{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"f94b2250422f","filters":{"venue":"Research & Politics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2575707019","doi":"10.1177/2053168016686915","title":"Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":747,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Elitism; Salience (neuroscience); Elite; Politics; Ideology; Political science; Chapel; Political economy; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Psychology; Economics; Geography; History; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3519349588949806,"gpt":0.5022994775134062,"spread":0.1503645186184256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01207398,0.0001357814,0.0002450741,0.00009852843,0.002361283,0.0004471371,0.001765875,0.00008949162,0.000009119991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01391335,0.00008259004,0.00002256272,0.0001495531,0.004717411,0.0005147575,0.0007655071,0.0004116565,0.000004861956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001675088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007486031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0820626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006532528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943969,0.001943126,0.0003262836,0.0004387626,0.001129629,0.001765289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941202,0.00358354,0.0001119865,0.001257138,0.0005725679,0.0003545232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002390333,0.00005744422,0.04291105,0.00002357992,0.00001354729,0.000005900773,0.008560732,0.000001190455,0.0001507953,0.9467342,0.001209015,0.0003085834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001228131,0.0003894811,0.8930329,0.0005294541,0.00002529746,0.000008926074,0.05656777,0.003835855,0.0009922094,0.02432167,0.01858542,0.0004828538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711874,0.0001457913,0.0001876784,0.0215331,0.000166556,0.0007574453,0.000262406,0.00002134971,0.005738332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985796,0.000134331,0.0001267756,0.0003046135,0.0003928904,0.00003190374,0.00002566116,0.00002236132,0.0003818547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911244646","doi":"10.1177/2053168018816228","title":"Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social media","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incivility; Politics; Social media; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Public opinion; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Media studies; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0630384512932419,"gpt":0.3518732818706828,"spread":0.2888348305774409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001905714,0.0000644395,0.0001692414,0.0000839714,0.00009131958,0.00003193922,0.0003832914,0.00004595246,0.000006596983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002684568,0.00003499564,0.00003940444,0.0002725387,0.0003577353,0.00004386152,0.00006439643,0.0001581821,0.000009418005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002512912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001680242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001135004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009347138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998078,0.0005764092,0.0001774323,0.0001434796,0.0005439639,0.0004807121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978403,0.001588517,0.00003682332,0.0003747037,0.0001018579,0.00005776969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001287553,0.0007362202,0.001827119,0.0000801511,0.00003469164,0.000008083167,0.09418649,0.000009495991,0.0002668956,0.8673975,0.00008286581,0.03524173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01578228,0.01116991,0.3581865,0.0002287927,0.00003141219,0.00003229531,0.03153117,0.02958838,0.04716418,0.4781056,0.02749741,0.0006820479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995884,0.00007432112,0.00002327483,0.00197973,0.00005050205,0.0002765238,0.000009353489,0.000006849223,0.001695466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995245,0.0001304628,0.00004198509,0.00006832341,0.00009558412,0.00002020967,8.359473e-7,0.000003335025,0.0001147783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3892919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1715795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130387723","doi":"10.1177/2053168021993979","title":"How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Distrust; Public opinion; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Politics; Law; Medicine; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2658703680133792,"gpt":0.5026970614589801,"spread":0.2368266934456009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861835,0.0001537402,0.0002651781,0.0002158014,0.001790519,0.001903826,0.0002264807,0.0002030793,0.0002227365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03693116,0.0001522747,0.00005481111,0.0003382464,0.002025062,0.001489257,0.0001557391,0.0003335583,0.0000100571],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005332694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007461132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003936676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009164541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.0006656797,0.0002796053,0.0003022217,0.001074882,0.0009942395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924539,0.003817145,0.00009583714,0.0002493304,0.0008145362,0.00256919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002483274,0.00007441361,0.002085644,0.000457385,0.00003487488,0.00005468483,0.2963163,0.000001342833,0.00004792157,0.6488831,0.04997505,0.002044404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009983889,0.00007242006,0.001463497,0.00004557988,0.00001745184,0.00001216068,0.2655589,0.00004528955,0.0000822771,0.0207634,0.7107578,0.0001828619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646278,0.006507292,0.001224179,0.7125725,0.000518138,0.002365571,0.001110111,0.0001696175,0.01090489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8572269,0.02404884,0.001619034,0.09028062,0.0007643657,0.00006779988,0.0003048626,0.00005392031,0.02563365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750665954","doi":"10.1177/2053168018759127","title":"The