{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":83,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ca5068b3cda4","filters":{"venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles"}},"results":[{"id":"W166688865","doi":"","title":"Sex work by law: Bedford's impact on municipal approaches to regulating the sex trade","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Sex work; Sex offender; Criminology; Supreme court; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Craig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1187161819420112,"gpt":0.2926210342613091,"spread":0.1739048523192979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007649601,0.0002385983,0.000276523,0.00006423335,0.001978262,0.0001386206,0.000538929,0.0002234568,0.0001924255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261732,0.0001611524,0.0001702852,0.0005096109,0.001152748,0.0001362605,0.00006539468,0.0003148755,0.00008278035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009696364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00222576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000362327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982528,0.0002923997,0.0002993045,0.0003620878,0.000282488,0.0005109386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989565,0.0003088612,0.0001081649,0.0003917868,0.00001845658,0.0002162281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937511,0.000219432,0.003454111,0.00001194652,0.000186946,0.000009143667,0.2437932,0.002455027,0.00003238397,0.7423781,0.002195457,0.005194872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001257061,0.0005339779,0.003125788,0.001347411,0.0003457891,0.00003949723,0.3815735,0.0009131836,0.002967828,0.01092388,0.5949294,0.002042687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5680447,0.001487375,0.000166589,0.003105956,0.0003837895,0.0007489318,0.000008022366,0.0002433892,0.4258113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970307,0.0001389757,0.0005615589,0.0002465154,0.000371767,0.00003649467,0.00001097054,0.00001761239,0.001585449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7314543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Strelein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tran Tran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0195328239617701,"gpt":0.290385753938838,"spread":0.2708529299770679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001584739,0.00009046196,0.0001459875,0.00003581846,0.0005197575,0.0001364348,0.0002159453,0.00007110165,0.0004797563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005795777,0.00009613334,0.00003847752,0.0002728416,0.0001183594,0.0001884663,0.00007702986,0.0001284367,0.0003895785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002701391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002438226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03865808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008186284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999155,0.0000508694,0.0001907627,0.000243039,0.0001335382,0.0002267959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992265,0.0003820821,0.0001042615,0.0001314823,0.00006759288,0.00008807219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003114186,0.00004933127,0.009887005,0.000006660351,0.00002500671,0.000005996262,0.01772985,0.0003974791,0.002354227,0.9618454,0.0002443658,0.007451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001477772,0.00004514631,0.1116881,0.001986437,0.00008891055,0.000003437523,0.02982225,0.004638548,0.002261859,0.04533913,0.8010157,0.001632653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658472,0.0004417136,0.005077067,0.001455237,0.0001817786,0.0005777196,0.00005127281,0.00008668687,0.1262814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789672,0.00007733131,0.01997581,0.0001086415,0.0003043876,0.00007932556,0.000005646499,0.000007578522,0.0004740396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9165063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745694497","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Conceptualization of Culture after Delgamuukw and Van der Peet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Political science; Sociology; Legal culture; History; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Ash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01373546859679356,"gpt":0.2657368160699835,"spread":0.25200134747319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002367336,0.00009196851,0.0001233806,0.000004004926,0.001122664,0.00008450586,0.0001441972,0.0001505855,0.0004881999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001143888,0.0000655756,0.0000711657,0.0001750032,0.002284829,0.0001778984,0.0000143436,0.00009340548,0.0000179601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003860043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001447179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001026627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001144809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991849,0.0001140175,0.0001821861,0.0001569017,0.0001852684,0.0001767494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995423,0.00007868058,0.00006405135,0.0001112642,0.0001407684,0.00006296777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002381146,0.00002978544,0.001477165,0.00001535128,0.00003887473,0.000002156403,0.03586007,0.0001785219,0.00002393664,0.956071,0.002360801,0.003918517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549734,0.0000188435,0.0004511684,0.00009059148,0.00006038373,0.000006057168,0.01924271,0.00003212895,0.00004286235,0.01396771,0.9656794,0.0001531955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3296261,0.03318394,0.0008766905,0.007856866,0.0007800487,0.001225874,0.0000910454,0.0002438517,0.6261156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891366,0.006346164,0.0002418191,0.0002456929,0.0002794816,0.00001989505,0.000007200535,0.00000415462,0.003718996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.863474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Donna Greshner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07338972501701502,"gpt":0.2919209915651096,"spread":0.2185312665480946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005027106,0.0001130724,0.0001818822,0.0000718942,0.003524816,0.00008233147,0.0003421941,0.00009416003,0.0002677593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005710021,0.00007686135,0.0001066629,0.0004758571,0.002157785,0.0001518291,0.00003706029,0.0001170047,0.0001158279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001317423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4234188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8582053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987254,0.0001979118,0.0002776514,0.0001752067,0.0002428376,0.0003809815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989726,0.0003301222,0.0001106102,0.0001846561,0.00020673,0.0001952696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001729799,0.00002477961,0.001252779,0.000009817588,0.00003857609,0.000003595294,0.009729248,0.00001870021,0.00002285476,0.9851807,0.002440703,0.001276559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206201,0.00000915866,0.001243311,0.00004352738,0.00002215847,0.000001645945,0.005601091,0.00003140719,0.00005741133,0.001747676,0.9909813,0.0001407258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160168,0.007121119,0.00005488718,0.0226167,0.0011339,0.0009404717,0.00005831365,0.0001296166,0.8519282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949823,0.001907496,0.0001885118,0.00005646456,0.0002184876,0.00002177116,0.000001939597,0.000003055778,0.00261997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Larry Chartrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05214594207642598,"gpt":0.2883170905806425,"spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692354,0.0003418467,0.00048339,0.00005249343,0.002556019,0.0001538675,0.0005862447,0.0002711945,0.001863605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006531473,0.0002519039,0.00032683,0.0005261807,0.003694333,0.0004645617,0.0002088448,0.0004705807,0.000862438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004969471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003137585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0291385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003056668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997318,0.0004173015,0.0006312426,0.0004245579,0.0005297917,0.0006790762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982416,0.0005080496,0.0003556671,0.000332918,0.0003722518,0.0001895092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008056282,0.00034081,0.004786754,0.0001303055,0.0002779249,0.00000733988,0.02884124,0.0006339708,0.0002715354,0.9560688,0.002509981,0.006123337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008132182,0.0003846782,0.03509859,0.001675945,0.0004720837,0.00002333751,0.1003162,0.0006374083,0.001703003,0.007212606,0.8502555,0.001407366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826661,0.00970309,0.0001469441,0.02982439,0.003599925,0.0014971,0.00004868437,0.00009213569,0.07242167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873333,0.002376733,0.000343387,0.000179325,0.0009337961,0.0001014059,0.000005324997,0.00001338187,0.008713366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21238772","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.073","title":"Dismembering Canada? Stephen Harper and the foreign relations of canadian provinces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Dartmouth","keywords":"Federalism; Negotiation; Delegation; Autonomy; Political science; Decentralization; Cooperative federalism; Foreign policy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher J. Kukucha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01218334945823992,"gpt":0.198193225502847,"spread":0.1860098760446071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002606263,0.00005863726,0.0001252648,0.0002793472,0.001627235,0.0001227755,0.0001476562,0.0000472631,0.0001338873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000228376,0.00005795171,0.00003676252,0.0003222476,0.001495348,0.0001541493,0.000008617539,0.00008085697,0.000003260194],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006929163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00661898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993411,0.00005995614,0.0001621381,0.00011696,0.0001345244,0.0001853157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994873,0.0001006046,0.0000652054,0.0001124683,0.00006379533,0.0001706571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000369348,0.000004128841,0.0004178361,0.000006899304,0.00001054233,0.000004788889,0.002928205,0.0001295138,0.000003625546,0.9922512,0.002979951,0.001259622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002727981,0.000006804386,0.004766976,0.00006875164,0.00003896627,0.000005802807,0.006366685,0.00005370445,0.000002585245,0.004894012,0.983398,0.0001249073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04597441,0.00289855,0.0001018772,0.01891742,0.0002896993,0.0005571633,0.00007815623,0.00002880735,0.9311539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967077,0.0003931317,0.0001180784,0.0001871171,0.00009161205,0.000006678125,0.000003587399,0.000002306282,0.002489823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762342677","doi":"","title":"a Failed Discourse of Distrust Amid Significant Procedural Change: The Harper Government´s Legacy in Immigration and Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Immigration; Refugee; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","authors":[{"name":"Peter