{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":83,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ca5068b3cda4","filters":{"venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles"}},"results":[{"id":"W166688865","doi":"","title":"Sex work by law: Bedford's impact on municipal approaches to regulating the sex trade","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Sex work; Sex offender; Criminology; Supreme court; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Craig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1187161819420112,"gpt":0.2926210342613091,"spread":0.1739048523192979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01603477,0.0004356856,0.0006140844,0.001624004,0.03132599,0.01508789,0.00340037,0.01947362,0.007740162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02859597,0.0009861055,0.001096764,0.002295528,0.02013359,0.004288929,0.006495955,0.01282967,0.0005136991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0644371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08630255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9009565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9765237,0.0058166,0.0008165663,0.001650195,0.006939218,0.008253691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789888,0.01292697,0.001256395,0.0009114388,0.003708971,0.002207458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088609,0.000110968,0.008715992,0.000302857,0.00005525597,0.0009960071,0.01968576,0.0006854298,0.0008236434,0.8471659,0.09204128,0.029308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002775268,0.0002517304,0.0426451,0.001100642,0.0002518978,0.0003656858,0.02480316,0.001599861,0.001237024,0.04236966,0.8847953,0.0003024021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1303358,0.02079483,0.003032734,0.5833808,0.002233076,0.0003035009,0.0002540401,0.0001247644,0.2595405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7356763,0.006085259,0.003165653,0.1530921,0.0009240361,0.0002935635,0.0001061804,0.00006380636,0.100593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4675261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Strelein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tran Tran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0195328239617701,"gpt":0.290385753938838,"spread":0.2708529299770679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674323,0.0001616447,0.0003682853,0.0007498472,0.007166191,0.008357181,0.001157906,0.001591908,0.003089051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00784908,0.0002783418,0.0003132417,0.0005801127,0.04588667,0.006206537,0.009760026,0.003159349,0.0002871529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01209172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02296216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1222167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2192613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962172,0.001656597,0.0001031222,0.0004374633,0.0008036331,0.0007819841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967518,0.001213414,0.0003715774,0.000606231,0.0004449917,0.0006120378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008015767,0.00001966244,0.001655563,0.00007893222,0.000005741776,0.0002283474,0.09717965,0.0003229872,0.000629976,0.8785965,0.001487447,0.01978707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002990156,0.0001572182,0.01388332,0.001012939,0.00003156921,0.0004825658,0.07847554,0.001743617,0.001643116,0.4067964,0.4956599,0.00008392092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3218084,0.004365274,0.0508765,0.03694239,0.0003821706,0.0002326484,0.00003906558,0.000141622,0.585212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648445,0.0008175477,0.005782194,0.00134761,0.00005236655,0.00006486907,0.00001043398,0.00003185864,0.0270486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1222167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2430106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745694497","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Conceptualization of Culture after Delgamuukw and Van der Peet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Political science; Sociology; Legal culture; History; Philosophy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Ash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01373546859679356,"gpt":0.2657368160699835,"spread":0.25200134747319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473744,0.0004581875,0.0004029972,0.001355872,0.00951434,0.009448318,0.002290237,0.003346762,0.002159729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006061356,0.0002939824,0.000308503,0.003063835,0.03322425,0.00440141,0.001971548,0.006203435,0.0002421405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03586645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03798767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7282304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995613,0.001211074,0.00009523516,0.0003756638,0.001633954,0.001071079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977843,0.001012132,0.0001318372,0.00009551789,0.0007905654,0.0001857845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004373323,0.000003560855,0.0001740745,0.00002583392,0.000002679529,0.00005446082,0.007530963,0.00007931374,0.00004448041,0.977582,0.009028737,0.005469463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001744782,0.00001776788,0.002760583,0.0007076372,0.00002060039,0.0001205518,0.01735732,0.0002885878,0.0003325067,0.3902517,0.5880657,0.00005955641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03488779,0.137348,0.01321404,0.268982,0.004832418,0.00007713382,0.0001727308,0.00004885552,0.540437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8220766,0.03349156,0.003037561,0.04825987,0.0008965506,0.0001390407,0.00009263768,0.00007618292,0.09192996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2717696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742267879","doi":"","title":"The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Fundamental rights; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Donna Greshner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07338972501701502,"gpt":0.2919209915651096,"spread":0.2185312665480946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003976438,0.0007854862,0.0005655464,0.002447526,0.02575464,0.01620117,0.002427983,0.005014991,0.02726981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009816377,0.0005179982,0.0005815978,0.003526835,0.01539144,0.004814989,0.004982111,0.006839475,0.002826446],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1022454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1550522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892948,0.001190889,0.0002635896,0.001549006,0.004508196,0.003193464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939145,0.0008848319,0.0002226143,0.000581646,0.003574151,0.0008221335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000573547,0.000004424578,0.0002427882,0.00002268712,0.000001974245,0.00004061857,0.001896499,0.00005122519,0.00005394261,0.9432204,0.04505391,0.009405892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007660769,0.000004806288,0.001449994,0.0001285437,0.000008241796,0.00004682535,0.00164428,0.0001380384,0.0001971929,0.03902477,0.9573239,0.00002572916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003682606,0.004188373,0.002330748,0.03694074,0.00128364,0.00007396552,0.0005467606,0.00007498486,0.9508783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2496346,0.004874925,0.004938682,0.02275883,0.0006181924,0.000162538,0.0007296755,0.0001859756,0.7160966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.741846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219669053","doi":"","title":"Eagle soaring on the emergent winds of indigenous legal authority","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Political science; Colonialism; Sociology; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law and economics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Larry Chartrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05214594207642598,"gpt":0.2883170905806425,"spread":0.2361711485042165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132898,0.0001383307,0.0002808998,0.001184334,0.007820116,0.006583014,0.0006310425,0.001328893,0.003127072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004521526,0.0001908083,0.0002295824,0.0009135808,0.03946705,0.006042732,0.004821585,0.00330975,0.0002199985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007548967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06708509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08944117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971504,0.001162812,0.00006608528,0.0003647973,0.0007258834,0.0005300461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980782,0.0009124865,0.0001589987,0.0002492428,0.0003508937,0.0002502214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006075962,0.000004033938,0.000375864,0.00002306266,0.000002031549,0.0001535185,0.07214681,0.0001059005,0.0001481473,0.9191031,0.001349696,0.006581814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001278237,0.00003661002,0.003304103,0.000284748,0.00001075518,0.0003082099,0.09313685,0.0008303173,0.0003764936,0.5610142,0.3406522,0.00003267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2672616,0.009601382,0.01214742,0.07385673,0.0005357192,0.00004385453,0.0000476164,0.00008333444,0.6364225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771731,0.001439651,0.002105807,0.0009847035,0.00008487178,0.00001066395,0.0000060941,0.00002020476,0.01817488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06708509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21238772","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.073","title":"Dismembering Canada? Stephen Harper and the foreign relations of canadian provinces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Dartmouth","keywords":"Federalism; Negotiation; Delegation; Autonomy; Political science; Decentralization; Cooperative federalism; Foreign policy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Christopher J. Kukucha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01218334945823992,"gpt":0.198193225502847,"spread":0.1860098760446071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250554,0.0004447758,0.0004980298,0.001398125,0.02137487,0.005028669,0.0009137295,0.001920505,0.02501085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299997,0.0002473946,0.0002010557,0.002012576,0.006083669,0.002184964,0.002036438,0.003030378,0.001984671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04711955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08478011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998515,0.0001833732,0.00002453752,0.0001383792,0.0004719581,0.0006668561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977185,0.0002489385,0.00009082578,0.00006718029,0.0009063807,0.0009681691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003767653,0.00001541979,0.005183573,0.00008634877,0.00001392364,0.0003846604,0.008399985,0.0001007017,0.0001257748,0.09865348,0.8447781,0.04222038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003413337,0.000003318732,0.005019293,0.0001435668,0.000005197034,0.0001261786,0.0111261,0.00003722445,0.00006873691,0.001967082,0.981475,0.00002483295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.021843,0.07989416,0.0004037192,0.6197333,0.01044834,0.00003113445,0.000698473,0.00008331599,0.2668645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3073826,0.05872869,0.0009474983,0.06470771,0.001427302,0.00002269342,0.0003254492,0.0001567241,0.5663013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04711955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3418779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762342677","doi":"","title":"a Failed Discourse of Distrust Amid Significant Procedural Change: The Harper Government´s Legacy in Immigration and Refugee Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Immigration; Refugee; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Immigration policy; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","authors":[{"name":"Peter