{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":91,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":91,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"b6bc1cd2abf9","filters":{"venue":"Qualitative Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W2017994899","doi":"10.1177/1468794105056924","title":"Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1012,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Focus group; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1238096831614969,"gpt":0.5506791787967483,"spread":0.4268694956352515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005101479,0.00009225658,0.0001727301,0.0001529723,0.0001358673,0.00002381389,0.0003034628,0.0001277744,0.0003038463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008446768,0.00007432419,0.00006470734,0.0003927045,0.001184936,0.00005923192,0.0001064067,0.0005842416,0.00006438701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008561589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008560126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002934441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001012014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964421,0.001994471,0.0002777145,0.0002740442,0.0006193579,0.0003922991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961151,0.002987453,0.00004470654,0.0004067649,0.0003609517,0.00008499025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002475467,0.0004300302,0.001209769,0.00005845459,0.00008355323,0.0000112675,0.7306926,0.000002976762,0.004293557,0.2135875,0.01496226,0.03442055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002232407,0.001492315,0.1043096,0.0002042522,0.00003669907,0.00004701482,0.5771782,0.0001928038,0.0004074315,0.2163549,0.09686903,0.000675263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851871,0.002190987,0.002333557,0.002850364,0.0001436993,0.0005349488,0.00006044269,0.00002575269,0.006673147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956402,0.0001485951,0.001917896,0.0002309364,0.00009846678,0.00009235403,0.000002210106,0.00001988905,0.001849455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4365947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562473293","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679873","title":"Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":580,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Theoretical sampling; Qualitative research; Management science; Process (computing); Conceptual framework; Saturation (graph theory); Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9120043105781258,"gpt":0.7689833316555257,"spread":0.1430209789226001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1929458,0.0001987359,0.0004611998,0.0009294079,0.002466854,0.0001773952,0.001008651,0.0002209184,0.0002964708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04918524,0.0001244761,0.0001216699,0.003226883,0.01241319,0.0008017106,0.0003368571,0.001467849,0.00005306025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001384253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01204557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004669022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8306178,0.1618374,0.000967844,0.0007842588,0.004158486,0.001634262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90755,0.08772953,0.0002463558,0.00059155,0.003608006,0.0002745115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007038257,0.00009586899,0.00002627182,0.00002767947,0.00001906751,0.000001994101,0.5099327,4.868169e-7,0.01755139,0.458856,0.0002784878,0.01313961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004128318,0.0001736066,0.0002171654,0.0004195785,0.00000252119,2.271345e-7,0.7089483,0.0000508744,0.001468225,0.2835334,0.004630671,0.000142575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021596,0.003975285,0.05290248,0.1147357,0.0002106839,0.00524268,0.0002751141,0.0001040011,0.1203945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862152,0.0006193493,0.01155827,0.00001995501,0.0002867755,0.0003379905,0.000005744784,0.00003452673,0.0009221748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2840557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143472267","doi":"10.1177/1468794106093636","title":"What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Active listening; Epistemology; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5654033162008418,"gpt":0.6453762317024662,"spread":0.07997291550162433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0928205,0.0001629263,0.0003565038,0.0002538239,0.004493289,0.0007563531,0.0003783325,0.0001728916,0.00005838329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04109735,0.0001103262,0.00006360078,0.001243816,0.02044775,0.0006993753,0.0002713932,0.001263464,0.000007738365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001675328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001017719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01032338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004882498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9380022,0.0581608,0.0002479648,0.0004720345,0.00213999,0.0009769633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549751,0.04239474,0.00008414749,0.0002557617,0.001846232,0.0004440575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001075908,0.00001493018,0.00007357752,0.00003663582,0.00003897783,0.00001845042,0.7603143,1.183022e-7,0.0002301948,0.2310602,0.004958644,0.003146377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008950117,0.0001600033,0.0002585625,0.00009224739,0.000003787971,0.000004814062,0.8803999,0.00005696146,0.0001595373,0.04400187,0.07380788,0.0001593897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5113026,0.01050544,0.0004458763,0.4460997,0.0001909731,0.001351601,0.00002523634,0.00007118419,0.03000737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962316,0.03615885,0.004147841,0.0006443583,0.0003203389,0.0001848198,0.000008543632,0.00003904554,0.06226461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4454553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4244514128753006,"gpt":0.6660440278786938,"spread":0.2415926150033932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1512379,0.0001163703,0.0002432953,0.0007122922,0.0009061605,0.00008712774,0.0003491827,0.0001458069,0.0003623182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01603854,0.0001113387,0.00007337406,0.002559366,0.001482195,0.0002721296,0.0000946478,0.001214926,0.0002714679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004895473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002521773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01271733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709051,0.02526862,0.0004445366,0.0004100194,0.00164542,0.001326289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792014,0.01974565,0.00006757901,0.0001497983,0.0005818573,0.0002536584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005169028,0.00005306108,0.001252111,0.000008259426,0.000005830789,0.0000188516,0.4884046,9.625981e-7,0.0002981256,0.4588947,0.0002189959,0.05079281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295767,0.0002616373,0.00527251,0.00003471083,8.883337e-7,2.06354e-7,0.7708715,0.00000937456,0.0003791419,0.1639163,0.05876565,0.0001585183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5449904,0.0007815948,0.01674657,0.005031564,0.0001490572,0.0005404454,0.000002855404,0.0001002934,0.4316573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831396,0.00008228755,0.007312472,0.00003567312,0.0002396328,0.00003233569,0.000002171477,0.00002017328,0.009135689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4381492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063123176","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446105","title":"Storytelling in a digital age: digital storytelling as an emerging narrative method for preserving and promoting indigenous oral wisdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Indigenous; Digital storytelling; Narrative; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Ecology; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3496602325606374,"gpt":0.6162015810418132,"spread":0.2665413484811758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01690682,0.0003240864,0.0005233628,0.0006901356,0.001969362,0.0003348896,0.0003530142,0.000262412,0.0000516437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007130365,0.000316646,0.00008164108,0.0007814282,0.0003038365,0.003438984,0.0002218363,0.001547153,0.00007575617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007379336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006164266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008293825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001547116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928084,0.002778413,0.0008589413,0.0007088587,0.0008372372,0.00200816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881562,0.009777978,0.0002789515,0.0003497131,0.0008320144,0.0006051477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002348808,0.0003989466,0.01036268,0.0005416084,0.000056283,0.000004413464,0.9468743,0.00002868372,0.0001990859,0.002075867,0.0001515702,0.03907172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009109182,0.0006670793,0.0008967299,0.0007039626,0.00001161595,0.000003789301,0.9571565,0.002116664,0.0001230958,0.023036,0.0138722,0.0005014818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794897,0.001316078,0.0109844,0.0002320451,0.0003660071,0.00242603,0.0000621446,0.0001129758,0.005010586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876996,0.00002761944,0.007852489,0.00004873448,0.0006026545,0.0006425743,0.0001608827,0.0001056692,0.002859724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03857024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119068251","doi":"10.1177/1468794114548945","title":"Five stories of accidental ethnography: turning unplanned moments in the field into data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; National Council for Eurasian and East European Research; Russell Sage Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Ethnography; Accidental; Notice; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Politics; Everyday life; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology; History; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Art; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3221945454977697,"gpt":0.6206663579474165,"spread":0.2984718124496468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01751255,0.00007871204,0.0001902171,0.0001560785,0.0006907763,0.0000593793,0.00115579,0.00007580203,0.00005161918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02090495,0.00005770185,0.00004047291,0.0009405805,0.001721865,0.0002121329,0.0003812312,0.0004782991,0.00002871075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008915284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008872549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02695071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008803118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893795,0.008240986,0.0002367226,0.0002567268,0.001378265,0.0005077564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806087,0.01863591,0.00005509048,0.0003638849,0.0002614935,0.00007494283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002869027,0.00004227867,0.01653869,0.00001712476,0.00002525988,0.000001095081,0.8726038,1.297685e-7,0.000008885616,0.1073128,0.002189614,0.00123162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674433,0.0001191539,0.006102351,0.00003955979,0.000002884389,3.503806e-8,0.9222656,0.000008813023,0.00003500883,0.06654261,0.004654594,0.0000619233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256388,0.0003971205,0.0001260175,0.02301979,0.0001159182,0.000484246,0.00003838475,0.00002175697,0.05015795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991994,0.00002326573,0.0002493019,0.0001307938,0.0001392853,0.00003453193,0.00001105849,0.000005730319,0.0002066633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07356055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029413296","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337877","title":"The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Visual research; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Psychology; Point (geometry); Value (mathematics); Representation (politics); Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Geography; Political science; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8454495203515204,"gpt":0.8040831670268701,"spread":0.04136635332465033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3662727,0.0002082158,0.0003554019,0.0008925648,0.01360845,0.003291593,0.001284738,0.0002260962,0.0002203617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1765822,0.0001325445,0.0001244736,0.004732129,0.01269688,0.0012406,0.000506444,0.003220504,0.0005434473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002018541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004822376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01180775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002872109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.798154,0.18761,0.0008145822,0.0009464488,0.008511414,0.003963559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422857,0.0537147,0.0001029886,0.0006186859,0.002395173,0.0008828149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001599271,0.0007367837,0.001507227,0.00004187363,0.00002013671,0.0001839577,0.705914,0.000001069168,0.03093479,0.147357,0.00340915,0.1082948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005754866,0.0009827801,0.01771301,0.0002418836,0.000002325844,0.00000182784,0.4761692,0.0002529689,0.003366173,0.4474924,0.05291168,0.0002903102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130857,0.0004437992,0.0002453941,0.02799494,0.0001019568,0.001061782,0.000006181205,0.00006890642,0.05699135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936403,0.0001813665,0.001591667,0.00006779968,0.0003705262,0.0001162824,0.000003644751,0.00002990092,0.003998516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3001353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053888554","doi":"10.1177/1468794109348680","title":"Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnography; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Institution; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Narrative inquiry; Engineering ethics; Social science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6951726244112297,"gpt":0.6988167302744593,"spread":0.003644105863229608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1452328,0.0002207469,0.0003802083,0.0007926196,0.006141481,0.0003751279,0.0005709986,0.00037718,0.00008387239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476323,0.0001950058,0.0001472376,0.001577529,0.01533825,0.0008828745,0.0002065947,0.002070921,0.00000615927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009172262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003390547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009749649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9614663,0.03431933,0.0004847723,0.0007368775,0.001894312,0.001098404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458626,0.05048522,0.0001463821,0.0003290335,0.002606562,0.0005701882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009756449,0.00008219804,0.0004922842,0.00006094457,0.0000433447,0.000001579405,0.4192478,0.000001859507,0.008751115,0.5494465,0.0002145324,0.02156032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043135,0.0004357367,0.0008967783,0.00002674161,0.00000372578,4.388737e-7,0.5132677,0.0002354131,0.0007505797,0.4710113,0.01274065,0.0001996085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8414897,0.0005348596,0.1218498,0.02390441,0.000525489,0.002948444,0.0002146386,0.0002458553,0.008286798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5487102,0.0001149009,0.4500283,0.00006670485,0.0002601674,0.0005615457,0.00002816053,0.00001992067,0.0002100624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3281785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043162520","doi":"10.1177/1468794108099320","title":"Multiple text analysis in narrative research: visual, written, and spoken stories of experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Construct (python library); Reading (process); Narrative network; Narrative inquiry; Narrative criticism; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5614235798992749,"gpt":0.6945102678409579,"spread":0.133086687941683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01379984,0.0001106029,0.000367064,0.001325698,0.0008069599,0.00002742484,0.000209787,0.0001301633,0.0001466963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007992834,0.00009706353,0.00004641773,0.003841958,0.0008532455,0.0003130465,0.00009110061,0.001073218,0.00005643306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003427457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003995687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004486872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001294986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897156,0.007500191,0.0005486018,0.0004158297,0.001062332,0.0007574108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869795,0.01085209,0.0001037193,0.0002564347,0.001626506,0.0001817842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217559,0.0002632885,0.04042028,0.00006911594,0.00003818006,0.00000216452,0.9494395,0.000005713717,0.0008830178,0.004138617,0.001505841,0.003012567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002986454,0.0004465651,0.1065649,0.0001442053,0.000003982157,6.44879e-8,0.8849083,0.0001831028,0.0002860598,0.005290666,0.001780121,0.0000934311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989705,0.000576033,0.00009616002,0.001560053,0.00005022124,0.0005508496,0.00001394895,0.00001672593,0.00743097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995582,0.0001357856,0.0003136211,0.00003549212,0.00006697558,0.0001469783,0.00002027045,0.000009610554,0.003689268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06614462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7126574550515453,"gpt":0.634758587860571,"spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366878,0.0001789341,0.0003265202,0.0006222053,0.0005747258,0.0003031202,0.0002929059,0.00009200845,0.000106128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006617971,0.0001455409,0.00005044692,0.002553198,0.0004240603,0.001083477,0.0001081336,0.0005577023,0.0001716444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004720297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001306211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01296177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01598427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754547,0.02104577,0.000293442,0.0004374181,0.001313642,0.001455043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859338,0.01249938,0.00006835147,0.0002433596,0.0005478175,0.0007072905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004900396,0.0002142538,0.002407335,0.00002484072,0.00003366292,0.00000563691,0.8511137,0.00003438818,0.001609476,0.1303671,0.002014347,0.01168512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004050762,0.001194419,0.00473883,0.0002532853,0.000008757544,4.63137e-7,0.9241933,0.00003688989,0.001019456,0.006051491,0.06172177,0.0003762142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5651675,0.0004026006,0.410184,0.01946224,0.0001959634,0.002454445,0.00001375711,0.0000731487,0.002046369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968732,0.00003026186,0.1010139,0.00008725392,0.0001774601,0.0006426121,0.000001595654,0.00003015363,0.001143585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3317057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988588354","doi":"10.1177/1468794114543400","title":"Apprenticeship as method: embodied learning in ethnographic practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Emic and etic; Ethnography; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pedagogy; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8886648517063099,"gpt":0.8267451170160557,"spread":0.06191973469025425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2941374,0.000164381,0.0003660147,0.001135143,0.001284998,0.0003001899,0.0008019378,0.0002278189,0.0004201945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3367189,0.000165614,0.00009891098,0.004010055,0.0018993,0.0008111555,0.0002579686,0.002541807,0.0007791815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003367532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008669464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01246011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002044876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7621152,0.2311138,0.0004948368,0.0006844655,0.003789312,0.001802366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8914226,0.1056526,0.0001679114,0.0004216832,0.00163695,0.0006983142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001866465,0.0001940417,0.001003257,0.00004633782,0.00003137017,0.00001359116,0.4617207,0.00003918974,0.0005900066,0.4941516,0.0002798321,0.04174343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005631698,0.0005161854,0.0008129081,0.00008582899,0.000008183372,4.108695e-7,0.6152458,0.001568123,0.0004355534,0.1090839,0.271417,0.0002629544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1856288,0.0004312805,0.01450108,0.01142203,0.0001481064,0.001104735,0.00000188041,0.0001891242,0.786573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615192,0.0001302984,0.0318411,0.0001879173,0.0002111865,0.0003359398,0.000003070515,0.0000366884,0.005734621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7808384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310008377","doi":"10.1177/1468794115626244","title":"Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Investment (military); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Peer group; Public relations; Social psychology; Process (computing); Applied psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9050232879490918,"gpt":0.7786427984073505,"spread":0.1263804895417413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1948511,0.0003426962,0.0006006641,0.001085365,0.005624332,0.00005503944,0.0006723442,0.0002201266,0.001652994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009806486,0.0002267347,0.0001048801,0.001714846,0.0007664262,0.0004961768,0.0009946757,0.004024354,0.00357233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002166743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009292932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01850775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002315368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8361627,0.1539821,0.001531085,0.001044117,0.004516939,0.002762957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236349,0.06938384,0.000265941,0.000840735,0.004967032,0.0009075906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003292223,0.0009582964,0.002864172,0.0009292876,0.00008843163,0.000302097,0.9116409,3.368214e-8,0.0005606145,0.003414523,0.06991138,0.009001014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002651145,0.00286452,0.0000438445,0.001639195,0.000006278608,0.000006562057,0.9578714,0.00001089598,0.0001245071,0.006635337,0.02787583,0.0002704884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723247,0.0007341985,0.0009582631,0.007413332,0.000499349,0.006083057,0.000334817,0.00009627121,0.01155599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644163,0.00008666397,0.0003950805,0.0004262439,0.0002841286,0.002997578,0.00006779823,0.0000767453,0.0312495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1850447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299219954","doi":"10.1177/1468794116630040","title":"Arts-based health research and academic legitimacy: transcending hegemonic conventions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Hospital for Sick Children; University of British Columbia; University Health Network; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Openness to experience; The