{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":30,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"7dee6eed0035","filters":{"venue":"Ratio"}},"results":[{"id":"W2143134544","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00379.x","title":"RULE‐FOLLOWING WITHOUT REASONS: WITTGENSTEIN'S QUIETISM AND THE CONSTITUTIVE QUESTION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Focus (optics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008774348466961375,"gpt":0.2528014911494923,"spread":0.2440271426825309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001308246,0.0001182869,0.0001544755,0.00004443292,0.0003195477,0.0001900901,0.0002657043,0.00006245414,0.000003850068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002475306,0.00007705696,0.00005592014,0.0001880129,0.0002338237,0.0003867521,0.0001071074,0.0001211591,0.00004224257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003588828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000846818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007240585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009929614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990556,0.0001134044,0.0001621357,0.0002660785,0.0001814609,0.0002213558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992676,0.0002242539,0.00007708724,0.0002919835,0.00006419876,0.00007481144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001594015,0.0000133161,0.004253637,0.000003279306,0.00002061532,0.00002094697,0.002319123,0.000004036614,0.0002097635,0.9801962,0.0002004126,0.01274275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02719413,0.0009067506,0.2076004,0.001245728,0.0005045512,0.001518299,0.003085318,0.1131158,0.02490135,0.5347599,0.08117505,0.00399269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04227147,0.001761163,0.8539602,0.0007073128,0.0008236404,0.0003359105,5.851641e-7,0.0001926335,0.09994715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881454,0.00003272159,0.01051871,0.0002910227,0.0001339678,0.000009497991,0.000001344555,0.000004677628,0.0008626385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3142292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042248626","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00434.x","title":"WHAT IS NATURAL ABOUT FOOT'S ETHICAL NATURALISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Creatures; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Foot (prosody); Function (biology); Philosophy; History; Biology; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03306659182887726,"gpt":0.2992511848137308,"spread":0.2661845929848535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000130329,0.00006823922,0.00006568877,0.00002934026,0.0003351572,0.0006637494,0.000108084,0.00006093481,0.001799636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003121946,0.00005321372,0.00004458562,0.00003671049,0.0001100983,0.0007731548,0.000005933045,0.0002802355,0.0002690511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003113391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003609089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000245235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000211386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993778,0.00002730098,0.0001196398,0.0001369758,0.0001986026,0.0001396993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996644,0.00002516001,0.00003536348,0.0001160051,0.0001140672,0.00004497384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003710674,0.0000229235,0.00001022187,0.000002079964,0.000002564728,4.944102e-7,0.06534259,9.932795e-7,0.0002375614,0.810153,0.1146863,0.00953752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001641156,0.00006424969,0.004330919,0.00003314754,0.000006946955,0.000003491921,0.00973223,0.001286801,0.0004520293,0.01233111,0.9713888,0.0002061348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4789615,0.004467799,0.00007724218,0.4140775,0.02075361,0.0003785115,0.000007524717,0.0003156617,0.08096068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442831,0.00005059823,0.00005018699,0.02440095,0.0008709017,0.0000025374,0.00001218827,0.000002562138,0.030327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8567025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110504366","doi":"10.1111/rati.12018","title":"Do<i>a Posteriori</i>Physicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Epistemology; A priori and a posteriori; Dualism; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02171918970681241,"gpt":0.331893481330093,"spread":0.3101742916232806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105504,0.0001093335,0.0001306341,0.00001874033,0.00008720911,0.00008200562,0.000252457,0.00005663021,0.002932879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002271538,0.00008724961,0.00004876705,0.0001204526,0.0001431281,0.0001812511,0.00004877704,0.0001168666,0.006450461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002068147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001622203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004906569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001531083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990035,0.00009478231,0.0001545826,0.000278621,0.0001678043,0.0003007005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.00004638282,0.00004751084,0.0002952679,0.00004420279,0.0001551004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001296653,0.00008519569,0.0002257278,0.000002157114,0.00001292496,0.000006534816,0.001131515,9.980421e-7,0.005673389,0.9852287,0.00356173,0.004058169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001253517,0.0004811169,0.04816207,0.00002246542,0.00002358868,0.00002794245,0.0009098729,0.0002437765,0.00161569,0.9318045,0.01484149,0.0006140123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4196382,0.00006929636,0.0008110915,0.00540648,0.0009293219,0.0002886047,0.00001577663,0.00008043024,0.5727608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959524,6.647484e-7,0.0000993044,0.001721783,0.0005480863,0.00004942448,0.000005267294,0.000008410672,0.001614699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5763142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971691221","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00174","title":"Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self‐Sufficiency","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Illusion; Passion; Narcissism; Psychology; Flourishing; Social psychology; Allegation; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03650694236829226,"gpt":0.2957230461562005,"spread":0.2592161037879082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006674836,0.00005370143,0.0001116302,0.00006334647,0.00005038486,0.000003864116,0.00006047093,0.00005487932,0.002198373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009284199,0.00004655107,0.00003096794,0.0001151084,0.00006511337,0.00003735559,0.00002265365,0.00005142716,0.00003559769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007641327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006455389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006777229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001246173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995221,0.00002314042,0.0001756099,0.0001122566,0.00007848542,0.00008836552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999624,0.00002331604,0.00007177944,0.0001989308,0.00005002535,0.00003194601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295451,0.01017163,0.1464066,0.0001682637,0.0001697013,0.00006475294,0.09507179,0.00001468113,0.136628,0.4024116,0.08309948,0.1257406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001517056,0.0008691496,0.9378812,0.00005947949,0.0001895552,0.00005993764,0.002505305,0.0005242598,0.002114874,0.0006387795,0.05326641,0.000374026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734764,0.0007288796,0.0001646226,0.0002500912,0.0001677465,0.0001042813,0.00002049707,0.00002044635,0.02506707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973356,0.00004122161,0.0006105888,0.00003866694,0.0000198007,0.000006690381,0.000002450452,0.000005736638,0.001939294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7914746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222931779","doi":"10.1111/rati.12128","title":"Subject‐Relative