{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":31,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":31,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b551b66d04c7","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"}},"results":[{"id":"W4385464282","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.2.0199","title":"Violent Inheritance: Sexuality, Land, and Energy in Making the North American West","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Human sexuality; Sociology; Queer; Aesthetics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Suspect; Materialism; Gender studies; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nathan Stormer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.03952458556388738,"gpt":0.3133172136242772,"spread":0.2737926280603898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002343942,0.00008966164,0.0001567398,0.00005648474,0.0004854381,0.00004625247,0.0001109608,0.00001878614,0.000004252505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004651508,0.00006194649,0.00001779531,0.0009602854,0.000494297,0.00007591306,0.0001150062,0.00008576951,0.000003944259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002716564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002318347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002735548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006242328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991383,0.000143891,0.0001235119,0.000188377,0.0001762,0.0002297526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996006,0.0001678717,0.00006861909,0.00009624333,0.00001832078,0.00004830581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008890151,0.0000257916,0.8075368,0.00001677802,0.00001845028,0.00001083394,0.01716906,0.00000654993,0.000001179254,0.1235627,0.0002377184,0.05140523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001805149,0.0000602439,0.9504067,0.00002255709,0.000008462601,0.000001142026,0.003226091,0.00009149897,3.02948e-7,0.01615154,0.02965668,0.0001943145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8879727,0.002725318,0.00002716178,0.02581608,0.0004258628,0.0001510077,0.00001128007,0.0001799826,0.08269062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943553,0.004609959,0.00002366071,0.0004822499,0.0003609757,0.00002037769,0.000001441771,0.000005968494,0.0001400984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1428698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144331134","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0026","title":"Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Abstraction; Dialectic; Natural (archaeology); Rhetorical question; Representation (politics); Computer science; Argument map; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06192275201670944,"gpt":0.2646790907539224,"spread":0.202756338737213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001840588,0.0000648731,0.00008526605,0.00003668383,0.00006845728,0.00003216181,0.0002314215,0.00002428935,0.000001026081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001293518,0.00003904229,0.0000274348,0.0001080808,0.00001216437,0.0002150442,0.00008959475,0.00006409294,0.000007157895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001716019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001248847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003180705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001437885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999396,0.00004729412,0.0001350134,0.0001345309,0.0001959723,0.00009117788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995843,0.00003036806,0.00009262183,0.0002006855,0.00004344163,0.00004859508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002440976,0.0002027142,0.09427013,0.0002383602,0.0001124519,0.0000113529,0.01153281,0.00005925888,0.001520365,0.8659908,0.001312142,0.02472528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008970591,0.0009957209,0.4454331,0.0009029031,0.0001178555,0.0001801476,0.0006817928,0.2205013,0.008668357,0.2724776,0.03906811,0.002002538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486603,0.006737418,0.1133683,0.00917214,0.009874572,0.0007768687,0.000009609703,0.0001970064,0.01120377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.00002639741,0.0002341888,0.00008687194,0.0002060439,0.000004365712,9.469009e-7,0.000002739452,0.00008400245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5935131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1592098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550479137","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0107","title":"The Late Fourteenth-Century Renaissance of Anglo-Latin Rhetoric","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Vernacular; The Renaissance; Poetry; Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); Rhetorical question; Art; Classics; Middle Ages; The arts; History; Philosophy; Art history; Ancient history; Theology; Visual arts; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Camargo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03642942060721387,"gpt":0.2253976647327588,"spread":0.1889682441255449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002483549,0.0001542159,0.0001941557,0.00006359144,0.0005810379,0.00004693749,0.0001353242,0.00004251189,0.0001619963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002637454,0.00009723932,0.00008262866,0.00006105628,0.0003034462,0.0002367,0.00003909331,0.0001771538,0.00003857043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002522287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001319883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001561304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001047965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990696,0.00005626948,0.0002536692,0.0001227172,0.0002104919,0.0002872818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.0001214424,0.0001507238,0.0002318011,0.00007489953,0.0001159329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003877948,0.00006939393,0.0003664591,0.00007604282,0.0000369726,8.409046e-7,0.0209856,1.50987e-7,0.00005608069,0.9685042,0.008101759,0.001763742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041668,0.00005986941,0.0006574311,0.00004328012,0.00003815213,0.000001733621,0.0001811733,0.000004623307,0.00002653526,0.008555448,0.9900812,0.0001464204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05245374,0.1769842,0.000006441469,0.001258019,0.009165948,0.0002986677,0.00004897322,0.00008875761,0.7596952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891505,0.001752053,0.00001631344,0.0001465651,0.003859785,0.00001257534,0.000007659231,0.00001678227,0.005037828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4468933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096863564","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0148","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Argument map; Philosophy; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03117581066464339,"gpt":0.3006801159728074,"spread":0.269504305308164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002617421,0.0001933808,0.0002193398,0.0001410646,0.0001709588,0.00002699284,0.00007140215,0.0001522042,0.0006793478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004858327,0.0001578132,0.00005061316,0.0002857803,0.00004686186,0.0001343741,0.00005256977,0.000179453,0.0009275906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007499278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001168649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988002,0.0001234909,0.0002131053,0.0003242137,0.0001518931,0.0003871194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999294,0.00008714633,0.00006577775,0.0002135542,0.00003608977,0.0003034461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002086358,0.000576982,0.006707788,0.0000495063,0.0002351054,0.0000406664,0.01580289,3.600905e-7,0.0006909444,0.9561412,0.001986717,0.01755925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00364219,0.001684557,0.08559831,0.00008798892,0.0005163257,0.0006457533,0.00123106,0.000005385825,0.0007277504,0.8335985,0.07083903,0.001423148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6238887,0.01689965,0.0001278825,0.002012684,0.00413719,0.0004920446,0.00001014304,0.0001508569,0.3522808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953216,0.0002864023,0.00007336348,0.0009864946,0.0008648395,0.00006825705,0.00001022266,0.00002251261,0.002366261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3714329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059759980","doi":"10.1353/par.0.0000","title":"On