Carver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02491421388405214,"gpt":0.2832272938847591,"spread":0.258313080000707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01508577,0.0004838007,0.0007384378,0.002482072,0.05591432,0.02656443,0.003237078,0.009238432,0.002149618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01821505,0.0006154663,0.0004704422,0.002758366,0.1276838,0.009806561,0.009803756,0.01644502,0.0003124657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07499703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06300606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7336369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7150647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828251,0.008695393,0.0002895424,0.001098742,0.003597019,0.003494252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821797,0.01162085,0.001091857,0.0008490087,0.002372194,0.001886539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001807072,0.00001480197,0.0009439013,0.00003752191,0.00000639355,0.0004475732,0.4607901,0.0000778605,0.0001014065,0.5181121,0.01220261,0.007247679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002341213,0.00002809075,0.00256915,0.0007754348,0.00002462646,0.0005024712,0.5689574,0.0003917528,0.0004018178,0.06979213,0.3564276,0.0001060676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2955178,0.0191656,0.004163657,0.4462901,0.001598687,0.0000294576,0.00005495118,0.0001122748,0.2330675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663787,0.001662014,0.0003941961,0.02244285,0.0002323527,0.00001404434,0.00001090568,0.00005215439,0.008812843],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2663631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5441441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35712514","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2022.912935","title":"The Power of a Single Feather: Meech Lake, Indigenous Resistance and the Evolution of Indigenous Politics in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Institutes of Health; Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Ethnology; Political science; Colonialism; Resistance (ecology); Geography; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Art; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Ian Peach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01392339201716117,"gpt":0.1929432388257847,"spread":0.1790198468086235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003300057,0.0001771519,0.0002955037,0.0009225571,0.01194671,0.002819336,0.0007872345,0.0006832656,0.008505173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001122825,0.0001854511,0.000240633,0.001828272,0.002931545,0.0008420139,0.001679851,0.001391414,0.0003642529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0466786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06513861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993713,0.00004650008,0.0000123157,0.00008341399,0.0001524567,0.0003340071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.00004223261,0.00006890771,0.00001807513,0.0001895905,0.0003321168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005349147,0.0001898299,0.5421588,0.0004757185,0.0001815811,0.007323409,0.1238411,0.0005432013,0.004814152,0.05939145,0.06336036,0.1971853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000220705,0.00005611036,0.5777441,0.0003381172,0.00007971392,0.001600835,0.1363288,0.0008764205,0.0007532832,0.003261072,0.2788161,0.0001233434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123574,0.005256975,0.0005107095,0.02367425,0.000283791,0.00004733919,0.00138039,0.0000567877,0.05643228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725605,0.002288091,0.0003809961,0.001396118,0.00002367766,0.000008720789,0.0002251671,0.00003603584,0.02308081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0466786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3386785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71561623","doi":"","title":"A strategic approach to judicial legitimacy: Supreme Court of Canada and the Marshall Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Vuk Radmilovic","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03383723725556665,"gpt":0.2559929142548845,"spread":0.2221556769993179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005739551,0.0006069246,0.001203897,0.004788879,0.02788567,0.02302604,0.003722735,0.01207228,0.01021179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02175919,0.0006336397,0.0006975144,0.006252519,0.03894177,0.006782656,0.005356676,0.009216399,0.0004151171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1047146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2159037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897209,0.001767931,0.0001410376,0.0007244747,0.002599718,0.005045951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899982,0.004873375,0.0005643284,0.0004234149,0.002509004,0.001631584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001067056,0.00001159241,0.0006518178,0.000009729131,0.000007145939,0.000104012,0.002365964,0.0002721553,0.00003262018,0.9908481,0.003992544,0.0016937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001333541,0.00001809306,0.005521326,0.0001928034,0.0001005684,0.0001004556,0.01687333,0.002205979,0.0002920022,0.9078857,0.0665687,0.0001077066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1630592,0.005045402,0.003735925,0.1244658,0.0002608279,0.00008893306,0.0002474945,0.00004539645,0.7030511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818954,0.0008350268,0.0004847834,0.002712789,0.00009848023,0.00002677873,0.00002518485,0.00001980118,0.01390182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1047146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.759761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737906729","doi":"","title":"The structural conception of rights and judicial balancing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Rhetoric; Adjudication; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Richard H. Pildes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02707902267497707,"gpt":0.2635758241752165,"spread":0.2364968015002394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005973171,0.0006052144,0.0004189818,0.001810633,0.005368816,0.01013071,0.001906571,0.005500897,0.01153098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007678486,0.0004769378,0.0006922864,0.001449169,0.03465264,0.01241789,0.003915906,0.005757467,0.001599246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01216512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007061511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007176532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006045722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931162,0.003104471,0.0002615844,0.0009948441,0.001480662,0.001042222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965293,0.001797857,0.000341906,0.0005600071,0.0006210211,0.000149854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.780659e-7,7.940393e-7,0.000005747472,0.000002217558,2.597403e-7,0.000004320785,0.0001334096,0.00003678079,0.000009918588,0.9992394,0.0002529538,0.0003135247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001161125,0.000006123694,0.00004946821,0.00004840498,0.000002879711,0.00002113437,0.0002373863,0.0004313762,0.0001209102,0.9540125,0.04505394,0.000004257224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009942534,0.002806976,0.05742956,0.0290343,0.0004702807,0.00005597121,0.0000886222,0.00007430794,0.9000975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652762,0.002362239,0.0123298,0.005748898,0.001255586,0.0003261046,0.0001062997,0.0001284415,0.1124664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01216512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08826447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978324001","doi":"","title":"Is Originalism Bad for Women? the Curious Case of Canada's \"Equal Rights Amendment.\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Ratification; Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Original meaning; Meaning (existential); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kerri Froc","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768285191453441,"gpt":0.2989592137626368,"spread":0.2712763618481024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004261133,0.000390881,0.0003364254,0.00101234,0.0353664,0.009982623,0.00135201,0.004679294,0.003655492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007395743,0.0002157703,0.0003822493,0.001526484,0.0420865,0.003796594,0.003512441,0.007215722,0.0003067424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06051099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0776518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.927012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9599257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928054,0.001709382,0.00006964264,0.0006889906,0.0024597,0.002266927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973655,0.001082206,0.0001714065,0.0001455777,0.0007615516,0.0004736712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001448922,0.000006130058,0.0006357912,0.0000279195,0.000004355136,0.0002701369,0.03078809,0.00005468874,0.00007825669,0.9108506,0.04743506,0.009834488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002028555,0.00001276135,0.003050323,0.0002887532,0.00002194814,0.0002439998,0.04740115,0.0001902603,0.0003546773,0.1106005,0.8377632,0.000052056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04279131,0.01368666,0.002197476,0.4769487,0.002198845,0.0000458426,0.0001912761,0.00005595885,0.461884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628673,0.005650005,0.001162279,0.1000059,0.00068297,0.00005557434,0.00006059441,0.00008541922,0.1294301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07298797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581998729","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court in Canada's constitutional order","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitutional court; Majority opinion; Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kate Glover","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02754197687777528,"gpt":0.249645461380737,"spread":0.2221034845029617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003074208,0.0003108463,0.0004679882,0.00192073,0.02809071,0.01558439,0.00170042,0.003804818,0.005477921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915388,0.0003295292,0.0002709771,0.003730653,0.03305107,0.003152411,0.002201906,0.005197057,0.0003138121],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1595474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.165216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941053,0.001119141,0.00007748583,0.0005299336,0.001864019,0.002304041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974691,0.0008545745,0.0001139712,0.0001248069,0.001040766,0.0003968821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003291017,0.000001903558,0.0002096675,0.000009003093,0.000001845208,0.00004914554,0.004554329,0.0001345867,0.0000352368,0.9853987,0.007065568,0.002536821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000317297,0.00001595952,0.009029264,0.0003947931,0.0000383854,0.00008164423,0.01805084,0.001148205,0.0002626115,0.3411106,0.6297449,0.00009093145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05927611,0.01467178,0.00182615,0.08433701,0.0005488727,0.00003432595,0.0003732682,0.00005350219,0.8388789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341173,0.003519768,0.0006136459,0.004725409,0.0001543233,0.00001997345,0.00008608888,0.00003398693,0.05672952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1595474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750460237","doi":"","title":"Obsèques Prématurées: la Disparition des Minorities Francophones et Autres Illusions Nationalists","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Edmund