{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":8,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"70189db4e3b6","filters":{"venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas"}},"results":[{"id":"W4288069547","doi":"10.5209/rpub.76612","title":"De la comunidad a lo común: desplazamientos teóricos, éticos y políticos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Social and Economic Solidarity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Álvaro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01345824957064557,"gpt":0.3137762946012974,"spread":0.3003180450306518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007592281,0.0007238931,0.001217574,0.0005027524,0.00421759,0.003368329,0.002474756,0.0007582429,0.003012768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004381895,0.0009023861,0.0007671525,0.001709165,0.001580342,0.0005217667,0.001029312,0.002156094,0.000277398],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01481803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005816028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01545242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001417177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881421,0.00569146,0.001231157,0.001125889,0.001250553,0.002558865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935606,0.002508141,0.0008411419,0.001262736,0.0002462689,0.001581125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002313398,0.0009894578,0.019241,0.0001570415,0.0002690919,0.0001451028,0.008880122,0.00003280511,0.000151178,0.8334555,0.1331769,0.003270453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001351941,0.0002210343,0.003962041,0.00008075335,0.0003953591,0.0001223656,0.004330236,0.0007751385,0.00001168561,0.0223741,0.9654198,0.0009555533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5275337,0.02342238,0.0008838535,0.06018012,0.0079813,0.003865939,0.00134672,0.001751546,0.3730345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876657,0.0007440396,0.0006108511,0.002777972,0.002700868,0.0003939552,0.00005941705,0.0001564394,0.004890747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557614419","doi":"10.5209/rpub.53879","title":"Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Social contract; Law and economics; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Morality; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Paweł Nowakowski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02181435496158752,"gpt":0.3120924097632771,"spread":0.2902780548016896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002917839,0.001017183,0.00184414,0.0002850394,0.00123559,0.001128903,0.002013499,0.001328495,0.00293044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009810513,0.000785812,0.0009754667,0.001024576,0.002072875,0.001251677,0.0004769568,0.0008591544,0.0005466056],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005011105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002194405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03022822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001936949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908072,0.001637462,0.001931242,0.001403913,0.001811679,0.00240851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919613,0.002559917,0.001471727,0.001369006,0.001137365,0.001500668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002601933,0.0004416987,0.003910982,0.0002618595,0.0007666581,0.00006492357,0.02498954,3.674506e-7,0.003005361,0.7177191,0.2445737,0.004005544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001905448,0.0002825198,0.006162537,0.0007240874,0.0006141971,0.00001735181,0.001416153,0.00001822424,0.000247251,0.005857985,0.9816852,0.001069114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09771141,0.02875366,0.0009907628,0.6042643,0.007684529,0.004884897,0.001696592,0.0009524811,0.2530614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483112,0.003571653,0.001857634,0.002186379,0.003057199,0.0001094111,0.00001749775,0.0001526939,0.04073639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069545","doi":"10.5209/rpub.83136","title":"J. L. Villacañas, Neoliberalismo como teología política. Habermas, Foucault, Dardot, Laval y la historia del capitalismo contemporáneo, Barcelona, NED Ediciones, 2020, 280 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Carmelo Moreno","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008612311335508075,"gpt":0.2763726671861261,"spread":0.267760355850618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007013004,0.001464085,0.002398932,0.0005699917,0.003634625,0.001480683,0.003314234,0.001359265,0.004330602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005219,0.001704923,0.00122759,0.001576972,0.002961732,0.001051282,0.001620111,0.003219472,0.000401734],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01274968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007067615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03747753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006101162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9827942,0.005911634,0.00258257,0.002232832,0.002424547,0.004054186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894465,0.002995021,0.001312348,0.002177294,0.000650009,0.003418802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002902745,0.0004268783,0.0005393989,0.0001670216,0.000264354,0.0004481683,0.001868719,0.000005500726,0.000115036,0.5500056,0.4451301,0.0007389885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002787405,0.0004375943,0.0005408581,0.0001365904,0.0006347442,0.0003655301,0.001096316,0.0002636562,0.00001349632,0.03413546,0.9578246,0.001763691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02397154,0.1151661,0.0005345488,0.3313215,0.02291109,0.004910846,0.003893354,0.002240487,0.4950505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932049,0.005076556,0.0009426419,0.01178518,0.008951731,0.0007699161,0.0005929613,0.0003885975,0.03944341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141885","doi":"10.5209/rpub.100865","title":"El