face of internet recruitment: Evaluating the labor markets of online crowdsourcing platforms in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Generalizability theory; The Internet; Replicate; Sample (material); China; Online research methods; Population; Benchmark (surveying); Data science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Statistics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2644258724742663,"gpt":0.5298346130798748,"spread":0.2654087406056085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005763142,0.00007853761,0.000160439,0.00009765756,0.0005639283,0.00005083414,0.0006896807,0.00009793621,0.0000712717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010191,0.00004822349,0.00005252342,0.0005120218,0.002535589,0.00006951355,0.0001858244,0.0004267252,0.000009187053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002459954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009315572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01497684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004967983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965929,0.0008693914,0.0003742588,0.0001261787,0.001189624,0.0008475894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951369,0.003801671,0.0001172248,0.0002816481,0.0005344962,0.0001281206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001033799,0.0002069186,0.06548113,0.00009918462,0.0000674758,0.000003068729,0.4350437,0.000004020428,0.00075747,0.4749742,0.001602061,0.02165738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001242382,0.001366276,0.1862634,0.0007628929,0.00003456353,0.000001815615,0.5304512,0.00388486,0.01591371,0.171324,0.08840639,0.0003485786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875855,0.0002591048,0.000004786485,0.003395701,0.0002503562,0.0005750948,0.00004509143,0.000008660645,0.00787572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962969,0.0002343769,0.00008320076,0.00006421536,0.0007039878,0.00002299015,0.000003383589,0.00001168666,0.002579231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3036502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790651206","doi":"10.1177/2053168017751993","title":"Compulsory voting and voter information seeking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Sophistication; Politics; Political science; Voting behavior; Feeling; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1132627350467932,"gpt":0.4559658056747056,"spread":0.3427030706279124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135278,0.00005606252,0.0000833082,0.0001478154,0.001308007,0.0002129872,0.0001532818,0.0001052767,0.00005876778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002078482,0.00005845563,0.00002092394,0.0001975024,0.001489738,0.0003277596,0.00009421735,0.0002588916,0.0002121702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001768164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003827166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003200096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979458,0.0003658554,0.0001491108,0.00008242091,0.0006687383,0.0007880689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983594,0.0006800526,0.0000303286,0.00009121574,0.0005408717,0.0002981536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003818555,0.00001729946,0.03034822,0.00004440717,0.0000126429,0.000002533654,0.1655714,1.895636e-7,0.00005771114,0.7875537,0.006779997,0.009608129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002188888,0.00009917904,0.006354933,0.00005801746,0.000006483743,0.000001796569,0.06403235,0.0008606758,0.0003135707,0.02320982,0.9046761,0.0001681787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8863155,0.00004312008,0.0002421678,0.004829131,0.0004663653,0.0002072816,0.0000079593,0.00007048465,0.107818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958491,0.00003250003,0.0002761268,0.0005646713,0.002521347,0.0000042738,0.00000346997,0.000006326939,0.0007421362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391790392","doi":"10.1177/20531680241233439","title":"Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Laura and John Arnold Foundation","keywords":"Reproducibility; Politics; Political science; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5427626271480739,"gpt":0.6652534810633781,"spread":0.1224908539153042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1492238,0.00009134643,0.0001799655,0.0008301322,0.0003560678,0.001022927,0.0006336092,0.00005503581,0.0002383856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08185679,0.00006637618,0.00003737287,0.002471084,0.001997282,0.000658947,0.0006131658,0.000632834,0.0001983457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007914108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003041169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004283606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007676868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904854,0.0008822721,0.0007500185,0.002075656,0.004382824,0.001423841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915569,0.003998198,0.00002851477,0.002555364,0.001252509,0.0006085059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005638049,0.0001070934,0.1797951,0.00007710597,0.000002057597,0.00001382303,0.002750179,0.000002530529,0.001395801,0.7848968,0.0003171401,0.03063678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009511466,0.0001097782,0.4067348,0.0000616375,0.000001369988,0.00001688789,0.001381741,0.05699906,0.003690712,0.5231546,0.007654347,0.00009993646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572753,0.0001485951,0.00003198716,0.02315113,0.0001351882,0.000362901,0.000007792864,0.00004294491,0.01884413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983147,0.000009672979,0.0003253799,0.0001410278,0.0001458133,0.00002392035,7.667667e-7,0.000006749362,0.001031908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2617422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196065819","doi":"10.1177/20531680211041505","title":"Did exposure to COVID-19 affect vote choice in the 2020 presidential election?