{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4cb78e555126","filters":{"venue":"Quantitative Science Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W4388465513","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00272","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publication; Publishing; Oligopoly; Library science; The Internet; Economics; Business; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Finance; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8782480311744858,"gpt":0.6940854257892891,"spread":0.1841626053851967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05136183,0.0002377451,0.0003971427,0.01330963,0.006047872,0.04870819,0.02115961,0.00005559207,0.00002690192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2016291,0.0001033997,0.00009158613,0.3018027,0.004194415,0.009673412,0.01386246,0.0004937406,0.0007396236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009211948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003412659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003567637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861211,0.0004399323,0.0006188772,0.001438495,0.009956274,0.001425328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729512,0.01845724,0.0005062321,0.001166346,0.006413073,0.000505965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103817,0.00004647426,0.1480063,0.00001043497,0.0001145409,0.0000135069,0.05254576,0.0001467138,0.005007589,0.02332318,0.29502,0.4756617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003003211,0.0002233239,0.6632833,0.00006434917,0.00001184791,6.000931e-7,0.1961934,0.005918351,0.00449451,0.1070592,0.02208621,0.0003644702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8245032,0.004670235,0.0004180524,0.1659501,0.00142714,0.001110681,0.00004467542,0.00006950313,0.001806353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937676,0.0008880332,0.0004165958,0.0008159177,0.0001173619,0.0002496634,8.913167e-7,0.00001278529,0.003731128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5152771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113126806","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00097","title":"Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Division of labour; Taxonomy (biology); General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8339422120845222,"gpt":0.6137471753924978,"spread":0.2201950366920244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04250939,0.0001791103,0.0004226311,0.006390642,0.003850134,0.002753972,0.004642354,0.00002999796,0.00002914403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2617323,0.0000759707,0.0001331605,0.190283,0.01417019,0.001257018,0.002439493,0.0002792238,0.00005481236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008811185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007767429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003916663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003263172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871413,0.0005313293,0.0008354462,0.0009440579,0.009858585,0.0006893019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582623,0.01852588,0.001294489,0.001253038,0.02015959,0.0005046683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005075743,0.0001858467,0.4071733,0.00006052765,0.000214332,0.000008428126,0.05820768,0.002985589,0.2923539,0.1498637,0.03912706,0.0497689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001009662,0.00115681,0.2128999,0.0001636732,0.00006078059,0.000003602338,0.3246449,0.3212181,0.06246091,0.03252978,0.04313292,0.0007190153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973762,0.006163258,0.006306634,0.01152785,0.001186993,0.0006108819,0.00008499559,0.00001828587,0.0003390411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948659,0.00006961973,0.004538381,0.0003512453,0.00006615662,0.00001932486,4.360231e-7,0.00000548957,0.00008343182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3182325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311844276","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00228","title":"Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford Graduate School of Education","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Diversity (politics); Indonesian; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Political science; Discipline; Social science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7607194694388768,"gpt":0.6363862618839845,"spread":0.1243332075548923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07835025,0.0001248939,0.000330777,0.02842256,0.00218856,0.007659231,0.004800776,0.00002499721,0.00006988616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2975377,0.00007429033,0.00006024881,0.3347103,0.001891391,0.01357607,0.002733667,0.0005476096,0.000009492345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002742189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001240888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001358073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836172,0.0008046089,0.0008766399,0.0008602759,0.01323992,0.0006012962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751423,0.009963432,0.000767957,0.0006538402,0.01331873,0.0001537159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470022,0.0006793194,0.6409175,0.00004901107,0.00005852895,0.00002115307,0.05040047,0.02760977,0.006605578,0.1690744,0.005994496,0.09844278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001069834,0.001610561,0.3357742,0.00007530603,0.00001040018,0.000008732508,0.3727418,0.1811344,0.003403096,0.1021092,0.001585499,0.0004769892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786509,0.005803256,0.003372931,0.004975385,0.000515281,0.000561462,0.00003459396,0.00001608458,0.006070119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965323,0.0001625153,0.002891906,0.000145514,0.00001127563,0.00008947614,7.596582e-7,0.000005943777,0.0001603012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3223413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118099553","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00104","title":"The institutionalized stratification of the Chinese higher education system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meritocracy; Excellence; China; Hierarchy; Government (linguistics); Inequality; Empirical research; Political science; Statistical analysis; Economic growth; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394733721977589,"gpt":0.4788295273824484,"spread":0.3393561551846895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001454797,0.00007494209,0.0001128786,0.00003482198,0.004726404,0.00007941448,0.0003352041,0.00001658634,0.00001537851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002948065,0.00003886571,0.00006290394,0.001410504,0.003786667,0.0002908981,0.00008661421,0.00005614094,0.00001210849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000243824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002580475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002524528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00137229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983546,0.0002897655,0.000268477,0.0001916089,0.000734041,0.0001615588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958005,0.0005686831,0.0001829497,0.0001735441,0.003245437,0.00002889464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003690497,0.00003965574,0.002520164,0.00001364386,0.0000327267,4.195754e-8,0.01070116,0.00002065916,0.00142223,0.9836575,0.001422511,0.0001659985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001406766,0.00003127525,0.4075423,0.0001797881,0.00004042463,0.000001514177,0.3997483,0.00004712378,0.002803601,0.1303993,0.05884231,0.0002234527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179602,0.0155915,0.00009649403,0.09954296,0.01510685,0.0005331245,0.00002578588,0.00004719528,0.1510959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903507,0.0002484051,0.0005198462,0.0001623009,0.0002082303,0.00006820675,0.000002169694,0.000001906785,0.00843823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013695337","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00038","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Affect (linguistics); Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7557475091659885,"gpt":0.6168525148930493,"spread":0.1388949942729393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01376326,0.0001817143,0.0004578393,0.01238965,0.0006281689,0.001631503,0.001107691,0.00005002294,0.00004621566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.140561,0.0001122058,0.00008367556,0.05782105,0.001749691,0.001642537,0.0005284209,0.0001668097,0.00002879694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009667676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002719684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008189851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001264183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936828,0.0001542862,0.0005495265,0.000932368,0.004051898,0.0006291069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796301,0.01364716,0.0002814628,0.0002420419,0.005893948,0.0003053172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009883054,0.00003915135,0.8824083,0.00003854396,0.0000402379,0.00000423717,0.08170287,0.0001019286,0.0005741286,0.02258263,0.004937985,0.007471218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007291986,0.001234478,0.8783957,0.00002582217,0.000009516937,7.252301e-7,0.07106467,0.02409524,0.0004811356,0.0216164,0.002003674,0.0003434872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820284,0.005717866,0.007479208,0.002501771,0.0006285164,0.0004278106,0.00005050261,0.00002178223,0.001144204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957723,0.0009351992,0.002908156,0.0002683637,0.00005921773,0.00002112158,7.527451e-7,0.00000508623,0.00002978516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1267977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391464262","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00285","title":"Large-scale