{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5a8b5b1a8a85","filters":{"venue":"Religion and Human Rights"}},"results":[{"id":"W2069256681","doi":"10.1163/187103212x624229","title":"The Islamic Veil and its Discontents: How Do They Undermine Gender Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Human rights; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Point (geometry); Political science; Gender studies; Social science; History","authors":[{"name":"Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2011164868778584,"gpt":0.3931843780641265,"spread":0.1920678911862681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004508273,0.0001273703,0.000120466,0.00002754521,0.001974561,0.0002768861,0.0001167337,0.00009061061,0.000018722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003169853,0.00007138378,0.00004172213,0.00002768746,0.0003451773,0.0003274456,0.00003907684,0.0000956634,0.0000165341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001352042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003273234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003704519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01935166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987805,0.0002395826,0.0001583786,0.0001797481,0.0002634285,0.0003782882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994386,0.00009545466,0.00008614585,0.0001466616,0.00009016023,0.0001429781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002378749,0.00002449686,0.001628303,0.000007861405,0.00001795637,3.128082e-7,0.04217388,5.451611e-8,0.0001734836,0.9522247,0.003714286,0.00003231738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001184797,0.00004667257,0.1182839,0.00004584457,0.0001031429,0.00001109723,0.01945962,0.00002994143,0.0004485763,0.194952,0.6647258,0.0007086676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840266,0.001630283,0.000005849184,0.002500294,0.0002406927,0.0002417085,0.000005645456,0.00004601106,0.01130295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811092,0.0005230752,0.000005020991,0.0005141051,0.0004100489,0.000006562267,0.000007518875,0.000007287285,0.01741717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902882691","doi":"10.1163/18710328-13021142","title":"Bent Out of Shape: Fictions of Yoga and Religion before the Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Salient; Sociology; Aesthetics; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dia Dabby","is_ca":true},{"name":"Amélie Barras","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01710155191594023,"gpt":0.3073530642958906,"spread":0.2902515123799504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001291776,0.00005267972,0.00009786963,0.00003195866,0.0009083534,0.00001330581,0.00006596933,0.00004678917,0.00005720092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009390299,0.00003406939,0.00003043169,0.00003830564,0.002060144,0.00004012839,0.00002029026,0.0000463469,0.000003780342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001361341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006944806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004995921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009033578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994619,0.00004125985,0.0001444369,0.0000911996,0.0001568166,0.0001043704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.00004216029,0.00008823664,0.00008709518,0.0001127868,0.00006045962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003097332,0.00001481802,0.0006157664,0.000004461823,0.000007686226,2.986713e-7,0.002585202,1.00556e-7,0.00002015653,0.990578,0.006108699,0.00006172898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295365,0.0001536526,0.002726718,0.00004274229,0.00003291914,0.000001909293,0.0001899409,0.000008283617,0.0001115873,0.1030466,0.893496,0.00006006466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8377379,0.0001935592,0.00003182717,0.0009151063,0.0001715166,0.0001168609,0.00001611562,0.00001658764,0.1608006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975336,0.0001318909,0.00003527811,0.0001062346,0.0002267317,0.000002678083,0.00000286012,0.000002116302,0.001958587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8875314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221061441","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10025","title":"Law and Religion: A Comparative Approach to the Management of Religious Intolerance in Brazil and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Religious diversity; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Phenomenon; Religious freedom; Accommodation; Sociology; Globalization; Cultural diversity; Law; Religious pluralism; Reasonable accommodation; Cultural pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Economic freedom","authors":[{"name":"Camila Silva