A. Aunger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0297426328468357,"gpt":0.2478335561691683,"spread":0.2180909233223326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002541526,0.0003442959,0.0002769991,0.0008612018,0.01776584,0.004967321,0.0006969084,0.002487615,0.003531293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002185874,0.0001738131,0.0002078502,0.0006651769,0.01530378,0.002035059,0.003032875,0.003078305,0.0002829015],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01628231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6650884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7028996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982855,0.0006277918,0.00002907809,0.0001585459,0.0002886387,0.0006105501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975781,0.0006678143,0.0004004684,0.0001044325,0.0005396816,0.0007094597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008647209,0.00005053054,0.03489665,0.00006750117,0.00002601546,0.001204718,0.8675188,0.00006023699,0.0007101319,0.04698632,0.03093495,0.01745776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001445713,0.00006410215,0.0739966,0.0003215043,0.00002257126,0.0005799335,0.6590742,0.0001192764,0.000326077,0.002709921,0.2626848,0.00008653472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8222122,0.008180613,0.0001769278,0.09747344,0.0005985672,0.00001121926,0.0001006807,0.00001911559,0.07122724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753517,0.001158207,0.00004547647,0.006948667,0.0001430111,0.000008832872,0.00001767632,0.000009909751,0.01631652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223141162","doi":"","title":"Failing to walk the rights talk? post-9/11 security policy and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Torture; Judicial deference; Deference; Deportation; Rhetoric; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01367976552209877,"gpt":0.2601131835827444,"spread":0.2464334180606457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024622,0.0003428864,0.0005039866,0.001668974,0.0410393,0.02012189,0.002962054,0.009991585,0.007139598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01152744,0.0007246797,0.0005408219,0.002004854,0.01527343,0.002831202,0.003463356,0.01298866,0.0004490936],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1978122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2611503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902237,0.0006185192,0.0001616303,0.0008239159,0.002944257,0.005228026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926887,0.002091653,0.0004189073,0.0002049139,0.002835729,0.00175999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004466834,0.00004225945,0.005988374,0.00007392571,0.00003097425,0.0008437217,0.01335589,0.0006166584,0.0004484577,0.8804688,0.08302847,0.01505762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008715509,0.00004661909,0.03002191,0.0008374759,0.0001249922,0.0002260721,0.02680937,0.00152056,0.001303818,0.05335988,0.885281,0.0003810355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1955719,0.01969985,0.001254374,0.3475401,0.001747275,0.0001291829,0.0007600434,0.0001117435,0.4331855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8650373,0.0049159,0.0007785093,0.05371189,0.0003108524,0.00005151637,0.0001398132,0.00007307722,0.0749813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1978122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9304241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744841385","doi":"","title":"A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chretien and Canadian Foreign Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Political science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Keating","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01458588464039399,"gpt":0.2413672259877081,"spread":0.2267813413473141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005645989,0.0009045653,0.001048871,0.003113476,0.04470174,0.02514298,0.002837045,0.01498079,0.01394759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01215616,0.0007188826,0.0005039577,0.006735391,0.03337827,0.009975363,0.0043318,0.01268314,0.00067687],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1599566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2160469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943103,0.001161918,0.000102334,0.0005601142,0.001583926,0.002281452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943831,0.001998628,0.0002170023,0.0002055501,0.001689737,0.001505869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003040991,0.00001589705,0.0004806929,0.00006084405,0.000009310951,0.0001004713,0.008794402,0.0002542602,0.00005475988,0.8496631,0.1331289,0.007407098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003242036,0.000007727738,0.002022062,0.0003763345,0.00002013667,0.00006893816,0.02653282,0.0002365824,0.000120356,0.0940963,0.8763908,0.00009560461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0133323,0.05080724,0.000496199,0.7310482,0.002974791,0.0000176655,0.000150756,0.00003446936,0.2011383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5743951,0.05041912,0.00109614,0.09154887,0.003028426,0.00005970052,0.0001151069,0.000199733,0.2791377],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742216822","doi":"","title":"The Nisga'a Treaty: What Future for the Inherent Right to Aboriginal Self- Government?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Humanities; Political science; Indigenous; Ethnology; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Claude Denis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420643738653712,"gpt":0.2434846787650906,"spread":0.2292782413785535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00179142,0.0001751403,0.0002624419,0.0006295017,0.008806297,0.007956742,0.0008206227,0.001832547,0.00658745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334513,0.0001102088,0.0002074914,0.001136463,0.01562164,0.003344943,0.002017163,0.003242439,0.0003710522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02911275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03500035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6834241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7522461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974595,0.0007599644,0.00003189427,0.0001620125,0.0004713001,0.001115338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992207,0.0001801613,0.00006880536,0.0001024369,0.0002435888,0.0001842267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001504002,0.000007676967,0.001130306,0.00005461004,0.000004251483,0.0001896757,0.03944779,0.0001032082,0.000129806,0.944308,0.006314034,0.008295668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001158253,0.00001720967,0.01665839,0.0007305788,0.00001713853,0.0001313215,0.139118,0.0002743115,0.0002005488,0.1218122,0.7209933,0.00003530659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1355723,0.009717721,0.001361896,0.09658626,0.0004949226,0.00003736743,0.0001297134,0.00002925533,0.7560706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209055,0.002984648,0.0004544327,0.003165217,0.00009694869,0.00002802561,0.0000572968,0.00002053951,0.07228746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3165759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6368805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010917512","doi":"","title":"UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Treaty; Federalism; Political science; Indigenous rights; Law; Public administration; Environmental protection; Human rights; Geography; Politics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"James S. Henderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01571786543268518,"gpt":0.220735898784385,"spread":0.2050180333516998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00593326,0.0006459428,0.001040846,0.001851562,0.02043898,0.01016493,0.003300039,0.00884674,0.00973194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01352732,0.001106313,0.0008966295,0.003369305,0.006220078,0.002037025,0.003507663,0.01216223,0.0006535075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09831148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4153346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889019,0.0008762182,0.0004103135,0.0006353729,0.004783818,0.004392393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926886,0.002016525,0.0002614348,0.0003959757,0.003300432,0.001336998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008909728,0.00009861108,0.002541743,0.0001785691,0.00003439631,0.0003343502,0.009429153,0.0007718,0.0007052798,0.7747399,0.1926638,0.01841328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007714855,0.00001797305,0.01302651,0.0004854675,0.00004519747,0.00007255784,0.003128123,0.0006526974,0.000540241,0.01713109,0.9646938,0.0001290579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05312461,0.01437123,0.002414723,0.1037017,0.003520499,0.0005379894,0.004706758,0.000263707,0.8173589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2725522,0.005854353,0.005273862,0.03894089,0.0004967999,0.0004365081,0.001044384,0.0001670802,0.675234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09831148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741567171","doi":"","title":"Citizen Supplicants?: Alain Carins' Citizens Plus and the Politics of Aboriginal/Constitutional Scholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Scholarship; Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Elaboration; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Dobrowolsky","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Devlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03733390591740756,"gpt":0.2978203878822749,"spread":0.2604864819648674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002407031,0.0001809484,0.0002991154,0.000740118,0.01601356,0.009093661,0.0008621402,0.00252155,0.004453273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002749682,0.0001321115,0.0001109346,0.001381379,0.02830871,0.003220129,0.003143332,0.002971418,0.0002667974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02342939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02185701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5418651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6762468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.0007361264,0.00002230263,0.0001572917,0.0002456383,0.0004148716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972566,0.001722915,0.0001838687,0.0001201127,0.0003269073,0.0003895788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000229898,0.00001271656,0.0009039876,0.00006890094,0.000002790118,0.0002422444,0.1074764,0.00005371535,0.00008714723,0.8546362,0.0271478,0.009345014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001577686,0.0000210669,0.005619478,0.0003933929,0.00001103602,0.0001546272,0.1572202,0.0001379668,0.0002840701,0.06561415,0.7704963,0.00003194237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1611312,0.05710643,0.0005859254,0.3727353,0.001025897,0.00001880225,0.00005185445,0.00004959986,0.407295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242377,0.006261869,0.0002625608,0.01202972,0.0002970291,0.00001430163,0.00001187131,0.00003437325,0.05685047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9216659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740105340","doi":"","title":"Federalism, Pluralism, and Constitutional Faith: Canada in Question","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Humanities; Federalism; Ethnology; Political science; Politics; Nothing; Pluralism (philosophy); Faith; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Anthropology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Samuel