{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"df8a2b361fd2","filters":{"venue":"Perspectives on Federalism"}},"results":[{"id":"W2800980875","doi":"10.2478/pof-2018-0011","title":"The Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Evaluation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Strengths and weaknesses; Construct (python library); Point (geometry); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Politics; Decentralization; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0732006269023147,"gpt":0.296155291308756,"spread":0.2229546644064412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01740383,0.0005754105,0.000698959,0.0059095,0.002823457,0.003912396,0.001168349,0.00226359,0.005138431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02378545,0.0002235881,0.0006089601,0.002356906,0.01961059,0.008102275,0.002365749,0.003673724,0.0003068126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009903949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003116226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003924126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002819993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956975,0.003027617,0.0000894277,0.0002927991,0.0006708512,0.0002218224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667361,0.02835147,0.0007656363,0.000740456,0.003133953,0.0002722972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008812235,0.000005087577,0.0001037542,0.00003262485,0.000003356532,0.00003050245,0.0002739268,0.0003881236,0.000007702648,0.9958208,0.001272828,0.002052424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001491795,0.00001719073,0.0002821407,0.0002378232,0.000007990017,0.00004758469,0.001186845,0.003708394,0.00008733528,0.9794662,0.01493534,0.00000819158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121472,0.06059474,0.1443689,0.2709168,0.005217565,0.0003619652,0.0002685263,0.0001249535,0.4059994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732213,0.008528167,0.008243033,0.004278427,0.001627767,0.0001185099,0.00004024458,0.00002460186,0.003918031],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01740383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09204131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782811191","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0023","title":"The Spanish vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: from idealization to myth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Referendum; Secession; Political science; Brexit; Prestige; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Law; Political economy; Sociology; European union; History; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Francisco Javier Romero","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692729209093308,"gpt":0.3221870534681478,"spread":0.3052597613772147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068089,0.0004327132,0.0004460351,0.001895093,0.01517004,0.01850821,0.001920466,0.004852842,0.002474663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01389666,0.0002925776,0.0004560531,0.002076027,0.03599245,0.002405063,0.003323348,0.005962572,0.0002157383],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1514281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1766046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9375561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882586,0.003447131,0.0002250947,0.0008790091,0.003881279,0.003308855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906988,0.001832936,0.000366076,0.0004732305,0.005583958,0.001045062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000164216,0.000006612022,0.000514851,0.00001434674,0.000002790084,0.00004895128,0.005458018,0.0002703286,0.00006230039,0.983143,0.007347554,0.003114849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001000669,0.00004185637,0.009970634,0.0007078466,0.00004644722,0.0001434133,0.04763882,0.00334805,0.0008681353,0.3472745,0.5896484,0.0002118227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084575,0.007793027,0.009346153,0.1959161,0.001238507,0.0001019357,0.0003587461,0.00009354731,0.6766946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711567,0.0008765309,0.001659103,0.006874933,0.0001111327,0.00003119868,0.00006511815,0.00003374148,0.01919156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784109776","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0020","title":"Immigration and Federalism in Canada: beyond Quebec Exceptionalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Devolution (biology); Immigration; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Exceptionalism; Politics; Public administration; Delegation; Immigration law; Ethnic group; Political economy; Law; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Strazzari Davide","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01595020684997438,"gpt":0.2868375622968348,"spread":0.2708873554468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00182537,0.0001513813,0.0003270881,0.001494726,0.01178564,0.005884713,0.000986308,0.001100132,0.007093976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004079225,0.0001430809,0.0002896904,0.002953202,0.005585011,0.001155637,0.001639331,0.001768638,0.0001372715],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1511765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1410142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975072,0.0003288985,0.0000439338,0.0001753212,0.0004475029,0.001497295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960817,0.0006144056,0.0003618184,0.00013191,0.001493275,0.001316906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001112246,0.00005491039,0.07494429,0.0001676062,0.00006761234,0.0006058342,0.01485385,0.001990231,0.0004533383,0.8102665,0.04931372,0.04717099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005434141,0.00005610603,0.412855,0.0009418686,0.0001240691,0.0002354784,0.03772196,0.004081042,0.0006866966,0.04991747,0.4931318,0.0001943561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5148864,0.01091745,0.001553336,0.1419462,0.00041872,0.00005891254,0.001066101,0.00007231021,0.3290806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880962,0.001266028,0.0002878867,0.002157661,0.00003217833,0.00000641832,0.00009669269,0.000005805967,0.00805113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1511765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755856806","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0018","title":"Canadian