{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":84,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":30,"predictions_cover":84,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"be4a03ae57b2","filters":{"venue":"Public Understanding of Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W2156568070","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306","title":"Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ignorance; Functional illiteracy; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Climate change; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Public awareness of science; Scientific literacy; Social science; Science communication; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Science education; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5924144285400437,"gpt":0.4405157376015892,"spread":0.1518986909384545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003516349,0.00007520037,0.0001042489,0.0000729637,0.003639509,0.0003493468,0.0008230351,0.00003997919,0.000267804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002327493,0.0000446128,0.00003779376,0.001263311,0.00893705,0.0006874106,0.0001200192,0.0001185605,0.00001937875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006914712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003657693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002095249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986879,0.0002155366,0.0001446346,0.0001812535,0.000425655,0.0003449896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992504,0.0001581668,0.00008672947,0.0003173847,0.00009624692,0.00009105929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007818073,0.00004812178,0.0009677237,0.00001480008,0.0000053769,1.223675e-7,0.2381136,0.000001010947,0.00005119534,0.7350789,0.0002522082,0.0253887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003664299,0.0001441457,0.005179061,0.0001638461,0.00005910977,0.000003848286,0.5190759,0.003021037,0.00002079267,0.03160298,0.4365343,0.0005306895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2234253,0.005809478,0.0002848542,0.1062683,0.001042022,0.001119634,0.00002140276,0.0001587727,0.6618702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700394,0.02931867,0.00003537971,0.0002061963,0.0000978224,0.00002085649,0.00000177447,0.000003930469,0.0002760279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.746614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133826347","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302","title":"Scientific literacy as collective praxis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Praxis; Situated; Literacy; Ethnography; Sociology; Collective intelligence; Event (particle physics); Information literacy; Epistemology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2115868698010102,"gpt":0.4075914366067257,"spread":0.1960045668057155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007018163,0.0001272424,0.000178162,0.001240591,0.001785183,0.0005567946,0.0006474876,0.00005650591,0.002662914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002344368,0.0001166435,0.00005040298,0.005997199,0.005292149,0.0007982264,0.00009821081,0.0003409054,0.0001574032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006469669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002496059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003939011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001146954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974743,0.0003767883,0.0002779561,0.0005995837,0.0006749877,0.0005964165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983568,0.0004040597,0.0002302346,0.000436345,0.0004404478,0.0001321685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872452,0.0003177129,0.01069493,0.00001322321,0.00003609031,0.00000773378,0.127048,0.000004310476,0.007943942,0.833039,0.00830814,0.01256823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006626113,0.003648898,0.1152756,0.0005305125,0.00009827672,0.0005247388,0.1586003,0.01413628,0.008836438,0.4179403,0.2705242,0.003258275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3558727,0.0001302792,0.07429568,0.001782305,0.002121652,0.0001773887,0.000003578205,0.0001305352,0.5654859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689319,6.982306e-7,0.004151245,0.0001059482,0.00004070651,0.000007599306,8.177787e-7,0.00001115363,0.02674992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6130592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2089501922","doi":"10.1177/0963662510384461","title":"Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Newspaper; Public opinion; Political science; Scientific publishing; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5880613633378229,"gpt":0.4714212013915512,"spread":0.1166401619462717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02393834,0.0001161917,0.00021641,0.0005909778,0.004543836,0.002190525,0.003150151,0.0001489298,0.0001513585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01090549,0.0001174375,0.00002862774,0.004663763,0.03387401,0.008681203,0.0009104891,0.0005417857,0.000001979384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004369404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001813661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006822334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04973115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965827,0.0002528199,0.0004585473,0.0003711032,0.001625712,0.0007090934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996187,0.0004851818,0.0004896327,0.0007940534,0.001660549,0.0003836359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008453426,0.00008170586,0.2208374,0.00002828919,0.000004355897,7.950872e-8,0.08147538,4.286748e-7,0.006424665,0.6868927,0.000120138,0.004126458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009319595,0.000118219,0.3167082,0.0001779187,0.00001340786,0.000009770049,0.6331336,0.00124672,0.0005157638,0.02772743,0.01871856,0.0006983869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676279,0.000198001,0.0004754704,0.01473757,0.0003321641,0.0002156681,0.00005249087,0.00006378094,0.01629699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971629,0.002216073,0.000456293,0.00007483323,0.00002362248,0.000005861642,0.00001372631,0.000007280381,0.00003944189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1904970715","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303","title":"What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Theme (computing); Scientific literature; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5649196279989956,"gpt":0.4116867703268896,"spread":0.153232857672106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005988,0.00008163686,0.000104291,0.000209917,0.00251926,0.001168516,0.0003528367,0.00009825399,0.0004394138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001725498,0.00006916844,0.00002394997,0.00100301,0.01073628,0.001910117,0.0001229042,0.0001149637,0.000003943673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001654514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002258671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001574013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984517,0.0000502151,0.00009935706,0.0003557539,0.0007529204,0.0002900331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.00005148037,0.00005981044,0.0002211905,0.0001758327,0.0001704268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000257548,0.0002203859,0.002184432,0.00004797844,0.00001502744,8.649575e-7,0.5011857,0.000009369107,0.03715686,0.3845105,0.01005367,0.06458952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008255707,0.00008778596,0.0009095988,0.0002971523,0.0000237118,0.00001438105,0.736725,0.05163463,0.0006632273,0.04941003,0.1587781,0.0006308495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315499,0.001739076,0.001701412,0.2348973,0.0003113081,0.0004259979,0.0000272265,0.0001411794,0.02920659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868595,0.008731129,0.001159491,0.0004793019,0.00001129345,0.000003604523,0.000001829623,0.000002889634,0.00275094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3351004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133789319","doi":"10.1177/0963662512472160","title":"From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Publics; Deliberation; Corporate governance; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Political science; Public awareness of science; Public participation; Sociology; Science communication; Business; Science education; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5857273778470713,"gpt":0.4660049300630402,"spread":0.1197224477840311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004358701,0.00009173347,0.0001353676,0.000405452,0.002613903,0.0007736894,0.001027392,0.00004404778,0.0001539752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003838922,0.00009087645,0.0000213198,0.003350011,0.009885617,0.001844404,0.0003734712,0.00009830022,0.00001200604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003711909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002605522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977015,0.0001118973,0.0002093075,0.0003783395,0.001056051,0.0005429047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983784,0.0002125734,0.0001479814,0.0003751914,0.0003635667,0.0005222803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004020688,0.00003057248,0.0104489,0.000003590718,0.000001758257,5.122061e-8,0.07509003,0.00000351371,0.004139118,0.9021628,0.0001809943,0.007934679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001231176,0.0003289133,0.2686425,0.0002346073,0.0000262355,0.000002203076,0.3525566,0.01113675,0.00197923,0.186973,0.1756438,0.001245003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8356393,0.00003412198,0.005827149,0.03582085,0.0003206998,0.000208474,0.00001875657,0.00007155728,0.1220591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976572,0.0003007292,0.0009392638,0.0008366627,0.0001487632,0.00000849699,0.000001420457,0.000005284779,0.0001021511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7151898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2070091809","doi":"10.1177/09636625030122001","title":"University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Northwestern Polytechnic; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Reading (process); Psychology; Scientific literacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Science education; Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2309674058448551,"gpt":0.4044384480982892,"spread":0.173471042253434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009066671,0.00006781203,0.0001408407,0.0009122659,0.001092477,0.0001355764,0.0004727893,0.00003604262,0.00001954535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01019517,0.00006802041,0.00001611158,0.004088553,0.007822215,0.001510453,0.0001406558,0.00008242161,5.137376e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005660065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001886227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006382233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.0001367304,0.0002715386,0.0003562141,0.0008989369,0.0002943508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978894,0.0006000356,0.0002834436,0.0001494124,0.0007798393,0.000297854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005235009,0.00005923789,0.08774001,0.00001688752,0.000002402511,3.558031e-7,0.1097467,0.000002430924,0.003859514,0.7982079,0.00002950607,0.0003298128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002391346,0.0000981583,0.1777264,0.0001656073,0.00001611474,0.000009241302,0.8069147,0.0002666053,0.002141047,0.01168904,0.0005326406,0.0002013841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980868,0.00004231146,0.002670063,0.0005601494,0.0004621564,0.0001575284,0.000001632156,0.00001093858,0.01522726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993531,0.00002368107,0.0004188268,0.00001019319,0.000008025788,5.39343e-7,2.171656e-7,0.000002073418,0.0001834064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093329438","doi":"10.1177/0963662520963365","title":"Knowledge, (mis-)conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Disease; Middle East respiratory syndrome; Outbreak; Risk perception; Social distance; Perception; Hygiene; Environmental