Reasons for Love","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy of love; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1074334324099028,"gpt":0.3829748444764652,"spread":0.2755414120665624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001087916,0.00005218565,0.00006732196,0.00002568666,0.00002480758,0.00001082964,0.00004621434,0.00005623423,0.0005537495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004178322,0.00004679885,0.00003728689,0.00005971157,0.00002181685,0.00006460861,0.000007397668,0.00004946525,0.001592516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002567811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000323717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005426026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005430177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996099,0.00002861525,0.0000803095,0.0001191893,0.00004571074,0.0001162464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996362,0.00004046248,0.00002852046,0.0001518962,0.00007829467,0.00006468005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008221103,0.0002427445,0.00988916,0.000002728925,0.00004450359,0.000009134773,0.008357054,0.000005531255,0.0004792262,0.5303892,0.4452609,0.00523752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006754951,0.001884092,0.1436878,0.00002968495,0.000278399,0.00005987838,0.008586658,0.0002233718,0.002010626,0.0247913,0.8109208,0.000772383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4686412,0.0004306708,0.07773012,0.003897267,0.002594989,0.001201608,0.0001484793,0.0001326668,0.445223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956574,5.248767e-7,0.002277792,0.0001441559,0.0001574524,0.00005004937,0.00003265724,0.00001180411,0.1016682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5055979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522518042","doi":"10.1111/rati.12009","title":"Freak Observers and the Simulation Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"FREAK; Argument (complex analysis); Observer (physics); Epistemology; Observable; sort; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01503744737917182,"gpt":0.2450055581649969,"spread":0.2299681107858251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000708056,0.00003403895,0.00004022321,0.000005607215,0.00008316302,0.0001001402,0.00003840282,0.000006636744,0.0003569206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003681073,0.00001972775,0.00001662748,0.00003480566,0.00004064197,0.0001673033,0.00001053317,0.00002383369,0.0001076899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002830919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001049341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007301172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004908492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997467,0.00001679095,0.00005539778,0.00006094477,0.00005541257,0.00006480252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998296,0.00004394092,0.0000226516,0.00006833333,0.00001273674,0.00002277087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978617,0.00009412788,0.2158922,0.000006386005,0.0001010191,3.108603e-7,0.004777464,0.05861414,0.004178767,0.6337922,0.01705504,0.06541856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006032396,0.00008881836,0.137946,0.00002110153,0.0000563391,2.537084e-7,0.004888839,0.707266,0.004256929,0.1099323,0.02905114,0.0004599145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859695,0.00001360884,0.003458782,0.002288734,0.0001278867,0.0002538429,0.0000011421,0.000008794005,0.007877655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990005,4.6674e-7,0.00005283926,0.0000954719,0.0001622826,0.00001739119,0.000003346788,0.00000154387,0.0006661864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.390803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01787471168403942,"gpt":0.2244475776745353,"spread":0.2065728659904958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008322637,0.0000693847,0.00007685283,0.00002146984,0.00020953,0.0001404595,0.00005081636,0.00002661605,0.0002014138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001597901,0.0000521389,0.00002661289,0.00001122695,0.0001954635,0.0001340334,0.00002153537,0.0001793494,0.00003347636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007239846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001171379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001132604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000630117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.00002088199,0.00009185476,0.0001011602,0.00009196805,0.00009952119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997792,0.00005860777,0.00002407004,0.00007135615,0.00004701898,0.00001971805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005535037,0.0000117048,0.00001346481,0.000008676158,0.000004644126,0.000002398109,0.0007988077,5.06309e-7,0.0001984243,0.9982725,0.0003095134,0.0003738286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001967398,0.00001651524,0.0005166894,0.00001206338,0.00000804267,0.000002966537,0.0001255538,0.0003953878,0.0001513958,0.8991334,0.09931476,0.0001265032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5291942,0.004097723,0.00001602711,0.008301891,0.001937456,0.000149486,0.00002068671,0.0001340185,0.4561485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913189,0.000006035268,0.000009318176,0.0006605376,0.001142234,0.000003360453,0.00001633218,0.000006786013,0.006836533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4621246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544533727","doi":"10.1111/rati.12153","title":"Creativity and Meaning in Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Creativity; Skepticism; Superlative; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sketch; Characterization (materials science); Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.118821049526996,"gpt":0.2928256195497564,"spread":0.1740045700227604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000611636,0.00002729784,0.00003610512,0.00001840168,0.00002591776,0.000005023574,0.00002862601,0.00001382307,0.00007095534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001790082,0.00001705763,0.00000535859,0.00002964995,0.000041811,0.00008439171,0.00001372048,0.00002071283,0.00005652743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007430946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006119537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004699116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009919429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996956,0.00003259384,0.00004692403,0.0001124188,0.00004954925,0.00006294038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998358,0.00008214654,0.00001165153,0.00003946463,0.000002510049,0.00002845818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002765572,0.0000627685,0.04692947,0.000002721088,9.338083e-7,0.00001349777,0.0001883347,0.000002948359,0.8813593,0.05789857,0.001464528,0.01204931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693525,0.0001444669,0.7573367,0.00007158117,0.000002671374,0.00002785549,0.00002230131,0.0002557107,0.1945056,0.0391761,0.006551497,0.0002119761],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798528,0.000006721997,0.0003865024,0.00621253,0.00006142127,0.00003220265,0.000001350022,0.00001228918,0.01343421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980467,0.00001719403,0.00005094501,0.001114372,0.00002386766,0.000002767417,6.503821e-8,0.000001398869,0.0007426994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07769113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486718986","doi":"10.1111/rati.12000","title":"Laws of Nature Don't <i>Have</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses, They <i>Are</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02035335800772086,"gpt":0.3033767068206914,"spread":0.2830233488129705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005666442,0.0002929628,0.0004296751,0.00005896201,0.0001702597,0.00005510774,0.000583948,0.0004881145,0.001419579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001416193,0.0002348287,0.0001569416,0.0002430755,0.0004216066,0.0003633462,0.000139104,0.0005686456,0.0003266996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003803163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002811114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001863717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001091644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976116,0.0003150286,0.0004720425,0.0004432313,0.0003870566,0.0007710511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982389,0.0002757739,0.0002849124,0.0008069219,0.00009660362,0.0002968803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002814302,0.0007799671,0.08109296,0.00004441205,0.0001305323,0.0000283089,0.00398193,0.000004181576,0.009627244,0.8865681,0.01562455,0.001836389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004032705,0.001084367,0.2386066,0.0002871233,0.0004364728,0.0002750601,0.002274038,0.00006199924,0.05569708,0.2259375,0.4687429,0.002564146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7648219,0.002719066,0.0007733238,0.002580173,0.003419966,0.0005484406,0.0005375727,0.000214893,0.2243846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962686,0.00005761287,0.0002151297,0.002304331,0.0007245692,0.00004740276,0.00003193521,0.00003018101,0.0003202806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6606306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912804059","doi":"10.1111/rati.12228","title":"Excuses, exemptions, and derivative norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Excellence; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03695069559257504,"gpt":0.2428804490552681,"spread":0.205929753462693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009278439,0.00006553609,0.0001035443,0.00002435602,0.0001426052,0.00006947725,0.00004228124,0.00003164975,0.0007091477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001605687,0.00005257956,0.00002382862,0.00001041505,0.0001672653,0.0002380986,0.00001776589,0.00009568002,0.000327028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007936337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002180306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009270557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000516685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996086,0.00002783305,0.00009670428,0.000112575,0.00006182572,0.00009249643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996898,0.00006933879,0.00004058269,0.0001154806,0.00006023744,0.00002457055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003589758,0.00001811013,0.001523447,0.00002803365,0.00001867724,5.515445e-7,0.02563212,0.000001120553,0.0002989,0.9698401,0.0020734,0.0005619476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693621,0.0001400959,0.004272964,0.00003071289,0.00002689224,0.00000243567,0.008886294,0.00007893592,0.000589198,0.05305063,0.9321902,0.0002622981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.806767,0.0004565902,0.0002595599,0.00121536,0.0008952272,0.00024507,0.00002084891,0.00007008188,0.1900702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612351,0.00004917542,0.0001004801,0.0006819355,0.0003266629,0.000008519792,0.00001646687,0.000008267027,0.03757336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801806119","doi":"10.1111/rati.12198","title":"Intending, believing, and supposing at will","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02534065622126824,"gpt":0.2620824951268216,"spread":0.2367418389055533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004509015,0.00005736634,0.00005141512,0.00002581231,0.0002380197,0.00004343788,0.00007465271,0.00002100853,0.0004058442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712574,0.00004747225,0.00001313781,0.00007195618,0.0001443634,0.0001908964,0.00008241203,0.00003793838,0.0001886646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001721978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006910652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000815217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003244842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995025,0.00002123122,0.00007695071,0.0001848215,0.0000803476,0.0001340813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997786,0.00003235454,0.00002636977,0.0001058319,0.00001280659,0.00004400725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004833182,0.00001008249,0.003774589,0.000005568122,7.663571e-7,0.000007122909,0.0006273097,2.523191e-7,0.9801722,0.006265646,0.005894993,0.003236701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001781295,0.0001454223,0.003665628,0.00002577392,0.000004837655,0.00005850557,0.00001809058,0.001377939,0.8824633,0.0009055329,0.1110129,0.000143945],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973968,0.00005970798,0.0004444834,0.0005588133,0.0003873644,0.0000693277,0.000003317477,0.00006078801,0.02444826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919626,0.00002151527,0.0001328109,0.0007397343,0.0001936928,0.000001845956,5.81116e-7,0.000006667275,0.006940528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4443709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903656838","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00498.x","title":"DOES PERCEPTION OUTSTRIP OUR CONCEPTS IN FINENESS OF