Common Knowledge and &lt;i&gt;Ad Populum&lt;/i&gt;: Acceptance as Grounds for Acceptability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Nothing; Epistemology; Persuasion; Context (archaeology); Dialogic; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"David Godden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03908586551773882,"gpt":0.2801424699484467,"spread":0.2410566044307079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003280646,0.0002696642,0.0003616135,0.0001286346,0.0006574118,0.00009266118,0.0004043535,0.0001417304,0.00001642455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006106385,0.0002362004,0.0001071592,0.0003204409,0.00009732086,0.0006175767,0.0001607828,0.0001252519,0.00003699012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008763358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003850961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001190094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002848224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982694,0.000109673,0.0003660787,0.0006847802,0.0002487729,0.0003212376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998758,0.000232915,0.0001668065,0.0005566417,0.00009639463,0.0001892292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001149568,0.0006840057,0.005412554,0.0003353999,0.00005995812,0.00001186424,0.003805861,0.00001088176,0.001838958,0.9447982,0.003121463,0.03980585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005657828,0.001995075,0.4697509,0.0002161652,0.00007054556,0.0002129595,0.00001968718,0.02733727,0.0009825543,0.3540172,0.1377837,0.001956164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375536,0.0101135,0.0223757,0.001704799,0.003070418,0.001421271,0.00003089964,0.0003323712,0.02339748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997323,0.0005002188,0.001106112,0.0001539273,0.0004050692,0.00007826567,0.000009063392,0.00001737612,0.000406996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.590781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663408855","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Identity (music); Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03019749857148778,"gpt":0.2482754903876877,"spread":0.2180779918161999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001196477,0.00009046226,0.0001631694,0.00003480345,0.000428195,0.00005600986,0.000106767,0.00003864279,0.0001174581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002737074,0.0000502582,0.00003554351,0.00004685124,0.0006343778,0.0001770562,0.00008357887,0.0001535282,0.00001491715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008845471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005414186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008993568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004036275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994404,0.00005276414,0.0001759064,0.0001122877,0.0001295392,0.00008905418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.0001848955,0.00009589782,0.0001557676,0.000108953,0.00003025328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001390543,0.00002009491,0.000227339,0.00001762564,0.00003055029,6.113149e-8,0.01318463,1.171887e-7,0.000005073516,0.983286,0.00138368,0.001830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001854826,0.0001396122,0.006223265,0.00004942411,0.00008800307,0.000006005101,0.00687566,0.0001921222,0.00003239232,0.8549564,0.1293012,0.0002811468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2737241,0.05472147,0.00007447193,0.04006451,0.002030058,0.001055959,0.00001484536,0.0001114479,0.6282031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957052,0.002436766,0.00003302009,0.0002865405,0.0003585774,0.00005451147,0.000001714785,0.000004837785,0.001118825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3293373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243244020","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.2.0233","title":"Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Houdek","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2142616842438778,"gpt":0.2766817939204269,"spread":0.06242010967654907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001819213,0.0001392881,0.000177177,0.00008039206,0.0005147642,0.0002032134,0.00009643198,0.00004402915,0.00004112622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006872016,0.0001118441,0.00002869808,0.0000611318,0.0002454314,0.0002283266,0.0001115404,0.000124291,0.00004132612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003417554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002408827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001837544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001109006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991878,0.00006940859,0.000194945,0.00019395,0.0001817191,0.0001722024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00008110803,0.00006268622,0.0001896352,0.0001914774,0.0001833056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001132439,0.00002931254,0.0005597947,0.00001059313,0.00003189367,9.73253e-7,0.007823907,1.278662e-7,0.000001303789,0.9788682,0.009346076,0.003316499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007537903,0.0001790492,0.0004648595,0.0000163374,0.00003621835,0.00001655311,0.002654229,0.0001072111,0.000003005819,0.5675015,0.4279376,0.0003297175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08009256,0.02653337,0.0002479521,0.02324862,0.001847147,0.0002857579,0.00001557771,0.0003167639,0.8674123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955404,0.0007803571,0.00007874865,0.0003745751,0.001253883,0.00002741234,0.000009002536,0.00001252255,0.001923054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9154479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4560871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891414723","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.51.3.0269","title":"Designing Soundscapes for Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Soundscape; Argumentative; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Normative; Epistemology; Sound (geography); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History; Acoustics","authors":[{"name":"Justin Eckstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08313284929350859,"gpt":0.2801152351405932,"spread":0.1969823858470846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009330949,0.00008117992,0.0000959011,0.00004452669,0.0009034669,0.00007652495,0.00007305923,0.00001741787,0.00009226472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001416183,0.0000663133,0.00003338514,0.00002608442,0.0001849984,0.0001509286,0.00002921495,0.00003270459,0.00003812854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001231943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006480232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009005341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001053026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999568,0.00001713825,0.0001218203,0.0001196422,0.00006598857,0.0001073413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996039,0.00009206314,0.00005664269,0.00009867883,0.000122044,0.00002668428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002041194,0.00002288075,0.00006573033,0.00001668817,0.00003498662,5.467751e-8,0.020478,1.004118e-7,0.00004933782,0.9734203,0.003213465,0.002678016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004928298,0.0002975778,0.00009400269,0.00002506108,0.00004633077,0.000001298946,0.00337676,0.00008254523,0.0002659057,0.4115018,0.5836053,0.0002105629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02801554,0.008420079,0.0178686,0.007377477,0.003775969,0.0009183808,0.00003819726,0.0003855315,0.9332002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945315,0.0001731512,0.0007013252,0.0002499048,0.002313096,0.00006681685,0.000006588533,0.000009223421,0.001948377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6948829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89977932","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0533","title":"The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Target audience; Perspective (graphical); Audience reception; Function (biology); Audience analysis; Audience participation; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Media studies; Advertising; Philosophy; Social science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ralph H. Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0200355414744477,"gpt":0.2300781494553129,"spread":0.2100426079808652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001090329,0.00006506515,0.00008557539,0.00002980546,0.0002199176,0.00003483091,0.0001267106,0.00001985852,0.0000971647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003827776,0.00003506108,0.00002698257,0.00005057591,0.0002916742,0.0003199487,0.00002882761,0.00008041859,0.00001206213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001580488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001615708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001733809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009587068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994969,0.00003717825,0.0001977173,0.00007753947,0.0001039226,0.00008668053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994048,0.0002333248,0.0001382029,0.0001160133,0.00009237837,0.0000153071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001025302,0.0000313757,0.0008001258,0.000004996055,0.0000117225,2.70172e-8,0.05508204,0.00000276277,0.00005177058,0.9419203,0.00003714111,0.002047473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001061239,0.00005116134,0.0152064,0.00002092694,0.000008357186,2.380718e-7,0.01433479,0.00008672111,0.0001320155,0.9691849,0.0008222626,0.00004607673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6984416,0.005551395,0.000006307384,0.01013944,0.0006782718,0.0004289531,0.00002667633,0.00001338698,0.284714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.0002629668,0.00001466397,0.00008983596,0.0003322689,0.00003198465,0.00000352738,0.000002764399,0.00003700141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3007834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2621012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176353597","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109","title":"Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1200682433845068,"gpt":0.2821851329781331,"spread":0.1621168895936262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002066445,0.0001026065,0.0002032579,0.00001776468,0.0003530952,0.00004752143,0.00006793224,0.00004984651,0.00002133904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000314207,0.00006768633,0.00006971494,0.00002452599,0.0002960378,0.00008051359,0.00004087311,0.0001261324,0.00000133154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004552471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002569459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003853222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004952906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999422,0.00004832958,0.0001605001,0.0001620348,0.00008044597,0.000126759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.0002941233,0.00007792765,0.0001458638,0.0001330166,0.00003473378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001637535,0.00003558089,0.00007266035,0.000191577,0.0000727957,0.000001097779,0.03304473,7.758651e-7,0.0001066618,0.9651049,0.0002697752,0.001083114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484925,0.000130772,0.0001280451,0.0001175943,0.0001428157,0.000007510947,0.00642367,0.0001063783,0.0006881587,0.9052901,0.08622849,0.0001880245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1987961,0.02752005,0.0002996657,0.01269866,0.002074276,0.0007510124,0.0002311046,0.00008411951,0.757545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954314,0.001433063,0.00007074618,0.0002789967,0.001139553,0.00001429571,0.000006605601,0.00001217085,0.001613197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2760169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322747704","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337","title":"Ways of Being Reasonable:","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Windsor; Rhetoric; Citation; Download; State (computer science); Publishing; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Algorithm; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0437671729541827,"gpt":0.2906555638302812,"spread":0.2468883908760985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003718021,0.0001127641,0.0001862309,0.00008919957,0.0003824583,0.00002648921,0.0002160406,0.000174011,0.0001287198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000441746,0.0001053256,0.00006214844,0.0003149354,0.0005567556,0.0002072205,0.00005572428,0.0003606411,0.00003440702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001986152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008066034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003172757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002926491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988203,0.00006207947,0.0001974454,0.0002217052,0.0003373573,0.0003610944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991726,0.0002105139,0.00006643635,0.0002069255,0.0001055268,0.0002380228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004787433,0.00003502321,0.0007758855,0.00002159789,0.000009069771,0.000005478397,0.001614249,9.762007e-8,0.0005254411,0.9958865,0.0004120696,0.000709791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360323,0.00003743477,0.0004104726,0.00001509506,0.00001455443,0.000002013241,0.00004784549,0.00000510501,0.0003002518,0.9361426,0.06275474,0.0001338771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0736593,0.0001314495,0.0000482233,0.05891433,0.0009339956,0.0001737178,0.00001104752,0.0001117128,0.8660162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956728,0.0000428804,0.0003487765,0.001345072,0.002428683,0.000007181198,0.000002037782,0.00001276618,0.0001398233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4295052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769221086","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0566","title":"Replicating Reasons: Arguments, Memes, and the Cognitive Environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Persuasion; Epistemology; Cognition; Memetics; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03189146961181358,"gpt":0.2912759381567086,"spread":0.259384468544895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003641221,0.0001289368,0.0001635193,0.00002529507,0.0007345332,0.00007524919,0.0001285413,0.00006613349,0.0001547733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001042992,0.00008296291,0.00004461343,0.00002087948,0.0003476476,0.00009284543,0.00009597673,0.0001441464,0.00008379025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009709394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003750026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009313538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001362807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991165,0.0001192792,0.0001442352,0.0003402511,0.0001146266,0.0001650683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991418,0.0001545163,0.0001827164,0.0004408353,0.00001582769,0.0000643707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000903895,0.0003405467,0.008475636,0.00006387131,0.0006679056,0.00005663829,0.01251113,7.386732e-8,0.0001095472,0.8015508,0.0007579312,0.174562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01598359,0.0004034968,0.1692815,0.0002917198,0.001045049,0.0002502664,0.003885214,0.00004258947,0.0003277459,0.785852,0.02168084,0.0009559346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3284936,0.03513176,0.0004825767,0.009146448,0.001132759,0.001296662,0.00007517797,0.00009294076,0.6241481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965608,0.001337704,0.00003869414,0.0004348467,0.0004906118,0.000132932,0.00001085891,0.00001267842,0.0009808375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6680672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5649509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926220562","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0570","title":"Figural