{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":240,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":240,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"104078c7a71b","filters":{"venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication"}},"results":[{"id":"W1496956611","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a24","title":"A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Open source software; Publishing; Open source; Computer science; Open-source software development; World Wide Web; Sample (material); Political science; Software; Internet privacy; Library science; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9052581429497064,"gpt":0.6965406886885522,"spread":0.2087174542611542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.433576,0.0001195702,0.0004019846,0.03364575,0.002558488,0.1098876,0.01210562,0.0002789478,0.0002355656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3023365,0.00008194177,0.00007058738,0.08484101,0.0007203755,0.01999828,0.005994099,0.005729906,0.00004615419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000952301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001196768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005253255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000514977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9683597,0.01157841,0.001605345,0.0005630978,0.01708219,0.0008112332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197867,0.01380645,0.0007502267,0.002565576,0.06217973,0.0009113114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001311972,0.0003612057,0.7971197,0.00001390774,0.00005794618,0.000008108411,0.0004949608,0.00002580916,0.07074478,0.004240541,0.004941639,0.1218602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007371,0.0002011177,0.9658162,0.00009110665,0.000004186201,0.0001192674,0.001120983,0.006252105,0.0005849045,0.01393141,0.0109903,0.0001512915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794955,0.01436569,0.0008082774,0.001353794,0.0003841213,0.0004804255,0.00003517951,0.00000506305,0.003071928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929074,0.003473525,0.002915818,0.00001859986,0.00005570619,0.000006962259,0.000003727517,0.00001262983,0.0006056092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1686966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782500369","doi":"10.22230/src.2017v8n1a274","title":"Integrated Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: An Organizational Approach for Stakeholder Engagement and Communications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Stakeholder; Computer science; Process (computing); Information exchange; Key (lock); Organizational learning; Variety (cybernetics); Process management; Business; Public relations; Telecommunications; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8840719856424369,"gpt":0.687998286373576,"spread":0.196073699268861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01811797,0.0001106619,0.0001605672,0.0002316491,0.01435497,0.0006496598,0.001108398,0.0001313239,0.00005463443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004550841,0.00009805941,0.00001005097,0.0002284126,0.001013864,0.002164353,0.001125868,0.001369111,0.000007152648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001070061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005291711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005214248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00152715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934323,0.005066601,0.0004121173,0.0003136958,0.0003346942,0.0004405743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935318,0.002363388,0.00010382,0.001809656,0.00187182,0.0003194622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000256057,0.0007390789,0.1267793,0.002154207,0.0001064469,4.027558e-7,0.2898932,6.771178e-7,0.006693013,0.4350586,0.01078477,0.1275343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005752023,0.0004867665,0.4881778,0.0003508989,0.00004042171,0.000005975073,0.06543463,0.007782838,0.0001490598,0.01489039,0.4164323,0.0004969208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539299,0.004655814,0.0204127,0.087346,0.0001281358,0.008706633,0.0004962577,0.000155462,0.02416913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736921,0.004097107,0.01951644,0.0006693281,0.00005081775,0.0009186213,0.0002167271,0.00002223882,0.000816635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4201682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954773522","doi":"10.22230/src.2019v10n3a333","title":"Play Smarter Not Harder: Developing Your Scholarly Meta","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crunch; Interactivity; Computer science; Production (economics); Debugging; Game Developer; World Wide Web; Game design; Multimedia; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2179912943310233,"gpt":0.4591514622052115,"spread":0.2411601678741882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01098101,0.0000968844,0.0001554369,0.0002769737,0.002371703,0.004140988,0.0008490962,0.0001908053,0.0004573287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002168486,0.00008916877,0.00004638802,0.0009381747,0.0003142929,0.006697216,0.0002543792,0.001096916,0.0004673336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002157857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008765003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00121082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001611836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954486,0.002543113,0.0002382673,0.0002726857,0.001135389,0.0003618772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963344,0.0004799631,0.00007996478,0.0007523784,0.002198851,0.000154431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009453735,0.0002023839,0.02542925,0.00004996611,0.0003454585,8.943482e-7,0.07205065,0.000003898819,0.005145703,0.8573065,0.01429558,0.02507511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003991602,0.00005353064,0.05036625,0.00005264011,0.0000369374,9.645323e-7,0.02350441,0.0000234465,0.0007577796,0.01137163,0.9132043,0.0002290175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7619057,0.004863027,0.0001845903,0.1330082,0.0004645183,0.001224173,0.000008693266,0.0001333165,0.09820781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816229,0.002911715,0.003176366,0.0007347502,0.0001085285,0.0001006629,0.00002465305,0.00001274365,0.01130764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953925114","doi":"10.22230/src.2020v11n1a347","title":"Plan S in Latin America: A Precautionary Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Plan (archaeology); Business; Political science; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.373152398162572,"gpt":0.5023155294866329,"spread":0.129163131324061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01261099,0.00006754784,0.0001500809,0.0003142898,0.0005021582,0.002782478,0.002884903,0.0001366246,0.00009544992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0292226,0.00005184493,0.00002359434,0.002117393,0.0003027724,0.00544419,0.001516144,0.002280629,0.0002036821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004437071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001513441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003944822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007288659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948999,0.002381684,0.000407676,0.0003538068,0.001707047,0.0002499258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956868,0.002783968,0.0000963811,0.0006790119,0.0005472099,0.000206668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003541278,0.000148559,0.2729997,0.00001727497,0.00001396532,0.00001173832,0.02644417,0.0001091406,0.001593872,0.01728549,0.09435713,0.5866649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007612759,0.0001425522,0.5286845,0.00008685142,0.000002243413,0.000004115057,0.007207454,0.0200106,0.000163614,0.09475719,0.347962,0.000217639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6587275,0.005015132,0.001398052,0.2805634,0.0000635421,0.0006028771,0.00002813117,0.00007395925,0.05352738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963253,0.0006626996,0.001495779,0.0009697643,0.00004427312,0.00002370915,0.00001848955,0.000005620967,0.0004543731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5864472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142642425","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a164","title":"Negotiations of engaged scholarship and equity through a global network of refugee scholars","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public relations; Negotiation; Privilege (computing); Political science; Refugee; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1529756134901319,"gpt":0.4828833761250387,"spread":0.3299077626349068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714869,0.00007215057,0.0001661157,0.00005365537,0.003110153,0.0003952737,0.0006066442,0.0001504534,0.00002770321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006807816,0.00006197539,0.00003686091,0.000686482,0.001560081,0.002011883,0.0003567232,0.001006059,0.000002751218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004902851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002386157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002054805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002661315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994537,0.00400479,0.0002931271,0.0001764372,0.0006940279,0.0002946064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974748,0.0008528011,0.0001413319,0.0004673053,0.0009227911,0.0001409182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004862406,0.000160018,0.08756118,0.00005260328,0.00002927693,6.940001e-8,0.02871733,0.000005002053,0.0006265498,0.8260346,0.000335054,0.05642968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008346583,0.0002756627,0.5065967,0.0004495397,0.00002383827,0.000001754853,0.04693243,0.00004155472,0.0004818608,0.2562062,0.1879095,0.0002462084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692704,0.007077335,0.0001011731,0.00581477,0.00008048593,0.0002366803,0.000005175587,0.0000197712,0.01739422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890248,0.007131902,0.003559382,0.00008436914,0.00006570845,0.00001410171,0.000006703646,0.000004242049,0.0001087641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5698284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953027984","doi":"10.22230/src.2011v2n2a31","title":"A