Carver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02491421388405214,"gpt":0.2832272938847591,"spread":0.258313080000707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497483,0.0001321788,0.0001776457,0.00003586782,0.0004100438,0.00009772531,0.0001600196,0.00008503564,0.00006398981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002771336,0.00007742368,0.00005517579,0.0001802349,0.001370793,0.0009685992,0.00002472088,0.0000744254,0.00000686366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001838548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001555471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0825061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987621,0.0001512109,0.0003375176,0.0002426919,0.000305155,0.000201343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993642,0.0001324815,0.0001825589,0.0001695117,0.00009248322,0.00005876143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003175561,0.00007578052,0.008251478,0.00002565262,0.00001199689,0.000001024102,0.01024318,0.000002421051,0.003516443,0.9744404,0.00009765688,0.003302235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005978926,0.0007801115,0.1273613,0.00477995,0.0004095093,0.000031846,0.3106061,0.001475697,0.02376821,0.02173539,0.5005826,0.002490385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819839,0.0004480382,0.001193542,0.008583767,0.0002116212,0.0008811532,0.00006468671,0.00003776126,0.006595527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.0007793925,0.00008504923,0.00008419308,0.0002467068,0.0001189617,0.0000106902,0.000006028434,0.0004135973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.952705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9342358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35712514","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2022.912935","title":"The Power of a Single Feather: Meech Lake, Indigenous Resistance and the Evolution of Indigenous Politics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Institutes of Health; Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Ethnology; Political science; Colonialism; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Art; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Ian Peach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01392339201716117,"gpt":0.1929432388257847,"spread":0.1790198468086235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004612466,0.00006377073,0.000164875,0.0001136501,0.0009488171,0.00003500336,0.0002403014,0.0000528756,0.00002723047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002417728,0.00005508517,0.00003927485,0.0002654628,0.002905765,0.00007075143,0.00002326277,0.00008785759,9.336772e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001677882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990643,0.0001492317,0.0002648662,0.0001090665,0.0001850298,0.0002275552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992807,0.0002062132,0.0001693342,0.0001778272,0.0001081355,0.00005781542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277119,0.00003884243,0.00631113,0.00003101739,0.00002346526,0.000007819139,0.08559378,0.000006211071,0.00002222523,0.9076171,0.0001079761,0.0002076725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002234493,0.0001015578,0.07828926,0.0006573737,0.0001684223,0.00003095138,0.2840332,0.000005631447,0.000216143,0.03866959,0.5949416,0.0006518264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991809,0.01344286,0.00006401442,0.0003931792,0.0003491563,0.0005543443,0.00009313107,0.00001114628,0.08591126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984067,0.0006823405,0.00005039855,0.0000191406,0.00002461972,0.000008979654,8.344194e-7,0.000003641345,0.0008033123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Vuk Radmilovic","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03383723725556665,"gpt":0.2559929142548845,"spread":0.2221556769993179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006565731,0.0001400214,0.000284395,0.00004576198,0.001512393,0.0000630673,0.0002238715,0.00007364545,0.0000406782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003885518,0.0001078158,0.00006234284,0.0002559656,0.003513054,0.00008842848,0.00009006618,0.000202365,0.000003042021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006498783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7425453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9559174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987822,0.00009845161,0.0002767878,0.0002429196,0.0003026597,0.000297043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990851,0.0002883007,0.00009410913,0.0001510791,0.0002213248,0.0001601163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004124038,0.00004416802,0.0007193544,0.00001343697,0.00004847821,0.00005680486,0.001884491,0.00007701782,0.00005674767,0.9965205,0.0003596259,0.0001781132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008414347,0.0001937219,0.006811455,0.0005415133,0.0009641057,0.004536693,0.1809861,0.001491703,0.0002408661,0.4004208,0.3924724,0.002926257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.491708,0.000503968,0.0003164884,0.006209901,0.0007443586,0.0007913981,0.00008045584,0.00004037474,0.499605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985661,0.00009626566,0.0004864234,0.0002422638,0.0004538069,0.00004976095,0.000003213917,0.00000423356,0.00009791703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Richard H. Pildes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02707902267497707,"gpt":0.2635758241752165,"spread":0.2364968015002394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002274274,0.00009008122,0.0001532701,0.00002988207,0.002661101,0.00004961856,0.000128333,0.00005824,0.00006798773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002024558,0.00006633249,0.00005387051,0.0001569571,0.003536797,0.0001407315,0.00004081125,0.00008094088,0.0000141532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005326611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006198942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002705181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005429498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991397,0.00008079853,0.0002246774,0.0001495249,0.0002039876,0.0002013345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993853,0.0002452786,0.0001057848,0.00007832645,0.0001277721,0.00005752192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005835711,0.000008479938,0.003391782,0.000003813326,0.00002647123,0.000002015534,0.002108638,0.00001428859,0.00007124758,0.9912558,0.0002933605,0.002818265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417212,0.0001309067,0.01609736,0.0006239134,0.0002169019,0.00005091413,0.02666005,0.0009157865,0.0003019283,0.4460799,0.5066364,0.000868688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.740949,0.01744099,0.0003978745,0.005119875,0.00174721,0.0005373227,0.00002778061,0.0001189495,0.233661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977004,0.001488431,0.0001057453,0.00003450092,0.0005308703,0.000008313453,0.000001293366,0.000001889564,0.0001285907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5451759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kerri Froc","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768285191453441,"gpt":0.2989592137626368,"spread":0.2712763618481024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483932,0.0001688833,0.0002919602,0.00002536218,0.002563599,0.00006146697,0.000284817,0.00007698462,0.0001083453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004353579,0.0001145706,0.0001025983,0.0001712926,0.001157985,0.0001115617,0.00004899811,0.0001035125,0.000005586757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005948307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005254378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5007361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8107107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985301,0.0001621053,0.0003139176,0.0002545804,0.0002757996,0.0004634909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.0006288933,0.000192228,0.0001946025,0.0002606052,0.0001416526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147687,0.00004163633,0.000241043,0.0000525314,0.0001049407,0.00002239528,0.0272916,0.00006502344,0.00003341231,0.9651766,0.006486739,0.0004693241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004762372,0.0000419512,0.00007767527,0.00005634728,0.00005039019,0.00003149854,0.01684931,0.00009178066,0.0001847828,0.007394412,0.9745141,0.0002315376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137135,0.001268752,0.001457726,0.02220156,0.00174965,0.001860293,0.0002551514,0.0001159258,0.05737747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971417,0.00007993825,0.0003068052,0.0003842856,0.0004377781,0.0001311561,0.000003721265,0.000005704529,0.001508902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kate Glover","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02754197687777528,"gpt":0.249645461380737,"spread":0.2221034845029617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000780984,0.0003553657,0.0004233347,0.00007121699,0.002725546,0.00009108689,0.0005801704,0.0001753046,0.0006144812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001214484,0.0002417597,0.0001372825,0.0008283274,0.01752658,0.0003691557,0.0001686379,0.0002704227,0.0003266959],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003157649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01968021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8276157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967497,0.0003298474,0.0007330333,0.0005215497,0.0006918292,0.0009740427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970969,0.001679106,0.0002082581,0.0002785963,0.0004913881,0.0002457583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250465,0.00007928542,0.02491923,0.00001622975,0.000118936,0.00008838403,0.000202397,0.0002326226,0.00002618275,0.9551182,0.006550244,0.01261575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006740062,0.00001772512,0.005172992,0.0008570438,0.00005830026,0.00005555186,0.002909941,0.00004089414,0.0000181479,0.03036312,0.9593843,0.0004479476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03065098,0.09657668,0.005653204,0.4267656,0.01930855,0.001448586,0.0007783902,0.0001244392,0.4186935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750565,0.0186367,0.0001358117,0.0004962555,0.001118265,0.0000746239,0.00000618691,0.000008401872,0.004467266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750460237","doi":"","title":"Obsèques Prématurées: la Disparition des Minorities Francophones et Autres Illusions Nationalists","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Edmund