{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"35806e15b583","filters":{"venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Steven E. Clayman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marc N. Elliott","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Heritage","is_ca":true},{"name":"Laurie McDonald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04610514520876348,"gpt":0.2807071089102456,"spread":0.2346019637014821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000219041,0.0002231927,0.0004021912,0.0002624711,0.0006335393,0.0001799742,0.0002966285,0.00004304804,0.0003899664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000203352,0.0002069213,0.000125602,0.0001215585,0.0001964087,0.0003914661,0.0000837788,0.0001746016,0.00008519412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005131215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002046488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02105509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03020124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998255,0.0001420174,0.0006233361,0.0003062311,0.0003304835,0.0003429887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.000124626,0.0001710718,0.000320539,0.0001540779,0.00003475781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001166916,0.0005745937,0.01770184,0.00007353896,0.0003909949,0.00004550009,0.2514707,0.00005559835,0.00003326186,0.241287,0.4364246,0.05182564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630245,0.0004664376,0.09989277,0.0001557466,0.0001644333,0.000006290149,0.02790612,0.00004540736,0.00002091224,0.03625736,0.8325647,0.0008895946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.417416,0.1848037,0.000328241,0.008273132,0.007191564,0.0006752269,0.0000161535,0.0009828439,0.3803131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230592,0.0002085663,0.00006064418,0.00004096856,0.001138593,0.000118786,0.000007319832,0.00001940413,0.07534655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5056432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121105972","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00270.x","title":"Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Polling; Presidential system; Democracy; Cash; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Politics; Finance; Geography; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randall E. Adkins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Dowdle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04293825986779676,"gpt":0.3602472136261893,"spread":0.3173089537583925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145114,0.0001500931,0.0002664713,0.00007090298,0.0006663111,0.0001816297,0.000310115,0.00009487375,0.00009982636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003241327,0.0001146504,0.0001238335,0.0002335836,0.0003437044,0.0006174341,0.00004650527,0.0001191797,0.00006764117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008420178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02404648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04544896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976515,0.0004351536,0.0005681239,0.0002448127,0.000633899,0.0004665807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986371,0.0003407639,0.0002957325,0.000213192,0.000421229,0.00009195616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573174,0.000426101,0.0464848,0.0003794702,0.0008466853,0.000007607713,0.3276564,0.0002138166,0.007048765,0.08749875,0.01148856,0.5175917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007112914,0.004818888,0.7479609,0.0009691187,0.002244063,0.00001154097,0.06529786,0.006748647,0.02276099,0.1026485,0.03574859,0.003678028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927518,0.001332122,0.0009059137,0.002343446,0.0007449255,0.0005936494,0.000007470857,0.00006777018,0.001252888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966014,0.00001822278,0.00009233764,0.00003207115,0.002123586,0.00007947933,0.000001742976,0.00001478359,0.001036344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133804459","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03992.x","title":"Politics or Policy? How Rhetoric Matters to Presidential Leadership of Congress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Political science; Legislation; Appeal; Politics; Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"José D. Villalobos","is_ca":true},{"name":"Justin S. Vaughn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julia R. Azari","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1777775721093467,"gpt":0.4137089684351728,"spread":0.2359313963258261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000648803,0.0002023566,0.0004247262,0.000177232,0.0004745813,0.0001349512,0.0003020232,0.000119925,0.000123532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006330393,0.0001763321,0.0001240386,0.0004330793,0.0003903008,0.0005970037,0.00005031437,0.0001073445,0.0001063887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002497679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001588844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03213715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01545014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99686,0.000539096,0.0004399984,0.0002315763,0.000728799,0.001200527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983968,0.0004029347,0.0001904765,0.000227583,0.0002920184,0.0004902371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003564189,0.0005194637,0.054839,0.001171103,0.001120046,0.00001478143,0.3719311,0.00001244964,0.004411457,0.3466851,0.21492,0.004019089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00517217,0.006577777,0.3261237,0.001596763,0.001865825,0.00002599804,0.3417584,0.00002536947,0.02563065,0.02891824,0.2575903,0.004714795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9267431,0.001805065,0.0005466205,0.06167323,0.005659054,0.001421096,0.00004689013,0.0001967151,0.0019082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875209,0.00001447535,0.00006496077,0.0005787106,0.003781696,0.00007609854,0.000002044351,0.00002187694,0.007939289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3177668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.974308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339222831","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x","title":"“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Political