{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":83,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ce7c0b976c56","filters":{"venue":"Political Theory"}},"results":[{"id":"W2116645954","doi":"10.1177/0090591707310090","title":"Democratic Theory and Border Coercion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":645,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sovereignty; Naturalization; Coercion (linguistics); Legitimation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Discretion; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Popular sovereignty; Political economy; Sociology; Citizenship","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02506666886951697,"gpt":0.3391944328032704,"spread":0.3141277639337535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009424442,0.00006382056,0.00008909537,0.00003200914,0.00066333,0.00002606698,0.00006923592,0.00006505603,0.0009893019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000475766,0.00004730521,0.00002877673,0.00004992649,0.0009754107,0.0001342766,0.00001573006,0.00008183842,0.00009432244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003305716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007201588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001226076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000623841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986259,0.0006692237,0.0001047007,0.0001218231,0.0001546113,0.0003237753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990662,0.0006107569,0.00001558063,0.00008732449,0.00003610085,0.0001840714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001328076,0.00002047188,0.0002497826,0.000002443176,0.000004361438,0.000003670815,0.004307262,3.302646e-8,0.00001908918,0.9940798,0.0003031755,0.000996606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009670003,0.00002228293,0.004143063,0.000005604613,0.000009269975,0.000004150504,0.001916701,0.000006301467,0.00007474075,0.9785867,0.01505257,0.00008186496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6234394,0.0002405578,0.003568497,0.001870003,0.0001500338,0.0001594176,0.000003089722,0.00009269123,0.3704763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822373,0.0000437327,0.00007449758,0.001056855,0.0002555969,0.000005051232,0.000001723142,0.000006489916,0.01631876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3587979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987636686","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332336","title":"Rhetoric and the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":560,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; State (computer science); Sociology; Public administration; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03162158993094817,"gpt":0.3318990754674336,"spread":0.3002774855364854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078973,0.00007614369,0.0001279677,0.00001699474,0.0005332296,0.000115915,0.0002037948,0.00007299143,0.0007245272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002250861,0.00004865997,0.0000695111,0.0001360073,0.002022632,0.000115662,0.0000277357,0.0001708645,0.0001102785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002968082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003745223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001614517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002648508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.00105508,0.0001157711,0.0001365733,0.0001967095,0.000504959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973295,0.002123773,0.0000117366,0.0001569828,0.00003989834,0.0003380468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004716387,0.00002839563,0.0000126706,0.000001639036,0.00000466178,0.000002564649,0.0005592723,7.797236e-9,0.000001365712,0.9937367,0.00008424535,0.005521263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002482512,0.00001910005,0.00006416355,0.000003569752,0.00001040707,0.000002615175,0.0008588634,0.000002192909,0.000005823098,0.892511,0.1062066,0.00006741752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005337683,0.0004483098,0.0002892951,0.09741288,0.0001605199,0.0001150245,0.00000258985,0.00007215463,0.8961616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907776,0.00002467212,0.00003098431,0.007024426,0.0008221616,0.000004217115,4.447161e-7,0.000004175567,0.001311382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7933065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171918329","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329650","title":"Disability, Self Image, and Modern Political Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Personhood; Sociology; Opposition (politics); Political philosophy; Autonomy; Binary opposition; Identity (music); Self; Citizenship; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03116059058709605,"gpt":0.3471203260432779,"spread":0.3159597354561819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001383129,0.0001456286,0.0002123889,0.0000274803,0.0006911615,0.00007452413,0.0002019896,0.0001445155,0.0006295659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126513,0.0001089247,0.000109772,0.0000987837,0.008485082,0.000291545,0.0001069424,0.000185641,0.0001002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001725559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001347529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006600232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004489264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967555,0.001269924,0.0002485235,0.000375435,0.0004121605,0.0009384226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969843,0.001891037,0.00002311123,0.0002978244,0.00008022501,0.0007235257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058171,0.0003435313,0.006315132,0.000016965,0.00001697398,0.000006437357,0.003966821,7.875411e-8,0.00001645921,0.9884176,0.00005014352,0.0008193286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001924477,0.00002672395,0.01606127,0.000005369307,0.000026923,0.00001216444,0.003509347,0.00003892293,0.00009361727,0.9782504,0.001620629,0.0001621512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4642498,0.00006115554,0.001160951,0.009311722,0.0001667575,0.0002978827,0.00001989554,0.0002417236,0.5244901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962123,0.00001495974,0.0004043694,0.0006842432,0.0004940074,0.0000152409,0.00000373556,0.00001568596,0.002155469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5319625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1285266877168514,"gpt":0.3874451090091326,"spread":0.2589184212922812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187506,0.000165496,0.0002026793,0.00007647031,0.001359523,0.00005937613,0.0002434519,0.0002307676,0.001021669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007385185,0.0001423673,0.00009255638,0.00007116568,0.004973303,0.0001251592,0.00006750965,0.0004588605,0.0002324322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000592595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009684268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.0006766951,0.0001940557,0.0003510202,0.0003466155,0.001247912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976562,0.000932346,0.00002041811,0.0002387041,0.00008038943,0.001072004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002569727,0.0001994278,0.00007380322,0.000007189068,0.00001585345,0.00001529425,0.008670188,1.516772e-9,0.000005521812,0.9909397,0.00002934945,0.00001798544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001527289,0.0001497605,0.001658269,0.00001804625,0.00002419616,0.000002403533,0.008491671,3.480968e-7,0.0002110971,0.9855792,0.003515074,0.0001972116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06174503,0.00003389498,0.00004671662,0.002882591,0.0001044588,0.0001092195,0.00001523241,0.00013627,0.9349266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956064,0.000001324611,0.00008699365,0.002031422,0.0009423471,0.000008354599,0.000001227635,0.00001464055,0.001307272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497174511","doi":"10.1177/0090591716661222","title":"Everyday Deeds: Enactive Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Silence; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0281936615050476,"gpt":0.3292949038784501,"spread":0.3011012423734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562787,0.0001080569,0.0001860875,0.00009255639,0.000169884,0.00004279966,0.0001299142,0.0001373847,0.00007448422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003479542,0.00007611427,0.00003110033,0.0001806223,0.001187873,0.0002055589,0.00003723663,0.0001196759,0.00006244182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001965534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002002378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001976267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000813222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997649,0.001016748,0.0001783286,0.0002022139,0.0002428625,0.0007109028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956244,0.003785587,0.00003480948,0.0001018768,0.00008393268,0.0003694528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001523028,0.00002505544,0.006078773,0.000008685081,0.000006905072,0.000006876662,0.01001948,2.800423e-8,0.0001191629,0.982317,0.0000499509,0.001352829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003546465,0.00005697649,0.003885716,0.0001779436,0.00001231964,0.000002522223,0.05131454,0.000004236004,0.0009899202,0.9377394,0.005247531,0.0002141998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8269176,0.0004806686,0.0009246061,0.003724944,0.0006712435,0.0008258612,0.00004489016,0.0001043747,0.1663057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975022,0.00006726848,0.00004726135,0.0003735839,0.0005966715,0.00009961733,3.107963e-7,0.00001045703,0.001302621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1705845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4376768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02734212584362437,"gpt":0.3469111767575753,"spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249939,0.0001229947,0.0001536824,0.00001473705,0.0006028314,0.00006532734,0.000180314,0.0002142373,0.0001111921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00342814,0.000103651,0.00006300755,0.0001027647,0.002080484,0.0002463862,0.0000996381,0.0003621288,0.0000827433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002533639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007967911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005218312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002534261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997386,0.0007197724,0.0001530417,0.0001683723,0.0003622191,0.001210549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972735,0.001544558,0.0000225827,0.0001242618,0.00005900029,0.000976116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430765,0.00005048216,0.0005019589,0.00001210194,0.00001241013,0.000002754803,0.001145915,6.225861e-9,0.000002078689,0.9977953,0.0002574445,0.0001752718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537131,0.00001619557,0.003624581,0.00001026997,0.0000742071,0.000004033078,0.001223525,0.000001354291,0.00002664445,0.9051629,0.08956159,0.0001410364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04567479,0.0007842882,0.0003280824,0.01115666,0.004531835,0.0001501182,0.0002545341,0.0001533779,0.9369663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864981,0.000004979688,0.00007305642,0.001621329,0.01147222,0.000004113439,0.000005954375,0.000005908092,0.0003143278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2443657003","doi":"10.1177/0090591716651109","title":"Responsibility as Responsiveness: Enacting a Dispositional Ethics of Encounter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Massey University","keywords":"Situated; Embodied cognition; Normative; Sociology; Active listening; Politics; Normative