{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":49,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"06e5e346ffe2","filters":{"venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel"}},"results":[{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Peter Harder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361827854848971,"gpt":0.2266752809809839,"spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003657436,0.0003381348,0.000869273,0.002940361,0.02407817,0.0112451,0.001580339,0.002796795,0.01353028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01182341,0.0003590548,0.000395145,0.005911887,0.0164251,0.00429651,0.004627673,0.003567898,0.0003586814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07601719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1245501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929328,0.001465537,0.0001027661,0.0007556524,0.001394724,0.003348587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934583,0.002337019,0.000352858,0.0003789732,0.002726716,0.0007461442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004212,0.000008302054,0.002062476,0.0000248836,0.000018829,0.00006776414,0.003054308,0.0002397659,0.00006663274,0.9823745,0.007006349,0.005034065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380076,0.0000557913,0.0529238,0.0006743551,0.0003530777,0.0001925155,0.03887953,0.002060734,0.001170744,0.4000748,0.5032438,0.0002327384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1490654,0.005664208,0.001290271,0.03443218,0.0002048509,0.00004819595,0.0006239694,0.00002252207,0.8086483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704706,0.001042715,0.0002732039,0.002128651,0.00006564552,0.0000197663,0.00006161653,0.00001945982,0.02591836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07601719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5515459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2861617510","doi":"","title":"The Disappearance of the Four Equality Rights and Systemic Discrimination from Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Gender equality; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Mary Eberts","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kim Stanton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03682096381429417,"gpt":0.3031002468661284,"spread":0.2662792830518342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008539286,0.0004493422,0.0009065605,0.002903983,0.02612007,0.01048844,0.002044823,0.005756744,0.005870832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01649131,0.0005412313,0.0008738826,0.00375677,0.04064957,0.004198408,0.004849752,0.01230966,0.0003185831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1185244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1743361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845691,0.001525566,0.000371681,0.001823068,0.008495742,0.003214939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892294,0.003028665,0.0004537172,0.001050171,0.005204591,0.00103343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001826781,0.000009321276,0.000482087,0.00004245676,0.000007476996,0.00004236426,0.007826287,0.0001337896,0.0002250665,0.9668633,0.01034671,0.01400271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008723072,0.0000385537,0.02654231,0.0004866112,0.0000968935,0.0002071705,0.01513736,0.001147234,0.001297439,0.3697326,0.5849915,0.0002352179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1139121,0.005927681,0.005911177,0.1968116,0.001318827,0.00007875201,0.000301811,0.0001013057,0.6756368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212749,0.001432925,0.003394469,0.01617158,0.000269783,0.00004621437,0.00007628129,0.00007211169,0.05726171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125777417","doi":"","title":"Canadian Climate Federalism: Parliament’s Ample Constitutional Authority to Legislate GHG Emissions through Regulations, a National Cap and Trade Program, or a National Carbon Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Parliament; Carbon tax; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Commerce Clause; Emissions trading; Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Cooperative federalism; Economics; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0417525047389458,"gpt":0.3187750178305256,"spread":0.2770225130915798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002429099,0.0003165718,0.0003422469,0.001443184,0.01936987,0.008235027,0.001361646,0.002809676,0.004013471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006443662,0.0003505783,0.0005807669,0.002476586,0.01186494,0.002291408,0.002241511,0.003935095,0.0003287738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1233577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1742045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931606,0.0005718002,0.00006996358,0.0006159209,0.003346297,0.002235346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977598,0.0004145775,0.0001314551,0.000171917,0.001155646,0.0003665608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001778631,0.000005176008,0.00108019,0.00003409594,0.00001276196,0.0001120626,0.004300536,0.0005052811,0.0002278531,0.9668422,0.01696832,0.009893808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004080858,0.00002085854,0.02717546,0.0002647029,0.0001211316,0.0001565221,0.009142586,0.002613859,0.0007755586,0.1809586,0.7785876,0.0001422855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0753158,0.006238245,0.005282183,0.09784704,0.0006037964,0.0000534614,0.000527193,0.0001248121,0.8140076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414252,0.002650914,0.002117177,0.007658346,0.000121154,0.00002679302,0.0002113263,0.00004311029,0.04574597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1233577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31139685","doi":"10.1002/acn3.770","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: a Global Template?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Bloodworth","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Coleman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Errol P. Mendes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Allan Rock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01209229238798827,"gpt":0.2476136278835664,"spread":0.2355213354955781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103749,0.0007784805,0.001318475,0.002784989,0.01718312,0.01724954,0.004066519,0.009674532,0.01170557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02790141,0.000531302,0.000932445,0.005869705,0.01716896,0.006920237,0.005095545,0.01531867,0.00109767],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1536852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4327618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859543,0.001225242,0.0006451093,0.001493542,0.006182015,0.004499764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768304,0.002805609,0.001008636,0.0009330233,0.01223371,0.006188559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007598793,0.0001202209,0.01557934,0.0003299639,0.00004928777,0.0007843112,0.007044853,0.0007092652,0.0003450696,0.3682353,0.5023972,0.1043293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004455143,0.00004606315,0.026759,0.001537464,0.00005363463,0.0003432739,0.01676893,0.0009603229,0.0002643103,0.04719653,0.905788,0.0002379517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01192005,0.0186811,0.001604309,0.8858675,0.005960588,0.0001087327,0.001732454,0.0001039236,0.07402129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.447548,0.04446205,0.01023559,0.4048139,0.002848409,0.0002797004,0.00231417,0.0004187631,0.0870795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8463148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230639928","doi":"","title":"Embedding Environmental Rights in Section 7 of the Canadian \"Charter\": Resolving the Tension Between the Need for Precaution and the Need for Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Section (typography); Embedding; Law; Tension (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Advertising; Compression (physics)","authors":[{"name":"David W.-L. Wu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01332486221887336,"gpt":0.2512878125561648,"spread":0.2379629503372915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0204669,0.0009167779,0.001224318,0.002723955,0.02387172,0.01935791,0.005936216,0.02265995,0.00746248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0303793,0.001151984,0.001500207,0.002867366,0.0352763,0.006903308,0.006843706,0.02134328,0.0007742167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1136189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4188585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9647847,0.006571223,0.001021644,0.002876587,0.01530767,0.00943816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778504,0.0067322,0.0009346613,0.001737334,0.009847487,0.002897954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133207,0.00001807068,0.0003867067,0.00003999823,0.000007908386,0.0000611222,0.004336007,0.0005153255,0.0003153236,0.9650011,0.0244578,0.004847404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008211695,0.00004917471,0.005716434,0.0006849777,0.0001069335,0.0001150067,0.008194265,0.001869674,0.001451727,0.286294,0.6950339,0.0004017814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03300413,0.002728964,0.01349751,0.2055361,0.002211402,0.0002905386,0.00072498,0.0002467046,0.7417597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7035626,0.002289384,0.03378263,0.09722751,0.0008394209,0.000423544,0.000421649,0.0003151371,0.1611382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1136189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8243667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"M.H. Tse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01250135321138379,"gpt":0.2754712596877646,"spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004579517,0.0008298114,0.001058812,0.004165928,0.02154346,0.01536884,0.004251808,0.009672504,0.01092566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01529272,0.0009036357,0.001486031,0.005348413,0.01814496,0.003691627,0.003061598,0.01053257,0.0008023538],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1499142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2019173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838874,0.001195762,0.0002472686,0.0009292343,0.009013984,0.004726459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994188,0.001387275,0.000182819,0.0003035821,0.003330393,0.0006078829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008544373,0.000005733637,0.0002372594,0.00001301021,0.000004809741,0.00004428426,0.0006347194,0.0001667262,0.00004828439,0.9860376,0.01066683,0.002132085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002158689,0.0000509107,0.01523478,0.0005399016,0.0003570196,0.0001760208,0.006717233,0.004471547,0.001207201,0.4580678,0.512677,0.0002848144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04434946,0.003652818,0.004848705,0.05636086,0.000409897,0.0003403859,0.001200498,0.00006096219,0.8887764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8190404,0.0035292,0.005550314,0.01881668,0.0003026469,0.000276149,0.0003440857,0.0001292371,0.1520114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1499142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98050972","doi":"","title":"\"Bruker