{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"35806e15b583","filters":{"venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Steven E. Clayman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marc N. Elliott","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Heritage","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laurie McDonald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04610514520876348,"gpt":0.2807071089102456,"spread":0.2346019637014821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002687728,0.0002239611,0.0003192319,0.006758315,0.001894159,0.00354203,0.0005087141,0.001042949,0.003927276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279577,0.0003932881,0.0001769056,0.009094933,0.001929779,0.002553046,0.001781756,0.00183913,0.001111805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003908922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009989657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02923157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05448415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980503,0.000413542,0.0002550358,0.000389397,0.0005177888,0.0003738937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840776,0.005131404,0.005873419,0.0004216782,0.003367564,0.001128361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006488506,0.0002255319,0.6662187,0.001108783,0.0001082607,0.000900668,0.09798,0.0005340053,0.002901413,0.02940702,0.02474969,0.175217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006828001,0.00009968816,0.8282557,0.0002004532,0.00001957884,0.0003997224,0.012411,0.0001459723,0.001362695,0.0004226904,0.1566434,0.00003233004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9098101,0.01996036,0.0006021461,0.004464311,0.0002413126,0.00005768935,0.003498202,0.00006208957,0.06130383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840605,0.006288012,0.0003476685,0.0005935546,0.0003443304,0.00003776617,0.001876971,0.00002556752,0.006425652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02923157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05812287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121105972","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00270.x","title":"Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Polling; Presidential system; Democracy; Cash; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Politics; Finance; Geography; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randall E. Adkins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Dowdle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293825986779676,"gpt":0.3602472136261893,"spread":0.3173089537583925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004617782,0.0003564074,0.0004973907,0.001633194,0.0005945318,0.002074804,0.0004740766,0.0007670325,0.005086725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0438592,0.0002486901,0.000224313,0.001213742,0.0002279442,0.00294206,0.0005270565,0.0008664341,0.001922136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005644968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005361793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007488547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01651723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983338,0.0008058952,0.0001080697,0.0003146627,0.0002657994,0.0001719216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695215,0.01790125,0.006937783,0.001994639,0.002471012,0.001173843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009639417,0.0001990876,0.754667,0.0001348134,0.0001471946,0.0000841895,0.001275157,0.008488008,0.00139886,0.001245233,0.00688414,0.2245123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005997582,0.0007541081,0.9345102,0.0001426305,0.0001010683,0.0001549168,0.002410183,0.04159047,0.00248126,0.003869829,0.01384498,0.0000803701],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721513,0.0008040764,0.008123219,0.00213319,0.0001691401,0.00003860708,0.001559071,0.0003116962,0.01470973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951932,0.0001865396,0.00242625,0.0001132857,0.000121115,0.00001294989,0.0008288519,0.00002757254,0.001090101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007488547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02442145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133804459","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03992.x","title":"Politics or Policy? How Rhetoric Matters to Presidential Leadership of Congress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Political science; Legislation; Appeal; Politics; Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"José D. Villalobos","is_ca":true},{"name":"Justin S. Vaughn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julia R. Azari","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1777775721093467,"gpt":0.4137089684351728,"spread":0.2359313963258261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289268,0.0002508914,0.0006059157,0.002985466,0.001513616,0.007301748,0.000500071,0.00122482,0.006453383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05963495,0.000192357,0.0002874147,0.003446676,0.005253498,0.005132414,0.001670373,0.001632992,0.000956694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00166574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00173202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001605271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900851,0.006395219,0.0002837773,0.0007209918,0.001787955,0.0007269779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298346,0.05082405,0.01227423,0.001210119,0.003215648,0.002641458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004252658,0.0006343801,0.5407779,0.0008970952,0.0004416114,0.0003525356,0.07488029,0.001111902,0.002838862,0.2092911,0.005642388,0.1627067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008260525,0.0005412972,0.8287718,0.0006827788,0.0002556236,0.0003085277,0.04609186,0.002408542,0.001317904,0.07308896,0.0463502,0.0000998746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8684958,0.00343526,0.002954692,0.02805709,0.0002239195,0.00003502239,0.0002163501,0.00004555817,0.09653632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974516,0.0004908073,0.0002686901,0.0005888672,0.0002732758,0.00001454068,0.00004748807,0.00001810969,0.0008466245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01289268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339222831","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x","title":"“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Political