science; Character (mathematics); Persona; Law; Linguistics; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lee Sigelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia Whissell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08396634978852817,"gpt":0.2678813228460341,"spread":0.1839149730575059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008951018,0.0003451921,0.0004242476,0.00004619085,0.009184196,0.001045919,0.001076525,0.00004483228,0.000288095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002052017,0.0001650009,0.0002193984,0.00007904219,0.003088555,0.000276364,0.000412345,0.0004537647,0.0001363799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005742585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001796915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005745338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973152,0.00086119,0.000533817,0.000326572,0.0005181616,0.0004450142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957446,0.002575562,0.0002996883,0.001110308,0.0002219036,0.00004793786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002495232,0.0000710342,0.0002557897,0.00003949801,0.001637918,0.000005180311,0.547734,9.443013e-7,0.000002899162,0.2186256,0.2076475,0.02373015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002715856,0.0005904212,0.001198854,0.000154641,0.0005518628,0.00003044189,0.3784927,0.000468275,0.00001625744,0.009776698,0.6053795,0.0006244939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3424082,0.3371831,0.0000406164,0.1174032,0.005675967,0.005231443,0.00005701113,0.0007284764,0.1912721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635191,0.009047559,0.000008129392,0.0003895638,0.0009292639,0.0004826296,0.000001601566,0.00003179803,0.02559034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6211109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508403","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00007.x","title":"Projecting Presidential Personas on the Radio: An Addendum on the Bushes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Political science; Persona; Public administration; Law; Art; Art history; Politics; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Lee Sigelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia Whissell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4336227091230434,"gpt":0.3722272772533016,"spread":0.06139543186974183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006809893,0.0004992235,0.0004560787,0.00007012681,0.001887499,0.0002500704,0.0008839854,0.0001611979,0.005152945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001373381,0.0002512254,0.000290005,0.0002897582,0.0005790275,0.0001700835,0.00009505466,0.0007105478,0.001847672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000536813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004608848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007972374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007324357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960839,0.001042824,0.0005200862,0.000884411,0.0006574329,0.0008113552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976272,0.001069906,0.0002444816,0.0008410467,0.000117576,0.00009976418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006956314,0.001646586,0.003925494,0.00002499288,0.00158495,0.0001801509,0.1511294,0.000003481454,0.0003162723,0.01916657,0.7465758,0.07475073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005176039,0.02743701,0.4904741,0.0004780431,0.001467798,0.0001392688,0.3934973,0.00009183155,0.0006970802,0.01529604,0.06174966,0.003495774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551799,0.004489081,0.00001105225,0.01213304,0.003407187,0.001285375,0.00002538102,0.0002694516,0.02319955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881802,0.0001356861,0.00001104818,0.001323705,0.002349142,0.0007057686,0.000002608931,0.0000419479,0.007249893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6848261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008865813","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03692.x","title":"<i>The Law</i>: Presidential Proclamation 6920: Using Executive Power to Set a New Direction for the Management of National Monuments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Presidential system; Political science; Delegation; Public administration; Law; Executive power; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Executive branch; Veto; Agency (philosophy); Separation of powers; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Belco","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brandon Rottinghaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07674447495653182,"gpt":0.416195859362648,"spread":0.3394513844061162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007266692,0.0001077889,0.0001445454,0.00003025405,0.001305367,0.0001632914,0.0001900733,0.00004305779,0.000008385853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007532108,0.00007609069,0.00008795674,0.0001965478,0.0000929936,0.0002778297,0.00002014084,0.00004625963,0.000007038199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002134662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006013594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009763254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009007064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982784,0.0001587075,0.0003748551,0.0001868838,0.0006746793,0.0003264707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990209,0.0002458977,0.0001710674,0.0001049468,0.00038219,0.00007500633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008306782,0.0002096962,0.0005289388,0.0001591407,0.00171468,0.000001862112,0.1654023,0.0009927906,0.002598303,0.7476355,0.06089002,0.01903613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004597852,0.004437636,0.09226384,0.0010375,0.001644653,0.000003765348,0.08345081,0.002027542,0.006201404,0.6813642,0.1213643,0.001606451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8535265,0.004700481,0.05408666,0.04644095,0.007250901,0.01638079,0.00008124825,0.0003249627,0.01720752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972095,0.00001699432,0.0001746889,0.0001126208,0.000463404,0.0001273628,0.000001980913,0.000006321313,0.001887144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.143683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045058034","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02609.x","title":"<i>The Contemporary Presidency:</i> Who Wants Presidential Supremacy? Findings from the Institutions of American Democracy Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidency; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Ideology; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Joel D. Aberbach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mark Allen Peterson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paul J. Quirk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09407801719163439,"gpt":0.4111771612360809,"spread":0.3170991440444466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945186,0.0002285953,0.0004305442,0.00005957695,0.00285869,0.0002502448,0.0007010442,0.00008650309,0.0000252074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001076039,0.0001507915,0.0001975531,0.0005193988,0.00227478,0.0005462313,0.00009002086,0.0002433229,0.0000362044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005338416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2819519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.268617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961818,0.0007907608,0.0009376878,0.0003627919,0.000958827,0.0007680762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958521,0.002785515,0.0004175605,0.0003981534,0.0004035891,0.0001431265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008843152,0.0003101816,0.4320605,0.0001183135,0.001629147,0.00004099738,0.2132755,0.00001035915,0.003082294,0.1187868,0.2202427,0.009558869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00125923,0.0009153472,0.8559536,0.0003851441,0.0004181666,0.000002530994,0.0556198,0.00002347809,0.003133963,0.0416947,0.03984968,0.0007443172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834472,0.003717808,0.0006262236,0.005310316,0.001217239,0.001363334,0.00004831024,0.00008753408,0.004182016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975041,0.0001310795,0.00003817169,0.0001207257,0.001075258,0.00007278439,0.000005848488,0.00001675707,0.001035264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4238931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390946246","doi":"10.1111/psq.12867","title":"The president and the vice president: Different types of partnerships for a unique power couple","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Vice president; Typology; General partnership; Power (physics); Political science; Administration (probate law); Executive power; Principal (computer security); Inherent powers; Public relations; Public administration; Management; Sociology; Law; Politics; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Karine Prémont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07834875492056055,"gpt":0.4157984529263873,"spread":0.3374496980058268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002155295,0.0001368373,0.0002329018,0.0000502987,0.001295833,0.0006546938,0.0004231769,0.00006290871,0.00003608828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000901847,0.00007425465,0.0001292503,0.0001680321,0.0014846,0.000244676,0.00008008495,0.0001502716,0.000005697078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004264069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002332638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001666739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01700363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978462,0.0005718587,0.0003629316,0.0002503993,0.00056119,0.0004073786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952979,0.004058167,0.00009494301,0.000212851,0.0002409426,0.00009518729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002807065,0.00003055687,0.0001151139,0.0001426963,0.0004781989,0.000002472239,0.05544905,0.000001247865,0.00005301182,0.9260613,0.0150336,0.002352099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002544196,0.001110456,0.009163095,0.0003566681,0.0004490229,0.000005986755,0.1193008,0.0009913453,0.001155506,0.5358758,0.3284813,0.0005657731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643758,0.1226691,0.002354126,0.2794032,0.00337412,0.008159695,0.0001679137,0.0004419141,0.01905414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922264,0.001970924,0.00001014633,0.00007196163,0.000315203,0.000401948,0.000001510456,0.00001110678,0.004990807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4278506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059448304","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02666.x","title":"George Akerson's Legacy: Continuity and Change in White House Press Operations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Outreach; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Charles