{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d0a910580b15","filters":{"venue":"Ratio Juris"}},"results":[{"id":"W2800376573","doi":"10.1111/raju.12200","title":"Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Reciprocal; Law and economics; Usability; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1058675165811877,"gpt":0.3355693400562069,"spread":0.2297018234750192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008320806,0.0005876239,0.0006382564,0.003402207,0.003807709,0.009839849,0.001402747,0.004408292,0.002940634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006582933,0.0005965465,0.0006562196,0.00196892,0.08119052,0.0120473,0.006574342,0.004733446,0.0005424002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005435025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002413941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002084264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001247392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831502,0.01180879,0.0005140595,0.001108245,0.002664051,0.0007546147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923538,0.005299788,0.0004428666,0.0008529975,0.0008035765,0.0002468945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000196494,0.000002106451,0.00002238109,0.000006970755,0.000001118471,0.000008229019,0.0007791428,0.00006765686,0.00002362739,0.9983097,0.0001283615,0.0006487546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004316917,0.000006850868,0.00008276111,0.00005556,0.000003934888,0.00005016834,0.0005652097,0.0003577538,0.0001135042,0.9862266,0.01252592,0.00000730375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04614092,0.01050238,0.2009797,0.02208596,0.0003079407,0.00006902841,0.00007732667,0.0001333194,0.7197034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.001663802,0.0103084,0.001291052,0.0002633313,0.00008802779,0.00001753137,0.00005624878,0.009401616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009839849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04400516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397389185","doi":"10.1111/raju.12122","title":"The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion, and Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Stipulation; Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Green","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03305861707672286,"gpt":0.3289714597609529,"spread":0.29591284268423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005447947,0.000295661,0.0004633485,0.002391597,0.002352452,0.007275898,0.0006956795,0.002292251,0.005119273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009951173,0.0002912237,0.0002812679,0.001136233,0.04189579,0.00866209,0.004206027,0.00267473,0.0003512656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003884043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002346338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002089483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942675,0.003628199,0.0001760623,0.0003256258,0.001221553,0.0003811085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881232,0.009022517,0.001084366,0.000526002,0.0007680659,0.0004758354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004563459,0.00000493009,0.0001701277,0.00001672846,0.000001697395,0.0000204359,0.001335177,0.00007706753,0.00004155594,0.9960184,0.0003567773,0.001952603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001067601,0.00001305471,0.0005745477,0.0001615723,0.000004892825,0.00007329001,0.001992831,0.0005612782,0.0001160273,0.9723297,0.02415332,0.000008725749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.148185,0.02343908,0.05007676,0.1056641,0.0008624734,0.00009995202,0.00008912913,0.00007066776,0.6715129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879655,0.002387699,0.00196901,0.0015747,0.0002917067,0.00003590616,0.000008800408,0.00001683546,0.005749801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02881187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933138509","doi":"10.1111/raju.12088","title":"Paying a Price, Facing a Fine, Counting the Cost: The Differences that Make the Difference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Business; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Mark Migotti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08582151452728418,"gpt":0.2320309329924938,"spread":0.1462094184652096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005077736,0.0003663421,0.0005500726,0.0007253005,0.002071442,0.006544778,0.001164526,0.002927794,0.01218773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03237036,0.0003110835,0.0003991925,0.0007345075,0.01088664,0.009658009,0.002834293,0.00486041,0.001135445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002405513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001789683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00168383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001191927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935707,0.003337664,0.0002710109,0.0006636202,0.001488974,0.0006680846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873427,0.007111229,0.002186453,0.001172835,0.001472324,0.0007144439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004438796,0.00003856051,0.0005933238,0.00002477759,0.000007974368,0.00006074664,0.0004424399,0.0007551406,0.0001879063,0.9879489,0.002424321,0.007471602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002203034,0.00004823033,0.001384289,0.00006291092,0.00001374133,0.0001092557,0.0009992203,0.002565521,0.00041935,0.9761806,0.01816743,0.00002745878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.252132,0.003743959,0.1717043,0.08210409,0.002007703,0.00009885594,0.0001557749,0.0002357565,0.4878176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787159,0.000550816,0.008276987,0.002206181,0.0002328063,0.0000402055,0.00001873689,0.00009370453,0.009864691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01218773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1761959659","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00514.x","title":"Presumptions in Legal Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Computer science; Epistemology; Work (physics); Event (particle physics); Management science; Philosophy; Engineering; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05998884018687108,"gpt":0.4055579889840732,"spread":0.3455691487972022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02117605,0.0008636239,0.001162705,0.004894943,0.003832896,0.01026614,0.00368033,0.005320768,0.005449655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0468733,0.0008361107,0.002044729,0.002307581,0.03312937,0.01737034,0.00858101,0.007940616,0.00104261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005501322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002947077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009218011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.973611,0.01630469,0.001958605,0.002047033,0.00525631,0.0008224817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493337,0.03689267,0.003184857,0.005227802,0.004177,0.001184048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003011973,0.000002735005,0.00002997724,0.00001833696,0.000003389341,0.00002597951,0.0002463466,0.0003869664,0.00003292315,0.9983138,0.0001228583,0.000813715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008378616,0.000006134137,0.00003254224,0.00005929218,0.00000458051,0.00003816512,0.0001081349,0.001486877,0.00009851407,0.9932359,0.004915706,0.000005889945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02974707,0.005258306,0.7471566,0.01995645,0.0005953111,0.0002517746,0.0001989398,0.0002541242,0.1965814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8438753,0.001736932,0.1428743,0.001767045,0.0004266648,0.0003602354,0.0001792409,0.00007828602,0.008701974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02117605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515411761","doi":"10.1111/raju.12070","title":"Beyond