{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"14c866f9963d","filters":{"venue":"Philo"}},"results":[{"id":"W1985575923","doi":"10.5840/philo20058115","title":"Theistic Replies to Rowe’s a Priori Argument for Atheism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"ROWE; Theism; Atheism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Agnosticism; Economics; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Klaas J. Kraay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05199844951843739,"gpt":0.2648501780858846,"spread":0.2128517285674472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000160819,0.0001209909,0.0001480702,0.00004981101,0.0002923567,0.00004666164,0.0001600547,0.00003142297,0.001481442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004768232,0.00009846517,0.00008346566,0.00001114337,0.0001030064,0.00008167141,0.00003355119,0.0000668951,0.0006762042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002084195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001258723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001139021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001517856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.00001562977,0.0001593487,0.0001988669,0.0000703214,0.0002095804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.000107339,0.00004323208,0.00023585,0.00004881969,0.00006492248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006695554,0.00006568852,0.00001057756,0.00001202006,0.00003086151,5.84074e-7,0.01246966,0.00001053747,0.00002749125,0.9758129,0.007527171,0.003965508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007019,0.0001361703,0.00003777408,0.00001373205,0.00002127812,0.000001378041,0.00009079757,0.00001630423,0.0001079305,0.247075,0.7521831,0.000115789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1095096,0.001141363,0.0007985397,0.139727,0.002219223,0.001528395,0.0002501235,0.0004004297,0.7444254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723302,0.000006037265,0.0004691842,0.003849219,0.003441812,0.00009591825,0.000009348071,0.00001662601,0.01978173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275982711","doi":"10.5840/philo20101324","title":"Conscientious Refusals without Conscience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Conscience; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Michael W. Hickson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07220251378484821,"gpt":0.2899979755039991,"spread":0.2177954617191509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004114243,0.00007060795,0.00008278479,0.00005767849,0.0004875393,0.0002171692,0.0001808704,0.00003834178,0.00202145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001687928,0.00005981804,0.00003237444,0.00002787634,0.001117374,0.0001863009,0.00002227724,0.0002216999,0.0006976007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005685881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000514422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001788223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993107,0.00001757459,0.0001389387,0.0001937059,0.000179657,0.0001594659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993941,0.00006097046,0.00006741237,0.0002495328,0.0001651936,0.00006276392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003214669,0.0000365606,0.0004527432,0.000009945818,0.000003502958,7.656874e-7,0.0122253,2.780149e-7,0.008913707,0.9723097,0.005154668,0.0008896078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000187676,0.00002279682,0.0004633381,0.000009909252,0.00001586735,0.000005801951,0.0009743663,0.00009235646,0.001892987,0.05132125,0.9448431,0.0001705263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4758943,0.00005592383,0.00005763168,0.005389916,0.004457077,0.0001855299,0.00003594962,0.0001971032,0.5137265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843843,0.00000388762,0.0001300537,0.000663075,0.0006990611,0.000008720331,0.000007315486,0.000007349559,0.01409624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9396884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503062492","doi":"10.5840/philo20141712","title":"‘O God, O Montreal!’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Glouberman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01504029383046567,"gpt":0.2761652692316829,"spread":0.2611249754012172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002211914,0.00004024836,0.00006583917,0.000009799982,0.0008140338,0.00001220813,0.0000924683,0.0000266108,0.0002627721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001357791,0.00003367949,0.00003318166,0.00006410883,0.000136642,0.00005896894,0.00001251545,0.00004111529,0.0003199511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002324468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001131453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002501055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003512142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.00007047339,0.00004740675,0.00008613685,0.0001204785,0.0001231616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998198,0.00001062967,0.00001925755,0.00007373391,0.00002861283,0.00004794858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008484067,0.000055638,0.001017985,0.000007090668,0.00002329249,0.000001928172,0.1658491,0.000002697145,0.00008567241,0.6432629,0.1459928,0.04369238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005877744,0.00001013842,0.0007072846,0.000002644902,0.00000518265,9.391494e-8,0.003080705,0.000001840012,0.000003563957,0.02270759,0.9733692,0.00005297915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002052194,0.0003455102,0.00006876544,0.01096189,0.0003277496,0.00004653039,7.316244e-7,0.00008238998,0.9861143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882179,0.00002244382,0.00004335084,0.000370838,0.0006079769,0.000006755052,5.601409e-7,0.000002880072,0.01072723],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9861658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6260973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1159254799","doi":"10.5840/philo201316212","title":"Layman’s Lapse: On an Incomplete Moral Argument for Theism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Richard Brian Davis","is_ca":true},{"name":"W. Paul Franks","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08484084240546812,"gpt":0.2601647275641592,"spread":0.1753238851586911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001091011,0.0001247156,0.0001385929,0.00004375743,0.0003066027,0.00007287579,0.000176365,0.00003695919,0.005216084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009042079,0.00009609987,0.00006918451,0.000006939527,0.0001521668,0.0001909165,0.00002272384,0.00009234092,0.0009528112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001050443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006442975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001058589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000868834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993768,0.00003544336,0.0001413162,0.0001750032,0.00007270311,0.0001986728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995388,0.00007422158,0.00005163982,0.0002211567,0.00005069973,0.00006353218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003252361,0.0001070312,0.00004354939,0.00000949591,0.00002461859,5.792119e-7,0.003241117,0.000003546657,0.0000269533,0.9843356,0.01080579,0.001369192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003391675,0.0004146156,0.0003854411,0.000009514214,0.00001122086,7.448725e-7,0.0001243602,0.0000776678,0.00006032553,0.7050061,0.29344,0.0001308077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4465016,0.0001929984,0.00003757247,0.03098949,0.001731505,0.00107084,0.0001861988,0.0002486985,0.5190412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014,0.000002468587,0.00009199515,0.003680222,0.001901931,0.0001323044,0.0000419539,0.00001672991,0.00399241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}