ethics; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05336935418280534,"gpt":0.3997133891864039,"spread":0.3463440350035985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007596393,0.0000843052,0.0001439452,0.0000560349,0.000392097,0.00002038415,0.0002157095,0.0002109868,0.001088181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02039504,0.00005861263,0.0001020553,0.0000840206,0.00151091,0.0001746381,0.00006870751,0.0003140788,0.00007996673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001786346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007376536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003493844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006640684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961361,0.002457494,0.0002287021,0.0002104959,0.0005276893,0.0004395105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863231,0.01290561,0.00007147823,0.0002180056,0.0002899512,0.000191877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003259629,0.00005867416,0.0003480083,0.0000102167,0.00001105704,0.000004259554,0.004193792,1.33281e-8,0.005597133,0.9889668,0.000009747031,0.0004743169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001310386,0.0000470656,0.003552535,0.00008998488,0.00000920733,0.000002015017,0.002235962,3.180974e-7,0.005571044,0.9820709,0.00619481,0.00009512797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7060702,0.00003614926,0.002064168,0.03055796,0.0002849551,0.0001481447,0.00007477491,0.00006026448,0.2607034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958407,0.00001247353,0.0000625921,0.000906354,0.0002273457,0.000007007493,7.120109e-7,0.000009307098,0.002933507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2897705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137617981","doi":"10.1177/0090591713507934","title":"A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political culture; Political economy; Conversation; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Pragmatism; Social science; Epistemology; Economic system; Law; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1236483320624184,"gpt":0.411159859143011,"spread":0.2875115270805926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252038,0.0002451932,0.0004060532,0.00008186167,0.0009851067,0.0001476181,0.0003416864,0.0003316821,0.001225777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327656,0.0002119197,0.0002435494,0.0001544071,0.003637645,0.000319637,0.00008308219,0.0004764187,0.0007946723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002612653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001009471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004854653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948148,0.001802332,0.000410103,0.0003778106,0.0003715371,0.002223428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848039,0.01283349,0.0000426258,0.0003165626,0.000304074,0.001699376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003987714,0.0001400701,0.00001780813,0.00003500875,0.00004321591,0.00004289615,0.002301361,1.871276e-7,0.000009945333,0.9964277,0.0007318514,0.0002100581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003195355,0.00009971517,0.00005426988,0.00002119794,0.00006887077,0.00006461217,0.01368538,0.00009261268,0.0001623559,0.9825361,0.002605849,0.0002895099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03062686,0.00009104375,0.01206263,0.0299058,0.0004104444,0.001173965,0.0001096906,0.0002537206,0.9253659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841908,0.000001077718,0.0007786417,0.01039314,0.001416984,0.0002363468,0.000006313084,0.00002493501,0.002951762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975290864","doi":"10.1177/0090591705274867","title":"Normativizing Hybridity/Neutralizing Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Essentialism; Identity (music); Orthodoxy; Politics; Sociology; Identity politics; Cultural identity; Epistemology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Anthropology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04172689706387978,"gpt":0.3666921770762609,"spread":0.3249652800123811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457038,0.0001239037,0.0001609973,0.00004146425,0.0006031682,0.00008914405,0.0002641005,0.000110064,0.001224108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009829476,0.0001123289,0.0001297025,0.0001397419,0.0005890152,0.0003522334,0.00005104258,0.0002921055,0.0008141139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003985613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003404591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007508811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977593,0.0007610936,0.0002014384,0.0001887206,0.0002946094,0.0007947781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998414,0.0008441664,0.0000211512,0.0001731875,0.00006216305,0.0004853008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001414792,0.00005582346,0.00003387554,0.000008329108,0.000008381031,0.000004421385,0.003001495,9.392164e-7,0.00006484322,0.993799,0.0003559864,0.002652796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007767102,0.00001132604,0.00001218593,0.00001481308,0.00001121606,0.000002839271,0.001546307,0.000005986887,0.0007659756,0.6993178,0.2981101,0.000123723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01278068,0.0001756747,0.001088675,0.0130507,0.000219537,0.0001134272,0.00001583534,0.0002170933,0.9723384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894453,0.00001318745,0.0005256234,0.005708038,0.002595284,0.000007725952,0.000003011658,0.0000124829,0.001689319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804291774","doi":"10.1177/0090591718776938","title":"Poor-Led Social Movements and Global Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Poverty; Social movement; Politics; Political science; Culture of poverty; Economic Justice; Sociology; CONTEST; Political economy; Power (physics); Development economics; Basic needs; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01667947132752511,"gpt":0.2560716456888615,"spread":0.2393921743613364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002004112,0.0001408164,0.0001411007,0.000003090698,0.0003351508,0.00005350948,0.000148722,0.0001019279,0.0005180081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009563161,0.00004587471,0.00004587448,0.000137219,0.0002286573,0.00006498847,0.0001427026,0.0000709207,0.0002022114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000581847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006789554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005513621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003520078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987816,0.0001046178,0.000153227,0.0002423936,0.000196212,0.0005219979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995191,0.0001298849,0.00002910594,0.00002561972,0.00006988476,0.000226459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003985992,0.00004311192,0.00178749,0.000005056342,0.00001666545,0.000003385206,0.00004162748,3.712626e-9,0.0004070125,0.9846889,0.001297317,0.01166961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001525048,0.0001007309,0.3987679,0.00000691628,0.00002711295,0.00001011126,0.0005660685,0.000003440077,0.0004800126,0.5897431,0.00996766,0.0001743843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497466,0.00003270345,0.000011854,0.001257051,0.0001968816,0.0001057964,0.00005845515,0.00007455431,0.04851607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938878,0.000003067087,0.00006970288,0.003796853,0.001245992,0.000007251776,0.0000215718,6.486901e-7,0.0009671148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3969804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5671825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170826547","doi":"10.1177/0090591713476050","title":"“Office Is a Thing Borrowed”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute monarchy; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Doctrine; Normative; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02720892225003769,"gpt":0.2301989445031296,"spread":0.2029900222530919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002821714,0.0001664355,0.000205255,0.00008943801,0.0002960392,0.0001735335,0.0002569822,0.00003908618,0.07214911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003145694,0.0001371782,0.0001808837,0.000030861,0.0008420579,0.0002894677,0.00007797793,0.0002279051,0.02694495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007831669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002235162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004135758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006151074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983383,0.0002294038,0.0002694619,0.0002535934,0.0002037296,0.0007054655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985607,0.000537612,0.00003174167,0.0003598258,0.0001239426,0.0003862268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005239478,0.00005171183,0.00001033891,0.00001534676,0.00003468056,0.000005793117,0.003404719,1.265285e-7,0.0000184029,0.9838582,0.01239347,0.0002019532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009195161,0.00003058527,0.00009573115,0.00001514088,0.00006192581,0.000002985618,0.002008209,0.00006639535,0.0001016301,0.5227168,0.4745963,0.0002123866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01731454,0.0001031032,0.0001811172,0.001632946,0.000220588,0.00009021335,0.00002406005,0.0001867753,0.9802467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664758,7.675038e-7,0.00006869803,0.01337492,0.0008521815,0.00001300076,0.000003971804,0.00003229257,0.1191783],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9738127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153860839","doi":"10.1177/00905917211008591","title":"Land Grabbing and the Perplexities of Territorial Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Land grabbing; Alienation; Democracy; Corporate governance; Political science; Land law; Political economy; Law; Land tenure; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01260785870010134,"gpt":0.2058414908057724,"spread":0.193233632105671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002816589,0.00009483178,0.0001784811,0.000002530745,0.0001220326,0.00003801196,0.0001001023,0.00005763663,0.0003043015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002912047,0.00002194429,0.00007268052,0.00006912325,0.0002624941,0.00003932412,0.0001130784,0.00008730649,0.000005500127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001210344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001007257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001051333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003710019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991024,0.0002056726,0.0001528575,0.0001384501,0.0001549473,0.0002457266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989135,0.0008726656,0.00002873329,0.00003699507,0.00006357711,0.00008447489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005752898,0.00001686165,0.002394435,0.000006248471,0.00001615032,0.00000231641,0.00008620517,6.902627e-8,0.0001933609,0.9954678,0.0001655999,0.001593421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003047893,0.00002284687,0.05291552,0.00001528938,0.00001661453,0.00001460484,0.00127508,0.000003068379,0.002809308,0.939247,0.003287633,0.00008827531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784142,0.0003454169,0.000003139706,0.001067162,0.0003022337,0.00007816099,0.00003418098,0.00002195754,0.0197335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981225,0.00002504898,0.00003359203,0.0004026238,0.0008950671,0.000006361377,0.00001941761,5.193785e-7,0.0004948807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05622084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3331888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386569268","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193107","title":"Colonialism versus Imperialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Colonialism; Ideology; Decolonization; Opposition (politics); Cultural imperialism; Power (physics); History; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07211415653491443,"gpt":0.3796386410283284,"spread":0.307524484493414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001190996,0.00006725245,0.0001029497,0.00002738827,0.0005598671,0.00003426037,0.0001828495,0.00014218,0.001354094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009084561,0.00006860206,0.0001000328,0.0002202287,0.0008593469,0.00007844103,0.00003452735,0.0001198116,0.001572654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002035721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001572366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004571409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002664141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998459,0.0004359764,0.0001048166,0.0001421106,0.0002259773,0.000632069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.0006896792,0.00001667572,0.0001286706,0.00003009676,0.0002961454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003276971,0.00001221723,0.0000380901,0.000002290099,0.000009198496,0.000009118661,0.008918021,1.607735e-7,0.00002113356,0.9792677,0.01161324,0.00007608337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004028902,0.0000416352,0.0007235784,0.000004089045,0.00001841205,3.023048e-7,0.01477784,0.000001400599,0.00005602777,0.4214993,0.5623163,0.0001582811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.465265,0.00001787906,0.00002728984,0.006742064,0.005323882,0.0001945927,0.000038797,0.0008018729,0.5215886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765999,0.00001032973,0.00002621351,0.0005738504,0.001168738,0.00001225955,0.000005494921,0.000009684632,0.02159358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5577684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147169714","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265931","title":"Brothers and Others","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Narrative; Racism; State (computer science); Rivalry; Sociology; Relation (database); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02000349591988229,"gpt":0.3299957686529255,"spread":0.3099922727330432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008998397,0.00008002412,0.0001025478,0.00003033187,0.0002832962,0.00004597141,0.0001476232,0.00008287329,0.0004864456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055572,0.00007160087,0.00004235787,0.00008045159,0.002123133,0.0001526817,0.00002730672,0.0001144387,0.0002123372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001023766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004975057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001219904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986214,0.0002778634,0.0001094865,0.0001595891,0.000160897,0.0006707346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988679,0.0004687353,0.00001268566,0.0001227908,0.00002189053,0.0005060121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001317584,0.0000202523,0.00009177472,0.000003349172,0.000006105005,0.000003224295,0.001378365,6.857904e-7,0.00005454135,0.9975047,0.000005995418,0.0009178047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001869729,0.00002307199,0.0003880524,0.00001441525,0.000006472661,0.000002202551,0.002658424,3.19091e-7,0.000477902,0.9811446,0.01499425,0.0001033182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1335866,0.00009511261,0.001292584,0.004268797,0.0001001783,0.0001068475,0.000006096805,0.000118243,0.8604255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926557,0.00001131362,0.0002253034,0.005648755,0.0002067701,0.000006288006,1.948821e-7,0.000009484977,0.001236221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8591893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977534503","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276383","title":"The Federal Structure of a Republic of Reasons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Classical liberalism; The Republic; Original position; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03677186889086934,"gpt":0.3475646313101299,"spread":0.3107927624192605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101224,0.00006455807,0.0001364759,0.00002240236,0.0003592751,0.0000234517,0.000291395,0.0001356006,0.0002045966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004757919,0.00004346613,0.00009656014,0.0001108187,0.002545596,0.00008242689,0.00004719195,0.0002380326,0.000007848864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005166507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002278045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003168418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001415852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.0005370988,0.0002256185,0.00009998315,0.0003320328,0.0005212731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970074,0.002356482,0.00004892729,0.0002180802,0.0001263971,0.000242716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001908293,0.00002666119,0.00008314943,0.000007134377,0.00001246901,2.133856e-7,0.0009243355,3.260055e-7,0.00005794045,0.9975817,0.0001123397,0.001174598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007124367,0.00001962518,0.0007134954,0.000009988918,0.000009229655,7.646568e-7,0.001028296,0.000003643588,0.00103173,0.9791992,0.01786256,0.00005020771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1159958,0.0002254481,0.00009950699,0.06118748,0.0001780798,0.0001286569,0.00007140738,0.00004421416,0.8220695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975384,0.00000921623,0.0001312782,0.0009936081,0.0005620455,0.000001147688,8.423904e-7,0.000005543381,0.0007578833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9379355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2348057775","doi":"10.1177/0090591715625877","title":"For a Pragmatics of the Useless, or the Value of the Infrathin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Proposition; Value (mathematics); Expression (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Key (lock); Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Programming language; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0531368396237485,"gpt":0.2780976724256777,"spread":0.2249608328019292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005425869,0.0001081885,0.0001751519,0.00001381047,0.0002679778,0.00002056843,0.0004746774,0.00004544523,0.0002972146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001158565,0.00002998451,0.0001965801,0.000003493933,0.0021706,0.00005324994,0.0001414696,0.00008763484,0.000008369409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002485295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001540408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009819401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988048,0.0002527391,0.0003097045,0.00009381711,0.0001898197,0.0003490984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970067,0.00218856,0.0001201529,0.0005077285,0.0001250321,0.00005184047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002638896,0.00004946227,0.00004538629,0.00005389396,0.00003601974,5.838614e-8,0.01553875,4.801605e-7,0.00005310203,0.9824507,0.001502732,0.0002430479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442786,0.00004267232,0.0002338317,0.00008357529,0.00007012955,0.000001441001,0.002117551,0.00005110543,0.00319373,0.8708959,0.1230008,0.00006496649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2261703,0.0003247168,0.009433319,0.06173128,0.004006444,0.003751997,0.003034396,0.0001517374,0.6913958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547639,0.000003401116,0.00003556059,0.002417495,0.0004552574,0.00002596981,4.447826e-7,0.00001810094,0.04227986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7997667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093435547","doi":"10.1177/0090591707307326","title":"The Force of Ideas in Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Epistemology; Transpersonal; Ideology; Power (physics); Falsity; Interpretation (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Vitality; Contemplation; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02667486654622725,"gpt":0.3904393409680602,"spread":0.3637644744218329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004879492,0.00004773978,0.00008406242,0.0000296214,0.0001944338,0.00001551543,0.0002191012,0.0001007564,0.00006554882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030781,0.00003378464,0.00005112275,0.0001275669,0.001314808,0.00004385262,0.0000295015,0.0001887514,0.00003759864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006105502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001167848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001433593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986389,0.0002612646,0.0001863857,0.00008214366,0.0002551943,0.0005761518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969226,0.002723686,0.00002513987,0.0001319856,0.00005227531,0.0001443654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245447,0.00001769307,0.0007895563,0.00000400554,0.000002471207,0.000002065256,0.003607426,1.498368e-7,0.00001454076,0.9942287,0.00004511501,0.001265788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007405041,0.00001405794,0.004579862,0.00001145189,0.000002699781,3.169208e-7,0.01199817,0.000001904255,0.0002415866,0.9552199,0.02780958,0.0000464508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030586,0.0003000213,0.0004140631,0.004719195,0.0003503933,0.00009420556,0.000001805635,0.00002431484,0.8910373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951751,0.00002880679,0.00003657943,0.0007019026,0.0001942281,0.000001388959,2.111602e-7,0.000004634583,0.003857107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8921165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4844464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520880326","doi":"10.1177/0090591715596559","title":"The Critique of Possessive Individualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Private property; Possessive; Debt; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05021306714651034,"gpt":0.3791271739592444,"spread":0.328914106812734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358784,0.00006395862,0.0001221602,0.00002198787,0.0002475452,0.0000451948,0.0003098835,0.00009238104,0.00009216079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005803627,0.00004555551,0.00006339564,0.00006877571,0.001930855,0.0001151191,0.00006930759,0.0001330389,0.00007611069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007558314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004396188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009151617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006020863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981905,0.0006916851,0.0001891231,0.0001023271,0.0002121086,0.000614259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967084,0.002411208,0.00003412008,0.0001648398,0.0001402431,0.0005412007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009630208,0.00002261641,0.00008100591,0.000002326934,0.000009710536,0.000001935435,0.001638515,4.683574e-8,0.000001182716,0.9963743,0.0006251488,0.001233598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020849,0.00002052189,0.0002140637,0.000005544807,0.000008551013,0.000001036796,0.009245437,9.727947e-7,0.0002219924,0.869659,0.1204644,0.00005643243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02090326,0.0001977755,0.0004497461,0.01452203,0.0003557018,0.000116084,0.00002134336,0.00004333928,0.9633907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948707,0.000009853652,0.00006675105,0.002311635,0.0003609611,0.00001246252,9.440487e-7,0.000005658088,0.002361047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101567242","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366367","title":"Polybius’ Advice to the Imperial Republic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aristocracy (class); Constitution; Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Narrative; Classics; History; Political