{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":62,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"7699fc2acd53","filters":{"venue":"Public Administration"}},"results":[{"id":"W2122642665","doi":"10.1111/padm.12209","title":"INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; University of Toronto; European Commission; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Public sector; Variety (cybernetics); Corporate governance; Empirical research; Systematic review; Business; Economics; Political science; Management; Computer science; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4283953741007598,"gpt":0.5388943579545579,"spread":0.1104989838537981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04263882,0.0003684775,0.001452319,0.001342296,0.0009491801,0.002246038,0.001421712,0.0006033153,0.0002735767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111629,0.0002533971,0.0001484277,0.008896545,0.0005641859,0.001152274,0.0001165679,0.001462294,0.00009535797],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005914299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01398006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006374865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001707443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842445,0.009781059,0.001794605,0.0006377774,0.00253621,0.001005876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956417,0.001084945,0.0007728618,0.0007857732,0.001406545,0.0003081417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001123825,0.0001276211,0.000001128936,0.2890877,0.00004354984,0.00001653857,0.001038936,2.812177e-10,9.452092e-9,0.6338201,0.01753879,0.05832461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077273,0.00007719095,0.000001239374,0.0143002,0.0001390437,0.00005909632,0.00242139,7.079367e-7,9.06783e-9,0.0009478484,0.9817429,0.0002331102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001216653,0.8825254,0.000005231787,0.07547687,0.0001551888,0.005314571,0.00006342094,0.00005938769,0.03639868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005248318,0.9931001,0.00001845348,0.0008673886,0.001184195,0.00234054,0.0005952357,0.00002968328,0.001339592],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662542501","doi":"10.1111/padm.12175","title":"UNDERSTANDING HYBRIDITY IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Public sector; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public relations; Anthropology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4552793757901237,"gpt":0.4269935463645355,"spread":0.02828582942558816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662173,0.0001089772,0.000124658,0.0003688718,0.00054892,0.0009522109,0.0003536385,0.0001355497,0.0006690609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007234404,0.0001223747,0.00002757834,0.002284746,0.0003067158,0.001769657,0.00004428772,0.0002152544,0.00009554916],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009020054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008150461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002880305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01451588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975486,0.0004621222,0.0003298575,0.0002691541,0.0008021893,0.0005881128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983859,0.0001597701,0.0001045049,0.0002033444,0.0004379636,0.0007084844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005132802,0.0001570771,0.0124973,0.000002527219,0.000004775873,0.000007382667,0.00137607,0.000001408276,0.000008672169,0.9800578,0.005570653,0.000311202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00129744,0.0002142611,0.006553612,0.00001037613,0.000006727531,0.00001750338,0.03147194,0.001096152,0.0001319132,0.1052577,0.8534023,0.0005401428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05977894,0.00001603773,0.02447882,0.2744117,0.00046641,0.0005606756,0.00002842554,0.0003303516,0.6399286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973697,0.0000168053,0.0001891189,0.0003102348,0.000342415,0.00003413928,0.0001163134,0.00001177245,0.001609492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105566173","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01836.x","title":"LEADERSHIP STYLE, CRISIS RESPONSE AND BLAME MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF HURRICANE KATRINA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Newcastle Australia","keywords":"Blame; Crisis management; Hurricane katrina; Politics; Political science; Leadership style; Public relations; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology; Natural disaster; Law; History; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0411152672154706,"gpt":0.3164825033139023,"spread":0.2753672360984317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398909,0.00006456812,0.00006411056,0.00008346423,0.0003700721,0.0002135267,0.0002103571,0.00004679109,0.0001913242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001986065,0.00004959128,0.00002555134,0.0003358536,0.0004419131,0.000338423,0.00004477369,0.00009560439,0.000007226043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008936779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005984217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001258317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00343925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991437,0.0001502205,0.0001481894,0.0001628483,0.0002023425,0.0001926983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994382,0.0001342516,0.00009827386,0.0001992467,0.00005127633,0.00007881207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000168551,0.0001585157,0.002134795,0.00006248774,0.00003786652,0.0002013346,0.01136565,4.272939e-7,0.0002048304,0.9474461,0.004554522,0.03366494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009005049,0.0004102464,0.04954787,0.00001586729,0.0001461629,0.0001139746,0.6194485,0.0002866167,0.0002688633,0.005129485,0.3232638,0.0004681683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.909224,0.00002024709,0.0001140927,0.03960979,0.0001509585,0.000285802,0.000002617207,0.0000343638,0.05055818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955085,0.00001782505,0.0001350152,0.0001421776,0.00006797624,0.00001561043,0.000001840271,0.000003861097,0.004107187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2846333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977095901","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x","title":"WAS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUCH A GOOD IDEA? A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Argument (complex analysis); Corporate governance; Politics; Government (linguistics); Local government; Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1411593023963273,"gpt":0.420598985497123,"spread":0.2794396831007956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009199217,0.0001841765,0.000216338,0.00005393747,0.000734053,0.0003715612,0.0005177935,0.0001799303,0.00207598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006683466,0.0001897588,0.00009892727,0.0008911891,0.0009375558,0.001235899,0.0000532015,0.0002362544,0.0002241064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003910022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004148649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02023534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972445,0.0004120545,0.0003369683,0.0004395295,0.0008811579,0.0006858177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983251,0.0001079766,0.0002049017,0.0002548815,0.0005843968,0.0005227304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000614762,0.0003068861,0.002048868,0.000003296892,0.0000303503,0.00001211669,0.008440511,1.455757e-7,0.0000052486,0.9859974,0.00160612,0.001487629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001992598,0.001655491,0.163409,0.00003481687,0.00005030141,0.00006584771,0.1808776,0.0006690312,0.00125427,0.166283,0.4823676,0.001340449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04286496,0.00006094882,0.006166772,0.02305398,0.0002054788,0.000473781,0.00009753989,0.0001862194,0.9268903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963595,0.00002560106,0.0004658276,0.0003262149,0.0003197263,0.00008611368,0.00002613398,0.000007231679,0.002383621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035697834","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01792.x","title":"POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN AN AFRICAN STATE: AN EXTENSION OF KINGDON'S MULTIPLE‐STREAMS APPROACH","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Context (archaeology); STREAMS; Transferability; Extension (predicate logic); State (computer science); Empirical research; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Incentive; Epistemology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04613510281498018,"gpt":0.3830751511687941,"spread":0.3369400483538139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006176991,0.00008105538,0.00009294307,0.0002507356,0.0001419524,0.0001270033,0.0001650857,0.00005149387,0.00006081424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000170798,0.00008495267,0.00002181902,0.0004200128,0.00005490442,0.001198165,0.000007991666,0.00005854442,0.000001738988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001378426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006183898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001072928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008751005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987304,0.0001462216,0.0002907737,0.0002073307,0.000402831,0.0002224698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.00002933214,0.0001599416,0.0001013617,0.0001943371,0.0001063858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043791,0.001068412,0.08114748,0.000007272373,0.000008011491,0.00000356847,0.02174428,0.00001606142,0.003690147,0.6621523,0.00007715829,0.2299809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008552602,0.0006686086,0.9555577,0.000008617404,0.000004517245,0.000001816654,0.01876619,0.00162214,0.00213443,0.01805199,0.002036838,0.0002919126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792051,0.000001815476,0.0005319167,0.005233595,0.00005419121,0.0002698101,0.00001051579,0.00004231014,0.01465071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974422,0.000006620151,0.001745652,0.0001196335,0.0001456227,0.00001315504,0.0004300394,0.000004783662,0.0000922814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8744102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4883266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023963495","doi":"10.1111/padm.12672","title":"Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co‐production by third sector organizations under different models of public management","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Public sector; Corporate governance; General partnership; Hierarchy; Contingency; Government (linguistics); New public management; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1303631252126095,"gpt":0.3536550681182538,"spread":0.2232919429056443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107568,0.0001815893,0.0002417911,0.00009786083,0.0007329345,0.0004297678,0.000730712,0.0001397171,0.0007219102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001168125,0.0001528406,0.00008119429,0.001606979,0.0003887315,0.001595811,0.00009629026,0.000240821,0.000008679523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001570694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001641195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007662956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968424,0.0004298939,0.0005701506,0.0004010864,0.00126258,0.0004939011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980449,0.0001321621,0.000481282,0.0003434719,0.0005167751,0.0004814255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001255343,0.0002993984,0.0008291791,0.00005868528,0.00008372389,4.090783e-7,0.00282316,0.00002442149,0.0005188403,0.9724003,0.0199806,0.00296869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004772746,0.001598928,0.04977065,0.0001466409,0.0002862273,0.0000148865,0.1016474,0.01606343,0.02494076,0.09490122,0.7032205,0.002636584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09798808,0.0002079296,0.07651764,0.7563195,0.0002977636,0.00109259,0.0001451513,0.0002050076,0.06722632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965066,0.0004924157,0.0001050589,0.0004745703,0.0003882777,0.00003316067,0.0001643283,0.00001716201,0.001818461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8985185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.790441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018772302","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02003.x","title":"SYMPOSIUM OVERVIEW: CONCEPTUALIZING NEW GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Multi-level governance; Key (lock); Economics; Management; Computer