the Law‐State: The Adequacy of <scp>R</scp>az's Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra‐State and Supra‐State Legality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; State (computer science); Citation; Law; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer W. Primmer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03164222571396745,"gpt":0.2880223225213779,"spread":0.2563800968074105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006291538,0.0004014372,0.0007385383,0.002898189,0.004732356,0.01125417,0.002798009,0.006513952,0.007504651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01670696,0.0003864047,0.0009619184,0.002408088,0.04006873,0.01416762,0.003696488,0.009149516,0.0007754823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004138254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005127213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009141544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007053515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950111,0.002696052,0.0001361976,0.0006057202,0.001124072,0.0004268304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856656,0.01109304,0.0006112075,0.001382844,0.0009724643,0.00027479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001723598,0.000003085554,0.00003642189,0.000003530722,0.000001155986,0.00000579079,0.0002314776,0.00009789391,0.000009135665,0.9986014,0.0005387422,0.0004695872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005628877,0.000003717191,0.0001597549,0.00001469977,0.00000403652,0.00001086755,0.0001968226,0.001014812,0.00007031813,0.9939494,0.004566628,0.000003371815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06033349,0.003015143,0.0759336,0.1411209,0.0004272157,0.00009563894,0.0002931653,0.0002448294,0.718536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779395,0.0007428509,0.00687801,0.005395721,0.0005927467,0.0001220264,0.00004524747,0.0001024467,0.008181485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03327322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920893504","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00452.x","title":"Dichotomies and Oppositions in Legal Argumentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dichotomy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Function (biology); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006254954551877653,"gpt":0.2411551073782732,"spread":0.2349001528263955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01166352,0.0006874504,0.0009301619,0.004091498,0.006395595,0.008641302,0.001719897,0.004716827,0.004613109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508488,0.0005283215,0.001059734,0.002645913,0.02523557,0.01490979,0.009524411,0.006521164,0.0009002249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002962437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001120439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008452149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006265473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712583,0.01911077,0.001215921,0.001754084,0.005171741,0.001489116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818271,0.01377467,0.001374041,0.001174684,0.001337035,0.0005125253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001016664,0.000006559903,0.0001211621,0.00002434542,0.000003504826,0.0000984923,0.00178115,0.0001813205,0.00009830078,0.9949397,0.0002878945,0.002447502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001779795,0.00001408017,0.0001399812,0.00006561468,0.000006518417,0.0001446945,0.001298701,0.001530645,0.0001231737,0.9805506,0.01609661,0.00001161677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1107157,0.005599969,0.254507,0.0202757,0.0008820647,0.0002369206,0.00009556058,0.000209689,0.6074775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397575,0.001367127,0.04811867,0.001083759,0.0003038148,0.0004290769,0.00009113635,0.00007701035,0.008771891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01166352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06168336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072611680","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00381.x","title":"The Regular Practice of Morality in Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Law; Legal positivism; Philosophy; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Giudice","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02336370591314746,"gpt":0.3174846268317675,"spread":0.2941209209186201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02437487,0.0003270978,0.0005609567,0.002088962,0.005564131,0.01145359,0.00159006,0.003886678,0.005075366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04613855,0.0004473361,0.0004799697,0.001808086,0.08532817,0.01000996,0.005146328,0.007566495,0.0009550842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005318332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004558002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002075199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00140016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9634576,0.02639425,0.0009376451,0.002957288,0.005279682,0.0009734389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541353,0.02887704,0.003366231,0.008044809,0.00452277,0.001053898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002958358,0.000004423488,0.0001075089,0.00001538518,0.00000259465,0.0000134215,0.001667219,0.00005884758,0.00004606265,0.9939973,0.001085035,0.002999215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008911885,0.000009972446,0.0002015061,0.0001186362,0.00000358649,0.00003779204,0.0008473827,0.0003659907,0.0001331018,0.9527549,0.04551117,0.000006985658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04464487,0.009115442,0.09487174,0.1444724,0.00178341,0.00007004465,0.00005964801,0.0002232965,0.7047591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773431,0.001302844,0.006872778,0.002669406,0.0008254125,0.00005890892,0.00001452358,0.00009907325,0.010814],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02437487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1289082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580343503","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00484.x","title":"When Is a Country Multinational? Problems with Statistical and Subjective Approaches*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Allegiance; State (computer science); Sovereignty; German; Dilemma; Political