{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5a8b5b1a8a85","filters":{"venue":"Religion and Human Rights"}},"results":[{"id":"W2069256681","doi":"10.1163/187103212x624229","title":"The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Human rights; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science; Gender studies; Social science; History","authors":[{"name":"Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2011164868778584,"gpt":0.3931843780641265,"spread":0.1920678911862681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009111088,0.0002758327,0.0004505511,0.001264085,0.008340864,0.01063085,0.00129836,0.003619406,0.004076796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01967362,0.0002168674,0.0002569369,0.001129831,0.04354591,0.00711381,0.006881851,0.003549744,0.0003864433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002395024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006852736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900329,0.007306925,0.0001549956,0.000360404,0.001110108,0.001034767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870114,0.00843212,0.00187351,0.0009714728,0.0009570525,0.0007544485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008298193,0.00008875517,0.004432199,0.0001730718,0.00002017057,0.0003016436,0.3105948,0.0001200824,0.0005651425,0.6369113,0.004864282,0.04184562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002894917,0.0001672473,0.007881931,0.001328724,0.00003312568,0.0005220184,0.5810054,0.0003491172,0.001519841,0.1926772,0.2144401,0.00004643209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402978,0.006526197,0.005147937,0.08748271,0.0009171931,0.00003462555,0.00003103589,0.00004253353,0.35952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940246,0.0005599119,0.0002486146,0.001990004,0.00008370588,0.000009761931,0.000002788089,0.00001194001,0.003068714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01063085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04818463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902882691","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13021142","title":"Bent Out of Shape: Fictions of Yoga and Religion before the Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Salient; Sociology; Aesthetics; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dia Dabby","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amélie Barras","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01710155191594023,"gpt":0.3073530642958906,"spread":0.2902515123799504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003885407,0.0002431357,0.0003203187,0.0009312446,0.01883034,0.00628191,0.001164324,0.006128218,0.00333274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009010217,0.000282782,0.0003063648,0.0007010404,0.05170807,0.003995268,0.00315231,0.009854141,0.000256809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008226246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003638482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0387261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05640911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960141,0.00254949,0.00007229403,0.000302559,0.0005102359,0.0005513518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936515,0.005220453,0.0002904643,0.0002854785,0.0003397315,0.0002123235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001100357,0.00001876501,0.0003129696,0.0000278747,0.000002627815,0.0003091956,0.06466611,0.0001090932,0.00008472605,0.9204931,0.01102434,0.002940255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003399175,0.00006951161,0.002323657,0.000990812,0.00002570275,0.0004473958,0.09339887,0.0009448572,0.0008801672,0.2142014,0.6866236,0.0000600816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1491793,0.01492146,0.005444302,0.2654783,0.001945588,0.00005143081,0.00006785333,0.00006749662,0.5628443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661374,0.001892393,0.0006774194,0.01185346,0.0005400014,0.00003338356,0.00001038438,0.00002774991,0.01882774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0387261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07700133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221061441","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10025","title":"Law and Religion: A Comparative Approach to the Management of Religious Intolerance in Brazil and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Religious diversity; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Phenomenon; Religious freedom; Accommodation; Sociology; Globalization; Cultural diversity; Law; Religious pluralism; Reasonable accommodation; Cultural pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Economic freedom","authors":[{"name":"Camila Silva Nicácio","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01515773720254099,"gpt":0.28347647220919,"spread":0.268318735006649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531964,0.0002773754,0.0005093842,0.005304762,0.02122935,0.0085012,0.00205951,0.002222815,0.004744704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129767,0.0002303668,0.0003232965,0.00754702,0.01558823,0.002548762,0.004403824,0.002269124,0.00007927581],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1878641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1653318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963127,0.001275511,0.00006692486,0.0002011398,0.0007654227,0.001378374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951088,0.002073347,0.0003302427,0.0001339966,0.001514953,0.0008385871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004485984,0.0001132929,0.01657484,0.0002749153,0.00003189636,0.00145896,0.2193124,0.0009310319,0.0004893952,0.725552,0.005747903,0.02946852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002056436,0.00006630539,0.05137846,0.0008967206,0.00009593887,0.0003282607,0.7484044,0.00225272,0.0004767464,0.03031202,0.1656892,0.00007853209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6108443,0.007414984,0.001990455,0.03345823,0.0001610767,0.0002497899,0.0002344206,0.00002543632,0.3456213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919091,0.001573039,0.0005591305,0.0007929548,0.00001280844,0.00003242686,0.00002423222,0.000007111194,0.005089085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1878641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612204118","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12111134","title":"Pluralism, Autonomy and Resistance: A Canadian Perspective on Resolving Conflicts between Freedom of Religion and lgbtq Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Covenant; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Diana Ginn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin Kindred","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01974110969968116,"gpt":0.308500853256769,"spread":0.2887597435570878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045979,0.0007241978,0.0009203959,0.00473633,0.0603947,0.0251071,0.00472652,0.01289207,0.006669661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01397946,0.0005848397,0.0008508677,0.005119339,0.09519788,0.008841921,0.009113159,0.01626262,0.000359269],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.195124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.209309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856471,0.004678375,0.0002839176,0.001112449,0.003805324,0.004472904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883546,0.005136457,0.0005880191,0.0004808297,0.002587765,0.002852303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009805617,0.00001482458,0.000586537,0.00003560711,0.000006840699,0.0002380024,0.04624548,0.0002052036,0.0001040932,0.9391582,0.008519373,0.004876044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005255613,0.00002955775,0.004455511,0.0008060051,0.00005136452,0.0003670211,0.1562905,0.001569085,0.0003175906,0.3940101,0.4418691,0.00018165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04920319,0.01045744,0.005156603,0.2863569,0.0008884299,0.0001140127,0.00008862311,0.0000377697,0.6476971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247776,0.005739944,0.00379479,0.02533487,0.0003154682,0.00005194819,0.00004121874,0.00007820406,0.03986586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.195124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9335421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967229705","doi":"10.1163/187103211x592604","title":"Is the Law Empowering or Patronizing Women? The Dilemma in the French Burqa Decision as the Tip of the Secular Law Iceberg","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ambivalence; Sociology; Legislation; Dilemma; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Noemi Gal‐Or","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0840956502407824,"gpt":0.3645352413234768,"spread":0.2804395910826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009873444,0.0005125453,0.0005941245,0.00106203,0.01614547,0.01749469,0.001388047,0.01291467,0.005301359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01186718,0.0003623784,0.0005521068,0.0008341256,0.03730681,0.006199326,0.003088607,0.006273002,0.0009025107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0243603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01190252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1849308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1483701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889521,0.005923492,0.00016262,0.0009662561,0.001638952,0.002356677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950482,0.003340715,0.0002960909,0.0002001908,0.0007458203,0.0003688438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002719737,0.000011818,0.0007177437,0.0000539583,0.000009457192,0.0003558744,0.02426367,0.0001174511,0.0001816054,0.9416125,0.01921955,0.01342928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002139765,0.00005769672,0.002745687,0.0005594807,0.00001994792,0.0004087074,0.03769783,0.0003006105,0.0004098506,0.1139958,0.8437067,0.00007628566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0544057,0.03727629,0.003812827,0.6478639,0.002034258,0.0000199673,0.00004857568,0.00005111309,0.2544874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653244,0.006217049,0.001067988,0.07278799,0.00179629,0.0000249067,0.00001988699,0.00006460836,0.05269694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1849308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3677089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}