health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Psychology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Virology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4714173073633237,"gpt":0.4917286856753585,"spread":0.02031137831203483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004152096,0.0002530882,0.001275989,0.0006200557,0.001438856,0.0001531265,0.0006269767,0.0001255212,0.00007338101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004228451,0.0002144268,0.000191239,0.002647911,0.004546028,0.001706386,0.0002156725,0.0002657144,0.000005973247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001015531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000580943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001052632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996995,0.0002906145,0.0009907598,0.0003942048,0.0008700474,0.0004593815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973568,0.0002787257,0.001320932,0.0002434949,0.0004538701,0.000346165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001203517,0.00006309891,0.0001157188,0.2515087,0.00006077644,8.928352e-7,0.1113151,2.017525e-8,0.000001837516,0.008040089,0.000291913,0.6286007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028159,0.00008048017,0.0001269078,0.7495859,0.0008594323,0.00001705333,0.1402459,0.0000063944,8.258176e-7,0.0001958293,0.1079637,0.000636031],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000721797,0.9943411,0.0001089848,0.000210023,0.0002821877,0.001870083,0.00003287329,0.00005249114,0.003030083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001808045,0.9977086,0.0001720834,0.00004634219,0.000123238,0.00006533629,0.000004331262,0.00001209926,0.00005988487],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6279647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129601625","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306","title":"Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: a comparative study of four Anglo-American nations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sociology of scientific knowledge; General Social Survey; Public opinion; Political science; Variation (astronomy); Scientific evidence; Social science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1476767092510554,"gpt":0.347158489290871,"spread":0.1994817800398156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042386,0.0001176291,0.0002185647,0.0005885662,0.0008943324,0.0001766794,0.0006509447,0.00001536457,0.000525626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000158547,0.0001027762,0.0000202485,0.005547757,0.02510381,0.001083158,0.0002710477,0.00009311804,0.000006140722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001093398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003128346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000367442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007578136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976959,0.00007567117,0.0003064823,0.0006139143,0.0009186908,0.000389347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992622,0.0001090863,0.0001257601,0.000272312,0.00004059472,0.0001900423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005158689,0.0009690726,0.9447901,0.00001065717,0.000002515346,2.518786e-7,0.04977401,0.0000558764,0.001417357,0.002187076,0.00001024925,0.0007776406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002264481,0.0001409779,0.8923202,0.000006720805,0.000003274571,0.000001363028,0.1050315,0.0009011293,0.0001587623,0.0010825,0.00002546194,0.0001016658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851303,0.00002108906,0.00009135297,0.0001640935,0.00006822388,0.0003581224,0.000002458644,0.0000108567,0.01415352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999516,0.000008005601,0.0003092776,0.000008334076,0.000002815299,0.00001365411,3.359207e-7,0.00000286409,0.000138739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05525754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2103628484","doi":"10.1177/0963662506059259","title":"When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Alzheimer's disease research and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Perspective (graphical); Disease; Reflexivity; Population; Family aggregation; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Biology; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Pathology; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1266542245590007,"gpt":0.3536581988586312,"spread":0.2270039742996305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001890025,0.00009606023,0.0001633631,0.0004841328,0.0002232393,0.00009254073,0.0002919625,0.00002888509,0.00002735094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002982532,0.00006536768,0.00004792162,0.001471405,0.001670102,0.0004186817,0.00007152446,0.0001446533,0.000003409325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001370678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008471968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003076278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001285845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997999,0.00006075656,0.000217389,0.0003568374,0.0008628644,0.0005031659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992588,0.0001579098,0.00006071267,0.0002703122,0.0001403598,0.0001118795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006120521,0.0009749087,0.9257742,0.00003701624,0.00008830881,0.0000806553,0.00504125,0.000009575811,0.002353491,0.06496156,0.0002938996,0.0003239198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002062215,0.0002491381,0.7676734,0.0001242755,0.00004020107,0.00001717717,0.1294301,0.000977206,0.0005264886,0.09870888,0.00004613684,0.0001446866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602002,0.001390345,0.0003209519,0.01006779,0.00003397952,0.000486978,0.000005883015,0.00001807254,0.02747584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994532,0.00002465465,0.000381463,0.0000839718,0.00002506695,0.00001107281,0.000002695088,0.000004922889,0.00001298246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1581008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6153559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2119874225","doi":"10.1177/0963662511420511","title":"Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Structural equation modeling; Public trust; Set (abstract data type); Science communication; Psychology; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Science education; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7019911411933458,"gpt":0.4628115520615452,"spread":0.2391795891318006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272243,0.00004355946,0.00008026498,0.0007972172,0.001099263,0.00007301679,0.0005990915,0.00003677166,0.00004285995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002888995,0.00003185093,0.000005236334,0.004536339,0.01344904,0.0005261787,0.0002601246,0.00007904176,0.000001114042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000278119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005956439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004162473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009441793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990988,0.00004891946,0.0001493307,0.0001725205,0.0003159959,0.0002144265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991776,0.0002363107,0.00007502791,0.000196896,0.0002258617,0.00008835459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004806999,0.00002969803,0.3352078,0.000008696731,5.0775e-7,7.402839e-8,0.07915509,5.643323e-8,0.001048552,0.5826738,0.00001003971,0.001860913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000216378,0.0001098495,0.79701,0.00009868058,0.000004059324,0.000003572076,0.1725571,0.0001268408,0.0002195493,0.02875755,0.0007755435,0.0001208658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573385,0.0001004616,0.0002257856,0.006460123,0.00007099441,0.0001991333,0.000001409535,0.00001902804,0.03558453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991652,0.0002753163,0.0004651798,0.00002340254,0.000005114773,0.000005330922,8.662327e-8,0.000001820217,0.00005849428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5539162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796216221","doi":"10.1177/0963662518761733","title":"Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Open science; Social media; Science communication; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Citizen science; Ask price; World Wide Web; Altmetrics; Online community; Public engagement; Data science; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Science education; Publishing; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.50896915729909,"gpt":0.496626232536117,"spread":0.01234292476297294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002881206,0.00009728035,0.000231788,0.0007436593,0.0005672697,0.0004536173,0.001341408,0.000009673142,0.0001286192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003649474,0.00007493598,0.0000300079,0.002437967,0.001170432,0.0008551654,0.001680405,0.0001352011,3.589174e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001150339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001372697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005020816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001261922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978277,0.0001657172,0.0003713213,0.0003587165,0.0009465833,0.0003299293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984764,0.0001961748,0.0002840087,0.0004961622,0.0004572796,0.00009000579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006484748,0.00308025,0.9437094,0.00003387287,0.00008888314,0.00001453184,0.01517381,0.00002697074,0.01169206,0.02102828,0.00006047397,0.005026561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002666369,0.004180921,0.08483757,0.0008741533,0.0001098891,0.00001165853,0.7495735,0.0130032,0.1070031,0.03728257,0.00001963811,0.0004374775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.967214,0.000001843534,0.03166658,0.000146102,0.00001781885,0.0004348508,0.000005407892,0.00001310858,0.0005002314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992802,7.697605e-7,0.0006444073,0.000006315426,0.00003245316,0.00001299439,0.000001083108,0.000007875936,0.00001390155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8588719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1824962959","doi":"10.1177/0963662507060586","title":"Experts’ understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public opinion; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Control (management); Public relations; Expert elicitation; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Politics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5543987976542909,"gpt":0.439884760632671,"spread":0.1145140370216199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009954808,0.0001044367,0.0002104324,0.0006319006,0.001519102,0.000176887,0.001171364,0.00008950692,0.0001777308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002817685,0.00008502595,0.0000933815,0.003029668,0.006180611,0.0008887904,0.0001647586,0.0001776733,0.000001594511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002693419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006836192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007955431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02474926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976252,0.0003056844,0.0004332953,0.0002448836,0.0007927811,0.0005981271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977283,0.0009827774,0.0004062376,0.0004115619,0.0002906454,0.0001804646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002093774,0.0001381666,0.0696898,0.00001201594,0.000007828452,2.323972e-7,0.06422888,0.000002040723,0.002394428,0.8620984,0.0002235647,0.00118372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002281365,0.00007082822,0.01623781,0.0001585666,0.00001794919,0.000001887525,0.9249297,0.001781468,0.00016189,0.03964326,0.01439822,0.0003170998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2686709,0.0005987987,0.1592323,0.0344728,0.002033674,0.001357141,0.00005319686,0.000131161,0.5334501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991557,0.0005113149,0.00006169481,0.0001441027,0.00003980554,0.000004291149,8.181126e-7,0.000006580996,0.00007571801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034078848","doi":"10.1177/0963662508097626","title":"Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Public relations; Representation (politics); Event (particle