dispositivo ontológico y la política de los gestos en el proyecto Homo Sacer de Giorgio Agamben","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Nicolás Ried","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ricardo Camargo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007902786983268514,"gpt":0.3488800055641926,"spread":0.3409772185809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005685302,0.0008810495,0.001357169,0.0005264213,0.001383918,0.001199312,0.002034925,0.002061563,0.0005884889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01209891,0.0009159089,0.0007902161,0.001337054,0.002306663,0.0005411216,0.0005259957,0.002025179,0.000185404],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007567737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004446351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002752512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874751,0.005684686,0.001169942,0.001283822,0.0009408751,0.003445597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154,0.004379023,0.0004096475,0.001454644,0.0003955113,0.001821247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003819536,0.0006532429,0.007875429,0.0004333142,0.0004397789,0.000275786,0.001922659,0.000004812073,0.0002567384,0.966404,0.02013927,0.001213072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001083934,0.0001479772,0.01663127,0.0005334842,0.0007559838,0.00009303526,0.0003476408,0.0002612512,0.0001297613,0.3541209,0.6250952,0.0007995532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06505629,0.01059052,0.00394837,0.03237715,0.001327724,0.001795799,0.0004340178,0.00077388,0.8836963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742154,0.0009952999,0.001070256,0.003461123,0.002172405,0.0002222694,0.00002819663,0.0001150174,0.01772002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200502634","doi":"10.5209/rpub.77483","title":"El pensamiento republicano en el postkantismo. Dos modelos","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Moggach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02898785190792283,"gpt":0.3612103051210746,"spread":0.3322224532131518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005092208,0.0008565225,0.001346021,0.0004576791,0.001581149,0.002586203,0.001958052,0.001818945,0.001091852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02355183,0.0009639693,0.0009170112,0.002197098,0.00155054,0.001135948,0.0007401516,0.002437874,0.0004718583],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005366798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009019638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004834509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001859635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877679,0.003523997,0.001576425,0.001746893,0.00230715,0.003077666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904534,0.002393309,0.0005688078,0.002209304,0.001635366,0.002739798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169287,0.0005552857,0.0006202545,0.0003783852,0.0002294379,0.0003945617,0.003120914,0.000007368311,0.0005948256,0.9428395,0.05057891,0.0005636384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006748039,0.0001317653,0.0007468506,0.0002890997,0.000361163,0.0001044015,0.000429187,0.0005320991,0.00008787064,0.2363651,0.7593982,0.0008794718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02905133,0.01702786,0.00157562,0.3321839,0.004458242,0.001278287,0.0008230141,0.0009995158,0.6126022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708987,0.002403578,0.001855959,0.007088395,0.00585986,0.00006065028,0.0001355433,0.0001766694,0.01152059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415666287","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2016.v19.n1.52220","title":"Kari Palonen y José María Rosales (eds.), \"Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives\", Opladen/Berlin/ Toronto, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2015, 324 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Fernando Berdún