Federalism in Design and Practice: The Mechanics of a Permanently Provisional Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Improvisation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Point (geometry); Public administration; Law and economics; Architecture; Law; Sociology; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"James A. Gardner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03908113119585761,"gpt":0.3455383739377584,"spread":0.3064572427419008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009136431,0.0003231908,0.000438496,0.002600333,0.0222175,0.01123934,0.002044976,0.002173623,0.005511234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01459468,0.0003298951,0.000431092,0.003296147,0.05792321,0.00318329,0.004448825,0.002491922,0.0002092914],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1424137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.133072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.932103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9473909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877169,0.00508097,0.0002169907,0.001064585,0.003575994,0.002344577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941635,0.001960012,0.0004561364,0.0008551812,0.001971247,0.0005940226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000660796,0.000005110483,0.001043021,0.00001727279,0.000003590647,0.00006710711,0.01112352,0.0009085608,0.0001259119,0.980476,0.00144333,0.004780005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007032183,0.00007055171,0.01567306,0.0003350362,0.00007383143,0.0002273388,0.05093827,0.008968407,0.0008329262,0.5434725,0.3792003,0.0001374402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1846994,0.001369025,0.02777649,0.02881441,0.0001590413,0.0002221467,0.0001774838,0.0001804812,0.7566016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898342,0.0001701388,0.003264621,0.0002329334,0.000008507133,0.00003079938,0.00002008308,0.00001728721,0.006421493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604134551","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0002","title":"Which Governments Come Out Ahead?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"William M. Myers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04691081642210825,"gpt":0.3473193465272077,"spread":0.3004085301050994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003594856,0.0001028895,0.000307368,0.0016614,0.003202853,0.006798939,0.0005886245,0.001560446,0.01092692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469823,0.0001712368,0.0003184707,0.001872478,0.003977839,0.00796215,0.002512661,0.00212451,0.0008523364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003408369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003268967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004685942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007393409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959025,0.001846176,0.0001716034,0.0004901624,0.0005474173,0.001042192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891347,0.006107644,0.002066131,0.0005590873,0.0009319304,0.001200592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005489784,0.00004705474,0.03372325,0.00007147311,0.00001742127,0.0003596153,0.009929179,0.0007029115,0.000131311,0.9326655,0.004551567,0.0177459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003175544,0.00008321058,0.04991031,0.0007022658,0.0000473922,0.0005353512,0.1697457,0.002736547,0.0009604366,0.687057,0.08812831,0.00006186016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025942,0.002012423,0.006746684,0.04325851,0.0002066521,0.00005657884,0.0002767413,0.00004050235,0.3448078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972286,0.0002596777,0.0002129014,0.0005095618,0.00001907601,0.000005269565,0.00001822688,0.000004759093,0.001742096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01092692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03655422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757537265","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0016","title":"Constitutional and administrative paradigms in judicial control over EU high and low politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Administrative law; Control (management); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Public law; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Pola