philosophy; Law; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02172936344141912,"gpt":0.3412937576863255,"spread":0.3195643942449064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001637962,0.00009110113,0.0001368878,0.00003082581,0.0007472002,0.0001206747,0.0004861262,0.00009295094,0.001111468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009768966,0.00005852343,0.00008758431,0.0002261263,0.001081906,0.00007741497,0.0002310704,0.0003262839,0.0006882685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004016423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006027986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003338491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998188,0.0003369684,0.0001634723,0.0002066581,0.0003515285,0.0007533994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976941,0.001481139,0.00002093003,0.0002952721,0.00009076394,0.0004177428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001574484,0.00003381379,0.0001381385,0.000001134982,0.000008489323,9.760246e-7,0.003205851,1.530676e-8,0.0001965579,0.9839962,0.007403483,0.004999618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005459346,0.00001971033,0.001608185,0.000001926265,0.000008769856,7.208784e-7,0.002959707,0.000001614334,0.0001596576,0.3290043,0.6660967,0.000084062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1903192,0.00002101188,0.00007930862,0.2991423,0.001894354,0.0002414142,0.00001487361,0.0002409213,0.5080466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766451,0.000001594854,0.0001233747,0.006750135,0.003347737,0.00002383224,5.190797e-7,0.000009326139,0.01309834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7863259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154796128","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329668","title":"Not So Novus an Ordo","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Polity; Social contract; Law and economics; Politics; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.12402404434066,"gpt":0.3829714428445114,"spread":0.2589473985038514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085179,0.0001088296,0.0001569535,0.00004062185,0.0009875837,0.00003957717,0.000313419,0.0002113722,0.001119526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002357705,0.0001004809,0.00008925468,0.0001124738,0.003551261,0.000199364,0.00004694227,0.0003488073,0.0009179958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001042474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008809898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003627235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.0006875422,0.0001742,0.0002223556,0.0004097589,0.0009876844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974338,0.001290503,0.00001713204,0.0002471522,0.00008898076,0.0009224749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002100426,0.000102216,0.00009766819,0.000003877801,0.000005870535,0.00002431372,0.002330777,1.626263e-7,0.00002061579,0.9969558,0.0000924628,0.0003452079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001205774,0.00003778607,0.00079573,0.000005026865,0.000009158187,0.000006731572,0.0007383873,0.0000073352,0.0003144548,0.9700811,0.02773445,0.0001492545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08054863,0.00002834456,0.0004758825,0.0183144,0.0002854792,0.00008798594,0.0000207975,0.0002017734,0.9000367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814112,0.00001013864,0.0002273934,0.01423877,0.001711477,0.000005967647,0.000002531668,0.00001386877,0.00237868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9008626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148598833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299951","title":"Platonic Reflections on the Aesthetic Dimensions of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Shame; Virtue; Dialogical self; Democracy; Deliberation; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Communicative action; Transformative learning; Sociology; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08464911667457438,"gpt":0.4138454733850256,"spread":0.3291963567104513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051009,0.00009844668,0.0001185299,0.00007919698,0.0002103945,0.000005862707,0.000115675,0.00008172538,0.001440758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001077027,0.00005573355,0.00009901066,0.0001580809,0.0003642138,0.00001981507,0.00002747762,0.00026188,0.0004778593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004068877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002241509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003387356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008246787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988366,0.0002501955,0.0002276579,0.0001624462,0.0001048606,0.0004182099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984069,0.000980484,0.00003652963,0.0003812441,0.00006207809,0.0001327191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000465979,0.0002582648,0.00009924782,7.194046e-7,0.00001339359,0.000008150785,0.0004988529,5.044818e-7,0.0003491697,0.9969516,0.0003698982,0.001403572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003600921,0.0004277664,0.01936939,0.00003086373,0.00008796802,0.0001104333,0.004038646,0.000002469169,0.004536769,0.9668929,0.003973469,0.0001692099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7368622,0.00004762188,0.001585528,0.002813741,0.0003059837,0.0001848955,0.00001556346,0.00004794327,0.2581365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943776,0.000001411154,0.0001997493,0.001550172,0.00004972648,0.00001524427,0.000002216103,0.00001553236,0.003788377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2575154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126637129","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332339","title":"Afghānī on Empire, Islam, and Civilization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Islam; Orthodoxy; Contradiction; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; Hegemony; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02155916857103512,"gpt":0.3159714448499227,"spread":0.2944122762788876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003635604,0.00005424355,0.00008055718,0.00003099024,0.0003646601,0.00001724005,0.000056994,0.00005034233,0.0001747888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003181127,0.00004918616,0.00002277807,0.00005149324,0.0003604724,0.00003658024,0.00001062558,0.00006209827,0.00006064266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007859361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003163709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008804286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006172129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999234,0.0001388167,0.00007197353,0.0001170695,0.0001383628,0.0002997775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995934,0.0002153233,0.00001258121,0.00007321782,0.00002546291,0.0000800273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006652266,0.0000223952,0.00003480842,0.000001540928,0.000002415087,0.000001252063,0.003714202,5.206888e-8,0.000004053339,0.9883356,0.000978737,0.006898305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009999627,0.00006594462,0.005809847,0.00001084308,0.000007930301,3.342454e-7,0.003098141,0.000003705325,0.00001239745,0.8947742,0.09603382,0.0000828288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03457198,0.000180533,0.0001241849,0.004704463,0.0001803837,0.00006841491,0.000002747647,0.00005649698,0.9601108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901063,0.00005661621,0.00002733536,0.004122428,0.0003432886,0.000001739909,8.602867e-7,0.000003547891,0.005337921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2804708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130704102","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485371","title":"Political Corruption and the Concept of Dependence in Republican Thought","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Dependency (UML); Law; Sociology; Political corruption; Law and economics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784362813286467,"gpt":0.3119066672801213,"spread":0.2940630391472567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002718,0.00007644857,0.0001895496,0.00003896328,0.0001563354,0.00003864065,0.0001816611,0.00007499311,0.0005915489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002325669,0.0000531209,0.00005075321,0.0001321337,0.009055217,0.0001488317,0.00005701215,0.000164828,0.00001288251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008076795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004713369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008408589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000897811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997919,0.0008439667,0.0002361074,0.0001412501,0.0002627997,0.0005968839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966375,0.002774037,0.00003942613,0.0001448597,0.0001120252,0.0002922008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146225,0.00002152844,0.001636015,0.000002628243,0.000004626098,8.579441e-7,0.0003381779,1.588909e-7,0.000003507121,0.9975073,0.00003818476,0.0004324275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003629006,0.00001865308,0.00510325,0.00001570524,0.00001179099,0.000006085182,0.006929703,0.00002157819,0.00005844801,0.9756671,0.01171376,0.00009109298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0638779,0.0001712167,0.0009638212,0.0158362,0.0001222119,0.0003143162,0.00002100404,0.00003081268,0.9186625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956055,0.000005786072,0.000151318,0.002542691,0.0001983277,0.00002237236,0.000001499253,0.000004296793,0.001468191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163111576","doi":"10.1177/0090591703251146","title":"Heidegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Liberalism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01867336995970931,"gpt":0.3056367691413799,"spread":0.2869633991816706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279963,0.00006682565,0.0001243226,0.000009475344,0.0003876266,0.00002778495,0.0001695272,0.00006404183,0.0003269089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00191287,0.00003584203,0.00009325313,0.0001042229,0.003593672,0.00005931893,0.00003701657,0.0001489277,0.00001448206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000205892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005609267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003352642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966488,0.002612272,0.0001442005,0.0001059298,0.00019059,0.0002981783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970615,0.002574564,0.00002404138,0.0001747998,0.00004068292,0.0001244496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231012,0.00002815834,0.0001201604,0.000005274162,0.000009685415,2.875448e-7,0.001808367,1.032872e-7,0.00001075781,0.9977472,0.00002908266,0.0002085689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185656,0.0000108829,0.0001704956,0.000009419036,0.00002485944,0.000001453105,0.001335566,0.000002619067,0.0003501451,0.9820203,0.01570378,0.0000519667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09591335,0.0002380435,0.0001192608,0.01203513,0.0002762017,0.000265337,0.00001018735,0.00003877969,0.8911037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.00001112656,0.00003670682,0.002074102,0.0002243429,0.000007641837,2.049819e-7,0.000005007955,0.0005881009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9011394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170591943","doi":"10.1177/00905917211021796","title":"Martin Luther King Jr. on Democratic Propaganda, Shame, and Moral Transformation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Shame; Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; White (mutation); Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03936060068206847,"gpt":0.2266899206312947,"spread":0.1873293199492262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001748544,0.00009527014,0.0001126125,0.00003737552,0.0002742761,0.00007116354,0.00003873764,0.00003566946,0.002658296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003890448,0.00007992597,0.00004717466,0.00001427485,0.0002523802,0.0001221427,0.000008661035,0.0001322922,0.0001768463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002964709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002611406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006703388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001160488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992433,0.000143265,0.0001464897,0.0001226617,0.00009836241,0.0002459014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996485,0.0001039738,0.00001784159,0.00009857797,0.0000353628,0.00009578132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003658282,0.00004407386,0.00001989882,0.00005057038,0.00001061765,0.00001348479,0.01584711,3.329949e-7,0.00002269698,0.9831744,0.00008906092,0.0006911825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236678,0.00007046686,0.00006903457,0.00004669042,0.00002373353,0.000009457293,0.0008757975,0.00005568455,0.0006559871,0.9610129,0.03680465,0.0001389159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2040298,0.0001033513,0.00005725684,0.001456566,0.0002322428,0.00009702423,0.00002812155,0.00004581322,0.7939498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899501,9.3366e-7,0.00001506067,0.002580479,0.0005170412,0.000008693597,0.00001097222,0.00001290945,0.006903861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045498150","doi":"10.1177/0090591706286986","title":"The