V. LaSelva","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02056909318842353,"gpt":0.223110527904839,"spread":0.2025414347164155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568171,0.0002454795,0.0003854438,0.001130358,0.02428527,0.01280058,0.001668283,0.006341803,0.006300441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00504966,0.0002200197,0.000360579,0.002736961,0.02393546,0.004563696,0.003843959,0.006271795,0.0002200087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1131267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1115695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964818,0.0007244053,0.00005913791,0.0003334088,0.0007891788,0.001612059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979297,0.0008159857,0.0001202574,0.0001076023,0.0005604146,0.0004659811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008149822,0.000006988485,0.0007014761,0.00001928347,0.000003725941,0.00008373424,0.00683981,0.0001246181,0.00003494619,0.9769018,0.01153644,0.003738966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004137669,0.00001399393,0.01019257,0.0004575907,0.00002871637,0.0001054448,0.03516828,0.0007006358,0.0002571941,0.2615095,0.6914369,0.00008779184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07279306,0.02069173,0.001674924,0.3324141,0.0007503543,0.00004410446,0.0002792968,0.00003722866,0.5713152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045357,0.005978541,0.0007608114,0.02910986,0.0001811594,0.0000381269,0.00007771066,0.00003484343,0.05928332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1131267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8207955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03630339283605489,"gpt":0.2698295430549229,"spread":0.233526150218868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03879485,0.0005486042,0.0008871838,0.01067985,0.005971589,0.01769592,0.002107127,0.004068057,0.002894602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09580551,0.0006091752,0.0006999623,0.006943973,0.06411989,0.03756985,0.01237737,0.005249799,0.0003453071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005132436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002965278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001888781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9405288,0.04582075,0.002383969,0.003382975,0.006351009,0.001532441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908403,0.07136662,0.008387447,0.007502194,0.003512755,0.0008279479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001467031,0.00000567017,0.0003758879,0.00005136321,0.00000434176,0.00002196864,0.02637674,0.0001291621,0.0001220889,0.9664536,0.0001963816,0.006248238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002987835,0.000031751,0.001784498,0.0003145628,0.00002239909,0.0001872487,0.01987811,0.001870198,0.0007353513,0.9433557,0.03175326,0.00003704698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2238824,0.01325902,0.3391372,0.03350157,0.0006587504,0.000330149,0.0001847211,0.0002178174,0.3888283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816132,0.0006771592,0.0154484,0.0004414372,0.0001492523,0.0001096715,0.00005722281,0.00004447405,0.001459239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912097679","doi":"","title":"\"Providing Essential Services of Reasonable Quality to All Canadians\": Understanding Section 36(1)(c) of the Constitution Act, 1982","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Underpinning; Law; Section (typography); Order (exchange); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sanitation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Karen Busby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.110776023013309,"gpt":0.2567147494172821,"spread":0.1459387264039731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004167196,0.000262487,0.0003081641,0.001469479,0.01087833,0.007341145,0.001425105,0.00692496,0.00342562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01401236,0.000344422,0.0003980195,0.002155268,0.01541256,0.002462931,0.002017113,0.004409259,0.0003103042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04618844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1344302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945005,0.0007675714,0.0001692941,0.0003903155,0.002278507,0.001893859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958115,0.001634235,0.0004861472,0.0002424003,0.001341575,0.000484239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007139335,0.000009618301,0.001569925,0.00003116558,0.000003083701,0.00007636141,0.003389145,0.0003306014,0.0001113692,0.9706826,0.02043973,0.00334931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893958,0.00005399583,0.04426704,0.0008086207,0.00007155563,0.0002140082,0.01458304,0.002536371,0.000837011,0.3187214,0.6176099,0.0002281242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1399402,0.00799796,0.006246895,0.3350094,0.0008211581,0.0001781354,0.002563711,0.00009518004,0.5071474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928618,0.003880454,0.005150125,0.05163337,0.0003315653,0.0001223038,0.0003085353,0.00002775415,0.04568409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04618844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3351222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999925103","doi":"","title":"Indigenous cultural rights and identity politics in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Jurisprudence; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law; Citizenship; State (computer science); Scholarship; Constitution; Identity (music); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Avigail Eisenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015619502280686,"gpt":0.2572331762607448,"spread":0.2416136739800588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002274333,0.0002542259,0.0005253702,0.001967181,0.04782252,0.01097356,0.002045206,0.002911364,0.01175857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004964318,0.0003672719,0.0003879317,0.00378922,0.01635781,0.002789333,0.00653318,0.004589139,0.0003766635],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2504011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3136649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947624,0.0003809914,0.00007012622,0.000381575,0.001376004,0.003028904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962692,0.0006151087,0.0001409621,0.000116348,0.001173468,0.001684799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004189688,0.00005786237,0.00916593,0.00009572328,0.00001992758,0.0008178527,0.06128379,0.0005585522,0.0002846688,0.8606413,0.03423103,0.03280142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007160642,0.00003474635,0.05264071,0.0005217685,0.000064933,0.0002974813,0.1491789,0.001761997,0.0005294925,0.08512616,0.7095906,0.0001815305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2600816,0.008494906,0.001040215,0.0908923,0.000547808,0.0001060824,0.0003829915,0.0000544761,0.6383996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070462,0.002820987,0.0005809951,0.006660589,0.00005696865,0.00002872409,0.0001061918,0.0000368216,0.08266255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182430000","doi":"","title":"Manitoba and the (long and winding) road to the natural resources transfer agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Terminology; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Elite; Law and economics; Natural resource; Law; Political economy; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Jim Mochoruk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361755765929973,"gpt":0.2270230356718108,"spread":0.2134054780125111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001895437,0.0002748331,0.00028475,0.001263328,0.03360555,0.005910596,0.001181306,0.002618018,0.007782708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002629297,0.0004261043,0.0002608559,0.002637857,0.01367915,0.001611904,0.005475771,0.003350876,0.0003589008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08620936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1022931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974797,0.0004913984,0.00004162136,0.000190777,0.0004419464,0.001354458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988005,0.0003699626,0.00007706245,0.00008564385,0.0003289596,0.0003378405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001060717,0.0000836718,0.01327045,0.0001389481,0.00002581882,0.004460217,0.1019872,0.0006738967,0.001715728,0.8382676,0.01330912,0.02596135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004518546,0.00006725363,0.03743897,0.0003743997,0.00004307681,0.0009908469,0.1048879,0.0007031278,0.001111111,0.02454176,0.8296815,0.0001148067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4693834,0.005364629,0.001856262,0.04446442,0.0002752768,0.0001546636,0.0001675326,0.00005768124,0.478276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397351,0.0008251874,0.0009696332,0.002580792,0.00001669715,0.00004477544,0.00002905771,0.00001679968,0.05578207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08620936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123992025","doi":"","title":"Meaningless mantra: substantive equality after Withler","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Substantive due process; Relevance (law); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Koshan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonnette Watson Hamilton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09327847133984746,"gpt":0.3019885457289145,"spread":0.208710074389067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007257516,0.0004376637,0.0006862669,0.001258473,0.01803804,0.01241384,0.002085724,0.006916358,0.004950912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01351825,0.0002813675,0.0006145557,0.001094479,0.03995481,0.007065103,0.006881249,0.009127362,0.0004050483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02220541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0273621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4135666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5629048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861283,0.003942983,0.0002667276,0.001978543,0.004477374,0.003206091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951492,0.003005887,0.0002286813,0.0003782237,0.001009103,0.0002288582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005338718,0.000003553356,0.0001062101,0.00001155324,0.000001784949,0.00007990854,0.003002243,0.00004120289,0.00005412537,0.9905745,0.002847976,0.003271537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705586,0.00005927205,0.001202924,0.0002973987,0.00005433374,0.00036402,0.01333044,0.0004829685,0.001961174,0.5125305,0.4695712,0.0001086657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05194759,0.005913338,0.02039248,0.08798637,0.001690216,0.0001185774,0.00008366326,0.0001251409,0.8317426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564104,0.001342122,0.003795216,0.03491636,0.0004108833,0.00008669227,0.00003718471,0.0001047714,0.1028963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4135666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8223187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123088121","doi":"","title":"Marital rape, polygamy, and prostitution: tradibg sex equality for agency and choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Law; Charter; Criminology; Doctrine; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Janine Benedet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0365480915880803,"gpt":0.2997919318510741,"spread":0.2632438402629938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002327079,0.0002255275,0.0003829474,0.0008481701,0.006228785,0.008532435,0.0008084552,0.003571785,0.004519715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003227828,0.0002033147,0.0003392512,0.0008849778,0.05311561,0.006059156,0.004528105,0.002712495,0.0002854826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005259879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006709251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0376571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972396,0.001318767,0.0000641411,0.0002390839,0.0004185793,0.0007197455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984903,0.0008948744,0.0001854845,0.0001391839,0.000105833,0.000184375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004300125,0.000007727183,0.0003873999,0.000009799305,0.000001623233,0.00005593701,0.006895485,0.00001694813,0.00002098614,0.9885102,0.0006900626,0.003399482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002400494,0.00003656939,0.003808442,0.000260706,0.00001073385,0.0003050098,0.04345148,0.0001353437,0.0002123738,0.8290023,0.1227305,0.0000226079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1403397,0.03502048,0.003882197,0.2105177,0.001045887,0.00003085697,0.00004975279,0.00001502296,0.6090983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774303,0.005677158,0.0003220876,0.005063605,0.0003581701,0.00002097587,0.000008767038,0.000006579459,0.0111124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06347889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190033593","doi":"","title":"\"A rather vexed question...