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential election; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Presidential system; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; State (computer science); Public administration; Political economy; Demographic economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Disease","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1539790330154678,"gpt":0.5215833821985074,"spread":0.3676043491830396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003367734,0.00008188144,0.0001342228,0.0000993436,0.0008707904,0.0003195858,0.0003248129,0.000112985,0.000162894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01228144,0.00006833912,0.00005911501,0.001061937,0.000206636,0.0001247161,0.00007168711,0.0004295215,0.0001355825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000632503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001737468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1747132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2865344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99361,0.003584063,0.0002295324,0.0002600581,0.001217103,0.001099189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965163,0.002233051,0.00002260932,0.0002745677,0.0003293349,0.0006240874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002751731,0.0003231156,0.2434193,0.0001675252,0.00003260977,0.0001728862,0.01546633,0.0001466474,0.002624096,0.6410041,0.09625996,0.0003559146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005427374,0.0004730325,0.242344,0.00006348715,0.00001816977,0.000009805981,0.003015391,0.00006612887,0.001989386,0.03013125,0.7210317,0.0003149444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112293,0.0002216073,0.0001392398,0.07709064,0.0002535213,0.0007800918,0.00001681594,0.00004498227,0.01022383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901903,0.000009498511,0.0000164625,0.001506806,0.001850036,0.00009661238,0.000007177419,0.000009683252,0.006313388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6247717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897967232","doi":"10.1177/2053168018805612","title":"Help is close at hand? Proximity and the effectiveness of peacekeepers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peacekeeping; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Diversity (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Geography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07304809186357884,"gpt":0.4324863699256712,"spread":0.3594382780620924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717817,0.00006908768,0.0001636703,0.00003931782,0.001042821,0.00007158283,0.0002912836,0.00008307249,0.00007715269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003933675,0.00004783304,0.00005343304,0.0001841011,0.0101831,0.00009392135,0.0002237834,0.0002088633,0.00004739995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002046802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003602682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0162845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009191344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964319,0.001692985,0.0001220292,0.0001760037,0.0008387446,0.0007382976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961611,0.002802062,0.00003071822,0.0002462936,0.0005170724,0.0002427326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001420782,0.00002432013,0.004989028,0.00006067772,0.00001414346,0.000001187508,0.008139901,6.983247e-9,0.0003454824,0.9855691,0.0005064952,0.000207631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002551589,0.0003803521,0.1070922,0.00021006,0.00002870275,0.000002894703,0.003304805,0.00008709758,0.05930631,0.3125008,0.514271,0.0002641456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516787,0.000303948,0.000008654395,0.002945243,0.00006121817,0.0004019583,0.00003233303,0.00001059864,0.1445573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883282,0.0001535851,0.00001296893,0.0002017682,0.0003511718,0.00001738873,5.179864e-7,0.00000698219,0.01092741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118407758","doi":"10.1177/2053168020987333","title":"Terrorism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Presidential system; Voting; Randomness; Identification (biology); Political science; Voting behavior; Exploit; Benchmark (surveying); Computer security; Politics; Criminology; Political economy; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Law; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2025763893554624,"gpt":0.4739199247184943,"spread":0.2713435353630318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002048033,0.0001496861,0.0001814968,0.00009500594,0.001489252,0.0004790454,0.0005893159,0.0001526004,0.0002203717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003570385,0.0001201871,0.00006306897,0.0005058986,0.001552047,0.0002760945,0.000337087,0.0007831697,0.00008125619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002576743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007027521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07464718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004511663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950304,0.001718362,0.0002854577,0.000408007,0.001248852,0.001308892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934155,0.004859242,0.00004281299,0.0004385009,0.0007223751,0.0005215427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002492561,0.0003285337,0.2935633,0.00008307305,0.00009326754,0.0006086275,0.6209005,0.000005844783,0.0008242496,0.05758011,0.01572604,0.01026154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003210593,0.00012416,0.1131527,0.000776832,0.00007506312,0.00001290777,0.7565836,0.0008568072,0.0009303634,0.01187676,0.1148162,0.0004735004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792763,0.001687406,0.0001257617,0.01763838,0.0002904145,0.0002289126,0.00009254314,0.00006827882,0.0005920221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939327,0.002229331,0.00004656833,0.001138009,0.0009690141,0.00003185453,0.00003469884,0.00002012796,0.001597714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1804106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767421284","doi":"10.1177/2053168017720023","title":"Forecasting