{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":59,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":59,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"25d0cca1d330","filters":{"venue":"Reference Services Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1971203752","doi":"10.1108/00907321011044990","title":"The mobile university: from the library to the campus","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobile device; Originality; Mobile business development; Mobile technology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Academic library; Library science; Multimedia; Mobile Web; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00839920895512247,"gpt":0.2378703472914999,"spread":0.2294711383363775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000421482,0.0001164234,0.0001218583,0.00001231767,0.0005252063,0.0003115875,0.004486915,0.0000423437,0.0001635475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000324495,0.00005173354,0.00004983842,0.0006097702,0.00004087498,0.0004304998,0.0006686185,0.0004321777,0.0009898366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001184795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001214829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002750348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000559517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998806,0.0003091354,0.0001534671,0.0003007695,0.0002318324,0.0001988103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973699,0.0006188226,0.0001421424,0.001731849,0.00006293923,0.0000743584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002303355,0.00002475388,0.001341729,0.0001897797,0.00002168095,0.000001883552,0.001871261,0.00002713214,0.00004706301,0.02442705,0.02265616,0.9493892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001936355,0.00001434401,0.005481586,0.0003514289,0.00001327472,0.000002757573,0.0001608244,0.0004130008,0.00001170163,0.0004679101,0.9929858,0.00007803727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1787198,0.2575988,0.003944417,0.4854244,0.008448756,0.00785915,0.000063981,0.001259894,0.05668079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4679295,0.3841724,0.01787256,0.1118713,0.00205072,0.0005354246,0.0001303778,0.00009235492,0.01534539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582617615","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2014-0052","title":"Situating information literacy in the disciplines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Discipline; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Literacy; Critical literacy; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05967301209942835,"gpt":0.3852315745808768,"spread":0.3255585624814485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202784,0.00007714209,0.0001261178,0.00006271598,0.0002001902,0.0004261899,0.0007023022,0.00003290177,0.0001125837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001497776,0.0000455692,0.00002829515,0.0009752577,0.00004321384,0.02667497,0.00005644761,0.0001095489,0.0006075529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002668062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001659391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006614274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001098738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985468,0.0002284741,0.0004204608,0.00007614039,0.000526386,0.0002017329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992713,0.00007303734,0.0001943018,0.000202338,0.0001769777,0.00008204419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005667328,0.00003869346,0.009095485,0.002289672,0.000003405996,0.000001326646,0.3744608,0.00001905439,6.103352e-7,0.1257083,0.003879758,0.4844972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006658902,0.00001193418,0.002803195,0.001128512,0.000003263421,9.621209e-7,0.0119142,0.0002410234,3.858367e-7,0.00154025,0.9822087,0.00008095981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099008,0.03347456,0.00009390002,0.0788416,0.0006028363,0.002192622,0.00002108214,0.0002075299,0.7746651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.810243,0.05784653,0.001364282,0.1290502,0.0003088996,0.0001462542,0.0003386162,0.000006690003,0.0006955113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150851841","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774300","title":"From paper to electronic, the evolution of pathfinders: a review of the literature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Psychology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0464699099909326,"gpt":0.3946334016620571,"spread":0.3481634916711245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279021,0.0004130611,0.001731221,0.00007458967,0.00005151049,0.00001550517,0.001625643,0.0003098486,0.001273716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008232486,0.0001994235,0.0006942778,0.001788426,0.00005150787,0.00007333583,0.0001262979,0.0007054724,0.0002693911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004841608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004248975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001066196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962308,0.0009465883,0.001489596,0.000539957,0.000465408,0.0003276861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953862,0.0003475589,0.001704475,0.002023808,0.0004733205,0.00006463235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001787455,0.00005258574,0.000002137119,0.3319338,0.000123657,1.366726e-7,0.0003542226,1.065829e-8,3.202021e-7,0.007299103,0.002356584,0.6578757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001706708,0.00001746514,0.00009927454,0.4247131,0.0007476249,0.000006222452,0.00006779149,2.011986e-8,6.340581e-8,0.0002007107,0.5740229,0.0001077526],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002002241,0.9917027,0.000007952869,0.001542836,0.0003325123,0.00265309,0.0002161198,0.00001133862,0.00353143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001460707,0.9933826,0.00003638265,0.004702485,0.0002168057,0.0004008154,0.0004829404,0.00003299902,0.0007303209],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.657768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009092618","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920397","title":"Investigating the efficacy of embedment: experiments in information literacy integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Information literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Library science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0505696941402474,"gpt":0.3512319207413276,"spread":0.3006622266010802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562283,0.00008439893,0.0001622559,0.00008016487,0.0002610295,0.00007852288,0.0004670048,0.00003754226,0.0002084703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001390892,0.00005486841,0.0000387825,0.0008849345,0.0001246323,0.0149504,0.00004769353,0.0001094835,0.0001154885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003305812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001461777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001018691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002507305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985148,0.0001849302,0.0006255121,0.00008129061,0.0004302153,0.0001632813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991305,0.00008809481,0.0003809406,0.0001967669,0.0001467468,0.00005692953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007729505,0.0001049936,0.02457007,0.002520731,0.00001082248,6.529588e-7,0.5124366,0.00002989229,0.0001013838,0.07518473,0.0008609091,0.3841715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005368926,0.00006841838,0.1055067,0.01133551,0.00001380897,0.00000324234,0.009539404,0.001108314,0.0004573167,0.0008307961,0.8702541,0.0003454483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897023,0.01538251,0.00004890171,0.004910412,0.0002420744,0.001595621,0.00001027959,0.00007852993,0.0880294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516097,0.03794868,0.0004618711,0.00970077,0.00003029306,0.00004119,0.00008814565,0.00000258164,0.0001167735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8693932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486968116","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2015-0047","title":"Learning from faculty voices on information literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Pedagogy; Digital literacy; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Originality; Qualitative research; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03436764857811462,"gpt":0.3346687161987958,"spread":0.3003010676206812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004822421,0.0001258913,0.000188959,0.00006931849,0.0003817563,0.0003361104,0.0005639821,0.00006466464,0.002540777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001383332,0.00007312031,0.00005840903,0.000414673,0.00005599953,0.02978426,0.00005529259,0.0001136204,0.006628446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004262075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009344423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000777833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002160888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984311,0.0001778187,0.0004306636,0.0001521511,0.0005455682,0.0002626825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.0001488656,0.0003378014,0.0002114663,0.0001936907,0.0001420606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000615523,0.0000111408,0.002566587,0.0004326788,0.000006846667,3.026214e-7,0.01098698,0.000001410099,0.000008776446,0.01619308,0.001128256,0.9686578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000944588,0.0000357429,0.004442747,0.003836287,0.000006077049,1.412944e-7,0.0006231887,0.00002255078,0.00001801865,0.0005104305,0.9902762,0.0001341833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2557991,0.0142705,0.0002524386,0.05935381,0.001031822,0.001822302,0.0002863865,0.001006019,0.6661776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6948828,0.2238583,0.0007450515,0.07228892,0.0003747135,0.00008185103,0.0008935173,0.000013454,0.006861459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020250223","doi":"10.1108/00907320210428697","title":"From the front line: information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Front line; Library science; Academic library; Literacy; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Higher education; Front (military); Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02936049768988975,"gpt":0.293652376689537,"spread":0.2642918789996472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004991316,0.0001107329,0.0001625406,0.0001058058,0.0003848573,0.0004412226,0.0007863885,0.000111157,0.003491363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001025216,0.00007639593,0.00003623936,0.0007419394,0.00007855349,0.03721471,0.00004566617,0.0003068765,0.001690163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009090924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002435436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3536826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05745482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.0001722374,0.0005343886,0.0001196503,0.0003449924,0.0003456887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00008025057,0.0002137373,0.0002375919,0.00008664206,0.0001970194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003019747,0.000007804008,0.01736031,0.0005436161,0.000006275034,7.670284e-7,0.1110334,0.0000077265,4.816447e-7,0.03094298,0.009244088,0.8308495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006981225,0.000006129295,0.008381722,0.001325285,0.000004615683,5.006439e-7,0.001690678,0.0007045321,0.000001257576,0.001166583,0.9865443,0.0001045737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2222959,0.2183256,0.00002173059,0.1951662,0.00198746,0.002980289,0.0003172704,0.0003501737,0.3585553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.437143,0.4420832,0.0004549122,0.1181176,0.0005179622,0.00008047104,0.0005262615,0.000008578675,0.001068061],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032564839","doi":"10.1108/00907320210451367","title":"Problem‐based learning: evolving strategies and conversations for library instruction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Library science; Information