\": the Federal-Provincial debate over the constitucional responsibility for Métis Scrip","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Political science; Obligation; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicole C. O’Byrne","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02413818042145314,"gpt":0.2835320252039089,"spread":0.2593938447824557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006746392,0.0002445509,0.0003758598,0.0004201086,0.0180532,0.01068645,0.002014765,0.007387137,0.003866371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027349,0.0003094914,0.0003375161,0.001094518,0.02187321,0.006675021,0.00255546,0.01204813,0.0007460862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01958879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03372191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4500326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5448707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948339,0.001671741,0.0001298122,0.0006685233,0.001341569,0.001354429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970499,0.001263962,0.0001918399,0.0001695657,0.0009988933,0.0003258253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009832155,0.000005318851,0.0003038692,0.00002385918,0.000002506629,0.00003853687,0.009136761,0.00003656483,0.00007228945,0.9052683,0.08063683,0.004465428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002809539,0.00001666674,0.002878008,0.0004484622,0.00001476682,0.0001012033,0.0261852,0.0003546846,0.0004917269,0.1713778,0.79806,0.00004342429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009472541,0.004508943,0.001622674,0.8723582,0.002170875,0.00001465205,0.0001036753,0.00002943126,0.109719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6130621,0.003691852,0.001636541,0.2676596,0.001958097,0.00005082671,0.00008046829,0.00009980355,0.1117607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5499674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8948263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565867575","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing everything: the role of \"Charter values\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Normative; United Nations Charter; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics","authors":[{"name":"M. Harding","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rainer Knopff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02518275058038969,"gpt":0.2607977655492197,"spread":0.2356150149688301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313225,0.0004323382,0.0007182073,0.001972302,0.009950454,0.01595621,0.002180568,0.005289986,0.002399345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03022665,0.0003338054,0.0004854225,0.002225712,0.1017669,0.01653684,0.005659563,0.01075204,0.0002269551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01138886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01357791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02004442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02068555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9798023,0.01343566,0.0004268466,0.001696705,0.003002024,0.00163651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771871,0.01655137,0.001312381,0.002708674,0.001464469,0.0007759788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.573193e-7,0.00000109864,0.00003119438,0.000002889182,5.514178e-7,0.000003974016,0.0008635594,0.00002846189,0.00000838175,0.9980891,0.0002585076,0.0007114049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008813125,0.000007967167,0.0002399697,0.00009164318,0.000006145311,0.0000198682,0.00208988,0.0001637714,0.0001077976,0.9662812,0.0309732,0.000009848267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06554018,0.01071255,0.05724557,0.1449796,0.001011196,0.00007296637,0.0001136579,0.0001022323,0.7202221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800325,0.002066231,0.00568536,0.00530881,0.0004407188,0.0000720296,0.00003364276,0.00004904918,0.00631166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1223365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747512870","doi":"","title":"Royal succession, abdication, and regency in the realms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Parliament; Dominion; Law; Humanities; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Art; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anne Twomey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04576666992306225,"gpt":0.3313024482657277,"spread":0.2855357783426655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002717924,0.0002168205,0.0002726504,0.0008284407,0.01050846,0.005761677,0.0008299331,0.002813568,0.006999131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430674,0.00032193,0.0003046113,0.0006994032,0.02642456,0.002904642,0.004798545,0.004518299,0.0005590879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01771966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01742057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3391697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5408141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951723,0.001150321,0.0002535857,0.0004375731,0.001291315,0.001694852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975007,0.00103074,0.0002868543,0.0001712162,0.0004985586,0.0005119132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493338,0.00001193643,0.001008885,0.00002847288,0.00000330338,0.0004882449,0.01110407,0.0001669816,0.0001922525,0.9758341,0.004414751,0.006732002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004823817,0.00006692673,0.02153406,0.0006192507,0.00002743149,0.001042311,0.03129216,0.0008325986,0.0009669401,0.1814931,0.7619709,0.0001062541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1126313,0.008520312,0.002937196,0.0168525,0.0004191691,0.00006494156,0.00004830288,0.00004002395,0.8584863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957742,0.002076937,0.0007203196,0.002979883,0.0001617557,0.00002578944,0.00001620798,0.0000177048,0.09822714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3391697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625873439","doi":"","title":"Daviault Dialogue: The Strange Journey of Canada's Intoxication Defence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Dennis J Baker","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rainer Knopff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03053669851787179,"gpt":0.2674705802949157,"spread":0.2369338817770439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451494,0.0007600597,0.0009203737,0.001907314,0.05669242,0.02148059,0.003462295,0.02095096,0.00976346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01153618,0.0008390321,0.0008435112,0.002542517,0.0221721,0.004868745,0.004963123,0.02234229,0.0007554694],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1952071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.211467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890431,0.001460389,0.000213565,0.001327541,0.004114277,0.003841266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928787,0.002340585,0.0001992131,0.0002141256,0.002694661,0.00167267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005671662,0.0000354021,0.001309386,0.0001052917,0.00003246703,0.001138346,0.02524417,0.0002786689,0.000538898,0.6298745,0.3256139,0.01577224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002739838,0.00001423485,0.002127285,0.0002430919,0.00002711598,0.0001209607,0.01206238,0.000220569,0.0003790376,0.02308734,0.9615616,0.0001290271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02014446,0.02870356,0.0009266885,0.7533693,0.00354206,0.00003763117,0.0003536101,0.00007624895,0.1928464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4151885,0.01195992,0.001057918,0.3702594,0.001418122,0.00004881918,0.0001383162,0.0002178857,0.1997112],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1952071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9334456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911209324","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the \"No Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights\" Doctrine","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Hierarchy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Carter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01901472872440604,"gpt":0.2685540167596146,"spread":0.2495392880352086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006257247,0.000337652,0.0004388093,0.002072697,0.006709258,0.005694978,0.0019686,0.004144856,0.005967201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009788376,0.0003390184,0.0005642172,0.001644565,0.03602244,0.005635236,0.00229171,0.006446179,0.0005796573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01951928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0204581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1481118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1622228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922029,0.002023475,0.0001871561,0.0006859504,0.003514909,0.001385677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949098,0.002741158,0.0004863054,0.0003694254,0.001213721,0.000279493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.199238e-7,0.000001076696,0.00002469609,0.00000348636,3.967469e-7,0.000007586844,0.0001785076,0.00003126973,0.00001340456,0.9985268,0.0006162687,0.0005959368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001202659,0.00001073665,0.0006201382,0.0000828394,0.000005537412,0.00004020146,0.0005349763,0.000603848,0.0001641909,0.9309348,0.06697957,0.00001112469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02199424,0.004794006,0.03914376,0.07326412,0.000538107,0.0001250746,0.0001736711,0.00004311787,0.859924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132527,0.002913191,0.01014843,0.01684143,0.0006066709,0.0001866357,0.0001087747,0.00004171385,0.05590038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1481118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2944993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994570748","doi":"","title":"Between Despair and Denial: What to Do About the Canadian Senate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Institution; Oligarchy; Clientelism; Politics; Law; Art; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Pellerin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02472501234720183,"gpt":0.2565780905670746,"spread":0.2318530782198727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463099,0.0005181632,0.0005788055,0.00242345,0.04666748,0.01298958,0.002562382,0.004444038,0.008689181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005971272,0.0003101631,0.0005840712,0.004574618,0.04166008,0.006105543,0.0047571,0.007036723,0.0006287969],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1646651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2140113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948961,0.0009938949,0.00006033451,0.0002960152,0.00092522,0.002828392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959952,0.0006219536,0.0001866999,0.0001501026,0.001781419,0.00126462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009996651,0.00003384919,0.0105173,0.0002815323,0.00004592549,0.0007467796,0.2041426,0.0002666085,0.0002399538,0.6381125,0.1079613,0.03755178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001960028,0.00001706171,0.02139785,0.001221781,0.00005204732,0.0002103,0.3702661,0.0001816015,0.0001987212,0.03561258,0.5706586,0.0001638105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1227156,0.03710064,0.00057229,0.4746722,0.001288129,0.00005000581,0.0005554549,0.00005110095,0.3629946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144675,0.01453425,0.0003677844,0.03342431,0.0003003649,0.00003185578,0.0001245094,0.00005445255,0.036695],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1646651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740894130","doi":"","title":"Post-Colonial Federalism: Social Citizenship and New Identities","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizenship; Political science; Federalism; Sociology; Ethnology; Politics; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ian