arts; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7458826426879663,"gpt":0.7055587668032544,"spread":0.04032387588471198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02266851,0.0001118641,0.0002988121,0.0007023204,0.0005338699,0.00002208702,0.0001219291,0.0001418396,0.0003680919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004387388,0.00007617864,0.00006005257,0.0008856161,0.001761702,0.0001445552,0.00003716527,0.00143528,0.0002184385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000491701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002032806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001624485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000205986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936907,0.002867501,0.0004095115,0.0004635263,0.001599515,0.0009692123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915572,0.006470173,0.00004901591,0.0002507033,0.0008672117,0.0008057061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001657007,0.001777248,0.003391901,0.003025534,0.0001815857,0.00006127106,0.4824203,1.584561e-7,0.04455259,0.1704259,0.04885938,0.2436471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01454664,0.01125966,0.02846256,0.01273701,0.00003639363,0.00006984242,0.7040308,0.0001985495,0.02621996,0.1170305,0.08479427,0.0006138512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550035,0.003145127,0.004015557,0.2323888,0.000124786,0.001442132,0.00004351777,0.0000695926,0.003766986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933059,0.00105234,0.0005801062,0.0004174635,0.000210225,0.0002159231,0.00003108168,0.0000256073,0.004161346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2430333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7856499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013537486","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446104","title":"‘If you can call it a poem’: toward a framework for the assessment of arts-based works","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Performative utterance; Sociology; Arts in education; Normative; Visual arts; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9252908332090877,"gpt":0.8223612904170058,"spread":0.1029295427920819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0970705,0.0001498946,0.0003396021,0.0002459364,0.00106515,0.0001441935,0.0008620896,0.0002053184,0.0003937455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04738226,0.0001090735,0.0001821847,0.001429289,0.002589286,0.0002259017,0.0001578497,0.001054012,0.00002294463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002370649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003066572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004761298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758431,0.01849835,0.0004323461,0.0003223275,0.003118045,0.001785844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346238,0.06271631,0.0001336684,0.0004670214,0.001449248,0.0006099964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001578674,0.0004193412,0.004088015,0.000116089,0.0001166511,0.000001321603,0.4120302,0.00002272931,0.000374759,0.5620741,0.004038171,0.01656081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009251946,0.0009946395,0.00925962,0.0004528665,0.00004236276,1.237539e-7,0.7603487,0.004122533,0.001901012,0.06975617,0.1517604,0.0004363804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06048904,0.00126099,0.853929,0.06507047,0.0004321799,0.00416339,0.0001644801,0.00007041069,0.01441997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341597,0.00006911551,0.0629426,0.0002243557,0.0003954065,0.00122973,0.00000405266,0.00002727683,0.0009477649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8736706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.960642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005372738","doi":"10.1177/1468794106065005","title":"Expressions of personhood in Alzheimer’s: moving from ethnographic text to performing ethnography","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Nurses Foundation","keywords":"Personhood; Embodied cognition; Ethnography; Sociology; Immediacy; Appeal; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8564210565874426,"gpt":0.7527300817271043,"spread":0.1036909748603383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03741505,0.0001671974,0.0003915715,0.001959938,0.0008813943,0.00008938711,0.0007770226,0.0001955941,0.000373631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01107876,0.0001636463,0.0001549981,0.005493513,0.001894602,0.0004121113,0.0002715493,0.001005667,0.00006871175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001638398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005973514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08127265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01143408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733953,0.02106771,0.0006047324,0.0005757264,0.002900331,0.001456133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851975,0.01308666,0.00009701655,0.0003914465,0.0007758262,0.0004514848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001394318,0.0004106941,0.0226377,0.00002643905,0.00007056538,0.00001368698,0.8758303,0.00003063929,0.06293031,0.02339694,0.0009077954,0.01360549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102835,0.0002923516,0.02933401,0.000392378,0.0000120231,5.580391e-8,0.9201042,0.0001936828,0.01259438,0.03076251,0.005485665,0.0003184669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786586,0.001674711,0.000623587,0.001238431,0.00005461209,0.0007414877,0.00004609169,0.00004175464,0.01692077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891036,0.00005650118,0.01019853,0.00002703596,0.0001352078,0.0002785419,0.000005620979,0.00002611595,0.0001689223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06983858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052860698","doi":"10.1177/1468794107082305","title":"Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sociology; Identity (music); Politics; Socialization; Ideology; Qualitative research; Narrative; Power (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7115118991827734,"gpt":0.7857387431437663,"spread":0.074226843960993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4646444,0.0001348407,0.0003270196,0.001270531,0.003436151,0.0002911634,0.001552193,0.0002457033,0.0001058964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04797972,0.0001038999,0.0000918894,0.005421595,0.01234213,0.001023844,0.001059663,0.00351912,0.00005310704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008262231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001394401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02156805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02814125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8483531,0.1382992,0.001188265,0.0007127011,0.008367985,0.00307879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063751,0.0870172,0.0001389652,0.0006294898,0.005343094,0.0004961419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005251525,0.0001551008,0.001013167,0.00004829605,0.000009385735,0.000007070186,0.4874497,0.00000329729,0.0004962359,0.5080794,0.0003429822,0.002342824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001404985,0.0002966605,0.004393908,0.00007790398,8.699822e-7,2.075927e-7,0.6239853,0.00007904199,0.000186241,0.369517,0.001244902,0.00007751069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8882588,0.0009154489,0.005724898,0.01101398,0.0001542276,0.001162909,0.00002668385,0.00002809572,0.09271499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936415,0.0001664824,0.003383924,0.00002541121,0.0003782754,0.00005260291,0.000004926359,0.00002497018,0.002321885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4166647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532883782","doi":"10.1177/1468794116672914","title":"(Re)Grounding grounded theory: a close reading of theory in four schools","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Grounded theory; Focus group; Epistemology; Coding (social sciences); Phenomenon; Sociology; Axial coding; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Process theory; Theoretical sampling; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5036375311519631,"gpt":0.6665039151524628,"spread":0.1628663840004997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1650523,0.0001534211,0.0003845097,0.0008264564,0.0007841383,0.0001014867,0.0007081794,0.0001495997,0.0006426764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05369444,0.0001099435,0.0001240908,0.002378989,0.002825866,0.0005682777,0.0001911678,0.0006576626,0.0001861552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000735272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007527224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00207457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008971817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9223353,0.0733347,0.0006010445,0.0005584247,0.001987956,0.001182534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307408,0.06738914,0.0001564141,0.000372198,0.001030356,0.0003111411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556567,0.00007988571,0.0003489495,0.00003103984,0.00003152373,0.000003755515,0.1333088,3.513872e-8,0.006834176,0.7957312,0.000246553,0.06322844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352138,0.00009038766,0.0008071084,0.0002072118,0.000001947942,9.605576e-8,0.3695011,0.000001359371,0.0007750971,0.6252517,0.002908797,0.0001030105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5090358,0.0007183265,0.1709741,0.03076391,0.0001139131,0.002829896,0.0001325676,0.00012177,0.2853097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839312,0.0004421654,0.007192117,0.00002921599,0.0001332223,0.0003772381,0.0000017455,0.00002794129,0.007865093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4748955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130133015","doi":"10.1177/1468794110380525","title":"Interviews as encounters: issues of sexuality and reflexivity when men interview men about commercial same sex relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Respondent; Human sexuality; Interview; Sexualization; Gender studies; Sociology; Qualitative research; Queer; Conversation; Focus group; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6093595537735169,"gpt":0.7057991561710943,"spread":0.09643960239757743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1641035,0.0002409248,0.0006991446,0.0004174927,0.001234536,0.0002561536,0.0008995107,0.0003646283,0.002066121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03309553,0.0002124217,0.0001515803,0.0008675584,0.008460395,0.0007263173,0.0006039866,0.002554015,0.0001639759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002270951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008020393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04490744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01527665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9235222,0.0713642,0.0009148053,0.0006639658,0.002557755,0.000977013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721111,0.02429369,0.0002744613,0.0006129774,0.002184398,0.0005233779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005801819,0.0001621731,0.0004744528,0.0002057971,0.0000766026,0.000002108186,0.6625726,4.065657e-8,0.001896944,0.2906205,0.01265274,0.03127805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003062152,0.0003749035,0.001857917,0.0001909182,0.00000964491,7.22063e-7,0.478987,0.00002220972,0.0005276536,0.3740911,0.1434176,0.0002141338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117822,0.004071652,0.004203187,0.1632914,0.0003462638,0.00284908,0.0004063079,0.0001505423,0.5128994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085099,0.005021933,0.02819818,0.000467406,0.0007513397,0.0003400494,0.00005182039,0.0000776243,0.05658175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996716493","doi":"10.1177/1468794111404319","title":"Interpreter-facilitated cross-language interviews: a research note","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Qualitative research; Grandparent; Mandarin Chinese; Psychology; Semi-structured interview; Process (computing); Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8626783080133277,"gpt":0.7844615248927833,"spread":0.07821678312054436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2871876,0.0003093244,0.0005714269,0.001591134,0.003036307,0.0005616524,0.002158398,0.0004877406,0.005163459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07994916,0.0002757211,0.0002832872,0.004441351,0.01850772,0.0009497313,0.0009453468,0.004727446,0.003160872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001695588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02937387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006678328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8445357,0.1448104,0.0009252955,0.001118018,0.00557919,0.003031451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554236,0.03526407,0.0001275101,0.0009812725,0.007181398,0.001022162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003359071,0.0002209593,0.0001298135,0.0001413889,0.00005820336,0.00006019246,0.8185016,7.995195e-8,0.00142277,0.1532821,0.003292004,0.02255497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004382713,0.0008879878,0.0003424221,0.000270618,0.000003092391,0.000001017064,0.7508203,0.0000405684,0.00214708,0.1930957,0.0516203,0.000332673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2838464,0.002435979,0.01176455,0.006576812,0.0004379688,0.002463253,0.0001878094,0.0003018785,0.6919853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948997,0.0006197804,0.01741681,0.0001122655,0.0003270346,0.000536872,0.00001917889,0.00007774689,0.03189326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6651506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048310586","doi":"10.1177/1468794103003001770","title":"Exposing