physics); Democracy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8892915425614092,"gpt":0.6111883534280442,"spread":0.278103189133365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02218993,0.00006131831,0.0001583002,0.0005112715,0.0003232802,0.0001002022,0.0003664158,0.0001556994,0.0000135745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1146814,0.00004396892,0.00005162183,0.00194651,0.001883874,0.0003625274,0.00004945575,0.0009091881,5.377264e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004209608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00145006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001691212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005953668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972211,0.0001093236,0.0004810286,0.0003051121,0.001567302,0.0003161508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853806,0.01279952,0.000238341,0.0004011789,0.001071761,0.0001085812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004226856,0.00009279136,0.001479651,0.00004674395,0.000003052266,3.414006e-7,0.001398955,0.000009134291,0.01354788,0.9806213,0.00003885391,0.002719043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000927597,0.0009823771,0.01219332,0.0005293721,0.000007611282,0.000002938311,0.01022723,0.008193646,0.02306247,0.9437169,0.00006053603,0.00009596597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4343418,0.00003232192,0.06010814,0.4734992,0.0001828314,0.001185197,0.000004566218,0.00003250491,0.03061336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965189,0.00005591133,0.002382812,0.000926481,0.00002914214,0.000009510773,0.000002463647,0.000004480018,0.00007029457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5621771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.892776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056839815","doi":"10.1177/0963662507075649","title":"School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Public awareness of science; Promotion (chess); Science education; Science, technology, society and environment education; Science communication; Social science education; Sociology; Literacy; Political science; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering ethics; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.183257703049856,"gpt":0.421375110627949,"spread":0.238117407578093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02825251,0.0001352066,0.0001797205,0.002127702,0.007249612,0.003165129,0.001729239,0.0000543494,0.000431818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02589259,0.0001181681,0.00002871834,0.01273847,0.01684985,0.006359975,0.0003015921,0.0001510834,0.00004969678],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001727689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009964095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002316075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008467919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943183,0.00006451302,0.000347236,0.0008230711,0.003142479,0.001304387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952619,0.0006930606,0.0002325495,0.0003435659,0.001875752,0.00159317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005394385,0.0001005602,0.007831092,0.00001487343,0.000004198721,0.000003313674,0.08550674,0.000003035725,0.03579979,0.861391,0.002112176,0.007179252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001391747,0.000380439,0.03124667,0.0002049136,0.00002112558,0.00002489563,0.6459271,0.0008031958,0.01921838,0.01687635,0.2827341,0.001171015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725346,0.0001034113,0.01130865,0.02536741,0.004163222,0.0006975269,0.000005857595,0.0001133998,0.08570588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948615,0.00002065944,0.0008966659,0.001052385,0.00009179236,0.000003529455,3.145523e-7,0.000005429215,0.003067663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033947970","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/301","title":"Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Jury; Constructive; Public health; Public opinion; Political science; Publics; Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Process (computing); Law; Medicine; Nursing; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6234218180529332,"gpt":0.5204227652734262,"spread":0.1029990527795069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636975,0.0000948232,0.0002048837,0.001785013,0.0008980794,0.000260187,0.0005182842,0.0003065877,0.0006513124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05318325,0.00008576573,0.00003987167,0.003409104,0.006979379,0.0006732825,0.00004408283,0.001086889,0.00002693399],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001325031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006225565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001094681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01729499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960782,0.00004227071,0.0003590457,0.0003918687,0.002479823,0.0006488179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943899,0.003277257,0.000110293,0.0003143626,0.0009269841,0.000981182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008853795,0.0001185025,0.0106239,0.0000437435,0.00001936283,0.00003999116,0.0003496605,8.041155e-7,0.001052755,0.9858543,0.0002122232,0.001675965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03222593,0.005585642,0.03215816,0.006631084,0.0003722084,0.001225171,0.1154218,0.1416962,0.008844766,0.6414799,0.01186716,0.002491941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2297394,0.00008217548,0.02356167,0.5784511,0.0005391521,0.0005837133,0.00002534292,0.0001721217,0.1668454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978421,0.0000972062,0.0008569533,0.001005649,0.00003552144,0.00000625467,0.000004461716,0.000008537914,0.0001433478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997466337","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335410","title":"In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Prima facie; Experiential knowledge; Public relations; Public participation; Biobank; Political science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2983881626394008,"gpt":0.3883963051243476,"spread":0.09000814248494687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005597124,0.0001111099,0.0001356144,0.0009667375,0.0009157691,0.002613661,0.0007709435,0.00006361236,0.00005862466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009150154,0.00008974163,0.0000229647,0.003019589,0.00235226,0.00692013,0.00008095361,0.0001827687,0.000001978314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007380907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004585212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003017966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003581673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976378,0.0002332496,0.0003434357,0.0003726027,0.0008255221,0.0005874002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992458,0.0001082132,0.0001392834,0.0002208103,0.0001435124,0.000142424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001943379,0.0001195076,0.0055061,0.000004956937,0.00000147396,0.00000332061,0.03548214,0.000002837297,0.001215585,0.9383353,0.0004380388,0.01888881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001359728,0.0001761616,0.3958433,0.0002112779,0.000006016657,0.000009916227,0.445362,0.001896072,0.00007959508,0.1017364,0.05260095,0.0007185553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.865985,0.0001237177,0.005172807,0.1055614,0.0001865947,0.0003418254,5.870688e-7,0.00004108977,0.02258696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997035,0.0003055568,0.0003501416,0.002213542,0.00003095392,0.000009727385,7.84488e-7,0.000003468769,0.00005086507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1984233276","doi":"10.1177/0963662506076138","title":"Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public actor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Ambivalence; Autonomy; Modernity; Late modernity; Social science; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6134299573489076,"gpt":0.4467951162357288,"spread":0.1666348411131788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008095298,0.00005307054,0.0000995282,0.0001377234,0.002031573,0.0002400867,0.000836769,0.00003806324,0.0000684503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778436,0.00003250516,0.00004966432,0.0009973745,0.007208528,0.0006779556,0.0001789982,0.00006788415,3.192425e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004119262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004079081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002195911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001133448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988366,0.00007337004,0.0002134639,0.0001333776,0.000433966,0.0003092248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985239,0.0007013045,0.0002327689,0.0002558113,0.0002133247,0.00007292945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001182347,0.00002343932,0.006477717,0.00001305,0.000004123838,8.831991e-9,0.07419428,2.300997e-7,0.002178121,0.9098951,0.00007966703,0.007122427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002689363,0.00006111342,0.04211655,0.0001451167,0.00002722488,0.000002772795,0.7618454,0.002417191,0.00132043,0.05053696,0.1384375,0.0004004825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.596293,0.0004494559,0.04877095,0.174007,0.001056069,0.001495201,0.00001454304,0.00008803989,0.1778257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.0001586138,0.0002429141,0.0001726217,0.00004525011,0.000008090362,5.650412e-7,0.000003380108,0.0001184515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2127448545","doi":"10.1177/0963662509102690","title":"The gap between scientists and journalists: the case of mercury science in Québec’s press","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Media studies; Journalism; Science communication; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Science education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6052165534473128,"gpt":0.4691542361943893,"spread":0.1360623172529236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01152,0.00005913653,0.00009867932,0.0002786806,0.004475825,0.000615802,0.001303677,0.00002501757,0.00001792225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001402139,0.00003779781,0.00002286017,0.002412485,0.01929446,0.00103462,0.0001667422,0.0001317699,3.303531e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005910507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009044728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01170338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04534435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983317,0.0001532502,0.0002640718,0.0001905622,0.0006954125,0.000364976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858,0.0004958221,0.0002177778,0.0003258635,0.0002447784,0.0001357541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008684699,0.00006045755,0.01358722,0.0000111461,0.000002646328,0.00000369661,0.1147308,0.000003970139,0.002601465,0.8336586,0.0001960195,0.03513526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009100214,0.0002215809,0.1406157,0.0002901152,0.00003301907,0.0001416993,0.7288572,0.002333686,0.0007293672,0.1032897,0.02204408,0.000533888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153531,0.0006343969,0.0003460962,0.04974548,0.0002176068,0.0002586384,0.000006973336,0.00001749054,0.03342022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984014,0.001419398,0.00005379531,0.00005097573,0.00002229693,0.000001535796,2.065925e-7,0.000001609864,0.00004875291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7303689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3081647417","doi":"10.1177/0963662520950671","title":"Exploring scholars’ public engagement goals in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kavli Foundation; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; Burroughs Wellcome Fund","keywords":"Public engagement; Demographics; Agency (philosophy); Sample (material); Public relations; Funding Agency; Political science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4329928537704818,"gpt":0.3110697779997487,"spread":0.1219230757707331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008356762,0.00008944363,0.0001504277,0.0002787736,0.002341716,0.0005553986,0.001012134,0.00001473454,0.00004455879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002028341,0.00007235909,0.00001800981,0.003506814,0.001948148,0.001187649,0.0003757824,0.0004323856,8.977696e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001225666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8445402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7823097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972207,0.0008293032,0.000235733,0.0002225354,0.0009905845,0.0005011591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984718,0.0008187317,0.0001193627,0.0001895046,0.000129358,0.0002712168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217907,0.00003228747,0.05786717,0.00003765586,0.00002311707,0.000003278993,0.2428064,0.000539924,0.00005900171,0.6962759,0.0001503993,0.002183069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007546854,0.00002543059,0.005824091,0.00003787777,0.000005752094,2.245958e-7,0.9648585,0.003711034,0.00004041482,0.002444797,0.02214626,0.000150891],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.909808,0.00006741901,0.0006672146,0.08237628,0.0001353358,0.0001978341,0.000001542576,0.00003791602,0.006708394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979498,0.0004918467,0.00009490794,0.001413394,0.0000182579,0.0000140353,0.000001801242,0.000005172367,0.00001073087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7220521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2147876970","doi":"10.1177/0963662506063017","title":"Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: the case of foot and mouth science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of East Anglia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Public awareness of science; Sociology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Politics; Criticism; Science communication; Relation (database); Philosophy of science; Social science; Political science; Science education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1653316454734304,"gpt":0.2743574182359106,"spread":0.1090257727624802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092913,0.00006437561,0.000134087,0.00005735645,0.00030209,0.00004663063,0.0004534129,0.00002273603,0.000009032199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002861899,0.00002093652,0.00003970281,0.001752465,0.004048903,0.0004839684,0.0002244338,0.00004494512,4.900684e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005224983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000481631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001179333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007626512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989976,0.00003848657,0.0002775397,0.000203574,0.0002795269,0.0002032987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993683,0.0001484567,0.0002607339,0.00007499118,0.0001123087,0.00003524451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766062,0.0001488925,0.186451,0.00004814536,0.000006377181,0.000001984917,0.001592927,0.00140578,0.2923976,0.5168729,0.0001655315,0.0008711379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003697258,0.0002280212,0.8138905,0.0001096396,0.00003806685,0.00001803878,0.03419055,0.08316781,0.004704711,0.06303885,0.00002744514,0.0002166953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977532,0.00004906092,0.0001607695,0.001003191,0.00001932193,0.0001521233,0.00002640147,0.000003574097,0.0008323265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997457,0.000009513714,0.0001743219,0.00003506826,0.000005011726,0.000002068185,0.00000107963,3.112541e-7,0.00002690317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6274394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1981739046","doi":"10.1177/0963662513495149","title":"Public media communications about H1N1, risk perceptions and immunization behaviours: A Quebec–France comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University","keywords":"Credibility; Risk communication; Perception; Public health; Risk perception; Pandemic; Agency (philosophy); Health communication; Public relations; Population; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Environmental health; Political science; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Nursing; Disease","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1611894976693929,"gpt":0.3483433421483837,"spread":0.1871538444789908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002264125,0.0001039269,0.0001631262,0.0005342066,0.003474204,0.001308663,0.001051071,0.00007615445,0.0004607773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002204331,0.0001010875,0.0000338091,0.002065388,0.007295435,0.005255266,0.0001962285,0.0002007562,0.00002540489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004800764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007888343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01466005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0145304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979641,0.0001772273,0.0003866411,0.0001851897,0.0008194764,0.0004673734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978954,0.0002811594,0.0003658353,0.0005029201,0.0005532849,0.0004013768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001009392,0.0001391725,0.08609784,0.000008438287,0.000008767975,3.125339e-8,0.2237469,0.000005734533,0.0002963029,0.6715143,0.001784106,0.01639738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000549971,0.00004589595,0.499503,0.00007856429,0.00002485291,0.000002016241,0.4717221,0.01102768,0.00003104563,0.01058869,0.006033981,0.0003922766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701289,0.0003749137,0.0410233,0.0248198,0.0004037876,0.0007114496,0.00003261586,0.0002098082,0.06229548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972758,0.0005832328,0.00171614,0.0001055244,0.0000220871,0.000006741712,0.00001478424,0.00000601762,0.0002696587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6609256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112267120","doi":"10.1177/0963662512445011","title":"Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Prerogative; Synthetic biology; Opposition (politics); Value (mathematics); Perception; Epistemology; Contextualization; Sociology; Biology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Genetics; Computer science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6569746554918238,"gpt":0.4649709770504388,"spread":0.1920036784413849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380699,0.00006292946,0.0001271021,0.0002589234,0.0008995323,0.00005978765,0.0004055066,0.0000653124,0.0001133226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007464649,0.00005093248,0.00002353343,0.0008770616,0.004732683,0.0005686354,0.0001419661,0.00008301271,0.000002070084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002358094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001697501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003162292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002441688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989336,0.00009517358,0.0001864527,0.0001460782,0.0002817631,0.0003569165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.0002664714,0.0001591325,0.000189094,0.00009832044,0.000147989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002191484,0.0001140466,0.04671891,0.00006734605,0.000008763087,1.17886e-7,0.1552708,5.369586e-7,0.01522312,0.7743327,0.0001256666,0.008116088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001577687,0.0004507012,0.04140581,0.0004542453,0.00007597615,0.00004126553,0.8902787,0.001214449,0.001593795,0.03847589,0.02335476,0.001076699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195569,0.0009169506,0.002490214,0.009997401,0.0006401372,0.0002882871,0.00001123908,0.00007442128,0.06602447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967409,0.00246678,0.0006424417,0.0000472658,0.00004424732,0.000002679115,0.000001795281,0.000003682799,0.00005017548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7358568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2146122845","doi":"10.1177/0963662513481294","title":"A surfeit of science: The “CSI effect” and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Appropriation; Hegemony; Contradiction; Sociology; Science communication; Social media; Reality tv; Public opinion; Mass media; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Science education; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3991288809330105,"gpt":0.3842480176711197,"spread":0.01488086326189086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0239903,0.0001248478,0.0002646825,0.0006501031,0.004572572,0.0005238461,0.003245397,0.00006026159,0.000100941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006951823,0.0000663333,0.00008327085,0.008414348,0.1255048,0.002234044,0.0007278569,0.0001902111,0.00000111156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008384231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001626038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00123948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008784833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954892,0.0004290661,0.0004987186,0.0003393392,0.002700594,0.0005430988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956646,0.001658337,0.0008153766,0.0007758363,0.0009231204,0.0001627256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009727,0.00003758649,0.00748193,0.00003816002,0.000005267636,1.1031e-8,0.08764303,0.000003528871,0.02273971,0.8808422,0.00003024484,0.001168223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001673165,0.0001526963,0.04874065,0.0002893162,0.00005467795,0.000004634427,0.7933478,0.009016342,0.006180086,0.1399404,0.0002677827,0.0003324657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389895,0.0001595063,0.002396326,0.02644852,0.0007357885,0.001127399,0.00000757781,0.00002609673,0.03010933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999352,0.0004258186,0.0001002858,0.00005332893,0.00002454795,0.00001487388,5.937728e-7,0.000005271602,0.00002327746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052346044","doi":"10.1177/0963662506067662","title":"Parental views on pediatric vaccination: the impact of competing advocacy coalitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cancer Care Ontario; McGill University; York University; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Vaccination; Feeling; Public health; Vaccination policy; Focus group; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Immunology; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.16620912751457,"gpt":0.3706688252949526,"spread":0.2044596977803826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704221,0.0000823072,0.0001468713,0.0003056463,0.002433113,0.00007584589,0.0005940914,0.00002868752,0.0002735082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007181349,0.000057979,0.0001133813,0.00218023,0.0004745496,0.0006957288,0.00005886194,0.0001007991,0.000005109271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005589968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001425047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004516303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001093993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983236,0.0001057078,0.0002737088,0.0001879747,0.0007645815,0.000344388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988499,0.0003668841,0.0002617116,0.0001913657,0.0002128511,0.0001172505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001166885,0.0002427434,0.6539466,0.0000159622,0.00001237454,0.000002471944,0.04720175,0.0001143279,0.0001829376,0.2946954,0.00328943,0.0002843559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007437409,0.0003731119,0.9036605,0.00004521907,0.00002355847,0.00001225802,0.07865012,0.0004036541,0.0001683375,0.01504701,0.0005760315,0.0002964131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9244212,0.0001558543,0.001472298,0.002405875,0.0001910212,0.0002255366,0.000007021134,0.00003148016,0.0710897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994511,0.0002537409,0.00006202229,0.00003153547,0.0001223253,0.000003151418,0.000001224103,0.000003891407,0.00007098755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2796484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2167322003","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414983","title":"Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Narrative; Skepticism; Newspaper; Normative; Climate change; Media studies; Subject (documents); Political science; Neutrality; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Art; Computer science; Library science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.413333968661421,"gpt":0.3835932143465601,"spread":0.02974075431486095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006160495,0.00008333586,0.0001220969,0.0002033404,0.001776491,0.0001428603,0.001489012,0.0000313193,0.00008152178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004965423,0.00004673107,0.00004090543,0.001686821,0.003040868,0.0006391449,0.0002621528,0.0001610219,0.000002761285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003633519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008000365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02043811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982399,0.0001953769,0.0002383139,0.0001776178,0.0007079783,0.0004408463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988161,0.0004121647,0.0002073697,0.0003784107,0.000106252,0.00007970026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001330447,0.00001513157,0.01532078,0.00000420837,0.000002209225,6.851051e-8,0.9310278,0.000002664084,0.001317546,0.04792907,0.000106637,0.004260611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008963171,0.00002239937,0.01533695,0.0001612701,0.000003392818,2.271905e-7,0.9674862,0.00009736006,0.0001303698,0.002735534,0.01384734,0.00008934103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755089,0.000717839,0.002778691,0.1155675,0.005846458,0.001649253,0.00002065177,0.00007711718,0.09783351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977408,0.001157489,0.0002239851,0.000372653,0.0004598066,0.00003633937,5.3798e-7,0.000005521324,0.000002891029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153995192","doi":"10.1177/0963662506052889","title":"The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: competing voices, contrasting frames","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Exploratory analysis; Political science; Democracy; Cluster (spacecraft); Descriptive statistics; Pragmatism; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Data science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06979643153437269,"gpt":0.2602738571691507,"spread":0.190477425634778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003247692,0.00009558356,0.000135582,0.00006643269,0.001506629,0.0005026261,0.0008737221,0.00003563975,0.000004405616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001982295,0.00003119286,0.00001905349,0.001497794,0.002822415,0.0002185139,0.0003237402,0.0001596407,2.090067e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004242524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002716581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07305858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5430704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981449,0.00007586754,0.0002788648,0.0002678206,0.0005103752,0.000722179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967333,0.002804121,0.0001307053,0.00008313629,0.0001719791,0.00007677838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002227499,0.0001273475,0.1321082,0.0001006938,0.00005147386,0.000002141747,0.002370294,0.0007472929,0.1081317,0.5521699,0.0002605003,0.2037077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003411944,0.0004612659,0.08685245,0.0002023045,0.00001440496,0.00003731596,0.454306,0.3688209,0.01596284,0.04680459,0.02217264,0.0009533802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241105,0.0003729305,0.000634548,0.07427018,0.0000733838,0.0003878104,0.00001981168,0.00003668889,0.00009410497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988413,0.0005432003,0.0004726232,0.000094227,0.00002039499,0.00001855198,0.000006562581,9.915681e-7,0.000002191381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5053653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322230534","doi":"10.1177/0963662512450990","title":"Front page or “buried” beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Newspaper; Media coverage; Opposition (politics); Greenhouse gas; Content analysis; Political science; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Public opinion; Public relations; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Media studies; Climate change; Sociology; Social science; Law; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4860786367515358,"gpt":0.3951380317364512,"spread":0.09094060501508461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002892865,0.00006848778,0.0001187086,0.00013372,0.000783278,0.00009607815,0.0004898656,0.00005300945,0.0002920675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005987889,0.00004584386,0.00002472978,0.0005873304,0.003163655,0.0005853888,0.0001347651,0.00009462819,8.857261e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003006629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002100913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002855774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986956,0.0001205321,0.0001593325,0.0001229666,0.0005909637,0.0003106583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.0003546534,0.0001560352,0.0002579673,0.0000905167,0.0001568765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002848289,0.0001361564,0.04213621,0.00004470014,0.00001319369,3.894605e-7,0.6897755,0.000002981624,0.004199729,0.2596731,0.0003782143,0.003611348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008118466,0.00009937683,0.06890455,0.0001319852,0.00005373477,0.000005503601,0.895573,0.0009370339,0.0002943516,0.009626902,0.02309692,0.000464856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8715891,0.0008226939,0.001220813,0.007505883,0.0005986271,0.0002926021,0.00002347051,0.00003900321,0.1179078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980189,0.001584716,0.00008095901,0.000079393,0.00007450921,0.000003495002,0.000002163152,0.000004086638,0.0001517745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2500463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008656998","doi":"10.1177/0963662520905466","title":"Assessing YouTube science news’ credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Popularity; Source credibility; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2267858417234492,"gpt":0.3819570587012111,"spread":0.1551712169777619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008561436,0.00009467593,0.0001721861,0.0002690872,0.001812268,0.0008342395,0.001162866,0.00003176401,0.00008602384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007136231,0.00005170199,0.00006477982,0.003935634,0.01388531,0.002777497,0.0002423885,0.0001648533,0.000001133874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003051662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005525516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967162,0.0001310941,0.0003217242,0.0002363994,0.002108863,0.0004857067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981134,0.000585544,0.0002800032,0.0002785666,0.0004345961,0.0003079111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004626635,0.0001132976,0.09562688,0.0000358307,0.00002312128,1.603609e-7,0.2311709,0.0004917265,0.06651304,0.5977648,0.001265806,0.006948191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004118933,0.000364133,0.04719254,0.000103797,0.00001211497,0.000001593107,0.8956817,0.03471245,0.01354479,0.00635683,0.001404917,0.0002132179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519196,0.00004037381,0.002030674,0.01591572,0.00004699582,0.0002336339,0.000008080391,0.00002054796,0.02978444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995656,0.0000311044,0.00008035677,0.0002849317,0.00002143431,4.59568e-7,1.9518e-7,0.000003408966,0.00001250183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012209553","doi":"10.1177/0963662508098575","title":"Food, publics, science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public awareness of science; Citizen science; Science communication; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Biology; Science education; Politics; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1837613329618355,"gpt":0.3122339638260476,"spread":0.1284726308642121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509982,0.0001097151,0.0001832668,0.0007041303,0.005495278,0.000760482,0.001530623,0.00004889176,0.00006099202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916873,0.0001051911,0.00005978862,0.006585342,0.02686643,0.002566034,0.0001295744,0.0001235605,0.000005927344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002164063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00256578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004342276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000559581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961591,0.00003726667,0.0002407199,0.0004214934,0.00214635,0.0009950482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00009611551,0.0001565384,0.0002355252,0.0005567334,0.0004172523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001259502,0.00003922259,0.0006157689,0.000001496202,0.000002424272,2.750656e-7,0.01225864,5.550146e-7,0.0004595947,0.9842339,0.0006856117,0.001701272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005202786,0.0006647981,0.01285472,0.00004759292,0.00001309475,0.0000015344,0.1237679,0.0001588953,0.0009885529,0.7967025,0.06364808,0.0006320094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05121347,0.0005394897,0.005922523,0.01807984,0.00138281,0.0002627072,0.000003840612,0.0001982645,0.9223971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985762,0.00009840966,0.0006096701,0.0002630175,0.0001246546,0.00000175587,2.027494e-7,0.000003267494,0.0003228717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2118284749","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104721","title":"Ethnocultural community leaders’ views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Biobank; Public relations; Qualitative research; Population; Political science; Parliament; General partnership; Empirical research; Sociology; Social science; Law; Biology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9682858363290403,"gpt":0.7231313609780634,"spread":0.2451544753509769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08564277,0.0001185522,0.0002934728,0.001448337,0.003165716,0.000322425,0.0005077581,0.0001488349,0.00002953804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02069972,0.00009354447,0.00003469746,0.002794045,0.01453879,0.0004528936,0.0003654735,0.004226864,0.000007885816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004376654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005582356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006553088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920717,0.002792033,0.0004668251,0.0005672933,0.003375192,0.0007269865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860479,0.01142551,0.00008268176,0.0006645404,0.001328778,0.0004506299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003149932,0.001613506,0.02939762,0.000145266,0.00002473182,0.000007340737,0.5209102,6.517829e-7,0.04038326,0.4031047,0.0004057269,0.003692065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005961065,0.002639994,0.320288,0.0001527525,0.000003462488,0.000004751863,0.5508044,0.0000463723,0.00003989679,0.125334,0.00001992701,0.00007030398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742653,0.000112956,0.0001218219,0.01944219,0.00003705557,0.0008881202,0.000004300238,0.00002344199,0.005104858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985882,0.0003056944,0.0006955212,0.00009720995,0.00003818948,0.000009187214,0.000003707775,0.000008128205,0.0002541424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2908904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2059720664","doi":"10.1177/0963662512444682","title":"Progress, decline, and the public uptake of climate science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Conservatism; Climate change; Blame; Narrative; Global warming; Divergence (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perception; Public opinion; Social psychology; Political economy; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5307798169057809,"gpt":0.4478265359944933,"spread":0.08295328091128762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0161155,0.00007363933,0.0001425611,0.00037205,0.002782767,0.0004039057,0.001192025,0.00003583829,0.0001036972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001479075,0.00005257187,0.00003555633,0.002905364,0.04345337,0.002329254,0.0005379288,0.00008843854,0.000002911817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002749765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005527763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008259291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002648946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976683,0.0001163032,0.0002850326,0.0001833555,0.001101036,0.0006459359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985251,0.0002329737,0.0002719791,0.0003566642,0.0003557488,0.0002575252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006350792,0.00004322289,0.03018422,0.0000108649,0.000001475572,1.439557e-8,0.02003011,4.566471e-8,0.0002088183,0.9411606,0.00001455155,0.008339687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003216518,0.0001446966,0.226308,0.0002121549,0.00006027172,0.00001821482,0.5728599,0.002660966,0.0004189191,0.05961911,0.1336846,0.0007966359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6645588,0.001565053,0.001174748,0.07822157,0.0009334416,0.0006988122,0.0000126781,0.0001041476,0.2527308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931005,0.006070415,0.0006340649,0.0001232837,0.00004402518,0.000007967882,9.060291e-7,0.000003771133,0.00001502616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110560640","doi":"10.1177/0963662510362834","title":"Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Demographics; Agriculture; Genetically modified maize; Biotechnology; Biology; Genetically modified