{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f47ced49f3ab","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical inquiries"}},"results":[{"id":"W3015158120","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v8i1.281","title":"Potentiality, modality, and time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Appeal; Ontology; Modal; Philosophy of mind; Framing (construction); Incompatibilism; Computer science; Moral responsibility; Compatibilism; Artificial intelligence; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Wang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07937587695016678,"gpt":0.3265620107765446,"spread":0.2471861338263778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002419468,0.0001712153,0.0002536951,0.00002540617,0.0001485078,0.0000663085,0.0003210165,0.0001408211,0.001779292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002203594,0.0001443616,0.00007075295,0.0002410944,0.003825081,0.0001492298,0.0003158117,0.000269432,0.002080272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000722288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006303778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.720897e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984725,0.0001687187,0.0002487569,0.0005094106,0.0002650106,0.0003356025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.000157513,0.00004677837,0.0002403465,0.00003726707,0.0004572205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001099487,0.0000667909,0.0001923021,0.0000110145,0.00002564685,0.00003256976,0.0009983818,5.798236e-7,0.0006705867,0.9967757,0.0003235329,0.0007929443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002868657,0.0001936021,0.001273751,0.000005360997,0.00002127475,0.00001761217,0.00002937028,0.0001971585,0.000138036,0.9966957,0.0009499057,0.0001913659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1085426,0.0003639561,0.003343012,0.6356956,0.0003676742,0.0002554232,0.00003822174,0.0005426688,0.2508508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892091,0.000004769363,0.0001101157,0.009642038,0.0009464322,0.00001182429,0.000002978948,0.00001906103,0.0000536721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8806666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754415601","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v5i2.192","title":"James on religious experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Religious experience; Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Misak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1285245040742116,"gpt":0.3344982180124536,"spread":0.205973713938242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001071934,0.0001885916,0.0001915154,0.00006135864,0.001864109,0.0007323304,0.0005958058,0.00006914655,0.0006588059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004110567,0.0001565451,0.00008301077,0.00001145567,0.004194845,0.0006448001,0.0001118424,0.0002239628,0.0007797239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002400008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000237102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005441152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008044153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.00003193126,0.0002326858,0.0003033107,0.0002663745,0.0002589212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986991,0.0001025756,0.000165542,0.0008396002,0.0000851099,0.0001080899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003953837,0.00009178453,0.0001183357,0.0000125681,0.00001257567,0.000007259563,0.0335647,7.976336e-7,0.00001495314,0.9583461,0.006829453,0.0009619336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639529,0.0001270112,0.0003540122,0.00005500139,0.00001049765,0.000002594517,0.0009084134,0.00001271218,0.0003670522,0.9040261,0.09373917,0.0002334933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3945028,0.0003102156,0.00003983062,0.1868286,0.004782076,0.0002384957,0.00003152759,0.0002837921,0.4129827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919266,0.00006633285,0.00003839507,0.002604572,0.004727877,0.00006859605,0.000006395497,0.00002075096,0.0005405426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897401158","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v6i1.218","title":"Was Royaumont merely a dialogue de sourds? An Introduction to the discussion générale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mathieu Marion","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06715421566981535,"gpt":0.3095230908987937,"spread":0.2423688752289784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000326945,0.0001627265,0.0002019745,0.00008545008,0.0009242159,0.0003710806,0.0002861629,0.00005298805,0.001270051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003531981,0.00008540382,0.0001058822,0.00007256084,0.001769133,0.0001724495,0.0001170863,0.0001655641,0.0003053258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003286152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003456217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002832707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001828999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987459,0.0001000786,0.0002494107,0.000333802,0.000260816,0.000310002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.00003751665,0.00006637185,0.0004482176,0.0002331406,0.000179247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007411926,0.000116448,0.0001056322,0.000005321275,0.00004516873,0.000003214001,0.02633101,0.00003065824,0.00008366209,0.9570468,0.01547142,0.000686519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001395673,0.0004217915,0.0001654263,0.00001321564,0.0001484315,0.000002785587,0.003675431,0.0007434502,0.0003430821,0.549238,0.4448376,0.0002712864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1754675,0.0001093943,0.002128141,0.7948815,0.002433673,0.0003325592,0.00008366515,0.0002085357,0.02435504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220796,0.000006427043,0.00008269742,0.002102078,0.07456705,0.00003096512,0.00004295626,0.0000216041,0.001066596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7927794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135268784","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v9i1.342","title":"Naturalism, pragmatism and historical epistemology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Empiricism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Social epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Continental philosophy; Hacker; Contemporary philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Hyder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040886068555461,"gpt":0.2565864291635448,"spread":0.1524978223079987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001387723,0.0001653801,0.0002833114,0.00007133937,0.0006352314,0.0001327835,0.0001690597,0.00009154191,0.0007768119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001886574,0.0001473075,0.00007182041,0.0000546788,0.00388943,0.0003902184,0.0001306973,0.000294336,0.00008812376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001089435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005580798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003321482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006973484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987661,0.00008593145,0.0002649501,0.0003866875,0.000243842,0.0002525406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992483,0.0001487236,0.00007104555,0.00022367,0.0001563436,0.000151951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001168697,0.00005350437,0.00002712868,0.00003286248,0.00001233304,0.00009156536,0.006871159,1.454356e-7,0.0001943631,0.9881805,0.004027704,0.0004970444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329873,0.00006499909,0.00006931263,0.00001527635,0.00001415464,0.00007962882,0.0001450272,0.00001025886,0.00005669339,0.5931002,0.4061452,0.0001662408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1095143,0.01839907,0.0001721743,0.5814693,0.007276194,0.000235546,0.00005248924,0.0004590878,0.2824218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901085,0.00006785869,0.0002197951,0.003572426,0.001505649,0.00001215705,0.000009908794,0.00001300173,0.004490697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8805942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598397404","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v3i1.119","title":"Assessing metaphor as mediator between Christianity and science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Christianity; Sociology; Analogy; Ideology; Mediation; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Theology; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jitse M. van der Meer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.298164757527164,"gpt":0.3882087209893698,"spread":0.09004396346220578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009664589,0.000106803,0.0001526329,0.000140225,0.0007331127,0.0009052122,0.000219183,0.00003511689,0.0002002005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001138849,0.00008458584,0.00002378939,0.0001404098,0.009675184,0.00165546,0.00009858359,0.000149857,0.0001515758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005662433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003730167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005955656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001791475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987417,0.00004918239,0.0001899403,0.0002706056,0.0005135786,0.00023493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989955,0.0001019024,0.00006749171,0.0001556737,0.0003148403,0.0003645355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003338822,0.0000293118,0.002418993,0.000006539552,0.000004691673,9.214623e-7,0.01629098,1.910621e-7,0.00006446693,0.978964,0.001605618,0.0006109052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002376036,0.0001243802,0.006646532,0.00001988451,0.00003561135,0.000006099079,0.01360718,0.00009944502,0.0004334874,0.9186453,0.05985691,0.000287591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378369,0.0004599101,0.00009952501,0.02749469,0.001232018,0.00009422276,0.00000665947,0.00009951748,0.03267657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973635,0.000007615297,0.0001732008,0.000507488,0.001745851,0.000007420048,0.000004693371,0.00000638549,0.0001838174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06031876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}