Logic in Gregor Mendel's “Experiments on Plant Hybrids”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Botanical Research and Chemistry","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Synecdoche; Antithesis; Philosophy; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Linguistics; Metonymy; Literature; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04514377850033875,"gpt":0.2472888029777974,"spread":0.2021450244774586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006169015,0.0001152585,0.0001253919,0.000007185247,0.00009005872,0.00004043322,0.0001452773,0.00006709301,0.000529318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003384595,0.00004050778,0.0000397825,0.0001317388,0.00004574938,0.00008748866,0.00005326386,0.0001637893,0.0001120162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002641127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002997825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008211805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007254674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.00002911248,0.000128454,0.0002484213,0.0001851776,0.0002898498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963,0.0001065334,0.00002534662,0.00004416069,0.00001732288,0.0001766144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003209682,0.001259134,0.0110083,0.00006571048,0.00004910332,0.0001124093,0.0001425453,0.000002192892,0.8240743,0.03114749,0.008644356,0.1231735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001597621,0.002413398,0.2440052,0.0002123169,0.00001004925,0.00003016491,0.0002103388,0.0004724423,0.04723062,0.6914783,0.01115097,0.001188663],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980329,0.0005476244,1.227654e-7,0.004913223,0.00005898613,0.0001400992,0.00002056213,0.00002613835,0.01396427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998753,0.0001441185,0.000007011644,0.0005303394,0.0002722943,0.00003739946,0.00002400826,6.69836e-7,0.0002311993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5795661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189575033","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.2.0156","title":"The Absence of Rhetorical Theory in Richard Rorty's Linguistic Pragmatism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rhetorical question; Linguistic turn; Rhetoric; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Danisch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02769138526835404,"gpt":0.2429658997923705,"spread":0.2152745145240165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003999498,0.000158643,0.0002050979,0.0001000403,0.0003968399,0.00009976234,0.0002141369,0.00005594241,0.0002324828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000260852,0.0001051451,0.0000530752,0.0000983728,0.00037657,0.0002419442,0.00005422031,0.0002145989,0.00008985719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003187733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003278243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001689647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002027514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.0001259997,0.0004015236,0.0002030974,0.0001953406,0.0002388477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987817,0.0006053873,0.0001659209,0.0002525243,0.0001219261,0.00007255658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001259245,0.00007698409,0.0002553625,0.00005568991,0.00001703654,0.000001075914,0.01292995,0.000001382819,0.00001411749,0.9822708,0.0004982075,0.003866828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001682224,0.00006514422,0.003403812,0.00007328732,0.00001077164,0.000003290581,0.0003785302,0.0001015898,0.00001426282,0.9836805,0.01195184,0.0001487056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2154994,0.01772618,0.0001609898,0.01194484,0.008882657,0.001444133,0.00003289549,0.0001671945,0.7441416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972897,0.0004920699,0.0000430477,0.0001208022,0.001304084,0.00009319867,0.00000410809,0.0000141467,0.0006388348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4287694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224075577","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0066","title":"Mind the Gap: <i>Kairos</i> in the Spaces of Silence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Silence; Order (exchange); Moment (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04794473051460189,"gpt":0.2324774843342745,"spread":0.1845327538196725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004238882,0.00007226902,0.0001110406,0.00005230957,0.0006284957,0.00003534516,0.0002145116,0.000007610018,0.000805582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001012919,0.00003680713,0.00005676341,0.0001153916,0.0002793718,0.00006832228,0.00005310061,0.0001519389,0.000004048446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006628715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000816891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005436927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002999567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999292,0.0002240572,0.0001268814,0.0001054184,0.0001625844,0.00008912278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995736,0.0001855296,0.00007363811,0.0001395101,0.00001661984,0.00001108625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002375882,0.00007307196,0.0001708063,0.00001064921,0.00001784393,0.000003397252,0.07884654,0.00002040345,0.00006439788,0.9199848,0.0003131236,0.0004712279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004240329,0.0003299658,0.0002773288,0.00002328032,0.00009286125,0.0000103988,0.1126833,0.00008724986,0.000158351,0.6719926,0.2136853,0.0002353211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8323128,0.003443462,0.000003406089,0.00813482,0.0002999078,0.0001631704,0.00006061282,0.000007514588,0.1555744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979196,0.00005617066,0.000001401005,0.0003655856,0.0003102578,0.00002356221,0.00000257287,0.000003377706,0.00131753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2479922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8820558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408997826","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0076","title":"Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative Cruelty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Silence; Argumentative; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1458905830559336,"gpt":0.3381840382233853,"spread":0.1922934551674517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009446011,0.0001133865,0.0001959924,0.00003271215,0.005878789,0.00001525037,0.0002246834,0.00003353953,0.000681274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006598912,0.00007814296,0.0001048116,0.0002293654,0.0007358788,0.00006808594,0.0002813561,0.0002451341,0.00002830352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001322264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006014836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001774159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001319781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983508,0.0007222181,0.000115354,0.0002573315,0.0003237465,0.0002305682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992508,0.0004276943,0.00009110182,0.0001420128,0.00003032687,0.00005804764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001181319,0.0001552098,0.003503613,0.0000327174,0.001440798,0.00003677176,0.2896042,0.00001923882,0.0000216437,0.6587508,0.04458517,0.001731706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004822685,0.0002491646,0.01268599,0.000005018107,0.0007095918,0.00001806258,0.04292799,0.000003771298,0.0000375467,0.1918503,0.7506049,0.0004253664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09873857,0.1362208,0.00005900037,0.1387893,0.005315294,0.001288152,0.0003660889,0.0002284889,0.6189943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844959,0.0006841077,0.00002064652,0.001156963,0.0002375754,0.0002004838,0.000002840434,0.000005872893,0.01319558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008435593","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0054","title":"Guide(s) for the Perplexed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Consciousness; Sociology; Phenomenon; Social life; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alan Blum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1780648351725243,"gpt":0.296879688243058,"spread":0.1188148530705338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001969372,0.00008540001,0.0001061107,0.00002255114,0.0006584937,0.00007229091,0.0001644433,0.00001698967,0.00003725084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004795331,0.00004890827,0.00004779346,0.0000257752,0.0001798751,0.00008891241,0.00006764416,0.00005485913,0.00003101047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000158649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001773434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006607903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995393,0.0000196868,0.0001316913,0.0001023763,0.00009932161,0.0001076713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993413,0.0001855569,0.00004614264,0.0002243882,0.0001558805,0.00004671888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001369555,0.00001661469,0.00002220887,0.000006174824,0.00003473122,8.993763e-8,0.01415426,8.395958e-7,5.151577e-7,0.9243725,0.05800572,0.003372664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002565389,0.00005201561,0.00002596255,0.000004202358,0.00002497086,0.000001047288,0.002862057,0.00006996314,0.000001077436,0.09859864,0.8980286,0.00007492922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008391057,0.03085668,0.0004465908,0.02750567,0.00221066,0.0004427005,0.00002496236,0.0001247282,0.9375489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736234,0.0007231817,0.0000853692,0.000611869,0.002080542,0.0001243871,0.000004155911,0.00001078213,0.02273632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5064667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939457100","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.52.1.0078","title":"<i>Combat–Débat</i>: Parataxis and the Unavowable Community; or, The Joke","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Trope (literature); Politics; Identity (music); Presidency; Alterity; Sociology; Subordination (linguistics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Art","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tad Lemieux","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0282866409356068,"gpt":0.2124171622419334,"spread":0.1841305213063266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003697281,0.0001637804,0.0002139653,0.00003246543,0.001193714,0.0003644652,0.000236686,0.00004333428,0.0003828483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002195254,0.00006203834,0.00005460127,0.00005580442,0.0006356954,0.0002161926,0.0001043365,0.0004431459,0.00006355377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006065718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001253783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003832568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000163461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999141,0.0002200071,0.0001679622,0.0001388278,0.0001377879,0.0001943742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989089,0.0005362786,0.0000492763,0.0004045665,0.0000535317,0.00004746237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007661834,0.00003704408,0.00003671945,0.0000622938,0.00003751098,0.000001703413,0.02522919,3.681311e-7,0.000004318812,0.968995,0.005050411,0.0004688443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026729,0.000172793,0.00009556561,0.00005349017,0.00005067685,0.00001664644,0.001769255,0.00003302434,0.000007524796,0.293438,0.7031825,0.0001537423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09843151,0.02461808,0.000003965489,0.01993816,0.001926099,0.0007053982,0.00006041129,0.00008971185,0.8542266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771336,0.0005385993,0.000004355653,0.003208865,0.0007708738,0.00002662259,0.000009544495,0.00001239761,0.01829515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234122","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0333","title":"Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Autonomy; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09365532945548626,"gpt":0.2821873199907969,"spread":0.1885319905353106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001730667,0.0001275773,0.0001830162,0.00006712498,0.000297258,0.0001474383,0.00004880406,0.00006095021,0.00003436248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000138693,0.0001008336,0.00006954242,0.00001975715,0.0003407756,0.0001674586,0.0000239911,0.0001393025,0.00001701582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001463538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004006421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002151405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001304228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993868,0.00002061459,0.0001464362,0.0002406027,0.00005686968,0.000148619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995592,0.0002121618,0.00002708464,0.00009221247,0.000047382,0.00006195904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009085036,0.00001528359,0.00001166452,0.0003272072,0.00005584846,0.000002927582,0.01235807,9.555494e-8,0.00002072961,0.9835312,0.001027061,0.002640829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001459594,0.00008740662,0.00001113109,0.00004111888,0.00004048432,0.000003357682,0.0001469128,0.00008912605,0.00001431023,0.5044408,0.4948758,0.0001036737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04615983,0.1164706,0.001225586,0.0445119,0.01742365,0.001578431,0.0004010788,0.000855135,0.7713737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886908,0.0002642025,0.0000750446,0.000491511,0.003275327,0.00004753842,0.000011616,0.00002007774,0.007123878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4111876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234222","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0270","title":"Autonomy and Argumentation: An Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Autonomy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"John Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katharina