{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":90,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":90,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a53a94d6cacc","filters":{"venue":"Political Studies Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1876990691","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x","title":"Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations: Toward a Multidisciplinary Conversation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":435,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilities; Conversation; Policy transfer; Politics; Sociology; Multidisciplinary approach; Work (physics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Public administration; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1497839436097501,"gpt":0.4686603892144751,"spread":0.3188764456047251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973696,0.0001142041,0.0002979377,0.0000474572,0.0004471883,0.00002131984,0.0000743276,0.00004392142,0.00006442094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002796101,0.00009532969,0.00007027058,0.0002060221,0.0006519364,0.0002703989,0.00005851153,0.0001123141,0.00005521642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009754254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002415427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006980103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983353,0.0004129151,0.0002369745,0.000136725,0.0002206911,0.0006574217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988199,0.0006749977,0.00002825373,0.00008392325,0.00008663489,0.0003063258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001654776,0.00004028201,0.007287937,0.001520588,0.00005503866,6.499833e-7,0.04288692,6.863311e-8,0.000001753137,0.9376189,0.0002505898,0.01033563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001094411,0.0002223962,0.1932513,0.004326985,0.0009004832,0.00002555888,0.2779393,0.00002052439,0.00005458943,0.1099114,0.4108635,0.001389527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03346899,0.7142096,0.0001866098,0.1511954,0.0003397202,0.001299036,0.00002316178,0.0002490521,0.09902846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8843957,0.1127328,0.0001037303,0.001913964,0.0005139112,0.00008259319,0.00000341467,0.000007200098,0.0002466803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3887432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104815380","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00199.x","title":"The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Politics; Explanatory power; Epistemology; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03413259899054638,"gpt":0.4021189070731236,"spread":0.3679863080825773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148294,0.00007384429,0.0004194858,0.000006406713,0.0006877471,0.000006713701,0.0001580071,0.00002568806,0.000004773834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035847,0.0000294243,0.0001343504,0.0001527424,0.00322259,0.00002585375,0.00007384141,0.00006906549,0.000002646616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001938673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002928361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006546146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001065803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987963,0.0002690471,0.0003079665,0.00007334802,0.0002457313,0.000307601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984369,0.001151829,0.00009785904,0.0001068347,0.0001546275,0.00005200937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004930053,0.000008331825,0.00009689913,0.00007159279,0.0000647679,7.083075e-8,0.00248732,1.980807e-9,2.84387e-7,0.9792787,0.0004331188,0.01755396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001462135,0.00003608123,0.003653454,0.0003140079,0.0001057818,3.472547e-7,0.01475851,1.262022e-7,0.000009608227,0.8836452,0.09727509,0.00005550967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001017648,0.7083322,2.771239e-7,0.08909609,0.00005808631,0.0003015854,0.000002760079,0.000008094923,0.2011833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6028448,0.3951715,0.000004034717,0.001754128,0.00009003167,0.000009233114,3.728916e-8,0.000001431667,0.0001248339],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580653733","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00272.x","title":"‘Let there be a Balance’: Women in African Parliaments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Gender studies; Politics; Sociology; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1493546521868695,"gpt":0.4360376649211836,"spread":0.2866830127343141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000832,0.00009629239,0.0003284066,0.0000221642,0.0001579196,0.00001520139,0.0001225304,0.00003329714,0.0002871539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008130877,0.00007246,0.00005804689,0.0001980714,0.0002450396,0.00009168781,0.00007464091,0.0000849639,0.00008495735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004819025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005029422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001003478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001354555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977923,0.0002920849,0.000246427,0.0001329923,0.0003046723,0.001231514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.0001595745,0.00004267192,0.0001216891,0.00005353559,0.0003723935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002010219,0.0002015488,0.0927025,0.000977474,0.00008935402,0.000003852882,0.02612411,5.057671e-8,7.853143e-7,0.8667094,0.006515353,0.006673612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001828205,0.00002145324,0.03335355,0.0003958194,0.00003431942,8.447218e-7,0.0405037,4.975446e-7,0.000002932809,0.02339878,0.9019147,0.0001906394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04698888,0.3817717,0.000006377005,0.0693213,0.0006350084,0.001044368,0.00001882876,0.00006420783,0.5001493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241158,0.0705893,0.0000363574,0.003954773,0.0002774082,0.0001601992,0.000001393429,0.000006321588,0.0008584843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965556682","doi":"10.1177/1478929919865131","title":"Right-Wing Populism and the Politics of Insecurity: How President Trump Frames Migrants as Collective Threats","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Framing (construction); Politics; Ideology; Political economy; Political science; Presidency; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04916609791277082,"gpt":0.3669458433741906,"spread":0.3177797454614197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118126,0.0002665574,0.001089062,0.00005276193,0.0008740075,0.00007401009,0.0003902612,0.0001029928,0.0001203931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916964,0.0001597679,0.000222758,0.0003202476,0.001641279,0.0001849422,0.0002966888,0.0002459116,0.00004432074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000335897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006951714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965141,0.0008746274,0.000495984,0.0003891997,0.0008360376,0.0008900308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974787,0.001432683,0.0002091114,0.0003527092,0.0002709431,0.0002558683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001474148,0.00005860268,0.005704593,0.00122299,0.0003247353,0.000005634256,0.008259638,2.168006e-8,0.000001295496,0.9816704,0.001988298,0.0007489882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001710832,0.000151366,0.01375563,0.004724515,0.0006569403,0.00000584302,0.00801326,0.000004494375,0.0001102679,0.8854759,0.0849152,0.0004757168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2954988,0.5588322,0.000003865754,0.077068,0.0007379678,0.003577503,0.00005625372,0.0000911097,0.06413426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8859422,0.1029704,0.00006609382,0.005583406,0.0002047805,0.00008614056,0.000001867091,0.00001901928,0.005126198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5904433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8344206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803316142","doi":"10.1177/1478929918777975","title":"The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Radical right; Variable (mathematics); Variables; Immigration; Unemployment; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Demographic economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2170182572134253,"gpt":0.4627487538863878,"spread":0.2457304966729625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242227,0.0001675418,0.001274309,0.00006237208,0.0005335226,0.00002914284,0.0004931244,0.00003872703,0.0005436852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002438647,0.00007867728,0.0005891688,0.001125897,0.001989583,0.00008028572,0.000172809,0.0001271818,0.00003396383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001360545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005200731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008786369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968362,0.0009538475,0.000651981,0.000257611,0.0006503051,0.0006500155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982982,0.0008610675,0.0001456839,0.0003025352,0.0002234101,0.0001691391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008031081,0.00008377741,0.05293899,0.0004372089,0.08842728,0.00001431583,0.00703756,2.341044e-7,0.000001396205,0.8472643,0.002320575,0.001466311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001961303,0.00008268857,0.09216146,0.00016928,0.1083792,4.433148e-7,0.0008737664,0.000006668556,0.00003341009,0.01166471,0.7860267,0.0004056372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2244537,0.6803863,0.00001882056,0.05770238,0.000911571,0.001884779,0.0001210934,0.0001123677,0.03440897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789773,0.0175295,0.00003778019,0.002368108,0.0001342152,0.00002780374,0.00000286617,0.000009512849,0.0009129473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8355996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200368091","doi":"10.1177/14789299211058390","title":"Are People More Satisfied with Democracy When They Feel They Won the Election? No","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Democracy; Voting; Political science; Split-ticket voting; Mediation; Single non-transferable vote; Respondent; Conceptualization; Social psychology; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0797218739814854,"gpt":0.3994588516694181,"spread":0.3197369776879327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006365962,0.000179267,0.0005292487,0.00001197016,0.001062894,0.00007623489,0.0001687228,0.00006054778,0.0003508533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003711711,0.00009904437,0.0001266589,0.000238665,0.0002100135,0.0001065948,0.0000709929,0.0002114771,0.0002568657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002312076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001623376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06219873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971699,0.0008269749,0.0003758915,0.0002809938,0.000522367,0.0008239401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977849,0.0008520551,0.0001387433,0.0002791085,0.0006902777,0.0002549503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008177665,0.00008257209,0.04302556,0.001130983,0.0001916586,0.00001131299,0.002862477,4.273292e-7,0.00000350838,0.9363275,0.0147655,0.001590369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005781854,0.0002224868,0.1872044,0.005134552,0.0009718541,0.00003115308,0.01089633,0.00001621212,0.00005040819,0.2384749,0.5554665,0.0009529302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03945829,0.1228764,0.00008520563,0.7290102,0.0007810317,0.002228539,0.00003358213,0.0002655086,0.1052612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797537,0.007525952,0.00005319649,0.009420469,0.0006884482,0.0001764097,0.000003764372,0.00001582969,0.00236226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164662615","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9299.2008.00168.x","title":"Comparative Journal Ratings: A Survey Report","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Survey research; Regional science; Public relations; Social science; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5571540850613699,"gpt":0.5884562526653938,"spread":0.03130216760402393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006561535,0.000102233,0.000440203,0.00003006183,0.001633875,0.00004538492,0.0002551092,0.00003181453,0.000525506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03913622,0.00007175376,0.00010522,0.0004577417,0.001836932,0.0002113173,0.00006735079,0.0002428691,0.000256706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006251602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004894342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958097,0.001134063,0.0004399515,0.0001978107,0.000828143,0.001590286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962693,0.001247291,0.00009399549,0.0001371842,0.0008276685,0.001424547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001237886,0.0004359585,0.07044811,0.0007374877,0.0002331863,0.0005044607,0.01293818,1.535798e-7,0.000003137932,0.5058827,0.4015972,0.007207048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001503733,0.0001204977,0.1537348,0.0009704953,0.00004187939,0.0006051825,0.006173228,0.000003434719,0.00001270337,0.01941314,0.8184222,0.0003520572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04782728,0.2688026,0.0001679375,0.1102635,0.001272621,0.001257353,0.00001855271,0.0001205945,0.5702695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8481715,0.1442727,0.0002401392,0.003774954,0.0008235238,0.00004534225,0.000004757239,0.000004971316,0.002662114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8003442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986205589","doi":"10.1111/1478-9299.t01-2-00003","title":"Equality: From Marxism to Liberalism (and Back Again)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Proletariat; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Flourishing; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Materialism; Marxist philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2562981807556405,"gpt":0.4499342341790122,"spread":0.1936360534233718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347897,0.0001770951,0.0005750894,0.00001907697,0.000419922,0.00004498585,0.0001719752,0.0001103598,0.0007102918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736249,0.0001454553,0.000113527,0.0002071272,0.0008139177,0.00009704541,0.0001300209,0.0002513744,0.001262468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001480721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007313239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001412941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009538516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970202,0.0009347006,0.0003936157,0.000345959,0.0003976283,0.0009078412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971749,0.001556015,0.00003394438,0.0002323898,0.0001440697,0.0008587324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001052439,0.00002127662,0.00005986109,0.0003678659,0.00004246612,0.000003022751,0.0008767277,7.011867e-9,3.713804e-7,0.9928047,0.004279982,0.001542636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005316202,0.00001320405,0.00008064119,0.0004643879,0.00004595799,3.731574e-7,0.0002713271,4.739467e-8,0.000003710197,0.4416465,0.5572937,0.0001270518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006352227,0.1373512,0.00003885145,0.2707251,0.0003023194,0.0004278914,0.00003679955,0.00005252403,0.5904301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4022501,0.1974922,0.002275842,0.3897764,0.001559629,0.0001252803,0.000007366216,0.00004165315,0.006471559],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5839585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286495524","doi":"10.1177/14789299221109081","title":"Covid-19 Policy Convergence in Response to Knightian Uncertainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of British Columbia; McGill University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Incentive; Divergence (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Knightian uncertainty; Politics; Public opinion; Public policy; Set (abstract data type); Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Ambiguity; Law; Macroeconomics; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1348487233406251,"gpt":0.4896484995432864,"spread":0.3547997762026613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003273714,0.0001789241,0.0006185042,0.0001492371,0.002189798,0.00001387384,0.0004213725,0.00003935933,0.0005784932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03276418,0.0001465188,0.0001605002,0.001723345,0.000782178,0.00005278594,0.0006312582,0.0002543329,0.0001119136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00299553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001721482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02673044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004299667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953909,0.002061288,0.000467955,0.0003404017,0.0006298883,0.001109567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973683,0.001369759,0.00006829162,0.0002047237,0.00009660287,0.0008922855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009086812,0.00007401956,0.000643561,0.000593618,0.00006511107,0.00003474651,0.02306135,0.000009507668,0.000001092287,0.9466965,0.02680803,0.001921666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001897896,0.00008690217,0.0009669053,0.0001187011,0.00002371197,0.000002162607,0.02734203,5.838101e-7,3.842102e-7,0.04656355,0.9244805,0.0002247664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003481559,0.07980345,0.000004044985,0.873988,0.000512103,0.001373897,0.00009008569,0.0001227019,0.0406241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.653052,0.1076745,0.00003073294,0.2330997,0.00085502,0.001115859,0.000003030589,0.00001940129,0.004149722],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964828952","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00193.x","title":"The Contemporary Radical Right: Past, Present and Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Radical right; Appeal; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Relevance (law); Political radicalism; Front (military); New Right; Extreme right; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06885840889288128,"gpt":0.3974703155992587,"spread":0.3286119067063774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008846722,0.0001492301,0.0003892539,0.00001130264,0.001178628,0.00005704015,0.0002640093,0.00005382328,0.00005214823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002907405,0.00007869596,0.00009683328,0.0001403741,0.0009503043,0.00009509447,0.0000903423,0.0001682535,0.00003665511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006523199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000127389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002557651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978348,0.000453687,0.0003443506,0.0002346459,0.000496374,0.0006361675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989372,0.0003961773,0.00006282041,0.0002000237,0.00008098259,0.0003227495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002902362,0.00003894936,0.0002045484,0.000136214,0.00005915493,0.00001368616,0.0004848844,1.274505e-9,1.329615e-7,0.7670053,0.1914417,0.04061249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001114071,0.00003534045,0.00272876,0.0002846111,0.00003697593,0.000001293181,0.000521037,2.844277e-7,0.000001270374,0.04171771,0.9544581,0.0001032551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002649584,0.5067512,0.000001876938,0.4135934,0.0002784432,0.0004876368,0.000003750026,0.00004852601,0.07857019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.205863,0.7343763,0.0001367488,0.04538448,0.01093462,0.0001018922,0.000004377202,0.00001828023,0.003180309],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7630163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610370816","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00219.x","title":"What Can Multicultural Theory Tell Us about Integrating Muslims in Europe?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Underpinning; Politics; Democracy; Immigration; Political economy; Sociology; Islamophobia; Political science; Law; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04247990569086332,"gpt":0.3846024328193373,"spread":0.3421225271284739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419096,0.0001729123,0.0003931536,0.00003288852,0.0003798281,0.0001320621,0.0002077525,0.00007325318,0.0002969383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01022602,0.0001096278,0.00009246257,0.0003776365,0.0005245693,0.0003733553,0.0000512164,0.0003790082,0.00008786489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000958791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07614183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978495,0.0006035372,0.0004663109,0.0002537895,0.0002884436,0.0005384039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986149,0.0004802446,0.00008438178,0.0001604916,0.0004849331,0.0001750647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002367008,0.00005025757,0.001497731,0.0003439348,0.00002304354,0.000003600352,0.03111937,6.408806e-8,0.00004342571,0.9408106,0.001426674,0.02467894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002128724,0.00005515085,0.008374845,0.003395734,0.00008914216,0.000004152109,0.05626747,0.00002386829,0.00007781348,0.005283787,0.925777,0.0004381725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5108106,0.3441198,0.00003262232,0.02535217,0.005382347,0.002463154,0.00002013378,0.0002413345,0.1115778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7162579,0.2721382,0.0003253197,0.007839264,0.001015128,0.000113058,0.00001609009,0.00001663996,0.002278324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979065067","doi":"10.1177/1478929919847132","title":"Consultant Lobbyists and Public Officials: Selling Policy Expertise or Personal Connections in Canada?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Public relations; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1063566552186614,"gpt":0.3265862546060092,"spread":0.2202295993873478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001859126,0.000213975,0.0005785184,0.00009719921,0.0001316315,0.0001101274,0.0001178929,0.00003359018,0.0003127445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001453732,0.0001534613,0.00004772861,0.0005696786,0.0001866796,0.0004006978,0.0001359691,0.0001446344,0.0001574434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004056038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007937494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5098348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3787654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981768,0.00002672416,0.0004638304,0.000295527,0.0002239136,0.0008132614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.0002616854,0.00008668618,0.0001281507,0.0002370538,0.00007459272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009748932,0.00003124606,0.008353173,0.002866304,0.00004303087,0.00003001304,0.00001990621,4.025707e-7,0.000004483018,0.9843445,0.000908721,0.003388421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002880195,0.0001457492,0.0381167,0.01377191,0.0004938758,0.0001367293,0.03433713,0.003310192,0.00002583034,0.08044481,0.8233049,0.003031975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.639396,0.1829176,0.00001298654,0.1064935,0.0006011734,0.001578345,0.0000491815,0.0001522645,0.06879903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589285,0.01164423,0.000007945274,0.0288478,0.0003836338,0.00004913333,0.000004604578,0.00001262807,0.0001215172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6325706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079622474","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00007.x","title":"Taxation and Distributive Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Economics; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Public economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1762564249190296,"gpt":0.4615375938042736,"spread":0.285281168885244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005436433,0.00008574724,0.0002446722,0.000009014484,0.0005399922,0.00001657289,0.00007563025,0.00005456039,0.00002842994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01228798,0.00006826113,0.00004825643,0.0001345548,0.001156117,0.00008996817,0.00006364298,0.0001538229,0.00008356619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002311335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008367878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004167034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006300402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.0001479996,0.0001845864,0.000153032,0.0002387405,0.0004786954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988981,0.00052676,0.00004822798,0.00007697044,0.0001595602,0.0002903496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.453371e-7,0.00001703658,0.00001943132,0.0008284355,0.00001625677,0.000002376194,0.0004854261,2.979288e-8,1.122754e-7,0.9972688,0.0002675731,0.001093772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009938273,0.00002503821,0.0006304157,0.0007660917,0.0002026522,0.00000141495,0.00104732,1.189169e-7,0.000004543768,0.8930196,0.1040975,0.0001059022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007750306,0.257614,0.0003455108,0.394128,0.0003076251,0.0004977376,0.00004712947,0.0001011704,0.3461838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8478143,0.1358153,0.000128254,0.01567715,0.0004533168,0.00002512756,0.000003063544,0.000004289188,0.00007915062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8470393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127451413","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12055","title":"Taking