{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":31,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":31,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b551b66d04c7","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"}},"results":[{"id":"W4385464282","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.2.0199","title":"Violent Inheritance: Sexuality, Land, and Energy in Making the North American West","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Human sexuality; Sociology; Queer; Aesthetics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Suspect; Materialism; Gender studies; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nathan Stormer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.03952458556388738,"gpt":0.3133172136242772,"spread":0.2737926280603898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113538,0.0001811056,0.0002170428,0.0005159513,0.00841997,0.004847192,0.00052248,0.0009714891,0.002366531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001148588,0.0001334875,0.00009590321,0.0007501906,0.01696694,0.003449133,0.001678829,0.002407561,0.0001649599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003309993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002751789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1087887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989676,0.0007280438,0.00001264719,0.00004138203,0.0001446528,0.0001055988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994474,0.0003888659,0.00004815665,0.00002315121,0.00003814402,0.00005432832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001227266,0.0000231379,0.00108995,0.00007667641,0.00000380219,0.0003173836,0.3716103,0.00005255463,0.0001809439,0.5724831,0.02477314,0.02937683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000496138,0.00002331902,0.003705493,0.0005027553,0.000007753385,0.0003867505,0.4049365,0.0001496336,0.0003047907,0.09180254,0.4981572,0.00001836654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2219177,0.07002061,0.002980025,0.117206,0.001952879,0.00003494035,0.00003308414,0.00005060837,0.5858042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276695,0.01559095,0.001066122,0.005579235,0.0002505928,0.00002470973,0.00001030334,0.00003348402,0.0497751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144331134","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0026","title":"Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Abstraction; Dialectic; Natural (archaeology); Rhetorical question; Representation (politics); Computer science; Argument map; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06192275201670944,"gpt":0.2646790907539224,"spread":0.202756338737213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847955,0.0003372914,0.000490648,0.007697704,0.001899365,0.007108726,0.001205155,0.001633841,0.003214289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03089953,0.0003469121,0.0005609721,0.005460398,0.006084462,0.006177271,0.002851431,0.001362076,0.0006123821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001533822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001101082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009628958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001172013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900737,0.005124864,0.001016722,0.001047185,0.002211412,0.0005261403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757343,0.01286367,0.003286789,0.004164953,0.003344025,0.0006064139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003034176,0.0001455372,0.04177199,0.0004733505,0.00008367484,0.0005486455,0.02163707,0.0016739,0.00761257,0.8179829,0.003144297,0.1046226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004914256,0.0001415298,0.03091656,0.0004543798,0.00008483738,0.001132136,0.01629161,0.03081229,0.00544585,0.8602133,0.05439202,0.000066379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5853347,0.001193286,0.3430502,0.0038926,0.0001681899,0.0006148248,0.001008383,0.0006144332,0.0641235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002514,0.0001739629,0.09648715,0.000102237,0.00003148468,0.0002158322,0.0005901344,0.00007196428,0.002075909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007697704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02563876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550479137","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0107","title":"The Late Fourteenth-Century Renaissance of Anglo-Latin Rhetoric","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Vernacular; The Renaissance; Poetry; Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); Rhetorical question; Art; Classics; Middle Ages; The arts; History; Philosophy; Art history; Ancient history; Theology; Visual arts; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Camargo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03642942060721387,"gpt":0.2253976647327588,"spread":0.1889682441255449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005768399,0.0002793318,0.0002532631,0.001871695,0.004494278,0.008200889,0.0004583107,0.0009108746,0.003157836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004640599,0.000217404,0.0001302497,0.001105487,0.02345934,0.002585165,0.003090005,0.00326278,0.0004125025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01125667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002847163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00659894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008962778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971561,0.001845341,0.00008693799,0.0002761198,0.0004002173,0.000235272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962901,0.002088625,0.0003636261,0.0002450568,0.0007819276,0.0002305972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004030495,0.00001895178,0.0009118625,0.00008222485,0.000006133327,0.0001832346,0.1059802,0.00005351774,0.000570216,0.8797824,0.002956441,0.009414461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003133418,0.0000470541,0.004289243,0.000633315,0.00001140866,0.0003199743,0.03290362,0.0001738249,0.001316861,0.05252866,0.9077186,0.00002604017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151628,0.02265943,0.003125833,0.02454717,0.001095296,0.0000354552,0.00006747981,0.00007958667,0.7332268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635459,0.002222936,0.0006229107,0.001442604,0.0003001781,0.00002309556,0.00001824424,0.00006330172,0.03176093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0816732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096863564","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0148","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Argument map; Philosophy; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03117581066464339,"gpt":0.3006801159728074,"spread":0.269504305308164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009788797,0.0004794906,0.0007412918,0.005604846,0.002971586,0.01290488,0.000848291,0.002925218,0.003438614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01712357,0.0003659921,0.0004797683,0.003588482,0.04166619,0.01199898,0.003788658,0.00364821,0.0004264225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00565196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003478001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007234501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861616,0.01083548,0.0003098914,0.0005595305,0.001651502,0.0004820581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816121,0.01421711,0.00154279,0.0007027033,0.00126797,0.0006572634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008648815,0.000008658544,0.0001288689,0.0000470921,0.000004352374,0.00003398594,0.002307817,0.0001822328,0.00008504457,0.9947311,0.0002782437,0.002183966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009395679,0.000007637846,0.0001953642,0.00005923636,0.000004684014,0.00004553645,0.001302259,0.0004001245,0.00008108844,0.991317,0.006570896,0.000006705509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480136,0.05334506,0.1208467,0.06398248,0.001234671,0.0001239302,0.0001188264,0.0001983997,0.6121364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829828,0.00313115,0.009644515,0.001178789,0.0003010808,0.00006812897,0.00002905722,0.00004009888,0.002624406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01290488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05176872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059759980","doi":"10.1353/par.0.0000","title":"On