{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"12628e6bbb28","filters":{"venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech"}},"results":[{"id":"W2154960524","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.609830","title":"Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and other Tropes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02802844531728641,"gpt":0.2695315050434055,"spread":0.2415030597261191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003418545,0.0006347331,0.0009194139,0.002672955,0.003325979,0.008932669,0.0007284259,0.002415507,0.005826038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005439977,0.000464848,0.0005462726,0.003440645,0.02138828,0.01894345,0.002923415,0.003585845,0.0008579664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00293172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002906822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004609669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007191598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985141,0.001065799,0.00005028688,0.00009068599,0.0001748428,0.0001043028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960074,0.003243725,0.0001958713,0.0001518195,0.0002065596,0.0001945495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019344,0.00001451712,0.0002523036,0.000262806,0.0000117266,0.0001770756,0.0191558,0.0002463274,0.0001361338,0.9177676,0.03233851,0.02961781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007947197,0.00000903828,0.0005545493,0.0006557451,0.000008614301,0.0002762995,0.01300299,0.0004031234,0.00009697507,0.8751599,0.1098086,0.00001617182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01419141,0.6439234,0.02363297,0.1012054,0.003438272,0.00002657742,0.0001710607,0.00008945499,0.2133214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6504581,0.3031664,0.01557536,0.004515093,0.004828251,0.0001149768,0.0001614889,0.000131244,0.02104911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008932669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02127117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165248973","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.585171","title":"Review Essay: Assessing Rhetorics of Social Resistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Griffin; Democracy; State (computer science); Social movement; Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Media studies; Art history; Art; Political science; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Brian L. Ott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09695040382527086,"gpt":0.298547802321351,"spread":0.2015973984960802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964821,0.0007090258,0.000969994,0.006645219,0.00172256,0.006632298,0.001170226,0.002047114,0.01818953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09051954,0.0003099839,0.0005826692,0.006652595,0.001350204,0.003900393,0.001619982,0.001663043,0.008063722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003303992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002363006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005139775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920604,0.003220145,0.0004205107,0.0006381106,0.003442849,0.0002179322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222507,0.03915663,0.006392116,0.001715525,0.02824542,0.002239555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005895483,0.00005556476,0.001261194,0.002920081,0.00007095883,0.00007792546,0.001554486,0.00009691629,0.0003365142,0.004988499,0.8364641,0.1521148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003478418,0.0001862498,0.009597107,0.006500338,0.0001273144,0.0002329055,0.004278283,0.0002076295,0.0002975443,0.003462297,0.9750295,0.0000459223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01959997,0.5095407,0.00491491,0.1790421,0.06574921,0.001293278,0.002859969,0.0003524165,0.2166474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2409114,0.4627981,0.008765235,0.05532791,0.06066419,0.004083481,0.004652902,0.0007281976,0.1620685],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01818953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06085002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005574439","doi":"10.1080/00335630500291521","title":"Whither Propaganda? Agonism and “The Engineering of Consent”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agonism; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"James J. Kimble","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01039561356250929,"gpt":0.2560756083630068,"spread":0.2456799948004975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01423268,0.0007414335,0.0003632095,0.001227033,0.00726221,0.01312981,0.001596522,0.007565507,0.03243468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03989835,0.0004290692,0.0004536808,0.0008454061,0.03711372,0.01786289,0.005745674,0.009437738,0.006403363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005294981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004426455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004362148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004795804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839648,0.01131953,0.00039384,0.001178034,0.002084433,0.001059313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829643,0.01230092,0.000772964,0.002012596,0.001278259,0.0006709475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006224435,0.000004039185,0.00004193518,0.00002689665,0.000001494258,0.00003934864,0.002544818,0.00003698578,0.00004572077,0.9315323,0.05801585,0.007704573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001377027,0.00001181262,0.0001280479,0.0002903875,0.000004067907,0.0001175344,0.003057326,0.0002104969,0.0002584236,0.5105563,0.4853335,0.00001834603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00419744,0.009796519,0.02356529,0.3488144,0.004177158,0.0001008843,0.0001161554,0.0002547769,0.6089774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5646449,0.00876604,0.01361953,0.102718,0.004785347,0.0005574588,0.0001525123,0.0007156398,0.3040406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03243468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304806329","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2022.2128201","title":"Rhetorical