{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":65,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":65,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e9f31daf8e87","filters":{"venue":"Regulation & Governance"}},"results":[{"id":"W2057005672","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x","title":"Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":889,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Politics; Public good; Economics; Global governance; Corporate social responsibility; Social responsibility; Public economics; Business; Public relations; Economic system; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01792997800950943,"gpt":0.2858078674811009,"spread":0.2678778894715915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005609313,0.0002968608,0.0003165452,0.00002584666,0.0002951124,0.0003967632,0.0003612067,0.0001799021,0.0001311427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006005118,0.0003073931,0.000149963,0.0009458992,0.0001821929,0.001692106,0.00009441537,0.000202369,0.00004872003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007212619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008230469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001942874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975383,0.00001542954,0.0004584514,0.0004909604,0.0007668175,0.0007299915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985356,0.00004825318,0.0005866111,0.000454104,0.0002980798,0.00007731225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002163454,0.0002805855,0.1960693,0.000153928,0.00004285128,0.00005110765,0.0003863185,0.001584819,0.00001994953,0.7799366,0.003831589,0.01742665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003885802,0.00001874702,0.9127545,0.00006148547,0.00003961458,0.00000211066,0.0003487327,0.005028179,0.00001324123,0.06019935,0.02078023,0.0003651874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549914,0.0001004929,0.007887021,0.005141797,0.0006393031,0.0004274837,0.00009940727,0.000226641,0.03048646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953486,0.00001799537,0.0003919679,0.002275549,0.0013872,0.000004019773,0.00003757286,0.00002848004,0.0005086182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762174315","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01136.x","title":"Subprime catalyst: Financial regulatory reform and the strengthening of US carbon market governance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Financial market; Climate governance; Financial crisis; Regulatory reform; Financial regulation; Consumer Protection Act; Economics; Market economy; Economic policy; Business; Financial system; Finance; Political economy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02328486455838834,"gpt":0.203413237603568,"spread":0.1801283730451797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009776797,0.0001914775,0.0004762445,0.0000385862,0.0001161117,0.00002795813,0.0002088476,0.0001312327,0.0001696028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002602772,0.0001822062,0.0001172812,0.0001678647,0.0002378891,0.0004274862,0.0001087697,0.0001363895,0.00002207949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003555559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002239068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002781713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985009,0.00002234074,0.0007392055,0.0002855179,0.00007293997,0.0003791005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977536,0.00009747053,0.001551361,0.0004934646,0.00002598194,0.00007816179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001941312,0.00004152107,0.1104416,0.00007314669,0.00003562369,2.674946e-7,0.001355718,0.000047483,0.0000413817,0.8850442,0.0005232953,0.002201615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001273485,0.00001549255,0.9587902,0.00004779977,0.00001391835,0.000008650822,0.00004013106,0.003917336,0.0005539411,0.007744083,0.02733104,0.0002638673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474353,0.009126818,0.0000522419,0.0007938514,0.0004497363,0.000207349,0.0002945628,0.00002144774,0.04161874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960114,0.001556615,0.0001578073,0.0001448508,0.0004031159,0.00002111708,0.00001252771,0.00002725234,0.001665363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7430152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145701550","doi":"10.1111/rego.12075","title":"Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Empowerment; Certification; Externality; Control (management); Business; Social control; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Management; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01138755599805728,"gpt":0.2289945126091799,"spread":0.2176069566111226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004240363,0.0001173207,0.0001826949,0.00001106968,0.0001434212,0.00007494889,0.0001579874,0.00005556259,0.00002600269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002553541,0.00008953444,0.00006472087,0.000178684,0.0001435389,0.0004718849,0.00002781753,0.00006899763,0.000002300107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006217429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001566803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008703283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002158695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.00002374823,0.0002577631,0.0001700126,0.0003881649,0.0001703615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990935,0.00009820831,0.0004982075,0.0001611912,0.0001377317,0.00001117185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002451074,0.00002691078,0.167982,0.0000715874,0.00001782734,1.346607e-7,0.00009100184,0.0003398824,0.00006243294,0.8272704,0.0001658111,0.003947445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005865742,0.00001110728,0.9229196,0.00001228047,0.00003630863,1.533954e-7,0.00003815662,0.001447041,0.00002420079,0.04058813,0.03423892,0.00009751259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731686,0.0001108901,0.007112335,0.01574278,0.000136014,0.0003664815,0.00003726412,0.00003480389,0.003290826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989282,0.00001092575,0.00004050239,0.0005248553,0.0003909266,0.000004714213,0.000009653199,0.000008704887,0.00008146486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7866823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3651109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527631542","doi":"10.1111/rego.12091","title":"<scp>A</scp>chilles' heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Vulnerability (computing); Mode (computer interface); Order (exchange); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04397335743665175,"gpt":0.3264848674574277,"spread":0.282511510020776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137533,0.0001746504,0.0002942815,0.00003075355,0.0001972737,0.0001142363,0.000346135,0.0001854246,0.0000411034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008518493,0.0001680321,0.0000623886,0.0005508318,0.0007263112,0.0008313002,0.00008010121,0.0002371743,0.00001298305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002654333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006494909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005580242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005484471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975178,0.0002301587,0.000412159,0.0003617897,0.0009675985,0.0005105431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981146,0.0006742971,0.0003938386,0.000259795,0.0002703155,0.0002870796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688656,0.000103682,0.009369627,0.0000280748,0.000007468686,0.000001993209,0.006272418,0.0001166608,0.0004515664,0.9758039,0.004217953,0.003609836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009724174,0.0001021902,0.5725192,0.0001854387,0.000005684014,0.000006598091,0.003528672,0.002265656,0.0029853,0.03814362,0.3790911,0.000194094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168102,0.002145597,0.0003797491,0.008333942,0.0001736428,0.0003411016,0.0002974304,0.00005189721,0.07146643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960958,0.0004330406,0.000290314,0.0001375682,0.0002121268,0.00002006895,0.000003755292,0.00001323112,0.002794144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171736988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01100.x","title":"Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Interdependence; Constraint (computer-aided design); Sociology; Action (physics); Ethnography; Public relations; Process management; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07142465795682423,"gpt":0.240633283152125,"spread":0.1692086251953007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005335025,0.0002000535,0.0001608065,0.0000624137,0.001259847,0.0002030563,0.0003829722,0.00005042323,0.0007542059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002348767,0.0001594223,0.00008812231,0.001094361,0.0003988169,0.003759921,0.0001956065,0.000125027,0.0004852277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001532936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005417384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001906799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005173611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979337,0.00001047756,0.0003890356,0.0004182034,0.000909001,0.0003396244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982632,0.00004268784,0.0008881745,0.0004203877,0.0003736909,0.00001189156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003759691,0.00002191872,0.02774396,0.00002052852,0.00001231591,5.265946e-7,0.0003815117,0.001569814,0.0005455356,0.9600707,0.003325887,0.006269674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268137,0.000003895151,0.8203028,0.00006245343,0.00001807574,0.000002577375,0.0001199025,0.02022052,0.0001488826,0.0409054,0.1177495,0.0001977877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525737,0.0005670295,0.05954611,0.005564692,0.001522706,0.0007767033,0.000006419002,0.0003872476,0.7790554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929385,0.00001839167,0.002150849,0.0008368422,0.0007936904,0.00002497463,0.00001272197,0.00002315843,0.003200825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.968985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611950864","doi":"10.1111/rego.12161","title":"A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03852498133838284,"gpt":0.331879904024158,"spread":0.2933549226857752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003825783,0.00009232727,0.0001092802,0.00002235378,0.001226378,0.0002335165,0.0002961541,0.00005481129,0.0006148189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005039817,0.00009509802,0.00005778535,0.00006215547,0.0002573193,0.0001799053,0.00004914042,0.00007206125,0.00047594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000188785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005544685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002802224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003799662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998786,0.00006679154,0.0001568699,0.000238123,0.000525951,0.0002262039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.00005756232,0.0004426698,0.0004607258,0.00006647514,0.00008049372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009981963,0.00008137197,0.006552812,0.00001203324,0.00001982677,0.00001175004,0.003949882,0.0003584933,0.00103872,0.7370396,0.1048064,0.1460292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002272463,0.000009668853,0.4432595,0.00003023087,0.000004639751,2.219181e-7,0.0002008385,0.0002307214,0.0001045237,0.0006733962,0.5551604,0.00009864097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4553574,0.00003595841,0.0004610674,0.0550106,0.001064448,0.0004330938,0.00002332379,0.0001572053,0.4874569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882656,0.0001467889,0.0003048856,0.0009799246,0.0003025216,0.00001007502,0.000001995198,0.000008703901,0.1099795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7363663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9432434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613995320","doi":"10.1111/rego.12162","title":"Governance gaps in eradicating forced labor: From global to domestic supply chains","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; International Labour Organization; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Universidad de Navarra; Yale University; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Joseph Rowntree Foundation; City University of New York","keywords":"Supply chain; Corporate