failures, unsettling accommodations: tensions in interview practice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Conceptualization; Vulnerability (computing); Qualitative research; Sociology; Power (physics); Semi-structured interview; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8056848262636709,"gpt":0.7474369098650276,"spread":0.05824791639864324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2117609,0.0001550901,0.0003185078,0.0007705905,0.001721179,0.0003374751,0.0004932827,0.0002008549,0.0003972901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2287699,0.0001470503,0.00009387009,0.003202852,0.002328865,0.001076239,0.0001328393,0.002102063,0.0002421619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006278312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001534389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007594275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003460705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8417981,0.1530742,0.0006599706,0.0005703168,0.002547909,0.001349461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918616,0.07773522,0.00012711,0.0003957168,0.002762704,0.0003632475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001640619,0.0001330835,0.00002528068,0.00003827908,0.00001746438,0.00001565252,0.3523591,0.000003581611,0.0001949029,0.6402379,0.00113199,0.005826354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002024183,0.00007004029,0.00003466777,0.0002109342,0.000002508395,9.939929e-7,0.5637568,0.00001650851,0.0001093966,0.1627728,0.2726983,0.0001245903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01959749,0.01173786,0.1027416,0.3727119,0.0004595836,0.003439192,0.00005460418,0.0002093549,0.4890485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206181,0.006140584,0.2665079,0.001185483,0.0002410045,0.0005313835,0.00002439236,0.00008557787,0.00466554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7010207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980954613","doi":"10.1177/1468794119880746","title":"Situating the life story narratives of aging immigrants within a structural context: the intersectional life course perspective as research praxis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life course approach; Photovoice; Operationalization; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Everyday life; Immigration; Praxis; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; History; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7032767612204109,"gpt":0.7400981043034065,"spread":0.03682134308299556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1470106,0.0002180539,0.0004317566,0.0004561285,0.004250666,0.0002890665,0.0015508,0.0001477591,0.0009401094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1079424,0.0001358899,0.0001799258,0.002543472,0.01107593,0.0006018871,0.0005332503,0.003567327,0.0003042111],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007862507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006951235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02806421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009023873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8884696,0.1026674,0.0005547139,0.0006668792,0.006218052,0.00142339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331132,0.05724877,0.0003435684,0.0007677849,0.007857545,0.000669128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002777275,0.00006226753,0.0012782,0.00003094057,0.0002259039,0.000002797766,0.7291303,0.00001641261,0.00199057,0.2654329,0.00109717,0.0004548544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004215131,0.0006121838,0.005039361,0.0001391754,0.000007463329,8.054122e-7,0.9560202,0.0003451565,0.0006092619,0.03545626,0.001197473,0.0001511789],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.953315,0.002086516,0.00006907427,0.03089633,0.0002688617,0.001982401,0.00002849218,0.00003343198,0.01131988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954062,0.00002639766,0.0002446198,0.0001658306,0.0003504503,0.0002627397,0.000001707332,0.00003267558,0.003509439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2299767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966332451","doi":"10.1177/1468794112455037","title":"Doing participatory qualitative research: development of a shared critical consciousness with racial minority research advisory group members","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; Association of Local Public Health Agencies; York University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Dialogical self; Critical consciousness; Sociology; General partnership; Participatory action research; Public relations; Qualitative research; Community-based participatory research; Consciousness; Community development; Photovoice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9089431206035483,"gpt":0.7810056252157593,"spread":0.127937495387789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4363225,0.0004223968,0.0009875007,0.002390379,0.006154246,0.0003565441,0.001715469,0.0004792654,0.001271983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123178,0.000384313,0.0001680287,0.00703078,0.02838053,0.001799766,0.001125741,0.004394525,0.0005167119],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007360867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005962985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007723076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7315404,0.2413107,0.001541543,0.001327678,0.01702681,0.007252865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8437418,0.1386657,0.0002253835,0.00103577,0.01322092,0.003110446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001081713,0.001226199,0.001528657,0.000427922,0.0001401893,0.00002553831,0.7451068,6.652596e-7,0.00327576,0.2416377,0.001860637,0.003688169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009386142,0.0009283208,0.001987383,0.0004348784,0.00001548289,9.542269e-7,0.9092162,0.0000281809,0.004487385,0.01056585,0.07087572,0.0005210924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336278,0.00196385,0.002961134,0.001952177,0.0002449071,0.002842595,0.00009735375,0.0001289555,0.05618118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546151,0.0000491109,0.04141132,0.00002523717,0.0005236027,0.001946185,0.00001545383,0.00007846711,0.001335525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3131445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751556990","doi":"10.1177/1468794117728411","title":"Advancing rigour in solicited diary research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Qualitative research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Research design; Psychology; Management science; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7994687555827503,"gpt":0.7960433844838966,"spread":0.003425371098853769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4324345,0.0001926953,0.0004629387,0.002166735,0.009441433,0.001043409,0.002332444,0.0003646553,0.0004639533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2471982,0.0001836082,0.0001209952,0.00252293,0.01325548,0.001216363,0.0009062688,0.004626558,0.0006431636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001156381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002425002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05978971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02550409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8365614,0.1513548,0.000663663,0.0009501801,0.006780491,0.003689457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278005,0.06580207,0.0001545624,0.001195197,0.004255522,0.0007921254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009750749,0.0001471141,0.001625398,0.00007079071,0.00001905223,0.0000670275,0.4244406,0.000001163087,0.000907077,0.552248,0.004451262,0.01592498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000438516,0.0001732432,0.004346768,0.000226231,9.079817e-7,2.633097e-7,0.4418321,0.00009300098,0.0002883963,0.4799348,0.07245715,0.0002086951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3102211,0.001055048,0.00212008,0.1350708,0.0003148878,0.002125197,0.00004992151,0.00009718752,0.5489458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710155,0.001920567,0.008531068,0.00007942682,0.0006189754,0.0003368967,0.000006251862,0.00005218911,0.01743913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809432046","doi":"10.1177/1468794118781380","title":"Moving between theory and practice within an Indigenous research paradigm","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Paradigm shift; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Reciprocal; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3238106970331905,"gpt":0.6304965313042169,"spread":0.3066858342710264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1977697,0.000130569,0.000224721,0.000647729,0.02508308,0.0003820632,0.0005916974,0.0002429518,0.0001507589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003647239,0.0001087945,0.00002565497,0.001592903,0.006200856,0.00105011,0.00001526379,0.001170568,0.0003990323],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005981792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02081398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2441891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3616533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9195911,0.07558499,0.0003795496,0.0005793149,0.002318773,0.001546288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581713,0.03746676,0.0001277623,0.0004458432,0.003105853,0.0006824553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008930665,0.00008477263,0.0001345332,0.00002046632,0.00001746042,0.000002829193,0.5435359,2.679126e-8,0.000005701884,0.4553387,0.00006057795,0.0007097239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001125368,0.0007400342,0.0009401513,0.00003277013,0.000004559986,0.000001824761,0.6183026,8.554124e-7,0.0001231123,0.2402107,0.1394061,0.0001247032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8094646,0.0005190193,0.0002125174,0.001853619,0.0001688685,0.001227988,0.00001451944,0.00005532035,0.1864836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804339,0.001625824,0.001668687,0.00004928197,0.002487614,0.00002481857,0.00001476786,0.0000347842,0.01366037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.215128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315425008","doi":"10.1177/1468794111399841","title":"Carrying my family with me: artifacts as emic perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Emic and etic; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.941550614149252,"gpt":0.791870571483774,"spread":0.149680042665478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0375838,0.0001774386,0.0002973723,0.000476187,0.001468325,0.0001555983,0.0006953939,0.0001298086,0.00115505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01745057,0.0001478367,0.00007553322,0.001812881,0.00445347,0.0006004446,0.0001735471,0.0009757146,0.001145074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006602305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002104583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01574013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001088443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970006,0.02432962,0.0002734815,0.00062749,0.003135725,0.001627673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911642,0.005690564,0.00007623809,0.000405455,0.001895064,0.0007684964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554918,0.0001437484,0.0008299449,0.00001703202,0.00006106063,0.00004298082,0.7969236,3.300355e-7,0.004719337,0.1945957,0.0003704093,0.002040325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002981473,0.0007023002,0.004039463,0.0000628877,0.000006221887,6.766708e-7,0.9526398,0.00001268465,0.004744146,0.03211538,0.005158753,0.0002195706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7104802,0.0005119515,0.0006702979,0.0005789974,0.00003596512,0.0005814744,0.000005448971,0.00008371579,0.2870519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882404,0.000143398,0.004980217,0.00004424006,0.0001269002,0.00023939,0.000001065513,0.0000358893,0.006188482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2808635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139498372","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337880","title":"Preliminary