science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1451504226460573,"gpt":0.4219347328444115,"spread":0.2767843101983542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001321241,0.0001332893,0.0001327541,0.00005832359,0.0006188935,0.0004651129,0.0003587693,0.0001289474,0.003052691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008023878,0.0001424946,0.00006832334,0.0004906533,0.0002088477,0.002349225,0.00004244616,0.0001590031,0.0002729055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001753854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004567005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006818671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997521,0.0002677491,0.0003087795,0.0002159984,0.0008702026,0.0008163034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985459,0.0001192577,0.000181339,0.0002244203,0.0001208543,0.0008082522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009010263,0.0001359239,0.004268987,0.000007596806,0.00001530825,9.410635e-7,0.002961919,1.721742e-7,0.0001916432,0.9526412,0.03382174,0.005945588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002507645,0.00004609365,0.004034393,0.0000072239,0.000006020736,0.000002262653,0.001330355,0.00001554782,0.0003820068,0.0007867746,0.9929683,0.0001702336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03011422,0.0009224658,0.002155803,0.1790226,0.001376392,0.0007232449,0.00004639463,0.0003258947,0.785313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785226,0.0003392623,0.0003422715,0.001040614,0.002028349,0.00003719737,0.00004945374,0.00001207382,0.0176282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114327298","doi":"10.1111/padm.12199","title":"HOW PUBLIC SERVICE LEADERSHIP IS STUDIED: AN EXAMINATION OF A QUARTER CENTURY OF SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public service; Public relations; Quarter (Canadian coin); Diversity (politics); Exploratory research; Public sector; Service (business); Leadership studies; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Leadership style; Business; Social science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3780762306924821,"gpt":0.4160277530872755,"spread":0.03795152239479344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004476188,0.0001592199,0.0002429192,0.0003642794,0.0002727557,0.0006532791,0.000591325,0.0002440257,0.0001825549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002740247,0.000165552,0.00006688551,0.001369143,0.0003661668,0.003986628,0.0000406927,0.0002315622,0.00001165324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003057971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001283293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002936322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960976,0.001050046,0.0004557178,0.0003409687,0.001513743,0.0005419776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963409,0.0001598325,0.0004213021,0.0003804638,0.002051149,0.0006463614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117602,0.002037666,0.01362486,0.0002465306,0.000121166,0.000004957169,0.05356667,3.840483e-7,0.001126777,0.8817851,0.003369729,0.04399854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00373642,0.003320036,0.1115344,0.00008415203,0.00007880148,0.00001523382,0.509527,0.0005635162,0.00798854,0.01023936,0.3517231,0.001189482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6878867,0.0001119259,0.0005196876,0.2648314,0.0002490906,0.0006853029,0.00008219806,0.0001185492,0.04551517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979617,0.00001895524,0.0002537871,0.0005666493,0.000282967,0.00004212411,0.0001253193,0.00001267247,0.0007358184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6751013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143720337","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01811.x","title":"DODGY KEBABS EVERYWHERE? VARIETY OF WORLDVIEWS AND REGULATORY CHANGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Variety (cybernetics); Newspaper; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0585633736557314,"gpt":0.3365104808808747,"spread":0.2779471072251433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007834721,0.00005761391,0.00008503211,0.00005657451,0.00018378,0.00008122178,0.00009887341,0.00007696694,0.00109717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009941994,0.00005670504,0.00002805307,0.0001535497,0.0002613138,0.0004238132,0.00002360476,0.00008328723,0.00001939513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001650646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001080467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001707638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01227655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992599,0.0000698595,0.0001606727,0.0001406718,0.0002330196,0.0001358103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995409,0.00002103526,0.0001034192,0.0001509539,0.00007424013,0.0001094393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001201048,0.0001430603,0.0088839,0.00002893617,0.000013211,8.146743e-7,0.01156275,3.602257e-8,0.0009836818,0.8194155,0.005942483,0.1530137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114252,0.00003253755,0.09987347,0.000002520998,0.000006985252,5.595058e-7,0.001690066,0.00001971342,0.00004547778,0.001114274,0.8970221,0.00007803505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8794816,0.00004416526,0.0003403451,0.01917414,0.0006555067,0.0005036529,0.000004850308,0.00008596141,0.09970984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996404,0.0001526995,0.0005279992,0.0002530008,0.0002674228,0.00003543021,0.00001030501,0.000004333728,0.002344829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596845526","doi":"10.1111/padm.12198","title":"TRANSGOVERNMENTAL POLICY NETWORKS IN THE ANGLOSPHERE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Situated; Public administration; Public policy; Political science; Policy transfer; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06908654125971815,"gpt":0.3607165936294204,"spread":0.2916300523697023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064545,0.0000559662,0.00005397939,0.00002542372,0.0001796186,0.0001770614,0.0002039767,0.00006622662,0.00008145149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904606,0.0000456347,0.00002809115,0.0004318985,0.00009710728,0.0003369263,0.000003522366,0.0001394519,0.00001088358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006690639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001853383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01422371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988497,0.0003008436,0.0001172812,0.00009768773,0.0003762503,0.000258221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.00005812743,0.00002167492,0.00008032779,0.00002142381,0.0001161534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002986625,0.0001613314,0.02357457,0.000002544897,0.00000677859,0.000009063494,0.04759394,0.00005392029,0.000004991007,0.9045396,0.002115688,0.02190764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235456,0.0003044516,0.05636936,0.000008764676,0.00001219293,0.00001293557,0.09490003,0.00118232,0.00001585157,0.006143951,0.8394904,0.0003242801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1914586,0.00007057976,0.004360476,0.1047246,0.0001588743,0.0003146141,0.00000502241,0.00007567316,0.6988315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980748,0.00001337466,0.00003251927,0.0008960284,0.0006510761,0.00001796147,0.00001174215,0.000004278734,0.0002982127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8983957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7937166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081282679","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00357","title":"Ethics, values and behaviours: comparison of three case studies examining the paucity of leadership in government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pillar; Public relations; Public service; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Ethical leadership; Public administration; Political science; Service (business); Business; Law; Marketing; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7788923445721057,"gpt":0.5100501830772671,"spread":0.2688421614948385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01066797,0.00008261523,0.0002154352,0.00006476726,0.0001619735,0.0001016158,0.0001604683,0.0001102899,0.00002516151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02370729,0.00005553461,0.00001895953,0.0003843753,0.0004527145,0.0002975287,0.00003529796,0.0002854358,5.146516e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004211396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002720533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009050861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973959,0.000481523,0.0006891117,0.0002289792,0.001071569,0.0001329439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993399,0.005240915,0.000500043,0.0003101396,0.0005151124,0.00003481646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001366688,0.0002581573,0.8797216,0.00006346175,0.00001437587,0.000006654015,0.02077429,0.00001421344,0.00008572189,0.0861243,0.0001741603,0.01274939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003018691,0.0003624352,0.6990736,0.0000833724,0.00003897394,0.0001069015,0.239931,0.0005789726,0.004489957,0.05473464,0.0001211754,0.0001771489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892415,0.0007465241,0.001765813,0.007535356,0.0002243424,0.0001383506,0.000005593862,0.000004251153,0.0003382649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990747,0.00004101785,0.000748835,0.00006414598,0.00001832444,0.00001220507,0.000001612985,0.000003506014,0.00003565635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2191567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128493221","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02095.x","title":"RETHINKING E‐GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FROM A CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Information and Communications Technology; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Perception; Public relations; The Internet; E-Government; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Work (physics); Business; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03246826175757975,"gpt":0.3077215769791296,"spread":0.2752533152215498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006539408,0.000127217,0.0001207773,0.00002692956,0.0006068185,0.0009698875,0.0003363354,0.0001180585,0.006270894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001554887,0.0001253753,0.00004925319,0.0002195816,0.0001435398,0.001939703,0.00005714309,0.0001714619,0.0001205313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008630939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005252133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00409393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004095362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976267,0.0001553967,0.000225281,0.0003018528,0.001349807,0.0003409793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.0001612045,0.0001918016,0.0001988516,0.0002158119,0.0001808958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001589249,0.0002350296,0.1173466,0.00001157092,0.00008681917,0.000002182766,0.03002549,6.787861e-7,0.0002560634,0.8333313,0.003925287,0.01476302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134925,0.0004838634,0.4970136,0.00005571793,0.00006059309,0.00000183399,0.2290924,0.003449458,0.0006928228,0.09981006,0.1672264,0.0009783162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5729656,0.00001968546,0.000223939,0.04845198,0.0002533401,0.0003209877,0.00001109449,0.00009795838,0.3776554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951016,0.00005251659,0.001355037,0.0007426046,0.0005919057,0.000121098,0.00003792668,0.00001038609,0.00198687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7335213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975219832","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01809.x","title":"HOW TO ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM? INVESTIGATING THE ADOPTION AND PRELIMINARY IMPACTS OF THE NORWEGIAN WELFARE ADMINISTRATION REFORM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Context (archaeology); Welfare reform; Autonomy; Public economics; Welfare; Politics; Administration (probate law); Process (computing); Economics; Public administration; Political science; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09016467142494265,"gpt":0.3830460822216327,"spread":0.29288141079669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002730988,0.0002767348,0.0002398673,0.000161655,0.002257254,0.001446248,0.0008729924,0.0003301316,0.00009814875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004361788,0.0001836844,0.0001130924,0.001134563,0.001235838,0.001800546,0.0001640615,0.0007575146,0.000004369036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002733531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003467704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006211223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02128834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965186,0.0005230534,0.0005881593,0.0004756342,0.001228692,0.0006658265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971701,0.0002460158,0.0005828848,0.0006802693,0.0006462932,0.0006744409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009852363,0.0001896898,0.002981362,0.00006145663,0.000034023,0.000003192624,0.004131362,2.585362e-7,0.006849431,0.9762489,0.000399391,0.009002442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001196555,0.003531459,0.5654412,0.0001431938,0.0001041439,0.0001779026,0.09730531,0.0003046569,0.0386733,0.007507719,0.284394,0.001220568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888783,0.000006624176,0.0001291542,0.3803107,0.0002967438,0.001014421,0.00006976669,0.00006652161,0.02922773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966286,0.00001354629,0.0007060876,0.0006769404,0.0005383371,0.0001839482,0.00006684793,0.00002105733,0.001164587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224216051","doi":"10.1111/padm.12849","title":"Designing for adaptation: Static and dynamic robustness in policy‐making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Regional resilience and development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Indigenous Peoples' Health; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06732327629877961,"gpt":0.2896131292671255,"spread":0.2222898529683459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004881952,0.0000613715,0.0001103345,0.0002744028,0.0001787936,0.00008725322,0.00007653733,0.00001979668,0.00005499514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001740598,0.00008059761,0.00001850573,0.0002752446,0.00001867828,0.0002664366,0.00002723369,0.00005585392,0.000002465659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002041804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002199679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001060013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007160507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992643,0.00001327492,0.000303963,0.0002114904,0.00004501577,0.0001619435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996559,0.0000744147,0.0001524642,0.0000677499,0.00001707642,0.00003238071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006927928,0.0001314873,0.01276289,0.00005887255,0.00001696223,0.000006364081,0.002409029,0.01603759,0.00001596509,0.9526538,0.0001796168,0.01565821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352596,0.0004473557,0.05279109,0.00001427897,0.000003117144,0.00004244057,0.00706258,0.7855756,0.00001910218,0.1181983,0.03399517,0.0004983429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2950764,0.0002959912,0.6857097,0.01517966,0.0001511788,0.0005542182,0.00004948316,0.00002658159,0.002956795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896709,0.00001694719,0.009495917,0.0002321393,0.00001819974,0.0002962612,0.00005343892,0.000007672121,0.0002085118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3286675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535853360","doi":"10.1111/padm.12184","title":"DETERMINANTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEDIATIZATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ADAPTATION OF SWEDISH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO NEWS MEDIA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Media management; Adaptation (eye); Government (linguistics); Media coverage; Affect (linguistics); Organizational structure; Business; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06942274079313049,"gpt":0.3322231872913237,"spread":0.2628004464981932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001013902,0.00006438995,0.000173438,0.0001369095,0.0001343269,0.0000411745,0.0004174356,0.00006547329,0.0001313878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002871878,0.00005544743,0.0000574905,0.00233704,0.0001433995,0.0005665112,0.00004886582,0.00003723719,8.731522e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00114029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004338031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02578798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978327,0.0003056579,0.0005350832,0.000122102,0.001106574,0.00009790468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977659,0.0001463259,0.0006037591,0.0003614741,0.0009952759,0.0001272435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002304265,0.0003478086,0.7246485,0.000009888297,0.0001069923,8.905168e-8,0.05218138,0.001808601,0.0001848186,0.2103982,0.0002263872,0.01006434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004243085,0.0002494866,0.7960736,0.00001759885,0.000483418,5.211324e-7,0.156758,0.03412947,0.002184711,0.002420377,0.007021837,0.0002367154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98096,0.00002165893,0.01146288,0.002887675,0.0001622954,0.0002623342,0.00007120078,0.00001405538,0.004157968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979127,0.00002080857,0.001772303,0.00003419581,0.00004614257,0.00001435903,0.0001338636,0.000004773838,0.00006083582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2079778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005810389","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00368.x","title":"Cabinet Government: An Elusive Ideal?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Criticism; Proposition; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03569998423194719,"gpt":0.298077534154662,"spread":0.2623775499227148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003966335,0.0000535103,0.00006484825,0.00001190932,0.0004107309,0.00009517089,0.00008815909,0.00005825159,0.001970484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002757638,0.00005579954,0.00002664564,0.00005094088,0.0001181384,0.0004298481,0.000003677396,0.00004771248,0.0001162784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001864479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003521913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001331896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.00009701207,0.0001242477,0.0001366676,0.0001758048,0.000248134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995388,0.00002876142,0.00004374807,0.00008855346,0.00002553135,0.0002746008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002639467,0.00005409258,0.0005834404,0.000001217011,0.000002646671,0.000001365042,0.000887813,1.373179e-7,0.00001264647,0.9952053,0.001242691,0.002005959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009956329,0.00006673929,0.000740164,6.125391e-7,0.000003200149,0.000001460604,0.002038295,0.00001597387,0.00005925769,0.01153102,0.9853582,0.00008553274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1915501,0.00001893775,0.0002488722,0.004748919,0.0003165144,0.00008294931,0.00001199821,0.00004547206,0.8029763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917951,0.000008682922,0.0001257168,0.0004506412,0.0002262513,0.000009983421,0.00001097421,0.000003582143,0.007369055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970065311","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00270","title":"Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Business; Service delivery framework; Northern ireland; Public relations; Senior management; New public management; Central government; Performance management; Public sector; Public administration; Service (business); Focus (optics); Local government; Political science; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05999297915839075,"gpt":0.3489346431225087,"spread":0.2889416639641179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009789264,0.0001617399,0.0001639656,0.0002231385,0.0006415559,0.0003848408,0.0002649336,0.0001234295,0.0006036503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002753588,0.0001647112,0.00003941376,0.0006230632,0.000336705,0.001341872,0.00005118344,0.000185619,0.00004178474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007268799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003156924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02269562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978745,0.0002958719,0.0003800214,0.0003971957,0.0005670837,0.0004853414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991824,0.0001385977,0.0001406507,0.0001708545,0.0001121639,0.0002553388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249064,0.0007514795,0.5550303,0.00005641034,0.0001209238,0.0001327617,0.03372554,0.00000631642,0.0002164824,0.3367999,0.003701755,0.06920904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008881788,0.0001682525,0.5815012,0.00003067768,0.00001155077,0.000007703723,0.009423454,0.0005953241,0.00008002258,0.007223135,0.3996592,0.000411227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7014603,0.0001123641,0.0004968194,0.008063722,0.00009982577,0.0004765477,0.00002982456,0.00005463013,0.289206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913056,0.001240244,0.0002894961,0.0002232952,0.0002416129,0.0001241805,0.0001888996,0.000009464527,0.006377176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3959575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113206757","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00698.x","title":"POLICY DESIGN FOR LEGITIMACY: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE, CITIZENS, TIME AND INCLUSION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM’S BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTOR","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Inclusion (mineral); Narrative; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08998183470126617,"gpt":0.3905297206880784,"spread":0.3005478859868123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002995573,0.00009439632,0.0001008976,0.0004514286,0.00126931,0.0001116638,0.0002659046,0.0001989103,0.00002965619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000994499,0.00007982094,0.0000274316,0.00090003,0.0002322567,0.000185303,0.0001060568,0.0001501685,0.000004112168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005151424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001250285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002795468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987571,0.0002894797,0.0001953481,0.0001801206,0.0001854719,0.0003924718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990663,0.0006384098,0.00004381329,0.0001045133,0.00006552663,0.00008145074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001243033,0.0002030626,0.0001992267,0.0000135281,0.00001288583,0.000005798836,0.06856217,0.000002762839,0.005405636,0.8809588,0.00094617,0.04356567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001996759,0.0007792455,0.003039115,0.00003864546,0.00001718141,0.00002601406,0.006468481,0.002787062,0.005693963,0.03827927,0.9403269,0.000547416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5714031,0.0001589912,0.1456521,0.233055,0.0002077723,0.002332712,0.00001993213,0.0004477521,0.04672261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978534,0.00002703743,0.0005478401,0.0009306933,0.000420689,0.00003970101,0.0000338311,0.000009692774,0.0001371069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033370333","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x","title":"TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Scholarship; Public administration; Administration (probate law); Excellence; Public service; Political science; Nationalism; Sociology; Sovereignty; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08824151112287518,"gpt":0.4165040994268083,"spread":0.3282625883039331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003473872,0.0001595815,0.0001605224,0.0002390863,0.000595456,0.001602334,0.0007437609,0.0003505236,0.002358498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005849093,0.0001723785,0.00007649064,0.001581373,0.0005090613,0.002409276,0.00006429594,0.0006432083,0.0001502665],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002369914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006956549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07172593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968913,0.0003969552,0.0004051838,0.0003984756,0.001013442,0.0008946985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998382,0.0001083295,0.0001231066,0.0003367294,0.0003096327,0.0007402155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001026702,0.0002061942,0.021879,0.000003772799,0.000005788802,0.00001036811,0.0002651845,5.046076e-8,0.0001763826,0.9553806,0.0004924175,0.02156999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000678801,0.0001328323,0.122175,0.000005745065,0.000003978422,0.00001755299,0.002624928,0.00007616769,0.0002748629,0.05449775,0.8191043,0.000408128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2835732,0.000007686102,0.0002559259,0.1506133,0.0004291465,0.0003370392,0.00003297851,0.0001777196,0.564573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973906,0.00001368612,0.0005878587,0.0003460295,0.0006084407,0.00008853464,0.0000700044,0.000009668802,0.0008852113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9008828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588716391","doi":"10.1111/padm.12290","title":"Temporary