governance; Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Business; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Marketing; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01231238378897643,"gpt":0.2714826490656635,"spread":0.2591702652766871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000267607,0.000240687,0.0003102526,0.00002304548,0.0004573229,0.0007793055,0.0006313187,0.000112798,0.00005599798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002120812,0.0002581181,0.00009287648,0.0003790391,0.00009772441,0.00228024,0.0001932199,0.0001235632,0.00007915025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006665947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007316811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02091208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005313907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0000175092,0.0003756834,0.0004748079,0.0004936424,0.0004897036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982192,0.00004324543,0.0008582275,0.0006785017,0.0001598363,0.00004097103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034109,0.00009391932,0.7134098,0.00009275045,0.00001811792,0.0000203355,0.0004171169,0.001043106,0.0001713903,0.270052,0.001600645,0.01297743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007815132,0.000008205201,0.9676082,0.0001677158,0.00001838061,4.459483e-7,0.0002017138,0.002229222,0.00001354887,0.01703249,0.01165378,0.0002847458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803997,0.0002362748,0.0004106498,0.007810267,0.0004910989,0.0004611321,0.0001694013,0.00008707337,0.009934422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967834,0.0000343495,0.0002365869,0.001188112,0.00108425,0.00001972461,0.00003057938,0.00002151796,0.0006014595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2541985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133990882","doi":"10.1111/rego.12392","title":"Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Emerging technologies; Disruptive technology; Corporate governance; Emerging markets; Political science; Business; Management science; Economics; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01875644706640974,"gpt":0.2738712410400727,"spread":0.2551147939736629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002455735,0.00009173188,0.0001345461,0.00002755723,0.0001767145,0.00004396217,0.0006200338,0.0001110434,0.000004148231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001377535,0.0000741618,0.0000525828,0.0005238969,0.000186133,0.0003604286,0.000302602,0.0001467815,0.000003119497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004191828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006275325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003712576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001148783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999042,0.00004784653,0.0002145625,0.000312982,0.000237591,0.000145062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998321,0.0001071207,0.0003853117,0.00101588,0.0001599523,0.00001071846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[2.90325e-7,0.00002126058,0.0001875083,0.000009000439,0.000008204229,0.000001195495,0.0002838867,0.00007305032,0.002134188,0.8024059,0.00005667852,0.1948189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002740711,0.00002256624,0.4086311,0.0001521805,0.00001475208,0.0000502219,0.002349569,0.04077695,0.1494278,0.3807793,0.01720084,0.00032071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2520927,0.02956297,0.627243,0.08444002,0.0002743576,0.0002994956,0.00000482185,0.001037762,0.005044817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867762,0.0006822054,0.01238938,0.00002941251,0.00001554627,0.00002268379,7.57094e-7,0.000005203691,0.00007857098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7346836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.302423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153429383","doi":"10.1111/rego.12395","title":"Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Multi-level governance; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05139605862242522,"gpt":0.389241714175491,"spread":0.3378456555530657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004306827,0.00009970012,0.0001491813,0.00002014192,0.0004337552,0.0003457982,0.0001711903,0.00007112975,0.0001843394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003264144,0.0001135244,0.00005107107,0.0007384776,0.0001946657,0.0009994205,0.00006741595,0.0001233694,0.000005477816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006177938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001572366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007417064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.128415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998413,0.0001681557,0.0002773621,0.0003070462,0.0004033006,0.0004310897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.0002061024,0.0002040535,0.0001581904,0.0002197077,0.0001605167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001568082,0.00005850035,0.02252116,0.00002146839,0.000007463336,0.000001743307,0.0004881172,0.00001145238,0.0001827957,0.939135,0.001834793,0.03572187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005548932,0.00001475593,0.4482043,0.00007852183,0.000002641557,0.000004592077,0.0007717399,0.000875318,0.0001929823,0.04341379,0.505729,0.0001574891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6756769,0.001586961,0.008757777,0.2182776,0.000487872,0.001390133,0.0006018894,0.0001787712,0.09304208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923779,0.0002272479,0.001412216,0.000281593,0.0003460096,0.00004800469,0.00001266135,0.000006714602,0.005287648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922755047","doi":"10.1111/rego.12249","title":"Exploring the formal and informal roles of regulatory intermediaries in transnational multistakeholder regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Intermediary; Intermediation; Rulemaking; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Law; Biology; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03788645329170837,"gpt":0.2119857216232263,"spread":0.174099268331518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002794937,0.0001362326,0.0001786779,0.00009899648,0.000123731,0.00007525922,0.0001266258,0.0000352645,0.00007382673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003760902,0.0001111932,0.00004999324,0.0003009212,0.0001668425,0.003526591,0.00007439118,0.00008245635,0.00001096782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003017495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001521586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002683872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002373801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988475,0.000007762756,0.0004009949,0.0001772885,0.0003866613,0.000179771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991899,0.00004956752,0.0004383741,0.0001879667,0.0001275781,0.000006621876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001194704,0.00002233442,0.1474461,0.000151199,0.00001589986,2.253624e-7,0.0007625841,0.007254135,0.0006454752,0.7919163,0.0001057021,0.05156062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006680618,0.000005497794,0.9602907,0.00007652397,0.000007210771,0.000001005682,0.0003377368,0.02732651,0.0001627488,0.00170296,0.009295511,0.0001254753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939169,0.0001019248,0.0007963797,0.001474059,0.0002533117,0.0002979736,0.00000288468,0.000031296,0.003125237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990803,0.00001857752,0.0001011493,0.0001300413,0.0001578372,0.00003131821,0.0000143468,0.00001187005,0.0004545448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8128446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4534329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517048361","doi":"10.1111/rego.12092","title":"Correlates of rigorous and credible transnational governance: A cross‐sectoral analysis of best practice compliance in eco‐labeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Impartiality; Best practice; Transparency (behavior); Corporate governance; Accounting; Compliance (psychology); Accountability; Political science; Public economics; Business; Public relations; Economics; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03878447950701336,"gpt":0.3074547689996508,"spread":0.2686702894926374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005272834,0.0001352063,0.0003483333,0.00008691997,0.00006045867,0.00008011869,0.0001344174,0.00008560401,0.0000292166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009587503,0.0001441766,0.00008737636,0.001282179,0.0001565652,0.001673009,0.0000354243,0.00009598523,0.000001778028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001805246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007760279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003261401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009137024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998556,0.00002481941,0.0004690322,0.00023864,0.0005194475,0.0001921111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980627,0.0001157952,0.0009530296,0.0001557387,0.0006920612,0.0000206926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002541587,0.000323261,0.8185834,0.0002354571,0.000137981,0.000002963189,0.0007785459,0.04675715,0.00007593941,0.1316727,0.0000706869,0.001107708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000952608,0.00002345096,0.945095,0.00006308004,0.0002586046,6.799662e-7,0.0006821886,0.04758915,0.00001891503,0.004127499,0.001038419,0.0001503806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951724,0.0008117734,0.0004834885,0.0007017482,0.000140833,0.0001865967,0.00005728496,0.00001729638,0.002428521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999285,0.00003827442,0.0003716864,0.00006906492,0.00009083638,0.000003666894,0.00002781646,0.00001010963,0.0001035684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1275453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5879351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131220949","doi":"10.1111/rego.12030","title":"Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Corporate governance; Normative; Political science; Process (computing); State (computer science); Key (lock); Positive economics; Management science; Business; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02493115886156119,"gpt":0.2608867888793069,"spread":0.2359556300177457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008263157,0.0001599706,0.0002193675,0.00007504338,0.0002593048,0.0002762651,0.0001069189,0.00005402133,0.0007640878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001880646,0.0001583131,0.00009082392,0.001111314,0.0000809613,0.00190659,0.00003154598,0.00005313885,0.00003131034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000525269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001207867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000749071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001078889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989159,0.000005738279,0.0003102721,0.0003134407,0.0002888081,0.0001658602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984876,0.00009597628,0.0005825416,0.0001693152,0.0006532561,0.00001134582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789459,0.00002401859,0.01726005,0.00005061446,0.00009293214,5.95775e-8,0.00004441267,0.003531402,0.00008289819,0.969203,0.002270218,0.007422479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002835694,0.000002200052,0.8098413,0.00002627228,0.0001007509,3.546011e-7,0.00004767287,0.06799959,0.00001076211,0.05496857,0.06655009,0.0001688212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09362284,0.0004855659,0.8646806,0.03567097,0.0006577739,0.001034444,0.00003040245,0.0001953774,0.003622045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925587,0.00003331013,0.004475621,0.0008747011,0.0004684647,0.0001825577,0.00008789263,0.00001744974,0.001301346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619703440","doi":"10.1111/rego.12222","title":"Revisiting the governance of privacy: Contemporary policy instruments in global perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Politics; Legitimation; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration; Business; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02895650473826486,"gpt":0.3262071123066863,"spread":0.2972506075684214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692256,0.0001039634,0.0001567003,0.00001812702,0.0003222417,0.00004967856,0.0005323156,0.00008359709,0.00004503163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002748745,0.00009312863,0.00005122039,0.0008273392,0.0004531319,0.0007315975,0.0001927785,0.0001071058,0.00001874303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001157838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006235813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04230756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002392164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998415,0.000230844,0.0003018896,0.0002636321,0.0005563375,0.0002322836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986207,0.00005181849,0.000696524,0.0003780098,0.0002086256,0.0000442782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007893205,0.00002947044,0.05065972,0.00001340271,0.0000108433,6.310369e-7,0.006099563,0.000003900924,0.0001319487,0.9120417,0.0008570037,0.03007285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004757592,0.00003155427,0.8683808,0.0001678092,0.000003585694,0.000001220762,0.001166855,0.0002348249,0.0003485014,0.05436042,0.07469902,0.0001296263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7127975,0.002049064,0.001266853,0.05267463,0.0006528792,0.001198384,0.0002415184,0.0001075537,0.2290116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979243,0.0002622677,0.0002170788,0.0001584195,0.001153547,0.00001028859,0.000003254269,0.000006323706,0.0002645534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8576813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051446680","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00016.x","title":"Institutional