A. Aunger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0297426328468357,"gpt":0.2478335561691683,"spread":0.2180909233223326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004822568,0.0002569873,0.0003402273,0.0004830752,0.003808809,0.0008276553,0.0002822104,0.0003568187,0.008819019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007149127,0.000355449,0.000257122,0.0006671321,0.009205723,0.001179621,0.00006603808,0.0003681936,0.0007496473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001107025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006955375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6597656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976977,0.0005885118,0.0004472111,0.0004157569,0.0003892088,0.0004615976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984853,0.0005677076,0.0001774739,0.000226608,0.0002633594,0.0002796006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004362214,0.0003068934,0.0003386153,0.0004285667,0.00006868665,0.00006663973,0.02640294,0.0002116062,0.00003948153,0.9188567,0.04753132,0.005744182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000281906,0.00002339464,0.002637534,0.001301092,0.00009503481,0.00008003154,0.006386377,0.000208052,0.000006222434,0.01042612,0.9781232,0.0004309748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07761703,0.2549714,0.0009141351,0.03039455,0.01086584,0.0008000924,0.001368192,0.0004223334,0.6226465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8242213,0.06146783,0.001354658,0.0004080356,0.00114274,0.00006463887,0.00007129404,0.00002265601,0.1112468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223141162","doi":"","title":"Failing to walk the rights talk? post-9/11 security policy and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Torture; Judicial deference; Deference; Deportation; Rhetoric; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01367976552209877,"gpt":0.2601131835827444,"spread":0.2464334180606457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007150745,0.00009657371,0.0001501885,0.0000429905,0.001479882,0.00005971934,0.0003056483,0.00004478979,0.0001043512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003138322,0.00005478149,0.00005483457,0.00008725839,0.001161348,0.0001617973,0.00006107317,0.0000900478,0.000005383818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001793264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009049429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6917977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9263106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989357,0.0001477868,0.0002093202,0.0001176407,0.0003099932,0.0002795869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989735,0.0004415345,0.00008821061,0.0001493922,0.0002250212,0.0001222999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001553164,0.00001862942,0.000292331,0.000008582007,0.00002588603,0.000001271733,0.008448498,0.00003068628,0.00001594675,0.9907697,0.0003596871,0.0000132337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005765472,0.00001621715,0.002209719,0.0001239646,0.00006008329,0.00002783999,0.003660691,0.00008029443,0.0003941431,0.122868,0.869716,0.0002664894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210911,0.0002601503,0.00004943044,0.01500721,0.0004691184,0.0004094322,0.00005632602,0.00001764469,0.06263961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974777,0.00001607184,0.0000420199,0.0004364011,0.0008412147,0.00001263582,0.000003876474,0.000003272561,0.00116682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8693563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744841385","doi":"","title":"A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chretien and Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Political science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Keating","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01458588464039399,"gpt":0.2413672259877081,"spread":0.2267813413473141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012506,0.00007785013,0.0001060911,0.0006174095,0.001480905,0.0003165238,0.0001687642,0.00008672338,0.0002268623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004344584,0.0001059454,0.00004992084,0.0002550085,0.001574949,0.0002233061,0.0000202061,0.00009014188,0.00007585566],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002416485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992498,0.00002951262,0.000133363,0.0001855195,0.0001368906,0.0002649295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.00004106674,0.00005078219,0.0001004482,0.00009276701,0.0003908364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001651451,0.000009626255,0.0002738157,0.000009217675,0.00001499102,0.00003507873,0.004002928,0.00008702701,0.000004779448,0.9937939,0.0005744081,0.001192551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002737463,0.00001138187,0.0009936597,0.00008758881,0.00001456242,0.00001925117,0.002768111,0.000005446522,0.000003775628,0.05162509,0.9440258,0.0001716281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03117067,0.001557697,0.0006362741,0.03122117,0.0004499677,0.0004826546,0.0002057058,0.0001086623,0.9341672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957879,0.0007326358,0.0001749767,0.0004726416,0.0004781413,0.00001451781,0.00001535289,0.000005659845,0.002318176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742216822","doi":"","title":"The Nisga'a Treaty: What Future for the Inherent Right to Aboriginal Self- Government?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Humanities; Political science; Indigenous; Ethnology; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Claude Denis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420643738653712,"gpt":0.2434846787650906,"spread":0.2292782413785535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003659628,0.0001126362,0.00012231,0.00004707567,0.006160859,0.001323376,0.0004303528,0.00008031965,0.0004776978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007119634,0.00008518137,0.0001345073,0.0002363735,0.0008070805,0.0003264587,0.00002227005,0.0001142183,0.0001764108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001164498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000358718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006722437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5666705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988511,0.00006929598,0.0001762642,0.0002172732,0.000325595,0.0003605193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991015,0.0003194971,0.0000741879,0.0002631183,0.00007475154,0.0001669885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001085112,0.00005235292,0.00005568668,0.00001274569,0.00005781058,0.000005897587,0.00798513,0.00003034167,0.000005805577,0.902298,0.06718203,0.02230334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001708723,0.00002096053,0.00007790287,0.00004202393,0.00006078476,0.000004609278,0.01173334,0.00004610368,0.000005396073,0.000316004,0.9873919,0.0001300347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02348517,0.1261719,0.003602379,0.3821544,0.02721492,0.008295013,0.0005182726,0.0007293818,0.4278286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.824201,0.1018826,0.0007006092,0.001997825,0.007955345,0.0005428112,0.000008155348,0.00003295375,0.06267875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010917512","doi":"","title":"UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Treaty; Federalism; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law; Public administration; Environmental protection; Human rights; Geography; Politics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"James S. Henderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01571786543268518,"gpt":0.220735898784385,"spread":0.2050180333516998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003084999,0.0001159517,0.0002055282,0.00006048951,0.001019533,0.00005658545,0.0001699219,0.00007483289,0.0001724237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004288137,0.00007696722,0.00003534079,0.0001783958,0.0003000613,0.0001039438,0.00001682055,0.0001048285,0.00001021696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003731428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002660912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.937565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989337,0.0001548311,0.0002383414,0.0001950563,0.0002213364,0.0002567811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991871,0.00041519,0.0001122619,0.0001675623,0.0000621812,0.00005569748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001218635,0.00004312212,0.02259278,0.00001993928,0.00001738926,0.000008604552,0.02932404,0.0001456906,0.00003941749,0.9475379,0.00003146571,0.0002274623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004990285,0.0006559033,0.3080225,0.002092208,0.0002476154,0.0001133369,0.2263545,0.0005719046,0.007502935,0.05279572,0.3937449,0.002908207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676482,0.0002368187,0.00001106317,0.0008647337,0.0001874567,0.0005396542,0.00002141708,0.00001164043,0.03047899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.0002974554,0.00003935275,0.0001134678,0.00006394558,0.00001197425,0.000008111829,0.000004183814,0.0003148043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7841523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Dobrowolsky","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03733390591740756,"gpt":0.2978203878822749,"spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019262,0.0002195345,0.0004336342,0.00006506559,0.002409381,0.0001298089,0.0003649453,0.0001521081,0.0002686373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009591637,0.0001634644,0.0001594506,0.0003109701,0.01482364,0.0002432395,0.00009349606,0.0002839485,0.00003721114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003170942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002789854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002036576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009693402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980475,0.0002963985,0.0004218628,0.0003241817,0.0004446935,0.000465366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983362,0.0007609973,0.00018247,0.0002198847,0.0003204984,0.0001799618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145721,0.00003520977,0.006233387,0.00003903373,0.00009885774,0.00000793916,0.008704924,0.00006388556,0.00004199861,0.9840388,0.0004891717,0.0002322759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009409271,0.00009049345,0.01569462,0.0008652224,0.0007171149,0.0001699634,0.04877239,0.000920126,0.0003449815,0.04232381,0.8790945,0.00159748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676784,0.01701871,0.001095374,0.03145675,0.001039699,0.002335286,0.0003923705,0.0003281105,0.2786553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993283,0.003918072,0.0007213991,0.0002018622,0.0004374859,0.00005533049,0.000007773245,0.000006796835,0.001368285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740105340","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Pluralism, and Constitutional Faith: Canada in Question","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Humanities; Federalism; Ethnology; Political science; Politics; Nothing; Pluralism (philosophy); Faith; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Anthropology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Samuel