report detailing the development of a university-based knowledge mobilization unit that enhances research outreach and engagement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Educational Tools and Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Service (business); Knowledge management; Computer science; Business; Geography; Political science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5209089268633714,"gpt":0.5493349835850041,"spread":0.02842605672163268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06945504,0.0000488795,0.00007454192,0.0002065313,0.003790732,0.0002080809,0.0004088699,0.00007332187,0.00001853521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002977308,0.00003876911,0.00001479767,0.0007157445,0.0008666774,0.0008474015,0.0002979292,0.0006586573,0.000003156914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001211364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009560119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004566573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001422589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896609,0.009038452,0.0001603084,0.0001340162,0.0007226039,0.000283695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944555,0.003661357,0.00006972514,0.0003703306,0.001319672,0.0001234441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001276635,0.0009546296,0.2563981,0.0002022379,0.00007735843,8.47491e-7,0.384055,0.000004074338,0.008991671,0.1840391,0.000312568,0.1648368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002904721,0.00004551338,0.2257966,0.0002083122,0.00001338086,0.00000113623,0.1995468,0.00005077044,0.008812297,0.003472551,0.5616311,0.0001310166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620731,0.005785935,0.0009935574,0.003252951,0.0000464348,0.0005348607,9.424585e-7,0.00001373993,0.02729846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806744,0.002255729,0.01519304,0.00000660776,0.00003659964,0.00002514105,0.00001254935,0.000004453502,0.001791412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5613186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940415060","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a161","title":"From Research to Action: Four Theories and Their Implications for Knowledge Mobilization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Action (physics); Situated; Set (abstract data type); Action research; Epistemology; Collective action; Sociology; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Politics; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5141403587630617,"gpt":0.6046664691806096,"spread":0.09052611041754788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02010919,0.0001104731,0.0001799076,0.0004221867,0.008865278,0.0002509097,0.0005950071,0.0002237407,0.00003165669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009148028,0.00009143876,0.00002004213,0.0007324331,0.0002836105,0.0006446226,0.001179852,0.002031583,0.00007211031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002248165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001010508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003833667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913549,0.007154849,0.0003788956,0.0003095629,0.0002261666,0.0005755908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784964,0.01649631,0.0000639069,0.001316696,0.003244958,0.0003817055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004503807,0.000221575,0.01911318,0.0004883492,0.00003580899,2.489021e-8,0.08775732,0.000001682786,0.003442883,0.2903238,0.02039867,0.5777663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005872863,0.0001797993,0.1179279,0.0002490813,0.000002666709,4.80024e-7,0.02544275,0.0001865828,0.00009113643,0.3570208,0.4982036,0.0001079886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7543637,0.005787714,0.03018349,0.1840722,0.0002921483,0.007609617,0.000120937,0.0001972195,0.01737305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871628,0.003225113,0.005080075,0.0004806601,0.0002342143,0.002478007,0.0001543388,0.00002399649,0.001160785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5776583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483930064","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n3a123","title":"Reading Environments for Genetic Editions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Computer science; Presentation (obstetrics); Digital humanities; Philology; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Documentation; State (computer science); Close reading; Linguistics; Literature; Art; Sociology; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1471699120763154,"gpt":0.3276753681374433,"spread":0.1805054560611279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008470521,0.00007133483,0.00007419494,0.0001260936,0.001957594,0.00393638,0.0003474435,0.0000415586,0.0008249381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003558069,0.00006296853,0.00003296732,0.00002839973,0.0004859989,0.00334286,0.000174825,0.0004118831,0.0002077795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003743156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002047123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002677597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001155871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990028,0.0001664462,0.0001578358,0.0001422574,0.0002762417,0.0002544158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988158,0.0003360854,0.00003191697,0.0004116389,0.0002861028,0.0001184087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001176904,0.0001253291,0.0004053793,0.00003441503,0.00003022609,3.161225e-7,0.01026205,6.536129e-7,0.0004798933,0.9304824,0.03331452,0.02485306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002468255,0.0001366204,0.005552241,0.00005003289,0.000005925952,0.000001315829,0.006654446,0.00007668788,0.00005625107,0.1675451,0.8195555,0.0001191127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6235856,0.002835408,0.0001860945,0.009859524,0.0002608433,0.002104703,0.00009649059,0.00009647478,0.3609749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720016,0.0004451983,0.0006799338,0.0001962963,0.0002138966,0.0004219883,0.0000704236,0.00001526525,0.02595538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675730219","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n1a17","title":"Ibero-American Systems for the Dissemination of Scholarly Journals: A Contribution to Public Knowledge Worldwide","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Information Architecture and Usability","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Visibility; Latin Americans; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Scientific communication; Data science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05244301446697044,"gpt":0.3960074370375881,"spread":0.3435644225706176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01745419,0.00008746848,0.0001487835,0.0004414828,0.001341262,0.004049104,0.001891311,0.00007488143,0.000003574606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01180557,0.00006028087,0.00005124782,0.001384191,0.000310675,0.005622126,0.000625944,0.001340558,0.00001095846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006462036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000175412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009573761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002593324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975904,0.0008921263,0.0004082576,0.0001845562,0.0006226941,0.0003019871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901378,0.003305191,0.0001939172,0.001334487,0.004857758,0.0001708307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006705343,0.0001977246,0.003885129,0.00006839324,0.00004694361,9.792953e-8,0.007178016,0.00002464854,0.01789421,0.4950246,0.001643844,0.4739693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001258135,0.0008736758,0.3838313,0.000500367,0.0000281317,0.00004394097,0.002396574,0.1037853,0.007659355,0.02624391,0.4728151,0.0005642092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3734672,0.005445787,0.5401337,0.0755937,0.00041011,0.002919698,0.00002945937,0.0001046419,0.001895774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939501,0.0003016834,0.005280592,0.0000709432,0.00004940091,0.0002306129,0.000009770211,0.000005213059,0.0001017351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6204829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752956309","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a175","title":"Knowledge Translation and Strategic Communications: Unpacking Differences and Similarities for Scholarly and Research Communications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; CLARITY; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.507873489414358,"gpt":0.4638289232970491,"spread":0.04404456611730889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01359353,0.000178558,0.00027286,0.0005788431,0.004491005,0.006214658,0.002847582,0.0002330121,9.885783e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002144229,0.0001616777,0.00002840793,0.0006532001,0.002664239,0.004841401,0.00302472,0.001717207,0.000002375397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004176676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001358562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003451102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001179089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941209,0.004005366,0.0003856347,0.0004889296,0.0005225852,0.0004765708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853103,0.009823035,0.00009122432,0.003006835,0.00157385,0.0001947936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002577232,0.0001228056,0.007467711,0.00018042,0.00003305692,1.571885e-7,0.009205211,1.551329e-7,0.001069682,0.8127106,0.00005316472,0.1691313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001721425,0.0006992501,0.09907874,0.0006292532,0.00003089947,0.00002912626,0.01422364,0.1220217,0.0001987373,0.745242,0.01563025,0.000494983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.531987,0.3292632,0.02105222,0.09871184,0.00009816883,0.002890719,0.00003009212,0.0003479477,0.01561886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904346,0.04572076,0.04953928,0.00006250366,0.00002236549,0.0002032819,0.0000198971,0.000013128,0.00007280928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.372359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529017456","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a25","title":"The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in