Palacios","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0192832742766387,"gpt":0.3034540891215282,"spread":0.2841708148448895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665971,0.0009850619,0.001496526,0.0002492887,0.001456573,0.002734081,0.001209985,0.001586258,0.0005805243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039878,0.0008344953,0.0004152468,0.0005382271,0.003828952,0.003238059,0.0005518486,0.001356671,0.00006480764],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01196476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002933729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02401007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009236226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899536,0.00326103,0.001403539,0.001732825,0.001527688,0.002121257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905044,0.004281219,0.0006473912,0.00118778,0.0006194439,0.002759737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003098208,0.0002924141,0.002768863,0.0002122918,0.0002693369,0.00007654227,0.004303982,5.048982e-8,0.000115311,0.7181726,0.2719848,0.001493945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152921,0.0003463025,0.001757063,0.0003583621,0.0004127035,0.00005824637,0.002233341,0.00002342401,0.000006184689,0.2111132,0.7811524,0.001009538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0113887,0.4942979,0.0009499806,0.3191132,0.003298379,0.002067079,0.00040479,0.0007027826,0.1677772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666336,0.01450118,0.0007408978,0.001696732,0.004004043,0.0001161423,0.00002442916,0.0001576796,0.01212529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391827801","doi":"10.5209/rpub.92078","title":"The Possibility of the Possibility of Something New: The Subject and Fidelity to the Event in Love and Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Event (particle physics); Political philosophy; Politics; Fidelity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Hilda Fernandez‐Alvarez","is_ca":true},{"name":"Am Johal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02290000287453406,"gpt":0.3450609309393994,"spread":0.3221609280648653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779997,0.0002779619,0.0005253968,0.00016613,0.0003553443,0.0001693855,0.001099213,0.0002190347,0.00003813352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005782053,0.0001477671,0.0002802804,0.001258503,0.000832139,0.00008103576,0.0003753263,0.0007028156,0.00001392098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005426363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000608449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00824328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001368838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950349,0.001991587,0.001093415,0.000552804,0.0005208919,0.0008063929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933689,0.003328491,0.0004123107,0.002365411,0.0002427874,0.000282062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977052,0.0001897344,0.09252483,0.0001838274,0.0003220913,0.000005390302,0.02056715,0.00001460253,0.0001802577,0.8321249,0.05213859,0.001450912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006430294,0.0001361248,0.5227862,0.00007782564,0.0002669926,0.00002572881,0.001661678,0.0002136978,0.00005513811,0.2380612,0.2358048,0.0002675772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186218,0.00601908,0.00009777902,0.06782932,0.0009180555,0.0009468852,0.0001964961,0.00004087841,0.005329689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965641,0.0001196515,0.00005947563,0.001127267,0.0005636028,0.00002180287,0.000004147989,0.00002830911,0.001511666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5940637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108180159","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2014.v17.n2.46699","title":"Jean-Luc Nancy sobre la soberanía y la retirada del Dios cristiano","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Nothing; Philosophy; Deconstruction (building); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tenzan Eaghil","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01008266269988732,"gpt":0.2990572924036336,"spread":0.2889746297037463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633686,0.0007700974,0.001263876,0.000292269,0.001428547,0.001232233,0.001790226,0.001812735,0.0008342778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02273346,0.0007941367,0.0006852534,0.0008408412,0.002789333,0.0005326161,0.000355993,0.001740985,0.0006173067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001808549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002151367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001743584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005368283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874479,0.006714609,0.001134277,0.001181137,0.001080586,0.002441524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893681,0.00649248,0.0005186656,0.00147218,0.0004078826,0.001740667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001502516,0.0002808645,0.0007083255,0.0002479194,0.0001455789,0.0001158033,0.0006538846,0.000002042669,0.00003759679,0.9399424,0.05406216,0.00365323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007972736,0.0001204905,0.0008314946,0.0002272059,0.0002633261,0.00005217736,0.0001216282,0.0001612534,0.00002053599,0.2686628,0.728083,0.0006587986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005561845,0.005252891,0.002952695,0.01295496,0.00166844,0.0006195554,0.0001664632,0.0005379256,0.9702852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972115,0.002238568,0.00120929,0.00228265,0.003944375,0.00007514698,0.0000304112,0.0001328958,0.01797169],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}