Unsettled and Unsettling Claims of Culture","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006093930751230042,"gpt":0.2674621643246079,"spread":0.2613682335733779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005402198,0.00004822408,0.00006975306,0.00001359032,0.0004380703,0.00004259589,0.0001139499,0.00004972235,0.00008783819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003175469,0.00003257323,0.00002340233,0.0001469067,0.0009965117,0.00004555385,0.00001911898,0.00007353571,0.00001264901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002410249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004104618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001656127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001016003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991023,0.0002591025,0.0001248076,0.00008309529,0.0001635694,0.0002671356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990844,0.0006684468,0.0000272775,0.00008985609,0.0000530576,0.00007699746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003689124,0.00001033686,0.0008272458,0.000002610182,0.000003726559,4.351166e-7,0.0004939142,4.121337e-7,0.00008710534,0.9980789,0.0003706689,0.0001208882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000865713,0.000005813776,0.003194553,0.000006007901,0.00001022901,7.349185e-7,0.001478243,0.000003062399,0.0007428646,0.9223634,0.07205748,0.00005105538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1724764,0.001297146,0.00107559,0.06988708,0.0004573282,0.0004010521,0.00003396937,0.0002345792,0.7541369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959726,0.00001433177,0.0001064496,0.0002634735,0.0002439995,0.000001417023,0.000001830492,0.000006897518,0.003388943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3671689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133322118","doi":"10.1177/0090591704272278","title":"Book Review: Stretching “The Political”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02041720021970197,"gpt":0.2699473762028781,"spread":0.2495301759831761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003101372,0.0001483195,0.0002006409,0.00002584844,0.0004517607,0.0000598804,0.0001983563,0.0000233777,0.01304357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008979531,0.00008592467,0.0001289223,0.00001610582,0.0006910739,0.0001820079,0.0000731799,0.0002213455,0.001379898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004465801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002204554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000434005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000287872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986007,0.0001210037,0.0002391914,0.0001431704,0.0001619052,0.0007340703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990967,0.0004095166,0.00002356726,0.0002697817,0.00004708556,0.0001533593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004109098,0.00001971525,0.000006246479,0.00006277466,0.00002188211,7.534476e-7,0.0009271606,5.27776e-8,3.514979e-7,0.798553,0.198134,0.002269886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006820315,0.00002443961,0.00001062534,0.0001434483,0.00005285259,0.000004705773,0.001927427,0.00000692613,0.00005651511,0.1161431,0.8814435,0.0001183104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004119065,0.1123853,0.000007831671,0.08866838,0.00025146,0.0001488804,0.00003311703,0.000103586,0.7979895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5670444,0.001953522,0.00001248216,0.3798404,0.005221189,0.00003507883,0.000005783837,0.00002552747,0.0458616],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7521279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102591225","doi":"10.1177/0090591709345463","title":"Approaching Others: Aristotle on Friendship’s Possibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Democracy; Statement (logic); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0601659445881968,"gpt":0.2798299955626103,"spread":0.2196640509744135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005425347,0.0002539069,0.0002860109,0.00006738887,0.000320087,0.0001433416,0.0002733066,0.00009574559,0.003920683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406115,0.0001861821,0.0002305032,0.00003660422,0.0005836314,0.0001325754,0.00003699378,0.0004685836,0.0008155303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009606576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002268523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003330662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002045186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977162,0.0003268603,0.0003364415,0.0004136442,0.0003157966,0.0008910276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983451,0.0006225969,0.00003876035,0.0004408213,0.00004448432,0.0005081866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244734,0.0005453518,0.0000163122,0.00001226093,0.00001830344,0.000007323377,0.001024955,4.261766e-7,0.000006334036,0.9957008,0.0001502869,0.002393147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559959,0.0002674827,0.0003248698,0.00002845813,0.00002283213,0.000003098085,0.000544344,0.00002754048,0.0001377539,0.9370465,0.06110153,0.0002396186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231311,0.00008814061,0.0001766401,0.007719067,0.0004433592,0.0001680433,0.00008248821,0.0002283843,0.9487808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812102,0.000001074292,0.00006157051,0.01450814,0.002164842,0.000007818952,0.00001495541,0.00002192695,0.002009528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158248433","doi":"10.1177/0090591709359593","title":"Theocracy and Autonomy in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Theocracy; Obedience; Judaism; Islam; Autonomy; Law; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Philosophy; Torah; Power (physics); Divine law; Religious law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01901359846419651,"gpt":0.2378588496994711,"spread":0.2188452512352746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004014438,0.0001595571,0.0002218024,0.00007592321,0.0001286934,0.00008432736,0.0001085846,0.00007381824,0.001396497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023801,0.0001189572,0.00004192856,0.00001876024,0.001620475,0.0001501487,0.00009530265,0.000452621,0.00007277155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001425606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003264474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002785012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006068379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988862,0.0001024228,0.0002109006,0.0002580604,0.0001338915,0.0004085275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990052,0.0005769216,0.00002484455,0.0001612336,0.00002874269,0.0002030886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002687257,0.00006347999,0.0001422123,0.0000327726,0.000009848281,0.000008397792,0.001761519,4.563255e-9,0.0001040551,0.9943603,0.000030113,0.003460467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003692736,0.00005771776,0.0006980106,0.00002101714,0.00001647076,0.00000770541,0.000248455,0.00004027383,0.0000481378,0.9826858,0.01564535,0.0001617578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.355567,0.0001693824,0.000004510754,0.008405124,0.0003954515,0.0001157336,0.00002235078,0.00005112286,0.6352693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945062,0.000005378507,0.0000261138,0.002396107,0.001808259,0.00001388128,0.000003623602,0.00001684083,0.001223567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6389392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111299150","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265729","title":"The Force of Political Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Contradiction; Politics; Performative utterance; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Criticism; Aesthetics; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sincerity; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910312734016661,"gpt":0.3490306364080441,"spread":0.3199275090678775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001807419,0.0000999935,0.0001554218,0.00002520595,0.0005745059,0.00004217682,0.0003574288,0.0000955953,0.0002123485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002281746,0.00006988893,0.0001520519,0.0001250693,0.002977216,0.00007129915,0.0000660008,0.0001850092,0.0001216469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001473104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001350898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001917157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001028825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976624,0.0005373045,0.0002606704,0.0001563402,0.0003835697,0.0009997453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963044,0.002802391,0.00002332918,0.000257891,0.00008451402,0.0005274827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000470195,0.00008426869,0.00001988847,0.00000713859,0.00001363,0.000002963842,0.0004185446,6.3607e-7,0.00004034395,0.999007,0.000008516641,0.000350074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001938579,0.00005616695,0.0000586337,0.00001754162,0.00001786025,0.000001786787,0.002626957,5.312205e-7,0.00190894,0.9817178,0.01330831,0.00009162311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0219578,0.0001460561,0.001725916,0.03224594,0.0003206824,0.0001966948,0.00001793244,0.00006820384,0.9433208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969047,0.000007284925,0.00008486551,0.001630464,0.000578182,0.00001144171,8.738089e-7,0.000009974681,0.0007721878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2872121524","doi":"10.1177/0090591718786471","title":"The Rhetoric of Self-Ownership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Rhetoric; Depiction; Sociology; Politics; Rhetorical question; Subversion; Invocation; Law and