competitiveness, social investment, and welfare regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Investment (military); Productivity; Welfare; Race to the bottom; Social Welfare; Welfare state; Social protection; Trilemma; Economic policy; Development economics; Economic system; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Globalization; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02157774057682983,"gpt":0.3064179430968523,"spread":0.2848402025200225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003434279,0.0000708077,0.00009914886,0.00001784706,0.00179821,0.00002736011,0.00006243734,0.00008136081,0.0000426489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001250979,0.00006625083,0.00003424588,0.0001882877,0.0007422,0.0002288066,0.00002963637,0.00005713859,0.00000658147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001409952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007141987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008681616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001251884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991822,0.00004010588,0.0001246678,0.0001289168,0.000324117,0.0001999582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996388,0.00004146635,0.000159701,0.00003974527,0.00007134592,0.00004892063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137639,0.00001163555,0.006222137,0.000005921065,0.00001040072,0.000001261998,0.003931788,0.000001798211,0.00001728912,0.9842569,0.0002189906,0.005310457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001622739,0.000004550641,0.7007757,0.00001167504,0.000004369274,5.04697e-7,0.001355561,0.000002371212,0.00002976168,0.01507666,0.2825005,0.00007612802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4260539,0.0008995319,0.0006180239,0.03884637,0.0006178628,0.000327956,0.00003658475,0.0001454578,0.5324544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947523,0.0002441482,0.0001048892,0.000409697,0.0009250489,0.000003912806,0.000004655015,0.000004335437,0.003551037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547227611","doi":"10.1111/rego.12016","title":"Technical systems and the architecture of transnational business governance interactions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Set (abstract data type); Scheme (mathematics); Political science; Tracing; Industrial organization; Transnational governance; Business; Economic system; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01167596073260381,"gpt":0.2008716687655072,"spread":0.1891957080329033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001850022,0.0001170159,0.0002797642,0.00002995273,0.00009536535,0.00006210592,0.0001557349,0.00006502269,0.0002682307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002228925,0.00009782599,0.00007502256,0.0003339392,0.000217747,0.0003127426,0.00002736282,0.0001006111,0.0000372103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006966214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001959889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003933354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005727622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989753,0.00002006052,0.0005346939,0.0002302844,0.0001058608,0.0001338433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987636,0.0001084745,0.0007270299,0.0002268876,0.0001385728,0.00003541406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002679672,0.00002224743,0.001872825,0.00002397228,0.000008791892,8.986628e-8,0.00006458104,0.002296512,0.0001290342,0.9925596,0.0009474298,0.002048094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007375712,0.000008042681,0.8638932,0.00003127695,0.000004998638,0.00001229268,0.00001231,0.005959414,0.00002536512,0.05598364,0.07321217,0.0001197859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.499691,0.01569876,0.2972917,0.09396843,0.002373962,0.00311677,0.0009967852,0.0002000553,0.08666251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972293,0.0001511314,0.0004987795,0.0000891673,0.00007574613,0.00006424525,0.000009209843,0.00001089261,0.001871531],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.936576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3989228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129380138","doi":"10.1111/rego.12387","title":"Why and how does the regulation of emerging technologies occur? Explaining the adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation using the multiple streams framework","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Harmonization; Emerging technologies; General Data Protection Regulation; European union; Technology policy; Entrepreneurship; Business; Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Economic policy; Computer science; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05267641396923324,"gpt":0.304763676269331,"spread":0.2520872623000978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001099238,0.0001168746,0.0001341715,0.00002282684,0.001288108,0.0001070968,0.000442587,0.0001383487,0.00001050956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001882319,0.00005877178,0.00005979547,0.0007198212,0.0005298082,0.0005532556,0.0001428311,0.0002576587,1.43179e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007663068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009593695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001440607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001728529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981189,0.0005945407,0.0002487701,0.0002624,0.0005867668,0.0001885949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998058,0.0004289528,0.0006047387,0.0007263323,0.0001689725,0.00001300565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001432105,0.00007436412,0.05924788,0.0001618632,0.0001612889,3.896597e-7,0.05752404,0.09187748,0.1864617,0.317428,0.000630096,0.2862897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352575,0.00002042104,0.695439,0.000548558,0.0001089918,0.000005748141,0.02047172,0.2186842,0.02704702,0.008422457,0.02866606,0.0002332001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.886857,0.0006643166,0.06285634,0.04835038,0.0003330957,0.0007057881,0.0000366352,0.00007626397,0.0001201434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982568,0.0001607825,0.001120741,0.00007093073,0.0002231378,0.00001485733,0.0000109166,0.00001111087,0.0001306926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6361912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598588154","doi":"10.1111/rego.12034","title":"Confronting trade‐offs and interactive effects in the choice of policy focus: Specialized versus comprehensive private governance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Corporate governance; Business; Public policy; Public relations; Public economics; Action (physics); Process management; Political science; Economics; Management; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01802830968388683,"gpt":0.2720345246913077,"spread":0.2540062150074209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001460272,0.000189333,0.0002990432,0.00004046844,0.0001117456,0.0001856701,0.000221287,0.00007256395,0.00001939143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001405091,0.0001582265,0.00007874616,0.0005021715,0.0001498628,0.001423676,0.00007475867,0.0001450268,0.000008787484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003154418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01257671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004834123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987605,0.00006068391,0.0003154379,0.0002474394,0.0003370598,0.0002789352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984548,0.0004678039,0.0007341275,0.0002086293,0.0001202816,0.00001433264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005815359,0.0003238328,0.1210338,0.0009070708,0.0001158278,0.00000813864,0.005813273,0.0002932987,0.001301464,0.7903573,0.002624276,0.0766402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001823209,0.0000224042,0.977455,0.0001181913,0.00002431532,3.572165e-7,0.001180329,0.0008624254,0.00005196738,0.008305988,0.009994942,0.0001608948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888694,0.0004192288,0.0001080127,0.0042411,0.0002618748,0.0008832996,0.000007512681,0.00002799775,0.005181567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986148,0.00003907521,0.00005276479,0.0004170323,0.0007812529,0.00002101684,0.000005181967,0.00001453243,0.00005435716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8564212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621326712","doi":"10.1111/rego.12165","title":"Does intellectual property lead to economic growth? Insights from a novel IP dataset","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; Genome Canada","keywords":"Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Order (exchange); Index (typography); Empirical evidence; Causality (physics); Economics; Value (mathematics); Developing country; Lead (geology); Business; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Public economics; International trade; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science; Economic growth; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08210224460433876,"gpt":0.2294099532302121,"spread":0.1473077086258733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009314511,0.0002131234,0.0002117702,0.00005334594,0.0005746049,0.0007055174,0.0006885452,0.00008320926,0.001049459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055511,0.0001181432,0.00005495081,0.00006668357,0.00007768028,0.002141796,0.000373338,0.0001167306,0.00500923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008970204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002885042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00963534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002390546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987943,0.000007517719,0.0002809532,0.000466062,0.0002221771,0.0002290528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987314,0.00004930407,0.0004487402,0.0006503705,0.00009942522,0.00002076297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00180564,0.0004246332,0.009441892,0.0002492465,0.0002413458,0.00001818094,0.001585702,0.001153218,0.02372828,0.03658982,0.8633772,0.06138488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006996865,0.00001793051,0.07083208,0.0001666889,0.00003001625,7.429026e-7,0.00002940977,0.0309846,0.00332508,0.001991328,0.8914632,0.0004592196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.94335,0.00009063478,0.007495707,0.009712338,0.003959721,0.001189751,0.001099444,0.0002125694,0.0328899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907386,0.00001529121,0.0001996569,0.001778741,0.001689792,0.00002015583,0.0004776186,0.00002986989,0.005050327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06139019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918402301","doi":"10.1111/rego.12241","title":"Transparency in transnational governance: The determinants of information disclosure of voluntary sustainability programs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"European University Institute","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Civil society; Corporate governance; Sustainability; Normative; Accounting; Politics; Business; Sustainability reporting; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Finance; Corporate social responsibility","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009547879678577112,"gpt":0.2225388844846211,"spread":0.212991004806044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000225918,0.0001019696,0.0001771149,0.00002887066,0.00002873963,0.00003569889,0.0001997888,0.00005322596,0.00007813178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004965667,0.00007734643,0.00006559188,0.0004177096,0.0001145165,0.002521979,0.00001813135,0.00007456192,0.00000669727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005881548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008824137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007110733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005634344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988149,0.00001029636,0.0005096323,0.0001129998,0.0003848065,0.0001673645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988583,0.00002852301,0.0006476053,0.0001923475,0.0002676672,0.000005594358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004884662,0.00004139677,0.5462923,0.0003930206,0.000002993324,1.919194e-7,0.00009808307,0.0008330428,0.00004512742,0.4436159,0.00001050229,0.00861859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003403893,0.00001497705,0.949066,0.00007342984,0.000008994058,2.952021e-7,0.0002394181,0.005702283,0.0001480536,0.04291746,0.0014015,0.00008720339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961599,0.00003584236,0.0001382367,0.001011333,0.00007671626,0.000425575,0.00002030051,0.00001246465,0.00211962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997417,0.000006479287,0.00002208419,0.00007643156,0.00003485213,0.0000188967,0.00002661623,0.000004559727,0.0000684004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4027737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3154096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3058764868","doi":"10.1111/rego.12354","title":"Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; University