Angus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05106684700111322,"gpt":0.2433136647690867,"spread":0.1922468177679735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231603,0.0001353436,0.0001688165,0.0006827068,0.004196172,0.00382207,0.0004185121,0.001273257,0.00490169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001088335,0.00007171575,0.0001864393,0.00104814,0.01061931,0.002995361,0.003007906,0.001424438,0.0002507891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00822825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002769364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03433694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04733473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990627,0.0003822617,0.00001735895,0.00008205189,0.00009995171,0.0003556766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993827,0.0002992062,0.0001075063,0.00005980211,0.0000710692,0.00007969079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007832966,0.00001386019,0.00108747,0.0000149884,0.000001600951,0.00007866471,0.01820474,0.00007266899,0.00004702515,0.97164,0.001885383,0.006945755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002005656,0.00004035391,0.02393718,0.0003475928,0.00001185005,0.0002186387,0.06086065,0.000885562,0.0005092003,0.4488663,0.4642825,0.00002007405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3525599,0.00751568,0.002890024,0.05065642,0.0002613277,0.00001792722,0.00006087538,0.00001995856,0.5860177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743888,0.0009193774,0.0001567407,0.0008028479,0.00005221847,0.000008358517,0.0000147698,0.000005381585,0.0236514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737671693","doi":"","title":"Jean Chrétien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Economic history; History; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Young","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03402436715252795,"gpt":0.2199523210745476,"spread":0.1859279539220197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001081218,0.0004395715,0.0004342797,0.00108171,0.0218342,0.007115595,0.0009793441,0.002648686,0.02971902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002956051,0.0003207536,0.0002421975,0.002537595,0.008757876,0.00272628,0.002370343,0.00580128,0.001357916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04683723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04550365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985861,0.0002535825,0.00002326189,0.000174027,0.0003750836,0.0005880435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998795,0.0002292102,0.00007612893,0.00007988903,0.0004380913,0.0003817287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000732589,0.00005041147,0.004752311,0.0001225402,0.00002578378,0.001009284,0.04036538,0.0003245707,0.0004208312,0.3577279,0.5132405,0.0818873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004820034,0.000005759079,0.00452293,0.0001428714,0.000004827261,0.0001087483,0.01062306,0.00005119025,0.00009926585,0.00393996,0.9804738,0.00002278266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07655071,0.0430636,0.001362735,0.2415336,0.005187269,0.00005448552,0.0008721027,0.000148367,0.6312271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3387201,0.01159767,0.0006512104,0.02514883,0.0004997863,0.00003648689,0.0001645058,0.0002081227,0.6229734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04683723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3398294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163287952","doi":"","title":"From centralization to sovereignty-association: the canadian labour congress and the constitutional question","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Politics; Constitutional monarchy; Sovereignty; Law; Philosophy; Monarchy","authors":[{"name":"Larry Savage","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01477771345327654,"gpt":0.2264600803921833,"spread":0.2116823669389068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692988,0.0003486147,0.0004592008,0.002454733,0.02692368,0.01454418,0.002066427,0.003761434,0.007814125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009040659,0.0003412392,0.0003402371,0.004314571,0.0404488,0.004360074,0.00333034,0.005260513,0.00030758],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2260489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2032752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938717,0.001084375,0.0001016907,0.000652048,0.001552861,0.002737283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963467,0.001334057,0.0002400518,0.0002277699,0.001242004,0.0006094463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000687082,0.000003242709,0.000489648,0.00001786798,0.000002619412,0.00004701236,0.005521373,0.0001762006,0.00004002029,0.9830305,0.007124669,0.00353992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317371,0.00001642984,0.01374153,0.0005605829,0.00002951293,0.00008345001,0.02679321,0.0008333538,0.0003150617,0.1770116,0.7804776,0.0001043675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08674738,0.02889445,0.002316308,0.1818998,0.0008992574,0.00005500225,0.0004339187,0.00005826774,0.6986957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542819,0.005067485,0.000519323,0.00612902,0.0002156395,0.00003108457,0.000086559,0.00002969484,0.03363929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8976736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740259405","doi":"","title":"Les Procédures de modification constitutionnelle dans les fédérations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Normative; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Louis Massicotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antoine Yoshinaka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05856938562781288,"gpt":0.3098007958848562,"spread":0.2512314102570433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03504701,0.001050302,0.001205064,0.003002754,0.01026065,0.0131876,0.002030799,0.005350111,0.004397663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04782009,0.001001254,0.002471976,0.004003056,0.01890964,0.008337638,0.003742617,0.0128439,0.001624921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01793939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02393744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07942101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04863279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9388106,0.03240586,0.00297361,0.004919752,0.01731806,0.003572172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736809,0.01431913,0.00287433,0.005366218,0.003173578,0.0005858518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751041,0.0000361501,0.0006417978,0.00005629229,0.0000172751,0.0001403121,0.003919831,0.00159385,0.0007045256,0.9578036,0.002194321,0.03285445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001693517,0.000182751,0.00942794,0.0006148554,0.00005082271,0.0006401071,0.004281492,0.0053793,0.004140934,0.3503691,0.6244491,0.0002942377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1431668,0.01531701,0.3617022,0.02520625,0.002450559,0.0009568543,0.0006380902,0.001313819,0.4492484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789708,0.007886738,0.1309678,0.001843666,0.0009715402,0.001365644,0.0004201843,0.0002539282,0.06658257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07942101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1853485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas M.J. Bateman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01968497722486387,"gpt":0.2691515264457322,"spread":0.2494665492208683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005663862,0.0003241981,0.0005450504,0.001371593,0.04719704,0.01460634,0.002405924,0.01033698,0.005391102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01381821,0.0005076559,0.0005101234,0.001987603,0.01862905,0.002346356,0.003044853,0.01288736,0.0002729487],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1548347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1836897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926457,0.001228257,0.00009953718,0.0005293181,0.001976578,0.003520478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935483,0.002654435,0.0002743724,0.0001503511,0.001821352,0.001551095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006139341,0.00003379513,0.004843529,0.00004468383,0.00003508759,0.0008139021,0.01529215,0.000458085,0.0004986221,0.8816161,0.08797313,0.008329482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000307978,0.00008411422,0.05062079,0.0009195356,0.0002142933,0.0003389664,0.04251865,0.002666452,0.001638921,0.1547152,0.7454902,0.000484864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480339,0.01276813,0.0008848606,0.4801648,0.001286189,0.00007808447,0.0004152411,0.00004733904,0.3563215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904695,0.002338013,0.0003483858,0.05837357,0.0002676629,0.00004203331,0.00006329342,0.00003033589,0.03384171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1548347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W85021076","doi":"","title":"The Post-9/11 National Security regime in Canada: strengthening security, diminishing accountability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; National security; Business; Public administration; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Reg Whitaker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910280110150013,"gpt":0.2801687870571302,"spread":0.2510659859556301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005195003,0.0002295049,0.0005649291,0.00143924,0.02555854,0.01306511,0.002087466,0.005489243,0.00866873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01126402,0.0004758119,0.0005020698,0.002549059,0.01367573,0.002976684,0.004214077,0.008120376,0.0003498102],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2693293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4456978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901161,0.0008829458,0.000144529,0.0004306954,0.001957083,0.006468588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902495,0.001668092,0.0007935506,0.00033289,0.003039365,0.003916719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003283977,0.0002446786,0.06685667,0.000175966,0.00008052162,0.001005858,0.05385553,0.001879198,0.001156828,0.7704604,0.05652278,0.04743314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000204033,0.0001446475,0.3866153,0.0006631551,0.0001117663,0.0002019662,0.1025821,0.002974593,0.001574949,0.05017085,0.4543939,0.0003626904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7196721,0.002387779,0.0006797728,0.1293912,0.0004050111,0.00009097785,0.0006207251,0.00004258836,0.1467097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697826,0.0005614294,0.0002541805,0.004564322,0.00003666074,0.00002390807,0.00006524672,0.00002164496,0.02468999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7306707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8474745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17783591","doi":"10.1126/science.13.319.211","title":"Challenging English-Canadian Orthodoxy on Democracy and Constitutional Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Orthodoxy; Democracy; Elite; Conversation; Law; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Fafard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07178905838013909,"gpt":0.3030945892290276,"spread":0.2313055308488885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007374334,0.000393761,0.0005053284,0.001637293,0.02781648,0.01302882,0.001695583,0.00479231,0.005262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00918311,0.0002291508,0.0003162216,0.002021511,0.03884606,0.003874886,0.003905035,0.007187078,0.0002927512],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1554942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1364613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884952,0.003055908,0.0002069223,0.00104995,0.003624587,0.003567371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930776,0.002988418,0.0002757828,0.0002463351,0.002437616,0.0009741975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008370474,0.000006342998,0.0003274533,0.00002677213,0.000002483449,0.0001263743,0.01050671,0.0001295072,0.00005614927,0.9726322,0.01198477,0.004192846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003797706,0.00001636036,0.004046369,0.0004988801,0.00002746424,0.0001569177,0.04477121,0.0008435015,0.0003699362,0.1978516,0.7512916,0.000088143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04055373,0.02338598,0.003949601,0.3756154,0.00163409,0.00006028791,0.000193239,0.00004972489,0.5545579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813236,0.007697721,0.001703306,0.03647756,0.000531774,0.00004412233,0.00005591987,0.00005360142,0.07211234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1554942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911083342","doi":"","title":"Spending