{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":49,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"06e5e346ffe2","filters":{"venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel"}},"results":[{"id":"W2964917791","doi":"","title":"Complementarity: The Constitutional Role of the Senate of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Peter Harder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361827854848971,"gpt":0.2266752809809839,"spread":0.2130570024324942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784541,0.0001568075,0.0003008056,0.00004332998,0.001086843,0.00001676577,0.0005321466,0.0001079625,0.0006724749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004592576,0.0001309222,0.000200359,0.0006641949,0.007829288,0.000154676,0.0001430378,0.0002626536,0.00002155632],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01044917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3473545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4438328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977346,0.0002136534,0.0005546743,0.0002258635,0.0009162094,0.0003549849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997933,0.0005464846,0.0004292151,0.0002203703,0.0007948456,0.00007603639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001095034,0.00008976754,0.03065278,0.00005469768,0.0001727097,0.000001222106,0.0005956607,0.002772541,0.0002699482,0.9638319,0.001196451,0.0003513513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122998,0.00002221166,0.03649013,0.0007519056,0.0002178536,0.000076465,0.005992257,0.001161657,0.0009248072,0.3606402,0.5925673,0.0003429428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3353205,0.02225619,0.0007936549,0.06770664,0.007478121,0.001690188,0.002184546,0.00002443524,0.5625457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950649,0.0002176494,0.0000850416,0.0006428024,0.0003331481,0.00001882346,0.00001716473,0.000003590214,0.003616925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6597443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2861617510","doi":"","title":"The Disappearance of the Four Equality Rights and Systemic Discrimination from Canadian Equality Jurisprudence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Gender equality; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Mary Eberts","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kim Stanton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03682096381429417,"gpt":0.3031002468661284,"spread":0.2662792830518342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002008647,0.00008746057,0.0001246473,0.00004785676,0.002239414,0.0001222894,0.0004087836,0.0001069428,0.0000419414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00135105,0.00006855376,0.00006533479,0.000293972,0.002162563,0.0002803551,0.00003886094,0.0001134956,0.00002133903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005365511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008838908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1915471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6493362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982054,0.0004944304,0.0003482511,0.000219568,0.0004787495,0.0002535908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983565,0.0004664471,0.0002183753,0.00025653,0.0005559585,0.0001461873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000556429,0.00001509714,0.005263324,0.00001868226,0.00001252339,3.141367e-7,0.006472991,0.000007097301,0.00004798063,0.9872268,0.0001305601,0.0007990781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004507535,0.00001494288,0.2354056,0.0004311493,0.00006812827,0.00001028657,0.003295795,0.0009470608,0.0002827447,0.7184555,0.0403414,0.0002966762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8093274,0.0003079222,0.009070513,0.01250545,0.001253521,0.0007240175,0.0003387318,0.00005273225,0.1664198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977688,0.00003721887,0.0000895241,0.0001994309,0.0002933229,0.00002361678,0.00001107694,0.000003384749,0.001573624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4577891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125777417","doi":"","title":"Canadian Climate Federalism: Parliament’s Ample Constitutional Authority to Legislate GHG Emissions through Regulations, a National Cap and Trade Program, or a National Carbon Tax","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Parliament; Carbon tax; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Greenhouse gas; Commerce Clause; Emissions trading; Legislature; Law; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Cooperative federalism; Economics; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0417525047389458,"gpt":0.3187750178305256,"spread":0.2770225130915798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491199,0.0002067837,0.000224473,0.0002956174,0.002004475,0.0002025721,0.0002390938,0.0002415262,0.0003274986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003328179,0.0002063869,0.00008825307,0.000631134,0.001234461,0.0005849635,0.00003476081,0.0001693255,0.00003101184],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004700302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01368733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2148225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6624242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997295,0.0001394346,0.0004338104,0.000502308,0.0009234403,0.0007060698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979041,0.0004536573,0.0001760817,0.0001309896,0.0005727379,0.0007624038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002547065,0.00005863242,0.002083255,0.00001556414,0.00003441429,0.00001477328,0.001125371,0.0001294513,0.00005733121,0.9687426,0.02676644,0.0009467086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000870432,0.00002735132,0.01304615,0.0002537826,0.00002389929,0.0001382299,0.0001951979,0.000484609,0.00001992307,0.09210322,0.8924106,0.0004266073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123697,0.0005990597,0.007370384,0.6457782,0.001473181,0.004404652,0.02762997,0.0005026049,0.2610049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820845,0.0001791919,0.004406286,0.004537343,0.0008529487,0.0003796858,0.0001289028,0.00001343705,0.007417776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31139685","doi":"10.1002/acn3.770","title":"The Rule of Law in Canada: a Global Template?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Bloodworth","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Coleman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Errol P. Mendes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Allan Rock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01209229238798827,"gpt":0.2476136278835664,"spread":0.2355213354955781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003061024,0.00003922286,0.00006180733,0.00001867346,0.0003184425,0.00003202991,0.0001612415,0.00003810094,0.0001154873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003642919,0.0000388471,0.00002617858,0.0001498088,0.000217648,0.0001774759,0.00001104874,0.00005436144,0.00002466291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001870466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002936885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9623196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99924,0.00004541208,0.0001985649,0.00007981651,0.0002924913,0.000143681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992408,0.0002122788,0.00008459706,0.00005486586,0.0003678993,0.00003951799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001777372,0.00001130428,0.01308727,0.000003240143,0.000005724131,0.000001178482,0.0001406246,0.0004704006,0.00001163259,0.9855723,0.0002831407,0.000411438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005199582,0.000006757751,0.2407079,0.0001018744,0.000008827845,0.00001510585,0.000963318,0.002145218,0.0001073397,0.6294934,0.1257392,0.0001911372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4562163,0.0002068406,0.0008834801,0.01260869,0.0005500779,0.0004181609,0.00009091913,0.00001856689,0.529007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988655,0.00002536171,0.0001762534,0.0002267915,0.00009171956,0.00003272876,0.00001220341,0.00000137645,0.0005680873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5426492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5209907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230639928","doi":"","title":"Embedding Environmental Rights in Section 7 of the Canadian \"Charter\": Resolving the Tension Between the Need for Precaution and the Need for Harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Section (typography); Embedding; Law; Tension (geology); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Advertising; Compression (physics)","authors":[{"name":"David W.-L. Wu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01332486221887336,"gpt":0.2512878125561648,"spread":0.2379629503372915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577553,0.00006904418,0.00009485585,0.00004752476,0.00230952,0.00005097946,0.0001820829,0.00009110214,0.000008897973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003933197,0.00004063763,0.00007429285,0.0001052349,0.0009602538,0.0001173817,0.00002141813,0.0001181391,0.000001206515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005028287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03278157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1226843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991285,0.0002022529,0.0001880867,0.0001253269,0.0001721352,0.0001836978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986944,0.0009959494,0.0001211338,0.0001203288,0.00002410989,0.00004414249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245742,0.00001206967,0.00851726,0.0000112746,0.00001701234,4.516857e-8,0.004589584,0.000961932,0.0002650074,0.9847223,0.0001941082,0.0006870189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005214247,0.00007471069,0.2822526,0.0003043878,0.0002726394,0.00002497236,0.004984257,0.06831763,0.0008812441,0.2850922,0.3521166,0.0004645506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436542,0.0001862929,0.005594179,0.035662,0.0005796063,0.003424007,0.0002614577,0.00001874059,0.01061954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998537,0.00001424998,0.00009504003,0.0003487456,0.0004832927,0.0001197561,0.00002555554,0.000003820456,0.0003725445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.69963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"M.H. Tse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01250135321138379,"gpt":0.2754712596877646,"spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026345,0.00007362682,0.0001846597,0.0001378899,0.0006774175,0.00001932992,0.0002810813,0.00007091199,0.00002658308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006695476,0.00005298693,0.00004477517,0.0006319885,0.0003771167,0.0002039444,0.00001493291,0.00008931771,1.117708e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007350833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986774,0.0001455355,0.0003004651,0.0001621218,0.0005103724,0.0002041001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984938,0.0004914376,0.0001649986,0.0001755806,0.0005026826,0.0001715044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002900962,0.00003822818,0.07316943,0.00001569094,0.00009209195,0.000005249703,0.002577966,0.01450563,0.00006306814,0.9073275,0.000424569,0.001751569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003873433,0.0000381364,0.9100605,0.0001830341,0.0003271098,0.00001135294,0.002485555,0.0231154,0.0007886273,0.02354696,0.03879849,0.0002575449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937794,0.0001784719,0.00002939652,0.002554138,0.0001099411,0.0002581883,0.0001252681,0.000001945293,0.002963266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00002015456,0.0001328156,0.00009350444,0.00005173451,0.00001045921,0.00001266941,0.000002283821,0.0001344998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98050972","doi":"","title":"\"Bruker