{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":61,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":61,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ef2b842f8668","filters":{"venue":"Political Research Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W1993559288","doi":"10.1177/1065912910379227","title":"Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":636,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Mainstreaming; Gender mainstreaming; Sociology; Power (physics); Frame (networking); Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Gender equality; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1687916133329364,"gpt":0.5278332544710013,"spread":0.3590416411380648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301807,0.0001212436,0.0001454794,0.0003397196,0.0005441217,0.0001634356,0.0001828155,0.0001905817,0.007349944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001166825,0.0001150931,0.00008362243,0.0001895676,0.0006657661,0.0001014053,0.00002261623,0.00161509,0.006137555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000128166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002857817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01438496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003345035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968302,0.0006354663,0.0002983711,0.0003858226,0.0005596392,0.001290491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961462,0.002229409,0.00002296912,0.0005665906,0.0002914261,0.0007434036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002679508,0.0002934915,0.005173885,0.00003613191,0.00001685463,0.00003561364,0.0005707273,1.34258e-8,0.0002416863,0.9596475,0.03073682,0.003220438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005892785,0.001159291,0.2033693,0.000008864258,0.00000959615,0.00009752975,0.001177876,0.00001489588,0.00004926704,0.7849528,0.008389559,0.0001817062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6115643,0.000007319737,0.00003821888,0.0206948,0.001032863,0.0001913639,0.00004773679,0.00006483899,0.3663585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915073,8.395743e-7,0.00009072112,0.001177712,0.001570895,0.00007952578,0.000009931646,0.00001931492,0.005543749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.379943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040042046","doi":"10.1177/1065912920938143","title":"Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disinformation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Democracy; Internet privacy; Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1989053183833872,"gpt":0.5076986544846781,"spread":0.3087933361012909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001134872,0.00008724607,0.0001203037,0.0001355284,0.000753377,0.0004919937,0.0003007321,0.0000770304,0.00124562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00476416,0.00007667292,0.00004816357,0.0006789498,0.0002595517,0.001138762,0.00003248118,0.0003010634,0.009682252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000211403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005870207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001393104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967617,0.0003619971,0.0002650214,0.0001471768,0.00139209,0.001072052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966363,0.0004913041,0.00002106792,0.0001370125,0.000484281,0.002230086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453793,0.00001503922,0.00001582099,0.000007541018,0.000003884221,0.000002301298,0.2057995,4.853002e-7,0.00002100734,0.7617432,0.01149759,0.02085907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009153039,0.003708618,0.004510724,0.00006437577,0.000008841118,0.000004057338,0.5069756,0.001787716,0.0007150893,0.2666322,0.2141626,0.0005148829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1911686,0.000005769973,0.002740488,0.2227327,0.00005154081,0.0005820222,0.0000143911,0.0001183059,0.5825862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98874,0.000003065865,0.0002542407,0.00938483,0.000326586,0.000008063535,0.000007450278,0.000007129989,0.00126869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7975714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012536499","doi":"10.1177/1065912910376385","title":"Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":337,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Public policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3368530038552728,"gpt":0.5182908525237124,"spread":0.1814378486684396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001634127,0.00008714648,0.0001198546,0.000240001,0.0009306656,0.0005161903,0.0002582951,0.000151706,0.0001172488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001865107,0.00008322192,0.00005050896,0.0002380763,0.001462989,0.0005132274,0.00006639786,0.0007007567,0.00005224827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008718733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1797042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01205987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966896,0.0005905893,0.0001968837,0.0003437555,0.0009138538,0.001265281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971641,0.001173987,0.00002349718,0.0002348152,0.000374035,0.00102952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003037905,0.00005587346,0.0008196663,0.000004800713,0.00001014057,0.000002616032,0.005218587,7.662634e-8,0.0005649113,0.9878726,0.0001224184,0.005325242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001324622,0.00004874467,0.006605274,0.00000483961,0.000002522135,0.000001326402,0.01903137,0.0005690372,0.0000441979,0.9706405,0.002830473,0.00008919252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8206383,0.00002403139,0.0005515228,0.07772689,0.0002697495,0.0001844762,0.000073061,0.00006674008,0.1004652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970384,0.000006337978,0.0002662747,0.0002319099,0.001868758,0.00002685239,0.000012103,0.00001130727,0.0005380103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1764001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8257582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128384648","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349631","title":"Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Proposition; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Public administration; Composition (language); Local election; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09907213906656631,"gpt":0.4741072488650793,"spread":0.375035109798513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246112,0.0001176762,0.0001800141,0.0004090596,0.0005881659,0.0003501275,0.0003544406,0.0001586638,0.000108115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001586331,0.0001095928,0.00006029669,0.0006932683,0.0007019851,0.0004544045,0.00002369693,0.0006143864,0.0001789588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004505569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001034686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0333248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004086865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945383,0.0006419503,0.0003758244,0.0002902871,0.001232641,0.002920995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976087,0.000872374,0.000024468,0.0001876101,0.0003116001,0.0009951977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212895,0.00006475695,0.02646877,0.000008484016,0.000003571108,0.00001882197,0.01000989,9.148333e-7,0.00009243914,0.9599219,0.00008654909,0.003311803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000556099,0.0009928535,0.3235703,0.00005438942,0.000005703478,0.000007387819,0.1049829,0.0004770498,0.0006506591,0.5647284,0.003641099,0.0003330999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7125057,0.00002252584,0.00002416707,0.009224248,0.00006365484,0.0002296385,0.000004550813,0.00004720112,0.2778783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980069,0.000003451391,0.0001060183,0.0005399227,0.0004633601,0.00001857411,0.0000052904,0.0000071194,0.0008492986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3951934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047661309","doi":"10.1177/1065912908314713","title":"The Political Resocialization of Immigrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resocialization; Political socialization; Immigration; Politics; Socialization; Biology and political orientation; Adaptation (eye); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Psychology; American political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.198422205777519,"gpt":0.489765840549163,"spread":0.2913436347716439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290647,0.00008313201,0.0001726252,0.00009012922,0.001768352,0.00007090474,0.0003294376,0.0001399824,0.00007285737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003544552,0.00006130816,0.00009069068,0.0005122287,0.002949241,0.0001380757,0.00001917728,0.0002983405,0.0001645193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002827828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006545881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08981132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008944096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939204,0.001922041,0.0004198572,0.0001878145,0.001548159,0.002001751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953147,0.002834397,0.00003808109,0.0002464149,0.0007796226,0.0007868156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000201918,0.00005935735,0.00711812,0.000009236332,0.000007285156,0.000003912318,0.001822432,2.724751e-8,0.0001304899,0.9887579,0.00146972,0.0006013354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000424625,0.0009768292,0.0652016,0.00005154671,0.00001206453,0.000004771735,0.01440872,0.00009801921,0.00102142,0.8752214,0.04234373,0.0002352097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8085927,0.0001334908,0.0002831805,0.05531095,0.0002938997,0.0006750607,0.00002240076,0.00008347824,0.1346049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.000006293978,0.00001585749,0.0001328648,0.000668516,0.00004113856,0.000002838894,0.00001114288,0.001662804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1888659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088244397","doi":"10.1177/106591290105400309","title":"Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09078999668256828,"gpt":0.4302359069857462,"spread":0.3394459103031779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002685511,0.0001338769,0.0001340788,0.0001430323,0.0008017254,0.0003966168,0.0004001927,0.00006608367,0.006006822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002718816,0.00009835669,0.0001006649,0.0007618692,0.004349608,0.0002674529,0.0002219529,0.0003332892,0.001601755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008077325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007364395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003911238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000945197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965346,0.0004171948,0.0002460717,0.0006132883,0.001280953,0.0009079286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984831,0.0005103397,0.00002225651,0.0004292247,0.0000379674,0.0005171301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689164,0.0006994464,0.9517784,0.00001678433,0.00006526456,0.000005370234,0.004637456,0.00004996538,0.0002258909,0.03631078,0.0008871844,0.005306604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001427272,0.0000874184,0.9432485,0.000001053786,0.00002031644,0.000004838194,0.001808489,0.001104077,0.00002596554,0.03277335,0.0206691,0.0001142445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620701,0.000135304,0.0003231111,0.003513015,0.00004114845,0.0002846823,0.00001246677,0.00001951855,0.03360062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950131,0.00001090149,0.0001321627,0.0001391824,0.00004717115,0.00007797942,0.00001333658,0.000009143145,0.004557038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03294295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031101128","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304501","title":"Retrospective Economic Accountability under Authoritarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Authoritarianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); China; Mainland China; Political science; Panel data; Revenue; Nationality; Public administration; Local government; Development economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Accounting; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06804154293687427,"gpt":0.4524899138525372,"spread":0.3844483709156629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008318657,0.000127306,0.0002273492,0.00009553312,0.000925362,0.0002583055,0.0004689063,0.0002212391,0.001035705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004574462,0.0001184025,0.000127817,0.0001416663,0.001502359,0.0005144657,0.00004546804,0.000702535,0.001243562],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005532558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008970745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09974459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04869432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962857,0.0002674901,0.000355576,0.0004720123,0.0007018129,0.001917373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978234,0.0007747244,0.00004794896,0.0003758706,0.0001943903,0.0007836703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002347169,0.00005273084,0.005846056,0.000003937919,0.00001148484,0.00000464733,0.005562149,1.037491e-7,0.00001549816,0.9853345,0.0008019619,0.002343466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002108457,0.0001983345,0.2331146,0.000005896629,0.00000236196,0.000001003021,0.02070611,0.00001277927,0.00002215707,0.7230625,0.02252038,0.0001430609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7106584,0.00002577568,0.0004429183,0.008225873,0.0004249426,0.0003010904,0.00004692884,0.00005864976,0.2798154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994675,0.000007961376,0.0001145029,0.0001844299,0.001337743,0.00001366498,0.000002521615,0.00001600774,0.003648164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2840166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970262444","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500201","title":"The Ghent System and Union Membership in Europe, 1970-1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Receipt; Economics; Labour economics; Income protection insurance; Demographic economics; Control (management); Trade union; Insurance policy; General insurance; Economic growth; Actuarial science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1048910238796115,"gpt":0.3922902800749383,"spread":0.2873992561953268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003497693,0.00006697184,0.0000893232,0.00009215098,0.0009117687,0.0003122024,0.0002847741,0.00005639148,0.0001014371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009310081,0.0000453626,0.00001836861,0.0006481405,0.0007313614,0.0001252994,0.00003575154,0.0003280522,0.00005882794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002125114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007951172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01985532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01356341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958748,0.001766433,0.0001839684,0.0002006917,0.0008519609,0.001122123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976832,0.001407946,0.00001398731,0.000204786,0.0002425658,0.0004475579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002948741,0.00004061261,0.0009017837,0.000005878446,0.000003524096,0.00001356393,0.00335846,2.184734e-8,0.000008235026,0.98406,0.0008860349,0.01071886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007806308,0.0007296111,0.08924709,0.0001393267,0.000007704236,0.000002875856,0.07958326,0.0006574526,0.00001878259,0.03910521,0.7894539,0.0002742321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4300492,0.0007165721,0.00001457731,0.05559788,0.0002685825,0.0006670596,0.00001596772,0.00008266956,0.5125874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947653,0.00009150129,0.00000791462,0.0001415355,0.0001924485,0.00002503867,6.888897e-7,0.000007908919,0.00476764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347107049","doi":"10.1177/1065912916640900","title":"Political Socialization and Voting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Socialization; Turnout; Voting; Educational attainment; European Social Survey; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Voting behavior; Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2370657947104446,"gpt":0.5209200335860047,"spread":0.2838542388755601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001700567,0.00006022026,0.00008792949,0.00008789663,0.0009237552,0.0001068671,0.0001056965,0.00006645473,0.0002184601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00322295,0.00004268469,0.00003071345,0.0001365212,0.001105746,0.0001916615,0.00002479349,0.000098289,0.0001687301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002876112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003358298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002379335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007781831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972745,0.0006199002,0.0001748039,0.0001929436,0.000730633,0.00100728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970784,0.001792618,0.00001198769,0.00006046741,0.0006024524,0.0004541088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004903065,0.00003423921,0.003653839,0.000005350677,0.000007139565,6.990722e-7,0.00230179,1.859226e-9,0.0001496179,0.9894699,0.002006854,0.00236569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482116,0.0001533909,0.01909543,0.00003441017,0.000003694182,9.85965e-7,0.01650118,0.00001182077,0.0001150619,0.9387071,0.02510631,0.0001224349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2962283,0.00007133991,0.002742287,0.4995018,0.0003960757,0.0002730065,0.00003718834,0.00008761066,0.2006623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936275,0.000003633397,0.0001028842,0.0005081756,0.00155346,0.0000300089,0.000002420475,0.000006001687,0.004165928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6973991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7104872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810349191","doi":"10.1177/1065912918784209","title":"<i>TRENDS:</i> Police Militarization and the Use of Lethal Force","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Suspect; Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Political science; Poison control; Geography; Law; Psychology; Politics; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2495762502331529,"gpt":0.4923058386755124,"spread":0.2427295884423595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064863,0.00005636599,0.0001071694,0.0001329964,0.0008152486,0.0001497477,0.0001895117,0.00007298415,0.000217994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001141195,0.0000398674,0.00004381513,0.0004289335,0.004803494,0.0003826508,0.00003181663,0.0002272049,0.00005518584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004720324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001363728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5050331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05339526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971133,0.001291443,0.0001685091,0.0001492516,0.0006044459,0.000673048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955885,0.003506918,0.00002723507,0.0002163634,0.0003785893,0.0002824345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006488521,0.00002954379,0.0003849277,0.000005533961,0.000007373977,1.60106e-7,0.08923639,7.549507e-8,0.000128782,0.8995703,0.001269516,0.009302539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002834084,0.002980551,0.07175139,0.0001187774,0.00009504904,0.00001497407,0.1225958,0.002639758,0.0001872047,0.2603928,0.5358698,0.000519838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051517,0.00002192104,0.0007541486,0.0536679,0.0001384408,0.0003150555,0.00004787126,0.00004423064,0.1398587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938585,0.00001613633,0.0002294291,0.0004341445,0.0005810892,0.00001134364,0.000002107393,0.000006244991,0.004861029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079411133","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500401","title":"When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democracy; Elite; Craft; Political science; Politics; Ideology; Political economy; Work (physics); Public administration; Control (management); Direct democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3659834105683202,"gpt":0.4934216830183262,"spread":0.1274382724500059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001857959,0.000108197,0.0001975412,0.0004049968,0.001014163,0.0001784641,0.0002654111,0.000154587,0.0008478886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002341656,0.0001031431,0.00009163353,0.0006766492,0.0006085511,0.0004835989,0.0000162469,0.0002947146,0.00054376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004972349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002507119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03295179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1037483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961806,0.0005588702,0.0003694307,0.0003003336,0.0007997658,0.001791017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967521,0.001941086,0.00002523238,0.0002155552,0.0003420577,0.0007239255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006149459,0.0001673539,0.004981857,0.00002512532,0.000006045357,0.000004310155,0.003738899,1.018525e-7,0.00002411472,0.9854109,0.002020277,0.003614882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006364157,0.0006855209,0.02273832,0.0001063504,0.00001434996,0.000001249422,0.0009280209,0.0009662106,0.00003840628,0.6328219,0.3407501,0.0003131205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1109219,0.0002663569,0.001276786,0.1611819,0.0005751254,0.004011253,0.0002530851,0.0002354469,0.7212781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938682,0.00000653869,0.0001524777,0.0002740119,0.0009135989,0.0008021743,0.00001514307,0.00001314619,0.003954707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043953143","doi":"10.1177/1065912914524831","title":"Race, Party, and the Consequences of Restricting Early Voting in Florida in the 2012 General Election","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Straight-ticket voting; Group voting ticket; Political science; First-past-the-post voting; Legislature; Instant-runoff voting; Disapproval voting; Split-ticket voting; Spoilt vote; Demographic economics; Race (biology); Cardinal voting systems; Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09682191908473017,"gpt":0.4357739978005059,"spread":0.3389520787157757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01093131,0.00006607406,0.0001716532,0.0001241183,0.0003490328,0.0001467391,0.000209577,0.00008010828,0.00001223841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003524724,0.0000394393,0.0000316672,0.0006031393,0.001461827,0.0002033894,0.00001382515,0.0004478463,0.00001006616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008649149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001356941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2585105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03881752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928835,0.004949336,0.0003584751,0.0001632275,0.0007024808,0.0009429655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942636,0.00529034,0.00004311134,0.0001183903,0.0001386053,0.0001459391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002836411,0.00001726816,0.07011927,0.00001082825,0.000001774312,9.658329e-7,0.00560808,6.409566e-7,0.0001487046,0.9227771,0.00005444461,0.001232533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244965,0.0008077704,0.4893472,0.0001129407,0.000008963348,0.000003104077,0.009628703,0.002266411,0.0002350105,0.4946919,0.001481064,0.0001720338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736614,0.00007001465,0.00005227229,0.01707003,0.00005935168,0.0003489797,9.819491e-7,0.000007928966,0.008729002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992752,0.000002941852,0.00001392432,0.00008900147,0.0004215176,0.00006356526,5.097564e-7,0.000004197451,0.0001291458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4280853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794532306","doi":"10.1177/1065912918761009","title":"Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent Men versus Leftist Women?