{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"90fe748c4389","filters":{"venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition"}},"results":[{"id":"W1996666899","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.2.02che","title":"Recognizing sarcasm without language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Prosody; Linguistics; Sincerity; Psychology; Active listening; Irony; Spoken language; Intonation (linguistics); Communication; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0516756280067124,"gpt":0.3127958999284132,"spread":0.2611202719217008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004680735,0.0002141417,0.0002320872,0.0001739668,0.0001267911,0.00004177122,0.0001491657,0.0001673831,0.007130081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001733241,0.0002049904,0.0001011475,0.0002269629,0.0000692853,0.0002118999,0.00003740325,0.0002570102,0.003701433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002359285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002040739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001411189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006888873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984396,0.0002276488,0.000381554,0.0003382102,0.0002353227,0.0003776516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.0001006781,0.0002138181,0.0003366923,0.0001556356,0.0001107363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007531842,0.002423618,0.004100205,0.0003920016,0.0009547761,0.0005720269,0.2555483,2.424947e-7,0.02098856,0.03160472,0.005662531,0.6769998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02139902,0.002631121,0.1403911,0.00198936,0.006054448,0.002181981,0.2425525,0.001071285,0.1180925,0.4470485,0.009950931,0.006637293],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4908368,0.0003517955,0.01088342,0.00003574651,0.0007559254,0.0004339242,0.00003650981,0.0003027201,0.4963631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904214,0.00002428597,0.006599317,0.000708401,0.000283266,0.000141039,0.0001958947,0.000053878,0.001572584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6703625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040258355","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.2.06god","title":"A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Foundation (evidence); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05674631934493059,"gpt":0.2933166530883365,"spread":0.236570333743406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023328,0.00009208132,0.0001097343,0.0001257768,0.0001760789,0.00004514954,0.00006218591,0.00004344643,0.0003915582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001903599,0.00009082469,0.00006077782,0.00003357428,0.00009602861,0.0003893336,0.00000908377,0.00005381694,0.00003602331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002079833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000435427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002784498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.00004722085,0.0003760217,0.0001106362,0.000160036,0.000144377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988607,0.00047292,0.0002711281,0.0001050085,0.0002589906,0.00003126789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161029,0.0002242259,0.00002210893,0.0002974674,0.00004931411,1.432606e-7,0.02795759,0.000004198914,0.001731783,0.9366475,0.0007196698,0.03218495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006110916,0.0001460197,0.001144123,0.0001255728,0.0001783168,0.000001706877,0.004477778,0.0002295505,0.009508733,0.9785143,0.004904221,0.000158632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4768032,0.0002224618,0.34408,0.0005941809,0.002485586,0.002154596,0.0002342669,0.0001877895,0.1732379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959156,0.00001469227,0.002566542,0.0001584435,0.0005142558,0.00007860703,0.0003283743,0.00001448905,0.0004089981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5191123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4287288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043836746","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.1.11lau","title":"Pragmatics, Pittsburgh style","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03021741586209437,"gpt":0.2476085380366767,"spread":0.2173911221745823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003872131,0.0002229909,0.0002125901,0.0001550987,0.0004843793,0.0003166317,0.0001852019,0.00007697947,0.003913766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002129625,0.0002189416,0.0000869072,0.00006478505,0.0001803488,0.0009408859,0.00004306672,0.000221858,0.001605332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006508314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005393413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001858825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007717924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984903,0.000086526,0.0005203843,0.0002325504,0.0003490211,0.0003211589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988679,0.0001916307,0.0002657906,0.0002996945,0.0002672473,0.0001077858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002339415,0.0006962488,0.00002239761,0.0002129485,0.00009903322,0.00000230324,0.06077342,0.00003396202,0.0002007944,0.8470194,0.03343659,0.05747947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009158413,0.0001425253,0.0003202667,0.0002538488,0.0002764686,0.00002124064,0.00528928,0.003894798,0.0007326847,0.5417213,0.445711,0.0007207366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1269529,0.0005590502,0.008906218,0.0142904,0.002755754,0.001271384,0.00009797589,0.0008363625,0.8443299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908965,0.00006531739,0.002886582,0.00146835,0.002766426,0.0001122476,0.0001624062,0.0000382228,0.001603951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979138239","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.04cha","title":"Ideomotor design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Robotics and Automated Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Perception; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive science; Mental representation; Video game; Representation (politics); Mental