partisans, tagged officers or impartial professionals: Moving between ministerial offices and departments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Impartiality; Competence (human resources); Politics; Public administration; Public service; Public relations; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1539850934406701,"gpt":0.4652385094898656,"spread":0.3112534160491955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024611,0.0001986675,0.0002677499,0.0001164366,0.003699008,0.002539508,0.0006362079,0.000238408,0.0007249776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002651747,0.0001753175,0.00005275072,0.0001420582,0.0007715564,0.00247175,0.0001602366,0.0002080511,0.00002892205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007917071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004295056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004091541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004451567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970625,0.0005012719,0.000500891,0.0004534856,0.0008278604,0.000653978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979528,0.0003185161,0.0005057196,0.0004238839,0.0001535363,0.000645599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002179756,0.002115597,0.6247109,0.0003085322,0.000546177,0.0002191688,0.01049649,3.074038e-7,0.001492751,0.2018912,0.06008266,0.09595647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001920531,0.0009438608,0.1779426,0.00006427529,0.00006134936,0.00001291336,0.006154239,0.0001030131,0.001651975,0.001176433,0.80913,0.0008388874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016579,0.00002010722,0.00008804713,0.05826248,0.0004781644,0.0007422636,0.000172639,0.0001303572,0.03844807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935901,0.00002661475,0.0001663603,0.0002072631,0.001562478,0.0001145111,0.0001890657,0.00001598773,0.004127636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7490473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010157159","doi":"10.1111/padm.12126","title":"CONTROL PATTERNS IN CONTRACTING‐OUT RELATIONSHIPS: IT MATTERS WHAT YOU DO, NOT WHO YOU ARE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Corporate governance; Neglect; Service (business); Business; Control variable; Public relations; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Management; Market economy; Psychology; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09138552575451299,"gpt":0.377922477863216,"spread":0.2865369521087031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004978608,0.0002165587,0.0003039293,0.0003231697,0.0008665066,0.002666945,0.0004788392,0.0003115619,0.0008610679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005131205,0.0002333509,0.00009951426,0.0004616518,0.0002731073,0.003570185,0.00002988727,0.0006040491,0.0001795986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002320397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009359923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003882161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01679658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956907,0.001377628,0.0006736111,0.000495913,0.0009618599,0.0008002761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973232,0.001111954,0.0004157546,0.000372269,0.000288487,0.000488398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002366745,0.0007963961,0.209559,0.0000992474,0.00008340022,0.0000359792,0.01631059,0.00001851339,0.0001853127,0.7408734,0.0131817,0.01861982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002878027,0.0002542473,0.1507736,0.0002163356,0.00002822555,0.00001025731,0.04679338,0.00177252,0.0002112174,0.003954249,0.7922904,0.0008174547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2204355,0.00002494582,0.00586502,0.7341374,0.0006992227,0.0009887679,0.00008674767,0.0001963498,0.03756597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900618,0.00006151883,0.00004666993,0.006264478,0.0006916128,0.000150813,0.00008578615,0.00002039557,0.00261697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891183708","doi":"10.1111/padm.12548","title":"Encouraging civil servants to be frank and fearless: Merit recruitment and employee voice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Scrutiny; Bureaucracy; Civil servants; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Corporate governance; Employee voice; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1780918141101522,"gpt":0.430857246392334,"spread":0.2527654322821818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774757,0.0001328044,0.0001416209,0.000154606,0.001023982,0.0008974104,0.0002107243,0.0001122286,0.0004117278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009562,0.000136945,0.00002132293,0.0004593389,0.0004462815,0.0008883851,0.000082836,0.0001304764,0.0000355704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006595387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008320647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005969687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02157247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.0002806871,0.0002469716,0.0003849458,0.000566127,0.0005008018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986904,0.0001589595,0.00007706197,0.0001848322,0.0002556153,0.0006330824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002113026,0.0006402492,0.09893477,0.000138246,0.0001814525,0.00004387484,0.08256658,2.783117e-7,0.002952626,0.4664553,0.05475431,0.2931211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003368172,0.0004551842,0.041103,0.0000182137,0.000009889493,0.00001064942,0.006486522,0.00007108335,0.0006032523,0.001688,0.9489387,0.0002786605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7511932,0.00004663121,0.0009823611,0.1940468,0.0002019928,0.0007823436,0.00003691512,0.0001242749,0.05258551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946991,0.0000889393,0.0005693954,0.002007456,0.0005722499,0.0001103768,0.00001709674,0.00001085387,0.001924528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164915570","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02001.x","title":"GOVERNANCE FROM THE BOTTOM UP: COMPLEXITY AND DIVERGENCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Corporate governance; Politics; European union; Perspective (graphical); Convergence (economics); Political science; Multi-level governance; Public administration; Regional science; Economic system; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; International trade; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2051655190897747,"gpt":0.4375753109876892,"spread":0.2324097918979146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145642,0.00009896615,0.000123196,0.00002829658,0.0006412624,0.0004075146,0.0002857674,0.00007797952,0.0004349631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009334921,0.00008179677,0.00002719443,0.0004102169,0.0007869364,0.001723011,0.0000565987,0.0002580216,0.00002648896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001909755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006841977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007186105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02948017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998198,0.0004901529,0.0001936626,0.0002096997,0.0004729121,0.0004355267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998894,0.0004817456,0.000112309,0.000151375,0.0001380041,0.0002225256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001632345,0.00008543439,0.072645,8.268874e-7,0.000007564051,4.600145e-7,0.0164922,4.03302e-8,0.000016984,0.9091588,0.001232755,0.0003436357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002798754,0.00004327414,0.8528701,0.000006220494,0.000004350934,0.000001417634,0.03774346,0.0001106703,0.0001119832,0.01708582,0.09157941,0.00016341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8061932,0.0003966957,0.0003757773,0.1147178,0.0003309576,0.0004682236,0.0001569781,0.00005147627,0.07730886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980012,0.00009324097,0.0001470107,0.0003812401,0.0004348916,0.0000389163,0.00002666901,0.000003400265,0.0008734768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.892073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972182074","doi":"10.1111/padm.12626","title":"How do professionals perceive the governance of public–private partnerships? Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Rijkswaterstaat; Deltares; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public administration; Business; Political science; Public relations; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06391360935701565,"gpt":0.2676082773967081,"spread":0.2036946680396924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418391,0.0002363932,0.0002307419,0.00005694186,0.000297471,0.001662952,0.0008253179,0.0001011554,0.0003965587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853441,0.000140232,0.00005321329,0.0005811811,0.0001561864,0.003324506,0.0002672976,0.0002758303,0.00002811743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007814735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007356108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008902007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1118768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978634,0.0001370198,0.0003379229,0.0004202794,0.0008211097,0.0004202363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976317,0.0006433567,0.000686185,0.0006407393,0.0003580314,0.00003998549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001113092,0.0001065211,0.6791086,0.0002100627,0.0001235751,0.000005319461,0.0004130722,0.000001971158,0.001203582,0.2889895,0.02471098,0.00501551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005995838,0.00004049297,0.7586618,0.0001691552,0.00005930983,0.000005109465,0.003244599,0.001934856,0.0004531498,0.002767402,0.231616,0.0004485454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8058315,0.0003327286,0.00006590221,0.1883703,0.0003308565,0.0006155773,0.00001420529,0.00002902803,0.004409944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961758,0.00002720746,0.00003907601,0.001867269,0.0006191291,0.00008254305,0.00005378347,0.00002253371,0.001112671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2862221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898187675","doi":"10.1111/padm.12567","title":"Adding rooms onto a house we love: Central banking after the global financial crisis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Financial crisis; Monetary policy; Inflation (cosmology); Order (exchange); Financial stability; Price of stability; Resilience (materials science); Financial system; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Central bank; Business; Monetary economics; Finance; Keynesian economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02610218090874216,"gpt":0.2603708475578203,"spread":0.2342686666490781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001942378,0.0001834563,0.0001256601,0.00005259331,0.0002546012,0.001580443,0.0002702207,0.00009542319,0.0008286306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000146232,0.0001395842,0.00007843899,0.0004688253,0.0001661503,0.002383165,0.00008420201,0.0001161751,0.0007049188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007501412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001968244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001650687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001520643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00001433135,0.0002808684,0.0002755967,0.0002939066,0.0005741776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993547,0.00001764896,0.000151331,0.0002357562,0.0002043721,0.00003614683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001861348,0.0001172802,0.02481386,0.0000507651,0.00002178591,0.00002419172,0.0001394981,0.000002064051,0.00002800865,0.9548915,0.01495905,0.004765853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007105873,0.0001541307,0.2069566,0.00008864462,0.0001386405,0.00002651145,0.002581036,0.002148198,0.0001714395,0.2587913,0.5273501,0.0008827823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8247256,0.0001027865,0.003540699,0.06931487,0.001393478,0.0004699491,0.00003095906,0.0004659973,0.09995567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905236,0.000003652704,0.00006800803,0.005252569,0.0040354,0.00002532411,0.00001653049,0.00001491288,0.0000600224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06613390136467633,"gpt":0.3548929265915542,"spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001998649,0.00006417021,0.0001083755,0.00003240861,0.0002668875,0.0001442464,0.00008829276,0.00004148724,0.0001107613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003712209,0.00006902832,0.00001176477,0.000139101,0.00003146382,0.0002441685,0.000005820687,0.00009672893,0.000003856815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991313,0.00006110757,0.0002028191,0.0001731477,0.0001812012,0.0002504191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994971,0.00004002615,0.0001070547,0.00008972296,0.000007245219,0.0002588703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005007963,0.0006516639,0.2789907,0.000005066711,0.0000758839,0.00002388443,0.03725585,0.00005709639,0.0006158761,0.2398733,0.01406828,0.4283323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002427057,0.00004014284,0.743007,0.000003759939,0.000006077294,6.613371e-7,0.001423306,0.00003780458,0.00002124031,0.002331512,0.2527754,0.0001103876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575416,0.00003763551,0.0004970621,0.1409611,0.00002918947,0.0002223567,0.00004853753,0.000009789565,0.0006527443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998109,0.00004945806,0.0001751476,0.00065803,0.000111297,0.000003836226,0.0001049054,0.000002212205,0.0007860775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4640163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4671242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122993439","doi":"10.1111/padm.12060","title":"GOVERNMENT