter","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Turri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05600285033129099,"gpt":0.2697287505763414,"spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589349,0.0002574276,0.0004308544,0.00008938806,0.0002498815,0.0001219612,0.0001746443,0.0001877197,0.0007870663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003454923,0.0002169249,0.0001430825,0.00003422233,0.000786318,0.0002027261,0.0000271329,0.0005549045,0.001708987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001920055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003659742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005582981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002230353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.0001502191,0.0003323606,0.0004899108,0.0002026102,0.0004341298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987234,0.0004744741,0.0000680806,0.0003893338,0.0001136898,0.0002309965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250562,0.00022054,0.00002712097,0.0001079664,0.000040119,0.000006945124,0.04122822,2.363231e-8,0.00005058536,0.9545914,0.0002452769,0.003449333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007080059,0.001348011,0.0001173239,0.00004977644,0.00003902401,0.0000111903,0.004833773,0.0001473303,0.000005590935,0.9003702,0.09199344,0.0003763805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1304763,0.0009989019,0.00002186351,0.01424308,0.002139314,0.0002946926,0.00003567024,0.0001823814,0.8516079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934991,0.00002915036,0.00003120106,0.0001643545,0.002029639,0.00002170917,0.00001122053,0.0000333753,0.004180222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8630229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698627","doi":"10.1111/papq.12447","title":"A Regularity Theory of Causation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Transitive relation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Causal theory of reference; Causality (physics); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Data mining; Quantum mechanics","authors":[{"name":"Holger Andreas","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mario Günther","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04527593141553939,"gpt":0.2355493043176204,"spread":0.190273372902081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005612466,0.0001381345,0.0001875005,0.0001687009,0.0002829646,0.0001269681,0.0002007916,0.00006052751,0.001217745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002093304,0.0001159746,0.000137229,0.00008402197,0.001061507,0.0004213512,0.000009665519,0.0002175083,0.0002362996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003612988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005512531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007822341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008207086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987742,0.00008598935,0.0002960316,0.0003121043,0.0003242659,0.0002073568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993899,0.0001309676,0.00005150248,0.0002566617,0.00007414798,0.00009684497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000276474,0.00006085919,0.000001348312,0.00007827995,0.00001918669,0.00001220335,0.03274821,2.273725e-7,0.000634418,0.9594811,0.0005905639,0.00634596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007284316,0.0003749382,0.00003046757,0.00007072594,0.00002151524,0.000006291161,0.001236409,0.0001560923,0.00004486197,0.9615721,0.03627046,0.0001433424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02613694,0.001198295,0.0005375464,0.01581756,0.002142237,0.000206615,0.0001047265,0.0003672365,0.9534888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964217,0.000003520288,0.0000363593,0.0000779952,0.001076234,0.00001236851,0.000007859485,0.00001311399,0.002350845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046505692","doi":"10.1111/papq.12320","title":"Some Hallucinations Are Experiences of the Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Hallucinations in medical conditions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"SGS (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hallucinating; Object (grammar); Visual Hallucination; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sensory system; Causal chain; Attribution; sort; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Michael Barkasi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04950657806939075,"gpt":0.2756734211767464,"spread":0.2261668431073556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001293105,0.0001539767,0.0002119493,0.00006403828,0.0004232461,0.00004198634,0.000767153,0.00009416461,0.0002772133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506457,0.0001102325,0.0001470455,0.0007553949,0.0007882229,0.0002736952,0.00005254778,0.0003940281,0.0001007601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002295231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005379953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.927785e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.687632e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978738,0.000273956,0.0004075286,0.0004393364,0.0007330047,0.0002724175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986896,0.0003811129,0.0001911063,0.0004217885,0.00007201011,0.0002443758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