Computer Science and Engineering","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Scholarly communication; Computer science; Scientific communication; Engineering ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Science communication; Science and engineering; Library science; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Science education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3502538929813399,"gpt":0.5242150292590216,"spread":0.1739611362776818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2066368,0.00009858558,0.0001582478,0.009160933,0.002201658,0.01862223,0.005740731,0.0001059752,0.000008785825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1453367,0.00004809542,0.00002469895,0.04241594,0.002570158,0.004228194,0.002933712,0.002999563,0.00001208197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006283765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001897148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001406878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000712443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899109,0.001055472,0.0004740002,0.0004294081,0.007637595,0.0004926031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635069,0.02460286,0.0001564238,0.001777431,0.00974752,0.0002088975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568946,0.0001071553,0.2255517,0.00002935948,0.00001329097,6.32101e-7,0.002240708,0.00001061406,0.09384022,0.1704585,0.0009287772,0.5066622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006853501,0.0007409879,0.8903005,0.0001382724,0.000002542475,0.000007783779,0.0007406114,0.0704143,0.01322224,0.01691354,0.006672487,0.0001613582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867782,0.0009724246,0.0000625367,0.0104231,0.00005145769,0.0005272258,0.000001826285,0.000008058601,0.00117515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976862,0.001520693,0.0006615172,0.00002448202,0.00001246591,0.00004766493,5.330504e-7,0.00000537339,0.00004106504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595972248","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a165","title":"Envisioning Global LGBT Human Rights: Strategic Alliances to Advance Knowledge and Social Change","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Autonomy; Human rights; Sociology; Participatory action research; Humanities; Public relations; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2405418476866323,"gpt":0.4982404291704979,"spread":0.2576985814838656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003412819,0.00006467632,0.00008840557,0.00007491318,0.004823739,0.0008043521,0.0003636894,0.00009704868,0.00001196501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001374352,0.00005822766,0.00001676958,0.000275413,0.0004790764,0.0009185337,0.000251202,0.0003390124,0.00002102007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004186698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005681579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01157566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975305,0.001411687,0.0001266636,0.0002039061,0.0004147819,0.0003124624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990091,0.0001776515,0.00003721864,0.0002349708,0.0003847326,0.0001562881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006172883,0.00004440521,0.002547842,0.00001828107,0.000006332728,2.348243e-7,0.02684028,3.865637e-7,0.0002561838,0.9563363,0.0001646596,0.0137789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004873713,0.0001703569,0.1296332,0.0001092093,0.000008562546,0.000001106903,0.01697863,0.0001403254,0.00007949253,0.5757979,0.2763543,0.0002394982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881954,0.003259254,0.0001092024,0.01224589,0.00007179059,0.0004893758,0.000006331634,0.00004243883,0.09558032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982048,0.0004957235,0.0005126474,0.00005960448,0.0002113583,0.00004290134,0.000009886096,0.000004021891,0.0004590923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3805384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208023489","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n4a216","title":"Mode 2 in Action: Working Across Sectors to Create a Center for Humanities and Technology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White paper; Digital humanities; Center (category theory); White (mutation); Mode (computer interface); Discipline; Action (physics); Private sector; Work (physics); Knowledge production; Political science; Humanities; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Social science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.342124365554846,"gpt":0.4567625948698538,"spread":0.1146382293150078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986097,0.00005504707,0.00008941994,0.0002782941,0.0004464473,0.0008412877,0.0006785117,0.00008306806,2.784127e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005956836,0.00004854446,0.00000807016,0.0004351391,0.0001793789,0.001043351,0.0009179602,0.0003731679,0.000002350332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005468908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002524941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00194717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990666,0.000200656,0.0001105802,0.0001877617,0.0001800678,0.0002543147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988546,0.0002170537,0.00002143215,0.0005204073,0.0003385919,0.0000479529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002873401,0.0002870634,0.2478838,0.0001134942,0.00005020437,0.000009999754,0.06573504,0.00003947522,0.00344655,0.2958233,0.002036266,0.3842875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006966277,0.001891253,0.1866269,0.001077676,0.000008637833,0.0001189027,0.07107598,0.02896754,0.01055482,0.4294112,0.2622751,0.001025729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790062,0.002002153,0.005666322,0.01224188,0.00005594985,0.0003462084,0.000001873142,0.00007549683,0.0006039696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891022,0.0003351214,0.01021949,0.00008285652,0.00001406884,0.0000907471,0.000002214331,0.000003826789,0.0001494258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3832617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8112556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855391563","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a39","title":"Build It and They Will Come? Support for Open Access in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Joint Information Systems Committee; Australian Research Council; National Library of Australia; Times Higher Education; Medical Research Council; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Citation; Process (computing); Business; Open research; Public relations; Access to information; Political science; Knowledge management; Data science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Information access; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8706319294959223,"gpt":0.7148403740911772,"spread":0.1557915554047451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1260267,0.0001005564,0.0002325972,0.01783052,0.0008749294,0.0248987,0.007827929,0.000153857,0.0002275411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04290096,0.00007153801,0.00003444578,0.03259672,0.0003697508,0.01809936,0.009438637,0.0009743316,0.00005160453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009773154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001524466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001666714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000690048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927099,0.001543062,0.0005200328,0.0004457276,0.003983231,0.0007980607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986646,0.008033487,0.0001175882,0.001351975,0.003314501,0.0005364594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008427281,0.0002311429,0.9192014,0.00001434701,0.000008721771,7.201811e-7,0.0008165026,9.55143e-7,0.0003957314,0.01278102,0.01630728,0.05015785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008188601,0.0001582582,0.7672966,0.0000251155,0.000002037576,0.000005340177,0.0009614545,0.0002704667,0.0002302274,0.05861731,0.1714847,0.0001296596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973357,0.003035557,0.0002556919,0.01516804,0.0001097141,0.001495058,0.00004485435,0.000008594927,0.006525556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911496,0.00265872,0.001566767,0.0001121008,0.00003105073,0.0001264873,0.0000153593,0.000008455379,0.004331456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1551774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188849270","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n2a222","title":"A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Taxonomy (biology); Humanities; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2888760666916068,"gpt":0.3942359117604715,"spread":0.1053598450688647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002507027,0.00004601483,0.00006253584,0.0001669919,0.0004708454,0.0008101037,0.001193973,0.00005181688,0.000001339644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001169842,0.00003269462,0.00001649711,0.0002858768,0.0004800621,0.002760434,0.0005980403,0.0004926461,0.000005311754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004102257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009742394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004591759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002498165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991868,0.0001726735,0.0001414482,0.0001148213,0.0002558306,0.0001284405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968891,0.0005373916,0.00007097777,0.0007530444,0.001731765,0.00001778559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004151155,0.00006229898,0.0006201909,0.00001719413,0.00002688666,1.600563e-7,0.001795786,0.000001142477,0.0005544694,0.9314086,0.00194077,0.06353094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001056372,0.001028437,0.006246183,0.0001212075,0.000005506456,0.0000185002,0.005068454,0.005209688,0.01587657,0.2037458,0.7614387,0.0001845715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2693361,0.009668916,0.5800485,0.05054931,0.0004118307,0.01295479,0.00003516244,0.0004834162,0.07651197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927585,0.00004136464,0.006080196,0.00003723022,0.00001569058,0.0006703879,0.000004410636,0.000003626523,0.0003885961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7594979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7811848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110117288","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n1a48","title":"Understanding Long-Term Collaboration: Reflections on Year 1 and Before","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Work (physics); Term (time); Digital humanities; Interface (matter); Scale (ratio); World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Engineering; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4131191501423206,"gpt":0.4548115564687706,"spread":0.04169240632644994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002998183,0.00006383986,0.00006622329,0.0001727838,0.001090694,0.001245905,0.0004661492,0.00008269675,0.00001115002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003115576,0.00005747132,0.00001190342,0.0005408947,0.0001934592,0.003496191,0.0003745911,0.0006192568,0.00003430849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001539029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005120309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001425165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001355516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984121,0.0007230073,0.0001153279,0.0001710319,0.0003445657,0.0002340128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.0002938668,0.00002826127,0.0007358252,0.0002739143,0.000133995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004025724,0.000211822,0.05482418,0.00003537387,0.00002551303,6.316362e-7,0.01514794,0.000002332318,0.001271824,0.9224952,0.0009318475,0.005013085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001531305,0.001735838,0.7985938,0.0004536464,0.0000197877,0.00004974373,0.007865001,0.0013772,0.004604863,0.1722543,0.01091662,0.0005978572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669236,0.002945714,0.0851888,0.02927857,0.0002639069,0.0007829044,0.000005970141,0.0001909184,0.01441963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954914,0.0003996457,0.003750535,0.00007360344,0.00003418148,0.00002135347,0.000004081976,0.000004890354,0.0002203507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7502409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102820044","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n4a72","title":"Firing on all cylinders: Progress and Transition in INKE’s Year 2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Transition (genetics); Corporate governance; Knowledge management; Project team; Scale (ratio); Business; Transition management (governance); Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1419602899877559,"gpt":0.4231031568506079,"spread":0.281142866862852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003403933,0.00004060982,0.00005362178,0.0001979706,0.0005896722,0.0008944263,0.000235171,0.00007030753,0.00003685566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002383026,0.00003897923,0.00000893028,0.0002374132,0.0002847982,0.00144719,0.0001343595,0.0005121471,0.00004129333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005195591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002020226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008043824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001953889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985702,0.0006960905,0.00009127233,0.0001261466,0.0003115319,0.0002047457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994133,0.0001572594,0.00001582733,0.000195832,0.0001517418,0.00006610032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006489929,0.0002944296,0.07507747,0.000105641,0.00002998075,0.000002755641,0.13816,0.000003598161,0.0002924954,0.1662023,0.001180458,0.618586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001885078,0.0002740216,0.729571,0.0007704761,0.00001022485,4.7014e-7,0.05821067,0.00223068,0.0001198002,0.1595548,0.04696902,0.0004037687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330117,0.002252633,0.00000985202,0.01566508,0.00001742457,0.0005623492,2.954106e-7,0.00002910195,0.04845159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971936,0.002037545,0.0002561713,0.00004716664,0.00002606747,0.00006024665,0.000004630632,0.00000432537,0.0003701955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6544935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8624973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936184467","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a43","title":"Libraries, Scholars, and Publishers in Digital Journal and Monograph Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; General partnership; Political science; Library science; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Electronic publishing; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Media studies; The Internet; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1614446921168239,"gpt":0.3782160306821334,"spread":0.2167713385653095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02048755,0.00009781829,0.0001089984,0.001090711,0.001041891,0.2295502,0.00258977,0.0001022175,0.00000307083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01037772,0.0000865882,0.00001385666,0.00132913,0.0003905107,0.6686498,0.005825733,0.002981902,0.000002344886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004670019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001015359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001310808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000250532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967079,0.001189508,0.000247824,0.0002836889,0.0009835718,0.0005875148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969664,0.001021191,0.00009141982,0.001052178,0.0004214816,0.0004473867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003706599,0.0001827421,0.3610691,0.00005568971,0.0000440683,0.000008972902,0.002757286,3.238866e-7,0.0001577899,0.4071407,0.004004994,0.2245414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001403686,0.0001864081,0.6812923,0.0002301632,0.000005456386,0.0001454331,0.005292377,0.001066802,0.0000492492,0.0685865,0.2413827,0.0003589923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210295,0.08480122,0.007020991,0.06659169,0.0001327256,0.000731918,0.000007818843,0.0001030255,0.01958113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655927,0.02081261,0.01323213,0.0001045017,0.00003793114,0.0000182258,0.00001624352,0.000008400241,0.000177251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4390996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520902659","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n3a121","title":"Reading Thomas Jefferson with TopicViz: Towards a Thematic Method for Exploring Large Cultural Archives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Digitization; Workflow; Reading (process); Data science; World Wide Web; Cultural heritage; Visualization; EPIC; Thematic map; Software; Database; History; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Programming language; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2743791472729266,"gpt":0.4991388844558557,"spread":0.2247597371829291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006162631,0.0000727324,0.0001397906,0.0001613033,0.002063217,0.0009778191,0.0004051374,0.00004479646,0.00003626846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001597981,0.00005030235,0.00005067133,0.0003931005,0.0002137255,0.001865442,0.0001607016,0.0003961148,0.000005715654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004162799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008499203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001531054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003103261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965818,0.00230325,0.0001478252,0.0001777141,0.0004847058,0.0003046964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996582,0.002431398,0.00005297797,0.0002752077,0.00054215,0.0001162706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005489656,0.0001147424,0.00346558,0.000114565,0.000117712,4.920616e-7,0.1010153,0.00001219815,0.001277549,0.3387717,0.0001946159,0.5548607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001831735,0.0004276828,0.06276745,0.0006934942,0.00009624171,0.000005721493,0.2204158,0.02665124,0.00213543,0.5974803,0.08687064,0.0006242114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5530906,0.002260256,0.3508877,0.03205218,0.00007105229,0.00230044,0.000005933567,0.0001455076,0.05918631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7559168,0.0008452182,0.2403763,0.00003522528,0.00008032996,0.0004716503,0.00001376284,0.000007767735,0.002252855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5542365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190152122","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n4a211","title":"Platforms for Social Reading: Material Imagery in Digital Book Formats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Textuality; World