{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":99,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":99,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ec9adcf975a2","filters":{"venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism"}},"results":[{"id":"W2123513496","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004947","title":"Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01881560336712127,"gpt":0.2451674486261018,"spread":0.2263518452589805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113208,0.00008351277,0.0001948147,0.0000262332,0.0004699123,0.00007893026,0.0005256419,0.00003504756,0.0004484236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006392637,0.00004703976,0.00006186355,0.0003865243,0.0001892015,0.0003843751,0.00004249221,0.0002718032,0.000003385239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006407131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007852913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.922259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977155,0.0005140176,0.0005554741,0.00006307139,0.0008724242,0.0002794887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998539,0.0004285699,0.0005778582,0.0001192588,0.000230747,0.0001045943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005117318,0.0001541962,0.02723433,0.00001167079,0.0001397945,0.00003073545,0.07223818,0.0002633836,0.0001958596,0.3712991,0.5267618,0.001619671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283322,0.0001510877,0.2283672,0.0002577895,0.0000643286,0.00006711065,0.07578178,0.0004971403,0.0002822579,0.007105884,0.685753,0.0003890933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8055446,0.002011545,0.00004942804,0.1251827,0.001404254,0.0002789149,0.00005413219,0.000004131088,0.06547038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963024,0.0003381067,0.00001975416,0.0007000707,0.0002009192,0.000002658798,1.503769e-7,0.000004933822,0.002431045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3641933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4909924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900510850","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy036","title":"Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Theorizing Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Political science; Public administration; Regional science; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556067526305265,"gpt":0.3120419825160873,"spread":0.2864813072530346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002401379,0.00006410046,0.000123386,0.00004520033,0.0007129334,0.0003500331,0.0001885365,0.00005107761,0.00003483443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008864116,0.00004475707,0.00003278988,0.0001464376,0.0003178173,0.0004667649,0.00002143632,0.0001408929,0.000002268539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001981165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002055312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006884635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01333621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985515,0.0004862005,0.0002975921,0.00006302142,0.0003000252,0.0003017006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.000171911,0.0002350531,0.00006444407,0.0002062124,0.0001230233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001663228,0.00003829289,0.008884558,0.000007809702,0.00002016678,0.000004602245,0.04770762,0.00001720112,0.0004543826,0.9387303,0.002200647,0.001917763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002033577,0.0002744715,0.2899075,0.0005474662,0.00007193422,0.0001777811,0.02154627,0.002174324,0.0003691033,0.1410786,0.5412837,0.000535246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636462,0.000919486,0.005007099,0.01441977,0.0005870329,0.0001466621,0.000002869067,0.00001458168,0.01525635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980963,0.0002593712,0.0001011529,0.0006053831,0.0004305478,0.000001203653,2.003602e-7,0.000005772023,0.0005000405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051020871","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp030","title":"Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Law; History; Decentralization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01351349057987914,"gpt":0.2681913515043193,"spread":0.2546778609244401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009797524,0.00007264111,0.0001526843,0.00005454927,0.0003951299,0.0001268654,0.0002633958,0.00004000586,0.00001223112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004456092,0.00004249148,0.0000327211,0.0003225377,0.0000981918,0.0003337933,0.0000192465,0.0001347803,1.611468e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004297092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6998674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6531047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983086,0.0003098692,0.0004033318,0.00005214015,0.0006755865,0.0002504913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991699,0.0001759469,0.0003651571,0.00008657938,0.0001245712,0.0000778033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007458907,0.0001008588,0.03092696,0.00001386532,0.00003252678,0.00001185052,0.03308855,0.0008694251,0.0001538816,0.8855106,0.03911103,0.01010588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002040001,0.0002599714,0.662007,0.0001712669,0.00007725378,0.0000711694,0.02327989,0.0008762766,0.0008449748,0.1470963,0.1628717,0.000404163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8130738,0.0005947911,0.0005039613,0.1802104,0.0002890546,0.0001641344,0.000006384089,0.000003994777,0.0051534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945282,0.0008591291,0.00001869297,0.003999199,0.0002683533,3.478062e-7,9.162596e-7,0.00000360421,0.0003216118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3532252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104635029","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr053","title":"Beyond Decentralization--The Comparative Study of Interdependence in Federal Systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04870057337254793,"gpt":0.3416385983432719,"spread":0.292938024970724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003726426,0.00009616178,0.0003017141,0.00005232533,0.0004278735,0.0002155143,0.0005918377,0.00004438765,0.00002503374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003349424,0.00005126118,0.00005978281,0.0002878244,0.0001695645,0.0007516357,0.00005232868,0.0002561951,0.000003753576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001632563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001295541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03082604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01098458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.001393683,0.000656757,0.00005962747,0.0008034738,0.0004030366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982467,0.0005016513,0.000671597,0.000135935,0.0002970861,0.000147072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001077619,0.001121945,0.3270843,0.00002569044,0.0001632439,0.00000644457,0.3536073,0.0005249674,0.00006155189,0.3033198,0.01373899,0.0002380292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002214642,0.0004347721,0.7019179,0.0002811266,0.0000748032,0.0001092671,0.2277484,0.0002109797,0.000082045,0.00321361,0.06335825,0.0003541313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868483,0.001186708,0.0001675764,0.002654637,0.001328098,0.0003862966,0.000003304575,0.000004272018,0.007420801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988093,0.00005111091,0.000006120891,0.0001359708,0.000493493,0.000004887316,1.674097e-7,0.000004826845,0.0004941078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3748337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744934096","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx046","title":"Dynamic De/Centralization in Canada, 1867–2010","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Modernization theory; Political science; Nationalism; Citizenship; Localism; Globalization; Federalism; Political economy; Public administration; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01714878104020529,"gpt":0.2854445466285561,"spread":0.2682957655883508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001449474,0.00005491732,0.0001300297,0.00002180043,0.0007320287,0.000343827,0.0006350954,0.00003711533,0.00003763211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009379008,0.0000373005,0.00003762954,0.00004633426,0.00009412981,0.0004799519,0.00002753434,0.000181937,0.000001690775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009598237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001923631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986957,0.0002097856,0.0002617516,0.00004553084,0.0004400327,0.0003472413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990228,0.00009878221,0.0004563108,0.0001497885,0.0001169988,0.0001553367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009284803,0.0001353656,0.4119852,0.00004165684,0.00009638483,0.0002038246,0.01960697,0.0003726309,0.0002707421,0.4264062,0.1245799,0.01620833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002954941,0.000008243399,0.853116,0.00005724521,0.000008287847,0.00002278477,0.0007788402,0.0003334181,0.00001196227,0.004904027,0.1403843,0.00007947644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9147599,0.0002619308,0.0002399577,0.07036576,0.001575713,0.00008930887,0.000006921054,0.000003195873,0.01269729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969227,0.0002085329,0.00002265003,0.0005902503,0.0002055753,6.403445e-7,1.752808e-7,0.00000441365,0.002045068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4411307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5630248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165650283","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji028","title":"Electoral Accountability in a Federal System: National and Provincial Economic Voting in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Voting; Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539428594599356,"gpt":0.2678831157886278,"spread":0.2524888298426343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773436,0.00007840843,0.0002063226,0.00004877255,0.0002467171,0.0002060599,0.0002239662,0.00004196403,0.00001767721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000341572,0.00005795258,0.0000306638,0.00008654613,0.0000609905,0.0006201666,0.00002720488,0.0002505566,0.00000159863],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005312503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004367814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982684,0.0003195644,0.0005172123,0.0000864543,0.0004641376,0.0003441924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992183,0.0002475798,0.0002874422,0.00003995965,0.000102755,0.0001039666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181908,0.00008568777,0.8057314,0.00006703824,0.00003337835,0.00002198306,0.006322213,0.0007712593,0.00004052276,0.1734537,0.009695378,0.003595499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001036887,0.00002590245,0.9616878,0.0001189945,0.000004786691,0.00008540051,0.002412575,0.001869714,0.0000166497,0.0005378379,0.03199971,0.0002037429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850907,0.0001832495,0.000004302093,0.009856493,0.0003052847,0.0001297597,0.00001131867,0.000003255888,0.004415685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998611,0.000004920358,0.00001989821,0.0003540453,0.0008943037,0.000002630271,2.004484e-7,0.000004262581,0.0001087562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1729159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088511019","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq011","title":"Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Business; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01214903033927827,"gpt":0.2663310337949503,"spread":0.254182003455672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001514246,0.00007821929,0.0002308641,0.00006803497,0.0002673554,0.0003821003,0.0002123578,0.00002795422,0.000001661435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001132117,0.0000412886,0.00001428203,0.0002232664,0.0002021366,0.0003408561,0.00004925194,0.000295289,7.903306e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003951519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007067214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986466,0.0002915148,0.00035769,0.00005763923,0.0004072882,0.0002392647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987989,0.0006790448,0.0002797836,0.00005067964,0.00009944376,0.00009214682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007751294,0.00002863441,0.874359,0.0000454014,0.00002809083,0.000007756246,0.01240062,0.00006297731,0.00001280862,0.1120647,0.0007130972,0.000199389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003064859,0.00003001782,0.9464321,0.0001920467,0.00001087639,0.00009045582,0.03047565,0.001489596,0.00001167154,0.005096825,0.01292087,0.0001850166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963487,0.0001526946,0.000006520787,0.03522961,0.0002650201,0.0001435028,0.000005606758,0.000002185649,0.0007078063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989829,0.00009451889,0.000003124442,0.0005616205,0.0001197033,0.000003402971,4.362936e-7,0.000003975802,0.0002303238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1069679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019199818","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq035","title":"Citizen