003016998,0.0006370447,0.0002330909,0.00008897915,0.00001619246,0.00003969479,0.08244462,0.0000264149,0.07469784,0.8364511,0.003743232,0.00159166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001254647,0.001124475,0.003723362,0.0001283327,0.00005753056,0.00004503424,0.04235744,0.004267964,0.0397252,0.9022323,0.004329259,0.0007544488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5425537,0.00007119241,0.001339789,0.4296165,0.001051908,0.0006510054,0.0001214814,0.0002792889,0.02431517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967915,0.000003378325,0.00006833691,0.002333896,0.0006024398,0.0001104597,0.000001713609,0.00001466172,0.00007355445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4542379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4495149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gurpreet Rattan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Åsa Wikforss","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1963590482312692,"gpt":0.309647523111002,"spread":0.1132884748797328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007568804,0.0002457174,0.0003904246,0.0001802011,0.00020436,0.0001439295,0.0002514193,0.0003131414,0.0001657358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000615516,0.0002209333,0.0001406873,0.00009152974,0.0006439962,0.0002731789,0.00001761991,0.001109398,0.0003087863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002093657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009428384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004145287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001804029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980955,0.000183039,0.0004364578,0.0004260431,0.0003861848,0.0004728162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.0001953902,0.0001110784,0.0003767876,0.0001127214,0.0002496663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004381729,0.00009775952,0.000151576,0.000036123,0.00002284548,0.00002974595,0.07097793,4.012262e-7,0.00002053511,0.9262222,0.002260007,0.0001370329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006388593,0.0003237945,0.00002541788,0.00005530338,0.00001543736,0.000009565998,0.02518747,0.00009047839,0.000009970741,0.958678,0.01468847,0.0002772309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04371551,0.0007597096,0.0002585452,0.09173261,0.003318612,0.0003515086,0.00006457602,0.00022536,0.8595735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954147,0.000006539748,0.00003512391,0.00120411,0.00145388,0.00001719457,0.00001499753,0.00003113876,0.001822328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536369043","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01403.x","title":"DISENABLING LEVY'S FRANKFURT‐STYLE ENABLING CASES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Style (visual arts); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael McKenna","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09809195847360846,"gpt":0.2575912204720239,"spread":0.1594992619984155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002264034,0.000335058,0.0003127814,0.0001812676,0.0004936818,0.0001003085,0.0005084415,0.0001559157,0.0006419569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004032901,0.0002876932,0.0002001663,0.0004774969,0.0003014862,0.0003559059,0.00004501091,0.0004191983,0.0007541726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002663037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003916838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002246839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002970255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972642,0.000173544,0.0004624735,0.0008592766,0.0004810323,0.000759453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985414,0.0002633998,0.0001208339,0.0006391488,0.0000463249,0.000388956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008120781,0.002723199,0.001601453,0.0002418933,0.00006171097,0.005337244,0.02491779,0.000007876493,0.6439963,0.2537457,0.001596768,0.06495795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002372028,0.003992165,0.001720865,0.0002090539,0.00008496118,0.001082173,0.002504682,0.001616741,0.09253606,0.8805155,0.01080092,0.002564891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7754344,0.0003437783,0.0012994,0.004359204,0.001769691,0.0005903733,0.0000832081,0.000848394,0.2152716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979016,0.0000235143,0.0002185398,0.0004248328,0.0007924817,0.00003887712,0.000003549349,0.00004964572,0.0005469432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206038229","doi":"10.1111/papq.12404","title":"Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Marc‐Kevin