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Left-wing politics; Ideology; System justification; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Parliament; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Competence (human resources); Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064055992237248,"gpt":0.4104760657507457,"spread":0.3040704665270209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002278954,0.0001848109,0.0003964995,0.0003855896,0.0003823834,0.0002073151,0.0005039946,0.000162189,0.0004300314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890943,0.0001539573,0.00005606673,0.0005465821,0.002166186,0.0001924288,0.000082395,0.000396741,0.000140025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003443483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001112754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03527131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00335822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924448,0.001205639,0.0004705931,0.0004936148,0.001828037,0.003557325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961482,0.0009536449,0.0000560317,0.0004253248,0.0008289478,0.001587883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003420677,0.000196845,0.001890335,0.000155602,0.00005614684,0.00003645444,0.03488766,1.296653e-7,0.00005224264,0.9621114,0.0001319469,0.0001391717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003305367,0.005494032,0.03261473,0.000173314,0.00001573831,0.000007959768,0.8810857,0.0003731519,0.0002452013,0.07467449,0.001594169,0.0004161602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213103,0.00001437726,0.00006809832,0.001798533,0.0001597004,0.0005271189,0.00008601716,0.00005162531,0.1759843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998486,9.178955e-7,0.00009204076,0.00005333042,0.000588334,0.0001789314,0.00001111593,0.00002626145,0.0005631003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089831780","doi":"10.1177/1065912911411099","title":"Politics in Peer Groups","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reciprocal; Social capital; Bridging (networking); Diversity (politics); Political science; Interpersonal ties; Panel survey; Political economy; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2239347211012974,"gpt":0.4529826483081469,"spread":0.2290479272068495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003043558,0.00008912977,0.000150202,0.0001872608,0.0004251568,0.00008972216,0.0004050153,0.0001952652,0.0009587054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001224145,0.00008660425,0.00006933895,0.0005600647,0.001320911,0.0002094302,0.00003603102,0.0006353518,0.000702163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003305104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003345652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03440367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005624863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952137,0.0008597658,0.0002175998,0.0002455839,0.001380614,0.002082705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978453,0.0007562436,0.00001294295,0.000182416,0.0004103919,0.0007926981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107764,0.0001173951,0.00287466,0.000004052877,0.000003083591,0.00003371405,0.06312659,3.039736e-9,0.000002980663,0.9303209,0.001292234,0.00221361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001831196,0.0003409444,0.03824505,0.00001402674,0.000001989252,6.731009e-7,0.08126729,0.00001065893,0.00001313307,0.8697215,0.01007097,0.000130658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4403357,0.00005525395,0.00001956669,0.004868612,0.0001806817,0.000196457,0.000005097118,0.00005306122,0.5542856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994083,0.000007124267,0.00007968022,0.0002444093,0.0009443912,0.0000371479,0.000002243412,0.00001331177,0.004588622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5537474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05646041653789657,"gpt":0.3829438105350005,"spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001083,0.00006636819,0.0001071094,0.00004269738,0.001448264,0.00004032865,0.0001828453,0.00006584942,0.00009241257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034989,0.00003989546,0.00001617966,0.0002273747,0.006925977,0.00004682103,0.00008374635,0.0003467574,0.000003241867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008211037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980073,0.0003969352,0.0001412113,0.000142167,0.0006880434,0.0006243216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.001248811,0.00002730008,0.00011713,0.0003764027,0.0002406169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983309,0.00001267305,0.01756161,0.000003234894,0.00001317838,0.000001842336,0.001065843,1.40575e-7,0.00008504857,0.9792608,0.001839882,0.00014775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001420328,0.00007720481,0.4570455,0.00001022773,0.00001275998,0.000002847761,0.003957063,0.000007801617,0.0001224993,0.5170532,0.02149906,0.00006978132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437982,0.00002605022,0.000003363424,0.05306702,0.0001939294,0.0001698718,0.00006906086,0.000005562827,0.002666948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986952,0.00001256754,0.000003480799,0.0004516602,0.0002125253,0.00001055697,0.000004555848,0.000003016733,0.0006064537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4622076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969774453","doi":"10.1177/1065912909358583","title":"Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Test (biology); Political science; General election; Approval voting; Social psychology; Psychology; Cardinal voting systems; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2479019606440463,"gpt":0.5080655312814356,"spread":0.2601635706373893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345797,0.0001041341,0.000176104,0.0002096865,0.0006163031,0.000451921,0.000189821,0.000171718,0.0001606778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001110237,0.0001032152,0.00003680033,0.0005737605,0.000974802,0.0003308065,0.00001688052,0.001036929,0.0001471705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002153412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000462624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3454832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.594972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960228,0.0008557149,0.0002950021,0.0003176098,0.000783611,0.001725255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968925,0.001676781,0.00002087842,0.0002026165,0.0002763201,0.0009309596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007418688,0.0001184741,0.02095875,0.00001384012,0.000004700531,0.00000374573,0.0005601146,7.06225e-8,0.002303977,0.9753088,0.00004558061,0.0006744764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005778007,0.0007728346,0.1326032,0.00003674324,0.000008869209,0.000003388747,0.001659311,0.0002905,0.0001097177,0.8564194,0.007252757,0.0002655694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9329056,0.00001970427,0.00002258209,0.009536396,0.000153833,0.0003319158,0.000006149039,0.00004334128,0.05698045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997334,7.684495e-7,0.00004569355,0.00009077108,0.0009829018,0.0000713822,0.000002836038,0.00001220209,0.001459431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2494888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6588752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970494169","doi":"10.1177/106591290005300407","title":"Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Situational ethics; Political science; Voting; Affect (linguistics); Identity (music); Gender identity; Politics; General election; Test (biology); Ideology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3546987589204944,"gpt":0.4797843638421292,"spread":0.1250856049216348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843107,0.00007966112,0.000128681,0.0001704968,0.0003460505,0.000253382,0.0001788106,0.0001251799,0.0002795256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004308493,0.00007462673,0.00002850248,0.0002750035,0.0007486397,0.0001820996,0.00001027683,0.0003653459,0.0002249381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001835322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002245098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06858893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003710475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996062,0.001128292,0.000211175,0.0002910075,0.0008255835,0.001481987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980251,0.001039135,0.00001007024,0.0001697762,0.0001151777,0.0006407496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001293268,0.0001168027,0.01471071,0.00006733045,0.000007958912,0.000021317,0.02029117,0.000002507928,0.0000599237,0.9536653,0.0005632064,0.01048086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002212047,0.000650605,0.363815,0.0001209056,0.00001407813,0.00001329411,0.3506932,0.004684481,0.00005615191,0.1812937,0.09577217,0.000674327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534568,0.0004395455,0.0000215655,0.00701523,0.0001132889,0.0005104173,0.000008894023,0.00004685025,0.2383875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934618,0.00002187975,0.00002582398,0.000107665,0.0003689964,0.00004107811,0.000002680839,0.000009552132,0.005960514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7723716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9376134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954655822","doi":"10.1177/1065912919847293","title":"Intersectionality, Linked Fate, and LGBTQ Latinx Political Participation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Transgender; Intersectionality; Politics; Feeling; Gender studies; Sociology; Minority group; Identification (biology); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Ethnic group; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1643047173249085,"gpt":0.4968359847713774,"spread":0.3325312674464689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002412672,0.0001339621,0.0002367061,0.0001687061,0.0004501704,0.0002874727,0.0001802317,0.0002134505,0.0007653984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001382746,0.000125117,0.00007050632,0.0003613661,0.0008580429,0.0003503203,0.00004246078,0.0005074761,0.001164863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004248122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002888787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03312044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003514736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943367,0.001536971,0.0004084753,0.0003944518,0.001160578,0.002162847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960043,0.001838053,0.00003174966,0.00024125,0.0004913204,0.001393268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002416989,0.00008723128,0.04373949,0.00003978786,0.00001147936,0.000002359284,0.001391973,1.178465e-7,0.0003035865,0.9531484,0.0002242435,0.001027226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006151331,0.001412432,0.2132344,0.00008909032,0.00001691752,0.000003036801,0.005785752,0.0005721317,0.0001531937,0.7645708,0.0132086,0.0003384681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785262,0.00001554198,0.0001104095,0.0182557,0.0002294169,0.0005235322,0.00001498271,0.00008700367,0.1022372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963915,7.297336e-7,0.00004280532,0.000365325,0.0007372916,0.0000787131,0.0000102633,0.00001689613,0.002356524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2842535635","doi":"10.1177/1065912918786040","title":"Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Cash; Public relations; Social psychology; Control (management); Political