V. LaSelva","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02056909318842353,"gpt":0.223110527904839,"spread":0.2025414347164155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001806657,0.00009689618,0.0001557627,0.000238107,0.001297752,0.0002617751,0.0001139417,0.00009392815,0.0005595687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000251576,0.0001329385,0.00003137975,0.0002363629,0.004623502,0.0002900232,0.00002005301,0.0001409119,0.00002299265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001473084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9465296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989748,0.0001065697,0.0002165957,0.0002286183,0.0002131787,0.0002602332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995073,0.00009104003,0.00005924713,0.0000944573,0.00006765386,0.0001802762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002058339,0.00002160694,0.002280137,0.00001405847,0.000006662028,0.00008051831,0.001246817,0.00008862503,0.000009096707,0.9886125,0.006958683,0.0006792347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002712414,0.000005137459,0.001315093,0.0001100483,0.00001032425,0.00003232349,0.00121433,0.00009023873,0.000001381746,0.0007853259,0.9959602,0.0002043982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2685656,0.01759591,0.001222259,0.054894,0.004569099,0.001410387,0.0003284112,0.0003314872,0.6510829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943235,0.001918125,0.0001299316,0.0003144424,0.0001937053,0.00001481083,0.0000118153,0.000003585389,0.003090072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03630339283605489,"gpt":0.2698295430549229,"spread":0.233526150218868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000321735,0.0001303815,0.0002803477,0.00005862217,0.001046704,0.0000742642,0.0001480514,0.00008677411,0.0001143537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002813232,0.0001127115,0.00006019858,0.0001675594,0.00347429,0.000338568,0.00007948184,0.0000841408,0.00004646724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007677866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001646693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05679066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003736177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998745,0.0001432255,0.0003676268,0.000237175,0.0002696892,0.0002373076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990491,0.0003862605,0.000153036,0.0001043676,0.0001991307,0.0001080706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006058308,0.00004949358,0.00998929,0.0000138373,0.00004881883,0.000002151933,0.003010546,0.00008003919,0.0002443952,0.9849927,0.0004129045,0.001149807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003807544,0.0005212385,0.04067929,0.004509071,0.0005515948,0.00008013635,0.3447727,0.0006680196,0.0008442125,0.2634378,0.3375239,0.002604396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973442,0.007976145,0.001470749,0.0009183366,0.001075342,0.001061818,0.00005254982,0.000109142,0.08999167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.0006521183,0.0003802159,0.00004201134,0.0003471305,0.00006480509,0.0000102039,0.000003403469,0.00007139646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Karen Busby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.110776023013309,"gpt":0.2567147494172821,"spread":0.1459387264039731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006389258,0.0001749096,0.0004433571,0.000169839,0.0003271186,0.00004645045,0.000291128,0.0001054013,0.00003124013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002582119,0.0001648843,0.0001575377,0.0004552702,0.0005973641,0.0003114101,0.0001335014,0.0001262029,0.00002627344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005913802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004105257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02903495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01391389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.00004137253,0.000746117,0.0003442029,0.0001116277,0.0002558455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988403,0.00007488322,0.0004930465,0.0002892741,0.0001620199,0.0001404264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050212,0.00006241543,0.02984107,0.0001709546,0.0001223879,0.000001479922,0.0008560863,0.003804957,0.0003643429,0.964469,0.0002318329,0.00002523492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006383837,0.0004361976,0.0358064,0.002984854,0.0004439623,0.0002152196,0.02994512,0.003621407,0.01036505,0.2245689,0.6822702,0.002958789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199445,0.005030517,0.03392009,0.005554543,0.004766537,0.001328853,0.001178791,0.0001135292,0.3281626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989954,0.00007879239,0.0003418651,0.0001799063,0.0001729324,0.00002013149,0.0000185159,0.000006148869,0.0001863413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999925103","doi":"","title":"Indigenous cultural rights and identity politics in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Citizenship; State (computer science); Scholarship; Constitution; Identity (music); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Avigail Eisenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015619502280686,"gpt":0.2572331762607448,"spread":0.2416136739800588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001704243,0.0001305161,0.0001986514,0.00006619978,0.001547774,0.0002068397,0.0002150467,0.00008537031,0.0002645292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004714183,0.000107664,0.00003197435,0.0001988021,0.0005893737,0.0006243281,0.00003682831,0.0001363797,0.0000422525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009201852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002887649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987013,0.00009000405,0.000252391,0.0002179225,0.0002325749,0.0005057474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994016,0.00008689924,0.00007071696,0.0001262204,0.0001300362,0.0001844744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.783351e-7,0.00003096596,0.01642458,0.00002056231,0.00001307944,0.00003267009,0.0221181,0.00002144734,0.00001349523,0.9608816,0.0002388211,0.0002037862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001248371,0.00006134595,0.09852882,0.0003674042,0.00006630979,0.0001245571,0.07407889,0.0001402122,0.0001838363,0.1040041,0.7196137,0.00158246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603261,0.0005339804,0.0000303248,0.0004179602,0.0003412652,0.0004571252,0.00001617139,0.00003103683,0.037846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983185,0.0002557996,0.0001603965,0.0001312048,0.0002155201,0.00002034424,0.000009021903,0.000004371107,0.0008848279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182430000","doi":"","title":"Manitoba and the (long and winding) road to the natural resources transfer agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Terminology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Elite; Law and economics; Natural resource; Law; Political economy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Jim Mochoruk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361755765929973,"gpt":0.2270230356718108,"spread":0.2134054780125111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001115521,0.00007629475,0.0001099015,0.0001311174,0.002743073,0.000401404,0.0001810221,0.00004755407,0.00004268873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001311089,0.00005747319,0.00004598481,0.0001841041,0.002571139,0.0001076613,0.00003351621,0.0001299766,0.00001978707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000190471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000130982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09785783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991914,0.00008894435,0.0001487778,0.0001681301,0.000181477,0.0002212563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995372,0.0001669123,0.00002329759,0.000117686,0.00003816266,0.0001167805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000539629,0.00001277193,0.001434732,0.00001927402,0.00003892296,0.00001947468,0.04891376,0.0000130911,0.00002365503,0.9280671,0.001040376,0.02036281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004000126,0.00001056159,0.02198683,0.00006829755,0.00004976481,0.0000206841,0.0242426,0.000007810374,0.000005213406,0.000295211,0.9527806,0.0001323977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215929,0.01057078,0.0005616172,0.01779807,0.0007863326,0.0007447797,0.00001136129,0.00004074797,0.04789343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968278,0.0007352859,0.00003275427,0.0005196405,0.0003878612,0.000009187464,9.497409e-7,0.000003170878,0.001483375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Koshan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonnette Watson Hamilton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09327847133984746,"gpt":0.3019885457289145,"spread":0.208710074389067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000565028,0.0002248821,0.0003152055,0.00004631613,0.001203296,0.00008417672,0.000304461,0.0001582064,0.0006097624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003255828,0.0001930159,0.000154507,0.0002825816,0.002094587,0.0004165058,0.00009680456,0.0001910288,0.0002226749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001492086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003972697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.0002481492,0.0003329951,0.0004008757,0.0003318301,0.0004954549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990622,0.0001359855,0.0001447374,0.0002010085,0.0002880321,0.0001679836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005650755,0.0001264655,0.02563744,0.0000349609,0.0001168074,0.00003995446,0.08202897,0.000005164645,0.00005239244,0.8912284,0.0001338168,0.0005391098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002396052,0.0001823933,0.2785287,0.001223888,0.0006105232,0.00003293796,0.2612691,0.00005011637,0.002319735,0.01469154,0.4355281,0.003166943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6361338,0.001657611,0.001288262,0.0008001463,0.0008435977,0.0006847677,0.00003682874,0.0003269403,0.358228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964315,0.0004607156,0.001764954,0.0001212003,0.0003224432,0.0000760437,0.000004134568,0.00001062063,0.0008083846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123088121","doi":"","title":"Marital rape, polygamy, and prostitution: tradibg sex equality for agency and choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Law; Charter; Criminology; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Janine Benedet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0365480915880803,"gpt":0.2997919318510741,"spread":0.2632438402629938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004036044,0.0001656656,0.0002367423,0.0000718974,0.001125666,0.0002485013,0.000132077,0.0002157382,0.0001535566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003341128,0.0001525876,0.00006554757,0.0001823702,0.001606722,0.000413988,0.00004488829,0.0001322303,0.00002244211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005082975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001944577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002770202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987797,0.000101031,0.0002746255,0.0003581144,0.0001462068,0.0003402987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.0002990548,0.00008535188,0.0001422424,0.0001114551,0.0002017051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548009,0.000132556,0.0280471,0.00017373,0.0001089938,0.000004524647,0.02214355,0.00001242981,0.0004860254,0.9260623,0.0009995914,0.02181368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002701009,0.0002377954,0.04141755,0.0005805023,0.0002809719,0.00008816623,0.03081812,0.0009099788,0.0003201475,0.04617708,0.8750902,0.001378446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112532,0.01357808,0.002183114,0.006959096,0.0008734174,0.002463563,0.00002479094,0.0002841911,0.06238052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933468,0.001924179,0.001363922,0.0001071623,0.0004736208,0.0001134839,0.00001555294,0.000008190671,0.002647122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8798853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8657824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190033593","doi":"","title":"\"A rather vexed question...