field-work: methodological reflections from northern Canadian research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Field research; Research ethics; Creativity; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8558503893335307,"gpt":0.7424642321071072,"spread":0.1133861572264235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03680858,0.0001594247,0.0004079413,0.0006871747,0.01483665,0.00002305166,0.0005030229,0.0005537906,0.003042336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551257,0.000131635,0.00008405855,0.001592379,0.0003589266,0.00007674794,0.0002988498,0.004454705,0.00368345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001916273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6424314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9001079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597181,0.03495908,0.0005264319,0.0005909732,0.0008178892,0.003387531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545655,0.04160038,0.0000633834,0.0005019068,0.002750407,0.0005183764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007943097,0.0001830526,0.007075384,0.00003148622,0.0000955624,0.0001028459,0.8380708,0.000003183634,0.0001674565,0.01975278,0.1249973,0.008725775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004094199,0.00333349,0.04961276,0.00008001732,0.000006594777,9.118937e-7,0.7083716,0.000007180429,0.00003612487,0.1063257,0.1316063,0.0002098905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5382314,0.001036229,0.0004848996,0.1088379,0.0005496405,0.002540371,0.00009695807,0.0001002506,0.3481224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980008,0.0002305815,0.004102613,0.001986439,0.0008449171,0.0005980227,0.00005381946,0.0000268766,0.01214874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4417766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560223254","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679726","title":"Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Freedom of information; Qualitative property; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6820203904628809,"gpt":0.7045284147875014,"spread":0.02250802432462051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1450395,0.00007339021,0.0002895399,0.000935083,0.0007172374,0.0001571872,0.0005736692,0.00006688818,0.00002444444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03193973,0.00004501795,0.00005096616,0.002146869,0.006568678,0.00168727,0.0001614883,0.0002385455,0.000002926997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004117361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0245886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01369921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9666809,0.0297147,0.0007606745,0.0002512675,0.001997155,0.0005952831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9514956,0.04689874,0.0001912606,0.0001648092,0.001205449,0.00004411913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067369,0.00006025858,0.001315514,0.00005461554,0.000006143262,1.379156e-7,0.5645677,2.578878e-7,0.0008938651,0.4299749,0.0005818143,0.002464081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056985,0.0002758604,0.01843249,0.0001721019,0.000001371324,3.25176e-8,0.8239197,0.0000333625,0.0001299374,0.1549631,0.001591741,0.00007453976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851996,0.00004739874,0.0008307718,0.009515636,0.00001830983,0.0007008121,0.0003405919,0.000003879949,0.003343029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977804,0.0001016128,0.00184848,0.00001554037,0.00003975981,0.00009099905,0.000009558651,0.000003367871,0.0001102879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139378737","doi":"10.1177/1468794108093898","title":"Dynamics of the `field': multiple standpoints, narrative and shifting positionality in multisited research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Crafts, Textile, and Design","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Gender studies; Narrative; Subjectivity; CONTEST; Power (physics); Social science; Political science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3627527784733803,"gpt":0.511294056283965,"spread":0.1485412778105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008319243,0.0001192913,0.0002416454,0.0003823596,0.001347188,0.00007864958,0.0002748336,0.00007282809,0.0004430159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003862513,0.00008767423,0.0000607586,0.0004186054,0.002685127,0.0002178795,0.0002102147,0.0009204011,0.00001474206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001990593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001845745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006555199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01266771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922917,0.005290669,0.0004049988,0.0003303389,0.001194549,0.000487691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846032,0.01362608,0.0000716567,0.0002719856,0.001348601,0.0000784834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002426457,0.0001627194,0.002545255,0.00006433481,0.00002253794,0.00001030752,0.7161304,0.000003561361,0.0002508753,0.2780932,0.002166153,0.0003080391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001350359,0.0004789405,0.01627322,0.0002439513,0.00000270905,0.000003527376,0.8980019,0.003549149,0.0008348824,0.07730217,0.001743238,0.000215924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834189,0.0002419158,0.00009861582,0.00392127,0.00005036866,0.000632151,0.0001354328,0.00001476683,0.01148655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966524,0.0000475508,0.0002395898,0.00005481368,0.00007858032,0.00005401985,0.00001818599,0.00001551453,0.002839327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.200791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109319812","doi":"10.1177/1468794105048658","title":"Fear of offending: disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Psychology; Content analysis; Focus group; Constructivist grounded theory; Social psychology; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Sociology; Grounded theory; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7134932883470805,"gpt":0.7306789638120522,"spread":0.01718567546497174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1723178,0.0001714251,0.0006033602,0.002568242,0.001042987,0.000185041,0.0008557566,0.0001946958,0.0009133908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02163727,0.0001554748,0.0002611422,0.006254128,0.00495937,0.0007119047,0.0003309869,0.002136648,0.0000374222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008814558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009486175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02116744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01758095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9296051,0.06295188,0.0007876184,0.0006197374,0.004390725,0.001644941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972047,0.02609178,0.000136309,0.0004378484,0.0008741076,0.0004129274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008433293,0.000199353,0.005489019,0.00007222505,0.0002087948,0.00000630601,0.6540397,0.00005299788,0.0007736586,0.3248916,0.0004920935,0.01368989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005282401,0.0001582978,0.004522136,0.0001773615,0.00002675867,1.139637e-7,0.8377546,0.001223007,0.000876523,0.1338478,0.02059806,0.0002871444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7498341,0.001765757,0.02238493,0.06133511,0.00007642403,0.001631429,0.0001139759,0.00008046479,0.1627778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644741,0.0004185012,0.0293887,0.00003047472,0.0001872221,0.00007331724,0.00001505504,0.00002731841,0.005385259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2146401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163261691","doi":"10.1177/1468794113495038","title":"‘Emergent reconstruction’ in grounded theory: learning from team-based interview research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Sociology; Framing (construction); Constructivist grounded theory; Construct (python library); Solidarity; Premise; Population; Epistemology; Social constructionism; Psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.771834576379648,"gpt":0.6983268824887411,"spread":0.07350769389090694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2711205,0.0002317295,0.0005038282,0.001488678,0.002396116,0.000567288,0.001063413,0.0003673063,0.009371649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07085693,0.0002113258,0.0001680212,0.004236382,0.007603979,0.0007707759,0.0003352217,0.005249842,0.002174337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001388152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001817641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09442832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008657145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.733087,0.2594134,0.0007188732,0.0008279613,0.004024253,0.001928492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191716,0.07514147,0.0001241631,0.0004898458,0.004441085,0.0006318871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054587,0.0002185568,0.0008955054,0.0000969928,0.00006141321,0.000005286446,0.4101176,0.000008710307,0.0008314188,0.4635334,0.004362836,0.1197628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003453426,0.0002113764,0.0008638469,0.000252274,0.000001397513,1.148597e-7,0.471761,0.0002838596,0.0001392702,0.5051479,0.02082749,0.0001661538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5084612,0.004606619,0.0263521,0.10445,0.0009184309,0.006066088,0.00005165551,0.0003079057,0.3487861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679747,0.001586827,0.01550835,0.0001547407,0.0005906496,0.001378638,0.00003366882,0.00007271025,0.01269976],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4595135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124352716","doi":"10.1177/1468794114538897","title":"Catching the shimmers of the social: from the limits of reflexivity to methodological creativity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Participatory action research; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Creativity; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9741345824231714,"gpt":0.8375044618927163,"spread":0.1366301205304551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1945635,0.0001174142,0.000382895,0.00006741125,0.002100894,0.00006331319,0.001851719,0.0001239436,0.0001180379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1918385,0.00005452011,0.0001912958,0.001718032,0.005831593,0.000113592,0.0005674839,0.00100558,0.00002261028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001884711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005778518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02415356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004176704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7936855,0.2021269,0.0003740784,0.0003248727,0.002775618,0.0007130677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8330663,0.1650036,0.0001992357,0.0005934719,0.0009548385,0.000182565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001694486,0.000107579,0.003496256,0.00001521519,0.00006430344,2.269491e-7,0.6818372,0.000005477609,0.01763522,0.2773271,0.001599503,0.01774246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002614597,0.000364094,0.2107665,0.00008981881,0.00002320748,4.994333e-8,0.5250516,0.00007792287,0.02740145,0.2114469,0.02434248,0.0001745178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316444,0.00008050211,0.006043592,0.04446173,0.00008323109,0.0008208459,0.00004645522,0.00001416337,0.01680508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962338,0.00001619702,0.002712462,0.0002415782,0.0001917109,0.0001020939,6.234907e-7,0.00001167552,0.0004899058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2072703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2897285595","doi":"10.1177/1468794118803022","title":"Negotiating with gatekeepers to get interviews with politicians: qualitative research recruitment in a digital media environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Negotiation; Reputation; Politics; Qualitative research; Social media; Sociology; Reputation management; Digital media; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7666971906980924,"gpt":0.7040218733260135,"spread":0.06267531737207888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1547678,0.0004103226,0.0007338764,0.001812421,0.001983427,0.0008508288,0.001184876,0.0002630642,0.0004604503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03097951,0.0003121922,0.00009154688,0.004530128,0.01445362,0.0009825841,0.0005618625,0.002738256,0.0009996765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00263608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002028921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01627389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01161856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9147891,0.07155998,0.0009226629,0.001406276,0.00779151,0.003530414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433587,0.05046138,0.0001691001,0.0007488088,0.003897523,0.001364462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006403013,0.0002734025,0.0001438428,0.00005689864,0.00007577143,0.00004010893,0.7562741,0.00000863538,0.00008498495,0.2339402,0.0008693086,0.007592424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008098893,0.003885876,0.0002498132,0.0006732166,0.000004147939,0.000001119267,0.8770851,0.00003427707,0.0001708839,0.07746524,0.03919913,0.0004213133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6979299,0.001303091,0.0237451,0.07052755,0.0002128069,0.01261287,0.00059136,0.0001777611,0.1928996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618958,0.0004344316,0.02972579,0.0002974396,0.0006607042,0.002411719,0.00004647528,0.0001268062,0.004400834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2639659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988730351","doi":"10.1177/1468794119885040","title":"Where’s the database in digital ethnography? Exploring database ethnography for open data research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Sociology; Ethnography; Data science; Key (lock); Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7969043138591074,"gpt":0.6418251739474456,"spread":0.1550791399116618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1151235,0.0001752991,0.0003453821,0.001256948,0.002456472,0.001455144,0.006340724,0.0001117323,0.0006105108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01252918,0.0001409969,0.0001224964,0.006667284,0.002888775,0.0039144,0.002784924,0.001527839,0.00034229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002076597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001201468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07609472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1411994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838833,0.0100204,0.0005728982,0.001251517,0.002866719,0.001405178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680125,0.02710797,0.00009012282,0.002800619,0.001701212,0.0002876374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006053301,0.001103728,0.01538881,0.0005436165,0.0002592939,0.00001018792,0.6702462,0.0000203538,0.0002439078,0.2438273,0.03340004,0.03435116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007158181,0.0001679264,0.0003718158,0.0002797751,0.000008919176,6.486968e-8,0.8118181,0.0007405639,0.00005194472,0.0179224,0.1676693,0.0002534021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066699,0.01013599,0.006457041,0.06585782,0.0006534189,0.02464395,0.01349675,0.0002403316,0.07184477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922767,0.0009859446,0.0007321617,0.00007657715,0.0002089941,0.001630867,0.001613017,0.00003789535,0.00243787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.225905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784091840","doi":"10.1177/1468794117753353","title":"Research in carceral contexts: confronting access barriers and engaging former prisoners","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Prison; Qualitative research; Public relations; Function (biology); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Criminology; Plan (archaeology); Psychology; Political science; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3735031249630323,"gpt":0.6427627717095051,"spread":0.2692596467464728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03308189,0.00008909941,0.0002001317,0.001073095,0.002845362,0.0004935832,0.0004082266,0.00009180596,0.000373507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005123774,0.00008695945,0.00004308161,0.002631065,0.00341766,0.0006270598,0.0002368334,0.0009434559,0.0000549748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004210325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006068389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.126221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09213276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884922,0.008475463,0.0002659759,0.0004159055,0.001347811,0.001002663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932496,0.004670642,0.00004099558,0.0001700917,0.00157427,0.0002944159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009094765,0.00002546686,0.006066608,0.0000376842,0.0000300273,0.000008720754,0.9190771,0.00000104206,0.0001565095,0.01980675,0.001594082,0.05310503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211279,0.0001194041,0.0008605828,0.00007935851,0.000007757036,3.441827e-7,0.982706,0.0002441003,0.0001120474,0.003018621,0.01252288,0.000107847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451284,0.0003712833,0.0003104576,0.002778545,0.00008260317,0.0003134795,0.000004098444,0.00001962377,0.05099151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973484,0.000256937,0.0001352876,0.00005415574,0.0002773287,0.00007372251,0.000001839097,0.00001170775,0.001840599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391157828","doi":"10.1177/14687941231224591","title":"Who can you trust these days?: Dealing with imposter participants during online recruitment and data collection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Data collection; Psychology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.568417349501868,"gpt":0.6156968205055752,"spread":0.04727947100370722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412896,0.0001455474,0.0002657024,0.0005441676,0.0002918293,0.0001852748,0.0001891964,0.00005858346,0.0003673851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001348695,0.0001017024,0.00004621404,0.000818759,0.0003893905,0.0002498603,0.0003162883,0.0007378419,0.00004642207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002542184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003559767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001220988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00161406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996253,0.001154648,0.0003264184,0.0006062998,0.0009391823,0.0007204817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977846,0.0008227623,0.00002591437,0.0005573605,0.0003879259,0.00042141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01191639,0.003228804,0.02196695,0.01121308,0.005909769,0.003290808,0.572113,0.000007585179,0.0925418,0.01288353,0.07235247,0.1925758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01441679,0.05252833,0.05886179,0.02632803,0.0006538452,0.0007775601,0.5856052,0.1061019,0.03692114,0.004488136,0.1115599,0.001757334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835186,0.002156791,0.0002203947,0.009657045,0.00002124235,0.001299037,0.000502463,0.00006078548,0.002563661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503301,0.0008925644,0.0006312952,0.0000238444,0.0001407396,0.0002169505,0.0003198236,0.00004513561,0.04739956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1908185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4147303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143692112","doi":"10.1177/1468794115569564","title":"Filtered meaning: appreciating linguistic skill, social position and subjectivity of interpreters in cross-language research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Subjectivity; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Fluency; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6750878281009164,"gpt":0.7356350787654956,"spread":0.06054725066457922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1987063,0.0001490017,0.0004216615,0.0009959801,0.001073297,0.0002790984,0.0004750529,0.0002615431,0.00004150559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1457636,0.0001494513,0.00007501675,0.002252368,0.006879564,0.0003777185,0.0004018947,0.002093597,0.00001527282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009556345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001294863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0219907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003195697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9200466,0.07397821,0.0005713723,0.0005645375,0.003595251,0.001243984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619749,0.03325974,0.0001394952,0.0002149316,0.004026736,0.0003842603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002838309,0.0001150731,0.001664324,0.000136996,0.00002224608,0.00001601225,0.8380297,0.000001256726,0.001884621,0.1533033,0.0001601885,0.004382464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006634414,0.0004664469,0.002091609,0.0002103808,0.000001984573,4.770972e-7,0.7483991,0.0002113837,0.001153069,0.2464027,0.0002353656,0.0001640931],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248605,0.0004350206,0.001109393,0.002305418,0.00009215807,0.0007228425,0.00005221553,0.00002963078,0.0703928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994651,0.00005902787,0.004306467,0.00001472901,0.0002536848,0.0000773427,0.000009434188,0.00002448406,0.0006038113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09309939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050898615","doi":"10.1177/1468794113509261","title":"Advocating beyond the academy: dilemmas of communicating relevant research results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Sociology; Public relations; Participatory action research; Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Work (physics); Community-based participatory research; Political science; Media studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.775037321702685,"gpt":0.7288378966725597,"spread":0.04619942503012531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3899354,0.0002088463,0.0004812077,0.0006712464,0.005936413,0.0003985254,0.003075169,0.0003727975,0.0003762917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.187783,0.0001466909,0.0001655857,0.004600591,0.02017421,0.000639096,0.001335531,0.006484633,0.000577367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004792092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001621564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0442711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001054277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.794736,0.1935873,0.00133051,0.000701919,0.007281754,0.002362467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7174558,0.2708073,0.0004236454,0.001357015,0.009326788,0.0006294761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000602499,0.00008184066,0.00003934887,0.00007626769,0.00003992525,8.758891e-7,0.4932796,0.000001329738,0.002412708,0.4720765,0.01421215,0.01771922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002911949,0.0002200018,0.0004313376,0.0001737881,0.000002249713,2.523258e-7,0.5735781,0.0001156756,0.0008339912,0.3769598,0.04726151,0.0001321367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1723101,0.003019369,0.000579227,0.3923338,0.0001164244,0.004105367,0.000104812,0.000104397,0.4273264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965415,0.002170161,0.0215528,0.0001903511,0.0003657469,0.0007026843,0.00001479805,0.00005492213,0.009533564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6043639673826666,"gpt":0.600795378554305,"spread":0.003568588828361641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036414,0.000140577,0.0003510258,0.001080141,0.002839693,0.00004782519,0.0009128005,0.00008432964,0.00002899184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006187272,0.0001087203,0.00002099799,0.004079661,0.00349213,0.0002563364,0.0002274358,0.0009482064,0.000001155911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001120684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002696118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748918,0.02204569,0.0004470975,0.0002807702,0.001592135,0.0007424669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481035,0.04770751,0.0001435094,0.0007263033,0.003231985,0.00008721074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003488682,0.0004596167,0.002728506,0.0001113451,0.00005947438,0.00007365114,0.8874434,0.000004712708,0.000002012286,0.1061689,0.00009425903,0.002505273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001027002,0.002687622,0.000490778,0.0002820416,0.000005724622,0.000005923831,0.9698704,0.00006044822,0.00007384265,0.02487569,0.0004744577,0.0001461034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791074,0.0003512565,0.002028149,0.001794348,0.00001267561,0.003136996,0.00004987314,0.00004257699,0.01347674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710574,0.0001386726,0.02791151,0.000002853565,0.000007451845,0.0006807255,0.000004433758,0.0000232769,0.0001737221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08242693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020575600","doi":"10.1177/1468794103033007","title":"‘Giving