science; Psychology; Personality; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Law; Management; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1314561291431731,"gpt":0.4539914673465095,"spread":0.3225353382033365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003410967,0.0001883563,0.0002873392,0.0002249724,0.001948168,0.0007583011,0.0003110919,0.0001586567,0.00008530488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002456518,0.0001438725,0.00005260862,0.000295533,0.00311264,0.0001305775,0.00009081003,0.0004408278,0.00001558223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003171094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007078249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008180983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001372443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994612,0.0006733267,0.0003341295,0.0005446316,0.001116863,0.002719059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938005,0.003203613,0.00003182789,0.0003182651,0.0006757606,0.001970095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005473047,0.00003902144,0.001012899,0.00004037091,0.00003259312,0.00001029479,0.0670908,8.185843e-8,0.0001899527,0.9241149,0.006148131,0.001266165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076613,0.002011903,0.01901582,0.00008685859,0.0000371999,0.00002508184,0.4188615,0.0008185476,0.0003815544,0.5280777,0.02912079,0.0004864868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8229038,0.00005632406,0.0005555945,0.1151345,0.0001395525,0.001463999,0.0001616397,0.00005829686,0.05952622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947596,0.000004923392,0.0001597268,0.001893733,0.0008386822,0.0001814663,0.000004135842,0.00002558575,0.002132162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3960373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992108282","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500303","title":"Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Nomination; Politics; Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Economics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.213721088203873,"gpt":0.4678759746180191,"spread":0.2541548864141461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001782565,0.000134929,0.0002242949,0.0005964743,0.0005837259,0.0002381839,0.0004840995,0.0002251363,0.002082572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007144134,0.0001436062,0.00006851654,0.0009015375,0.001452602,0.0001977017,0.00002691364,0.0006362209,0.002272691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001166546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8587605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8107001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901881,0.001466346,0.0002913639,0.00033149,0.001228585,0.006494177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907733,0.001754724,0.00001011223,0.000242071,0.0002779847,0.006941865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004744742,0.00006408151,0.0280265,0.000008439117,0.000005332268,0.00005620228,0.03680051,2.061138e-8,0.000005179121,0.9308264,0.003098159,0.001104422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003917183,0.0006211877,0.01951958,0.00008123389,0.000008830027,0.000002141498,0.2526157,0.00007019549,0.0001303629,0.4105485,0.3155413,0.0004693109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4916069,0.0000569971,0.000002212096,0.1188193,0.0003139111,0.0004318628,0.00003116867,0.0000516614,0.388686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943879,0.00000438643,0.00004106679,0.001804801,0.001066558,0.00009517596,0.000002064596,0.00001834329,0.00257967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5202779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104194603","doi":"10.1177/1065912913510609","title":"Emerging Powers in the Climate Negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Political science; Political economy; Emerging markets; Identity (music); Development economics; International trade; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07136422016343524,"gpt":0.4553042924580914,"spread":0.3839400722946562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115447,0.00004406391,0.00005028613,0.0001569524,0.000493683,0.0002834063,0.0003802255,0.00003746579,0.001197545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006130768,0.00003219165,0.00002969738,0.0003513894,0.0002950441,0.0002906774,0.00001665382,0.0002684371,0.001791854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001432215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001606465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008574896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00174375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973234,0.0005362594,0.0001450788,0.0001174005,0.0009341117,0.0009437636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986356,0.0009005089,0.000009789814,0.00009241466,0.0002182282,0.000143415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001110305,0.00002849563,0.002081777,0.000001714546,0.000001812865,0.00000281191,0.01503825,4.492063e-8,0.00001472736,0.9782568,0.00288519,0.001687322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001938291,0.0001175762,0.1762802,0.00002362973,0.000001324691,8.008616e-7,0.1411625,0.0001831082,0.00001045642,0.636461,0.04543315,0.0001324937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2339626,0.00001020629,0.00002281549,0.1744999,0.0001159839,0.0003153578,0.000002571733,0.0000217494,0.5910487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980046,0.000005924269,0.00006566195,0.0006812874,0.0001797988,0.00008180762,0.000003518049,0.000003835175,0.0009736189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7640419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984778247","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304109","title":"Presidents, Political Context, and Economic Accountability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Institutionalisation; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Voting; Political economy; Voting behavior; Survey data collection; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07627312439421254,"gpt":0.4773338045635671,"spread":0.4010606801693545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006356877,0.000144921,0.0002554367,0.0001185847,0.0008702335,0.0002341009,0.0004011871,0.0002160341,0.0005585399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001479478,0.0001461837,0.0001039801,0.0001532081,0.004716733,0.0002783191,0.00007720631,0.0006065104,0.0003047598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001161843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007633806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1005768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005726542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942819,0.0006271749,0.0004109773,0.0004398746,0.0009642696,0.003275754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928238,0.004405769,0.00003028324,0.0003465089,0.0002562385,0.002137337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001570038,0.00006381377,0.006715569,0.00001256252,0.00001288499,0.000006852197,0.004557648,7.176812e-9,0.0000161447,0.9829167,0.00114772,0.004534357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000528586,0.0005619072,0.06106214,0.00002614919,0.00001368114,0.000006625432,0.1497709,0.00007034198,0.00008712878,0.7028758,0.08462419,0.000372595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666173,0.0001312,0.0002284257,0.0126574,0.0002158559,0.0004230859,0.00005093361,0.00009073059,0.419585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969737,0.00001308001,0.0001696584,0.0008712425,0.0009104983,0.00001756932,0.000002876997,0.0000174379,0.001023928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4303564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244645105","doi":"10.1177/1065912919870605","title":"Discursive Inequity and the Internal Exclusion of Women Speakers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Public sphere; Inequality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05536214733259488,"gpt":0.4272572163790546,"spread":0.3718950690464597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003395156,0.00005210486,0.0001362321,0.00008053469,0.0002279734,0.0001038312,0.0002428324,0.00004963248,0.000221516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006693961,0.00003226281,0.00004369766,0.0001414187,0.001813282,0.0001047518,0.00008441286,0.0002332126,0.00006092616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002253789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002083614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01683311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002371632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997065,0.000872182,0.0001661312,0.0001596394,0.0008494933,0.0008875271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980708,0.001143732,0.00002791591,0.0001726031,0.0002148656,0.0003700819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006055165,0.00002707974,0.003069885,0.00001778316,0.00001066599,0.000001030307,0.06085564,8.613899e-8,0.0001145824,0.9342483,0.00007197315,0.001522407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001138052,0.0004442535,0.02938946,0.00002745941,0.00000465347,0.000001350879,0.2679515,0.0001853697,0.0001027378,0.6976784,0.002996627,0.00008018514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038173,0.00002402503,0.00004784039,0.009298251,0.0001030508,0.0003093456,0.000004561411,0.000006392236,0.08638922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976974,0.000009705112,0.00001289269,0.00007051523,0.0001496134,0.00001398287,9.286988e-7,0.000004585612,0.002040372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2365699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047227654","doi":"10.1177/106591290605900401","title":"Party, Ideology, and Vote Intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French Electoral Panel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Multinomial logistic regression; Political science; Identification (biology); Panel data; Legislature; Single non-transferable vote; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1256264227865234,"gpt":0.4240124513640647,"spread":0.2983860285775413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001773768,0.0001168847,0.0001782468,0.00006783906,0.0008946156,0.0003188722,0.0002946837,0.0001736609,0.0002108306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001208887,0.00008598035,0.00006409053,0.0003400481,0.001778969,0.0001831773,0.00003763272,0.000516633,0.0002106391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003045722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000249137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5742035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4112537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953456,0.001539169,0.0003343025,0.0003032539,0.0009231904,0.001554517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996368,0.002528161,0.00003186134,0.0002434513,0.0003767103,0.0004518536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004574189,0.00005744429,0.08009502,0.000004550483,0.000009086195,0.000004323791,0.0003047166,8.485493e-8,0.00007681789,0.9124424,0.006021403,0.0009795448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001986699,0.0002978784,0.3474101,0.00002623014,0.00001449814,0.000001218453,0.0009926963,0.0008587326,0.00001905887,0.6424486,0.007588865,0.0001434429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059793,0.0003831008,0.0006994625,0.06357421,0.0002640418,0.0005381845,0.0001110621,0.00009328985,0.02835733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959151,0.000001901379,0.00004393423,0.0002284501,0.0009854499,0.00006910105,0.00002608052,0.0000113524,0.002718616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2699938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.688075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048937976","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304502","title":"Economic Voting and Political Sophistication in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Sophistication; Presidential system; Voting behavior; Politics; Political science; Disapproval voting; Economics; Ranked voting system; Political economy; Public economics; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1403162767359102,"gpt":0.4878980342988645,"spread":0.3475817575629542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007443625,0.00008162794,0.0001208703,0.000251234,0.0004577526,0.0002077675,0.0002099144,0.0001069159,0.00004978052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001353779,0.00006389363,0.00002706479,0.0003488513,0.0009827262,0.0001331536,0.00001413231,0.0003953768,0.0001314967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001720912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1321783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0270994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957661,0.001190996,0.0003440637,0.0002166431,0.0005630835,0.001919138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942219,0.004848061,0.00002038171,0.0001420629,0.0001412281,0.0006264255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001486678,0.0000386217,0.01140256,0.00001129799,0.000002224497,0.000006271794,0.003095845,2.663409e-7,0.00001122871,0.9847766,0.0001100826,0.0005300927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003603109,0.0007175779,0.1607025,0.0000459132,0.000008934117,0.000004837567,0.03336702,0.001954258,0.00004314605,0.7889727,0.01359879,0.0002240415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363827,0.00001795587,0.000405784,0.03763419,0.00005900193,0.0003356822,0.000007627951,0.00002879749,0.02512833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987416,0.00000108502,0.0000269225,0.0005206598,0.0005583064,0.0000239738,0.00001309407,0.000007939468,0.0001063923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1958039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167331783","doi":"10.1177/10659129211023590","title":"Are Political Attacks a Laughing Matter? Three Experiments on Political Humor and the Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam; Institute of Population and Public Health; Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Backlash; Political science; Advertising; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1141494262037224,"gpt":0.4800217024457434,"spread":0.365872276242021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001795562,0.0002342863,0.0005441958,0.0001197094,0.0004705074,0.0001087011,0.0003060258,0.0001293583,0.0004677993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001322111,0.0001693862,0.0001510436,0.0003136294,0.002208037,0.00004028418,0.0001751074,0.0008275556,0.0003655946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000208186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009705596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001383265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006251082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934408,0.002709543,0.0004218101,0.0006411487,0.000707095,0.002079569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855739,0.01266954,0.00005795134,0.0006841085,0.0003366855,0.0006777861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004369722,0.0003760688,0.006742339,0.00008984206,0.0001351526,0.00008384658,0.001839045,4.167522e-8,0.0003594447,0.9895827,0.0002235171,0.0001310337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004360626,0.0009211058,0.3644189,0.0004112779,0.00005658324,0.00007578289,0.1288845,0.00004491549,0.00547393,0.4947667,0.0002347381,0.0003510479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523213,0.0001372869,0.0003111626,0.01051829,0.0001098261,0.0007432002,0.0001072886,0.0000329106,0.1357188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979766,4.813273e-7,0.00006754093,0.0008186047,0.0002463404,0.0006196152,0.00000606781,0.00003601725,0.0002287584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.494816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8135604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130308920","doi":"10.1177/1065912915580627","title":"Minorities in the Middle East","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Middle East; Democratization; Middle class; Ethnic group; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Psychological resilience; Islam; Secularism; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Democracy; Gender studies; Politics; Social psychology; History; Psychology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4291201391669498,"gpt":0.4644150513692397,"spread":0.03529491220228992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004342405,0.00007630602,0.0001178235,0.0000901446,0.0002666122,0.000248249,0.0006728807,0.00008850122,0.000084409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003206114,0.0000556479,0.00004583518,0.0004243725,0.001496276,0.0002152348,0.00002552877,0.000493077,0.0006026743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006772811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04312321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008205665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949271,0.001310901,0.000177966,0.0001830029,0.001696117,0.001704881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974774,0.00127551,0.00001104872,0.0002502444,0.0002662452,0.0007195292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076679,0.00006295504,0.0009310051,0.000005065567,0.00000136544,0.00002396935,0.04640167,9.423323e-9,0.000001754656,0.949356,0.002293703,0.0009117277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873933,0.0003319276,0.006474691,0.00002338165,0.000001762617,0.000002048165,0.2095266,0.00001759704,0.000005160757,0.451712,0.3315075,0.0001099328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2478265,0.000142085,0.00001347629,0.03704937,0.0001112934,0.000219489,0.00001336825,0.0000271547,0.7145973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910362,0.000002048417,0.00002323992,0.0009104103,0.0007074876,0.00004802326,0.000001147379,0.000005925834,0.007265533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7432097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966298473","doi":"10.1177/1065912911427449","title":"Separate but Not Equal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Politics; Electoral politics; Political science; Electoral reform; Ceiling (cloud); Electoral system; Natural experiment; Test (biology); Glass ceiling; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Demographic economics; Law; Economics; Statistics; Democracy; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3802724686431003,"gpt":0.5012837606199578,"spread":0.1210112919768576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017655,0.00008577947,0.0001187332,0.0001644857,0.000613714,0.0001443986,0.0003607124,0.0001211957,0.0009120943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005231287,0.00007809073,0.00007297257,0.0002444097,0.001056512,0.0001891554,0.00003406534,0.0003497022,0.001757416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004827435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03814138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008013662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957384,0.0008889944,0.000213692,0.0002818305,0.001164774,0.001712315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979283,0.0004772933,0.00001902719,0.0002578255,0.0003956743,0.0009218932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001727733,0.00008313193,0.000315195,0.0000064597,0.000009019712,0.00002116053,0.01829259,1.613072e-8,0.0002588601,0.9785448,0.0007205258,0.00173091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003562993,0.0006650687,0.01294867,0.00001103614,0.000008841776,0.000002958478,0.06605562,0.00007835585,0.003320108,0.9027219,0.01359252,0.0002385918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2807242,0.00001405354,0.0004537013,0.003003494,0.0002184348,0.0002481501,0.00001564411,0.00006859715,0.7152538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899544,0.000004070373,0.0001972658,0.0002207614,0.0005091545,0.0000322508,0.00000308378,0.00001227781,0.009066731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7092302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008660424","doi":"10.1177/1065912920906193","title":"Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Presidential system; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2500075570869809,"gpt":0.4546764629392381,"spread":0.2046689058522572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006228698,0.00009152292,0.0001214589,0.00004181188,0.0005588177,0.0002357671,0.0003078015,0.00005491684,0.0001378414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003252755,0.00005628278,0.00003209133,0.0002108394,0.002057498,0.0001475017,0.00007233366,0.0002753091,0.00001490677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005073644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008740543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06195107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003358151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973963,0.0007370326,0.0001932761,0.0002405207,0.0007086435,0.0007242011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974436,0.001771487,0.00002908556,0.0001777729,0.0001345288,0.0004434938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009398876,0.0001030854,0.2365601,0.0000847533,0.00005744104,0.000008168131,0.2796977,0.000002337845,0.003842233,0.4778988,0.001121001,0.0005303917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004956838,0.001423123,0.4462915,0.0001383405,0.00003304841,0.000003073711,0.5310062,0.002322483,0.005925041,0.01116301,0.0009659937,0.00023256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713922,0.000213456,0.00001193115,0.02748137,0.00003970468,0.0002793613,0.00004470153,0.000009822023,0.0005274101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989929,0.0001046517,0.00001872393,0.0004076875,0.0002194158,0.00001856118,0.000007091851,0.000007184173,0.0002238059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4667358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9442955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805677146","doi":"10.1177/1065912918775252","title":"Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Accountability; Politics; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Preference; Political economy; Social psychology; Public administration; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05567274590710162,"gpt":0.4787482996375129,"spread":0.4230755537304113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002281189,0.0002078334,0.0003438761,0.0001503658,0.001450244,0.0004355478,0.0002925052,0.00009467747,0.00006770903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008760529,0.0001753727,0.00003482428,0.0006821803,0.00567899,0.0004917787,0.00004565927,0.0005519366,0.00004808964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005234287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002607451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3940451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04818485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905565,0.004824507,0.0003450016,0.0006871905,0.001412904,0.002173839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955691,0.002140991,0.00006864519,0.0003756911,0.0005164449,0.001329108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004244884,0.003119707,0.5913166,0.00005032655,0.0001095882,0.00002514638,0.08858262,8.645672e-8,0.003376608,0.3035913,0.0002417427,0.009161867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002078869,0.08570755,0.3355318,0.000136199,0.00009683298,0.000006592511,0.5412672,0.0009633555,0.005675489,0.0265537,0.0009895838,0.0009928235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926888,0.00003532942,0.00124953,0.0004954921,0.00004941974,0.001049239,0.00001820544,0.0001111815,0.004302795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988462,8.518632e-7,0.00007648845,0.00009401827,0.000672095,0.0001719929,0.000005719949,0.00003102632,0.000101629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4526846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020852836","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500110","title":"Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conservatism; Charter; Political science; Voting; Law; Context (archaeology); Roberts Court; Principal (computer security); Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1274915580550173,"gpt":0.4054802517909082,"spread":0.2779886937358909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378905,0.00008554927,0.0001901588,0.00009363546,0.000877635,0.00003810972,0.000350624,0.00004905217,0.0003860272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001274063,0.00005539556,0.00005224661,0.0004971747,0.001665046,0.00009020777,0.00006345059,0.0003908869,0.00007401573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007946973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009708005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963339,0.0004386014,0.0002875775,0.0002044238,0.00171769,0.001017824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963059,0.00296444,0.00002724949,0.0001615206,0.0003218779,0.0002189404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002148774,0.00009050145,0.01904384,0.000004124417,0.00001741844,0.00004014459,0.00193687,0.000001837321,0.00001319275,0.9588746,0.01222801,0.007727975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007148656,0.0004932596,0.3286634,0.0004728524,0.00002957508,0.00000809301,0.05359392,0.0008179285,0.00001536169,0.4844933,0.1302827,0.0004148396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7871309,0.001613594,0.000103373,0.07060625,0.0004284052,0.0006527135,0.00007373001,0.00002651374,0.1393645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993008,0.00006862648,0.00004489642,0.0002316995,0.000194618,0.00002179699,7.013558e-7,0.000004459326,0.0001323397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4743814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6750147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991634631","doi":"10.1177/1065912909357177","title":"Contradictory Calculi","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Microeconomics; Voter turnout; Bullet voting; Function (biology); Economics; Public economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Cardinal voting systems; Political