{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"df8a2b361fd2","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Federalism"}},"results":[{"id":"W2800980875","doi":"10.2478/pof-2018-0011","title":"The Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Evaluation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Strengths and weaknesses; Construct (python library); Point (geometry); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics; Decentralization; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0732006269023147,"gpt":0.296155291308756,"spread":0.2229546644064412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001631297,0.0001736873,0.0002873286,0.0001222846,0.0007170347,0.000207254,0.0002300137,0.0001194795,0.001156374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008523227,0.0001542965,0.000153815,0.0001091043,0.0005130887,0.0002548089,0.0000446254,0.0001712119,0.0004285805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001965283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002324191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007223722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001901696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998458,0.0001289871,0.0005425967,0.0004696029,0.00007778955,0.0003229841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989045,0.0003092704,0.0002143714,0.0003796443,0.0001159223,0.00007634769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903328,0.00008023589,0.0002602118,0.000006302893,0.00005074487,2.544921e-7,0.004802251,0.000003167232,0.0001352242,0.9867483,0.007312775,0.0005314382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007508304,0.0003559527,0.01724879,0.00001110158,0.00001167461,0.000005350998,0.002641778,0.006807915,0.001413914,0.9582155,0.01223635,0.0003008484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963747,0.001583607,0.0008865867,0.01357571,0.001301222,0.0004323675,0.0001794342,0.00004957412,0.3856168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961417,0.0000226598,0.000117586,0.0009102693,0.001259317,0.00004923207,0.00001011005,0.00002382225,0.001465244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3997671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782811191","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0023","title":"The Spanish vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: from idealization to myth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Referendum; Secession; Political science; Brexit; Prestige; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political economy; Sociology; European union; History; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Francisco Javier Romero","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692729209093308,"gpt":0.3221870534681478,"spread":0.3052597613772147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345217,0.0000747154,0.0001290424,0.00000798111,0.002641848,0.0003305689,0.0004038979,0.00005656145,0.00003220973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00137719,0.00005544652,0.00004060586,0.00003050713,0.0001830391,0.0001345313,0.000053002,0.00008689024,0.00000601173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004071629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004198074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9848347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987766,0.0001151158,0.0001317722,0.000204079,0.0005041053,0.0002683725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.000166689,0.0001592869,0.0003377144,0.0001375284,0.0001492759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002174494,0.00002359216,0.001205379,0.000001557241,0.00001233539,0.000001745722,0.01369482,0.000003706733,0.00008521453,0.9650359,0.0193754,0.0005385833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000164523,0.00003811492,0.620743,0.0000482527,0.000004561705,8.418713e-8,0.009623764,0.00001715806,0.00015712,0.01370922,0.3553692,0.0001249742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5201969,0.0002793877,0.0001955162,0.1489205,0.00116543,0.0004786558,0.0001694443,0.00003589073,0.3285583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537,0.00005551532,0.00003347276,0.0005491658,0.0003619265,0.000004810562,9.004575e-7,0.000005806752,0.003618449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784109776","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0020","title":"Immigration and Federalism in Canada: beyond Quebec Exceptionalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Immigration; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Exceptionalism; Politics; Public administration; Delegation; Immigration law; Ethnic group; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Strazzari