v. Marcovitz\": (Get)ting Over Freedoms (Like Contract and Religion) in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"M.H. Ogilvie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008248387706292095,"gpt":0.2424491782418516,"spread":0.2342007905355594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002917671,0.0004499184,0.0004338198,0.0009878071,0.03437359,0.008286584,0.002155517,0.01014284,0.01012664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00964557,0.000589679,0.0005086627,0.001837439,0.009077447,0.002494888,0.00385285,0.01123152,0.0005258697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1080659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2995378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951443,0.0004426599,0.00008834735,0.0004095233,0.001375976,0.002539157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967975,0.0007549939,0.0001221166,0.00009814651,0.001103044,0.001124106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008219806,0.00003498879,0.007865489,0.00008475711,0.00002608576,0.0006049451,0.01118368,0.0005853795,0.0004665061,0.7864196,0.1790846,0.01356187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685086,0.00004140379,0.02969085,0.0004393634,0.0001342764,0.00023916,0.02195532,0.001786064,0.001589746,0.06048112,0.8832086,0.0002655268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1499698,0.009162414,0.001536731,0.3505157,0.001628798,0.0001829269,0.00137265,0.0001062616,0.4855247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6987202,0.002911455,0.0006988969,0.06769736,0.0002352409,0.00008332794,0.0001742297,0.0000853398,0.229394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1080659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.784077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802592240","doi":"","title":"What Should Canada’s Promised New National Accessibility Law Include?: A Discussion Paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04145766638207853,"gpt":0.3177230709955922,"spread":0.2762654046135137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02800732,0.0006922395,0.001576127,0.00275164,0.02408433,0.03170402,0.007280842,0.0402284,0.01378764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05566365,0.0009266267,0.001707121,0.004314668,0.01160932,0.01380553,0.005195196,0.0253582,0.001182399],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1502558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3255856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9646037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9654272,0.004408424,0.001097547,0.002145734,0.01596667,0.01095439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337078,0.02928445,0.001544019,0.001474405,0.02859318,0.005396104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001141813,0.0001410783,0.004413818,0.0005160217,0.00009254344,0.0003601364,0.01139927,0.0008050354,0.0003575009,0.5204334,0.4463218,0.01504508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000972448,0.00003702546,0.01196247,0.001660261,0.0002887526,0.00009284793,0.03678544,0.001025135,0.0008363713,0.03882342,0.9081311,0.0002599303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0157163,0.006743908,0.0007170659,0.8397526,0.002910008,0.00009968656,0.0007840514,0.00003185068,0.1332446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4088038,0.007389988,0.002545239,0.5115907,0.002508573,0.0002204376,0.0005268126,0.0001356244,0.06627886],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8497441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279420640","doi":"","title":"Canada's Supreme Court, Constitutional Principles, Federalism, and the 1998 Quebec Secession Reference Case: Toxic Wine in a Very Old Bottle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Secession; Supreme court; Law; Wine; Bottle; Political science; Art; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Michael D. Behiels","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02029996763542845,"gpt":0.2458453635924874,"spread":0.2255453959570589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004420686,0.0003974434,0.0007761395,0.001528352,0.02634498,0.01278947,0.003416438,0.01190564,0.010804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01181972,0.000547074,0.0005833738,0.003405348,0.009050952,0.003188196,0.001638013,0.01047576,0.0004520144],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1419485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1855341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958199,0.0005717571,0.00007898277,0.0003758439,0.001325719,0.001827714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934421,0.002467015,0.0003440627,0.0002402806,0.002545136,0.0009615055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001179504,0.00007965101,0.008396077,0.00006656043,0.00003690358,0.0005279382,0.006379541,0.0008135327,0.0002716366,0.8205131,0.1508756,0.01192163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000399204,0.00007463851,0.08633842,0.0008633964,0.0003249451,0.0002017113,0.02671955,0.004132703,0.001331659,0.1044472,0.774721,0.0004456251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2216733,0.009024072,0.00112087,0.3313614,0.0008324286,0.0001150483,0.00197029,0.00005968855,0.4338429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369222,0.002386556,0.0007328775,0.03797964,0.0002306578,0.0000921128,0.000285514,0.00004270444,0.1213276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8580515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590765334","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Spending Power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","authors":[{"name":"Bérard Frédéric","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05216058820681362,"gpt":0.2924536003508084,"spread":0.2402930121439947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004555082,0.0004807619,0.001171061,0.002598033,0.02887224,0.01742835,0.003432994,0.007833365,0.01360459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279604,0.0006268271,0.0009989486,0.005722255,0.00965147,0.003837088,0.00635157,0.009698826,0.0004464262],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2343876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5164987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889601,0.0008993765,0.000193585,0.0006174837,0.002476773,0.006852655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868282,0.001800776,0.0005693824,0.0002473538,0.003290015,0.007264336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001856916,0.0001527744,0.0357014,0.0003833596,0.0001672338,0.0008569186,0.02388118,0.002900904,0.0007470272,0.714874,0.1737813,0.04636814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001524475,0.00007111325,0.1072709,0.001068568,0.0001891614,0.0001715348,0.04922343,0.00278845,0.0007063408,0.04757718,0.7903626,0.0004182847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2759002,0.01395132,0.001059217,0.4952881,0.001300324,0.0001260235,0.001547061,0.0000851905,0.2107425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8971907,0.005128689,0.0008093959,0.03205181,0.0002507042,0.00007020443,0.0002428917,0.0001007123,0.06415486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2343876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8880019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182529916","doi":"","title":"\"Auton\" and \"Chaoulli\": Who Decides the Future of Health Care in Canada?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false},{"name":"S. Zachary Green","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01393487150850771,"gpt":0.2181913222740833,"spread":0.2042564507655756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058436,0.0002915009,0.0007207384,0.001697275,0.008980992,0.01238553,0.001667029,0.006744431,0.008683995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02035568,0.0003078126,0.0005496227,0.00291811,0.009129411,0.005357797,0.002086367,0.007444806,0.0003943475],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.163455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2486884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945737,0.001034992,0.0001272365,0.0003058997,0.001369778,0.002588554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859481,0.00346064,0.001066828,0.0001840834,0.004928287,0.004411964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002546316,0.00007639801,0.05091702,0.0001750865,0.0000895276,0.0003586485,0.005570289,0.003260682,0.0001506388,0.685972,0.2213986,0.03177648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001996921,0.0000565353,0.1352968,0.001527013,0.0002590588,0.0002235995,0.04100701,0.01309626,0.0006464898,0.3080281,0.4991775,0.0004820294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.08592596,0.01104868,0.0006959233,0.8377652,0.0007078225,0.00002926382,0.001408032,0.00002542053,0.0623937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383095,0.005723271,0.0005410776,0.0387293,0.0005163828,0.00002004249,0.00028743,0.00003029262,0.01584258],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.163455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279648004","doi":"","title":"The \"Charter\", Poverty Rights and the Space Between: Exploring Social Movements as a Forum for Advancing Social and Economic Rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Space (punctuation); Political science; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Yavar Hameed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Niiti Simmonds","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02994539334027635,"gpt":0.2542416446116925,"spread":0.2242962512714162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003378229,0.0003906887,0.0005345005,0.001914365,0.05103102,0.02278963,0.002620693,0.00549882,0.01237027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070927,0.000439949,0.0004653896,0.004469271,0.03458085,0.005594581,0.009291274,0.006971753,0.0002862945],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1768174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3872112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945406,0.001218309,0.00006811313,0.0003473734,0.0009299867,0.002895519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960194,0.001464863,0.0002247027,0.0001176661,0.0006295155,0.001543881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185192,0.000060336,0.004949395,0.00007681289,0.00001147782,0.0002740088,0.1272635,0.0008182786,0.0002414034,0.8303919,0.01407579,0.02179518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006113835,0.00003883363,0.01761013,0.0003457961,0.00004302392,0.00007955828,0.4612876,0.001890926,0.0004425639,0.1156776,0.402414,0.0001088584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4545521,0.002883767,0.003240974,0.1240968,0.0003001517,0.0001864961,0.0003094774,0.00004849066,0.4143817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611329,0.000748531,0.0007756618,0.00229177,0.00002021619,0.00004389594,0.0000336251,0.00003211204,0.03492123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1768174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9547751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W968103359","doi":"","title":"Trends