{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"fe5d5281f20a","filters":{"venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07141585429859594,"gpt":0.2915769428938861,"spread":0.2201610885952902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002176296,0.0002140464,0.0002815693,0.00001836063,0.003589189,0.0006402913,0.0008532829,0.00007609028,0.000517286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003015127,0.000185109,0.0003406101,0.00002278761,0.0005190423,0.0005051405,0.00009953588,0.0002421144,0.0006146029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009594612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004331727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003454385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006305056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987342,0.00003818827,0.0002901307,0.0002848218,0.0003119188,0.0003406809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981149,0.0001090403,0.000246166,0.001244975,0.000179217,0.0001056446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001198045,0.0002142076,0.00129569,0.00002749908,0.0002678106,0.000004188687,0.1992012,2.078941e-7,0.00002273319,0.4406673,0.3146464,0.04364084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004716718,0.0002060211,0.00308948,0.00002088652,0.00004689411,0.000003541931,0.02024461,0.0001292028,0.000004057171,0.005682897,0.9697514,0.000349364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1029117,0.004267996,0.001575007,0.01411125,0.01157325,0.0006402049,0.00005431131,0.001045844,0.8638205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673612,0.0002039279,0.0003743735,0.0003032863,0.002059314,0.00006898002,0.000006749064,0.00002683883,0.02959534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072091286","doi":"10.1080/02773940701658104","title":"Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Presupposition; Utterance; Reading (process); Sociology; Grice; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Philosophy; Pragmatics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01842934317265458,"gpt":0.3074355206646182,"spread":0.2890061774919636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006657881,0.0002260434,0.0003184352,0.00006455315,0.0001113652,0.00001608138,0.0001731166,0.0002515276,0.001069505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002515342,0.0002163453,0.000390639,0.0004977257,0.000104026,0.0001206318,0.00001227376,0.000231179,0.0005687188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009567539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003191252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001636022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000100892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981143,0.00008664501,0.0004797662,0.0003982749,0.000397913,0.0005231412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987077,0.0003869691,0.000258123,0.0002882946,0.0002215703,0.0001373076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006942729,0.003254206,0.01370376,0.0001565744,0.002876841,0.0001245434,0.4523565,1.728414e-7,0.007425834,0.02626831,0.05884353,0.4342954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01973545,0.008681312,0.3706763,0.0005078036,0.001709055,0.0001944968,0.5457116,0.00003945139,0.01260531,0.01493287,0.0221967,0.003009544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103244,0.001443704,0.0199693,0.00004054558,0.003458302,0.0004222852,0.00004750858,0.0001652431,0.0641287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949576,0.00001684949,0.0003787495,0.0002848604,0.000574314,0.00003333613,0.00005413499,0.00003458224,0.003665564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4312859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063171179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2013.768352","title":"Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Public discourse; Phenomenon; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622528970467317,"gpt":0.2649978063844592,"spread":0.228772516679786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001714451,0.000177782,0.0003885089,0.00004149948,0.0003065151,0.00008098976,0.0001981222,0.00004312345,0.0003146802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001167241,0.0001525018,0.000144813,0.0001052679,0.0003061836,0.0002922703,0.00004033828,0.0001790914,0.00008546917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004671319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01415302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002557368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987767,0.0001028324,0.0004498205,0.0002158505,0.0002231528,0.0002316738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.0002753257,0.0001847008,0.0003847457,0.0002716925,0.00004983975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008766609,0.001515058,0.004663295,0.00002457265,0.0003308657,0.00003742231,0.9511987,0.000002406008,0.00000913382,0.02734417,0.01216934,0.002696251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002404351,0.0009111797,0.00132838,0.00002138198,0.00004781599,0.00002137295,0.9838824,0.0001233421,8.227728e-7,0.0004192439,0.01063214,0.0002075553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840072,0.0005614611,0.00004290757,0.0001599876,0.0004184448,0.0007956983,0.000008242538,0.00005904725,0.01394696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.00003669234,0.00006257618,0.00007888965,0.0001368231,0.0002386931,0.000001626618,0.00001087033,0.001482258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0326837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079137350","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2012.724514","title":"Stanley Fish is not a Sophist: The Difference between Skeptical and Prudential Versions of Rhetorical Pragmatism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sophist; Skepticism; Rhetorical question; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Epistemology; Linguistics; Fishery; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03503770894047068,"gpt":0.2803586722369094,"spread":0.2453209632964387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002922165,0.0002075622,0.000379319,0.00002883417,0.0005758931,0.0001163949,0.0002510935,0.000078646,0.0006807508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002848513,0.0001390037,0.0003124315,0.00008536647,0.0007232224,0.0002572875,0.0000765617,0.0002326222,0.00003433435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006057194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002537343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001714248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006163376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00007980709,0.000353239,0.0002233514,0.0005309006,0.0003981683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988962,0.0003938765,0.0001627664,0.0003179623,0.0001135465,0.0001156695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001243612,0.0002966596,0.005999185,0.00009877177,0.001178472,0.000001303537,0.7639332,6.226413e-8,0.000108446,0.1240847,0.08893433,0.01535238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003211752,0.002013705,0.2035671,0.000321967,0.005356278,0.00001556378,0.5013774,0.0003198959,0.0004502612,0.009092661,0.2719656,0.002307718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772184,0.001736014,0.0008811599,0.005157571,0.001489744,0.0003760489,0.0003272604,0.0001063948,0.01270738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943221,0.00008289364,0.0001415862,0.0003083491,0.001786294,0.00002178929,0.00001055214,0.00001741371,0.003309009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2625558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7453743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412708738","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2025.2533751","title":"Empathy as Bug: The Rhetoric of MAGA’s “Battle”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Battle; Empathy; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Art; Social psychology; Linguistics; Ancient history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0119407341108538,"gpt":0.3019329431486792,"spread":0.2899922090378254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004720338,0.0001776507,0.0003486035,0.00004763704,0.0001458611,0.00001593017,0.00019998,0.0002030783,0.0002256263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002205885,0.0001221543,0.0003991594,0.000730823,0.0001810239,0.00007131594,0.00001717677,0.0003846804,0.00008085846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006423849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008927372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000269678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984859,0.00006225122,0.0004215977,0.0002813152,0.0004416077,0.0003073205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986048,0.0003669542,0.0001341105,0.0005434336,0.0002022727,0.0001483809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670503,0.001461536,0.002374372,0.0008834062,0.0006857311,0.00001040843,0.4273888,0.000001342743,0.002996323,0.0145216,0.4397144,0.1097951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007686369,0.004699688,0.1456859,0.001251884,0.001717999,0.0001343588,0.4895399,0.000636985,0.006035828,0.01231962,0.329425,0.0008664541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577471,0.002569823,0.0008442823,0.01501865,0.00459493,0.0005812559,0.00000608064,0.000127126,0.01851078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853166,0.0002063992,0.0003131654,0.002388743,0.00055123,0.00005940982,0.00002053516,0.00001660597,0.01112728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1433115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4981308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01201972707389747,"gpt":0.2716246617896202,"spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812594,0.0001553694,0.0003725761,0.00003892789,0.0005512739,0.00007332143,0.0004056092,0.0001949648,0.00001463406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002614581,0.00008790417,0.0002672883,0.0008923378,0.007792423,0.0001738119,0.0000355864,0.0003236689,0.000006962177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001525315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005231036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000314598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981074,0.0002629006,0.0004340046,0.000283429,0.0005137715,0.0003984449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988711,0.0004631524,0.0001725743,0.0003456881,0.00008284755,0.00006456792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000248743,0.00006225627,0.002530605,0.0002483203,0.0002627031,0.000002332635,0.4495775,7.515691e-7,0.0001173332,0.4872485,0.00877197,0.05115283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003304331,0.001200197,0.001821954,0.00091564,0.0004286594,0.00002303377,0.4237527,0.0004907734,0.0004944592,0.1541005,0.4124787,0.000989037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5737851,0.2520377,0.03278545,0.1044966,0.02154902,0.004722051,0.0001162469,0.001490581,0.009017195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994664,0.002585657,0.0002278739,0.00007056688,0.0007553707,0.00005250981,6.5936e-7,0.00001730772,0.001626088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4208789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402216286","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2387507","title":"Nestwork: New Material Rhetorics for Precarious