GRAIN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fineness; Perception; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04865859430877825,"gpt":0.3430707012506878,"spread":0.2944121069419096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001719987,0.0000445659,0.00007924873,0.00002965651,0.00001524858,0.000002807652,0.0001129501,0.00004813191,0.001127759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003414429,0.00002734953,0.00002273817,0.0001065716,0.00008818559,0.0000568139,0.00001275827,0.00005375637,0.0001181308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008236098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008271783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001131588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003344064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995019,0.00007388976,0.0001270603,0.0001249395,0.00006544546,0.000106693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997711,0.00001644452,0.00003435909,0.0001301216,0.00001837981,0.00002959191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004798594,0.0001270781,0.01068814,0.000004471723,0.000003513684,0.000005303571,0.01011153,6.834805e-7,0.002981154,0.972526,0.00007143125,0.003432777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005864374,0.0001571023,0.489512,0.00001795263,0.000006291369,0.000002031784,0.002635289,0.00006231939,0.002970859,0.5037224,0.0001969328,0.000130379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217081,0.00001032408,0.002260078,0.0005595481,0.0007408063,0.0001221151,0.000007993559,0.00001880845,0.1745722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993342,0.000001077572,0.0001131229,0.00009620585,0.00005537858,0.000009474517,0.000001637397,0.000002412608,0.0003865458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4788239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542702755","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00543.x","title":"SELF‐KNOWLEDGE AND MORAL STUPIDITY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Stupidity; Moral disengagement; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Morality; Moral psychology; Psychology; Rationalization (economics); Moral responsibility; Harm; Social psychology; Moral authority; Moral reasoning; Self-deception; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2017951875856925,"gpt":0.5388453456551577,"spread":0.3370501580694653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004093421,0.00006075688,0.00009936999,0.00001927739,0.0007326356,0.000004465337,0.0000650848,0.0001973587,0.0005780919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003902936,0.00005076901,0.00001097285,0.00006573286,0.00006450481,0.0002881333,0.0001031977,0.001790932,0.001522067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005707606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001488063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002616253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005870649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977574,0.001519614,0.0001885285,0.00009476265,0.0001494088,0.0002902732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959393,0.00353153,0.00007314167,0.0001689107,0.00008868298,0.0001985071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001721935,0.0002901658,0.3224661,0.0005178523,0.00003109176,0.000001563645,0.04461752,1.025389e-7,0.0001617344,0.4954374,0.1340733,0.002385981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007206869,0.00004208309,0.1388857,0.00006540121,0.00005233779,0.000003052518,0.003273559,0.0004260986,0.00007467892,0.01222691,0.8440474,0.0001820009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2708699,0.002578023,0.002678402,0.0105933,0.004855171,0.0008506241,0.000006131572,0.0003271579,0.7072412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900501,0.000108241,0.003053979,0.001936396,0.001423967,0.00003500367,0.000003259822,0.00001075203,0.003378321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7191802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011876580","doi":"10.1111/rati.12261","title":"The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Injustice; Deontic logic; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1097439368881215,"gpt":0.2928605684959553,"spread":0.1831166316078338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001527361,0.00004016326,0.00009076339,0.000009066173,0.0001024422,0.00002813295,0.0000590272,0.00002576708,0.00007369923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001549183,0.00002771308,0.00003280826,0.00002044899,0.0001941985,0.00005741668,0.00001147915,0.0001179734,0.00006964961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008375946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004306412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007057768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008017079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00007023395,0.0001462037,0.00006318343,0.00004759414,0.00007100396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995762,0.0002351066,0.00003639611,0.00005997477,0.00007246189,0.00001986386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670998,0.00003192346,0.0002571744,0.0000206795,0.000008901881,4.110655e-7,0.06024388,9.366152e-7,0.0003887484,0.9352379,0.001426814,0.002365855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000629273,0.0003011171,0.002362043,0.00002689249,0.00002896287,3.260678e-7,0.01393824,0.001518735,0.003765428,0.01927585,0.9579918,0.0001612928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4929823,0.001693621,0.0005496849,0.01949847,0.001966089,0.000424099,0.00001221112,0.00006328811,0.4828102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972987,0.00001810033,0.000004832904,0.0003691237,0.0004159741,0.000006095841,0.000002472013,0.000003985058,0.001880779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.956565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4473718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146077072","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00497.x","title":"ON THE IMMORALITY OF THREATENING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immorality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Morality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2677034102949305,"gpt":0.260815378152138,"spread":0.006888032142792488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001789798,0.00003195163,0.00004250031,0.0000111447,0.0001447947,0.00001893889,0.00005853439,0.00001473965,0.001753311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003187049,0.00001926246,0.00002180259,0.000007271608,0.0001244532,0.00005272113,0.000005355389,0.00005633229,0.00007749968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003775267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009577903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003672913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003408302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997274,0.00002634016,0.00008931596,0.0000509135,0.00006225454,0.00004373194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997039,0.00005355,0.00004838883,0.0001290782,0.00005764782,0.000007406737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006146509,0.00001607758,0.00006224123,0.00000510568,0.000004783866,8.187248e-8,0.05882435,6.31493e-7,0.00009902574,0.9394042,0.001376475,0.0002008046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005368906,0.0004016196,0.02157462,0.0001321895,0.0001175381,0.000001120932,0.04464297,0.0007698857,0.06870217,0.7805647,0.08206569,0.0004906626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.45079,0.00004608371,0.0002254776,0.001336136,0.0003888571,0.0001335641,0.0000113,0.0000371386,0.5470314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961629,0.000002466948,0.00002163151,0.0001630509,0.0001101077,0.000004522134,0.000003464368,0.000003115197,0.00352872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5453728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953730719","doi":"10.1111/rati.12242","title":"Naturalness