Daoust","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0426968052843611,"gpt":0.2168190719656676,"spread":0.1741222666813065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005066774,0.00009953401,0.0001805127,0.00003660749,0.001503809,0.00005630073,0.000281371,0.00001383056,0.001408118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000188631,0.00005365512,0.00006518463,0.00004603224,0.002659535,0.0001767173,0.0000414557,0.0002321779,0.0000062781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002142952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004179789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005389131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001350556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987994,0.0001901725,0.0002457742,0.0002160619,0.0004048337,0.0001437032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994512,0.000115235,0.0001132672,0.0002010234,0.00006366931,0.00005555734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001593761,0.00002819439,0.000018731,0.00001159652,0.000009243843,0.000001353583,0.03220132,0.000002528423,0.00008451092,0.9663058,0.0002773529,0.0009000197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006180998,0.0004091879,0.0001751753,0.000003883813,0.0000114621,0.00001247923,0.003517259,0.0005262077,0.000003653989,0.9799735,0.0146296,0.0001194864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.335739,0.0006219116,0.00001263434,0.1024016,0.001325515,0.0008107465,0.0002931932,0.0001040526,0.5586913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982889,7.944285e-7,0.00001194738,0.0002766081,0.0002740736,0.00005382564,0.000005219195,0.000004713571,0.001083963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6625499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blome‐Tillmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0614580390015568,"gpt":0.2717297105392614,"spread":0.2102716715377046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000999709,0.0002061196,0.0003488328,0.00004461299,0.000619069,0.000131659,0.0001777207,0.0001106763,0.0002056989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000561273,0.0001201195,0.000136908,0.00003056152,0.002539031,0.0002752498,0.00002391635,0.0004637784,0.0003990903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001255713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001873127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002715041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004692401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985908,0.0002870243,0.0003056171,0.0002093131,0.000165054,0.0004421354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986654,0.0006240858,0.00009010816,0.0003212121,0.0001050294,0.0001941424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004565609,0.00009467362,0.00002358109,0.00002413385,0.00003879718,7.860398e-7,0.1698471,6.006442e-9,0.00001145907,0.8271753,0.0007228399,0.002015719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001216493,0.000177759,0.0001375427,0.00001842882,0.00006301258,0.00001522038,0.01414445,0.00002804676,0.000005160021,0.8050321,0.1789173,0.0002445046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0486448,0.004564526,0.00008408685,0.04011063,0.002821223,0.0004278188,0.00004249503,0.000166907,0.9031375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906591,0.00002064099,0.00001120787,0.0007650102,0.004395741,0.00004189802,0.000007580922,0.00002174669,0.004077087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Julia J. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09859490224146784,"gpt":0.2631039937800987,"spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000200847,0.0002643405,0.0003992551,0.00004775639,0.0004412134,0.0001544346,0.0003000697,0.0001385532,0.001466083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009661763,0.0002306459,0.0002275522,0.0000615485,0.0007180027,0.0002018868,0.00002076685,0.0006255851,0.002201748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001825955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005791638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005326425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001291379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982931,0.0001638737,0.0003818592,0.0004637038,0.0002787818,0.0004186805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988407,0.0001573933,0.00009889739,0.000305655,0.0001848838,0.0004124205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004186407,0.0001119075,0.00001308518,0.0000875668,0.0000502191,0.00002694513,0.1032039,2.204843e-7,0.0003842703,0.8873478,0.00618951,0.002542733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005641672,0.0009210028,0.00003113802,0.00002857357,0.00005163904,0.00000388907,0.006840836,0.0003002617,0.00004888849,0.6614719,0.3292921,0.0004456051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.017085,0.0003769891,0.0002429453,0.1419915,0.001648654,0.0002836053,0.000066545,0.0005274001,0.8377773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889696,0.000006669373,0.00004917921,0.002482222,0.005620627,0.00001946023,0.00002165042,0.00004134921,0.002789212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208017042","doi":"10.1111/papq.12371","title":"Frege's Critical Arguments for Axioms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principle of sufficient reason; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jim Hutchinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03357800758751189,"gpt":0.3404896237130658,"spread":0.306911616125554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004867568,0.0002809678,0.0003792699,0.00006852675,0.0003505882,0.0001072085,0.0004149468,0.0002833315,0.002592107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041341,0.0002569753,0.0002836034,0.0003860474,0.0007471297,0.0001652564,0.00003539712,0.0003682638,0.001082693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004033526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005672371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001828198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.373129e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969772,0.0002447421,0.0004637782,0.0009397641,0.0004277153,0.0009468783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974731,0.0009701466,0.0000560783,0.0007432129,0.0001713319,0.000586082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135218,0.0006342543,0.00001481552,0.00002084367,0.00004433089,0.0001585394,0.0009909145,1.066326e-7,0.001358078,0.9909071,0.0005345074,0.005201295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008000917,0.0008039447,0.0002774559,0.00002518393,0.00003699325,0.0001044634,0.000492515,0.0001005036,0.0003387824,0.9933002,0.003379208,0.0003406753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121254,0.0005288298,0.03309667,0.1109613,0.004106565,0.0005169277,0.0002595693,0.0003180345,0.8380867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959696,0.000001590784,0.000748547,0.00111042,0.001205108,0.0001868945,0.00002772146,0.00003263471,0.0007174763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616958750","doi":"10.1111/papq.12199","title":"How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Epistemology; Tree (set theory); Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth L. Pearce","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05550305048270084,"gpt":0.2354725756166384,"spread":0.1799695251339375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003411843,0.0003683118,0.0004480644,0.0001096727,0.002930246,0.001586704,0.001183614,0.000164476,0.0009515457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001486836,0.0002986728,0.0003051051,0.00003663864,0.001593268,0.0009894363,0.00005609214,0.0005014776,0.0007066407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009864783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004712671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003426996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001140757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975575,0.00008739216,0.0003436795,0.000704987,0.0006394573,0.0006669749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977298,0.00009124542,0.0002527163,0.001311376,0.0001696965,0.0004451872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006970527,0.0002215272,0.00002023883,0.00002434271,0.00003446982,0.00005431356,0.01224763,1.360159e-7,0.0004940795,0.9658461,0.00682443,0.01416304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005300544,0.0005407365,0.0002184022,0.000026681,0.00002937083,0.00000756856,0.0006913726,0.00009898809,0.00001665228,0.5613959,0.4359408,0.0005035267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00670298,0.0001679053,0.0000529422,0.1016207,0.002069293,0.0002024868,0.00003826563,0.0001918097,0.8889536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624462,0.000006165605,0.00006571825,0.0002801465,0.005178299,0.00004292783,0.000004807374,0.00003531878,0.03194047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011821939","doi":"10.1111/papq.12308","title":"Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Cognition","authors":[{"name":"Philip Clark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04934398974864333,"gpt":0.2555141702994389,"spread":0.2061701805507956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009838398,0.0002381928,0.0002577401,0.00007566944,0.0002824283,0.0001406808,0.0002402434,0.0001041663,0.0002852298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003801025,0.0002086948,0.0001111134,0.000267838,0.000352734,0.0002688351,0.00006282357,0.0004335255,0.0004018647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001182475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002618853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002052476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.660193e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980644,0.0001276195,0.000336216,0.0006709697,0.0003974004,0.0004034055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991235,0.0001321015,0.00008149004,0.000182496,0.00004504112,0.0004354383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002355347,0.0004845781,0.0006884773,0.0001236249,0.00003435394,0.0002383856,0.004708129,4.557132e-7,0.5537913,0.3909787,0.002371027,0.04634545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004940831,0.007116347,0.003682555,0.0003101731,0.0001708027,0.0006724522,0.002727423,0.009150779,0.02876783,0.9188933,0.02116235,0.002405156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4450721,0.0002843413,0.01151466,0.2008696,0.001865609,0.001024306,0.0002560468,0.001229853,0.3378834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979259,0.00002678439,0.00006658429,0.001209333,0.0005633711,0.00002242636,0.000006516989,0.00002586622,0.0001531791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8510327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204643877","doi":"10.1111/papq.12388","title":"‘True’ as Polysemous","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Extensibility; Epistemology; Philosophy; Polysemy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Andy Demfree