Common Knowledge and &lt;i&gt;Ad Populum&lt;/i&gt;: Acceptance as Grounds for Acceptability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Nothing; Epistemology; Persuasion; Context (archaeology); Dialogic; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"David Godden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03908586551773882,"gpt":0.2801424699484467,"spread":0.2410566044307079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698154,0.001064633,0.001689205,0.002495695,0.009205963,0.01680707,0.002506253,0.01204083,0.01195108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03051812,0.0008016381,0.001498785,0.002574045,0.06030151,0.0269894,0.008136018,0.01549786,0.003124024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01231155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004153204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007739001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003371821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978595,0.01389188,0.000675613,0.00230652,0.003356306,0.001174678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751434,0.01807341,0.0009207051,0.002046078,0.003068641,0.0007477186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007764183,0.00000514205,0.00003841415,0.00002299427,0.00000270534,0.0000316142,0.0007304237,0.00009288015,0.0000194568,0.9930851,0.004156316,0.001807196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007192933,0.000004115612,0.00004504497,0.00006073191,0.000002535533,0.00001618373,0.0002219065,0.0002360406,0.00002637225,0.9846106,0.01476283,0.000006543253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01074697,0.0178532,0.06593339,0.2166621,0.00207757,0.0001652674,0.0001587987,0.0001342238,0.6862684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830526,0.009266268,0.02477752,0.02771712,0.005216749,0.0009488816,0.0001879222,0.0005261805,0.1008334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08980805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663408855","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Identity (music); Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03019749857148778,"gpt":0.2482754903876877,"spread":0.2180779918161999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02664002,0.0006226799,0.0009863507,0.004547739,0.007464217,0.01843237,0.001640762,0.007364469,0.005046247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04394549,0.000402238,0.0005382003,0.002582553,0.04459286,0.02220598,0.008103495,0.005171684,0.0006187037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005105064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006920387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004301946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597449,0.03346022,0.0007497304,0.001401413,0.003661993,0.0009818549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9355738,0.05328126,0.003538401,0.001962707,0.004152304,0.00149154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001773581,0.00001196942,0.0002021727,0.00006967857,0.000004947313,0.00006363854,0.01325106,0.0001202678,0.0001027117,0.9825749,0.0005959768,0.002984907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002652227,0.00002539811,0.0003320912,0.0004099315,0.00001275532,0.0001514407,0.01002257,0.001270363,0.0002831685,0.9635942,0.02385772,0.00001392234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1295997,0.01587277,0.1183956,0.07281781,0.00120473,0.00009884684,0.00006544165,0.0001395223,0.6618056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902557,0.001012409,0.003526349,0.0009544856,0.000363393,0.00004521393,0.00001278174,0.00003472254,0.003795036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02664002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1408876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243244020","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.2.0233","title":"Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Houdek","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2142616842438778,"gpt":0.2766817939204269,"spread":0.06242010967654907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02027306,0.0005022161,0.0006460401,0.003363759,0.005871138,0.01254587,0.001240365,0.004583701,0.004531184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02480744,0.0004061149,0.0007403508,0.002314493,0.04187708,0.0127185,0.008854968,0.004832697,0.0008316602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004419518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003362866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001063493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006660732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9731319,0.01875292,0.000774244,0.002214958,0.003600691,0.001525283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718913,0.02129688,0.002626689,0.001772241,0.001674864,0.0007379578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001288154,0.00001413038,0.0002668685,0.00003977722,0.000007525759,0.00004733213,0.0101836,0.0002199515,0.0001042048,0.981938,0.001079133,0.006086545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001983931,0.00001498999,0.0003023053,0.00009977569,0.000006658087,0.00006523112,0.002579828,0.0003190211,0.0002635399,0.9613857,0.03493125,0.0000118404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1057248,0.01630765,0.06356934,0.0781408,0.0007936434,0.0001030807,0.00008384766,0.0002329804,0.7350439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835381,0.001362521,0.004556531,0.002078302,0.0003708072,0.00007557,0.0000385536,0.00006577819,0.007913828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02027306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1072155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891414723","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.51.3.0269","title":"Designing Soundscapes for Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Soundscape; Argumentative; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Normative; Epistemology; Sound (geography); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History; Acoustics","authors":[{"name":"Justin Eckstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08313284929350859,"gpt":0.2801152351405932,"spread":0.1969823858470846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01042464,0.001100427,0.0004285029,0.002295777,0.003265308,0.009210906,0.001921732,0.003123862,0.01852268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0329552,0.0004996569,0.0006455843,0.0008436567,0.007451666,0.007039012,0.00657203,0.001751586,0.002550669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008793498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001202838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910303,0.00650965,0.0002903586,0.0005158216,0.001226224,0.0004276111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620935,0.02884031,0.001319115,0.00328553,0.003230524,0.001230978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007602199,0.0006595976,0.004956895,0.002935921,0.000122442,0.002503075,0.1081727,0.01278842,0.05428967,0.4937583,0.02281066,0.2962421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003151465,0.0009933766,0.004249154,0.002198305,0.0001345804,0.001125034,0.05330053,0.03246053,0.02880792,0.2964169,0.5796999,0.0002985008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.177891,0.001183169,0.5899575,0.006717456,0.0008434537,0.001585896,0.0004003081,0.005959248,0.215462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7849995,0.000306349,0.1969622,0.0008167394,0.0001370522,0.001266494,0.0002226244,0.0005160932,0.0147729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01852268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06196451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89977932","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0533","title":"The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Target audience; Perspective (graphical); Audience reception; Function (biology); Audience analysis; Audience participation; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Media studies; Advertising; Philosophy; Social science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ralph H. Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0200355414744477,"gpt":0.2300781494553129,"spread":0.2100426079808652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04197807,0.001093586,0.001248072,0.00453886,0.008825584,0.02427273,0.002514204,0.008898325,0.006722142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03840723,0.000805993,0.001281885,0.002187197,0.04876307,0.0303727,0.01044754,0.009209692,0.0008527876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005868837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003265141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001370194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008328664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9220822,0.06875465,0.001283935,0.001682364,0.004620173,0.001576636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92298,0.06565762,0.002933318,0.002816392,0.004011884,0.001600809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001158604,0.000007522793,0.00007541652,0.00004262635,0.000005443366,0.00006759501,0.008534549,0.0002462348,0.00008837314,0.9891795,0.0003305037,0.001410705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002481319,0.00001643625,0.00006735076,0.0001620876,0.0000121667,0.00007849248,0.002609557,0.001581531,0.0001603791,0.9793174,0.01595734,0.00001240725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05273736,0.008324665,0.4060395,0.07413583,0.001178806,0.0001803726,0.00007209565,0.0003217332,0.4570097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660866,0.001114302,0.02054085,0.001676811,0.0006873578,0.0001567993,0.00001957818,0.0001377519,0.009580022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04197807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2220039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176353597","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109","title":"Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1200682433845068,"gpt":0.2821851329781331,"spread":0.1621168895936262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01845396,0.0007488086,0.001152275,0.002032622,0.01912443,0.0126749,0.002088801,0.01117931,0.008728382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03629697,0.000615322,0.0004998901,0.001173902,0.06573138,0.0196174,0.00960687,0.01247492,0.001775889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004326171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002950125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002060029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002356843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812858,0.01383447,0.0002945246,0.001233414,0.001894819,0.001456966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826806,0.01207647,0.001517929,0.001174807,0.001503137,0.001047071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000332324,0.00002198485,0.0007289601,0.00005858681,0.00001689722,0.000702623,0.1649524,0.00005679765,0.0002018547,0.8174162,0.008949734,0.006860612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001928361,0.00005549943,0.0006836642,0.0008911281,0.00003231941,0.001114797,0.2150646,0.0005943064,0.0009811789,0.4853913,0.2951164,0.00005555482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2140687,0.01180944,0.05464401,0.2277383,0.004526949,0.0001398201,0.00004763816,0.0001781483,0.486847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640619,0.001016732,0.001766524,0.01035288,0.00055187,0.00003647327,0.00001099899,0.0001256894,0.02207685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01912443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09759504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322747704","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337","title":"Ways of Being Reasonable:","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Windsor; Rhetoric; Citation; Download; State (computer science); Publishing; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Algorithm; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0437671729541827,"gpt":0.2906555638302812,"spread":0.2468883908760985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003602535,0.0003548891,0.0003467288,0.001034699,0.005106638,0.007356596,0.0005263757,0.002751481,0.02003439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005430595,0.0002799143,0.0003003081,0.001106718,0.01411955,0.00986426,0.002990439,0.004283717,0.002737191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004788543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006577977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973449,0.00134903,0.00009367766,0.0002918154,0.0006512234,0.0002693491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984643,0.0005855188,0.0001450196,0.0001926522,0.0003509551,0.0002614703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001022457,0.00001048988,0.0001744024,0.0000370104,0.000002211661,0.00003459732,0.006215671,0.00002551319,0.00003751609,0.9028217,0.07976013,0.01087067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006827416,0.00001697283,0.0007610507,0.0002510023,0.000006250663,0.0001674489,0.00837355,0.00006159824,0.00007599349,0.2834783,0.7067914,0.0000096282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00880933,0.01922775,0.002833775,0.1408525,0.0028825,0.00003294873,0.0001154086,0.00005129429,0.8251946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6798514,0.01326486,0.00236667,0.0154134,0.002203131,0.00008433496,0.0001856871,0.000114702,0.2865157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02003439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06702173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769221086","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0566","title":"Replicating Reasons: Arguments, Memes, and the Cognitive Environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Persuasion; Epistemology; Cognition; Memetics; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03189146961181358,"gpt":0.2912759381567086,"spread":0.259384468544895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008942759,0.0005154047,0.0004633878,0.002228762,0.002459183,0.008405114,0.001338668,0.003286104,0.004414883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03794684,0.000436277,0.0004301128,0.001067608,0.02049996,0.01439303,0.004559175,0.002702871,0.0004968562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001358811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008397443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002612063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002646723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909903,0.007390177,0.0001690809,0.0004689095,0.0007767714,0.0002047761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666885,0.02770044,0.002133257,0.001699986,0.001190236,0.000587559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009013726,0.0000569726,0.001943799,0.0002495167,0.00004464229,0.000787507,0.06407124,0.0008182629,0.001959367,0.9098018,0.001694776,0.01848203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004067711,0.00007006866,0.001510271,0.0002989338,0.00003216791,0.0006623009,0.02256992,0.003173633,0.001432319,0.9302495,0.03991747,0.00004290537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5060043,0.009022282,0.2125795,0.043819,0.001121297,0.0001531474,0.0001303176,0.0004775296,0.2266925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844567,0.0004534702,0.01262801,0.0004504843,0.00008769918,0.00003014841,0.0000180982,0.00004486572,0.001830536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008942759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04729438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926220562","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0570","title":"Figural