constraints on best systems accounts of laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Interpretation (philosophy); Simplicity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Linguistics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03967469576711394,"gpt":0.2243489413905601,"spread":0.1846742456234462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007479764,0.0000535813,0.00009854195,0.00003842874,0.0001130885,0.00005144373,0.0001169115,0.00001950788,0.001290367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005790097,0.00004338005,0.00002452,0.00001353898,0.0003103304,0.0002035957,0.000007586181,0.00005548024,0.0007638898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001946451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002757282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008656825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005649133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995527,0.0000110378,0.0001070935,0.00009855977,0.0001553035,0.00007535796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997161,0.0000246626,0.00006367458,0.0001150982,0.00006090722,0.0000195259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006870261,0.00003253714,0.0000278265,0.00003473256,0.000004961177,8.064169e-7,0.00480835,0.00002053289,0.0007904627,0.9927634,0.000987777,0.0005217584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009192171,0.0006821502,0.0003932024,0.0004563314,0.00002448701,0.000007119877,0.009401768,0.0006567315,0.001474807,0.004775895,0.9806765,0.0005318439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2983257,0.0000893098,0.0000016371,0.00009511858,0.001673202,0.0001132549,0.00003534313,0.00001426836,0.6996522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836436,0.000001434757,0.000002407482,0.000118752,0.0002029335,0.00000291965,0.000003219097,0.000003099864,0.01602166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888535219","doi":"10.1111/rati.12201","title":"One standard to rule them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Irrational number; Doxastic logic; Rational agent; Permissive; Rationality; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.134330643599987,"gpt":0.2998526925579861,"spread":0.1655220489579992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001849009,0.0000656086,0.0001184035,0.00001947693,0.0002112703,0.00009134096,0.00009054736,0.00003239205,0.002066657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003311699,0.00005778071,0.00003631811,0.00001366533,0.0002249941,0.00008692082,0.00002393795,0.00008019245,0.001747742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001754092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003677955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007479755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994651,0.00003196041,0.0001149383,0.0001209937,0.0001236416,0.0001433856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995319,0.00003844163,0.0000316722,0.0001742495,0.0001733828,0.00005031936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002074242,0.00002840216,0.0000288571,0.0000102521,0.0000335667,6.688456e-7,0.04917332,3.756902e-7,0.0004223147,0.9076057,0.04064716,0.002028614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001226453,0.0001567227,0.00005906891,0.000009448585,0.0000162032,3.076008e-7,0.0009434309,0.000006595336,0.002964995,0.03828489,0.9573382,0.00009754705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1315742,0.00005522582,0.002255502,0.009065757,0.001750769,0.0002441977,0.00007048273,0.0001419353,0.8548419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393157,0.000007538114,0.0007397109,0.006833242,0.003296082,0.00001329015,0.0000132656,0.00001708256,0.0497641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.916691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065190707","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00326.x","title":"UNDERDETERMINATION AND THE ARGUMENT FROM INDIRECT CONFIRMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0314890652546003,"gpt":0.230720348990048,"spread":0.1992312837354477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025252,0.00004928687,0.00007788531,0.00001611256,0.0002180111,0.0001201468,0.00003192598,0.00002439724,0.000115964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000144022,0.0000329132,0.00002107966,0.000006928754,0.0002485686,0.0001034008,0.000007534724,0.00005885179,0.00002398177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000116149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001226029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009213329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003572847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995643,0.0001041638,0.0001135442,0.00006996293,0.000095217,0.00005280718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996455,0.0001533208,0.0000657925,0.00007310677,0.0000548314,0.000007413534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006264028,0.00001331101,0.00007015908,0.000004994918,0.00001281389,2.15909e-7,0.0167157,0.000008075133,0.00006322903,0.9801679,0.001168235,0.001769112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002373266,0.00004032222,0.006581761,0.00002366539,0.0001656734,0.000001385278,0.004720423,0.004489779,0.002493795,0.7555738,0.22331,0.0002260707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7532151,0.0006783305,0.001223373,0.004966027,0.0008351091,0.0003721027,0.0000325702,0.00007025646,0.2386072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951286,0.00001175524,0.00002870303,0.0003458305,0.0004873212,0.00001319998,0.00004760357,0.000003811582,0.003933205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2419135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1993732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248327916","doi":"10.1111/rati.12310","title":"Controlling hope","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0153927993915802,"gpt":0.2937104179092143,"spread":0.2783176185176341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001010527,0.00006438472,0.000112755,0.00001988438,0.00007097182,0.00004385977,0.00005701867,0.00005769976,0.003160311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003023329,0.00006436795,0.00004685728,0.00008483504,0.00001398707,0.00005004042,0.00001337106,0.00008930021,0.001179218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001053709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003194478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002276862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001900909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994038,0.00006289745,0.0001288474,0.0001738738,0.00006602929,0.0001645013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999595,0.00006983162,0.00002848396,0.0002144875,0.00005017038,0.00004204522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249503,0.0006841519,0.01472919,0.00005210936,0.0007099852,0.001714867,0.02663434,0.002018722,0.0400279,0.6424424,0.1385222,0.1322146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008655113,0.0002470304,0.01992958,0.00008429127,0.0001996479,0.000195894,0.005206651,0.006278951,0.02498259,0.008266728,0.9248274,0.001126145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1573778,0.001390246,0.01513144,0.001611499,0.001771071,0.0001308231,0.000003731656,0.000106045,0.8224773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654285,0.00002251507,0.0006045472,0.00135866,0.0004073895,0.00001129683,0.00001343612,0.00001396366,0.03213967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8080508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572252090","doi":"10.1111/rati.12062","title":"Some