{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":24,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"548fe427fbf8","filters":{"venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2052006286","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01336.x","title":"INTUITIVE NON‐NATURALISM MEETS COSMIC COINCIDENCE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intuitionism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Face (sociological concept); Natural (archaeology)","authors":[{"name":"Matthew S. Bedke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02129149548421103,"gpt":0.2379685841833593,"spread":0.2166770886991483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004965408,0.0003644234,0.0007549497,0.001432272,0.003096023,0.004610962,0.0009529968,0.002768045,0.006578662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01229458,0.0003637889,0.000748352,0.0006220144,0.02424196,0.007043563,0.004965418,0.00492699,0.0005620648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002494495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006262049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005966995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949067,0.0025826,0.0002095526,0.0007775933,0.001153053,0.0003704866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922006,0.004124876,0.0005910435,0.001454613,0.001187627,0.0004412827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003482674,0.000004079424,0.0000460398,0.00001025975,0.000002305314,0.00003140609,0.0001683302,0.0001054974,0.00003510821,0.9986131,0.0003640222,0.0006163539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003684995,0.000003155829,0.00005874395,0.00001100089,0.000001334265,0.00004662286,0.00009082931,0.0003348078,0.00004392419,0.9961703,0.003232155,0.000003280188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09453548,0.002421813,0.2065442,0.0421612,0.00119602,0.00008694886,0.0001459205,0.0002771241,0.6526314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836988,0.0003127252,0.009455335,0.001554616,0.0002857147,0.00005845583,0.00004336324,0.00004655446,0.004544568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006578662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0262599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","authors":[{"name":"Karolina Hübner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06398916241848439,"gpt":0.2429104741561115,"spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003682081,0.0003687548,0.0006393967,0.002169607,0.003423628,0.006155208,0.000652777,0.001606104,0.002724346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003452614,0.0002912387,0.0005521975,0.001122262,0.04481634,0.01006531,0.00348701,0.003860363,0.0002098855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002453278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006571461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004734706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.001190453,0.00009065415,0.0003296954,0.0003825265,0.000205785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977462,0.00126495,0.0001971293,0.0003819681,0.0002266412,0.0001832215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002716023,0.000001417251,0.00003140794,0.000005828293,0.000001041096,0.000008266808,0.0006913181,0.0000430959,0.0000213547,0.9985757,0.0001312032,0.0004866977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004593929,0.000002886987,0.00009105349,0.0000178839,0.000003023226,0.00001969579,0.0005341752,0.0002523826,0.00004283142,0.9905733,0.008454358,0.000003826829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1651537,0.01214188,0.2000257,0.06308913,0.001023065,0.00007615818,0.0002640321,0.0002280958,0.5579982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854754,0.0008743663,0.007999452,0.0009544296,0.0001447928,0.00003868097,0.00002507497,0.00002836309,0.004459336],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006571461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03655273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484922772","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01371.x","title":"ASSERTION AND CAPITULATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Utterance; Coercion (linguistics); Ideology; Speech act; Context (archaeology); sort; Resistance (ecology); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; History; Arithmetic; Politics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Tim Kenyon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03470307404019345,"gpt":0.2508384244666748,"spread":0.2161353504264813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384907,0.0005372428,0.0004989511,0.001160123,0.003531677,0.005796508,0.001949892,0.002795195,0.007716653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681362,0.0003732636,0.0004425462,0.000939217,0.02206228,0.009421663,0.005719051,0.004997735,0.001358854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002174472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001468455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001502728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008002723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903244,0.006297751,0.0005292007,0.0009966162,0.001251849,0.0006002007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866605,0.007387285,0.001246688,0.00202637,0.002281162,0.0003981242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001795634,0.000004781792,0.00007055196,0.00004260335,0.000003472603,0.00007517361,0.004738186,0.00006923574,0.0002044548,0.9908413,0.001217945,0.002714514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002521773,0.00004574012,0.0002802494,0.0003072741,0.00002565027,0.0003037303,0.005053125,0.001437865,0.002009672,0.8949353,0.09553908,0.00003702117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06382336,0.005326486,0.1242437,0.02884447,0.002194325,0.0001237156,0.0001837288,0.0003955827,0.7748647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755307,0.0008012998,0.007131408,0.001436367,0.0007398707,0.00009586036,0.00006918087,0.0001131251,0.01408221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007716653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03905559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104958832","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-0114.2003.00180.x","title":"THE