Explanation Seriously in Political Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec); University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Politics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Positive economics; Sociology; Systems theory in political science; Social science; Political science; Political philosophy; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3261567400023848,"gpt":0.5884286726172157,"spread":0.2622719326148308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007732689,0.0001243447,0.0005240929,0.000183177,0.0005765944,0.0000650962,0.0004263485,0.00003008042,0.0005028988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03979139,0.0001014708,0.00008614287,0.001545119,0.002727946,0.0002667114,0.0001784828,0.0001939534,0.0003787651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002737477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00208922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001832711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949303,0.001634722,0.0004473257,0.0003669575,0.001101909,0.001518821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967593,0.001782871,0.0000813404,0.0001977732,0.0006944131,0.0004843242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.618691e-7,0.00002674853,0.001897871,0.0002139366,0.00001221972,0.000001365348,0.001046917,1.226612e-7,0.000007454119,0.9916981,0.0004047593,0.004689586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000642934,0.0002246796,0.1104807,0.004446202,0.0001356581,0.000003319936,0.03251603,0.0004604951,0.0002106066,0.4673315,0.3825366,0.001011354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01480018,0.0497703,0.001139755,0.1101598,0.0001932455,0.0009718271,0.000004590401,0.00009221042,0.822868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894199,0.005942812,0.0002117988,0.003968251,0.0001627138,0.00006843747,0.000001144641,0.000005650764,0.0002193035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142962280","doi":"10.1177/14789299211001690","title":"Does Federalism Prevent Democratic Accountability? Assigning Responsibility for Rates of COVID-19 Testing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Federalism; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public economics; Economics; Law; Medicine; Disease","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3007585873983663,"gpt":0.5225060600833137,"spread":0.2217474726849474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003343623,0.0001507221,0.0007160582,0.00001726155,0.0006619988,0.00004021763,0.0001233067,0.00007063578,0.0001247664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0833829,0.00009554064,0.0001812542,0.0003598386,0.0004879648,0.0001159405,0.00008058637,0.00009940826,0.000005797474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005286377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008426714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003325607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003142299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961777,0.001566229,0.0008328781,0.0003520325,0.0003651076,0.0007060973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989457,0.008750597,0.0001667194,0.0002410047,0.000949228,0.0004355007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002171665,0.0002946944,0.03846082,0.02643363,0.0001773656,0.000004994144,0.001765187,0.000001052466,0.0002269733,0.9251459,0.003528529,0.003939175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005331366,0.0002353808,0.006424405,0.005001734,0.0006004046,0.000003587622,0.0045264,0.00005983644,0.001935818,0.8924431,0.08760808,0.0006281403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2113688,0.220195,0.003081091,0.5315513,0.002238306,0.01072375,0.000331932,0.0004490199,0.02006081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915529,0.001362319,0.0009059336,0.004839881,0.0003277524,0.0003498441,0.000007132283,0.00001126702,0.0006429172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9243382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981723007","doi":"10.1177/1478929919881332","title":"The Moral Foundations of Public Engagement: Does Political Science, as a Discipline, Have an Ethics?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Praxis; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Criticism; Political science; Political philosophy; CLARITY; Public engagement; Citizenship; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Social science; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3645412430301688,"gpt":0.5735652990163207,"spread":0.2090240559861519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0184042,0.0001451263,0.000358479,0.00008800431,0.003053077,0.0003019702,0.001025866,0.00006363125,0.0007293173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06318871,0.00007684173,0.0001294791,0.0009559455,0.009462578,0.0007251902,0.0004012402,0.0004686284,0.0002875127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009650995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003601862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004279222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001858989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923366,0.001296203,0.0005031505,0.000414999,0.001874481,0.003574542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924253,0.003449511,0.00008739992,0.0005102831,0.001219464,0.002308006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001146112,0.00008675124,0.004770513,0.0002250078,0.00001598683,2.716836e-7,0.0009550023,1.173188e-8,0.000004174874,0.9895744,0.0001113976,0.004255343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001312585,0.0001870322,0.0218516,0.0004725452,0.00005495652,0.000001515298,0.0466985,0.00002193395,0.00004646973,0.725708,0.2045717,0.0002544778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04344325,0.01064416,0.0000319308,0.5043612,0.0009076544,0.001655298,0.00003109546,0.00007130322,0.4388542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861387,0.009559228,0.0001060849,0.002458497,0.0003150076,0.00009998419,0.000004353289,0.000006782136,0.001311334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940132263","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12018","title":"The Future of Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Liberalism; Liberal education; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Liberal arts education; Philosophy; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043605403803128,"gpt":0.4165109872557917,"spread":0.3121504468754789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005378741,0.00009899411,0.0003065277,0.000005615776,0.0006336739,0.00002416127,0.0002583024,0.00006598583,0.0001447848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427547,0.00004961826,0.0001482667,0.000135245,0.001702168,0.0001016557,0.00009014914,0.0002029149,0.000216367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006932278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004173625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005533525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009299078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982792,0.0003376799,0.0003198367,0.0001144241,0.0003419819,0.0006069456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997961,0.001186827,0.0000503315,0.0001588753,0.0003979449,0.0002449993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.692539e-7,0.00001182432,0.00001604696,0.000346882,0.00003055532,3.042275e-7,0.0006681757,3.709916e-9,3.717652e-7,0.977921,0.01488169,0.006122796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000422763,0.00001339254,0.000522219,0.0003293316,0.00004153978,4.939031e-7,0.002090911,4.283793e-7,0.000003980022,0.3855157,0.6113597,0.00008007026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005322616,0.384219,5.195586e-7,0.4837808,0.0004419141,0.0004714541,0.000004954281,0.00003419115,0.1305148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5307085,0.4418576,0.0001248155,0.02341305,0.002019944,0.0001284351,0.000001262544,0.000008435512,0.001737968],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.596478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6271709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900083978","doi":"10.1177/1478929918807972","title":"What Is an Ombudsperson? Global Diffusion, International Standardization, and Institutional Diversification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Democracy; Diversification (marketing strategy); Institution; Corporation; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Institutional theory; Public administration; Political science; Public institution; Civil society; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08904207041328743,"gpt":0.419098828666169,"spread":0.3300567582528816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003348103,0.00009468995,0.0001839391,0.00001915628,0.001074706,0.0001376608,0.000166198,0.00003865095,0.0009819313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000248054,0.00007488018,0.00004167221,0.0001215161,0.001490248,0.0006276732,0.0000914377,0.00004223501,0.0001148707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003204539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008180667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001368212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005189091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987568,0.0001133629,0.0001957701,0.0002447276,0.0004348297,0.0002545138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990604,0.00003655173,0.00004719087,0.0001073819,0.0005446487,0.0002038049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003375172,0.00003722873,0.001581815,0.00007890361,0.00003861367,9.656429e-7,0.00308471,6.496216e-9,2.358546e-7,0.9770133,0.004673568,0.01348731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002002631,0.00005078117,0.01120842,0.0005950727,0.00006926408,0.000002481992,0.004714362,0.00001032367,0.000002551692,0.04938157,0.9336084,0.0001565085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08693805,0.3441018,0.002080998,0.2596895,0.008950783,0.002253292,0.0003522352,0.0004444951,0.2951889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6923795,0.292267,0.0003045396,0.01236506,0.001586223,0.00001708447,0.00002911717,0.000005825124,0.001045621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956643530","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12058","title":"Elites in Action: Change and Continuity in Strategic Culture","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Culture change; Strategic planning; Strategic thinking; Political science; Sociology; Organizational culture; Public relations; Social science; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2757296523925866,"gpt":0.4758798443029653,"spread":0.2001501919103787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004920098,0.00005788229,0.0001933244,0.00003003179,0.00008453315,0.00001531059,0.00005194259,0.00003765025,0.00007098925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007960166,0.00004402465,0.00002703123,0.0001538765,0.0001832334,0.00008650711,0.00002791379,0.00009607273,0.00002482109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001480127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001086279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002121828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992248,0.0001466783,0.0001683299,0.000103339,0.0001232029,0.0002336475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996509,0.0001557256,0.00002619565,0.00004080092,0.00006538882,0.0000609981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[4.706275e-7,0.00001123092,0.00372644,0.0001510677,0.000003807325,5.583512e-7,0.0007572913,8.747912e-9,8.577154e-8,0.9904286,0.00008260002,0.004837786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001974967,0.00003054665,0.04696329,0.001268685,0.00001691235,0.000001309288,0.002546678,0.0000144987,5.442897e-7,0.5832567,0.3655711,0.000132309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01200262,0.1281967,0.000002676245,0.01175219,0.00006256257,0.0004043531,0.000004817986,0.00001723851,0.8475568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917475,0.1051528,0.00002757619,0.002220162,0.0002358914,0.00005571738,0.000001243254,0.00000201442,0.0005570769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763502379","doi":"10.1177/1478929917720429","title":"Situating