Voice’ to Students: Using the Internet for Data Collection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Ethnic group; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Geography; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.927024663724717,"gpt":0.760420218698501,"spread":0.1666044450262161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3034135,0.0001089438,0.0001976663,0.0002769796,0.001789136,0.0002101889,0.001221692,0.0001290564,0.0003085573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2487636,0.00008712031,0.00005118639,0.001557627,0.0007181558,0.0002572561,0.0003240414,0.0004332836,0.0001689644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003297355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007947277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02019459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8517247,0.1453835,0.0003116505,0.0005589006,0.001239624,0.0007816369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8857526,0.1125464,0.00007424118,0.000623371,0.0008322953,0.0001711217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003425734,0.0002418043,0.008560946,0.0000338142,0.0001930734,0.000001890061,0.9043804,0.00001048485,0.002286826,0.02136116,0.0581847,0.001319221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004680873,0.0001765142,0.004049915,0.0000556841,0.00001451229,0.000001663686,0.2255208,0.00005329416,0.0003293348,0.009121096,0.7599872,0.0002219619],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197671,0.0002146994,0.1731238,0.002544102,0.0005353504,0.001370127,0.00005415995,0.00003317909,0.002357435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7777293,0.00008148371,0.1108039,0.0005833042,0.0004884974,0.0004050605,0.00006352504,0.00006166234,0.1097832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7018025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063364875","doi":"10.1177/1468794104041106","title":"What’s So Funny?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Solidarity; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social justice; Gender studies; Social solidarity; Epistemology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5065192918331807,"gpt":0.686000224803707,"spread":0.1794809329705264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002533095,0.00008281651,0.0001314419,0.0001271592,0.000546194,0.000108018,0.0002407065,0.00005443603,0.001636837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001751171,0.00007269767,0.00005277551,0.0005780257,0.0006358279,0.00006828069,0.00009893742,0.0003833493,0.009343541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007885075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008092272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977719,0.0007837623,0.0001810906,0.0003252997,0.0004102392,0.0005277696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983289,0.0009399623,0.00002710071,0.0003780045,0.0002157656,0.0001102277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000159211,0.0001429287,0.00001075659,0.000004734656,0.00004492521,0.00000708455,0.2578208,7.969153e-7,0.000145064,0.7211606,0.01429041,0.006355931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005156999,0.0001942919,0.001378566,0.00002230114,0.000002440277,0.00000211507,0.6013848,3.908576e-7,0.0001679376,0.1495506,0.2466762,0.0001047355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3128335,0.008334298,0.002368135,0.1032485,0.0009121586,0.00134045,0.00006232061,0.0001785386,0.5707221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794508,0.0001927213,0.0004459337,0.0001796286,0.0001776952,0.0005093066,0.000007616706,0.00001898461,0.01901729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6666173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947458104","doi":"10.1177/1468794119851336","title":"The necessity of a relational ethics alongside Noddings’ ethics of care in narrative inquiry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Ethics of care; Indigenous; Narrative; Sociology; Club; Identity (music); Narrative inquiry; Environmental ethics; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6814733013135371,"gpt":0.6720827856224815,"spread":0.009390515691055645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03321582,0.00006779237,0.0002170972,0.0001785525,0.0008942739,0.00001830305,0.0003573696,0.000308506,0.00008410479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02868679,0.00005457639,0.00006261246,0.0009386625,0.003146961,0.0001167436,0.00006816204,0.002468692,0.00002068731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000414559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003604226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01228112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01755775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839735,0.01322021,0.000365677,0.0002199006,0.001858234,0.0003624726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507375,0.04683849,0.0001550458,0.0001742688,0.002014294,0.00008039629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005874139,0.00002878954,0.0029141,0.00005990552,0.000008168481,4.260274e-7,0.6718414,0.000004763997,0.00003998739,0.3246639,0.0002240239,0.0001557328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001690725,0.000202288,0.003974896,0.0001161393,0.000001389786,5.653044e-8,0.965607,0.000003237354,0.00005858882,0.02060739,0.009200143,0.00005983625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.941849,0.001224658,0.00002916741,0.02008212,0.0003111135,0.000303781,0.00001076479,0.00000920517,0.03618021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979712,0.0001262103,0.0003257022,0.00003688754,0.00008023344,0.00001568518,0.000004560903,0.000007206043,0.001432305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3040565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392284092","doi":"10.1177/1468794115619002","title":"Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Queer; Participatory action research; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Narrative; Citizen journalism; Politics; Action research; Gender studies; Knowledge production; Unpacking; Feminism; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8154885795801954,"gpt":0.7488891148639437,"spread":0.06659946471625167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2390205,0.00009455859,0.000204459,0.0002709305,0.00130603,0.000284268,0.0005630936,0.0001595172,0.0001010183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1290269,0.00006953446,0.00006956432,0.0018092,0.005356801,0.0009276061,0.000108627,0.001327611,0.0001946784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005863748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002681965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009650397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9169154,0.07866738,0.000411626,0.0003298783,0.002832869,0.0008428629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759625,0.01610557,0.0001146906,0.0003740418,0.00703438,0.0004088279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005148869,0.00006928646,0.0002667296,0.00003165665,0.00002235315,7.501761e-7,0.6275839,0.000002877321,0.0008161676,0.3571925,0.008055472,0.005906782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001733031,0.0002158546,0.0005098811,0.00005360665,0.000004097148,2.36942e-7,0.6803944,0.00003422867,0.002515116,0.1950406,0.1209698,0.00008897176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5455164,0.00432403,0.01614055,0.1149366,0.0006084171,0.001636877,0.00002536829,0.0001025062,0.3167092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753222,0.0002674999,0.008046476,0.00004958747,0.0005517466,0.000145272,0.000004105528,0.00001964055,0.01559348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4298058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268836053","doi":"10.1177/1468794115622529","title":"Watching the watchers: conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Covert; Secrecy; Ethnography; Law enforcement; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; State police; Symbol (formal); Reflexivity; Legislation; Participant observation; Deception; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Public relations; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8909101175761514,"gpt":0.7009790939748612,"spread":0.1899310236012901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09244322,0.00009909952,0.0001143001,0.0007709422,0.003518249,0.0003377788,0.0008810805,0.0001288804,0.000109687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009866956,0.00004773602,0.00005379821,0.004897756,0.003202507,0.0005133083,0.0001053174,0.001641518,0.0002306756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003210384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003947703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6307672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08874572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9476249,0.04858146,0.0002631426,0.0003062783,0.002294292,0.0009299004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346415,0.0639852,0.00008117554,0.0004148422,0.0007455742,0.0001317351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002690025,0.00003425853,0.0008655502,0.000005854589,0.00001013431,6.410239e-7,0.8379268,0.000004342844,0.001826655,0.1547236,0.003432516,0.001142677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002257465,0.0001312725,0.003735369,0.0001781824,0.000002368999,4.35003e-7,0.9118799,0.00001547109,0.0001010476,0.03124506,0.05239432,0.00009083329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8154265,0.00001005059,0.00001868264,0.1700467,0.00005254673,0.0004537305,0.00000728504,0.00002230959,0.01396217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972998,0.0001575182,0.00004198241,0.0008686742,0.000362739,0.0001183225,0.000004128723,0.00001365076,0.001133135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5420215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781528524","doi":"10.1177/1468794117743463","title":"Play-making with migrant farm workers in Ontario, Canada: a kinesthetic and embodied approach to qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Qualitative research; Habitus; Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Embodied cognition; Action research; Public relations; Action (physics); Citizenship; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Cultural capital; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8220467114492359,"gpt":0.7273129418213309,"spread":0.09473376962790503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1140809,0.0002842127,0.0005781412,0.001323206,0.002008712,0.0003188031,0.0009217148,0.0001753119,0.0001576669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01923514,0.0002431013,0.00004238758,0.004872493,0.006628052,0.0002613481,0.0004173798,0.002174078,0.00005477524],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004527312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01336121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9301963,0.05905488,0.000581418,0.00116053,0.006017325,0.002989526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977221,0.01815059,0.00008710974,0.0005302076,0.002943798,0.001067292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009513078,0.0002066617,0.006381297,0.00004483076,0.00005016386,0.00005224924,0.9302717,0.000007247292,0.0001167942,0.05892559,0.001920122,0.001071971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007177539,0.001138213,0.0195727,0.0003269396,0.000004264335,0.000001712047,0.9350116,0.000101673,0.00008039699,0.00901066,0.03366064,0.0003734587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045971,0.0001314023,0.0006129888,0.003113497,0.00004767321,0.002108113,0.00001541761,0.00003078919,0.08934299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832278,0.000006271629,0.01101413,0.0001056655,0.0001131263,0.0008784845,0.000003864104,0.00004672268,0.004603882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09484576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576190658","doi":"10.1177/1468794116682823","title":"A