rotation; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Multimedia; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01121354419707139,"gpt":0.2089733607085249,"spread":0.1977598165114535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001860876,0.00009000902,0.00009314256,0.00005096168,0.00004253507,0.00006156215,0.00006451049,0.00007861631,0.00009758463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005363724,0.00008945929,0.00002491181,0.00008078534,0.00001239422,0.00009137965,0.000007078405,0.000154116,0.000416251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007774203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007391941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001058185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002773023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994821,0.00001611351,0.0001813326,0.00006887905,0.0001125766,0.0001390023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996827,0.00006469596,0.00002763816,0.0001252243,0.00004987709,0.00004988662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004745885,0.00008454463,0.00004592425,0.0004335564,0.0001096223,0.00001897847,0.0006392141,0.03239922,0.932448,0.004269284,0.008237915,0.02130898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707954,0.00002243873,0.0003841416,0.00006214923,0.00003951741,0.00002778264,0.00003295227,0.9556557,0.03530793,0.006048911,0.001910788,0.0002369288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1330739,0.00004820784,0.8391038,0.0000557989,0.001919,0.0004937081,0.00001261933,0.001152878,0.02414011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741429,0.00001126708,0.02556981,0.00002266996,0.0001361383,0.00003112277,0.00001775375,0.00002860635,0.0000397193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9232565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5350203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047012610","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.3.06har","title":"Distributed processes, distributed cognizers, and collaborative cognition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Socially distributed cognition; Feeling; Cognitive science; Thinking processes; Process (computing); Need for cognition; Test (biology); Computer science; Turing test; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01306857904446628,"gpt":0.2520850149167202,"spread":0.2390164358722539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000272988,0.0002223833,0.0002483724,0.00009431135,0.000255685,0.0003514842,0.000261299,0.000118367,0.00001756712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009941007,0.0002109278,0.00002825291,0.0008290568,0.0001287542,0.001016887,0.0001393244,0.0001483502,0.00007299723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004292676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000144023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004166896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000568798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984857,0.0001039782,0.0003676165,0.0003953551,0.000327203,0.0003201165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982045,0.0004078418,0.0002325555,0.0002300457,0.0008085557,0.0001165155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007661222,0.005753701,0.004081154,0.004719799,0.001682852,0.0003532462,0.02666671,0.0006092588,0.01548554,0.1483713,0.0692452,0.7222651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02119967,0.002081804,0.05060074,0.002681585,0.002038096,0.0009220369,0.01041851,0.386014,0.1333154,0.3035226,0.08111413,0.006091448],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03443801,0.0007175868,0.957023,0.003904993,0.0001610257,0.0006958939,0.0005078618,0.0005559141,0.001995772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605427,0.0002826721,0.03764195,0.000395758,0.00009373185,0.00008374245,0.0009339312,0.00001090664,0.00001461001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8601384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005174739","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.1.09cor","title":"Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Minimalism (technical communication); Proposition; Utterance; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Philosophy; Semantic theory of truth; Value (mathematics); Truth value; Counterexample; Linguistics; Mathematics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04304640448116723,"gpt":0.2956730208095352,"spread":0.252626616328368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005386829,0.0001270327,0.0001331716,0.0001061164,0.0002960083,0.0002846848,0.0001131005,0.00004553011,0.0009935698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001270012,0.000117938,0.00003464036,0.00003606661,0.0003056824,0.0004109464,0.00004774913,0.0001157069,0.000118892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002616901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005553471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009761653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990679,0.00005972184,0.0003239902,0.0001352235,0.000237976,0.0001751768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988883,0.0004050504,0.0001617526,0.000197442,0.0002866003,0.00006086538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001620579,0.00007269387,0.00002162581,0.00003851273,0.00003673587,0.000004218514,0.05453664,3.66556e-7,0.0003522023,0.9393969,0.001406465,0.004117414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003302156,0.0002301535,0.007615184,0.0003824726,0.0005064936,0.00008333752,0.2769598,0.0007223702,0.002045679,0.4696443,0.2371642,0.001343778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720819,0.0008415875,0.003945349,0.001941958,0.0003484361,0.0004513384,0.0001144541,0.0002507121,0.5200242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961269,0.00005008613,0.001247734,0.000899615,0.0003063653,0.00001981456,0.0002479276,0.00001831604,0.001083238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.524045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994949853","doi":"10.1075/pc.11.1.06rot","title":"From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Modalities; Nonverbal communication; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Cognition; Competence (human resources); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Multimodality; Cognitive