FUNDING, EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS, AND WORK ORGANIZATION IN NON‐PROFIT COMMUNITY SERVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outsourcing; Recession; Business; Work (physics); Public sector; Vulnerability (computing); Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Industrial relations; Labour economics; Private sector; Economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025330945643539,"gpt":0.3923508044582871,"spread":0.2898177098939332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648844,0.00008783119,0.000129426,0.00005670774,0.0007176956,0.0002017481,0.0001274541,0.00007225451,0.0001176451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001544204,0.00009421126,0.00000672771,0.0007406934,0.00007331566,0.0003463462,0.00003369043,0.0001832079,0.00001214431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002402658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001452091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002846017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04733625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982118,0.0007709237,0.0002856011,0.0001489296,0.0004009308,0.0001818038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992358,0.0001391061,0.0001454,0.0001416321,0.0002293942,0.0001086601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001102492,0.0005181217,0.818145,0.0000267087,0.00001256308,5.589976e-7,0.05703191,4.250937e-7,0.00001187437,0.1222999,0.0001260504,0.001815817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005434686,0.0003284091,0.767949,0.00002867958,0.000005848852,4.353525e-7,0.2181718,0.00004740611,0.00003164458,0.0004932429,0.01224969,0.0001503261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762573,0.000005542224,0.0002584421,0.01867153,0.00008661402,0.0005770913,0.000005396832,0.00005278882,0.004085336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992341,0.00001201982,0.00004788061,0.0003632202,0.00006554049,0.00006141957,0.00007904581,0.000006055407,0.0001307502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1611399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118170475","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00410.x","title":"Governance Structures and Political Processes in a Public System: Lessons from Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Deliberation; Public administration; Politics; Political science; Mandate; Multi-level governance; Field (mathematics); Negotiation; Sociology; Organizational field; Public relations; Institutional theory; Economics; Law; Social science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04023555174953917,"gpt":0.3309499452127805,"spread":0.2907143934632413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003013369,0.00009792826,0.0001326028,0.00002785857,0.0003565459,0.0008057395,0.0002377805,0.0001217573,0.00004439979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001138405,0.00009353644,0.0000208317,0.0004477449,0.0003755017,0.001460772,0.00002593543,0.0001048219,0.000004182375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005016107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003262212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.167454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8372359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984617,0.00007628932,0.0002038568,0.0003045746,0.0004969039,0.0004567068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999341,0.0001012954,0.0001334354,0.00009670658,0.0001046932,0.0002228695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003382083,0.0000307558,0.01204058,0.00001306453,0.000002413527,0.000004257593,0.002281875,2.74586e-7,0.0000080141,0.9841819,0.00004095773,0.00139251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000926254,0.00009540027,0.7579864,0.00009469552,0.00001337121,0.000008208493,0.04944011,0.00002286554,0.0002052883,0.1334286,0.057249,0.0005298303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8155183,0.0002552689,0.0005291993,0.1646672,0.0002431375,0.0002345718,0.00005924366,0.00009332656,0.01839968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989995,0.00004346082,0.0002032396,0.0001749009,0.000304891,0.00001831239,0.000009998058,0.000005091009,0.0002406232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8507534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003112792","doi":"10.1111/padm.12654","title":"Burdens of transparency: An analysis of public sector internal auditing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Audit; Business; Public sector; Unintended consequences; Accounting; Internal audit; Public relations; Function (biology); Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1770778992339946,"gpt":0.4094292100692392,"spread":0.2323513108352446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001440702,0.0001132683,0.0003153677,0.0003763832,0.0002171874,0.0002225259,0.0005404582,0.0001224674,0.002914047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002094505,0.0001201396,0.0001755297,0.002216908,0.000377737,0.0009980192,0.00002397926,0.0001598684,0.000004530965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005283827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001965107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000511265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005411123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973425,0.0004797367,0.0006402798,0.0002980172,0.0008561169,0.0003833043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981415,0.0001853136,0.0004045606,0.0001998592,0.000481876,0.0005868722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008064028,0.0006609366,0.08142786,0.00009266073,0.0008206586,0.00000816545,0.024395,0.00003144258,0.004602144,0.8741375,0.0004150191,0.01332799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004094035,0.007059161,0.4384523,0.00009086477,0.001991394,0.000009961875,0.1238236,0.11163,0.026235,0.006555526,0.27733,0.002728215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813443,0.00001726695,0.01433318,0.05712128,0.00007967708,0.0002516976,0.0002531324,0.0001007655,0.04649867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.00001595865,0.0002669905,0.0001889417,0.0002868176,0.00001419765,0.0001783201,0.00000788843,0.0001576532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.867582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224223747","doi":"10.1111/padm.12852","title":"Trust, but verify? Understanding citizen attitudes toward evidence‐informed policy making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public trust; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public policy; Public opinion; Policy making; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2984983609591186,"gpt":0.4703500000369211,"spread":0.1718516390778025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002439935,0.0001777884,0.000193764,0.0005023198,0.003154597,0.001196992,0.0007604756,0.0001164899,0.004180612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00395869,0.0002048681,0.0001182644,0.001469763,0.0004103536,0.001739845,0.0002027724,0.0004242806,0.00003609262],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002284992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005827251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00135744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961185,0.0005451875,0.0004569388,0.0003862106,0.00161808,0.0008750612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984334,0.0005222221,0.0002400387,0.000281473,0.0001374427,0.0003854908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367962,0.00009970682,0.003490347,0.0000291547,0.00002733364,0.00001512207,0.003430972,0.000005406539,0.000059926,0.9872545,0.003462914,0.002060958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001053917,0.0009441017,0.01021595,0.00006064711,0.00002883529,0.00007242361,0.08534701,0.0007036543,0.0001721836,0.03970259,0.8607091,0.0009896378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08891091,0.0001156655,0.005395948,0.3353169,0.0008044117,0.001302237,0.0001691557,0.0006595933,0.5673252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924216,0.00007358137,0.0002055374,0.00125562,0.0008641548,0.0002252706,0.00006943043,0.00001781125,0.004866946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989399700","doi":"10.1111/padm.12630","title":"Left on the shelf: Explaining the failure of public inquiry recommendations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Politics; Order (exchange); Public administration; Policy learning; Political science; State (computer science); Public relations; Law; Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1049622976576041,"gpt":0.3596358037202134,"spread":0.2546735060626093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002196797,0.00008345208,0.00009024506,0.00007279178,0.0007884276,0.0002805092,0.0003903892,0.0000779901,0.002063001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008130363,0.0000536326,0.00006275803,0.0003263612,0.0002187281,0.0005065893,0.00001784556,0.0002562591,0.00008837441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004505455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004899352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008363725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001480919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983596,0.0006202897,0.0002230837,0.0001545732,0.0003620226,0.0002804772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986998,0.0007602238,0.0001024302,0.0002553941,0.0001058142,0.00007637613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004307019,0.00004714545,0.006492317,0.000004019264,0.00001840526,1.178715e-7,0.02718996,0.000002421409,0.0001054918,0.9565188,0.002711102,0.006905885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002160216,0.000175163,0.01055913,0.00001715121,0.00001178643,0.000002085537,0.08775531,0.0001227033,0.0002976054,0.002038217,0.898643,0.0001617998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3589115,0.00001110911,0.001109392,0.4888845,0.0004410161,0.000433377,0.000009558596,0.00008099054,0.1501185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978205,0.00001477898,0.00004944973,0.000891512,0.0002810656,0.00002266041,0.00003376257,0.00000806112,0.0008781923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993448166","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00256","title":"The Lost Legitimacy: Property, Business Power and the Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Leverhulme Trust; Manchester Metropolitan University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Competition (biology); Constitution; Politics; Accountability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political economy; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03152106397148123,"gpt":0.3043101881480836,"spread":0.2727891241766023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007617311,0.00005290377,0.00004867766,0.00001137796,0.001854915,0.0007350812,0.0001635161,0.00003811481,0.00009685691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004075095,0.00002444637,0.00001890689,0.0002718395,0.001190861,0.0003642087,0.00002760436,0.00007114788,0.00004264865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000302454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004819206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000375818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003244547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993028,0.00009802552,0.0001274843,0.0001139045,0.0001971071,0.0001606523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994095,0.0001354152,0.00006697922,0.000140658,0.0001888527,0.00005858498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749505,0.0000184194,0.0004730689,6.95432e-7,0.000003585301,4.443424e-7,0.0003936921,2.469617e-7,0.000006146717,0.9927039,0.001002923,0.005379434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002239209,0.000007703668,0.003106342,0.000001784179,0.000005420343,0.000008186841,0.001044832,0.00007964811,0.00000437457,0.004654344,0.9908147,0.00004877123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01571285,0.00008404287,0.001950956,0.4089601,0.0001418253,0.0005894469,0.000003555964,0.00004581781,0.5725114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936181,0.0002536888,0.000027981,0.000338063,0.0001759782,0.0000684265,0.000006907184,0.000002490864,0.005508361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988975138","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01844.x","title":"MECHANISMS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN EU REGULATORY POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Politics; Constructivism (international relations); Collective action; Conflict management; European union; Sociology; Economics; International relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03017416709435131,"gpt":0.273964605615616,"spread":0.2437904385212647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002769636,0.0001141343,0.0001268555,0.0003629348,0.00004871929,0.0002024099,0.0001958393,0.00007970688,0.0002231027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006504675,0.0001124107,0.00003879193,0.0004979137,0.00009695214,0.001171824,0.00005423036,0.0001244466,0.00006981698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001409453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009839629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001420763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002645275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990266,0.000005528176,0.0003132199,0.000181865,0.0002131999,0.0002595723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00001165053,0.0001648986,0.000232221,0.0001048316,0.00002074313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771803,0.0000701646,0.0006276151,0.00005278104,0.000006259545,0.000006095437,0.000006018833,8.13242e-7,0.003854435,0.992633,0.0001155486,0.00261751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007501766,0.0000439967,0.1273823,0.00002548091,0.00002696893,0.000005566395,0.0007471013,0.0007629839,0.003834626,0.8072272,0.05880273,0.0003908516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6657328,0.00000370264,0.0006185206,0.007024673,0.0002434703,0.000273629,0.000003173995,0.00009257864,0.3260074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978617,0.000001911256,0.0002762254,0.001298621,0.0002712807,0.00002945307,0.00003247972,0.000009850633,0.0002184442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3321289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4583976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144474058","doi":"10.1111/padm.12027","title":"STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PHARMACEUTICAL REGULATION: CONNECTING TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND LAY KNOWLEDGE IN RISK MONITORING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Technocracy; Stakeholder; Democracy; Process (computing); Ideal (ethics); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5825368299380186,"gpt":0.5522875246403636,"spread":0.03024930529765502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001967284,0.0002286713,0.0002483453,0.0002033378,0.0002978478,0.0001056443,0.00015704,0.0005681809,0.002072892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004756533,0.000238699,0.00003467548,0.0004121563,0.0001446229,0.0005971025,0.00009838946,0.002316097,0.00006923409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002689199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001703867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003435053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001514214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969078,0.001185146,0.0006640141,0.0004560998,0.0001602347,0.0006267113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984507,0.0006645432,0.0001288365,0.0001553564,0.0001044302,0.0004961396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002803968,0.001618084,0.6734661,0.0001908244,0.0000503419,0.00006371045,0.002459804,0.00009487011,0.02217555,0.008953526,0.0007744181,0.2898723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008071146,0.0004708631,0.7583196,0.0001526613,0.00009935343,0.0001104646,0.00462789,0.0428451,0.04545802,0.002004727,0.1366751,0.001165084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843644,0.0006564558,0.0001562787,0.008223712,0.0005616496,0.0009078756,0.00001116514,0.0001134389,0.005004972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998168,0.000276823,0.0003372035,0.0003252291,0.0003886139,0.0003521842,0.00002269369,0.00002028226,0.0001090056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2887072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086548991","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01854.x","title":"LIFE AND DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION: THE CASE OF COLLECTIVE WHEAT MARKETING IN AUSTRALIA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Demise; Politics; Institutional change; Reproduction; Institutionalism; New institutionalism; Sociology; Historical institutionalism; Positive economics; Political economy; Political science; Social science; Economics; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04593249519228391,"gpt":0.3464601884750435,"spread":0.3005276932827595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001020925,0.00003436784,0.00005595874,0.00004002914,0.000218813,0.00004944364,0.00005953668,0.00004954773,0.0001253123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009157252,0.00002648574,0.000009712438,0.0002162097,0.0001612539,0.0003026944,0.000009999343,0.00007608858,6.436e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001783749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006396039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003645015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1155085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994613,0.0001407473,0.0001443589,0.0000776008,0.00009089252,0.00008511091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995818,0.00008346636,0.00008017573,0.0000751665,0.0001018919,0.00007747785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001939123,0.0001106118,0.03903183,0.000004187193,0.000005766033,0.000008786586,0.003142131,4.362798e-7,0.0004318938,0.9552498,0.00003995113,0.001955246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005825768,0.0001989865,0.9672939,0.00001127238,0.00001593592,0.00002813216,0.01615644,0.0002152126,0.0007150842,0.00465729,0.009995153,0.0001299967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988993,0.000003242872,0.00002037296,0.002312613,0.00009322627,0.0001594041,0.00001131114,0.000004894859,0.008401884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995135,0.000003497403,0.0001742421,0.00003877127,0.00005398913,0.000008322234,0.000003523653,0.000001355652,0.0002027868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9006312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205922673","doi":"10.1111/padm.12793","title":"What has become of the audit explosion? Analyzing trends in oversight activities in the Canadian government","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Accountability; Performance audit; Internal audit; Government (linguistics); Business; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Institution; Exploratory research; Joint audit; Public administration; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09572233357555879,"gpt":0.3651327426155417,"spread":0.2694104090399829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509406,0.00008033389,0.0001104124,0.0001592865,0.0006156227,0.001033973,0.0004106934,0.00009665004,0.0006934955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006081011,0.00006038897,0.00006656662,0.001506654,0.0002755256,0.001331471,0.00003623826,0.0002302642,0.000001592114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005903879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004616432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02655973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.964053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997623,0.0006511427,0.000260118,0.0001817524,0.0009142518,0.0003697919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992113,0.0002397231,0.0001098029,0.0002480202,0.00005930264,0.0001318123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002912767,0.0005904833,0.08188726,0.00002427773,0.00003890044,0.00006629479,0.04961154,0.00001328559,0.0003587872,0.8414226,0.006851929,0.01910553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000648584,0.000103946,0.2937357,0.00007207829,0.00001271595,0.00000869639,0.1412366,0.0001989254,0.002618252,0.003476857,0.5575733,0.0003143988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5039871,0.00005478978,0.000006230333,0.4160177,0.0002926364,0.0001847689,0.00004196729,0.000008584001,0.07940619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971411,0.00005237567,0.00001123592,0.0005125342,0.0001012403,0.0000366346,0.000027956,0.00000368779,0.002113278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789063311","doi":"10.1111/padm.12401","title":"A study of the operationalization of management controls in United Kingdom Private Finance Initiative contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Operationalization; Incentive; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Business; Management control system; Finance; Private sector; Public administration; Accounting; Public relations; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Management; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08145269741602383,"gpt":0.3078247887812682,"spread":0.2263720913652443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005977422,0.0001383531,0.0001942194,0.0004578333,0.0001118949,0.0001749764,0.0003408337,0.00005439633,0.00004970812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005605395,0.000113604,0.00003114863,0.001872116,0.000113142,0.001473069,0.0001345267,0.00008285805,0.000008766032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004278946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008760525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007806324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009726044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985164,0.00007637981,0.0005666714,0.0002365089,0.0004068948,0.0001971841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983582,0.00005769226,0.0006680263,0.000300289,0.0006078774,0.000007894851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001465464,0.001159276,0.1509444,0.00008323466,0.00005907811,0.000003479905,0.0003797465,0.00008052701,0.0003737872,0.8462357,0.0001454165,0.0003888659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006391542,0.0003438077,0.9469794,0.0001715514,0.00009114383,0.00000185895,0.002218045,0.01289003,0.002296289,0.00470733,0.02352539,0.0003835878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847701,0.000002670469,0.0006415815,0.001708292,0.0001533245,0.001405668,0.000003671119,0.00002794597,0.01128679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989391,9.092958e-7,0.00009113923,0.0005756631,0.0001612484,0.0001158531,0.00007149536,0.00001277302,0.00003180132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4632637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591549822","doi":"10.1111/padm.12303","title":"Partisan advisers and political policy failure avoidance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Elite; Work (physics); Public administration; Control (management); Political science; Public relations; Economics; Management; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03912756663661974,"gpt":0.3782934069858279,"spread":0.3391658403492081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003929492,0.00007392484,0.00008372844,0.00005065765,0.001691601,0.0007610093,0.0002132333,0.00008857188,0.0001055987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001343831,0.00007751724,0.00002819425,0.00005940225,0.0005135951,0.0007497438,0.00001888401,0.0001290681,0.00001906074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005277791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006727833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001698417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006438611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998953,0.0001079116,0.0001154644,0.0001709956,0.0002070606,0.0004455554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992893,0.00005323919,0.00005036575,0.0001933682,0.00004593216,0.000367755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000386018,0.0000153258,0.02665258,0.000004523114,0.000004164272,0.000001777834,0.001332183,3.390578e-8,0.00003895609,0.9657084,0.0001933549,0.006044851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005073668,0.0001239814,0.3458768,0.00001515182,0.00001496279,0.000008955009,0.004787466,0.00006548018,0.0002541088,0.02268666,0.6253417,0.0003173634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3142188,0.00001502414,0.0007265218,0.3774301,0.0001061521,0.0001642023,0.00001108392,0.0001125672,0.3072155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977658,0.0000140452,0.0001338668,0.0004393308,0.000760139,0.00001238888,0.000005622499,0.000006403542,0.0008623351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400058320","doi":"10.1111/padm.13013","title":"Influences