{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"fe5d5281f20a","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Gordon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katherine D. Lind","is_ca":false},{"name":"Saul Kutnicki","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07141585429859594,"gpt":0.2915769428938861,"spread":0.2201610885952902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007682063,0.0005910238,0.0005988996,0.002448488,0.01174685,0.01522097,0.001107377,0.004676908,0.01414252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687615,0.0003914963,0.0004508274,0.001637861,0.03045556,0.0163465,0.005778019,0.008440389,0.004847698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00582737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004654071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001460195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00247722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904022,0.005369137,0.0002310171,0.0009063905,0.002536948,0.0005541299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898808,0.005856627,0.0005878554,0.001369239,0.001676496,0.0006290231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009251097,0.000006682368,0.00005138888,0.00004131659,0.000002457293,0.00003713515,0.004000898,0.00001842423,0.00009014326,0.9589472,0.02935183,0.007443358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101738,0.00001866685,0.000157168,0.000314832,0.000005905026,0.0001637384,0.003634132,0.000134049,0.0002645534,0.3057962,0.6894889,0.00001163972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005521197,0.02126073,0.01413676,0.1582034,0.005726201,0.00003148165,0.00008519232,0.0001935943,0.7948413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557811,0.01128616,0.01053032,0.05585115,0.009689805,0.0001435727,0.0001277513,0.0006816527,0.2559085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01522097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04731143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072091286","doi":"10.1080/02773940701658104","title":"Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Presupposition; Utterance; Reading (process); Sociology; Grice; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Philosophy; Pragmatics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Dan Sperber","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sarah Cummins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01842934317265458,"gpt":0.3074355206646182,"spread":0.2890061774919636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003787057,0.00058981,0.0003709905,0.001418222,0.003089451,0.006356796,0.0007984511,0.001904895,0.004200036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006375,0.0004663181,0.0003542267,0.0009450327,0.02459271,0.01161522,0.002731385,0.006037364,0.001424529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003048955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001298086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009876479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964017,0.002348458,0.0001270096,0.0003734886,0.000603386,0.0001459636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902112,0.007791157,0.0003782175,0.000934445,0.0004868138,0.0001981209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082093,0.000006200519,0.00007037829,0.00005264689,0.000003669502,0.00004442412,0.00294623,0.000127141,0.0001184081,0.9775141,0.008768247,0.0103377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006343461,0.000009412143,0.000130881,0.00007906904,0.000002245471,0.000131467,0.0006368414,0.0003940039,0.000200785,0.8313547,0.1670461,0.000008101288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01891571,0.06596691,0.116484,0.1498853,0.003961204,0.00006016305,0.0001310684,0.0006000138,0.6439957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427808,0.0200925,0.0335927,0.008813124,0.006129179,0.000207372,0.0001001179,0.0004170474,0.08786722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006356796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02212185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063171179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2013.768352","title":"Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Public discourse; Phenomenon; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Peter Cramer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622528970467317,"gpt":0.2649978063844592,"spread":0.228772516679786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008439751,0.0006337729,0.0007757868,0.002876788,0.05151288,0.009776806,0.002222338,0.01154343,0.003242346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02609981,0.0006366264,0.0005912021,0.003221959,0.02700007,0.006129996,0.007384396,0.008730598,0.000456875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004024112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01296486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02808939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879615,0.009138168,0.000267395,0.0006643538,0.001003985,0.0009645815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775556,0.01814834,0.001331246,0.0006728637,0.0007577947,0.001534083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003607883,0.00008281154,0.001809516,0.00009012456,0.000006620707,0.0202638,0.9196981,0.00005137058,0.000422689,0.05011282,0.002912733,0.004513228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002186644,0.00009507467,0.002131709,0.0002934637,0.00002262088,0.01507204,0.8481187,0.00034415,0.0006906189,0.009936877,0.1232369,0.00003597042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425878,0.003306955,0.004461148,0.04345942,0.0006733303,0.0001464372,0.00005004966,0.0000684238,0.1052464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810278,0.001313562,0.001630708,0.003483474,0.0003911691,0.00007913653,0.00002093411,0.00006160398,0.01199157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05151288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05226314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079137350","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2012.724514","title":"Stanley Fish is not a Sophist: The Difference between Skeptical and Prudential Versions of Rhetorical Pragmatism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sophist; Skepticism; Rhetorical question; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Epistemology; Linguistics; Fishery; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Robert