Earth Democracy: Vandana Shiva on Agroecology, Contemporary Politics and Resilience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Politics; Sustainability; Democracy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychological resilience; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Ecology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0823965429244996,"gpt":0.3265337054843363,"spread":0.2441371625598367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003428977,0.0002535346,0.000582183,0.00000560669,0.001417989,0.00008738465,0.0003524648,0.00007366221,0.00006486209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001816702,0.00008166989,0.00009425911,0.00006483925,0.0003833931,0.000134373,0.0004232122,0.0001903908,0.00009005555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004957144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001632951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001574647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001741786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981581,0.0001290601,0.0003994993,0.0004152995,0.0002570041,0.0006410288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986135,0.0006395333,0.0001777396,0.0001357123,0.0001273726,0.0003061048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002545383,0.0002202229,0.1102763,0.00154881,0.0002484672,0.0001192338,0.0001384205,1.030038e-7,0.0001166353,0.697237,0.04009758,0.1499717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001770859,0.000306324,0.8721017,0.001525339,0.00005416827,0.00002411761,0.000291594,0.000002348947,0.0001270705,0.04157924,0.08341806,0.0003929537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.824545,0.07677569,9.454307e-7,0.06252258,0.0003285539,0.001030238,0.00007151398,0.000117914,0.03460757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749652,0.01674571,0.000107965,0.007140318,0.0002457663,0.0000322903,0.00001474332,0.00000142623,0.0007466134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7618254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743240725","doi":"10.1177/1478929917704815","title":"What Makes a Political Theory <i>Political</i> ? A Comment on Waldron","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Idealization; Political philosophy; Legitimacy; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Abstraction; Epistemology; Law and economics; Conversation; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2273783492528414,"gpt":0.4738709291070918,"spread":0.2464925798542504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024822,0.0004696988,0.001169535,0.00005109563,0.003201764,0.0005047397,0.001154084,0.0002747175,0.000376494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02088835,0.0003657976,0.0004910177,0.0001026907,0.006661251,0.0005810713,0.0005704956,0.0008576593,0.00104272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009313842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002571134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009095967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009007578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923216,0.001428365,0.0007663919,0.0006718556,0.001176336,0.003635478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918088,0.00426821,0.0001486301,0.00123885,0.0003610513,0.002174402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001785686,0.0002249468,0.00004646825,0.001133507,0.0001222505,0.00003572951,0.0003275403,7.416278e-9,1.812528e-7,0.9875371,0.007953322,0.002601128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001921566,0.000105447,0.0001066248,0.002893855,0.0001703615,0.000003512187,0.002307245,5.141841e-7,0.00001557871,0.615857,0.3780519,0.0002957861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006816873,0.02838471,0.00001078978,0.563623,0.0008773034,0.000533275,0.00003278376,0.0001035963,0.4063664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6173298,0.04190337,0.00005131447,0.3377417,0.001771633,0.0001599532,0.000004991796,0.00003509546,0.001002161],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6172616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906643019","doi":"10.1177/1478929918819195","title":"The Iron Cage of Enterprise or the Restoration of Class Power? Approaches to Understanding Neoliberalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Marxist philosophy; Sociology; Subjectivity; Rationality; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Epistemology; Subjectification; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3329209131505452,"gpt":0.3826339965371486,"spread":0.04971308338660335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225219,0.00009458627,0.0003606189,0.00001457978,0.0002913388,0.00001772733,0.0002787246,0.00003867885,0.00007362667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001345421,0.00004215075,0.0001096733,0.0001587673,0.0008914329,0.00007482579,0.0001358692,0.00009526324,0.00003624493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002730785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001055336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004201137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003998062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984035,0.0003802881,0.0004022985,0.0001405214,0.000234954,0.0004383603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979295,0.001555103,0.0001007402,0.0002409197,0.00004463003,0.0001290727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000951753,0.00001228724,0.00004625723,0.0003904439,0.00002936848,2.246882e-7,0.002582263,2.280957e-7,4.524382e-7,0.9952946,0.0009494259,0.0006849606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002031705,0.0002043084,0.0004430714,0.001383345,0.000135805,0.000001163906,0.03693819,0.000008521695,0.00002636167,0.1759349,0.7845163,0.0002048586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01208348,0.06694416,0.0002829853,0.5073386,0.0008428085,0.002942049,0.00003197437,0.00004385442,0.4094901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795493,0.0148379,0.00002811036,0.003965578,0.00007491027,0.00004026416,5.231179e-7,0.000005904119,0.001497464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507824196","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00243.x","title":"Virtue Epistemology and the ‘Epistemic Fitness’ of Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Virtue; Normative; Democracy; Social epistemology; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1259582919674101,"gpt":0.354937026333023,"spread":0.2289787343656129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00132959,0.0001794846,0.000944763,0.00001933513,0.0003222172,0.00001088086,0.0001524068,0.00004690444,0.0001366412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001235332,0.00009776951,0.0001841658,0.0000314728,0.004695218,0.00009249907,0.0001635186,0.0002238556,0.00006260264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002668192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001876762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000130933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000423268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998132,0.0005416994,0.0005578604,0.0001532989,0.0001419319,0.0004732262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972332,0.002012012,0.0001665927,0.0002667646,0.0002078827,0.0001136188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000722703,0.00003466588,0.0003731287,0.004221015,0.000158491,6.197365e-7,0.002406521,4.764464e-9,5.705776e-7,0.9900947,0.001348495,0.001354532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008722049,0.00009590553,0.0006854963,0.001852163,0.001061483,0.00005954624,0.004410986,0.000002096329,0.00002203428,0.5025483,0.4880572,0.0003325971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003541013,0.8470476,0.00001641057,0.05332301,0.0009565802,0.0005406798,0.00002442388,0.00003152682,0.09451876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106806,0.07758327,0.00003280176,0.008976185,0.0007665216,0.00006341862,0.000003043505,0.00001470954,0.00187948],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9071395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129027856","doi":"10.1177/1478929920985686","title":"Should We or Should We Not Include Confidence Intervals in COVID-19 Death Forecasting? Evidence from a Survey Experiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Confidence interval; Affect (linguistics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Survey data collection; Reliability (semiconductor); Econometrics; Consumer confidence index; Psychology; Actuarial science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8844695486587504,"gpt":0.6012815572450311,"spread":0.2831879914137193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005693442,0.0007672062,0.003476232,0.00006669419,0.0003176842,0.00006781292,0.000758695,0.00021747,0.001340674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4022367,0.0004995621,0.0004573101,0.0006961297,0.0005665502,0.0001897342,0.002956454,0.0006980829,0.000090084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004467525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006570395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904708,0.003337762,0.002420285,0.001389359,0.0008978845,0.001483866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9064202,0.09092491,0.0004116161,0.0009955071,0.0005071361,0.0007406301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001299727,0.003285859,0.1783884,0.1188052,0.004249632,0.004851299,0.01246198,0.00001790336,0.00020464,0.4725592,0.1707337,0.03314259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00299645,0.001109982,0.02343749,0.1652168,0.00174704,0.0001586932,0.005830232,0.0005108395,0.001793425,0.5689988,0.2242462,0.003954154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006825555,0.8275394,0.003693931,0.1590982,0.0003121754,0.001735173,0.0001977374,0.0002171913,0.0003806746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2750969,0.643588,0.005885163,0.07373916,0.0002377719,0.001100039,0.00001355276,0.00005986716,0.0002795065],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216070479","doi":"10.1177/14789299211059428","title":"Value-added and Transparent Experiments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Elite; Value (mathematics); Politics; SPARK (programming language); Identity (music); Process (computing); Work (physics); Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Positive economics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3185554339124465,"gpt":0.5092538635986922,"spread":0.1906984296862457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003146762,0.00008893467,0.0003400993,0.000007178788,0.0002672067,0.00002315182,0.00004798939,0.0000341782,0.0002631375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001001344,0.00007195809,0.00006475932,0.0001295835,0.0002528511,0.0000539191,0.0000311095,0.00005935035,0.0000516963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006313749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001022094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003127607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983769,0.0004128976,0.0002688534,0.0001808518,0.000255793,0.0005046912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992047,0.0002347228,0.00002403809,0.00009551179,0.0001346909,0.0003063679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.563048e-7,0.00003335952,0.0008686782,0.0006835785,0.00003884436,0.00000552141,0.0005404763,1.69618e-8,0.00001271001,0.9939466,0.001417636,0.002451895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004028778,0.00009306688,0.006535508,0.003440743,0.0003468593,0.000006745835,0.002559438,0.000004993252,0.0008177658,0.07891491,0.906381,0.0004960899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01466857,0.7969165,0.00005754808,0.100597,0.0004521154,0.0005824853,0.00001146262,0.00008680757,0.08662756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558997,0.03799573,0.00007308464,0.005007123,0.0002323063,0.0000716233,0.000002505073,0.000005928561,0.0007119697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2934366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154868771","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9299.2009.00178.x","title":"Four Perspectives on Terrorism: Where They Stand Depends on Where You