{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":47,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":47,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"724760f9b037","filters":{"venue":"Research Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2757021329","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733296","title":"Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Decolonization; Participatory action research; Sociology; Sovereignty; Context (archaeology); Traditional knowledge; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law; Anthropology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4584712924101543,"gpt":0.6055265106912358,"spread":0.1470552182810814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2487502,0.0001635628,0.0003223643,0.001749492,0.06723838,0.001717655,0.001504957,0.00105432,0.00004625013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009921231,0.0001486262,0.00002834861,0.001483251,0.007424823,0.0007975124,0.0001671233,0.01040684,0.0001054666],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04922129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4463699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8731182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9625332,0.02710688,0.0003540333,0.0009682875,0.005481475,0.003556167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682006,0.02496759,0.00007099763,0.0008887813,0.004973074,0.0008989596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001617356,0.0002691704,0.0205028,0.0006328855,0.00001419046,0.00009134277,0.6908496,3.433015e-7,0.00009779919,0.2859142,0.00007402257,0.001391842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001466149,0.001387159,0.3652658,0.001442912,0.000003870061,0.00001307486,0.06989652,0.00004929765,0.001464019,0.1922553,0.3661927,0.0005632199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290549,0.003014087,0.000001524407,0.008617986,0.000178716,0.002816147,0.000007335156,0.00002849133,0.05628081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.926357,0.06527506,0.00006757364,0.000009376028,0.000557176,0.00008499414,0.000003415074,0.00004107312,0.007604277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6209531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782102453","doi":"10.1177/1747016117750208","title":"Ethics review and freedom of information requests in qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Vetting; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Bureaucracy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Public relations; Qualitative research; Citizenship; Sociology; Research ethics; Law; Social science; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8226387391353674,"gpt":0.7699121586614852,"spread":0.05272658047388223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5452964,0.0001329774,0.0004320811,0.001055456,0.001791599,0.0001793611,0.0007762114,0.0009970417,0.0001707961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4450229,0.0001226594,0.00005445176,0.004202364,0.0218849,0.001054966,0.0004920511,0.01340138,0.0001295705],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004059233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00633976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02697102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01867033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8007063,0.1853814,0.001198668,0.0005532039,0.01023906,0.001921372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8381715,0.1373612,0.0002156759,0.0007027718,0.02295205,0.0005967593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003128242,0.00003064061,0.00006375889,0.001810666,0.000009249064,0.000001505896,0.5012445,1.177902e-7,0.00005829167,0.4923163,0.001981923,0.002451807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003403188,0.000650791,0.0004739358,0.003637406,0.000005941782,7.176707e-7,0.3126126,0.00003910972,0.0002060307,0.5134875,0.1683426,0.0002030129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01153713,0.02429167,0.003904596,0.7844961,0.0002797758,0.004165289,0.0001118031,0.0000910411,0.1711227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4623853,0.4894917,0.04145946,0.003028452,0.0007775874,0.0003616694,0.00003409056,0.00006266999,0.0023991],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7814676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626646765","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510654","title":"Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences SchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.van den HoonaardWill C, The Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011. <sup>1</sup>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1974055059104547,"gpt":0.4784404928850635,"spread":0.2810349869746088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2730872,0.000415482,0.001047908,0.00009166298,0.03328133,0.0002342011,0.004164382,0.003629587,0.0002492118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03602203,0.0002038338,0.0002319011,0.0008130213,0.1404251,0.001097438,0.002683702,0.05531766,0.000002582239],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004524578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00861856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3146282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05270632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.902143,0.08595079,0.001106406,0.00106961,0.008365294,0.001364915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.830137,0.1637872,0.001475835,0.00101097,0.003413949,0.0001750814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001833841,0.00009278693,0.0003029749,0.001560872,0.0001822211,0.000003484061,0.2567267,0.00003232144,0.00001906687,0.7159709,0.02249376,0.0007809931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01822324,0.001122191,0.03493464,0.006875386,0.001557002,0.00005368443,0.4680223,0.007000444,0.00004031478,0.06503157,0.3959533,0.001186016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02934191,0.02194552,0.0001607844,0.9247055,0.0002777337,0.005813219,0.0006489102,0.00002437829,0.01708207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979864,0.296039,0.0001902901,0.005070417,0.0005675748,0.00002315389,0.000007771232,0.00002202068,0.00009330822],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145177063","doi":"10.1177/1747016113481145","title":"The betrayal of research confidentiality in British sociology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Betrayal; Discipline; Criminology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8581578964113781,"gpt":0.7378586250440586,"spread":0.1202992713673194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2028537,0.0001026909,0.0004275213,0.0004142174,0.0008004501,0.0001989353,0.001185646,0.002070229,0.000746059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3736555,0.00008815961,0.0001407354,0.001343902,0.01784227,0.0001054197,0.001120144,0.04269376,0.0005228784],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007275491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04938007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05183322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9755266,0.01097499,0.001127361,0.0007094345,0.009685131,0.001976469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5260807,0.4468734,0.0001235889,0.002180501,0.02394583,0.0007959627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000809579,0.002034346,0.1885742,0.005788046,0.0003228753,0.0005392989,0.02170919,0.000004629871,0.02000096,0.6976694,0.0325417,0.03000579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001228816,0.0009562377,0.2199052,0.001024889,0.000004364181,0.00002462461,0.01188716,0.0001498397,0.001742813,0.7587476,0.00421422,0.0001142277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413482,0.00178742,0.00002496083,0.1398117,0.0001691353,0.001745286,0.00001002114,0.00002917356,0.01507414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791343,0.01271146,0.0002099866,0.0002702283,0.0002667458,0.0002164546,0.000007435062,0.00003191908,0.00715148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4494459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010452120","doi":"10.1177/1747016112461731","title":"Good intentions and dangerous assumptions: Research ethics committees and illicit drug use research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Informed consent; Illicit drug; Population; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Drug; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9437146307990955,"gpt":0.7360995700310963,"spread":0.2076150607679992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3883467,0.0003958899,0.0007634175,0.002755035,0.005393106,0.001130792,0.001136833,0.004095848,0.0002745491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6011747,0.0003535093,0.0001719987,0.003926896,0.01646105,0.0009728793,0.004806295,0.1260365,0.0005784418],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008612892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005065515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007874979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.92901,0.03373072,0.001468532,0.001874411,0.02850567,0.005410651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2767416,0.6740279,0.000156402,0.004106712,0.04018199,0.004785356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007004701,0.002251529,0.1306705,0.005398394,0.0003590163,0.0001985397,0.05256579,0.000001030563,0.00785154,0.774351,0.02127232,0.004379816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004837525,0.003560643,0.1621818,0.009565672,0.0001480372,0.0005042385,0.07785564,0.0004039513,0.00385613,0.3272937,0.4084468,0.001345788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.578253,0.01484268,0.0002703723,0.3793524,0.0004702014,0.004323658,0.0001400676,0.0002816768,0.02206591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682329,0.09595681,0.004656742,0.0009207521,0.001087446,0.000436669,0.00005015549,0.0001753289,0.0284832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6522684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396231016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116650235","title":"Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Interpreter; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Power (physics); Public relations; Subject (documents); Ethical code; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.909567698881051,"gpt":0.7704003056718381,"spread":0.1391673932092129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3864456,0.0003188135,0.000546827,0.0006467337,0.01229632,0.0001124076,0.002422432,0.004995463,0.002536209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8470115,0.0001947329,0.0001386368,0.001914073,0.005772983,0.0005730719,0.002782143,0.1413599,0.01424984],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001243715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009527182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001571342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8447196,0.1319404,0.001829641,0.001323598,0.01635407,0.00383264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4395518,0.5026205,0.0005907477,0.002426659,0.05335772,0.001452601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002708875,0.0001721868,0.005443349,0.001723902,0.00007851311,0.0001999359,0.02828405,0.000001450175,0.006178521,0.4217058,0.5335404,0.002401014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009817505,0.0001596397,0.002177883,0.004941088,0.000009062113,0.000006637295,0.04205318,0.00003962487,0.0001916732,0.2091493,0.7400056,0.0002845722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006500728,0.00098059,0.001209581,0.9255511,0.001533369,0.001580657,0.00005803465,0.00030161,0.06228434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.693864,0.04679187,0.01572734,0.07273902,0.01107498,0.001303367,0.00004095839,0.0004232323,0.1580352],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4366688244","doi":"10.1177/17470161231169205","title":"Systemic