of Ottawa; Yale University","keywords":"Corporate governance; Scholarship; Convention; Selection (genetic algorithm); Value (mathematics); Institutionalism; Politics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Social science; Computer science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02747269286269299,"gpt":0.2293299503822558,"spread":0.2018572575195628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001842198,0.000124837,0.0002101978,0.00003855049,0.0002292293,0.00006017859,0.0001275165,0.0000460753,0.0001447755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005036261,0.00008994393,0.00006729114,0.0006844975,0.0002364399,0.0007387365,0.000099603,0.00006278223,0.0000253917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003235537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002245976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000987512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003816032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989954,0.00001945729,0.0003029702,0.0002231264,0.0003091235,0.0001498774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998993,0.00004011729,0.000613936,0.0001273388,0.0002116288,0.00001394175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470006,0.00001287667,0.04576257,0.00005059555,0.00002036541,1.246204e-7,0.0001003859,0.0007245532,0.0004451179,0.946483,0.001258728,0.004994649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009347931,0.000007104576,0.8642673,0.00001685253,0.00001543787,0.000001159322,0.00003747713,0.03748741,0.00004811049,0.01015552,0.08692639,0.0001024564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8215911,0.000574737,0.01569394,0.1295037,0.0002149649,0.0009597686,0.000004941181,0.0002878935,0.03116896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969613,0.0000386558,0.0002187553,0.001614927,0.0007451624,0.0000146746,0.000006257158,0.000009743891,0.0003905322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3667807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089368672","doi":"10.1111/rego.12356","title":"Grounding transnational business governance: A political‐strategic perspective on government responses in the Global South","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Transnational governance; Function (biology); Global governance; Economic system; Diversity (politics); Economics; Public administration; Political economy; Political science; Economic growth; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04097167132574609,"gpt":0.3082939830499425,"spread":0.2673223117241964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003939774,0.0001312617,0.0001183969,0.000008520414,0.000261058,0.0001321171,0.0003296202,0.000065769,0.0001897945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000539729,0.0001115569,0.00005843193,0.0006178989,0.0001378977,0.0002940538,0.00001689754,0.000126667,0.00002917603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002205509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003352045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003469421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004031347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972718,0.0001875738,0.0002281291,0.0002914939,0.001716907,0.0003040371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992937,0.0001909678,0.0002060372,0.00008418379,0.0001527415,0.0000723058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001829746,0.00004098289,0.005216804,0.000004449595,0.000008335885,0.000007160465,0.005592403,0.0001777242,0.00001747768,0.988495,0.0001510371,0.000105669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000544313,0.00003298839,0.9048954,0.00004307152,0.000006348858,0.000001451955,0.008244853,0.0003635882,0.00002425381,0.07507907,0.01058166,0.0001830482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4010118,0.00007562681,0.0006378039,0.348683,0.0003381735,0.0004461767,0.000219258,0.00005535,0.2485328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968327,0.00001666615,0.0001162394,0.00200207,0.0003907151,0.00002063841,0.000006238916,0.000006926473,0.0006078499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5767329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928080006","doi":"10.1111/rego.12086","title":"The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public‐private hybrid organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Property rights; Public economics; Appropriation; Public property; Public relations; Entrepreneurship; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Finance; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03273550307993877,"gpt":0.2329730445480841,"spread":0.2002375414681453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001895456,0.0001479322,0.0001558014,0.00003804529,0.000504185,0.0004164391,0.0005982158,0.00004042174,0.00002536008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001971774,0.00005309654,0.00003590868,0.0007519254,0.0003653948,0.00127202,0.0002385055,0.0001626165,0.00003423377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005986931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007582621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006414448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009865337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985201,0.0001381928,0.0003361386,0.000219542,0.0005689314,0.0002170906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978606,0.0003889707,0.0007364507,0.0005290803,0.0004732982,0.00001156237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007563506,0.00002614666,0.002753373,0.00001427989,0.00002348354,3.29776e-7,0.0002044129,0.0001292922,0.00002184624,0.9909436,0.003989635,0.001817967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001463249,0.000004226352,0.1375924,0.0000390099,0.00002097002,0.000004521165,0.0002092142,0.01019404,0.00007971912,0.07372914,0.7765366,0.0001269386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2891231,0.007698511,0.0006621908,0.5991883,0.0009497029,0.003318038,0.00000987464,0.0001909217,0.09885938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977174,0.0002449421,0.00002393747,0.0006037806,0.0003926384,0.00007484206,0.000006511051,0.00001624068,0.0009196806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4015732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945803091","doi":"10.1111/rego.12238","title":"Why do junctures become critical? Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Juncture; Divergence (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Structure and agency; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Political science; Critical discourse analysis; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political economy; Social science; Linguistics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04410591384373807,"gpt":0.3785232340873527,"spread":0.3344173202436146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003132916,0.0001219784,0.0002581412,0.0000359242,0.0001560378,0.000089346,0.00007172006,0.0001015655,0.0004518933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004566149,0.0001094838,0.00004731014,0.0002127602,0.0003466337,0.0003793426,0.00002517726,0.0001382373,0.00005787174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000429202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009606778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02155952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01202863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982796,0.0002556031,0.0002711611,0.0002955591,0.0004335858,0.0004644984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.0002645139,0.0001115813,0.0001354318,0.0001427731,0.0001853804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001233141,0.00004223605,0.02508403,0.00001566677,0.000004639892,9.067141e-7,0.005486809,0.0000375061,0.0001725125,0.9685795,0.0004950738,0.0000688367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000234729,0.00006047809,0.8961309,0.00009366217,0.0000073634,3.40885e-7,0.001656276,0.0003987734,0.00007838121,0.09451386,0.006652982,0.0001722369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9286969,0.0004590478,0.0002289945,0.03096524,0.0002956929,0.0004490563,0.00002521964,0.00003449897,0.0388453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978636,0.000006675133,0.00006529819,0.0004451881,0.0002217265,0.00001675315,0.000002486273,0.000007573633,0.001370717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304136456","doi":"10.1111/rego.12501","title":"From voluntary to mandatory corporate accountability: The politics of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Due diligence; Politics; Parliament; Legitimacy; German; Business; Supply chain; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Corporate social responsibility; Benchmarking; Window of opportunity; Public relations; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02271140338208221,"gpt":0.2391604685502079,"spread":0.2164490651681257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002898219,0.0001546874,0.000171247,0.00002910001,0.0005035411,0.0001114828,0.000664547,0.00002726229,0.0005127097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007030318,0.0001096132,0.0000885598,0.0005418275,0.0001799406,0.0006461845,0.0004484495,0.0001777381,0.00005336392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001240759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001052691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005662916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003521503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984929,0.0000416486,0.0003375976,0.0002680822,0.0005767752,0.0002829995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984966,0.00007321411,0.0006794208,0.0006081585,0.0001255125,0.00001710389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144948,0.0001359198,0.259212,0.00009882853,0.00004877622,0.000007447455,0.0008674127,0.005888054,0.004847321,0.7121004,0.01426999,0.002409373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001146267,0.000006988138,0.8621625,0.00002512597,0.0000271385,0.000001240564,0.0003850986,0.001758932,0.000528109,0.1025012,0.03234016,0.0001488561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932005,0.00008663951,0.00006266278,0.004564418,0.0004344312,0.0003153043,0.0001686678,0.00003713955,0.00113023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994527,0.000002914651,0.00001476819,0.003937094,0.0006132587,0.00004453862,0.00003419621,0.00001593642,0.0008102537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6095992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873958906","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01139.x","title":"The rise of the constitutional regulatory state in Colombia: The case of water governance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Health Organization","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Regulatory state; Dialectic; State (computer science); Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political economy; Process (computing); Economic system; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01299734732267626,"gpt":0.2156339392757678,"spread":0.2026365919530916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005814807,0.0001226563,0.000156813,0.00001402837,0.0003667739,0.00003721398,0.0002612661,0.0000333912,0.00005418527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001058522,0.00005923027,0.00008856149,0.0003056642,0.0008947314,0.0005800168,0.0001692703,0.00009554189,0.00001887164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006482632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002717414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003582436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006097825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988489,0.00003146936,0.0004089798,0.0001287758,0.00034092,0.0002410156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986036,0.00008171376,0.000743181,0.0003882665,0.0001764343,0.000006788638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009074205,0.00007851464,0.1707736,0.00007572002,0.00003755225,0.000002616546,0.0003098955,0.003903233,0.0008178734,0.8066648,0.01017762,0.007067877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003491645,0.000002064968,0.8837324,0.00006380909,0.00001499058,0.0000111071,0.00009181005,0.001702624,0.000827967,0.003956378,0.1091587,0.00008902042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879333,0.001688758,0.0001411762,0.003567512,0.000639066,0.0003850631,0.00001280686,0.00001491134,0.005617419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980684,0.00005528907,0.00001438199,0.0001451879,0.0002015729,0.00002173145,0.000001304142,0.000007598075,0.001484558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8027084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3296675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585306030","doi":"10.1111/rego.12145","title":"Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of Israel; Israeli Centers for Research Excellence; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Supreme court; Deference; Corporate