economics; Ambiguity; Individualism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05681015421322361,"gpt":0.2815420788844856,"spread":0.224731924671262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871848,0.00005930479,0.00008922345,0.00001553574,0.0005074472,0.00003262805,0.000243651,0.00001606025,0.0004232145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001427253,0.00003270503,0.00005133246,0.00002147788,0.001235796,0.00003447086,0.00008038466,0.00006446271,0.0002458507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001985124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001775193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001579431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000130139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993132,0.0001408591,0.0001512954,0.00006290562,0.0001066671,0.0002250171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.0008694563,0.00003583193,0.0003107924,0.0001570029,0.0000459723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001060837,0.00002547476,0.00002603234,0.000003537534,0.00003450418,5.749328e-8,0.006641543,1.97466e-9,0.000001273996,0.9905463,0.00164276,0.001067906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004498032,0.00003962844,0.0001203885,0.00000360968,0.00001213557,3.315312e-7,0.00510609,0.000003056337,0.00007636516,0.4731894,0.5213653,0.00003867408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005859606,0.0005332807,0.0000529168,0.001369351,0.0004077156,0.00004407873,0.00000356374,0.00005959178,0.9916699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863306,0.00003434658,0.00002519746,0.0003277601,0.0008260449,0.000009260729,3.850323e-7,0.000006246512,0.01244017],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4633902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524797","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030001003","title":"Beyond Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08188175393542789,"gpt":0.3565416022448439,"spread":0.274659848309416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007816417,0.00008268354,0.0001120411,0.00003383288,0.0004138513,0.00004433512,0.0002381433,0.0001640546,0.004292591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003846874,0.00007745487,0.00008065805,0.0001202865,0.001416252,0.0001290342,0.00003866396,0.0002997897,0.001912015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008523486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002813874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001987715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99804,0.0004695534,0.0001336655,0.0001603893,0.0003193578,0.0008770284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969007,0.002221995,0.00001311913,0.0001752037,0.0000487994,0.0006402029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001798279,0.0000542607,0.0000772647,0.00000429911,0.000005760581,0.00000357505,0.0009317077,4.878255e-8,0.000003130811,0.9973165,0.0007668524,0.0008348025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007486036,0.00001325521,0.0001687709,0.000004467427,0.000009553804,6.844661e-7,0.000334453,0.000009128462,0.00003114583,0.8922297,0.1070251,0.00009879542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002886326,0.0001333394,0.0001168816,0.03134906,0.0002749307,0.00006073437,0.000009334421,0.000130368,0.965039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770048,0.00001094408,0.00006654148,0.01190723,0.001657296,0.000005365036,6.741452e-7,0.000009419285,0.009337688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216475987","doi":"10.1177/00905917211065064","title":"Settling Accounts at the End of History: A Nonideal Approach to State Apologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Governmentality; Individualism; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03924193129292487,"gpt":0.3066311663187966,"spread":0.2673892350258718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007268729,0.0001198816,0.0001922805,0.00007372138,0.000183607,0.000004257846,0.0003431748,0.00006224255,0.004538163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004368428,0.00008253112,0.0001023575,0.0001008211,0.0005436326,0.00001740678,0.0003803293,0.0003399925,0.0001380025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004316683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005826117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003275083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000206047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984199,0.0003566519,0.0002190689,0.0002533718,0.0002214459,0.0005295493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990719,0.0003610772,0.00005548667,0.0003821815,0.00002329946,0.0001060606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002483138,0.0002200499,0.0006255392,0.000009916541,0.00005946638,0.00001263436,0.003454539,0.00009733167,0.0004449837,0.9920379,0.001779592,0.001009715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003016791,0.00135357,0.06429332,0.00003512048,0.0005207693,0.0005053442,0.0519152,0.00007936296,0.001897731,0.4781308,0.3967775,0.001474507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662851,0.0005755199,0.00008468649,0.0004972079,0.0009383318,0.0002202,0.0001531246,0.00005119867,0.1311946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865525,0.000001390023,0.00003710061,0.0008359415,0.00004035437,0.0001464953,0.00001352699,0.00002474651,0.01234796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5139071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023998101","doi":"10.1177/0090591700028006008","title":"Review Essay on Thucydides","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04364299207181617,"gpt":0.3768244900225771,"spread":0.3331814979507609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009636377,0.00008594259,0.0001867101,0.00001444129,0.0003172777,0.00002294832,0.0001909432,0.00004770253,0.007588532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001713009,0.00006530595,0.0001003135,0.0001214753,0.0008773257,0.00004989073,0.00002753876,0.0001335721,0.002492817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006045711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008725955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004806178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983836,0.0005207083,0.0001389413,0.0001688683,0.0002523571,0.0005355333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983544,0.001224719,0.00001242507,0.0001570804,0.00003033683,0.000221053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007368799,0.00004905755,0.00001792407,0.00003686628,0.000007748349,0.000002406701,0.0002457134,2.415214e-8,5.742039e-7,0.9470841,0.008833101,0.04371509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003173279,0.00001766063,0.0001396834,0.000240037,0.00001238845,2.65189e-7,0.0001645079,3.007922e-7,0.00001279597,0.432606,0.566708,0.000066714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002289844,0.003110047,0.000006875307,0.07036313,0.00007488302,0.000135701,0.00000579329,0.0001110209,0.9239027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8275987,0.008015933,0.00004440236,0.05864226,0.000816706,0.00002735829,0.000001398337,0.00001452541,0.1048387],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335328045","doi":"10.1177/0090591716642496","title":"Catching Up with Wells: The Political Theory of H. G. Wells’s Science Fiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Politics; Faith; The Imaginary; Institution; Identity (music); Narrative; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Aesthetics; Literature; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193288600333313,"gpt":0.2504189024739024,"spread":0.2184860164705693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001004446,0.0001842097,0.0002038095,0.0001232322,0.0005237691,0.00009523011,0.000314098,0.00005129535,0.001921166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002596149,0.0000873371,0.0001019243,0.00007252607,0.004617341,0.0003331616,0.00006756522,0.0001706665,0.0001217078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001518874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001340051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002223284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002826769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979048,0.0003183104,0.0002853488,0.0003084803,0.0004141865,0.0007689078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813,0.0009832324,0.00007260665,0.000391036,0.0002042396,0.0002188499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001028368,0.00005574423,0.0002903618,0.00001621385,0.00002554963,0.000001539762,0.002269981,3.747929e-7,0.0003696306,0.9959034,0.00004318139,0.0009211784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004471843,0.0001996924,0.00305614,0.000118953,0.00006519383,0.00001693169,0.004377603,0.00002038427,0.005373945,0.8890166,0.09707104,0.0002363697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3676195,0.00001855032,0.003938923,0.003661069,0.0008797562,0.0002308569,0.00005558207,0.0001022715,0.6234934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052337,0.000002828088,0.00002377383,0.0008412103,0.0007622599,0.00001071237,0.000001575507,0.00001980099,0.09310415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5376141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966583833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707302196","title":"From Honor to Dignity and Back Again: Remarks on LaVaque-Manty's “Dueling for Equality”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Dignity; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09210073930510225,"gpt":0.4036069734791128,"spread":0.3115062341740105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004438701,0.0001536529,0.0002416849,0.00005929108,0.0004541665,0.00008125771,0.0002226979,0.0002817852,0.0001772038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150671,0.0001426293,0.00009877634,0.0001020429,0.0007950723,0.00009913279,0.00008001354,0.0003344792,0.0002393186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001456029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009541047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001025195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001538004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974155,0.0004700555,0.0002936953,0.0003588648,0.0003238251,0.00113809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887593,0.009796041,0.00002969653,0.0002304927,0.00009944791,0.001084988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001876697,0.00005299542,0.00005699914,0.00001982213,0.00001416923,0.00000271037,0.00261168,3.39298e-7,0.00003451027,0.9955936,0.0001652606,0.001260242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000218399,0.00008797599,0.000344063,0.00005192837,0.00001870718,2.05409e-7,0.001861952,0.000008510001,0.0006382461,0.9731486,0.02342041,0.000200936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06303197,0.00003791385,0.0209777,0.02532891,0.0004646579,0.000496881,0.0002045429,0.0001060033,0.8893514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782634,0.000004632877,0.001047953,0.01733784,0.002331301,0.000009303022,0.000008738239,0.00001762004,0.0009791505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084410903","doi":"10.1177/0090591720952056","title":"Laughing with Leviathan: Hobbesian Laughter in Theory and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Rhetoric; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Adversary; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05017537227571865,"gpt":0.2822843875170103,"spread":0.2321090152412916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096121,0.0002331608,0.0003007796,0.00005072009,0.0001399214,0.0001508975,0.0001645569,0.00007186495,0.001765294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001628346,0.0001634221,0.00006517039,0.00005749451,0.0008439812,0.0003546138,0.0001028799,0.0004309676,0.0001869083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002993534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002683694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003433189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009592034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974875,0.0009422692,0.0002797063,0.0003661583,0.0002374237,0.0006869538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954898,0.003699081,0.00004055804,0.000173874,0.00005215578,0.0005445658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007333075,0.0001294171,0.00006101079,0.00005735585,0.00003873649,0.00008259044,0.005539681,2.145504e-7,0.00001260443,0.9927638,0.000104317,0.0004769358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005625575,0.0002164315,0.0001268698,0.00006403268,0.00006180688,0.00003777577,0.004690635,0.00001219068,0.00005576634,0.8521703,0.1417316,0.0002700189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03249795,0.0009709518,0.0005846784,0.08293353,0.0002091571,0.0003707003,0.00009924263,0.0001902319,0.8821436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618979,0.00001535276,0.0001506961,0.03564708,0.001407861,0.00001552259,0.00000809475,0.00003472573,0.0008227969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088037499","doi":"10.1177/0090591720960438","title":"Lyons and Tygers and Wolves, Oh My! Human Equality and the “Dominion Covenant” in Locke’s <i>Two Treatises</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Covenant; Punishment (psychology); Power (physics); Humanity; Creatures; Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Natural (archaeology); History; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03340030916116202,"gpt":0.3390903998550614,"spread":0.3056900906938994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009357622,0.0001018807,0.0002163207,0.00001819324,0.0004145555,0.00006211405,0.00008612345,0.00005576734,0.00005559814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007157424,0.00007359643,0.00003066641,0.00008520784,0.006326539,0.00007930057,0.00007359414,0.0001516602,0.000003722056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004064148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000212897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004574363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003416577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982876,0.0007829383,0.0001811252,0.0001980802,0.0001594973,0.0003908185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976728,0.001810499,0.00003416258,0.00008067307,0.00002186068,0.0003799878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005584313,0.00001347344,0.003339905,0.00001108085,0.000008669678,0.000003198922,0.002268989,1.431923e-7,0.00001512683,0.9937021,0.0000630026,0.0005184273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002216104,0.00007205935,0.004778448,0.00004113142,0.00006287819,0.000007872696,0.009398107,0.0000267485,0.00004516401,0.9087607,0.07432479,0.0002659564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3708234,0.001139085,0.000417127,0.03581811,0.00007339102,0.0003816761,0.0001370259,0.00005489377,0.5911553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930504,0.00009936646,0.00004675318,0.006274913,0.00021615,0.00000786537,0.000003272078,0.00000541974,0.000295872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.622227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134495749","doi":"10.1177/0090591714555577","title":"Shipwrecked Sovereignty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Sovereign immunity; Corporation; Political science; Indigenous; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01790465694181895,"gpt":0.2342287276199324,"spread":0.2163240706781134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003525352,0.00007994259,0.00007649537,0.00005978268,0.00007616478,0.0001152833,0.0001304599,0.00003245566,0.003675617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003526167,0.00006665585,0.0000551544,0.00005896293,0.00009079207,0.0003593942,0.00004947789,0.00007043646,0.003251107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001827032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006128148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002661261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001452575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.00001933016,0.0001270178,0.0001231935,0.0001582687,0.0002469366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996743,0.0001007326,0.00003219203,0.0001093049,0.0000633083,0.00002022064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001305441,0.00003086455,0.0001782672,0.00001028477,0.000006012254,4.585141e-7,0.000001981976,5.510412e-7,0.00004560677,0.9985373,0.0009633256,0.0002122821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001643755,0.000003833669,0.0008465159,0.000005543341,0.000007870154,5.627533e-7,0.00001698445,0.001669797,0.0001945658,0.8507997,0.1462075,0.00008274954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0106931,0.00000275174,0.002090394,0.001526581,0.0002531226,0.00005070332,9.144968e-7,0.0001064507,0.985276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862538,9.609686e-8,0.00008403509,0.1108195,0.001561692,0.000006003797,0.00001408385,0.00000994894,0.001250831],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326128374","doi":"10.1177/0090591715619337","title":"Book Review: <i>Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</i> , by Hartmut Rosa, translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06610963969518283,"gpt":0.3509671365448971,"spread":0.2848574968497143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003045399,0.0002557445,0.0005386407,0.00004120755,0.0003469569,0.00005608664,0.0004478517,0.0002632182,0.003716552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00124637,0.0002412815,0.0002650179,0.0002553814,0.001300911,0.0003968624,0.00004259674,0.000358227,0.0001812923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009643297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003019388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002665211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951651,0.00250526,0.0005422056,0.0003117581,0.000685066,0.0007906658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973602,0.001126992,0.0000836968,0.0002580644,0.0001950002,0.0009760252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001331706,0.0001520816,0.000001169791,0.00005585909,0.0000252621,0.000001775599,0.002467697,8.265171e-8,0.0001765392,0.7016329,0.2941714,0.001182069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000346196,0.00005202274,3.408565e-7,0.00006360132,0.00006403314,9.920128e-7,0.0003496452,0.0000020309,0.001328558,0.5483125,0.4493084,0.0001716849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009964537,0.222356,0.008060236,0.05752684,0.0004318162,0.0009988338,0.0007611474,0.0003266156,0.708542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881933,0.001434976,0.00007652343,0.06864984,0.001740084,0.00005983203,0.0001806035,0.00007839138,0.04584678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073087360","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340136","title":"Communicating Depth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Intersubjectivity; Praxis; Epistemology; Existentialism; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06044201083906416,"gpt":0.3692253665010782,"spread":0.3087833556620141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002939602,0.00008478749,0.0001265391,0.00003694633,0.0001056984,0.000008124093,0.000288819,0.00009548729,0.0009578037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009047069,0.00007771456,0.00005946894,0.00005494805,0.0002373582,0.00003050645,0.00004200534,0.0002548931,0.001752845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001934872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006836077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008391441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.193764e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988527,0.0003229236,0.0001489492,0.0001476339,0.00005056053,0.0004772396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990333,0.0002921351,0.00002261053,0.000493694,0.00001428207,0.0001439372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000562715,0.0001372181,0.0001209175,0.000001039021,0.00002478623,0.000008902003,0.0003084943,6.669729e-8,0.00006432655,0.9919595,0.000173562,0.007144932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002195184,0.0001034692,0.01084236,0.000003897653,0.00001419211,0.00002013727,0.0002307578,0.000001546187,0.00004408851,0.9861636,0.002267022,0.00008944928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03157088,0.0003231239,0.000455366,0.004247087,0.0001901254,0.0000519746,0.000002858392,0.0001173877,0.9630412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889539,7.818406e-7,0.0002442119,0.009518755,0.0002489814,0.000005410472,0.000004818593,0.000007795522,0.001015356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141674088","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451722","title":"Isaiah Berlin as Essayist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Rhetorical question; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Rhetoric; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0656464873582708,"gpt":0.3934418696320561,"spread":0.3277953822737854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324978,0.0001084475,0.0001452202,0.00003514518,0.0004584817,0.00004320095,0.0002455452,0.0002248299,0.001884574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003985024,0.00009917649,0.000104456,0.0001108417,0.00172922,0.0002400257,0.00006293596,0.0003623219,0.003283299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001342722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001531734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005788158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001494244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971204,0.000735619,0.0001685737,0.0001399634,0.0003905103,0.001444871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966358,0.00185857,0.00001889206,0.0001985011,0.00005456862,0.001233703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001088759,0.00009988195,0.0003125761,0.000006595545,0.000009193994,0.000001962091,0.001985047,2.500671e-8,0.000005824199,0.9968925,0.0002386915,0.0004368061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007143108,0.00001375674,0.0003520571,0.000007234195,0.00001679684,0.000001903534,0.001478011,5.414123e-7,0.0001585449,0.8737918,0.1239812,0.000126716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01230132,0.0001718773,0.0002622172,0.0174545,0.0005854229,0.00008152272,0.00001562449,0.0001317334,0.9689958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807626,0.000006664362,0.0001079537,0.01062855,0.0031777,0.000008402864,0.000002287544,0.0000137573,0.005292083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016158199","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299808","title":"Citizenship as Inherited Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Politics; Scrutiny; Citizenship; Realm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Analogy; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05238002556775614,"gpt":0.3448930610020612,"spread":0.2925130354343051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278059,0.00006273432,0.00009143381,0.00002808503,0.0005487067,0.00002318782,0.000113875,0.00006435575,0.0005355299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001698739,0.0000419999,0.00004944799,0.0001450468,0.001474074,0.00003405476,0.00003889998,0.00009969616,0.0005241848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008917171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001323694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002752101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001459445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998796,0.0001499154,0.0001180122,0.0001169757,0.0002619165,0.0005571119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991063,0.0004931213,0.00001301672,0.0000601365,0.00008336829,0.0002440236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000298843,0.00001980828,0.0008510416,0.000001163446,0.00001344429,0.00001362948,0.000497289,1.867962e-8,0.00002579766,0.9958064,0.0003519832,0.002389554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006843667,0.0000153213,0.003737993,0.000008311329,0.000007552054,0.000001753789,0.003227905,1.558913e-7,0.00009962053,0.9430555,0.04969665,0.00008078053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04733475,0.0001282086,0.000386726,0.003982896,0.0001962212,0.00009048155,0.000002548972,0.00009901013,0.9477792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912039,0.000007762039,0.0000480676,0.002949208,0.0007186381,0.00000429894,7.622823e-7,0.00000395584,0.005063398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042393846","doi":"10.1177/0090591720943507","title":"Book Review: <i>Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration</i> , by Anna