Danisch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03503770894047068,"gpt":0.2803586722369094,"spread":0.2453209632964387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01270219,0.00027029,0.0005666026,0.001829559,0.007113685,0.0103602,0.001069284,0.004385367,0.002451976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0316572,0.0003319166,0.0002906318,0.001422719,0.04396753,0.01263234,0.00389559,0.00841999,0.0006955336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006311104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00620412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004413862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004978678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880947,0.007511173,0.0002569079,0.0008247234,0.002813683,0.000498853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672475,0.02657922,0.001414033,0.001381024,0.002523235,0.0008550051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108437,0.000007270399,0.000186409,0.00003222602,0.00000268528,0.00003481783,0.01654598,0.00003940241,0.00006053206,0.9701488,0.008068029,0.004862934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001713333,0.00001979594,0.000528932,0.0002225858,0.000008258166,0.00009785435,0.01057313,0.0003237916,0.0002610149,0.8748217,0.1131068,0.00001899145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05341911,0.00944115,0.02924808,0.4644869,0.001642117,0.00002795512,0.00005076459,0.0001688305,0.441515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951093,0.00242536,0.004530771,0.02299272,0.0009871563,0.0000709637,0.00001912091,0.0001407013,0.01774017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01270219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06717634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412708738","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2025.2533751","title":"Empathy as Bug: The Rhetoric of MAGA’s “Battle”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Battle; Empathy; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Art; Social psychology; Linguistics; Ancient history","authors":[{"name":"Stuart J. Murray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0119407341108538,"gpt":0.3019329431486792,"spread":0.2899922090378254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00691458,0.0005384894,0.0004451091,0.002281244,0.01258318,0.008054579,0.001020525,0.004962979,0.00469928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0213965,0.0002595442,0.0003673552,0.0008490583,0.02818797,0.01218849,0.007165037,0.007140122,0.0009464244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004593537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002185754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001755001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901956,0.007592801,0.0001327256,0.0004287648,0.001023547,0.0006267025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925618,0.005831633,0.0004272642,0.0002789027,0.000511084,0.0003893711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003051423,0.00001052353,0.0001672268,0.00006202343,0.000005561126,0.0001842975,0.06110813,0.0000738511,0.0002121888,0.9171464,0.01249786,0.0085014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002234655,0.00007137732,0.0004609546,0.0004977704,0.00002339001,0.0005613844,0.04245188,0.000966398,0.0008196929,0.3281285,0.6259624,0.00003384138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06001243,0.01993809,0.0328679,0.320307,0.009223921,0.00005262969,0.00003427215,0.0003129585,0.5572509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95287,0.001656291,0.002263871,0.01735882,0.001666971,0.00003787194,0.00001108725,0.000115981,0.02401918],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01258318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03656828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Kem-Laurin Lubin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01201972707389747,"gpt":0.2716246617896202,"spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02276729,0.0007104218,0.000461394,0.002066313,0.01312013,0.01461281,0.001757309,0.01277191,0.004165429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215756,0.0005952933,0.0006673613,0.000914449,0.05675469,0.01447996,0.007129066,0.01799597,0.001137975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006386992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004821398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005744276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815917,0.01332208,0.0005237245,0.001586537,0.00215586,0.0008200726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626902,0.03240678,0.001072699,0.001467224,0.001806326,0.0005567718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014837,0.000007018712,0.0001068164,0.00003586605,0.000002654153,0.00008027475,0.02627395,0.00003406176,0.0001302966,0.9595096,0.009672374,0.004136943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002614799,0.00006935439,0.0003132698,0.0007119133,0.00002515887,0.000272182,0.02563038,0.0005036671,0.001230728,0.2381702,0.7329988,0.00004823885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02267543,0.005088151,0.02482724,0.4891805,0.006472768,0.0001178126,0.0000698684,0.0001831152,0.4513851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604695,0.002223144,0.008915602,0.135118,0.002719456,0.0003916445,0.00005355946,0.0003318437,0.08977729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1204064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216286","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2387507","title":"Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dylan Annandale","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03331352049615477,"gpt":0.3212884107069616,"spread":0.2879748902108069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00340411,0.0006230526,0.0003071284,0.002147093,0.01332824,0.007795965,0.001188702,0.003031156,0.01238977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007350188,0.0003295848,0.0003021888,0.001385797,0.0199458,0.01089483,0.004795172,0.005025692,0.001390512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01586355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008702894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2899173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.0009592708,0.00004410161,0.0001209322,0.0005031567,0.0001901054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935428,0.004323155,0.0002896163,0.0003623411,0.000922091,0.0005600306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002716423,0.0000181492,0.0005012715,0.0001587955,0.000005387667,0.0002959347,0.1815139,0.0001251153,0.0005113113,0.6212051,0.1652267,0.0304112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008588332,0.000007278681,0.0004488788,0.0002311922,0.000005652803,0.0001186566,0.03509009,0.0002216906,0.0002179406,0.04170783,0.9219286,0.000013643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02605706,0.01242589,0.01753483,0.1728975,0.004527767,0.00006638493,0.0002814717,0.0003482085,0.765861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.788093,0.008973305,0.01371508,0.01807093,0.002918297,0.0001396047,0.0003397443,0.0008951633,0.166855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506842823","doi":"10.1080/02773941003800063","title":"A