Wide Web; Computer science; Power (physics); Visual arts; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Art; Literature; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1522278573044072,"gpt":0.4227913482745897,"spread":0.2705634909701825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004434202,0.00005168547,0.00009270821,0.0001315464,0.0004080417,0.001939313,0.000370735,0.0001070671,0.000007045783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001940107,0.00004595047,0.00002517189,0.000197774,0.0004312783,0.006553426,0.0002142786,0.0003070456,0.00001566234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000147279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001852448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988339,0.00008511417,0.0001555948,0.0001063986,0.0004806671,0.0003383007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989642,0.0002128502,0.00003581686,0.0001710283,0.0004527782,0.0001633615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000764637,0.0003007172,0.00331287,0.00006610977,0.00002185381,0.000003973674,0.1152081,4.215979e-7,0.0003975801,0.2616646,0.03864486,0.5796142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006580854,0.00009094639,0.001344528,0.00004045297,0.000001528339,7.877436e-7,0.01824504,0.00001772946,0.00008637589,0.0626162,0.9167962,0.000102143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878261,0.001005935,0.00004144339,0.007111361,0.0001992909,0.001006523,0.00006758335,0.00006613768,0.4026756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905993,0.0004755931,0.0002011597,0.00008052316,0.0001597482,0.00007760282,0.00008277812,0.000008486886,0.008314813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096139548","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n4a71","title":"Electronic Environments for Reading: An Annotated Bibliography of Pertinent Hardware and Software (2011)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Computer science; Section (typography); Software; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Bibliography; Library science; Programming language; Operating system; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09196653101199652,"gpt":0.3090607242878928,"spread":0.2170941932758962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001335709,0.0001060719,0.0001362517,0.001517272,0.001010311,0.001986819,0.0003754116,0.00005807911,0.0003245516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125809,0.00008978576,0.00004170596,0.0002158744,0.0006385963,0.004166848,0.0001945923,0.0004636807,0.00001423179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001392869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001820808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002062025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.0002430749,0.0002261348,0.0002039815,0.000317026,0.000340907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986045,0.0002248157,0.00007063786,0.0004851185,0.0004975665,0.0001173993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005721236,0.001632321,0.0351125,0.0006676879,0.0004464565,0.000001344726,0.06388847,0.000002412915,0.007624186,0.7179945,0.04635024,0.1257078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00163414,0.00268426,0.06777316,0.0002295812,0.00004305246,0.000004882764,0.02688907,0.0002338214,0.0008123416,0.2007329,0.6984162,0.0005465763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883652,0.005085653,0.00002776056,0.0007806517,0.00002368539,0.0007598857,0.00005615857,0.00003509187,0.004865896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990375,0.006887309,0.0002146952,0.00006099574,0.00003647269,0.0001613069,0.0001454398,0.00001916057,0.002099663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6520659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125755085","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a40","title":"Enhancing Scholarly Publications: Developing Hybrid Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Interoperability; World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Complement (music); Section (typography); Semantic Web; Library science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3395408956290512,"gpt":0.3797078644914657,"spread":0.04016696886241455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01053986,0.0001228716,0.0001258438,0.0005507652,0.007849492,0.02251375,0.0008443122,0.00004891345,0.0000565585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000501445,0.00009181851,0.00003178045,0.0002302803,0.002316326,0.01852851,0.0004100235,0.001166984,0.00001524322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005280371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009134049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003274183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001848189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974231,0.0009493462,0.0002900815,0.0001885956,0.0006469255,0.0005020182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983449,0.000692924,0.00007280608,0.0003182089,0.0005407598,0.00003040312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005187296,0.00004926503,0.003116869,0.0000261808,0.000007828588,1.943218e-7,0.07152344,1.54252e-8,0.00001954004,0.9218456,0.0006640974,0.002741844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002745155,0.00009236304,0.03204123,0.0001302169,0.000008532073,0.00001214798,0.1542462,0.000006373832,0.00007848883,0.06701802,0.7458311,0.0002607895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705482,0.01149345,0.000008794214,0.008370449,0.00006616105,0.0003795461,0.00001562432,0.0000502076,0.1090675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967427,0.0007212964,0.0002001325,0.0009459266,0.0001774354,0.0001151563,0.00003197094,0.00001091603,0.001054483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1668290563","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a163","title":"Knowledge Mobilization as Design: The Case of the Canadian Homelessness Research Network","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Knowledge management; Work (physics); Engaged scholarship; Publishing; Assertiveness; Knowledge creation; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5475184668422741,"gpt":0.555256647611042,"spread":0.007738180768767866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05019571,0.00007950775,0.0001264627,0.0001882992,0.0156504,0.0001129685,0.0008916311,0.0002021408,0.00006173671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001563843,0.00004628535,0.000023625,0.001211233,0.000621312,0.0003091399,0.0007665407,0.002843226,0.0001007405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004162725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001608344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2109183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6847073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970614,0.02744392,0.0003992554,0.0001829721,0.0005676734,0.0007921673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907473,0.005252328,0.0001115156,0.00139489,0.002188993,0.0003049975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004343209,0.000473168,0.166278,0.002596288,0.0000603138,0.000007539821,0.1031813,0.0002306839,0.0002528951,0.5968649,0.02516999,0.1044505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003604031,0.001980205,0.1247146,0.007163784,0.00004259779,0.00004128508,0.1160759,0.01565505,0.0008997779,0.2900487,0.4391898,0.0005842633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383478,0.006547427,0.0002172006,0.009207795,0.0004292308,0.005563121,0.00001316798,0.000021731,0.03965257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971206,0.00085894,0.0001671736,0.0002854892,0.0001107706,0.000461428,0.00003100619,0.00001359346,0.0009510574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.473789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940754229","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n3a115","title":"Responding to Change and Transition in INKE’s Year 3","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Knowledge management; Corporate governance; Term (time); Public relations; Transition management (governance); Scale (ratio); Business; Political science; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2112822889848356,"gpt":0.4285050508987794,"spread":0.2172227619139439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004772408,0.00003146703,0.00004770571,0.0005898903,0.0006725549,0.0007377326,0.0002168503,0.00005288266,0.0000529756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004836885,0.00003176215,0.000006219057,0.0007803335,0.0001199638,0.001892273,0.0001981326,0.0003323738,0.0000671661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005295711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001466046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002587345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003662035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986042,0.0007716436,0.00007690989,0.0001089455,0.0002507935,0.0001874468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994153,0.0001493662,0.000009572789,0.0001742291,0.0001663608,0.00008517042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005753544,0.00008989328,0.06138763,0.00005654225,0.000009825389,0.000001605617,0.3561242,4.373683e-7,0.00191118,0.2671144,0.001693757,0.3115531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006434023,0.0001114425,0.7562254,0.000374403,0.00000364825,2.402428e-7,0.07295399,0.0003105742,0.00006859191,0.04307299,0.1260167,0.0002185852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936015,0.001057717,0.00001952911,0.02444415,0.00001665315,0.0006048431,3.761359e-7,0.00001909896,0.03782261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963065,0.001889625,0.0004030938,0.00009052709,0.00003798668,0.0001104434,0.000002373172,0.000003621041,0.001155816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6948377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581739030","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a194","title":"The Provision of Digital Apparatus for Use in Experimental