Cebulak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051304378143667,"gpt":0.3438546395748842,"spread":0.3133415957934476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06067701,0.0002861944,0.001039381,0.003390826,0.006490867,0.0340818,0.001677428,0.006550278,0.003002301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047858,0.0004492818,0.0005986767,0.002678917,0.03742613,0.008145073,0.007713696,0.0070572,0.0002876554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01209381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007078466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004860742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005529068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9440162,0.03406704,0.002527972,0.007308083,0.006806428,0.005274378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405309,0.04387456,0.003765276,0.004472186,0.005144171,0.002212924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001434819,0.000008063479,0.0004540091,0.00001775737,0.000006644271,0.00003199971,0.001690417,0.0001785301,0.0001634732,0.994104,0.0003983674,0.002932406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006514632,0.00007432766,0.00453635,0.0003099426,0.00004361367,0.0001093504,0.004718275,0.001646298,0.001140057,0.9404218,0.04686081,0.00007415879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3381104,0.01124553,0.05626418,0.05668812,0.0006068343,0.0001230458,0.00010663,0.0001219474,0.5367334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951049,0.0002201057,0.001059844,0.001242773,0.0001308823,0.00002748816,0.000008463271,0.00001383406,0.002191748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06067701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3208945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783105250","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0021","title":"The Canadian Living Tree Doctrine as a Comparative Model of Evolutionary Constitutional Interpretation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Comparative law; Constitutional economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Leonardo Pierdominici","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05670185527763862,"gpt":0.3485477200490272,"spread":0.2918458647713886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003082738,0.0003025283,0.0003791672,0.002635281,0.007333917,0.005878201,0.002190969,0.00229542,0.009488724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005383069,0.0001314362,0.0003455863,0.003023162,0.0225885,0.003051681,0.002119666,0.002529107,0.0003363651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04373719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7883446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.834267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971206,0.0008502377,0.00004320388,0.0003774541,0.001083724,0.0005248233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973042,0.0008953218,0.000155348,0.0002688036,0.001091115,0.0002851562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.381233e-7,6.610488e-7,0.00004949412,0.00000261893,4.973302e-7,0.0000126163,0.0003622814,0.0001637872,0.000013183,0.9982722,0.0004022662,0.0007194656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001089846,0.000008034565,0.001182676,0.0000726234,0.00001067972,0.00007230055,0.001695872,0.003664407,0.00008482718,0.9172322,0.07594412,0.00002140964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03239163,0.0014044,0.02393024,0.01418244,0.000149704,0.00005595934,0.000237587,0.00005667223,0.9275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755887,0.0007159155,0.006014592,0.0007288561,0.00005839065,0.00003027696,0.00007492376,0.00002256228,0.01676578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2116554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4258038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783786080","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0019","title":"Provincializing Constitutions: History, Narrative, and the Disappearance of Canada’s Provincial Constitutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Scholarship; Constitution; Narrative; Political science; Dualism; Law; Constitutional law; Politics; Monism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Price Peter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02634452700438047,"gpt":0.2840251339998479,"spread":0.2576806069954674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002923008,0.0001917119,0.0003530294,0.002363932,0.02958384,0.01336689,0.001642353,0.001684395,0.005653471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009131805,0.0002253731,0.0001803123,0.005052864,0.02862854,0.002595886,0.002943048,0.00440834,0.0001566519],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2055639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2120826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969109,0.0005133847,0.00005914036,0.0002984528,0.001009975,0.001208138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931132,0.002330243,0.000437676,0.0003831003,0.002577056,0.001158678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002686598,0.00001261618,0.004168276,0.00005459386,0.000007933507,0.0002585018,0.1058292,0.0003353868,0.0002066849,0.8477983,0.0244174,0.01688424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001747707,0.00001564285,0.02189305,0.000339535,0.00003228431,0.0001594787,0.1384494,0.001220831,0.0006578767,0.05335776,0.7837622,0.00009450332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3998908,0.0101617,0.003004624,0.09651304,0.0005567591,0.00006269672,0.0011923,0.0001393122,0.4884787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819475,0.001234661,0.0002799234,0.000990962,0.00003522371,0.000009260252,0.000100146,0.00002696395,0.01537518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9214333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783926903","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0025","title":"Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Intersectionality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Gender equality; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Valentina Rita