TROUBLE WITH MARY","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Physicalism; Appeal; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Consciousness; Modal; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Victoria McGeer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01575516668011224,"gpt":0.2591353873303521,"spread":0.2433802206502398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002103831,0.0003557663,0.0003724608,0.0005453853,0.009310386,0.005709698,0.0007390738,0.003630577,0.03062155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007732801,0.0003932566,0.0002801076,0.0005477606,0.01180724,0.009246602,0.004268004,0.0095543,0.009426445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002283814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001535936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006262263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008615108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986764,0.0005015868,0.00004047719,0.0002969074,0.000297615,0.0001870353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982704,0.0007388334,0.00009070891,0.0002478315,0.0004385177,0.0002137081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003279338,0.00001330487,0.0003275101,0.00003924012,0.000007134076,0.0002080443,0.009220237,0.00004015159,0.0002686603,0.7789866,0.1966235,0.01423285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009273557,0.00001159717,0.0003260651,0.0001220045,0.000007483745,0.0003085312,0.005849828,0.0001384737,0.000453747,0.17559,0.8171663,0.00001681554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009361827,0.003833107,0.006024222,0.2292394,0.005618604,0.00002242173,0.00007918339,0.0001977425,0.7456235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.518034,0.003490805,0.002833112,0.07832433,0.002927322,0.00006308842,0.00008779675,0.0007464172,0.3934931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03062155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1024393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1869766104","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01416.x","title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT ‘HOW DO YOU KNOW?’ CHALLENGES A SPEAKER'S KNOWLEDGE?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Rachel McKinnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09897644136040398,"gpt":0.2738701778148647,"spread":0.1748937364544607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02467785,0.0003194739,0.0008017779,0.001327186,0.003810253,0.008877953,0.001625167,0.005110851,0.006955715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0784684,0.0004219454,0.0003984719,0.00139366,0.0380961,0.02132477,0.006068769,0.008622752,0.0009485648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002481787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003043921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001631402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9725627,0.0167648,0.001316618,0.002455076,0.005894262,0.001006576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8829488,0.09158385,0.007963445,0.008755488,0.007570923,0.001177498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001541519,0.0000629821,0.003887016,0.0003540864,0.00004593819,0.0006117328,0.2267248,0.0002797771,0.001726574,0.7509801,0.00393126,0.01124152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002562252,0.00006308337,0.004345124,0.0009389312,0.0000593767,0.0005877183,0.2305065,0.001578641,0.004015882,0.6818652,0.07591121,0.0001028232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.442512,0.002020129,0.06024314,0.1480776,0.001359673,0.00007582224,0.0004797383,0.0001088485,0.3451231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948336,0.0002379883,0.001198885,0.00195453,0.0001840512,0.00002113655,0.00004429129,0.00002916955,0.001496319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02467785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1305104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Eze Paez","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0519382189520884,"gpt":0.2740827046406117,"spread":0.2221444856885234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006069753,0.0002745054,0.0005234715,0.0007250147,0.005392968,0.0056526,0.0006442374,0.004125537,0.005443068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005400043,0.0002237167,0.0005729988,0.0005523128,0.05377349,0.006955336,0.00627944,0.005906901,0.0005898654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002882307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003164365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002479935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002034452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951805,0.0029735,0.0001442843,0.000475674,0.0006481585,0.0005780217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959061,0.001907153,0.0003482024,0.0008613396,0.0004704634,0.0005067266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002039965,0.000002979964,0.00003069825,0.000003948361,0.000001188961,0.00001340634,0.0003888911,0.00005722285,0.00002588609,0.9986079,0.0004641075,0.0004017161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004595848,0.000005604602,0.00008984545,0.0000206876,0.000002097969,0.00002432428,0.0002933863,0.0001625146,0.00004317262,0.9877169,0.01163232,0.000004436008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591681,0.002263577,0.03207471,0.08997135,0.0005979983,0.00007336472,0.0001016441,0.00004543817,0.8157039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805523,0.0005819593,0.002486533,0.003941927,0.0002585086,0.00007140958,0.0000254558,0.00002329659,0.01205853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006069753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286488953","doi":"10.1111/papq.12423","title":"The