literacy; Multimedia; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05768089413799968,"gpt":0.3252910419064912,"spread":0.2676101477684915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002337889,0.00006991447,0.000120441,0.00003047334,0.0004117277,0.00023434,0.0001121702,0.00004686598,0.00151556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004838493,0.00006348451,0.00002387128,0.0002023774,0.00006135558,0.0007586409,0.00001418905,0.00008952829,0.00003509949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002120193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001261533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006112384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005646724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992754,0.000111975,0.000168857,0.0001530818,0.0001451329,0.0001455257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995908,0.00009778119,0.00006874806,0.00006537027,0.00009648542,0.0000808268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004014614,0.0001206545,0.005919143,0.01826763,0.00002977755,5.721312e-7,0.01898042,0.000008520501,0.0000140448,0.6403923,0.002985841,0.3132771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169803,0.00002255395,0.0007490836,0.002125384,0.00002582651,3.955443e-7,0.004506502,0.0003020632,0.000004285645,0.009858781,0.9821586,0.0001295442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03295257,0.2540974,0.001913478,0.162778,0.0009166056,0.005399784,0.00001964986,0.001466891,0.5404556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8062453,0.1622761,0.02248099,0.005735125,0.000130542,0.0002367909,0.00007941099,0.0000184647,0.002797293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992171206","doi":"10.1108/00907321111108169","title":"The librarian's role in combating plagiarism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Tracking (education); Value (mathematics); Plagiarism detection; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Work (physics); Medical education; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04872931401283874,"gpt":0.3035127650852845,"spread":0.2547834510724457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002857104,0.0001229348,0.0002370884,0.00002884052,0.0005287798,0.00006757167,0.001007329,0.0004211078,0.0006465964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001847612,0.00008238789,0.00005168448,0.0004119883,0.000120838,0.0004451736,0.0001016064,0.001360832,0.0003439903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003752997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001473914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009701913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998004,0.0006767223,0.0003788626,0.0002071824,0.0003337321,0.0003995369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990761,0.0003185979,0.0001874789,0.0002450155,0.00007604148,0.00009671119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001446028,0.00005537273,0.009764925,0.001294382,0.00002391307,0.000009697793,0.0427217,2.0225e-7,0.00001081678,0.6332561,0.001696022,0.3111523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000697335,0.00001426196,0.003373954,0.003416531,0.000019295,0.000001412981,0.006902317,0.000041839,0.00001637289,0.02603491,0.9599286,0.000180762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006800171,0.1535184,0.00001097993,0.00482305,0.0002336459,0.0005843585,0.000005234295,0.00009518748,0.8339289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3563019,0.6334013,0.00064564,0.007204509,0.0002089241,0.00007336009,0.00001603148,0.00001777505,0.002130503],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029827368","doi":"10.1108/00907320610716486","title":"The benefits of buy‐in: integrating information literacy into each year of an academic program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Bachelor; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Library instruction; Medical education; Library science; The arts; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01641634458610779,"gpt":0.3428869113149481,"spread":0.3264705667288403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224572,0.00008508041,0.0001932993,0.00007675996,0.0001662393,0.0001131519,0.0006858581,0.00006925385,0.00004450896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006993456,0.00005473689,0.00004089034,0.0009126621,0.0001023837,0.01473552,0.00004992567,0.0001658159,0.00002755468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002143208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001221751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002888883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003760573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983155,0.0001435654,0.0008492834,0.00008493002,0.0004150983,0.0001916251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988421,0.00007787859,0.0005632833,0.0002068268,0.000264124,0.00004574639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003830242,0.00002231852,0.004518723,0.001536014,0.000001537635,2.812785e-8,0.0107849,0.00001038495,0.000004763011,0.1050301,0.00004085137,0.8780466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000162144,0.0001222819,0.03285233,0.0071174,0.00001156571,5.994475e-7,0.006279286,0.000920162,0.00009798395,0.003790356,0.9484527,0.0001931892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8839622,0.039067,0.000009507258,0.002826957,0.0001759783,0.001811124,0.00002100539,0.0001024471,0.07202382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9195361,0.07546317,0.002938992,0.001558863,0.00008426689,0.00007745646,0.0001940018,0.000005470028,0.0001416415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166721722","doi":"10.1108/00907321111108088","title":"Information is social: information literacy in context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Internship; Context (archaeology); Originality; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Information needs; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0607230360067265,"gpt":0.336814150699898,"spread":0.2760911146931714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005542164,0.0000868332,0.0001566198,0.00008499396,0.0002059224,0.0001818345,0.000353669,0.00007417789,0.001246021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002653656,0.00007547352,0.00003745868,0.0006238712,0.00005111842,0.01758475,0.00002991531,0.00009630997,0.001096854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003408554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001925168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002551475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007911384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988613,0.0001098173,0.0004429324,0.00007091479,0.0003111342,0.0002039132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.00001623381,0.0002531153,0.0001146648,0.0001452775,0.00006646867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007823293,0.00002779531,0.004599082,0.001913491,0.000003617957,4.324381e-7,0.2639681,3.143928e-8,0.000001104602,0.06970064,0.001387609,0.6583902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009066377,0.00002166829,0.01517544,0.001000314,0.000006221837,3.709927e-7,0.00893897,0.00001511633,0.00001602989,0.00163473,0.9729679,0.0001325489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1167569,0.008505614,0.00006497364,0.011608,0.000410136,0.001776448,0.00005177481,0.0002313833,0.8605948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498252,0.02730804,0.0001453562,0.02239027,0.00003737388,0.0000321863,0.0001044218,0.000002135207,0.0001550775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082816247","doi":"10.1108/00907320910982758","title":"Wikipedia: friend or foe?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Computer science; Encyclopedia; Originality; Multidisciplinary approach; Subject (documents); Scopus; Sample (material); Quality (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Data science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04320511733365887,"gpt":0.413290147315561,"spread":0.3700850299819021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004624655,0.00009287184,0.0001814413,0.00002992938,0.0002755724,0.00008950625,0.0003390287,0.00006952244,0.002434656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009068065,0.00007055834,0.00003064868,0.0007784169,0.00003280559,0.0003855961,0.00001175054,0.00009074024,0.0005312237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005701958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003663474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001953855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002252933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988728,0.0001716648,0.0002290111,0.0001916365,0.0003278156,0.0002070827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992413,0.00003924069,0.0001257988,0.0002312392,0.0002425433,0.0001199137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001605462,0.0001939195,0.0003423722,0.001600446,0.0000120656,0.00000406342,0.01046305,5.458882e-7,0.0000267435,0.2220952,0.02444343,0.7408022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004543084,0.00003190906,0.001146626,0.0009018731,0.00002064611,5.771894e-7,0.001648095,0.000002195398,0.000004861362,0.001647564,0.9944419,0.0001083152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009812731,0.09942973,0.00002936249,0.05599549,0.0008097827,0.001122679,0.000009969119,0.0002812288,0.832509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4025691,0.5554979,0.0009250523,0.02795737,0.0008108229,0.00006086795,0.00005325697,0.0000103626,0.01211535],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609389044","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2016-0045","title":"Teaching research skills through embedded librarianship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Originality; Grading (engineering); Library instruction; Psychology; Collaborative writing; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Collaborative learning; Medical education; Mathematics education; Engineering; Medicine; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1791282458580755,"gpt":0.4912280333265865,"spread":0.3120997874685111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00411007,0.0001320452,0.0002701089,0.00006235897,0.004402104,0.001722253,0.002885459,0.0001033954,0.001653212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005630084,0.0001027493,0.00007572716,0.0002838607,0.0003468258,0.03410908,0.0003413501,0.0005104386,0.001948011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003541673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003310628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003638575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001260576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969422,0.0007206982,0.0004076496,0.0003025696,0.0010494,0.0005775267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980174,0.0001780731,0.0003218147,0.001047041,0.0002363058,0.0001993359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002948292,0.00005478828,0.001923863,0.002372973,0.00001004581,0.000004055598,0.03561109,1.746829e-7,0.000007041039,0.7505288,0.009420395,0.2000639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006201075,0.00001814508,0.002324521,0.003176862,0.000005393943,7.430381e-7,0.00219868,0.00001142918,0.00001021611,0.0118843,0.9801635,0.0001442699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004991188,0.01065754,0.000008827637,0.03666991,0.0002654399,0.0005675362,0.000008773382,0.000110311,0.9467205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4599722,0.3623997,0.005506185,0.07151454,0.001440272,0.0001674635,0.0001278714,0.00004470969,0.09882708],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088614083","doi":"10.1108/00907321111135493","title":"Library support of bibliographic management tools: a review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Computer science; Originality; Library science; World Wide Web; Process (computing); Service (business); Academic library; Work (physics); Higher education; Digital