governance; Politics; Preference; Law; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06546170716106989,"gpt":0.3415143140665916,"spread":0.2760526069055217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003223526,0.00008934834,0.0001673478,0.000005238173,0.002075787,0.00007058493,0.0002042828,0.00005500315,0.00007006372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004274657,0.00006267708,0.00003903652,0.0000584575,0.002100568,0.0003157666,0.00006402763,0.00007194377,0.000008655989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005211568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007830784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007728426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008909405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990106,0.00008569177,0.0001862193,0.0001824598,0.0003989333,0.0001361621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.000231475,0.000637422,0.0002078759,0.00015463,0.00003666609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711997,0.00001735052,0.02384862,0.000002325844,0.00001463804,0.000007393608,0.001431887,0.0002023445,0.00004290313,0.9707353,0.0006790637,0.002981123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001661657,0.00003054687,0.9422345,0.00005576505,0.00001089456,0.00001010727,0.0002931059,0.0001450998,0.0001105593,0.0314497,0.02540663,0.00008699911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9453586,0.0007800224,0.00007311221,0.008175868,0.0001962893,0.0002157261,0.00002785512,0.00001720421,0.04515527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986495,0.0002544428,0.00005817524,0.0001016124,0.0002074361,0.000009553601,6.584237e-7,0.000001866914,0.0007167679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123843977","doi":"10.1111/rego.12077","title":"Innovation and public space: The developmental possibilities of regulation in the global south","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame; Secretaría de Salud; National Research Foundation; Ford Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Discretion; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Competition (biology); Space (punctuation); Business; Economic system; Industrial organization; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01885502005423096,"gpt":0.2215936146235653,"spread":0.2027385945693343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007942632,0.00009402139,0.000089808,0.00006346833,0.0001236678,0.0001996315,0.0001806941,0.00004080977,0.00003481981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004574796,0.00006133789,0.0000178402,0.001042522,0.00008571588,0.001024805,0.00006363958,0.0000529321,0.000008689553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006223247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003344402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002994088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002800194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999079,0.00002490778,0.0002737674,0.0001389178,0.000337578,0.0001458696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991738,0.00003637047,0.0004978661,0.0001516256,0.0001368774,0.000003444974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100097,0.00001221953,0.1707857,0.00002841196,0.00000336158,2.418094e-8,0.0002563386,0.00001759083,0.0000669822,0.8206062,0.0009156614,0.00729749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003066396,0.000003419196,0.9090624,0.00002195015,0.00000478501,8.963399e-7,0.0002924351,0.002993123,0.00002207712,0.05366461,0.03355155,0.00007614811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693757,0.00005000022,0.001087291,0.01000824,0.00007918426,0.0002362295,0.000003529732,0.00002383591,0.01913596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985011,0.00000201762,0.00009879503,0.0008218856,0.0003280037,0.00001186519,0.00002342145,0.000004996643,0.0002078808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7669417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2501287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125441319","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01142.x","title":"Implementing independent regulatory agencies in Brazil: The contrasting experiences in the electricity and telecommunications sectors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Latin Americans; Divergence (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Independence (probability theory); Electricity; Economics; Public economics; Economic system; Sociology; Political science; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02646403264347446,"gpt":0.2576216747173567,"spread":0.2311576420738822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001158868,0.0001229567,0.0001258611,0.00006107321,0.0005509463,0.0001595409,0.0002812893,0.00003101428,0.00005448261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001588584,0.00008295672,0.00003134861,0.0006623897,0.000098393,0.0009572012,0.0001458457,0.0001391687,0.000005268599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006464009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001241698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003187877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001122416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988081,0.00004782108,0.0003228974,0.0001532954,0.0003098096,0.0003580427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991431,0.0001427348,0.0004055937,0.0002551874,0.00004712,0.000006313796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009976182,0.0000457464,0.9056852,0.00002025335,0.00001003248,3.304079e-7,0.008174243,0.0002119529,0.0002919419,0.06870945,0.0004423951,0.01639844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001759755,0.000001793767,0.9779505,0.00002539029,0.000006175115,0.000001875795,0.007941055,0.003497479,0.00005731829,0.0007673004,0.00946855,0.0001065649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915731,0.00159194,0.000210184,0.001815127,0.00008329576,0.000301613,4.639866e-7,0.00002603966,0.004398264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987935,0.00005465463,0.00007464348,0.0006618442,0.0002404669,0.0001043634,0.000003120215,0.000008127336,0.00005922633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07226528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.423749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023223706","doi":"10.1111/rego.12316","title":"Indexing watchdog accountability powers a framework for assessing the accountability capacity of independent oversight institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Context (archaeology); Audit; Public administration; Democracy; Political science; Accounting; Business; Public relations; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.143791356473306,"gpt":0.426530394825542,"spread":0.282739038352236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001630724,0.0001050928,0.0001699945,0.00001734447,0.0009001581,0.0002114282,0.0004283552,0.0001667722,0.0002605669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00553053,0.00008891144,0.0001198423,0.0005875676,0.0006986012,0.001096273,0.00006319172,0.0002771265,0.000004169667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004002424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002289486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001366795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979065,0.0002295366,0.0003459284,0.0002920727,0.0008943741,0.000331609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980171,0.0007934009,0.0004451502,0.0002743468,0.0003190518,0.0001509374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413461,0.0000839061,0.02384412,0.00005215727,0.0000212016,1.35827e-7,0.01175573,0.0004136845,0.0005347133,0.9611898,0.0006348408,0.001425577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000583801,0.00004814607,0.6402134,0.00009406776,0.00002636571,6.402861e-7,0.006588318,0.002468459,0.001533615,0.05467324,0.2934629,0.0003070106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275681,0.00005321241,0.1026769,0.05453848,0.0003119185,0.001115906,0.0002375509,0.00008179216,0.01341623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976524,0.00001495484,0.001303943,0.0006053587,0.0003022688,0.00003312028,0.000007649072,0.000005940681,0.00007439134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.692338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662728150","doi":"10.1111/rego.12081","title":"Making sense of the legal and judicial architectures of regional trade agreements worldwide","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Sovereignty; Harmonization; Law and economics; Polity; Legislature; Political science; Regulatory competition; Law; Sociology; Economics; Corporate governance; Politics; Corporate law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03395845327360456,"gpt":0.2870599071706746,"spread":0.2531014538970701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001946207,0.00005781998,0.0001020519,0.00001870245,0.0001296826,0.0000104258,0.0001087115,0.00003372842,0.00002419951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002575487,0.00004914512,0.00003052592,0.0003460233,0.0004208481,0.00008888207,0.00002925903,0.00005225115,5.203003e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004537631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001669668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004501689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001315701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988613,0.000119534,0.0001926929,0.0001101529,0.0006156104,0.0001006723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993151,0.00005692776,0.0004260391,0.0001193668,0.00004627374,0.00003631565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006533728,0.00004931155,0.07311413,0.00002220347,0.00002549073,0.000001577123,0.01249893,0.001847099,0.002992314,0.9044118,0.002547057,0.002424784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003282778,0.000009704459,0.9534975,0.00007117292,0.00001276136,0.000003782474,0.0001617948,0.00008223634,0.001919695,0.003006222,0.04083534,0.00007153807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678579,0.0002178803,0.0002665268,0.02220251,0.0002354765,0.0002278787,0.00001359037,0.00002157409,0.008956667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987192,0.000007050492,0.0004233283,0.0001375317,0.0001386729,8.663383e-7,8.629742e-7,0.000006657815,0.0005658364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.200408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096542568","doi":"10.1111/rego.12360","title":"The ratio of vision to data: Promoting emergent science and technologies through promissory regulation, the case of the <scp>FDA</scp> and personalised medicine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sixth Framework Programme; Universität Wien; Health Canada; European Commission; King's College London","keywords":"Regulatory science; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Corporate governance; Legislation; Political science; Scholarship; Law and economics; Economics; Public administration; Public economics; Sociology; Law; Biology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2368592711053475,"gpt":0.3956138028832499,"spread":0.1587545317779024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008456126,0.000118424,0.0003535965,0.00004006829,0.0006339917,0.00005164272,0.0005619872,0.00005144,0.000008446757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611193,0.00007962471,0.00002250065,0.0007166212,0.0006226079,0.0005287206,0.0003597256,0.0000926986,0.000005492746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001329206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003382223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001479591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974291,0.0001311008,0.001527385,0.0004890742,0.0002328171,0.0001905085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958569,0.000807787,0.002269689,0.000773348,0.0002254379,0.00006680988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185641,0.00007187903,0.02534582,0.001062878,0.00009668231,0.000001444964,0.09644414,0.002163091,0.008592641,0.752089,0.1031066,0.01098393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068892,0.0003048304,0.6555928,0.000550789,0.00002990817,0.00004215001,0.01453401,0.1983234,0.002298363,0.01703837,0.110017,0.0001994207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7205304,0.002785704,0.002765808,0.2718945,0.0001763598,0.001456337,0.0001047211,0.00002549937,0.0002607135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971375,0.0001721229,0.001012837,0.00142809,0.00009128023,0.00003220686,0.000002950972,0.00001090837,0.0001120524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943263346","doi":"10.1111/rego.12252","title":"Private regulatory capture via harmonization: An analysis of global retailer regulatory intermediaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Intermediary; Business; Harmonization; Corporate governance; Industrial organization; Transnational governance; Regulatory competition; Multinational corporation; Transaction cost; Leverage (statistics); Standardization; International