Stevens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04752464318364486,"gpt":0.3420196998847242,"spread":0.2944950567010794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003681942,0.00007584463,0.00007805303,0.00006661966,0.0004576469,0.000154198,0.00004918642,0.0000898961,0.00005040842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004761744,0.00006982327,0.00002041774,0.0001774192,0.0003363171,0.0005499527,0.00001846377,0.0001725735,0.00002140302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006270374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009008942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008681253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009928772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992426,0.00009122018,0.0001014933,0.0002469604,0.0001488426,0.0001688974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996187,0.00008851082,0.00001242175,0.00007500667,0.00002631318,0.0001790272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000377903,0.00001532446,0.00003574454,0.00003534655,0.000009152939,0.000002767659,0.005766326,5.885229e-7,0.00001386094,0.9902371,0.0001397619,0.003740259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005244288,0.00004682677,0.0001917155,0.00001029393,0.00001742303,0.000003592388,0.0001911804,0.00007118559,0.00001639427,0.8288983,0.1704103,0.00009035486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08166575,0.007739555,0.0004884868,0.4955848,0.005566897,0.0004289122,0.00002151473,0.000716664,0.4077874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991873,0.0003321145,0.000123087,0.000352781,0.006880187,0.000008352627,0.000005756601,0.000006763597,0.0004179465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3519896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038055792","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326","title":"The Moral Sense in the Time of the Recluse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recluse; Rhetoric; Darwin (ADL); Environmental ethics; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Poetry","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06630831190702248,"gpt":0.2260373133054254,"spread":0.1597290013984029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001828637,0.000118538,0.0001447383,0.00001276691,0.0004114571,0.00005944024,0.0002668778,0.00003379253,0.0001017281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008275334,0.00004720006,0.0001079011,0.0001000273,0.0004611201,0.00006069924,0.00009260085,0.0002550026,0.00004551739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007525793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001056644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002169408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005717266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990203,0.0001980325,0.0002257278,0.0001439674,0.0002213366,0.0001905874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.0003439046,0.00005976758,0.0002139869,0.00002935401,0.00006132651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004446029,0.00004740509,0.00007024658,0.00001979288,0.00001431975,0.000003308379,0.00741346,9.635016e-7,0.000008357198,0.9908255,0.001357634,0.0001945549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003198633,0.0001119281,0.000472405,0.0000291597,0.00003051656,0.000005179984,0.0002868782,0.0001543992,0.00003060391,0.7093855,0.2890552,0.0001184296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1401836,0.003682746,0.00000124566,0.5139025,0.001214012,0.0006893217,0.0001226401,0.00005394861,0.34015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926667,0.0001262133,0.000001760658,0.004998533,0.001824999,0.000008034403,0.000002008707,0.000008367288,0.0003633468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3164637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392845246","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.3-4.0274","title":"<i>Kairos</i> , The Sire of Beauty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Beauty; Rhetoric; Harmony (color); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Intuition; Antinomy; Art; Theology; Visual arts","authors":[{"name":"SeungJung Kim","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05204658885694838,"gpt":0.2298340042324031,"spread":0.1777874153754547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001561405,0.0001242995,0.0001744028,0.0000647542,0.0004204437,0.00003972815,0.0001566357,0.00003831224,0.0001338599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002747955,0.00007443655,0.0001004342,0.0001498912,0.0004511762,0.0001065244,0.00007743941,0.0001441001,0.000121893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007288543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001105701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001978563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001422958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992243,0.00003499243,0.0001964136,0.0001697178,0.0001799169,0.000194633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994377,0.00017657,0.00007090854,0.0002120617,0.00004291203,0.0000598369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001442794,0.00003681781,0.00004409216,0.00004761455,0.00002636367,0.000003393081,0.00405292,0.000001746612,0.00003800574,0.9901349,0.004537328,0.001062412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001872858,0.00006754763,0.0003135359,0.00002553645,0.00002649924,0.000001531145,0.0001681565,0.00004661952,0.000066374,0.690707,0.3082781,0.0001118342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07318209,0.001668904,0.000003737312,0.03048363,0.002271011,0.0002936567,0.0001279857,0.0002931728,0.8916758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994509,0.0001743528,0.00000243784,0.0003937237,0.002374369,0.00001358199,0.00001072625,0.00001416137,0.002507679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3233756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768152958","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0528","title":"On Rhetoric and the School of Philosophy Without Tears","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Philosophy; Transitive relation; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06001572697176672,"gpt":0.2746537719903597,"spread":0.214638045018593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231589,0.0003263167,0.0005361856,0.0001421899,0.002062794,0.000370237,0.0004941103,0.000128366,0.0001494494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002872961,0.0002117792,0.0001747061,0.00003040428,0.002702025,0.0004021615,0.000197702,0.000495073,0.00008034693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002361357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003719486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002363161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002760468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983589,0.0001181135,0.0003992286,0.0004282437,0.0004023808,0.0002931023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981799,0.0002197704,0.0004110142,0.0008533989,0.0001536137,0.0001823071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003356722,0.0000783274,0.0002179164,0.0001362277,0.000111627,0.000004263614,0.005199103,7.177273e-7,0.00001016488,0.992999,0.0006453799,0.0002616349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024523,0.0002199907,0.0007508908,0.0001834439,0.0001163081,0.000008176315,0.0001066675,0.00003599433,0.00001590793,0.9773861,0.0184181,0.0003061316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07995539,0.002993422,0.000005345335,0.02010439,0.003247462,0.0005374218,0.00008565269,0.00008680646,0.8929841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921355,0.0007591744,0.00001512434,0.0007865603,0.004255476,0.00002954759,0.000004176053,0.00003745205,0.001977006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037169852","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0299","title":"The Suicidal State: In Advance of an American Requiem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Racism; State of exception; Writ; State (computer science); Criminology; Context (archaeology); Biosocial