Yu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01931303214561802,"gpt":0.3018161903339666,"spread":0.2825031581883486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003645114,0.0002803297,0.0003486518,0.00007907798,0.0002822145,0.0000961262,0.0004539739,0.0002691093,0.008518403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001353375,0.0002529011,0.0002276082,0.000628711,0.0005670133,0.0001412154,0.00004395809,0.0005248495,0.008968181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003846155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008241312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009181882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001086874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970386,0.000337615,0.0004152845,0.0008780264,0.0005059967,0.000824501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979786,0.0002853802,0.00007617169,0.0009471989,0.0001101621,0.0006024723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008806887,0.0004042841,0.00003265377,0.000005379653,0.00004166296,0.0008669786,0.001668523,1.400804e-7,0.002488591,0.9834345,0.0003133792,0.01065581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005211447,0.0005776709,0.0006327354,0.0000145217,0.00002257651,0.0004059321,0.0006925439,0.00001700264,0.0004781241,0.9925517,0.003745512,0.0003404874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05484609,0.0003315427,0.0004170795,0.04189634,0.001350857,0.0001194786,0.00002420239,0.0002235741,0.9007909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994185,0.00000318057,0.0001367286,0.001605315,0.0009826032,0.00003759154,0.00001312263,0.00002893381,0.003007548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083137785","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00317.x","title":"DISPOSITIONAL COMPATIBILISM AND FRANKFURT‐TYPE EXAMPLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Explication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Free will; Moral responsibility; Incompatibilism","authors":[{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06037728995766115,"gpt":0.2495521528642782,"spread":0.1891748629066171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008218084,0.000193942,0.0002166162,0.00007132415,0.0004933879,0.00003621813,0.000185772,0.00008988231,0.0002275527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008933756,0.0001626478,0.00006240206,0.0002311108,0.0005468974,0.0002160538,0.0000218712,0.0002417259,0.0002302497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001340969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002684391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005923456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.247858e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983782,0.0001183768,0.0002600474,0.0005340887,0.0003755085,0.0003337623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.0002718793,0.00005264488,0.0002766631,0.00003466061,0.0002387718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003297503,0.001056953,0.004140206,0.00007563634,0.00002156894,0.000820292,0.007791474,0.000006406472,0.5603288,0.4146938,0.002826976,0.007908051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001561514,0.002100302,0.05905967,0.0000578472,0.00002216801,0.001298242,0.0001767871,0.001828387,0.007499533,0.9216684,0.003741868,0.0009852907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758809,0.0001262059,0.0001457488,0.006089453,0.0003436471,0.0001638085,0.00004744465,0.0001552377,0.01704752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.00003836805,0.0001535599,0.0004552308,0.0003757818,0.00001092963,0.000009154688,0.00001724592,0.0001964079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sam Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03424912674816231,"gpt":0.3047580133527852,"spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002137428,0.0001164147,0.0001395142,0.0000198071,0.003262525,0.0002587906,0.0003349677,0.0001470006,0.00005534474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005957105,0.00006220578,0.00009252666,0.0001893419,0.004204302,0.0001660951,0.00001925607,0.0004731823,0.0001070622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003169988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007997741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008475375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997865,0.0006358011,0.0002392029,0.000212971,0.0005688615,0.0004782001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968306,0.002536967,0.00004907048,0.0002452712,0.000092109,0.0002460165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009803894,0.00001982064,0.00003084724,0.000001353089,0.00001174945,0.000003857561,0.006114553,1.683522e-7,0.000002512455,0.9907566,0.0003209222,0.002639604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004173976,0.00005403071,0.0002562579,0.000004453768,0.000009694412,0.000006594054,0.002394236,0.00009481188,4.328163e-7,0.9279626,0.0687091,0.00009040512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003281093,0.0002265066,0.0001481725,0.573287,0.0002635978,0.0001850069,0.00000399682,0.00005963121,0.422545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954382,0.0001656598,0.00001566252,0.001510871,0.001832749,0.00003511579,0.000001546019,0.000007421107,0.000992804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968405612","doi":"10.1111/papq.12288","title":"Not as a Means: Killing as a Side Effect in Self‐defense","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Liability; FREAK; Pedestrian; Conflation; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Transport engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kerah