{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2795d39b1aef","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2079357922","doi":"10.1080/07350190802540690","title":"Metis, Metis, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical Bodies across Rhetorical Traditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Metis; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mainstream; Normative; Subject (documents); Mythology; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1326650696711928,"gpt":0.3553509111752561,"spread":0.2226858415040633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009159194,0.0006179842,0.001415905,0.0001007432,0.001640933,0.0002621978,0.0009611206,0.0001310695,0.001911018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003339569,0.0004897817,0.0005954193,0.0003641968,0.0003740136,0.0005319374,0.0001264921,0.0005827592,0.001074438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003561349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008424192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001007682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005300569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959617,0.0003819908,0.001288797,0.0006753384,0.0008476408,0.0008445447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971046,0.0004230459,0.0004236052,0.001246814,0.0004729713,0.0003289202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001052661,0.0004108517,0.00003428098,0.0003529729,0.000162787,0.00001454205,0.008366316,7.021118e-7,0.000007963917,0.4481438,0.4891434,0.05335185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003050883,0.0001958468,0.0004578584,0.0008089815,0.0002591155,0.00003691926,0.0005532164,0.000008029078,0.000008526755,0.004103202,0.9926572,0.0006059982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004181923,0.7540287,0.0007936892,0.02452579,0.003512725,0.001262073,0.0001463254,0.0007917702,0.2145207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2163905,0.7395791,0.001018434,0.005784825,0.003091872,0.0005188092,0.0001513554,0.00008610989,0.03337898],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399821572","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2024.2351723","title":"Post-Rhetoric: A Rhetorical Profile of the Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Chatbot; Rhetorical question; Generative grammar; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1191692240314877,"gpt":0.4193943617586894,"spread":0.3002251377272016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526696,0.0001873279,0.0004316687,0.00005112399,0.000558341,0.0001722461,0.0006038897,0.0001907656,0.0005269262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662103,0.0001227037,0.0003796346,0.001472511,0.0003824343,0.0003152938,0.0001106193,0.0005005722,0.0001977873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001064542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000881193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002795165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971022,0.000635416,0.0006044898,0.0003330635,0.0009227119,0.0004021068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982592,0.0004574762,0.000178012,0.0003417172,0.00059443,0.000169188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003317789,0.00005915949,0.000009117532,0.0007391519,0.00004864174,0.000004950578,0.00801339,7.781777e-7,0.0002195553,0.8969458,0.008755234,0.08520085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002691212,0.000165099,0.0000880315,0.004347924,0.0002128049,0.000004416143,0.001171957,0.0001021525,0.0008833148,0.07905122,0.9134735,0.0004726506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003039705,0.5934093,0.0024064,0.2364775,0.01742844,0.004199529,0.0001475246,0.0004228572,0.1424688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6568372,0.32345,0.0008221085,0.003998642,0.004396273,0.0001788192,0.0000129071,0.00007078412,0.01023329],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5769472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285400524","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2022.2038510","title":"A Play on Occlusion: Uptake of Letters to the University President","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Occlusion; Linguistics; Psychology; Property (philosophy); Process (computing); Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology; Cardiology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02757560253036187,"gpt":0.2556585530005721,"spread":0.2280829504702102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003499826,0.00008032902,0.0002261528,0.00004432974,0.0005228654,0.00001118472,0.0003313967,0.000003273403,0.006462978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003439943,0.00005181916,0.0001480719,0.0001192441,0.00004809507,0.00003296939,0.0002657993,0.0000819582,0.00009179027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007587422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001478604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000133734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999151,0.0001240405,0.0001664519,0.0001350887,0.0003239212,0.00009950391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994816,0.000049538,0.00009964451,0.0003156108,0.00003178175,0.00002186732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008253862,0.00005245899,0.000009001686,0.0002062142,0.0001378107,0.00002790084,0.01619776,0.0001401347,0.000005129439,0.09157126,0.8863824,0.005261691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000392033,0.00004707999,0.00009202053,0.0002316164,0.000140873,0.000001150992,0.002857097,0.000001397566,0.000001331161,0.00001092035,0.9965161,0.0000611815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04437062,0.3960167,0.00005234274,0.0861088,0.003618718,0.002595776,0.0002648324,0.0001348994,0.4668373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8370916,0.05071679,0.00007085194,0.02764479,0.001402801,0.00007494083,0.00003050244,0.00004483278,0.08292293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.792721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994923595","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2011.604610","title":"Elocution and Feminine Power in the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century: The Career of Carolyn Winkler (Paterson) as Performer and Teacher","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Performing