library; Business; Engineering; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0870317036448305,"gpt":0.2970562575342295,"spread":0.2100245538893991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000469269,0.0007995983,0.003377913,0.001985169,0.0000802123,0.0003127963,0.004675724,0.0002074907,0.001369206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001037613,0.0005658395,0.00103031,0.01469936,0.00004889677,0.003911951,0.001954013,0.0003428113,0.001068398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001712516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003825286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003511016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.639784e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954397,0.0003332804,0.002080979,0.001029111,0.0006231044,0.0004937899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960725,0.0001265625,0.00157981,0.001869689,0.00009458045,0.0002568104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.324775e-7,0.00002841808,0.000001464129,0.4330071,0.0001077371,0.00001015802,0.000004543464,9.150541e-10,4.867803e-10,0.004319157,0.01895599,0.5435651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003261431,0.000039418,0.000003583424,0.3617339,0.0004201181,0.00002825602,5.813391e-7,1.959984e-7,1.06603e-7,0.0001654476,0.6371989,0.0003768751],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.030998e-8,0.787976,0.00003846145,0.00009584901,0.0001284365,0.001806889,0.00003043016,0.0002533815,0.2096706],"genre_scores_gemma":[2.921769e-8,0.9864819,0.003455919,0.004074141,0.00002876927,0.0004580316,0.0003604371,0.00005180724,0.00508897],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6182429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999155062","doi":"10.1108/rsr-09-2019-0064","title":"Fake or for real? A fake news workshop","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Variety (cybernetics); Institution; Value (mathematics); Digital literacy; Library instruction; Sociology; Literacy; Digital media; Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2062675239330561,"gpt":0.42557501555494,"spread":0.2193074916218838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004396036,0.0001409375,0.0003470228,0.00002259791,0.0002535255,0.0001386885,0.0005026714,0.00009361641,0.002237224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003903938,0.00009881738,0.00008980034,0.0005874452,0.00003351628,0.0005559376,0.00004675711,0.0001097331,0.0005792054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003465975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002613782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004580276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004515401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986106,0.0001107909,0.0004019337,0.0002001571,0.0003414716,0.0003350688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988965,0.0001283968,0.0002239223,0.000207848,0.0001691837,0.0003741383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007185964,0.00003477953,0.00007024778,0.01467486,0.00003526377,0.000002115956,0.04559297,0.000002289712,0.00001175086,0.02401819,0.06202528,0.8534604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001501615,0.00004114207,0.00008631763,0.001706341,0.00003174203,4.050119e-7,0.005993645,0.00007693845,0.000002753016,0.00009641078,0.9916639,0.0001502413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007268826,0.05950556,0.0008346845,0.1564909,0.0004934082,0.006262172,0.0001554216,0.0008460775,0.7681429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03076245,0.856429,0.001718333,0.1039072,0.0005319461,0.00006240737,0.0001288463,0.0000267772,0.006433054],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186959788","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2021-0014","title":"Is the library open? How the pandemic has changed the provision of virtual reference services","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Reference desk; Pandemic; Desk; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Computer science; Service (business); Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Business; Marketing; Medicine; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08322478144155697,"gpt":0.283934686088478,"spread":0.200709904646921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095597,0.0004230588,0.0006615865,0.00004169084,0.0007215008,0.001996221,0.01215605,0.0001374956,0.0004617155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000133062,0.0001824344,0.0001751859,0.001782349,0.0001428437,0.004063915,0.004969685,0.0005894583,0.0001516656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001147695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004195608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002807347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000532348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961309,0.001119229,0.0006353747,0.0008605539,0.0007695186,0.0004844052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952096,0.0005138412,0.000725179,0.003197219,0.000233622,0.0001204837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001017622,0.0006214248,0.009771012,0.04154311,0.0006819133,0.0000614002,0.02747471,0.00001569649,0.002244179,0.1670736,0.0215124,0.7288988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002773759,0.0001561427,0.009240357,0.008067926,0.0001223194,0.00004908301,0.00158328,0.002198095,0.001481936,0.002878536,0.973504,0.0004409588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04010727,0.5037563,0.0001994842,0.4319391,0.0006629186,0.003904908,0.0001498727,0.0004485729,0.01883159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.580309,0.3174798,0.0009167753,0.09756477,0.0002431735,0.0002775566,0.0001582207,0.00005319422,0.002997482],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176524000","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2015-0024","title":"Digging deeper into virtual reference transcripts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Originality; World Wide Web; Service (business); Content analysis; Software; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0723355024999818,"gpt":0.3513574866400497,"spread":0.279021984140068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001183004,0.000176666,0.0003046613,0.00007859743,0.0003879245,0.0002754903,0.001009557,0.00009524976,0.0008000917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000840153,0.0001397577,0.00006444438,0.0008060677,0.0001390072,0.01179633,0.00007709912,0.0001982407,0.001625927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007408374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004360834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001586966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002916762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977406,0.000249574,0.0004980741,0.0002866462,0.0008075428,0.0004175394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986786,0.00004544224,0.0001858593,0.0003533123,0.0002917231,0.0004450705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001992346,0.00008416094,0.002315802,0.002743275,0.00002362984,0.000006685219,0.07712199,0.0000101805,0.00004858414,0.4766547,0.007515478,0.4334556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009149841,0.00004667138,0.0002710902,0.001478625,0.00001344538,0.000001378953,0.004165307,0.00003447916,0.00001279425,0.001896912,0.9917764,0.0002114178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07083359,0.1116162,0.0002645228,0.02352177,0.00119817,0.001518345,0.00002768598,0.0007179854,0.7903017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7191653,0.2005434,0.00194633,0.0711785,0.0003448039,0.0001013988,0.0002197995,0.00002796259,0.006472556],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045313458","doi":"10.1108/00907321111161458","title":"Information literacy instruction for satellite university students","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Originality; Distance education; Value (mathematics); Instructional design; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Literacy; Mathematics education; Library science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Multimedia; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03947776816642038,"gpt":0.3159995709006682,"spread":0.2765218027342478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004999698,0.00008229291,0.0001325732,0.00008483719,0.0003499167,0.000143784,0.0006007075,0.00005232327,0.0004625422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002022623,0.00007335178,0.00005369417,0.0004956829,0.00004820749,0.02793868,0.00005269936,0.00005851586,0.0003836968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004235586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008751996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003999875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002285691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.00008084427,0.0002829561,0.00008679849,0.000308716,0.0001919254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999208,0.00002112769,0.0002379267,0.0001624376,0.0002663201,0.0001041283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002990586,0.00003647638,0.01232114,0.002983128,0.00001409318,2.771272e-7,0.0528951,1.427535e-7,8.689477e-7,0.1276377,0.0003089555,0.8037722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001427266,0.00002615971,0.01191084,0.0006789733,0.00001296235,4.368273e-7,0.00287875,0.000007820485,0.000004910304,0.0004812521,0.9837575,0.00009766174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2853258,0.01492017,0.0008750058,0.003148627,0.00164906,0.005281606,0.0001609208,0.0006621541,0.6879767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3838999,0.5712704,0.009257389,0.02961245,0.0002116347,0.00005089428,0.0007794951,0.00001502357,0.004902759],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030269731","doi":"10.1108/00907320410519405","title":"Health professional education, evidence‐based health care, and health sciences librarians","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Medical education; Health care; Process (computing); Psychology; Health professionals; MEDLINE; Nursing; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3314651731453244,"gpt":0.5719132116442873,"spread":0.2404480384989629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006836745,0.0003125691,0.0008616104,0.0003041755,0.004315788,0.00007488708,0.0008162062,0.0001233073,0.0003305216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001810123,0.0002328706,0.00006110114,0.001835084,0.0002363563,0.001213318,0.0001868451,0.000882252,0.0003456519],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00127367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09716613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02109607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005179279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927708,0.002043845,0.001544456,0.000918074,0.001085554,0.001637276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957479,0.0003912565,0.001146697,0.0005923817,0.0004930371,0.001628772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002829559,0.0004694104,0.02938577,0.3053001,0.0000122139,6.230759e-7,0.01693854,0.00001314435,0.000002799686,0.0194532,0.08833752,0.5400584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006963022,0.001999459,0.09939499,0.3075051,0.000009932181,0.000009370679,0.01514323,0.00005033966,0.000002032133,0.001778897,0.5728782,0.000532113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004096394,0.5978035,0.00007988537,0.3911527,0.001081796,0.00392691,0.00003430944,0.0001232245,0.001701255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05454747,0.5863053,0.008898197,0.3482478,0.0004645131,0.0008354724,0.0002818261,0.00002959113,0.0003898143],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5395263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899412640","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2018-0060","title":"Let’s chat: the art of virtual reference instruction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Computer science; Originality; Digital reference; Promotion (chess); World Wide Web; Literacy; Library science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Service (business); Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03496624989219526,"gpt":0.3246308900167173,"spread":0.289664640124522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009022166,0.0001050918,0.0002041746,0.00004776484,0.0004457878,0.00009391692,0.0008640352,0.00006269842,0.002293914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005682621,0.00006523192,0.00004916198,0.000800785,0.0004283637,0.005194217,0.00008683281,0.0001255215,0.00147487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001970951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001789765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004320873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002028008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984281,0.000192392,0.0004411591,0.000169438,0.0005346245,0.0002342711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998832,0.00005183662,0.0003458899,0.0003695708,0.0003161035,0.0000845547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120103,0.00003096383,0.0009038438,0.0011444,0.00001538115,2.684762e-7,0.01299201,5.843053e-7,0.00005550158,0.5198806,0.00593127,0.4590332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005210976,0.0000672465,0.00175118,0.001084166,0.00001004726,0.000001243808,0.001496772,0.00002424405,0.00006348802,0.0005944904,0.994765,0.00008999443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09874788,0.01223214,0.00005464863,0.01971986,0.001036383,0.001120314,0.00003500296,0.0001690476,0.8668847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.818927,0.1485627,0.0003205604,0.02554417,0.0004596388,0.00003850188,0.00007030879,0.000009795936,0.00606729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087852461","doi":"10.1108/00907320810873020","title":"Creating