disruptions: decolonizing indigenous research ethics using indigenous knowledges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Public relations; Law; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5412341569337655,"gpt":0.5964559282507289,"spread":0.05522177131696338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1294794,0.000262497,0.0004107912,0.002436363,0.07879893,0.000792611,0.001592184,0.002268948,0.00009079737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005184364,0.0002489421,0.0001320616,0.008002924,0.003180673,0.0004845138,0.00006377311,0.01339495,0.002441713],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004214178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.191553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7772386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662698,0.02136964,0.0007711492,0.0009078002,0.0063621,0.004319506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668908,0.02351114,0.000167063,0.0009164416,0.00762422,0.0008903994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700686,0.0001755111,0.001340679,0.0007439519,0.00003397446,0.00006146111,0.9190372,0.00006053132,0.00006767805,0.07781708,0.0001498468,0.0004950399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003290981,0.00031341,0.0009598581,0.00122964,0.00002137926,0.0000399411,0.4992624,0.0001853724,0.000227966,0.03078639,0.4660226,0.0006219067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651116,0.003855302,0.00009247675,0.004226997,0.001764343,0.003443918,0.00003273847,0.0004898782,0.02098274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663895,0.1119996,0.0004186324,0.00005904065,0.002968586,0.00009625886,0.00005985973,0.0001236771,0.01788491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4897057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113859811","doi":"10.1177/1747016113488858","title":"Public deliberation to develop ethical norms and inform policy for biobanks: Lessons learnt and challenges remaining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Biobank; Political science; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Public engagement; Public policy; Law; Politics; Engineering; Management; Economics; Bioinformatics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9344429354460383,"gpt":0.691832575104417,"spread":0.2426103603416213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0429142,0.0001845277,0.0003724987,0.0007818743,0.0007598187,0.0004086702,0.0002954608,0.002544,0.00004007762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4589949,0.000149067,0.00004313859,0.001074491,0.001233913,0.0002686939,0.0009107715,0.01468096,0.00009741532],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002717043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006417989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005057279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003003631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941716,0.0005019914,0.0005680016,0.0006692477,0.002945454,0.001143714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8701932,0.1047244,0.0001114548,0.001156841,0.02128402,0.002530056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278447,0.00006400007,0.0003667844,0.001991461,0.00005077658,0.000005787857,0.008933431,5.40025e-7,0.001420735,0.8369025,0.0005963588,0.1495398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003156052,0.00426025,0.08085483,0.00217078,0.0000223175,0.00009254221,0.00978214,0.001770678,0.001331257,0.7923913,0.1035227,0.0006451688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05801972,0.001158419,0.0008086974,0.9319068,0.00003993198,0.001702595,0.000007949297,0.00006711648,0.006288785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9177617,0.05296198,0.01755933,0.00747234,0.00061329,0.0006384289,0.00002708742,0.00007273795,0.002893086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096789464","doi":"10.1177/1747016120969743","title":"Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral injury; Beneficence; Dignity; Shame; Harm; Psychology; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Social psychology; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7539514315881478,"gpt":0.6299975630098864,"spread":0.1239538685782614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05712796,0.0002647508,0.0004992739,0.0007619379,0.001394969,0.0005342759,0.00214837,0.0009344579,0.001124738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06879888,0.0001954988,0.0001133558,0.002940044,0.004905117,0.0001227658,0.002357231,0.01844768,0.003933519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001497239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002713158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006060035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9635236,0.02614779,0.0006465315,0.001188181,0.006042047,0.002451913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612913,0.03355455,0.0000470243,0.001528621,0.002304165,0.001274353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01065637,0.0001755123,0.00149029,0.0002705674,0.0001777078,0.0001710498,0.2432646,0.000005538137,0.002138142,0.5980181,0.135197,0.008435139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01597743,0.008024661,0.03458542,0.0008213486,0.00005914135,0.0000668687,0.1725672,0.001935646,0.003600689,0.4034754,0.3570803,0.001805787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.107516,0.001690816,0.0001431325,0.8154304,0.0002070981,0.002743725,0.00006662409,0.0001366176,0.07206563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850733,0.000414836,0.000519515,0.006809989,0.00044521,0.0007512943,0.000008020776,0.0001061514,0.005871653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8775573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969465980","doi":"10.1177/1747016119868900","title":"A reflection on research ethics and citizen science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Warrant; Research ethics; Harm; Engineering ethics; Confusion; Institution; Institutional review board; Term (time); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9464113414639415,"gpt":0.7884269297242767,"spread":0.1579844117396647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3655352,0.0002014384,0.0004100658,0.002135534,0.002690338,0.0004617746,0.001047908,0.002713404,0.0003399045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5448238,0.0001710204,0.00008862107,0.00461066,0.01086036,0.0002437309,0.001667386,0.1090414,0.002113696],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00110423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02111711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000668152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005371004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9621148,0.007003711,0.0006187161,0.001774929,0.02611583,0.002372071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.625861,0.3439129,0.00008985776,0.003069038,0.02525853,0.001808676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002046871,0.000572147,0.008494363,0.003648332,0.00005895898,0.000175513,0.01601097,0.000007448084,0.09014837,0.8710628,0.002396559,0.005377674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004462325,0.01584743,0.02833327,0.007574666,0.00002198549,0.0001565285,0.01317645,0.002214084,0.04213912,0.8358817,0.04947498,0.0007175117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5724685,0.0003597828,0.00004522568,0.2343452,0.0004101738,0.001980019,0.000007667556,0.0001282595,0.1902551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656547,0.007866268,0.0009674882,0.001989354,0.0004036815,0.00006835786,0.000004976879,0.00006566598,0.02297951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3931862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416251886","doi":"10.1177/1747016115626496","title":"Opportunities, challenges and ethical issues associated with conducting community-based participatory research in a hospital setting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Casey House; Carleton University; York University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Confidentiality; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9876213550820785,"gpt":0.7915481589456984,"spread":0.1960731961363801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2321728,0.0001501159,0.0003091816,0.0007323432,0.004011326,0.00004293806,0.0004975218,0.0009127797,0.00009337018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100633,0.0001062344,0.00001645769,0.0008173597,0.002758995,0.0002298812,0.0005538799,0.02007209,0.00005740804],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008753047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008151195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002614404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01017494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9049245,0.08888543,0.0007433644,0.0003999065,0.0028322,0.002214655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8288571,0.1670185,0.0001784109,0.0005828393,0.002726385,0.0006367559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463683,0.0002456622,0.03510885,0.002442221,0.00003082462,0.000111138,0.8939717,9.305849e-7,0.0009716116,0.04896246,0.00612791,0.01188027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005581954,0.002837756,0.05301819,0.01264348,0.000007017453,0.000002415405,0.8168373,0.0002053866,0.0004296612,0.01899802,0.08883067,0.0006081589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.495776,0.0001427534,0.00001500132,0.5019941,0.00004562337,0.0007671752,0.00003092269,0.0000563288,0.001172137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915041,0.001295073,0.0002515766,0.005955128,0.0001189203,0.0005627334,0.000006663568,0.00003792033,0.0002678289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4960389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385278104","doi":"10.1177/17470161231189843","title":"Protected from harm, harmed by protection: ethical consequences of the exclusion of pregnant participants from clinical trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Pregnancy and Medication Impact","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Autonomy; Medicine; Pregnancy; Clinical trial; Beneficence; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Clinical research; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7981434410998176,"gpt":0.6341796684872538,"spread":0.1639637726125638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04041421,0.0001323096,0.0007659284,0.0001316901,0.0002402202,0.00001595012,0.0004078254,0.001179802,0.0003593046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2309548,0.00007759955,0.0002401368,0.001080577,0.002498128,0.00005292688,0.0002806272,0.006015232,0.00004958805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006041914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003456054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000435337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823156,0.01261458,0.001474999,0.0004246926,0.002665373,0.0005047217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762687,0.02065237,0.0005709948,0.0009223632,0.001149087,0.0004365014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002111375,0.0005491748,0.00414934,0.0005886903,0.0004018633,0.00002319716,0.009521094,0.000002380081,0.9501188,0.0002434582,0.01450941,0.01778126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00533152,0.001129845,0.06899923,0.01268262,0.0002159703,0.000004159403,0.001795384,0.001237356,0.8891491,0.01113161,0.008139794,0.0001834554],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8159758,0.00160023,0.0006252954,0.175864,0.0005591593,0.004599988,0.0005143824,0.0001168687,0.0001443118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953082,0.003181699,0.0001799663,0.0003871543,0.0002164592,0.0003335671,0.00006359543,0.00001890182,0.0003104478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1905405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549062016","doi":"10.1177/1747016116677635","title":"Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; Interior Health","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Research ethics; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Qualitative research; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9896698563797172,"gpt":0.823892782082878,"spread":0.1657770742968392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.593692,0.0004151211,0.001048459,0.003592726,0.003441842,0.0005819754,0.003205084,0.002979794,0.0004211289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5673867,0.0002632776,0.0001469837,0.008527194,0.01824857,0.0005014104,0.003404458,0.1187143,0.0008360646],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00307668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04448201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006976875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8020627,0.07845718,0.003180152,0.004622547,0.1006119,0.01106546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3206039,0.6239139,0.0002808046,0.004854327,0.04661873,0.003728387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006494485,0.004564539,0.09610929,0.008248053,0.0003349081,0.003254048,0.6963719,0.000005824011,0.009193476,0.146817,0.01265929,0.01594719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01085568,0.0199749,0.01830867,0.03511117,0.00001179416,0.0002017798,0.7388052,0.00007124402,0.01663139,0.1455483,0.01336358,0.001116233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.644249,0.0008258192,0.00008503318,0.348016,0.0001679072,0.002429715,0.000009576535,0.00009693686,0.004120063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672316,0.01756819,0.001414356,0.001102056,0.0006625837,0.001010997,0.000008229772,0.0001637355,0.01083828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976141823","doi":"10.1177/1747016112445435","title":"Social science and ethics review: A question of practice not principle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Meta-ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Applied ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6629785079412129,"gpt":0.7460695818609354,"spread":0.08309107391972248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5255703,0.0001209394,0.0002957822,0.0002322289,0.005594233,0.00002284716,0.0005809494,0.001390947,0.00009603117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8742515,0.0001064279,0.0000298346,0.001530379,0.005531146,0.00123107,0.001145232,0.05801038,0.0002171985],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005266141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004476432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004009989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9289522,0.05687326,0.0009593726,0.0004967796,0.01106251,0.001655885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6603543,0.3112357,0.0008267558,0.0009817358,0.02565913,0.0009423303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008114388,0.0001499643,0.0006280729,0.008484253,0.00001230014,0.000002651671,0.06679387,3.758882e-8,0.001805659,0.9133548,0.007339451,0.001347845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004220674,0.0001496442,0.005262559,0.005253971,0.00006099423,0.00001232159,0.01303452,0.00003795553,0.0004273804,0.01633559,0.9587978,0.0002051715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003167585,0.01033411,0.0007131238,0.8256366,0.0008303333,0.002023568,0.00001203018,0.00008981232,0.1571928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462212,0.0867507,0.007722084,0.05649236,0.001420533,0.0002008012,0.000005717514,0.00005108241,0.001135537],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137260078","doi":"10.1177/17470161211003021","title":"Queer considerations: Exploring the use of social media for research recruitment within LGBTQ communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"Mount Saint Vincent University","keywords":"Social media; Harassment; Queer; Public relations; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9052681565015958,"gpt":0.5311391777554012,"spread":0.3741289787461946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01766654,0.00008435782,0.0001466098,0.0002337001,0.002301861,0.0006974345,0.0005856064,0.0001564572,0.00002431821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01535625,0.00006768384,0.00006962548,0.0009068404,0.000704539,0.0005198244,0.0006692677,0.002755335,0.00001618475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000134673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001668894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004162707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922066,0.004828028,0.0003063909,0.0002356392,0.001896348,0.0005270378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645363,0.03030182,0.00005009176,0.0007501321,0.00427632,0.00008531015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000281329,0.0000834931,0.00001519471,0.000112883,0.00004862328,0.00001882787,0.2147818,0.000159331,0.002932812,0.7672413,0.006561601,0.008016001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001109824,0.0005472304,0.000631089,0.0005207514,0.00001495625,0.00005634335,0.1116397,0.02058225,0.2712418,0.3722571,0.2209333,0.0004656654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4204049,0.001974801,0.1797586,0.3833545,0.004408738,0.007008893,0.0001455406,0.0005691302,0.002374989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471339,0.0009886982,0.04863979,0.0004167705,0.0003740992,0.001522428,0.0000189032,0.00003080724,0.0008746339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.526729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149400202","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523421","title":"The ethics of metaphor as a research tool","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Dignity; Interpretation (philosophy); Research ethics; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Informed consent; Vulnerability (computing); Participant observation; Conceptual metaphor; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9859485521153608,"gpt":0.8450221242589507,"spread":0.1409264278564101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5867722,0.0001449062,0.0003100019,0.0005336043,0.005295584,0.000558025,0.002639333,0.001000375,0.0001329419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6918441,0.0001065842,0.0001322083,0.004314317,0.01483,0.0003505688,0.00114455,0.01673115,0.0007975818],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008272932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03326575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01799761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009057065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7957666,0.1689357,0.0008550842,0.0007908284,0.02972207,0.00392971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7971205,0.1785652,0.000123238,0.001583095,0.02099812,0.001609906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023406,0.0001295325,0.000404613,0.00006230102,0.0000494051,0.00002662586,0.2021245,0.000004690422,0.001311379,0.7785214,0.01151969,0.005611826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002348486,0.0004205696,0.0001670096,0.00006647631,0.000004638074,8.231994e-7,0.09564112,0.0001182789,0.004590252,0.2375051,0.6611339,0.0001169333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2530168,0.006129788,0.0007072212,0.3685941,0.001015572,0.003725637,0.00002748681,0.0002135166,0.3665699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728043,0.00484466,0.002073867,0.000243857,0.000646436,0.0003512611,0.000001734502,0.00005520376,0.01897868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529103505","doi":"10.1177/1747016116673135","title":"Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto East General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Research design; Process (computing); Compliance (psychology); Ethical issues; Information ethics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9282068780613373,"gpt":0.7457461906723061,"spread":0.1824606873890312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6272197,0.0006332214,0.001190509,0.003161418,0.005199454,0.0008166461,0.00357823,0.008878494,0.001279509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7663397,0.0004340993,0.0002645495,0.01225001,0.02490968,0.0005954618,0.003515235,0.1307527,0.005887762],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003704409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1141863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009019568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008404048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7443581,0.1663089,0.002634308,0.004661211,0.07213884,0.009898672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09553774,0.7901195,0.0002023044,0.004799007,0.105649,0.003692359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0110172,0.002698139,0.0005701226,0.002830789,0.0004977238,0.001549373,0.02312336,0.00001249132,0.203073,0.3073888,0.4398184,0.007420585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00587168,0.01634029,0.000224957,0.007422055,0.0000358848,0.00008022816,0.01382143,0.0003670688,0.1805299,0.6717824,0.1025996,0.0009245724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003715283,0.004502971,0.0578848,0.8932196,0.0004694843,0.01370349,0.0002121596,0.0004788724,0.02581328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6607172,0.09072129,0.0804356,0.002390671,0.002796168,0.004273628,0.00006185438,0.0008639923,0.1577395],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.890829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155777518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114552685","title":"Exploring ethical frontiers of visual methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Visual research; Engineering ethics; Confidentiality; Visual methods; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Visual