science; Plural; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nenad Stojanović","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04508772287482416,"gpt":0.2586104444013328,"spread":0.2135227215265086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.158133,0.0008556092,0.00191003,0.01055408,0.006127585,0.01389328,0.004970943,0.003808058,0.006531309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3315227,0.0007745369,0.0009786376,0.01111306,0.03415298,0.01965804,0.009005216,0.005206243,0.0007657055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006572295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002894484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008551099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8244485,0.1301581,0.01186277,0.01321976,0.01785957,0.002451281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6354797,0.2884677,0.02684686,0.02153284,0.02353903,0.004133771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006649365,0.00004566168,0.01824133,0.0004465643,0.0001781816,0.0002462329,0.02513709,0.0005833539,0.00006840603,0.8972035,0.01443554,0.04334766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002381719,0.00003193914,0.01336931,0.001124185,0.00007312127,0.0003005679,0.03210044,0.004762632,0.0002737338,0.9061,0.04172184,0.0001182981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1691805,0.02063322,0.3236733,0.2455691,0.004259014,0.0007174878,0.002248421,0.0003704967,0.2333487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952929,0.002329858,0.02554002,0.0129041,0.001754382,0.0007787739,0.0003924853,0.0001662521,0.003205222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.158133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8362973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274220625","doi":"10.1111/raju.12115","title":"An Argumentation Interface for Expert Opinion Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Credibility; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Rigour; Reliability (semiconductor); Epistemology; Work (physics); Expert opinion; Boundary-work; Public opinion; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nanning Zhang","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06657413016424077,"gpt":0.3698759947568834,"spread":0.3033018645926426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01434913,0.001253802,0.001403845,0.003903219,0.001658263,0.009111553,0.002528565,0.005046506,0.02633435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05280688,0.001008239,0.001884037,0.001566705,0.001770055,0.007825305,0.007303908,0.002295176,0.004832401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001578496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001062332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001289571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009423448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896428,0.00595582,0.0013435,0.0007818466,0.001990393,0.000285697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663628,0.02871818,0.000805737,0.001356426,0.002058231,0.0006985829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001336623,0.0004466628,0.002086741,0.001629658,0.0002828741,0.003817598,0.01027334,0.02399164,0.01129477,0.6397604,0.02569861,0.279381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004114161,0.0001248426,0.0005305285,0.0006017859,0.0001623323,0.001044511,0.001050673,0.4056115,0.00878747,0.3567089,0.224839,0.0001270254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007063644,0.0001866248,0.97184,0.0008345431,0.0001055512,0.000283734,0.0003241382,0.007578176,0.01178352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2059105,0.0003235165,0.7799805,0.000447927,0.0001329864,0.0006159262,0.001159664,0.001234705,0.01019421],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02633435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08809716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963569351","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00177","title":"Legal Obligation and Aesthetic Ideals: A Renewed Legal Positivist Theory of Law's Normativity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Positivism; Order (exchange); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Legal norm; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Keith Culver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01342387843461227,"gpt":0.2787319773754142,"spread":0.2653080989408019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007642129,0.0002525884,0.0003632803,0.001520257,0.003698907,0.008349633,0.001416729,0.002286692,0.001734908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009178586,0.0002748343,0.0003971673,0.0006957584,0.05432166,0.0102503,0.004838604,0.005493144,0.0002674882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002526943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00154332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00173997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937199,0.004046286,0.0001167496,0.0003264518,0.00143838,0.0003521432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936457,0.003598335,0.000631262,0.0007358912,0.0008734441,0.0005153822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001989343,0.000008727629,0.00006697053,0.000005099129,5.18732e-7,0.00001022768,0.00288118,0.00007221861,0.00002780309,0.9946781,0.0003466669,0.001900531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004945945,0.000007895846,0.0001660797,0.00002108424,0.000001299629,0.0000270944,0.001412086,0.0004952649,0.00005935885,0.9843204,0.01347843,0.000005997043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1221922,0.005395527,0.106925,0.1316752,0.001531579,0.00004953398,0.00002909828,0.0001088672,0.6320931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824682,0.00106434,0.007659606,0.002089069,0.0005639324,0.00004443505,0.000007292915,0.00003907969,0.006064076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008349633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04041594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410865059","doi":"10.1111/raju.12426","title":"Reflections on Complexity, Evidence, and Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"International Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ronald