Logic in Gregor Mendel's “Experiments on Plant Hybrids”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Botanical Research and Chemistry","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Synecdoche; Antithesis; Philosophy; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Linguistics; Metonymy; Literature; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04514377850033875,"gpt":0.2472888029777974,"spread":0.2021450244774586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008353862,0.0003981015,0.0003391624,0.001274113,0.003363524,0.003338106,0.001017047,0.002853495,0.00395927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01356307,0.0002301237,0.0003070661,0.0007149827,0.01972022,0.005781027,0.002441915,0.002684779,0.0004132952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00361866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007349682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001179367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932755,0.005676001,0.00008025009,0.0002902276,0.000558585,0.0001193962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880937,0.01049938,0.0003715111,0.0004241467,0.0004804397,0.0001308259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001325071,0.000004731135,0.00002574962,0.00001376104,0.000002073522,0.00002869875,0.002502976,0.00009797377,0.0001394992,0.9932665,0.002078753,0.001826058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004739716,0.0000463182,0.0001646313,0.0001489456,0.00001381245,0.00008927003,0.002313382,0.001118995,0.001034042,0.8457699,0.1492303,0.00002309574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08417308,0.006898767,0.134333,0.1258779,0.002624949,0.0001001977,0.0001688758,0.0003832284,0.64544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696271,0.0006571366,0.01375026,0.00421256,0.0004002852,0.00007013683,0.00002205199,0.00006075333,0.01119969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04417998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189575033","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.2.0156","title":"The Absence of Rhetorical Theory in Richard Rorty's Linguistic Pragmatism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rhetorical question; Linguistic turn; Rhetoric; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Danisch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02769138526835404,"gpt":0.2429658997923705,"spread":0.2152745145240165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02032282,0.0003428443,0.0007664541,0.002100678,0.00636795,0.01004448,0.001600961,0.005449636,0.001593382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02953651,0.0005367607,0.0006786191,0.0008465286,0.05021307,0.009078711,0.005857067,0.009994241,0.0006843207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005183697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001733941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001131739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9717426,0.02214878,0.0005796712,0.001456088,0.003207142,0.0008656352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560722,0.03547663,0.002345966,0.002777676,0.002639788,0.0006876822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008310621,0.000006825701,0.00004578953,0.00001996331,0.000002523249,0.00004386531,0.005336336,0.000154346,0.00006969908,0.9911095,0.001268406,0.001934409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002119794,0.00002366362,0.00008831583,0.0001065197,0.000006525531,0.0001158557,0.001871651,0.001071957,0.0003606651,0.9574497,0.03886288,0.00002111492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09224766,0.01199033,0.1023962,0.3883537,0.001476811,0.00006994739,0.00004197266,0.0004007613,0.4030225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738921,0.001006379,0.007364655,0.006730026,0.0005574324,0.00007214361,0.000008164871,0.00008495765,0.0102841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02032282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1074787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224075577","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0066","title":"Mind the Gap: <i>Kairos</i> in the Spaces of Silence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Silence; Order (exchange); Moment (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04794473051460189,"gpt":0.2324774843342745,"spread":0.1845327538196725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005296687,0.0003912926,0.0003983348,0.001379995,0.006797248,0.01129695,0.001153858,0.002115056,0.003638456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156226,0.0003580075,0.0003865742,0.001267094,0.03985492,0.01594248,0.005891848,0.004000833,0.0007698279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003088185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002746317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003017855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00302512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952537,0.003393806,0.0001256334,0.0003171427,0.0005288612,0.0003808638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993181,0.004243043,0.000682092,0.0008124096,0.0007160999,0.0003653543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004563115,0.000009146305,0.0002463014,0.00009133417,0.000005601992,0.0001829029,0.1475186,0.00007836903,0.0003792247,0.8417608,0.003374793,0.00630731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002584504,0.00005900095,0.0009284175,0.0007670344,0.00002963248,0.000704242,0.2420088,0.0007714709,0.001389632,0.4815252,0.2717224,0.00006827202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1339678,0.01237876,0.05727163,0.05588006,0.002072667,0.0001302639,0.0001352802,0.0003773977,0.7377862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831004,0.001184287,0.002232901,0.00154175,0.0002103117,0.00006267336,0.00002274114,0.00008916919,0.0115557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02801192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408997826","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0076","title":"Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative Cruelty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Silence; Argumentative; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1458905830559336,"gpt":0.3381840382233853,"spread":0.1922934551674517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04120698,0.001319131,0.001382469,0.002982513,0.02107074,0.01432864,0.004214379,0.01841814,0.003878319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07681909,0.0009414698,0.00181416,0.001731627,0.06959289,0.02803018,0.01279427,0.03173119,0.0009380861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01187139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00317652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004359894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9569488,0.03610247,0.0007361251,0.001561684,0.003035166,0.001615854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8795936,0.1076494,0.003447663,0.003620729,0.003909668,0.001778957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008371783,0.00002437497,0.0002758254,0.0001078033,0.00002176039,0.001691985,0.5051084,0.0001928267,0.0007578929,0.4845378,0.004077781,0.003119846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000874264,0.0001391008,0.0006671178,0.001381877,0.00006750829,0.001816427,0.3099548,0.003113098,0.003584641,0.4550271,0.2240334,0.000127565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1834875,0.008302721,0.06879475,0.5334789,0.003565498,0.0001907382,0.0001709935,0.0003381016,0.2016708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767462,0.0009033523,0.002845813,0.01242257,0.0007811342,0.000136211,0.0000295506,0.000181658,0.005953413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04120698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.217926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008435593","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0054","title":"Guide(s) for