Scotti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03455049357479525,"gpt":0.3060064664540142,"spread":0.271455972879219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006941372,0.0004116457,0.0008339838,0.002137615,0.05375889,0.01893133,0.003027933,0.006983863,0.00414219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00990413,0.0005529691,0.0006473316,0.003315105,0.04661859,0.003440709,0.008144965,0.008796055,0.0001605235],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1465866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.212489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98886,0.001852336,0.0002093364,0.0008798612,0.004185726,0.004012747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939445,0.00284149,0.0003090747,0.0002279618,0.001483407,0.001193506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001262989,0.00001598317,0.001542988,0.00003621599,0.00001011526,0.0003926847,0.03323041,0.0002569758,0.0001763012,0.9520866,0.004611963,0.007627162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007041469,0.00005122631,0.02366453,0.001318757,0.0001133463,0.0004757447,0.1980122,0.002997991,0.001426969,0.3702133,0.4013123,0.0003431448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.297276,0.01487481,0.003278579,0.1404325,0.0006110608,0.0001175806,0.0001737933,0.00004453856,0.5431911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749274,0.001652544,0.0009127805,0.005613634,0.00007388715,0.00003452436,0.00002239582,0.00001768991,0.01674506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1465866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780222313","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0024","title":"Franchises Lost and Gained: Post-Coloniality and the Development of Women’s Rights in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Gender studies; Franchise; Politics; Indigenous; Universal suffrage; Enlightenment; Modernity; Indigenous rights; Law; Sociology; History; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Charlotte Skeet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00849566290149294,"gpt":0.2373939859604645,"spread":0.2288983230589716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784689,0.0002686303,0.0004369358,0.002655234,0.03095919,0.009832288,0.001834222,0.001578605,0.007334771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004001688,0.0002529185,0.0002551604,0.004260848,0.02178434,0.002265219,0.004925957,0.003357874,0.0001528134],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2169354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1765889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958252,0.0003667622,0.00004320956,0.0002443123,0.0007429856,0.002777586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962953,0.0006293167,0.0003116186,0.0001079549,0.001205106,0.00145065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001467773,0.00008024339,0.04277093,0.0001662257,0.00003904319,0.002085038,0.5824752,0.0005509247,0.0008486845,0.2948689,0.01656444,0.0594035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001707529,0.00004234671,0.1239565,0.0005335585,0.00003217159,0.0003630189,0.5567507,0.0003679313,0.0005815896,0.006836896,0.3103872,0.0001308894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8186898,0.004897166,0.0003124406,0.02001007,0.0001675433,0.00003450365,0.0003272943,0.00001624708,0.1555448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877131,0.0009537234,0.00007950685,0.0004608622,0.00001249956,0.000004284202,0.00003357378,0.000007280698,0.01073523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2169354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.908244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613708823","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0005","title":"Commanders-in-chief beyond the border: analysing the powers of heads of state in Northern American federalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Presidential system; State (computer science); Democracy; Multitude; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law; Democratic system; Political economy; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tiago de Melo Cartaxo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01681568121608998,"gpt":0.3430970900787546,"spread":0.3262814088626645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667496,0.00009283859,0.0002758527,0.002162114,0.008796583,0.007221149,0.0006817706,0.000895256,0.003971611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007916529,0.0001939359,0.0001778172,0.003330277,0.0138803,0.00312747,0.003053921,0.001645852,0.0001115703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02060885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01471222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3799473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6296456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971879,0.001342629,0.0000627112,0.0001712079,0.0003848813,0.0008505432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921482,0.00499883,0.0008417269,0.0002297487,0.0009714918,0.0008099572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003944479,0.00003052985,0.02750173,0.00004373671,0.0000121835,0.0003769939,0.1691117,0.0007720319,0.0003141334,0.7902223,0.002208325,0.009366854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001681458,0.00003967646,0.1567801,0.0004419605,0.00006339669,0.000153975,0.6384977,0.002472376,0.0005352237,0.1033897,0.09755679,0.00005223934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7710704,0.0006241408,0.00133263,0.004251768,0.00002546491,0.00002804037,0.00006027638,0.000009109282,0.2225982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799,0.0001145774,0.0001426808,0.0000958486,0.000005318368,0.000006857916,0.00001174146,0.000002866312,0.001630126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7554715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783483970","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0022","title":"Constitutional Judges and Secession. Lessons from Canada … twenty years later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Tribunal; Political science; Jurisprudence; Constitutional review; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Spigno