{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"12628e6bbb28","filters":{"venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech"}},"results":[{"id":"W2154960524","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.609830","title":"Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and other Tropes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02802844531728641,"gpt":0.2695315050434055,"spread":0.2415030597261191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004242168,0.00006155987,0.0002160749,0.00004496695,0.0001426988,0.0000162127,0.0002465597,0.00006537142,0.0002612069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020749,0.00003896199,0.00009021302,0.0001015617,0.0005940117,0.0001095908,0.000007230314,0.0001169467,0.000006235493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002487597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007981794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001309017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006101218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990527,0.000226086,0.0002892984,0.00006297963,0.0002227294,0.0001461994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.0001119747,0.0002316481,0.00007985866,0.0001343768,0.00007085654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009271345,0.0003121754,0.03666795,0.00002961911,0.0003216198,0.0001718637,0.1792249,1.116813e-7,0.0006175246,0.4990765,0.003120664,0.2795299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001639519,0.008124269,0.07014832,0.00007650338,0.0003945967,0.0004791637,0.05011074,0.000002697694,0.001192795,0.1424803,0.7250047,0.0003463748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665459,0.001039227,0.00007978478,0.001087026,0.0005684961,0.00007218787,0.000002968984,0.00000560483,0.03059884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982961,0.00002951166,0.0009715412,0.00008695208,0.000254674,7.145075e-7,2.348502e-8,0.000003990069,0.0003564466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.721884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2860033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165248973","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.585171","title":"Review Essay: Assessing Rhetorics of Social Resistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Griffin; Democracy; State (computer science); Social movement; Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Media studies; Art history; Art; Political science; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Brian L. Ott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09695040382527086,"gpt":0.298547802321351,"spread":0.2015973984960802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005138963,0.00008971821,0.0003535731,0.0000598606,0.0002303324,0.00003745438,0.0002888388,0.00002374391,0.0005177329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001510596,0.00006974326,0.0001495124,0.00005479752,0.0001608889,0.0003411625,0.00001323679,0.0001683153,0.00001228539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003599002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000667924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001307206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002727949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988988,0.00008165888,0.0006184523,0.00005688721,0.0002374924,0.0001067121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982952,0.00004633168,0.0008242448,0.0001586934,0.0006461731,0.0000292958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007838617,0.000349648,0.0002282155,0.001185496,0.0003628308,0.00002849743,0.3025874,2.297043e-8,0.00006934891,0.3805391,0.1310082,0.1835628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003731737,0.0003375957,0.0005568389,0.001701056,0.0001720079,0.0000220002,0.0312056,6.29447e-7,0.00007520007,0.01174839,0.9536139,0.0001935528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03092868,0.1457079,0.001134958,0.00299192,0.002061685,0.0002224678,0.00001314745,0.00004247818,0.8168968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829126,0.00651597,0.002937776,0.0003231889,0.001059486,0.000002847618,0.000001024,0.00002008023,0.006227004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005574439","doi":"10.1080/00335630500291521","title":"Whither Propaganda? Agonism and “The Engineering of Consent”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agonism; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"James J. Kimble","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01039561356250929,"gpt":0.2560756083630068,"spread":0.2456799948004975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008677016,0.00005424437,0.0001507321,0.00000746371,0.0001231988,0.00004327983,0.0001433373,0.00006199816,0.00006874801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003492033,0.00003232781,0.00009104949,0.00008109835,0.0003088101,0.0001574773,0.000004064971,0.0001653475,0.000003365427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002111297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007540402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003492198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007106241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992723,0.00006165124,0.0002270561,0.00004400365,0.000276243,0.000118735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994892,0.00008886607,0.0001812345,0.00005271382,0.0001302841,0.0000576348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002718285,0.0001771447,0.0009590054,0.00009319731,0.0004086621,0.00004502838,0.5895335,0.0001013524,0.00905107,0.09499276,0.02327064,0.2810958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007591086,0.0008544708,0.00116302,0.000416127,0.0002529451,0.0004832137,0.09337608,0.0002511869,0.004784944,0.009888604,0.8804666,0.0004717641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595027,0.003215187,0.0002734016,0.02308591,0.0004722154,0.0002110659,0.000002444241,0.00001729921,0.01321979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953777,0.0003081628,0.001878103,0.0001130021,0.0007729135,6.036555e-7,5.592119e-8,0.000004783733,0.001544672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8571959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.131829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304806329","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2022.2128201","title":"Rhetorical