and evaluating a subject‐based blog: planning, implementation, and assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"RSS; Subject (documents); Originality; World Wide Web; Computer science; Tracking (education); Service (business); Value (mathematics); The Internet; Sociology; Marketing; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0816940200753422,"gpt":0.3947020829009506,"spread":0.3130080628256084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000486264,0.0001873755,0.0003061031,0.00006014947,0.0003253077,0.0001558348,0.0004483467,0.00003622359,0.00007989555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004479878,0.0001535821,0.00002626073,0.0003179473,0.00002491748,0.0009388577,0.0002508122,0.0001333073,0.000006956206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001283444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001689745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002214111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003906885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984139,0.0002000857,0.0003748402,0.0004559484,0.0003107647,0.0002444571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999068,0.0001343046,0.0002474319,0.0003494819,0.00008311366,0.000117622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112556,0.0001349415,0.5308785,0.03151394,0.0001265501,0.0000914436,0.00604273,0.00003291082,0.0007980444,0.02841601,0.0003300465,0.4016237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00199713,0.0009176282,0.8150429,0.01569098,0.0001861787,0.0002972028,0.001165553,0.1041873,0.0004244156,0.001819121,0.05686583,0.001405743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8212792,0.160329,0.001630321,0.002161622,0.00007328867,0.0008920089,0.000009098007,0.0002689614,0.01335651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.852938,0.04382686,0.09344503,0.009461763,0.00006224096,0.0001056847,0.00007031702,0.00001927777,0.00007084839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4002179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6262897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045424941","doi":"10.1108/rsr-08-2014-0037","title":"Sustainable decision making for emerging educational technologies in libraries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Dilemma; Relevance (law); Emerging technologies; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Originality; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03393920987175919,"gpt":0.3130381733872881,"spread":0.2790989635155289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004438582,0.0001646678,0.0002940857,0.0001843644,0.00009083801,0.0002955568,0.001815408,0.00007352931,0.00002219197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008526297,0.0001335309,0.00004489942,0.001041894,0.0000181498,0.003334972,0.0006618734,0.0001151582,0.00004164965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003971384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003000493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004614985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004726618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985752,0.00004750048,0.0003653079,0.0004074618,0.0002370446,0.0003675422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988511,0.0002055424,0.0001596174,0.0005625798,0.0001673569,0.00005378768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332295,0.0000647958,0.003775363,0.009780292,0.000009294319,0.000006833891,0.000811051,0.00003851118,0.000003126978,0.7101752,0.002333065,0.2729892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002775494,0.00007840719,0.001740329,0.009525295,0.00001121913,0.00001069786,0.002265198,0.005298235,0.00004661622,0.4249632,0.5553947,0.0003885797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01809718,0.888683,0.02053898,0.0479676,0.0006035161,0.002532989,0.000009447519,0.001170707,0.02039662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5440186,0.05463234,0.3908043,0.007764681,0.0001718664,0.0008186499,0.00008851704,0.00005059436,0.001650417],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8340507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607703561","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2016-0038","title":"International students and information literacy: a systematic review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Library science; Library instruction; Value (mathematics); Medical education; Literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social science; Medicine; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08004072114768998,"gpt":0.4528256406876353,"spread":0.3727849195399453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002693485,0.0004179602,0.002562442,0.0002183235,0.0005679185,0.00200403,0.003442356,0.0001991935,0.0005887109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005074913,0.0002876837,0.0003241511,0.0004415755,0.0001120289,0.03626329,0.0004661824,0.0003362356,0.001812547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001082148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004047405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001007003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003898603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995425,0.0005982792,0.002004917,0.0003060618,0.001325343,0.0003403843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953505,0.0001381449,0.00297269,0.0008845111,0.0004039818,0.0002501542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.335809e-7,0.000004813243,0.000001183563,0.6411141,0.00003274608,5.628392e-7,0.0003102993,6.058181e-10,6.948109e-11,0.001340236,0.0003014402,0.3568945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001955565,0.000004574273,0.000001077147,0.4891754,0.0004296944,0.000006779194,0.00002292248,5.735012e-7,3.795247e-10,0.000009723012,0.510173,0.0001566913],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[4.633269e-8,0.9542622,0.000001221429,0.0008813163,0.0003678354,0.003913363,0.00008441792,0.00006994347,0.04041965],"genre_scores_gemma":[1.735851e-7,0.9846495,0.00005995006,0.01264576,0.00008843295,0.0004574252,0.0007187132,0.00001075053,0.001369333],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5098716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219759973","doi":"10.1108/rsr-03-2015-0019","title":"The finals stretch: exams week library outreach surveyed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Staffing; Originality; Medical education; Space (punctuation); Library science; Academic library; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1222427228534676,"gpt":0.3496362686145142,"spread":0.2273935457610466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001980382,0.0001407977,0.0002346689,0.00003470757,0.0005380441,0.0006058493,0.001319862,0.00006470618,0.0008994247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001259491,0.00008423658,0.00006685617,0.0008442924,0.0001686362,0.01205612,0.0001426852,0.0001179677,0.001343975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002341769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005406929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000687409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001102144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976784,0.0006020468,0.0004675337,0.0002008762,0.0006586905,0.0003924465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986438,0.0002200679,0.0002601267,0.0004294264,0.0001329898,0.0003136533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002048732,0.00009297308,0.01164855,0.001505268,0.00002903969,0.000004841202,0.01888416,0.000001547274,0.000001382126,0.2273944,0.07202863,0.6683887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006527657,0.00003374857,0.002260058,0.0007021058,0.000007668834,7.454805e-7,0.002761078,0.00004266336,0.000003119606,0.003161646,0.9908292,0.0001326492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05537027,0.1237183,0.000004549268,0.05737923,0.0007906771,0.001209735,0.00004704632,0.0004250526,0.7610551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1705446,0.7340684,0.0008676494,0.06116239,0.0005394404,0.0001275685,0.0004298707,0.00003398588,0.03222611],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404280147","doi":"10.1108/rsr-08-2024-0042","title":"From hype to strategy: navigating the reality of experimental strategic adoption of AI technologies in libraries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07332867514545657,"gpt":0.3843678869492528,"spread":0.3110392118037962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007276612,0.00009265081,0.0002717827,0.00002438566,0.00006416706,0.0001088594,0.0004099379,0.00008354997,0.00003696174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009054454,0.00006458874,0.00004889753,0.0007098794,0.0001754519,0.0003263732,0.00008332772,0.0002293972,0.00001097542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003273849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001933324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007774632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001705003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987751,0.0002405655,0.0003606189,0.0001847135,0.0002843075,0.0001546914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.0002525091,0.00010565,0.0001717846,0.00005799461,0.00002970327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000326431,0.0001624436,0.002694862,0.01016495,0.00005769773,0.000008375946,0.04217959,0.000006496941,0.002066951,0.3902767,0.0001465012,0.5522028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001948874,0.0003656431,0.004995733,0.1294884,0.0001173561,7.429772e-7,0.5975169,0.0001250903,0.004435095,0.230315,0.0317215,0.0007236707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8237545,0.1396623,0.0000010399,0.004737789,0.0001191722,0.0004197806,0.00004393628,0.0001374536,0.03112402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815929,0.01812447,0.00007328735,0.0001065724,0.00003197199,0.000028712,0.00001856695,0.000005202803,0.00001833176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5553373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987813876","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920342","title":"Building an information literacy first‐person shooter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Information literacy; Video game; Computer science; Literacy; Multimedia; Game design; Game Developer; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Psychology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06342967326573867,"gpt":0.3724710295083506,"spread":0.3090413562426119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001823183,0.0001302357,0.0001839062,0.00006312908,0.0001174973,0.00003806732,0.0002830428,0.00007111121,0.001877141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009526058,0.0001100731,0.00004749484,0.0002409462,0.00001743835,0.001120003,0.00001583335,0.0001262931,0.001717461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003199198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002538933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002338931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001579011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990534,0.00007670753,0.0003224246,0.0001984629,0.000170407,0.0001786416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990518,0.00003409547,0.0001989892,0.0004407074,0.0001864812,0.00008793305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003037365,0.0003378894,0.01126637,0.008483215,0.00007039845,0.000004785185,0.03240103,0.000007340536,0.00005239688,0.04622505,0.006839843,0.8942813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003867,0.00004497804,0.1295428,0.001393474,0.00002415287,0.00004648047,0.0002453847,0.00006423483,0.000004462454,0.0001145118,0.8682557,0.0001634343],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412353,0.1704708,0.001133001,0.009780835,0.001269276,0.001650068,0.00005900273,0.0003507304,0.07405097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9156378,0.06318161,0.004555756,0.01411449,0.0002811387,0.0002395082,0.000740372,0.00002169222,0.001227653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600447983","doi":"10.1108/00907320810873039","title":"Incorporating