arts; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5932582166892093,"gpt":0.628617095756932,"spread":0.03535887906772273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03629467,0.00007586611,0.0001834927,0.0004914454,0.001188699,0.0001042095,0.0005277459,0.0004557834,0.0001528491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0386404,0.00007718457,0.0001187943,0.0008940075,0.002410526,0.0002983624,0.0001875866,0.005462849,0.00005353926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008398011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003456594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004886224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005443332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894356,0.007740469,0.0002434327,0.0002476804,0.001746025,0.0005868003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886701,0.009539974,0.00005872057,0.0002472064,0.001241385,0.0002425916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007831291,0.0001803167,0.001765258,0.00007803699,0.00008479999,0.000002925202,0.1550937,0.00002147489,0.006206958,0.809471,0.0137404,0.01327682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003053881,0.0007026611,0.007394388,0.0001321743,0.00002336241,8.912718e-7,0.2642024,0.0007415987,0.005846601,0.0884933,0.6318022,0.0003550473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158057,0.00078618,0.02028329,0.2212408,0.003935747,0.001028319,0.000007956774,0.0004255454,0.2364864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703132,0.000914584,0.02775128,0.0001688422,0.0003163002,0.00003941303,0.000001021322,0.00001473703,0.0004806549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390583869","doi":"10.1177/17470161231223594","title":"COVID-19 human challenge trials and randomized controlled trials: lessons for the next pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Clinical trial; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.986597454763469,"gpt":0.8006001352746288,"spread":0.1859973194888402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.809593,0.0003299794,0.005206703,0.000531222,0.006133208,0.0004152205,0.0006451553,0.001581969,0.001042915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9033729,0.000170285,0.0009742599,0.0004597226,0.00135203,0.0003461982,0.0004025962,0.01284361,0.0001667409],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007385597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01816723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004327334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5788763,0.410397,0.005298862,0.001013099,0.002629738,0.001785041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05525762,0.9399888,0.001073444,0.0009049433,0.001710642,0.001064572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1393403,0.0001111408,0.00003159156,0.01071567,0.001897237,0.00002178804,0.08525639,0.000002968052,0.0003832163,0.7213518,0.03049022,0.01039765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2736788,0.0002327333,0.0000134492,0.001179454,0.0007156025,0.000003182888,0.03508094,0.001765992,0.000004178638,0.1522145,0.5348507,0.000260422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002175531,0.09163388,0.004226054,0.8682238,0.00158589,0.03009167,0.0002092282,0.0003210959,0.001532852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7054367,0.2316342,0.0002782326,0.02027989,0.005499595,0.02879153,0.00006346512,0.0001615877,0.007854789],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8479439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762274663","doi":"10.1177/1747016117733506","title":"Pragmatic clinical trials and the consent process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Business; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.980525196242898,"gpt":0.8479461696890097,"spread":0.1325790265538883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5955442,0.0001362509,0.001002273,0.0001099003,0.001993422,0.0005752031,0.001078829,0.001451818,0.0001439033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9663029,0.00007199416,0.0002507067,0.0001613447,0.01718554,0.00009842742,0.001028495,0.02880186,0.0001861785],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005298379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009283273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002704331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007668798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.955186,0.03116092,0.002443585,0.000983669,0.009055994,0.001169811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05497972,0.9337486,0.0005747703,0.003424869,0.006327481,0.0009445249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008651492,0.0008134059,0.04471844,0.008438815,0.0007171857,0.0003515377,0.008826785,7.407712e-7,0.0001397455,0.8997394,0.008143391,0.01945902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01449188,0.0009232207,0.01875122,0.002827198,0.0001356051,0.00006442763,0.002747389,0.001522973,0.0002440746,0.9494582,0.008650126,0.0001836188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08314157,0.001430437,0.0001466819,0.8645617,0.0003529403,0.003382685,0.00001117791,0.00004719173,0.04692567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576791,0.03128228,0.0004731481,0.002083276,0.0008840138,0.000162981,0.00000297569,0.00003264498,0.007399597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3212272605","doi":"10.1177/17470161211059993","title":"Equality and Equity in Compensating Patient Engagement in Research: A Plea for Exceptionalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Exceptionalism; Research ethics; Equity (law); Political science; Doctrine; Compensation (psychology); Interpretation (philosophy); Normative; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9783687622030315,"gpt":0.7665734900477272,"spread":0.2117952721553042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08599877,0.0001152024,0.0002664576,0.0003953846,0.001843018,0.0000299491,0.0001912779,0.0003668283,0.0002790454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008183284,0.0001140236,0.00003142079,0.0008091045,0.0002493926,0.00009442565,0.001484015,0.007352487,0.00005404202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001540093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005143926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0270017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9721804,0.02226861,0.0009902415,0.000561678,0.00231304,0.001685983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739509,0.02385492,0.00009197518,0.0003662004,0.001385477,0.000350572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009085795,0.001621385,0.2290609,0.02565038,0.00002094705,0.0000788459,0.3779467,0.00003895108,0.001537191,0.3305438,0.003761743,0.02883054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009568428,0.002218336,0.1327356,0.01419823,0.000005294571,0.000001890044,0.3564477,0.004738463,0.0008983681,0.283842,0.194675,0.0006706506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715816,0.0006701851,0.0001211446,0.01525002,0.0002911426,0.003963585,0.0001256378,0.00001794653,0.007978688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931082,0.0007107305,0.001579353,0.002089698,0.0001338268,0.001572097,0.0002725488,0.00001982491,0.0005137062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1909133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894910408","doi":"10.1177/1747016118798877","title":"Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Sunnybrook Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Order (exchange); Reciprocal; Information Dissemination; Dissemination; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Ideal (ethics); Medicine; Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9542201912913564,"gpt":0.713385792098791,"spread":0.2408343991925653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05270492,0.00009674262,0.0002151198,0.0004365281,0.001611684,0.00001572404,0.0004267547,0.0002514459,0.00008514688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04058804,0.00006313217,0.00002402064,0.001469423,0.0006183537,0.00009405166,0.0007350655,0.002422217,0.0003426652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003236995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001720448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002520612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004339223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886386,0.005434673,0.001065718,0.0003602504,0.003037707,0.001463054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660822,0.02806588,0.0001697744,0.000801384,0.004304348,0.0005763881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00632744,0.0008210156,0.03734098,0.008654605,0.00005326548,0.000007399101,0.7896122,0.00002239249,0.02681446,0.01458334,0.09783506,0.0179279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003119498,0.03136553,0.1085757,0.0628151,0.00002766725,0.000001219064,0.1971641,0.002238926,0.1754522,0.006342146,0.4122357,0.0006620682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784179,0.00002001914,0.0001120579,0.01454273,0.0002435697,0.004240785,0.000158899,0.00001493703,0.002249099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944705,0.00008008245,0.001021609,0.000687118,0.0001597038,0.0004365912,0.00003409054,0.00001904284,0.003091203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.592448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151718518","doi":"10.1177/1747016114523772","title":"PAeDS-MoRe: A framework for the development and review of research assent protocols involving children and adolescents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Relevance (law); Informed consent; Citation; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.377266043510719,"gpt":0.6055227104397988,"spread":0.2282566669290798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05582146,0.0001256241,0.0003583261,0.0001846745,0.0007076966,0.00006314,0.000274346,0.0004865064,0.000008212865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05858717,0.00008190991,0.00004300701,0.0006121247,0.000913275,0.00004140787,0.0004326256,0.006633543,0.000003140183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001091093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001799801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001923708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004397234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943824,0.001600005,0.0005033195,0.0004021527,0.00246897,0.0006431132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830568,0.0129881,0.00008886338,0.0006163556,0.002895759,0.000354137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006190728,0.0005715631,0.1593971,0.3959277,0.0002283288,0.00001315652,0.04588022,3.869346e-7,0.0001022865,0.1986597,0.00789653,0.190704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002972771,0.002651101,0.2299339,0.3178986,0.00009725794,0.00005030555,0.003361397,0.0004856609,0.001339737,0.04281713,0.3978364,0.0005556719],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05061861,0.295087,0.004835014,0.508252,0.000206934,0.1400444,0.0000442925,0.0001070714,0.000804668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7146796,0.2234466,0.03865763,0.006210599,0.001633422,0.01488213,0.00003539047,0.00011368,0.0003409795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.664061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697889","doi":"10.1177/17470161231164530","title":"Cannabis, research ethics, and a duty of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cannabis; Harm; Research ethics; Duty; Duty of care; Psychology; Effects of cannabis; Political science; Criminology; Engineering