Ontological Consequences of Atomism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Atomism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Metaphysics; Motion (physics); Ontology; Physicalism; Physics; Classical mechanics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0353723973225685,"gpt":0.3171845364935317,"spread":0.2818121391709633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002094465,0.00003608505,0.00008303305,0.00001120991,0.0000274655,0.000005095803,0.0001277174,0.00004570269,0.0006703388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009487752,0.00002517817,0.0000239472,0.00004641772,0.0005470006,0.00003948479,0.000011758,0.00004557208,0.0002334859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003306001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007783461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001497717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000156205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999526,0.00009403243,0.00009904239,0.0001097931,0.000071261,0.00009983001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996491,0.0001518214,0.00003257077,0.0001210292,0.00001264156,0.00003285261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001038838,0.00002604155,0.0001996075,7.928587e-7,0.000002955485,0.000001458419,0.0001268241,6.932887e-7,0.003275348,0.9952234,0.00009696705,0.001035515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001199835,0.0001003583,0.00359012,0.000002259743,0.000002609473,0.000004739441,0.00001274554,0.00005253251,0.004052156,0.9907882,0.001235599,0.00003873418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4570691,0.0001075461,0.002015677,0.002597479,0.0003565233,0.00007170387,0.000002542898,0.00002894599,0.5377505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990569,0.000001412683,0.0001391394,0.0004765098,0.0001085706,0.000005341683,4.762159e-7,0.000001130184,0.0002104867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5419878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.733974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895800054","doi":"10.1111/rati.12213","title":"Attention norms in Siegel’s <i>The Rationality of Perception</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Epistemology; Perception; Norm (philosophy); Inference; Psychology; Subject (documents); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03381226890196056,"gpt":0.2832608242974247,"spread":0.2494485553954641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002186539,0.0000416847,0.00005010416,0.00002949819,0.00009767776,0.00001877301,0.00007699097,0.00002330485,0.0003654196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001126005,0.0000296688,0.00002837033,0.0001578101,0.0001084005,0.0001241285,0.00001497041,0.00004916953,0.0001672961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001703838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001760434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001955788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008011299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994114,0.00007278597,0.0001590227,0.0001290453,0.0001517143,0.00007604939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997324,0.00003999403,0.00005728211,0.0001238222,0.00003408288,0.00001244289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114154,0.00004835377,0.01058045,0.000007478722,6.083473e-7,3.294012e-7,0.0004067949,0.00002459853,0.9841038,0.002757956,0.0006455205,0.001412954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005639856,0.0001121043,0.7492552,0.00003363998,0.000006535638,0.000009087109,0.0002670119,0.006839925,0.2377975,0.002882814,0.002098424,0.0001337615],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925988,0.000002274236,0.004020839,0.000717074,0.0001573318,0.0001003812,0.000003247701,0.00001270824,0.002387298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984272,0.000003605029,0.00004954694,0.0002447766,0.000115602,0.000008338156,0.00000311694,0.000002975079,0.001144801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7463063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4001088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908302690","doi":"10.1111/rati.12097","title":"Epistemic Value Monism and the Swamping Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Premise; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08529585516567487,"gpt":0.2625903632555531,"spread":0.1772945080898782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006456402,0.00007597123,0.0001347645,0.00001594346,0.0002642294,0.0001381073,0.00007956716,0.00003471155,0.0000168733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005195278,0.00004751675,0.00003493478,0.00001102008,0.0005748248,0.000120536,0.00002911266,0.0001442093,0.00004728241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001314603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005242448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003404504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003621075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993985,0.0001283835,0.0001462501,0.0001100406,0.0001020154,0.0001148446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.0001329965,0.00006447024,0.0001405166,0.00008956252,0.00004080044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000930428,0.000006826249,0.00003158881,0.00001867821,0.00001599698,6.943896e-7,0.06609505,0.00001143925,0.00001716787,0.9316687,0.001810669,0.0003138591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319398,0.00005888513,0.0000344038,0.00003726912,0.00005588773,0.00000894735,0.01057262,0.0009168134,0.0001322756,0.6856983,0.3009953,0.0001698613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1334802,0.004657251,0.001531052,0.03399073,0.002184965,0.0009797852,0.00001652097,0.000205207,0.8229542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776903,0.0000400487,0.0001902401,0.00117174,0.0007249341,0.00002583012,0.00000535576,0.00001109149,0.0201405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2117966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942284900","doi":"10.1111/rati.12235","title":"Secondary self‐deception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Doxastic