Attitudes Toward Issues of Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Distribution (mathematics); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01865639806271957,"gpt":0.2844913667526119,"spread":0.2658349686898924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002954318,0.0001135304,0.0003468272,0.00006394042,0.0003859956,0.0002511746,0.0005695613,0.0000535883,0.00004853449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009116257,0.00005874416,0.00006429695,0.000239858,0.0005574667,0.0002691475,0.00006473221,0.0004619314,5.619133e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007656069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977427,0.0005564958,0.0005348165,0.00007971112,0.0007221688,0.0003641004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980811,0.0008387801,0.000463059,0.0001398105,0.0003085996,0.0001686626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032422,0.0001055429,0.07739928,0.00007808337,0.0002373507,0.00004404469,0.05826886,0.0001253252,0.0003128422,0.7954108,0.06594792,0.001745776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002764447,0.00006759406,0.4968974,0.0001904339,0.0000586481,0.00008852816,0.0111718,0.0002072765,0.0003573096,0.04113526,0.4467362,0.0003251427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8741078,0.0006320197,0.00001034219,0.122201,0.0005120582,0.0001383199,0.00001621002,0.000003965684,0.002378274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963903,0.0006946453,0.00003618274,0.001887085,0.0003044866,0.000002286213,8.845849e-7,0.00000761205,0.0006764606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7542755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2968805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063366292","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq025","title":"Federalism and Public Responsiveness to Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04198669779011627,"gpt":0.3619078820260473,"spread":0.319921184235931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003125474,0.0001008574,0.0001966626,0.0002850781,0.001049227,0.0008178619,0.000363688,0.00009720087,0.00007341746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003479412,0.00006589614,0.00006424743,0.0005433614,0.0002040211,0.0006006852,0.00005321241,0.0003769263,0.00001500539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008144073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006139282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01411386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0157802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978563,0.0006723719,0.0003820448,0.00008874205,0.0005183808,0.0004822152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979362,0.0004699699,0.0002162152,0.0001520183,0.000632831,0.0005927502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008996831,0.00006365749,0.007423063,0.00000943155,0.00004037204,0.000007373347,0.01087573,0.0000032051,0.007648816,0.9517078,0.01472596,0.007404653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043406,0.0002102512,0.0735305,0.00003105335,0.00003112037,0.0001285567,0.001631609,0.00001048058,0.00040988,0.04583466,0.8774162,0.0002613595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283364,0.00004654804,0.00007480113,0.2665682,0.0006507265,0.0001336922,0.00000196701,0.00001310891,0.004174638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931652,0.00001683214,0.0001066988,0.00310181,0.002117886,0.000004384174,3.724336e-7,0.00001063714,0.001476193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156576814","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp001","title":"Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Normative; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Field (mathematics); Federalism; Public administration; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07750398033551414,"gpt":0.3249232542420168,"spread":0.2474192739065027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001598174,0.00007096585,0.0001784315,0.00004008977,0.0007565971,0.0001916047,0.0001194927,0.00005490052,0.000007932857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003659725,0.00004689861,0.0000230934,0.00009541462,0.0007990206,0.0005924705,0.00002247944,0.0001607663,0.000001464535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007961136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001583107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05446988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985953,0.0005070884,0.0002703674,0.00006428242,0.000336073,0.0002268924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992156,0.0002871115,0.0001659301,0.00004696031,0.0001340869,0.000150294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002997443,0.00005650491,0.02979554,0.00001628683,0.00002563485,0.00006282337,0.01538549,0.00002779727,0.00001836465,0.9481534,0.005947673,0.0004804619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001648482,0.0002396281,0.4827839,0.0005543231,0.00002884386,0.003045693,0.002560962,0.0005299108,0.00001241443,0.01174664,0.4964411,0.0004081536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8944153,0.02773115,0.00237034,0.06780341,0.001195868,0.0006460189,0.00001504842,0.00002503921,0.005797894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995597,0.002710377,0.0001742337,0.000387966,0.000606317,0.000006070441,1.387615e-7,0.000002488141,0.0005154074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9518265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160417104","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju030","title":"Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Rule of law; Electoral reform; Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02512190099483901,"gpt":0.2634135380838276,"spread":0.2382916370889886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872553,0.00009086923,0.0002556767,0.00002761279,0.0004100289,0.0001507885,0.0003268271,0.00005806501,0.00003010069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004394846,0.00005399421,0.00005833566,0.00008335921,0.0001767051,0.0003263789,0.00003657816,0.0001977059,0.000001025085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004133154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9240645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7784088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982473,0.0002740462,0.0004352603,0.00006623112,0.0006419541,0.0003352185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.0002194151,0.0004883264,0.0001147803,0.0002484789,0.0002444069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001190688,0.00009982978,0.0167345,0.000109484,0.0001769868,0.00002949056,0.01240368,0.0000144271,0.001009078,0.8658659,0.09748557,0.005952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007646314,0.0001582678,0.2245894,0.0001107288,0.00003592635,0.0001198756,0.001311962,0.00002737709,0.0002615863,0.01446885,0.7579287,0.0002226394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658749,0.0001991361,0.00005390611,0.01451039,0.0005018958,0.00007168356,0.0000120268,0.000004059386,0.01877202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995597,0.00006112087,0.00003110935,0.0006263552,0.0005509522,6.138175e-7,2.37257e-7,0.000005549547,0.003127028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.851397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3153652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025608131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr040","title":"Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Historical institutionalism; Scope (computer science); Institutionalism; New institutionalism; Politics; Political science; Institutional theory; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02512064568221484,"gpt":0.2288653144031292,"spread":0.2037446687209143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139797,0.00008330416,0.0002694407,0.00003589331,0.0004394794,0.00007912601,0.0002776346,0.00004908815,0.0000144405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005289981,0.00004435365,0.00004410509,0.00008989943,0.0005894247,0.0003001466,0.00005375489,0.0002382984,1.304694e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003064062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000655335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7661167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998316,0.0004094302,0.0004499293,0.00006590255,0.0005297852,0.0002288743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998894,0.000366633,0.000361353,0.00008551488,0.0001652338,0.0001272145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007698617,0.00002362231,0.003095618,0.00001179401,0.00002649111,0.00001175736,0.01433442,9.439681e-7,0.000006883784,0.9744841,0.007658496,0.0002689121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001679869,0.00004890901,0.3327808,0.0000756493,0.00004524532,0.0001619426,0.001923127,0.00001330973,0.00001738257,0.07061733,0.5924576,0.0001787847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.929491,0.003267698,0.00004189361,0.04698129,0.0008634084,0.0001521323,0.000005230026,0.000003590962,0.01919372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973401,0.0004953893,0.00003561512,0.0008409357,0.0002192429,0.000001985234,5.711843e-8,0.000003664409,0.001062945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3380165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139040101","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq006","title":"A Two-Way Street: Federalism and Women's Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Arrow; Dual federalism; Suffrage; Political economy; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006651919003951761,"gpt":0.2127242906699705,"spread":0.2060723716660187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001927352,0.00008473442,0.0001894153,0.0002863301,0.001478903,0.001040167,0.0003058758,0.00004064002,0.00008547877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003575611,0.00005882871,0.00002780025,0.0002496004,0.0008801507,0.0002944836,0.00004199295,0.0005577003,3.95723e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007321421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002381016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985121,0.0003720434,0.0002857569,0.00006996436,0.0003944295,0.0003657166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987414,0.0004739058,0.000216643,0.0001083361,0.0001660876,0.0002935944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781992,0.00008927144,0.02168119,0.00005047352,0.0002573511,0.0002234074,0.3890082,0.0001288567,0.00007335754,0.4863512,0.09423763,0.007620873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002362907,0.00002869831,0.02708592,0.00002226129,0.00003378677,0.00009230504,0.0611892,0.00009646415,0.000002450991,0.0222533,0.886631,0.0002016755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524587,0.000297824,0.000001160417,0.04511476,0.0005353171,0.00009083894,0.00001312258,0.000003319701,0.001484987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994129,0.0008225859,0.00001469551,0.003665423,0.0002791056,0.00000222914,0.000001142482,0.000007547951,0.001078252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739138","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac008","title":"Dual versus Administrative Federalism: Origins and Evolution of Two Models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dual (grammatical number); Convergence (economics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Dual purpose; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Economic growth; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07011801920331819,"gpt":0.342197706841622,"spread":0.2720796876383038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987547,0.0000929603,0.0002326707,0.00005430808,0.001163993,0.0001402953,0.0002974995,0.0000318672,0.00006450383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002264152,0.00006726125,0.00009195697,0.0002058702,0.000254933,0.000592079,0.00009041437,0.0003094277,6.762237e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006361251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02965062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002667265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976612,0.00065808,0.0004101586,0.00008920212,0.0008868559,0.0002944526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.0003637767,0.0005589556,0.0001005667,0.0002343007,0.000167066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001835753,0.00005733681,0.0002530732,0.000004963947,0.00005407601,0.000008984733,0.007630787,0.0002410091,0.00007809991,0.9874957,0.003791342,0.0002010053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009627521,0.002549159,0.01734631,0.0001142699,0.0003223577,0.0005675485,0.05531846,0.001884245,0.0002544785,0.370094,0.5410928,0.0008289542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577533,0.0009806599,0.0004596717,0.01776616,0.00134786,0.0001733035,0.00006098376,0.0000106021,0.02144749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983778,0.00007167984,0.0000743804,0.0001624529,0.0004500594,0.000004124518,5.578448e-7,0.000006637451,0.0008523004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6174018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989114191","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs024","title":"Is Federalism Gendered? Incorporating Gender into Studies of Federalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1561229988684375,"gpt":0.4009926049919845,"spread":0.2448696061235471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004947924,0.0002612855,0.0005333355,0.000250128,0.002002364,0.0004004277,0.0006637883,0.0001473513,0.00008757663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007063708,0.0001765905,0.0003132323,0.0003815146,0.0005613423,0.001404181,0.0001905829,0.0004584732,0.00001187229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000245995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004084902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003577128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003637205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955679,0.001030215,0.001121117,0.0001644678,0.0013859,0.0007304672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960272,0.0004777292,0.001476326,0.0002999905,0.001343847,0.0003748874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007683261,0.0003925303,0.0193377,0.0001865002,0.001388243,0.00001375749,0.7414888,0.0001141193,0.003022125,0.1368555,0.09311337,0.004010614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003051877,0.0003225228,0.05520064,0.0002204317,0.0007907149,0.000403469,0.5105314,0.0001249073,0.009021725,0.3471967,0.07178653,0.001349041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9207211,0.007593552,0.000797594,0.04609625,0.00390316,0.000429208,0.000009781898,0.00004082339,0.02040853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922794,0.0009660831,0.001380048,0.00208101,0.002067771,0.000005341966,0.000002724296,0.00003049712,0.00118717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2309573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055423297","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005037","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism and Federal Political Culture in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Public opinion; Political science; Political culture; Public administration; Law; Library science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02820011905206972,"gpt":0.2700931987013161,"spread":0.2418930796492464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002058836,0.0001832302,0.0003449423,0.00007219233,0.00109878,0.0008196341,0.0003976986,0.00009753978,0.00001192419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008711602,0.00009534776,0.00006124075,0.0003031213,0.0005444084,0.0004409968,0.00006515089,0.0006280509,0.000001007096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001031687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001512964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969011,0.0007856478,0.0005224126,0.0001448456,0.0008714952,0.0007745228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.0004826074,0.0002952331,0.0001396814,0.0002400892,0.0004994804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009401089,0.00003748158,0.001894731,0.000008382794,0.00003434557,0.00001827916,0.004474573,0.00008039807,0.00000168867,0.9810607,0.01207949,0.0002159509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007899609,0.0002078584,0.0712276,0.0003111005,0.00002477634,0.0003969466,0.01387744,0.0001403359,0.00002112407,0.1905122,0.7149078,0.0004732475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4552462,0.002517249,0.00006060308,0.5341121,0.0007451505,0.0003275234,0.00003013647,0.0000116535,0.0069494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848876,0.001136504,0.00001932392,0.01316145,0.0004618298,0.000004025037,0.000003564877,0.00001142317,0.0003142777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7905485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.845104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766985713","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx059","title":"Territorial Politics and Institutional Change: A Comparative-Historical Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Formative assessment; Relevance (law); Political science; Institutional change; Distribution (mathematics); Regional science; Sociology; Economic geography; Public administration; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1111307428873171,"gpt":0.3639255908357007,"spread":0.2527948479483836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001256833,0.00007578149,0.0002893476,0.00006730905,0.002455266,0.000578721,0.0004801364,0.0000606612,0.00001723287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006020626,0.00004822321,0.0001278146,0.00008951514,0.0004140327,0.0007310608,0.00006190273,0.0001972876,0.000001603058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003590482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001915669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08392087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00790569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985734,0.0002230646,0.0002902432,0.00006979165,0.0005851994,0.0002583606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986995,0.0001537151,0.0005080037,0.0001569156,0.0002393695,0.0002424217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479402,0.0001000525,0.02858477,0.000008717924,0.0004630925,0.00002190332,0.01544175,0.000004254066,0.00001880421,0.9328966,0.02140615,0.001009158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003263486,0.00003756195,0.2166692,0.0000165534,0.0001726774,0.00001924661,0.0002193815,0.00005088491,0.000003612521,0.004192611,0.778206,0.00008596634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8397858,0.00139698,0.0008432249,0.1208566,0.007194408,0.0002210199,0.00003719491,0.00001502021,0.02964985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927346,0.0001005645,0.00007001478,0.0002767072,0.005551934,0.000001799111,3.285195e-7,0.000002273237,0.001261841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.928704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166377604","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab011","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Coordination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Responses in Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public administration; Pandemic; Procurement; Member states; Business; Economics; Economic policy; Law; European union; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04789608263493415,"gpt":0.3261299957056508,"spread":0.2782339130707166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123496,0.00007340772,0.0001431809,0.00002468721,0.0005558557,0.0002352697,0.0002247911,0.00004007522,0.00004764152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002166342,0.00004422732,0.00003422879,0.0001310333,0.0001209504,0.0003182375,0.00006201732,0.0002556161,3.868163e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009410639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008372241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7248151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8998217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980868,0.0006753149,0.0003283664,0.00007784477,0.0005673848,0.0002643188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984427,0.0009455317,0.0002693385,0.00007998341,0.0000802212,0.0001822233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004216,0.00008737738,0.8438609,0.00008364187,0.0001523649,0.0007178714,0.06243552,0.00007850927,0.003293215,0.04568052,0.04219618,0.0009135365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001097558,0.00002853512,0.6247573,0.00008748053,0.00001966037,0.001038784,0.01721941,0.00001509918,0.0001384719,0.001572981,0.3538605,0.0001641671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579521,0.0003805757,0.00001839373,0.04059464,0.0003054249,0.00006377738,0.000013348,0.000003328515,0.0006683666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910526,0.0001185273,0.000005828204,0.001716816,0.0002432895,0.000001910125,2.679144e-7,0.000004091874,0.006856719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3116643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036253132","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl002","title":"Canadian Abortion Policy: National Policy and the Impact of Federalism and Political Implementation on Access to Services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Federalism; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Health services; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01907550293836379,"gpt":0.394498132722935,"spread":0.3754226297845712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001191814,0.0001213232,0.0002432913,0.0004952122,0.000307813,0.0002301359,0.0001128002,0.00004380486,0.00001658359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002238352,0.00006354266,0.00007540613,0.0002760671,0.00008177554,0.0003885924,0.00002337338,0.0001898008,8.56139e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005988108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001448939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5795692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04431573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998471,0.0001832998,0.0004648235,0.0001119636,0.0004364063,0.0003325378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984151,0.0001325514,0.0003020521,0.0001144287,0.0006890208,0.0003468432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01073176,0.0005198705,0.184722,0.0004229565,0.0009794728,0.00002369696,0.008970456,0.0007459943,0.006085413,0.6971661,0.04221837,0.04741391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002379213,0.0003324331,0.9775863,0.00004090889,0.0000471686,0.0003757029,0.0002782402,0.00007810917,0.0001876064,0.01764578,0.0009859547,0.00006253568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7322298,0.0001154954,0.00001705392,0.265832,0.00004718715,0.0003454846,0.00002329581,0.000003229276,0.001386419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890862,0.000070002,0.00002689558,0.008695568,0.002019615,0.000006747744,0.00001403391,0.00001031881,0.00007064892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7928643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969401051","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004976","title":"The Federal Spending Power in