Cognitive Demands of Friendship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anna Brinkerhoff","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05132110497605342,"gpt":0.2606192914173379,"spread":0.2092981864412845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002401788,0.0002283644,0.0002107827,0.0008377682,0.001899806,0.00321045,0.000589948,0.001337653,0.006644782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01189145,0.0002523859,0.0002061788,0.0005534178,0.00911046,0.005043241,0.003611141,0.001519437,0.0003330488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002668718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00208717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972389,0.001593903,0.00008033298,0.0003094605,0.0005536199,0.0002238179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884644,0.00693145,0.001262147,0.00128142,0.001085593,0.0009749634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001459954,0.0001368967,0.01380706,0.0002438619,0.00006430678,0.000545943,0.04161122,0.001115795,0.002647027,0.9095144,0.003099074,0.02706843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004446611,0.00010059,0.0390969,0.0001392048,0.00006407205,0.0005179702,0.03004517,0.004512396,0.001194917,0.8881268,0.03609475,0.00006277433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6353024,0.0009534966,0.01724177,0.0115512,0.00009008367,0.00002511947,0.00008390365,0.00005231329,0.3346998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988717,0.00007130332,0.0003606098,0.00008296476,0.00001621009,0.000004645031,0.000009714,0.000003531543,0.0005792797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006644782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02222902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978502643","doi":"10.1111/papq.12298","title":"KNOWLEDGE AND TRUTH: A SKEPTICAL CHALLENGE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Wesley Buckwalter","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Turri","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05600285033129099,"gpt":0.2697287505763414,"spread":0.2137259002450504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06067723,0.0006015105,0.001670208,0.003773963,0.007157181,0.015645,0.003347683,0.01917773,0.005673398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1515158,0.0008186104,0.001007546,0.002421558,0.08181175,0.02940933,0.009784911,0.02326488,0.001425287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006517181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004973118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008472476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9360731,0.04067598,0.002773042,0.004797893,0.01426956,0.001410427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7301134,0.2049236,0.01139221,0.02309173,0.0265737,0.003905318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004850413,0.00002790242,0.0003495646,0.0000723012,0.00001665572,0.0001699437,0.003967157,0.0003187621,0.0001275065,0.9833359,0.006330313,0.005235499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001835505,0.0000114392,0.0001110874,0.0001388785,0.000007330282,0.0001141982,0.001101931,0.0007082625,0.0001611806,0.9866313,0.01097768,0.00001837659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03677122,0.004591301,0.06587136,0.7753178,0.002267929,0.00005062468,0.00009035537,0.0001312195,0.1149082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522485,0.001259043,0.007367965,0.03327269,0.002584085,0.00007314885,0.00003544839,0.00007584061,0.003083259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06067723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3208957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390698627","doi":"10.1111/papq.12447","title":"A Regularity Theory of Causation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Transitive relation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Causal theory of reference; Causality (physics); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Data mining; Quantum mechanics","authors":[{"name":"Holger Andreas","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mario Günther","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04527593141553939,"gpt":0.2355493043176204,"spread":0.190273372902081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004285111,0.0003814553,0.0006223702,0.002438429,0.001521798,0.002059364,0.001277169,0.001545494,0.007004956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009546464,0.0004172344,0.001295846,0.001011868,0.008394263,0.005959778,0.002809421,0.002451765,0.0005980508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002151284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001356831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001688609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009592633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967651,0.001428943,0.0001784462,0.0005745271,0.0007718377,0.0002809887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912196,0.004935726,0.0006581475,0.001528418,0.001320703,0.000337419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004164917,0.000004306024,0.0001740812,0.0000107147,0.000005684727,0.00002427176,0.00006449905,0.001088826,0.00008606211,0.9970374,0.0003610981,0.001138991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005808797,0.000008380836,0.0001806969,0.00001074417,0.000004244177,0.00004016902,0.00003877511,0.004993657,0.00007619534,0.990775,0.00386123,0.000005040632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06656375,0.001101831,0.7499241,0.01094095,0.0003521941,0.0001339315,0.0005079471,0.0002851328,0.1701901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494281,0.0004677113,0.03858228,0.0007075828,0.0004186892,0.000155202,0.0003389575,0.00008746348,0.009814095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02343386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046505692","doi":"10.1111/papq.12320","title":"Some