Davide","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01595020684997438,"gpt":0.2868375622968348,"spread":0.2708873554468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002733459,0.0001310488,0.0001945034,0.00003334918,0.00158274,0.0005057259,0.0002213421,0.00007499841,0.0000902935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030871,0.0001265678,0.00003724593,0.00003710026,0.0002724139,0.0004181796,0.00003908256,0.0001535801,0.0000102771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001616696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008392017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.0001274352,0.0001726306,0.0003383278,0.0004427953,0.0003772228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.00009483592,0.0001360954,0.0002252578,0.00007490218,0.000168318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001290529,0.00002824326,0.01001111,0.000004382587,0.000008575362,0.00002086382,0.0165692,0.000001911864,0.0000321171,0.9700252,0.002344128,0.0009413725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004911916,0.00001755316,0.901935,0.00005174408,0.000003752939,0.000001980321,0.02552889,0.00003703,0.00001909996,0.01263858,0.05900606,0.0002690984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820401,0.0003220764,0.000009471608,0.04657084,0.0003360583,0.0002075158,0.00003401276,0.00001879842,0.07046115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908667,0.0001702611,0.00002400635,0.0007650041,0.0004425736,0.0000216724,0.000002381943,0.000009057882,0.007698396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755856806","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0018","title":"Canadian Federalism in Design and Practice: The Mechanics of a Permanently Provisional Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Improvisation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Public administration; Law and economics; Architecture; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"James A. Gardner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03908113119585761,"gpt":0.3455383739377584,"spread":0.3064572427419008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001170969,0.00009089091,0.0001393691,0.00004101329,0.001812887,0.0003390354,0.0002480603,0.00008497627,0.00002359572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00247157,0.00006841329,0.00003392259,0.00003991395,0.0004281281,0.0003678315,0.00003055772,0.0001536926,0.000006726043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004249673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006274917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8162685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3581443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986473,0.0003671602,0.0001420552,0.0002177501,0.0003264671,0.0002993065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998968,0.0003858321,0.0001620543,0.0002039985,0.0001256026,0.0001545289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003006913,0.00003305436,0.0001175067,0.000003249031,0.00000942835,0.00001237956,0.01971016,0.000009216649,0.00003947824,0.9793829,0.0004209867,0.0002315796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003334885,0.0004290959,0.08452754,0.0006564492,0.00007329266,0.00008928703,0.1753058,0.002231165,0.0001929447,0.1505709,0.5814236,0.001165043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1619293,0.001909218,0.001320161,0.3914181,0.001007311,0.002694924,0.0001095796,0.0000524234,0.439559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.0001973381,0.000213429,0.0005545281,0.0001187575,0.00001839917,4.724555e-7,0.000004389599,0.0007027047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"William M. Myers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04691081642210825,"gpt":0.3473193465272077,"spread":0.3004085301050994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002215541,0.0001081067,0.0001496243,0.00002009024,0.00583624,0.0003730554,0.0003605104,0.00005821534,0.0001888381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006042972,0.00009888184,0.00006629459,0.00003442543,0.0006837784,0.0002453456,0.00009105999,0.0001233685,0.0003734338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003205214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008976383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01260221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01846988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998768,0.00006091204,0.00009142517,0.0002687225,0.0005359685,0.0002749701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993908,0.00005416124,0.00009405585,0.000219207,0.0001494238,0.00009230318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002422308,0.000095825,0.007873787,8.574105e-7,0.00004972845,0.000004196078,0.02888715,7.39496e-7,0.00002451341,0.9597758,0.002770351,0.0004928547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001065835,0.0001336567,0.4139634,0.00007896619,0.00003602573,0.000001024687,0.1365908,0.000006066966,0.00007600812,0.1181843,0.3292428,0.0006210662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.073106,0.0002061939,0.00001739414,0.03478592,0.0007075908,0.0001419857,0.00001741784,0.00006049952,0.890957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921465,0.00033256,0.00003177882,0.0003724996,0.0007222385,0.00001478172,7.876197e-7,0.000005645851,0.006373215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9190405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757537265","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0016","title":"Constitutional and administrative paradigms in judicial control over EU high and low politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Administrative law; Control (management); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Public law; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Pola