Review of:<i>The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts</i>, by Deanna D. Sellnow","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Power (physics); Criticism; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04591011160293366,"gpt":0.2972692920697946,"spread":0.2513591804668609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001401602,0.0007654669,0.001455748,0.00426602,0.0007010447,0.00255494,0.0007666404,0.00147043,0.006084967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734515,0.000421591,0.0004291659,0.009106152,0.001082405,0.003388229,0.00102583,0.002111944,0.00343014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001388627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00412101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01337865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992948,0.0001793497,0.00007880081,0.00008155771,0.0003228908,0.00004268152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974216,0.001310886,0.0002592642,0.00003545795,0.0008412024,0.0001316112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002958733,0.00004400581,0.0002440735,0.02876348,0.00008219932,0.0001089908,0.0005807886,0.0001095223,0.0004831929,0.006676761,0.3411418,0.6217355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005918034,0.00003179098,0.001093835,0.01127157,0.00005680671,0.0002927765,0.0003485587,0.0000220259,0.0001089775,0.00136431,0.9853907,0.00001277182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003763861,0.9971247,0.00004005894,0.001139067,0.0005015045,0.000002313328,0.00001008122,0.000002000328,0.001142659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007524635,0.9964556,0.0001168694,0.000945031,0.0005526809,0.00000754402,0.0000235874,0.000002782409,0.001143438],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006084967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0203563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809120","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391297","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Logos Bible Software; Power (physics); State (computer science); Rhetoric; Identity (music); Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Janice W. Fernheimer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Randy D. Allen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael C. Hoffman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mariana Portolano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05384353033119784,"gpt":0.2629627925610211,"spread":0.2091192622298232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001202199,0.001087877,0.001354878,0.003560661,0.001196522,0.005842464,0.002663175,0.003203686,0.3698036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006709905,0.0004265456,0.0008324403,0.003427429,0.001051294,0.0041507,0.002627588,0.002325799,0.2865279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002341691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00478645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002894168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979354,0.0003049595,0.0001778228,0.000376281,0.001032886,0.0001726828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967373,0.0006572427,0.0002086858,0.0003586579,0.001602714,0.0004354138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732984,0.00002136192,0.0000795883,0.001279897,0.00001033431,0.00008993618,0.00009551159,0.00004577708,0.0001705101,0.005845923,0.8494023,0.1429316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000242023,0.000004205692,0.00007254496,0.0003599553,0.000002744199,0.00006704426,0.00002978981,0.000004515109,0.00002148331,0.0007278512,0.9987053,0.000002261976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006617567,0.3607403,0.002541766,0.0408283,0.06332547,0.0003086656,0.006255592,0.001173745,0.5241644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005760571,0.2705583,0.003023732,0.02643888,0.02624204,0.0003458119,0.00765448,0.00073158,0.6592445],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6301965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039256858","doi":"10.1080/02773940601173071","title":"Foreword to “Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Neuroscience","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01926521752181014,"gpt":0.3148458081590478,"spread":0.2955805906372377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009867474,0.001137277,0.0007981574,0.001304568,0.002208213,0.003681734,0.001321711,0.003169798,0.06959089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007667087,0.0002801137,0.0004666992,0.001016393,0.002179629,0.004068617,0.001298237,0.008461774,0.0431253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001631016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001168684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003343808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004251021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992975,0.0001931328,0.00005521971,0.0001019718,0.0002923762,0.00005979096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946577,0.002500476,0.000281477,0.0001979311,0.001929718,0.0004325784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009328675,0.000004902501,0.00001195426,0.00005684509,0.000001292171,0.00001290179,0.00004277879,0.00000874307,0.00004570193,0.006935992,0.9887627,0.004106908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004994784,0.00000786448,0.0001476651,0.0001489411,0.000002234688,0.00004576066,0.0001043066,0.00003415321,0.00008343629,0.005685998,0.9937301,0.000004543086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002877942,0.0363778,0.002009578,0.3378869,0.547951,0.00003424198,0.0003461951,0.0001789091,0.07492751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0151221,0.0294411,0.001422159,0.1869671,0.5271195,0.0001110868,0.0005768351,0.0004931691,0.238747],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06959089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2328047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240880042","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391291","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Rhetoric; Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Art; History; Theology; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Jeanne