Stilz","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03016617488766515,"gpt":0.3182426056773699,"spread":0.2880764307897047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008369491,0.0002538291,0.0004453737,0.00002530664,0.0003412667,0.00009819702,0.0005526204,0.0002496749,0.003849196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005841477,0.0002475127,0.000215619,0.0002470195,0.001194575,0.0005492768,0.0001545375,0.0004915493,0.0009454573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001782801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003577146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009290547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003056017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957747,0.001137568,0.0004879973,0.0004932887,0.0008640062,0.001242412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967296,0.00102449,0.00006551124,0.000296089,0.0001576059,0.00172667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020202,0.00005939456,0.00000355732,0.0000725971,0.00001290439,0.000008571439,0.0002551284,1.174113e-7,0.00000827292,0.7472184,0.2521541,0.000166821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001815282,0.00006536154,0.000001155948,0.00006437259,0.00003760564,7.576837e-7,0.0001571496,0.00004522271,0.00002418816,0.4883117,0.5109233,0.0001877219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000650147,0.03059839,0.002698057,0.5094785,0.001255398,0.0009420372,0.0005611603,0.00054547,0.453856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2309757,0.00409455,0.0001768623,0.7479005,0.01323498,0.0001229108,0.0001097555,0.00008309794,0.003301674],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4505543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519147428","doi":"10.1177/0090591716663293","title":"Coherence, Consistency, Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0629267514145857,"gpt":0.3724374952563627,"spread":0.309510743841777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551486,0.00006403233,0.0001105742,0.00001206266,0.0003473969,0.0000358862,0.000275604,0.00007510846,0.002171551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002101798,0.00004013533,0.00006999636,0.0001411867,0.002042256,0.0001456873,0.0000395113,0.00004852282,0.0004349638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001233854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004892049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001017108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982014,0.0004552164,0.0001370392,0.0001823252,0.0003824819,0.000641575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982802,0.001144254,0.00004033568,0.0001380139,0.00006360882,0.0003335902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005194953,0.00001637644,0.004363379,9.76528e-7,0.000002808005,0.000001085858,0.0005923155,2.265004e-9,0.00005580614,0.9852145,0.000963004,0.008784514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009802383,0.00001315342,0.01032261,0.00001319795,0.000003933365,2.649916e-7,0.002511923,9.588373e-8,0.0001341503,0.9039488,0.08285944,0.00009434448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05756827,0.00007247505,0.001063201,0.01974711,0.0004164347,0.00009672783,0.00002328712,0.0000954232,0.9209171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783608,0.000008752576,0.00006267877,0.001239606,0.0003747486,0.000007842846,1.129657e-7,0.000003573988,0.0199419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705131","doi":"10.1177/00905917231210995","title":"The Ambiguity of Betrayal: Contesting Myths of Heroic Resistance in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Betrayal; Ambiguity; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07029374130561054,"gpt":0.3337115969779514,"spread":0.2634178556723409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002465744,0.00006389379,0.0001656672,0.00004683865,0.0001844609,0.00001663326,0.0002961179,0.00006125106,0.00002457414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003098251,0.00005059059,0.00007047359,0.0004002355,0.0009670763,0.0000303115,0.00005468701,0.0001296607,0.00001569419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003593761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000124606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003531406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006262105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998215,0.0005432734,0.000264588,0.0001297564,0.0003089788,0.0005384223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974411,0.002131641,0.00006341875,0.0001803439,0.00007622377,0.0001072306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001761598,0.00001907783,0.0022355,0.00002044745,0.000005869855,0.000002046058,0.03752995,2.474107e-7,0.00004738736,0.959853,0.00003247503,0.0002364036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001418797,0.00001693668,0.01922477,0.00003951167,0.000007657264,6.149467e-8,0.08281905,0.000006736929,0.0002498851,0.8943025,0.003119939,0.00007102474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3909797,0.0007052617,0.00002238591,0.001207346,0.0001504205,0.0001568635,0.00002224898,0.00006832682,0.6066874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997336,0.00001315771,0.00001581729,0.00004131091,0.00007526872,0.000007103586,4.741362e-7,0.000006573287,0.002504239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6063563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.370912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386772732","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193106","title":"The Art of Not Being Sexed Quite So Much: A Feminist Reading of Roland Barthes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Yale University","keywords":"Queer; Gender studies; Neutrality; Sociology; Normative; Transformative learning; Scholarship; Queer theory; Transgender; Opposition (politics); Binary opposition; Shame; Doing gender; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06299201384365997,"gpt":0.3707547056701377,"spread":0.3077626918264778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180329,0.0001001596,0.0002583275,0.00005348051,0.0007840456,0.00004461835,0.0002627589,0.0000746485,0.00003562066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002998534,0.0000726427,0.0001058563,0.0002337941,0.001995154,0.00003958054,0.0001153337,0.0001059306,0.00005179795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003208937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001223247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002460587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001404241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979897,0.0005032511,0.0003312398,0.0001679704,0.0003923755,0.0006154245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938277,0.005684503,0.00007416085,0.0002139353,0.00006791825,0.0001318015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598145,0.00001882865,0.002066853,0.00002830741,0.00004675305,0.000001531464,0.05782427,2.500493e-7,0.0003030743,0.9383464,0.0004898034,0.0008379666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002142407,0.00007822867,0.004050041,0.00005007525,0.00004707302,9.030298e-7,0.3685395,0.0000219888,0.003222848,0.5702225,0.05338081,0.0001718695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4262642,0.0001403844,0.00004229464,0.005352311,0.0003848271,0.0001929417,0.00004664886,0.00009540249,0.567481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907835,0.00008144046,0.00002295128,0.0004020895,0.000229257,0.000009593291,0.000002167709,0.00001045142,0.00845854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5645193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335250233","doi":"10.1177/0090591710378977","title":"Animals and Interdependence: Reply to Dolgert","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01537567347194484,"gpt":0.3665213307881342,"spread":0.3511456573161894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004434472,0.0001057634,0.0001610588,0.0001032275,0.0003943763,0.0001313423,0.0002676152,0.000100575,0.0005575747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008522962,0.00009596198,0.00003882938,0.0002237691,0.0007117754,0.0001353653,0.0001246149,0.0002868655,0.00008819839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001748513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002525484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005527319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980406,0.0004673212,0.0002689213,0.0002994233,0.0003193405,0.0006044397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983198,0.000694724,0.00003585894,0.000304076,0.0003081353,0.0003373939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001613872,0.00002048931,0.004720225,0.00001703912,0.000004932261,0.000003046357,0.006025865,3.594005e-8,0.0003116101,0.9877669,0.0003154608,0.0007982961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008519956,0.00004534079,0.01103768,0.00001024733,0.000005642621,0.000005135316,0.01003065,0.000003718465,0.000213196,0.9248118,0.05359927,0.0001521233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7279758,0.00001604335,0.0005639397,0.01182569,0.0006404583,0.0004091662,0.000005737541,0.0001296018,0.2584336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932777,3.268683e-7,0.0002400911,0.002711156,0.0008623317,0.00002635267,8.398378e-7,0.00001278007,0.002868375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2653019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254528727","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030006007","title":"Books in Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Historical and modern epidemiology studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1293256818209135,"gpt":0.3812378370303886,"spread":0.2519121552094751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111991,0.00004850479,0.0001767591,0.00001873473,0.0001295496,0.00000208043,0.0001003641,0.00004837709,0.0009726063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003344625,0.00003892021,0.00004917691,0.00006353347,0.000502219,0.00002691806,0.0000222832,0.0001122552,0.0004266626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000100634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002851723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009790151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986084,0.0006153594,0.0001446483,0.0001126259,0.00008881705,0.0004301501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989473,0.0008057911,0.00001298659,0.00007943467,0.00001563026,0.0001388321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.17824e-7,0.00002191601,0.0004172603,0.00001738217,0.000002311574,0.000003571591,0.000549504,1.003637e-8,2.677268e-7,0.9856774,0.009728328,0.00358139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003254971,0.000005938809,0.000233113,0.00006225142,0.000005272157,2.803426e-7,0.0001368289,0.000001874526,4.763185e-7,0.4719575,0.5275158,0.00004814096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000348352,0.02943466,0.00009479591,0.02556984,0.0001149357,0.00008289742,9.953399e-7,0.00003973607,0.9443138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228091,0.01051746,0.00008303891,0.03141744,0.0002982239,0.00003009274,2.783013e-7,0.000005927553,0.0348384],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339594322","doi":"10.1177/0090591716640471","title":"Book Review: <i>Leo Strauss on the Borders of Judaism, Philosophy, and History</i> , by Jeffrey A. Bernstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Judaism; Religious studies; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03154044214282961,"gpt":0.2457452975804432,"spread":0.2142048554376136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004233298,0.0002675495,0.0003908566,0.00003585061,0.0001257511,0.00001789784,0.0002936566,0.00007429156,0.01294316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003866256,0.0001336916,0.0001887681,0.00002024146,0.002329449,0.0001204136,0.00008071112,0.0002237811,0.0002174598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003318609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.835877e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979112,0.000384234,0.0004327812,0.0003219888,0.000346019,0.000603759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.001760881,0.00008327545,0.0004224517,0.00007472198,0.0003363112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004097319,0.0001070227,0.000001871569,0.0001418673,0.000033397,0.000001631663,0.000100113,1.871907e-9,0.00003008339,0.7374759,0.2617049,0.0003622569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000194547,0.0001136598,0.000002598424,0.0004539118,0.00004025003,0.000001482339,0.00002395868,2.388271e-7,0.0002155682,0.4184796,0.5803473,0.0001269134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007166397,0.1352048,0.00002036435,0.207675,0.0005147736,0.0004870098,0.0005764745,0.0000877473,0.6547171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736752,0.006141304,0.000003874386,0.2289822,0.001227827,0.00005138203,0.00001384905,0.00005509465,0.0267725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7360353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}