\": the Federal-Provincial debate over the constitucional responsibility for Métis Scrip","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Obligation; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicole C. O’Byrne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02413818042145314,"gpt":0.2835320252039089,"spread":0.2593938447824557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003603566,0.0001424691,0.0001795509,0.0001637918,0.00700316,0.0005335049,0.0004295477,0.0001530128,0.0003608499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00160029,0.0001173032,0.0002000774,0.0003056532,0.004894209,0.0002205963,0.00004796659,0.0002203048,0.00006635774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009140013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06421754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8567963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982414,0.0002937218,0.0003507332,0.0003231949,0.000321213,0.000469755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.0009755499,0.0001437254,0.0003267174,0.0002228515,0.0001539087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001081471,0.00004486868,0.0009256415,0.00001477811,0.00003049888,0.000009393372,0.002680141,0.00003251967,0.00009288647,0.9815766,0.01251867,0.001965865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003676105,0.00001845251,0.00633406,0.00004800101,0.00004422072,0.000014919,0.002484126,0.00002641449,0.00001541379,0.006656216,0.9838036,0.000186987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5424997,0.01062161,0.04660742,0.06321383,0.01392852,0.008525409,0.0009361575,0.0007787395,0.3128887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918475,0.0001224343,0.0003933531,0.0009987452,0.001213119,0.00006464787,0.00001365051,0.00001081131,0.005335809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","authors":[{"name":"M. Harding","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rainer Knopff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02518275058038969,"gpt":0.2607977655492197,"spread":0.2356150149688301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888314,0.0001609409,0.000250041,0.00007352541,0.002020662,0.00009458917,0.0003838821,0.0000999589,0.0005695989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000500867,0.0001232644,0.0001630681,0.0003279507,0.005030546,0.0003990254,0.0001010951,0.0001592433,0.0003031891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001083533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006815147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007096925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007510457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984624,0.0001556506,0.0003849736,0.0002461512,0.0004088519,0.0003419611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.0003962117,0.0001669693,0.0002034614,0.000424505,0.000101905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004222146,0.00005575601,0.007027862,0.000007598328,0.00007368562,0.000001589543,0.002558784,0.00008784363,0.000502948,0.9873807,0.0006198103,0.001679209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003473346,0.00002843239,0.004810457,0.000291889,0.0001095543,0.00002803363,0.03363737,0.0001181008,0.0004897665,0.3660893,0.5936182,0.0004315928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08339204,0.008288904,0.001577846,0.008560182,0.001099046,0.001120714,0.00003392233,0.0001930106,0.8957343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979061,0.000528467,0.0003706825,0.0002917426,0.0004988735,0.0000856136,0.000005797072,0.00000495413,0.0003077683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9145141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anne Twomey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04576666992306225,"gpt":0.3313024482657277,"spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007791026,0.0001075883,0.0001514617,0.00002627064,0.004401491,0.0003030954,0.0005463745,0.00009054018,0.00005497383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001469463,0.00007246433,0.00004205689,0.00008016486,0.002015364,0.0002869379,0.00009673645,0.0001403706,0.00002323388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008193689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001012493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0190819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.0001674486,0.0002084384,0.0002348227,0.0002199704,0.0002289101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991794,0.0001871016,0.0001652562,0.000298521,0.0001068581,0.00006283353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000498058,0.00004328824,0.1139922,0.00001959242,0.00001304917,0.000009033411,0.01936121,0.00001171841,0.00001935139,0.862602,0.001373372,0.002550216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004779281,0.00001804314,0.6388042,0.0002579651,0.00003900996,0.000006958453,0.03102584,0.00005336721,0.00001886646,0.005492893,0.3234865,0.0003184507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763666,0.004037936,0.0001337987,0.05718891,0.0006149785,0.0009620293,0.00001207136,0.00009864895,0.360585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996361,0.002039433,0.0002363822,0.00009925914,0.0002943019,0.00004905236,0.000003094515,0.000003166474,0.0009142904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8571091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625873439","doi":"","title":"Daviault Dialogue: The Strange Journey of Canada's Intoxication Defence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Dennis J Baker","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rainer Knopff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03053669851787179,"gpt":0.2674705802949157,"spread":0.2369338817770439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007780718,0.000164796,0.0002720069,0.00006705512,0.001145342,0.00006907561,0.0004419558,0.0001206702,0.0002671246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055496,0.0001426898,0.0001631398,0.0007572889,0.001585716,0.0001813188,0.0000448729,0.0002266986,0.00002524017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002814434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001496691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6148845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9560034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982356,0.0003807107,0.0004458926,0.0002589259,0.000355715,0.0003231555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982685,0.0005922516,0.0003033142,0.0003460344,0.0003508593,0.0001389695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009996112,0.0001262837,0.001053896,0.0001456767,0.0001018474,0.000003460457,0.007845724,0.003999108,0.0001476421,0.9271257,0.001477557,0.05796309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003809512,0.0001232202,0.003471513,0.0009825933,0.002248751,0.00006529608,0.2718968,0.008443606,0.000463296,0.003769809,0.7074701,0.000684019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7552544,0.02168132,0.06103198,0.04288847,0.008334705,0.0007937914,0.0001772897,0.00008043716,0.1097576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943016,0.003026135,0.0002196231,0.0001929773,0.0007475435,0.00001535266,0.00001189231,0.000006488186,0.001478387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9233559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8809164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Carter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01901472872440604,"gpt":0.2685540167596146,"spread":0.2495392880352086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004810286,0.0003102423,0.0008222119,0.0003072361,0.001488551,0.00003826676,0.0006695461,0.000235272,0.0007993872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001957975,0.0002521372,0.0007391718,0.002828118,0.02887586,0.0003716058,0.0001299098,0.000227999,0.00004527454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002571416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001262597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02847031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969882,0.0003868991,0.001007029,0.0004594543,0.0007110583,0.0004473795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975441,0.000390988,0.0006000979,0.000438363,0.0009044312,0.0001220335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003407181,0.0006871372,0.0337296,0.00005693179,0.001077012,0.000007385244,0.000400905,0.0156331,0.0004174923,0.9473844,0.0003352721,0.00023676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001491726,0.0002319185,0.08372135,0.001285027,0.009418,0.00003789441,0.002587605,0.00316422,0.001458139,0.1886655,0.7066562,0.001282452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3288443,0.03853031,0.005251187,0.006337093,0.006230887,0.001159909,0.002111339,0.0001117047,0.6114233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962043,0.0007179406,0.0005682911,0.00006716774,0.0008881029,0.00001813605,0.00006481822,0.000004487063,0.001466769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7587188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994570748","doi":"","title":"Between Despair and Denial: What to Do About the Canadian Senate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Institution; Oligarchy; Clientelism; Politics; Law; Art; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Pellerin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02472501234720183,"gpt":0.2565780905670746,"spread":0.2318530782198727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004912568,0.00009193593,0.0001343025,0.0003140965,0.003701724,0.001626274,0.0002590216,0.0001063453,0.0001365078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001873178,0.00009880259,0.00005244832,0.0002850998,0.001430114,0.0004746088,0.0000311252,0.0001357299,0.0002283364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001184485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002147447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8219667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990138,0.00009353445,0.000159793,0.0002160776,0.0001673118,0.0003495103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.00009085458,0.00004081287,0.0001742599,0.00007994992,0.0005287951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003232001,0.000009533072,0.00577205,0.00001588671,0.00003583379,0.00001762006,0.02124128,0.0001101056,0.000009461454,0.9104835,0.008700955,0.05360057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000776379,0.000004829618,0.005454771,0.0001002979,0.00002517104,0.000006225454,0.003267593,0.000003134504,0.000004150523,0.0002972005,0.9906153,0.0001436951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6403584,0.02296525,0.0002507495,0.1639312,0.002022926,0.001616492,0.0001063006,0.0002262852,0.1685223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944544,0.00151274,0.0001955064,0.0009936473,0.0008839806,0.00001597651,0.000002591963,0.00000677118,0.001934392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894130","doi":"","title":"Post-Colonial Federalism: Social Citizenship and New Identities","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizenship; Political science; Federalism; Sociology; Ethnology; Politics; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ian