text analysis using generative language models: A case study in discovering public value expressions in AI patents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Snap","keywords":"Generative grammar; Natural language processing; Scale (ratio); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Generative model; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Machine learning; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2553169436416557,"gpt":0.5238114656364624,"spread":0.2684945219948067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004589079,0.0001581162,0.000400745,0.001667974,0.001162907,0.0003684238,0.0002608649,0.00002556232,0.00001683716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008308379,0.0001246912,0.000123847,0.01105967,0.000752338,0.001719394,0.0002850913,0.0001847978,0.000003557703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000386888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003830986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009356229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967972,0.0009426446,0.0003689601,0.0006520539,0.0007587001,0.0004804506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987276,0.0007081497,0.00007110113,0.0001383552,0.0002645648,0.00009020454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003841752,0.0002570648,0.03065536,0.000008849272,0.0002860525,0.0006471293,0.8510596,0.0891554,0.0003903407,0.02659447,0.000003172498,0.0009387207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009261802,0.00002336919,0.002632314,0.00003627691,0.00008065416,0.000001369845,0.57946,0.4135927,0.00001121583,0.003951295,0.000005198558,0.0001130049],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467995,0.002240204,0.04970578,0.0003653085,0.0001667548,0.0002688332,0.00001482843,0.00003366812,0.0004051544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898112,0.00006019706,0.00991893,0.00003651321,0.00003065304,0.00004214632,0.000001285286,0.000006243813,0.00009277736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3244373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391884287","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00288","title":"Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Scopus; Field (mathematics); Web of science; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8724255180851594,"gpt":0.6912206117189744,"spread":0.181204906366185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1523189,0.0001047092,0.0003134749,0.02277406,0.0008714797,0.0008526848,0.003109043,0.00002472104,0.00001055425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3759314,0.0000458654,0.0000519528,0.2947519,0.01602047,0.001034863,0.002056396,0.0002775762,0.000005444916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001451732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001010962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000151838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876766,0.0005211427,0.0007762242,0.0007356424,0.00979781,0.0004925958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9300773,0.06029733,0.0005236801,0.001044998,0.007879028,0.0001776482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004471825,0.00004895225,0.5324684,0.00007234531,0.00001959058,0.000003693098,0.0332015,0.00004601287,0.1269192,0.2496691,0.0007476963,0.05675866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001137635,0.0002804179,0.8804586,0.0001751805,0.000004357757,0.000001868373,0.06398246,0.009407897,0.02649051,0.01878609,0.0001867602,0.0001121083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883734,0.005811346,0.0001378815,0.001827746,0.00103023,0.0002080248,0.000009161518,0.000006080001,0.002596153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.0002259595,0.0004547706,0.00004508097,0.000008395542,0.000006225445,1.302835e-8,0.000002402516,0.0001883101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3479902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969944961","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00006","title":"Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Citation; Field (mathematics); Association (psychology); Interlocking; Editorial board; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1046701732834297,"gpt":0.4297293689054758,"spread":0.325059195622046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00126813,0.0001078734,0.0003459145,0.0001361226,0.0007609011,0.0001159266,0.0002409086,0.00002177023,0.00001530066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001949121,0.00007774423,0.00005560839,0.0006748408,0.0031605,0.0008901556,0.000212249,0.0002420761,3.739539e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000165978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006813457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003246138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004468797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987796,0.0002072653,0.0003069001,0.0002206359,0.0003254034,0.0001602291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983197,0.0005441445,0.0003220628,0.0001311677,0.0006463294,0.00003659354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115578,0.00008555728,0.896525,0.00001353767,0.0001515312,2.771154e-8,0.07582237,0.0002334263,0.002223839,0.02207186,0.001527493,0.001333751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291029,0.0004749834,0.5955315,0.0001612743,0.0001423932,1.083031e-7,0.3532337,0.03161082,0.003518879,0.01448988,0.0002498905,0.0002955943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949203,0.0006037491,0.003826715,0.00009323937,0.0002002543,0.0001500414,0.00001071059,0.000008835653,0.0001861987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988998,0.0000156854,0.0009286933,0.000006215236,0.0001300193,0.000005968424,0.000001130771,0.000004425378,0.00000812665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3009936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356342","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00250","title":"An open data set of scholars on Twitter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Event (particle physics); Set (abstract data type); Open data; Matching (statistics); Open science; World Wide Web; Data set; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9676859895836807,"gpt":0.7752727570725012,"spread":0.1924132325111795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08227329,0.0001442364,0.0004262713,0.04028047,0.0009421391,0.002773517,0.01877354,0.0000307043,0.00008738381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1459059,0.00008769184,0.00003685646,0.2909728,0.002913368,0.005076125,0.01062496,0.0001926625,0.001171263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006291678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004119649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000745255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002697435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861351,0.0003555812,0.0006196986,0.001525937,0.01069338,0.0006703112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838663,0.006909742,0.00031817,0.002539584,0.006081601,0.0002846113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002556319,0.0006194036,0.2165436,0.00003443322,0.0001959283,0.00008084541,0.02163148,0.0007095907,0.06460918,0.1196824,0.3639739,0.2116636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008267585,0.003634661,0.7445951,0.00007432913,0.00001236518,0.000002107167,0.1113746,0.02692224,0.008792989,0.08088674,0.02233118,0.0005469031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890797,0.0003393806,0.0002430249,0.002616073,0.0007257882,0.0003631132,0.0002542888,0.00003281769,0.006345853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950615,0.0003163917,0.00349872,0.0001897618,0.00002569156,0.00001060621,0.000008415134,0.000007201482,0.0008816707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393164122","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00304","title":"Evaluating approaches to identifying research supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Syddansk Universitet","keywords":"Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Process management; Management science; Computer science; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.949022836235384,"gpt":0.7319454571991254,"spread":0.2170773790362586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1191044,0.0001616051,0.0002275752,0.006716428,0.006670736,0.002362959,0.001361139,0.00002259229,0.0001368853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05662056,0.00009056928,0.00005689988,0.03941279,0.001436423,0.001613823,0.001125835,0.0003161446,0.000923418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000468182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002182562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005660404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002157753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898106,0.0008994358,0.0009152647,0.0009027241,0.006573556,0.0008984297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799379,0.01267383,0.0002041071,0.0005765517,0.006447911,0.0001597126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007986477,0.00002706846,0.0009380445,0.00005770295,0.00005451484,0.000006657964,0.1856285,0.004448491,0.001400629,0.7869729,0.004189975,0.01626754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008659874,0.0001932869,0.01131864,0.0001795564,0.00001197758,0.000002463413,0.8384319,0.06536562,0.002906148,0.03904654,0.04224575,0.0002115169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334505,0.001857632,0.01096553,0.02752712,0.0008346418,0.001421132,0.000003376864,0.0001094433,0.02383061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625672,0.00005210507,0.02571766,0.0001616837,0.00004922992,0.0003320914,0.000001907546,0.000009843418,0.01110828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7479264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084189430","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00086","title":"Using web content analysis to create innovation indicators—What do we really measure?