Species","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03331352049615477,"gpt":0.3212884107069616,"spread":0.2879748902108069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000438319,0.0002421693,0.0002564927,0.00008763202,0.0009930849,0.001061667,0.0004118429,0.0002477098,0.0009679698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005290793,0.0002493816,0.0006949294,0.00071171,0.0002229765,0.0006308527,0.000022211,0.0002379496,0.0002170008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003674544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003638289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002971689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99793,0.00006466034,0.0003488161,0.0004784678,0.000480737,0.0006972416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988316,0.0004279438,0.00008164695,0.000257266,0.0001591318,0.0002424172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002516831,0.00006452706,0.0001028183,0.00006574092,0.000208476,0.000004223098,0.1610189,0.000005246819,0.0004493593,0.08034518,0.7502713,0.007439126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001866584,0.0003681929,0.0004654355,0.00005123772,0.00009951731,0.000003204465,0.03093448,0.0001410556,0.00003075791,0.01042807,0.9569451,0.0003462773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5657931,0.01581318,0.01624242,0.04854422,0.2108354,0.008046304,0.0007344452,0.01097079,0.1230202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176175,0.0003132857,0.003938497,0.0001634167,0.01124293,0.0001409888,0.00004453107,0.00006971024,0.06646911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3518244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506842823","doi":"10.1080/02773941003800063","title":"A Review of:<i>The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts</i>, by Deanna D. Sellnow","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Power (physics); Criticism; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04591011160293366,"gpt":0.2972692920697946,"spread":0.2513591804668609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005992502,0.000681008,0.00268885,0.00003851497,0.0004688081,0.00005646731,0.001207598,0.0004459864,0.0003312963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001346739,0.000433473,0.002391374,0.0003795889,0.0006567703,0.0001318156,0.0001578589,0.001161547,0.00006302979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002671591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004686137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001270454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962919,0.0003746215,0.001781938,0.0004689439,0.0006673264,0.0004152663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995797,0.000306419,0.001831525,0.001443816,0.0005054532,0.0001158105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001659488,0.0002205037,0.000002938518,0.04334641,0.0008362388,5.145085e-7,0.03761031,4.252929e-9,0.000003015646,0.008902228,0.7884821,0.1205941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482019,0.0001167973,1.93309e-7,0.02359696,0.0008386134,0.000008990994,0.00194987,4.824581e-7,6.412319e-7,0.0001078691,0.972795,0.0004363708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000258907,0.9929355,0.00001479752,0.0002279598,0.001840285,0.0008763157,0.0002642823,0.00008071548,0.003757561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005029521,0.9943626,0.00009173142,0.0003889715,0.0003445045,0.0001630591,0.0001172028,0.00007681322,0.004404806],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809120","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391297","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Logos Bible Software; Power (physics); State (computer science); Rhetoric; Identity (music); Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05384353033119784,"gpt":0.2629627925610211,"spread":0.2091192622298232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001891019,0.0001458182,0.0002301998,0.00001379909,0.000575299,0.0001000129,0.0002417006,0.00003622092,0.0004096146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006818651,0.000117402,0.0002892607,0.00006318744,0.0001548135,0.0001942434,0.00001901844,0.0001334626,0.001213137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001087565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002813791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001291259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000510216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999145,0.00002981567,0.0002863778,0.0001697116,0.0001576394,0.0002114679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993245,0.0000345584,0.0001081581,0.000397154,0.00008326613,0.00005234242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002143092,0.0001019057,0.00002244181,0.00002490146,0.00006701753,4.643218e-7,0.3599004,7.471327e-7,0.00001656256,0.4886388,0.1289093,0.02231539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000299288,0.0001181114,0.00005853762,0.00002259323,0.00001837471,0.000001280219,0.0223794,0.000002625153,0.000003202224,0.007914935,0.9690198,0.0001618444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0521105,0.06697282,0.007694447,0.01632417,0.009188592,0.001688137,0.00003536846,0.001648975,0.844337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594729,0.003810814,0.001789346,0.001907112,0.002222219,0.0001952692,0.00001594155,0.00003638313,0.03055003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039256858","doi":"10.1080/02773940601173071","title":"Foreword to “Rudiments of Cognitive Rhetoric”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01926521752181014,"gpt":0.3148458081590478,"spread":0.2955805906372377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006632041,0.0002463982,0.0003460486,0.00008905473,0.0001116663,0.0000145705,0.0002035192,0.0002396904,0.0007654073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003689523,0.0002378221,0.0003752398,0.0006900719,0.00006551229,0.0001105389,0.00001802253,0.0002134429,0.0007700674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001204788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000312122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001763095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002469113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979376,0.00007420835,0.0005015532,0.0004588457,0.0004225978,0.0006051608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986354,0.0003663035,0.0002044714,0.0003223575,0.0002536601,0.0002177758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008181378,0.001997122,0.007970977,0.000106097,0.001754294,0.0000735811,0.4122674,3.45266e-7,0.004716177,0.01707689,0.08304141,0.4701776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01610692,0.01380378,0.4173899,0.0006524118,0.001434123,0.0001362789,0.4911042,0.00004577857,0.01259826,0.01