Cebulak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051304378143667,"gpt":0.3438546395748842,"spread":0.3133415957934476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002006091,0.0001046023,0.0001525352,0.00002679014,0.001325811,0.0002946342,0.0001231642,0.00005895501,0.00003793027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005678192,0.0001028492,0.00002381551,0.0000243262,0.002746873,0.0002533727,0.00002577143,0.0001507091,0.000006079657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009042958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001294061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007430989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002132742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990767,0.0001341802,0.0001078323,0.0002538331,0.0001920483,0.0002353987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994507,0.0001560776,0.0001117976,0.0001212782,0.00004154715,0.0001185678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003882691,0.00004789151,0.004367429,0.000001889814,0.00001097356,0.00002210803,0.01282225,9.399398e-7,0.00001116372,0.9824136,0.000191678,0.00007117915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00242428,0.0001178116,0.9254621,0.00007050976,0.0000095011,0.000004927001,0.007013736,0.00002227923,0.0000336856,0.0392693,0.02530837,0.0002635401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7011925,0.0002271637,0.00001991286,0.01323703,0.0001572226,0.0001896504,0.0001308159,0.00001993123,0.2848258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997081,0.0003103088,0.00002414744,0.001348402,0.0004285097,0.000004495314,8.636328e-7,0.000004071743,0.000798171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Leonardo Pierdominici","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05670185527763862,"gpt":0.3485477200490272,"spread":0.2918458647713886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002564203,0.00009186638,0.0001350538,0.00005527967,0.01020065,0.0002027693,0.0002935996,0.00004720053,0.00003773555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008239811,0.00007262252,0.00007785349,0.00004791301,0.004795861,0.0002390539,0.0000451632,0.0001225507,0.00003069898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005313403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001336228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3835739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7164235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990249,0.00008718678,0.0001334965,0.000178024,0.0003590368,0.0002173978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990002,0.0002540804,0.0001332707,0.0001377757,0.0003758355,0.00009882639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003462197,0.0000291066,0.0006719687,5.340486e-7,0.0000508097,0.000001059145,0.03064272,0.000308861,0.000009876259,0.9673277,0.0006469493,0.0002758118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000730008,0.0001942123,0.1215943,0.0003056917,0.00006975625,0.000005669052,0.1906676,0.01118223,0.00004802781,0.6482935,0.02626121,0.0006478023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04105791,0.0007232736,0.0001972114,0.01641553,0.0002708746,0.0002372439,0.00003826855,0.00002298794,0.9410367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983849,0.0001900529,0.00008619623,0.0001323643,0.0001659878,0.00002275614,0.000001577729,0.000001859782,0.001014283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.957327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Price Peter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02634452700438047,"gpt":0.2840251339998479,"spread":0.2576806069954674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004034249,0.0001286068,0.0002488962,0.0000292178,0.008644629,0.0001068485,0.0002920608,0.00004768223,0.00003808377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001961163,0.00009517949,0.00006584603,0.00003604858,0.01397518,0.0002281145,0.00007779966,0.0001589524,0.000001684892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007415836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004734416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8565573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9125644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987574,0.0001539417,0.0001834932,0.0002525921,0.0004086176,0.0002439965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.0001590913,0.0002314514,0.0002044215,0.0002620694,0.00007755044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001187877,0.00003514133,0.0004865237,0.000003471135,0.00004299097,0.000003921069,0.04681363,0.000003249729,0.000008439003,0.9501416,0.002191517,0.0001507318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003984861,0.000107412,0.02507346,0.000283319,0.0001148983,0.000009877655,0.3553689,0.00003223895,0.00003912289,0.08009,0.5341909,0.0007050365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05101333,0.004947291,0.000117284,0.05208483,0.001116535,0.000877085,0.00006365379,0.00004485706,0.8897352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980011,0.0003443624,0.00003706089,0.0002785337,0.000333013,0.00004796708,6.721277e-7,0.000003385808,0.0009539024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9469877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Valentina Rita