Fahnestock","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carol Poster","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bill Wolff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05138248480521716,"gpt":0.2446914764103635,"spread":0.1933089916051463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001811239,0.001150682,0.001357758,0.003982395,0.001143572,0.00558033,0.002744826,0.00366577,0.3430892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01011016,0.0004743413,0.0008555406,0.003368756,0.00109064,0.003957636,0.002627225,0.002992869,0.324952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002645015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005632797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002325957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003491785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972759,0.0003527119,0.0002205142,0.0004672299,0.001464206,0.0002194376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942135,0.001047923,0.0003574602,0.0006145187,0.002961789,0.000804729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001630967,0.00001168239,0.00003605387,0.0007921404,0.000007714319,0.00003417446,0.00003387655,0.00002552752,0.0001290426,0.00244707,0.9187068,0.07775962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002274963,0.000003638316,0.00004462362,0.0003286484,0.000002643815,0.00003540693,0.00001346709,0.00000306478,0.00002276339,0.0004614492,0.9990802,0.000001904763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003704941,0.3767035,0.001987189,0.05584163,0.149852,0.0002806725,0.005580375,0.001155267,0.4082289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004004903,0.3293937,0.001846398,0.04121601,0.06382497,0.0003153528,0.006727863,0.0006630073,0.5520077],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3430892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302007442","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2022.2061582","title":"Chronotopic Expertise: Enacting Water Ontologies in a Wind Energy Debate in Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Technoscience; Appropriation; Ontology; Foregrounding; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jordynn Jack","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0252844068095275,"gpt":0.2043378678447275,"spread":0.1790534610352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006241522,0.0003392463,0.0004575599,0.002293698,0.05109775,0.009085222,0.001508232,0.003457361,0.003869337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01120697,0.0004075846,0.0002411162,0.003794526,0.02834067,0.004753072,0.006046416,0.004523593,0.0002009101],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2050002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1616367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949157,0.001454239,0.000172516,0.0005459968,0.001710431,0.001201054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898234,0.005287854,0.0004956135,0.0002514986,0.00302489,0.001116758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005858482,0.00002250134,0.004632139,0.0001162683,0.00001246356,0.001732172,0.7350917,0.0004332803,0.001074832,0.2240564,0.01837927,0.01439042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002454062,0.0000172417,0.007294165,0.0002564036,0.00002394529,0.0001408864,0.5487549,0.0008423152,0.0007092952,0.01666109,0.4252025,0.00007260973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5128325,0.003314237,0.004167809,0.100801,0.0006268268,0.0001439967,0.0001901403,0.00006254161,0.3778611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755972,0.0007518794,0.0007661738,0.00266504,0.00003501517,0.00002020743,0.00003184035,0.00003114202,0.02010148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9489022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377100510","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2185019","title":"Vaccine Rhetorics <b>Vaccine Rhetorics</b> , by Heidi Yoston Lawrence, The Ohio State UP, 2020, 176 pp., $29.95 (paper), ISBN: 9780814255704","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Image (mathematics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Judy Z. Segal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01453296222783326,"gpt":0.2701678609121427,"spread":0.2556348986843094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121107,0.0009463049,0.0003644445,0.001208474,0.001855907,0.005349583,0.0004996415,0.002340706,0.09118674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003113513,0.0006202807,0.0002938961,0.001822991,0.001043821,0.007171848,0.001467754,0.002929593,0.05165021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002593381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003260079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01165641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03012558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994791,0.0001318244,0.00002831173,0.00005749671,0.0002479967,0.00005532421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992152,0.0003483873,0.00007335814,0.00001968881,0.0001880382,0.0001552137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004044166,0.000003220277,0.00003095048,0.00006022781,7.997659e-7,0.000004804526,0.00009498671,0.000005250956,0.0000259396,0.0009929078,0.9814465,0.01733032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000163259,0.000003002684,0.0002378764,0.0001906628,0.000001270422,0.00001470276,0.0002455894,0.00001029142,0.00002287606,0.00081774,0.9984518,0.00000239538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006955909,0.5306481,0.0003923677,0.2028877,0.03338596,0.00002911935,0.0009632916,0.0003013122,0.2306967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009996614,0.2376821,0.0007257328,0.03939098,0.009385242,0.00007510904,0.0008258608,0.0002715304,0.7016467],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09118674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}