Dutch elections: An initial model from the March 2017 legislative contests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Carnegie Corporation of New York","keywords":"CONTEST; Legislature; Economics; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6241236452839624,"gpt":0.5788892936614738,"spread":0.04523435162248857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002747972,0.0001019391,0.0001530167,0.00005352785,0.006631924,0.0008679511,0.0007474697,0.000134918,0.00006352197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006876925,0.00008011379,0.00005680055,0.00009251993,0.001376453,0.0006154196,0.0001327677,0.0005738333,0.00006777261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003149353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2592535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09139834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962123,0.001160557,0.0002394933,0.000256616,0.0009501557,0.001180892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964257,0.001693327,0.00009422261,0.0005850363,0.0007947607,0.000406878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002425861,0.000102603,0.02369246,0.000009141933,0.00003410432,0.00001222885,0.01570394,0.00004564409,0.0002075119,0.9531324,0.005245814,0.001789921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007417324,0.0004118592,0.04845775,0.0001915473,0.00003613291,0.000003163298,0.004884299,0.1363862,0.0005725847,0.7646342,0.0431871,0.0004934429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8102865,0.00007783114,0.000472014,0.01580114,0.0002784996,0.0007330367,0.000141998,0.00005679842,0.1721522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929834,0.00001191001,0.0001283803,0.0001279407,0.002471534,0.00006511265,0.00001447739,0.00001561773,0.004181615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1884982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200156247","doi":"10.1177/20531680211062668","title":"Do people want smarter ballots?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Status quo; Status quo bias; Democracy; Point (geometry); Turnout; Bullet voting; Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Cardinal voting systems; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2010758568369511,"gpt":0.5029399262090691,"spread":0.3018640693721181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001600121,0.00006971715,0.0001402588,0.0000692059,0.0007954525,0.0002650497,0.000176276,0.0001105248,0.001109586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001723367,0.00006668692,0.00006340296,0.000424625,0.0002743771,0.0001196365,0.00007465097,0.0002873805,0.0006903448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003307021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02355389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962164,0.001098723,0.000200664,0.0002146094,0.001046437,0.001223194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978362,0.0005800463,0.00001858078,0.0002576586,0.0007783706,0.0005291974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001591014,0.00006609669,0.02145268,0.00002418557,0.000009454246,0.00001991018,0.003946275,6.528772e-7,0.0003292495,0.9653648,0.008351669,0.000433393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002890154,0.0001148472,0.04182037,0.00007665435,0.00001324873,0.000004840776,0.006103006,0.0001336113,0.001976351,0.1742102,0.7749712,0.0002865798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7731154,0.0002412884,0.00008487121,0.02310922,0.0003435807,0.0002390164,0.00001921433,0.00006708382,0.2027803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770545,0.00002914308,0.00005435433,0.0002080169,0.001038723,0.00002194759,0.000007543122,0.00001176838,0.02157403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7911546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155004808","doi":"10.1177/2053168014540605","title":"A call of duty in hard times: Duty to vote and the Spanish Economic Crisis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Duty; Voting; Context (archaeology); Recession; Demographic economics; Political science; Perception; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Development economics; Geography; Psychology; Macroeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09835848800502649,"gpt":0.4456588857525479,"spread":0.3473003977475214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004118898,0.00005677049,0.0001828669,0.00008736553,0.0002120024,0.00007676021,0.0001864037,0.00005871224,0.00002544586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001517876,0.00004279709,0.0000342269,0.0001320852,0.0005216928,0.00006537524,0.0000682866,0.0001717983,0.00005852998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002273125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002421371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2785934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06483563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974787,0.001145596,0.0002429745,0.0001485107,0.0003428438,0.0006413742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983219,0.001055728,0.00002874165,0.0001816853,0.0001309001,0.0002810642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001616308,0.00001680767,0.01468918,0.00002284797,0.000005648601,4.029533e-7,0.003305458,0.00001032763,0.00004189344,0.9769593,0.004778199,0.000153808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002541121,0.0005943093,0.2090399,0.0002127794,0.00003405708,0.000001725702,0.005201157,0.004885463,0.001886704,0.4372484,0.337814,0.0005404296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553002,0.00004127606,0.00003280685,0.02227139,0.0000632133,0.0003950344,0.00001421064,0.0000107173,0.02187115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976363,0.00001186035,0.00003993688,0.0002494127,0.000300246,0.00002431689,7.95272e-7,0.000006543374,0.001730546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5397109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9522287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411459860","doi":"10.1177/20531680251351238","title":"Changing