sociogram is worth a thousand words: proposing a method for the visual analysis of narrative data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Narrative; Computer science; Visualization; Data science; Narrative network; Data visualization; Qualitative property; Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Social network analysis; Graph; Narrative structure; Narrative criticism; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Social media; Theoretical computer science; Machine learning; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9278203283948669,"gpt":0.8422690525012019,"spread":0.08555127589366507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1384907,0.0001636266,0.0006038181,0.0006167789,0.00662296,0.000691645,0.003095784,0.0001382586,0.0002457038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0687741,0.0001140107,0.0002801688,0.002380707,0.004508827,0.0006950603,0.001006671,0.0006357344,0.000008640885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002208602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001624859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0156082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008009041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9676682,0.02701027,0.0004971208,0.0007584094,0.002878624,0.001187384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557113,0.03984913,0.0003947043,0.001651621,0.002090312,0.0003029194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003562746,0.0002200793,0.001809457,0.00004986714,0.002479278,0.00000231957,0.9149675,0.000004638382,0.0007085251,0.02001349,0.0022564,0.05713217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005705017,0.0004428933,0.004202643,0.00007184483,0.0004570819,6.773866e-8,0.9157537,0.03950878,0.001101392,0.01478092,0.02287419,0.000235959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3167037,0.002095814,0.6204095,0.04040149,0.0002488458,0.007940158,0.001138606,0.00009852933,0.01096334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369823,0.0001921231,0.05948061,0.00007571125,0.0002291529,0.0006205916,0.00001970413,0.00003154486,0.002368293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6202785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739530871","doi":"10.1177/1468794117722193","title":"The iSquare protocol: combining research, art, and pedagogy through the draw-and-write technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5274670924540499,"gpt":0.6141890882393464,"spread":0.08672199578529649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01196454,0.0001554234,0.0001935845,0.00005656412,0.01397351,0.002731596,0.000747464,0.00006744267,0.0004039897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001305302,0.00007431158,0.00004979515,0.0000556706,0.007484914,0.0005117479,0.0006728183,0.001240009,0.0001048293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003707884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009799773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002522677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003899992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945079,0.003235301,0.0002749153,0.0003569949,0.0009111208,0.0007137693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994829,0.003390214,0.00009972697,0.0006957662,0.0008917013,0.00009356884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006672438,0.00002213082,0.00001333725,0.00007611694,0.00001980006,0.000005092536,0.2826237,1.166388e-8,0.0001055702,0.6917756,0.0217156,0.003576355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002188016,0.0002962643,0.0001543197,0.0000995726,0.000001461112,0.000002402594,0.2769826,0.000007159605,0.00008257761,0.09940172,0.6226671,0.0000859996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01693776,0.0007146557,0.00003107035,0.05939299,0.0001167421,0.05837617,0.00006852081,0.00009343594,0.8642687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7834122,0.0002482078,0.0001534164,0.0001539566,0.0006560636,0.09502228,0.000006738267,0.00005468473,0.1202925],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422566680","doi":"10.1177/1468794116652451","title":"Researching resilience: lessons learned from working with rural, Sesotho-speaking South African young people","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Inclusion (mineral); Psychological resilience; Sociology; Qualitative research; Poverty; Gender studies; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4013304344147463,"gpt":0.5923547926670147,"spread":0.1910243582522685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009237006,0.0002842871,0.0004447335,0.0006274572,0.001113803,0.0001842697,0.0008982322,0.0001557254,0.001156335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140128,0.0001800099,0.00009058345,0.001786076,0.001146459,0.0003771516,0.0003176474,0.00112426,0.001427327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000514159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004617698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004445436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871379,0.007055607,0.0005004666,0.001080974,0.002170859,0.002054198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917367,0.00621513,0.0001865896,0.0009581546,0.0003867575,0.0005166949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002209139,0.0002421824,0.0445706,0.00004111624,0.0001166581,0.00009131768,0.7482889,0.000003048688,0.007902813,0.03176518,0.001603663,0.1631654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001774488,0.001057463,0.07733215,0.001012401,0.000009221683,0.00001370308,0.9039071,0.00001390517,0.001038621,0.01082868,0.002584735,0.0004275642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201735,0.0003779962,0.00301494,0.009294929,0.0001576918,0.0007132199,0.0001068166,0.0001058247,0.06605506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867457,0.0001152285,0.0008989341,0.00004782612,0.0002523988,0.0002563794,0.00001944018,0.00007044346,0.01159361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1627379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094611420","doi":"10.1177/1468794120965374","title":"A critical discussion of the use of film in participatory research projects with homeless young people: an analysis based on case examples from England and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Central Lancashire; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Publics; Participatory design; Media studies; Economic Justice; The Symbolic; Gender studies; Public relations; Politics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8844590982352759,"gpt":0.7048359669098964,"spread":0.1796231313253795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02499495,0.0001276406,0.0005029058,0.0004414707,0.000598049,0.0001073611,0.0004053832,0.00008980629,0.00009051111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05945851,0.0000738598,0.00004707113,0.004308293,0.003024826,0.0002953679,0.0001959724,0.0008615441,5.057262e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003298895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9347423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9319644,0.06258677,0.0003875925,0.0005243225,0.003690321,0.0008465836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612113,0.03628009,0.00007257288,0.0004322347,0.001376782,0.0006270504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009197812,0.0002987464,0.4284475,0.0001455919,0.00007177758,0.0001812477,0.5656127,0.0003143039,0.0008869102,0.002474786,0.00006374811,0.0005828932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008877956,0.001155376,0.3438099,0.0001982984,0.00004858188,4.065342e-7,0.6124431,0.03870334,0.00198438,0.0003647044,0.0002104521,0.0001936864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956681,0.00003080271,0.0002037699,0.003041304,0.00001153499,0.0006734222,0.0002748272,0.000006141392,0.00009006418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.000007959107,0.0006626319,0.00002505864,0.00003179828,0.0001534368,0.00000585469,0.00001484258,0.00002408925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08463759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037148320","doi":"10.1177/1468794120934398","title":"Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: a comparative case-study approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Photovoice; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Focus group; Participatory action research; Sociology; Work (physics); Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Climate change; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9649627906532334,"gpt":0.7976799185037576,"spread":0.1672828721494758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0278607,0.0001749042,0.0003626135,0.0002613468,0.001685477,0.0001350488,0.0003993629,0.00006721244,0.0002644216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460479,0.0001638668,0.00005464025,0.002151925,0.001143296,0.0003801922,0.0005584944,0.0006318471,0.0001853125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000139798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008985119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004397834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009542368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9665727,0.02909266,0.0003709252,0.0007041286,0.002050883,0.001208718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964743,0.001839,0.00007086642,0.0002306999,0.0005592001,0.0008259023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001196475,0.000441866,0.003362632,0.0001515385,0.00009946344,0.0004655339,0.9664918,4.809214e-7,0.00004905088,0.02536733,0.001055498,0.002395117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004932045,0.0006676749,0.001439369,0.00001249009,0.00001416522,0.000002754003,0.9888306,0.0007526001,0.00002876545,0.0007851534,0.006786042,0.0001871644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075865,0.0006160348,0.0004858795,0.001228513,0.00005011444,0.00403816,0.00003167386,0.00008942434,0.08587366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941917,0.0004079472,0.003103889,0.0000629124,0.0001942291,0.001560533,0.00000235628,0.00001969545,0.0004567022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08660519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006688485","doi":"10.1177/1468794120906012","title":"Working the aporia: ethnography, embodiment and the ethnographic self","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Scholarship; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6843093927139514,"gpt":0.6624807157343372,"spread":0.02182867697961421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1551851,0.0001775692,0.0003329926,0.0002009666,0.00491935,0.0004957164,0.0009996195,0.0001802361,0.00009880048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883606,0.00009521694,0.0001937193,0.003690696,0.01641044,0.000183173,0.000423849,0.002735245,0.00005655969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007299409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004648553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002903684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006160816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8960024,0.09841564,0.000433855,0.0005438271,0.003443077,0.001161257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374214,0.06069465,0.0001120703,0.0003450741,0.0009623135,0.0004644801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000973514,0.00001755486,0.0001047157,0.00002099244,0.00008163952,0.000001915335,0.5254425,3.393052e-7,0.00001872904,0.4687948,0.001981131,0.003438333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000606771,0.0001254902,0.0001155693,0.00003466962,0.00001107212,1.668282e-7,0.6363654,0.00009582042,0.00001961578,0.2213517,0.1411576,0.000116129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03688332,0.01010488,0.00294459,0.8698791,0.0002568352,0.002735421,0.00001155143,0.0001871976,0.0769971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852966,0.006418206,0.004361677,0.002213036,0.0007076721,0.000396463,0.000002528287,0.00003303157,0.0005708062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}