Hallucinations Are Experiences of the Past","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Hallucinations in medical conditions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"SGS (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hallucinating; Object (grammar); Visual Hallucination; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sensory system; Causal chain; Attribution; sort; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Michael Barkasi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04950657806939075,"gpt":0.2756734211767464,"spread":0.2261668431073556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003784335,0.0001789387,0.000159701,0.0004676859,0.0008260655,0.0008904944,0.0001739127,0.0005228833,0.001797497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002450341,0.0001260069,0.0001422991,0.0002744795,0.002407203,0.0009655269,0.00072613,0.0007068497,0.0001864027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002485396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001285816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007481598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006633133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998162,0.00006879431,0.0000153769,0.00001395798,0.00005432967,0.00003132415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992135,0.000297519,0.000207909,0.00008144716,0.0001003372,0.00009937536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001614698,0.000149287,0.08451104,0.001615084,0.0002371614,0.1110313,0.4245558,0.0008595816,0.09844115,0.1137166,0.01330154,0.1499666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001459778,0.001399952,0.1559139,0.001154342,0.0001741478,0.2963803,0.2208527,0.001356923,0.02066644,0.09338569,0.2082793,0.0002902709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288928,0.008095612,0.005184327,0.005095893,0.0003683138,0.00002357486,0.0001149942,0.000150606,0.05207387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980412,0.0006727271,0.0001429052,0.0002007426,0.00005803234,0.00000113901,0.000008407397,0.000004786614,0.0008700424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001797497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006013215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850974401","doi":"10.1111/papq.12092","title":"Is Understanding Epistemic in Nature?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Skepticism; Articulation (sociology); Philosophy; Focus (optics); Rationality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gurpreet Rattan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Åsa Wikforss","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1963590482312692,"gpt":0.309647523111002,"spread":0.1132884748797328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01329146,0.0004224835,0.0009483656,0.002465303,0.005109931,0.01369776,0.001448566,0.005004319,0.004281486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01693665,0.0002761932,0.0005218628,0.002207163,0.06747151,0.02408271,0.004565654,0.006741151,0.0005856139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005332805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005810887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003311791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001465005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914417,0.005693601,0.0002405214,0.0008453638,0.001329183,0.0004496567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827692,0.01172472,0.001206195,0.001432028,0.002072426,0.0007954339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007379032,0.00000795903,0.0001006422,0.00003974626,0.000004697776,0.0000349513,0.00399691,0.0001088035,0.00004748442,0.9919719,0.001595721,0.002083874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001926049,0.000003126602,0.00007448035,0.0001107305,0.000004249539,0.00002622042,0.001995749,0.0001583662,0.00005759299,0.9810961,0.01646641,0.00000507037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04427634,0.01933701,0.06787084,0.5200787,0.002447963,0.00005289744,0.0001427439,0.0001121301,0.3456813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716787,0.006028409,0.004273592,0.01142549,0.001348353,0.00006173514,0.00005730383,0.00004853028,0.005078047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07029283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536369043","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01403.x","title":"DISENABLING LEVY'S FRANKFURT‐STYLE ENABLING CASES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Style (visual arts); Virtue; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael McKenna","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09809195847360846,"gpt":0.2575912204720239,"spread":0.1594992619984155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005911607,0.0005485869,0.0006385174,0.001928155,0.003763983,0.00546431,0.001232174,0.004554263,0.007655826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117866,0.000554579,0.001052834,0.000887791,0.01720975,0.0120673,0.01016031,0.00416502,0.001169334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003406272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003249953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003416535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957179,0.001743708,0.0001879315,0.0005219472,0.0009414172,0.000887152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958788,0.002400868,0.0003053308,0.0008250783,0.0003682807,0.00022158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004100385,0.000002185242,0.00003554612,0.00000315208,8.347131e-7,0.00006733899,0.0003489178,0.00008749055,0.00003960664,0.998562,0.0002740385,0.0005748179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001493627,0.000004786035,0.0000597166,0.00001931596,0.00000413229,0.00009203772,0.0003234828,0.0008377245,0.000201399,0.9856117,0.01282139,0.000009317811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.115635,0.0006416668,0.090569,0.01398222,0.0002689367,0.0000945803,0.00009337862,0.0002620989,0.778453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820495,0.0002403905,0.007096571,0.0007809963,0.00006398153,0.00008662985,0.000024374,0.00004331821,0.009614086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007655826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03126395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206038229","doi":"10.1111/papq.12404","title":"Structural