information literacy into the building plan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Benchmarking; Plan (archaeology); Institution; Literacy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Pedagogy; Political science; Business; Marketing; Geography; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04652284662532909,"gpt":0.3343571530583617,"spread":0.2878343064330326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006785525,0.00008174103,0.0001210324,0.00003053414,0.001088494,0.00019854,0.0005280905,0.00003996323,0.0001243515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006009816,0.00005224951,0.00003361024,0.0005916829,0.0001111197,0.005344576,0.00005023364,0.0001144355,0.000214044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002305256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002630562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001324556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000333423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99887,0.00016484,0.0003023338,0.0001113794,0.0003849717,0.0001664901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993268,0.00007144678,0.0002413872,0.0001814752,0.0001029241,0.00007602299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008491447,0.00004226625,0.02438864,0.003691015,0.00001630054,0.00000911336,0.1518522,0.00001099763,0.0001185216,0.2412093,0.001974285,0.5766789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004287605,0.00002511828,0.003177396,0.001587798,0.000008761604,0.000005094066,0.001953064,0.0001157606,0.00003192771,0.002733188,0.9901768,0.0001422401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6914783,0.04408086,0.0002906626,0.0380617,0.0006424074,0.001937025,0.00001136941,0.0004118359,0.2230859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419754,0.04881819,0.001245502,0.007556446,0.0001381241,0.00002184698,0.00004613241,0.000002730131,0.0001956614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020336102","doi":"10.1108/00907320610716404","title":"Encouraging students' lifelong learning through graded information literacy assignments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Lifelong learning; Originality; Library instruction; Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01352969613386053,"gpt":0.335272558849813,"spread":0.3217428627159525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009121443,0.0001701255,0.0002542247,0.00008348954,0.0007529911,0.0009664157,0.000842249,0.00007021174,0.0006680646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004910849,0.0001427885,0.00007411769,0.0008470865,0.00006156477,0.04228674,0.0001159657,0.0002277068,0.001000401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007590702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001152991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002169129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002036152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973543,0.0002556039,0.0007163938,0.0001769509,0.001086154,0.0004105853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989163,0.0000648675,0.0004957392,0.0002161164,0.0002064333,0.0001005333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002070709,0.0003051354,0.2146811,0.01199178,0.00007610918,0.00000972383,0.1368709,0.000216921,0.00003639357,0.1877362,0.009052693,0.4390023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001346843,0.00001821712,0.009225306,0.002264144,0.00001504119,0.00000115595,0.001937869,0.00007479209,0.000009564363,0.001119033,0.9849945,0.0002057145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2604387,0.04739777,0.001009281,0.01319099,0.00133179,0.003266025,0.00002648615,0.001176711,0.6721623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8806313,0.08181027,0.001332614,0.03142767,0.0003205846,0.00008929714,0.000563513,0.00001386007,0.003810838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071521595","doi":"10.1108/rsr-12-2012-0082","title":"Hearing stories, not keywords: teaching contextual readers' advisory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Narrative; Originality; Cornerstone; Interview; Grounded theory; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05926129873465705,"gpt":0.3323333870352221,"spread":0.2730720883005651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028661,0.0001568485,0.0002956706,0.00006325488,0.0006986603,0.0003952922,0.0007704919,0.00007959465,0.002334072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001082095,0.0001263056,0.00006989259,0.0003618526,0.0001174412,0.01492238,0.000104736,0.0003035565,0.00175861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005745204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002385464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00900252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001125286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997998,0.0002902036,0.0004915168,0.0002480293,0.000558596,0.0004136469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989691,0.0001110519,0.0002336298,0.0003265264,0.0001302965,0.0002293614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007299951,0.00007444223,0.003735589,0.005329147,0.00003282797,0.00000221325,0.0904461,0.000002496808,0.0000590462,0.1752548,0.02679805,0.698258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006635871,0.00002162496,0.001429067,0.002129066,0.000006579693,8.901466e-7,0.01159954,0.00004900043,0.000005160667,0.0002298489,0.9842744,0.000188411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04701577,0.06350543,0.00009173415,0.03266955,0.0009910407,0.002526888,0.00002611165,0.000586253,0.8525872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8071094,0.07458344,0.001725638,0.1029816,0.000450691,0.0001566164,0.0001205272,0.0000225358,0.01284963],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205266038","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2021-0024","title":"Not a token! A discussion on racial capitalism and its impact on academic librarians and libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Sociology; Meritocracy; Context (archaeology); Tokenism; Value (mathematics); Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05094248514636049,"gpt":0.3642736036645187,"spread":0.3133311185181582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003021147,0.0001757703,0.0002861809,0.00004258341,0.0004309803,0.0003541829,0.0002604004,0.0001402054,0.0004160753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008041478,0.0001026189,0.00005128168,0.0004027697,0.00009347945,0.002692021,0.00009829351,0.0002525008,0.00006603672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001573236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004224858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006719238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001063839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983756,0.0002973471,0.0002487649,0.0004034011,0.000396059,0.0002788368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992941,0.0001145665,0.0001289203,0.0001651951,0.0000356443,0.0002615465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001967109,0.0002331669,0.006459097,0.006322768,0.00006545988,0.0001149664,0.04936426,0.000003090978,0.001881592,0.6485711,0.002848385,0.2839394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008734985,0.001128368,0.07703139,0.02641859,0.0001816635,0.00003367557,0.008539691,0.0002345551,0.003540274,0.0201287,0.860304,0.001585597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403718,0.07404584,9.292913e-7,0.06104695,0.0002107424,0.0006428761,0.00007979917,0.0001196493,0.02348135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8070543,0.1830258,0.00003205526,0.008121201,0.00018099,0.00001351348,0.00004719559,0.000008163862,0.001516769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4555733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604883256","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774292","title":"Getting everyone on the same page","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Interview; Originality; Process (computing); Medical education; Library science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Qualitative research; Medicine; Political science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03067113481765906,"gpt":0.2662815001079932,"spread":0.2356103652903342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001139414,0.0002121242,0.0002809853,0.0000493858,0.0001857415,0.0001800552,0.002419094,0.00005746511,0.000220232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001373278,0.0001228864,0.00008416428,0.0007251914,0.00001854085,0.0008368543,0.0003723883,0.0002668081,0.001019143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001617318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003368918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007199818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007112043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982128,0.0001444306,0.0003937714,0.0004230608,0.000413883,0.000412063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981761,0.0003349917,0.0002176365,0.001095312,0.00006201483,0.0001139479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622375,0.00021062,0.001709067,0.01442922,0.00009550257,0.0001003778,0.001636938,0.000006944552,0.001095455,0.4553998,0.005372602,0.5199272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529141,0.0001318322,0.02299247,0.0107396,0.00003039173,0.00002675998,0.0001242332,0.001254427,0.0008530209,0.003815972,0.9592788,0.0005995714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1046023,0.5059951,0.006417537,0.05935771,0.00119338,0.002564869,0.00001561148,0.001550535,0.318303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6116456,0.09725796,0.00817015,0.2797591,0.0004953631,0.00005494873,0.0000342342,0.00004895604,0.002533723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102349715","doi":"10.1108/00907320410569725","title":"Evolving instruction in biology: using the web to improve in‐class instruction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Information literacy; Class (philosophy); Computer science; World Wide Web; Strengths and weaknesses; Web application; Mathematics education; Face (sociological concept); Multimedia; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03060486194599998,"gpt":0.3426516212633465,"spread":0.3120467593173465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983969,0.00009773047,0.0001771486,0.0001536253,0.0002284115,0.0001192169,0.0004447959,0.00007440364,0.00009878967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006419562,0.00006869457,0.0000310794,0.001690069,0.00007128445,0.006109627,0.00007156801,0.0001729911,0.00006422456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002241611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000296031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004580714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987569,0.0001482359,0.0004216621,0.0001990776,0.0002021926,0.0002719452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994743,0.00002159483,0.0001639839,0.0001963404,0.00007675902,0.00006702919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002116023,0.00007722496,0.05408185,0.00288998,0.0000120309,0.000002563049,0.03772855,0.000771579,0.001718672,0.2391044,0.00004147556,0.6635505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407302,0.0001398886,0.04537417,0.01374879,0.00002437828,0.00001287293,0.01726091,0.002601856,0.0001892453,0.01854691,0.8998775,0.0008161942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781863,0.004208745,0.00001931542,0.006275678,0.000499887,0.0007358115,0.000004953476,0.00004093294,0.01002837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715065,0.02022623,0.0008169251,0.007291027,0.00009055087,0.00002858006,0.000009756975,0.000004332094,0.00002611584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.899836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069090196","doi":"10.1108/00907320910957198","title":"Undergraduate research in the public domain: the evaluation of non‐academic sources online","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Domain (mathematical analysis); Relation (database); Public domain; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Order (exchange); Computer