science; Character (mathematics); Persona; Law; Linguistics; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lee Sigelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia Whissell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08396634978852817,"gpt":0.2678813228460341,"spread":0.1839149730575059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002813526,0.000389161,0.0001479437,0.001816008,0.003366797,0.006557648,0.0002777085,0.0008833138,0.004203531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01098576,0.0002721865,0.0001980746,0.001142869,0.00419635,0.003765845,0.003382009,0.001711161,0.0007071229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008301819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003258403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006831454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971961,0.00173714,0.0000505069,0.0001174861,0.0006187194,0.0002800284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947441,0.003032687,0.0009947751,0.0001956541,0.0006290798,0.0004037347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001834325,0.0001028232,0.09628392,0.0001907714,0.00003815942,0.0004925955,0.7593861,0.0002462002,0.003770034,0.03203662,0.005180908,0.1020885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009613858,0.0001405526,0.14414,0.0002170048,0.00004892519,0.0004719635,0.8184627,0.00051899,0.001921787,0.003213834,0.03080409,0.00005051624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022586,0.0005259397,0.001777684,0.001945867,0.00009148584,0.00001402014,0.00003443483,0.00003345282,0.09331836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966998,0.0003737771,0.0003353441,0.0001173909,0.00005066441,0.000009239892,0.00002479477,0.00001516105,0.002373943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006557648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01487958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508403","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00007.x","title":"Projecting Presidential Personas on the Radio: An Addendum on the Bushes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Political science; Persona; Public administration; Law; Art; Art history; Politics; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Lee Sigelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia Whissell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4336227091230434,"gpt":0.3722272772533016,"spread":0.06139543186974183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003135486,0.0006195221,0.000435767,0.002171901,0.003713491,0.006466161,0.001183344,0.001137055,0.02912884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270426,0.0004420946,0.0005040038,0.002910678,0.001227293,0.007535618,0.00357987,0.003292623,0.005944199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001224835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009727038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04665911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991223,0.000341668,0.00004104239,0.00006461234,0.0003212236,0.0001091403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913898,0.004127504,0.0003046923,0.0009977549,0.002440193,0.0007400962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088853,0.0001674059,0.009837673,0.000338471,0.00002476492,0.0001449162,0.006083812,0.0002605636,0.0007197963,0.0516676,0.515209,0.415437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001285638,0.00006809382,0.01954346,0.0003697411,0.00005065518,0.0001637872,0.009280613,0.0004903111,0.0007833494,0.01311913,0.9560682,0.0000498765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09995542,0.04602092,0.02406379,0.3124849,0.04899656,0.0002543049,0.003362551,0.0006891569,0.4641724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3967055,0.1434293,0.06913157,0.03175679,0.08328601,0.0007044514,0.006930793,0.001726566,0.266329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02912884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09744573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008865813","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03692.x","title":"<i>The Law</i>: Presidential Proclamation 6920: Using Executive Power to Set a New Direction for the Management of National Monuments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Presidential system; Political science; Delegation; Public administration; Law; Executive power; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Executive branch; Veto; Agency (philosophy); Separation of powers; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Belco","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brandon Rottinghaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07674447495653182,"gpt":0.416195859362648,"spread":0.3394513844061162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005901802,0.0003132629,0.0002535634,0.0007321967,0.008160478,0.01216255,0.001095485,0.008783492,0.003721785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117691,0.0004107704,0.0002456743,0.00113967,0.01980125,0.004897963,0.003812644,0.007424405,0.0009463793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004849271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005228154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03285758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04927323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994357,0.002003427,0.0003745455,0.0007832609,0.00120509,0.001276629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952679,0.002289308,0.001052976,0.0003824776,0.0006671943,0.0003401252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001416788,0.00001170439,0.001000675,0.00002833918,0.00000352695,0.00007696902,0.00444173,0.00004798127,0.0002106044,0.9043924,0.0849833,0.004788537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003418407,0.00005868466,0.01047594,0.0002992853,0.00002030975,0.0003127325,0.004659597,0.0003376656,0.001411697,0.07344489,0.9088652,0.00007976813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04118204,0.005319767,0.004190542,0.2528468,0.002009983,0.00006152916,0.0001671806,0.0001127248,0.6941094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7775773,0.002371075,0.002574609,0.1140951,0.002615447,0.0002073515,0.0001092226,0.00006493933,0.1003849],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03285758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06533265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045058034","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02609.x","title":"<i>The Contemporary Presidency:</i> Who Wants Presidential Supremacy? Findings from the Institutions of American Democracy Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidency; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Ideology; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Joel D. Aberbach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Allen Peterson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paul J. Quirk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09407801719163439,"gpt":0.4111771612360809,"spread":0.3170991440444466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008668766,0.0001088701,0.0003200065,0.001225695,0.002115309,0.003994825,0.0007730824,0.00127361,0.005891808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874556,0.0001661739,0.0001785283,0.002266952,0.003027016,0.002810215,0.002468879,0.002512454,0.0007277767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00113279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00105481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007662477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0165628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969818,0.001754632,0.0001333246,0.000241182,0.0004124472,0.0004766359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748015,0.01189962,0.007598682,0.0008394995,0.001984235,0.00287642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001759862,0.0004882807,0.8572501,0.0001198923,0.0000707415,0.000128371,0.08763234,0.0001512969,0.0002655665,0.01236387,0.01455277,0.02680079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001471096,0.00006346636,0.8524207,0.00007934219,0.00002396273,0.00005716924,0.1345179,0.0002175831,0.0001226119,0.002286978,0.01018107,0.00001449352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791594,0.0002843561,0.00007689247,0.008072314,0.00001617738,0.000009147492,0.0001600642,0.000002835148,0.01221875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998077,0.0002144545,0.00003831239,0.0006642684,0.00003957691,0.0000216883,0.0001911572,0.000004620446,0.0007487508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008668766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04584539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390946246","doi":"10.1111/psq.12867","title":"The president and the vice president: Different types of partnerships for a unique power couple","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Vice president; Typology; General partnership; Power (physics); Political science; Administration (probate law); Executive power; Principal (computer security); Inherent powers; Public relations; Public administration; Management; Sociology; Law; Politics; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Karine Prémont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07834875492056055,"gpt":0.4157984529263873,"spread":0.3374496980058268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004189389,0.0002151565,0.0002902522,0.001620408,0.00546,0.008654477,0.0007371827,0.001312286,0.007151854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607061,0.0003807993,0.0002968518,0.001488045,0.007018103,0.007775605,0.007252072,0.001167898,0.0005987643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001835961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00159433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002497677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951442,0.002928553,0.0001341915,0.0003197656,0.0005967779,0.000876457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918773,0.003184712,0.001405151,0.0006270013,0.0007112649,0.002194528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001217614,0.0001465746,0.05473784,0.00008628286,0.00002960638,0.00179366,0.09603951,0.0004972822,0.0006420169,0.8053101,0.003015558,0.03757983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000886315,0.00022549,0.04968318,0.0004281268,0.00007207257,0.004018866,0.450362,0.006599228,0.0007952598,0.3967639,0.09086531,0.00009797336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383828,0.000807349,0.01507729,0.004846735,0.0001090513,0.00009790996,0.00004609413,0.00004654115,0.2405862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981427,0.00009443818,0.0004832994,0.00006487775,0.000009718859,0.00001568858,0.00000722349,0.00000382902,0.001178247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008654477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0239253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059448304","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02666.x","title":"George Akerson's Legacy: Continuity and Change in White House Press Operations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Outreach; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Charles E. Walcott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karen