theory; Sociology; Racialization; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Politics; Law; Psychoanalysis; History; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01224720338316971,"gpt":0.2551643427118993,"spread":0.2429171393287296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009173596,0.0000855233,0.0001143588,0.000007617699,0.00007163598,0.000008590376,0.0001287298,0.00003621518,7.145562e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003744205,0.00006589715,0.00003894044,0.0001081064,0.0002158555,0.000003499795,0.00005313287,0.00007276987,7.798545e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004515988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002465536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000236654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003187211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993702,0.00004649259,0.0001481998,0.0002167191,0.00007778557,0.0001405649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.00001283985,0.00007098084,0.000177509,0.00003102728,0.00007998787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002137444,0.0006045677,0.06663846,0.0003206152,0.0002893264,0.00002675536,0.0120349,0.001455501,0.7862563,0.01456682,0.00149737,0.114172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008846431,0.01757214,0.1459725,0.00008439063,0.0001278183,0.00003966318,0.005808313,0.003878206,0.4761855,0.1052437,0.2330282,0.00321319],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945546,0.003147341,0.0001451607,0.001101319,0.00007757055,0.00008566512,0.00001220761,0.000005160038,0.0008709675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963615,0.002708168,0.0002403127,0.0003441139,0.0002848468,0.000004926786,0.000009752015,0.00001010312,0.00003630916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3100707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2687208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321509394","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.4.0386","title":"The Erotic Madness of Writing in Plato’s <i>Phaedrus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Analogy; Possessive; Literature; Philosophy; Function (biology); Orientation (vector space); Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Nathaniel R. Street","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02964764073518852,"gpt":0.2163285235948449,"spread":0.1866808828596563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003217539,0.0001219519,0.0001920582,0.00008077357,0.001000138,0.0000484954,0.000200645,0.00002034172,0.000156156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089526,0.00008965564,0.00007314989,0.0001228605,0.0002807815,0.000105869,0.0001715486,0.0002648021,0.000004424731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003243115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001855786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004017685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004568458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989446,0.00009796603,0.0003255896,0.0001874829,0.0002354352,0.0002089166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993482,0.0003019811,0.0001064252,0.0001704153,0.00002826282,0.0000447387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005159204,0.0001002643,0.0001914159,0.00003964296,0.00001549193,0.000009243877,0.003453658,0.00001372188,0.00001841647,0.9944949,0.0002923131,0.001319307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005808808,0.0001434164,0.0001849267,0.00003169532,0.00001842062,0.000009023663,0.001198752,0.0001155641,0.00004129038,0.8209449,0.1765435,0.0001876804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3021549,0.01008038,0.000003741103,0.01637857,0.003138186,0.0006076938,0.0001565681,0.0001032582,0.6673768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982706,0.00008553327,0.000002800062,0.0002385028,0.0008120998,0.00005237921,0.000005182621,0.00001438981,0.000518532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7692358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414466736","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0069","title":"Normative Pluralism and the Other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Perspective (graphical); Pluralism (philosophy); Modal; Ethical theories","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02072143016879495,"gpt":0.3066598488529468,"spread":0.2859384186841519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388624,0.000108121,0.0001685476,0.00007059857,0.0007492179,0.0000753963,0.0001579384,0.00007682482,0.00003689587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002258831,0.00006953057,0.00004708361,0.0002840925,0.00128649,0.0001641029,0.00008020501,0.0001572195,0.00002657163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003493547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004470114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007832833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000471908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989886,0.0002692077,0.0001481749,0.0001739994,0.0001771472,0.0002428644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992408,0.0004255503,0.00003824051,0.0001355194,0.00005081711,0.0001090907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002466661,0.00001252375,0.0001453136,0.00001123915,0.00002399465,7.239294e-7,0.007198868,1.813384e-7,0.000001378271,0.9913365,0.0004577921,0.0007868741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000578339,0.00001054717,0.0003385658,0.000025422,0.00002287587,4.592854e-7,0.0003029376,0.00001357841,0.000008007581,0.9084719,0.09014101,0.00008640662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005411052,0.001957821,0.00006471537,0.1605187,0.0004662341,0.0002838852,0.00001089381,0.00006439124,0.8312224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993565,0.0002271086,0.00002764231,0.004271095,0.000672712,0.0000229538,6.107962e-7,0.000005660388,0.001207238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5762454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128779945","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0258","title":"The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Audience measurement; Craft","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08286538395446588,"gpt":0.2937740186613564,"spread":0.2109086347068906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001333018,0.0001446491,0.0002252957,0.00008449781,0.0009482013,0.00009509922,0.00009787286,0.00003602388,0.00001530946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006317551,0.00009962889,0.000035069,0.0001154765,0.0007283416,0.0001565314,0.00008423513,0.0001299588,7.796637e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003292819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005744707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005028154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003095251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992202,0.00005739659,0.0002909087,0.0001718097,0.000138034,0.0001216458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988761,0.000722968,0.00009815218,0.0001557916,0.0001075516,0.00003946027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007841788,0.0000565264,0.0004536607,0.00005666225,0.0001293841,8.684406e-8,0.06440258,4.363808e-7,0.0000131535,0.9220243,0.002020459,0.01076434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001603799,0.0005061707,0.004829714,0.0002055697,0.0002201643,0.000007308654,0.01699488,0.0002844731,0.0001138729,0.121825,0.8530731,0.000335984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8014733,0.0726184,0.0002283222,0.04642517,0.001088207,0.001296803,0.0001523957,0.0001068682,0.07661055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990231,0.007712607,0.00005565555,0.0001359239,0.000153978,0.00001927883,0.000009544107,0.000006332635,0.001675707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580755","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0030","title":"Figuring the Topos: Finding Common Ground in Cognitive Environments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Topos theory; Figuring; Common ground; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Art; Psychology; Communication; Astronomy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Michael