logic; Phenomenon; Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Psychology; Sketch; Self-knowledge; Lying; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02860040383087057,"gpt":0.2373217129412367,"spread":0.2087213091103662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001267603,0.00006168127,0.00009428272,0.00002414852,0.0001084894,0.00006242665,0.00005718195,0.00004020687,0.00513857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005784309,0.00005475929,0.00004613709,0.000009337427,0.00006022602,0.0001847382,0.00001151009,0.0001364434,0.002728713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001342563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004137173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003590892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002836463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995777,0.000035617,0.0001053993,0.0001086432,0.0000746232,0.00009802981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996939,0.0000393251,0.000042237,0.0001419399,0.00006129106,0.0000212745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003674468,0.00003569678,0.0002632281,0.00004716232,0.00002465713,6.517393e-7,0.03280032,0.000002557643,0.0005889427,0.9533564,0.01143974,0.001436932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240039,0.00006980906,0.0005231331,0.000007673976,0.0000139592,9.970295e-7,0.001900743,0.00009242721,0.0003517058,0.01141458,0.9852872,0.0001137685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3525189,0.0001147352,0.00006181298,0.0005644374,0.001888071,0.0001487645,0.00001100425,0.0001191202,0.6445732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242995,0.00001308692,0.00009481516,0.0009972119,0.0008202683,0.000005752467,0.00003044912,0.00001000398,0.07372891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366986237","doi":"10.1111/rati.12377","title":"Luck egalitarianism and non‐overlapping generations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Intuition; Positive economics; Skepticism; Epistemology; Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07122119246806932,"gpt":0.3506298898459108,"spread":0.2794086973778415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003569372,0.000033815,0.00004673938,0.00002627796,0.0006441835,0.00007401004,0.00004937118,0.00006567783,0.00004564119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002751226,0.00003488084,0.00001619164,0.0001625654,0.0001397587,0.0001477487,0.00001809683,0.00007900206,0.000193942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002001235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009652239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004932379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005590801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994899,0.0000546509,0.00007095424,0.00008815758,0.0001339633,0.0001623514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.0001212687,0.00001040602,0.00006184576,0.00002819275,0.00008408252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[3.38428e-7,0.000003100122,0.00007938976,0.000002587761,0.000003003138,0.00000137916,0.006441197,0.00001322495,0.0004723708,0.9909894,0.001885022,0.0001089357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001455204,0.00001743887,0.008763543,0.00001087359,0.00001225035,3.794775e-7,0.002183867,0.00229787,0.0002209881,0.9080355,0.07815287,0.0001588475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1936839,0.00006462574,0.004702045,0.1123073,0.0009060634,0.000292817,0.00002668999,0.000306098,0.6877105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947447,0.00003761742,0.0001383392,0.0009230633,0.0005774308,0.000006681236,0.000008326597,0.000003195769,0.003560706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8010607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169118977","doi":"10.1111/rati.12058","title":"Hypocrisy and the Nature of Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Notice; Disposition; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Inscribed figure; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01467359626384211,"gpt":0.2206930229945042,"spread":0.2060194267306621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111286,0.00005048778,0.00009875046,0.000009836986,0.0001059246,0.00003205359,0.00006368044,0.00003035899,0.0004313753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007222658,0.00002621383,0.0000381838,0.000009470018,0.0003523671,0.00003814892,0.00002188771,0.0001226858,0.00002058005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001712587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003023046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001995761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001465829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996118,0.00005504973,0.0001030044,0.00006593672,0.00008548956,0.00007870138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996193,0.0001964018,0.00002551799,0.00009934259,0.00003053532,0.00002890285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001639383,0.00001534142,0.00001391024,0.0000102367,0.00000892562,8.827649e-8,0.001090149,1.948256e-7,0.000007688808,0.99679,0.001517038,0.0005300388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003942646,0.00002940933,0.0001252287,0.000007774969,0.00001424289,7.184378e-7,0.00006798483,0.000142124,0.0001317886,0.3973026,0.6017424,0.00004144288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09636531,0.002011433,0.0001002985,0.04140725,0.0009569356,0.000274524,0.00004324663,0.00004886553,0.8587921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941987,0.00002043986,0.00001566568,0.002232074,0.000837578,0.00000358502,0.000003749725,0.000003828274,0.002684403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4723257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285494459","doi":"10.1111/rati.12347","title":"The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Worry; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Bayesian probability; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08906752553776437,"gpt":0.3022916171046589,"spread":0.2132240915668945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009591375,0.00007805305,0.0001537622,0.00001701248,0.002441479,0.0001425356,0.0001759107,0.00001687369,0.00009213213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005483921,0.00005817942,0.00007739548,0.0000183868,0.0001614979,0.00006223407,0.00005189183,0.0002042654,0.00001203797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003519678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000495255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006006391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004814398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.0001330099,0.0003130147,0.0001304464,0.0001387093,0.0001840577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990346,0.0005122531,0.0001930791,0.0001621285,0.00007847475,0.00001949258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009958871,0.00002694292,0.00004894524,0.00006893236,0.00002361005,1.533452e-7,0.03083304,0.0001253281,0.0001048622,0.9540819,0.01277362,0.001902706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010337,0.0001083606,0.000005375095,0.000006347013,0.000021422,0.000001346111,0.01713082,0.003763398,0.0001146077,0.1321422,0.8464012,0.0001038774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09698857,0.01139755,0.03086543,0.06241234,0.01212824,0.009527013,0.0006419815,0.001011456,0.7750274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644117,0.000008560853,0.0009549974,0.0006934296,0.0007670979,0.0007736066,0.00006369903,0.00002406745,0.03230285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845283","doi":"10.1111/rati.12446","title":"The Motive of Duty, Emotional Motives, and the Kantian Criterion of Summonability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Social