the Perplexed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Consciousness; Sociology; Phenomenon; Social life; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alan Blum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1780648351725243,"gpt":0.296879688243058,"spread":0.1188148530705338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005144604,0.001119934,0.0008792124,0.002843752,0.002854164,0.005214376,0.002488466,0.004149661,0.4637085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03030022,0.000653765,0.0009654518,0.001168829,0.002140306,0.004488557,0.005148767,0.005066347,0.4039425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001666388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004224029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002343179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004566242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962156,0.001495088,0.0003565573,0.0004634058,0.001222065,0.0002472721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827372,0.005260805,0.0006499347,0.002945404,0.006346637,0.002059868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003047519,0.00002843785,0.0000579383,0.0001392125,0.000002076865,0.0001139234,0.0005304524,0.00004644533,0.0003643445,0.007495493,0.9247353,0.06645589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005679038,0.000008399751,0.00003188842,0.00008360834,0.000001028902,0.0001142325,0.0002047386,0.00005030123,0.00009816526,0.001823852,0.997572,0.000006070285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002694237,0.003583015,0.09231818,0.1069674,0.0547658,0.004599551,0.009828473,0.02423115,0.7010121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007893097,0.001370342,0.05236363,0.01972781,0.003707096,0.002314362,0.002310275,0.005547415,0.904766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4637085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939457100","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.52.1.0078","title":"<i>Combat–Débat</i>: Parataxis and the Unavowable Community; or, The Joke","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Trope (literature); Politics; Identity (music); Presidency; Alterity; Sociology; Subordination (linguistics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Art","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tad Lemieux","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0282866409356068,"gpt":0.2124171622419334,"spread":0.1841305213063266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001970591,0.0004437517,0.0002761964,0.001256972,0.008472459,0.007781467,0.0006926057,0.002655982,0.00654921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004098409,0.0001377074,0.000228873,0.0007563885,0.02203868,0.004549566,0.001487722,0.004080813,0.001219649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009834201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002263543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03454277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03715872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977229,0.001548456,0.00002435232,0.0001988016,0.0003254802,0.000179852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977423,0.001463703,0.0001586704,0.0001668859,0.0003343049,0.0001340775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002067132,0.000006005092,0.000111247,0.00005254438,0.000004194814,0.0001108232,0.02626895,0.00006131073,0.0001948238,0.8983154,0.06770135,0.007152666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005657058,0.00001984832,0.0005373898,0.0002540561,0.000005520476,0.0002459355,0.01816159,0.0002171091,0.0004147674,0.06736282,0.9127567,0.00001857769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02253158,0.04456594,0.008514316,0.2403857,0.006471389,0.00002953165,0.00009729803,0.0003363132,0.6770678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8308596,0.005412044,0.001611593,0.01751206,0.003267125,0.00004555227,0.00003257753,0.0003185605,0.1409408],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03454277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07135242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234122","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0333","title":"Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Autonomy; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09365532945548626,"gpt":0.2821873199907969,"spread":0.1885319905353106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01015408,0.0003388919,0.0004174484,0.001096133,0.002953217,0.00418186,0.0005027391,0.002486326,0.003336168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01859677,0.0002156079,0.0006635244,0.0003654341,0.02421827,0.007304676,0.003949736,0.003845568,0.0003875716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003081777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001644016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007390808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006517038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880428,0.00856646,0.0003804406,0.0008913211,0.001559482,0.0005594435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985877,0.009680732,0.0008920919,0.001239333,0.001616049,0.0006946771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107674,0.000005338777,0.0002084512,0.00001735891,0.000003331764,0.00006457165,0.002610691,0.000112573,0.0001382119,0.9946419,0.0006483214,0.001538071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007936327,0.00001408933,0.0002911251,0.00004502844,0.000005686753,0.00006507704,0.0008740636,0.0006751477,0.0001981975,0.9871615,0.0106551,0.000007125532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1433117,0.001350917,0.09447192,0.04675283,0.001000598,0.00009742285,0.00005760169,0.0001742538,0.7127827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921217,0.0001315844,0.003189728,0.0009379683,0.000116764,0.00002605275,0.000008720338,0.00002411292,0.003443485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01015408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05370057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234222","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0270","title":"Autonomy and Argumentation: An Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Autonomy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"John Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04752464318364486,"gpt":0.3420196998847242,"spread":0.2944950567010794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022383,0.001040032,0.001271139,0.004231383,0.002754406,0.007777864,0.001362157,0.006181458,0.009301392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005199158,0.0006048426,0.0009623569,0.004085287,0.01114182,0.009327247,0.003605308,0.007480464,0.001922335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003471741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001893799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001908246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009572885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972746,0.001629502,0.0001387,0.0003088609,0.0004799108,0.0001683648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940502,0.004877376,0.0001776414,0.0001614996,0.0005118071,0.0002214087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001406886,0.00003954249,0.0001643718,0.0004070439,0.00001075622,0.0001283826,0.001892879,0.0005697662,0.0001301968,0.9622018,0.01520776,0.01923352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001127285,0.00003404501,0.0003334412,0.001589414,0.000007493431,0.0002413112,0.0007587498,0.0007373311,0.00005399558,0.6611396,0.3350747,0.00001864509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004976502,0.5105439,0.05657754,0.07018309,0.009944138,0.0001611955,0.0002668003,0.000147978,0.3471989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3496452,0.4665178,0.04762695,0.02507252,0.03854092,0.001012894,0.000663063,0.0003284969,0.07059215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009301392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03111625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038055792","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326","title":"The Moral Sense in the Time of the Recluse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recluse; Rhetoric; Darwin (ADL); Environmental ethics; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Poetry","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06630831190702248,"gpt":0.2260373133054254,"spread":0.1597290013984029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224967,0.000357824,0.0004960991,0.001306234,0.009674843,0.01122732,0.001170706,0.005691056,0.003660878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02317752,0.0002914656,0.0003096313,0.0007691002,0.09254967,0.01317754,0.005688391,0.01316416,0.0005291137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007271818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003738115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003092651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002671856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875937,0.009400059,0.0002445938,0.0006177,0.00141036,0.00073346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854099,0.00957189,0.001085262,0.0008116055,0.002116363,0.001004955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001489865,0.000006109859,0.0001056173,0.00002583016,0.000003147093,0.0001061109,0.04236601,0.0000496806,0.00008296862,0.9475659,0.007850817,0.001822988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001899333,0.00003520442,0.0003038003,0.0004333091,0.00001013034,0.0002553648,0.06074236,0.0002860127,0.0003469467,0.6741311,0.2633988,0.00003800998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05742527,0.01411052,0.01844959,0.4467761,0.01017648,0.00003980385,0.00006886422,0.0001270707,0.4528264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714035,0.001036944,0.001189248,0.01274022,0.00102429,0.00002280306,0.00001076342,0.0000738265,0.01249849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06478322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392845246","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.3-4.0274","title":"<i>Kairos</i> , The Sire of Beauty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Beauty; Rhetoric; Harmony (color); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Intuition; Antinomy; Art; Theology; Visual arts","authors":[{"name":"SeungJung Kim","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05204658885694838,"gpt":0.2298340042324031,"spread":0.1777874153754547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001206864,0.000289323,0.0002386698,0.0009275206,0.003111999,0.004168458,0.0004541694,0.001004327,0.005934652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002651246,0.0001517461,0.0002089438,0.0006822564,0.01373806,0.004159438,0.002022952,0.003125872,0.001096023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001862391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009627366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002693448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003690277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992467,0.0003694821,0.00002642412,0.0001040917,0.0001891589,0.00006409342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990507,0.0005332984,0.0001043589,0.00009062325,0.0001587221,0.00006234715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004669118,0.000008127309,0.0002540409,0.0001375845,0.000005957157,0.0002011295,0.02905292,0.00009416283,0.0007918405,0.9384147,0.0224667,0.008526148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001365637,0.00005944555,0.001563713,0.0004620268,0.00001846416,0.001251416,0.02757211,0.0004917865,0.001726013,0.1864685,0.7803309,0.00004191925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03745728,0.0115254,0.01293247,0.03905501,0.004740447,0.0000446897,0.0001744133,0.0002329485,0.8938373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008572,0.00338175,0.00244092,0.003936137,0.00142059,0.00003634983,0.00005905745,0.0001790502,0.08768903],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005934652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01985341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768152958","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0528","title":"On Rhetoric and the School of Philosophy Without Tears","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Philosophy; Transitive relation; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06001572697176672,"gpt":0.2746537719903597,"spread":0.214638045018593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007959461,0.0004778213,0.0006279273,0.003247006,0.006507799,0.0106005,0.0007507403,0.003642522,0.005539611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01409442,0.0002664118,0.0004378853,0.001393303,0.04551718,0.01254247,0.005253703,0.006203053,0.0009207337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004538766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002803543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001107304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007486609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915978,0.006175729,0.0001667046,0.0004260806,0.001244817,0.0003888168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821014,0.01435144,0.0008432242,0.0008874327,0.001380832,0.0004357512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003909322,0.000003439845,0.00002040442,0.0000173621,8.699307e-7,0.00002210508,0.002859892,0.00004249634,0.00002346002,0.994942,0.0008727977,0.001191301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001134867,0.00001369303,0.00005194719,0.0001816058,0.000003835636,0.00005983517,0.002273148,0.0002759861,0.0001209198,0.9447877,0.05221359,0.000006424125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04354022,0.02638974,0.05099883,0.1512565,0.003391936,0.00005556712,0.00005901949,0.000183327,0.7241247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560916,0.005416017,0.003973671,0.008074065,0.002569245,0.00007368694,0.00002359594,0.0001220823,0.02365607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04209411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037169852","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0299","title":"The Suicidal State: In Advance of an American Requiem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Racism; State of exception; Writ; State (computer science); Criminology; Context (archaeology); Biosocial