Rationality and the Property of Coherence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rationality; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Great Rationality Debate; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Marc‐Kevin Daoust","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0426968052843611,"gpt":0.2168190719656676,"spread":0.1741222666813065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009503108,0.0003500908,0.0008478942,0.001834619,0.002404346,0.004955749,0.000968756,0.00215192,0.006653897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02015038,0.0003691903,0.0008175794,0.002235965,0.02642734,0.008423091,0.004437726,0.002754731,0.0005577094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003537436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00261707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003372103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001742504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907046,0.005446197,0.0004599725,0.001067441,0.001496588,0.0008251694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728185,0.01711286,0.002103264,0.003631761,0.003504752,0.0008289349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007734757,0.000003466853,0.0001600813,0.00001482603,0.000007745105,0.00001122335,0.0001962235,0.000510756,0.00005756912,0.9973984,0.0003930241,0.001238953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005649782,0.000003549533,0.00009784219,0.00001295955,0.000002765531,0.000007382301,0.0001083716,0.0007041068,0.00004935115,0.9975732,0.001432346,0.000002563567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1651873,0.006526276,0.3471527,0.07841723,0.0003624769,0.0001250404,0.0004132989,0.0003104027,0.4015052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892113,0.0004498529,0.007256298,0.0006490335,0.0001437035,0.00004463276,0.00005780692,0.00003039429,0.002156962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009503108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05025786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494846022","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01446.x","title":"Contextualism and the Knowledge Norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Epistemology; Assertion; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Blome‐Tillmann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0614580390015568,"gpt":0.2717297105392614,"spread":0.2102716715377046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427939,0.0004513038,0.0006736947,0.002009152,0.004030538,0.007748439,0.001558851,0.003005587,0.002794504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02080646,0.0004803508,0.0004643885,0.001560445,0.05154301,0.01022449,0.00613387,0.004525806,0.0003597037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00558468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005293696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002421047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800805,0.01192914,0.0009363468,0.002233053,0.00405298,0.000768043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768811,0.01442358,0.001697315,0.002893424,0.003212364,0.0008922319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001821437,0.000001705575,0.00002501842,0.000007696972,9.826497e-7,0.000006541025,0.0004508522,0.00007761888,0.00001495667,0.9986243,0.0001279237,0.0006606246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004138519,0.000002394004,0.0000472776,0.00002317114,0.00000170956,0.000007611794,0.0002498952,0.0002462094,0.00004481104,0.9949116,0.004458412,0.000002851609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0809823,0.006326211,0.2295031,0.07924055,0.0009068999,0.0001351346,0.0002011079,0.0002110377,0.6024936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810363,0.0007708407,0.01208924,0.001215488,0.0003850849,0.0001558268,0.00003747554,0.0000406671,0.004268998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07551754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245134956","doi":"10.1111/papq.12299","title":"Unacknowledged Permissivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Proposition; Epistemology; Permissive; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Julia J. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09859490224146784,"gpt":0.2631039937800987,"spread":0.1645090915386309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184502,0.0008471608,0.001254419,0.002929621,0.004610933,0.01019754,0.004739418,0.009247636,0.008306704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08784476,0.001076553,0.001291434,0.001906234,0.0504467,0.02442365,0.01066963,0.01208499,0.001405402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00403042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004908747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001058671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007007833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9584621,0.01862797,0.003571105,0.008585218,0.008998431,0.001755117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9235796,0.04112359,0.006995026,0.01861224,0.008400991,0.001288448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002266073,0.00001020735,0.0002682439,0.00005989275,0.00002356119,0.0001349753,0.0009403319,0.0002470335,0.0001302996,0.9943709,0.0006565558,0.003135304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009793543,0.000009414434,0.00007262727,0.00008977085,0.000012311,0.0001102597,0.0002229574,0.0004576342,0.0003935348,0.9916565,0.006951872,0.0000132106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08361766,0.005020896,0.3493019,0.09145007,0.002494682,0.000366484,0.0005559163,0.0004368477,0.4667555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661401,0.0009003529,0.02088945,0.004994622,0.0009330858,0.0002223802,0.0001187269,0.00008905753,0.005712084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208017042","doi":"10.1111/papq.12371","title":"Frege's