trade; Finance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008852970475287006,"gpt":0.2288608814723744,"spread":0.2200079109970874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003608967,0.0002533456,0.0004846864,0.00009458923,0.0001267174,0.0001575348,0.0003378829,0.0001974763,0.0003471744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001805136,0.0002551676,0.0002465008,0.001790571,0.0002610724,0.002104011,0.0001042331,0.0001054709,0.0000313842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004033898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006614375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006184414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002302538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979831,0.00004018714,0.0005149765,0.0004578168,0.0006830808,0.000320816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977798,0.00002142846,0.0009885719,0.0006937946,0.0004804601,0.00003592259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008888989,0.00009351855,0.8157951,0.0001759179,0.0002316833,0.000001649905,0.000321132,0.005894879,0.0002018302,0.1753822,0.0004560534,0.001357124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003566722,0.00001211594,0.9719956,0.00003525109,0.0004224596,4.12393e-7,0.0004484268,0.01740048,0.00004604722,0.005301696,0.003712063,0.0002687685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939033,0.0001995638,0.002027347,0.0004519061,0.0004563178,0.000355513,0.00003770443,0.0001216485,0.002446685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984713,0.000006854281,0.00009090266,0.0004511783,0.0003829073,0.000004422496,0.0001594682,0.0000222111,0.0004107821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1700806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102250295","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01148.x","title":"Civil society and the regulatory state of the South: A commentary","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; CONTEST; State (computer science); Regulatory state; Shadow (psychology); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01282953606960803,"gpt":0.1980567894783148,"spread":0.1852272534087068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003518348,0.0001052033,0.0001407855,0.000008766222,0.0002884948,0.00004340255,0.0001472086,0.00001999026,0.00003901811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002914638,0.00006108376,0.0001100675,0.0002132808,0.0003350426,0.000519385,0.0001865001,0.00006355061,0.000009217858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000234108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005476245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007172919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003952846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992113,0.0000154087,0.0002085118,0.0001085398,0.0002980958,0.0001581964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00003890525,0.0005602503,0.0002694989,0.00007099563,0.000006323662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001678877,0.00007852498,0.5593003,0.0002288846,0.0001607663,6.788115e-8,0.003489591,0.0008412783,0.0003631153,0.2895991,0.1254384,0.02033206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006618406,8.284488e-7,0.9140974,0.00004110319,0.00002624819,4.074829e-7,0.0001348744,0.002842243,0.00004650014,0.003726833,0.07834283,0.00007887046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969936,0.002206868,0.0005572446,0.02054561,0.0005607637,0.0004589662,0.00000770471,0.00005007491,0.005676724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952078,0.00003652276,0.00004949459,0.003401051,0.0004163697,0.00001181018,0.000002106059,0.00001013631,0.0008646934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3547972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2490923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169412098","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01137.x","title":"Regulatory mobilization and service delivery at the edge of the regulatory state","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Corporate governance; Service delivery framework; Politics; Private sector; Context (archaeology); Business; Mobilization; State (computer science); Community mobilization; Collective action; Sewerage; Regulatory state; Service (business); Economics; Public administration; Economic growth; Political science; Finance; Economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009445359503614675,"gpt":0.2240671064928182,"spread":0.2146217469892035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005259757,0.0001202328,0.0001265477,0.00001062677,0.0005646229,0.0000271079,0.0002663462,0.00009566911,0.0001430698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008362299,0.00007813583,0.00005623993,0.0003353567,0.0004051916,0.0006573864,0.0001360111,0.00009270172,0.00001105995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002322679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001030349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007255187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984789,0.0001872936,0.0002456474,0.0001712656,0.000642314,0.0002745698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986696,0.00007061253,0.0006087734,0.0004282466,0.0001573784,0.00006544469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001436,0.00008706864,0.6843839,0.0001628803,0.00007762964,3.30023e-7,0.05995331,0.003448551,0.02610628,0.1546103,0.04203198,0.02899418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001472169,0.000004595952,0.8772345,0.00004366304,0.00001441261,0.000001402305,0.0003010372,0.00008904063,0.00581986,0.001132579,0.1151143,0.00009734517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928576,0.00171249,0.00004085093,0.002384191,0.0004677725,0.000294958,0.00002520822,0.000024432,0.002192488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922751,0.0002881156,0.00003764547,0.0005009847,0.0002663531,0.000008094277,0.000003682834,0.00001382886,0.006606211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1928506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.434268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402195577","doi":"10.1111/rego.12629","title":"Financial technocrats as competitive regime creators: The founding and design of the Network for Greening the Financial System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Technocracy; Greening; Finance; Business; Economics; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01317884109640513,"gpt":0.2066955164798975,"spread":0.1935166753834923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438972,0.0001980665,0.0002156336,0.00001918875,0.0006755868,0.0002596564,0.0003744866,0.00009273474,0.000007097605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000617885,0.0001136596,0.0001270361,0.0006899952,0.0002175796,0.0005490631,0.0001473435,0.0001583342,0.0000102279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008485185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009288716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002452091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009467522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987015,0.00002537186,0.0003283738,0.0003059697,0.0003590581,0.0002797116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985744,0.0003418232,0.0006168094,0.0003161097,0.0001446079,0.000006269915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007484244,0.000005022496,0.0007082227,0.000203815,0.00001111696,0.000002391996,0.0001595705,0.001123665,0.00007529068,0.9817633,0.01007936,0.005793389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000812137,0.00005119053,0.2916639,0.003500335,0.0002490612,0.00002795939,0.0004260577,0.08854882,0.0002532178,0.08971958,0.5241819,0.0005658664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3733464,0.02940186,0.5381823,0.01837043,0.01557331,0.009686884,0.000261885,0.0008121173,0.01436485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953551,0.0000741284,0.0002796075,0.0004074798,0.003068685,0.0001111459,0.000004434871,0.00003082371,0.000668547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5196136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893927247","doi":"10.1111/rego.12217","title":"Opaque transparency: How material affordances shape intermediary work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Affordance; Mandate; Legislation; Work (physics); Business; Legitimacy; Public relations; Hydraulic fracturing; Meaning (existential); Accounting; Political science; Law; Engineering; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0189127384527009,"gpt":0.2157185934142601,"spread":0.1968058549615592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001113762,0.0001868537,0.0001967554,0.00004650102,0.0002485999,0.0002899407,0.0002373478,0.00005492015,0.001179869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004086546,0.0001715543,0.00007047856,0.0004181442,0.000201514,0.001258728,0.00006839328,0.00005355781,0.0003007644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003723925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001308454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002445422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009446673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988822,0.000006790473,0.0002272197,0.0003119521,0.0003221557,0.0002497259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.00001267176,0.0004184128,0.0002304481,0.0001607463,0.0000113876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009557565,0.0001788388,0.1671492,0.0004233692,0.0001432301,0.00001204977,0.0007337226,0.0002216665,0.004740636,0.3316559,0.1942918,0.2994938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003186631,0.00001081179,0.7733853,0.0001527157,0.00001575817,8.518475e-7,0.00004036169,0.0028666,0.0004134003,0.004636665,0.217916,0.0002428476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172464,0.0003548399,0.008011744,0.01519621,0.004763234,0.0005376519,0.00001748695,0.0004919281,0.0533805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921461,0.00002850813,0.0004342756,0.0006448309,0.004388565,0.00002834929,0.00002590624,0.00002239252,0.002281124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6062361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043052803","doi":"10.1111/rego.12332","title":"Disaggregating <scp>public‐private</scp> governance interactions: European Union interventions in transnational private sustainability governance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies","keywords":"Corporate governance; European union; Incentive; Business; Sustainability; Multi-level governance; Certification; Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Finance; Market economy; Economic policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02901730722932369,"gpt":0.2684532586170326,"spread":0.2394359513877089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001163612,0.0004087124,0.0004242138,0.00005896868,0.0003850645,0.0005513647,0.0006334572,0.000105708,0.0001127954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006590988,0.0004529999,0.0003321461,0.00183077,0.0002022026,0.004544938,0.0002555183,0.0004763109,0.00004378067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001237465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001183023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004092622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005842529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964576,0.0002381915,0.00102208,0.0007757883,0.00083958,0.0006667679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972168,0.0001953708,0.001512292,0.0004117778,0.0005826376,0.000081142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318978,0.0005510101,0.1820949,0.001091199,0.00004983864,0.00001935169,0.001205911,0.003451747,0.0001499742,0.7950009,0.001542098,0.01480983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009907892,0.00002486979,0.8890649,0.0002529625,0.00003591283,0.000001338352,0.001084514,0.006115257,0.00003343958,0.01427248,0.08787919,0.0002443543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318449,0.0004049909,0.01081017,0.04375352,0.0004926631,0.001131733,0.0001276664,0.0003672692,0.01106701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972699,0.00006033053,0.0002443787,0.000894325,0.0008507658,0.00003427775,0.0001175863,0.00006090192,0.0004675114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161235961","doi":"10.1111/rego.12406","title":"Fine me if you can: Fixed asset intensity and enforcement of environmental regulations in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Enforcement; China; Business; Instrumental variable; Punitive damages; Fixed asset; Sample (material); Fixed effects model; Industrial organization; Panel data; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01071043713571397,"gpt":0.2022074042809274,"spread":0.1914969671452134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001077361,0.0001302378,0.0002194261,0.00005048828,0.0001035587,0.00004370313,0.00006676054,0.0000399639,0.0005592097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005807241,0.000136054,0.00004686675,0.0002789053,0.0000751113,0.0004020255,0.0001387787,0.00005920039,0.000008759435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007131714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001460964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002304599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005281375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990058,0.00000772944,0.0003231816,0.0002474329,0.0002720451,0.0001437884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.00001303115,0.0003820306,0.0002123829,0.00005938578,0.000009462817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001049842,0.0002144165,0.7444066,0.0001810194,0.0000648808,0.000009009684,0.0004586117,0.007922105,0.009053802,0.2155318,0.003259499,0.01879322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005384766,0.000004521977,0.9715861,0.0000697795,0.00001480117,0.000002245974,0.0001153448,0.01198168,0.000547467,0.00338018,0.01162399,0.00013538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892042,0.0003425754,0.0003778944,0.003271056,0.0001645918,0.0001937689,0.00002813733,0.00002794171,0.00638978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976684,0.00004688771,0.0002071304,0.0001536458,0.0001271811,0.000009104579,0.00009597755,0.00001026002,0.001681446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2271795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6122954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968547382","doi":"10.1111/rego.12272","title":"Business