theory; Sociology; Racialization; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Politics; Law; Psychoanalysis; History; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01224720338316971,"gpt":0.2551643427118993,"spread":0.2429171393287296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003132204,0.0002602767,0.000275387,0.0005069274,0.01685847,0.005338972,0.0006335827,0.004791205,0.003424585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006891132,0.0002017392,0.0002099864,0.0003722684,0.01486498,0.00447317,0.004277272,0.01607626,0.0006963753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004705296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005604573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009691162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02257137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998271,0.0008861514,0.000045335,0.0001651991,0.0003092099,0.0003230806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981312,0.000786778,0.0001392714,0.0000896569,0.0003997342,0.0004535034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000428076,0.00005173757,0.0009747288,0.00004921218,0.000005528503,0.0008012748,0.1769814,0.00004438637,0.0004462059,0.6262373,0.1740837,0.02028186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007750419,0.00003223667,0.0007871622,0.0002473198,0.00000916684,0.0003681511,0.09463192,0.0001280548,0.0003505399,0.0425383,0.8608754,0.00002387081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05867331,0.005857497,0.001581154,0.6265358,0.01930774,0.0000277407,0.00003136533,0.00007709651,0.2879083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7527688,0.0026248,0.0007664594,0.1558754,0.003096911,0.00003775518,0.00002721347,0.00007668144,0.08472607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01685847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03413945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321509394","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.4.0386","title":"The Erotic Madness of Writing in Plato’s <i>Phaedrus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Analogy; Possessive; Literature; Philosophy; Function (biology); Orientation (vector space); Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Nathaniel R. Street","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02964764073518852,"gpt":0.2163285235948449,"spread":0.1866808828596563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002755482,0.0002821637,0.0002518021,0.0009334512,0.006041603,0.007297712,0.0004022192,0.001118989,0.002068863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003601621,0.0002211647,0.0001665865,0.0006304201,0.04987834,0.005425327,0.003406897,0.003986337,0.0002998212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002614959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001313211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001680606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001394726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972682,0.001891308,0.00007898924,0.0002325898,0.0003513178,0.0001777041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973918,0.001615852,0.0003035357,0.0003226293,0.0002082384,0.0001579157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001776436,0.000007491164,0.0001537821,0.00002573393,0.000001693786,0.0001541124,0.04736885,0.00006930716,0.0002062205,0.9466637,0.002097797,0.003233514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002737398,0.0000518483,0.0009266944,0.0002246061,0.00001099655,0.0007264424,0.02632874,0.0009679958,0.001345311,0.7017384,0.2676214,0.00003014434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.117171,0.004662618,0.02093577,0.02679815,0.001260202,0.00003413361,0.00005504476,0.0001506387,0.8289324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879975,0.0003903929,0.0009872627,0.0006527129,0.0002522167,0.00001222841,0.000008202515,0.00004103241,0.009658438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007297712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01897293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414466736","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0069","title":"Normative Pluralism and the Other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Perspective (graphical); Pluralism (philosophy); Modal; Ethical theories","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02072143016879495,"gpt":0.3066598488529468,"spread":0.2859384186841519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01481957,0.0005650405,0.0008383404,0.00229643,0.00982183,0.01053059,0.00134486,0.004257901,0.00523714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01161882,0.0003575786,0.0006174945,0.001383068,0.07613489,0.01184523,0.008110515,0.008303488,0.0005510256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008648151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004456701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002783405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002529902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795857,0.01430203,0.0004419911,0.00219565,0.002652339,0.0008222437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901757,0.005661517,0.0006748171,0.001270133,0.001369925,0.0008479397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001749657,0.0000024298,0.00002294005,0.000007629409,0.000001124023,0.00001303114,0.00180665,0.00002742223,0.00001708181,0.997311,0.0003771314,0.0004118039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006456853,0.000004222466,0.00004739967,0.00005997379,0.000002704673,0.0000295493,0.001806496,0.0001771482,0.00006242696,0.9724762,0.02532261,0.000004860446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02195607,0.003749332,0.02657975,0.05845358,0.0007878959,0.00004301829,0.00003340766,0.00006074569,0.8883362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765323,0.0007142905,0.003293989,0.003032663,0.0004852918,0.00006420851,0.00002128986,0.00005731349,0.01579856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01481957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07837433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128779945","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0258","title":"The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Audience measurement; Craft","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08286538395446588,"gpt":0.2937740186613564,"spread":0.2109086347068906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008532487,0.0008823911,0.00056545,0.002812974,0.01579405,0.01315646,0.00130682,0.006000896,0.00214018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02935884,0.0005702807,0.0002750622,0.002913081,0.02482047,0.006279345,0.004356415,0.01390604,0.0007407879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01516776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00647826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02356227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0275846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912648,0.00422061,0.0002269458,0.0008147429,0.002605947,0.000866935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698192,0.02209999,0.00184899,0.001076796,0.004003534,0.001151535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001109604,0.00003559127,0.0005430197,0.0001851142,0.00002070913,0.0008394948,0.2749441,0.0001248651,0.000620279,0.3951294,0.3156163,0.01183022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001869141,0.00002014308,0.002046193,0.0007782495,0.000009713842,0.0002756448,0.03981078,0.0001919646,0.000934336,0.01863496,0.9372236,0.00005582205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09910377,0.07148819,0.003888347,0.4908877,0.02626283,0.0000810984,0.0004129624,0.0001816845,0.3076934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977727,0.008967862,0.0008352971,0.02192165,0.01033789,0.0001348135,0.0001291129,0.0005504471,0.05935042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02356227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1100503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580755","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0030","title":"Figuring the Topos: Finding Common Ground in Cognitive Environments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Topos theory; Figuring; Common