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Confirmatory factor analysis; Content analysis; Measure (data warehouse); Business; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Marketing; Data mining; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.372022180426349,"gpt":0.418371953123223,"spread":0.0463497726968739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002558682,0.0001970557,0.0004285693,0.003211479,0.0006872264,0.0007088126,0.001231133,0.00003252879,0.000004336301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051917,0.0001582439,0.00009422365,0.06112384,0.0007337075,0.004017239,0.0007517258,0.0001388058,0.000050771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004094455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001746313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001457543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969355,0.00008775277,0.0005557504,0.0007896859,0.001202455,0.0004288377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969692,0.000250584,0.0002961773,0.0004254065,0.001874888,0.0001838049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005416654,0.0001020795,0.0166208,0.00005961899,0.0009379617,0.00001063441,0.08344507,0.002937764,0.0297772,0.8004113,0.0003476714,0.06529571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002227023,0.005518177,0.1242834,0.0008605891,0.0009637824,0.000007340144,0.210503,0.5680545,0.05652772,0.01684466,0.01065123,0.003558655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4759529,0.003363207,0.5058245,0.01285166,0.0004793485,0.0004510879,0.000009236877,0.0001541,0.0009140002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103897,0.0007334224,0.08718553,0.001638368,0.00002371404,0.000009810206,5.375204e-7,0.000004268993,0.0000146874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9588324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386601204","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00264","title":"Tracing data: A survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Communications Research Centre Canada; Université de Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"High Energy Physics; CERN; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Discipline; Citation; Data science; Tracing; Data sharing; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Reuse; Survey data collection; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.822593535018854,"gpt":0.5661646224853495,"spread":0.2564289125335045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02321332,0.0001705708,0.0002759072,0.001011941,0.000895814,0.002037641,0.01116652,0.00001691972,7.586613e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04404158,0.0001374608,0.00001031231,0.01019173,0.001636196,0.08056462,0.02031848,0.0002263825,0.00006275586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006642719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000294285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003568979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951404,0.0007145258,0.0004115046,0.00167963,0.001398124,0.0006557922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904703,0.005703674,0.0002790409,0.003077041,0.0003587889,0.0001111154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000309601,0.0002429013,0.5285851,0.0004170366,0.0002297494,0.0001944958,0.05339371,0.0005181614,0.002643399,0.3837839,0.008311634,0.02164895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190218,0.00007519482,0.7036204,0.0001245808,0.000003773382,6.347409e-7,0.01513632,0.2752424,0.00003083619,0.005416737,0.00004494935,0.0001850891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.904544,0.001178735,0.0805676,0.01057813,0.000916937,0.0007038926,0.0003316406,0.0003457699,0.0008333028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547784,0.001093632,0.04367157,0.00004938598,0.00002096529,0.00002736367,0.0001896306,0.000006926514,0.0001620692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3783672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611368","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00248","title":"Impact of geographic diversity on citation of collaborative research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Citation; Perspective (graphical); Geographical distance; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Scale (ratio); Data science; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9158071959647329,"gpt":0.7441541280930054,"spread":0.1716530678717275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07156343,0.0001243268,0.0004593036,0.1064305,0.001480587,0.0002441425,0.002276273,0.00003925115,0.00003955677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1934755,0.00007650417,0.0001740941,0.5103058,0.007447093,0.0008655202,0.002481436,0.000210314,0.0001733261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001781432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006096333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002470934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003056535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808142,0.0006798394,0.0005840343,0.0007461234,0.01649329,0.0006825397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934672,0.02211989,0.0004520061,0.0006124064,0.0419302,0.0002135219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001288578,0.0001656271,0.9367593,0.0000121521,0.00009415064,0.000004069008,0.01124804,0.0005051408,0.01162271,0.02802556,0.004904212,0.006530207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002169387,0.002251266,0.9175344,0.00002367783,0.000002876145,1.076138e-7,0.03077276,0.001241625,0.002523304,0.04533381,0.00002065909,0.00007863556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948559,0.0004739603,0.00005759014,0.0002757391,0.0002479849,0.0003059297,0.0001056457,0.00001457768,0.003662681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.0008171475,0.0004401071,0.000004118973,0.000008104123,0.000007952221,9.222649e-7,0.000003539307,0.0002325895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4038754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401998","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.12","title":"Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Communications Research Centre Canada; University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs; Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine","keywords":"Data science; Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9677277945080556,"gpt":0.8158772839024488,"spread":0.1518505106056067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2099625,0.0005114562,0.005388297,0.4552121,0.001672671,0.001317434,0.008398178,0.0001034441,0.00003208645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8838592,0.0002342794,0.001665865,0.9203303,0.003873437,0.0008794062,0.002995597,0.0003892893,0.00003333818],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002643074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005664104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002491403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001304756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9731176,0.0007605411,0.009169303,0.002142729,0.01367879,0.001131062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3532565,0.4801026,0.0529313,0.007672972,0.1053182,0.0007184233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001858731,0.00002883032,0.00004307666,0.07469048,0.0001872933,0.000002355251,0.00006809134,0.0000036365,0.000001719341,0.001277176,0.00710133,0.9165941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001687188,0.0004191613,0.0001743182,0.7316606,0.001213626,0.000009727175,0.002019145,0.0002561033,0.00002878945,0.002366864,0.2610011,0.0006818355],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001239991,0.9851343,0.008170649,0.0002816656,0.001119641,0.004026309,0.00009914198,0.00001742487,0.001149643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000009782035,0.9917482,0.006720531,0.0000854163,0.00004229044,0.0006038932,0.000001908966,0.0000135946,0.0007743756],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283364764","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00184","title":"Center–periphery