J. Allen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1190413797807385,"gpt":0.4361583511226534,"spread":0.317116971341915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04359347,0.0006867269,0.001611858,0.006348757,0.008140379,0.02021736,0.003368658,0.01814213,0.007225752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08837473,0.0006955903,0.001317197,0.003409637,0.1104994,0.03400029,0.01332138,0.02787878,0.000573092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02122274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01084167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009188647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00541267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9623746,0.02584034,0.001055996,0.002128064,0.006992438,0.0016086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8156809,0.1691644,0.002726743,0.003963846,0.00644427,0.002019769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003615959,0.000003651723,0.00004091938,0.00002111049,0.000003015872,0.00003635151,0.0008426703,0.0001354201,0.00001409397,0.9949526,0.003084095,0.000862596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001112362,0.000004561229,0.00007809523,0.0001430012,0.000003016074,0.00003504874,0.0009790615,0.0002858711,0.00004279869,0.9656912,0.03271598,0.00001023496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00607716,0.01162098,0.008806861,0.8960876,0.00158022,0.00003440521,0.00008927898,0.0000210673,0.07568249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297554,0.01367156,0.01313983,0.119631,0.009394199,0.000240752,0.000101967,0.0001169268,0.01394842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04359347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2305471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998571529","doi":"10.1111/raju.12256","title":"Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Combatant; Law; Harm; Convention; Just war theory; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Spanish Civil War","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm Thorburn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.122758158883132,"gpt":0.2918407491302055,"spread":0.1690825902470735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005292483,0.0003508272,0.0002778256,0.0008037431,0.004777734,0.005517625,0.000888929,0.006454695,0.006713491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009816749,0.0002254378,0.0003209038,0.0002845931,0.02595784,0.003288406,0.00433683,0.00746819,0.0006194288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002916956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002237305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003052327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002272361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929146,0.00443056,0.0001550674,0.0004959111,0.001031457,0.0009725184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940659,0.002739934,0.0008047487,0.0005999751,0.001094145,0.0006953593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005703668,0.0000156689,0.0002751837,0.000009482604,0.000002067198,0.00007743444,0.003167739,0.00007934577,0.00005585101,0.9917704,0.003521843,0.001019225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005869872,0.00006668191,0.001873276,0.0002235584,0.00001815728,0.0002812186,0.01069077,0.0021956,0.0004030107,0.8511782,0.1329759,0.00003491685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.107357,0.001666709,0.02275879,0.2461307,0.002117589,0.0000692301,0.00005146875,0.00009702788,0.6197515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817215,0.0001938151,0.0008219048,0.006044355,0.0004930707,0.00002898102,0.00001024839,0.00001736441,0.01066877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006713491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02798969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742639438","doi":"10.1111/raju.12166","title":"When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jacob Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07090649790703209,"gpt":0.3657432294537599,"spread":0.2948367315467278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01443819,0.0004935862,0.0008441254,0.00214008,0.006075293,0.009194828,0.001904953,0.007991634,0.005832344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03037857,0.0005520715,0.000588219,0.001372067,0.0553029,0.02018388,0.009361752,0.01098415,0.0007153302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004936582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003316852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003344336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002230231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879116,0.005561023,0.0004860375,0.002088592,0.002687085,0.001265645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870477,0.008398823,0.001178139,0.001531115,0.001252676,0.0005914953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003661102,0.00000283704,0.00003573533,0.000003490838,8.928795e-7,0.00002177053,0.0003990087,0.00003078158,0.00001598329,0.9984218,0.0003482963,0.0007157152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000647429,0.000005392566,0.00003717615,0.00002641758,0.000001831826,0.00003471764,0.0003009042,0.0001855941,0.00005979519,0.9910437,0.008293052,0.000004870264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0879053,0.00393036,0.1104185,0.07728603,0.001240048,0.0001063977,0.00006184779,0.000104217,0.7189472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753457,0.0006669868,0.004845445,0.00546283,0.0004857687,0.00007255587,0.00001177822,0.00006051272,0.01304848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01443819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07635742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009134116","doi":"10.1111/raju.12288","title":"The Nature of Law and Potential Coercion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Morality; Appeal; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Compliance (psychology); Law enforcement; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kara Woodbury‐Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139100925645415,"gpt":0.2343247408479653,"spread":0.2204146482834238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004906346,0.0001821407,0.0004095253,0.001434079,0.0017394,0.006044141,0.0008519125,0.002261636,0.00468108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01031846,0.0002680061,0.0003183441,0.0004851824,0.04172701,0.007974207,0.003602963,0.002367626,0.000322012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002785282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001454695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008180552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006548073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958795,0.002310621,0.0001322319,0.000475325,0.0008955344,0.0003067597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908479,0.006171165,0.0007745713,0.001108226,0.0006671803,0.0004309115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002442707,0.000003559308,0.0001102891,0.000008072856,0.000001439493,0.00002320009,0.0003722168,0.0000641618,0.0000628018,0.9979858,0.0001544343,0.001211528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000497054,0.00000499296,0.0002394881,0.00003323798,0.000001521571,0.00006205989,0.0003162443,0.0003713731,0.00008610207,0.9941433,0.004732788,0.000003850713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1412633,0.008563694,0.06303093,0.06331822,0.0003980623,0.00005349964,0.00005586155,0.00007901307,0.7232375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927007,0.0007827497,0.002108691,0.0007957384,0.0001165036,0.00002765772,0.000007617786,0.00001097609,0.003449463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006044141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02594751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154286082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00147","title":"Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Discourse ethics; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Epistemology; Work (physics); Mode (computer interface); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth L. Avio","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02881720967533737,"gpt":0.3725118150548618,"spread":0.3436946053795245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0288853,0.000853303,0.001038593,0.003717966,0.0109749,0.01244648,0.00231804,0.007967394,0.003346525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02524528,0.0005462405,0.0006039243,0.003371002,0.08582343,0.02402693,0.01233131,0.007682535,0.0004907565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01279442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005708237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003788012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001518019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9617305,0.02995664,0.001056891,0.002108342,0.003691807,0.001455762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982329,0.01320502,0.001587952,0.001224003,0.001167148,0.0004869904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003405883,0.000003710254,0.00003127586,0.00001372612,0.000001014679,0.00001313487,0.006128857,0.00007126019,0.00002752993,0.9921231,0.0002937007,0.001289299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001051817,0.000008743222,0.00006379507,0.00007735948,0.000002299102,0.00002262268,0.003844378,0.0003441494,0.0001066032,0.9724092,0.02310225,0.000008103962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0861627,0.01745675,0.1376265,0.1591718,0.0009187278,0.0001282857,0.00006053394,0.0001653905,0.5983093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798725,0.00159969,0.00726483,0.002751408,0.0003457483,0.0001809215,0.00001952707,0.00005557936,0.007909828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0288853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1527618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118717622","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00191","title":"Deliberative Democracy and Liberal Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Democratic theory; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Luc Tremblay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03560618984125243,"gpt":0.3331400076000716,"spread":0.2975338177588192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194638,0.0004331867,0.0004875069,0.001116919,0.004727411,0.00803843,0.0009398392,0.004756549,0.007728145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137886,0.0002657368,0.0005389877,0.001246685,0.04394113,0.008350888,0.007066759,0.00715523,0.001417718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004071096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001401585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001002314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888495,0.005774011,0.0002933126,0.001142737,0.002526102,0.00141448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897356,0.00621831,0.0008634103,0.001600303,0.000938469,0.0006439085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001414411,0.000002293729,0.00001799599,0.000004425252,9.651329e-7,0.000006261225,0.0001833598,0.00005434514,0.00001155458,0.9985008,0.0004609996,0.0007554986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004023789,0.000002974849,0.00002965317,0.00001641938,8.586231e-7,0.000009163732,0.00009997642,0.00007496196,0.00004532504,0.983029,0.01668606,0.000001666637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0184036,0.006172742,0.05413076,0.08767951,0.000651023,0.00006133508,0.00006446407,0.00008706281,0.8327495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281936,0.002490287,0.009904526,0.01137616,0.001125197,0.0002098447,0.00005073866,0.00008119708,0.04656853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04333794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161815389","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00405.x","title":"Locke on Toleration and Inclusion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Articulation (sociology); Polity; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Deliberation; Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lee Ward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02213036907435186,"gpt":0.2932377962783683,"spread":0.2711074272040164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01200885,0.0003442319,0.0006935862,0.001817382,0.009683591,0.01005318,0.0015506,0.004129038,0.004461102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883258,0.0003050539,0.0007671864,0.0009964164,0.06211273,0.008017635,0.01209738,0.008334241,0.0005329789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005452638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003587702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002580454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9773464,0.01436004,0.0005275219,0.001966704,0.00372664,0.002072633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988041,0.008101255,0.0006452803,0.001458168,0.001141761,0.0006124342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003240526,0.000004047858,0.00004029058,0.00000418715,9.553961e-7,0.00001133617,0.001117029,0.00003097091,0.00002145667,0.9977285,0.000333138,0.00070489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106354,0.00001088262,0.00007924304,0.00002804026,0.000002688279,0.00002564106,0.0006651982,0.0001426258,0.00009998343,0.982144,0.01678609,0.000005006065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0687164,0.002736663,0.03900549,0.06354456,0.0004146076,0.00008828066,0.00004135378,0.00008388461,0.8253688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821743,0.000293242,0.002353334,0.003511538,0.0002756823,0.0001158694,0.00001102496,0.00003771698,0.01122716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01200885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212915363","doi":"10.1111/raju.12334","title":"Bentham’s Public Utilitarianism and Its Jurisprudential Significance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Morality; Jurisprudence; Jeremy bentham; Law; Philosophy of law; Legislator; Normative; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Legislation","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03822280387896085,"gpt":0.3193784715863606,"spread":0.2811556677073997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01055343,0.0004250896,0.0006535916,0.001667719,0.005421719,0.01009324,0.001418931,0.004504724,0.003675068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01614755,0.0004869639,0.0006222927,0.001293671,0.04526755,0.006014433,0.004494655,0.007968174,0.0006778464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008870584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003174733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004727144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002931214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835727,0.0102229,0.0004040525,0.001539983,0.00347588,0.0007845468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803284,0.01322044,0.0008556142,0.002121862,0.002852246,0.0006215501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001660957,0.000004380389,0.0000182879,0.000004620616,0.000001439126,0.00000863804,0.0004594568,0.00007069685,0.00001581595,0.9981748,0.0005887577,0.0006513206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005970102,0.000004923036,0.00006729388,0.00002329712,0.000003232072,0.00001365998,0.0001910423,0.0004584753,0.00006546768,0.984139,0.01502259,0.000005076598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04453718,0.006268376,0.08159643,0.1152144,0.001067263,0.00005218359,0.00007032176,0.0001627202,0.7510312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760029,0.0007306441,0.003727253,0.003322138,0.000756027,0.00005830558,0.00001919603,0.00006736952,0.01531622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01055343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06436092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497418157","doi":"10.1111/raju.12068","title":"Political