Critical Arguments for Axioms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Epistemology; Philosophy; Principle of sufficient reason; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jim Hutchinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03357800758751189,"gpt":0.3404896237130658,"spread":0.306911616125554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0196675,0.001172404,0.001257499,0.008527692,0.004859296,0.006023445,0.002348777,0.007718136,0.01090434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04465434,0.0008508401,0.001724707,0.002378112,0.03257458,0.0131146,0.004394668,0.009214118,0.001367433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008684606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002673806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002125116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861448,0.008018931,0.0005044427,0.001375288,0.003022552,0.0009340516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628125,0.02765636,0.001376761,0.002212028,0.005245246,0.0006970394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003880526,0.000002955529,0.0000132396,0.00001231555,0.000003749557,0.00001076069,0.0001048661,0.00005462484,0.00001280441,0.9984503,0.000920768,0.0004097125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122522,0.000002486632,0.00003279006,0.00004095522,0.000004598116,0.00001157802,0.0000807032,0.0002739138,0.00006304471,0.9917846,0.007689598,0.000004622465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02539422,0.007315655,0.1959889,0.1295138,0.002524497,0.0002205343,0.0004080877,0.0002793231,0.638355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9225035,0.002278453,0.03400379,0.01207927,0.003370943,0.0004798651,0.00017396,0.0002187568,0.02489145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0196675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616958750","doi":"10.1111/papq.12199","title":"How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Epistemology; Tree (set theory); Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth L. Pearce","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05550305048270084,"gpt":0.2354725756166384,"spread":0.1799695251339375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005730317,0.0003450279,0.0007174197,0.001550679,0.0111013,0.008772766,0.001472589,0.005094441,0.01010507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009888381,0.0005613396,0.0003486925,0.001133561,0.03801879,0.01148076,0.004486746,0.005657724,0.001151881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006623698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002720658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01939885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01924688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934187,0.004000891,0.0001206367,0.0008707,0.0009401117,0.0006490301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947916,0.00361484,0.0002734082,0.0003674046,0.0005877652,0.0003649496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003066892,0.00001246143,0.0003827765,0.00004283389,0.000008457126,0.0002147368,0.1154096,0.0001411672,0.0002318097,0.8651316,0.01312909,0.005264867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001934855,0.00003574935,0.001132059,0.0003759745,0.00003014885,0.000434108,0.08192264,0.0006154926,0.000704688,0.3561833,0.5584617,0.00008477294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.107325,0.007226794,0.03587162,0.1244365,0.001257241,0.00003889097,0.0001674716,0.0004054451,0.7232711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749267,0.0007442276,0.00239761,0.002952565,0.0001048719,0.00001501414,0.00002794474,0.0001509819,0.01868025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01939885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04805851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011821939","doi":"10.1111/papq.12308","title":"Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Cognition","authors":[{"name":"Philip Clark","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04934398974864333,"gpt":0.2555141702994389,"spread":0.2061701805507956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003426364,0.0003278508,0.0003531348,0.001212109,0.0009445281,0.003191721,0.0008384176,0.001455664,0.003916456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006401415,0.000245509,0.0004036881,0.0006136745,0.01709318,0.007517945,0.002780477,0.003266687,0.0003035621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001959974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008787655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001434548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008664519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987255,0.0004637646,0.00008227748,0.00025989,0.0003774562,0.00009120507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966316,0.001815368,0.0003584483,0.0004633134,0.0004859549,0.0002454194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001350147,0.00001053622,0.0003603489,0.00001811876,0.000005562648,0.00003155662,0.0006640713,0.0001105118,0.0001100133,0.9950205,0.0003160534,0.003339203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145957,0.000006343172,0.0003194138,0.000009431823,0.000003008018,0.00002656883,0.0001151014,0.000563267,0.0001158927,0.9970495,0.001783279,0.000004033027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2552443,0.005473953,0.1748132,0.0639568,0.0007395925,0.00007250199,0.0001372381,0.0001554463,0.4994069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884055,0.0005409874,0.005265395,0.001099517,0.0001580698,0.00003195646,0.00002724151,0.00001425471,0.004457013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003916456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01812053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204643877","doi":"10.1111/papq.12388","title":"‘True’ as Polysemous","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Extensibility; Epistemology; Philosophy; Polysemy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Andy Demfree Yu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01931303214561802,"gpt":0.3018161903339666,"spread":0.2825031581883486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004754758,0.0005656769,0.0004944024,0.001930761,0.002537981,0.00499622,0.001230803,0.002009506,0.006804675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01055002,0.0006385673,0.0004555341,0.00127125,0.01904975,0.01768496,0.003761461,0.004093425,0.000672806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001166249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007626555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955902,0.001735778,0.0003554142,0.0007616445,0.001290659,0.0002662767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901758,0.004505131,0.001059554,0.001371013,0.002350965,0.000537597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004850822,0.00001302464,0.0005199239,0.00009175014,0.00001300475,0.0002563514,0.005076673,0.0001581305,0.00104785,0.987442,0.0009781959,0.004354561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001309054,0.00002304362,0.0008709515,0.00007589017,0.00002209482,0.0003592139,0.001480588,0.001380144,0.0009281399,0.9807891,0.01402235,0.00003538394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.32351,0.004070636,0.3034182,0.02775452,0.002204092,0.0001171995,0.0005506774,0.0005910375,0.3377835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871714,0.0002605599,0.009411025,0.0008438293,0.0002248685,0.00002099505,0.0000962396,0.00006791557,0.001903248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006804675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02514583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083137785","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00317.x","title":"DISPOSITIONAL COMPATIBILISM AND FRANKFURT‐TYPE EXAMPLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Explication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Free will; Moral responsibility; Incompatibilism","authors":[{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06037728995766115,"gpt":0.2495521528642782,"spread":0.1891748629066171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003070144,0.0002032261,0.0002628015,0.0009969814,0.002452983,0.00271131,0.0006640415,0.001943608,0.006085166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065667,0.0002072059,0.0003522582,0.0005819458,0.008339922,0.004702892,0.003657436,0.001902491,0.0004430274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00133773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006029173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006041806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007157114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969612,0.001799905,0.00009591192,0.0003617387,0.0005265676,0.0002546567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972053,0.001717721,0.0002562839,0.0004549371,0.0002570393,0.0001086958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000539745,0.000004425116,0.00009318557,0.00000805336,0.000001859811,0.00004228614,0.0006624693,0.0001031858,0.00005416088,0.997408,0.0003660922,0.001250825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007964611,0.000006337562,0.0002995606,0.00002433877,0.000003047232,0.000144342,0.0004608037,0.0006864516,0.000234819,0.9864906,0.01163494,0.000006754148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1827174,0.001012401,0.06011304,0.009231048,0.0002062567,0.00003104467,0.00005452149,0.000105598,0.7465287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932348,0.00008754396,0.003584708,0.0001920596,0.00002331881,0.00001835966,0.00001239503,0.000008844308,0.002837998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006085166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02035689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sam Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03424912674816231,"gpt":0.3047580133527852,"spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01198812,0.0006292561,0.0008415137,0.00122721,0.00464513,0.01013803,0.001545147,0.00713387,0.00842635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01832921,0.0004819379,0.00079461,0.0007248752,0.054384,0.01050771,0.004801235,0.006699286,0.001397141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007697351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007655421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007027826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005027336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889535,0.005024732,0.0003841741,0.001976267,0.002396954,0.001264348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928169,0.003368092,0.0006401416,0.001793612,0.0008837426,0.0004974697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003239133,0.000003061063,0.00003347082,0.000006815441,0.000002958928,0.000007927219,0.0001034497,0.0001218481,0.00001580528,0.998,0.0009537459,0.0007476473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007445044,0.000002871555,0.00006231049,0.00001932986,0.000002439841,0.00001084858,0.00009409259,0.0002349282,0.00003489523,0.9866502,0.01287712,0.000003606923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02312943,0.007986245,0.06275081,0.1571279,0.001242782,0.0001505967,0.0001902164,0.0001279658,0.7472939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226642,0.002821108,0.01634864,0.01193352,0.001140966,0.0002562792,0.00008113352,0.0001291815,0.04462507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01198812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06339997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968405612","doi":"10.1111/papq.12288","title":"Not as a Means: Killing as a Side Effect in