science; Communication; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07797080367069067,"gpt":0.3891698717173427,"spread":0.311199068046652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004324885,0.0001016699,0.000104467,0.0001274278,0.0002355058,0.0001651267,0.0001488931,0.00006880449,0.001158647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002053866,0.0001082047,0.00004306746,0.0002963161,0.00006612375,0.0001693443,0.00002900544,0.0001462834,0.003763026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003947685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005649098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004812467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988791,0.0002527989,0.0002476909,0.0002251914,0.0001741436,0.0002210118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989701,0.0001719721,0.00008320731,0.0005749665,0.00009119253,0.000108592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003005708,0.007778469,0.005922663,0.0001657381,0.0008312978,0.00003180458,0.1419676,0.0001694266,0.1081784,0.3371779,0.07193033,0.3255457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007571938,0.0009418178,0.1206704,0.001843347,0.001539012,0.0001256786,0.06407654,0.002104463,0.0159398,0.4945908,0.2876503,0.002945937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175164,0.00005925678,0.02063453,0.001608344,0.001214273,0.0004241662,0.00002613286,0.0001259077,0.05839097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929831,0.00000685741,0.004364424,0.000173442,0.00007188616,0.0001291318,0.0001655228,0.00001807372,0.00208757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3225998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244035841","doi":"10.1075/pc.22.1.04kna","title":"A developmental approach to ancient innovation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Creativity; Scale (ratio); Embodied cognition; Process (computing); Economic geography; Cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Archaeology; Computer science; Geography; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01919202006520681,"gpt":0.2037573877328252,"spread":0.1845653676676184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002961679,0.00007595017,0.00007547526,0.00007407025,0.0002162666,0.00001079234,0.00006200397,0.00002854163,0.0002130671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009442712,0.00006610185,0.00001162832,0.0002561205,0.00006911521,0.00009144963,0.00002240245,0.0000552977,0.0007928376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005981919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007201852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001066951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003397004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.00003558178,0.0001531496,0.0001483622,0.0001620266,0.0001651373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998139,0.0000436036,0.00004551113,0.00003502865,0.00002035155,0.00004166088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008619583,0.0003041434,0.4976678,0.0001176098,0.00006993177,0.00000214718,0.006764768,0.002587856,0.002078824,0.01046356,0.003590037,0.4762672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002487742,0.0001014235,0.9709382,0.00001676529,0.00001320231,0.00001305418,0.0005083227,0.01010504,0.0004314432,0.007255047,0.01018209,0.000186645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226092,0.00001873575,0.06260654,0.0001383431,0.00007676297,0.00019834,0.00001336043,0.00003340563,0.1143053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655344,0.000005468047,0.03258409,0.001513037,0.00003944908,0.000006553454,0.0002083577,0.000001756821,0.0001069133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4760805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100684635","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.04poi","title":"A framework for thinking about distributed cognition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cognition; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Fuzzy cognitive map; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Socially distributed cognition; Fuzzy logic; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02292693330644633,"gpt":0.2851792136458544,"spread":0.262252280339408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006065472,0.0001763975,0.0001743795,0.0001446526,0.0004873205,0.000505937,0.0004076021,0.0001104356,0.00001657037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006009751,0.0001809731,0.0001039773,0.0006000485,0.00006598469,0.0009087058,0.0001236688,0.0001642419,0.00007532122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004160033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006565722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008004699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009850702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.00005838454,0.0003627613,0.0004032849,0.0004178624,0.0004126632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983135,0.0006108123,0.0002368702,0.0002446535,0.0005273241,0.00006686737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001661195,0.0002516525,0.00007095046,0.0001441795,0.00003002147,0.000008665807,0.000687578,0.00005236318,0.00389092,0.9316254,0.00125959,0.06196212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004809997,0.000066627,0.002572402,0.0003427174,0.00005609968,0.00001262659,0.0001054342,0.038569,0.003374615,0.9526088,0.001529833,0.0002808082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004998746,0.0000588677,0.9872378,0.0009448542,0.0003550125,0.0006441558,0.00007433019,0.0003385814,0.005347714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7539605,0.00001160607,0.2446324,0.000653173,0.0002240425,0.0001666296,0.0003176289,0.00001089591,0.0000230675],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7489617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7379868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031990438","doi":"10.1075/pc.9.2.04ols","title":"What writing is","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Adjunct; Compromise; Linguistics; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Direct speech; Indirect speech; Exploit; Speech act; Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03035789479025274,"gpt":0.3469682667578406,"spread":0.3166103719675878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002631225,0.00009503285,0.0001012155,0.00009159788,0.0001146806,0.0001537865,0.00006736995,0.00008330897,0.1264706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006143134,0.000101418,0.00004957681,0.0001568883,0.00002406764,0.0003399465,0.00001645946,0.0001703147,0.003865109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001309562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006381463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007116687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000164675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991431,0.0001046933,0.0002267352,0.0001762428,0.000133829,0.00021546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999442,0.0001464823,0.0001040379,0.0001692062,0.00008037919,0.00005787013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001247316,0.0005405428,0.0009948575,0.00009926353,0.0002547053,0.0005748507,0.07768607,0.000007327438,0.003100303,0.01319631,0.02761126,0.8758098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01045935,0.0006807225,0.06131853,0.001793277,0.0007291539,0.003628638,0.5074765,0.005650033,0.003215366,0.04085857,0.361476,0.002713836],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7442675,0.003453047,0.007872687,0.001644938,0.001204585,0.000257798,0.000005797015,0.0002726185,0.2410211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735065,0.00008016874,0.0006791056,0.02241612,0.0003526964,0.00003415409,0.0000885659,0.00002278185,0.002819989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121502482","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.1.04mac","title":"Reasoning from paradigms and negative evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06026554958588969,"gpt":0.2586381075095742,"spread":0.1983725579236845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002830134,0.0001336405,0.0001481155,0.00005229711,0.0001505652,0.0001444899,0.0002894285,0.0000639327,0.00004980116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007053892,0.0001201638,0.00003161146,0.0001753187,0.00007278196,0.0009117028,0.0001634784,0.000125741,0.0001432483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000197459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003816175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009348986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002975885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990076,0.0001130237,0.0001931773,0.0003122759,0.0001740836,0.0001998518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988924,0.0004651549,0.0001513304,0.0002598019,0.0001293829,0.0001019682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000807981,0.0004651196,0.01086616,0.0001717872,0.0002064396,0.0001057561,0.121948,0.000003125706,0.002402385,0.6223018,0.00114113,0.2403075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000881751,0.0003240595,0.08692989,0.001142122,0.0001477106,0.00005428125,0.0005821066,0.09326679,0.0140565,0.8015887,0.0003218834,0.0007041738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1725124,0.001030536,0.7671978,0.0001266531,0.0003329283,0.000315118,0.000005513532,0.0002758186,0.05820318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813404,0.0001690299,0.1182119,0.0001373963,0.00006257359,0.00002386882,0.00000410024,0.000006957589,0.00004376195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.708828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4900138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896512482","doi":"10.1075/pc.17013.mar","title":"Embodied concept mapping","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Cognition; Perception; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04361702205331579,"gpt":0.3262397162766982,"spread":0.2826226942233824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172989,0.0001608236,0.0002027032,0.00008497882,0.0005233024,0.0002024209,0.0002424507,0.000139057,0.002621602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003242253,0.0001581947,0.00008831033,0.00004931958,0.0001344363,0.0002580893,0.00005531354,0.0001874523,0.001957568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001915247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001792692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005472164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002120917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.0001202868,0.0002957387,0.0002698782,0.0002101851,0.0002933865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987293,0.0001048247,0.0003603585,0.0005602821,0.0001651113,0.00008006699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002377846,0.001227181,0.001616091,0.0002928463,0.0009423116,0.0003211049,0.0522382,0.000001978522,0.007777377,0.2318366,0.02334029,0.6801682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0170331,0.0006981401,0.2246835,0.001218838,0.001844275,0.0003914181,0.04271102,0.001600527,0.01164837,0.6521143,0.04282446,0.003232102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1571309,0.0002568631,0.02474023,0.0004590316,0.001731829,0.0005329009,0.00006313425,0.0002095057,0.8148756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953758,0.00001839135,0.001302086,0.0006112175,0.0004487705,0.0001042,0.000178202,0.00002743542,0.001933904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8382449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254185234","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.02oat","title":"Worlds of the possible","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalization; Empathy; Consciousness; Suite; Narrative; Social worlds; Cognitive science; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Literature; History; Art; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01729794668473367,"gpt":0.2816814425742599,"spread":0.2643834958895263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001870392,0.00009804423,0.0001249625,0.00006511783,0.00007635226,0.00003082936,0.0001424122,0.00008037835,0.005339919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001113213,0.00006839061,0.00008491045,0.0002534926,0.00007457929,0.0001224526,0.000032891,0.0001308026,0.00134477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001003301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001648766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000892581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002365724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990665,0.0001561402,0.0002723242,0.0001329003,0.0001982802,0.0001738333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999166,0.0001303112,0.0001859141,0.0002830607,0.0001976323,0.0000370768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000187616,0.003401195,0.008911786,0.0007473193,0.001061592,0.00001648041,0.0517519,0.00001045206,0.07180394,0.1782479,0.0836923,0.6001675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004281282,0.0003676321,0.3530611,0.0006283273,0.001052363,0.0001092396,0.01788885,0.0008639297,0.04203999,0.5752711,0.003508197,0.0009279803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7471908,0.0001632795,0.00219363,0.0003764453,0.000755034,0.0005876769,0.00001891648,0.0000573895,0.2486569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957718,0.000007820982,0.0005631353,0.0005456857,0.0001038306,0.0001400328,0.00003114093,0.00001577406,0.002820747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5992396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289326418","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.01ols","title":"Literacy