Equality by Precedent","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Constructive; Politics; Law and economics; Begging; Sociology; Inequality; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Hilliard Aronovitch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.14551455825995,"gpt":0.4144367432656803,"spread":0.2689221850057303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008799668,0.0003665209,0.000808528,0.001811749,0.005508219,0.007027407,0.001416394,0.006393832,0.01147918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01772888,0.000420581,0.0007569354,0.0009973291,0.03261989,0.007444905,0.004236958,0.009217126,0.001648983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00597736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004377136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886974,0.005750196,0.0003712402,0.00156496,0.002592399,0.001023845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889582,0.007081775,0.0005404894,0.001291485,0.001756672,0.000371249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.31167e-7,0.000001080986,0.00001081963,0.000004329977,6.910965e-7,0.000006337024,0.00006495446,0.00002840006,0.000008615879,0.9991704,0.0003306187,0.0003729154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000578087,0.000004578709,0.00005402619,0.00004044141,0.000002689908,0.00001589833,0.0000806048,0.0002178394,0.0000717457,0.9796569,0.01984593,0.000003605903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327321,0.003703409,0.04147782,0.05754006,0.001083308,0.000078063,0.000101245,0.00004880997,0.8826941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280038,0.00177815,0.009483592,0.008347088,0.001243634,0.0001944028,0.0001037537,0.00006732249,0.05077823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01147918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0465377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018743301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00355.x","title":"Rhetoric, Harm, and the Personification of Progress in Mill's <i>On Liberty</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Rhetoric; Mill; Law; Harm principle; Harm; Political science; Rhetorical question; Scrutiny; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Brian Donohue","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01627014826883257,"gpt":0.3215788633194586,"spread":0.305308715050626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007536384,0.0003768004,0.0003814051,0.001893473,0.008892141,0.0118811,0.000820878,0.003526397,0.002951089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002373,0.0003192243,0.0002749851,0.001208257,0.03463386,0.004603964,0.003746453,0.006376887,0.0002577576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009939796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003235344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007566083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01030568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931327,0.004641367,0.0001267356,0.0003670421,0.001335754,0.0003964248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870492,0.01097359,0.0006175322,0.0003228751,0.0007712232,0.0002656762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006341871,0.000005416353,0.00007954128,0.00001226609,0.000001623512,0.00002161471,0.006774966,0.00004006378,0.00004169054,0.9882755,0.002918762,0.001822346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002721341,0.00003667241,0.0007471013,0.0003198849,0.00002376289,0.00007133575,0.009449768,0.0008797654,0.0009577005,0.7275676,0.2598924,0.00002683482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05654452,0.007937073,0.01356151,0.1130138,0.0015419,0.00004089537,0.00003678596,0.00004773586,0.8072759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753153,0.001148488,0.00116481,0.005715435,0.0005562945,0.00003099845,0.000006287947,0.00003799788,0.01602432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07211858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398482181","doi":"10.1111/raju.12130","title":"The Ambiguity of Force","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ambiguity; Positivism; Closeness; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Empiricism; Legal positivism; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Mathematics; Legal research; Linguistics; Medicine; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05128283336193885,"gpt":0.2523430092640382,"spread":0.2010601759020994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007122895,0.0006814792,0.0008080574,0.003372007,0.005829945,0.009972684,0.001574038,0.004914741,0.009888479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01479431,0.0004855905,0.0006075494,0.001250879,0.05328722,0.01248918,0.00647106,0.005216292,0.001678096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004947481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00275966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002644703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001872738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926807,0.003659789,0.0003310706,0.001043163,0.001715506,0.0005696482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924062,0.004710987,0.000417115,0.001298886,0.0009319739,0.0002348139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002383415,0.000001285153,0.000027464,0.000005128247,9.496098e-7,0.00001498627,0.0006353502,0.00004482496,0.00002096568,0.9975859,0.0005229209,0.001137881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006592425,0.000006230628,0.00007340196,0.00008445646,0.000003229113,0.00005301289,0.0006584955,0.0002083251,0.00009136258,0.9588325,0.03997662,0.000005673559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01786657,0.005481529,0.05451883,0.03350298,0.0009857651,0.00004150717,0.0001000738,0.0001066148,0.8873962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574303,0.001603156,0.005638211,0.00307193,0.0006860678,0.00009063556,0.00004865912,0.0001077008,0.03132332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009972684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0376699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121890113","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00208","title":"Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin’s <i>Freedom’s Law</i> and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Democracy; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Brian