Sit","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Terrorism; Mainstream; Hegemony; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; Epistemology; Relativism; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; International relations; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Politics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07321959237516805,"gpt":0.3993829057860161,"spread":0.326163313410848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008449258,0.0004760644,0.0009559698,0.00007079575,0.0007713036,0.00009483485,0.0005737318,0.0001726414,0.0005157049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001457334,0.0003540434,0.0003661739,0.0002467686,0.0005551701,0.0002024681,0.00007808347,0.0005379906,0.0006006631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007660785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000139941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006206214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008326256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995426,0.0006328574,0.0005866123,0.0007404236,0.001018631,0.001595447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.0006506691,0.0001214061,0.0005367307,0.0003076612,0.0006767485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845321,0.0008161868,0.0006823397,0.00166496,0.00029031,0.0001779201,0.07743596,4.673931e-7,0.000003198594,0.7914011,0.0444856,0.08294352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007684466,0.00171985,0.004235124,0.01309291,0.0003972234,0.00001498113,0.3936203,0.000003608331,0.000009497769,0.03246032,0.5523654,0.001312367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02962339,0.5246951,0.00005639631,0.2500329,0.00112135,0.001536874,0.0001183823,0.0004618594,0.1923537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7810403,0.2082492,0.00001536994,0.007789945,0.0009657015,0.00004260238,0.000001280381,0.00002124693,0.001874411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7589408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385460101","doi":"10.1177/14789299231188336","title":"Does Simulating Financial Equality Reduce the Political Donations Gender Gap?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Gender gap; Variety (cybernetics); Survey data collection; Political science; Federal election; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.397899287389412,"gpt":0.524222900680599,"spread":0.1263236132911869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002025326,0.0001725686,0.0004494306,0.00003223648,0.001334578,0.00006051427,0.000244131,0.00008979694,0.0002287422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01633404,0.00008832552,0.0002035674,0.0007407587,0.0007959635,0.0001125706,0.0001389344,0.0002331813,0.0004619281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002051003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00377327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001244397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956936,0.001153982,0.0006401604,0.0002982459,0.0006647341,0.001549299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996107,0.002769975,0.0000786276,0.0002591273,0.0003492489,0.0004360373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001041719,0.00002128452,0.001533589,0.0005421464,0.00002724836,0.000001722281,0.0006778554,5.603158e-7,0.000001643964,0.9903936,0.005808745,0.0009905413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425962,0.00003254426,0.0141958,0.000672645,0.0001907616,9.262189e-7,0.002759428,0.00007156443,0.00001762792,0.6642321,0.3173309,0.0003531153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02346927,0.01723649,0.00009261613,0.8247757,0.002159398,0.002321991,0.0001021093,0.0006849481,0.1291575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862446,0.001484318,0.00001710835,0.009460667,0.00160614,0.0001899666,0.000007857655,0.0000126835,0.0009766629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385616827","doi":"10.1177/14789299231191431","title":"Ideas, Policy Feedback and the American Political Economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; International political economy; American political science; Currency; Political economy; Political science; Public policy; Politics of the United States; Sociology; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08410915719664726,"gpt":0.4511298143292208,"spread":0.3670206571325735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001349518,0.0002025583,0.0008827579,0.00006212298,0.001492949,0.00005133684,0.0002519486,0.00004059438,0.00001243833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00596806,0.0001139645,0.0002266777,0.000967543,0.009086477,0.00007945469,0.0003629378,0.0001887314,0.0002880686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002180091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001635992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006654573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003207186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970033,0.0005950551,0.0003973207,0.0002677843,0.0002731321,0.001463476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971811,0.001981804,0.00009716964,0.0001885048,0.0001414006,0.0004100522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000551893,0.000007739681,0.0002350728,0.0003305541,0.0001388318,0.000002313372,0.001102319,4.838821e-9,1.633211e-8,0.982371,0.00960458,0.00620205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002803427,0.00002242313,0.003510987,0.0002253281,0.0001152267,0.000002421156,0.0146887,0.000001054548,3.786924e-7,0.7192939,0.2616802,0.0001790028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007617706,0.04872117,7.322678e-7,0.6106701,0.0001153995,0.0005071716,0.00001132383,0.0001517624,0.3390605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4462034,0.4541161,0.00001660561,0.09396695,0.003556283,0.0002779457,0.000002268347,0.00002364682,0.001836821],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5167032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966492703","doi":"10.1177/1478929919865467","title":"Is It a Duty to Vote <i>and</i> to be Informed?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Voting; Spoilt vote; Moral obligation; Contingent vote; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Group voting ticket; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1892612065549737,"gpt":0.4763040612686781,"spread":0.2870428547137044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005476866,0.0001240015,0.0004427345,0.00002463781,0.000195824,0.0000348357,0.000120105,0.00004609637,0.0002027575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063236,0.00009471324,0.00007613519,0.0002944303,0.0001083368,0.00008642651,0.0001210592,0.00007800326,0.001242019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002055542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008355748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005212488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004517513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0001316113,0.0003567686,0.0002164996,0.0003601277,0.0007862714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984911,0.0004167336,0.0000296358,0.0001605117,0.0001740172,0.0007280126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003406672,0.00001705739,0.004840842,0.001512077,0.00003718594,7.469917e-7,0.003506076,4.928136e-8,0.000004015053,0.8815118,0.1055816,0.002985114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005530814,0.00009871583,0.00176088,0.0008854381,0.00003494351,4.37104e-7,0.0004164348,5.083511e-7,0.00001204053,0.002095671,0.9944912,0.0001484418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04509754,0.01553424,0.00001292971,0.807913,0.0003726478,0.001891871,0.00002443957,0.0000613904,0.1290919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7760193,0.003248261,0.00008525563,0.2145803,0.0002591971,0.0001312123,9.589497e-7,0.000008299397,0.005667224],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8889095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377021655","doi":"10.1177/14789299231174756","title":"Fair-Weather Voters: Personality and Vote Switching Intentions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Machiavellianism; Big Five personality traits; Conscientiousness; Social psychology; Openness to experience; Psychology; Personality; Psychopathy; Agreeableness; Trait; Facet (psychology); Extraversion and introversion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1677553468130488,"gpt":0.4679737145489153,"spread":0.3002183677358666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081902,0.00009252683,0.0003051052,0.00002466889,0.0005008252,0.00002329904,0.0001119774,0.00004593638,0.0001196706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001880898,0.00007222225,0.0001244793,0.0002873249,0.0004877728,0.00007358465,0.0001103317,0.0001212517,0.0001786756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008441732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000202591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001302219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008090957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986148,0.0002682977,0.0002090535,0.000209265,0.0002182549,0.0004802783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993379,0.0002944694,0.00003258352,0.00008548497,0.00009729202,0.0001522925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001907022,0.00003189885,0.003591973,0.0005560918,0.0001502336,0.000005135469,0.006145772,2.893839e-9,0.00000807686,0.9259917,0.02658152,0.03693574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001730699,0.00005701214,0.04291845,0.001387599,0.0001627151,0.000003565833,0.02188657,0.000002564745,9.535547e-7,0.09942187,0.8337069,0.0002787673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04515091,0.2259248,0.0001805966,0.4213576,0.001659514,0.0008947577,0.00002266228,0.0005528908,0.3042563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8348187,0.1476,0.00005933805,0.01391085,0.0006723949,0.00009328105,0.000002491927,0.00001358085,0.002829442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3851994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206606421","doi":"10.1177/14789299211064450","title":"Does the Introduction of Online Voting Create Diversity in Representation?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Globe; Turnout; Scope (computer science); The Internet; Electronic voting; Public relations; Ranked voting system; Politics; Public administration; Internet privacy; Political economy; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Law; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1357157183157339,"gpt":0.4494321949217522,"spread":0.3137164766060183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003730746,0.00005095996,0.000258943,0.00001048079,0.000335978,0.000006047995,0.00009636528,0.00002459547,0.0001376629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009751749,0.00002828036,0.000071247,0.000324599,0.0004701347,0.00004322447,0.0001907185,0.00009379976,0.000007792995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007260209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002850741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001885706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985967,0.0005552508,0.0002312204,0.0001203828,0.0002373546,0.0002590548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987597,0.0007814856,0.00005449606,0.00009781089,0.0002484947,0.00005804533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001914367,0.00009688213,0.1455262,0.0008316572,0.00007372849,0.000007475781,0.01178544,2.266166e-7,0.000002608826,0.8300841,0.00336636,0.00822338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004268107,0.00003691181,0.0997643,0.001755564,0.0004761146,0.000002814913,0.343977,0.00000421105,0.000446507,0.1011282,0.4516333,0.0003482599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2361268,0.1226143,0.000009684682,0.6249278,0.002037231,0.0006680953,0.00003911111,0.00004589177,0.01353098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8849624,0.1103583,0.00007184663,0.002353127,0.001656748,0.00001047835,0.000006581674,0.000003400217,0.0005770939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7289559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413201879","doi":"10.1177/14789299251361779","title":"From Reconciliation to Reversal: Explaining Reconciliatory Backsliding in Settler Societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Referendum; Politics; Declaration; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07858070062874419,"gpt":0.4200414015493989,"spread":0.3414607009206547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001747194,0.0001319182,0.0004578122,0.00006889529,0.001742052,0.00002543007,0.0001704057,0.00009353453,0.0002003564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004765321,0.0001128977,0.00008740849,0.0004502905,0.000169214,0.0001363131,0.000007561119,0.0001694847,0.0001603723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001535892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00348482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04353241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2115725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976268,0.0005341138,0.0005172823,0.0003092139,0.0002444468,0.0007680904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983687,0.0009572936,0.00006923821,0.0001654701,0.0002427099,0.0001965528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004243263,0.00004249839,0.001174847,0.001517286,0.00007054587,0.000001448576,0.2714123,2.114211e-7,3.207322e-7,0.6870282,0.03320467,0.00554344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007367159,0.00001063589,0.0005322238,0.002726533,0.00004054357,6.604076e-8,0.03445731,5.592174e-7,0.000008501742,0.0145279,0.947492,0.0001300702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03577543,0.3605248,0.00005450687,0.06894089,0.003967649,0.002157938,0.00003137603,0.0001583412,0.5283891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03305327,0.9308793,0.0009489539,0.01814616,0.001237995,0.00008942303,0.00001616334,0.00001797184,0.01561077],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340125629","doi":"10.1177/1478929915607889","title":"Pragmatism and the Naturalist Project in Ethics and Politics: Lessons from Peirce, Lewis and Ramsey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Naturalism; Relativism; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1754631738503405,"gpt":0.3962279914144232,"spread":0.2207648175640828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007573133,0.0001588283,0.000432159,0.00003023525,0.0004546327,0.00008477932,0.00007784733,0.00005069016,0.00006895994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002534393,0.00007538779,0.00003290431,0.00002721575,0.001970688,0.0001641757,0.0001489708,0.0002910055,0.00001194551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000397254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003586732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00204732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007029413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985632,0.0004525867,0.000315728,0.0002331064,0.0001334881,0.0003018773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963083,0.00331972,0.00006647679,0.0001557767,0.00007842785,0.00007132284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003628507,0.00001241667,0.0001005379,0.001071192,0.00004748554,9.175968e-7,0.01142917,2.972448e-10,2.071973e-7,0.9785956,0.001385034,0.007353827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006547357,0.00002145825,0.002430327,0.004586247,0.0001578471,0.000011036,0.002781142,0.000002430306,0.000001447244,0.7635607,0.2256022,0.0001904305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01109677,0.5225592,0.000003568101,0.4448281,0.000261727,0.000672365,0.0001475255,0.00002780939,0.02040297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7152338,0.2750999,0.00004369027,0.00871972,0.0003592169,0.0001116665,0.0000045432,0.000009623382,0.0004177971],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7261082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366289316","doi":"10.1177/14789299231162017","title":"Outgroup Bias and the Unacceptability of Tax Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Outgroup; Social psychology; Public economics; Ethnic group; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2831047992957027,"gpt":0.5046793284181331,"spread":0.2215745291224304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003758286,0.0000630665,0.0003439231,0.00002905939,0.0004273251,0.00002812937,0.0001817456,0.00002518611,0.0002940922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864144,0.0000366545,0.0001070399,0.0004769666,0.002577573,0.00005949825,0.0002292293,0.0000857523,0.00006742886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005064344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005411254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003345448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001000621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979815,0.0007480896,0.000276487,0.0001423767,0.0004969364,0.0003545719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976498,0.001785416,0.00004620986,0.0001494718,0.0002539005,0.0001151726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002528445,0.0000199595,0.01076766,0.001718772,0.00002982351,7.40783e-7,0.0009438971,1.15777e-8,8.857523e-8,0.9631199,0.0102732,0.01312337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008576043,0.00005063406,0.194157,0.0008266092,0.0002873284,6.536948e-7,0.02773196,0.00001266449,0.000006837056,0.373161,0.4026544,0.0002532864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03022061,0.4924308,0.00001282553,0.2289162,0.000397899,0.001768911,0.00003994168,0.0001104435,0.2461024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6684154,0.3285677,0.0000119118,0.001066813,0.0001080038,0.00006893657,0.000001182244,0.000003617385,0.001756436],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576331555","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00190.x","title":"Review Symposium on Cas Mudde's <i>Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe</i> Preface","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Radical right; Political science; Economic history; Media studies; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06583939088995072,"gpt":0.3985449986502744,"spread":0.3327056077603237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00177924,0.000377533,0.001236997,0.00004881503,0.0005334452,0.00004896255,0.0005797106,0.00008731445,0.0002672576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910903,0.0002730119,0.0002026079,0.0008274845,0.0007183037,0.0001897865,0.0001297791,0.0004052719,0.0005537813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005658885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001363963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005591797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004784412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994948,0.001218381,0.0009873515,0.0006044011,0.0008676903,0.00137412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982926,0.0003624124,0.0001604838,0.0004803547,0.000209841,0.0004943297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001243241,0.0005266251,0.0005604365,0.007894997,0.00009141078,0.0001561978,0.00109308,2.907449e-7,0.000003786693,0.7139313,0.2660148,0.009714704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002072827,0.0001226703,0.0008675312,0.02318904,0.0001530438,0.000003398747,0.00007117569,4.209797e-7,0.00001806673,0.004964379,0.9700551,0.0003478909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000533059,0.7086973,0.000001682364,0.1679327,0.0003853536,0.001402407,0.00001486516,0.0001394342,0.1208932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02351501,0.8621492,0.00006432848,0.1122145,0.000373292,0.0001061648,0.000007914086,0.00002051315,0.001549122],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7089669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020718042","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12028_2","title":"Book Review: Britain and Ireland: The Politics of Actually Existing Unsustainability: Human Flourishing in a Climate-Changed, Carbon-Constrained World","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Carbon fibers; Economic history; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Materials science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06126111661082525,"gpt":0.3575515551448837,"spread":0.2962904385340585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001893562,0.0001919192,0.0008642232,0.00004963324,0.000593779,0.0000292385,0.0002287707,0.00005220792,0.000353753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003453518,0.0001375135,0.0001328436,0.0001819032,0.001665069,0.0001245322,0.0001730296,0.0002535653,0.0000111919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003810416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001077782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00616132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001174759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971696,0.0004659104,0.0007978605,0.0002801919,0.0002082375,0.001078244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981326,0.00103999,0.0001329641,0.0002164259,0.0001643402,0.0003136208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002152637,0.00009789279,0.002508729,0.02143087,0.0000864162,0.00001252787,0.004580606,4.02101e-8,7.662667e-7,0.9174891,0.04563052,0.008160352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002683613,0.00005632795,0.001701624,0.01037083,0.0001983162,0.000005290148,0.006500972,0.000008018439,0.000001046244,0.03986907,0.9406677,0.0003523779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004749595,0.8534482,4.023475e-7,0.06333491,0.00006930174,0.0009680706,0.00001033269,0.00002742813,0.07739177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2109288,0.7128879,0.0000634212,0.06967792,0.0005266218,0.0003457954,0.000004556455,0.00002661679,0.005538297],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9314114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177249862","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12101_105","title":"Book Review: Other Areas: The Inevitable Caliphate? A History of the Struggle for Global Islamic Union, 1924 to the Present","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Caliphate; Islam; Political science; Ancient history; Economic history; Economy; History; Archaeology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07536502752155702,"gpt":0.3633826623579748,"spread":0.2880176348364177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002185483,0.0001828373,0.0006266841,0.000007674675,0.0005199258,0.000008275905,0.0007248727,0.00003618733,0.0001494142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003207767,0.00008103118,0.0002901963,0.0002599474,0.001170244,0.00004788634,0.0003527729,0.0001107521,0.00004352627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001905325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004760091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002272344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973399,0.0007499682,0.0004816437,0.0002395986,0.0005775308,0.0006113629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982749,0.0004205799,0.0001648932,0.000524888,0.0005160665,0.0000987364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002104705,0.00002161225,0.0000216304,0.001051452,0.00007123983,1.771952e-7,0.00147472,2.257655e-7,2.556143e-8,0.1499204,0.8454303,0.002006064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009815278,0.00003418676,0.00005299257,0.002197255,0.00027244,0.000001109197,0.001402751,0.000001068205,2.139941e-7,0.002889307,0.992942,0.0001085718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002553022,0.7112973,0.00001499179,0.2268331,0.0008450368,0.001735601,0.00003758505,0.0000141301,0.05921967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008705263,0.7123237,0.00002819597,0.2159134,0.001037771,0.001000863,0.00000154379,0.00002238211,0.06880157],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1475116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401294882","doi":"10.1177/14789299241266198","title":"Time on Our Side: Is Scottish Independence More Likely in the Future?