Scotti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03455049357479525,"gpt":0.3060064664540142,"spread":0.271455972879219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000499358,0.0001341017,0.0002490857,0.00003602736,0.0014441,0.00009840359,0.0003531994,0.00005734076,0.00004345143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002303456,0.0000902463,0.00003198057,0.00004517869,0.00080002,0.0002491316,0.00008232975,0.0002176328,0.000001196171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002103466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000167284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0002415036,0.000186509,0.0002988435,0.000417799,0.0003199713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992288,0.0002607151,0.0001346453,0.0001954894,0.0001135531,0.00006673715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005607517,0.00009447341,0.01900108,0.00001645906,0.00004503871,0.00001406334,0.6618828,0.00000358355,0.00001143561,0.3182891,0.0004054982,0.0001804191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003498672,0.00002532888,0.681715,0.00006144806,0.000002771303,5.255763e-7,0.2946499,0.000006070229,0.0000294864,0.01902029,0.003997046,0.0001422281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547219,0.001026069,1.45685e-7,0.02013623,0.000234259,0.0002373852,0.00001068568,0.00000877553,0.0236246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999051,0.0003871688,0.00001173806,0.00004769351,0.0001209579,0.00004872059,1.823559e-7,0.000002908053,0.0003295776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6627139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780222313","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0024","title":"Franchises Lost and Gained: Post-Coloniality and the Development of Women’s Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Gender studies; Franchise; Politics; Indigenous; Universal suffrage; Enlightenment; Modernity; Indigenous rights; Law; Sociology; History; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Charlotte Skeet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00849566290149294,"gpt":0.2373939859604645,"spread":0.2288983230589716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004535681,0.00005985751,0.0001551017,0.00007570963,0.002448808,0.0002671373,0.0001511564,0.00002914705,0.0001021884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002232712,0.00005338284,0.00001444497,0.0000275131,0.001061507,0.000110454,0.00003134162,0.00008804174,0.000001574668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002744991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001922032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.00009781023,0.0001144076,0.0001579359,0.0001875188,0.0001930724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995365,0.00008669818,0.00008952284,0.0001312532,0.00005370424,0.0001023445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348902,0.00003301403,0.003710794,0.00001378699,0.00002777923,0.000008680993,0.7847474,4.296099e-7,0.00001010404,0.2096208,0.0004654813,0.00122685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001355026,0.00001980057,0.7088876,0.00003216663,0.000005558852,6.483581e-7,0.1164379,0.000002655524,0.00001155381,0.004786687,0.1682784,0.0001819738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689248,0.000348801,2.934052e-7,0.006042872,0.000122167,0.0001428593,0.0000115758,0.000002788683,0.02440383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987441,0.00007363965,0.00002183135,0.000166032,0.00004259052,0.00001105086,2.660282e-7,0.000002304913,0.0009381605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7051768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613708823","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0005","title":"Commanders-in-chief beyond the border: analysing the powers of heads of state in Northern American federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Presidential system; State (computer science); Democracy; Multitude; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law; Democratic system; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tiago de Melo Cartaxo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01681568121608998,"gpt":0.3430970900787546,"spread":0.3262814088626645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006936109,0.0001443049,0.0003411174,0.00009768522,0.001412775,0.0001498775,0.0006181697,0.00003571685,0.00002222993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000284079,0.00009735559,0.0001384884,0.0002270655,0.005260174,0.0001491132,0.00006384458,0.000266089,0.000002120395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002087186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004913104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2191521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2791494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982744,0.0004079113,0.0002978272,0.0002304258,0.0004383065,0.0003511369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984715,0.0004279628,0.0004343157,0.0004524876,0.0001539322,0.00005980129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007020569,0.0001527412,0.06724095,0.000004320853,0.00007109049,0.000006575403,0.1058472,0.0003833001,0.00004103436,0.8248022,0.00008223613,0.001298254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001385225,0.0002828505,0.3867727,0.0001156063,0.00006027153,0.000003106579,0.5514553,0.0001332578,0.0001346851,0.0364246,0.02265325,0.0005791819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271693,0.0002795824,0.00005088156,0.03257378,0.0001075766,0.0002423527,0.00003009934,0.00001103774,0.1395354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984828,0.0002711192,0.00004004456,0.0006703781,0.00007117757,0.00000691122,0.000001916983,0.000009430017,0.0004462847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7883775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783483970","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0022","title":"Constitutional Judges and Secession. Lessons from Canada … twenty years later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Spigno