the lens: The contingency of results from conjoint experiments on the outcome variable and the estimand","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Outcome (game theory); Conjoint analysis; Psychology; Variable (mathematics); Econometrics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Preference; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2528790355996412,"gpt":0.4911974684037916,"spread":0.2383184328041504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007099622,0.00007253289,0.0001446434,0.00004142381,0.001763679,0.0001691136,0.0003832068,0.00005426623,0.00002607766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006646423,0.00002861543,0.00004204987,0.0003015562,0.001600796,0.00004584241,0.0001334748,0.0003157552,0.00001044105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008714157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001918088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05458879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007607992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965227,0.001811931,0.0003157893,0.0001411588,0.000602369,0.0006060908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899065,0.00937865,0.00006926481,0.0003689764,0.0002298867,0.00004668734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002919911,0.00001642958,0.0008467205,0.000006164441,0.00002619787,1.979791e-7,0.01122003,0.000003416484,0.00008061765,0.9866235,0.00107845,0.00006908504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003498148,0.0002544047,0.02017072,0.0006943784,0.0001324626,4.758225e-7,0.07134189,0.004948116,0.007490888,0.6899875,0.2011427,0.0003383717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7361452,0.0007298876,0.00008786974,0.1300951,0.0003311783,0.001498391,0.00006793452,0.00002216578,0.1310222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940607,0.00002272029,0.000009283955,0.00104715,0.0002489497,0.00006074309,0.000001625802,0.000004697079,0.004544133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.296636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793604432","doi":"10.1177/2053168017753901","title":"How to estimate (and not to estimate) war deaths: A reply to van Weezel and Spagat","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Selection bias; Death certificate; Politics; Citation; Sample (material); Political science; Demography; Statistics; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Cause of death; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2303698293127703,"gpt":0.5866539290503661,"spread":0.3562840997375958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002219584,0.000232716,0.0004260818,0.0004023294,0.002484419,0.0000770507,0.0002670117,0.0001496073,0.00004756893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007350129,0.0002016197,0.00002612518,0.0003940352,0.0002582044,0.00009423796,0.001128145,0.0007102294,0.001189677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003192607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007528628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003119375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006667117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952465,0.0004157002,0.0004240044,0.0006089283,0.0007131567,0.002591676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941586,0.00124316,0.00004301509,0.0006516149,0.00107828,0.002825357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001073845,0.0002432695,0.08438234,0.005378643,0.0001824625,0.0002171781,0.3311173,0.000005617149,0.003847991,0.1238767,0.4068224,0.04285234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004926166,0.001158025,0.05002105,0.0005441822,0.00001139089,0.000006098587,0.003721133,0.0001939486,0.0005209873,0.001228084,0.9418408,0.0002616699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6703969,0.0001772571,0.0006543234,0.3171768,0.0002378824,0.002225036,0.00009077442,0.0001227783,0.008918256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611954,0.0001786378,0.01488716,0.07226685,0.002096641,0.0007045383,0.000007566154,0.0001167369,0.04854648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5350184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414414233","doi":"10.1177/20531680251379914","title":"The source of economic shocks matters for their political outcomes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Offshoring; Politics; Authoritarianism; Economic impact analysis; Recession; Productivity; Opportunity cost","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09003504812794588,"gpt":0.4693727012865622,"spread":0.3793376531586163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00245337,0.00009464874,0.000187851,0.0001506283,0.001215878,0.0001422629,0.0007972615,0.00009173367,0.00002724756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00108928,0.00006556865,0.0001321953,0.0001069474,0.001379183,0.00007107903,0.000185535,0.0002169344,0.00002766373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008154929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007957821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001500374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973091,0.0003993835,0.0002920945,0.0001915304,0.000434098,0.001373746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955032,0.003685971,0.00003996418,0.0003739352,0.0001816091,0.000215283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006487097,0.0000276357,0.01016802,0.00002036403,0.00005099877,2.368634e-7,0.001244822,0.000002069751,0.00002975646,0.9751945,0.01280268,0.0004525025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003491887,0.0000404312,0.005562557,0.00003622532,0.00001106217,1.003618e-7,0.01154897,0.0001385752,0.002101059,0.4039829,0.5761229,0.0001060124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6510667,0.000196306,0.001232715,0.2219599,0.001183204,0.001940383,0.0002033525,0.0001204354,0.1220971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620816,0.00002370496,0.0001068095,0.001525658,0.000203444,0.00005162711,0.00000337509,0.00001465966,0.03598915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5712115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401562811","doi":"10.1177/20531680241272647","title":"Do sexual minorities participate more in politics?