economy: Affect, labor, and capital in transnational digital circulation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Capitalism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Economics; Political science; History; Linguistics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Zhaozhe Wang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01264072358126446,"gpt":0.2801224525385109,"spread":0.2674817289572465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007671891,0.00006043015,0.000139085,0.0001144346,0.0002373575,0.00005930767,0.000121326,0.00006189415,0.0001825845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002193383,0.00006375108,0.00006541364,0.0001533041,0.0001272798,0.0005282235,0.000006805272,0.0002835159,0.000002203019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002272945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003450443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007296794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990799,0.000176385,0.0002525257,0.00009312727,0.0002428404,0.0001552577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995471,0.0001340267,0.0001261648,0.00003523727,0.0000786786,0.00007881113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009396046,0.0001946633,0.1343308,0.000008638031,0.00005413066,0.0002084344,0.1039063,0.00006636547,0.00005773649,0.7215199,0.0003859468,0.03917305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002745748,0.001994095,0.2169309,0.00001304736,0.00003560333,0.0004655225,0.08518252,0.00008608745,0.000006482432,0.6467455,0.04536246,0.0004320625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868019,0.0004221598,0.00003793225,0.008689524,0.0003210386,0.00007178974,0.00001683814,0.000006543686,0.003632327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995154,0.000008478394,0.00005051808,0.000129035,0.0002244814,0.000002104529,0.000004531394,0.00000366981,0.00006181111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08260008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2599694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602045680","doi":"","title":"Law, Rhetoric, and Irony in the Formation of Canadian Civil Culture by Michael Dorland and Maurice Charland","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Irony; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Literature; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Robert Hariman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006863992282732792,"gpt":0.2113893632136513,"spread":0.2045253709309185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719673,0.00004607442,0.0001083771,0.0003519898,0.0002668969,0.0001516399,0.0001118049,0.00006320948,0.00001644474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008544373,0.00003999646,0.00002334544,0.0002068358,0.0001819848,0.0004006684,0.000001603765,0.0001334584,0.000001384199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002377215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8178797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993804,0.00004896807,0.0001847513,0.00004894918,0.0002016578,0.000135247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996128,0.00001675047,0.0001303954,0.00004352894,0.00005780375,0.0001387387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005400932,0.0001145212,0.001585296,0.0001649436,0.00003622015,0.0002219173,0.8744143,0.000005517904,0.0009569041,0.02758071,0.06902843,0.02583727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009255799,0.0003762623,0.00319109,0.00008737882,0.00002602423,0.0001780999,0.02662763,0.00000147054,0.00001730756,0.003706111,0.9647469,0.0001161384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745635,0.004051358,0.00001850414,0.006354342,0.0001784778,0.0001393099,0.00003397451,0.000002208933,0.0146583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974595,0.001920663,0.00006564591,0.0001874498,0.0001320112,6.040958e-7,0.000001350888,0.000002767375,0.0002300352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2052782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560342508","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2017.1266213","title":"Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Danisch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02066598124769291,"gpt":0.2214631594352809,"spread":0.200797178187588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003525294,0.00008390732,0.0002408636,0.00004626991,0.00006580563,0.0000349182,0.0001496445,0.00002441175,0.0006438058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000290005,0.00003245181,0.0001310483,0.00001883816,0.0004978368,0.0001430898,0.000009458298,0.0001050733,0.00001792565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001083725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001696168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009784168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002870251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990894,0.00007466871,0.0004057876,0.00006280419,0.0002286101,0.0001387718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991919,0.0002490401,0.0002165762,0.0001026157,0.0001523207,0.00008759647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003177654,0.0000755916,0.00004023065,0.00002274387,0.00007235059,0.00001504954,0.004923423,1.42236e-8,0.0003556677,0.9275452,0.0007408748,0.0658911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005362273,0.001875959,0.0001962666,0.0003231016,0.0001361523,0.000219306,0.001071599,0.00000612937,0.001421117,0.7730411,0.2161698,0.0001771136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175681,0.002070278,0.0001276309,0.0369049,0.001608172,0.0002588521,0.00003973635,0.0000147468,0.04140757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969841,0.00008623462,0.00005589839,0.0001161674,0.001459804,9.631142e-7,1.181351e-7,0.000006548763,0.001290163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.215429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}