Canada: Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03244015693377263,"gpt":0.2883594640292888,"spread":0.2559193070955162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003623249,0.00009761001,0.0001683136,0.00004837094,0.001540206,0.0005620734,0.0004765358,0.00004158284,0.00008222586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003640012,0.00005138363,0.00006007971,0.0003009556,0.0001054811,0.0005024716,0.00002137002,0.0003289733,0.00000187309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002829208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8641667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974032,0.0005790123,0.0005099296,0.00007885464,0.0009363625,0.0004926242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979523,0.001134512,0.0004426755,0.0001009194,0.000214437,0.0001551373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003087861,0.00002000718,0.01247247,0.000003065069,0.00003807042,0.00002711854,0.002428243,0.00007056451,0.00002902617,0.9725681,0.01177372,0.0005387696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007211617,0.00004610707,0.06130872,0.0001176354,0.00001514885,0.0001461165,0.01020337,0.00006303946,0.000125814,0.02889947,0.8980784,0.0002749458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8926061,0.0007040026,0.0001933128,0.05197813,0.003368629,0.0002438807,0.000004849594,0.000008921581,0.05089219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968761,0.00009559122,0.0000754302,0.0006272637,0.0003181838,0.000002306399,9.181503e-8,0.000008131016,0.001996937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166600131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab010","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Conflict in the COVID-19 Crisis: The United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Divergence (linguistics); Skepticism; Incentive; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06304866190792953,"gpt":0.3308383654452491,"spread":0.2677897035373196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002953152,0.00009010691,0.0001523951,0.0000220174,0.000690694,0.0004551953,0.0005047217,0.0000369535,0.00007118077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001040259,0.00004302683,0.00004518561,0.0002669473,0.0001733086,0.0002103838,0.00005933316,0.0003708349,6.313205e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000471823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000816857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9633528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9396188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972722,0.001134768,0.0003571159,0.00007832317,0.0008265683,0.0003310583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.0009550066,0.0002773473,0.0001319771,0.0001050364,0.0002008065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005334927,0.00005011732,0.008804538,0.00001715771,0.00009556854,0.0002920487,0.09677571,0.0001209774,0.00002111935,0.1465132,0.747155,0.0001012545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003171722,0.00001975652,0.01180923,0.00001987906,0.00001702855,0.0002037669,0.08264887,0.0000142644,0.00001118264,0.0009404612,0.9039298,0.00006857259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7266011,0.0004985552,0.00003873526,0.2713511,0.0003888139,0.00008902752,0.00003104945,0.00000288271,0.0009987713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628345,0.0003072886,0.000005787574,0.03568066,0.0002424084,0.000002591117,0.000001758042,0.000004257533,0.0009207075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2362335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.531233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385249247","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv037","title":"Secession Risk and Fiscal Federalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Decentralization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02974139326641809,"gpt":0.290269295680313,"spread":0.2605279024138949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002656233,0.0000900282,0.0001560306,0.00004489653,0.0007237503,0.0004346391,0.0002621085,0.00007727384,0.00003586821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007240086,0.0000543916,0.00005376511,0.0001821724,0.0001550367,0.0008938147,0.00005304222,0.0002298933,0.000006662048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001196689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001723074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001444852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005117314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980032,0.0005064486,0.0003055976,0.00007782232,0.0008613165,0.0002456361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988469,0.0001348208,0.0004345374,0.00009254131,0.0002381997,0.0002529996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005778368,0.0002879549,0.1107226,0.00001808781,0.0001188129,0.00004461179,0.1052382,0.0003234017,0.000125257,0.0623995,0.6540047,0.06613903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001991625,0.0002376467,0.04231724,0.00006615929,0.00009867245,0.00008203646,0.01389494,0.0002704237,0.000158238,0.04269776,0.8979149,0.0002703571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321436,0.001586786,0.004144276,0.04210572,0.001492473,0.0001802666,0.000005526479,0.00002784925,0.01831355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994878,0.002032687,0.0001590659,0.0009828225,0.0006305676,7.87225e-7,9.443774e-7,0.000007686361,0.001307427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5566576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311479810","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjw002","title":"Governing an International Transboundary River: Opportunism, Safeguards, and Drought Adaptation in the Rio Grande","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Economic shortage; Corporate governance; Water scarcity; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Government (linguistics); Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0174668177881999,"gpt":0.2054618559070744,"spread":0.1879950381188745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000805899,0.00008906372,0.00009283951,0.0001077874,0.0001029647,0.000250011,0.0003103458,0.00002825414,0.00002578626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002348553,0.00004375023,0.0000353596,0.00007432953,0.00004339205,0.001204027,0.00001547117,0.000130214,0.000001426889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000450168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001041111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003339362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008339294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999171,0.0001013355,0.0002618119,0.00005469888,0.0002915126,0.0001196178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996461,0.00007963686,0.0001022364,0.00008945386,0.00004668874,0.0000359046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000889678,0.000288111,0.01538604,0.000125739,0.0008320792,0.0001968898,0.1764677,0.1886707,0.002290351,0.0102996,0.02120237,0.5833508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007891138,0.0003872074,0.1753011,0.0003416956,0.0002335972,0.0005920368,0.005514517,0.1501127,0.0002131496,0.007893667,0.6507899,0.0007292274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149806,0.0002983335,0.06648775,0.01183642,0.0005826487,0.0001724167,0.00000959845,0.00003625685,0.005596004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980109,0.0009392529,0.0004027153,0.0002290907,0.0001912027,0.000001829555,0.000006322611,0.0000128606,0.0002058183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6295876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2410862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045098566","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt030","title":"The Question of Federalism in Nepal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Unitary state; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Nepali; Dual federalism; New Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Ethnic group; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01610185448587914,"gpt":0.3013066334009589,"spread":0.2852047789150798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003460442,0.00008421822,0.0002013683,0.00004132706,0.0005867474,0.0003869892,0.000561183,0.00006358019,0.00004429831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056578,0.00004287941,0.0001021004,0.0001935653,0.0002793574,0.0006366341,0.00003894678,0.0002871531,0.00001284662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002014861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09842151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975771,0.000743922,0.0005761581,0.00006046366,0.0006651287,0.0003772712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982237,0.000587189,0.0005472608,0.0001389243,0.0003692176,0.0001337053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004811569,0.0001035705,0.006389689,0.00001517157,0.00005149415,0.000006553708,0.01022523,0.00002570213,0.0004159223,0.9080412,0.05907275,0.01560462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008448185,0.0001378106,0.3819029,0.0002065934,0.00002375553,0.00005406711,0.003807319,0.0001246461,0.0001641494,0.1071228,0.5053912,0.0002199495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8711029,0.0008543655,0.00008115584,0.1047203,0.001025961,0.0002510294,0.00000244078,0.000008197422,0.02195368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957977,0.0003809768,0.00004436893,0.0005622851,0.0005772682,0.000004622148,1.410208e-7,0.000006183327,0.002626446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8009183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167940972","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq008","title":"Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Similarity (geometry); Value (mathematics); Variation (astronomy); Perception; Political science; Positive economics; Variable (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03580295199593247,"gpt":0.3271679563338115,"spread":0.291365004337879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00137397,0.00007745264,0.0001455332,0.0000571236,0.002268572,0.0003354473,0.0003047769,0.00002951678,0.00003779796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004884773,0.0000402704,0.00004243759,0.0001991904,0.001141686,0.0001457093,0.00002754128,0.0005445824,8.059232e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008300885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001652397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8969997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9168408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986801,0.0003851489,0.0002340003,0.00004941758,0.0004297445,0.0002216049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998117,0.001091096,0.0002323734,0.0001014595,0.0003113585,0.0001467265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004814366,0.00001075466,0.0002768711,9.744849e-7,0.00003724676,0.000002888763,0.003188928,0.0001893964,0.000008675096,0.9780577,0.01809432,0.00008413814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000461066,0.00002181257,0.00121158,0.00000965987,0.00003389113,0.00008401914,0.005468713,0.00006076807,0.000009722084,0.007873862,0.9846862,0.00007873792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7398903,0.00006626855,0.0001003536,0.1494109,0.001408159,0.0001083048,0.000008551863,0.00001208419,0.1089951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989587,0.0001417442,0.00006466012,0.008455081,0.0005458884,0.000001241949,0.000002140793,0.000004462634,0.001197785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607314962","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx025","title":"Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Post communist; Political science; Communism; Political economy; Economic system; Economic