structure in research communities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thomas and Stacey Siebel Foundation; University of Victoria; Grainger Foundation; Washington University in St. Louis; Google","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Pipeline (software); Data science; Citation; Subject (documents); Cluster analysis; Community structure; Center (category theory); Computer science; Geography; Library science; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3119855917260361,"gpt":0.5164166050925184,"spread":0.2044310133664823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001842277,0.0001014618,0.0002176778,0.0004711852,0.001921067,0.00005854806,0.0006667486,0.000004745403,0.0004206558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003570765,0.00009184687,0.00004342631,0.002494593,0.00185686,0.0002189884,0.001297645,0.0004666776,0.000003626518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001771131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000975688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007220993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004085833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980759,0.0004609069,0.0001890483,0.0002304415,0.00063665,0.0004070385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989725,0.00035359,0.00005948873,0.0002742891,0.0003120445,0.00002808346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002620553,0.0002051491,0.3136666,0.00001001625,0.0001037389,0.000003587733,0.06252708,0.001225016,0.002334604,0.6096808,0.003364704,0.006852576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873773,0.0003207727,0.02450857,0.00004249376,0.000007443274,8.128982e-7,0.7871696,0.003292029,0.0007858503,0.1754332,0.007855436,0.0002963855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909788,0.000716283,0.0001601303,0.0003134193,0.0001099436,0.0001754587,0.0000491254,0.00002782425,0.007468991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982321,0.00001725519,0.001457945,0.00002842461,0.00002720939,0.00008723155,0.000007823809,0.000006228614,0.0001358345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013134734","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00036","title":"Who are the acknowledgees? An analysis of gender and academic status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Instituto de Salud Carlos III; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2109544355535592,"gpt":0.4806547421617286,"spread":0.2697003066081693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034036,0.00007289007,0.000224079,0.0001055864,0.000937001,0.00003947917,0.0002875372,0.00001942037,0.00002863896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00197167,0.00004811991,0.0000310384,0.002968135,0.003105038,0.0004694591,0.00008847764,0.00008477864,0.00001043455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006730678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004006881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001250931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005097584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986215,0.0001311602,0.0001727849,0.0002712395,0.0005541131,0.0002491628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987167,0.0002578691,0.0001817545,0.00008735059,0.0006258531,0.0001304393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005014078,0.00001070708,0.2751001,0.000006915906,0.0001542706,1.906436e-7,0.6317338,0.0000261841,0.0001448041,0.0916473,0.0006560726,0.0005146044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000349461,0.00002525792,0.5907407,0.000007468721,0.00006653908,9.271909e-9,0.4045964,0.0001176047,0.00007557109,0.0006700994,0.003605929,0.00005942205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865113,0.005492582,0.0001658043,0.00442201,0.0001731156,0.0001335964,0.00001211532,0.00001709456,0.003072418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953087,0.003203495,0.000715745,0.0006120388,0.0000383399,0.000009191643,3.922117e-7,0.000002108919,0.0001099854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3156406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032439792","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00069","title":"Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Demography; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Subject (documents); Citation impact; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8348130930551083,"gpt":0.6305721392040463,"spread":0.204240953851062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01842205,0.0002750654,0.0006211698,0.01649531,0.001183221,0.001802802,0.001845492,0.0001439119,0.00008558128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1163859,0.0001560549,0.00008096556,0.1389448,0.002211356,0.002491086,0.0008778637,0.0007819988,0.0001361516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003225621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004453522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006550934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006828934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881654,0.0003127007,0.0008233038,0.001493333,0.00820016,0.001005089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879936,0.006652274,0.0004728901,0.0003867004,0.004070927,0.0004236031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009282012,0.0001519438,0.8273072,0.0001203053,0.0001472223,0.0001516825,0.1270504,0.001803264,0.009342682,0.01105562,0.008480121,0.01346132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008344953,0.0009985223,0.8862264,0.0001073234,0.00001657551,0.000003961986,0.09607361,0.004918647,0.007110863,0.002609407,0.0006085588,0.0004916742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813337,0.00107746,0.0007177198,0.01495584,0.0003381335,0.0004001901,0.00004276789,0.00003929707,0.001094894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922109,0.0003994611,0.006051345,0.0004713231,0.00004593384,0.00004663883,9.502176e-7,0.00001349613,0.0007599171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1224495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295878695","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00211","title":"Assessing the quality of bibliographic data sources for measuring international research collaboration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Digital library; Data quality; Information retrieval; Conceptual framework; Metric (unit); Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9238412134420332,"gpt":0.7257074572657539,"spread":0.1981337561762793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1379287,0.00007812503,0.0002221624,0.002603617,0.003779218,0.001015887,0.004895641,0.000007858378,0.00002896791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05603263,0.00004930538,0.00004797191,0.01700875,0.003278573,0.003045732,0.004982365,0.0001482159,0.000005713658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007011552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002695502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001001873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003252525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904249,0.001782903,0.0007391174,0.0007402979,0.006025782,0.0002870524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756542,0.01611446,0.0007692903,0.001540132,0.005874872,0.0000469711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000194262,0.0003303898,0.02050801,0.00006142253,0.0002954079,0.000001128038,0.04541436,0.002008259,0.009219865,0.8452355,0.05691098,0.01982039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000219897,0.000163704,0.03754361,0.00001502422,0.000009911826,2.725601e-7,0.8053657,0.003295567,0.0006711425,0.1113956,0.04121264,0.0001069758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379362,0.002868516,0.02290242,0.02746795,0.00257728,0.001202602,0.001079215,0.00003425503,0.003931494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952641,0.0001267045,0.004207525,0.0001101265,0.00003150693,0.00009758058,0.00001564921,0.000003283281,0.0001435158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038101076","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00055","title":"Beyond networks: Aligning qualitative and computational science studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Computer science; Dichotomy; Data science; Workflow; Domain (mathematical analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3028395154045068,"gpt":0.5582822649915379,"spread":0.2554427495870311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008272159,0.0001944076,0.0004427174,0.000316271,0.005070779,0.0002487375,0.0004909671,0.00002228583,0.00001036982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01330394,0.0001626537,0.000065809,0.005048486,0.02299103,0.001352257,0.0004489552,0.0001398746,0.00001681168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001794998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006397046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006968919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000954127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961686,0.0005883967,0.0003762119,0.0007792079,0.00153801,0.0005495457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925891,0.00408441,0.0002384526,0.00008362572,0.002719179,0.0002852787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009914866,0.00001235743,0.0005269444,0.00001155693,0.0001038239,0.000002491221,0.447329,0.004879058,0.0001477644,0.543785,0.0002441228,0.002947879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198254,0.0001858726,0.002660146,0.00004413365,0.00004972965,6.328381e-7,0.7761655,0.02732071,0.00006262042,0.1925714,0.0004479625,0.0002930925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7092712,0.04823655,0.1484198,0.06742693,0.001933891,0.001128559,0.00002824071,0.0004400001,0.02311488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9195551,0.0006539947,0.07853267,0.001026886,0.00013725,0.00001568693,9.645464e-7,0.000006007628,0.0000714233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3512137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410299443","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.1","title":"Examining