Power, Social Policy, and the Principle of Subsidiarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal and Social Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Welfare state; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); State action; Social policy; Action (physics); Public administration; Economics; Welfare; Law; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Éléonore Gauthier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05304713381432047,"gpt":0.3460608155569254,"spread":0.2930136817426049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324641,0.0004581377,0.0005996822,0.001782369,0.004578352,0.005553737,0.0009425788,0.002745978,0.003815936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005526434,0.0003265908,0.0006427988,0.001693401,0.04226921,0.005736058,0.004041944,0.004079937,0.0003740262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01412379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01014091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02439695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951261,0.002091571,0.0001395987,0.0005469717,0.001086844,0.001008874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978008,0.001273031,0.0002215103,0.0002870166,0.0002632972,0.0001543671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[4.954957e-7,6.94994e-7,0.0000146623,0.000001832802,4.308794e-7,0.000002411534,0.00008279574,0.00004359248,0.000006835464,0.9994325,0.00012646,0.0002872616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006715753,0.000003462787,0.0001297781,0.00002101237,0.000002394735,0.00000927797,0.0001282881,0.0001683158,0.00005069865,0.9826093,0.01686828,0.000002591451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03762421,0.004055553,0.06151859,0.05852958,0.0004117341,0.00006290457,0.000091206,0.00006296873,0.8376434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676138,0.001826426,0.005419638,0.002652418,0.0003508345,0.0001339974,0.00003806462,0.00003616825,0.02192858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02439695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1024758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739100633","doi":"","title":"La Nation Quebecoise et la Minorite Nationale Canadienne-Francaise","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"French; Humanities; Vision; Political science; Dynamism; Theme (computing); Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Michel Seymour","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02715354916946068,"gpt":0.2334376144173533,"spread":0.2062840652478926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008829933,0.0004659842,0.0002918073,0.0009860815,0.0140682,0.006615151,0.0006549191,0.001637184,0.01659836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001337293,0.0001369249,0.0002763286,0.001685871,0.006379056,0.00207959,0.002034864,0.00265539,0.0009217932],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04890154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04680293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986495,0.0002515652,0.00002162187,0.0001614721,0.0002786836,0.0006370291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987217,0.0001460642,0.0000801692,0.00005022174,0.0005442717,0.0004575442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668146,0.00003020965,0.01042833,0.0001160407,0.00003714815,0.0005906178,0.05284294,0.0001644287,0.0005797692,0.8198048,0.08400286,0.03134614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000891519,0.00001718028,0.02774813,0.0002329804,0.0000176558,0.0001819151,0.02666692,0.0001339786,0.0001585859,0.006798668,0.9379882,0.00004699487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1191643,0.01613238,0.00156041,0.07710849,0.001332566,0.00004104729,0.001007431,0.00007222768,0.783581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7594047,0.004168637,0.0006845685,0.005337758,0.0001161591,0.00004264625,0.0003440525,0.00003810966,0.2298634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3548071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748666452","doi":"","title":"An Elusive Search for Community: Globalization and the Canadian National Identities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Humanities; Political science; Ideology; Welfare state; National identity; Ethnology; Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Janine Brodie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04876453634992067,"gpt":0.2816699365534167,"spread":0.232905400203496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650851,0.000402109,0.0004728289,0.003269773,0.03703601,0.01344682,0.001577524,0.002009256,0.010906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028175,0.0002501805,0.0003530685,0.005254471,0.02965492,0.004517004,0.006168185,0.002291122,0.0004274686],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1644516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967875,0.0005400398,0.0000420438,0.0003079141,0.0008561561,0.001466287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972434,0.0004159206,0.000197777,0.0001432737,0.0008327644,0.001166882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005493642,0.00002283598,0.009243719,0.00009843197,0.00001101528,0.0002441981,0.1550841,0.0002236391,0.000146911,0.7759923,0.02463778,0.03424012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001854767,0.0000143947,0.03499727,0.0004618129,0.00002656134,0.000142799,0.3184978,0.0003852232,0.0001855245,0.06290649,0.5822605,0.0001030906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544793,0.0125607,0.0008963731,0.07101239,0.0003819267,0.00005407688,0.0004358064,0.00003755915,0.6601419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471883,0.004378135,0.0004893476,0.002119285,0.0000401792,0.00002065528,0.0000945192,0.00002694902,0.04564258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9582169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70434532","doi":"","title":"Unseating horseman: commercial harvesting right and the natural resources transfer agreements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extinguishment; Treaty; Proposition; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Humanities; Geography; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kerry Wilkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01743360580810691,"gpt":0.2720837140977891,"spread":0.2546501082896822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004455041,0.0004325859,0.0003126918,0.0007985841,0.01519668,0.009516905,0.002143349,0.01304517,0.006163855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007811024,0.0004614778,0.000523594,0.001137721,0.01342196,0.006512024,0.002561543,0.008653728,0.0006644761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01475633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02470347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5212075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6516331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942028,0.001361288,0.0001454055,0.0008447269,0.001666955,0.001778841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973412,0.00157199,0.0002399155,0.0001331003,0.0005682157,0.0001455833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009282973,0.000008476645,0.0003231776,0.00001452692,0.000002419443,0.000154846,0.00234456,0.00007691955,0.00006557247,0.9719642,0.02274182,0.002294242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007064403,0.00006082941,0.004740085,0.0005726665,0.0000530513,0.0002422483,0.006799931,0.000866889,0.000741771,0.2907922,0.694947,0.0001126479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02703649,0.009175718,0.003665261,0.1361916,0.0006280558,0.00009214648,0.0001847779,0.00004466805,0.8229812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.607231,0.004797867,0.001695644,0.123156,0.0008438364,0.0001912977,0.0001116709,0.00004310398,0.2619296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737262796","doi":"","title":"Mutations et limites de l'identitaire au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Oppression; Identity (music); Sovereignty; Politics; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Diane Lamoureux","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03343803331656561,"gpt":0.2515676503858552,"spread":0.2181296170692896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013999,0.0002042627,0.0003254442,0.00143162,0.01495735,0.005833055,0.0008209618,0.0010672,0.00816028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003031211,0.0002258636,0.0001888218,0.002064191,0.01100053,0.001612744,0.00270789,0.002280025,0.0002044925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1018795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06246424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980789,0.0003546476,0.00003951333,0.0002447028,0.0005366256,0.0007455689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998437,0.0003449214,0.0001774005,0.0001096183,0.0006703184,0.0002607544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633861,0.00002068067,0.00861203,0.00005027318,0.000014129,0.0003828605,0.05795494,0.0005124887,0.0008022809,0.8922995,0.00588469,0.03341986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004377988,0.00005875909,0.1267936,0.000519981,0.0000736572,0.0004527537,0.08196483,0.002887417,0.001787853,0.06383941,0.7214209,0.000156851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6087379,0.003450937,0.002570878,0.02244722,0.0001260754,0.00004283275,0.0002586838,0.00004378247,0.3623217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618114,0.000576662,0.0004061869,0.0003997519,0.00001060699,0.00001435364,0.00002982696,0.00001413672,0.0367371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1018795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7391912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743980511","doi":"","title":"Adverse Effect Discrimination: Proving the Prima Facie Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prima facie; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn Braun","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04223672470172506,"gpt":0.3249294545874573,"spread":0.2826927298857322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005733287,0.0005249862,0.0006142878,0.001790138,0.004096203,0.003505535,0.001485875,0.005404836,0.01475454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01262364,0.0003236255,0.001489105,0.0009551871,0.006662264,0.003978578,0.005421086,0.005327814,0.001301913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00314039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003713297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02014915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01747698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965861,0.0009110388,0.0001332638,0.0005008815,0.0007771429,0.00109164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897817,0.006343788,0.001023958,0.001156457,0.001242022,0.0004521513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008270529,0.00009074438,0.006853438,0.00007564434,0.00004589715,0.002455358,0.001074976,0.0004555533,0.0003937676,0.9753361,0.004085015,0.009050939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003836961,0.0002782744,0.0129044,0.0004932825,0.0002883684,0.002649176,0.004461899,0.004774303,0.002995411,0.8541667,0.1165414,0.00006312661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1995808,0.00303794,0.01873422,0.05475626,0.0007730739,0.0002055265,0.0003620374,0.00004027094,0.7225099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423755,0.001827769,0.002936084,0.01255264,0.0005332071,0.0001220292,0.00008460991,0.00001397006,0.03955421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02014915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04935884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737595584","doi":"","title":"Liberty