geography; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05154112912042661,"gpt":0.3456976157494429,"spread":0.2941564866290163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001412915,0.0000914069,0.0002730651,0.00002813189,0.001956166,0.0005241767,0.001177005,0.00005842865,0.00006175567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002716139,0.00005721652,0.0001198881,0.00004562081,0.0006700106,0.00116419,0.000100577,0.0002519533,0.000007090491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007331937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005378279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1216185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01346055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998159,0.000367982,0.0004545249,0.00006264047,0.0007296802,0.0002261964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973438,0.0004823592,0.001000423,0.0003036216,0.0007191944,0.000150561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008885122,0.0001531547,0.02216435,0.000007018197,0.0001598107,0.00001765908,0.005724593,0.000005086983,0.0004277987,0.950038,0.01879627,0.002417471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006089224,0.00003722716,0.4669212,0.00005464885,0.00002667111,0.000009578812,0.0003763623,0.00000296687,0.00004074015,0.004678998,0.5271615,0.00008112905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389706,0.0005562701,0.0002754723,0.1880274,0.009254835,0.0001791599,0.0003313329,0.00001378719,0.06239117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955717,0.00009349314,0.0001151139,0.0004805145,0.002124537,9.573325e-7,0.000002542394,0.000005711331,0.001605422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9453589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033865671","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs021","title":"Federalism, Decentralization, and Reproductive Rights in Argentina and Chile","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Unitary state; Opposition (politics); Autonomy; Political science; Cooperative federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02586979651979738,"gpt":0.3057559082121908,"spread":0.2798861116923934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001844105,0.00007142634,0.0001221877,0.00009520548,0.0006315862,0.0002356482,0.0001052693,0.00004417169,0.00002599928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002208274,0.00004645942,0.00002670645,0.0001483757,0.0001538237,0.000742423,0.00003298987,0.0001334767,9.20738e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004368807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005360472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003165969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008100893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987012,0.0003708395,0.0002663634,0.0000820955,0.0002842472,0.0002952882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999278,0.00008388013,0.0002177679,0.00008191485,0.0001755038,0.0001629511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000587003,0.0002925129,0.252999,0.00002356942,0.0001128498,0.000007428166,0.2607845,0.0000358523,0.0003557555,0.4667173,0.01704206,0.001570458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001079808,0.00004805811,0.7480595,0.00003880229,0.00007248839,0.0002289065,0.01531022,0.00002578242,0.0007920991,0.08324077,0.1508438,0.0002598391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760655,0.001426085,0.00007526192,0.01677651,0.0005841604,0.0001411494,0.000001170556,0.000005707736,0.004924476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979169,0.0005981613,0.000112452,0.0002250559,0.0006624557,0.000001164944,0.0000011136,0.000004535209,0.0004782067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4950605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4857714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147452464","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju040","title":"Regions as Primary Political Communities: A Multi-Level Comparative Analysis of Turnout in Regional Elections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Turnout; Salience (neuroscience); Legislature; Political science; Politics; Voting; Democracy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1862378547035477,"gpt":0.4074363070230401,"spread":0.2211984523194924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266709,0.00009524018,0.000442625,0.0003987714,0.0004848236,0.0000942846,0.0003427737,0.00008024332,0.00005262353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004241304,0.0000669545,0.0002060349,0.0009469833,0.0004253371,0.0003073388,0.0000256676,0.0003737866,0.000003450715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003311225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06637259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08566123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965001,0.001885724,0.0006440836,0.00005871034,0.0005234468,0.000387901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971825,0.001472343,0.0003914007,0.0001630557,0.0005794861,0.0002112063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006415763,0.000330027,0.01975311,0.000009987271,0.0004271975,9.593351e-7,0.0332886,0.0003187989,0.0001201639,0.9432875,0.002288539,0.0001109656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00162172,0.0005094779,0.8798623,0.000204861,0.001122035,0.00004408055,0.03055561,0.003450622,0.00008395621,0.05169617,0.03044502,0.0004041638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541646,0.0001168722,0.002514289,0.0294345,0.0001733171,0.000170958,0.00001116665,0.0000114855,0.0134028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981956,0.00001776124,0.0001575636,0.0009759089,0.0001917683,0.000004832706,0.000006432123,0.000004344965,0.0004458101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057117391","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs015","title":"Federalism and the \"New Politics\" of Welfare Development: Childcare and Parental Leave in Australia and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Welfare; Politics; Parental leave; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Engineering; Work (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02274958839846366,"gpt":0.2869332547827435,"spread":0.2641836663842799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129927,0.0001145897,0.0002697935,0.00005233711,0.001334996,0.0001184807,0.0001593376,0.00006061012,0.000007089662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002310018,0.00005954886,0.0000321223,0.00009347725,0.0005747002,0.0003127262,0.00009073711,0.0002335101,8.991242e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009554926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003186992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7509692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6849493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986084,0.0002534308,0.000350603,0.00005827654,0.0003634469,0.0003658724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.0001885782,0.0002610648,0.00005058295,0.0000879767,0.0001971211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001373224,0.00005908959,0.2833176,0.00006771371,0.0003845073,0.000006935222,0.4627793,0.000001432254,0.000008368613,0.2343765,0.01443514,0.004426187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001789499,0.00002345386,0.8852798,0.00006791545,0.00006133214,0.00008437134,0.07797252,6.600529e-7,0.00005279697,0.009624023,0.02485666,0.0001870209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151011,0.002225927,5.323557e-7,0.08096777,0.0003265898,0.0001316699,0.000005807431,0.000002426118,0.001238147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975742,0.0007324518,0.00002699256,0.0005147794,0.0005657937,0.000001254592,5.431027e-7,0.000005453592,0.0005785845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6019622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160152441","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq012","title":"Going Alone or Moving Together: Canadian and American Middle Tier Strategies on Climate Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Political science; Regional science; Geography; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05346229013758931,"gpt":0.3193139495873245,"spread":0.2658516594497352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984358,0.0001046078,0.0001871439,0.0001710579,0.001186399,0.0006163887,0.0002978074,0.00005229301,0.0001100554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002301951,0.00006552193,0.00005108654,0.000207799,0.0002820043,0.0006499445,0.00001521241,0.0005990264,0.000005935835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006206858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004375957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2684366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7077097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986133,0.0002910698,0.0002148476,0.00008050557,0.0003057852,0.0004944759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990501,0.0002591193,0.0001535896,0.00009533735,0.00009369322,0.0003481812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005639479,0.0001392493,0.0295341,0.00006694915,0.0002731671,0.0001913781,0.6560588,0.0000509342,0.002971393,0.1009492,0.005985229,0.2032157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001583852,0.0009135355,0.1810537,0.0003152186,0.0001606653,0.0003720894,0.1526469,0.0001624088,0.0001887432,0.004248032,0.657466,0.0008888399],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309412,0.00008618442,0.000009295814,0.04529913,0.0003862752,0.00009325761,0.000005470016,0.00001498827,0.02316422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955011,0.0004673334,0.0001037831,0.002613501,0.000981705,0.000002134193,3.388179e-7,0.00001377039,0.0003163502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968502388","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq009","title":"Safeguarding Federalism in Education Policy in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Safeguarding; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Education policy; Enforcement; Political science; Autonomy; National Policy; Politics; New Federalism; Economic growth; Higher education; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0100092869944246,"gpt":0.2873418114393782,"spread":0.2773325244449536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003432383,0.00008779574,0.0001763188,0.0003083929,0.0005736313,0.0003206318,0.0003600982,0.00004373532,0.00002150115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008243318,0.00005143322,0.00003504164,0.0006145842,0.0001739255,0.0003480095,0.00002203682,0.0008066394,3.608075e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003002802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003555882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980875,0.0008211398,0.0003544049,0.00006351278,0.0003539811,0.00031947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988489,0.0006790317,0.0001486638,0.00009032049,0.0001157094,0.0001173853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004518176,0.0001377954,0.1529973,0.00003351807,0.00009966583,0.00002432714,0.4738192,0.001713552,0.0003578172,0.3114251,0.01192407,0.0470158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004157093,0.00003613612,0.5267367,0.0001421075,0.00004181807,0.0001695184,0.1100503,0.0006327197,0.00005977703,0.05093988,0.3066296,0.0004042822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8536023,0.0001562963,0.000007101673,0.1426313,0.0004090175,0.0001039287,0.000001188658,0.000003257298,0.003085606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941908,0.0007368986,0.00002101193,0.004363906,0.0005002582,0.000002812801,0.000001390654,0.000007361756,0.0001755378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3737395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073159803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs036","title":"(Sub)national Economic Union: Institutions, Ideas, and Internal Trade Policy in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Economic union; Trade union; Commercial policy; Public administration; Economic history; Law; International trade; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02459961988116227,"gpt":0.2891645562863082,"spread":0.2645649364051459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00132207,0.00006230943,0.0001067334,0.0001140982,0.0002921172,0.00009919021,0.000237107,0.00002931955,0.0000306229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002866051,0.00004999765,0.00002985132,0.0001220591,0.0001245928,0.0007656137,0.0000201823,0.0002042376,0.00000149495],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002211063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007696497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989413,0.0001994131,0.0002566037,0.00004087403,0.0002850768,0.0002767559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993578,0.000107405,0.0002148826,0.00004563719,0.00002875382,0.0002455573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002231564,0.00002598012,0.02325794,0.000005287314,0.00004183569,0.000008968702,0.007335746,0.0001861637,0.0000137787,0.5973996,0.3645641,0.007138358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873991,0.000006669483,0.2542112,0.00001930481,0.000005155322,0.0001183173,0.0006646863,0.00001192558,0.00001158079,0.003479395,0.741105,0.00007928339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6758149,0.001171168,0.00001545584,0.3056801,0.0008075827,0.0000711585,0.00006540466,0.000002531539,0.01637176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919347,0.0005370499,0.00001130012,0.005683128,0.001575894,8.142939e-7,4.848926e-7,0.000003482741,0.0002531733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079486721","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv016","title":"Negotiating