ground; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Art; Psychology; Communication; Astronomy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Michael Joseph Regier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05827019360311416,"gpt":0.2696944171496502,"spread":0.211424223546536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01306093,0.0006584373,0.0006516299,0.005194875,0.007835438,0.01542401,0.002194912,0.002872812,0.004775005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02945212,0.000674699,0.000858881,0.002850148,0.04036605,0.0219411,0.01575894,0.002896318,0.0006134774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002621019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002706222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001155822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.976665,0.0178858,0.0006300602,0.001698258,0.002263081,0.0008577022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738156,0.01750537,0.002330831,0.003547598,0.00161318,0.001187434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006656016,0.00004296242,0.00126819,0.0001600714,0.00002464657,0.001122765,0.2393358,0.0009866874,0.001518746,0.7316049,0.001124642,0.0227439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003197218,0.00009191761,0.001111693,0.0004614176,0.00003542367,0.0007650587,0.1863145,0.006986186,0.00220197,0.7333443,0.06859298,0.00006264728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2752515,0.001289849,0.5662532,0.01007139,0.000393373,0.0003370629,0.0001181054,0.0006559008,0.1456296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503855,0.0001610927,0.04673736,0.0001567651,0.0000365343,0.00008812818,0.00004316323,0.00009696199,0.002294559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01542401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06907362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163034977","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.3.0267","title":"Standing on a Bridge Between Cultures: Translation and Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Bridge (graph theory); Bridging (networking); Perspective (graphical)","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jiaxing Li","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06644373872172389,"gpt":0.3174488902698804,"spread":0.2510051515481566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04454815,0.000879346,0.0009152051,0.004077315,0.01008762,0.02247049,0.00222364,0.005575744,0.004494146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07721218,0.0004806465,0.0006861074,0.00423034,0.03912191,0.017657,0.01301138,0.006101343,0.0007831096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005820453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005475274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009019305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000761541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9059369,0.08461217,0.001850316,0.00157923,0.004879439,0.001141958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8388162,0.142119,0.005345876,0.005532932,0.006603996,0.001582013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000799058,0.00007170269,0.001160724,0.0006622223,0.00002771703,0.001422924,0.6013436,0.000526391,0.0009967658,0.362656,0.002480218,0.02857191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005575033,0.0001259437,0.001645892,0.00329892,0.00005296816,0.001055748,0.4667378,0.005274161,0.00347327,0.3880078,0.1301904,0.00008124779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4140742,0.0135794,0.1197926,0.07301465,0.002792818,0.0004636791,0.0001373083,0.0002526513,0.3758926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849834,0.001531496,0.008830605,0.001000147,0.0002040948,0.000116343,0.00003034082,0.0000923129,0.003211302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04454815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.235596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580875","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0103","title":"<i>Logos</i> in the Flux of Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Flux (metallurgy); Philosophy; Chemistry; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04114067469432026,"gpt":0.2956897383847379,"spread":0.2545490636904177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002134118,0.0002482734,0.0002850015,0.001464381,0.005663511,0.008120403,0.0005813758,0.001700247,0.005084666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002509596,0.0001546781,0.0001671171,0.001362648,0.04367527,0.009574554,0.002995197,0.003777764,0.0004970718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004356519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00162741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002082267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001986775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979741,0.001561491,0.00002977194,0.0001327562,0.0001874997,0.0001143722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982814,0.001039215,0.0001990318,0.0001766174,0.0001679259,0.0001359431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012659,0.000006853681,0.0001555897,0.0000283697,0.000001353586,0.00005823351,0.02101339,0.00004112589,0.0001340262,0.9729873,0.003670893,0.001890233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001277451,0.00002301389,0.0006913925,0.0003461208,0.00000607511,0.0002180388,0.04613767,0.0003443273,0.0002974649,0.6350147,0.3168907,0.00001782087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07341006,0.0119175,0.0172719,0.1038666,0.001845261,0.00004145856,0.0001214659,0.0001856237,0.7913402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792824,0.001961668,0.001317302,0.002625696,0.0004606799,0.00003762365,0.00003265428,0.00006654608,0.01421538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008120403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03160888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128780135","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0159","title":"Dialectic, Dialogue, and Difference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Western thought","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0415909414146712,"gpt":0.2464001392779251,"spread":0.2048091978632539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583469,0.0004682995,0.0005547106,0.002222035,0.005076252,0.01036737,0.000928906,0.00250279,0.005356984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009583194,0.0001854818,0.0002936193,0.00220076,0.05439638,0.009916184,0.006163697,0.004212556,0.0005439278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00542793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002444555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001247437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005953409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865568,0.0110723,0.0003022375,0.0007310284,0.001019274,0.0003182719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878178,0.009982553,0.0005131648,0.0007853781,0.0005839188,0.0003171337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008127379,0.00000540681,0.00005824277,0.00003272531,0.000002286958,0.00002789058,0.008939919,0.00006139174,0.00004921855,0.9873013,0.0008909117,0.002622519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001370637,0.0000119753,0.0001276187,0.0001431498,0.00000276441,0.00005268011,0.005688267,0.0001970927,0.0001022817,0.9353679,0.05828682,0.000005706324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0617049,0.04900347,0.046789,0.09069976,0.001526682,0.00008175827,0.0001209191,0.0001078621,0.7499658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792489,0.003525993,0.00427798,0.001938888,0.0004253944,0.00007371026,0.00003247335,0.00003214943,0.01044452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01036737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}