and the languages of rationality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Literacy; Dimension (graph theory); Relation (database); Epistemology; Logical conjunction; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01771214698085294,"gpt":0.3498769284328915,"spread":0.3321647814520386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008416058,0.00002980556,0.00005611087,0.00002027889,0.0002187309,0.0000643008,0.00008031416,0.00002514161,0.0002741579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009529581,0.00002192142,0.00001437506,0.00008427801,0.0002550106,0.0002551536,0.0000135291,0.00004268337,0.00002805484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008659455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005220323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001139469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001893142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992785,0.0003274817,0.0001425805,0.00004296423,0.0001508524,0.0000575521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987852,0.000743954,0.0001079377,0.000111457,0.0002251952,0.00002626241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001364503,0.0001415484,0.003597321,0.0001088837,0.00002973624,3.606359e-8,0.427287,0.00000116777,0.0002430248,0.4859795,0.002397791,0.08020037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009919784,0.00001769029,0.09213296,0.0001146083,0.00009286851,0.000001128287,0.05734153,0.001449194,0.0003597862,0.8414665,0.005875248,0.0001564897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8958312,0.0006592482,0.002232308,0.01916359,0.0001459046,0.0007001174,0.000005113046,0.00003219222,0.08123035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996768,0.0005189566,0.002069245,0.0002081563,0.00009778114,0.00006118312,0.00003621583,0.000002038842,0.0002384459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3699454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3001837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009926695","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.2.01vil","title":"Revisiting pragmatic abilities in autism spectrum disorders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Literal (mathematical logic); Psychology; Linguistics; Literal and figurative language; Metonymy; Grammar; Irony; Pragmatics; Metaphor; Possessive; Class (philosophy); Autism; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01934129810438339,"gpt":0.2804843630756579,"spread":0.2611430649712745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005268136,0.0002522865,0.0002890412,0.0003717644,0.0002191544,0.0002738975,0.000329306,0.00009845805,0.001745558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001716364,0.0002584877,0.0000758537,0.0007428822,0.0002143744,0.0008903151,0.0001632795,0.0004870661,0.001919393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007237495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002192848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001304169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997001,0.0004771519,0.0006249719,0.0005102119,0.0006350931,0.0007515993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982434,0.001046031,0.0001999408,0.0003833947,0.000009197689,0.0001180484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003900915,0.0009632517,0.005233137,0.001858221,0.00002441577,0.00004141756,0.007936638,0.0002078302,0.02496772,0.9041462,0.0003248455,0.05425734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000758198,0.00007749169,0.02507023,0.0002848178,0.00001356834,0.00002120107,0.000429552,0.02593623,0.003895219,0.9429235,0.0002079591,0.0003820745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707341,0.0001152313,0.003895987,0.04874025,0.0001737225,0.002710828,0.00001857085,0.0003626445,0.07324866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.0002184587,0.0009076028,0.0003433861,0.00004127121,0.0004258857,0.0000159119,0.00005050056,0.0003154576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023187384","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.01wal","title":"The Carneades model of argument invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Inference; Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04691921290485994,"gpt":0.2717797030864859,"spread":0.2248604901816259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006362614,0.00006385845,0.00007307176,0.00003763887,0.0001291922,0.0000522493,0.0001593188,0.00003358502,0.000002753738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005958092,0.0000469426,0.000042349,0.0000962121,0.00001512021,0.0004601117,0.00005068052,0.00004583494,0.00003129807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002369622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001610666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006891873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004579763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.00007786814,0.0002635831,0.00007930006,0.0002593482,0.0001491267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993457,0.00008143133,0.0002247754,0.0002038072,0.0001034575,0.0000408218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001509114,0.0007275345,0.002391821,0.0004539083,0.0001291278,3.109053e-7,0.01265067,0.002641834,0.06211215,0.8218233,0.001820878,0.09523337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471741,0.00002414233,0.002056379,0.00006693584,0.00002787103,0.000002297946,0.000111194,0.9583383,0.01396484,0.02470271,0.0003562576,0.0001019035],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07281073,0.0001814099,0.923811,0.0002209411,0.00033068,0.0002717508,0.000002786387,0.00004283753,0.00232783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878262,0.00004895017,0.01190438,0.00004024195,0.00005129951,0.00003306432,0.000008386231,0.000004206977,0.00008331909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1914264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123209816","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.1.03wal","title":"Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argumentation theory; Conversation; Computer science; Persuasion; Equivocation; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Vagueness; Transitive relation; Epistemology; The Internet; Negotiation; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Management