Territorial Change in Multinational States: Party Preferences, Negotiating Power and the Role of the Negotiation Mode","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Power (physics); Mode (computer interface); Political science; Economic geography; Space (punctuation); Economic system; Political economy; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050010180715122,"gpt":0.2969719739030321,"spread":0.2664718720958809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003506733,0.000090556,0.0002021446,0.00003321542,0.000378004,0.0002805229,0.0004179272,0.0000639218,0.000005488237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002132624,0.00004227711,0.00005903182,0.000176729,0.0002627251,0.0007123207,0.00008364871,0.0002881597,4.021271e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000137219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002614589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1034988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006003798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997223,0.001054063,0.0005110339,0.00007597078,0.0008706749,0.0002652692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978883,0.0007205586,0.0008063909,0.0001049632,0.0003792589,0.0001004956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002749912,0.0001500279,0.10154,0.00001616689,0.00007488254,0.000001098146,0.2803753,0.003332587,0.00004819976,0.6076439,0.002585141,0.003957722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009821059,0.0002515676,0.4673427,0.0005215073,0.000123431,0.00004436174,0.08159373,0.06809794,0.00007795823,0.2072977,0.1642639,0.0005642191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974021,0.001847626,0.00008146515,0.01731457,0.002601364,0.0004554944,0.00002445144,0.000006859193,0.003647128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982666,0.00007442867,0.00003219619,0.0002259319,0.001321994,0.000008459967,7.050134e-7,0.000005583966,0.00006413571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4003462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976031580","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji010","title":"Shaping the Constitutional Dialogue on Federalism: Canada's Supreme Court as Meta-Political Actor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Politics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Political question; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08276134096458518,"gpt":0.3094598507758515,"spread":0.2266985098112664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002086046,0.0001993747,0.0003824951,0.00005854289,0.003952643,0.0004041277,0.0007229486,0.00007461727,0.0004298772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001351998,0.0001022651,0.0002703369,0.0002080675,0.00201755,0.0003992858,0.00008099271,0.0005410205,0.0000279098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006197619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003759224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4026273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5646108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996596,0.0005498478,0.0005201719,0.0001329512,0.001587332,0.0006136994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974828,0.001155159,0.0003020156,0.0001379137,0.0006305042,0.0002916089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004692068,0.00004808663,0.0001230966,0.000001044681,0.0005645393,0.00001574957,0.0008603624,0.00010372,0.00001064364,0.9324589,0.06537126,0.0003956775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003616384,0.00005255049,0.002011576,0.0000232105,0.0004474185,0.0001456231,0.00286542,0.00001081278,0.00005865239,0.03608475,0.9577378,0.0002005662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03675789,0.002158471,0.0001570388,0.8063821,0.001811336,0.0002770302,0.00005868997,0.0000259411,0.1523715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732407,0.0002269875,0.00003714043,0.02278453,0.003185158,0.000008017251,0.000002603705,0.000006155418,0.0005087287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081028403","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju039","title":"From Calgary to Canberra: Resource Taxation and Fiscal Federalism in Canada and Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Politics; Revenue; Incentive; Fiscal federalism; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Finance; Law; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01829936736056144,"gpt":0.2613873447796973,"spread":0.2430879774191358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001260536,0.00009737103,0.0002233724,0.00003911735,0.0002731187,0.0002504755,0.0002122505,0.00005811774,0.00002195482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008318101,0.00006770371,0.00002323883,0.0001123492,0.00008230458,0.0002463966,0.00004728874,0.0002404959,0.000001031452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000346592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003028867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982414,0.0004662981,0.0003564162,0.0001098111,0.0004944912,0.0003315403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.0003724438,0.0003199243,0.00009113976,0.00006703471,0.000356972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002582409,0.00007843588,0.3265016,0.00004604138,0.0001218177,0.00009064624,0.06564748,0.0001224277,0.0004861563,0.1375373,0.4479307,0.02117923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003972482,0.00003457589,0.6665108,0.00006997967,0.00001242121,0.0000211661,0.001405986,0.00005979159,0.00001595834,0.003888661,0.3274509,0.0001325096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.956558,0.0001246318,0.00007036944,0.0404975,0.0003191459,0.0001004563,0.00001105832,0.000003121497,0.00231574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995592,0.00002238378,0.00007107105,0.002139904,0.0006447986,0.000001763787,7.661613e-7,0.000006013368,0.001521293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3400092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2760877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967031825","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv010","title":"Federalism and Women’s Representation: Do Federations have more Women Legislators than Centralized States?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05040549755963111,"gpt":0.3384341840796425,"spread":0.2880286865200115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002903899,0.0001877444,0.0003199006,0.0001773959,0.001554345,0.002031814,0.0003809042,0.0001046278,0.0001010422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005489766,0.0001325432,0.00009326138,0.0002421039,0.000367599,0.001164491,0.00008455101,0.0003191041,0.000004951319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005738802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006278707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004074688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006451614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965469,0.0008294922,0.0006216833,0.000189046,0.001104231,0.0007085952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973531,0.0002342138,0.0005635337,0.0002348051,0.000823891,0.000790436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001507566,0.0001453946,0.01269479,0.00001299509,0.0002644733,0.00003222802,0.9141735,0.0005670954,0.00006108383,0.02430209,0.04643771,0.001157875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003165194,0.0002120821,0.01820644,0.0000291141,0.0000651054,0.0001877066,0.743562,0.000269059,0.0001272932,0.09340503,0.140353,0.0004179881],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362994,0.0003770397,0.0002771322,0.05339718,0.001033518,0.0003104653,0.0000116624,0.00003058419,0.008262975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922714,0.0005543355,0.0001719506,0.001101464,0.0008060424,0.00002251264,0.000007320546,0.00002128857,0.005043686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1706116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033313409","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs041","title":"A Little Help from My Friends: The Partisan Factor and Intergovernmental Negotiations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Explanatory power; Political science; State (computer science); Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01929589639790587,"gpt":0.2545251382291095,"spread":0.2352292418312036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051823,0.00006505669,0.0001225891,0.00001119652,0.0003231716,0.0001472178,0.0002627475,0.00002547905,0.0001276507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002855725,0.00003491623,0.00003398836,0.00008489196,0.00009047481,0.0004974541,0.00004614568,0.0001951263,0.000002046592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005713745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004284793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985774,0.0002936838,0.0002661944,0.00004472228,0.0004992919,0.0003187198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990156,0.0004579386,0.0002230184,0.00008143277,0.00003549527,0.0001865691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004179178,0.0001123973,0.7838021,0.000005974667,0.0001326286,0.000008590033,0.08199114,0.000005160212,0.0001366215,0.08435246,0.04497655,0.004434592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002193329,0.00001207641,0.7306111,0.00002775294,0.00001377034,0.00001010787,0.01505727,0.00001173646,0.0000445243,0.0009929042,0.2529263,0.00007311322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709374,0.001172648,0.00002449019,0.02372512,0.0007842653,0.00007302828,0.00005428625,0.00000209966,0.003226696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.00009525266,0.000009987659,0.001005913,0.0006696805,0.000001952181,3.251138e-7,0.000004034601,0.0002701882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2079497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2485607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734257280","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx043","title":"Introducing a Societal Culture Index to Compare Minority Nations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Political science; Index (typography); Politics; Sovereignty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Normative; Democracy; Minority rights; Empirical research; Political culture; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economic growth; Development economics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03322985371849833,"gpt":0.3410213217413101,"spread":0.3077914680228118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670788,0.00007731902,0.0001820808,0.00003319488,0.003274683,0.0009756425,0.0009085186,0.00004050904,0.00003932657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002365457,0.00004829232,0.0001164593,0.00009360105,0.0001838999,0.0006862806,0.0000918193,0.0002926526,0.00001292635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001647433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002053343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02714735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01839375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985462,0.0001811249,0.0002680971,0.00008120666,0.0006182747,0.0003051235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984967,0.0001123445,0.0004670443,0.0002321554,0.0004488837,0.000242943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003575608,0.0001188234,0.03247759,0.00002135407,0.0001263348,0.00001233903,0.05101895,0.00006374476,0.0001546576,0.4084752,0.5043857,0.003109558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002376334,0.00002669006,0.1600185,0.00005321707,0.00002286932,0.0000232057,0.002344585,0.00002253124,0.00002536969,0.004655855,0.8324497,0.0001198422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5575047,0.000420817,0.00107477,0.2929316,0.00270041,0.0003156842,0.00003066113,0.00002348125,0.1449979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891791,0.00003498746,0.0001481614,0.0008952748,0.00251681,0.000001640931,2.349683e-7,0.000003784996,0.007220055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4316744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196130899","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab020","title":"Dissecting