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sexual minority; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sexual orientation; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2821002385783308,"gpt":0.538539593807816,"spread":0.2564393552294852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264469,0.0001274895,0.0001976297,0.0003643976,0.0004800938,0.0005197584,0.0002563296,0.0001737111,0.0002694924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001199888,0.0001224009,0.00005305149,0.0006548324,0.0009492712,0.0002697703,0.00007424659,0.0005560649,0.0004690438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007961601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001022491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09313809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008688933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951459,0.0009415512,0.0003712347,0.0003238317,0.00114999,0.002067521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977699,0.001121478,0.00001520888,0.0002460953,0.0002635079,0.0005838231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002135439,0.00005181895,0.01377674,0.0001529884,0.0000114947,0.00006624335,0.01399548,0.000004953193,0.0000884918,0.9676653,0.00370553,0.0004788717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004040966,0.0004133372,0.02700838,0.0006073448,0.00003330947,0.000006616501,0.03334424,0.002316509,0.001035693,0.3988912,0.5352119,0.0007274746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512249,0.001055481,0.00001011043,0.01041764,0.0003639969,0.0003362966,0.00004370875,0.0001263634,0.03642152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763228,0.00002604267,0.0000207388,0.0001218263,0.001726812,0.00008117965,0.000007492689,0.00002397871,0.02166915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5687741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9129008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391166403","doi":"10.1177/20531680241228358","title":"Using MI-LASSO to study populist radical right voting in times of pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Pandemic; Immigration; Mainstream; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Salience (neuroscience); Misinformation; Ideology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2090501683386363,"gpt":0.517196241568434,"spread":0.3081460732297977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004952798,0.0001122424,0.0002283441,0.0006018252,0.0004822578,0.0001841445,0.0005283048,0.0001096557,0.000304655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001723264,0.0001042021,0.00005826932,0.001087972,0.0004633366,0.000169697,0.0002514031,0.0005538917,0.00007077321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008547506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03414809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006007672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952969,0.001073681,0.0004100242,0.0003574589,0.001715598,0.00114634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985291,0.0006961071,0.00003074896,0.0002254834,0.0001563568,0.0003621534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000244431,0.0009706473,0.5204356,0.000206493,0.0001388022,0.0005914792,0.06083807,0.00005544072,0.001582042,0.4101004,0.00321143,0.0018451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005170152,0.002282631,0.2278808,0.006138038,0.0002579527,0.00003015934,0.1112571,0.01795097,0.01180112,0.3679552,0.2461944,0.003081528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894699,0.0001801148,0.000026032,0.0008466468,0.0002495736,0.0005539045,0.00001759871,0.00007456987,0.008581595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965876,0.00001048951,0.0004936181,0.00005583627,0.0004053564,0.00001166151,0.000002268095,0.00002411345,0.002409031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2925548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890189191","doi":"10.1177/2053168018797866","title":"Do third-party supporters recognize their party is out of the running? Evidence from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Third party; Voting; Political science; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Internet privacy; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2484782882582324,"gpt":0.4595000098904151,"spread":0.2110217216321827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002156368,0.0001060943,0.0001972444,0.0000372053,0.000824798,0.0001002785,0.0005795809,0.0001136017,0.000641166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002592335,0.00007155631,0.00007386383,0.0002959112,0.001282559,0.000149366,0.0001218841,0.0003253017,0.00007433352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005153374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003553488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9614195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8945326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959751,0.000962191,0.0003506434,0.0002523278,0.001366247,0.001093466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967194,0.001396782,0.00009595168,0.0004791484,0.0008906315,0.0004181233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003040901,0.00008077895,0.6177039,0.00006704197,0.00008800637,0.000005246933,0.05398306,6.743497e-7,0.002273876,0.04964307,0.275282,0.0008419204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004500722,0.0004402286,0.2825528,0.00107596,0.00006046956,8.002688e-7,0.01377332,0.0002707967,0.08112387,0.1042685,0.5153429,0.0006402939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972502,0.0001391069,0.00000562082,0.0123807,0.0006313627,0.0003293901,0.0001409772,0.00001758399,0.01385329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945543,0.00001854634,0.00001957324,0.0005756273,0.001100503,0.00001508281,0.000002531439,0.00001130568,0.003702469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3351511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7020318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}