arts; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Rhetoric; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics; Classics; Literature; History; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05289596105385775,"gpt":0.2403370436338031,"spread":0.1874410825799453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005307824,0.0001115762,0.0002422453,0.00001670178,0.0002088302,0.00001617075,0.0002635143,0.00002407838,0.0004704099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002273072,0.0000453146,0.0000716123,0.00007079945,0.0002776085,0.00007805488,0.00009136082,0.0001328946,0.000007078513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001028138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005139516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001451845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991807,0.0001436046,0.0002943737,0.0001025966,0.0001757531,0.0001029402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992397,0.00005890461,0.000185331,0.0004274232,0.00007651368,0.00001216229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000371377,0.0002490939,0.09793285,0.001253972,0.000219127,5.875118e-7,0.7246498,5.323602e-8,0.000003505717,0.07453828,0.08520576,0.01590977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587728,0.00007710487,0.08229111,0.0006305363,0.0001214947,0.000003961177,0.01561688,0.000001452836,0.000002862521,0.0001615835,0.9008443,0.00008999307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2786437,0.51993,0.000001511191,0.006237981,0.0006545777,0.001112559,0.00001123958,0.00001170398,0.1933967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187875,0.07949477,0.000003071745,0.0004661998,0.00004221447,0.00003844398,0.000001044868,0.000005551786,0.001161197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979197978","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2013.739492","title":"Shakespeare and the Rhetorical Tradition: Toward Defining the Concept of an “Opening”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07796644478538362,"gpt":0.2879005116006043,"spread":0.2099340668152206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009058221,0.0001540017,0.0003773184,0.00002117162,0.0003679958,0.0001050513,0.0002243489,0.00002769378,0.001433771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001328964,0.00007781867,0.0001260553,0.00007653336,0.0004334199,0.0005110811,0.00002460782,0.0001546424,0.00003563936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000140598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002894354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007032724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006500938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985775,0.0003665105,0.0004295104,0.0001478475,0.0002634582,0.0002151329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989458,0.0004159142,0.0001534139,0.0002883098,0.0001086464,0.00008794756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008777358,0.00002628667,0.00002261195,0.0002410273,0.0000215004,6.317529e-7,0.05564373,1.882063e-7,2.144013e-7,0.9293245,0.004493715,0.01021682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000416166,0.00006286352,0.0004187942,0.0006316774,0.0001656918,0.00003376769,0.003805063,0.00002655755,0.000004251163,0.001362695,0.9929244,0.0001480963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005459472,0.8910697,0.00007192484,0.004212832,0.00164344,0.0008181878,0.00005616766,0.00006531901,0.09660301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855019,0.009555135,0.0000990812,0.001957238,0.001480279,0.00006284333,0.00004061514,0.00002044267,0.001282435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388025166","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2023.2219495","title":"<i>Proleptic Logics in Media Coverage of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Mitacs; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Action (physics); Feeling; Psychology; Sociology; Science communication; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Science education; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4820083538594555,"gpt":0.5063524760002199,"spread":0.02434412214076442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002467816,0.00005878091,0.0002005881,0.00003115029,0.000118243,0.00001250831,0.0003281619,0.00004557063,0.0004871958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006820508,0.00004093812,0.0000866101,0.001106372,0.00006576205,0.00005436948,0.00009564931,0.0001191458,0.00007062455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001491686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001138224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003220999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001391277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985402,0.0004986604,0.0003589323,0.000110828,0.0003553836,0.0001359633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990123,0.0002264754,0.0002098422,0.000451426,0.00006480159,0.00003515304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006826521,0.0004792564,0.101892,0.005501324,0.00003799401,0.00005982849,0.0354273,0.00003476166,0.0005537344,0.08540745,0.08485483,0.6857447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009574105,0.000007796997,0.07809687,0.001509857,0.00002075682,0.000002246049,0.00058858,0.0000213034,0.000001791295,0.001511442,0.9180507,0.00009288554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09468976,0.08747164,0.0001420459,0.06786343,0.004401097,0.004127715,0.00003372752,0.0003574699,0.7409131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2932316,0.7052448,0.00002599884,0.0005542907,0.00006774649,0.00004552738,0.000028168,0.000005170962,0.0007967427],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795283686","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2018.1424476","title":"“[M]ost plain, rational, and easie”: Rhetorical Disavowal in Early Eighteenth-Century Inoculation Pamphlets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Character (mathematics); Rhetorical device; Literature; Sociology; Media studies; History; Political science; Classics; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03503555735466808,"gpt":0.3275623289446815,"spread":0.2925267715900134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007449987,0.0001412186,0.0003086933,0.00006748916,0.0003413764,0.00008462194,0.0001580659,0.00009944853,0.000376534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004592854,0.0001252043,0.00007017845,0.0005923872,0.00004046597,0.0004290213,0.0000436975,0.0001304968,0.0001974829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002029444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001262018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002758144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002706098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982758,0.0002979946,0.0004008503,0.0003055501,0.0004194642,0.0003003005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992673,0.0001383164,0.00012719,0.0001837364,0.0001392109,0.0001442543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158008,0.000389408,0.4798731,0.001241281,0.00005895024,0.00005096421,0.009940592,4.913751e-7,0.00007235492,0.3041311,0.08680326,0.1173769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003273781,0.00006843488,0.1799663,0.0008981638,0.00003124091,0.000002974379,0.00005235391,0.00001025816,0.000002937122,0.0006940726,0.8177166,0.000229333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4487883,0.5012992,0.0003769777,0.009306557,0.002137386,0.002041713,0.00001002327,0.0001471509,0.03589275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7646469,0.2333279,0.0001150786,0.0005598188,0.001043947,0.0000305499,0.00001149972,0.00001098362,0.0002533171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7309133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5105681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}