crops; Sociology; Demography; Transgene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3381699158898848,"gpt":0.4289904534386749,"spread":0.09082053754879005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00189812,0.00006233629,0.00008623627,0.0002021213,0.0001204353,0.00006917439,0.0005224645,0.00005804947,0.000008373968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009306839,0.00004714117,0.00002889039,0.0006767426,0.00221703,0.00001105945,0.0002354719,0.0001574555,2.660121e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000247506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002866329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005951495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001780307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988178,0.00002966558,0.0001837959,0.000230824,0.0004255267,0.0003124114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993036,0.00005892336,0.00003661561,0.0003456037,0.0001854285,0.00006981472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008465888,0.00002646332,0.004686641,0.00001176948,0.000003855318,2.597718e-7,0.0001290983,0.0003961144,0.974537,0.0196494,0.00004354573,0.0005074234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004085139,0.0002868589,0.09992103,0.00002981056,0.000004417579,0.000009681946,0.0008234598,0.00529609,0.8887466,0.002375691,0.001900221,0.0001976694],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769667,0.00008425149,0.02118251,0.0004988868,0.00009545355,0.0001151574,0.000003169437,0.000003229575,0.001050642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997367,0.00004526669,0.002513877,0.0000124849,0.0000251925,0.000004209816,7.65899e-7,0.0000055926,0.00002560713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09523439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1988131571","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335523","title":"Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: Five lessons from British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public relations; Sociology; Public discourse; Political science; Public involvement; Public engagement; Public participation; Public awareness of science; Science communication; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4121721520602322,"gpt":0.4722221365860229,"spread":0.06004998452579074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005301996,0.00006495018,0.0002681979,0.0001173456,0.0006652299,0.0006923276,0.0004272292,0.0001223614,0.00009094955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03575138,0.0000609206,0.00005026432,0.001291684,0.0129025,0.0004705669,0.0001296961,0.0005041442,6.463539e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002007131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001351016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001775731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007300751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997427,0.00009019583,0.0004363421,0.0003668894,0.001376783,0.0003028269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926284,0.005100199,0.0002588072,0.0003099033,0.00150558,0.0001970957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005545639,0.000187117,0.01558226,0.0000444183,0.00004026192,0.000006234171,0.00431774,0.000002544375,0.0008504183,0.97314,0.001745428,0.004028136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002860489,0.0002850218,0.06091736,0.0002427876,0.0000356474,0.00001868374,0.01268718,0.001081173,0.0001507181,0.9214813,0.0001315164,0.0001081749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7405373,0.0006400517,0.02421482,0.2205185,0.0002128031,0.0007740972,0.00007858823,0.00004378784,0.01298008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996338,0.0005032826,0.001951459,0.0007564864,0.00002621323,0.000003824059,0.000008409522,0.00000423081,0.0004081627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2558007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2130426866","doi":"10.1177/0963662510393083","title":"Frames, claims and audiences: Construction of food allergies in the Canadian media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Framing (construction); Allergy; Environmental health; Mass media; Public health; Food safety; Perception; Food allergy; Medicine; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography; Immunology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1520233534381148,"gpt":0.2180794939586775,"spread":0.06605614052056269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001072076,0.00005670451,0.00009359155,0.00007996798,0.0003975403,0.00005012045,0.0004292672,0.00003646794,0.00005665849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001242624,0.00002087902,0.00001826841,0.001109612,0.003323327,0.0003564898,0.00004100087,0.00007299559,3.000446e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006743604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01702016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4490344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999099,0.0000334437,0.0001584704,0.0001629947,0.0002973174,0.0002488321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995967,0.0001288376,0.00008443138,0.00004628419,0.00005434444,0.00008937679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605223,0.00003478204,0.02217184,0.000008129515,0.000005094037,0.000001022729,0.01156052,8.058796e-7,0.00346273,0.9565479,0.00003075219,0.006166856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001987485,0.000783896,0.6409263,0.00005470859,0.000006375664,0.00002226693,0.1405935,0.0001051736,0.002264387,0.2141858,0.0006504884,0.0002083285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867039,0.00007886864,0.00002287845,0.002794782,0.00009882756,0.000076966,0.00001118812,0.000006674427,0.01020587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995422,0.00004838031,0.0003409648,0.00005446682,0.000009924466,0.000001743042,0.000001009149,2.112022e-7,0.000001122687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.742362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379509183","doi":"10.1177/09636625231174845","title":"Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Legitimacy; Ideology; Social psychology; Pandemic; Identity (music); Public health; Religious identity; Science communication; Vaccination; Skepticism; Psychology; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Public trust; Politics; Public engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Science education; Epistemology; Law; Immunology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08528824625014327,"gpt":0.3560411184421343,"spread":0.270752872191991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01403062,0.0001059689,0.0001537498,0.002297569,0.004897867,0.001117623,0.0009347021,0.00004115516,0.000006989979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003914814,0.00008561908,0.00001610433,0.01513649,0.004028963,0.004911371,0.0004564341,0.0002219353,7.10165e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002043893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002794504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01461974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966735,0.00006355353,0.0003010124,0.0005860099,0.00161956,0.0007563221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988772,0.0002633328,0.0001667739,0.0002089496,0.000221748,0.0002620059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005028285,0.0000136805,0.8856723,0.00003379027,0.000001016107,0.000004688135,0.03014739,0.00005375074,0.003182969,0.0806537,0.000004075679,0.0002275793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005987245,0.00003797528,0.8945514,0.0001404627,0.000004572484,0.00001885562,0.06565197,0.0009956914,0.00007898187,0.03770652,0.00003924836,0.0001755951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912286,0.0001497642,0.001211075,0.005345068,0.0001262029,0.0002985195,0.000001107796,0.00006731897,0.001572327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988737,0.0008686337,0.00009164226,0.00008802424,0.00002496039,0.000009501042,2.317361e-7,0.000005072062,0.0000382202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04294718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2062160663","doi":"10.1177/0963662510394949","title":"Post-ecological discourse in the making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011657381050739,"gpt":0.3095242110761428,"spread":0.2083584729710689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954843,0.00006672879,0.00006812427,0.00007906264,0.0002980151,0.0000412706,0.0007253249,0.0000236785,0.001946328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002850769,0.00004349226,0.00002674117,0.0007959678,0.005503134,0.0005906587,0.0002055398,0.0001027733,0.00001991687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000808922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005357691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001083897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987445,0.00006019341,0.0001618719,0.0002513206,0.0004619716,0.0003200738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995857,0.0000513886,0.00006563823,0.0002411325,0.000005560673,0.00005061791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007899138,0.0005722523,0.8858538,0.000004677578,9.85325e-7,0.000003861468,0.02858788,0.00001479603,0.001215475,0.08266794,0.0001009659,0.0009694811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076037,0.00005847116,0.8695267,0.00000254244,0.000001481715,0.000005039842,0.1143634,0.0001261837,0.00008092843,0.01557146,0.0001176147,0.00007011132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073568,0.000003506731,0.0009603963,0.003298912,0.00007554389,0.0001626344,7.628638e-7,0.000009210432,0.08813221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.000001326691,0.0006239687,0.000513341,0.000003526442,0.00000812761,2.632855e-7,0.000002223484,0.00004752271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09144288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969751061","doi":"10.1177/0963662519868969","title":"The critical reception of the <i>DSM-5</i>: Towards a typology of audiences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Typology; Naturalism; Association (psychology); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Common ground; Narrative; Humanism; Sociology; Narratology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Linguistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251424667542597,"gpt":0.3140854409436589,"spread":0.1889429741893992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001174826,0.00004799623,0.0001018772,0.00007090344,0.0006730109,0.00004625358,0.0004760615,0.00001804041,0.0003661776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001669915,0.00002509982,0.00004212232,0.0002063235,0.007062073,0.0002363573,0.00007213183,0.00007090923,0.000003455378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005489999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003144278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001327593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000275484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989628,0.00004314516,0.0002396405,0.0001187383,0.0004002968,0.0002353883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992983,0.000193453,0.0001562735,0.0001836994,0.0001209301,0.00004734005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023099,0.00002204727,0.002291635,0.0000603377,0.000002012476,8.383027e-9,0.006484615,2.734365e-7,0.0002976959,0.9901982,0.0002820872,0.0003508911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007702261,0.001430995,0.01150463,0.0004023117,0.00002882158,0.000008678042,0.425315,0.0005610402,0.003508254,0.5148467,0.04130745,0.000315898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5925535,0.0002801824,0.0001687193,0.01709098,0.005124654,0.0002500862,0.0000171031,0.0000113047,0.3845035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993716,0.00002806968,0.00003672747,0.0001207492,0.00004138125,0.000001635613,1.787314e-7,0.000001982964,0.0003976439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4753515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094400678","doi":"10.1177/0963662520965490","title":"Population health AI researchers’ perceptions of the public portrayal of AI: A pilot study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Sensationalism; Perception; Population