E. Walcott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karen M. Hult","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09835431921463739,"gpt":0.3685272551464853,"spread":0.2701729359318479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003516744,0.000108887,0.0002330394,0.00004411238,0.0006487328,0.000117018,0.00009286012,0.00006881304,0.00002586167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001114506,0.0001047337,0.00003605126,0.0001231798,0.0003128136,0.0007644538,0.00002487637,0.00009587488,0.00001993609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006578348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003298845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1656792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4361736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985467,0.0003273338,0.0002527317,0.0002196067,0.0002565862,0.0003970314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.00009016176,0.00004318514,0.000101575,0.0001117921,0.000117354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004378201,0.0001528128,0.3420348,0.00007031955,0.00009691391,0.00004726575,0.623988,0.000006446713,0.0001271114,0.02710522,0.003329547,0.002997845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009151438,0.0003225871,0.9804237,0.00007382307,0.00004956039,0.000003773844,0.008954838,0.0001227603,0.0000560451,0.001100577,0.007590466,0.0003866716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941271,0.00166781,0.00003042518,0.002369133,0.0003197589,0.0005448364,0.000006023549,0.0000924963,0.0008424392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979354,0.0001804636,0.00002507904,0.00009138335,0.0005414856,0.0001776337,0.000001141833,0.00001046233,0.00103693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.638389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8398766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213240781","doi":"10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00229.x","title":"The Legacy of John Adams","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04227632875375947,"gpt":0.3253315176716337,"spread":0.2830551889178742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002555779,0.00006985149,0.0001336135,0.00001756749,0.001176016,0.00007238324,0.0002427879,0.00002650456,0.0001912352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001758108,0.00005127432,0.0000771395,0.0001157218,0.001902897,0.0001973397,0.00002209406,0.00006250722,0.00006120504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008801149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004139927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.0001529265,0.0002111106,0.0001030698,0.000358963,0.0002650688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990866,0.0004630195,0.0001016224,0.0001293132,0.0001635832,0.00005588271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000553643,0.00002276944,0.0003713637,0.000005940485,0.0001046456,0.000002663073,0.01421333,0.000001428449,0.00001013071,0.9492959,0.02445588,0.0115104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001992542,0.0001820696,0.001329689,0.00002029785,0.0000625363,0.000001452312,0.06065593,0.000009949079,0.00002803682,0.007715858,0.9296355,0.0001594881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08893117,0.03030384,0.000335769,0.01129182,0.002410425,0.0004269384,0.00001791277,0.0001129594,0.8661692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912601,0.0009978681,0.00004375969,0.00007993043,0.0004577829,0.00001167172,2.598056e-7,0.000003490644,0.007145185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154288493","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03893.x","title":"Remaking the Presidency: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson, 1901‐1916 – By Peri E. Arnold","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Citation; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Graham G. Dodds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04980468674170938,"gpt":0.3138057694811652,"spread":0.2640010827394559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005320549,0.0001910936,0.0002521597,0.0000336074,0.001769202,0.0001454623,0.0003641419,0.00007408448,0.0001697815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002157041,0.0001465726,0.00008015263,0.0001389324,0.002496893,0.0004129161,0.00008285299,0.0001660863,0.0000334916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006547943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002789493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02049794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009227994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980755,0.0003158342,0.00030662,0.0003216685,0.0004616689,0.000518717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.0003272816,0.0001616595,0.0002209328,0.0001775655,0.0001339452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004150283,0.00006086657,0.006068419,0.00003367267,0.0003411329,0.00002279243,0.1235474,3.791795e-7,0.00008269258,0.8111671,0.0505393,0.008094735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007178255,0.0006424593,0.04614749,0.0001706503,0.0004751161,0.00002793919,0.1247374,0.000009706684,0.0001643861,0.05744597,0.7683883,0.001072746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2284013,0.05214913,0.001657731,0.01090626,0.002755699,0.001511106,0.0001077052,0.0004556017,0.7020555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931676,0.0007690815,0.0002170164,0.0003900584,0.0005204903,0.00005035116,0.000001638562,0.00001266169,0.004871076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323925465","doi":"10.1111/psq.12823","title":"Managing our SOBs: Washington's response to friendly dictators in trouble","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Argument (complex analysis); White (mutation); Political science; Political economy; Foreign policy; Law and economics; Law; Development economics; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Victor A. Béliveau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03130302216694004,"gpt":0.3768631547745976,"spread":0.3455601326076576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001327742,0.0001163734,0.0001735382,0.0004846801,0.0005924529,0.0001550206,0.0003071837,0.00005548213,0.00003217355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000544889,0.0001203798,0.00007843845,0.0008333239,0.00006382876,0.0003732914,0.00007367207,0.0001181651,0.0006468706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002373346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008116547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004061087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006164026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981896,0.0002605908,0.0002923498,0.0002642133,0.0005155007,0.0004777171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.0002442177,0.00006548398,0.0001349389,0.000115014,0.000104824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006865003,0.00008643975,0.007972209,0.00002951263,0.0002707914,0.0001678826,0.5397482,0.000622785,0.0003421602,0.3710044,0.05919632,0.01987284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001379734,0.0006843203,0.1254566,0.0001975277,0.00005036061,0.000001625198,0.5413392,0.0003666802,0.00007144525,0.2495659,0.08019827,0.000688374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506919,0.0001757671,0.0003145493,0.01559548,0.0008068216,0.0005705021,0.0000119507,0.0002500966,0.03158288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907382,0.00007369238,0.0001013246,0.0001242961,0.0003568565,0.0001357698,0.000002461032,0.00001489072,0.008452504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1214385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8314429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086851228","doi":"10.1111/psq.12163","title":"No End Save Victory: How FDR Led the Nation into War. By DavidKaiser. New York: Basic Books, 2014. 408 pp.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; Citation; Classics; History; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Galen Roger Perras","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0221666065675903,"gpt":0.2706024242281873,"spread":0.248435817660597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085763,0.0003531445,0.0004707087,0.00003382932,0.004701806,0.0002370676,0.0006481762,0.0001444503,0.0002477564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000481799,0.0002621619,0.0002181864,0.0001920973,0.0009173061,0.0005570732,0.00009280235,0.0002741247,0.000416852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002473767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001197952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003746452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0415274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968173,0.0007755595,0.0003445461,0.0005532325,0.0009330299,0.0005763615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.0001991911,0.0002881784,0.0003734636,0.0003627549,0.0001713243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003450418,0.00003110976,0.0001349468,0.00002554731,0.0002570288,0.00000124723,0.2335135,7.258575e-7,0.0003507653,0.002830226,0.7516527,0.01116763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109992,0.0002752671,0.0004322789,0.00003821807,0.0001622966,5.041031e-7,0.07924774,0.000007200636,0.00004533944,0.005135221,0.9137971,0.0003478724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04355831,0.4545516,0.003338023,0.1948114,0.035872,0.006232289,0.00008294686,0.002133981,0.2594194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457104,0.001551217,0.0001037482,0.0005949174,0.004216065,0.000172959,0.00001522365,0.00003854018,0.04759692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2835894000","doi":"10.1111/psq.12464","title":"The Diversity of Unilateral Presidential Orders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Graham G. Dodds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03119393008496603,"gpt":0.3362892602455776,"spread":0.3050953301606116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004248123,0.00009689834,0.0001616783,0.00002846263,0.003711864,0.00006489184,0.0004255426,0.00004351535,0.0001036243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001655196,0.00007600126,0.00009259814,0.0001425029,0.005203272,0.0002099139,0.0001820885,0.00007097219,0.00003780123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005651548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003016228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02652302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02883479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985173,0.0002431992,0.0002306942,0.0001584758,0.0004942202,0.0003560669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988596,0.0003229469,0.000140428,0.000162065,0.0004383843,0.00007656899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000888908,0.00003065834,0.008647424,0.00001219917,0.0003406936,0.000004590225,0.03938924,0.000001369439,0.0000424965,0.9334533,0.01566903,0.002320095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001334138,0.001509039,0.05461088,0.00009025292,0.0005148137,0.000004738104,0.1095214,0.00001548195,0.0005020946,0.07286175,0.7582275,0.0008079131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616737,0.001504167,0.0008141089,0.003854786,0.004216845,0.0005172973,0.00003114213,0.0001261844,0.1272618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995538,0.0001395757,0.00005494434,0.0000777071,0.0008952246,0.00000505529,8.056587e-7,0.000004165577,0.003284507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}