the geographic and linguistic coverage of gold and diamond open access journals in OpenAlex, Scopus, and Web of Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; World Wide Web; Diamond; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Materials science; Metallurgy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1692326442315159,"gpt":0.444099002351288,"spread":0.2748663581197721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003353203,0.0001133408,0.0002978924,0.0009438604,0.0005308069,0.0008026363,0.0009385683,0.00001075987,0.000004693929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005019232,0.00007633018,0.00001209675,0.003514386,0.007873259,0.002163599,0.003197525,0.0000941004,5.366161e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001246634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001587789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003957848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006851004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988369,0.00002161312,0.0003040916,0.0003642972,0.0002633478,0.0002097728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998022,0.000664136,0.0002407472,0.0001334563,0.000927667,0.00001204623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002543065,0.00003064351,0.7828,0.0002365203,0.00002267461,0.000002688479,0.00172421,0.000007926405,0.005357771,0.2036394,0.00001854969,0.006134159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002562627,0.00004740421,0.9578267,0.001436785,0.00003053312,7.467691e-7,0.0118389,0.001356155,0.00117093,0.02560935,0.0002998229,0.0001263464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677573,0.01208759,0.00006158927,0.0002159917,0.0001846428,0.0002741585,0.000002264577,0.000003374242,0.01941309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966255,0.003042796,0.0001202189,0.0001275084,0.00001634657,0.000009381787,7.499638e-8,0.000002524522,0.00005564308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.17803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402586478","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00331","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Diamond; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9189744428884732,"gpt":0.7656385779657428,"spread":0.1533358649227304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1548605,0.0004957814,0.001145446,0.08258206,0.004473627,0.04311279,0.02483564,0.00007146933,0.0001277739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3105747,0.0002581522,0.0002137391,0.4880457,0.01473271,0.01732683,0.02183049,0.0009477455,0.0009678238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002167834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002791712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006946829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728298,0.000980771,0.001833663,0.003001377,0.0192976,0.002056777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154617,0.05514203,0.0008872113,0.002349512,0.02501645,0.001143079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002139236,0.0003616565,0.03000169,0.0001509066,0.0004478183,0.0003396021,0.3219785,0.001034066,0.03378001,0.3706901,0.1187758,0.1222259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004631476,0.0009788526,0.115543,0.001122825,0.00003343364,0.00001454214,0.470936,0.006114063,0.006968719,0.3837505,0.01323807,0.0008369148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871336,0.1686808,0.001914241,0.126992,0.006645194,0.00224973,0.00008343255,0.00007982854,0.006221097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964838,0.0267999,0.00495183,0.0005953719,0.00007669734,0.0001812761,2.565594e-7,0.00002286071,0.002533866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4054637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980178188","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00009","title":"On the topicality and research impact of special issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discipline; Scarcity; Analytics; Phenomenon; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Space (punctuation); Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8962515934314642,"gpt":0.756896630519447,"spread":0.1393549629120172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06608193,0.00009858468,0.0003135492,0.01489018,0.0007146019,0.0007694569,0.001915231,0.00002633959,0.0004610766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.177527,0.00004185068,0.00009454452,0.1098289,0.005814314,0.0005056394,0.001242779,0.0002646823,0.0003116612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001227635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002708326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001262504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001300629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874837,0.0005727782,0.0003770923,0.0006537359,0.01037679,0.0005359303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553033,0.03365874,0.0001738687,0.0008082547,0.009880305,0.0001755234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007079888,0.00009893794,0.2235285,0.00000668862,0.00003861621,0.000001851184,0.006303365,0.00001983874,0.003607404,0.7323918,0.02173275,0.01219941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001407779,0.001609129,0.7260254,0.00001731763,0.000001205148,5.490128e-7,0.01731041,0.0006275791,0.001740426,0.2512609,0.001180334,0.0000859752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769636,0.001161319,0.00001576183,0.002859592,0.0003339734,0.0002830511,0.00001208885,0.000003569773,0.01836703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979767,0.0003740315,0.0002173583,0.00002779066,0.00005973488,0.000004398458,5.514998e-8,0.00000223239,0.00133774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175903833","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00142","title":"Uncited papers are not useless","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Citation; Poisson process; Measure (data warehouse); Poisson distribution; The arts; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Library science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.891090757630023,"gpt":0.6925934581402525,"spread":0.1984972994897705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0244475,0.0001978476,0.0005168364,0.02313167,0.001579353,0.002207353,0.002442759,0.00004590191,0.0002636389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2196518,0.0001289306,0.000152645,0.2961609,0.003452345,0.0012308,0.001691454,0.0002343321,0.0006792739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002225764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008001083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001776445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008479386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834384,0.000329726,0.0006299415,0.001414408,0.01328106,0.0009064092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651027,0.009803979,0.0003970168,0.0009799021,0.02326232,0.0004540475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034214,0.0007277112,0.3555217,0.00004528731,0.0002903465,0.0005647978,0.013565,0.0004724512,0.1969259,0.2481132,0.03949209,0.1441781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007787551,0.0003953787,0.6622147,0.00006765635,0.00001991576,0.00001926307,0.193314,0.004047748,0.07945564,0.02127103,0.03767609,0.0007398282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599605,0.006652297,0.001234763,0.005411548,0.001808701,0.0002008823,0.00006135336,0.00005748438,0.02461252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888262,0.0008174264,0.005159071,0.0005967387,0.00003521056,0.00001233365,7.563201e-7,0.000007665982,0.004544628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.306693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392454393","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00298","title":"Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Order (exchange); CITES; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5820455615646037,"gpt":0.6069358497101962,"spread":0.02489028814559247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01951515,0.0000771348,0.0001546601,0.001341717,0.002348371,0.0002976214,0.0003590589,0.00001986278,0.00002166156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02447788,0.00004154378,0.0000212171,0.01260323,0.004626821,0.0006839821,0.00008966033,0.000255201,0.000006017734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000172242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009174041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002825038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1246799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969474,0.001128329,0.000290254,0.0002338026,0.001065192,0.0003350008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892422,0.01013701,0.00007167402,0.00009804885,0.0003881025,0.00006299107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004391098,0.00004028951,0.001670235,0.0000167737,0.000009308188,0.00003435628,0.8764075,0.00001672575,0.000002627756,0.1182434,0.0006003696,0.002953991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120195,0.000133018,0.01791925,0.00002388506,0.000004549956,0.000002331147,0.9759442,0.0001736219,0.000001404439,0.004961198,0.0006650067,0.00005135152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792657,0.001770849,0.00002097215,0.01080859,0.0001659385,0.0005258077,0.000008114127,0.00001036194,0.007423678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991009,0.0005365253,0.000094642,0.0001867297,0.00002971605,0.00002104783,1.484248e-7,0.000001837998,0.00002841547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1218548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390511741","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00282","title":"Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preprint; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Journalism; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Media studies; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Virology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.19069987931136,"gpt":0.4933801193258072,"spread":0.3026802400144472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0420193,0.0001593435,0.0003608511,0.0006095608,0.0008715172,0.001584784,0.006693693,0.0000331848,0.00007370501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07944141,0.00006683762,0.00009176386,0.01075807,0.008735005,0.004222187,0.001283854,0.0004237309,0.0002392766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002730046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001163701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000878239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006357009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929628,0.0006333939,0.0007992098,0.001028158,0.004159786,0.0004166132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801425,0.01670561,0.000400025,0.001135244,0.001537014,0.00007963253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391966,0.00008212653,0.04080367,0.00002785265,0.00003711408,0.00001488645,0.2452033,0.0006738748,0.009271781,0.58072,0.03731041,0.08582102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001394582,0.00007498956,0.2312776,0.0004026779,0.00002250618,0.000003116061,0.3145369,0.004232249,0.001226139,0.441055,0.006806226,0.0002232024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083002,0.0482407,0.007942989,0.01818995,0.003691216,0.0006848649,0.00005621808,0.00002760579,0.01286631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974299,0.001621402,0.0005050431,0.000222362,0.00007757013,0.00003278284,4.018069e-7,0.000003443115,0.0001070993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1904739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392122745","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00296","title":"Do you cite what you tweet? Investigating the relationship between tweeting and citing research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Academic institution; Institution; Positive correlation; Unit (ring theory); Social media; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9203955165518652,"gpt":0.6926351140286738,"spread":0.2277604025231914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1607959,0.0002087008,0.000357982,0.02857776,0.005463222,0.02027534,0.002213239,0.00005958342,0.00001684802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4448118,0.000116099,0.00008977124,0.2299385,0.009591062,0.004979122,0.002567817,0.0009220902,0.000237227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001973045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004357777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005259866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001719171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98335,0.001214798,0.0008160393,0.001503767,0.0118851,0.001230273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6953642,0.2867264,0.0005214778,0.001662258,0.01473898,0.0009866427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002558535,0.000008507005,0.760379,0.00002997758,0.00002800321,0.000008417553,0.02237012,0.0000179775,0.00148546,0.103013,0.001099639,0.1115574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009673106,0.0001862629,0.4938005,0.0003965042,0.00001121585,0.000004212601,0.2301538,0.004906522,0.0008486919,0.2681399,0.001245625,0.0002100927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436449,0.03962945,0.0005092559,0.01372579,0.0005813554,0.0003303172,0.00001128094,0.00005588345,0.001511814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954779,0.0008321369,0.002892095,0.00006499393,0.0001584293,0.00002872688,5.254313e-7,0.00001321735,0.0005320181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2879858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022460410","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00044","title":"How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Timeline; Openness to experience; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9412102896347241,"gpt":0.6538876646655836,"spread":0.2873226249691405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05265013,0.0004890816,0.002022049,0.04320477,0.001183047,0.00483356,0.003959927,0.0002109828,0.00002506116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2809594,0.0003493894,0.0001771746,0.08299639,0.01371119,0.001633965,0.01224127,0.001613732,0.00001160695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003002429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006177388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002648127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.972604,0.002349273,0.001253069,0.002837111,0.01954298,0.001413549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9558998,0.02475304,0.001576031,0.001338305,0.01556119,0.0008716037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000460387,0.004776876,0.4495557,0.001607444,0.001527297,0.00002840412,0.03217123,0.00002418192,0.2574511,0.08426767,0.00247319,0.1656566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001155269,0.004692826,0.7432553,0.0006849553,0.00006056242,0.000001521628,0.1572673,0.0143464,0.02588654,0.05081141,0.0009241995,0.0009136762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679167,0.004755988,0.0004242116,0.02276359,0.0002118741,0.001647566,0.0004957034,0.00002816456,0.001756179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906004,0.004617779,0.004389086,0.00003305453,0.00003528336,0.00008087725,0.000007613717,0.00001962739,0.0002162942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2936997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401109185","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00319","title":"Researcher profile system adoption and use across discipline and rank: A case study at the University of Manitoba","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Sociology; Regional science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4144187244737644,"gpt":0.5513445988952799,"spread":0.1369258744215155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101254,0.00006524352,0.0001158911,0.00007222415,0.004085514,0.00021163,0.0001449443,0.00001487372,0.000005707672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397913,0.0000436514,0.00001591802,0.0006405555,0.005167417,0.001261107,0.0004522967,0.0001108395,0.000009124408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009846623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07401123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979496,0.0008258525,0.0001069539,0.0003041117,0.0006299352,0.0001835533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973813,0.001982616,0.00007928022,0.00010883,0.0004018787,0.00004606512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004968685,0.00004900543,0.04079876,0.0001179579,0.00009142678,0.0001685387,0.9309221,0.00001106684,0.0002372299,0.02431701,0.0002538649,0.002983361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001161075,0.0001396044,0.05503754,0.00007390252,0.00003567125,0.00001437016,0.9432504,0.0007493692,0.000008666992,0.0000589614,0.0004628626,0.00005257409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949501,0.001786458,0.00004735884,0.002177179,0.000136834,0.0005274207,0.00001915545,0.00003615351,0.0003193179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983249,0.0002625069,0.0005553055,0.000003061072,0.0000143701,0.000004263486,2.063764e-7,0.000002837952,0.000832541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06416461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413008886","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.17","title":"On the open road to universal indexing: OpenAlex and Open