on e‐governance in Africa: A study of economic, political, and infrastructural dynamics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ural Federal University","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Dynamics (music); Economic system; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Political economy; Sociology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02980596493048344,"gpt":0.3237422782832691,"spread":0.2939363133527856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003784999,0.00007470357,0.0001021284,0.00006480051,0.00008223679,0.0003186697,0.0001413787,0.00005708534,0.0001604018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006132,0.00006974637,0.00001547124,0.0001941024,0.0001467936,0.0006863148,0.00002592557,0.00008730458,0.000004509187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002294334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003220214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00188168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04897841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999025,0.00007677681,0.0002181789,0.0001901406,0.0002717391,0.0002181301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995692,0.000182303,0.00006583516,0.00008053979,0.00002114834,0.00008092521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009256187,0.0000592672,0.0923259,0.00001264057,0.000008548797,0.000001916448,0.00344106,0.000001164751,0.000001190706,0.90213,0.00004215334,0.001966867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008981306,0.001672374,0.7250425,0.00008107231,0.00003263896,0.000003283835,0.1921188,0.007749379,0.00003781841,0.04828473,0.02357635,0.0005028639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.935891,0.00004332328,0.000002158415,0.008773848,0.0001819216,0.0001750096,0.00001770787,0.00002889064,0.05488613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.00001683223,0.00001926373,0.00004365898,0.0001007227,0.00001562102,0.000005385145,0.000004131497,0.0001950391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8538453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9683753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592078335","doi":"10.1111/padm.12322","title":"Combating terrorism by constraining charities? Charity and counter‐terrorism legislation before and after 9/11","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Terrorism; Legislature; Democracy; Normative; Political science; Law; Intersection (aeronautics); Public administration; Politics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.029208191433742,"gpt":0.32624109330636,"spread":0.297032901872618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059933,0.0002460039,0.0002636934,0.0000742039,0.001852633,0.00156671,0.0003068655,0.0002796476,0.0001497773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005227533,0.0002579766,0.00004755125,0.00005388823,0.00129297,0.002271048,0.00009683566,0.000273142,0.000006342228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008349503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009719314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006620442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978648,0.0001551934,0.0004173931,0.0004864742,0.0004741414,0.0006019293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986563,0.0001032997,0.0003589724,0.0003467177,0.0001550484,0.0003796775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006689774,0.000206095,0.6922591,0.0001289968,0.00005638509,0.00003941591,0.184009,1.694655e-8,0.0001531894,0.04576465,0.0009858598,0.07633047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002226112,0.0008375056,0.6571272,0.0004114406,0.0001275185,0.00007964231,0.2567059,0.002174601,0.0001418802,0.01005186,0.06849793,0.001618353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683843,0.00008959285,0.001292684,0.0245088,0.0006442063,0.0003518849,0.000118724,0.0001083299,0.004501487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981794,0.00007303733,0.00006991229,0.0005458847,0.0005533456,0.00007160228,0.00006006928,0.00001776492,0.0004289728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07471211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011543177","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00459.x","title":"Proving the Potential of Independent Commissions: A Critical Review of the Richard Commission on the Powers and Electoral Arrangements of the National Assembly for Wales","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Llywodraeth Cymru; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Commission; Insider; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Politics; Law; Administration (probate law); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.123699470397102,"gpt":0.418915967783011,"spread":0.2952164973859089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002297907,0.0001421724,0.0004181517,0.00002044273,0.0004904453,0.00005863362,0.0006330248,0.0001304264,0.00004235169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005729569,0.00005765046,0.0003020878,0.0002377787,0.0004139275,0.0001000921,0.0000817753,0.0002228435,4.419407e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001148538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001288852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001491824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002563553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969766,0.0009020038,0.0006494066,0.0001609638,0.001113923,0.0001970736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997664,0.0009808894,0.0007227699,0.0002274473,0.0003435159,0.00006137745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001236591,0.0002809517,0.00006001087,0.0139448,0.00009552882,1.074933e-7,0.0002100962,1.217316e-7,0.00001037766,0.8834567,0.008883436,0.0930455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000662323,0.00005404827,0.0003897329,0.0121089,0.0001362577,0.000002230217,0.00008773334,0.00001157116,0.000007346538,0.0005401565,0.9865239,0.00007192122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001578475,0.9227055,0.000115896,0.06487731,0.0004794203,0.004318547,0.0004057367,0.000009906251,0.006929855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3568488,0.6411678,0.00003334636,0.0005269013,0.0004311092,0.0002802931,0.00001669783,0.0000171202,0.0006779153],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6859244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036747559","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00435.x","title":"Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Control (management); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Business; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04344142266758387,"gpt":0.3153778832916118,"spread":0.2719364606240279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000369541,0.00005074721,0.00007262887,0.00004372989,0.0003526036,0.0001423857,0.0001200557,0.00005333505,0.0001074032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007385782,0.00003928169,0.00001903668,0.0001407903,0.000116607,0.0005820562,0.000007748423,0.00004318117,0.000001272713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005008319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007883891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3011676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7350246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.00005291473,0.0002197574,0.00006209874,0.0002605453,0.0001121931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990016,0.0004422425,0.0001777701,0.00009731409,0.0002085736,0.00007255261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000567395,0.00002819597,0.0009015637,0.000007150218,0.00002361134,8.416494e-8,0.001688388,0.00007852995,0.00009067373,0.9527109,0.02580074,0.0186134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008756047,0.00003373533,0.01088631,0.000007467021,0.00001748431,2.920802e-7,0.002905536,0.013544,0.0001230339,0.001116655,0.9704071,0.00008282501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1913113,0.0001262215,0.1440691,0.6465608,0.0009229893,0.001544551,0.0005085783,0.00009360955,0.0148628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976318,0.000008589622,0.001225149,0.0006952665,0.0002416182,0.00003231765,0.000113494,0.000002093564,0.00004963103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.703486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192810220","doi":"10.1111/padm.12777","title":"Usability of transparency portals: Examination of perceptions of journalists as information seekers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Credibility; Usability; Democracy; Perception; Politics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Corporate governance; Business; Open data; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02837010437137608,"gpt":0.3231353179263385,"spread":0.2947652135549624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001353915,0.00006379705,0.0001497583,0.00008376274,0.0001088076,0.00005816328,0.0001511929,0.000099782,0.002200484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006877747,0.00006902982,0.00007778817,0.0005222977,0.0002184903,0.001969933,0.00001059829,0.0000602224,0.000002931852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006251241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009034565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003881249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002869614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981831,0.0002321426,0.0006410879,0.00009213488,0.0007339529,0.0001176207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982908,0.0001092534,0.0005768648,0.0001469693,0.0008002001,0.00007593197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004896725,0.0009638501,0.2788504,0.0005155085,0.00009437876,0.000001069742,0.06887259,0.00001116555,0.005894738,0.6025086,0.0001894097,0.0420493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005272964,0.0002754414,0.8270705,0.00005365156,0.00006499593,0.000004259852,0.1494259,0.00014622,0.01129497,0.002578525,0.008363324,0.0001949302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229562,0.00002288708,0.0007557582,0.003476435,0.0001119884,0.0001311813,0.00004778641,0.00001348652,0.07248425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992506,0.00008588615,0.0002681192,0.00003042903,0.00003978137,0.000006569188,0.0001788182,0.000002402503,0.0001373997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5999301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095834832","doi":"10.1111/padm.12704","title":"A micro‐process model of institutional complexity in public hybrid organizations: Construal of identity threats and mitigation strategies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Hybridity; Public relations; Identity (music); Process (computing); Sociology; Organizational identity; Construal level theory; Work (physics); Resistance (ecology); Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Institutional theory; Business; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Organizational commitment; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07139996580677298,"gpt":0.2738957080663798,"spread":0.2024957422596068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001687074,0.0001182764,0.0001845043,0.0001785993,0.0001437598,0.0002632887,0.0001450202,0.00003476824,0.00014015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003257312,0.0001264401,0.00001935309,0.0009583224,0.000274084,0.003685158,0.0001065908,0.00005890528,0.000004391752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001707524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002297519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002305012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003432382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989528,0.000009675873,0.0004132919,0.0002105176,0.000292295,0.0001214392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989665,0.00001797387,0.0003037898,0.00006769078,0.0006261838,0.00001782145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151659,0.0001051383,0.1186948,0.0003745319,0.00002295407,7.706965e-7,0.0001046346,0.0002292631,0.0004956329,0.8795713,0.00006416222,0.0003216223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002950007,0.0000935012,0.2602497,0.0001012597,0.0001428352,0.000006299687,0.005456671,0.2330054,0.002769421,0.4939478,0.0004782486,0.0007988836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295338,0.0001029781,0.05542611,0.008420545,0.00004521227,0.0003098281,0.00003633567,0.0000576993,0.006067534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.00002843365,0.0007802914,0.0002940002,0.00009241705,0.000008588567,0.0003938467,0.00000841843,0.000005552207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3856235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5156078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980773956","doi":"10.1111/padm.12627","title":"Network