Irene","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02685168043430914,"gpt":0.3211501995924507,"spread":0.2942985191581416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001034273,0.00007514228,0.000117026,0.000006465314,0.001481904,0.0003002521,0.000177097,0.00005436047,0.0002058621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002615438,0.0000661168,0.00002557399,0.00001234074,0.0008322303,0.0001639382,0.00004665383,0.00009904199,0.00001276634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002529555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002902212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8022034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991029,0.00005885243,0.00007444205,0.000235322,0.0003029791,0.0002255017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994825,0.00008672203,0.00007376768,0.0001611363,0.00004193308,0.0001539483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004409835,0.00001794997,0.01852261,0.000001219115,0.00001788001,0.00001796356,0.004765316,5.27269e-7,0.00001649649,0.9705351,0.005689556,0.000410972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445207,0.000006049118,0.7527883,0.00003157688,0.000004484344,4.709152e-7,0.004361399,0.000003181941,0.00002474042,0.007046616,0.2353629,0.0001257923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425875,0.0003158177,0.000007257103,0.03589753,0.0004717011,0.00008759596,0.0002423148,0.0000199618,0.1203704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996704,0.00008396455,0.00002468673,0.000531534,0.0004101605,0.000004788735,0.000002129281,0.000002965408,0.002235813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","authors":[{"name":"F. Bérard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jean François Gaudreault DesBiens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04712162325057034,"gpt":0.3015334131619888,"spread":0.2544117899114184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002586669,0.00008066026,0.0001312288,0.00001805331,0.001561063,0.00002053004,0.0002898762,0.0000263417,0.00002594859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004689716,0.00004158436,0.00008660019,0.000253384,0.0004616978,0.00005485599,0.0001176161,0.0001837437,9.324859e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006960498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008248494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9658987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988007,0.0002482911,0.000154884,0.0001425704,0.0005036524,0.000149879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.0004436327,0.0001018994,0.00007592062,0.0001164543,0.0000289032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453066,0.0001103791,0.04200413,0.000001437263,0.00006036703,0.000003520388,0.1475744,0.001414784,0.00001018638,0.8071718,0.001132884,0.000370779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021733,0.00006506816,0.872054,0.00003387733,0.000004381237,1.152056e-7,0.1040359,0.0001509855,0.00001470833,0.02281815,0.0003343225,0.0000863587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7862384,0.0005252634,7.832912e-7,0.169296,0.000115899,0.0003162879,0.00002930413,0.00000493428,0.04347314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.000241352,0.000001107717,0.0004642635,0.0001089479,0.000007841204,4.995262e-7,0.000001974629,0.00001387055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782783416","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0027","title":"An Opportunity for Reflection – A Special Issue on “The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Democracy; Separation of powers; Politics; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Bill of rights","authors":[{"name":"Giuseppe Martinico","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Richard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antonia Baraggia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cristina Fasone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03398625285613072,"gpt":0.2902328097809999,"spread":0.2562465569248691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004143657,0.00006889604,0.0001082207,0.0001095194,0.004442083,0.0001743635,0.0001943047,0.00006262997,0.000211158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007702244,0.0000713783,0.00003270383,0.00002966738,0.00141186,0.0003187734,0.000009325964,0.000106219,0.000001860907],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008915798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003546544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992037,0.00008936591,0.0001074496,0.0001991319,0.0002373817,0.0001630115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999162,0.00003749647,0.000174023,0.0002508958,0.0002236615,0.000151992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008011964,0.00004071568,0.00005665997,0.000006637839,0.00001106072,0.000001911643,0.02184662,0.000004197841,0.00007923631,0.9104277,0.06684473,0.0006003923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001889286,0.0001147936,0.01602157,0.0000205186,0.000008545629,9.221632e-7,0.0208245,0.000008695409,0.00001270258,0.003661491,0.9590258,0.0001115074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2342604,0.0002023283,0.00002235178,0.0220372,0.00177919,0.0006001713,0.00008638045,0.00003186211,0.7409801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907497,0.00007572043,0.00001512033,0.0003330784,0.001418322,0.00001757921,0.000001724497,0.00000433572,0.007384395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}