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Independence (probability theory); Politics; Political economy; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Brexit; Home rule; Law; Sociology; Economics; European union; Economic policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05496258063907393,"gpt":0.4043306248692289,"spread":0.349368044230155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451863,0.0001704205,0.0004372902,0.00002202155,0.0002400812,0.00009628032,0.0004131987,0.00008747065,0.0001112612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001281653,0.0001000546,0.0001625926,0.0004541176,0.0002960336,0.0001184619,0.00008130355,0.0003781617,0.00149738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002988558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001332868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002772451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006071766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972808,0.0004022532,0.0003686541,0.0003362443,0.0007801412,0.0008319339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989246,0.0005522011,0.00003485397,0.0002321002,0.00007283072,0.0001834564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.832865e-7,0.00002608136,0.00008069228,0.000939432,0.00002472845,0.00004651766,0.001355463,2.046686e-8,1.333172e-7,0.9022926,0.08305841,0.01217515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004273441,0.00002865875,0.002015217,0.00426422,0.00003606186,0.000005763767,0.001895127,0.000002799776,0.000001319902,0.01199725,0.9795609,0.0001499547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001113535,0.5141355,0.000001840218,0.3864311,0.000646196,0.000626743,0.00004791807,0.00006980887,0.09692732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7279537,0.1746868,0.00002023672,0.08649542,0.003622416,0.0002083845,0.00000151047,0.00002348519,0.006988037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8965025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597187331","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00253_12.x","title":"Book Review: General Politics: Bioregionalism and Global Ethics: A Transactional Approach to Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Social Justice, and Human Well-Being","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Politics; Transactional leadership; Sociology; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Social justice; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Public relations; Law; Biology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07154724919773359,"gpt":0.4174586999517915,"spread":0.3459114507540579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568806,0.0003056157,0.0009067414,0.00003343882,0.001960985,0.00005332541,0.0002053913,0.0002259714,0.0002221004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342229,0.0002596987,0.0001967944,0.0001980495,0.00235079,0.0002940097,0.0002681937,0.0004815329,0.00002239264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008407513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002044625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003779327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002284542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957959,0.0009953745,0.0006240207,0.0004801257,0.0004333468,0.001671202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975113,0.0008449508,0.00007727685,0.0001424421,0.0002915112,0.001132542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001773257,0.0001339365,0.0002870552,0.01000919,0.00006242031,0.000001613829,0.0007807933,1.817386e-8,6.667666e-8,0.9607507,0.02720253,0.0007699199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001497721,0.00004340081,0.005010325,0.0008073731,0.0006604589,0.00001969915,0.001329326,7.397418e-7,1.860048e-7,0.05560813,0.9360265,0.0003441473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.000878495,0.6527933,0.000171312,0.2335632,0.0001908917,0.001243167,0.00002766248,0.00008076332,0.1110512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1400017,0.3744219,0.0006735936,0.4795498,0.003381296,0.0004272354,0.00001411578,0.00002463624,0.001505781],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520127911","doi":"10.1177/1478929916660502","title":"Book Review: Seyed Hossein Mousavian with Shahir Shahidsaless, <i>Iran and the United States: An Insider’s View on the Failed Past and the Road to Peace</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Insider; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04323935280898139,"gpt":0.3238830701898249,"spread":0.2806437173808435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002787895,0.0003288953,0.001045004,0.0000245403,0.001885262,0.00006341356,0.0004050836,0.00003983104,0.0001427997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001634706,0.0001060026,0.0001192011,0.0003694822,0.005646255,0.00009719091,0.0002537849,0.0002155177,0.00004728267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001699191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005407465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001595012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00199399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959536,0.001896243,0.0004928852,0.0004294995,0.0005163248,0.0007114515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966334,0.002256571,0.0001497699,0.0005075392,0.0002451131,0.0002076134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001159382,0.00004130362,0.00007014548,0.001842044,0.0002797598,0.000007195502,0.01299385,4.018968e-8,9.581856e-8,0.4358681,0.5250394,0.02374217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009099551,0.0001097654,0.0002614637,0.00812948,0.000336842,0.000003046881,0.005118262,0.000001163103,1.581624e-7,0.0008013144,0.9841154,0.0002132117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002753202,0.5857722,0.000004464021,0.4069707,0.0000474342,0.001732071,0.00001361016,0.00002909466,0.005155059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005130723,0.7381035,0.000006470628,0.2545176,0.0001814053,0.0004302275,0.00000176273,0.00001683165,0.001611539],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.459076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618734925","doi":"10.1177/1478929917708747","title":"Book Review: Jesse Salah Ovadia, <i>The Petro-Developmental State in Africa: Making Oil Work in Angola, Nigeria and the Gulf of Guinea</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"New guinea; State (computer science); Work (physics); Ancient history; Political science; History; Ethnology; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05450581094889883,"gpt":0.2812530643510405,"spread":0.2267472534021416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00210409,0.0002181144,0.001251933,0.00005528718,0.0002009579,0.00005634663,0.0004893165,0.00003628539,0.0002035531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001660185,0.0001406401,0.0001338332,0.0001473113,0.0004595206,0.0001238182,0.0005112878,0.0002340585,0.00009587812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002445392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002300341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001412262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009746217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976627,0.00006180055,0.001291504,0.0003497947,0.0000583307,0.000575825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986666,0.0003309323,0.000498351,0.0004061217,0.00002869324,0.00006927957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002152075,0.0002264807,0.1852171,0.02694571,0.0008216022,0.00005829516,0.005534616,0.000001888095,4.272315e-7,0.1303106,0.5437562,0.1069119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006320848,0.000009130556,0.02817894,0.005828434,0.00001436745,0.000004788691,0.00008762623,0.00000407173,6.831669e-7,0.003791005,0.9612375,0.0002113526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003785482,0.9578089,0.000001372294,0.02246572,0.0001456556,0.0003859005,0.00002098912,0.000004700671,0.01538133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04088468,0.9422522,0.000113805,0.01383174,0.00004404945,0.0001666514,0.000001696141,0.00001550154,0.002689637],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4174813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5735138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473609864","doi":"10.1177/1478929916630914b","title":"Book Review: Alain Badiou and Jean-Claude Milner, <i>Controversies: A Dialogue on Politics and Philosophy in Our Time</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art history; Art; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0371482147265372,"gpt":0.3550321709280371,"spread":0.3178839562015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006712901,0.0005509318,0.001821463,0.0001467814,0.0001421426,0.00001626246,0.0002615323,0.0001520218,0.000457514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002663491,0.0003689451,0.0002806833,0.0002426458,0.0005037222,0.0001052954,0.0001693586,0.0003034359,0.0008379613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002075055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003247128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000719662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008853388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958828,0.0006963998,0.001005515,0.0007958859,0.0003263043,0.001293063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959946,0.002431975,0.0001744135,0.0007354536,0.0001313269,0.0005322188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002244603,0.0001763627,0.0004280071,0.004779448,0.0005057387,0.00005477197,0.00007795962,7.445752e-9,0.000001712816,0.3289635,0.6628719,0.002118199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001380352,0.0002877976,0.0003336226,0.01457295,0.000732753,0.00003853322,0.00004325344,6.593999e-7,0.000002361531,0.03707692,0.9450052,0.0005255845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005366985,0.7693114,0.000004171332,0.1952578,0.0002251942,0.0006669963,0.0002001215,0.00004134812,0.03423927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006599043,0.7000504,0.00001910182,0.288815,0.0006298338,0.0001387638,0.000009176115,0.00003854855,0.003700133],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2918865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469957531","doi":"10.1177/1478929916653516","title":"Book Review: John M Owen IV, <i>Confronting Political Islam: Six Lessons from the West’s Past</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Politics; Religious studies; Political science; Political Islam; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0746033751875546,"gpt":0.3738731901016903,"spread":0.2992698149141357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001422088,0.0004031375,0.001266714,0.00001856862,0.001079762,0.00005890665,0.0007147298,0.00009331582,0.0007507688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007510036,0.000204389,0.0004439628,0.0002429096,0.001918563,0.000240603,0.0005959929,0.0002670294,0.00154326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003232863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001486876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001043629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009521721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947236,0.0009959175,0.0008576519,0.0006117944,0.0007922969,0.002018744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953871,0.002936871,0.0001860424,0.0005663779,0.0003956745,0.0005278846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001569785,0.00003387478,0.001557774,0.0008737251,0.000201594,0.000008072057,0.0002372175,3.922223e-10,8.741353e-7,0.4832397,0.4742678,0.03957782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966048,0.0000263334,0.001172924,0.01583645,0.0004923992,0.000002918921,0.001770971,4.260791e-8,0.000002952399,0.0078777,0.9723026,0.0003180871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001065433,0.5817313,0.00002688648,0.3597146,0.0003308908,0.0005549302,0.00006503806,0.00007373581,0.05749193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009677527,0.7668771,0.00004013814,0.2147944,0.001986219,0.0001945883,0.000003331538,0.00002595648,0.006400806],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4980348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234214192","doi":"10.1177/1478929917714962","title":"Book Review: Mark B Salter (ed.), <i>Making Things International 1: Circuits and Motion</i> and Mark B Salter (ed.), <i>Making Things International 2: Catalysts and Reactions</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04944401804709997,"gpt":0.3320887400399627,"spread":0.2826447219928628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005166,0.0002949745,0.000654055,0.00008176823,0.001312535,0.0002880684,0.0003570934,0.00004291462,0.0007663476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001548634,0.0002262726,0.00009856275,0.00002182458,0.001541365,0.001562255,0.0004299662,0.0002975843,0.00004995681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000258909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009420814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002337296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978051,0.00007197227,0.0006345405,0.0005381966,0.0005079113,0.0004422492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986268,0.0002199275,0.0003467913,0.0003182792,0.0002999574,0.0001882658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001018851,0.00006528563,0.0006830005,0.009070544,0.0003049211,0.00004522651,0.004209273,6.95357e-9,0.00001718576,0.09609998,0.815415,0.07407944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002377294,0.0000310123,0.0005646592,0.01575773,0.0002205711,0.0001137804,0.0002372475,0.000008333562,0.000001982434,0.0008079917,0.9817739,0.0002451048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001355746,0.8452131,0.0000311972,0.06224209,0.001853958,0.0004738835,0.00002997474,0.00005210169,0.08996817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02591213,0.7993259,0.0001165205,0.1659613,0.001504128,0.00008056904,0.00001784102,0.00002730757,0.007054295],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1663589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608149090","doi":"10.1177/1478929917705074","title":"Book