Interfaces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Alberta; University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Affordance; Markup language; Computer science; Warrant; World Wide Web; Interface (matter); Information retrieval; Human–computer interaction; XML","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09350177569094645,"gpt":0.3786676830844827,"spread":0.2851659073935363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009758,0.0000364209,0.00006081166,0.00007894293,0.000531828,0.0006518609,0.0008091538,0.00004719098,1.350947e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009118982,0.00002377938,0.0000119008,0.0001667344,0.0003431136,0.001505603,0.0007729388,0.0002860978,0.000001031883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000143575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001531469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002367637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008269098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992609,0.0002243619,0.0001196132,0.0001134493,0.0001540058,0.0001276549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981589,0.001041579,0.00003152365,0.0005770714,0.0001753127,0.00001565407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001127628,0.0002071367,0.01104529,0.00002154644,0.00001871737,1.623156e-7,0.007186601,0.000001807902,0.005244517,0.7288016,0.0008517975,0.2465081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004258161,0.003391009,0.09700287,0.0004428102,0.000005540699,0.00001040327,0.01404802,0.06184728,0.08888076,0.5344852,0.1950243,0.0006036749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827576,0.002980974,0.01075498,0.002483487,0.0000305342,0.0003216658,8.712786e-7,0.00002322054,0.0006466593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967989,0.0002395262,0.002792253,0.000007748239,0.000003278724,0.00005761372,0.00000104064,0.000001633703,0.00009806143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2459044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6285909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1865164899","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n3a202","title":"Beyond Open Access to Open Publication and Open Scholarship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Openness to experience; Engaged scholarship; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Law; Publishing; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7510332386073579,"gpt":0.6312466305469201,"spread":0.1197866080604378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02960462,0.0000863171,0.0001835177,0.0002610259,0.003440358,0.04696237,0.01170213,0.0001480714,0.00008746304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01158605,0.0000845129,0.0000106822,0.001144801,0.0004957166,0.02085235,0.0146793,0.0009530146,0.00007980671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004705613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001657109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04880409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01792331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951315,0.003152921,0.000226403,0.0004022286,0.0007027439,0.0003841913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955855,0.000521896,0.00008034921,0.0009579917,0.001952113,0.0009021297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049491,0.0003299104,0.04413126,0.00001253165,0.00002509925,8.863627e-7,0.06025274,2.957843e-7,0.00009515571,0.6442775,0.1475113,0.1031584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005744445,0.0001272676,0.0302193,0.00005210559,0.000004771375,9.610658e-7,0.02192783,0.000002510634,0.00001707104,0.1050136,0.8419078,0.0001523228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09138638,0.002072022,0.00001651364,0.2376002,0.0001316993,0.002408598,0.000008213575,0.0000377846,0.6663386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836477,0.0008821284,0.003818447,0.001549775,0.00009412241,0.000397624,0.00003767473,0.00001594569,0.009556601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8922613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502332670","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n3a162","title":"Knowledge Co-Creation and Assistive Technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Praxis; Scholarship; Knowledge management; Service (business); Knowledge transfer; Knowledge production; Perspective (graphical); Co-creation; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Computer science; Sociology; Business; Political science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06075506679856065,"gpt":0.4278842571124599,"spread":0.3671291903138993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003385477,0.00008244352,0.0001040947,0.000869244,0.0009976459,0.0005817508,0.0008447829,0.0002037254,0.000004212941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001327427,0.00007730118,0.000009975891,0.00091932,0.0007064753,0.002167973,0.000818486,0.001261247,0.00006057842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008170446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004372569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002002542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003289678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983396,0.0007754379,0.0001636094,0.0002922887,0.0002159155,0.0002131632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973891,0.0004367973,0.00007071027,0.0009093637,0.001153333,0.00004064605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007674825,0.00005136738,0.004977346,0.000009308662,0.00001173956,3.406316e-7,0.0004538731,1.044045e-7,0.009062444,0.7619087,0.0003743636,0.2231427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001579611,0.001134629,0.3087201,0.0003274451,0.00001091498,0.0001196582,0.00121389,0.02231066,0.05595599,0.3829615,0.2251186,0.0005471113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581536,0.00380909,0.1958895,0.03832936,0.0001512105,0.0007951289,0.000002515831,0.0007018004,0.1021678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887371,0.000325585,0.01044572,0.00004428747,0.00001622124,0.0000593425,0.000007254244,0.000005790485,0.0003586798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3789472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565341686","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n2a150","title":"Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; University of Victoria","funders":"Universität Hamburg","keywords":"Rubric; World Wide Web; Library science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1880699696746045,"gpt":0.3756631901660528,"spread":0.1875932204914482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050841,0.0001119133,0.0001349805,0.001913492,0.003646639,0.006068334,0.0005409369,0.00007465531,0.0003113859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003196894,0.00009679187,0.00005738642,0.0008188767,0.001384802,0.003435818,0.0003195613,0.0008041586,0.0001134974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001531274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002326176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002775184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004091299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982908,0.0005976722,0.000211557,0.0001887186,0.0004155419,0.0002956662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976957,0.0004280813,0.00005055715,0.000429353,0.001310119,0.00008621305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002818428,0.00009380056,0.001022012,0.00002782994,0.00002315735,2.457329e-7,0.01640684,5.490471e-8,0.0000319781,0.9412854,0.02006389,0.02101658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003193166,0.0001405504,0.01872287,0.00005259768,0.000007881417,0.000001114199,0.003905549,0.00006696921,0.00001881219,0.1855298,0.7910824,0.0001522007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2978008,0.002735174,0.00001303734,0.003105234,0.0000689309,0.0002133322,0.00001129542,0.0001125357,0.6959397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233,0.0009760426,0.00003847775,0.00007972241,0.0003296725,0.00004585511,0.00006611956,0.00001697474,0.006117109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7710185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881153610","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a187","title":"Digital Bibliography and Global Shakespeare","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Thriving; Bibliography; Workflow; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Digital humanities; Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Database; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07638729358184823,"gpt":0.3262056460821941,"spread":0.2498183525003459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001330462,0.00009238573,0.000100597,0.0007909687,0.001315434,0.005234213,0.0002917744,0.0000527428,0.0001344502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002823133,0.00008007867,0.00003186923,0.0005458662,0.0008159204,0.003507744,0.000180163,0.0004022207,0.00003652281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009740597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001712388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002044656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000330895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986336,0.0003836969,0.0001651642,0.0001971808,0.0003876391,0.0002327173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984743,0.0003151766,0.00002846354,0.0004298883,0.0006196115,0.0001325794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617961,0.00007420105,0.01428494,0.00003846175,0.00002553738,8.451725e-7,0.01194579,2.022615e-7,0.00001569483,0.8999476,0.00658061,0.06704989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004107848,0.0001622994,0.0420441,0.00008134745,0.000007041446,0.000006000516,0.00637506,0.0001654743,0.000004653715,0.08587586,0.8647179,0.0001495045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4299062,0.01029033,0.00008571133,0.005073555,0.0001035239,0.0003028804,0.0001039581,0.0001183493,0.5540155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958972,0.001845176,0.0001364918,0.0001669274,0.0001527236,0.00001551191,0.00007299035,0.000009291271,0.001703634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567681576","doi":"10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a250","title":"“Faster