in Applications for Leave to Intervene in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Gary Β. Magee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02424618332448678,"gpt":0.2877375730537424,"spread":0.2634913897292556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007247498,0.0003420847,0.001201236,0.00708894,0.01351312,0.01441635,0.004592466,0.00606206,0.009653144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045896,0.0006988805,0.0009310498,0.01144681,0.005947451,0.002274627,0.003144036,0.01184034,0.0008137763],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1398473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1987407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.975265,0.0015245,0.0006301552,0.002238333,0.01083754,0.009504499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082379,0.01863355,0.008328817,0.0016313,0.03758867,0.02557972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005891136,0.0003212719,0.2730282,0.0006113731,0.0002732031,0.001178154,0.02828997,0.002700184,0.002023712,0.2467738,0.3225137,0.1216974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008200215,0.00007677075,0.6725004,0.0006449273,0.0001085085,0.0002726794,0.02284325,0.001767789,0.0007728095,0.006961227,0.293772,0.0001976735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.516783,0.01499112,0.001759909,0.2282002,0.001180922,0.0002108934,0.006059551,0.0003387069,0.2304756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462534,0.003678506,0.0004538056,0.01536685,0.0003213285,0.00005631657,0.001424391,0.0001411191,0.03230432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254183191","doi":"","title":"The Contract Clause Comes to Canada: The British Columbia \"Health Services\" Case and the Sanctity of Collective Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01282865137004936,"gpt":0.2437861796722954,"spread":0.2309575283022461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007233486,0.0007419399,0.001468711,0.002691453,0.0541228,0.02339916,0.004921856,0.02866922,0.01255912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0217658,0.001249696,0.001009726,0.005734761,0.03458081,0.006600582,0.007998597,0.02174513,0.0007323952],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1517186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2764209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836073,0.00252396,0.000275991,0.0009642725,0.003788828,0.008839611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876462,0.005450319,0.0006027897,0.0005209964,0.003080601,0.002699206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004482486,0.00003776317,0.001914414,0.00003643137,0.00002151213,0.0005366463,0.008176503,0.000491358,0.0000803521,0.9591382,0.02568827,0.003833776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161646,0.00006631365,0.01890676,0.001469754,0.000421348,0.000635824,0.1000401,0.00443513,0.0007889542,0.4522056,0.420124,0.0004899551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1286504,0.003831468,0.001298669,0.1482866,0.000434878,0.0001006099,0.0003133809,0.00003127717,0.7170526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103016,0.001664161,0.0004912083,0.0205481,0.0001656294,0.00008887514,0.00007362641,0.00004841403,0.06661847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1517186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185958079","doi":"","title":"Federalizing Canada's Securities Regulatory Regime: Insights from the Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Franco Barbiero","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02583997308384504,"gpt":0.2463340956138175,"spread":0.2204941225299725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007752217,0.0002566095,0.0006117541,0.001911959,0.03596052,0.01514025,0.002094035,0.00641279,0.00721958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01954449,0.0004979439,0.0004614039,0.006173484,0.009023109,0.002674125,0.003698183,0.008159656,0.0003016879],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.218378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2809034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875355,0.001915369,0.0002080425,0.0005411428,0.004462379,0.005337479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856118,0.004965542,0.0006805223,0.0004651854,0.005204491,0.003072473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001935687,0.0002764075,0.03396362,0.0002153953,0.00008642532,0.001454124,0.1983078,0.002698619,0.001421915,0.6307108,0.07560886,0.05506253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000846928,0.0001210935,0.1388396,0.0003946599,0.00009436557,0.0002247379,0.1121289,0.001884068,0.001071968,0.0200233,0.7248992,0.00023348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878174,0.002773011,0.0009498142,0.1033977,0.0002401392,0.0001523695,0.0004783738,0.00004765649,0.3041436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362452,0.001314783,0.0004229615,0.008345636,0.00004434579,0.00003983776,0.0001026489,0.00002791061,0.0534568],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.218378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275501760","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Clash between the Prerogative Power to Conduct Foreign Affairs and the \"Charter in Prime Minister of Canada et al v. Omar Khadr\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Physics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Errol P. Mendes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01556146896768624,"gpt":0.2294685615515281,"spread":0.2139070925838419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007993366,0.0005437909,0.0005057313,0.0007708395,0.01370705,0.009295888,0.002054717,0.01165243,0.002918274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01474198,0.0004529713,0.0004715568,0.001055795,0.01201523,0.002524358,0.002993734,0.01569817,0.0009036281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02446647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09160271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6723388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8379652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991882,0.001266118,0.0002683547,0.0007836698,0.003608741,0.002191044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948099,0.001817493,0.0003529092,0.0003442312,0.002125444,0.00054991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002704607,0.00001486133,0.0003335664,0.00003841419,0.000008047698,0.0001122826,0.004912875,0.0001305454,0.0003760332,0.8593199,0.1272015,0.007524879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006458801,0.00003538638,0.003394513,0.0001945956,0.00004802121,0.0002023665,0.002788759,0.0005646738,0.001601937,0.06184908,0.9291623,0.00009389607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03027134,0.004032153,0.006192015,0.3542775,0.004976877,0.0002049781,0.0003199858,0.0003871215,0.5993381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5322041,0.001350394,0.005788772,0.2377242,0.0012762,0.0001403902,0.0001099739,0.0001893475,0.2212166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6591816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Daly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01987016449860858,"gpt":0.2900390755757322,"spread":0.2701689110771237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006327279,0.0005208987,0.0005110572,0.001925516,0.0356224,0.007083528,0.003912273,0.009120815,0.005255148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01281762,0.0005390623,0.0007248393,0.005395335,0.009305524,0.002207882,0.004720208,0.007320363,0.0004228234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09685224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1574634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891272,0.001673522,0.000257761,0.0006379734,0.003020798,0.005282712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919456,0.002421288,0.0005979715,0.0004078212,0.002331003,0.002296272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561332,0.0002992919,0.04845449,0.0004187174,0.0000743608,0.07363658,0.1001677,0.003293186,0.001068814,0.5725127,0.1456634,0.05425461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009194228,0.0001807269,0.03600238,0.0008837548,0.0001416841,0.01672485,0.1956572,0.002449359,0.001789566,0.01463079,0.7311882,0.0002596315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686098,0.005834748,0.005537396,0.1310908,0.0008975322,0.0005316655,0.001004422,0.0001337642,0.28636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182339,0.003679656,0.002776158,0.01611494,0.0001263625,0.0001599265,0.0002801444,0.00007714286,0.05855192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09685224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7027155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268499598","doi":"","title":"Whether the \"Constitution Act\" has made a difference for First Nations?: Impact of the 1982 Constitution on First Nations: Reflections on Section 35","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David C. Nahwegahbow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicole D.O. Richmond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05504278559855365,"gpt":0.2897075039663778,"spread":0.2346647183678242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01482701,0.0004182766,0.0009857593,0.001679139,0.02255701,0.01512239,0.003045413,0.02365128,0.01243282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02836482,0.0005821552,0.0009845443,0.002801378,0.03058014,0.01055778,0.005772803,0.02285826,0.0007429722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06611481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1425023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8588982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8890254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863312,0.002481263,0.00030799,0.001323769,0.003037831,0.006517979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870535,0.007379937,0.0007926179,0.000458106,0.002795571,0.001520228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002502589,0.00002409851,0.0007101496,0.00005558037,0.00001103083,0.000102481,0.01045668,0.00006982358,0.00006659754,0.9363143,0.04726907,0.0048951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008239981,0.0000365202,0.01341427,0.0009789952,0.0000794344,0.00009103379,0.02313216,0.0001359211,0.0005614763,0.12815,0.8331979,0.0001399381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02756062,0.01559428,0.0003483842,0.6626204,0.003812307,0.00003816105,0.0003155573,0.00001783854,0.2896924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5080534,0.007793565,0.0007010841,0.3851101,0.00254801,0.0001278191,0.0001488046,0.0001068841,0.09541048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1411018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4796988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Beaton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01471896982157139,"gpt":0.2902955722324222,"spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006846845,0.0002740815,0.000674329,0.00142674,0.0279482,0.01648831,0.00375174,0.008731845,0.00306103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145222,0.0004268222,0.0005425618,0.002748935,0.02651382,0.00347639,0.003266915,0.01094429,0.0002093311],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1388129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1627769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913917,0.0009771626,0.0002342113,0.001162446,0.003432885,0.002801656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922091,0.003472113,0.0003086949,0.0003357111,0.002711519,0.0009628945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001122529,0.000008078979,0.0007899887,0.00003835714,0.000008687828,0.0001833565,0.01026402,0.0001647796,0.00013676,0.9719155,0.01192183,0.004557225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949701,0.00003544766,0.01247589,0.000767479,0.0001216936,0.0002211078,0.01868278,0.001775731,0.0008671603,0.2625983,0.702125,0.0002597531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1613107,0.03127628,0.003588947,0.2456548,0.002204524,0.0001114585,0.0005007743,0.0001155083,0.5552371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073428,0.00415846,0.001785417,0.03675143,0.0005068276,0.00004834741,0.0001011872,0.00004969931,0.0492559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1388129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Robitaille","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04127155449291715,"gpt":0.2834743800357117,"spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03884812,0.0007196903,0.0008849811,0.002932659,0.02265641,0.01518495,0.002240594,0.01199947,0.002573932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03864401,0.000681137,0.0007673074,0.002794111,0.06698523,0.01318353,0.01284417,0.0178579,0.0002814268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02225932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03918273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1361309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1749167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9729954,0.01584144,0.001432331,0.001849424,0.00467283,0.003208534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731477,0.02140722,0.001157056,0.00106942,0.002537788,0.0006808394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006610231,0.000004107581,0.0002391929,0.00004392581,0.000005221125,0.0001967029,0.0122583,0.00009256714,0.0001468627,0.980437,0.002649383,0.003920188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004340009,0.00002050091,0.001157639,0.001067685,0.00003953519,0.0002341502,0.01634112,0.0008048966,0.0009185426,0.7858294,0.1934791,0.00006404326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07802366,0.02354081,0.04198245,0.4519241,0.002776062,0.0004461576,0.0001136734,0.00004488109,0.4011482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908374,0.008537308,0.01357382,0.0530747,0.00147776,0.000401411,0.00003876619,0.00006990548,0.03198897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1361309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228178568","doi":"","title":"Canadian Citizens and the Others: The Failure of the Federal Court to Ensure the Respect of International Law for Non-Citizens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stewart Istvanffy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01668669166852979,"gpt":0.2481304286469156,"spread":0.2314437369783858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01252317,0.0006103535,0.0008284671,0.002466213,0.07012638,0.01658654,0.0051968,0.01649042,0.009780605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04085719,0.0007946342,0.001094727,0.004338081,0.02145132,0.004823437,0.00520081,0.01897839,0.0005311501],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1922308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4146165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795653,0.002425681,0.0004151691,0.001628332,0.006712044,0.009253596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751514,0.006853382,0.001113754,0.001066993,0.009971601,0.00584293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001362364,0.00009612479,0.01030431,0.0001084855,0.0001084173,0.001104124,0.04769695,0.0006253334,0.0005400241,0.6850784,0.2151063,0.03909526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001836505,0.00006966374,0.05191787,0.0006765136,0.0003990601,0.0004777125,0.09095524,0.001636725,0.001603936,0.07075153,0.780628,0.0006999559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1618579,0.004415656,0.001133959,0.4691641,0.001428931,0.000148869,0.0003771515,0.00007824193,0.3613951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8863844,0.001676737,0.001181247,0.05764318,0.0002736525,0.0000593604,0.00008674794,0.00009767146,0.05259698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9368978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64516891","doi":"","title":"Canada, Secularity and a Constitutional Monarchy","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Philosophy; History; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert W. Thompson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01429547535388989,"gpt":0.2491053731318362,"spread":0.2348098977779463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002431245,0.0002804307,0.0006450947,0.001963128,0.01893454,0.01238036,0.001397586,0.00337032,0.01696631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009253322,0.0003434344,0.0003325554,0.004042659,0.0160497,0.00294152,0.002665994,0.00543249,0.000653604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1037462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1686166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961179,0.0004457245,0.00007665761,0.0004078297,0.001203271,0.001748585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956776,0.00103514,0.0002332691,0.0002369821,0.001829544,0.0009874076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428766,0.000005280322,0.0007000502,0.00001594514,0.00000539166,0.00003101394,0.0008481242,0.0001589316,0.00002940547,0.9810176,0.01392699,0.003247011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008312897,0.00001805736,0.01400791,0.0003000135,0.00006688722,0.00007854364,0.00632909,0.0008802979,0.0002494708,0.3886759,0.5892356,0.00007511731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04658879,0.007967992,0.0007736111,0.07122824,0.0003104146,0.00003637411,0.000545133,0.0000545465,0.8724949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734935,0.00369686,0.0006161944,0.007413952,0.0001953867,0.00003249837,0.0001419788,0.00005956843,0.1143501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1037462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7527351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999539695","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Permanent Military Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David McNairn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007870559035556541,"gpt":0.2233335076362398,"spread":0.2154629486006832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003564901,0.0002130506,0.0007148396,0.002129245,0.01830067,0.01250096,0.002881723,0.006890764,0.04571324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089427,0.0004659427,0.0005784935,0.004625262,0.005741693,0.005133164,0.002547873,0.005812229,0.001986693],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1094344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2860904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914269,0.0006030314,0.0001647897,0.0005059395,0.002043894,0.005255465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752294,0.003864004,0.001389049,0.000680759,0.01097483,0.007861949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003625076,0.0001741595,0.06241782,0.0003668894,0.0001293134,0.0007172787,0.006632295,0.0005893512,0.0004459533,0.5233073,0.3521226,0.05273452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002372816,0.00008032542,0.1061304,0.001295845,0.0001959589,0.000280627,0.05108313,0.000656199,0.0006554998,0.03026147,0.8089015,0.0002216953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1924839,0.005879561,0.0003787532,0.3116312,0.0013052,0.00009885732,0.003196179,0.00005928959,0.484967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8717487,0.003105015,0.000473705,0.04151586,0.0002356634,0.00004908405,0.0007478427,0.00006557488,0.08205847],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8905656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7940061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Sutton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01204942171878944,"gpt":0.2346356043731855,"spread":0.2225861826543961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009774516,0.0003696458,0.0005082582,0.001373161,0.03388837,0.01464329,0.004047762,0.02336241,0.004424892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01985707,0.0006035034,0.0006913072,0.001781877,0.02832484,0.006327537,0.004895832,0.01735357,0.0002197304],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07681996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2057098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868325,0.003099488,0.0003664877,0.001088482,0.003803515,0.004809545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927424,0.003815737,0.0005657772,0.0002559097,0.00179152,0.0008285742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000168845,0.0000251544,0.00135235,0.00004573901,0.000008763868,0.0003772697,0.02221481,0.0002663699,0.0001124344,0.9350793,0.03476945,0.005731453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377718,0.00007749256,0.01576632,0.001191019,0.0001754115,0.0004546111,0.1016048,0.002417016,0.001774641,0.3014044,0.5746953,0.0003012083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1463958,0.00878766,0.003995774,0.4983451,0.000935355,0.0002629055,0.0005349392,0.00007736206,0.340665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873199,0.002331794,0.001534718,0.06750403,0.0002177011,0.00007668541,0.00006926391,0.00003748389,0.05502939],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.92318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557656702","doi":"","title":"The Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism: The Intergovermental Safeguards","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Wade K. Wright","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01645280782813708,"gpt":0.2615479931444465,"spread":0.2450951853163095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006623376,0.0005181289,0.000579253,0.002531422,0.01585643,0.01342581,0.002121797,0.003602843,0.008262282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01972161,0.0004225985,0.0008586657,0.003087318,0.0252838,0.005096807,0.003948609,0.007022767,0.0003972427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1049965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2179077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9597481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898266,0.001602433,0.0001717727,0.0007801686,0.004540368,0.003078672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918972,0.001683761,0.0004954918,0.001159311,0.003698155,0.001066019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014332,0.000006408176,0.0005489024,0.0000226061,0.000007498393,0.00001634644,0.001272965,0.0003958612,0.00005577264,0.9794764,0.00667777,0.0115051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003393197,0.0000203277,0.01266558,0.0003690122,0.00005867836,0.00004456549,0.005300635,0.002017692,0.000521219,0.6364492,0.3424188,0.0001003495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05718474,0.01076395,0.008439521,0.1447398,0.0008606796,0.00007591205,0.0005434109,0.0001269365,0.777265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469996,0.003144136,0.003708791,0.005331486,0.0002304436,0.00003621421,0.0001201616,0.00005705429,0.04037218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1049965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7618062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Patricia Hughes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06012035141865464,"gpt":0.3314063545271241,"spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01114331,0.0004269545,0.000706884,0.002357801,0.02341184,0.0195424,0.002335503,0.01085903,0.007599606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03301128,0.0007787399,0.0005573111,0.004124104,0.03216936,0.01090096,0.006635399,0.008854475,0.0003950043],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1705939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3107015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864029,0.002652288,0.0007141554,0.001277235,0.005063555,0.003889902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799951,0.006392067,0.001604262,0.000877413,0.006856216,0.004275024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152542,0.00001477129,0.004303871,0.000100251,0.00001405971,0.000143682,0.02620695,0.00025663,0.0001403429,0.8977685,0.05705899,0.01396035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005894727,0.00003360204,0.03870069,0.0009105116,0.00007171266,0.0001216989,0.02805799,0.000637166,0.0003060862,0.232304,0.6985385,0.0002590958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08576065,0.02463931,0.004734376,0.5841986,0.001676437,0.0002484033,0.001295726,0.00006886626,0.2973776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294109,0.009375297,0.005135495,0.02911963,0.0008370394,0.0001878787,0.0002332244,0.0001455196,0.125555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288138134","doi":"","title":"Federal Court of Appeal De-Rails Equality Rights for Persons With Disabilities: \"Via Rail v. Canadian Transportation Agency\" and the Important Duty Not to Create New Barriers to Accessibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Duty; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01623098254764939,"gpt":0.2832535096587471,"spread":0.2670225271110977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004917993,0.0006793795,0.0008650269,0.001609762,0.01811501,0.006734567,0.003284099,0.01973419,0.0115539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01157327,0.0008976674,0.001197624,0.001553092,0.00462459,0.00188004,0.002971935,0.01077699,0.001472789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04316815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1172497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9636977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911012,0.0005821614,0.0002793734,0.0006186214,0.003313014,0.004105573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954941,0.001224019,0.0001211273,0.000257775,0.002387728,0.0005151939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009781744,0.00009304458,0.003490642,0.0001017469,0.00003280081,0.0005639537,0.005411266,0.0003800412,0.001081425,0.6118762,0.3636323,0.01323879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001643885,0.00006805566,0.02214638,0.0004410718,0.0002043118,0.0002334895,0.004384715,0.001293942,0.001535187,0.02568583,0.943615,0.0002275996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.05595902,0.003225482,0.002646064,0.1603995,0.002975322,0.0006829696,0.004086346,0.0002643388,0.7697609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4386154,0.00178152,0.002573095,0.1253496,0.0006581058,0.0004580879,0.00091065,0.00008688898,0.4295667],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3132083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286880886","doi":"","title":"\"Render Unto Caesar…\": Using the Freedom of Conscience and Religion to Challenge Canadian Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Tonkovich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0540997260953207,"gpt":0.3027252114588052,"spread":0.2486254853634845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004530324,0.0004321482,0.0003774697,0.00118544,0.03053915,0.01094961,0.002098327,0.007499361,0.01004009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01919941,0.0003619763,0.0006236679,0.001274913,0.02018232,0.004028449,0.004279425,0.008523988,0.0006366082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09295546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1503724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942067,0.000946001,0.00007060624,0.0004207632,0.001929377,0.002426531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955102,0.001508602,0.0001343871,0.0003601047,0.001722121,0.0007646202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003930224,0.00002347513,0.001093696,0.0000210774,0.000008623204,0.00009087725,0.01072787,0.0005399744,0.0001772837,0.9382195,0.03961508,0.009443145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001301711,0.00004713912,0.009676022,0.000267216,0.0001083387,0.00008546333,0.03288716,0.002498003,0.001303599,0.2883175,0.6644819,0.0001974386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08250895,0.001443644,0.003198296,0.126995,0.0007902354,0.00008838901,0.000180735,0.00008159724,0.7847131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8758216,0.000528175,0.001531913,0.01681183,0.000112325,0.00006079536,0.00004087298,0.00007023484,0.1050223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09295546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1034034791","doi":"","title":"Canadian Leadership in Latin America: in Constitutional Terms","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Irvin Studin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07922056073633844,"gpt":0.2778791955390536,"spread":0.1986586348027152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002761282,0.0003811561,0.0003941329,0.003312457,0.02516174,0.01306614,0.001410851,0.002800112,0.01699306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955968,0.0002654127,0.0003022833,0.008862178,0.01028093,0.002558001,0.003052663,0.004644793,0.0005377121],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1874696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1917543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950175,0.0007125232,0.0000782116,0.0003805589,0.001061671,0.002749536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960789,0.0006521703,0.0002097255,0.0001400452,0.001857352,0.001061857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004618872,0.00002859664,0.005329092,0.00006617346,0.00001118986,0.0001764469,0.01661767,0.0002458708,0.0001268666,0.914858,0.04514666,0.01734731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005405342,0.00001945157,0.03713536,0.0003075139,0.0000368496,0.00008028431,0.03652539,0.0003473934,0.0002033471,0.03383714,0.8913877,0.00006550415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08575813,0.007119749,0.0007236974,0.1194989,0.0004992616,0.00008313777,0.0007194862,0.00006884499,0.7855287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863893,0.003528154,0.000725729,0.009249321,0.0001712576,0.00007196718,0.0002403268,0.00005418512,0.122066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1874696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. Perlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0171675608478357,"gpt":0.2436749021350067,"spread":0.226507341287171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01656203,0.0008354345,0.001717493,0.004206317,0.0223922,0.01847367,0.009160521,0.02874668,0.005604703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04982969,0.0010053,0.001222852,0.005281692,0.03252551,0.004812108,0.004160037,0.02627181,0.0005963058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09603207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.162015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804561,0.003267736,0.0006632752,0.001947833,0.009536318,0.004128749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726986,0.01464241,0.0005980974,0.0008163876,0.009749743,0.00149483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005371183,0.00001463596,0.001126176,0.00007470352,0.00004359259,0.0002689892,0.006386743,0.0004080643,0.0001240655,0.8992158,0.08366428,0.008619242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002904091,0.00004104463,0.01030733,0.001988396,0.0005242924,0.0002713954,0.0141533,0.003592275,0.00108573,0.5275043,0.439813,0.0004283933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04351227,0.009162737,0.005529084,0.5399894,0.001990914,0.0001575757,0.001303919,0.0001174641,0.3982366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8000338,0.003093454,0.003583533,0.140963,0.001289012,0.0001699032,0.0002132882,0.0001681968,0.05048572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09603207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129899286","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Follow International