ethics; Law; Psychiatry; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3646539138534396,"gpt":0.5654747881828157,"spread":0.2008208743293761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04638829,0.0001962354,0.0005023967,0.001835201,0.001240511,0.0001180998,0.0004732686,0.001103214,0.0001913977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04028049,0.0001702424,0.0001407954,0.004386711,0.003580891,0.00009542882,0.001146871,0.01917483,0.0001924719],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004039056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005444842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001741853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855339,0.004112604,0.0004780334,0.0007802717,0.007322481,0.001772722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855492,0.002311513,0.00004458612,0.0010803,0.0101626,0.0008517642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001484105,0.0003175835,0.009156899,0.01635842,0.0001888053,0.0009379527,0.1387215,0.00001102498,0.03629303,0.03391623,0.7449579,0.01765659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00247313,0.003534353,0.05591757,0.001530464,0.00002964975,0.00009105297,0.0976926,0.0004085877,0.02348025,0.006159354,0.8082805,0.0004024991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910736,0.007012148,0.000007291995,0.4861697,0.0001721671,0.001984278,0.0001280341,0.000173035,0.01327972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451046,0.0108075,0.000108247,0.0002894128,0.0003904568,0.000252661,0.00008214876,0.00009549453,0.04286946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4858803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588113643","doi":"10.1177/1747016117693828","title":"Revisions to the Common Rule: A proposal in search of evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Criticism; Subject (documents); Empirical evidence; Scientific evidence; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.948464032356229,"gpt":0.7742134374355288,"spread":0.1742505949207002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1502,0.0001214498,0.0004229172,0.0003721935,0.001045884,0.0001987062,0.002557385,0.0008302786,0.0001779428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5987241,0.00006947602,0.0001125352,0.0007879277,0.003112169,0.0001561879,0.002889463,0.02405949,0.000390959],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002402705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009125909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003957373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009108537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985122,0.00357762,0.0007638785,0.0006195516,0.00886967,0.00104728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8174149,0.1679775,0.0001453378,0.0059044,0.007699637,0.0008581985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005124445,0.002077769,0.3931914,0.01354629,0.0001767859,0.001196263,0.03829754,0.00008771619,0.0268259,0.414216,0.0125361,0.0927238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002324203,0.004884286,0.74929,0.04368459,0.00003523003,0.00004814783,0.004505662,0.001598627,0.01819804,0.1620512,0.01294097,0.0004390768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2212871,0.0006147263,0.00006560676,0.7668979,0.0000945165,0.002102594,0.0000117811,0.000017582,0.008908168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855334,0.007564505,0.001858787,0.000666227,0.0002127276,0.000087577,0.000001657767,0.00002995779,0.004045185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7662317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979464758","doi":"10.1177/1747016119869847","title":"Improving dissemination of study results: perspectives of individuals with cystic fibrosis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Medicine; Focus group; Qualitative research; Medical education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3792453037823527,"gpt":0.6152022783020771,"spread":0.2359569745197244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05131121,0.0001250381,0.0004691182,0.0005401936,0.0001103196,0.00003140471,0.0004344042,0.0005874643,0.00008983872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2881463,0.00009260151,0.00007652738,0.001226233,0.001168125,0.0001153415,0.0004162961,0.007764443,0.00002564692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002763022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006079518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002453106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899588,0.001465154,0.0007055977,0.0005720502,0.00683171,0.0004666629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8605168,0.1291774,0.000266353,0.001259383,0.008557314,0.000222748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01104855,0.007520142,0.4720634,0.01496855,0.0008411389,0.00006915742,0.3040206,0.00005019806,0.1489448,0.03620353,0.0002641141,0.004005756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008211551,0.04290735,0.3801189,0.01220784,0.0001892149,0.00001310682,0.4893882,0.0006771952,0.05673147,0.009025547,0.0001054343,0.0004241867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887114,0.0002608028,0.0001119483,0.004919492,0.00002669264,0.001810272,0.00006677882,0.00002131991,0.004071266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945536,0.0003101139,0.002667429,0.00001075932,0.00005028892,0.00003306448,0.00001128803,0.00003240586,0.002331014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2368351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312872714","doi":"10.1177/174701610800400212","title":"Written Consent: Sometimes More Trouble than it is Worth?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Research ethics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8700218989740885,"gpt":0.6795600486951501,"spread":0.1904618502789385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03031642,0.0002513379,0.0005890646,0.0006163082,0.001036897,0.00009193035,0.0008721369,0.002047367,0.001936148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1544705,0.0002144311,0.0002956595,0.001549575,0.005216333,0.0001411319,0.0008490797,0.02734416,0.002106425],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01229575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009913499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008382729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855643,0.001323707,0.0007383566,0.0009378068,0.009814997,0.001620818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981403,0.09251454,0.00008962733,0.001992088,0.005965765,0.00129766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002966538,0.002848803,0.1667897,0.005897456,0.0009617254,0.006554415,0.06738323,0.000008809669,0.005415699,0.07667215,0.6620995,0.002402024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01410505,0.00658851,0.08264646,0.007429023,0.0001788184,0.001537825,0.02607744,0.001422178,0.03181921,0.2342664,0.5919745,0.001954578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1587444,0.001610643,0.00009468997,0.7511425,0.0001712741,0.001166907,0.00004040342,0.0001714814,0.08685769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805577,0.03757181,0.002576614,0.01416801,0.0007347388,0.0001030706,0.00003630134,0.0001132574,0.1641385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7369745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289524090","doi":"10.1177/17470161221116552","title":"Ethics review and conversation analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Warrant; Research ethics; Informed consent; Normative; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Data collection; Conversation analysis; Resource (disambiguation); Preference; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Alternative medicine; Business; Communication; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5176638388297126,"gpt":0.520446981172352,"spread":0.002783142342639433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113518,0.00007461731,0.0001855058,0.0002720808,0.001940054,0.0002508916,0.0003970821,0.00006496252,0.006987244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001512261,0.00006811666,0.00006486353,0.0003929408,0.0008574198,0.0001692457,0.0004624919,0.004212358,0.00004162357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000815063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004528765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001273053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002603143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950798,0.003119443,0.0001978961,0.0001939229,0.001186197,0.0002227937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995862,0.00272731,0.00006783332,0.0005510125,0.0007287867,0.00006302985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049372,0.00003215141,0.00005482241,0.0004455073,0.0001771291,0.000003066937,0.2308249,0.00001279612,0.000005853389,0.7631408,0.005026669,0.0002713753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001669522,0.00008529771,0.0001537627,0.00007718628,0.0003764952,0.000002454223,0.2175884,0.0002254117,0.000008060605,0.01959613,0.7615379,0.0001818753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007137354,0.1101395,0.000134386,0.6552159,0.0002242812,0.001202805,0.0002880156,0.0002274815,0.2254303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626223,0.02641612,0.00006274378,0.003994272,0.00008005414,0.000131311,0.000145618,0.00001495364,0.006532573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129501706","doi":"10.1177/1747016121994011","title":"Identifying and addressing nonrational processes in REB ethical decision-making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Heuristics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Population; Decision-making; Ethical decision; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6625705175875278,"gpt":0.7134502216898961,"spread":0.05087970410236831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08296613,0.0001269289,0.0002589277,0.0003017147,0.003159327,0.0001542062,0.000327216,0.002388653,0.0007157092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6853123,0.0001224225,0.00002516102,0.001529142,0.0008763529,0.0003839619,0.001072002,0.07106587,0.0001699366],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000302426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01121749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001111996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004363272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9743674,0.01946249,0.0007677767,0.0006445715,0.003835185,0.0009225181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5707126,0.422318,0.0001846519,0.0005758681,0.005851031,0.0003579092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006683039,0.0005299372,0.04653135,0.02089843,0.00008591678,0.002736309,0.4374202,0.00005708461,0.004195872,0.4405465,0.01124742,0.03508267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009097563,0.00004515398,0.01113917,0.02003217,0.00001120198,0.00004225587,0.07503851,0.0009554776,0.0001613141,0.8739341,0.01744168,0.0002892142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2078753,0.01039308,0.03875236,0.6772597,0.001976503,0.001685878,0.00002825143,0.0002288175,0.06180011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628198,0.003273628,0.02499657,0.007968852,0.0005021679,0.00008516849,0.00001022065,0.00003739836,0.0003062033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092966289","doi":"10.1177/1747016114531980","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Statement (logic); Informed consent; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Research design; Cluster (spacecraft); Identification (biology); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9026774175548228,"gpt":0.7135437916802408,"spread":0.1891336258745819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.801569,0.0001930767,0.001281461,0.0001635696,0.0007947233,0.0001576747,0.0006216398,0.001668412,0.00009444404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9306571,0.00008245521,0.0003307025,0.000406146,0.007682181,0.00003229305,0.0005222164,0.02900651,0.00002858917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001279309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003807518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001656777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001609856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.764645,0.2027244,0.006403732,0.001660875,0.02242774,0.002138259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01610753,0.976175,0.0003221015,0.001866561,0.005092024,0.0004368265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1135403,0.0003049153,0.0001075526,0.0009163182,0.0008093951,0.0001383479,0.003369466,0.00003313153,0.00203594,0.8384802,0.03563689,0.004627623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07599176,0.003594545,0.0001805434,0.002031808,0.0002529521,0.000103624,0.002155202,0.01082211,0.01300338,0.8167537,0.07480612,0.0003042123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0173378,0.0005523078,0.02031532,0.9439557,0.0002468573,0.007209776,0.00000518116,0.0000372108,0.01033983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740955,0.01097361,0.003905986,0.005688705,0.000411385,0.0006307118,0.00000669258,0.0000589714,0.0042284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170104746","doi":"10.1177/174701611000600305","title":"Ethical Issues in Socio-Historical Archival Research: A Short Skit","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Narrative; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Comparative historical research; Historical method; Ethical issues; Research method; Sociological research; Epistemology; Social science; History; Engineering; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8053528758101043,"gpt":0.7315629167550886,"spread":0.07378995905501573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4161475,0.0002377055,0.0005252844,0.001436435,0.00408184,0.000567189,0.002092339,0.002915117,0.0005043337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3110537,0.0002250196,0.0001985649,0.003662523,0.01518731,0.0003185296,0.0009090723,0.08332247,0.0004352304],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001733965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008540538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03876664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04796714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8693516,0.106741,0.0009118559,0.001356815,0.01717033,0.00446836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8874889,0.1050873,0.0000470104,0.001009696,0.004854358,0.001512681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009386977,0.0002494646,0.0014101,0.0001069645,0.00001497905,0.0001183278,0.1937591,8.68764e-7,0.003555873,0.7748097,0.01386564,0.01201519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001691531,0.0001831717,0.001523922,0.00008354111,0.000001440104,0.000001565391,0.02368032,0.00006271333,0.0001822967,0.4602822,0.5136141,0.0002156152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07060579,0.0004844806,0.0006214349,0.8107429,0.0007209845,0.001213781,0.00001563846,0.0001546661,0.1154403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499139,0.007391378,0.02206327,0.0007907356,0.003305572,0.0003341878,0.00001115436,0.0001044616,0.01608537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378083064","doi":"10.1177/17470161231174734","title":"Deception and informed consent in studies with incognito simulated standardized patients: empirical experiences and a case study from South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Deception; Waiver; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Health care; Research ethics; Empirical research; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8727288311649408,"gpt":0.6396184292881465,"spread":0.2331104018767943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02723621,0.0001499047,0.0006771371,0.0006992047,0.0004540516,0.0001545465,0.0001016147,0.0001806625,0.00002524211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043596,0.0001450166,0.0000199617,0.0007559906,0.000506813,0.0003175398,0.0002141105,0.0007248261,0.00007961575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004172386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006427959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002538976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006819209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954121,0.001550634,0.001649452,0.0005545321,0.0003702007,0.0004630599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801185,0.0186507,0.0003783518,0.0002553868,0.0003937083,0.0002034127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104853,0.00008624916,0.4216274,0.000160427,0.00006456101,0.00005482421,0.5771919,0.00003920415,1.149495e-7,0.00006349391,0.0005352023,0.00007172174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003745406,0.0007057643,0.053443,0.0001978735,0.000005209392,0.000004707576,0.9352862,0.003165969,8.408093e-7,0.002273548,0.0009427043,0.0002288068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902201,0.0009024262,0.00004052544,0.007152055,0.00007385336,0.001355594,0.0001550488,0.00004248116,0.00005795358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998525,0.000584511,0.0001666925,0.0003752854,0.00003848468,0.000236979,0.00001671503,0.00001719264,0.00003916802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403187240","doi":"10.1177/17470161241288649","title":"“Dear John”: Overriding institutional axiology by privileging Indigenous relational ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Indigenous; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6981611830080889,"gpt":0.6661478696372294,"spread":0.03201331337085955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1533193,0.0001888071,0.0002531408,0.0006148163,0.006533032,0.0006310953,0.0006968072,0.001705544,0.0004818993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0957425,0.0001827812,0.0001414738,0.001941517,0.007336645,0.000675362,0.0003552434,0.01985365,0.0004790851],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001247893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01950153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004711269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001453408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9671845,0.02480287,0.0004520199,0.0007302932,0.005224016,0.00160635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.930133,0.0671747,0.00005393326,0.0002950285,0.001823096,0.0005202219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001645891,0.00003825269,0.0001439405,0.0002242912,0.0000565669,0.00004323263,0.1944789,0.00003845248,0.000709293,0.7958416,0.005069819,0.003339201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012622,0.00008905148,0.0001230497,0.0003167193,0.000005409408,0.000005450692,0.01055622,0.0005849489,0.00009347198,0.2184909,0.7694328,0.0002007398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02946718,0.02352366,0.1704625,0.6010339,0.003216432,0.0021288,0.0004030749,0.0008978356,0.1688667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242051,0.03278415,0.02191173,0.002057476,0.003579827,0.0002341382,0.0002080851,0.0001279614,0.0148915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399705302","doi":"10.1177/1747016116649992","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of the education and training program of the TCPS 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Modalities; Medical education; Political science; Research ethics; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9261742110490973,"gpt":0.7771917464788358,"spread":0.1489824645702614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06162598,0.00007460341,0.0001747258,0.00006274126,0.0004165468,0.00002448834,0.0007359789,0.0004179919,0.00003971033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4459301,0.00002593919,0.0001120544,0.0006963005,0.004133666,0.00003413941,0.0006774936,0.00629014,0.000004235493],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007837469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009238746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001275829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001687245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911464,0.003226118,0.0004403328,0.0002629026,0.004533769,0.000390448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8039374,0.1888525,0.0002257624,0.001858649,0.004950463,0.0001751803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000310021,0.0007814444,0.01330345,0.001327553,0.00009456532,5.164129e-7,0.03311431,0.000002594644,0.05259948,0.1075632,0.0003810059,0.7905219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004399823,0.004700521,0.4969402,0.01827642,0.0001572105,0.00004172099,0.02093571,0.0008317183,0.04423544,0.402126,0.007104967,0.0002502669],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7976046,0.0003883294,0.00001135712,0.1961753,0.0001374658,0.001529743,0.000003220486,0.00001064578,0.004139425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948902,0.0007030363,0.0006950861,0.0002700097,0.0001789157,0.0000806058,3.425147e-7,0.000017158,0.003164673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7902716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402950882","doi":"10.1177/17470161241269154","title":"Community-led approaches to research governance: a scoping review of strategies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9157198261708849,"gpt":0.6876227615237697,"spread":0.2280970646471152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1044783,0.0004248723,0.003489951,0.0008944009,0.0005882805,0.0001369654,0.0009888046,0.001205505,0.0001287423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03379487,0.0003084227,0.0006420442,0.0053239,0.000911044,0.00009107978,0.001299618,0.03075551,0.0007693052],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009078123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03741151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001103002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002893312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9744729,0.01597241,0.001644961,0.0006581316,0.005437756,0.001813809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795821,0.01480267,0.000205428,0.002105766,0.002297518,0.001006569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677277,0.0001088025,2.783094e-7,0.7854869,0.00008299886,0.0000873196,0.0005374947,3.733798e-8,1.049602e-7,0.01606301,0.02064703,0.1769592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004739901,0.0002440257,5.072303e-7,0.5389018,0.0001146096,0.00003640606,0.0004741794,7.864814e-7,3.781936e-7,0.000579061,0.4594937,0.0001071837],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001311376,0.9569799,0.000004494831,0.01094041,0.0001838938,0.006410263,0.0001199459,0.000052948,0.02530687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001443245,0.9964861,0.0002320781,0.0004143117,0.0003243009,0.0008826115,0.0001796261,0.0001032262,0.001363262],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4388466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362697961","doi":"10.1177/17470161231166600","title":"Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Engineering ethics; Harm; Sociology; Research