Journal Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8496207791303315,"gpt":0.7015085151665741,"spread":0.1481122639637574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06894229,0.0001627217,0.0004527005,0.02292418,0.003758776,0.022503,0.01332251,0.00002877117,0.00005035092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1301574,0.00007917738,0.00004396588,0.1530139,0.002459158,0.002463171,0.01338546,0.0003101509,0.0001255087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002672429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009685289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003149714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005746612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920701,0.0005679004,0.0005397624,0.0009108975,0.00530532,0.0006060681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779367,0.01256926,0.0003335594,0.0007853668,0.007963677,0.0004113832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008570594,0.0000594172,0.004567706,0.000003118493,0.00006229147,0.00001335564,0.003384105,0.0001547708,0.000321645,0.89165,0.08160163,0.01809621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001715735,0.002656738,0.1781719,0.0004887886,0.0000252405,0.00002252312,0.4463683,0.007576036,0.0006526552,0.2635908,0.09806486,0.0006663574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7234305,0.004793638,0.005313223,0.04538509,0.003098643,0.002876154,0.00003046004,0.00001476254,0.2150576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844413,0.0003677501,0.001483071,0.001049121,0.00001796096,0.00003260101,8.108518e-8,0.000004342317,0.01260374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6280592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009935877","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00125","title":"Textual analysis of artificial intelligence manuscripts reveals features associated with peer review outcome","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Readability; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Jargon; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Similarity (geometry); Semantic similarity; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2643686269816425,"gpt":0.4440727271641647,"spread":0.1797041001825222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006782023,0.0004050432,0.001630142,0.0007699656,0.0004390969,0.0003328612,0.00230573,0.0001141161,0.00001130628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0159652,0.00030077,0.0003668299,0.00748668,0.002429151,0.0006734667,0.001740069,0.0005347144,0.000005441162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002807232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009604431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007196065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938902,0.000464197,0.001142785,0.001526463,0.002506796,0.0004695152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884618,0.001027748,0.001178463,0.001439404,0.007787505,0.0001050596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004247883,0.001059838,0.02073436,0.003477623,0.008788848,0.00006090114,0.04611955,0.006621479,0.001976282,0.8711147,0.001848706,0.03815519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001191024,0.0008596937,0.8834671,0.009225428,0.005155477,0.000007434866,0.03818914,0.01896948,0.003632084,0.03794063,0.00009657412,0.002337888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.214223,0.0680223,0.6842102,0.02640383,0.001528898,0.00265485,0.0003842931,0.0003966359,0.002176022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601396,0.001734435,0.03724379,0.0004037435,0.00001336394,0.00007950608,0.00006184094,0.000008649093,0.0003150359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8627327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226297244","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00178","title":"Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Bibliometrics; Epistemology; Point (geometry); Sociology; Classics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4986595425254802,"gpt":0.570894191989019,"spread":0.0722346494635388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003944249,0.0001292893,0.0003091761,0.005361164,0.000495908,0.00002226825,0.0004712805,0.00001228886,0.00005657141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02194776,0.0001135626,0.00004392042,0.02838833,0.0006180885,0.0003923363,0.0007790055,0.0001028109,0.000006284152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002604658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001646034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004861498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977988,0.0002223686,0.0003369241,0.0003348452,0.001024558,0.0002824962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970897,0.001269831,0.0002243409,0.0002917561,0.00106221,0.00006210471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003591334,0.0001851266,0.0006070775,0.00005842018,0.0000426945,0.000006763586,0.02714677,0.0002550015,0.2074158,0.7577543,0.003957395,0.002211516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003445699,0.004092842,0.006922289,0.00008872757,0.00003446014,0.000005938963,0.06466841,0.0005442121,0.1435254,0.7771622,0.00212211,0.0004888195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868399,0.0004146586,0.1097823,0.0009617255,0.0002074094,0.0005468166,0.00004559421,0.0001729396,0.001028691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8311115,0.00003950048,0.1684423,0.0001000309,0.000004270667,0.0001643218,3.559905e-7,0.00001059185,0.000127126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0638904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3211790144","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00153","title":"L’Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at <i>Quantitative Science Studies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.158121210622361,"gpt":0.4718197526596155,"spread":0.3136985420372546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007583012,0.0003658964,0.0008360422,0.0004152358,0.009007315,0.0003034817,0.0008509289,0.00008825734,0.00001570177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03003001,0.0003090308,0.0001160877,0.003661364,0.03610075,0.002267717,0.00118144,0.0003360789,0.00004484813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008647191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001634951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000484459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942713,0.0004579826,0.0006320722,0.001200953,0.001950894,0.001486763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924853,0.00325355,0.0003773429,0.0003529339,0.003145142,0.0003857305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001209524,0.00002716725,0.01533226,0.00007540686,0.0001453497,0.00002029367,0.1796239,0.00001629148,0.00768751,0.7952995,0.001030438,0.0007297827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005082873,0.0002363199,0.01093482,0.0004637934,0.0001149261,0.000008194105,0.8500916,0.0001788405,0.005554316,0.1294624,0.001730005,0.000716496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306581,0.03871958,0.0001552115,0.01246503,0.002372982,0.0004386728,0.00003910206,0.0001512774,0.01500003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729697,0.01102728,0.01241396,0.0008622279,0.0001418466,0.00002765112,0.000001077556,0.00001812764,0.002538139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6704677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207049150","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00180","title":"Predicting the impact of <i>American Economic Review</i> articles by author characteristics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Exploit; Quarter (Canadian coin); Institution; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6240591201744193,"gpt":0.6427755631256137,"spread":0.01871644295119435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04315316,0.0001420155,0.000514173,0.006920059,0.001763329,0.0003972006,0.003010422,0.000007348561,0.0002084874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05871398,0.00007450304,0.0001936545,0.09304181,0.004189461,0.0005417033,0.001986805,0.0002395291,0.00005010218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003918071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005443382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003549479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007521015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919609,0.0005365491,0.0008394537,0.0006439417,0.005441588,0.000577561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862662,0.008832231,0.001188386,0.0007733575,0.002730163,0.0002096739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006587878,0.0002625391,0.6333606,0.0000352341,0.0001797263,0.000004792905,0.007749543,0.0004309362,0.01342516,0.004727259,0.2266634,0.1130949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693172,0.005444131,0.8124467,0.0001084583,0.00005590339,0.00001995498,0.1121469,0.04441762,0.002552941,0.009152656,0.01251076,0.0006746448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816719,0.01354601,0.0001344966,0.002813834,0.0003906795,0.0003154406,0.0004106389,0.00001259741,0.0007043892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964025,0.002839017,0.000266043,0.0001475328,0.00001647468,0.00004284123,0.000001267725,0.000005591631,0.0002787032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2141527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8238363909286305,"gpt":0.67728162911672,"spread":0.1465547618119105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06750784,0.0001532432,0.0004509258,0.01498858,0.0008353671,0.0004925784,0.002584122,0.0000290726,0.00002455161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08367249,0.00006579304,0.0001176683,0.2165027,0.003300309,0.0005949016,0.001934801,0.000298556,0.00001183679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000405846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007070712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001439672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915592,0.0005220213,0.0009059036,0.0007382773,0.00567343,0.0006011322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857699,0.00692983,0.0003276367,0.0008408871,0.006049092,0.00008259846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004112056,0.0008086622,0.5268908,0.0003266991,0.0001108413,0.0001821226,0.03363011,0.0004290024,0.005078502,0.3795306,0.03702138,0.01558011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004723993,0.0002774251,0.6470588,0.001286332,0.00003623436,0.00002956979,0.247664,0.00642241,0.01845709,0.06518506,0.008277182,0.000581865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178084,0.06145019,0.000174494,0.01466116,0.0008561141,0.0009526776,0.00001024435,0.000004165628,0.004082614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994964,0.003812604,0.0001858348,0.0002801308,0.000005769087,0.00007084658,1.470724e-7,0.000002454376,0.0006781802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3143455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405991561","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00347","title":"On