science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Sociology; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07546235976159879,"gpt":0.3161215183926628,"spread":0.240659158631064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003581613,0.00007517219,0.0001091155,0.0001935985,0.00004678218,0.00005685821,0.00007359195,0.00003980033,0.000002982958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004732153,0.00008123828,0.00001566024,0.0002973536,0.00001721033,0.0004078159,0.00003927928,0.00003862279,0.000006019244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000490918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002106232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009655892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004526419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.00004654772,0.0004174314,0.0001564971,0.0001958491,0.0001128058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994918,0.00005379127,0.0002141091,0.00009824181,0.0001176122,0.00002451422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004368307,0.0008648164,0.01273188,0.001142831,0.00003485833,0.000003525106,0.04181434,0.0401108,0.5433528,0.2664013,0.00006269156,0.09343644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001927281,0.00007522424,0.03614265,0.000261967,0.00001742249,0.00000444114,0.0005651217,0.8042382,0.07772847,0.08058339,0.000007920752,0.0001824558],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4215143,0.00001073774,0.5779064,0.0001201473,0.00006276735,0.0002906174,0.000002318819,0.00001484699,0.00007778523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573185,0.000006833177,0.04256925,0.00003848,0.00003104602,0.00001526683,0.0000151333,0.000003820288,0.00000161871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3312801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020500505","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin","title":"Out of the Space of Reasons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Common Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Realm; Space (punctuation); Personhood; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer security; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1090471562200705,"gpt":0.2552478712419941,"spread":0.1462007150219236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001494179,0.00004452467,0.00009962655,0.00002075578,0.0001066796,0.000007412428,0.0001420065,0.00001345269,0.000332006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000128827,0.00002904904,0.00005073515,0.00002377876,0.000197714,0.00005554952,0.00006623766,0.00004502083,0.00002371259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003803095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001116771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003590844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001477022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995222,0.00005742064,0.0001993237,0.00003981793,0.000133898,0.0000473188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991203,0.00009593808,0.0002447564,0.0002480209,0.0002823812,0.000008621345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008894888,0.0001469096,0.000365686,0.00004752435,0.00006504676,4.502668e-8,0.1463615,1.566806e-7,0.0001055989,0.8469295,0.004320698,0.00164847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001047078,0.0002580883,0.02349586,0.0006295586,0.0007237789,0.000002189028,0.1304676,0.0001969719,0.01381507,0.5977186,0.2311897,0.0004554633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05604031,0.0001988822,0.0006186649,0.0004299019,0.0004269464,0.0001686204,0.00002949706,0.00001867697,0.9420685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972793,0.00007553217,0.0003954895,0.00003240709,0.0000379041,0.00001025136,0.000002433892,0.000004247748,0.00216243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3635233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026508940","doi":"10.1075/pc.12.1.11rot","title":"Theory and praxis of metacognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Cognition; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03205679742935121,"gpt":0.3717343111749982,"spread":0.339677513745647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022847,0.00009628432,0.0001545826,0.0001331682,0.00008108839,0.00001246567,0.00004304912,0.00008156151,0.0002823571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008926539,0.00009083197,0.00003146955,0.0001767309,0.000115885,0.00007766729,0.00001670179,0.0002279855,0.00006286331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001234214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001567132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001422428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001281493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983258,0.001021164,0.0002533739,0.0001519613,0.0001186503,0.0001290227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989977,0.000502987,0.0001997296,0.000120126,0.0001532398,0.00002617733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000334846,0.0004539763,0.0003686485,0.0001651827,0.0002648647,0.000007251703,0.02144943,0.00001107115,0.01511894,0.7615147,0.00008052618,0.2002305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002473719,0.0004715774,0.06575255,0.0002512345,0.0003421212,0.00007083089,0.003671866,0.00003012028,0.008983898,0.9168813,0.0007715407,0.0002993059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6073997,0.0001095014,0.3472351,0.0001191395,0.0001620932,0.0001632556,0.00000927148,0.00006501492,0.04473699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705755,0.000007374205,0.02892085,0.0001892734,0.00005221322,0.0000252667,0.00003794573,0.00001573193,0.0001758188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3631758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.370402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080521047","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.05val","title":"Unarticulated comparison classes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Predicate (mathematical logic); Indexicality; Linguistics; Utterance; Perspective (graphical); Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03679927968927353,"gpt":0.3006408775835764,"spread":0.2638415978943028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001359021,0.0001043883,0.0001525537,0.00007934398,0.0002550012,0.000288827,0.00007440579,0.00004219716,0.004732675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234179,0.00008995768,0.00006691979,0.00003691873,0.0001240362,0.0001043052,0.00002027386,0.0001802563,0.0005008894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005120556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002148615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006251172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001424605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992438,0.0000210635,0.0002716377,0.0001229965,0.0001848616,0.0001556746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999254,0.00008566202,0.0001237922,0.0001503352,0.0003239906,0.00006222579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009716207,0.0003782344,0.0004533864,0.00004478727,0.0001260021,0.000005966558,0.006437961,0.00001923495,0.002279341,0.9827085,0.004953642,0.002583272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001383455,0.0001865306,0.001267664,0.0001192927,0.002001261,0.000008413075,0.01051463,0.09761928,0.005733718,0.2543258,0.6257638,0.001076072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4804048,0.00003407888,0.0005785326,0.0005023739,0.0009891186,0.0001496848,0.00003460521,0.0001509772,0.5171559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972692,0.000006152055,0.0004967101,0.0001955758,0.00105321,0.00001206223,0.0001582302,0.00001403743,0.0007947904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050367651","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.3.13har","title":"Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autopoiesis; Superordinate goals; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Turing; Metaphor; Cognition; Enactivism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1182189939909495,"gpt":0.4023126551786989,"spread":0.2840936611877494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002040724,0.0001448096,0.000181089,0.00008856077,0.0006725434,0.0000812955,0.0001131954,0.0002292543,0.0001466679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001650622,0.0001427921,0.00008981218,0.0002147686,0.0001467522,0.0003170678,0.0000238306,0.0001649776,0.00005679771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008289215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001432965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983484,0.000266636,0.0003377389,0.0002211258,0.0003373076,0.000488769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983475,0.0008936535,0.0001998568,0.00009838909,0.0003414887,0.0001191719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003191389,0.000645288,0.00009136232,0.0007762746,0.0006322165,0.00009276386,0.3180128,0.00007665793,0.04885679,0.272197,0.003914131,0.3515134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01860256,0.001900412,0.008195306,0.0008713086,0.004007266,0.00008545587,0.4163241,0.00375089,0.04527396,0.4442732,0.05342242,0.003293174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6143014,0.0003295381,0.2291416,0.002201252,0.005345594,0.002891469,0.00008669797,0.0008989772,0.1448034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716595,0.00006215768,0.02666995,0.0002841349,0.0007054404,0.0000617523,0.0002352212,0.00001886252,0.0003029563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3573581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5822893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051971282","doi":"10.1075/pc.17.2.01sta","title":"Perry, Wittgenstein’s builders, and metasemantics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Block (permutation group theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02667486133742012,"gpt":0.2311185816114544,"spread":0.2044437202740343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001142183,0.0001427017,0.0001513484,0.00007560573,0.0003780498,0.0002105318,0.00007354665,0.00004014833,0.0002633433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002998304,0.0001339425,0.00004625945,0.00003983048,0.0001522627,0.0002394126,0.00001603022,0.0001095914,0.0001347657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008393528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001329672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005310995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001865642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999235,0.00002893117,0.0002349991,0.0001785475,0.0001562891,0.0001661888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.000054366,0.0001010733,0.0001658734,0.0001225166,0.00007447728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008836193,0.0002115611,0.000003542853,0.00004730502,0.00004211897,0.000004102298,0.008298911,0.000001401742,0.001189699,0.9728187,0.002715106,0.0146587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001227677,0.0004525309,0.0006521742,0.0001809726,0.0006874049,0.00005791959,0.004238121,0.00123475,0.002140931,0.8663244,0.1219876,0.0008155159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3130203,0.001049615,0.003970829,0.02187237,0.0004622845,0.001539333,0.000302656,0.000621722,0.6571609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956381,0.00006867282,0.001854222,0.001320323,0.0004262713,0.00002017504,0.00009181305,0.00001296332,0.0005674929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6826178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5462018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027599522","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.03val","title":"On local bars and imported beer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Linguistics; Sentence; Truth condition; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Prima facie; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02027403404800836,"gpt":0.2976193521228441,"spread":0.2773453180748358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003635691,0.0001446483,0.0001456525,0.0001026579,0.00008576359,0.0000274867,0.00004513391,0.0001355509,0.001794491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009327519,0.0001320309,0.0000433467,0.0001157102,0.00007460205,0.0001614771,0.00001855865,0.0001710915,0.001094843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008112206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001789265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004580033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99896,0.0001303868,0.0002338592,0.0001755143,0.0001932704,0.0003069656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993525,0.0001777568,0.0001037591,0.0001641238,0.00007136972,0.0001304614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007127746,0.003428672,0.002957984,0.0002935974,0.0007626796,0.00008401818,0.0305099,0.000003894768,0.003271372,0.2761848,0.02147694,0.6603134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0186033,0.002527358,0.4484097,0.0008207638,0.004044209,0.001243127,0.04188633,0.002282099,0.01425318,0.4417572,0.02022139,0.003951322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8216206,0.0005282496,0.03939793,0.0001422686,0.0008373003,0.000407869,0.00003996058,0.0001453116,0.1368805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974402,0.00002143006,0.0005173574,0.001170986,0.0002202287,0.00007221119,0.0001881529,0.00002591537,0.0003435235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6563621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039246849","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.1.07rut","title":"On