Alone, Further Together”: Reflections on INKE’s Year Six","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Grounded theory; Knowledge management; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Geography; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1950430784832551,"gpt":0.5167160976691573,"spread":0.3216730191859022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007350611,0.00006913469,0.00007397287,0.000238716,0.001781231,0.0006126523,0.0005514926,0.0001477085,0.0002886969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005124287,0.00005037987,0.00002591059,0.0005295222,0.0006888886,0.002533473,0.0001633743,0.0007589273,0.0005247002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003151443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002320584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001075922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003260569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947225,0.003899524,0.0001414858,0.0002264957,0.0007103839,0.0002996325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966009,0.001656322,0.00007009386,0.000719809,0.0008252262,0.000127686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003411535,0.0006616997,0.04603148,0.00001331069,0.00008502558,9.349566e-7,0.1062585,9.287785e-7,0.02259797,0.4116462,0.006046927,0.4063158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006022704,0.0002580294,0.06034632,0.0001649931,0.000009836886,0.000001464705,0.02775276,0.00000186908,0.001238818,0.1010057,0.8084055,0.0002124384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3268994,0.000545679,0.0002234288,0.1152274,0.0002402315,0.0005297764,0.00000346082,0.00008148834,0.5562491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855543,0.003700799,0.001993631,0.000176419,0.000184203,0.00008308699,0.000002175239,0.00001409578,0.008291245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8023586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1870437236","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n2a224","title":"Outside the Four Corners: Exploring Non-Traditional Scholarly Communication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto; University of Victoria; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Digital scholarship; Scholarship; Narrative; Digital library; Digital humanities; Work (physics); Sociology; Library science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Media studies; Political science; Publishing; Art; Engineering; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6376414798323873,"gpt":0.35773028797171,"spread":0.2799111918606773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008235709,0.00018016,0.0001748338,0.0002562734,0.003770471,0.01618887,0.001714836,0.00008678165,0.0001781056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001394111,0.0001352007,0.00007368449,0.0001685172,0.0014708,0.01937243,0.0008083886,0.002383871,0.0002345425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000164159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001848729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008438309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001534433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965107,0.001214843,0.0003782746,0.0002651281,0.001198021,0.0004329964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948428,0.000912422,0.0001127137,0.001498138,0.00237968,0.0002543045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008186691,0.0001456476,0.0006402779,0.00002148125,0.00005441699,0.000003074762,0.04569285,0.000006496829,0.00003430681,0.927493,0.01636944,0.009457102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009926679,0.000315341,0.007374795,0.0002848337,0.00002380683,0.00002078859,0.09332775,0.0002003424,0.0000568335,0.2426209,0.6544126,0.000369365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141965,0.00630037,0.00002493272,0.01590382,0.0002962279,0.0007167379,0.00005119344,0.0001412469,0.4623689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911363,0.001172571,0.0002176519,0.0004197625,0.0003214518,0.0002699362,0.0001303638,0.00003137065,0.006300609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6848722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831420131","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n3a92","title":"On Open Books and Fluid Humanities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Agency (philosophy); Digital humanities; Reuse; Selection (genetic algorithm); World Wide Web; Work (physics); Humanities; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Media studies; Art; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2237570487063067,"gpt":0.346502460970641,"spread":0.1227454122643343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165518,0.00006410291,0.00006728521,0.0001247546,0.001440681,0.003088827,0.0003884587,0.00001037235,0.0001571238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007246761,0.00005086037,0.00001273846,0.00002065027,0.0005964448,0.003375691,0.0007789765,0.0003194354,0.00008094678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001440654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009715871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002032196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000791007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991252,0.0002213283,0.00009653622,0.0001013945,0.0002572778,0.0001982525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999229,0.0002895686,0.00002047862,0.000277075,0.0001094682,0.00007448118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002426491,0.0001040351,0.00005175215,0.00001530555,0.00001583987,2.211219e-7,0.006860917,3.747155e-8,0.00001007676,0.9743838,0.005001087,0.01353264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002133837,0.0001667972,0.01605964,0.00007172058,0.00000439016,0.000001316036,0.002641569,0.00001017471,0.00002206235,0.3697275,0.6109883,0.00009314097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1212431,0.0009347771,0.000001828058,0.002033727,0.00003678594,0.0002494439,0.00001650075,0.00001878786,0.875465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794524,0.0005036945,0.00005996226,0.0004117486,0.00008753718,0.00005776036,0.00004117809,0.000007532496,0.0193782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8582093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513816295","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a181","title":"Research Collaboration as “Layers of Engagement”: INKE in Year Four","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Knowledge management; Productivity; Best practice; Reflection (computer programming); Public relations; Project team; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Process management; Business; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3088112713784174,"gpt":0.5572842066191961,"spread":0.2484729352407787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09489861,0.00009506415,0.0002153914,0.00205261,0.001109134,0.0018135,0.001707151,0.0001660628,0.0001656717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02722694,0.0000787821,0.0000337418,0.005780843,0.0006827717,0.002900769,0.001400553,0.001899855,0.0003159938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001614825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004729073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002251922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002458852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9785953,0.01515556,0.0006792527,0.0004543319,0.004609167,0.0005063586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849808,0.005315532,0.0001271858,0.001565345,0.007830381,0.0001807791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002645607,0.0007790381,0.06854352,0.00009328549,0.00004956848,0.0000104042,0.02308632,0.0002113916,0.03712019,0.7148814,0.03564201,0.1169373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002204379,0.002230136,0.1193949,0.0002759377,0.000003867877,0.000004505601,0.1047539,0.006894889,0.008043311,0.6713216,0.08458003,0.0002925534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223475,0.0004807914,0.0002249229,0.01707463,0.00005655812,0.0007262198,0.000007602303,0.00001404971,0.05906769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963099,0.0003718331,0.0007669236,0.00002626202,0.00005071719,0.00009577168,0.0000149351,0.00001104485,0.002352608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1166447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878282730","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n3a97","title":"Homer and the New Testament as “Multitexts” in the Digital Age","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New Testament; Scholarship; Digital humanities; Literature; Arabic; Old Testament; Style (visual arts); Textual criticism; Classics; Critical edition; History; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics; Humanities; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.084675660349249,"gpt":0.4014817837226947,"spread":0.3168061233734457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003451424,0.00003625183,0.00006032001,0.00003907285,0.001744561,0.00131392,0.0004240803,0.00003500442,0.00002843853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007220039,0.00001809316,0.00001236091,0.0002575911,0.001173335,0.0003406948,0.0002085822,0.0004889309,0.0000541389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004156084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005660622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02420525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001926102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983349,0.0008993846,0.00009005047,0.00008108761,0.0004342398,0.0001602945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974464,0.002064788,0.00001801624,0.0002512398,0.000159659,0.00005987734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003232657,0.00009810304,0.006299285,0.00000693585,0.00001456665,0.000002247075,0.2728341,1.222162e-7,0.00001793461,0.5194691,0.0156544,0.1855709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004538947,0.00003271799,0.04916456,0.00002552306,0.000002442207,4.870972e-7,0.03227072,0.000008953012,6.900036e-7,0.1325786,0.7854117,0.0000497065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2862788,0.02557882,0.000008063737,0.19837,0.00006916056,0.001303775,0.000001497991,0.00002378139,0.4883661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899169,0.004788283,0.000059974,0.0001737267,0.00005255497,0.00005121744,0.000001164983,0.000001884553,0.004954289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7697573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1918044616","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n3a201","title":"Wikipedia