Angus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05106684700111322,"gpt":0.2433136647690867,"spread":0.1922468177679735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002403322,0.0002309429,0.0003653291,0.0003437196,0.004428586,0.001377934,0.0002556774,0.0003629927,0.006185625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002345802,0.0003536217,0.0002041259,0.0003658514,0.005936052,0.0005000216,0.00007411637,0.0003023105,0.0008388907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009493941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009266307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1539726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5339922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981518,0.000207148,0.0003723569,0.0004110472,0.0003008003,0.0005568188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990173,0.000132905,0.0001588088,0.0001405953,0.0001391657,0.0004112537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081152,0.0000447766,0.0001231818,0.0001220556,0.00007902363,0.0000991733,0.02234325,0.000005457252,0.00003036407,0.8092624,0.1597296,0.00815262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000599662,0.00004925513,0.0007630679,0.0001903065,0.0001915857,0.0001358687,0.003579231,0.00004004622,0.000002642694,0.01493082,0.9790241,0.000493485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1880371,0.1329306,0.0001953052,0.1782341,0.01220874,0.0008225885,0.0005956804,0.0002888975,0.4866869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6967167,0.009357127,0.0001743168,0.0009637608,0.004002483,0.00001013777,0.00001296207,0.00001909462,0.2887435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8192944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737671693","doi":"","title":"Jean Chrétien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Economic history; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Young","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03402436715252795,"gpt":0.2199523210745476,"spread":0.1859279539220197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002358229,0.0004861596,0.0007171499,0.00009871869,0.008651681,0.0007299005,0.0003205277,0.0001950054,0.0007812431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003368286,0.0004223401,0.000546854,0.0001848028,0.002356224,0.0006580691,0.0001647093,0.0004382886,0.000446561],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004363933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004238625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07814921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1061425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976376,0.0000748813,0.0007041853,0.0005800456,0.0003152155,0.000688123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986253,0.0002195806,0.0002824987,0.0002759388,0.0003532738,0.0002433716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001508784,0.0002536819,0.00005518464,0.0003167379,0.0004359556,0.00008450567,0.04501537,0.01434616,0.00004260643,0.9360801,0.0004809137,0.002873685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001232782,0.0001272863,0.00004147461,0.002036178,0.0009319934,0.00002639859,0.03733059,0.0001872208,0.00003494724,0.01195209,0.9451495,0.0009495791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.374715,0.1387679,0.01421889,0.4130683,0.01112374,0.001371214,0.0004397163,0.0007380003,0.0455572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429485,0.006619402,0.0007991639,0.0002562242,0.003438802,0.00003026218,0.00005233429,0.00003077322,0.04582452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163287952","doi":"","title":"From centralization to sovereignty-association: the canadian labour congress and the constitutional question","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Politics; Constitutional monarchy; Sovereignty; Law; Philosophy; Monarchy","authors":[{"name":"Larry Savage","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01477771345327654,"gpt":0.2264600803921833,"spread":0.2116823669389068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005826748,0.00009106315,0.0001411585,0.0001461845,0.006954863,0.0004672662,0.0002164782,0.0001237903,0.0005487581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009832212,0.00008126743,0.00005590561,0.0003024356,0.004642145,0.0002161594,0.00002301307,0.0001470817,0.0001164076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001947066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00368238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9155216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987387,0.0002930611,0.0001928048,0.0001976283,0.000304569,0.0002732192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.0003198275,0.0001022333,0.0001468586,0.0002353621,0.0002563321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001094991,0.000007656001,0.00364972,0.000003005494,0.0000294673,0.000009807731,0.00633429,0.0002044559,0.000001629381,0.9799757,0.009649296,0.0001239992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004619017,0.000003550104,0.005057988,0.0000448149,0.00003651777,0.00001378238,0.001870461,0.00003610348,0.000002065226,0.007933351,0.9844039,0.0001355694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1812483,0.009356369,0.002825788,0.2490301,0.01112217,0.004064064,0.00192275,0.0003722276,0.5400582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924425,0.001038093,0.0000822417,0.001357219,0.0007257133,0.00003170264,0.00003318641,0.000003746677,0.00428556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740259405","doi":"","title":"Les Procédures de modification constitutionnelle dans les fédérations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Normative; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Louis Massicotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antoine Yoshinaka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05856938562781288,"gpt":0.3098007958848562,"spread":0.2512314102570433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005959313,0.0003641185,0.000406291,0.0000717185,0.002786842,0.0002207939,0.0004670153,0.0004948981,0.002917238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004370443,0.000399338,0.0002481837,0.0005682379,0.004783203,0.0005753444,0.00003681391,0.0003664343,0.0007553886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009980163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001295116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04998024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01600623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969516,0.0004701126,0.000722658,0.0005962672,0.0003950967,0.0008642635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998437,0.0003063455,0.00023183,0.0004001573,0.0002136956,0.0004109988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143725,0.0003455489,0.00551429,0.0001786398,0.00006918539,0.00001927315,0.00498957,0.007767668,0.0003021883,0.9626638,0.001350509,0.01678494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004260891,0.00004460133,0.004599937,0.0008970444,0.0001385185,0.000148424,0.003086756,0.002754474,0.0001915983,0.007891285,0.9792514,0.000569901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2110907,0.01674236,0.04616967,0.01456267,0.001260247,0.00107483,0.0004754899,0.0003138888,0.7083101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441485,0.004525923,0.001378126,0.0001474681,0.00138327,0.0001311537,0.00003661985,0.00002002267,0.04822896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas M.J. Bateman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01968497722486387,"gpt":0.2691515264457322,"spread":0.2494665492208683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004060695,0.0001343588,0.0002532251,0.00003328472,0.0007510437,0.00006423807,0.000202914,0.00009127423,0.00002295898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000508619,0.00009576106,0.00004983175,0.0001931436,0.001624213,0.0001667786,0.00007612045,0.0001403195,0.00000144668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005381348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009519277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985657,0.000125129,0.000330145,0.0002160077,0.0003536735,0.0004093013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990759,0.0004837337,0.00007918115,0.0001241312,0.0001448489,0.00009214594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001058446,0.00004334571,0.01510734,0.00001742644,0.0000111917,0.000009853004,0.001015423,0.0003635586,0.00004957135,0.9824591,0.0006185107,0.0002940984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00207235,0.00005393069,0.4178388,0.0009250485,0.0001337143,0.000037038,0.07398497,0.002119721,0.0004343748,0.01963158,0.4816186,0.001149811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.947803,0.001660961,0.0003530044,0.0144827,0.0003045851,0.0004818438,0.00003603706,0.00003506614,0.03484281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998902,0.0001244017,0.0002405898,0.00007374206,0.0002003153,0.00001707716,0.000003619273,0.000004345837,0.0004339705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5984479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85021076","doi":"","title":"The Post-9/11 National Security regime in Canada: strengthening security, diminishing accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; National security; Business; Public administration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Reg Whitaker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910280110150013,"gpt":0.2801687870571302,"spread":0.2510659859556301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00218061,0.0001560212,0.0002083331,0.00004526109,0.001993956,0.00007617532,0.000314822,0.00007694717,0.00006981001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003238208,0.0001326743,0.00007449392,0.0002852461,0.0008433922,0.000575988,0.0001330994,0.0002526688,0.00001023252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001012556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002759024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7813904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979421,0.0003427133,0.0003867074,0.0002424064,0.0005286719,0.0005573964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997441,0.001854471,0.0001170494,0.0001881803,0.0002616475,0.0001376561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001379204,0.00005193145,0.1513234,0.00002080413,0.00002171251,0.000002900216,0.01791817,0.00004807679,0.000003118591,0.8297104,0.0007097558,0.0001758937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000681997,0.0000232671,0.07406719,0.0002945061,0.00005795595,0.00002899769,0.2830831,0.0002937615,0.00004854795,0.0436755,0.596853,0.0008922265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.899788,0.003282627,0.000009287811,0.003478073,0.0009441868,0.0003359183,0.00006874112,0.00005024434,0.09204289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987451,0.0004213314,0.00005630518,0.0001709788,0.0005222307,0.00003092562,0.00001067121,0.000005035846,0.00003745874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7860349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Fafard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07178905838013909,"gpt":0.3030945892290276,"spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004262758,0.0002214189,0.0002668198,0.0001390265,0.003603062,0.0001426963,0.000188814,0.0001686182,0.0001234731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009888947,0.0002100389,0.00008858028,0.0002401596,0.003210172,0.0004312675,0.00002974282,0.0002281702,0.00006658895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004083928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003082859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006121826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02046748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998436,0.0001267305,0.0002381454,0.0003834486,0.0002741157,0.0005415454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.0002305865,0.00008184049,0.0001362133,0.000226192,0.0003989297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006405487,0.00003718883,0.002767479,0.00001098206,0.00002759108,0.00002570308,0.01048791,0.00004027522,0.0000125933,0.9810936,0.000205792,0.005284493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001090791,0.000146604,0.0334016,0.0007229612,0.0001049833,0.00003009277,0.02500392,0.0001499764,0.00003609509,0.008954375,0.9291778,0.001180769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1821585,0.009638367,0.001063436,0.09088583,0.002934811,0.002794349,0.0001436693,0.0009048209,0.7094762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946542,0.002330512,0.0005894089,0.0009820975,0.001203468,0.0000293447,0.00001356675,0.000004894679,0.0001925562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911083342","doi":"","title":"Spending