M. Hult","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09835431921463739,"gpt":0.3685272551464853,"spread":0.2701729359318479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005225125,0.0001383822,0.0001884126,0.001361449,0.006438017,0.01345533,0.001038991,0.002108372,0.005734046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01214662,0.0002878658,0.0001254457,0.002480895,0.01021793,0.008021307,0.004094654,0.003493901,0.0007643619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004091633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005183864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02745515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04120688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996644,0.00132704,0.0001320271,0.0006642052,0.0007268874,0.0005058745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923206,0.003682344,0.0008891392,0.0009500305,0.0008549407,0.001303072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007434619,0.00007495623,0.009915509,0.00009566571,0.00002044294,0.000680283,0.07688811,0.0002278158,0.0002277681,0.5932672,0.1966836,0.1218443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007656421,0.00002440265,0.008705564,0.0001630114,0.000009250754,0.0002830535,0.02322393,0.0001327573,0.0003384952,0.0307886,0.9362957,0.00002764015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1743564,0.02272866,0.003711242,0.4978995,0.004121524,0.00002402161,0.0002475533,0.0001720837,0.296739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884485,0.008051124,0.001593678,0.01728065,0.002219467,0.00002156365,0.00008850023,0.0001370621,0.08215946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02745515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0545907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213240781","doi":"10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00229.x","title":"The Legacy of John Adams","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04227632875375947,"gpt":0.3253315176716337,"spread":0.2830551889178742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190929,0.0007103382,0.0004384345,0.001377037,0.004046328,0.005814111,0.0007680488,0.002690152,0.03414736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006174583,0.0004986278,0.0003214804,0.001562249,0.002156267,0.005114316,0.002454053,0.006453482,0.01982767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002352049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004181916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01979639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03577096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980701,0.0004480903,0.00007452896,0.0003901389,0.0007889305,0.0002282666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974712,0.0005220735,0.0002102267,0.0001464748,0.0009801536,0.000669863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001145725,0.000006817036,0.00008214925,0.0000492758,0.000002060669,0.00001746662,0.0002197005,0.00001037909,0.00003168852,0.01322312,0.9615971,0.02474864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.688171e-7,0.000002112407,0.0000840672,0.0000683165,7.363788e-7,0.00002487684,0.0001061399,0.000004867759,0.00001746443,0.001185632,0.9985029,0.000002047267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000692528,0.3390765,0.0006875664,0.4126847,0.07083687,0.00001612199,0.0002144829,0.0001257593,0.1756655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01755552,0.1391655,0.001098777,0.09737705,0.02597116,0.00003588386,0.0001778732,0.0002326087,0.7183857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03414736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1142343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154288493","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03893.x","title":"Remaking the Presidency: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson, 1901‐1916 – By Peri E. Arnold","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Citation; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Graham G. Dodds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04980468674170938,"gpt":0.3138057694811652,"spread":0.2640010827394559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002173588,0.0005634476,0.0003184015,0.000819278,0.006315783,0.007093889,0.0008265911,0.003625764,0.006509753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006106852,0.0005561681,0.0001990265,0.001427296,0.004757125,0.004862576,0.001520776,0.008096001,0.002147535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00588929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005211318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07408892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2442327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998535,0.0006681478,0.00005868572,0.0002614162,0.0002422002,0.0002344491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.0004142411,0.0001680587,0.00003288131,0.0001549721,0.0001400003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003289752,0.00003547381,0.0007002419,0.00008211272,0.00001728428,0.000198409,0.01583282,0.0001686784,0.00007707578,0.2523587,0.6868337,0.04366269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006707306,0.000007208128,0.00111761,0.0002420094,0.000005297664,0.00008686693,0.004914334,0.00005123117,0.00007615258,0.01465971,0.9788198,0.00001309672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02153184,0.2388883,0.001062107,0.4768044,0.01389542,0.00004651085,0.0002775494,0.00004787335,0.247446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3632723,0.07753125,0.0008509968,0.0495073,0.007643987,0.00005861798,0.0001422498,0.000156588,0.5008367],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07408892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1473154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323925465","doi":"10.1111/psq.12823","title":"Managing our SOBs: Washington's response to friendly dictators in trouble","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Argument (complex analysis); White (mutation); Political science; Political economy; Foreign policy; Law and economics; Law; Development economics; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Victor A. Béliveau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03130302216694004,"gpt":0.3768631547745976,"spread":0.3455601326076576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805718,0.0001927919,0.0001661617,0.000495544,0.01221869,0.005389399,0.0006629084,0.003169008,0.008305639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008411911,0.0002043508,0.0001165755,0.0005058257,0.003090725,0.002384088,0.003413642,0.005790323,0.0007791696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003871557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004086319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03506482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09609751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985018,0.000520365,0.00004828917,0.0001011506,0.0001363559,0.0006920176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995083,0.001331515,0.0007479545,0.0001682937,0.0005656478,0.002103736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004793424,0.000542654,0.1562548,0.0002324762,0.00008313413,0.01400184,0.385468,0.001160612,0.004100527,0.07697376,0.2667999,0.09390281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002838195,0.0001676915,0.05059721,0.0002313506,0.00001883835,0.0004337848,0.6772923,0.0005981807,0.001002174,0.00555782,0.2639902,0.0000821197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468271,0.0004278819,0.0003535762,0.05395789,0.0006338858,0.0000526185,0.0000585318,0.00003015538,0.09765854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834681,0.0001789354,0.0001126363,0.003962648,0.0000639702,0.00002053016,0.00002040003,0.00001216783,0.01216059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03506482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06972146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086851228","doi":"10.1111/psq.12163","title":"No End Save Victory: How FDR Led the Nation into War. By DavidKaiser. New York: Basic Books, 2014. 408 pp.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; Citation; Classics; History; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Galen Roger Perras","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0221666065675903,"gpt":0.2706024242281873,"spread":0.248435817660597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079969,0.0009104607,0.0003144835,0.001010234,0.003572516,0.004707919,0.0009698606,0.001959638,0.03472678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002418231,0.0005630927,0.0002886342,0.001324728,0.002873607,0.006337216,0.001775736,0.002923158,0.00722854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004710802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005285572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06258222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1458266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994755,0.0002290835,0.00002255206,0.0000469058,0.0001057343,0.0001203497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995616,0.0001673141,0.00004621835,0.00001317989,0.00009800561,0.0001137017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001655828,0.00001518314,0.0002418507,0.0002854682,0.000004671724,0.00008503924,0.003447341,0.00006048967,0.0000439755,0.0189307,0.8951339,0.08173488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003626146,0.000007435084,0.0004872477,0.00061086,0.000002767469,0.0001036054,0.004289021,0.00003630764,0.00005435395,0.005385181,0.9890132,0.000006311055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001500899,0.703079,0.0007421677,0.1833098,0.01075985,0.00002971183,0.0003043207,0.0001285469,0.1001458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06303415,0.4365938,0.001556581,0.03176353,0.003600858,0.00009344868,0.0004205173,0.0002893805,0.4626478],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06258222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1244359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2835894000","doi":"10.1111/psq.12464","title":"The Diversity of Unilateral Presidential Orders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Graham G. Dodds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03119393008496603,"gpt":0.3362892602455776,"spread":0.3050953301606116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087544,0.0001463262,0.0008331025,0.003795407,0.004145311,0.009029512,0.000936489,0.001405029,0.009866122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859526,0.0004050661,0.0003343347,0.00351848,0.004628955,0.004650521,0.003414463,0.001871198,0.001008451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001668004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001626389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004496044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843679,0.005893274,0.0008026964,0.001443176,0.005500328,0.001992662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221535,0.05619938,0.005127214,0.006781749,0.006441955,0.003296186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005141416,0.0001436445,0.1014457,0.0001785364,0.000203308,0.0002095136,0.01663673,0.001190292,0.002688178,0.7847595,0.007213382,0.08481712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001280576,0.0001486333,0.32789,0.0002444249,0.0002380087,0.0006534943,0.01934408,0.003567707,0.002106415,0.6060938,0.03948303,0.0001023633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009887,0.00173491,0.005578733,0.005446197,0.000136875,0.00003778053,0.0005914131,0.00007158928,0.1854139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982223,0.0001313517,0.0002027983,0.0001706852,0.0000660232,0.00001145938,0.00008510622,0.000009320078,0.001100909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01087544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0575155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}