Law","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law","authors":[{"name":"Cassandra Kirewskie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02576789029707875,"gpt":0.2787476493507047,"spread":0.252979759053626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006389317,0.0005786204,0.0009375169,0.00257184,0.0192219,0.01921957,0.003335997,0.02554689,0.04353021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03006964,0.0007109647,0.001318553,0.003561319,0.008654436,0.007613025,0.004943499,0.01505261,0.006865157],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07117848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2620308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9773606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832805,0.001027161,0.0003859038,0.001386613,0.006052251,0.007867658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811507,0.002076363,0.0005611017,0.001127551,0.01200297,0.003081285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005418868,0.00005821398,0.001887155,0.0001011982,0.00004236591,0.0001786877,0.001629816,0.000210068,0.0001913226,0.5846302,0.3978747,0.01314228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005689196,0.00001794041,0.003523588,0.0002620232,0.00006318252,0.00005937084,0.003357221,0.0002083623,0.0003769816,0.04189125,0.9500882,0.0000949118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009475669,0.003396344,0.0005206928,0.3106811,0.003449513,0.00009729079,0.00107701,0.0001349449,0.6711674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1672313,0.00335545,0.001277413,0.3364262,0.001003827,0.000162981,0.0006522333,0.0002470105,0.4896436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5164385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard G. Ogden","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03716799095065223,"gpt":0.2717512029331928,"spread":0.2345832119825405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362184,0.0002704439,0.0005190149,0.001983789,0.02987329,0.005716844,0.001984518,0.004373941,0.01068639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01282239,0.001160036,0.0005275788,0.005442963,0.004844722,0.001617572,0.002965888,0.004424644,0.0005709268],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1441782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2289027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945595,0.0003572105,0.000205241,0.0003629107,0.002093024,0.002422146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918922,0.002376483,0.0008298201,0.0004034493,0.002625292,0.001872697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004192327,0.000180318,0.0858335,0.000570207,0.0001562205,0.003791223,0.04892868,0.001320682,0.001203393,0.3987164,0.4266796,0.03220057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001388207,0.00003941049,0.2890263,0.000333497,0.0001114441,0.0003189482,0.02518197,0.0005541682,0.0005649409,0.008646774,0.6749743,0.0001095098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.433716,0.007629968,0.0005299018,0.07037962,0.0004880898,0.000446317,0.01171279,0.0001009886,0.4749963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6429442,0.003530173,0.0007871946,0.0105711,0.0001652468,0.0003493851,0.001450209,0.0000502024,0.3401524],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06374453824057522,"gpt":0.2878263210930261,"spread":0.2240817828524509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272837,0.0007393609,0.001549828,0.00241995,0.03602817,0.02393753,0.005532932,0.04909398,0.03503398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05480888,0.0009783603,0.001529544,0.002769834,0.0158964,0.008960318,0.006097198,0.02610791,0.008236819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06779373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3753239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979076,0.001471406,0.0005443592,0.001533359,0.007252766,0.01012202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088765,0.006441918,0.00153383,0.002498063,0.04480901,0.03584071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000424639,0.00005763639,0.001774163,0.00006345689,0.00003816508,0.0001159708,0.001095937,0.0001199364,0.0001637231,0.05797939,0.9276898,0.01085933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000380483,0.00001969788,0.00347819,0.0002289653,0.00004075429,0.00002821874,0.004727585,0.0002384532,0.0002024158,0.01081022,0.9800625,0.0001248769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002931726,0.002006317,0.0002506597,0.9369838,0.0105271,0.00004632203,0.0002794762,0.0001363488,0.04683822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05038715,0.002235129,0.001716739,0.6670072,0.003212,0.00007805424,0.0002789574,0.0002318865,0.274853],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4918802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543676754","doi":"","title":"Qualifier ou Graduer?: L’application de la “Charte canadienne des droits et libertés” aux Universités","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Noura Karazivan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01727183472408289,"gpt":0.2558475628391498,"spread":0.2385757281150669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862139,0.00045629,0.0005527947,0.002067701,0.02518879,0.01416042,0.002316948,0.006246357,0.01138608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01720921,0.0004332313,0.000464687,0.004896171,0.02672683,0.006580118,0.004866214,0.008747712,0.0008571089],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1165684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1971805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9589656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908456,0.002289916,0.0002679394,0.0009005629,0.002611838,0.003084178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942251,0.001813259,0.0003181862,0.0003185469,0.002195954,0.001128975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001738151,0.000009924081,0.001735753,0.0000511123,0.000003290952,0.00006144424,0.03108434,0.0001215817,0.00008158248,0.9103112,0.03992202,0.01660041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002229068,0.00002251028,0.01241346,0.000403333,0.00002110532,0.0000930997,0.04638185,0.0003631435,0.0003476409,0.055134,0.8846996,0.00009797793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06192436,0.009241858,0.006053559,0.3947681,0.003679603,0.0001358851,0.0005614649,0.0001208958,0.5235143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8261393,0.003692613,0.004798473,0.02302768,0.0006037878,0.0001330479,0.0001694431,0.0001258966,0.1413097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8834316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8457671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ranjan K. Agarwal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Faiz M Lalani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935321606732226,"gpt":0.2720005618493013,"spread":0.2426473457819791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04132385,0.00103358,0.00177782,0.002731985,0.0722796,0.03991724,0.0135747,0.08693731,0.009294878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0854893,0.002656175,0.003038455,0.004378496,0.04224054,0.01060679,0.007920024,0.0932935,0.0009189397],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1829558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3190867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9348227,0.01165915,0.002264671,0.009292069,0.01788032,0.02408102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420537,0.02659703,0.002033818,0.001463533,0.02011033,0.00774166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009030395,0.00009311055,0.002556912,0.00009977584,0.0001363875,0.001392507,0.06002546,0.0008090801,0.001111965,0.4703213,0.4561746,0.007188521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000187534,0.00006461424,0.007187427,0.0008432532,0.0002110062,0.0001987753,0.06196414,0.001282314,0.001479138,0.05660155,0.8690438,0.0009364723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02924044,0.002420813,0.002089772,0.889051,0.005031132,0.0001414116,0.0003406369,0.00008571381,0.07159901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1568939,0.0008332588,0.001540838,0.7892234,0.001309196,0.0001079044,0.00007801074,0.0002154919,0.04979794],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1829558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Ann Chaplin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03010718239465562,"gpt":0.2689573982666613,"spread":0.2388502158720056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01565504,0.0002834804,0.001022564,0.002825836,0.01778721,0.01828035,0.002970431,0.009521999,0.005085499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04393142,0.0006846837,0.0008601676,0.002857973,0.06721357,0.01735231,0.01062387,0.016235,0.0006867255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01493113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01436637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05908255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04341788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834654,0.007245556,0.000434398,0.00198733,0.004352139,0.002515241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684033,0.02093479,0.001647967,0.002651558,0.003695742,0.00266657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001020055,0.00001044409,0.0003056138,0.00001209929,0.000004281966,0.0001635518,0.006898766,0.000167996,0.00006247892,0.9861128,0.002468811,0.003783018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005068555,0.000009991997,0.0007929015,0.00005660436,0.000009685285,0.0001002255,0.007898205,0.0007390059,0.0001580357,0.9610013,0.02915014,0.00003318132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.228152,0.005659491,0.02840788,0.1982578,0.0005517777,0.00009513061,0.0001435836,0.0001179469,0.5386144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800253,0.0009176142,0.002275701,0.009224245,0.0002738504,0.00004833788,0.00003241036,0.00006381987,0.007138748],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05908255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Geneviève