v. Marcovitz\": (Get)ting Over Freedoms (Like Contract and Religion) in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"M.H. Ogilvie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008248387706292095,"gpt":0.2424491782418516,"spread":0.2342007905355594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004629596,0.0001163569,0.0001864703,0.0001093584,0.0004782797,0.00005259427,0.0001413873,0.00009189521,0.0001196319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000786387,0.0001469796,0.00004291595,0.00028549,0.0006288182,0.0002641655,0.00001489266,0.0002067392,0.000008276332],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01164999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7370432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8058044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985984,0.00008906216,0.0003041689,0.0002392943,0.0003789674,0.000390119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989362,0.0004634442,0.0001138646,0.0001032713,0.0001815616,0.0002016207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007956893,0.00002384826,0.03722524,0.0000056434,0.000007590923,0.00004666188,0.000178801,0.0004451424,0.00002025939,0.9602841,0.0007964114,0.0009583982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001838163,0.00003455662,0.3084912,0.0002915019,0.00005163161,0.0001995113,0.001159398,0.002594991,0.00001371129,0.07744089,0.6070513,0.000833195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4815176,0.001719696,0.004136639,0.0129394,0.0007743022,0.0006000901,0.0001979503,0.00009321563,0.4980212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943896,0.0001893417,0.0006676361,0.003524043,0.0003240013,0.00001013233,0.00002642589,0.000004114486,0.0008647322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802592240","doi":"","title":"What Should Canada’s Promised New National Accessibility Law Include?: A Discussion Paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04145766638207853,"gpt":0.3177230709955922,"spread":0.2762654046135137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114691,0.0001543198,0.0001931799,0.00007044028,0.001463247,0.0002792545,0.0004533828,0.0001903349,0.001699296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007756327,0.0001395396,0.0000944245,0.0004290832,0.001032647,0.00226415,0.00004445234,0.0002105638,0.0000301268],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2188977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9298012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975724,0.0001126347,0.000426656,0.0004760463,0.00104008,0.0003722098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998259,0.0001635032,0.0001614918,0.0002130506,0.0008838337,0.0003191225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713237,0.0001786776,0.03117268,0.00003768965,0.00003362428,0.000007558268,0.002449495,0.0000367571,0.0002626708,0.9570429,0.006735349,0.001985485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001494923,0.00002579573,0.1587348,0.0002794073,0.00005591355,0.000006370519,0.001482945,0.0004677311,0.0005959161,0.3434225,0.4927807,0.0006529826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3408413,0.0008121108,0.007982762,0.1128061,0.005779637,0.002555277,0.0003422782,0.0005060091,0.5283746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868726,0.00002216759,0.0005882054,0.002802405,0.001628516,0.00003336999,0.0001135482,0.00000866345,0.007930513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7109036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279420640","doi":"","title":"Canada's Supreme Court, Constitutional Principles, Federalism, and the 1998 Quebec Secession Reference Case: Toxic Wine in a Very Old Bottle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Secession; Supreme court; Law; Wine; Bottle; Political science; Art; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Michael D. Behiels","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02029996763542845,"gpt":0.2458453635924874,"spread":0.2255453959570589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008044931,0.0001228093,0.0002094491,0.00004977901,0.0008187786,0.0001506469,0.0001814037,0.0001311938,0.0001310655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001205704,0.0001074754,0.00003659183,0.0002141888,0.001832805,0.0003559475,0.0000473154,0.0002326297,0.00001987108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001597443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004633169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.971736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9745121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983425,0.0001966139,0.0003667204,0.0002574753,0.0004687346,0.0003679187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986829,0.0006566879,0.0001402851,0.0001336596,0.0001995638,0.0001868664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914969,0.00002406644,0.003943868,0.00002443193,0.000009922589,0.00008324507,0.0003014764,0.0001802535,0.00001803685,0.9928801,0.00241432,0.0001113475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003402486,0.00001252164,0.08576244,0.000678632,0.00003302125,0.001449581,0.001336471,0.007021433,0.00002180148,0.04439793,0.8552648,0.0006188731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.855144,0.001456502,0.002070306,0.05240987,0.0007192823,0.001654558,0.0005756959,0.0000756186,0.08589418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916306,0.00007590518,0.0001139059,0.00103371,0.0003384596,0.0001151409,0.0000278914,0.000003668868,0.006660772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590765334","doi":"","title":"Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Spending Power in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics; Thermodynamics","authors":[{"name":"Bérard Frédéric","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05216058820681362,"gpt":0.2924536003508084,"spread":0.2402930121439947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008508423,0.00004880415,0.0000641142,0.00005585701,0.0003181304,0.00003838208,0.0002782499,0.00003554576,0.0001430637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001254978,0.00003335418,0.0000233165,0.0003332184,0.0001824413,0.0001633775,0.000010075,0.0001048337,0.0000115905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002590735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003936847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9228234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.0001220811,0.0001505938,0.0001111451,0.0002773264,0.0002541498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.0006396798,0.0000665902,0.000098828,0.00003503524,0.00004405052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002956679,0.000007532457,0.016319,0.000002139602,0.000002270694,0.00003290485,0.001931025,0.0001016137,0.00001904499,0.9766347,0.003917368,0.001029406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006786375,0.000003996355,0.5097073,0.0004336497,0.00000631351,0.00005911752,0.00349637,0.0001797934,0.00003585131,0.04819832,0.4369568,0.000243946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7228772,0.0007195722,0.0007642315,0.1451692,0.0005537405,0.0005752897,0.0002864531,0.00001462537,0.1290397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968936,0.0000562418,0.00001650778,0.001883216,0.0001648764,0.00002024293,0.00000118492,0.000002192099,0.0009619026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6983798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182529916","doi":"","title":"\"Auton\" and \"Chaoulli\": Who Decides the Future of Health Care in Canada?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operations research; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false},{"name":"S. Zachary Green","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01393487150850771,"gpt":0.2181913222740833,"spread":0.2042564507655756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004212,0.00006430531,0.0001983836,0.0001330415,0.0001219054,0.00001253318,0.0000951681,0.0000390889,0.00001637522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005851814,0.00007249376,0.00002612569,0.0001921412,0.00006292151,0.00006260283,0.0000199982,0.0000903262,0.000003552623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001110816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009404473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7414566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9094492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.00002143144,0.0004676229,0.0001594953,0.00004075502,0.0001734788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995261,0.00006773539,0.0002037931,0.0001204793,0.00004768674,0.00003414477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001761231,0.000009333933,0.04505193,0.00009880942,0.000005372237,0.000001479397,0.0002240583,0.001017215,1.575343e-7,0.9499511,0.0006687758,0.002970055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005134419,0.00001515728,0.5905191,0.00008725068,0.000002342568,0.00001630384,0.001049241,0.001854171,0.000006376275,0.1208014,0.2849725,0.0001627398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296074,0.137214,0.01317101,0.1457711,0.001154399,0.001594099,0.001766732,0.00004157959,0.06967966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975868,0.0006101987,0.0003251586,0.001144857,0.0001382847,0.00002437827,0.00003321118,0.000004114178,0.0001329313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.295621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279648004","doi":"","title":"The \"Charter\", Poverty Rights and the Space Between: Exploring Social Movements as a Forum for Advancing Social and Economic Rights in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Poverty; Space (punctuation); Political science; Social rights; Sociology; Law; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Yavar Hameed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Niiti Simmonds","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02994539334027635,"gpt":0.2542416446116925,"spread":0.2242962512714162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005510483,0.00008975975,0.0001556396,0.00004335847,0.004926356,0.00006413572,0.0001198432,0.00004636231,0.00001528986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007016455,0.0000655251,0.00003634607,0.00006015462,0.0005100316,0.0002404686,0.0000276344,0.00009332477,0.000002228352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001510415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001867598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3702646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9231129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990165,0.00006826634,0.0002305385,0.0001812664,0.0001978269,0.00030566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992161,0.0005085266,0.0001007436,0.00004350155,0.00006656451,0.00006456448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001865945,0.000004881912,0.002894108,0.00000470352,0.00002309072,0.000003387771,0.006984611,0.00001484105,6.625984e-7,0.9886415,0.001102686,0.0003068723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002972573,0.00000958364,0.0335804,0.00003843582,0.00001978971,0.00001309267,0.004008607,0.0006454497,0.00002729491,0.6175019,0.3408814,0.0003014093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979313,0.0001312693,0.000404964,0.01022471,0.0003968641,0.0006545414,0.0000492414,0.00001475596,0.008810661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982103,0.00005712289,0.00009996242,0.0002500851,0.0003807676,0.0001320349,0.000008150463,0.000003229402,0.0008583727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W968103359","doi":"","title":"Trends