science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1844319036505071,"gpt":0.4166844571124594,"spread":0.2322525534619523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008429538,0.0001591028,0.0002873288,0.0001496496,0.0001775174,0.0001714748,0.004721497,0.0000777464,0.00002084144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002561247,0.00007934236,0.00006462832,0.002678826,0.00006056393,0.001171294,0.0002688323,0.0006423343,0.00005694891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002766624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002335717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009746723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002968722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947844,0.002215048,0.0005427363,0.0003848228,0.001680025,0.0003929703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978181,0.0003236589,0.0002571043,0.001182879,0.0003617253,0.00005658532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006201642,0.00025649,0.001275939,0.003401596,0.00002371348,0.000004759119,0.003154404,0.00004016605,0.0001486187,0.2497777,0.0007085992,0.7412018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001025611,0.0005419316,0.1885455,0.0168408,0.0001085128,0.00005987305,0.002303827,0.06196591,0.0001014247,0.460288,0.2675192,0.0006994085],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2845595,0.2841434,0.0001603901,0.4180319,0.0001028711,0.001958682,0.000006130968,0.00006330539,0.01097384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205211,0.07056458,0.0004151552,0.008345583,0.00006506779,0.00003871443,0.00002217074,0.000004559883,0.00002308556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7405024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8773795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048405300","doi":"10.1108/00907320910957224","title":"The information and learning commons: a selective guide to sources","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Implementation; World Wide Web; Computer science; Originality; The Internet; Service (business); Library science; Index (typography); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0129154231229187,"gpt":0.3148011178189418,"spread":0.3018856946960231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129385,0.00007320764,0.0001152762,0.0000392947,0.00121156,0.0004751283,0.0003671717,0.00002909575,0.00003942937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000182686,0.0000462348,0.00002132989,0.0005856876,0.0000454861,0.00807549,0.00004021889,0.0001357923,0.000226933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002111143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008562047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000512091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001321282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989385,0.0001880521,0.0003034924,0.00007760194,0.000284715,0.0002076122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993541,0.0001109374,0.0001577121,0.0001127155,0.00015153,0.0001130032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000418761,0.000004300339,0.000868171,0.0002183444,0.000003751213,9.058633e-8,0.0264614,0.000006813604,0.000001773036,0.04712872,0.003497856,0.9218046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002761502,0.00004453929,0.004710834,0.0005571379,0.00000404137,6.844139e-7,0.003951687,0.00005090044,0.000002628836,0.0004091358,0.9901695,0.00007134299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06001034,0.07397702,0.0001407759,0.1303786,0.0001862452,0.00223997,0.000007623617,0.0003782257,0.7326812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3391319,0.4503666,0.001488962,0.2032076,0.0001689336,0.00008245389,0.00006155353,0.000007103411,0.005484866],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141680782","doi":"10.1108/rsr-03-2013-0016","title":"Using student questions to direct information literacy workshops","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Library instruction; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03970431801676159,"gpt":0.3850476936978899,"spread":0.3453433756811283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000543634,0.0001250152,0.0002082758,0.0001249962,0.0004473284,0.0008928821,0.000615182,0.00005238587,0.002111688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000691623,0.0001000264,0.00005224417,0.001154446,0.00003539675,0.03443988,0.0001069305,0.0001030713,0.004195826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007272624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001393959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002204063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003297836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983539,0.0001557663,0.0005226212,0.0001364826,0.000516111,0.0003151486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987862,0.00005024918,0.0002039007,0.0002822281,0.0004125102,0.0002649621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002859339,0.00007385691,0.005016074,0.0025644,0.00002215192,5.755248e-7,0.06098492,0.0001208217,0.00001839388,0.04175447,0.00638694,0.8830546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003413242,0.00001336534,0.008288856,0.002761711,0.00001033446,6.110925e-7,0.001350842,0.0002233144,0.000002132619,0.0001882973,0.9869654,0.0001610285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1696942,0.03087129,0.0008781173,0.03974406,0.001468019,0.007304442,0.00005602926,0.000838539,0.7491453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5968034,0.1373946,0.01897244,0.2405455,0.0005218451,0.0006595764,0.0003147211,0.00002760117,0.004760358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031036176","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774346","title":"Corporate governance research on the free web: a selected annotated guide","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Originality; Quality (philosophy); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics); Web 2.0; World Wide Web; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Political science; The Internet; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07097836391178541,"gpt":0.3116946073943818,"spread":0.2407162434825964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004789877,0.0003641491,0.0004469255,0.0001387662,0.0005018989,0.0003589595,0.002197266,0.00009017262,0.001086409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005341233,0.0002549636,0.0000816776,0.00438687,0.0001089551,0.0007800199,0.0008680181,0.0008419462,0.004578211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001355562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006966753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001499642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002325772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961527,0.000112169,0.00072478,0.0006932004,0.001417061,0.0009000622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860331,0.0003149817,0.01100351,0.00129606,0.001318279,0.00003410901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001408709,0.0002537222,0.01035467,0.02002514,0.0001654938,0.000179771,0.00007183864,0.00003078617,0.0007435554,0.2438778,0.3977302,0.3264262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002527392,0.00002203361,0.03955742,0.007043611,0.00004795421,0.000001756108,0.00005873003,0.0003029535,0.00003244671,0.001268246,0.9510946,0.000317476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2282655,0.04382379,0.001384779,0.02820589,0.0006170363,0.004709708,0.0000532621,0.001104372,0.6918356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8946267,0.05457588,0.000216445,0.0387366,0.001197707,0.0001681805,0.0001347954,0.0001371631,0.01020656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6816291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081547500","doi":"10.1108/00907320210451303","title":"Investigating the environment: teaching and learning with undergraduates in the sciences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Class (philosophy); Course (navigation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Process (computing); Mathematics education; Course evaluation; Higher education; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0501886532630549,"gpt":0.2882995171657948,"spread":0.2381108639027399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003020709,0.00008044072,0.0001005375,0.00002947116,0.001959041,0.0003771819,0.0005778374,0.00001894754,0.0001331222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009310281,0.00003590533,0.00001334169,0.0004220042,0.0004326706,0.003840443,0.00004828375,0.0003620492,0.0000538721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000993067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002169092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007010638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008596492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981623,0.0008611112,0.000193056,0.0001448932,0.0004271791,0.0002114409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993352,0.0003563929,0.0001425483,0.0001162476,0.000009113067,0.0000405574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.013306e-7,0.00004046439,0.06780777,0.001422395,0.00000936895,0.000001762776,0.2579717,0.0001699374,0.000007766055,0.3073559,0.0003661044,0.3648462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007308122,0.00007058046,0.007446884,0.002562929,0.00001271379,0.000005208904,0.04142457,0.00228442,8.70996e-7,0.00189881,0.9440485,0.0001714801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4006416,0.08806148,0.00001280746,0.1523795,0.0000408885,0.001088869,0.000001427219,0.00008062592,0.3576928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064292,0.06963877,0.0005906178,0.022864,0.00002629272,0.00002403452,0.000002552261,0.000002957488,0.0004216075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124274935","doi":"10.1108/00907321311301306","title":"LOEX‐of‐the‐West 2012: creative landscapes in southern California","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Library science; Dialog box; Theme (computing); Value (mathematics); Session (web analytics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01714667388032962,"gpt":0.2788882321189012,"spread":0.2617415582385716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004013891,0.0000892203,0.0002037799,0.00004124535,0.0001375179,0.00007141462,0.0006514412,0.00004885034,0.006997424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003872684,0.00005291701,0.00005477575,0.0006875185,0.00008273183,0.003674312,0.00007012858,0.0001001774,0.003039273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001808891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001224084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008095748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001765966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987921,0.0001846077,0.0003746793,0.0001196929,0.0003162392,0.0002126896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993086,0.00004501596,0.0002339141,0.0002149535,0.0001226027,0.00007486475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001376853,0.0003081167,0.3641281,0.01358434,0.00004954817,0.000001823482,0.1633411,0.00003811035,0.00008530787,0.04791786,0.01183762,0.3986943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001098289,0.00001578528,0.03636301,0.004310184,0.00001065312,5.326271e-7,0.008986475,0.000102528,0.00001178295,0.001284645,0.948626,0.0001785653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5675328,0.05452595,0.000006935896,0.02199588,0.000245404,0.002558891,0.0001938838,0.0001047788,0.3528355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145408,0.06214589,0.0002163516,0.01598735,0.00009973616,0.0001174284,0.00005247189,0.00001174177,0.006828229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015077654","doi":"10.1108/00907320911006994","title":"An information literacy program built for relevance and purpose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Relevance (law); Originality; Computer science; Population; Literacy; Information science; Library science; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02212596230120727,"gpt":0.3867751638301707,"spread":0.3646492015289634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005975766,0.0001090551,0.0001808406,0.0000577108,0.0003546028,0.0005869279,0.0004216455,0.00005720896,0.00007618532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006742735,0.0000870697,0.00003567566,0.0004356722,0.00004953038,0.03753558,0.00001627578,0.00007320385,0.00006753141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001640289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009126025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007406082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001139458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.00006970624,0.0003969799,0.0001429918,0.0002696623,0.0002638205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.00004302452,0.000221782,0.0002340183,0.0002632587,0.000173897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000421883,0.00002099392,0.00009358219,0.0009032271,9.839332e-7,6.611322e-8,0.003706026,3.612921e-7,0.000003328034,0.0293727,0.0002245413,0.96567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009130064,0.0001851001,0.002196268,0.001017215,0.00000789041,9.624655e-7,0.0002984172,0.0003654622,0.000005700645,0.002493076,0.9932078,0.000130828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2397216,0.2695612,0.002600947,0.1273939,0.001600867,0.03541267,0.0003863729,0.004055461,0.3192669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2954262,0.5060997,0.03844345,0.1571816,0.0003714559,0.0005461469,0.00100843,0.00001407201,0.0009088826],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576095053","doi":"10.1108/00907321011070900","title":"Patents under the microscope","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Inclusion (mineral); Value (mathematics); Scientific literacy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Literacy; Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Science education; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1284216255156498,"gpt":0.263784894839518,"spread":0.1353632693238682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003357975,0.0001644931,0.0001949739,0.00003253625,0.0002354429,0.000219509,0.0006870335,0.00006189496,0.003661613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001962457,0.00008524633,0.0000650905,0.0003275405,0.00003030453,0.0005094339,0.0002044845,0.0003331846,0.01000422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004479868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001192458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000748869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003924821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990914,0.000015571,0.0002387614,0.0002186566,0.0001950568,0.0002405429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.00002224217,0.0001459553,0.0003944273,0.000176335,0.00001100609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002054301,0.001031351,0.02051455,0.1295515,0.0005150023,0.0000415451,0.0004771536,0.00002586817,0.03739765,0.1512546,0.1175465,0.5414389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009386535,0.000004525209,0.002469638,0.0016513,0.00007119878,0.000003404804,0.00003297656,0.0002539534,0.0000818418,0.000960812,0.9941878,0.0001886657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4714156,0.0598371,0.00006583514,0.01538279,0.003436038,0.00243113,0.00001136473,0.0004298665,0.4469902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187401,0.01048151,0.00003335032,0.0688272,0.0005046232,0.00003514226,0.00006037959,0.00002481659,0.00129286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803994850","doi":"10.1108/rsr-02-2018-0012","title":"Media literacy and newspapers of record","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Information literacy; Literacy; Originality; Visual literacy; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Media studies; Pedagogy; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03732649619620929,"gpt":0.2917074511934579,"spread":0.2543809549972486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001627798,0.0001076995,0.0002577107,0.00004110107,0.00008120477,0.00006847304,0.0001535647,0.00002488244,0.00381135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000241994,0.00007708895,0.00003276106,0.00005242422,0.0001198521,0.000424599,0.00003003027,0.00006351302,0.0001982665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007283825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003155137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005944823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001198113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999234,0.00004989306,0.0002991784,0.0001650326,0.0001201682,0.0001317179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.00007937435,0.0001610063,0.0002208377,0.0002229178,0.00007171559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008655816,0.00004173367,0.001054302,0.0117036,0.00002176002,4.183221e-7,0.4337966,1.696806e-9,0.000007174409,0.01043156,0.001835337,0.5410989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949973,0.00006358654,0.001200415,0.00536411,0.00005608105,0.000001477183,0.004728333,0.000005868207,0.00001459396,0.001008891,0.9873712,0.0001159527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7696604,0.1646842,9.24305e-7,0.001646703,0.001642153,0.0003715656,0.00003889232,0.00005770025,0.06189742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.790342,0.2012009,0.0003668383,0.004519882,0.001620542,0.00002463722,0.0001087509,0.00001612993,0.00180027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973744457","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2019-0041","title":"Developing and assessing a graduate student reference service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Originality; Medical education; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Reference model; Graduate education; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1258996686322019,"gpt":0.4074605954515436,"spread":0.2815609268193416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034624,0.000166464,0.0003139588,0.00006885717,0.0003827199,0.0005743737,0.0006880102,0.00006848397,0.0005330857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002152701,0.0001332686,0.00002881144,0.0008826387,0.00004851806,0.01080148,0.00019931,0.0001861034,0.001094198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005597491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003295647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007808282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000134439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980072,0.0002020236,0.0004460445,0.0003174794,0.0006546123,0.0003725792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988999,0.0000820534,0.0002723999,0.0002960905,0.0002886778,0.000160835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008709741,0.00007495704,0.04610081,0.02646295,0.00005839532,0.000006047605,0.05193886,0.000004705181,0.00009121585,0.5518607,0.0004427416,0.3229499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001450993,0.00002247209,0.05311451,0.008201927,0.00002094199,0.00000367125,0.009612204,0.00008045503,0.00001035269,0.001047594,0.927361,0.0003798422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7836847,0.01958616,0.00002573108,0.01855244,0.0003301989,0.001153493,0.000007413244,0.0002058903,0.176454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6738648,0.2328388,0.002907188,0.08852609,0.00009274726,0.0000504029,0.00008657677,0.00001831927,0.001614997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543284682","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2016-0024","title":"Buy, borrow, or access online?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Reading (process); Purchasing; Replication (statistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Collection development; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Descriptive statistics; Value (mathematics); Mathematics education; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Marketing; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06807597633620646,"gpt":0.3179348797922088,"spread":0.2498589034560023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001185655,0.0001809909,0.0002745148,0.00008526749,0.0000877983,0.0003360527,0.002076344,0.00004657481,0.0006674582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003275388,0.00008819021,0.0000486328,0.0009980631,0.00001855197,0.003720805,0.0007324716,0.00005946333,0.0005686191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002583976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001730316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001282098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005547849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985813,0.00005648844,0.0003440346,0.0004170641,0.0003276064,0.0002734363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989328,0.000114624,0.0001537037,0.0005520471,0.00009581668,0.0001510407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001209184,0.00008075902,0.002161498,0.002561773,0.00002555244,0.00001814704,0.00005635187,1.601298e-7,0.00004440776,0.008721951,0.01135142,0.9749659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001493605,0.00004706102,0.003805349,0.004080526,0.000005900514,0.00001418154,0.000003021226,0.00003859739,0.0001481198,0.0009554937,0.9905196,0.0002327687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04519546,0.2314068,0.03544167,0.09744824,0.002289434,0.003861451,0.0001332864,0.004512222,0.5797115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1067709,0.6907035,0.02192506,0.06221485,0.000402303,0.0002338926,0.00006733437,0.00007109636,0.117611],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7308638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981042366","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2019-0044","title":"What citation patterns reveal about reading research and practice in academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scope (computer science); Citation; Discipline; Originality; Thematic analysis; Sociology; Library science; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1279943420806915,"gpt":0.4468342860196458,"spread":0.3188399439389542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004225487,0.00009269621,0.0002032244,0.0001729347,0.0002329168,0.0007606604,0.000505246,0.0001078665,0.0003618347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004099486,0.00007811472,0.00001737701,0.001135978,0.0001018464,0.05793595,0.0001314272,0.000427482,0.0004675056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003868062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001829022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006847606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005376396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975644,0.000708602,0.0004251783,0.0002574945,0.0006832441,0.0003610586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983495,0.0009032993,0.0002024753,0.0002119674,0.0002132248,0.0001194902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000470736,0.00005080281,0.08098567,0.01273561,0.0000126926,0.000005577071,0.159612,0.000001866603,0.00007305713,0.3628303,0.001321197,0.3823241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001094046,0.00005472455,0.02286171,0.01700397,0.000005043396,0.000003126309,0.0404617,0.00003146548,0.000008751989,0.004626871,0.9146625,0.0001707002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5568743,0.2185113,0.000003352721,0.06269715,0.0006766712,0.002245697,0.00001044708,0.0001141109,0.1588669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1512806,0.8311235,0.0002413882,0.01441488,0.00007271404,0.00003290051,0.00004331476,0.00000646533,0.002784267],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004595673","doi":"10.1108/rsr-09-2014-0040","title":"Piloting a blended model for sustainable IL programming","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Computer science; Curriculum; Asynchronous communication; Blended learning; Learning Management; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; World Wide Web; Educational technology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0930246152535281,"gpt":0.3641634140024235,"spread":0.2711387987488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001737045,0.0001114352,0.0002177685,0.00005206345,0.0004220654,0.0003204937,0.0005700287,0.00004956391,0.00005135859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001896662,0.00009029217,0.00005955082,0.0005810563,0.0000527376,0.01032144,0.00007980053,0.00007741338,0.00008865518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006740339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007595046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003994975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004511225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984452,0.00007654327,0.0003609169,0.0001944217,0.0004096229,0.000513314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987005,0.00004119358,0.0002133992,0.0002027829,0.0005887374,0.0002533766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747943,0.00007428769,0.0004454172,0.013372,0.00001470846,0.000002109659,0.03223661,0.0001519749,0.000001937533,0.7266073,0.006048612,0.2210276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001242342,0.0000368379,0.000007513477,0.0008845799,0.00001350487,4.748012e-7,0.008065474,0.012537,0.000002232508,0.004969505,0.9732153,0.0001432943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0167485,0.120983,0.009594271,0.05343584,0.0006375089,0.01487837,0.00006032559,0.001741081,0.7819211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.527423,0.1192766,0.0977278,0.122062,0.001063198,0.002445301,0.0006574061,0.0001094815,0.1292353],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7482794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030160027","doi":"10.1108/00907321011090755","title":"Innovation: the language of learning libraries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Library instruction; Computer science; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Sociology; Information literacy; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02360097329674872,"gpt":0.3186496057593804,"spread":0.2950486324626317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007880839,0.00005377045,0.0001125796,0.00004048971,0.0002974573,0.0001136382,0.0005677324,0.00003658565,0.001988109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000130767,0.00003207674,0.00002465324,0.001176901,0.0001506247,0.004910912,0.00005561985,0.0002063904,0.0001290952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002267004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002612124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000511578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991518,0.00009067314,0.0002863876,0.00007409744,0.0002740386,0.0001230662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.00007631016,0.0002353345,0.0001865382,0.0001391509,0.00002864946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001002048,0.000007361575,0.002955425,0.0008899739,0.000003636822,1.874649e-7,0.01991571,4.840645e-7,0.0001718895,0.8732038,0.000514369,0.1023362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001965533,0.000007774117,0.001585974,0.0003748353,0.000003903949,4.246093e-7,0.004503509,0.00001348477,0.00009554993,0.0006490616,0.9926958,0.00005000833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.37031,0.02450687,0.00001362027,0.02632843,0.0004861668,0.0006642611,0.00000829655,0.0001722445,0.5775101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302293,0.03765044,0.0008990475,0.02276067,0.0002532392,0.0000273769,0.00008056725,0.000007967452,0.008091374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970746207","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2014-0027","title":"Access to translated fiction in Canadian public libraries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cataloging; Originality; Subject access; Promotion (chess); Subject (documents); Computer science; Collection development; World Wide Web; Public access; Library science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Set (abstract data type); Relevance (law); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1180928324921905,"gpt":0.3118841948197374,"spread":0.1937913623275469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002912428,0.0001292106,0.0002539675,0.0001424629,0.0002383128,0.0005367412,0.0003180533,0.00003394562,0.003116831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009109909,0.0001039341,0.00003470414,0.0001980208,0.00002267746,0.001477721,0.00001888445,0.0001213206,0.0002705966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001916271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007124383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.144064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9309909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.0001115823,0.0002887155,0.0002036201,0.0001242879,0.0002881028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994335,0.00006327017,0.00007290876,0.0001799006,0.0000810424,0.0001693531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001516868,0.00004391941,0.005118737,0.006364864,0.00005207047,0.000002367271,0.01076836,0.000006227894,0.000002314712,0.1691974,0.005211694,0.8032169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006915817,0.00002171118,0.001789909,0.001007169,0.00001893889,4.374015e-7,0.000119616,0.00004125555,9.21079e-7,0.0002707781,0.9965232,0.0001368795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008229811,0.1317662,0.00001597498,0.06253105,0.0004373435,0.0008547579,0.00007008558,0.0001428447,0.7959519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433058,0.04257623,0.00003836631,0.01345479,0.000134333,0.00006566885,0.00008434553,0.00001451942,0.0003259936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200315670","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2021-0036","title":"Library response to Black Liberation Collective: a review of student calls for change and implications for anti-racist initiatives in academic libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Solidarity; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Political science; White (mutation); Media studies; Public relations; Library science; Gender studies; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2564408161545704,"gpt":0.4818059933521354,"spread":0.2253651771975649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001727209,0.0003499229,0.001993375,0.0002220768,0.0002708506,0.000203871,0.0008054778,0.0002790463,0.00006782798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005206004,0.000294866,0.0002553617,0.002220684,0.0001606633,0.002854087,0.0001910817,0.0002358234,0.000006407954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007761006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001543618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006407553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961289,0.001250345,0.00128055,0.0006925657,0.000290621,0.0003570894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967747,0.001557831,0.0008831873,0.0003659008,0.0002184835,0.0001998453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001971763,0.00008364567,0.0001821844,0.5487027,0.00004462356,8.408934e-7,0.004016522,3.326239e-8,0.000001188552,0.0155618,0.001900055,0.4294868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006489998,0.00008663037,0.0008823185,0.3021334,0.0001895639,9.128203e-7,0.0001949884,3.860547e-7,8.917934e-7,0.0002918382,0.6959349,0.0002193077],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003824529,0.9780211,0.00001527861,0.01020528,0.00006243194,0.01022007,0.0007178577,0.00003450253,0.0006852097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001526957,0.9893187,0.001045562,0.004463139,0.0001410895,0.003711326,0.000797838,0.00002961286,0.000477417],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6940348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892621043","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2018-0046","title":"An accessibility-first approach to online course readers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Originality; World Wide Web; Reading (process); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Multimedia; Sociology; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0800041352733582,"gpt":0.4102255043070442,"spread":0.330221369033686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510677,0.0002918386,0.0005531642,0.00005796288,0.0005571168,0.0004002284,0.00219013,0.0001393252,0.0006828301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002177768,0.0002425785,0.0001164354,0.001122121,0.0008043846,0.002179353,0.0002134263,0.0001819088,0.00059419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002895823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003616453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0329964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966719,0.0003442982,0.0006264533,0.000906041,0.000789449,0.0006618486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972728,0.00009122346,0.000200977,0.001266318,0.0005916166,0.0005770896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159909,0.01495381,0.08483078,0.07243463,0.0002074192,0.000004944981,0.1200689,0.000009355148,0.00003251344,0.09082592,0.005560959,0.6109109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003656767,0.0006545646,0.05971798,0.008334714,0.000287457,0.000003498433,0.06335503,0.0001512554,0.00002968459,0.01395229,0.8514307,0.001717145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4589211,0.01428452,0.00006569918,0.006731758,0.0003885385,0.003033944,0.0002262711,0.000730521,0.5156176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849033,0.005641176,0.002109919,0.005863641,0.0004625411,0.0001069305,0.000181331,0.00003032057,0.0007008716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8458697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892812305","doi":"10.1108/rsr-05-2018-0050","title":"Ask a guybrarian: work experiences of male librarians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Visibility; Quarter (Canadian coin); Qualitative research; Public relations; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1354604096650261,"gpt":0.3277740956670699,"spread":0.1923136860020438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000745368,0.000114147,0.0003187077,0.00003452399,0.0003394855,0.00005632783,0.0008348991,0.00009539895,0.009090112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005205359,0.000098622,0.00008182442,0.0007607503,0.0003385479,0.000604485,0.0001398063,0.00008986097,0.0004960861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001812927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001637629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004736657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998354,0.0003650858,0.0003073986,0.0002634807,0.0004235475,0.000286466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.00005459006,0.0002190069,0.000337573,0.0001900779,0.00013481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006459804,0.0003571002,0.02805893,0.01076641,0.0001296592,0.00001094908,0.7279572,2.780584e-7,0.00004370501,0.1424359,0.01583491,0.07434037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391727,0.000119994,0.003009762,0.004527102,0.00007524979,0.000001332119,0.09521303,0.000002388607,0.0001114441,0.001750105,0.8947104,0.0003399717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2483294,0.05967444,0.00009437562,0.003723095,0.0007436849,0.0008498643,0.00002141012,0.0001629751,0.6864008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490933,0.04507727,0.0008861747,0.002464615,0.0002179037,0.0000201333,0.0000110414,0.00000599213,0.002223508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893359417","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2018-0041","title":"Equitable public library services for Canadians with print disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Reading (process); Public service; Special collections; Sociology; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05209398907441835,"gpt":0.3269116369115809,"spread":0.2748176478371625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007626639,0.0002936473,0.0005262024,0.00006499617,0.0007538652,0.000889167,0.001475084,0.0001102019,0.002096981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001167725,0.0002208323,0.0001209917,0.0006953403,0.0009091657,0.004220926,0.0002592723,0.0001138787,0.0002251241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001580622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007883531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02091718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3095541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971492,0.0001691677,0.000503965,0.0006303478,0.0005233774,0.001023904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978925,0.0003062271,0.0002118523,0.0007374407,0.000426139,0.0004258435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008593828,0.0004450468,0.08091917,0.0914335,0.0001924902,0.000001814099,0.02707521,4.782041e-7,0.000005180801,0.6808583,0.002445071,0.1165378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374957,0.0002146184,0.0007842207,0.004118409,0.00005886461,0.000001204079,0.02344993,0.00001096365,0.00001798778,0.02326773,0.9475234,0.0004152195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958822,0.02682137,0.00001469707,0.01773598,0.0002701267,0.003493325,0.0004780312,0.0006547057,0.7546495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966764,0.01228256,0.001139252,0.006555955,0.0005164853,0.0007092857,0.0002623199,0.00007075052,0.01169936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}