Chabot","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02392565925271303,"gpt":0.2796583328803652,"spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007473667,0.0002439712,0.0004937605,0.003164029,0.03001202,0.01671586,0.00305881,0.004085985,0.00683657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01677208,0.0003548664,0.0004194819,0.006222666,0.04993321,0.005636032,0.005720878,0.004410124,0.0001838156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1318607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2197097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925156,0.00155223,0.0001508152,0.0007471632,0.001805085,0.00322908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991363,0.002878812,0.0005770135,0.0005102374,0.003060103,0.001610712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000247851,0.00001260957,0.003719351,0.00002997436,0.000008485767,0.00009928281,0.0356111,0.0001985739,0.0001587611,0.9422707,0.00424777,0.01361863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005764333,0.00003215491,0.07724061,0.0007392586,0.00009126196,0.0002630404,0.2305011,0.001430372,0.0005865346,0.271376,0.4174144,0.0002675478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.400668,0.007212014,0.002022755,0.1253173,0.0002965324,0.00006659846,0.0003889374,0.00002533227,0.4640025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854438,0.0009499612,0.0005066104,0.002270496,0.0000407832,0.0000170035,0.00003350767,0.00001512905,0.01072264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1318607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9567208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1032438667","doi":"","title":"Overview: Supreme Court of Canada Charter Decisions","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Debra M. McAllister","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02848703536602217,"gpt":0.2689585937572918,"spread":0.2404715583912696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005547533,0.001553894,0.001810137,0.0222582,0.00973724,0.01453703,0.004715871,0.009314737,0.02132265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01924,0.001482162,0.001558347,0.04360325,0.003598687,0.0040278,0.001840878,0.005268109,0.002723576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1123372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.187779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906996,0.00094207,0.000311251,0.0007105382,0.005190535,0.00214611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831805,0.004299446,0.0007199164,0.0004103633,0.01047282,0.0009170154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002980205,0.00002952327,0.0007592978,0.0008529076,0.00003680171,0.00005402989,0.0003738049,0.0006139401,0.00005894935,0.06322929,0.9021578,0.03180387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003269012,0.000009991083,0.00801192,0.001844125,0.00007856303,0.00003838215,0.0004825789,0.0002423524,0.00007790735,0.009972366,0.9791456,0.00006349275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004542294,0.38833,0.001829565,0.1368605,0.006996216,0.0006023725,0.02335435,0.0003831042,0.4371016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09431154,0.4707382,0.005636314,0.12013,0.0110098,0.0007719023,0.0179601,0.0004314069,0.2790108],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1123372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter Oliver","is_ca":false},{"name":"Taylor Wormington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03183355028587525,"gpt":0.2006843416943639,"spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01351192,0.0003797372,0.0005475899,0.001740767,0.02301,0.0182729,0.003007241,0.01592147,0.003449282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02975425,0.0005866273,0.000626627,0.002180148,0.04445117,0.008984087,0.006098137,0.02021187,0.0004569327],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05444474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06038446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6385495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7453772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857205,0.004028878,0.0003803978,0.001159668,0.005097682,0.003612957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892385,0.007621704,0.0003868901,0.0004256024,0.001829122,0.0004981306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005790371,0.000005414774,0.0002384375,0.000008450174,0.000002628943,0.0001528438,0.007183718,0.0001187469,0.0001208414,0.9838007,0.005667477,0.00269501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004466474,0.00002524355,0.002473676,0.0002680132,0.0000580748,0.0001629068,0.01604573,0.001976519,0.0008450765,0.6668739,0.3110919,0.0001342655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09569808,0.007012888,0.02411593,0.301787,0.002213598,0.0001814965,0.0001395843,0.0001567049,0.5686948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220378,0.001602988,0.003782738,0.04816531,0.0009803715,0.0000679032,0.00003680507,0.00007071888,0.02325542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162561870","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Section 15 on Canadian Society: Equality Rights: Beacon or Laser?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; Laser; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Operating system","authors":[{"name":"Marilou McPhedran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764727016560328,"gpt":0.2520280081384532,"spread":0.2343807379728499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02164098,0.0006532049,0.001323738,0.003881614,0.02373109,0.01936206,0.006369591,0.02722009,0.02966823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06180353,0.001134651,0.001418088,0.005182247,0.0216363,0.00850617,0.006738964,0.02313169,0.001673943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09387419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2942574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9515365,0.004002522,0.001584971,0.002641326,0.02649738,0.01373726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501432,0.01755316,0.001942955,0.001896844,0.02114369,0.00732012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005035322,0.0000452666,0.001489204,0.0001335015,0.00002185318,0.0001212251,0.005075693,0.0001349609,0.0002503181,0.725471,0.2521084,0.01509825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008897371,0.00004791297,0.02046957,0.001232252,0.0001065055,0.0001302601,0.01065088,0.0003151166,0.0006114861,0.07300992,0.8930306,0.0003066183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01767998,0.008920837,0.0008526708,0.4927034,0.005604867,0.0001065747,0.001065602,0.0001049421,0.4729611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3618252,0.007711974,0.003103327,0.3767337,0.002688437,0.0002470026,0.0005984692,0.0002760065,0.2468159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09387419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6811081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120985047","doi":"","title":"International Law and Canadian Courts: A Work in Progress","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Justice Russell G. Juriansz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124522136723284,"gpt":0.2618494991670113,"spread":0.2493972854946829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007642817,0.001011416,0.001194702,0.01358908,0.02126977,0.02262028,0.003114631,0.005049674,0.02279109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02459454,0.0006071372,0.001249008,0.03457312,0.01383483,0.0111716,0.00408479,0.004809787,0.0006413595],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1893137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2997588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894221,0.001818574,0.0002983909,0.0009648103,0.004789997,0.002705995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810564,0.004991381,0.0008382205,0.0006036298,0.01094922,0.001561265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090046,0.00006967813,0.006757325,0.00070856,0.00008061142,0.0001328969,0.01024217,0.0008238364,0.00011563,0.7668734,0.1015667,0.1125783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003524877,0.00002510604,0.03113645,0.002484676,0.0002738748,0.0001285448,0.03307968,0.001174751,0.0003912961,0.1001404,0.8309745,0.0001555464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03361961,0.1392715,0.003811412,0.1907369,0.002194177,0.0001335561,0.001221334,0.0001387249,0.6288729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6699485,0.1785911,0.01066684,0.02659378,0.001488382,0.0001843523,0.001241387,0.0001737391,0.111112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1893137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262202671","doi":"","title":"Whose \"Charter\" is it anyways?: An examination of \"Charter\" litigation as it relates to the Chinese Canadian community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Avvy Go","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04188625038076114,"gpt":0.3374065939308967,"spread":0.2955203435501355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00902958,0.0003996809,0.0006145024,0.006872521,0.08787017,0.01840835,0.004722978,0.007890741,0.007860373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02693579,0.0004636578,0.0006232947,0.01572351,0.03928098,0.005576664,0.008210477,0.008056046,0.0002924159],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1662475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.321588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983907,0.002399685,0.0003078284,0.0009247979,0.004242416,0.008218314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861585,0.005167711,0.001647418,0.0004541627,0.003987192,0.002584903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003433146,0.00005776168,0.0183924,0.0001020596,0.00001807557,0.0008940893,0.2818064,0.0002582527,0.0001997688,0.6598254,0.02259808,0.01581346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003278771,0.00004337498,0.07731479,0.000508649,0.0001135019,0.0003350504,0.6964712,0.001054889,0.000403485,0.02959024,0.1939534,0.0001785663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5753877,0.003840379,0.001041973,0.06738038,0.0002213618,0.0001790271,0.0002113992,0.00003899955,0.3516989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773742,0.001315975,0.0001772165,0.004808058,0.00004411718,0.00003637032,0.00003780566,0.00002091339,0.01618538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1662475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Kraicer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02469100168435922,"gpt":0.2996355685379767,"spread":0.2749445668536175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003771513,0.000442632,0.0005422382,0.0009064556,0.03214127,0.009146693,0.002795599,0.01519151,0.007287459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652035,0.0006088527,0.0005884969,0.001714774,0.008081015,0.002095884,0.002672789,0.01114841,0.0005750703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06286331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1546872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947712,0.000637694,0.0001302054,0.0004115503,0.001700105,0.002349337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960311,0.001745537,0.0001488774,0.000122372,0.001260158,0.0006919213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007502414,0.00004160251,0.005867097,0.0001105849,0.00004316779,0.001271824,0.01567052,0.0008460209,0.0006026229,0.7490119,0.2144162,0.01204342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001726448,0.00006034092,0.03006591,0.0009268533,0.0002255577,0.0005106035,0.0297349,0.003233815,0.001664123,0.1051363,0.8278984,0.0003706464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09677227,0.01541247,0.001669572,0.2770466,0.00160824,0.0002047263,0.001061738,0.0001184694,0.6061059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6533332,0.004377117,0.001377525,0.09546749,0.0003944559,0.0001526017,0.0001335321,0.00006855895,0.2446955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06286331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4561074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"A. Wayne