psychology; Psychology; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01497038065176664,"gpt":0.2460327491394425,"spread":0.2310623684876758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005632514,0.0000452552,0.00009960986,0.00001590276,0.0002668878,0.00003439847,0.00008634746,0.00001817868,0.00007360372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155706,0.00002275308,0.00004605965,0.00001935522,0.001768666,0.00004462427,0.00004960501,0.00009861165,6.762519e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004891977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003567656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001173684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.0001426443,0.0001655289,0.00007002771,0.00009269998,0.00005054922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.0006764192,0.00005834104,0.0001203508,0.0001536667,0.00000912465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000564006,0.0000245517,0.0001079757,0.00002787392,0.0000277279,5.360537e-8,0.004864077,0.000002023213,0.00003520583,0.9942876,0.00004246478,0.000524037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002618342,0.00001812149,0.006230789,0.00002865857,0.00001294774,9.74437e-8,0.00077538,0.0003401016,0.0002147226,0.9889724,0.003121949,0.00002296241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848969,0.001884036,0.0004100653,0.05454853,0.0005741372,0.000508502,0.0001377224,0.00001907908,0.257021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.00005516884,0.000003620124,0.0001719074,0.0000614676,0.000004016177,0.000002583332,0.000001816186,0.0004828215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3143197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6516722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632817046","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00382.x","title":"THE FABRICATION METAPHOR","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Commit; Philosophy; Perception; Realism; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02559766617831632,"gpt":0.2408609015548744,"spread":0.2152632353765581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000699579,0.00002499014,0.00001971662,0.000009159822,0.0001132163,0.00001754151,0.00004270968,0.00001037336,0.00007134205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006155139,0.00001844521,0.000009676621,0.00007058805,0.000008963902,0.00009389537,0.000001461084,0.00003739133,0.0004122297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000120038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002370013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002269647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998156,0.00001436062,0.00005126789,0.0000274203,0.00004562048,0.00004574631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997657,0.00009030279,0.00000862973,0.00009736646,0.00002261988,0.00001539131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000624295,0.00002963787,0.0004153743,0.000008263027,0.00006238004,0.000001732455,0.003134709,0.003343258,0.01216959,0.02108111,0.906814,0.05293373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000324665,0.000002847798,0.006005249,3.861001e-7,0.000004013918,0.000008076624,0.00005938341,0.007878266,0.004000613,0.0001116806,0.9818577,0.00003936743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1005103,0.004891011,0.2831415,0.007527557,0.005159992,0.0005696015,0.000003160644,0.001130856,0.597066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938266,0.0002722528,0.0004662292,0.00009406247,0.00009900872,0.00001653598,0.000002340962,0.000005530791,0.005217479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5298517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983495082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00221","title":"Shareability and Objectivity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03683054083108771,"gpt":0.2183448007868797,"spread":0.181514259955792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007044003,0.00004163672,0.00005505597,0.000008394461,0.0001474797,0.00005990656,0.00001675976,0.00001277135,0.001325585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006185644,0.000033407,0.00001818619,0.000008871935,0.00009929827,0.0001057802,0.000006222983,0.00004670853,0.00004063667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006963609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000830504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001478812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002511339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997264,0.00003060036,0.00005217403,0.00009084149,0.00004125006,0.00005870879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998204,0.00004746591,0.00001153203,0.00007570073,0.00001779184,0.0000271322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001928206,0.00002918922,0.0001872257,0.000005069091,0.000003154487,4.795845e-7,0.001507109,1.332696e-7,0.00002470197,0.9969035,0.0005745144,0.0007629785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001285354,0.00003157999,0.001057448,0.000002958337,0.000005877023,0.000001076057,0.0001407119,0.00002262992,0.0003810847,0.3866095,0.6115376,0.00008093952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1424844,0.00008046894,0.00006274047,0.0006118926,0.0001843342,0.00007440074,0.00001348154,0.00004103592,0.8564473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966604,0.000001450946,0.00002444093,0.0001587616,0.0001799749,0.000004351704,0.000001607883,0.000002827015,0.002966209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.854176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011611653","doi":"10.1111/rati.12264","title":"Medicalization and linguistic agency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicalization; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychiatry; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1134480235290356,"gpt":0.3312898294305474,"spread":0.2178418059015118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007581332,0.00006299134,0.00006832942,0.00003081728,0.0001302486,0.00003980055,0.0001016581,0.00003627871,0.0003893281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007850578,0.00006053215,0.000009953474,0.0003243455,0.0001965942,0.00006221055,0.00004916154,0.0001420691,0.000101733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007949912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003877454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001426725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.834132e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991449,0.00005271137,0.0001906616,0.000249647,0.0002534649,0.0001086656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995516,0.0001547536,0.00005612538,0.00009087379,0.00003705802,0.0001095981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006048467,0.00004342346,0.00009557354,0.00005244161,0.00000231442,0.00002898981,0.002647837,0.000004862776,0.7593509,0.2294642,0.00511094,0.003192505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244734,0.0004653424,0.001755648,0.00005803208,0.00003615375,0.00001459307,0.00005825053,0.05056735,0.6798575,0.05349705,0.2118748,0.0005705769],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2549235,0.0001408953,0.5855281,0.1061316,0.002193717,0.001192548,0.0000518621,0.0009846367,0.04885319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810954,0.00004311208,0.00025496,0.0180511,0.0002669277,0.000008204871,0.000005097334,0.000008908883,0.0002662447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7261719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}