relationships and standard adoption: Diffusion effects in transnational regulatory networks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Agency (philosophy); Business; Socialization; Memorandum of understanding; Industrial organization; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02223530069582409,"gpt":0.2294417785001114,"spread":0.2072064778042872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004342484,0.0001257651,0.0001366417,0.0001178156,0.0001483776,0.0003858684,0.00007506388,0.0001193642,0.0001153559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000486736,0.0001240948,0.00002615456,0.0003909031,0.00005960466,0.001863187,0.00002503544,0.0001965888,0.00002521493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000301546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006787943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005596885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001266201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989979,0.00002784854,0.0002599718,0.0002289822,0.0002230366,0.0002622714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999546,0.00009762206,0.0001100231,0.0001254694,0.00009670636,0.00002420566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003723208,0.00002098086,0.1623344,0.00004599879,0.000002990253,0.000002398604,0.000004716155,0.0003632545,0.00001587463,0.8362745,0.0001296852,0.0007680296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006147869,0.0000438339,0.8305936,0.00003732067,0.0000153178,0.00000301332,0.00009511582,0.01721384,0.000002809616,0.1457791,0.005393974,0.0002073309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741107,0.00007350148,0.003690917,0.006624754,0.0002957358,0.0003864963,0.000001343199,0.00009239666,0.01472417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983798,0.000002804532,0.0001391942,0.0007063915,0.0005279387,0.00002968945,0.0001191073,0.00001063013,0.00008448347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6904954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5060439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116123437","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01973.x","title":"A VERY PUBLIC SEARCH FOR PUBLIC VALUE: ‘RHETORICAL SECRETARIES' IN WESTMINSTER JURISDICTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Bureaucracy; Public administration; Accountability; Public value; Value (mathematics); Political science; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2370644455723442,"gpt":0.4044974523039545,"spread":0.1674330067316104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003952182,0.0002544431,0.0002958465,0.0008047092,0.001312207,0.001290878,0.0007835031,0.0004218866,0.0017192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002420224,0.000271165,0.0001758713,0.00187596,0.0007080716,0.003068933,0.0000960961,0.000508008,0.00009565601],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004981594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008012068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008379153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953172,0.0007363727,0.0007157233,0.0006379056,0.001102152,0.001490664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972668,0.0004824776,0.0001606146,0.0004514786,0.0006431655,0.000995492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005539681,0.0006910356,0.01127958,0.00002007852,0.00003187256,0.000008447161,0.004349222,1.560471e-7,0.00002775903,0.976194,0.001681012,0.005661466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303666,0.0007354774,0.02349874,0.00001257904,0.00001605682,0.00001685087,0.005278741,0.0008504756,0.0002207829,0.01141541,0.9560695,0.0005817343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1905039,0.00008264289,0.01940595,0.2187877,0.001301592,0.002965312,0.0002148298,0.0006365809,0.5661015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937274,0.00004873882,0.001092544,0.0005782544,0.0007205963,0.0006054972,0.0002356931,0.00003039732,0.002960874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207280407","doi":"10.1111/padm.12791","title":"Why create government corporations? An examination of the determinants of corporatization in the Canadian public sector","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatization; Public sector; Popularity; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Public management; Ideology; New public management; State (computer science); Outsourcing; Public relations; Politics; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Economy; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1115814883883347,"gpt":0.3565432835749618,"spread":0.2449617951866271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002752315,0.0001031098,0.0001430998,0.0001248062,0.0007085138,0.0004380498,0.0005102036,0.000144391,0.0003112845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002421402,0.00008080027,0.00005299324,0.001568551,0.0003836653,0.001095706,0.0000263842,0.0001544764,0.000001608072],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003143629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007426701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9425572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961785,0.001515885,0.0005112446,0.000221369,0.001255378,0.0003176098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981347,0.0001939533,0.0004346921,0.0003945691,0.0006505721,0.0001914997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039152,0.0005721567,0.1187073,0.00003270746,0.00001293884,0.000009114541,0.005523766,0.000004598252,0.0004795535,0.8654771,0.0008403861,0.008330009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007325474,0.0003552217,0.8770983,0.00004164105,0.00002503381,0.0000216313,0.02084847,0.002717616,0.008984004,0.005905487,0.0829199,0.0003501598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050161,0.00001359557,0.0002135361,0.05266729,0.0001728236,0.0006684223,0.0001469787,0.00001535613,0.04108594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986447,0.00001195061,0.00007978988,0.0005879961,0.0000932918,0.00006115612,0.0001300379,0.000007005969,0.0003840485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9317555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138597664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02002.x","title":"GOVERNING INFORMATION: A THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Value (mathematics); Political science; Positive economics; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Law; Management; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01525960342613311,"gpt":0.2750058883449407,"spread":0.2597462849188076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003353136,0.000125888,0.0001698061,0.00006840363,0.0001416716,0.00004030899,0.0001211901,0.00006695381,0.01168867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001643144,0.0001200179,0.0001140049,0.0003500809,0.0001341402,0.002232376,0.0001293765,0.00009079013,0.0002192466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003723002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002160557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006563887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998555,0.00004406646,0.0003394472,0.000113323,0.0006707291,0.0002774431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993488,0.00003636571,0.0002539472,0.0001679975,0.000002681491,0.0001901598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006740684,0.0003255308,0.9917766,0.000002031896,0.0001554678,2.33217e-7,0.000181551,0.0001033609,0.001349612,0.0006369432,0.0001159419,0.005345929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155277,0.00007251051,0.9922833,8.937313e-7,0.0001627778,0.000001779891,0.000181794,0.002134967,0.0001539454,0.00003403179,0.004692629,0.0001260511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798902,0.000008014485,0.002912382,0.0002784366,0.0001005514,0.0001483092,0.0001059866,0.00001860298,0.01653752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976732,0.00000314519,0.001574926,0.0001609716,0.00003407154,0.00001910426,0.0004564107,0.000005406268,0.00007283296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01778293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327557202","doi":"10.1111/padm.12923","title":"A comparative study of governance changes on the perceptions of accountability in Fire and Rescue Services in England","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Perception; Public administration; Service (business); Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing; Psychology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05816901732751636,"gpt":0.3577885098254921,"spread":0.2996194924979758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006588756,0.00003725037,0.00008237846,0.00003909353,0.00007358862,0.00003512996,0.0001204701,0.00002006422,0.00002655324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005162071,0.00002732848,0.000006264599,0.0004979066,0.0001147411,0.0001420158,0.00002785489,0.00004166437,0.000001156422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001730565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003430855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00239926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5564952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993157,0.0001674447,0.0001209383,0.0001075833,0.0002059111,0.00008236403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996954,0.0001216448,0.00005474861,0.00008458064,0.00003022546,0.00001345482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000590071,0.0006465451,0.6171123,0.00004934864,0.00000663537,8.464798e-7,0.3641151,0.0000211903,0.00004982818,0.01362457,0.00001969094,0.004294897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001402503,0.0001177169,0.7766109,0.00001350644,0.000001333968,1.370498e-8,0.2223904,0.000332829,0.000005538256,0.000127872,0.0002377031,0.00002188297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925863,0.000005946701,2.603376e-7,0.003495968,0.00002345351,0.0003775102,0.000005425072,0.000007149792,0.003498023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999778,0.00003858075,0.000001456869,0.0000127767,0.00001353084,0.0000376255,0.000002927987,9.791092e-7,0.000114154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5540959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4515976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387397682","doi":"10.1111/padm.12964","title":"Does increasing auditors' independence lead to more forceful public auditing? A study of a Canadian internal audit reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Audit; Accountability; Accounting; Auditor independence; Independence (probability theory); Internal audit; Business; Joint audit; Chief audit executive; Legislature; External auditor; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01946312852177811,"gpt":0.2509506810582495,"spread":0.2314875525364714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001749284,0.0003382153,0.0003469143,0.002352366,0.0004956808,0.001089362,0.0008496045,0.0001284528,0.0003701509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279006,0.0002871341,0.0000862043,0.00393211,0.00007241635,0.002918591,0.000498369,0.0003626903,0.0004147304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004716378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004004161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1221944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.453803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965195,0.00004434715,0.0007413947,0.0006972363,0.001138814,0.0008586766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928405,0.00007699864,0.005840096,0.000522046,0.0005892001,0.000131202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002160565,0.0007966141,0.7678826,0.0006494542,0.000368763,0.0003493122,0.003079827,0.0001145217,0.0006543947,0.04205909,0.03117242,0.1526569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001227996,0.0002853437,0.5353258,0.0001971625,0.00008534784,0.00001074683,0.02234582,0.002784643,0.0001151288,0.0006081418,0.4360976,0.0009162605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597306,0.000002167114,0.003774223,0.01687787,0.001042202,0.000905059,0.0000189408,0.0003864304,0.01726252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951119,0.000003238902,0.0001128092,0.0008633634,0.002013456,0.0001670096,0.0001265516,0.00006088388,0.001540813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4049252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}