Power, Social Policy, and the Principle of Subsidiarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Welfare state; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Social policy; Action (physics); Public administration; Economics; Welfare; Law; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Éléonore Gauthier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05304713381432047,"gpt":0.3460608155569254,"spread":0.2930136817426049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008382802,0.00009153238,0.0002344983,0.00004014051,0.004534686,0.0002051573,0.0004268398,0.0001040624,0.0000308283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406735,0.00007178175,0.0001158164,0.00008047465,0.005750129,0.0002780445,0.0001673303,0.0001311514,0.000008493955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006930743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003535579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004355958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001976232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.0001523251,0.0001911686,0.0001563849,0.0002033984,0.0002095276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992707,0.0001474516,0.0002330388,0.0002009313,0.00007984397,0.00006807072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003036197,0.00002528691,0.003713649,0.00001466364,0.00002614309,0.000002374735,0.008276491,7.929056e-7,0.00002853798,0.987597,0.00001473077,0.0002699541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003977086,0.00004506208,0.0873869,0.0001951943,0.0001540484,0.00001138414,0.008961101,0.00003485826,0.000291413,0.5610467,0.3372243,0.0006719437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5319358,0.0003028131,0.00006369353,0.01632578,0.0004131265,0.0003684884,0.00002319354,0.00004216277,0.450525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980526,0.0002742357,0.0000573274,0.00006756462,0.001182016,0.000007143572,0.000001117255,0.000004193798,0.0003538076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4661168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739100633","doi":"","title":"La Nation Quebecoise et la Minorite Nationale Canadienne-Francaise","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"French; Humanities; Vision; Political science; Dynamism; Theme (computing); Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Michel Seymour","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02715354916946068,"gpt":0.2334376144173533,"spread":0.2062840652478926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007922589,0.0001954605,0.0002419,0.0005279747,0.001398551,0.0005173867,0.0002818623,0.0003520411,0.004252085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049957,0.0002982511,0.0001799068,0.0006560595,0.00332284,0.0007513945,0.00003335806,0.0003307174,0.0009349126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001934297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001356236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6055128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980001,0.000555583,0.000352341,0.0003821024,0.0002710264,0.0004388439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985629,0.0004795596,0.000168132,0.0002082431,0.0002130635,0.0003680699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003052483,0.000164428,0.0002402356,0.0001183872,0.00004996654,0.0001254572,0.01352127,0.0002908032,0.0000143685,0.9454343,0.01748754,0.0225502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003507432,0.0000126404,0.0006789684,0.0002829097,0.00007405084,0.00009027799,0.00173618,0.0004528685,0.000001130258,0.002218118,0.993771,0.000331158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05415673,0.04056412,0.0003588802,0.02459168,0.004673896,0.0004532392,0.0004622571,0.0001330376,0.8746061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8355703,0.009573936,0.0002862994,0.0004342999,0.0007464268,0.00003359596,0.00003650575,0.0000175367,0.1533011],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748666452","doi":"","title":"An Elusive Search for Community: Globalization and the Canadian National Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Humanities; Political science; Ideology; Welfare state; National identity; Ethnology; Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Janine Brodie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04876453634992067,"gpt":0.2816699365534167,"spread":0.232905400203496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008952433,0.00005542788,0.00009157135,0.0002388329,0.008065286,0.0007665188,0.0002161891,0.00007238703,0.000226369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003368145,0.00006204828,0.00004102776,0.0001860379,0.003193369,0.0003248849,0.00001443197,0.0001103372,0.00002216936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009932808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001172465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8890302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991228,0.0002802321,0.0001167159,0.00009937134,0.0001951305,0.0001857805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.0001985391,0.00003600005,0.0001066226,0.0002953371,0.0001624239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003967509,0.00001407039,0.0001862995,0.00001543548,0.00001368428,0.000001015246,0.01537913,0.0001308104,0.000001803247,0.9801057,0.00360495,0.0005431502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007468045,0.00001929258,0.0005771811,0.00004367499,0.00003796446,0.00001378863,0.01860711,0.001613437,0.000001798119,0.01900448,0.959152,0.0001825077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06150074,0.0054254,0.00233945,0.02738545,0.001380322,0.00230627,0.000762358,0.0001689894,0.8987311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964174,0.0006837376,0.00008581602,0.0004499607,0.0002453017,0.00003121497,0.00003085505,0.000003960022,0.002051737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70434532","doi":"","title":"Unseating horseman: commercial harvesting right and the natural resources transfer agreements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extinguishment; Treaty; Proposition; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kerry Wilkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01743360580810691,"gpt":0.2720837140977891,"spread":0.2546501082896822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281473,0.0001311177,0.0001703966,0.00004592629,0.002119404,0.0001249781,0.0002080652,0.00007727428,0.00007281313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001749159,0.0000973242,0.00007420068,0.0001493301,0.002722268,0.0001990147,0.00004747659,0.0001943571,0.00001816489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007088135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004428739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01522615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987729,0.000196986,0.0002623192,0.00019804,0.0002279777,0.0003417958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991592,0.0005422324,0.00005328511,0.0001195296,0.00001973192,0.0001060726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180059,0.00002472786,0.006703403,0.00001634537,0.00002709078,0.00001000681,0.01289834,0.00001330002,0.0001231467,0.9749647,0.00004422121,0.005132923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003643868,0.00005363971,0.03765934,0.0004957822,0.0001911402,0.00005839649,0.02024425,0.0001123625,0.0006319517,0.004000975,0.9321375,0.0007707563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7899931,0.00136169,0.0006475326,0.002882365,0.0003265878,0.000410797,0.000008445719,0.00006534297,0.2043041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971311,0.0002413859,0.000317626,0.0004193993,0.0006298168,0.000007298401,0.000005181789,0.000006530056,0.001241679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737262796","doi":"","title":"Mutations et limites de l'identitaire au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Oppression; Identity (music); Sovereignty; Politics; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Diane Lamoureux","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03343803331656561,"gpt":0.2515676503858552,"spread":0.2181296170692896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663585,0.0001822062,0.000244852,0.0003874506,0.003068655,0.0005400361,0.000317573,0.0002313079,0.005210135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006027726,0.0002785247,0.0002376873,0.0006054575,0.00488148,0.0007214016,0.00004469842,0.0002812064,0.0027679],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004950536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005548327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9059966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982855,0.0002584745,0.0003479482,0.0003351821,0.0002290161,0.000543893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988123,0.0002882442,0.0001474517,0.000245595,0.0001303915,0.000376074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001795411,0.0002017225,0.002816255,0.0001183248,0.00007385709,0.00009867304,0.0343941,0.0006635612,0.00001888815,0.9276412,0.02427876,0.009692884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002069161,0.00002448743,0.001352109,0.0003280681,0.0001636246,0.00007779658,0.007858029,0.0004056422,0.000003095034,0.001544956,0.9877095,0.0003257627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1129273,0.104036,0.001455142,0.1314425,0.005485973,0.000588579,0.0002884373,0.0002824985,0.6434935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8810213,0.007223724,0.0004928514,0.0005898869,0.0008130349,0.00002885921,0.00001387896,0.0000165251,0.1097999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743980511","doi":"","title":"Adverse Effect Discrimination: Proving the Prima Facie Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prima facie; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn Braun","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04223672470172506,"gpt":0.3249294545874573,"spread":0.2826927298857322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001158211,0.0001481232,0.0001581915,0.00006612531,0.001956151,0.000163009,0.0002721987,0.00008818704,0.0002824455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006499133,0.0001123971,0.000128038,0.0002456639,0.001130584,0.0005548632,0.00006102045,0.0001443087,0.0002274619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002189793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002408599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005941061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008761077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985054,0.0003549518,0.0002752557,0.0002585219,0.0002990178,0.000306894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990526,0.0003486949,0.0001117343,0.0002476604,0.0001171349,0.0001221305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007744829,0.00006388343,0.000354601,0.00004063708,0.00001752262,0.00006763139,0.01250066,0.0001806796,0.00002560366,0.9624438,0.0002988565,0.02399839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009410868,0.00007541186,0.0009147865,0.0002163248,0.0001954213,0.0003895923,0.03035974,0.0008024282,0.0004591923,0.002021163,0.9630291,0.0005957833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107831,0.0002709925,0.003628224,0.02042473,0.0007933044,0.001356658,0.00002609278,0.0003676107,0.6623492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962862,0.00005892817,0.0004505319,0.0003084636,0.0005329964,0.00006399229,0.000009769838,0.000007506709,0.002281622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Hester