in Applications for Leave to Intervene in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Gary Β. Magee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02424618332448678,"gpt":0.2877375730537424,"spread":0.2634913897292556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006592725,0.00007584385,0.0001459521,0.0001771896,0.0001443406,0.00001650229,0.0002901012,0.00008270207,0.00006242892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004443902,0.00009327503,0.00006729134,0.001106718,0.0001966103,0.0001030312,0.000006148654,0.0001155706,0.000002652905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001768075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6258057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989536,0.00006348138,0.000319299,0.0001649329,0.000217003,0.000281714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.0003140852,0.0001090575,0.0001255686,0.0001339032,0.00008831477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007612105,0.00008049856,0.0003706754,0.000021457,0.000004665834,0.000003379545,0.001970615,0.003241452,0.000008128934,0.9528974,0.03051304,0.01088102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000514239,0.00003708601,0.06328408,0.0002274188,0.0000148868,0.00001680949,0.0007058328,0.001230085,0.00002596796,0.06699353,0.8667755,0.0001745606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0376168,0.003448409,0.01865616,0.855216,0.0005775796,0.001908318,0.00515508,0.00001127723,0.07741036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854588,0.00004886859,0.0003502253,0.004102734,0.000311225,0.0001415573,0.00002938304,0.000002703126,0.009554527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4623454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254183191","doi":"","title":"The Contract Clause Comes to Canada: The British Columbia \"Health Services\" Case and the Sanctity of Collective Agreements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01282865137004936,"gpt":0.2437861796722954,"spread":0.2309575283022461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250282,0.000055906,0.0001371755,0.00001398994,0.005336099,0.0002800098,0.0002695036,0.00002962641,0.00004103305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008659902,0.00005118693,0.0000441478,0.0002345192,0.001039587,0.0001029279,0.00003663438,0.0001409017,0.000002615704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007261462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003057048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9070381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.0003418694,0.0002787329,0.0001386342,0.0004076403,0.0001924014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976934,0.001292406,0.0001992689,0.0001178014,0.0005969658,0.0001001614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007697044,0.00008186005,0.02310566,0.00002763008,0.0001799972,0.0002180936,0.007169,0.0002089856,0.000003410864,0.954438,0.01273508,0.001755365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00344093,0.000055497,0.4459824,0.0002574922,0.00006053701,0.002039365,0.007033946,0.001536725,0.000004922897,0.009058975,0.530226,0.0003032286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022113,0.002058944,0.0004040126,0.01669334,0.0006751845,0.001786433,0.00041932,0.00002783837,0.07572363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887205,0.000591372,0.0000267158,0.003337406,0.0001373418,0.0000337621,0.000006266423,0.000003820679,0.007142831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.945379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185958079","doi":"","title":"Federalizing Canada's Securities Regulatory Regime: Insights from the Australian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Franco Barbiero","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02583997308384504,"gpt":0.2463340956138175,"spread":0.2204941225299725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001122332,0.00008541998,0.0001012583,0.00003002165,0.002079103,0.00005907675,0.0002949002,0.00008465019,0.000131346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005846695,0.00009266064,0.00004772645,0.0002280112,0.0009741081,0.0002516212,0.00001570299,0.0001434133,0.00001022041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001239391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004712697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9390694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988742,0.00008227708,0.0001784247,0.0001908362,0.0004208742,0.0002533342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991469,0.0002858869,0.0001014548,0.0001707558,0.0001424709,0.0001524638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002419665,0.000006699055,0.002075458,0.00000286359,0.000009950218,0.00004292554,0.01421467,0.0001095267,0.00001772861,0.9036946,0.0797513,0.00007189556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001661251,0.000001920525,0.06525189,0.00007749634,0.000006002256,0.00004005547,0.002842399,0.0000481913,0.00008764186,0.01567733,0.9156239,0.0001770504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8990985,0.001711695,0.0002097357,0.03720004,0.0006742275,0.0002944429,0.0004751306,0.00006284429,0.06027343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832348,0.000177807,0.00009049632,0.003487865,0.0007827799,0.00002797526,0.00001943325,0.000004691683,0.0121741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275501760","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Clash between the Prerogative Power to Conduct Foreign Affairs and the \"Charter in Prime Minister of Canada et al v. Omar Khadr\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Physics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Errol P. Mendes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01556146896768624,"gpt":0.2294685615515281,"spread":0.2139070925838419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006573674,0.0001008758,0.0001277272,0.00007505659,0.0002292139,0.0001057066,0.0002140532,0.00002797858,0.00005575528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003444643,0.0000622994,0.0000452058,0.0001992339,0.0002476778,0.0003682396,0.00004177812,0.0001384503,0.000007064345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001181343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002094128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002631617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990905,0.0000358124,0.0002864094,0.0001532541,0.0002788939,0.0001551089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.0003037779,0.0001610829,0.0001213609,0.0002176132,0.00001365239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002596631,0.00001711874,0.001460054,0.000005244009,0.00002278618,0.000001362832,0.0002275975,0.0002850186,0.00003066477,0.9943278,0.003537169,0.0000591453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004883178,0.00004570867,0.1656119,0.0003973734,0.0001323315,0.0000347764,0.004071208,0.02560401,0.000419278,0.3796805,0.4184938,0.0006258934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1827089,0.0001030802,0.002452056,0.2225074,0.0002990227,0.001667065,0.00005101636,0.00002511164,0.5901863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425631,0.000003235227,0.00007824719,0.0568909,0.0001393746,0.00004247878,0.00003005217,0.000004226064,0.000248355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5544916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Daly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01987016449860858,"gpt":0.2900390755757322,"spread":0.2701689110771237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008686656,0.0001141948,0.0001565661,0.00006713124,0.001309182,0.00009638195,0.0002590006,0.00009556804,0.0001418228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002384093,0.0001386979,0.00005297145,0.000215055,0.0004119327,0.0002096339,0.00003233105,0.0001828616,0.00001433491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002973688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6114731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9083562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983784,0.0001668954,0.0002633176,0.0003063311,0.000554975,0.000330107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986702,0.0004038136,0.0001345076,0.0002561455,0.0002981621,0.000237171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009113521,0.00005995443,0.01965718,0.00003655224,0.00002406182,0.0012821,0.002498287,0.001333279,0.000008796794,0.9722489,0.001260999,0.001580763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003316585,0.0002403706,0.1052508,0.0008088815,0.0006332341,0.01826161,0.1401752,0.004406914,0.0001470558,0.189782,0.5342231,0.002754271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665439,0.0002159533,0.002445458,0.001940393,0.000591033,0.0003465409,0.00001758352,0.00007081281,0.02782833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675,0.00001616476,0.0001917291,0.0002616552,0.0006651206,0.00002158674,0.00001230444,0.000007288276,0.002074172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7824669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268499598","doi":"","title":"Whether the \"Constitution Act\" has made a difference for First Nations?: Impact of the 1982 Constitution on First Nations: Reflections on Section 35","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David C. Nahwegahbow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicole D.O. Richmond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05504278559855365,"gpt":0.2897075039663778,"spread":0.2346647183678242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006037729,0.0001724198,0.0001935457,0.0009604523,0.01799106,0.0001964653,0.0003720802,0.0002424355,0.0001806452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005308001,0.000163646,0.0003758695,0.001435853,0.003844751,0.0003398908,0.00002066183,0.0003263338,0.0000401144],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005609948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005065281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03713122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7294463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982206,0.000164825,0.0004074128,0.0003400766,0.0005524437,0.0003146305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969692,0.001619971,0.000338615,0.0003350328,0.0006188641,0.0001183356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473087,0.0002030868,0.001013237,0.00003640698,0.00006418303,0.000001244777,0.002841445,0.0165288,0.000103786,0.9757735,0.00327406,0.0001155889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001718801,0.0001952601,0.05181343,0.0008961919,0.0001702511,0.0001851735,0.0008785992,0.00137969,0.0001277403,0.01651966,0.9255401,0.0005751236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1294519,0.0008054643,0.0335705,0.03376138,0.007052461,0.006403565,0.002414559,0.000418726,0.7861215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935281,0.0005359882,0.000123797,0.000181974,0.000638633,0.0003589162,0.00006402984,0.000008368336,0.004560158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123288322","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title in Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence: What Remains of Radical Crown Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Element (criminal