Donohue","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02104602275551616,"gpt":0.2454582728427759,"spread":0.2244122500872597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002975124,0.0001838999,0.000302181,0.002254636,0.00636516,0.006595565,0.0006591863,0.00200896,0.001818108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004532337,0.0001658375,0.0002051729,0.001285484,0.02735182,0.0060279,0.002911755,0.002919012,0.0001419961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006352777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003004753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01830351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973989,0.001008196,0.00005752354,0.0003530649,0.0006713492,0.0005110478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982945,0.001039461,0.0001419156,0.0001733129,0.0001781534,0.0001726023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003060477,0.000004367623,0.0001119776,0.000001973221,4.925648e-7,0.00001391147,0.0008388439,0.0000428162,0.00004312642,0.9967113,0.0003926571,0.00183549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001114689,0.000007032782,0.0005835165,0.00001682985,0.000001694096,0.00002902568,0.001505945,0.0003253673,0.00009601776,0.9842384,0.0131801,0.000004953468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2209492,0.005872582,0.01762997,0.06509696,0.0001515156,0.00003080118,0.00003844361,0.00003403684,0.6901964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946951,0.0005458716,0.0009849317,0.0008519119,0.00005934386,0.00001075887,0.000005950063,0.000005112114,0.002841074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01972614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04609287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598197424","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00520.x","title":"Dworkin and Phenomenology of the “Pre‐Legal”?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dean Goorden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01347234198795746,"gpt":0.2763746933080931,"spread":0.2629023513201356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004102441,0.0002933524,0.0003220267,0.001631415,0.006217655,0.007279123,0.0009860815,0.002267967,0.004016421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005832825,0.0002350861,0.0002478579,0.00135424,0.05861919,0.01383861,0.003791864,0.003772088,0.0002593783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009529648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003564905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00742243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00440099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962052,0.002949222,0.00007793379,0.0002618869,0.0003175827,0.0001883337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967642,0.002271509,0.0002459769,0.0002675377,0.0002192276,0.0002315409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008102358,0.00001476335,0.0001190679,0.00002928004,8.771258e-7,0.00006006384,0.02254531,0.00004725061,0.00006748041,0.9742783,0.001332437,0.001497061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001522304,0.00001242362,0.0003394531,0.0002109166,0.000001800828,0.0001292695,0.05274126,0.0002661536,0.0001041044,0.8675539,0.07861271,0.00001278922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.16225,0.03166785,0.02392098,0.211096,0.001238594,0.0001930466,0.0001480163,0.0000867357,0.5693988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982964,0.003618927,0.001977903,0.003646197,0.0001627389,0.00008965834,0.00002194988,0.00002056504,0.007498069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009529648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06914276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292307678","doi":"10.1111/raju.12359","title":"Raz and the Rule of (Authoritative) Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Work (physics); Position (finance); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Hillary Nye","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0185747673194405,"gpt":0.2898663340958504,"spread":0.2712915667764099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009574382,0.0002484434,0.0006719964,0.002541474,0.003694583,0.007497942,0.001410193,0.002941565,0.004601501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0232112,0.0002988452,0.0005819269,0.001673309,0.02867591,0.006849384,0.003212637,0.00458113,0.0009548836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00307887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002698425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003375485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002656894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878206,0.005546216,0.0006989351,0.001321155,0.003751364,0.0008617694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778906,0.01215693,0.002391166,0.002829491,0.004001727,0.0007301677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003014766,0.000002092889,0.00005114114,0.000005773176,0.000001016443,0.000008009371,0.0002679712,0.00005069455,0.00002460497,0.9985384,0.0003773329,0.0006699972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009960876,0.000009868282,0.0001911464,0.00002427485,0.000004469794,0.00003320723,0.0001823277,0.0003035364,0.00009946594,0.9820642,0.01707041,0.000007170555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07307842,0.004975905,0.07403176,0.04867417,0.0006515697,0.00006826552,0.0002091456,0.0002126446,0.7980981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850758,0.0006195355,0.003913531,0.001343269,0.0004447926,0.00002492393,0.00002977598,0.00003222703,0.008516168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009574382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0506348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586613920","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00203","title":"Placing Indigenous Rights to Self‐Determination in an Ecological Context","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Context (archaeology); Traditional knowledge; Environmental ethics; Land rights; Political science; Land management; Resource management (computing); Geography; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Human rights; Land use; Environmental planning; Sociology; Ecology; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Barbara Ann