{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"918ba1645900","filters":{"venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia"}},"results":[{"id":"W3023222327","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i11829","title":"ISLAMIC JURISDICTION: SHARIE‘A COURTS AND THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC POLICY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Islam; Sharia; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Mohamed A. Arafa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01891311209153559,"gpt":0.2947364436912928,"spread":0.2758233315997572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006441745,0.0001498055,0.0002606957,0.001070955,0.006062988,0.009821575,0.0006988498,0.005049346,0.004259082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005412085,0.0002024587,0.0002417458,0.001202898,0.02506576,0.006067719,0.002617711,0.005703059,0.0003197775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007799841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007940796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009367981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009892742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960069,0.00222565,0.00008085994,0.0002719154,0.0005878264,0.0008268158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.001740332,0.0003101873,0.0002210113,0.0003833072,0.0003213068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005880293,0.000008643619,0.0001453884,0.000009698394,0.000001336482,0.00002383425,0.001018268,0.00006306152,0.00002470618,0.9935809,0.002201673,0.002916709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002077657,0.00001873162,0.001428185,0.0002744934,0.000007094656,0.00005237904,0.003495363,0.0004336761,0.00009689448,0.9079646,0.08619253,0.00001527297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09040113,0.02846631,0.002691521,0.353212,0.001345382,0.00002022964,0.00005223683,0.00002761712,0.5237836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742756,0.004539646,0.0004631243,0.01140871,0.0007330651,0.00001308863,0.00001212669,0.000005923223,0.00854856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009821575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05659211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121227752","doi":"10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v25i31874","title":"CANADIAN LIVING TREE DOCTRINE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Metaphor; Constitutional law; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Luiz Henrique Diniz Araújo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02341220341272064,"gpt":0.2873373079858172,"spread":0.2639251045730965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002659431,0.0004095585,0.0004667898,0.002333657,0.01262581,0.00666792,0.001838389,0.002474076,0.00870821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005557839,0.0002869794,0.0005383664,0.003122977,0.01991422,0.002694127,0.002684793,0.004826322,0.000711127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05011537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06607152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8847938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9174299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940071,0.0007997813,0.0001490651,0.0008391978,0.003127648,0.00107721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976699,0.0006149361,0.0001067971,0.0002314922,0.001166227,0.0002105888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.276134e-7,4.161628e-7,0.00003103163,0.00000439327,6.583375e-7,0.00001165037,0.0003197507,0.00006676476,0.00002222244,0.9974294,0.0009944625,0.001118214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002210279,0.000007675118,0.001366084,0.0001154627,0.00002559004,0.0001172854,0.001149515,0.001564409,0.000300664,0.6641594,0.3311142,0.00005779832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01159009,0.001583442,0.01416133,0.0109258,0.0003347333,0.00004658751,0.0002935239,0.00009240642,0.9609721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836941,0.002484904,0.01308968,0.003240716,0.0002885294,0.00009444113,0.0002725569,0.00009897628,0.09673617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1152062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3636142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}