law); Assertion; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Beaton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01471896982157139,"gpt":0.2902955722324222,"spread":0.2755766024108508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002370225,0.00002766005,0.00007281976,0.00002053885,0.00007128008,0.000006475988,0.00006795384,0.00003856746,0.0009618378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003157148,0.00002856163,0.00001682834,0.0001065619,0.0002118777,0.0000691461,0.000004319537,0.00005010794,0.00002734791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003564344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000653765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01492433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07725878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.00002870287,0.0001039885,0.00005654916,0.000198543,0.0000775946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.00008115883,0.00004382311,0.00003533777,0.0001420217,0.0000283564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002370209,0.00002131793,0.001292289,0.00001955122,0.000008156908,0.000001526637,0.0007557252,0.00005071596,0.00004792567,0.9664136,0.03075806,0.0006287746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001030248,0.00000297005,0.003932944,0.00006362701,0.000004831069,0.00000125489,0.0002769885,0.0001248599,0.00008887862,0.002860363,0.9924893,0.00005091048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06768602,0.001530743,0.000837437,0.01337536,0.00158994,0.0003042031,0.00004654713,0.00002386992,0.9146059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933156,0.0008496704,0.000513995,0.00008753796,0.0001958681,0.000004196167,0.000004815912,0.000001899239,0.005026406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Robitaille","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04127155449291715,"gpt":0.2834743800357117,"spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004237579,0.00006436915,0.0001716096,0.000110933,0.0005179337,0.00001166855,0.0001390136,0.00008111885,0.00004400743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002825231,0.00006468864,0.00003312869,0.0002194754,0.00263597,0.0001845831,0.00003404317,0.00009689532,0.000003943408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002382824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003821228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005611618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005967215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.0001073662,0.0002681678,0.000154653,0.0001789161,0.0001307288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.0002735172,0.0002377763,0.00007495215,0.0001570547,0.00004350696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000797438,0.0000247828,0.007695268,0.00001313804,0.00001029677,0.00000137744,0.0963617,0.00003210983,0.00001202239,0.8957478,0.00005506497,0.0000384705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003075066,0.00005734485,0.3512826,0.0001229503,0.000109511,0.00004335061,0.01118848,0.002535192,0.0002065116,0.575095,0.05567738,0.0006066328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8800266,0.0009846715,0.0004599968,0.000907745,0.0001353365,0.0003700763,0.0001352173,0.00001696361,0.1169634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.0000404364,0.000470017,0.00001506275,0.0001379043,0.00001928424,0.000008398011,0.000002340964,0.0001866505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3435873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228178568","doi":"","title":"Canadian Citizens and the Others: The Failure of the Federal Court to Ensure the Respect of International Law for Non-Citizens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stewart Istvanffy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01668669166852979,"gpt":0.2481304286469156,"spread":0.2314437369783858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001268974,0.00007241055,0.0001023558,0.00005136618,0.0010393,0.0000587766,0.0005132915,0.0000699908,0.00008053359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008824155,0.00004213129,0.0001072209,0.0001602585,0.001063981,0.00008896639,0.00003149362,0.0001129532,0.000003405391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006938712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04599325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3820735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990178,0.0001188944,0.0002326127,0.0001239927,0.0003503743,0.0001563645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983373,0.0005951607,0.0001679813,0.0001452959,0.000704635,0.00004962117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003408613,0.00001068117,0.001881151,0.000004617287,0.00005239138,2.80821e-7,0.006893363,0.00008614267,0.00004956812,0.9898067,0.001125947,0.00005504047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002980971,0.00005713405,0.07310854,0.0003360005,0.000162777,0.00006110119,0.01429482,0.002034289,0.001487594,0.7213629,0.1837301,0.0003838101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2046968,0.0001444333,0.00552775,0.2130599,0.001704547,0.003119102,0.00122764,0.00002839068,0.5704914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956393,0.00001333183,0.0003368015,0.001460009,0.0003264149,0.00007526783,0.00001085941,0.000005188283,0.002132777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9603596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64516891","doi":"","title":"Canada, Secularity and a Constitutional Monarchy","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Monarchy; Constitutional monarchy; Law; Political science; Ancient history; Philosophy; History; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert W. Thompson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01429547535388989,"gpt":0.2491053731318362,"spread":0.2348098977779463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558966,0.0002607239,0.0003142165,0.0001139559,0.001381782,0.00008513244,0.0002520882,0.0002767508,0.001012285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007833941,0.0003679673,0.000116568,0.0004410009,0.01951789,0.0005118554,0.000070278,0.0004444928,0.00009255979],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003562553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04005414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.290708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3739124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974524,0.0002145873,0.0004857509,0.0004537938,0.0007036734,0.0006897427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978377,0.0006281385,0.0001872647,0.0001778478,0.0005886054,0.0005804645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009009087,0.0001192082,0.002802098,0.00006139911,0.00008642991,0.0000594303,0.0002087838,0.002770802,0.000008881095,0.980898,0.00960722,0.003368777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004680673,0.00001295977,0.001597532,0.0001505305,0.00009620463,0.0007098338,0.0002550331,0.002601597,0.00001010592,0.02309432,0.9705862,0.0004176492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02132188,0.03018198,0.08839659,0.1613912,0.002676068,0.0007409715,0.004191827,0.0001150144,0.6909844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526752,0.0009035108,0.005219388,0.005243757,0.002359919,0.00003352645,0.0001222466,0.000009052439,0.0334334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W999539695","doi":"","title":"Does Canada Need a Permanent Military Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David McNairn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007870559035556541,"gpt":0.2233335076362398,"spread":0.2154629486006832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003647829,0.00008937284,0.0001289087,0.00006036365,0.0009747992,0.00001268979,0.0001286209,0.00006193674,0.0002157426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003573863,0.0000817961,0.00006050468,0.0001963596,0.0004205195,0.0001395419,0.00001891494,0.00009580779,0.00002080824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008402591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001859455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7535683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988769,0.00007274135,0.0002128606,0.0001940319,0.0003768984,0.0002665427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.0002184246,0.00003835838,0.0001032172,0.0002590299,0.00008244745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008381178,0.00004884915,0.01642074,0.00002267918,0.00002320379,0.00003887749,0.0009805688,0.001432883,0.00002431048,0.9457362,0.03514931,0.0001140473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006107418,0.00001143564,0.07472504,0.00008113437,0.00005232658,0.00003001003,0.005953107,0.0007737461,0.00002756072,0.1170051,0.8002798,0.000450009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4571414,0.004106359,0.001485331,0.02959207,0.002074919,0.0006374984,0.0004395831,0.0001934624,0.5043294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896045,0.0001527504,0.0003149254,0.0004379558,0.000758072,0.00002989529,0.00006313463,0.000003802058,0.008634917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7497466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Sutton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01204942171878944,"gpt":0.2346356043731855,"spread":0.2225861826543961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001387917,0.00009299252,0.0001709484,0.00002725024,0.001328213,0.00009847089,0.000322421,0.00007546589,0.00003226021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006870629,0.00008538627,0.00004400877,0.00029494,0.0002263129,0.0002352836,0.00005925272,0.0002436352,0.00000698236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007446156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00165364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986777,0.0003409841,0.0002547255,0.0001646023,0.0003458135,0.0002161799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984996,0.0009450054,0.0001013926,0.0001515686,0.0001875918,0.0001148174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002250357,0.00008161185,0.1208497,0.000165076,0.00006049079,0.000002681595,0.0433495,0.0011016,0.0001638651,0.827926,0.0008598157,0.005417142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001183143,0.0000317663,0.4105629,0.0008929226,0.00005754261,0.000007313224,0.08245016,0.003531465,0.00007962329,0.1769016,0.323613,0.0006885764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.939483,0.0006974175,0.002970507,0.01134184,0.0003941941,0.0005834824,0.0002473333,0.00005184105,0.04423032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977201,0.0001354833,0.000227381,0.001444946,0.0003018639,0.00002520197,0.000034071,0.000004594609,0.0001063428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557656702","doi":"","title":"The Political Safeguards of Canadian Federalism: The Intergovermental Safeguards","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Wade