Rights, the Family and Constitutional Politics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Law; Charter; Politics; Humanities; Family law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Hester Lessard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04189545640418434,"gpt":0.2903830560030025,"spread":0.2484875995988181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002581741,0.0002521937,0.0002491866,0.0008402342,0.007659367,0.007591551,0.0009223348,0.002608724,0.007122062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003048906,0.0001765338,0.0001959908,0.0008064604,0.03258545,0.00346645,0.001928868,0.003267691,0.0004501576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02588616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01236306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2403692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2256064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997703,0.000960707,0.00005136723,0.0002694188,0.0003694672,0.0006460291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987561,0.0007146386,0.00008819522,0.0001245243,0.0001943092,0.0001222344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001315622,0.000001667587,0.00004293284,0.000004491505,4.413367e-7,0.00002491601,0.0008040375,0.00004738944,0.00001774819,0.9965227,0.00163567,0.0008967039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001372411,0.000009358814,0.0009668326,0.0001661321,0.000005026324,0.00007278979,0.003275936,0.0003690801,0.000190925,0.7099177,0.2850001,0.0000123284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0376569,0.02236127,0.004886876,0.06873444,0.0003817493,0.00003255165,0.0001720846,0.00003895975,0.8657352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137638,0.004716623,0.001099309,0.006146895,0.0003235629,0.00005240571,0.00006670628,0.00003160383,0.07379915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2403692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4779403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742655197","doi":"","title":"The construction of Nunavut and its impact on collective identity in the canadian eastern arctic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Government (linguistics); Arctic; The arctic; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; Ethnology; History; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Geology; Oceanography","authors":[{"name":"André Légaré","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05044722263641056,"gpt":0.3472969963767047,"spread":0.2968497737402941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002216253,0.0003262323,0.0003354796,0.001505297,0.03873702,0.007564075,0.001366093,0.0007399825,0.003033961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003360682,0.0002202596,0.0002769824,0.002243943,0.01857532,0.00123066,0.00659599,0.001357906,0.0001394562],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08351481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08443291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976977,0.0005308212,0.00003893281,0.0001804002,0.00049117,0.001061059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984698,0.000308613,0.0001580202,0.00006300224,0.0005036232,0.000496886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006492543,0.00003141856,0.03338866,0.00008022819,0.00001993764,0.0008366678,0.7919543,0.0006282352,0.000625351,0.1400335,0.005406389,0.02693038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005298958,0.00001653992,0.04548243,0.0001601852,0.00002297273,0.0001564909,0.8566004,0.0002823805,0.0003097048,0.005934427,0.09097861,0.00005052684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8256188,0.002745043,0.0008413203,0.008377043,0.00023669,0.00003114837,0.00006786783,0.00002288374,0.1620592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891515,0.0006329934,0.0002556014,0.0001774785,0.000008223302,0.000007878304,0.00001422741,0.00001145589,0.009740667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6059452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738323090","doi":"","title":"Searching for Multinational Canada: The Rhetoric of Confusion","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Solidarity; Political science; Neutrality; Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Alan C. Cairns","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03179725717827302,"gpt":0.2573078273275478,"spread":0.2255105701492747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100574,0.0007146904,0.0007361352,0.003227304,0.04099859,0.01846684,0.003291462,0.01075668,0.006602179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02582627,0.000608784,0.0004932652,0.005658609,0.05588642,0.01177209,0.008238634,0.01417404,0.000671124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09458132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06579424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7995898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7841241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876841,0.004493767,0.0002609915,0.001464515,0.004142644,0.001953898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874395,0.007073219,0.0007301485,0.0004681287,0.00325163,0.001037364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104289,0.000003675468,0.0003261868,0.00004106078,0.000004556643,0.0001918055,0.03238396,0.00006659847,0.00004511937,0.9319995,0.03072947,0.004197638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002344404,0.00001075648,0.0009292848,0.0006151137,0.00002539052,0.0002745109,0.06241194,0.001012766,0.0002903423,0.1762534,0.7580687,0.0000843215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02830238,0.01494606,0.005061439,0.5042953,0.002863523,0.00005285543,0.000118061,0.0001076022,0.4442527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8357666,0.005782189,0.002376965,0.1035935,0.00135472,0.00009890192,0.00005641946,0.0002883297,0.05068232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2004102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6862388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909747325","doi":"","title":"Th e Protective Function of the Constitutional Amending Formula","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Enumerated powers; Interpretation (philosophy); Separation of powers; Philosophy; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Sébastien Grammond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05151756309056284,"gpt":0.2977535307504103,"spread":0.2462359676598475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068057,0.0003979926,0.0006738526,0.001977081,0.004554215,0.008674071,0.001980292,0.005833325,0.004507648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03286575,0.0004965544,0.0007038376,0.001381296,0.0301769,0.004915609,0.00366597,0.009417455,0.0007001157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007234873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01550397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02440772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0212821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834381,0.005935792,0.0008642299,0.002246669,0.005429146,0.002086044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983449,0.007269313,0.001131912,0.004437592,0.00330009,0.000412077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047408,0.000002961496,0.00005402628,0.000006803801,0.000001323112,0.00001657682,0.0003986455,0.00003974211,0.00007565058,0.9954692,0.001015014,0.002916991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007069573,0.0001059483,0.002186099,0.000244151,0.00006678621,0.0002587625,0.00123065,0.001245733,0.002404103,0.7136065,0.2785011,0.00007946715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03565921,0.003898859,0.0400225,0.05309962,0.002314619,0.0001805526,0.0001281737,0.0002451499,0.8644513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214131,0.001675449,0.0147871,0.01312123,0.001330262,0.0002227219,0.00007776809,0.00008923974,0.04728315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05648494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993318716","doi":"","title":"The Charter at 30: A Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Constitutional law; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"John D. Whyte","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05762100584181712,"gpt":0.3022370486789722,"spread":0.2446160428371551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005285273,0.0006071329,0.0003482608,0.0009887283,0.01350464,0.009569848,0.002112265,0.008608423,0.01067576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066984,0.0003324017,0.0005659267,0.001155166,0.01934487,0.006187748,0.002743178,0.01566884,0.001848503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04845562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07650797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.910602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9163669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936835,0.001036173,0.0001094155,0.0008446827,0.00257514,0.001751133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970521,0.0006226015,0.0000849481,0.0001631326,0.001489056,0.0005881319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001464579,0.00001035279,0.000134836,0.00002492759,0.00000175115,0.0001370565,0.005798211,0.00009814437,0.0002047005,0.676901,0.3100562,0.006618192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005482931,0.000005301023,0.0004449182,0.00005942804,0.00000235799,0.0000292504,0.003021439,0.00006950909,0.0001272198,0.01624889,0.9799654,0.00002070411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006280096,0.006661053,0.00208147,0.6234328,0.01000546,0.00009706084,0.0003723615,0.00009235731,0.3509772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2435086,0.005344597,0.002272195,0.3284412,0.002606786,0.0001131673,0.000214848,0.000203186,0.4172955],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.910602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3515717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743130901","doi":"","title":"Cultural Myths and Political Realities or Why Québec Will Never Separate","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Mythology; Politics; Compromise; Political science; History; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"B. Lee Cooper","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04169517575311155,"gpt":0.2592332488909252,"spread":0.2175380731378136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00166744,0.0003357569,0.0002541033,0.00107269,0.02275414,0.008062621,0.001388708,0.002829785,0.01537467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002733363,0.0001838943,0.0002401251,0.001412557,0.02605654,0.004615211,0.002924887,0.005756979,0.0007508189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05064339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03417128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9349499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979826,0.0004404569,0.00002325608,0.0001949283,0.0003094498,0.001049316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986332,0.0002389723,0.00009863568,0.00008682979,0.0004402689,0.0005020511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002598531,0.00002543677,0.002984222,0.00005640326,0.00001598257,0.0002228349,0.04352922,0.0001331697,0.0001146133,0.8562238,0.07835677,0.01831159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325236,0.00001239739,0.01116893,0.0006160557,0.00001845308,0.00009692735,0.1330343,0.0002870737,0.0002017686,0.08427029,0.7702141,0.00005633297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06196531,0.009129882,0.0007828342,0.2979952,0.001027155,0.00002337129,0.0001644394,0.00003519666,0.6288766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.818414,0.003307735,0.0003160411,0.03877311,0.0001855281,0.00004060796,0.0000781769,0.00005681311,0.138828],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06505013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3674452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}