science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1415347659350244,"gpt":0.4976732993114364,"spread":0.356138533376412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838835,0.00008314852,0.0001433726,0.0001121237,0.0006939713,0.0001936651,0.0002833767,0.0001894629,0.00116096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002064729,0.00007487729,0.00006763201,0.0002855256,0.001478392,0.0001877346,0.0000112953,0.000846778,0.001290338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001421269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000496032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04457386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02074261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995744,0.0008391219,0.000234564,0.0002317706,0.001078937,0.001871583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996546,0.001331111,0.00001573023,0.0002505022,0.0004054699,0.001451175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006272169,0.00005932389,0.002243629,0.000006339421,0.000004421061,0.00000692776,0.001203023,5.329542e-9,0.002378416,0.9897224,0.001841755,0.00252751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003632419,0.0005732001,0.02415133,0.00001759004,0.00000771624,0.000002523275,0.002172746,0.00007868493,0.0005378723,0.511862,0.4599734,0.0002597702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6757582,0.00001699915,0.0001278424,0.02401658,0.0005917351,0.0003754371,0.00001131242,0.0001255061,0.2989764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949968,3.535152e-7,0.00004386289,0.0002331775,0.001773135,0.00005737322,0.000002604635,0.00001169249,0.002881009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4778604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097338549","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500204","title":"Evangelicalism Meets the Continental Divide: Mloral and Economic Conservatism in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Protestantism; Exceptionalism; Politics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Fundamentalism; Anti-Americanism; Sociology; Political economy; Positive economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09077587072037419,"gpt":0.4014249826728081,"spread":0.3106491119524339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196989,0.00006561187,0.00009085758,0.00004646599,0.0006606868,0.0003105317,0.0002172679,0.0000487695,0.0001438406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003906887,0.00004115437,0.00002245361,0.0001333368,0.001179581,0.0001014816,0.0000217915,0.0003968947,0.00002259741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001971414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001471065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.928699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976887,0.0009869689,0.0001580863,0.0001453096,0.0004192257,0.0006017665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959542,0.003596158,0.00001479717,0.0001229777,0.00006549327,0.0002463927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006174569,0.00003764522,0.009540776,0.0000056574,0.0000151094,0.00001799647,0.03650795,2.48939e-7,0.000004703179,0.8012679,0.151294,0.001301816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004761911,0.0001830544,0.04382869,0.00002444672,0.000007479269,0.00001275602,0.1703809,0.002888786,0.000002933877,0.04278155,0.7392582,0.0001549677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7185521,0.0001023263,0.000001059045,0.2764625,0.00004983569,0.000173333,0.00002537716,0.000006562165,0.004626946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947804,0.000342282,0.000003659136,0.004283588,0.0001004338,0.00003172411,0.000005197816,0.000004220575,0.0004484495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5081536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889870292","doi":"10.1177/1065912918798489","title":"Receiving Foreign Aid Can Reduce Support for Incumbent Presidents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aid effectiveness; Test (biology); Politics; Accountability; Public economics; Mechanism (biology); Business; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1330750610810366,"gpt":0.482618859026625,"spread":0.3495437979455883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002693508,0.00009100565,0.0001174262,0.0001781961,0.0008885177,0.0002534243,0.0005055549,0.00009307032,0.001046962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001962445,0.000088017,0.00006537125,0.0002115145,0.0008009911,0.0002301713,0.0000452655,0.0001978174,0.0004048873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004598959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009658019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004920411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002914936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964035,0.0002859216,0.0002482467,0.0003009456,0.001331028,0.001430373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974917,0.0007803637,0.00002704556,0.0001532494,0.001030126,0.000517512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004071732,0.00004441056,0.001410273,0.00001069998,0.00001389791,0.000003823431,0.004654706,5.719919e-9,0.0001268614,0.9764866,0.01377145,0.00343656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005305965,0.001335757,0.01369113,0.00007097804,0.000005937659,0.000001918132,0.008586665,0.00005666409,0.002167124,0.8309644,0.1423456,0.0002432248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1884324,0.000005930724,0.0004137183,0.02001609,0.0005209275,0.0008866569,0.00004575899,0.00008060359,0.7895979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686687,0.000002321229,0.0006821466,0.0002851163,0.001672364,0.0001290023,0.00001677998,0.00001502642,0.02852855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7802363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363675809","doi":"10.1177/10659129231166679","title":"Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Presidential election; Surprise; Democracy; Victory; Political science; Politics; Public opinion; Spoilt vote; Language change; General election; Social psychology; Psychology; Group voting ticket; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08358256831837564,"gpt":0.4576732434450982,"spread":0.3740906751267226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001314425,0.0001583217,0.0002925875,0.0005891567,0.0008310547,0.0002691456,0.0001238136,0.0001403257,0.00007065495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001348659,0.0001384238,0.00004965845,0.0022048,0.0008830708,0.0003647262,0.00001666215,0.0009610606,0.0001197687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007775538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005287949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5815396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5986555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947317,0.00170546,0.0003525159,0.0004214946,0.0009926163,0.001796269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975768,0.001202979,0.00004709562,0.0001716443,0.000389071,0.0006124199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009764991,0.00009481875,0.8436737,0.00001948972,0.00002590199,0.00001854984,0.002805427,8.523679e-7,0.002238589,0.1468527,0.0003233874,0.003848894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003502339,0.00102909,0.9700489,0.00002576472,0.0000105463,0.000003093796,0.003430535,0.0002838688,0.00005300825,0.02442716,0.0001808383,0.0001569667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870839,0.000006157962,0.0001220221,0.01100016,0.00008562117,0.0005689093,0.000006806964,0.0001888629,0.0009375449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987283,0.000003730246,0.00003683682,0.00004810055,0.000267639,0.0001508925,0.00001697264,0.00002082833,0.0007266912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046587431","doi":"10.1177/1065912913520573","title":"Strategic Voting and Coordination Problems in Proportional Systems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportional representation; Voting; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Electoral system; Straight-ticket voting; Contingent vote; Ranked voting system; Coordination game; Public administration; Political economy; Group voting ticket; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1772386846209009,"gpt":0.4521620114594282,"spread":0.2749233268385274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004792152,0.00007110578,0.000140521,0.0001550198,0.0003229808,0.0002644138,0.00009758685,0.0001078259,0.00002818283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008589635,0.00006425127,0.00001921914,0.0003107295,0.0004372992,0.0002018063,0.00000991086,0.0002831139,0.00006080796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002364895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05239475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006992725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961321,0.001457065,0.0003135535,0.0002267361,0.0008035973,0.001066938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983363,0.0007942357,0.00003005306,0.00008009381,0.0003015906,0.0004577305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002528643,0.00004178409,0.02286286,0.00006226231,0.000001734758,8.954561e-7,0.000818894,0.000002825368,0.000105365,0.9755601,0.00003810824,0.0005026855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006853644,0.001390015,0.09254909,0.0002949832,0.000006280703,0.000003861955,0.009728882,0.02818194,0.00001405157,0.862461,0.004341998,0.0003425253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410348,0.0000404476,0.0003609218,0.006805019,0.00009856364,0.0005872419,0.000002897824,0.00004404549,0.05102605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986696,3.672573e-7,0.0000125519,0.00002314281,0.0004297322,0.0001011955,0.000004144222,0.000007386357,0.0007518601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1130991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9539154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889819521","doi":"10.1177/1065912918796326","title":"The Influence of Cause and Sectional Group Lobbying on Government Responsiveness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Incentive; Interest group; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Set (abstract data type); Politics; Work (physics); Public policy; Special Interest Group; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07763246343692679,"gpt":0.3575061416990297,"spread":0.279873678262103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184683,0.0001150587,0.0001204869,0.00009140787,0.0005525313,0.0004070667,0.0002665838,0.00005725419,0.00002810231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008476248,0.00007910527,0.00003467194,0.0003054587,0.001730318,0.0005360357,0.000093134,0.00027028,0.0002074733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007809039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006416927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00098754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001252232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975763,0.00007882986,0.0002566363,0.0002520983,0.001006075,0.0008300492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980319,0.001057708,0.0000501711,0.0002675513,0.00052135,0.00007132938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002278117,0.00004215881,0.004522878,0.00004189347,0.00001320444,0.000008910639,0.00002695456,8.017296e-7,0.001641338,0.9922467,0.0001261626,0.001101209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002775079,0.0006936425,0.47626,0.00009349427,0.000009490842,0.000004136425,0.001816401,0.0002397865,0.0004138573,0.5134499,0.006587743,0.0001540717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770535,0.00001274336,0.00001584891,0.001920479,0.0000654651,0.0001485794,0.000007226412,0.00002223419,0.0207539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983003,0.000002460389,0.000007672267,0.0008122493,0.0006975913,0.00002938884,0.000001103336,0.0000103289,0.0001389515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4787968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.637543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980111277","doi":"10.1177/1065912919879764","title":"Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than Their Male Colleagues?