K. Wright","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01645280782813708,"gpt":0.2615479931444465,"spread":0.2450951853163095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007884189,0.00007200008,0.0001051238,0.00006173882,0.00108826,0.00006193565,0.0003455351,0.00008736056,0.0001290625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00208158,0.00004316347,0.00009517268,0.0002429251,0.00146799,0.000133085,0.00002487326,0.0000841517,0.00004834287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001608285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002087359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3106643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4632815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985654,0.0001392072,0.000261003,0.0001322699,0.0004031619,0.0004989809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985277,0.0007455728,0.00008912486,0.0001553151,0.0002274832,0.0002548099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004170778,0.00001051948,0.002035056,0.000003764934,0.00001634952,0.000002485361,0.0002368683,0.00000142976,0.00005433058,0.9940391,0.002867316,0.0007285696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002920423,0.00001208315,0.02075955,0.0001256669,0.00001250075,0.00003137529,0.001071286,0.00002589526,0.0001326085,0.1338737,0.843541,0.0001222596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06060494,0.0003654656,0.001899204,0.2175386,0.001124959,0.000497554,0.0007265774,0.00003748734,0.7172052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917611,0.00008020814,0.00003051557,0.0008191981,0.0005029936,0.00002501084,0.000002491654,0.000004027243,0.006774489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8370127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299835984","doi":"","title":"Defining Access to Justice: The Charter and the Courts (and the Law Commission of Ontario)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Commission; Law; Economic Justice; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Patricia Hughes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06012035141865464,"gpt":0.3314063545271241,"spread":0.2712860031084695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002830187,0.00009759245,0.0001550853,0.0000487279,0.001851849,0.0002411616,0.00033758,0.00009516053,0.0006265714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001894917,0.00006231396,0.00005087564,0.0003473297,0.003833608,0.0006717225,0.00008516223,0.0004108406,0.00002868886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002389495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001676118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06687157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03426669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99869,0.0003859953,0.0003335374,0.0001581617,0.0002656344,0.0001666424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967231,0.002244196,0.0002685622,0.000186384,0.000498375,0.00007933939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007460899,0.00004874328,0.0005829337,0.00002678621,0.00003715374,4.996008e-7,0.08492319,0.00003581366,0.000001040301,0.9113613,0.0019914,0.0009165016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001841072,0.00001581006,0.01245342,0.0002126937,0.0004377769,0.00008991537,0.008351503,0.0007291695,0.00001669358,0.2509798,0.7247043,0.0001677885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02306127,0.003070957,0.002673563,0.4319491,0.001847508,0.00096258,0.00004141412,0.0000155696,0.536378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821475,0.0002389878,0.0006065481,0.006494339,0.0002342485,0.00008373412,0.000006130996,0.000004619736,0.01018392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288138134","doi":"","title":"Federal Court of Appeal De-Rails Equality Rights for Persons With Disabilities: \"Via Rail v. Canadian Transportation Agency\" and the Important Duty Not to Create New Barriers to Accessibility","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Duty; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01623098254764939,"gpt":0.2832535096587471,"spread":0.2670225271110977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286665,0.0001018318,0.0001674104,0.00008611634,0.0009728242,0.0000797106,0.0001557824,0.00008287267,0.0001004264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007360269,0.00008998155,0.0000791643,0.0001920055,0.0004412543,0.0002304831,0.000003687596,0.00006669645,0.000001593333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008050906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00257928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4144609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8032876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987052,0.00009156958,0.0003630385,0.0002476888,0.0003295801,0.0002628998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0003728726,0.0001304277,0.00009731149,0.0004099174,0.0003524458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001702465,0.00002002005,0.04608729,0.00002325289,0.00002257683,8.750411e-7,0.009431373,0.001023024,0.00005927862,0.9427648,0.000311109,0.00008620423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003898296,0.0001195417,0.5702063,0.0002036966,0.0001658916,0.00001379953,0.005632167,0.003323637,0.0007140018,0.394226,0.02082973,0.0006668553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.915929,0.00002087643,0.06189185,0.01238529,0.0001157515,0.001229646,0.0009334428,0.00002416676,0.007470052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958107,0.000002330111,0.001880152,0.0004533759,0.0002250214,0.00009296939,0.0001309197,0.00000488534,0.001399584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5485387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7482275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286880886","doi":"","title":"\"Render Unto Caesar…\": Using the Freedom of Conscience and Religion to Challenge Canadian Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Tonkovich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0540997260953207,"gpt":0.3027252114588052,"spread":0.2486254853634845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008853614,0.00007694971,0.0001211736,0.0001537207,0.0006965923,0.00004492557,0.000208319,0.0000655986,0.00001971403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001417813,0.0000768459,0.00002978017,0.0003878582,0.001845101,0.0001576798,0.00002895566,0.00008975996,0.000008037832],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006612946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3314601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3306429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989056,0.0001085627,0.0001935438,0.0001775802,0.0003512136,0.0002635031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998604,0.0002164452,0.0000823638,0.0001277092,0.0005576427,0.00041185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003041378,0.00002206998,0.003758349,0.000003546666,0.000008575364,0.000005468379,0.002857682,0.003159123,0.00001139925,0.989697,0.0003914062,0.00008235854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001315951,0.0001971982,0.006115659,0.0002416289,0.000161406,0.0002527443,0.04138432,0.004039375,0.00004019814,0.08970076,0.8556678,0.0008830183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4206744,0.001554327,0.02127848,0.02192832,0.001156754,0.001393953,0.0005653008,0.00006748876,0.531381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971024,0.00003608521,0.001566711,0.0004925175,0.0002416253,0.0000128536,0.000004543885,0.000003256195,0.0005399993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1034034791","doi":"","title":"Canadian Leadership in Latin America: in Constitutional Terms","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Irvin Studin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07922056073633844,"gpt":0.2778791955390536,"spread":0.1986586348027152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001244177,0.0002817898,0.0003914165,0.000715702,0.0005366758,0.00006118478,0.0003289646,0.0004361074,0.001745123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001292439,0.0004062808,0.0001427044,0.001603973,0.007878439,0.0009215172,0.00003212243,0.000674427,0.0006845823],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01542897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1934248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.242918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964133,0.0003789596,0.0006746422,0.0003776083,0.0004830087,0.00167249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978592,0.0007112694,0.0001879651,0.000185377,0.00020079,0.0008553631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006462168,0.0001988284,0.1822179,0.00005361985,0.00001974322,0.00006080832,0.001210011,0.002293007,0.000004236003,0.811801,0.0008108517,0.001323567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009167223,0.00001936044,0.06786375,0.0007194165,0.00004692864,0.0002459758,0.003515687,0.0009379446,0.000005165277,0.01970911,0.9052526,0.0007673118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02335002,0.01238948,0.00526873,0.05092934,0.0039785,0.0007786948,0.001093421,0.00006218767,0.9021496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97599,0.0003616759,0.001712413,0.00388217,0.001457756,0.00007456105,0.0001839297,0.00001177146,0.01632574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. Perlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0171675608478357,"gpt":0.2436749021350067,"spread":0.226507341287171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009280361,0.00008302168,0.0002267838,0.00003322887,0.0003103488,0.00005540733,0.0002338623,0.0001565345,0.0001337076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003038871,0.0001300648,0.00005876978,0.0004068015,0.000986685,0.0004039613,0.00005838893,0.0001803893,0.00000112826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007621963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003412293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8863876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984615,0.0001292643,0.0004264725,0.0001787249,0.0004461712,0.0003578264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983086,0.0007616357,0.0002105923,0.000123833,0.0004548814,0.0001404737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000439748,0.0002113871,0.4516424,0.0005249834,0.00001232522,0.000006210078,0.001168165,0.0001232182,0.00006752372,0.5403299,0.003403768,0.002505752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005858099,0.00002852683,0.9588847,0.003077801,0.0001015486,0.0003536051,0.001767141,0.0003306634,0.0001858995,0.01521781,0.0191815,0.0002849573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.959971,0.01580859,0.00003845749,0.01205893,0.0007038866,0.0005094385,0.0005511596,0.000007625384,0.01035088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945326,0.0005543323,0.0002368755,0.0001693088,0.0002151399,0.00002513784,0.000006079092,0.000005885605,0.004254604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.525112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6053262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129899286","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Follow International Law","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law","authors":[{"name":"Cassandra Kirewskie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02576789029707875,"gpt":0.2787476493507047,"spread":0.252979759053626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491768,0.0001923538,0.0001875424,0.0001320214,0.0007576386,0.0001121997,0.0004635495,0.0002886918,0.001563529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006732055,0.0002713626,0.0001529844,0.0004103643,0.0006854979,0.0006372237,0.00004473376,0.0003391068,0.0001695737],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005579505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003176351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5746999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9383122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973511,0.00008283638,0.0005554158,0.0003596691,0.001120346,0.0005306372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997806,0.0005294455,0.000257498,0.0001418794,0.001013173,0.0002519629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002083559,0.0001149515,0.002378169,0.0000221785,0.0001029521,0.00009087404,0.0003896403,0.001042621,0.00004471475,0.987275,0.005593192,0.002924856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005489445,0.00001152013,0.003820047,0.0001602266,0.00004622576,0.0000984103,0.0004100858,0.001589511,0.0001904996,0.08600649,0.9067928,0.0003252662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01593528,0.001203783,0.03412092,0.04228645,0.01501975,0.0003185333,0.0004624836,0.00006883108,0.8905839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895982,0.0001667318,0.00149179,0.003667726,0.003585314,0.0000142864,0.0002812701,0.00001437851,0.09479652],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76925935","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases in Ontario, 2008","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard G. Ogden","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03716799095065223,"gpt":0.2717512029331928,"spread":0.2345832119825405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008435062,0.0003070566,0.0004393806,0.0002223153,0.001254906,0.00008885522,0.000316796,0.0003856788,0.002126193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001118255,0.0004180748,0.0002309099,0.0009925908,0.006247823,0.000725185,0.00004091355,0.0006254327,0.0005280635],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005295714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006500386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1297956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.415454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971421,0.0001770729,0.0006885639,0.0005419768,0.0006740796,0.0007762547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983341,0.0005051055,0.0002023801,0.0001630306,0.0005230968,0.0002722799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003472477,0.0005116413,0.02226015,0.00001267118,0.00005142216,0.0004568896,0.001146937,0.002482952,0.00001325152,0.9660558,0.002768393,0.004205139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035084,0.00007672916,0.09264614,0.0006373881,0.00008708326,0.0008358476,0.0006230049,0.0002103365,0.000009287101,0.4658981,0.4373313,0.000609614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07928018,0.0264984,0.00614613,0.04627489,0.004600782,0.0008856652,0.0003214633,0.0001422085,0.8358503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813999,0.001122501,0.001024544,0.001896752,0.001129858,0.00004376017,0.00008870453,0.000004413984,0.01328957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Robert E. Charney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06374453824057522,"gpt":0.2878263210930261,"spread":0.2240817828524509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000751193,0.00006753537,0.0001341962,0.00001724347,0.0008392705,0.00005336727,0.0002531428,0.00008688356,0.00002700522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004190986,0.00006785074,0.00005892044,0.0003423594,0.0003822968,0.000311253,0.00004194917,0.0001351208,0.00001294289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005057597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7006032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8484551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989551,0.0001020194,0.0001612099,0.000145626,0.0004546471,0.0001814038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986377,0.0001694311,0.000104877,0.00008963183,0.0007879068,0.0002104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008648159,0.00002032199,0.003512828,0.00002547608,0.00002145746,0.000002677148,0.002705467,0.0006665384,0.0000257774,0.9902837,0.002691753,0.00003529975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006097783,0.00001580942,0.002613395,0.0001921232,0.00004510395,0.000009399577,0.01642786,0.0001536536,0.0002606676,0.008877761,0.9705456,0.0002488036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2633745,0.0009209922,0.005999981,0.04825427,0.001245231,0.001223715,0.0003962645,0.0001174138,0.6784676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961704,0.00001552678,0.0001307691,0.001404836,0.0003250494,0.000003182854,0.000005661069,0.000003207159,0.001941378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8971959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543676754","doi":"","title":"Qualifier ou Graduer?: L’application de la “Charte canadienne des droits et libertés” aux Universités","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Noura Karazivan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01727183472408289,"gpt":0.2558475628391498,"spread":0.2385757281150669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358039,0.0001463407,0.0001849035,0.0004853891,0.001513812,0.0001782658,0.0003163425,0.0003434558,0.0009027875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008313029,0.0002081017,0.0001452702,0.000652929,0.003741481,0.0007500271,0.00002918266,0.0002090891,0.0004145803],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01010436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005970303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3544449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8442178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981726,0.0003849046,0.0002698797,0.0003678488,0.0002525963,0.0005521335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981245,0.0005868019,0.000168629,0.0002068788,0.000401772,0.0005113934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044351,0.00007768763,0.0007210853,0.00004942572,0.00004856259,0.00003964008,0.005440179,0.0001021881,0.0003120148,0.9612897,0.00623259,0.02567888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004462741,0.00001165334,0.004568818,0.0002111461,0.00007374679,0.0000976787,0.000503684,0.000155791,0.00001081916,0.1828349,0.8108335,0.0002519307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2537282,0.007997775,0.1093707,0.1083214,0.002381034,0.0008765988,0.001854932,0.000250483,0.5152189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959736,0.00241837,0.00048436,0.0005928917,0.0004957057,0.00003526814,0.00004194769,0.00001675834,0.1999411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510209270","doi":"","title":"Noting the Obvious: A Reflection on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Application of Judicial Notice under Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ranjan K. Agarwal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Faiz M Lalani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935321606732226,"gpt":0.2720005618493013,"spread":0.2426473457819791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006454012,0.00005895758,0.0001022818,0.00002212793,0.0009999636,0.000008563969,0.0001607207,0.00005706782,0.00001439349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001500915,0.00003170302,0.00004892818,0.0002425465,0.0008901143,0.00007118606,0.00002666209,0.00009121208,7.554315e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004958998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000618286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08711749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4155096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990247,0.000143257,0.0002304028,0.0001095883,0.0003774706,0.0001145973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981196,0.000971865,0.0002737111,0.000111471,0.000500918,0.00002244629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001078399,0.00003300383,0.004380999,0.00001635333,0.00005041561,5.397821e-8,0.003963956,0.0007308922,0.004113556,0.9857401,0.0005466492,0.0004132058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00226922,0.000129198,0.7788185,0.001133522,0.0004674671,0.00003241957,0.05291457,0.003930824,0.01597036,0.1074079,0.03619898,0.0007270745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8808553,0.0001652896,0.007452934,0.08915531,0.0005045094,0.001079478,0.0001195234,0.00002353638,0.02064414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.0000326493,0.0000413218,0.0001563779,0.000159989,0.00003144595,0.000001056027,0.000002528517,0.0002691944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124689136","doi":"","title":"Travelling in Constitutional Circles: The Paradox of Tribunal Independence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology; Constitution; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Ann Chaplin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03010718239465562,"gpt":0.2689573982666613,"spread":0.2388502158720056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986265,0.0002186058,0.0003807899,0.0001987382,0.0008587202,0.00003317015,0.0004882124,0.0003227464,0.0006032251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001829159,0.0001855321,0.0002224596,0.00112944,0.01467521,0.0004920072,0.00006643144,0.0003414057,0.0001626364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001238351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003665728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970356,0.0003025082,0.0008036928,0.0004117017,0.0008894405,0.0005570335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969324,0.001733474,0.0003430901,0.0001780785,0.0006764902,0.0001364155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003530615,0.0002052273,0.01681217,0.00003388805,0.00007944942,0.00002785117,0.001008845,0.0009165278,0.0001670829,0.9698457,0.0002042796,0.01066367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001953832,0.00004846737,0.05050155,0.002335134,0.0001311469,0.0002473789,0.002043826,0.0004106213,0.0002459115,0.8610071,0.0805144,0.0005606174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2010461,0.07501151,0.3052686,0.1419069,0.00824134,0.002376956,0.00229134,0.0001436518,0.2637137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920387,0.004549372,0.0003394223,0.000287447,0.0009070491,0.00006633704,0.00001026146,0.000005630203,0.001795834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560432532","doi":"","title":"Devolution, Evolution, Confusion: the Constitutional Status of the Canadian Territories and its Potential Implications for the Duty to Consult","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Devolution (biology); Duty; Law; Political science; Operations research; History; Psychology; Mathematics; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Geneviève Chabot","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02392565925271303,"gpt":0.2796583328803652,"spread":0.2557326736276522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006796443,0.000114886,0.0001297943,0.000052323,0.006394398,0.00007261297,0.0003624984,0.0001156018,0.00004810624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006310244,0.00006278035,0.00009534027,0.0003646652,0.004024866,0.0001890245,0.00006890826,0.0001007624,0.000009051111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001810713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003612164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.340459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986176,0.0001252307,0.0002973044,0.0002217134,0.0003219217,0.000416185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964613,0.001069794,0.0001525808,0.0001725315,0.001936742,0.0002070346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007904924,0.00001258435,0.01832079,0.000006828521,0.00004775412,1.111549e-7,0.00129784,0.0001636646,0.0002793933,0.9772958,0.0022203,0.0003470634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006759922,0.00001293143,0.5840667,0.00009621755,0.0001105086,0.00002853615,0.001931424,0.0001693939,0.00006565297,0.04085584,0.3717729,0.0002138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09323459,0.007184437,0.08970118,0.7775282,0.004203091,0.00785224,0.007170124,0.0001477772,0.01297834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997374,0.0002215405,0.0002760111,0.0004168026,0.0004658687,0.0003227998,0.00001304242,0.000003806191,0.000906146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1032438667","doi":"","title":"Overview: Supreme Court of Canada Charter