ethics; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9320193979545133,"gpt":0.7806733284161768,"spread":0.1513460695383365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7117449,0.0004543579,0.001055432,0.007407567,0.003979392,0.0007261585,0.003442215,0.007852641,0.003264616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8040493,0.0004135872,0.0004200016,0.02698846,0.009692236,0.0002203906,0.009570275,0.1770751,0.05636657],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002714674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03918618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001474271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00350077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7744881,0.07837733,0.004290226,0.007344097,0.1194106,0.0160897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2723202,0.6373981,0.0001123371,0.01022547,0.0739834,0.005960442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01004819,0.001610341,0.004889595,0.005263449,0.0002479843,0.005069581,0.02167574,0.0000224097,0.02695805,0.4342659,0.4763277,0.01362102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002984015,0.01364329,0.03254439,0.002718965,0.00002059039,0.00007292274,0.01359024,0.0004704082,0.008950941,0.5377521,0.3864931,0.0007589952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3630412,0.0001209858,0.00006633041,0.5588809,0.0003762755,0.005572507,0.00008966764,0.0004943409,0.07135784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651513,0.004481278,0.002420121,0.004413679,0.001657276,0.001494532,0.0001202204,0.0002514399,0.1200101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5590208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410543065","doi":"10.1177/17470161251335709","title":"Picturing informed consent: Exploring participatory visual methods to enhance meaningful consent conversations with young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Visual research; Psychology; Visual methods; Participatory action research; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Visual arts; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Cognitive science; Art; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8577231489267905,"gpt":0.7451852201053167,"spread":0.1125379288214737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04824063,0.000243743,0.0004293027,0.0008590586,0.002850743,0.0006024123,0.0007722682,0.0003084508,0.0001787295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1569825,0.0002374082,0.00008986477,0.003213426,0.001782076,0.0008017962,0.0005825554,0.002791796,0.0001372775],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001648658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01906613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007252902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09761087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780509,0.0153076,0.0005879585,0.0007010289,0.003198694,0.002153822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9403287,0.05579127,0.00009936337,0.0006099878,0.002058999,0.001111736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006523856,0.0003641701,0.05233359,0.0009750306,0.0003466575,0.00005195069,0.7247018,0.0003691347,0.01148014,0.1975893,0.002012945,0.009122834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001716596,0.001187733,0.03817154,0.003201183,0.0001389672,0.000004602123,0.4619136,0.002103808,0.2503872,0.01036734,0.2292006,0.001606762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7749696,0.0002387338,0.1532186,0.0254369,0.0007973469,0.002384029,0.00001054309,0.0003799904,0.04256424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687138,0.0005674087,0.02424853,0.0004372544,0.0001606176,0.00129066,0.000002589166,0.00003482165,0.00454429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2627882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380609532","doi":"10.1177/17470161231180829","title":"Who owns your consent? How REBs give away participants’ agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Permission; Public relations; Qualitative research; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9205153017155312,"gpt":0.719668062793361,"spread":0.2008472389221702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1630668,0.0001867083,0.0003341286,0.0004924593,0.006009057,0.0009224312,0.001006814,0.0008022653,0.0001837706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2216205,0.0001711566,0.0001670166,0.003487574,0.007549999,0.0003659548,0.0005177571,0.005976956,0.001363629],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003991564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007188479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003479183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008548846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9542305,0.03489362,0.0003945959,0.00068922,0.006336309,0.003455677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298146,0.06511418,0.00009523011,0.0005992877,0.003132815,0.001243863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007205247,0.00006579071,0.0005405033,0.0002277928,0.00008405841,0.000186225,0.3043912,0.00000433793,0.002837265,0.6052421,0.07473578,0.01161295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002847523,0.0002031101,0.001161485,0.0001900088,0.000005904114,3.655693e-7,0.1600229,0.0002813692,0.001042229,0.2473414,0.5891768,0.0002896356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07239871,0.001162685,0.001796699,0.8399414,0.001224024,0.001634374,0.0001390376,0.0006949696,0.08100814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5737371,0.1258653,0.004014942,0.0006013093,0.001918352,0.0004390751,0.00003174406,0.0001524973,0.2932397],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311012291","doi":"10.1177/17470161221141275","title":"Promising practices and constraining factors in mobilizing community-engaged research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Sociology; Community engagement; Focus group; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8689081218063074,"gpt":0.6349223159119336,"spread":0.2339858058943738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4555415,0.00009843926,0.0001707599,0.0006993431,0.05977762,0.0005285122,0.001110758,0.0001763967,0.0002228599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1292164,0.0001104314,0.00002745084,0.002066754,0.001631191,0.0003202182,0.00189821,0.08993194,0.000006554751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006470844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001772181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1007918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0304986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6323241,0.3630649,0.0002499768,0.0002624552,0.003099786,0.0009987924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8477961,0.1508307,0.000117135,0.0004890804,0.0005676361,0.0001993378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003093966,0.0001849736,0.01369744,0.00008596754,0.00001275204,0.00001403051,0.9742023,0.00007713697,0.0006676668,0.008587951,0.00007681635,0.002361959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002364174,0.0001831216,0.00249464,0.00009218017,0.000001947598,0.000001318164,0.9491935,0.0001359995,0.000071279,0.002826454,0.04465562,0.0001075328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446953,0.0003162486,0.00000292037,0.01282172,0.00006978241,0.0005234875,0.000002977844,0.00007460488,0.04149299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986067,0.0004770766,0.000203043,0.0001107834,0.00004616439,0.0001029324,0.00000887017,0.0000204843,0.0004239438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3263251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414932649","doi":"10.1177/17470161251380888","title":"Reframing payment practices for co-research for children and young people","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Public Health Ontario; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Payment; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Equity (law); Commodification; Incentive; Typology; Financial compensation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5447250875786909,"gpt":0.664233150346106,"spread":0.1195080627674151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05151155,0.00006281242,0.0001248518,0.0003405146,0.003380537,0.0003266293,0.0003092823,0.0003629419,0.00001943337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04265275,0.00006064922,0.0000279312,0.0008347685,0.0005535076,0.0001787154,0.0001013963,0.001656196,0.00000616356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000244676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002761559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006150429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05244808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954776,0.001832704,0.0002127473,0.0003368899,0.001371264,0.0007688593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827026,0.01395291,0.0000704101,0.000186208,0.002948629,0.0001392611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007111969,0.00007528028,0.005249556,0.0004049435,0.00003141011,2.803404e-7,0.05756393,1.051106e-7,0.00009020102,0.878852,0.0227801,0.03488104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004721823,0.0002082362,0.00848899,0.0001334143,0.000003915598,3.601166e-7,0.09668056,0.00007916651,0.0002271096,0.03791942,0.8556811,0.0001055678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06590913,0.001322463,0.001092369,0.9104798,0.0002690642,0.003397633,0.00006448167,0.00006573134,0.01739932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845837,0.005605168,0.0010258,0.000415582,0.0004089834,0.000576092,0.00003169799,0.000013095,0.007339862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389832860","doi":"10.1177/17470161231218173","title":"Needs and preferences of REB members in the development of a new TCPS 2 training program in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Robarts Clinical Trials; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographics; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8997131653263873,"gpt":0.6755732538506436,"spread":0.2241399114757437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04367974,0.00007597866,0.0002858254,0.0005057014,0.00006441396,0.00001499069,0.0003978926,0.0003407665,0.00003287786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0714656,0.00005283079,0.00002125808,0.002531637,0.0005620615,0.00002818218,0.000209329,0.007093361,0.000001478458],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002339231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04921488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6595216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932163,0.000958787,0.0006830544,0.0002391688,0.004302002,0.0006006554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486115,0.05004543,0.0000640535,0.0003725267,0.0006896632,0.0002168066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000408223,0.0002387186,0.1256654,0.004786136,0.00007771553,0.0001284874,0.5353413,0.00002941121,0.000899105,0.008943142,0.0009237394,0.3225587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002453344,0.001163931,0.4529929,0.005744136,0.00001047436,0.000006324416,0.469902,0.001343458,0.002913672,0.05675448,0.00649995,0.0002152492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700483,0.0001336751,0.000002734356,0.02342217,0.00002213464,0.0007351824,0.000002316234,0.000008700824,0.005624764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965267,0.001191007,0.001591747,0.00007417167,0.00002053388,0.00006122422,0.000005363164,0.00001032951,0.0005189508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.329582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415762304","doi":"10.1177/17470161251392249","title":"Barriers to Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Canadian Research Ethics Board membership: Challenges and opportunities for