conflict and international law: The political economy of copyright in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; The Internet; Negotiation; Incentive; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political economy; Business; Economics; Public relations; Law; Political science; Market economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02157306500005234,"gpt":0.24057115759252,"spread":0.2189980925924677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001274435,0.00007233532,0.0000863288,0.000031789,0.00003900591,0.0001483052,0.0001942233,0.00002685527,0.00008029167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002507748,0.00004331363,0.00001704415,0.0002309195,0.0001643469,0.0006333235,0.00003993602,0.00005993609,0.00002979449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001634437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001394648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001638427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009696138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994495,0.00001037499,0.0001769079,0.0001039876,0.000118077,0.0001411416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994591,0.0000903496,0.0001769762,0.0001334723,0.000135046,0.000005007308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001359398,0.00001227772,0.01126893,0.00002662603,0.000004845431,4.583452e-7,0.00003080867,0.0002063262,0.00003468545,0.9880984,0.0002322083,0.00007084079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003079693,0.000003790271,0.4997545,0.00004509054,0.00000772229,0.000001749056,0.0005056573,0.01130943,0.00004910726,0.3556722,0.1322575,0.00008536977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8357111,0.00005609347,0.00007087697,0.02177061,0.0001040437,0.0001782537,0.000008304885,0.00001336109,0.1420874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918881,0.00001013503,0.000005953762,0.00773322,0.0001438701,0.000005937803,0.00003346917,0.000004323865,0.0001750082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6324263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2476823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386048841","doi":"10.1111/rego.12550","title":"Rethinking complementarity: The <scp>co‐evolution</scp> of public and private governance in corporate climate disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Corporate governance; Complementarity (molecular biology); Directive; Public economics; Business; Accounting; Public disclosure; Economics; Comparability; European union; Finance; Economic policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05680063058337564,"gpt":0.2627476728164888,"spread":0.2059470422331132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002713848,0.0001915559,0.0002946305,0.00008352724,0.0003342031,0.0002270176,0.0002624427,0.00008075254,0.00002457605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00224045,0.000171076,0.00007426808,0.001790297,0.0002097867,0.001241936,0.0003624145,0.0002113509,0.0000333621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001946837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007415723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004341169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002468633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976345,0.00007050965,0.0007563768,0.0004034167,0.0006970498,0.0004381732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958951,0.0002910966,0.003215658,0.0003834394,0.0001983835,0.0000162665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008113893,0.0000204966,0.7187058,0.0001377899,0.00001091477,0.000005913648,0.0001972937,0.0002631941,0.001032305,0.2765391,0.0004080351,0.002671013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003473205,0.000004177522,0.8950879,0.0001180103,0.00001315596,0.000001322957,0.0001671323,0.01004169,0.00005498551,0.08090509,0.01318994,0.00006927861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946605,0.0001674989,0.0002356684,0.002314119,0.0001810302,0.0004656793,0.00002649773,0.0001244804,0.001824523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988626,0.00009680093,0.00009764432,0.0001516975,0.000212621,0.00002063251,0.00005866614,0.00002837326,0.0004710134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.195634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6976275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386546808","doi":"10.1111/rego.12552","title":"A comparison of stakeholder engagement practices in voluntary sustainability standards","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Stakeholder; Sustainability; Stakeholder engagement; Business; Sustainability reporting; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Setter; Stakeholder analysis; Accounting; Political science; Corporate social responsibility; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1096277407469585,"gpt":0.3732650455827641,"spread":0.2636373048358056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00337851,0.0001197988,0.0002731169,0.0001245638,0.0001048732,0.00007982946,0.0001383683,0.0000565252,0.0001298537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01009436,0.0001297527,0.00005936917,0.001500982,0.00006604326,0.001111999,0.0001686973,0.0001535274,0.00001361837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005044864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002686619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001653494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001932811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978434,0.00005905375,0.0006911444,0.0003131693,0.000851835,0.0002413296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995784,0.0002049894,0.00299637,0.0003134309,0.0006926456,0.000008513743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579401,0.0001060002,0.9605675,0.0003986834,0.000009617633,0.00000851502,0.0004057982,0.003932396,0.0005434319,0.008749804,0.00163329,0.02348705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002931291,0.000007850357,0.9440975,0.00005550323,0.00001353415,1.222081e-7,0.001543287,0.01489868,0.0001216051,0.007439941,0.03140786,0.0001210365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954043,0.00006037718,0.0002164982,0.001629908,0.0001467885,0.0004756568,0.000008371256,0.0001053352,0.001952735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.000005442992,0.00006435734,0.00004704974,0.000158419,0.00001922122,0.00002289813,0.00001562534,0.0005162277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02977457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379615510","doi":"10.1111/rego.12539","title":"The devil is in the detail—The need for a decolonizing turn and better environmental accountability in global supply chain regulations: A comment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Supply chain; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Accounting; Environmental ethics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01767988224789022,"gpt":0.2571823230377426,"spread":0.2395024407898524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386408,0.0001477077,0.0001396103,0.00002361989,0.0005355897,0.0003395596,0.0002651346,0.00006605894,0.00001014929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003224078,0.00009404613,0.00007375195,0.0005990148,0.0001664848,0.0005460497,0.0001012394,0.0001036758,0.000006206128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004137723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002398471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00156675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004821602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986969,0.00006559987,0.000324032,0.0002396697,0.0003243475,0.000349482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.0003272719,0.0002434312,0.0002772252,0.00003061016,0.000009105558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001102453,0.00008414609,0.9536083,0.00006974612,0.00001482423,0.000001335249,0.002771468,0.0003648605,0.00001126269,0.02367716,0.004411686,0.01487498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005380661,0.000006234782,0.9210666,0.00002301677,0.00001533409,5.662072e-7,0.006349179,0.008652392,0.000001573503,0.0311059,0.03213787,0.0001032051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206533,0.0002281902,0.00004757924,0.07756867,0.00009587987,0.001131553,0.00003817953,0.00002401593,0.0002126605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948927,0.0000410329,0.00001620804,0.004639806,0.0002017248,0.0001311298,0.00002316991,0.000009303086,0.00004493525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07423943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4119377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783585475","doi":"10.1111/rego.12185","title":"Community structure and the behavior of transnational sustainability governors: Toward a multi‐relational approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Corporate governance; Isomorphism (crystallography); Convergence (economics); Public relations; Business; Common ownership; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Economic growth; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02502448677909096,"gpt":0.2605586703575379,"spread":0.235534183578447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006263457,0.0001499049,0.0002095168,0.00002676101,0.0004353923,0.00008737593,0.0002090517,0.0001031674,0.00005608413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006839144,0.0001155886,0.00009504773,0.0003335719,0.0009205643,0.0007764692,0.00008070627,0.0002020954,7.101946e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001912328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007578799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002541586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002503185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987879,0.00009416669,0.0003062459,0.0001802875,0.0004474025,0.000184007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984561,0.00009345714,0.0004317557,0.0002474886,0.0007571146,0.00001410381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002350367,0.0002355597,0.1351991,0.0002246058,0.00002630923,1.82012e-7,0.002373703,0.0002617487,0.00003348005,0.8593945,0.0001520216,0.001863777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389455,0.00000989445,0.9478325,0.000006282549,0.00006278478,8.274045e-7,0.001763806,0.005118509,0.00001223822,0.04242111,0.001263618,0.0001189813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910349,0.000055955,0.003966911,0.00279607,0.0001009823,0.0008217563,0.00009092996,0.00003665764,0.001095806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.000001337711,0.0003658578,0.0001726094,0.0003034799,0.00002084467,0.00006133177,0.00001078838,0.0001132727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8169734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4713566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891584491","doi":"10.1111/rego.12215","title":"Between regulatory field structuring and organizational roles: Intermediation in the field of sustainable urban development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediation; Problematization; Marketization; Economic system; Decentralization; Field (mathematics); Corporate governance; Political science; Intermediary; Public administration; Industrial organization; Economic geography; Business; Economics; Marketing; Management; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007060769468904535,"gpt":0.2164926376516902,"spread":0.2094318681827856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001939089,0.00008591535,0.0001084724,0.00006385965,0.0001527516,0.00006162489,0.0001275655,0.0000408782,0.00007995565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002019678,0.00007152012,0.00001486526,0.0003252856,0.00005090711,0.0004752821,0.00008453948,0.00004885721,0.000005988937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003344378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002120206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004381547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000860564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999227,0.000007690588,0.0002504485,0.0001463533,0.0002453547,0.0001231534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992965,0.00007693652,0.0003139536,0.0001284125,0.0001798098,0.000004328639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002716021,0.00001405629,0.7856076,0.000113334,0.00001452299,6.790175e-7,0.001293999,0.00004868004,0.0001024354,0.1970073,0.005059959,0.01071026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002089425,0.000008573797,0.9725846,0.00005164295,0.000005926042,2.83852e-7,0.0004339592,0.0004155905,0.0009607963,0.004421738,0.02082432,0.00008363421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918836,0.00008465353,0.002092201,0.001922561,0.00007425591,0.0001783098,4.448173e-7,0.00002001562,0.003743984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982069,0.00000401639,0.0001706114,0.0006041753,0.0006455962,0.000007001091,0.000008426894,0.000006829741,0.0003464689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1925855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2916506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1769034834","doi":"10.1111/rego.12078","title":"When