Decisions","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Debra M. McAllister","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02848703536602217,"gpt":0.2689585937572918,"spread":0.2404715583912696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000456397,0.0001305434,0.0002387506,0.00008432476,0.0004217671,0.00002655823,0.0002882605,0.0001663732,0.000848418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00144454,0.000183589,0.0001208409,0.0005759742,0.0005281778,0.000268841,0.00001252159,0.0001793501,0.00003737143],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002023541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008740318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6284774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9074981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998299,0.0000827927,0.0004015054,0.0002312287,0.000546629,0.0004388536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984798,0.0003907034,0.0002282992,0.0001992617,0.0003950445,0.0003068363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004521112,0.00005596251,0.0001844465,0.00001727381,0.0000182492,0.00002070977,0.0005477846,0.000397294,0.00002606591,0.817259,0.177853,0.003615714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434695,0.00001930372,0.02170313,0.0004236275,0.00003616711,0.00006011193,0.0001118087,0.001022294,0.00003953498,0.08378119,0.8922403,0.0002190499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07241838,0.04603377,0.00493565,0.5682836,0.004599071,0.0009458749,0.009242671,0.00004919246,0.2934918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368625,0.002190855,0.0004094866,0.007142353,0.0008655064,0.000007267062,0.00002724091,0.000005753632,0.05248898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916167","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the \"Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act\" Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Federalism; Constitution; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Separation of powers; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter Oliver","is_ca":false},{"name":"Taylor Wormington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03183355028587525,"gpt":0.2006843416943639,"spread":0.1688507914084886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011187,0.0001291265,0.00020169,0.00005113461,0.0005323472,0.0001172734,0.0002192543,0.00007252547,0.00003735892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542756,0.0001132885,0.0000611079,0.0003437548,0.000209158,0.0002548736,0.00007903299,0.0002831671,0.000115358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003245006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007335682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001792541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001007493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989116,0.00003356894,0.0004093704,0.0003018578,0.0001232678,0.0002203835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994494,0.0001400992,0.0001950332,0.0001255418,0.00004300662,0.00004690418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001054248,0.00004563664,0.05711899,0.00004001643,0.00003532452,0.000005556868,0.001313458,0.003437652,0.00001970307,0.9371505,0.0003060097,0.0005166431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004131713,0.0001270197,0.3748477,0.0003729888,0.0001084053,0.0004763322,0.004456168,0.1158503,0.00005805237,0.2265852,0.271598,0.001388022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3322602,0.02640723,0.1914967,0.2042453,0.0005008553,0.0018265,0.0006480948,0.0001326322,0.2424824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945279,0.000615649,0.0004687154,0.003990534,0.0001920918,0.00006114056,0.00001080033,0.000007173555,0.0001259681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.461977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162561870","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Section 15 on Canadian Society: Equality Rights: Beacon or Laser?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Law; Laser; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Optics; Operating system","authors":[{"name":"Marilou McPhedran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01764727016560328,"gpt":0.2520280081384532,"spread":0.2343807379728499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003991133,0.0001022879,0.0001116102,0.0001425281,0.0005952929,0.0001556853,0.0001217487,0.00008768477,0.0002678396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002053677,0.00007735089,0.0001509716,0.0003941686,0.0001334072,0.0004204266,0.00001131377,0.0001192628,0.00007774092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005128999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000325705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.264904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1772861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.00001356627,0.0002530464,0.0001498335,0.0001852306,0.0001918105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999174,0.0001177391,0.0002309054,0.0001300659,0.0003270638,0.00002021724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003327625,0.00006737387,0.005334462,0.00003167204,0.00003746189,0.000002600122,0.00003464228,0.006950064,0.00007672699,0.9672861,0.01967654,0.0004691214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001526301,0.00003679724,0.1528922,0.0001752811,0.00007954896,0.00002259541,0.0002495978,0.03002762,0.0003518634,0.08010423,0.734037,0.0004969104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6687894,0.000124596,0.002003845,0.002017634,0.0006893048,0.000508432,0.0001034655,0.0001392644,0.3256241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955992,0.000004362488,0.00006146396,0.0003296089,0.001332216,0.00001718606,0.0001486608,0.000006107991,0.00250117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120985047","doi":"","title":"International Law and Canadian Courts: A Work in Progress","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Justice Russell G. Juriansz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124522136723284,"gpt":0.2618494991670113,"spread":0.2493972854946829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006623514,0.0001347835,0.0001466794,0.0002676131,0.0003930417,0.0001684293,0.0002281073,0.0002409916,0.0003850174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002478404,0.0001906307,0.00005834326,0.0003932556,0.0007468761,0.0006233795,0.00001382164,0.0002424074,0.00007884196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002289719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009937672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1577261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985374,0.0000907012,0.0003288591,0.0002902797,0.0003745073,0.0003782609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.000117524,0.0001181899,0.00007983868,0.0003817235,0.0002389482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001460988,0.0001059741,0.006668908,0.000009478586,0.00002084748,0.00005036431,0.00118239,0.0003592803,0.000002499997,0.9825085,0.0006073402,0.008469814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007210621,0.00002641131,0.05316363,0.0005660506,0.00002447376,0.00009181122,0.000256188,0.002539565,0.000007278177,0.2349112,0.70736,0.0003322469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04568445,0.004061924,0.000786389,0.1691094,0.003003863,0.0005539039,0.0002409866,0.0000507912,0.7765083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845877,0.0004923107,0.001490698,0.002804818,0.0009813568,0.00002432058,0.0001195333,0.000006080228,0.009493211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262202671","doi":"","title":"Whose \"Charter\" is it anyways?: An examination of \"Charter\" litigation as it relates to the Chinese Canadian community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Avvy Go","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04188625038076114,"gpt":0.3374065939308967,"spread":0.2955203435501355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002989474,0.000120039,0.0001554945,0.0002718998,0.002109356,0.00009237327,0.0003870529,0.0001094269,0.0003389621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001556704,0.0001189047,0.00007277026,0.0005949172,0.0004721987,0.0005043008,0.00003327296,0.0002499977,0.000135188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009194526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006791126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8207572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984039,0.000293024,0.0003724289,0.000177483,0.0004888106,0.0002643462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975868,0.0005942126,0.0001585623,0.0002091539,0.001238991,0.0002122674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001268072,0.0001068109,0.009087494,0.00001126323,0.00004505445,0.000002747891,0.07184831,0.0001666281,0.0001587492,0.9149708,0.002093781,0.001495662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005725152,0.0001696611,0.7418551,0.0002370711,0.00004671975,0.00002702931,0.02924475,0.001328563,0.0004855912,0.05936026,0.1662273,0.0004455364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8021352,0.00007953293,0.001816716,0.01858399,0.000281442,0.0004321141,0.0001221162,0.00002602603,0.1765229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945523,0.000032834,0.0002026219,0.002316531,0.0003371986,0.00003509389,0.0001062723,0.000005708057,0.002411495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202561496","doi":"","title":"R. v. Kapp: Aboriginal Fishing, Andrews and Affirmative Action in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Law; Fishing; Political science; Action (physics); Physics","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Kraicer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02469100168435922,"gpt":0.2996355685379767,"spread":0.2749445668536175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934087,0.0000629137,0.0001121135,0.00003329197,0.0005183195,0.00003414174,0.0001201646,0.00005526515,0.00001655326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006064408,0.00005562537,0.00002333892,0.0002283689,0.0002868537,0.0002474562,0.000005151795,0.0001318443,9.617726e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007223059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007851453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1578166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6419913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991124,0.0001124691,0.0001686791,0.0001083491,0.0003390289,0.0001590903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993501,0.0002557314,0.0001001388,0.0000459785,0.0002076045,0.00004042499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001466243,0.00007102188,0.01236037,0.00002420905,0.00002140359,0.000009094478,0.03309243,0.0005925465,0.0001301161,0.9440681,0.008163509,0.001452563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009284124,0.00003808965,0.6969647,0.0001625594,0.00004080875,0.00003164919,0.03672913,0.0009115523,0.000115525,0.02001447,0.2437492,0.0003138388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9072767,0.0007100459,0.0004461365,0.0495238,0.0002020542,0.0005002019,0.00005288507,0.00002293147,0.04126522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988001,0.0002704482,0.000213435,0.0002968935,0.0001352307,0.00001213947,0.000008303349,0.000001034212,0.0002624083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9240536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8477916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123325995","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2022.12.004","title":"In Defence of the Courts: A