Lessard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04189545640418434,"gpt":0.2903830560030025,"spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003586503,0.0001756156,0.0002080828,0.00003518679,0.004332433,0.0001736906,0.0002519917,0.0001200812,0.0001095933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003787254,0.0001154032,0.00008908928,0.000232439,0.01450711,0.000267298,0.00009741424,0.0001884518,0.00008041367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001926689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002576175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002606979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001461746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0001580934,0.0002541249,0.0002728716,0.0002990843,0.0004088162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989794,0.0004293496,0.00008553662,0.0001549193,0.000192817,0.0001579022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004262708,0.00003566997,0.004839559,0.000007895939,0.00005053168,0.0000147088,0.003474863,0.00002928786,0.00003349115,0.9894048,0.001757306,0.0003476456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002673736,0.00001115971,0.004719921,0.00006428984,0.00005214806,0.00004070463,0.007139377,0.00003659529,0.000009320557,0.01056896,0.9768634,0.000226779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3436559,0.01323125,0.003691971,0.03603921,0.001738122,0.00136029,0.00007905102,0.0004688945,0.5997353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935669,0.002550843,0.0005328911,0.0004884092,0.000716433,0.00003106138,0.00000745541,0.00000381302,0.002102189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742655197","doi":"","title":"The construction of Nunavut and its impact on collective identity in the canadian eastern arctic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Government (linguistics); Arctic; The arctic; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; Ethnology; History; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Geology; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"André Légaré","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05044722263641056,"gpt":0.3472969963767047,"spread":0.2968497737402941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006463557,0.0001137145,0.000200541,0.0001077273,0.006395102,0.00002570633,0.0001493614,0.0001163559,0.0001227861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003905836,0.00006803269,0.00004820037,0.0002764615,0.0004713873,0.00008189987,0.00004290048,0.000355185,0.00007701607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008193357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007215858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07738295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9451488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986176,0.0003322058,0.0003085035,0.0001538382,0.00009984951,0.0004879812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986906,0.000751712,0.0001484531,0.0001568444,0.0001890987,0.00006326341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000506938,0.00006950873,0.3216708,0.0001363381,0.0001055906,0.00001714961,0.05864715,0.0001511953,0.000006592575,0.6185011,0.0003347362,0.0003091813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003139517,0.0008655341,0.6859396,0.001204956,0.0001939022,0.0002801106,0.2726525,0.004181206,0.00001446658,0.01284886,0.01801831,0.0006610309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620078,0.001324241,0.00000906089,0.002747936,0.0005122906,0.00110663,0.00003560726,0.000009472812,0.03224695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985802,0.0007774154,0.00001236515,0.0002205723,0.000101773,0.0000914634,0.000002028344,0.000004793484,0.0002093973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738323090","doi":"","title":"Searching for Multinational Canada: The Rhetoric of Confusion","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Solidarity; Political science; Neutrality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Alan C. Cairns","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03179725717827302,"gpt":0.2573078273275478,"spread":0.2255105701492747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005229951,0.00009693782,0.0001759595,0.0001363089,0.002125455,0.00009593016,0.0002748094,0.00009123966,0.0005273599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004863095,0.0001086884,0.0001168998,0.0003779864,0.002319141,0.0001537159,0.00003439015,0.000141409,0.00001329663],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007486405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9668152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988137,0.0001278724,0.0002888319,0.0001864955,0.000294898,0.0002881778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987193,0.0005763959,0.0001627637,0.0001404809,0.0002771365,0.0001238875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001104088,0.00004910907,0.0002091019,0.0001028896,0.00003586373,0.000008746335,0.002251101,0.0009173002,0.00004466709,0.974231,0.008657248,0.01348193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002386192,0.0000148756,0.0007857676,0.0001824638,0.00004974863,0.00001790015,0.0020613,0.0007705931,0.000005988588,0.001246601,0.9945014,0.000124706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.193715,0.09509265,0.01208038,0.1775846,0.02643672,0.003948575,0.001636824,0.0001030067,0.4894023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659419,0.003278257,0.0003073112,0.0001942038,0.0008453102,0.00002528548,0.00002088325,0.000007439088,0.02937943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Sébastien Grammond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05151756309056284,"gpt":0.2977535307504103,"spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004757086,0.0001418502,0.0002232251,0.00005345976,0.007396327,0.0001181166,0.0005285848,0.0001029705,0.00008445983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001171047,0.0001100077,0.0001843329,0.0001410415,0.0109789,0.0004300097,0.0001909458,0.0001688429,0.00002695111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008909879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001748323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002747118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987385,0.00009200589,0.0002759164,0.0002453144,0.0003806549,0.0002675724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988145,0.0001197852,0.0003731701,0.0003251023,0.0002997927,0.0000676893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776483,0.00005355885,0.01061114,0.00001360207,0.00008090592,0.000001817514,0.0006582858,0.00009454828,0.0003237037,0.9868603,0.00009821368,0.001176217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001947713,0.0001333978,0.139501,0.001640947,0.0004442262,0.00003686937,0.01395248,0.00009587121,0.001871736,0.4190397,0.4202969,0.00103916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020186,0.0009386984,0.01566564,0.006266089,0.003651456,0.001630637,0.0001018915,0.0001399598,0.869587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.0001436992,0.0001439611,0.00006897661,0.00049461,0.00006010639,0.000002409555,0.000003309748,0.0002326835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8968316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"John D. Whyte","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05762100584181712,"gpt":0.3022370486789722,"spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009250454,0.0002712387,0.000271845,0.00004579748,0.007368017,0.0001232315,0.0002834239,0.0002331556,0.0008802953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003129464,0.0002201636,0.0002302151,0.0004828921,0.006185311,0.0005128762,0.0001844701,0.0002676737,0.00280181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008126068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003322437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00143016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003844342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976787,0.0002949904,0.0004187174,0.0003002622,0.0003890854,0.000918276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986709,0.0004492401,0.0001904125,0.0002346996,0.0001945106,0.0002602054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002237841,0.0001427744,0.00570759,0.00002139762,0.0001519326,0.000004365408,0.003134351,0.00002053766,0.00008330739,0.9726896,0.0105559,0.007465825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001866119,0.00002759553,0.002244771,0.000179139,0.0001345413,0.00005798323,0.003181361,0.00001627497,0.00004126456,0.006737119,0.9868957,0.0002976025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04198945,0.1951966,0.0006934417,0.04769368,0.02557481,0.0007076412,0.00005773061,0.0001829665,0.6879037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516876,0.018713,0.0000839128,0.0004110836,0.008165723,0.00007885798,0.000007258408,0.00001086299,0.02084169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743130901","doi":"","title":"Cultural Myths and Political Realities or Why Québec Will Never Separate","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Mythology; Politics; Compromise; Political science; History; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"B. Lee Cooper","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04169517575311155,"gpt":0.2592332488909252,"spread":0.2175380731378136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001771877,0.0002265762,0.0003443527,0.0001974932,0.001752987,0.0006107822,0.0002071167,0.0002609834,0.00642155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009198,0.0002538974,0.0001410811,0.0003333675,0.009498943,0.001335239,0.00005803296,0.0002480576,0.0005366781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001596383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001224128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7132991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9368955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981254,0.0002063131,0.0003597701,0.0003968033,0.0002293819,0.0006822724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.0002046102,0.00009813978,0.0002006556,0.0001377134,0.0005539061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001091212,0.00006888893,0.000149593,0.0001389891,0.00005662437,0.0001037461,0.009573652,0.000014239,0.000004795553,0.8899518,0.09795109,0.001975633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862313,0.00004376258,0.0001038519,0.0002696305,0.0001247582,0.0001867816,0.01211063,0.0001536033,0.000001605417,0.001164091,0.9851902,0.0003649171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03343923,0.1172377,0.0001478653,0.1827472,0.00461114,0.0006383213,0.0005423819,0.0002254906,0.6604107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6734161,0.0163515,0.0001825851,0.002512851,0.001467573,0.00001907323,0.00001087325,0.00001602312,0.3060234],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}