185597,0.03151197,0.003360415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216076,0.00056784,0.04945077,0.00007725514,0.002950959,0.000605796,0.00008460629,0.0001416416,0.02451354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930466,0.000006296541,0.000895515,0.0006853928,0.0005997467,0.0000650251,0.00004395644,0.00004028883,0.004617109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240880042","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391291","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Rhetoric; Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Art; History; Theology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05138248480521716,"gpt":0.2446914764103635,"spread":0.1933089916051463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001986924,0.0001697863,0.0002161096,0.00001755577,0.0003980233,0.0005621893,0.0002042882,0.00004438936,0.001353456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006828324,0.0001414022,0.0003795702,0.00003895046,0.0001438498,0.0006717339,0.00001033669,0.0001671399,0.001303998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001107589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003043446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008944053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001311564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990061,0.00001639916,0.0002801802,0.0002071295,0.0001919586,0.0002982499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.00002206134,0.0000813454,0.0002416413,0.00006309486,0.00008554763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000266221,0.00009128445,0.000009615515,0.00003974418,0.00002927616,0.000002800355,0.1598305,4.992462e-7,0.00001115689,0.7716572,0.05199353,0.01633168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032275,0.0002664188,0.00003211373,0.00003938642,0.00001429793,0.000002942453,0.01238476,0.000001256159,0.000004209314,0.0294893,0.9572285,0.0002140184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1603631,0.005083256,0.0002645536,0.001293771,0.004236385,0.0006419001,0.00004258623,0.0005777382,0.8274967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482239,0.0001442921,0.0002764647,0.001742257,0.002405141,0.00005407345,0.00002424067,0.0000357584,0.04709391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302007442","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2022.2061582","title":"Chronotopic Expertise: Enacting Water Ontologies in a Wind Energy Debate in Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Technoscience; Appropriation; Ontology; Foregrounding; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0252844068095275,"gpt":0.2043378678447275,"spread":0.1790534610352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001677626,0.0001718603,0.0002943224,0.00005142824,0.0006408528,0.00006122409,0.0003092373,0.00003143578,0.001714938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003370272,0.000147481,0.00009639744,0.00007492729,0.00006297664,0.0001571818,0.0001048052,0.0003374478,0.000002983234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000325194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985871,0.0001069855,0.0003771146,0.0002504352,0.0002688517,0.0004095652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994713,0.0001008996,0.00007599439,0.0002862418,0.0000330201,0.00003254612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722752,0.0001347796,0.009523994,0.000009056955,0.0001014501,0.00002167264,0.9542663,0.00007198346,0.00003621748,0.008232366,0.02011754,0.007467379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005560922,0.0001281523,0.008009591,0.0000111178,0.000009855844,0.000002841242,0.2471407,0.0002767302,0.00001129508,0.0003206155,0.7432438,0.000289265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820563,0.001113551,0.00000680916,0.001078774,0.001224401,0.0001194273,0.000005804832,0.00005050711,0.01434445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872062,0.0000338056,0.0000150646,0.0005706055,0.00009343634,0.0002048441,0.00002318974,0.00001374225,0.01183915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377100510","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2023.2185019","title":"Vaccine Rhetorics <b>Vaccine Rhetorics</b> , by Heidi Yoston Lawrence, The Ohio State UP, 2020, 176 pp., $29.95 (paper), ISBN: 9780814255704","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Image (mathematics); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01453296222783326,"gpt":0.2701678609121427,"spread":0.2556348986843094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002583739,0.0008810451,0.0009996073,0.0000574501,0.00309025,0.0006425017,0.001804308,0.0006192005,0.0008061141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002511839,0.0007393645,0.0009486806,0.004921204,0.00007829805,0.001351617,0.0001771876,0.001187033,0.001785204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009045701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006664222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001989779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00126081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925559,0.0005683992,0.001286632,0.001350797,0.001987135,0.002251194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956658,0.001027243,0.0006409734,0.001364128,0.0006287972,0.0006730383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005235998,0.0001587233,0.003195917,0.00005735152,0.0001975313,0.00002992078,0.04145113,0.00001491589,0.0008482913,0.002734406,0.9413861,0.009873361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001934248,0.0006650182,0.007273554,0.00007035284,0.0001584384,0.00001111889,0.01783349,0.0003308186,0.00008254046,0.004047425,0.9664567,0.001136354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7183753,0.07937551,0.002024806,0.1283734,0.03887752,0.006132704,0.0008253533,0.006937179,0.01907824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736593,0.1494385,0.0003572969,0.005015219,0.01034878,0.0005548366,0.0004464694,0.0004635332,0.09678233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1233582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}