Balanced Judicial Role in Canada's Constitutional Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Power (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial restraint; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"A. Wayne MacKay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01014062902697611,"gpt":0.2447480423113869,"spread":0.2346074132844108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001125096,0.0001058798,0.0002130125,0.0001506141,0.000560601,0.00001174845,0.0003090005,0.00009161428,0.00008210995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001728718,0.0001116413,0.00006745409,0.0008113754,0.002180873,0.0001984213,0.00004931654,0.0002311646,0.000006092492],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002958435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01248325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.720235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981959,0.00008710843,0.0004906593,0.0002125816,0.0006213661,0.0003923168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881,0.0005232868,0.0001720411,0.00009981986,0.0003135824,0.00008130283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843725,0.00004828003,0.2193806,0.000004750354,0.000008229967,0.00001921919,0.0004014029,0.001348351,0.00008877521,0.778339,0.0001098664,0.0002330221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009455652,0.000006113723,0.5803856,0.00028758,0.00001688965,0.00003664812,0.002989679,0.0002721378,0.0002036336,0.4015708,0.01301521,0.0002701652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399107,0.001248285,0.004824765,0.009961266,0.001457017,0.0008021754,0.0001635704,0.00002802708,0.2416042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998778,0.00007721413,0.0001889434,0.000603601,0.0002421104,0.00001959954,0.000005431379,0.00000240629,0.00008270233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3767682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247551692","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Clemency and Death Row Inmates: Smith v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Courtney G. Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0179727018015738,"gpt":0.2573905634779196,"spread":0.2394178616763458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005682217,0.0002180842,0.0002500422,0.00008495616,0.001504213,0.00009678142,0.0002026607,0.0002231223,0.0008108586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007359937,0.000287638,0.00006977022,0.0003399208,0.002245816,0.0003442706,0.0000576713,0.0005157569,0.00003092336],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001067047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01551671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5401874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.626779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981615,0.0001342972,0.0004081049,0.0003431533,0.0003923871,0.0005605351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997973,0.000684426,0.0001986555,0.0001928555,0.0004599581,0.0004911142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003591927,0.00008092661,0.007408958,0.00007711548,0.00005318509,0.0008032228,0.0004820141,0.0001142416,0.000008411144,0.9855984,0.003915785,0.001454192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000427997,0.00001955825,0.0006239191,0.0001132305,0.0001080228,0.006885794,0.001328921,0.0009457527,0.00001115112,0.01912452,0.9700173,0.0003938603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2865108,0.007099517,0.0062996,0.07268557,0.006980606,0.0008687919,0.003180884,0.0001150561,0.6162592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824212,0.0004099782,0.002310778,0.003551979,0.001113146,0.00003122525,0.00006068093,0.00001127959,0.01008975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041932618","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal Bungles the School Boards' Human Rights Duty to Accommodate Students with Disabilities: \"J.F. v. Waterloo Cathofic District School Board\" - An Erroneous Rejection of a Student's Request to Bring His Autism Service Dog to School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Duty; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark Lepofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03166711377603512,"gpt":0.3153538144643578,"spread":0.2836867006883227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855423,0.0004051605,0.000572128,0.0001681649,0.004371339,0.0005494099,0.001285329,0.0001864646,0.0004569826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006533855,0.0003303893,0.0001513225,0.001038634,0.0004218808,0.0008951847,0.0003256278,0.0005512821,0.0002497401],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005584156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004902075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3510974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7336094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958359,0.0003704848,0.0008033324,0.0008718959,0.001450801,0.0006675688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.0002054325,0.0002752332,0.0004527188,0.0009384246,0.00114151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005035397,0.001878703,0.4911132,0.0003257904,0.001016685,0.00009930672,0.2758743,0.01405099,0.00298489,0.2073016,0.004725301,0.0001256919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002507958,0.0008116861,0.9117185,0.0007571956,0.0004097844,0.00002865739,0.01750512,0.00004849315,0.0003721746,0.004900925,0.05953033,0.001409203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850435,0.00003807309,0.0004537249,0.008276867,0.0002347056,0.002662353,0.0001680175,0.0001900844,0.002932665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952008,0.000002752553,0.0007909891,0.0006896993,0.000647411,0.0003270835,0.0001065043,0.0000200969,0.002214649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4206053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035635063","doi":"","title":"Telling Stories: The Crown, Parliament and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Art; Law; Politics; Materials science","authors":[{"name":"Ann Chaplin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01790511277134235,"gpt":0.2129594855578513,"spread":0.195054372786509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002129487,0.00003597921,0.00005720572,0.00003745375,0.001380976,0.0001514593,0.0001094085,0.00003405989,0.000184003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005802315,0.00004527087,0.00001960739,0.0001368852,0.0005244663,0.00009472096,0.00001034037,0.00009160628,0.00001068379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00154131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004779999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9574251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994265,0.0000348076,0.00009627901,0.0001115296,0.0002091859,0.0001216594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995458,0.0001216016,0.00004096442,0.00004795327,0.00009890901,0.0001447821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003144334,0.000005068818,0.0007926687,0.00001640678,0.00001256457,0.00001160669,0.007850803,0.0003846271,0.00001161879,0.9654001,0.02462354,0.0008878691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007545237,0.000002419644,0.0007504353,0.00001118253,0.0000100662,0.000003808427,0.002945532,0.0001884733,0.000002082356,0.001368291,0.9945776,0.00006469576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2369706,0.0120522,0.01872754,0.3259309,0.003487331,0.001583844,0.0005771439,0.0002520744,0.4004184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933501,0.0003352014,0.0001133022,0.002586129,0.0005437273,0.00001318359,0.000006488648,0.0000029408,0.00304888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270387197","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dissenting and Concurring Reasons in The Supreme Court of Canada's \"Charter\" Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Justice Marshall Rothstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008489126006916854,"gpt":0.2452369108518927,"spread":0.2367477848449758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048112,0.00005054358,0.00009635494,0.0000287052,0.0008149244,0.00002232279,0.0002065342,0.00003933688,0.000008674217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001617687,0.00004093381,0.00002762539,0.0001945253,0.001231399,0.00007809857,0.0000260845,0.0001440448,3.635906e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007214324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001454911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1539513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7495396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991497,0.00006098159,0.0002054919,0.0000961175,0.0003269452,0.0001607793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987363,0.0007975247,0.0001163746,0.00007058975,0.0002454298,0.00003381856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002617448,0.00001427441,0.05468897,0.000004296218,0.000008713251,0.000001349202,0.001347269,0.00001531174,0.0006557813,0.9425797,0.00004115702,0.0006405289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006150614,0.0000170658,0.4939505,0.0003732328,0.00006826571,0.00007083473,0.03769789,0.001099978,0.0009250634,0.3691038,0.09571081,0.0003674832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080365,0.001219206,0.0001519978,0.006195451,0.0002646187,0.0002471198,0.00004624952,0.000008351803,0.08383053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995936,0.0001242817,0.00006415137,0.00003961691,0.000114042,0.00001709025,0.000001814279,0.000001301123,0.00004412674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5955883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8516827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104986285","doi":"","title":"Canadian Women and the \"Charter of Rights\"","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Doris Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01066146434178474,"gpt":0.2349822355629528,"spread":0.2243207712211681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006194506,0.00006707278,0.0001192616,0.00009648209,0.0005290695,0.00004348817,0.0001003851,0.0001097398,0.0002555883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000938951,0.00006316614,0.00005038397,0.0002111808,0.001670333,0.0001202078,0.00001040375,0.00008728017,0.00002599269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007713914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009814173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4155404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2023712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999059,0.0001238244,0.0002212447,0.000130547,0.0001848081,0.0002806159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992611,0.0002040919,0.0000952942,0.0000860798,0.0002252053,0.0001282261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002991463,0.00002206965,0.00184566,0.00002198793,0.00002161841,0.000003080976,0.004726092,0.0003869915,0.000006338344,0.9919354,0.0008297255,0.0001980002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006701305,0.000005098841,0.007498456,0.00003203616,0.00002684125,0.00003306313,0.001356639,0.00186667,0.00001574208,0.9208978,0.06750527,0.000092275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4663373,0.005418831,0.001892967,0.04802943,0.001423062,0.0005537182,0.0002796777,0.00001530228,0.4760497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739833,0.00009958995,0.0001414131,0.0001947443,0.0005110624,0.00002374131,0.00001918983,0.000002803856,0.02502417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.507646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}