economy: Affect, labor, and capital in transnational digital circulation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Capitalism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Economics; Political science; History; Linguistics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Zhaozhe Wang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01264072358126446,"gpt":0.2801224525385109,"spread":0.2674817289572465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003467458,0.0003020113,0.0002544,0.002914098,0.003051229,0.01014428,0.0005617801,0.001353107,0.004638208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009402281,0.0002265153,0.0002459635,0.002056166,0.01708096,0.01236514,0.003775537,0.001559422,0.0002960528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003862916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001957099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001889091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001612526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983558,0.0009598822,0.00005834185,0.0001509659,0.0003179516,0.0001570418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992473,0.005494026,0.0008270256,0.000505112,0.00037358,0.0003272982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000509776,0.00003899549,0.005434296,0.0001000862,0.00001153496,0.0003274171,0.04850908,0.0005927641,0.0008520184,0.9203498,0.001190171,0.02254286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004859623,0.0001164314,0.02361823,0.0005998099,0.00005737931,0.0006138868,0.08505728,0.008351285,0.002965443,0.7704726,0.1080327,0.00006640899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5675947,0.003908547,0.03218362,0.0276634,0.0003642119,0.0000690562,0.0001354635,0.0001287485,0.3679523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954053,0.0003452066,0.001095779,0.0002740866,0.0001066082,0.00002367173,0.00001423995,0.00002012994,0.002715089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01014428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02802753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602045680","doi":"","title":"Law, Rhetoric, and Irony in the Formation of Canadian Civil Culture by Michael Dorland and Maurice Charland","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Irony; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Literature; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Robert Hariman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006863992282732792,"gpt":0.2113893632136513,"spread":0.2045253709309185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00469089,0.0006972642,0.0005587557,0.003653084,0.03403454,0.01533716,0.001843093,0.004891829,0.006929556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01431969,0.0005929976,0.0002544257,0.00429077,0.03939792,0.0076248,0.002963571,0.008133451,0.0005018478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09205062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09468056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.955897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970152,0.0009456889,0.00007074772,0.0002867048,0.0009908034,0.0006909221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989813,0.005617844,0.000399675,0.0002303602,0.00303455,0.0009045141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004186453,0.00002864797,0.0009060513,0.0001125724,0.00001050998,0.0001387377,0.05588184,0.0003686847,0.0001283905,0.7214054,0.1987939,0.02218342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001967248,0.00001157532,0.003575489,0.0005083223,0.00002463073,0.00008377599,0.06061848,0.0005083634,0.0003594588,0.1571441,0.7770399,0.0001061391],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03230701,0.04966274,0.001281264,0.6227953,0.002769859,0.00003537557,0.0001806602,0.0000664376,0.2909014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263854,0.02899024,0.002025919,0.02576172,0.002276889,0.00006477811,0.0001043841,0.0001824461,0.1142082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09205062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6678771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560342508","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2017.1266213","title":"Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Danisch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02066598124769291,"gpt":0.2214631594352809,"spread":0.200797178187588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194611,0.0005500144,0.0005781926,0.001817882,0.006407399,0.01143561,0.001256967,0.006931824,0.01090413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01923181,0.0005924999,0.0004486758,0.00105217,0.04669252,0.01852613,0.004027645,0.00900459,0.001849331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005235192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002096414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002020103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001901093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992575,0.004757846,0.0001908646,0.00079885,0.001141371,0.0005360096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851281,0.01123217,0.0005740028,0.001638406,0.0009857288,0.0004415989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009668694,0.000003275633,0.00001834411,0.00001027474,0.000001240981,0.000006858197,0.0008458142,0.00006138688,0.00003894849,0.9967365,0.001344014,0.0009235661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001622105,0.000005228187,0.00004410965,0.00002935782,0.000003075029,0.00001583971,0.0004133364,0.0002337967,0.000133461,0.9684974,0.03059838,0.00000993352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02125609,0.009165062,0.02752049,0.1140154,0.001529329,0.00002918314,0.0001068655,0.0002291805,0.8261483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315025,0.001429743,0.006669921,0.008391753,0.001358347,0.00008267385,0.00003152727,0.0002243952,0.05030905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01143561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04333776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}