doctors shape policy: The impact of self‐regulation on governing human biotechnology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Mode (computer interface); Business; Biotechnology; Economic system; Economics; Biology; Finance; Medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03454178373228382,"gpt":0.2813156180043203,"spread":0.2467738342720365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002737212,0.0002146906,0.0002445003,0.00012915,0.0002447878,0.0001023355,0.0003000004,0.0001026509,0.0001620171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001889114,0.0001547714,0.0001411758,0.0006351469,0.0001277366,0.0006373961,0.0001296144,0.0001126397,0.0001481606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002893374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005606345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001221356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006473544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.00001697654,0.0003717214,0.0002742984,0.0004983331,0.000244438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982685,0.00003192015,0.001016752,0.000424582,0.0002428513,0.00001535463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001272037,0.0001517625,0.08107848,0.00005452281,0.0001411334,9.174792e-7,0.0005421865,0.02645476,0.003179787,0.8333296,0.03802853,0.01691114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005970872,0.00004307942,0.9120119,0.00006050519,0.00001943269,0.000001241705,0.00007462654,0.02941557,0.0002039089,0.01744356,0.03993795,0.0001911225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668527,0.0001402801,0.000517091,0.006048821,0.0001971411,0.0003575551,0.000007843199,0.0002615566,0.02561699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978684,0.000009093697,0.0001017597,0.0002159515,0.0008241288,0.00001295926,0.00002079487,0.00002481287,0.0009221659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021378734","doi":"10.1111/rego.12313","title":"Does business influence government regulations? New evidence from Canadian impact assessments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Documentation; Stakeholder; Government (linguistics); Business; Early adopter; Accounting; Government regulation; Public economics; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03165794952015639,"gpt":0.2694185516871538,"spread":0.2377606021669974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001059038,0.0003030982,0.0002909297,0.00003932454,0.0003316875,0.000474243,0.0003942381,0.00007869907,0.001137647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004456358,0.0002277985,0.00009610743,0.0009860115,0.0000597065,0.003230362,0.0001387039,0.0001128361,0.0004258004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004718458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002315942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1060809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02840158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977345,0.00001268061,0.0004286976,0.0005525504,0.0009021761,0.000369426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984283,0.00005523233,0.0006965427,0.000398705,0.000315731,0.0001054665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001520458,0.00003037689,0.8695419,0.00008856972,0.0001091079,0.000008555618,0.0002091018,0.04780093,0.002432838,0.008510414,0.04238642,0.0287297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003609731,0.000005992119,0.9148184,0.0002235016,0.00003382907,2.707774e-7,0.00003867624,0.01589897,0.00005657362,0.001796809,0.0664552,0.0003108204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375836,0.0005128119,0.00695853,0.04815489,0.0007303701,0.0007030123,0.0000731332,0.0002664636,0.005017246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932037,0.00006180081,0.0007341802,0.003051589,0.001588814,0.00001734073,0.00003939275,0.00003224913,0.001270908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07767933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036593844","doi":"10.1111/rego.12328","title":"<scp>Regulatory disempowerment:</scp>How enabling and controlling forms of power obstruct citizen‐based regulation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Operationalization; Politics; Authoritarianism; Regulatory state; Power (physics); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; State (computer science); Hierarchy; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Social science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01523742865581404,"gpt":0.2012585589340427,"spread":0.1860211302782286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001927603,0.0002861939,0.0004202035,0.00008777645,0.0002559018,0.0002174426,0.0001762262,0.00009445318,0.00007178929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003647515,0.00027487,0.0001400664,0.0005238923,0.0001512715,0.001369998,0.0001009841,0.0001015601,0.00001648205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005078585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002646789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008901493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005890423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.00001359538,0.0004797328,0.0004662024,0.0006148051,0.0003039524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981034,0.00009987009,0.001193547,0.0002725457,0.0002924548,0.00003822149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004229116,0.0001724389,0.2608728,0.001701996,0.0003141324,0.000008606517,0.001202936,0.03733759,0.06047789,0.5954635,0.01705681,0.02496838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001983473,0.00002448278,0.8604157,0.0001789232,0.00005718248,7.823398e-7,0.0003037985,0.08394536,0.001495053,0.005333906,0.04606043,0.0002009005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709516,0.001169127,0.01393751,0.005061981,0.000294176,0.000648192,0.00001607278,0.0002282338,0.00769316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975872,0.00002500802,0.0003761729,0.001063107,0.0004203132,0.00001870633,0.00003599554,0.00003991904,0.0004335879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093634163","doi":"10.1111/rego.12362","title":"Time to certify: Explaining varying efficiency of private regulatory audits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Audit; Business; Context (archaeology); Stewardship (theology); Intermediary; Sustainability; Vendor; Accounting; Warrant; Economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02140155788497341,"gpt":0.2346570344942177,"spread":0.2132554766092443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002268052,0.0001617914,0.0002489868,0.00003990984,0.0001544827,0.00007900177,0.0002376984,0.00006639144,0.000222515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008134748,0.0001704899,0.00009459663,0.0007623762,0.00006430371,0.0008229428,0.0001252548,0.00007749672,0.0002009749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003706083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007094643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001811634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985837,0.00001548329,0.0003513347,0.0003068911,0.0004517507,0.0002908186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990617,0.00003227653,0.0004874692,0.0002114927,0.0001672272,0.00003981284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001893946,0.001135978,0.1294322,0.00508576,0.0003229468,0.00005950423,0.02416223,0.2032693,0.06647924,0.417735,0.05909493,0.09132902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001126847,0.00006988031,0.8784461,0.0002939874,0.00008328872,6.940487e-7,0.0005971219,0.03087924,0.001533848,0.002661103,0.08355752,0.0007503729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815958,0.00007055901,0.0009062501,0.004129001,0.0001071111,0.0003429659,0.000007473123,0.0001432733,0.01269755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977291,0.000002693246,0.0001258082,0.001305242,0.000562795,0.000004374617,0.000008921183,0.00002235516,0.000238721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7490139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163827072","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01161.x","title":"Experimentalist governance in the<scp>E</scp>uropean<scp>U</scp>nion: A commentary","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Freie Universität Berlin; European Commission","keywords":"Deliberation; Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Accountability; Competence (human resources); European union; Political science; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Public administration; Action (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Economics; Management; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0270968855979093,"gpt":0.2931343955423567,"spread":0.2660375099444474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653664,0.0003540865,0.000315424,0.00003598017,0.0007177678,0.0001888668,0.001026786,0.000139527,0.0001108908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001482546,0.0003273527,0.000168965,0.0008132075,0.0004778223,0.001572911,0.0001587912,0.0003799176,0.0003706557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005861089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008640267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003689464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00118924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956202,0.0008934191,0.000597886,0.0004768997,0.001386989,0.001024633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969717,0.001016868,0.001019788,0.0006830864,0.00007351577,0.0002349973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006917441,0.0003717481,0.03173855,0.00002208981,0.00002161846,0.00001463106,0.04156411,0.00007101496,0.0003855852,0.5411408,0.382872,0.001790992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004446341,0.00002250498,0.3633687,0.00007982946,0.000008341263,0.000005782293,0.002820496,0.00002248113,0.0005293346,0.0002979778,0.6323345,0.00006551138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4670309,0.00847751,0.0002166022,0.005601933,0.001415812,0.0008746154,0.0001852973,0.000184431,0.5160129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653307,0.001570961,0.0002196627,0.007959138,0.001843478,0.00004778941,0.00002839877,0.00005198964,0.02294795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5408428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402693399","doi":"10.1111/rego.12634","title":"Decarbonization under geoeconomic distress? Energy shocks, carbon lock‐ins, and Germany's pathway toward net zero","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulation & Governance","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; University of Toronto; Independent Social Research Foundation","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Energy (signal processing); Carbon fibers; Distress; Economics; Lock (firearm); Zero emission; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Materials science; Waste management; Physics; Engineering; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02898426496464782,"gpt":0.2135301169806603,"spread":0.1845458520160125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001832666,0.0002409993,0.0003515478,0.0001154415,0.00008495856,0.0002467147,0.0001433899,0.0001702526,0.000197855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002659652,0.0003026665,0.00009089548,0.0001693119,0.00006846731,0.0004376417,0.00008631523,0.0001074061,0.0001007383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004202789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002881974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003857808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998381,0.00001243125,0.0006161194,0.0006152959,0.0000395675,0.0003356541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991,0.00006071875,0.0004017635,0.0003193346,0.00001642398,0.0001018065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001964571,0.00002736488,0.007768014,0.0001213862,0.00006061848,0.000003901304,0.0004253515,0.002901259,0.0000965934,0.9797627,0.0008869169,0.007926228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008186812,0.00006219672,0.2135502,0.0001760843,0.0000256846,0.00003219689,0.00004553282,0.3686492,0.0006387553,0.1708512,0.2441029,0.001047419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149096,0.03179232,0.02035287,0.004644217,0.001882679,0.0002877966,0.001414802,0.0002692864,0.0244464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922925,0.004440935,0.00007548823,0.0003424143,0.0003857464,0.00002733452,0.0001700317,0.00005894747,0.002206611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8089116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}