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Dove; Political science; Ideology; House of Representatives; Political economy; Roll call; Dimension (graph theory); Politics; Public administration; Law; Voting; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.113781629087415,"gpt":0.4303996830704761,"spread":0.3166180539830611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00134472,0.0001316543,0.0002695454,0.0002826381,0.0003309316,0.0001575162,0.0003206843,0.0001652599,0.0003409333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004300542,0.0001105007,0.0000936748,0.0003769672,0.001442687,0.0001886981,0.00006775953,0.0002855459,0.00005986192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001551098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006080403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01574637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005239513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963399,0.0006178329,0.0002745785,0.0003655492,0.001084174,0.001317985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975191,0.0008599976,0.00006545962,0.000337618,0.0005172754,0.0007005522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024402,0.00007384718,0.05083659,0.00009434942,0.00003433766,0.000008073792,0.01618111,5.811926e-7,0.000186163,0.9316893,0.0005355412,0.0003356607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001066558,0.0005796144,0.1384941,0.00007744165,0.00001531657,0.00001156265,0.5627596,0.0004247092,0.001011548,0.2916178,0.003613052,0.0003285684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7331191,0.00006523305,0.00001073244,0.002049469,0.0000838151,0.0004906858,0.00007642901,0.00001976359,0.2640848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928969,0.00001902339,0.00004815584,0.0001276652,0.0003039228,0.00002531238,0.000007867557,0.0000187621,0.006552424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6400715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036705317","doi":"10.1177/1065912920930822","title":"The Language of Legacies: The Politics of Evoking Dead Leaders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Courtesy; Charisma; Feeling; Natural experiment; Political science; Public opinion; Voting; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2136187505465005,"gpt":0.4850097768471612,"spread":0.2713910263006607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002159987,0.00007261402,0.000165018,0.0000349694,0.0007063958,0.00008719251,0.0004971837,0.00007513909,0.00005194145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003903373,0.00004278132,0.00009311812,0.0004343596,0.002981136,0.00009748174,0.00002795772,0.0003489537,0.00004456425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009030727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003859822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0366573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958514,0.001311296,0.0003731855,0.0001381741,0.001165057,0.001160906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949,0.003975189,0.00005142954,0.0002270023,0.0003946341,0.0004517231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001035757,0.00001911891,0.001017803,0.00004040027,0.00001269732,0.000001105277,0.03330674,2.57284e-7,0.0007746389,0.9632352,0.0006887905,0.0008928804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005975484,0.002674493,0.008451266,0.0001630393,0.00005086206,0.000001355311,0.6761174,0.0008104444,0.008667259,0.2381411,0.06397606,0.0003492426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8229672,0.0004005445,0.0001581394,0.1401442,0.000104259,0.0005062586,0.00002722953,0.0000347351,0.03565748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984794,0.000002406399,0.00001179398,0.0002628719,0.0005098066,0.000017332,9.480965e-7,0.000008550724,0.0007069531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7250941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733328125","doi":"10.1177/1065912917717818","title":"Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a Liberal Right of Secession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political philosophy; Frame (networking); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1736995416698116,"gpt":0.4960589075875838,"spread":0.3223593659177723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428162,0.0001063857,0.0002116078,0.0001236653,0.001841645,0.0003101642,0.0005775223,0.0002343171,0.0001170955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003696211,0.00008450674,0.00006695591,0.00008135714,0.004859569,0.0003184604,0.00008373002,0.0007534954,0.00009263778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008821568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003267399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004622405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004519251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996214,0.0007732429,0.000214549,0.0002886872,0.001264674,0.001244893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962153,0.002007204,0.00004171385,0.0004750991,0.0002884032,0.000972297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004752275,0.0001069496,0.0004531821,0.00003640438,0.000007030257,0.00001780347,0.002398005,5.37979e-9,0.00008358096,0.9938619,0.0005982395,0.002389408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508277,0.0007830515,0.009595189,0.0001114853,0.000004767779,8.537306e-7,0.001127632,0.00002022929,0.0005781875,0.9786816,0.008738571,0.0001076429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2883118,0.00003929286,0.00001214816,0.05537834,0.0001194674,0.0001806635,0.00002768957,0.00002829873,0.6559023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971331,0.00001582425,0.00005757339,0.0002680708,0.0006571693,0.00001091727,0.000001153561,0.000009901425,0.001846259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7088214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800115565","doi":"10.1177/1065912918768031","title":"Beneficence, Street Begging, and Diverted Giving Schemes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Compromise; Law and economics; Normative; Donation; Political science; Law; Population; Element (criminal law); Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1669631252470513,"gpt":0.5368734931876278,"spread":0.3699103679405764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001401352,0.0001268811,0.0003040748,0.0001776089,0.001811673,0.00006109486,0.0002402322,0.0002064522,0.001005997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008521126,0.0001077379,0.00003461861,0.0002986745,0.0008976184,0.0001886348,0.0001420204,0.0008366544,0.0006964817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006111401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006509835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960536,0.0008092382,0.0003108661,0.0003446158,0.0006639202,0.001817741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996706,0.001586808,0.00003191174,0.0002771014,0.0006959919,0.0007021558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002230321,0.00006010112,0.1518438,0.0001507591,0.00001770237,0.000009164653,0.01766389,1.110732e-9,0.0001685097,0.8153663,0.0002926703,0.01440476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001326934,0.002151853,0.3696046,0.0006681331,0.00001776486,3.227634e-7,0.4380901,0.0004299365,0.0002737251,0.1478074,0.03912342,0.0005056947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587983,0.0001026601,0.00008881209,0.001339992,0.0001528941,0.0003240405,0.00003209101,0.00009503384,0.03906612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974834,0.00001437998,0.0001147772,0.0001357284,0.001078132,0.00007195333,0.000006007086,0.00002215556,0.001073409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620762129","doi":"10.1177/1065912917709354","title":"When the “Laws of Fear” Do Not Apply: Effective Counterterrorism and the Sense of Security from Terrorism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Purdue University","keywords":"Terrorism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04479525207346099,"gpt":0.4084869752611737,"spread":0.3636917231877127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00656117,0.0002825258,0.0006740794,0.0001125535,0.001735521,0.000488675,0.00164839,0.0002947432,0.0001389199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00301923,0.0001693304,0.0002563898,0.0001218705,0.0141656,0.0004274697,0.0002878807,0.001126494,0.00005491502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001558258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003035056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1025844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003027475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919732,0.003206459,0.0006426243,0.0005711843,0.002042087,0.001564467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890686,0.007862505,0.000262311,0.001532571,0.0006719,0.0006021044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009251052,0.0002505478,0.002469614,0.0001110504,0.0001841073,0.00003633259,0.4942316,3.504092e-8,0.000307754,0.4796601,0.001220671,0.0206031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002775437,0.0009228695,0.03538946,0.0003620523,0.0001170997,0.000007307719,0.4070259,0.0004155069,0.0007623186,0.5475897,0.00424659,0.0003857218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571363,0.0002544055,0.0001543692,0.02943594,0.0004677777,0.001332442,0.0002870267,0.0000311846,0.01090052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983395,0.00005404122,0.00001145986,0.0003857561,0.0008325712,0.0001424417,0.000003264223,0.00002520089,0.0002057873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09955689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099907200","doi":"10.1177/1065912920971715","title":"From Generation to Generation: The Role of Grandparents in the Intergenerational Transmission of (Non-)Voting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Grandparent; Turnout; Voting; Socioeconomic status; Disadvantage; Demographic economics; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2432571695642312,"gpt":0.4739389600676953,"spread":0.230681790503464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001652505,0.00007450218,0.0001320925,0.00006536146,0.0004630664,0.00007015606,0.0003706953,0.00004789234,0.0001696659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007180081,0.00004740049,0.00006504864,0.0004046105,0.0002465857,0.0001179619,0.0000200629,0.0001870028,0.00001975943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006278968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003170769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007764748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002136575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969386,0.0009918008,0.0004264256,0.0001960918,0.001112781,0.000334315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984688,0.0006986663,0.0000396377,0.0001014267,0.0005407934,0.0001507021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000375606,0.0001389767,0.001113204,0.000008025157,0.00001980125,3.979522e-7,0.1704076,0.00008600538,0.04563128,0.7732724,0.005604832,0.003679932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001462046,0.002904147,0.04050536,0.0002117425,0.00006244556,0.000001294744,0.4633861,0.1402563,0.09901726,0.16968,0.08171678,0.0007964683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848512,0.0001591669,0.003579315,0.1071286,0.0001551609,0.0004272572,0.00005298364,0.000005299783,0.003641086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958284,0.000004498871,0.0003924785,0.0008512002,0.00272827,0.00008201009,0.00004858866,0.000004569864,0.0000599746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6035924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391946084","doi":"10.1177/10659129241234839","title":"Exploring the Threat of Fake News: Facts, Opinions, and Judgement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Judgement; Disinformation; Misinformation; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Public opinion; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Fake news; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy; Social media","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.405962641494832,"gpt":0.4901869945136026,"spread":0.08422435301877068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001823458,0.00005544513,0.00008121865,0.0001340572,0.0003458347,0.0003451136,0.0001811408,0.000028797,0.0002047704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007119103,0.00003576928,0.00003494314,0.0002972659,0.0005684267,0.0005397611,0.0000296931,0.0002323587,0.0001548383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008635918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002748864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003750439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003177844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979354,0.0002832514,0.0001824382,0.0001115331,0.0008577228,0.0006296692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983532,0.001006788,0.000008819886,0.0001504277,0.0001129145,0.0003678739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000327573,0.00001049513,0.0000325603,0.00003813601,0.000007854256,0.000001129456,0.03709348,4.247411e-8,0.000009669508,0.8839548,0.002978272,0.07587032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492139,0.0007299083,0.01574494,0.0002673675,0.00001095108,0.000002762495,0.4143995,0.0003100562,0.0002718308,0.1173835,0.4504449,0.000185042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5719456,0.0006038586,0.0003839655,0.1088565,0.0005500332,0.0007150342,0.00005091223,0.000127984,0.3167661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984649,0.0001893727,0.00002910195,0.0001368714,0.000199123,0.00001181837,0.000002681891,0.000004938161,0.0009611761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5669567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021049489","doi":"10.1177/1065912912461307","title":"Congressional