reform","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Tokenism; Excellence; Mandate; Champion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9187151411400475,"gpt":0.683498438943917,"spread":0.2352167021961304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2489635,0.0002095833,0.0005026457,0.002708836,0.009281942,0.0001342889,0.001051461,0.002894761,0.00004673533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3621902,0.0001989895,0.00006644752,0.0009670131,0.003303813,0.0001725213,0.06080687,0.02766427,0.000004940743],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0283939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3027474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9172333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841165,0.003959257,0.0005837957,0.001132065,0.007752881,0.002455497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8503461,0.1331059,0.00004876292,0.001360734,0.00959699,0.005541522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001258984,0.00007670301,0.003805352,0.008469273,0.00008401841,0.0002982051,0.1411161,9.775246e-7,0.0001458615,0.8198467,0.001297319,0.02360049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816127,0.001616724,0.00612571,0.004067589,0.00002195572,0.000006412656,0.08213738,0.0002675689,0.0003784875,0.8373618,0.06590929,0.0002909807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1000547,0.004757662,0.00001086334,0.8167264,0.0001198011,0.001997959,0.00004759066,0.00003333925,0.07625169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892077,0.09806167,0.0003956581,0.00634737,0.0001025401,0.0001313319,0.000009176424,0.00003310587,0.00571142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115170368","doi":"10.1177/17470161251406930","title":"Whose Data, Whose Ethics? Rethinking Ethical Accountability in Research Using Publicly Available Indigenous Data","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Accountability; Research ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Human rights; Operationalization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.761292527785612,"gpt":0.638879658298733,"spread":0.1224128694868789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.431676,0.0002854839,0.000536154,0.001827939,0.03467998,0.001839971,0.00867062,0.004959665,0.00042199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03299062,0.0002728229,0.00005360007,0.007306887,0.005909428,0.002231078,0.0008204321,0.04808551,0.0003537642],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3445832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8808125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9221212,0.05566894,0.00161594,0.003372547,0.01188146,0.005339887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042531,0.07034009,0.0003018512,0.01118388,0.01272539,0.001195635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009278599,0.000494041,0.004481892,0.0007008415,0.00002944823,0.00002450628,0.7978083,0.000005288435,0.00001574632,0.1925972,0.003253061,0.000496853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003421951,0.00006321662,0.000605901,0.0007586738,0.00001130487,0.000002314036,0.07055399,0.0008821227,0.00005330045,0.08171886,0.8446726,0.0003355653],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117623,0.005787108,0.0003680343,0.1674062,0.003097731,0.007281831,0.0005113319,0.0003740219,0.2034114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474318,0.1004303,0.008515014,0.003051898,0.004092625,0.00006806519,0.001656024,0.0001926276,0.03456167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410717485","doi":"10.1177/17470161251339785","title":"Amplifying voices, dismantling silences: Ethical praxis in multimodal child-centered research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Mitacs; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Praxis; Multimodality; Multimodal therapy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4114439133350249,"gpt":0.5912267293246217,"spread":0.1797828159895968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04796419,0.0001312916,0.0002306061,0.0008567194,0.003686428,0.0005404963,0.0008431572,0.001087052,0.0001448118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02232526,0.0001147494,0.00007316515,0.002907732,0.002128475,0.0002682688,0.0003672041,0.01160345,0.0001024899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005210073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00218445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1083017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851034,0.008862078,0.0004675907,0.0006437127,0.003429409,0.001493832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868757,0.01123532,0.00004783678,0.0004093253,0.001168184,0.0002636705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001942312,0.0004509842,0.04540215,0.0002853767,0.00003720043,0.00003746754,0.2347031,0.0001736009,0.000180702,0.7072161,0.001299625,0.01001945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003504161,0.000423432,0.1268577,0.006362729,0.000023434,0.000002224644,0.1079751,0.01312365,0.001068809,0.3096603,0.429924,0.001074508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6793303,0.0008293134,0.0007378765,0.2470007,0.0005769358,0.001887325,0.00002172149,0.0001459992,0.06946985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965764,0.001387985,0.0002631818,0.0003280203,0.000359349,0.00009438006,0.00001500319,0.00001413441,0.0009615975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4286244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242130756","doi":"10.1177/1747016113510668","title":"The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Statement (logic); Research ethics; Research design; Engineering ethics; Cluster (spacecraft); Randomized controlled trial; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9072127411373186,"gpt":0.7100848200719752,"spread":0.1971279210653435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6848279,0.000199343,0.001224416,0.0001676431,0.0007570739,0.000231967,0.0006280148,0.001704544,0.000339277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8875275,0.00008332189,0.0003286827,0.0004373536,0.007869737,0.00005546548,0.0005666603,0.02979203,0.00008231672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000149032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004626908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005318631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000133405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8655131,0.109359,0.005154389,0.001244667,0.0169637,0.001765082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01672192,0.9731607,0.0003279696,0.001862728,0.007420035,0.0005066689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1147435,0.0006668642,0.0002354793,0.001599456,0.001912635,0.0003653162,0.007577565,0.00003488701,0.006546738,0.6859063,0.1728789,0.007532381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06918264,0.002923516,0.0003805966,0.002001341,0.0002221287,0.000121878,0.004854933,0.006655779,0.01338079,0.8726089,0.02733481,0.0003326935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03154887,0.0007599739,0.004596769,0.9449606,0.0001898143,0.0111565,0.000004709023,0.00003245173,0.006750292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623494,0.0174234,0.004414361,0.006153645,0.0003326256,0.001834903,0.000007385624,0.00006664641,0.007417606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416409781","doi":"10.1177/17470161251396228","title":"Conducting creative research: Research ethics and research conduct in art and design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Emily Carr University of Art and Design; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Research ethics; Indigenous; Information ethics; Bridge (graph theory); Ethics of technology; Adaptation (eye); Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9317462045734879,"gpt":0.6339675005177997,"spread":0.2977787040556882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2837228,0.0003755623,0.0006899419,0.005200409,0.01134324,0.002191976,0.001152094,0.001031166,0.001270937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1345734,0.0003331011,0.00006571922,0.003003157,0.03062749,0.0007265707,0.002882939,0.04736076,0.0004539689],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008816081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006137353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007018871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.908097,0.07551707,0.0009484547,0.001939253,0.009224016,0.004274156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7954195,0.1839972,0.00007278313,0.001235849,0.01845439,0.0008202692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004332558,0.0002317339,0.0005006324,0.0007076185,0.00007892225,0.0001567808,0.1555602,0.000002921579,0.001171196,0.7986369,0.03862664,0.003893164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146756,0.001135728,0.0005089536,0.001693273,0.000007843484,0.00001058209,0.4829528,0.0007707096,0.002433758,0.2539945,0.2549759,0.0003691722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0806556,0.008980612,0.0004357383,0.1083834,0.0001711665,0.005068397,0.00009026207,0.0001350995,0.7960798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723183,0.00797606,0.0006043968,0.00018066,0.0004817321,0.0006416732,0.00002010235,0.0000837081,0.1176934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414258633","doi":"10.1177/17470161251346253","title":"Rethinking ethical reflexivity and oversight in health research through an ecosystem approach: A workshop report","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fogarty International Center; Medical Research Council; South African Medical Research Council; National Institutes of Health; UK Research and Innovation; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Research ethics; Reflexivity; Scrutiny; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Bioethics; Context (archaeology); General partnership; Scope (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9220719719747945,"gpt":0.745732954893545,"spread":0.1763390170812495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4430748,0.0003176538,0.001077667,0.001604744,0.001691422,0.0003816849,0.001065279,0.006290606,0.0000515101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5253513,0.0002867873,0.0001478643,0.005283101,0.003672272,0.000389987,0.002323391,0.1202961,0.00003054192],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002399175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03188638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00309042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01557965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9248321,0.0415442,0.003240495,0.004027985,0.02134991,0.005005276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.585858,0.3871269,0.0004394329,0.007318081,0.01545639,0.003801176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001698654,0.001217078,0.006856781,0.01463839,0.0001180334,0.002109769,0.03831768,0.00002079289,0.0003843367,0.9275403,0.005363517,0.001734655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002647965,0.001544413,0.003984433,0.01330328,0.00001357669,0.000305012,0.01463432,0.003151001,0.0003273283,0.9103834,0.0493228,0.0003824632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047306,0.002833901,0.002458862,0.7877942,0.0003101832,0.004006908,0.00001741692,0.0002332391,0.09761468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499659,0.01684209,0.01684715,0.006679022,0.0004088001,0.0002375224,0.00005641577,0.00008960484,0.008873472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}