Self‐defense","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Liability; FREAK; Pedestrian; Conflation; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Transport engineering","authors":[{"name":"Kerah Gordon‐Solmon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814841236460248,"gpt":0.2523809947056704,"spread":0.2242325823410679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006980748,0.0003909129,0.0004309531,0.000977865,0.006083211,0.005937587,0.0008669198,0.007867824,0.004980984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007664765,0.000297936,0.0003989348,0.0004610388,0.05802992,0.007755548,0.00557667,0.007773567,0.0005472954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003757983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003000354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002400476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002826429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930248,0.004830698,0.0001569852,0.0003804295,0.0009872928,0.000619862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946255,0.003215985,0.000425016,0.0007138977,0.0007280388,0.0002914937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003678814,0.000007395648,0.00009297525,0.0000102834,0.000001530828,0.0000712376,0.002561728,0.00005992649,0.00004795879,0.9951274,0.0009913804,0.001024355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122852,0.00003065015,0.0002866554,0.0001935456,0.000007762456,0.0002427487,0.004790096,0.0003716075,0.0002989499,0.9282993,0.06545258,0.00001480373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06009042,0.004054297,0.02223041,0.07397708,0.0009969452,0.00005320353,0.00002604596,0.00003559012,0.838536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736453,0.0007082514,0.001261469,0.004011182,0.0002282802,0.00003978546,0.000006001815,0.00002326138,0.02007643],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007867824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03691816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054207533","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01346.x","title":"DIS‐UNIFIED PLURALIST ACCOUNTS OF CAUSATION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Epistemology; Relation (database); Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy; Causality (physics); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"J. Edward Taylor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02470636864957924,"gpt":0.3021715665938924,"spread":0.2774651979443132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005591227,0.0005900703,0.0009830194,0.003019667,0.003021344,0.005883037,0.00165529,0.002643167,0.00901235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008339512,0.0005205922,0.001156427,0.001857382,0.01559371,0.0121504,0.007409527,0.003789853,0.0007481859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004610773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001947335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002948134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003197944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995756,0.001972764,0.0001962541,0.0005560176,0.001201706,0.0003172104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944298,0.002461697,0.0005768177,0.001211792,0.0009737974,0.0003459783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002893613,0.000002714546,0.00005790229,0.000008550056,0.000003943815,0.00001764661,0.0002656063,0.0004908885,0.00002279052,0.998189,0.0002689361,0.0006690596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002432933,0.000001362757,0.00003411096,0.000007519735,0.000002982092,0.00001362346,0.00007278837,0.001475329,0.00001672876,0.995091,0.00328015,0.000002081621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0645968,0.004312162,0.4175384,0.04134773,0.0007071398,0.00006984767,0.0002303289,0.0003718974,0.4708257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692082,0.0008880456,0.01841919,0.000804278,0.0003265137,0.0000662474,0.00007030209,0.00009161823,0.01012544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00901235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0334537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098404","doi":"10.1111/papq.70004","title":"Pulling Down the Hierarchy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Word (group theory)","authors":[{"name":"Mark McCullagh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04134218617910647,"gpt":0.2678413251231641,"spread":0.2264991389440577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004414024,0.0007030331,0.0007019282,0.002566145,0.005122942,0.007190887,0.001271718,0.002604251,0.0144321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01272192,0.0006252978,0.0007265572,0.001536492,0.02308519,0.01830615,0.008657423,0.005674773,0.002345891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004048558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002892261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006524227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006753134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943994,0.002366505,0.0002474605,0.0008440262,0.001530814,0.0006116925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926082,0.002992631,0.0004916042,0.001622711,0.001616337,0.0006684108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001486672,0.000006754351,0.0003396741,0.00004295757,0.000005582438,0.00006840858,0.005418864,0.00013979,0.0003777363,0.9853073,0.002091713,0.006186304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001536731,0.0000182398,0.0002612939,0.00009941716,0.00001036845,0.00007559841,0.002572711,0.0007204438,0.0003219965,0.9487522,0.04713896,0.00001347933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09934156,0.002703766,0.1604054,0.04386983,0.001360169,0.0001371892,0.0002876406,0.0005145535,0.6913798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372529,0.0009041473,0.03017247,0.00360791,0.0004714662,0.0001035183,0.0001461196,0.0003138238,0.02702749],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04828018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}