MacKay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01014062902697611,"gpt":0.2447480423113869,"spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007483959,0.0002398649,0.0004708093,0.00178556,0.02324236,0.01607727,0.00165261,0.003645126,0.005224421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01759486,0.0003020295,0.0002646967,0.002599715,0.02280087,0.002695899,0.003839988,0.006274447,0.0003145387],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08696744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.248064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9622492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875705,0.002983235,0.0002218381,0.001018541,0.004841811,0.003364233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863747,0.00520288,0.0006644717,0.0004115593,0.004849426,0.002496945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888431,0.00001381252,0.003089569,0.00004643221,0.000012628,0.0001410827,0.01376902,0.0005894856,0.0004294627,0.9564342,0.0083809,0.01707462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001633518,0.00006421244,0.03903297,0.0008201879,0.0001158173,0.0001907792,0.0476278,0.003017851,0.001378898,0.3135716,0.593842,0.0001745453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1705889,0.007678198,0.006870406,0.2119649,0.0004333776,0.000107701,0.0002314256,0.00008304288,0.602042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734631,0.001318984,0.001185909,0.006669738,0.00008290861,0.00002416317,0.00002291079,0.00001642738,0.01721592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6309959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247551692","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Clemency and Death Row Inmates: Smith v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Courtney G. Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0179727018015738,"gpt":0.2573905634779196,"spread":0.2394178616763458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506354,0.0006107585,0.0005767568,0.0008205777,0.03007429,0.004390581,0.003655809,0.02457942,0.01302943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007134604,0.0006910438,0.0006747613,0.001631111,0.005194637,0.001576211,0.001698316,0.01567316,0.001461084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04607221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1383153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975498,0.0001798721,0.00007156741,0.0002696165,0.0007228079,0.001206308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968578,0.0009783503,0.0001547824,0.00007220347,0.0009425146,0.0009943979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001222537,0.00008290154,0.01450546,0.000124935,0.00005877484,0.004309609,0.01256637,0.0004578841,0.0007865547,0.05396374,0.902307,0.01071455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001811873,0.00008210752,0.02216955,0.0005298968,0.0002755654,0.002089434,0.0630049,0.00119814,0.002096923,0.009961699,0.8981152,0.0002952865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06568307,0.001868043,0.0004821846,0.7614471,0.002421493,0.0001950399,0.0009153429,0.0001280785,0.1668597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2322672,0.002855648,0.0005539856,0.5871829,0.0009090927,0.0001201797,0.0002488524,0.00007302877,0.1757891],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04607221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3342789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03166711377603512,"gpt":0.3153538144643578,"spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022298,0.0004070693,0.0004603943,0.0007092942,0.03067,0.009290958,0.001671954,0.01359046,0.01522291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030491,0.0008249418,0.0005510111,0.00109887,0.00949857,0.001867552,0.002409911,0.01189031,0.002082902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05391083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1233818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934175,0.0005628773,0.0002034243,0.0004204615,0.003215805,0.002179929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993633,0.002059229,0.0002698011,0.0002540553,0.002409539,0.001374348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004306775,0.0000244519,0.004128728,0.00007972202,0.00001421549,0.0005196694,0.01107388,0.00008690215,0.0006130015,0.1303358,0.8408505,0.01223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002307872,0.00001594892,0.007080882,0.0001158775,0.00002565818,0.00009003319,0.005069576,0.00009523421,0.0003778592,0.002407311,0.9846469,0.00005164046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03840252,0.003750227,0.001228729,0.4564992,0.008282045,0.0001620515,0.000865729,0.0002771958,0.4905324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2038128,0.001904553,0.001354762,0.1256257,0.0005907854,0.00007103793,0.0001630229,0.0001752999,0.6663019],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05391083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3911523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035635063","doi":"","title":"Telling Stories: The Crown, Parliament and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Art; Law; Politics; Materials science","authors":[{"name":"Ann Chaplin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01790511277134235,"gpt":0.2129594855578513,"spread":0.195054372786509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272697,0.0004923801,0.000699011,0.002502299,0.06495418,0.02511402,0.002728851,0.0100985,0.0143357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01894106,0.000587466,0.000304701,0.005837924,0.04347412,0.009007501,0.006684395,0.01404917,0.0006891651],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1415785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1879163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934263,0.001595528,0.00009595249,0.000484381,0.001423493,0.002974321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900969,0.004200535,0.0005158857,0.000253377,0.00202478,0.002908493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007728243,0.00002592709,0.002582601,0.0001443632,0.00002348253,0.0006647967,0.4379098,0.0001709736,0.0001296657,0.305086,0.2337898,0.01939537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001460128,0.000006053117,0.003240475,0.0003145228,0.00002195766,0.0001065541,0.3624769,0.00009772972,0.0001163634,0.01758092,0.6159507,0.00007321252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09986439,0.03081826,0.0005173167,0.5531816,0.002946164,0.00004098252,0.0005082509,0.00004563123,0.3120773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787171,0.01005807,0.0002517947,0.03665615,0.0005795413,0.00002966271,0.0001049769,0.0001044739,0.0734982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Justice Marshall Rothstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008489126006916854,"gpt":0.2452369108518927,"spread":0.2367477848449758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04827767,0.000643662,0.001503299,0.004750596,0.03972015,0.02842221,0.005387886,0.01976971,0.00460027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1291205,0.001163132,0.0009081777,0.004815997,0.03509209,0.004965453,0.004374315,0.01640077,0.0003732715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0780552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1902855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8277406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9356264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9431989,0.01714466,0.001533518,0.004810226,0.01762361,0.01568904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724134,0.09919873,0.003416507,0.002836552,0.01639811,0.00573674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006403041,0.00002915394,0.003278995,0.00003812493,0.00003410529,0.0002579606,0.02346926,0.0003335961,0.0002097039,0.9528285,0.01320592,0.006250562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004332293,0.00007341549,0.04848475,0.001036409,0.0005444956,0.0002811232,0.07838865,0.007206413,0.003506257,0.6175346,0.2419275,0.0005831684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2933788,0.004124965,0.009122294,0.1764496,0.002141063,0.0002987905,0.000413997,0.00008331203,0.5139872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741812,0.0003570963,0.001743826,0.01031613,0.0001948255,0.00007388433,0.00003025399,0.0000443195,0.01305848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1722594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5663328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104986285","doi":"","title":"Canadian Women and the \"Charter of Rights\"","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Doris Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01066146434178474,"gpt":0.2349822355629528,"spread":0.2243207712211681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00564501,0.0005515016,0.0006135079,0.002496236,0.03644683,0.01547261,0.002092735,0.006180872,0.01762765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01144981,0.00048303,0.0004454315,0.004683943,0.03240576,0.003678512,0.00481469,0.007438389,0.000599928],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1551045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1979924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990408,0.001882478,0.000132589,0.0008314609,0.002662256,0.004083177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995169,0.001202838,0.0003131959,0.0003042601,0.001788821,0.001221875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002605703,0.000009866816,0.0008177697,0.00003078122,0.000005912982,0.00005727981,0.01693565,0.00008881465,0.00009795556,0.9343529,0.03857037,0.009006593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002972612,0.00001473177,0.008547845,0.0001998442,0.00002302632,0.00005683502,0.02454925,0.0001574455,0.0002459856,0.05601229,0.9100714,0.00009164029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05975111,0.008325082,0.0008805068,0.1743719,0.001177749,0.00005426629,0.0004102525,0.00004667574,0.7549825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087596,0.003183251,0.0008267437,0.0166566,0.0003492993,0.00004103842,0.0001155323,0.00007417872,0.1699937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1551045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}