Public Opinion on Regional Authority: Four Types of Regionalists Based on Citizens’ Preferences for Self-Rule and Shared Rule","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Universitetet i Bergen; Trond Mohn stiftelse","keywords":"Home rule; Rule of law; Autonomy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Political science; Regional autonomy; Majority rule; Identity (music); Public opinion; Public administration; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09125133047699784,"gpt":0.326313821118436,"spread":0.2350624906414382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001857767,0.0001151156,0.0002700406,0.00006667062,0.000603557,0.0003139115,0.0002823915,0.00009316836,0.00003293495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00246606,0.00007838289,0.0001348193,0.0001909736,0.0001168611,0.0003055886,0.00002981694,0.0002085346,8.745095e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004733831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001016181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003473439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997993,0.0003887702,0.0003935355,0.0001488707,0.0007625188,0.0003133377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969464,0.001323937,0.000536634,0.0001327678,0.0008670265,0.0001932475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002704689,0.0004205212,0.009930843,0.0001860681,0.000211772,0.00001346963,0.004264492,0.00004669383,0.0001727638,0.9434313,0.03759179,0.003459867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003184836,0.0008911914,0.2011448,0.00158843,0.000097916,0.0001337217,0.003853658,0.001099394,0.0005616318,0.1835445,0.603247,0.0006529756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8208656,0.00118317,0.0003757635,0.1543909,0.002127878,0.0004236736,0.0001132044,0.00004355828,0.02047622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968693,0.0001583254,0.0004087025,0.0007898357,0.0009673551,0.000006415758,0.000005381575,0.0000100901,0.00078462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4642133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212220698","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab037","title":"Political Parties and Decentralization in Pakistan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Devolution (biology); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Constitution; Local government; Power (physics); Incentive; Newspaper; Centralized government; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02614863212868593,"gpt":0.3412473208945656,"spread":0.3150986887658797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104897,0.00007277045,0.0001481985,0.00005352471,0.0003799615,0.0004060771,0.0001578371,0.0000530416,0.0000579704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002618386,0.00005387195,0.0000467693,0.0001648219,0.0002378094,0.0002437415,0.0000293581,0.0001618325,9.66267e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001052563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004276167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006447755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003086416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985006,0.0003561243,0.0003409949,0.00006909126,0.0003384025,0.0003947573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991539,0.0001419526,0.0001241987,0.00008554902,0.0002815532,0.0002128871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001301563,0.00003534526,0.002069168,0.000005620419,0.00001168366,0.00002445055,0.00199601,0.000001086427,0.00004854046,0.9951963,0.00007412828,0.0005246082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004516562,0.00003091738,0.009467768,0.00005027008,0.00002721588,0.00008528063,0.01109613,0.00001900589,0.0001767079,0.06295807,0.9155215,0.0001154846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2795523,0.007751754,0.001550226,0.01994434,0.00214453,0.0002329723,0.00002425512,0.00003275693,0.6887669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838251,0.0007146415,0.00006958858,0.001214163,0.0003110238,7.318239e-7,0.000001192827,0.000006287951,0.01385723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9322383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3915811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973235894","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq003","title":"What Explains the Paradox of Tobacco Control Policy under Federalism in the U.S. and Canada? Comparative Federalism Theory versus Multi-level Governance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tobacco control; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Multi-level governance; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Politics; Public health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06829945013192025,"gpt":0.3442498759291002,"spread":0.2759504257971799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385705,0.0002725427,0.0004919011,0.00009384273,0.001877004,0.001041785,0.001349819,0.0001341826,0.00004201422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008081069,0.000141752,0.0001573168,0.0003541972,0.0008692858,0.001190347,0.00005352474,0.001415527,0.000001159472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002010446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001695328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5563893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9230567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994997,0.002427677,0.0006800747,0.0001760981,0.001069833,0.0006493749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950424,0.003550154,0.0005856741,0.0003258306,0.000305184,0.000190783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001288662,0.0002586968,0.003304699,0.00001674925,0.0004821098,0.00003315623,0.3238904,0.0006048165,0.0005860641,0.6518146,0.009392908,0.008327119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01521811,0.0003462219,0.5116798,0.0002487385,0.0003003667,0.0002777063,0.3348229,0.0002247633,0.0002744399,0.02524652,0.1103425,0.001017927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7962973,0.001422536,0.0002276652,0.1971143,0.001610146,0.0004611991,0.00003774699,0.000009612993,0.002819538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902499,0.001104738,0.00004534828,0.007449699,0.0007913008,0.00001092879,0.000001267668,0.00001694462,0.0003299291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6265681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943154033","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz010","title":"Reconceptualizing Canadian Federal Political Culture: Examining Differences between Quebec and the Rest of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Federalism; Political culture; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Promotion (chess); Civic culture; Rest (music); Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02991610346132422,"gpt":0.2566245614585833,"spread":0.226708457997259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002109977,0.000110273,0.0003732062,0.00003358349,0.0007447631,0.0002854791,0.0005013228,0.00007593721,0.00004940997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009572975,0.00005590023,0.00005917173,0.0001215283,0.000534195,0.000290799,0.00003901067,0.0003313622,8.612529e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004018958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00270453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974482,0.0007242919,0.0004777101,0.00009051168,0.0006457691,0.0006134832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977334,0.001051871,0.0003858344,0.0001266492,0.0002161218,0.0004861138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002378594,0.00000598754,0.1474045,0.00001653129,0.00009320055,0.000005690289,0.01550804,0.000001218554,0.00001070138,0.8270464,0.009197776,0.0006862095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001167951,0.00007302309,0.7991493,0.0002101621,0.00005498737,0.00004018198,0.03001098,0.00001152745,0.00003094146,0.008248067,0.160765,0.000237869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235711,0.0004866085,0.000006014382,0.04315221,0.0005438532,0.0001491559,0.00002081043,0.000003070751,0.03206724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993949,0.00003759023,0.00001315755,0.001183533,0.000639953,0.000001014831,4.155484e-7,0.000006136091,0.004169191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5728191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165420987","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab005","title":"Projecting the Nation(s) in Multinational Federal Systems: International Education and Nation Branding in Canada/Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Nation branding; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03063296776982866,"gpt":0.2982813147362232,"spread":0.2676483469663945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232292,0.00006528434,0.0001195991,0.00008707101,0.0004047182,0.0004775892,0.0002162758,0.00003606911,0.00001354282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002357445,0.00004359106,0.00002483329,0.0002708729,0.00004532346,0.0006489397,0.00003249271,0.0002478549,3.16223e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001742804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00501434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980444,0.0005336424,0.0004471035,0.00008253536,0.0007033928,0.0001889431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983605,0.0005874881,0.0003562471,0.00005018441,0.0005915814,0.00005402851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740934,0.0002464156,0.2527611,0.00006258049,0.00008381046,0.00003447928,0.0366214,0.001317012,0.0001775034,0.6730351,0.01008851,0.02551465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283297,0.00001233563,0.7926903,0.0005198442,0.000012499,0.0002655217,0.05378187,0.003895443,0.00004768909,0.004563294,0.1426894,0.000238434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192855,0.0008828083,0.00008890383,0.06951898,0.002679314,0.0001965308,0.000005360682,0.000003386436,0.007339206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969693,0.00007449907,0.00003229862,0.0005451626,0.000668255,0.000008490746,0.000002324785,0.000004261693,0.001695387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6684718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8895224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042659518","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaa020","title":"Attitudes toward Ethnocultural Diversity in Multilevel Political Communities: Comparing the Effect of National and Subnational Attachments in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Multinational corporation; Geography; Political science; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Psychology; Archaeology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1529370413605822,"gpt":0.3703237125514678,"spread":0.2173866711908857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001431403,0.00005806364,0.0001722214,0.00003078274,0.0003157208,0.00005169748,0.0002466124,0.00002616715,0.00001860145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004716377,0.00003343108,0.00002811569,0.0001171307,0.0001428196,0.0002228128,0.00008937281,0.0002579039,3.143353e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004297329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003468869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9212224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8891163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980097,0.0008504727,0.0002925206,0.00003526203,0.000610543,0.000201505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984622,0.001106405,0.0001312035,0.00002729793,0.0001655266,0.0001073764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004342491,0.00001109615,0.9721311,0.00001863591,0.00001749479,0.000001104154,0.01301886,0.0002050625,0.00001023784,0.01410134,0.0003965513,0.00004506811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005536695,0.00004943062,0.9943113,0.00003619356,0.000007670568,0.000002398016,0.003338281,0.0009905862,0.00003013945,0.0004727443,0.0001612303,0.000046345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719357,0.00005327743,0.000007268842,0.0271897,0.00008033876,0.0001049473,0.000006383371,0.000001455142,0.0006209247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993335,0.00000323425,0.000005244238,0.000548524,0.00009707756,0.000001369787,0.000001485975,0.000001756831,0.000007821878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03210612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2428301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991974378","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjn029","title":"The