Gordon‐Solmon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814841236460248,"gpt":0.2523809947056704,"spread":0.2242325823410679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009402176,0.0003315137,0.0004689399,0.0002358108,0.000276389,0.0002648683,0.0002626401,0.0002328917,0.0008696218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001132624,0.0002932829,0.0001927754,0.00009585164,0.0002165079,0.0003479974,0.00001636516,0.0007564697,0.006655025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008366983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007284388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001992401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001127056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974683,0.0003006042,0.000555578,0.0006299552,0.0005169674,0.0005286132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983381,0.0006555685,0.00014115,0.00055759,0.0001244546,0.0001831459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003969398,0.0003191149,0.0001602725,0.0002749208,0.00006448721,0.00005966246,0.1648052,0.000009196982,0.001355883,0.8290401,0.0001923898,0.00332182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002314229,0.003408632,0.0001907719,0.0003728341,0.000101353,0.00003057367,0.01481503,0.002356501,0.0003998862,0.943758,0.03120552,0.001046638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6365612,0.0001058245,0.00001637265,0.0141344,0.001183236,0.0007018893,0.00002218616,0.0003206409,0.3469543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956466,0.0000112162,0.00003917548,0.000777017,0.001204544,0.00007100322,0.00002942142,0.00005003601,0.002171013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3590854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054207533","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01346.x","title":"DIS‐UNIFIED PLURALIST ACCOUNTS OF CAUSATION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Causality (physics); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"J. Edward Taylor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02470636864957924,"gpt":0.3021715665938924,"spread":0.2774651979443132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004329204,0.0002189052,0.0003262461,0.0001106627,0.0001393444,0.00003519449,0.0004288045,0.0002061549,0.0008402642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005924567,0.000184291,0.0001405189,0.0004947459,0.0004743686,0.0002043006,0.00001061593,0.0002894115,0.0003980956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000350587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002245494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009724749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.56744e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979145,0.0001693458,0.0004966083,0.0004877317,0.0004469635,0.0004848718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987344,0.0001560538,0.0001604181,0.0005987403,0.00009059444,0.0002598646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001897892,0.0003639338,0.00005171436,0.000005555495,0.00001621856,0.00001950312,0.002331278,5.372786e-7,0.003130438,0.9849044,0.0001294048,0.008857206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005074393,0.00109753,0.01292052,0.00002010499,0.0000183424,0.00001720131,0.0002750301,0.00005372748,0.0001733537,0.9844846,0.000208741,0.0002234291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1826415,0.0000762339,0.0008339743,0.03340914,0.0006685541,0.0002829384,0.00005827246,0.0001433393,0.781886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.000001673811,0.00007007128,0.0004309709,0.0004327947,0.00001289418,0.00001587292,0.00001083164,0.0001773254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.816206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","authors":[{"name":"Mark McCullagh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04134218617910647,"gpt":0.2678413251231641,"spread":0.2264991389440577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059766,0.0002147732,0.0002889495,0.0001002301,0.001016049,0.0002491383,0.0004014557,0.0001215806,0.0003079023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005480431,0.0001423545,0.0002086606,0.0000912266,0.001186847,0.0001434056,0.00002463612,0.0007361938,0.000264374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002644948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006973865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003326171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006254925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984068,0.0002168105,0.0003761975,0.0003475649,0.000239838,0.0004128263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986719,0.0004900385,0.00008089805,0.0005270634,0.0001451647,0.00008492688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002547613,0.00007779142,0.00001607797,0.0000386042,0.00006479472,0.000005729556,0.02260679,6.806573e-7,0.00006501565,0.9696529,0.002558679,0.004887463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001928595,0.0001334991,0.00003164772,0.00003312739,0.00003812071,0.000001915925,0.003942936,0.00007968905,0.00001860803,0.7901318,0.2052516,0.0001442066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01125251,0.0005840116,0.0004928465,0.1341893,0.002616248,0.0003091259,0.00003339229,0.0002106667,0.8503119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842296,0.00001424387,0.00003362297,0.002103895,0.001917864,0.00004705076,0.00001231876,0.00001667349,0.0116247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7814733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}