Joseph Regier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05827019360311416,"gpt":0.2696944171496502,"spread":0.211424223546536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001833526,0.0001049548,0.0001188393,0.00009578539,0.0003659172,0.0001555013,0.00006701591,0.00002124689,0.0005193898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007105392,0.00006685676,0.0000535918,0.00006547052,0.0001728549,0.0002144069,0.00003513235,0.0001740907,0.00005822554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002491321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003885005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003221871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004456731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999422,0.00007183995,0.0001283408,0.0001663621,0.00008700149,0.0001244534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996787,0.000206189,0.00002268819,0.00006433108,0.000004010528,0.00002413718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001597585,0.00003519506,0.0001775257,0.00003338545,0.00007545981,0.00002613016,0.03028605,0.000002607781,0.00003960714,0.9661456,0.00003390937,0.003128538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004356564,0.0001327151,0.001157878,0.0005829146,0.0001736285,0.000008254469,0.008428724,0.0004341957,0.0002002045,0.9112169,0.0768242,0.0004047473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7094769,0.007336321,0.00002688722,0.001697176,0.0005904271,0.0001860186,0.00003317359,0.00004941917,0.2806036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950148,0.0001842551,7.874598e-7,0.0001299901,0.0007214101,0.00001509585,0.000008286282,0.000008647803,0.003916653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2855379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5686954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163034977","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.3.0267","title":"Standing on a Bridge Between Cultures: Translation and Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Bridge (graph theory); Bridging (networking); Perspective (graphical)","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jiaxing Li","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06644373872172389,"gpt":0.3174488902698804,"spread":0.2510051515481566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007035327,0.00009254447,0.0001317914,0.0001162472,0.00037421,0.00009813312,0.0000299995,0.00001976903,0.00003811745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008176402,0.00007096332,0.00003133852,0.00004829668,0.0001020657,0.0001354522,0.00001214282,0.00005961239,0.000003447213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001621313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003915844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002940262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003972698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995367,0.00002173094,0.0001166394,0.0001523669,0.00009104011,0.00008154046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998063,0.00006198097,0.00003504838,0.0000550695,0.00002227825,0.00001932519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000162999,0.00002473635,0.001013968,0.00006616096,0.0001937935,0.000001232873,0.02684375,0.000001473309,0.00001150479,0.9528521,0.0005834941,0.01839149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003314426,0.0005448142,0.02316027,0.0009523521,0.001793662,0.000001525254,0.01667465,0.0002007128,0.0003058284,0.7771732,0.1747957,0.001082845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1825619,0.01169373,0.0003351321,0.00676264,0.0005891888,0.0003353725,0.00008463852,0.0001100405,0.7975273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982011,0.0003141674,0.00001586281,0.0001571709,0.0005692756,0.000008729409,0.00001824789,0.000004444636,0.0007109586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580875","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0103","title":"<i>Logos</i> in the Flux of Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Flux (metallurgy); Philosophy; Chemistry; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04114067469432026,"gpt":0.2956897383847379,"spread":0.2545490636904177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002817442,0.0001184121,0.0001844761,0.0001495041,0.00005844792,0.00001441684,0.0002034363,0.0001123155,0.0001906347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001675547,0.0000797438,0.00006623434,0.0003891388,0.0001730258,0.00006799341,0.00003673512,0.0002799937,0.0002077298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008315105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001799725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002390506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001582685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999094,0.0001296742,0.0002376779,0.0002516209,0.00009899301,0.0001880184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994879,0.0001737181,0.00003383881,0.000249045,0.00001172637,0.00004380809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006494442,0.0001232314,0.0005537046,0.00007777994,0.0000758678,0.00004224967,0.00366981,0.000001167103,0.00007524147,0.9913739,0.002804386,0.001137749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000429301,0.0002081603,0.005610148,0.00004423444,0.00004161823,0.00003735191,0.0001894718,0.00001283765,0.00001008456,0.9694768,0.0237916,0.0001484602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1455035,0.03446384,0.0000372289,0.01580208,0.003029366,0.0002700828,0.0000249726,0.00008337769,0.8007855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978817,0.00009029058,0.000009846661,0.0009669688,0.0007429002,0.00003044288,0.000006950082,0.00001143866,0.0002594515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8523782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3251858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128780135","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0159","title":"Dialectic, Dialogue, and Difference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Western thought","authors":[{"name":"Christopher W. Tindale","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0415909414146712,"gpt":0.2464001392779251,"spread":0.2048091978632539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005417631,0.0001009741,0.0001507102,0.00006908435,0.0005941445,0.00008004964,0.00008522617,0.00002457469,0.00003330455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002492386,0.00007820934,0.0000233059,0.00004971627,0.0002652265,0.00006803747,0.0001172523,0.00009061705,0.000009016944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000103965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001041918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005647831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003553797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995374,0.00003124562,0.0001218782,0.0001473271,0.00005803335,0.0001040935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995944,0.0001371781,0.00003272087,0.0001577114,0.00004594076,0.00003206131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008077881,0.00002651911,0.001032469,0.00002782267,0.00003282584,3.391478e-7,0.005117489,2.619864e-8,0.000005050211,0.9865057,0.0009066497,0.006337028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003863841,0.00006098413,0.009041468,0.00005449055,0.00005382548,0.000001369246,0.0006382441,0.00002342014,0.000009005982,0.6116409,0.3778884,0.0002015496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03988337,0.02544866,0.000114671,0.007657469,0.00122784,0.0001701959,0.00001133105,0.0001178846,0.9253685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873956,0.003461841,0.00001553137,0.0004416023,0.0003289463,0.00002610482,0.000002215958,0.000004274948,0.008323883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4569739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}