Review: Melynda J Price, <i>At the Cross: Race, Religion, and Citizenship in the Politics of the Death Penalty</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Citizenship; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05856892823187599,"gpt":0.4008438196968381,"spread":0.3422748914649621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002347775,0.0001824359,0.0005724166,0.00001008876,0.003084019,0.00007174921,0.0009516905,0.00004800034,0.00009019721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01177996,0.00008254394,0.0001939864,0.0001268464,0.007161895,0.0000807465,0.0004724678,0.0002614367,0.00002217179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000158469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003990477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00146339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002291594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969694,0.0009634736,0.0005464206,0.0002254393,0.0006198561,0.0006754276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963657,0.002115493,0.0003182043,0.0007624498,0.0002951951,0.0001429919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.664232e-7,0.00001001352,0.002587946,0.001068282,0.00002302134,0.000001366181,0.000136043,1.905847e-8,3.973268e-8,0.8089268,0.1871631,0.00008249798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008320463,0.00001437973,0.005166557,0.003173278,0.0001601075,0.00001204735,0.0001337141,1.368161e-7,0.000001563466,0.01657791,0.9745681,0.0001090101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001640892,0.6290792,0.000001112346,0.1328866,0.0001017588,0.000586481,0.00003232036,0.000006155282,0.2371422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04721891,0.7799352,0.00001154445,0.1652182,0.0002503183,0.00007174443,0.000001246815,0.000006871233,0.007285975],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592225315","doi":"10.1177/1478929917695304","title":"Book Review: Myroslava Rap, <i>The Public Role of the Church in Contemporary Ukrainian Society: The Contribution of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church to Peace and Reconciliation</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"European Politics and Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ukrainian; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07947085209708127,"gpt":0.3689254844429649,"spread":0.2894546323458836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005724636,0.0001849475,0.0006351498,0.00001266202,0.001578791,0.00009303878,0.001161767,0.00006124873,0.00005043215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009920094,0.00008478514,0.0003560489,0.0002747151,0.002584692,0.0001591731,0.0005848542,0.0003524832,0.000006402314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001449278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003826865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001131416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004843809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961562,0.001692667,0.0007167763,0.0002769388,0.0005805807,0.0005769104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971202,0.001022998,0.0003716058,0.0008932774,0.0004446425,0.0001472971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001069519,0.0001895023,0.009961774,0.006992476,0.0003888329,0.000003529709,0.1295101,5.076435e-8,0.00004671347,0.5802306,0.255614,0.01705171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013082,0.00002124002,0.0218512,0.003246119,0.00006898148,0.000002280615,0.0007629998,0.000003316264,0.000007996297,0.0005190211,0.9732848,0.0001012224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004466935,0.6735601,3.411491e-7,0.3027759,0.0001389884,0.001436485,0.00004287063,0.000008141188,0.01757027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54703,0.4095308,0.000002524274,0.04265554,0.0001475115,0.00007257247,0.000001101722,0.0000084045,0.0005515391],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7176708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585281311","doi":"10.1177/1478929916687779","title":"Book Review: Jacques Berlinerblau, Sarah Fainberg and Aurora Nou (eds), <i>Secularism on the Edge: Rethinking Church-State Relations in the United States, France and Israel</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Religious studies; Theology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05126962376221972,"gpt":0.3878355997611663,"spread":0.3365659759989466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002107799,0.0001829847,0.0004316136,0.00002251141,0.002570971,0.0001854011,0.0003720933,0.00006354695,0.00006818316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046133,0.000102881,0.00012427,0.0002067505,0.001306892,0.0001768666,0.0001369508,0.000576417,0.0000326518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007801851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004216494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003976925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003880857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976001,0.0008739193,0.0004356409,0.0002642201,0.0003825161,0.000443625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997333,0.001714853,0.0001878148,0.0004505683,0.0001944307,0.0001193408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002038363,0.00004442993,0.0005695978,0.001073909,0.00009080213,0.00000976867,0.01012333,4.481005e-7,3.170744e-7,0.2995581,0.6853782,0.003149047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008297028,0.00002225711,0.001453945,0.005123398,0.00008466001,0.000002743271,0.001509647,0.0000150566,4.045054e-7,0.009482855,0.9820938,0.0001282801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007560917,0.6353858,0.000006556705,0.3524764,0.00008225592,0.0006262386,0.00001009402,0.00001965473,0.01063695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004655854,0.7831169,0.00002264951,0.2101611,0.00007553673,0.00009658291,0.000006124042,0.00000768694,0.001857503],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2967156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313854333","doi":"10.1177/1478929916630918","title":"Book Review: Norman Bonney, <i>Monarchy, Religion and the State: Civil Religion in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and the Commonwealth</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Monarchy; Kingdom; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Religious studies; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05138525817237181,"gpt":0.3622121346763755,"spread":0.3108268765040037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002812598,0.0001776993,0.0005612266,0.00001721805,0.000839947,0.00002768194,0.0003253907,0.00002973427,0.00003191538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002319779,0.00006572717,0.00007429198,0.0002918548,0.006653619,0.0000651856,0.0001485949,0.0002281177,0.000009568281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002162265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004507593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6968604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3651005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962134,0.001945269,0.0005204977,0.0001988302,0.000500222,0.0006217864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947434,0.004528045,0.0001415145,0.0002639875,0.0001520905,0.0001709323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001047165,0.000004182673,0.0001346302,0.0004179298,0.00001526797,0.000003584586,0.0001205806,1.282801e-8,7.4773e-9,0.654366,0.3447284,0.0001990013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004625745,0.0000149496,0.0002001332,0.003316253,0.0001179308,0.00001496848,0.0001166806,3.834536e-7,8.953918e-8,0.009411471,0.9862344,0.0001101811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002561983,0.5754641,0.00000322397,0.4138726,0.00006212734,0.0007874041,0.0000247049,0.000008025912,0.009521695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08847894,0.6607697,0.000002782774,0.2498232,0.00009242503,0.00008852283,0.000002020013,0.000003896097,0.0007385529],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470805963","doi":"10.1177/1478929916630923e","title":"Book Review: Amales Tripathi, <i>Indian National Congress and the Struggle for Freedom 1885–1947</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07151970087093082,"gpt":0.3998940873955943,"spread":0.3283743865246636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001244254,0.0001848551,0.0007888057,0.00001032139,0.001434133,0.00002562919,0.0002461178,0.00005703838,0.001153046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007516631,0.00007597579,0.0002313781,0.0001176477,0.005712097,0.0001190093,0.0001721058,0.00008220931,0.00005582549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001332267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006660201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002437355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002325842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977529,0.0004131945,0.0004645557,0.0002990896,0.0004472337,0.0006229922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960269,0.003047537,0.0001295395,0.0001306821,0.0004738459,0.0001915315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006665223,0.00001371463,0.0000232125,0.0008882436,0.00006413062,7.525507e-7,0.0001040679,8.156279e-10,4.90184e-8,0.427077,0.5646589,0.007163224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005526255,0.00005422461,0.00005961655,0.00362663,0.0001231981,0.00000166041,0.0006381662,1.802322e-7,0.000001144197,0.01304761,0.9817503,0.0001446274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004482642,0.7278041,0.00001949505,0.2479432,0.0002442446,0.001100817,0.00005919195,0.00002533959,0.02279913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002252077,0.8951913,0.00003985656,0.09815798,0.0005249513,0.0004082084,0.000001656638,0.000007025989,0.00341699],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4170914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054647138","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00195.x","title":"Lifting the Siege of Liberalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Liberalism; Politics; Relation (database); Political science; Classical liberalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; History; Ancient history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251301968451732,"gpt":0.415443861917927,"spread":0.2903136650727538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006014685,0.00007020043,0.0003169586,0.000008349826,0.000362002,0.000006752368,0.0001778509,0.00002524799,0.0002560821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001022929,0.00004237859,0.0001281678,0.00006518918,0.000573455,0.00004419577,0.00002750633,0.00007893556,0.0001508784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007830536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004268752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002119924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003009861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998919,0.0001278919,0.0002807358,0.0001021375,0.0001256127,0.0004446671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992968,0.0003333857,0.00004585376,0.0001122076,0.00005830622,0.000153378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.123551e-7,0.00001517013,0.00002478104,0.00012753,0.0000126477,6.76581e-7,0.000785812,1.185061e-8,2.562489e-7,0.9717435,0.01116662,0.01612247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003565014,0.00002248398,0.0005012482,0.0002843361,0.00003922379,6.647624e-7,0.0004381628,4.469789e-7,0.000002669278,0.07556253,0.9230489,0.00006374995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001887631,0.2301294,0.000002611028,0.1448636,0.0001877102,0.0001790529,0.000004172431,0.00002941539,0.6227164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562794,0.08729777,0.00007548015,0.05054516,0.000754488,0.00001324389,7.228003e-7,0.000004888589,0.005028809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.280392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}