Gradual Defederalization of Canadian Health Policy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Library science; History; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04426395727677823,"gpt":0.3084944390624227,"spread":0.2642304817856445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00183955,0.00007579067,0.0001588784,0.0002971029,0.003051998,0.0001330428,0.0005382344,0.00004467097,0.00001611881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000940998,0.00004685525,0.00009796545,0.0008656784,0.0004040597,0.0003045363,0.00001402675,0.0001945663,0.000002726592],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000415403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006658618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981082,0.0004498125,0.0004155607,0.00005070021,0.000521709,0.0004539997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982847,0.000220542,0.0006185768,0.0001435439,0.000300954,0.000431704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001573646,0.0000115194,0.0004585765,0.000002911408,0.00002957224,0.000005717892,0.02817173,0.00003736825,0.000003871638,0.2829177,0.685528,0.002817296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001870175,0.00004711359,0.02245829,0.00001567893,0.000005138,0.0001160835,0.0009330545,0.000004316443,0.00001368642,0.005524827,0.9706325,0.00006230017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08608294,0.00173532,0.00004775144,0.898335,0.000510521,0.0001756622,0.00005110822,0.000006376084,0.01305535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777774,0.006513598,0.00002643412,0.01115583,0.0009235454,7.837206e-7,9.390313e-7,0.000008532401,0.003592935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8916945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118577803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq027","title":"Federalism and Economic Growth: The Importance of Context in Nigerian Public Finance Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public finance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; History; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01441585081340461,"gpt":0.2562146465781998,"spread":0.2417987957647952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658762,0.0001108991,0.0002393715,0.00006456616,0.0004975061,0.0003201305,0.0005592081,0.00009524806,0.00006784386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003814985,0.00006429774,0.00007415114,0.0001893101,0.0004040656,0.001118405,0.00005621503,0.0003683086,0.000002374741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001852168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003275802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004677172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04337805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998419,0.0001821285,0.0005912919,0.0001048834,0.0003907481,0.0003119534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986138,0.0001698768,0.0007732679,0.0001815558,0.0001833478,0.00007812584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180596,0.00009797007,0.1802389,0.00001336967,0.00004064304,0.00000843858,0.01587534,0.00001158791,0.0002233953,0.782523,0.01127095,0.009578328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002943334,0.0002159214,0.5601956,0.0001008278,0.00004664934,0.0001326219,0.01809097,0.0003505986,0.000732224,0.06178666,0.3548874,0.0005171689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047791,0.0005843822,0.000034342,0.0866999,0.0007496513,0.0001660067,0.000005149884,0.000005354135,0.006976146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957933,0.001874775,0.00004265908,0.001676866,0.0002854761,0.000003229793,8.479456e-7,0.00000856986,0.0003142291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9740778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089444739","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004996","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States in 2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Public opinion; Political science; Library science; Public administration; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03648860418386411,"gpt":0.268670089023311,"spread":0.2321814848394469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600416,0.0001234865,0.0002775991,0.0001251249,0.0004694726,0.0003870636,0.000374495,0.00005705533,0.00003384596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002512532,0.0000664059,0.00003647649,0.0007462538,0.00023156,0.0003501171,0.00002402923,0.0004603411,0.000001206805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006701932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001576466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962836,0.001864237,0.0005254038,0.00009915305,0.0007048424,0.0005227879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982988,0.0007802601,0.0003389526,0.0001307671,0.0002509178,0.0002002536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297339,0.00004830899,0.01313627,0.000006198667,0.00002339587,0.00001672688,0.005882596,0.0001721991,0.000001362196,0.9480947,0.03208507,0.0004602534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002376326,0.0000406065,0.06252852,0.0001055491,0.000004819583,0.00004107502,0.005538963,0.0001987051,0.00001112208,0.02232586,0.9066557,0.0001727592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7380502,0.001929016,0.00002929175,0.2350938,0.001407523,0.0003926485,0.00001272096,0.000006235959,0.02307858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920044,0.001306289,0.000009436498,0.006057055,0.0001275474,0.000004791142,0.000001143858,0.000008099932,0.0004812573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992593401","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl007","title":"Seceding The Canadian Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Injustice; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics; Self-determination; Negotiation; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01501184550171053,"gpt":0.2702112275652706,"spread":0.2551993820635601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003387157,0.00009371126,0.0001365236,0.0001003769,0.002376826,0.000740009,0.0008563573,0.00008284817,0.0001356018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006716917,0.00005023865,0.0001157755,0.0002914677,0.0003883296,0.0004095139,0.00003605228,0.0004690161,0.00002298346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004493559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009490025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6166081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8880814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979063,0.0004147111,0.0003324067,0.00006217287,0.0006706213,0.0006137861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985006,0.0004439162,0.0002104646,0.0001533334,0.0003895463,0.0003021004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000843425,0.00002365814,0.001509745,0.000002701623,0.00003535255,0.00002327355,0.005730909,0.000102199,0.00002820609,0.9242053,0.0664065,0.001923709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000299321,0.00004438328,0.03836269,0.00002566135,0.00006874942,0.000142718,0.005200257,0.0002589359,0.00002093862,0.1785091,0.7768555,0.0002117585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2685885,0.0003541535,0.0001150842,0.297556,0.001815169,0.0002014617,0.00001324194,0.00002383624,0.4313325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919099,0.00003579949,0.00007558856,0.002997089,0.001574269,0.000001015165,0.000001043241,0.00001035337,0.003394912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7456962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402553924","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae034","title":"Between Decentralization and Asymmetry: Explaining Preferences toward the Division of Power in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Political mobilization; Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02837015183771204,"gpt":0.2852332397300176,"spread":0.2568630878923056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805301,0.00005564328,0.0001440466,0.00003581618,0.0001798774,0.0001866107,0.0002453715,0.00002885471,0.00001768892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004744882,0.00002773277,0.00002789535,0.0002303828,0.00007605308,0.0003192959,0.00003547573,0.0001644,2.364317e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000192902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000779386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8719246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7346553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.0003097132,0.0003222309,0.00005448996,0.0005258343,0.0002164839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989671,0.00064436,0.000171184,0.00005164322,0.00008703105,0.00007874302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003080539,0.00003099081,0.4829362,0.0001220831,0.0001709754,0.00002383705,0.1259247,0.00007991989,0.00005213682,0.3261945,0.01802713,0.04640674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000227914,0.00006493893,0.8635626,0.0005730868,0.00003445734,0.000009549604,0.01830027,0.0001113613,0.00009394895,0.01147051,0.1054213,0.0001300183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706888,0.002556622,0.0002351821,0.0232667,0.0004924173,0.0000840042,0.000009549301,0.000003050059,0.002663699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993145,0.0003553847,0.000009471644,0.0001323126,0.0001324145,6.302803e-7,2.784552e-7,0.000003390084,0.00005161015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3806264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2701865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195366346","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab031","title":"Federal Constitutional Values and Citizen Attitudes to Government: Explaining Federal System Viability and Reform Preferences in Eight Countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University","keywords":"Federalist; Federalism; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political system; Constitutional amendment; Political culture; Law; Sociology; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02215456126661587,"gpt":0.2819885456755478,"spread":0.259833984408932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658405,0.0001438018,0.0003602189,0.00003163352,0.001131793,0.0009330459,0.0002208723,0.00008261608,0.00002685681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006957411,0.00009567998,0.00005287767,0.0001372967,0.0006658953,0.0007279486,0.0001239467,0.0002356766,0.000001619416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007467745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004563661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005611508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005812328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973961,0.0004975294,0.0005438093,0.0001798818,0.000982999,0.0003997084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986201,0.0004653712,0.0002660552,0.0001048597,0.0002712045,0.0002724155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001279315,0.00006516198,0.1355087,0.0001412769,0.00008424761,0.00005791273,0.01116726,0.00001046375,0.00007450835,0.8507809,0.001298821,0.0006827998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002409549,0.0002894614,0.8145369,0.001733771,0.00006471098,0.0008851322,0.0511796,0.00007020574,0.0004129824,0.02399262,0.1036937,0.0007312752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552475,0.001226572,0.0001311914,0.01434908,0.0004634471,0.000183176,0.00005197529,0.00001260733,0.02833442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980351,0.0002269682,0.0001670655,0.0005006128,0.0003704982,0.000006652806,6.961985e-7,0.000004761069,0.0006876804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8267883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8997383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}