Politics of U.S. Immigration Reforms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Immigration; Politics; Political science; Negotiation; Immigration policy; Political economy; Public opinion; Immigration reform; Public administration; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07748015581296601,"gpt":0.4512185268682029,"spread":0.3737383710552369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790618,0.00008780103,0.0001464928,0.000206617,0.0005715159,0.00006826713,0.0002153084,0.0001568833,0.0006380207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001191382,0.00006724094,0.00007683509,0.0003142961,0.0008479584,0.0006998199,0.00001413239,0.0002876526,0.0002067727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003031343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004902323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007239585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962413,0.0006655972,0.0003446338,0.0001454297,0.001395769,0.001207253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977345,0.0005280357,0.00005099138,0.0001999276,0.0008139638,0.0006725489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009684665,0.0001297211,0.003384127,0.00001256187,0.000005875594,2.495464e-7,0.01429456,1.823735e-8,0.0006641772,0.9766003,0.002675215,0.002223449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006327966,0.001517901,0.04763487,0.0001509298,0.00002275732,0.000004680381,0.1083754,0.0002657409,0.01112297,0.5123076,0.3174882,0.0004762228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8353553,0.0002390826,0.0007261311,0.005124548,0.0004092785,0.0003800436,0.00004207082,0.00005588474,0.1576677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939956,0.00001933947,0.0002011639,0.00008879933,0.001147515,0.00002649756,0.00003029917,0.000009234818,0.004481543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4642928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128006609","doi":"10.1177/1065912921990751","title":"Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Affect (linguistics); Persistence (discontinuity); Political science; Contingent vote; Survey data collection; Natural experiment; Political economy; Economics; Demographic economics; General election; Psychology; Politics; Group voting ticket; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05738659403101184,"gpt":0.4501477109484169,"spread":0.3927611169174051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002947095,0.00008753531,0.0001702974,0.00007719613,0.0009978411,0.0003075854,0.0002084336,0.00007648145,0.0001176471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002462732,0.00005552915,0.00005724827,0.0009149683,0.0007149914,0.0001407232,0.00004316647,0.0005378309,0.0001604923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000203232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004516354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08979129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.401904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952252,0.002098038,0.0002585998,0.0002648257,0.0008243395,0.00132899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964619,0.002479309,0.00001503685,0.0002004504,0.0002860389,0.0005572199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002997511,0.00006257596,0.01164931,0.00001115908,0.000006218886,0.000008567559,0.01731678,2.577778e-7,0.0001159183,0.9683517,0.0006361859,0.001811318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986269,0.001142487,0.5335944,0.0001505722,0.00003463424,0.00002576017,0.08397259,0.002408907,0.000273791,0.3190534,0.05684342,0.0005136877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177331,0.00008768608,0.0001735617,0.1537128,0.0001268541,0.0005802521,0.00001302417,0.00001823847,0.0275545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968253,0.00000517127,0.00001633038,0.0005501771,0.0005600126,0.0001989491,0.000002453923,0.00000848836,0.001833072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6492983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9162698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377088537","doi":"10.1177/10659129231176211","title":"Jobs and Punishment: Public Opinion on Leniency for White-Collar Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"White-collar crime; Public opinion; Wrongdoing; Incentive; Legitimacy; Affect (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); Business; Retributive justice; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3771322186534036,"gpt":0.5457266805041591,"spread":0.1685944618507555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002480989,0.00008760258,0.0001249043,0.0003605407,0.0009679365,0.0004926573,0.0002825334,0.00009345032,0.0006413717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001349414,0.00008257469,0.000101788,0.0005085469,0.0005095212,0.0002479606,0.00004433149,0.0002298605,0.0004768416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001539777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001807092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001393736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003748105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968853,0.0004263595,0.0002083549,0.0003231992,0.0007851244,0.001371645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979249,0.0009126118,0.00001724087,0.0002102537,0.0003258952,0.0006090741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145888,0.0001070225,0.001152564,0.00003147157,0.000008535621,0.000001938398,0.002208455,1.158013e-8,0.00003618527,0.9562495,0.03014416,0.01004552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007241414,0.003663771,0.05061748,0.0001137276,0.000005635517,0.000001101169,0.02959671,0.0002681262,0.00006757104,0.2893358,0.6253351,0.0002707884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3876378,0.0002068833,0.0009905671,0.256855,0.001303089,0.002549452,0.0003532725,0.0004860869,0.3496178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993628,0.00003523581,0.00003525362,0.0001582768,0.0004634662,0.0001941321,0.00002366764,0.00001461086,0.005447408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6669137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7444683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108005226","doi":"10.1177/1065912908320663","title":"Relative Extremism and Relative Moderation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2474749647686408,"gpt":0.4767775318302261,"spread":0.2293025670615853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001379967,0.00008813263,0.000146658,0.0001079822,0.001282183,0.0000836883,0.00009352778,0.000154366,0.0001316771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001633939,0.00008048928,0.00003908729,0.0002685057,0.00134396,0.0006493491,0.00001427125,0.0004301257,0.0002214687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002736431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01665865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00137753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962146,0.001355043,0.0002351345,0.0002625973,0.0008516775,0.001080944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970878,0.001609072,0.00002303976,0.000132352,0.0003959256,0.0007517763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001206965,0.00003532844,0.002315137,0.000005442886,0.000007300677,0.00001006749,0.0106796,8.856716e-8,0.000122782,0.985728,0.0004164237,0.0006677499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892525,0.0006254412,0.02202043,0.00003337408,0.000006900118,0.000005953469,0.002126813,0.0006457346,0.00009518959,0.967292,0.006681378,0.0001775125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7493617,0.0001214226,0.002817104,0.02150357,0.00008809775,0.0005274405,0.000008928669,0.00009002518,0.2254817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931139,0.000005989967,0.000153126,0.00009161374,0.000394314,0.00004909622,0.000003356013,0.000009666418,0.006178953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2437522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121249697","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349627","title":"Rethinking Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Harm; Pornography; Democracy; Political science; Reign; Law; Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Criminology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1021496459684972,"gpt":0.4610999824506014,"spread":0.3589503364821041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002758638,0.00007911167,0.0001250342,0.0001690314,0.001306969,0.0002719245,0.0004018662,0.0002011891,0.0004593632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001403856,0.00006861487,0.00006474667,0.0005474507,0.0006821316,0.00019381,0.00001178512,0.0007842642,0.001021682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001833635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002780012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00185626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000659506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958366,0.0008712424,0.0001809418,0.0002481399,0.001242267,0.001620833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978123,0.0009497484,0.00001373549,0.0002235429,0.0003023757,0.0006983393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009405592,0.00005831118,0.0001366318,0.000001861879,0.000004825371,0.0000339547,0.04290306,4.116071e-8,0.00005808493,0.92132,0.002461508,0.03301236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001108723,0.0004065972,0.001683965,0.00003271622,0.000002960216,0.000001398639,0.01738625,0.00002307117,0.0000595932,0.943057,0.03714001,0.00009559017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2571454,0.0002484123,0.00007517995,0.1032984,0.0001640461,0.000211666,5.167441e-7,0.0001911737,0.6386652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919577,0.00002669031,0.0002956059,0.0006252354,0.0007757147,0.000003480149,0.000001500688,0.000007386996,0.0063067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7348123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395046023","doi":"10.1177/10659129241248406","title":"Mechanisms of Political Responsiveness: The Information Sources Shaping Elected Representatives' Policy Actions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Parliament; Political action; Public administration; Public policy; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1815667486747599,"gpt":0.5088835050591657,"spread":0.3273167563844058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189994,0.000126812,0.0002027946,0.0005383854,0.0008380979,0.0005126521,0.0003616743,0.0001632537,0.0001999379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005805857,0.0000935549,0.00012956,0.001616784,0.001321932,0.0008116365,0.00004061974,0.0005964271,0.0003084101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005641902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001690554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09725928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001857499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934708,0.002533859,0.0005290867,0.0002348897,0.001438583,0.001792776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934943,0.004737943,0.00004014136,0.0002915532,0.0007721054,0.0006639037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003290837,0.000032804,0.00008619303,0.00006918235,0.00002775828,0.000002825785,0.006523286,5.187612e-7,0.001619941,0.9897475,0.0003853428,0.001471728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001259534,0.0005556295,0.006635945,0.0001509103,0.00001962206,0.000004757742,0.02485228,0.0005852715,0.002512693,0.947605,0.01679824,0.0001537324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.537651,0.0002422251,0.02172209,0.287211,0.0007670128,0.002376336,0.0002035793,0.0006033859,0.1492234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982248,0.000002140026,0.00004904234,0.0002790549,0.0006014295,0.0001220239,0.00001070635,0.00001365384,0.00069714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4605738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}