the use and misuse of the “Two Children” brainteaser","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Illusion; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02719719749886637,"gpt":0.2845454459444466,"spread":0.2573482484455803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002315868,0.00007795221,0.00007110085,0.00002333848,0.0001168454,0.00003464815,0.00009336851,0.00004057631,0.0005626635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005647861,0.00004311965,0.00003532355,0.00006582783,0.000102487,0.00003277657,0.00003816198,0.0002952228,0.0000813236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002955601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001137162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001857129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002883103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994239,0.0001004353,0.000139416,0.0001181972,0.0001187037,0.0000993354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915,0.0004596301,0.0001055243,0.0002078261,0.00005190577,0.00002506608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003262405,0.001452253,0.1240675,0.00007230904,0.0005628206,0.000006517525,0.01730619,0.00001048388,0.0313905,0.7413245,0.03745404,0.04602664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006315546,0.00004503129,0.9881525,0.00008616404,0.00005219628,0.00002593811,0.0001105124,0.00006405443,0.001014935,0.007346996,0.00236442,0.0001057034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929424,0.000008047882,0.0000630509,0.001625671,0.0002167581,0.000246156,0.00001411395,0.00001810043,0.004865693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980527,0.000003064031,0.0002840179,0.001283177,0.00005555364,0.00001085379,0.000009886352,0.0000103298,0.0002904711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.864085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980921678","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.16kan","title":"Speech transformation solutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Speech Recognition and Synthesis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dictation; Computer science; Spotting; Speech recognition; Keyword spotting; Perception; Interface (matter); Distributive property; Transformation (genetics); Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0223331473224711,"gpt":0.2342752848320863,"spread":0.2119421375096152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003382012,0.0001164603,0.0001115219,0.0001723441,0.0002326363,0.0002000322,0.0002184719,0.00007133424,0.0001408241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005778749,0.0001194106,0.00007644513,0.0003571688,0.00002940557,0.0008556019,0.00002886683,0.0000944089,0.0007969294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003715267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003449855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002772778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005136499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988587,0.00007294512,0.0003252376,0.0001792596,0.0003150807,0.0002487774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993432,0.0001159448,0.00009968265,0.0002116793,0.0001785773,0.00005088555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006188012,0.0004509948,0.00002307569,0.00007147132,0.00002693831,0.00001537301,0.0004855282,0.00002914157,0.007611078,0.3224047,0.003917025,0.6649585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001414401,0.0001021461,0.005673468,0.0001489551,0.0001153343,0.0002988777,0.000213343,0.2784843,0.05085349,0.6483649,0.01351523,0.0008155711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008961932,0.00002706367,0.8731203,0.001388863,0.0001844795,0.0002341957,0.00001129525,0.0003672773,0.1157046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8406129,0.00002351309,0.1586182,0.0003378927,0.0001053319,0.00005077245,0.00007831668,0.000009860954,0.0001632265],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404877463","doi":"10.1075/pc.24039.olk","title":"Training studies provide new insights about mechanisms of irony development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Training (meteorology); Psychology; Art; Literature; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09439507786787515,"gpt":0.352955237888043,"spread":0.2585601600201679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004857,0.000443366,0.0006974216,0.0003162413,0.0001128117,0.0000744167,0.0002296102,0.000324451,0.0003025432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002285498,0.0004074641,0.0001470255,0.0001606913,0.00006651644,0.00003603766,0.000679533,0.000905534,0.0005234869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001370553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000702845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001250385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003027278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973933,0.0001340361,0.0009980769,0.0006807907,0.0004576472,0.0003361913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986203,0.0002011189,0.0005589526,0.0002928104,0.00021415,0.0001126215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252776,0.0004216428,0.00001608545,0.005718443,0.003967773,0.0001093791,0.4248451,0.00007184931,0.002068913,0.1095137,0.005760308,0.4473816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001368752,0.0002867161,0.005037342,0.01489019,0.001208201,0.00004368051,0.02020057,0.0001977955,0.005810931,0.9139677,0.03540076,0.00158733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6357425,0.03930405,0.07733759,0.002796303,0.01726841,0.006742367,0.0001402065,0.001908822,0.2187598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445962,0.0001949318,0.05079646,0.0002581956,0.0003427323,0.000255899,0.0002696692,0.00008946097,0.003196412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}