the limits of causal theory for studying inequalities in science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Popularity; Gateway (web page); Explanatory power; Inequality; Causal model; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1390479634185213,"gpt":0.4233671641543557,"spread":0.2843192007358344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861174,0.00008535522,0.0001588099,0.0002288261,0.0007672157,0.00003686053,0.0004211611,0.000005361166,0.000004409689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006262417,0.00005375247,0.00003349859,0.001555712,0.001930569,0.0001452974,0.0001183689,0.00006476076,0.000002168084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003399879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002644852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000198565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007468478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990398,0.0000402254,0.0002014818,0.0002597038,0.0002274403,0.0002313326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974717,0.001819868,0.00009224298,0.0001879516,0.0004126852,0.00001553766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008920189,0.00005314716,0.000609407,0.00000810588,0.0000160356,1.759139e-8,0.004155498,0.00002196551,0.005412892,0.9889221,0.00004255397,0.0007493801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001216443,0.00009481608,0.001869285,0.00008014132,0.000007193569,7.389936e-9,0.07259101,0.0009770436,0.01696767,0.9071968,0.00003454789,0.00005989027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725184,0.0001792695,0.02127307,0.0009606956,0.0001776485,0.0004842262,0.00002678979,0.000006864715,0.004372994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.000006443435,0.0004347538,0.00007189693,0.000008284127,0.0001903836,2.967654e-7,0.000002444415,0.00007935202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08172533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293243777","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00205","title":"Visualizing academic descendants using modified Pavlo diagrams: Results based on five researchers in biomechanics and biomedicine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomedicine; Graduation (instrument); Mentorship; Computer science; Graduate students; Completeness (order theory); Data science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Medical education; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9158299019598442,"gpt":0.7019936612882616,"spread":0.2138362406715826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0847663,0.000236474,0.0005234065,0.07057562,0.002091387,0.0005584366,0.002318486,0.00005516148,0.00002144996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1472295,0.0001693497,0.00006628846,0.2401663,0.003069608,0.0007833868,0.002470188,0.0008076939,0.00001337347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007540136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006991132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002651174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002982348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9818569,0.00108137,0.0009766513,0.00161051,0.01326576,0.001208806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817358,0.01426748,0.0004466732,0.0006043065,0.002500341,0.0004454067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005114463,0.002308329,0.0761902,0.0001802677,0.0002248269,0.0008918157,0.1017289,0.04116912,0.3648109,0.05517695,0.0120354,0.3401688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001864159,0.002038911,0.01210989,0.0000929862,0.000006232604,0.000004224953,0.104287,0.8644161,0.002489119,0.0118564,0.0004801881,0.0003547722],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909989,0.003077885,0.001414086,0.002660228,0.0006717533,0.0005515304,0.0001422258,0.00002464515,0.0004587782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969696,0.0006424815,0.001947062,0.0002465765,0.00002079996,0.00003410485,0.000002205393,0.0000112977,0.000125886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.823247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392474250","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00300","title":"The gendered structure of science does not transpire in an experimental vacuum","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Observational study; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1756037992261316,"gpt":0.4929933936704603,"spread":0.3173895944443287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001071101,0.0001250168,0.0002192559,0.000289402,0.0007524109,0.00005825149,0.000320407,0.00002214587,0.000008187743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002900859,0.00006155221,0.00003800465,0.001742579,0.008320982,0.0004476764,0.00006876448,0.0001601808,0.000001960736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000148158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006250817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003946657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002166526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979809,0.00004763474,0.0002640104,0.0005366818,0.0007824707,0.0003882886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990004,0.0002345282,0.00003564287,0.0002614422,0.0003768559,0.00009118056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007231758,0.00003317379,0.003946149,0.0001520315,0.00002111262,0.00001519301,0.1231508,0.000004176372,0.8326438,0.0366444,0.00001117137,0.003305672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002180281,0.0007824645,0.0478206,0.0001631272,0.00001216068,0.000008036724,0.3584892,0.0007111695,0.5886992,0.002911745,0.00007696613,0.0001073415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833497,0.01327248,0.00001001054,0.001858016,0.0009961099,0.0002902084,0.0000226641,0.0000286916,0.0001721324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985402,0.000211437,0.001031458,0.0001184699,0.00003479502,0.00001106441,5.717902e-7,0.000006300474,0.00004571043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4285182479","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00197","title":"Values matter in science, so do facts: Response to Gingras","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"License; Citation; Icon; Library science; Attribution; History; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.222668104477103,"gpt":0.5672341325089335,"spread":0.3445660280318306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03819661,0.0002087991,0.000449057,0.003260182,0.01032113,0.0005593592,0.002042883,0.00001544519,0.001185554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01858136,0.0001894688,0.0000846285,0.01959956,0.02187696,0.001418636,0.001580244,0.0003534372,0.0008420773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002028475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002596128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009041048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008293444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895804,0.003361491,0.0004560362,0.001111429,0.004182769,0.001307854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944373,0.002900758,0.0001562719,0.0003837926,0.001822122,0.0002997156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003394222,0.0001570404,0.03439075,0.000007300394,0.00004217772,0.00001658491,0.7978369,0.000745821,0.03045258,0.1269074,0.008636807,0.0004672776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002409759,0.0005059207,0.1132691,0.00003191385,0.000007079075,4.610934e-7,0.8265347,0.0001337251,0.001165004,0.02263892,0.03509944,0.000372801],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.960658,0.000863059,0.0002009916,0.01348558,0.0003640604,0.0006151749,0.00001920162,0.00004174396,0.02375216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929283,0.00004651743,0.001987494,0.0007958045,0.00002497905,0.0002361758,3.847215e-7,0.000009700705,0.00397067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1042684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}