health; Psychology; Population; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4910734703954394,"gpt":0.4745531649617737,"spread":0.01652030543366573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008379367,0.00007627277,0.0002310531,0.0002353389,0.001949725,0.0002622837,0.0009883825,0.00004219052,0.00007201375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005266473,0.00006187535,0.0000644234,0.003479758,0.005226111,0.001441695,0.0001769497,0.0003598994,5.995042e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005745778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007327454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961994,0.0004564541,0.0004178593,0.0002505737,0.002186535,0.0004891534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980837,0.0001902766,0.0003482676,0.000220222,0.0007601008,0.0003974409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009738481,0.0003611942,0.207101,0.00003026222,0.00001297206,1.544046e-7,0.1083361,0.000006505297,0.0008416309,0.6827397,0.0003685504,0.0001921559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005532317,0.002151089,0.382163,0.00006387068,0.00001284073,3.349832e-7,0.5450807,0.0002668693,0.00003718741,0.06924336,0.0002469194,0.0001806161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6367598,0.00002012115,0.001230981,0.356287,0.0001497762,0.0005234803,0.00001037629,0.0000263219,0.004992101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988595,0.00002225934,0.0001024655,0.0009300261,0.00004412852,0.000002230008,8.162319e-7,0.000005780498,0.00003276442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6134964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011153353","doi":"10.1177/0963662513490466","title":"Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Worry; Opposition (politics); Animal welfare; Demographics; Public engagement; Intervention (counseling); Welfare; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9049595305333119,"gpt":0.4314383528755984,"spread":0.4735211776577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007589777,0.0001517019,0.0002395061,0.0003658681,0.00107371,0.00104956,0.001608933,0.00008559376,0.000458416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002021298,0.00006263759,0.00005348845,0.004771455,0.004312778,0.001619067,0.0008226807,0.0004241919,0.000003215355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00107216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003870983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002015433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001445377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951247,0.0005746536,0.0005089841,0.0005513857,0.002171761,0.001068514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977705,0.0009580077,0.0001418947,0.0002556748,0.0006200109,0.0002539073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001058223,0.0004565088,0.03676616,0.00002411894,0.00001153359,0.000001569754,0.0007459539,0.0001243381,0.8796121,0.0780617,0.00005308942,0.004132336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004727015,0.001220207,0.8569063,0.000152509,0.0000088468,0.00001112046,0.05565803,0.02806461,0.01472895,0.04184799,0.0003871114,0.0005416162],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911159,0.00003427039,0.001863837,0.006046102,0.00005402281,0.0006050214,0.00001527593,0.00002257258,0.0002430216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977968,0.00003283959,0.00206534,0.00003678002,0.00003695445,0.00001038748,0.000003360211,0.000002617373,0.00001487553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047411715","doi":"10.1177/0963662508088668","title":"Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychological intervention; Public relations; Relevance (law); Science communication; Media coverage; Order (exchange); News media; Public health; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Media studies; Business; Medicine; Law; Science education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4905787762507626,"gpt":0.4444615329357097,"spread":0.04611724331505285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01833241,0.0001125007,0.0002819471,0.0009127076,0.002209504,0.0006604329,0.002419302,0.00004564041,0.00006235723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003162816,0.00007775294,0.0001148656,0.004161743,0.007100484,0.001565556,0.0001739214,0.0001866394,0.000001127603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001787469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001243882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005858761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01212781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963929,0.0004588285,0.0004692275,0.0002869731,0.001766707,0.0006253573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975364,0.0008504058,0.0005856808,0.0004694011,0.000364258,0.0001938805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001918159,0.0001182335,0.002266675,0.00002105462,0.000004259656,1.934005e-7,0.08914334,0.000006434484,0.0004480574,0.905894,0.0002502223,0.001828291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00105534,0.000352063,0.01869518,0.0004365246,0.00001408871,0.000003349328,0.8855987,0.0003045797,0.00004060148,0.08981189,0.00347622,0.0002114187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2108699,0.0008562603,0.0441505,0.6957496,0.001307615,0.001969274,0.0001514553,0.00006193654,0.04488349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982074,0.0011497,0.00009118551,0.0004813796,0.00004425739,0.000005820065,0.000004169398,0.000003135871,0.00001297482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8160822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036239323","doi":"10.1177/0963662520923110","title":"What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Templeton Religion Trust","keywords":"Publics; Sociology; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Politics; Existentialism; Field (mathematics); Norm (philosophy); Social science education; Science education; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6248035204532549,"gpt":0.4449237684640692,"spread":0.1798797519891857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006432453,0.0001234635,0.0001786423,0.0007216653,0.005969785,0.000657449,0.00207209,0.00004933595,0.00005661766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001081533,0.00009904975,0.00004710047,0.00788269,0.0479802,0.004066471,0.0003716065,0.0001605277,0.000004051115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003373177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002960677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000218922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996213,0.0001160884,0.0003531442,0.0005514518,0.002137349,0.000628996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978725,0.0002024497,0.0003705194,0.0003619279,0.0008268207,0.0003657322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002828969,0.00004195376,0.002401524,0.0000217374,0.000005207733,1.897001e-7,0.3250277,0.000162057,0.2242067,0.4477679,0.0000627031,0.0002740196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002504225,0.0001492049,0.003311185,0.0001354301,0.0000202684,0.000003637416,0.9481488,0.03593626,0.001885412,0.00968267,0.0002336838,0.0002430069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7275205,0.0000987067,0.2080231,0.05719429,0.0006226958,0.0006176508,0.000007238815,0.0000641276,0.005851735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978549,0.0004000808,0.001275897,0.0003866256,0.00005293728,0.000005678315,0.000001480599,0.000007113973,0.0000152294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6231211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086139813","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414982","title":"The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Cardiff University","keywords":"Drama; Sociology; Science communication; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Focus group; Focus (optics); Human cloning; Public relations; Science education; Pedagogy; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5671756946719387,"gpt":0.4408201441421601,"spread":0.1263555505297786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008139046,0.00007774758,0.0001106363,0.0003759905,0.005488632,0.0002848119,0.002680667,0.00003880979,0.0003073384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055276,0.00006096474,0.00004707127,0.00253873,0.0281323,0.002118557,0.0004790371,0.0001236,0.00000950339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007608074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002485996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977273,0.000128359,0.0003277097,0.0002101106,0.00118548,0.0004210251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979571,0.0003170618,0.0003391977,0.0007603224,0.0004591562,0.0001671831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001315823,0.00007469636,0.002317172,0.000007596463,0.000002882467,6.974378e-8,0.1074913,1.802234e-7,0.002886219,0.8747801,0.00008550329,0.01234108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000420037,0.0001987742,0.0116996,0.0001723722,0.00001634894,0.000003680982,0.6810723,0.0005368606,0.003190733,0.2875127,0.01488691,0.0002896836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4803987,0.0002634564,0.001443802,0.009126812,0.0003960044,0.000485694,0.000004192633,0.00007506219,0.5078063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956676,0.003310972,0.00078644,0.00007557948,0.0000110286,0.000005589888,0.000001740481,0.000004328141,0.0001367614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5872674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387388262","doi":"10.3109/a036854","title":"Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Journalism; Public relations; Advice (programming); Popular science; Science communication; Media literacy; Literacy; Sociology; Psychology; Science education; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Media studies; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4662405871462212,"gpt":0.4757859517315292,"spread":0.009545364585308025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007027174,0.0000932566,0.0001543767,0.000402023,0.001895801,0.001769384,0.002276732,0.00003377953,0.00005905536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005688871,0.0000638058,0.00002519162,0.00347408,0.004759128,0.003338287,0.0006333104,0.00009113442,0.000002526945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006353502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001991493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001258695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01073832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970024,0.000246827,0.000281724,0.0003253689,0.001680796,0.0004628911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987953,0.0002288142,0.0001131945,0.0005011657,0.0001716416,0.0001898965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003576912,0.0001921994,0.03786014,0.00001377632,0.000002741247,5.005908e-7,0.931958,0.00001806256,0.00493915,0.01055655,0.0008914702,0.0135316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001299884,0.00005920589,0.006751509,0.0001878798,0.000003431727,0.000001862207,0.9674837,0.0002959218,0.00007884312,0.0002041417,0.02470572,0.00009781412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370896,0.001434321,0.0002191603,0.05577372,0.0002631297,0.0006876861,0.000002137765,0.00002004537,0.004510188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890702,0.01008181,0.00009813735,0.0006221491,0.00001610651,0.00001680906,0.000001174431,0.00000392078,0.00008969128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05515157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129744414","doi":"10.1177/0963662506053738","title":"Moral presentation of genetics-based narratives for public understanding of genetic science and its implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Harm; Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Genetic testing; Medical genetics; Psychology; Obligation; Bioethics; Political science; Genetics; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Biology; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1399270792147459,"gpt":0.3462521193223407,"spread":0.2063250401075948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105522,0.0001152218,0.0001481904,0.0005403659,0.0004815459,0.00008434492,0.0005521166,0.00005556624,0.000006679363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005343339,0.0001192787,0.00004292111,0.001389595,0.004437482,0.0000892393,0.0001332879,0.00004025739,1.052703e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005197771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002372393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002945708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002831403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982905,0.0000252836,0.0003720927,0.0004537442,0.0005143516,0.0003439838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998246,0.00005693578,0.0003446374,0.0003137091,0.0009096383,0.0001291498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001623747,0.00006377297,0.006506783,0.00006310509,0.00001639988,1.926902e-8,0.000723117,0.0008776783,0.9088928,0.08224572,0.00008625776,0.0005081094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146731,0.0004870668,0.01014786,0.00003884051,0.00002707024,0.000006410194,0.008816889,0.01928664,0.9421146,0.01726672,0.0003678905,0.0002932613],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393958,0.0006418781,0.2552153,0.003192088,0.0001024272,0.0004916516,0.00005471498,0.000008592185,0.0008975592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820257,0.00005395139,0.01777868,0.00004399303,0.00003393393,0.00003196778,0.000007942745,0.00001097366,0.00001290291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2426299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163499486","doi":"10.1177/0963662514528439","title":"Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Informed