Hocking","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04571723775842801,"gpt":0.3608290816082336,"spread":0.3151118438498056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00511878,0.0002060385,0.0003327667,0.001027518,0.01087462,0.007397448,0.0009268338,0.003012703,0.003855159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00504569,0.0002425467,0.0002029047,0.0007228495,0.08526388,0.00432819,0.008259235,0.00378182,0.0001889323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007090531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007919488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02103242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03758379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942643,0.003202492,0.000105098,0.0003909111,0.000832353,0.001204702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953011,0.002663801,0.0004055162,0.0003566711,0.0004541549,0.0008187064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003337981,0.0000110427,0.0005241913,0.00002560219,0.000002448785,0.0002208802,0.06067926,0.00006467987,0.0000869927,0.9333224,0.0007690453,0.004290231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001264952,0.00005739812,0.005386817,0.0003762674,0.00001285286,0.0003647747,0.1071215,0.0002395681,0.0002452937,0.5798374,0.3063183,0.00002727569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1217953,0.008211437,0.005110857,0.0642764,0.0005881038,0.0000266561,0.00001060777,0.00001631188,0.7999642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773312,0.001517462,0.0007383669,0.003264331,0.0002823915,0.00002143581,0.000002966912,0.00000731732,0.01683444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02103242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0514456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006231667","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00385.x","title":"Of Mice and Men: God and the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Religion, Ecology, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Supreme court; Law; Philosophy; Begging; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Glouberman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0257359241189442,"gpt":0.2832427134253849,"spread":0.2575067893064407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009499087,0.0004951006,0.0007792342,0.00126904,0.04593855,0.01226884,0.002479868,0.01565708,0.009989803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01206452,0.0006178372,0.0005679173,0.00192073,0.02911019,0.003703185,0.004046457,0.01532989,0.0006696555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08831866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1057822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893711,0.001429754,0.0001797223,0.001267107,0.00406875,0.003683625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935282,0.002474708,0.0002415744,0.0002885878,0.002099278,0.001367562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000223432,0.000009285331,0.0006075394,0.00001790447,0.000009413734,0.0001771946,0.004038029,0.00006083331,0.0001535249,0.931944,0.05927124,0.003688658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009575627,0.00002345286,0.005153294,0.0004214954,0.0000804687,0.0001807802,0.008066801,0.0005198325,0.0005224633,0.1380734,0.8466798,0.0001824955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03766781,0.01679507,0.001137215,0.3614259,0.001768868,0.00006258681,0.0004671617,0.00004291478,0.5806326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.731123,0.006622386,0.000854086,0.153635,0.0008472819,0.00006889387,0.0001521051,0.0000641408,0.1066331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6407998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027537097","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00224","title":"Delegation as a Source of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; Okanagan College; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Mediation; Arbitration; Ambivalence; Character (mathematics); Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Dale Dewhurst","is_ca":true},{"name":"David Hampton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roger A. Shiner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01319619880094725,"gpt":0.2247405094246471,"spread":0.2115443106236999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01739167,0.0003706335,0.0008717332,0.002649998,0.004997182,0.01743967,0.003035906,0.006088146,0.006760469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03619805,0.0006225526,0.001322433,0.001833112,0.04071558,0.01565232,0.01192058,0.008708864,0.001068986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005522732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001345464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006699922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9744002,0.009985456,0.001336436,0.003568804,0.007863238,0.002845864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652148,0.01717525,0.003774277,0.01012781,0.002779535,0.0009282232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002222204,0.000005297311,0.0001447394,0.00001201053,0.000004721904,0.00005134529,0.000940551,0.00009059045,0.00006839933,0.9965732,0.0001957788,0.001911015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001791907,0.00002215611,0.0005694063,0.0001707787,0.00001842824,0.000235237,0.001297494,0.00108164,0.0006350182,0.9683967,0.0275326,0.00002254661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09923255,0.002453178,0.1829811,0.02395108,0.0004046865,0.0001992268,0.00009685236,0.000364904,0.6903164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813886,0.0005249571,0.006822686,0.001159876,0.0002230561,0.0001335494,0.00003044107,0.00006844795,0.009648497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01743967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409537311","doi":"10.1111/raju.12405","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Universität Mannheim; University of Toronto; Università di Bologna; Victoria University; Washington University in St. Louis; University of New South Wales; Victoria University of Wellington; Yale University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Miami; Università degli Studi di Milano","keywords":"Philosophy; Computer science; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01399531665492111,"gpt":0.2633569917400271,"spread":0.249361675085106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001394574,0.0006822772,0.001256855,0.00223552,0.001764038,0.005316803,0.002253129,0.004351857,0.9052777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01428201,0.0004441495,0.0007896413,0.0018129,0.0005029109,0.00320169,0.002517662,0.002743436,0.7147018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001218384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002597505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001467075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003435641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984698,0.0002246,0.000146834,0.0003211556,0.00069831,0.0001391923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953722,0.001511562,0.0002200605,0.0005589197,0.001657674,0.0006795448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002043275,0.00001348626,0.00005475691,0.0002127384,0.000002008073,0.00004183207,0.0000175883,0.00002348984,0.00004454988,0.002390506,0.9698785,0.02730011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001175475,0.000005753997,0.00008922684,0.0001049768,0.000001424282,0.00003239305,0.00002319626,0.00003428345,0.00003925822,0.001268339,0.9983866,0.000002712325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002600324,0.00103226,0.001033587,0.01273256,0.01446138,0.0007899143,0.03186876,0.0009966026,0.936825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002981141,0.001124172,0.0007992081,0.01004287,0.00300036,0.0004487088,0.01150107,0.0005810626,0.9695213],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09472233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}