Irene","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02685168043430914,"gpt":0.3211501995924507,"spread":0.2942985191581416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007429344,0.0003350226,0.0007229507,0.00235469,0.01915063,0.01253594,0.002215117,0.006681119,0.009171914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02057084,0.0003573109,0.0005164003,0.004764649,0.02157503,0.005019221,0.003462109,0.009677279,0.000509901],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1384201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1695929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924896,0.001443575,0.0001666516,0.0008739231,0.002193886,0.002832375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871796,0.004945568,0.0004288519,0.0004816812,0.005326802,0.001637544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005584853,0.00004487526,0.002411392,0.00009715054,0.00001679606,0.0004859464,0.01166891,0.0003745334,0.0000931081,0.89536,0.0599146,0.02947681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009512319,0.00003831953,0.0116506,0.0009970493,0.00004587301,0.0001033852,0.01935464,0.0006235249,0.0002800287,0.09870043,0.8679969,0.0001141112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06230414,0.03490407,0.0009279603,0.3560182,0.002277969,0.00008384742,0.0004313945,0.00004000554,0.5430123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112038,0.0221393,0.001023773,0.06018314,0.0008984598,0.00005822599,0.000260171,0.00006526527,0.1041679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1384201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170833626","doi":"","title":"The Challenge of Diversity in a Multinational Federation: the Impact of the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Law; Constitution; Nomination; Charter; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Judicial independence","authors":[{"name":"F. Bérard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jean François Gaudreault DesBiens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04712162325057034,"gpt":0.3015334131619888,"spread":0.2544117899114184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006098022,0.0001762835,0.0004731067,0.001622076,0.04587332,0.01265098,0.00165065,0.00357884,0.002552321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01397583,0.0002476583,0.0003170445,0.003037213,0.02572689,0.002613562,0.004525739,0.005716622,0.00009798432],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.172139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1895843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929798,0.001751826,0.0001219493,0.0005702969,0.00198018,0.002595986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903593,0.00421717,0.0004709282,0.0002597334,0.002796942,0.001895843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432996,0.00001504673,0.003839493,0.00005234085,0.00001643714,0.0003680211,0.04332527,0.0007762649,0.0001950215,0.9166802,0.02090403,0.01379349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006533771,0.00006010336,0.0391043,0.0008089067,0.0001237069,0.0002580438,0.1387981,0.004568883,0.000821528,0.2020766,0.6130728,0.0002417398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2804186,0.01072703,0.002129079,0.2701402,0.0007883621,0.00005343528,0.0001347308,0.00003901304,0.4355696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832762,0.001362663,0.0004986097,0.005400232,0.00009148296,0.00000957542,0.00001174212,0.00001026523,0.009339327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.172139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782783416","doi":"10.1515/pof-2017-0027","title":"An Opportunity for Reflection – A Special Issue on “The Constitution of Canada: History, Evolution, Influence and Reform”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Political science; Law; Democracy; Separation of powers; Politics; Government (linguistics); Constitutional law; Bill of rights","authors":[{"name":"Giuseppe Martinico","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Richard","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antonia Baraggia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cristina Fasone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03398625285613072,"gpt":0.2902328097809999,"spread":0.2562465569248691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003842962,0.0006150913,0.0007215566,0.003167127,0.01510852,0.01257786,0.001719673,0.006914442,0.01032072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008951549,0.0003364829,0.0004799378,0.00495939,0.01560986,0.00469567,0.002798282,0.008289489,0.001087901],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09619784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08935884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9027851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9503514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995976,0.0008509772,0.00008701516,0.0002667231,0.001822602,0.0009966699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920724,0.002601693,0.0002217319,0.0002849333,0.003593083,0.001226142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006470834,0.00001026078,0.0001647533,0.00007776661,0.000004141618,0.00006636707,0.002928975,0.00007030387,0.00008311708,0.06584962,0.9208553,0.009882811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001791675,0.000001724217,0.0007254858,0.0002577567,0.000003021343,0.00001892376,0.003154258,0.00003701737,0.00005009787,0.004104626,0.9916288,0.00001657797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.002159319,0.06897907,0.0003925194,0.7929765,0.06303103,0.00003929431,0.0003868991,0.00004638235,0.07198897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2074063,0.2169642,0.002232867,0.280564,0.08499739,0.0001375654,0.0009388127,0.0004423668,0.2063165],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}