Nicácio","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01515773720254099,"gpt":0.28347647220919,"spread":0.268318735006649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001681781,0.00006928729,0.0001361421,0.0000297248,0.001093894,0.0000226392,0.00009550681,0.00001506023,0.000003431334],"category_scores_gemma":[7.153637e-7,0.00005340963,0.00001084671,0.000100904,0.0004790193,0.00002673939,0.00008075417,0.00009144061,2.701208e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007384452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001085316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.818635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7993129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992217,0.00009778307,0.0001427336,0.0001660849,0.0002326075,0.0001391136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997258,0.0000401146,0.00004767508,0.00008407512,0.00002165262,0.00008072023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001089126,0.00001667921,0.0001558552,0.00001198252,0.000009308923,0.000005562325,0.003378456,0.0000320103,7.72773e-7,0.9879415,0.008423585,0.00001340485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002216278,0.00004097764,0.0007765761,0.00002200644,0.00001081475,0.000006654765,0.001371843,0.00001192077,0.000003238795,0.01945164,0.9779824,0.0001002943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5823051,0.001069926,0.00001618658,0.001412645,0.00006137956,0.000331272,0.00001470238,0.000009862999,0.4147789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975075,0.0002042221,0.0001119378,0.00137922,0.00002705994,0.0000249591,0.00000350766,0.000002077728,0.0007394974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.841346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612204118","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12111134","title":"Pluralism, Autonomy and Resistance: A Canadian Perspective on Resolving Conflicts between Freedom of Religion and lgbtq Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Covenant; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Diana Ginn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kevin Kindred","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01974110969968116,"gpt":0.308500853256769,"spread":0.2887597435570878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002015352,0.0001342951,0.0002420719,0.0001217125,0.004032121,0.0001851509,0.0001499675,0.0001258,0.00001144939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004148173,0.0001139469,0.00003378405,0.0000322905,0.002246214,0.0001712678,0.00003155811,0.0001367269,0.000002793799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002311964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003900301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8022664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7484244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989756,0.00007390977,0.0001833056,0.000286196,0.0002028951,0.0002780744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.0001246585,0.0001731379,0.0002172932,0.0001446708,0.0003845647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009399083,0.000005131365,0.001688659,0.000006213357,0.0000167474,0.00001019914,0.003572304,8.049576e-8,0.000005333879,0.9925483,0.002129639,0.000007954641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003767799,0.00006742222,0.01332897,0.000165571,0.00003640435,0.0000016529,0.0001625497,0.000001127688,0.00002683518,0.1882252,0.7974066,0.0002008081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5508208,0.0004778075,0.00000285223,0.001788279,0.00007198668,0.0001780964,0.00003977107,0.00002130719,0.4465991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942695,0.0001699146,0.0001179134,0.0001314957,0.0002845546,0.000003169418,0.000005810042,0.000005484379,0.005012098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967229705","doi":"10.1163/187103211x592604","title":"Is the Law Empowering or Patronizing Women? The Dilemma in the French Burqa Decision as the Tip of the Secular Law Iceberg","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion and Human Rights","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Ambivalence; Sociology; Legislation; Dilemma; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Noemi Gal‐Or","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0840956502407824,"gpt":0.3645352413234768,"spread":0.2804395910826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075976,0.000144541,0.0001304628,0.0000197017,0.002808552,0.0001905277,0.0007758439,0.00008892176,0.0001743224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003873029,0.00004361466,0.0000965973,0.0001389665,0.001111601,0.0001313386,0.00009819231,0.0002367912,0.00001354228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001250232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006149349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1214669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2342322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981668,0.0004880296,0.0002959327,0.0002023598,0.0005206092,0.0003262813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988536,0.0003336791,0.0001481253,0.0005221157,0.00009561017,0.0000469336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005345928,0.00002022146,0.0002365522,0.000003066302,0.00001338472,0.00000147524,0.3348758,0.00000145597,0.00002663561,0.6629878,0.001810382,0.00001797896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004139281,0.00006467552,0.01836256,0.00009210853,0.00004839002,0.0000117027,0.03690223,0.00002635432,0.000815083,0.1644184,0.7786282,0.0002163547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768619,0.0001819163,0.000003796028,0.002778166,0.0001738484,0.0005083173,0.000003166096,0.00001657791,0.01947234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930038,0.00006313514,0.0000102576,0.005363275,0.0001597278,0.00002763339,0.000001023148,0.000008192033,0.001362903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}