consent; Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Psychology; Principal (computer security); Research ethics; Medical education; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Pathology; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7901716714040768,"gpt":0.6243422349910017,"spread":0.1658294364130751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02330875,0.00008577251,0.0002687144,0.0008358736,0.0002740595,0.000107485,0.0007644226,0.000152296,0.00002778904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04869932,0.00007875739,0.00003132957,0.001512394,0.009095494,0.0001729014,0.0009198902,0.0009613473,0.000003289823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004686171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002789225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006415379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005824352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949084,0.0003864628,0.0006218125,0.0003389645,0.002934704,0.0008096752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873497,0.01042009,0.0001677524,0.0008035074,0.0007315886,0.0005272918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002055719,0.0003192724,0.8979701,0.001007969,0.00005605547,0.000005574188,0.01263177,0.00006218201,0.05405867,0.0265845,0.00009441487,0.007003895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008341732,0.004104676,0.4889718,0.002001883,0.00007631387,0.00001416569,0.1171971,0.02503942,0.08954041,0.263331,0.0008154514,0.0005661277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990352,0.0001558192,0.001364556,0.003138757,0.00001975107,0.0003603882,0.000002268652,0.000008933323,0.004597553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975948,0.0009329526,0.001206868,0.00004396476,0.00002169751,0.000006068988,0.000004300619,0.00001085259,0.0001784979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4089984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098428202","doi":"10.1177/0963662510389977","title":"Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Credibility; Assertion; Situated; Social media; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Relevance (law); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Science communication; Social science; Media studies; Geography; Science education; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2064546613661575,"gpt":0.3581484969990694,"spread":0.1516938356329119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007303512,0.00003798713,0.0000772874,0.0001274992,0.0008306908,0.0001408407,0.0006936404,0.00002378578,0.00007956257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004449995,0.0000198607,0.0000245555,0.0005676763,0.01451816,0.0006159894,0.0001102722,0.0001016499,0.000001113143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009323686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000290342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003358055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998966,0.0001378445,0.0002117826,0.0000668161,0.000491175,0.0001264051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988303,0.0006478,0.0001967094,0.0002414365,0.0000572346,0.00002655757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001017213,0.00005006802,0.002037952,0.00000637881,0.000001866876,5.736033e-9,0.498904,5.498027e-7,0.005215084,0.4874721,0.0000694557,0.006232364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007661069,0.00002731113,0.009046388,0.00001370423,0.000006048803,2.983182e-7,0.9712759,0.0008383216,0.0002916964,0.008648789,0.009038735,0.00004673424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734716,0.000134312,0.0001128642,0.005193332,0.0003216622,0.0005203258,0.00002082958,0.000004140894,0.02022091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999405,0.0004515723,0.00001100458,0.00009496761,0.000009107528,0.00001264278,0.000002389723,8.293875e-7,0.00001252559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4788233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796249541","doi":"10.1177/0963662518766281","title":"Farmers prevailing perception profiles regarding GM crops: A classification proposal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Perception; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified crops; Variety (cybernetics); Stakeholder; Diversity (politics); Genetically engineered; Biotechnology; Sociology; Biology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1437147677885053,"gpt":0.3028344582027639,"spread":0.1591196904142587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001789787,0.0001118747,0.0001231164,0.0001079032,0.001100823,0.0003631379,0.0006984759,0.00007012632,0.0003737132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005512324,0.00004980881,0.00004488471,0.001786556,0.003741657,0.0006080018,0.0001895944,0.0001243909,0.00003326013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003961344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006845893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007543716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976583,0.00007397508,0.0002528887,0.0005095631,0.0009493025,0.0005559814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.00009323902,0.0001216772,0.0001114665,0.0004332872,0.0001925023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001108579,0.00003642581,0.006804913,0.000008953175,0.000002804612,1.856369e-7,0.0004334525,4.683066e-7,0.9670466,0.01420341,0.00005006331,0.01140162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005433145,0.001993805,0.6840537,0.0001744491,0.00002566295,0.00003119534,0.08989144,0.01497975,0.1818335,0.02440336,0.001202282,0.0008675905],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849586,0.00000950965,0.003831036,0.003877081,0.0001378896,0.0003323551,0.000004814065,0.00007660862,0.006772111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971106,0.000009941614,0.002577685,0.00002879876,0.0001473488,0.000009423188,0.000004813084,0.000001473557,0.0001099048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7852132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158238213","doi":"10.1177/0963662510361655","title":"Can the governance of a population genetic data bank effect recruitment? Evidence from the public consultation of Generation Scotland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Corporate governance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Good governance; Public economics; Business; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Demography; Geography; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3178384925395448,"gpt":0.3987202093187386,"spread":0.08088171677919381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005499185,0.00007734141,0.0001564948,0.00005982653,0.001094354,0.0002626082,0.001302537,0.00005099575,0.0000441405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039078,0.0000480582,0.00002796061,0.001052365,0.002592268,0.001314501,0.0001443796,0.0001229188,4.144758e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002081437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02737238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08816423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977136,0.0002845368,0.0003697365,0.0002716587,0.001052199,0.0003083017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961529,0.002437052,0.0005236632,0.0005644347,0.0002262598,0.00009563925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001453399,0.00003359854,0.6620527,0.0000774572,0.00001686137,2.133086e-7,0.01230131,0.00002436889,0.006710929,0.3084957,0.0005690551,0.00970331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473821,0.00008587639,0.96918,0.0002503238,0.0000426299,0.00000112876,0.01375808,0.007843859,0.0008989035,0.005531826,0.001754365,0.0001791906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601046,0.0003442985,0.003017008,0.03440958,0.0008586985,0.0007250438,0.0000727798,0.00001231677,0.0004556897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988528,0.0002953286,0.0005619693,0.0001365912,0.0001057026,0.0000116059,0.00001491027,0.000003862358,0.0000171784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3071273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061854397","doi":"10.1177/0963662514563888","title":"Voices from other lands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Media studies; Kingdom; Political science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Social science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4430785820135099,"gpt":0.4047955296543727,"spread":0.03828305235913726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005184551,0.00006936956,0.0001075596,0.0001220968,0.0001311523,0.0001299348,0.0004350114,0.00003406418,0.0006557345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009091505,0.00004836173,0.00002660218,0.0005321216,0.001076803,0.0003745567,0.00006245078,0.0000552028,0.00005420669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001081733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008502012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001127365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001093354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989782,0.00002395023,0.0001272625,0.0002360355,0.0003758617,0.0002586897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994386,0.00005250055,0.0000837422,0.0001829711,0.00007826711,0.0001639134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002856526,0.0001122035,0.2814155,0.000004238073,0.00003580956,0.000002104027,0.02953906,0.000001756484,0.00242336,0.678135,0.006992201,0.001310141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002872058,0.0006209734,0.3255327,0.0000984036,0.00004487306,0.00001422681,0.2934378,0.001258142,0.001352878,0.341315,0.0326339,0.0008190786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586306,0.0001604513,0.002506206,0.001190793,0.0008112526,0.00004979813,0.00001377271,0.00004488248,0.1365923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998687,0.000001822996,0.000204271,0.0001050878,0.00006965777,0.00000202022,0.000001668555,0.000003874192,0.0009245896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3368201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7179833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157148197","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104722","title":"Proceeding carefully: Assisted human reproduction policy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Leverhulme Trust; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Reproduction; Jurisdiction; Elite; Political science; Federalist; Policy development; Human reproduction; State (computer science); Public administration; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08371168763202602,"gpt":0.2941998160954693,"spread":0.2104881284634433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001371821,0.0000500405,0.0001021141,0.001557287,0.001929159,0.0003638932,0.0003863165,0.00002371582,0.00003858096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006398882,0.0000674743,0.00001852806,0.003565353,0.001822571,0.0006915229,0.00001897799,0.00009711951,5.345228e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02281496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02094168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998364,0.00002406466,0.0001843404,0.0002783781,0.0007311822,0.0004180892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994361,0.0000147101,0.0001121134,0.0001306692,0.0001114112,0.0001949964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000167126,0.00002555927,0.01108533,0.000009204914,0.000001853841,0.000003077111,0.01188713,0.000007092412,0.002558461,0.9682845,0.001286067,0.004850008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009069415,0.0001395511,0.371644,0.0002179208,0.00001694593,0.00001239085,0.3430938,0.00009484361,0.0004875102,0.1278626,0.1545367,0.0009867672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.625636,0.0001028305,0.0001582835,0.03286181,0.0006871148,0.0002636096,0.000005211988,0.00005427813,0.3402309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990353,0.000009654005,0.00003395476,0.00007970679,0.0001081026,0.000001191426,5.687043e-7,0.000002258332,0.0007292428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.840422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}