and the ecosystem of knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Cultural, Social, and Media Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Hyperlink; World Wide Web; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Web page","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2243371626940019,"gpt":0.4539093872561277,"spread":0.2295722245621257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01188496,0.00003732833,0.0001084218,0.00004360698,0.001370143,0.0002141064,0.0003115935,0.00006188577,0.000002650995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004533561,0.00002304463,0.00001826028,0.0002564083,0.00165983,0.0005163095,0.0002920706,0.0003514606,0.00000695888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004495347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001858852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002094778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01314512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968118,0.002448973,0.0001143238,0.00007620947,0.000399086,0.0001495894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974893,0.001092531,0.00004217265,0.0002246935,0.001046223,0.0001051288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008112614,0.00005122339,0.005593897,0.00003765473,0.00003555453,1.714116e-7,0.4703892,3.665033e-8,0.00006049557,0.5018907,0.007370104,0.01448983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002085423,0.0000751093,0.01181421,0.0001269239,0.00002343998,9.834877e-7,0.4637861,0.00001751694,0.00006141818,0.06896309,0.4529328,0.000113041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6767327,0.06805038,0.000002774219,0.02592688,0.0001486632,0.000655699,0.000004965358,0.00002586957,0.228452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782917,0.02041404,0.00007368948,0.00001309202,0.0001003546,0.0000324193,0.00000185306,0.000002430765,0.001070364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4455627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567279352","doi":"10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a259","title":"Research Commons: Site of Innovation, Experimentation, and Collaboration in Academic Libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Digital scholarship; Commons; Digital library; Scholarly communication; Digital humanities; Knowledge management; Public relations; Sociology; Academic library; Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Publishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2617706557646328,"gpt":0.5054330858837401,"spread":0.2436624301191074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02369647,0.00007712907,0.0001191852,0.001779836,0.0005877767,0.003194767,0.001756763,0.0001093644,0.000006147174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008938798,0.00006024981,0.000005680505,0.005251386,0.0008514199,0.07170253,0.003059025,0.00100963,0.000009390493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009009177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002881834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002636383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001839975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935511,0.003926342,0.0004949679,0.000375007,0.00130833,0.0003442607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928203,0.003065031,0.0001398699,0.001351145,0.002547703,0.00007600269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004909874,0.00005802593,0.02769539,0.00003566391,0.000008728055,0.000001033641,0.002432693,4.568232e-7,0.03478622,0.9159729,0.001127269,0.01783249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003678544,0.0008417611,0.4672311,0.001196048,0.000004771592,0.000008011938,0.01342994,0.001281649,0.06761672,0.3429736,0.1012531,0.0004847166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8895527,0.008558402,0.01222216,0.08559624,0.00003037626,0.001091811,0.00001384692,0.00005052219,0.002884002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973486,0.01717672,0.008703873,0.0000413279,0.00001192863,0.0001339391,0.00002099842,0.000007092467,0.0004180962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5729993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911382742","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n1a49","title":"From Writing the Grant to Working the Grant: An Exploration of Processes and Procedures in Transition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Grant writing; Work (physics); Public relations; Corporate governance; Inclusion (mineral); Scale (ratio); Political science; Process management; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Business; Library science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4311310873747218,"gpt":0.498412880295559,"spread":0.06728179292083719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03316126,0.00007517976,0.0001231785,0.0003365171,0.001424336,0.001486981,0.001403055,0.00006902829,0.000007236477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009796434,0.00003835947,0.00001686541,0.002098389,0.0006359548,0.007667678,0.0003132732,0.000916054,0.000005588247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002061718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007077565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001578067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946619,0.002421046,0.0004127244,0.0002584279,0.001905367,0.0003404954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946681,0.00357163,0.00009407452,0.0006922837,0.0008331725,0.0001407218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004212631,0.0003485966,0.1090096,0.00009119755,0.00001561193,8.916948e-7,0.430111,0.0001565501,0.04001643,0.01385613,0.0004805839,0.4054921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006721864,0.0002402723,0.4679024,0.0007939637,0.000008434784,0.000006961024,0.2601644,0.002833316,0.007725155,0.2550229,0.004367583,0.0002624189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705787,0.005627914,0.0006889565,0.02222879,0.00001888454,0.000531179,0.000004390073,0.000008194751,0.0003129522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973008,0.00199811,0.0003963953,0.0001092071,0.00007973077,0.00008509537,0.000004518241,0.000005144766,0.00002100695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4052297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573556226","doi":"10.22230/src.2012v3n4a69","title":"The Limits of Modelling: Data Culture and the Humanities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Digital humanities; Scholarship; Conversation; Humanities; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3838873495185969,"gpt":0.3606299237468287,"spread":0.0232574257717682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003683397,0.0000829452,0.0001109825,0.00005074504,0.004443612,0.009364414,0.00140071,0.00004038103,0.00006604195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003933111,0.00004031376,0.00002275766,0.00003932428,0.004375271,0.003883471,0.0008944233,0.0008149786,0.00001512667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008399256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003101582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001229689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001441103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985468,0.0004708531,0.000221239,0.0001415507,0.0004172909,0.0002022189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966573,0.001081116,0.00007018205,0.001223685,0.0009344775,0.00003324568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002840043,0.00001770103,0.00002215315,0.0000170205,0.00002383929,6.189485e-8,0.02525814,6.409708e-7,0.000005809583,0.9659008,0.003797344,0.004928088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004137527,0.00006688081,0.0001771042,0.00006670833,0.00001102428,0.000001678396,0.04519951,0.001445752,0.00001208429,0.2224949,0.7300285,0.0000821272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2929159,0.09250043,0.00001862022,0.01691285,0.0001397904,0.001561277,0.00008991073,0.00006093779,0.5958003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643553,0.009132481,0.00003847069,0.000127799,0.00008238581,0.00004832344,0.00003900396,0.000009260402,0.026167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7434059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658772478","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a42","title":"Organized Access to the Ibero-American Quality Journals: The PPL Experience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Journalism and Media Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4129209956279954,"gpt":0.5912263042803964,"spread":0.178305308652401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02673177,0.00005944826,0.0001056531,0.00006987355,0.006637767,0.001802576,0.001901251,0.0000361593,0.00006544654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007953878,0.00003079824,0.00002685146,0.001054449,0.001173521,0.00229877,0.0009000798,0.001059668,0.00003989943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007836982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001324521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006129003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004210461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926602,0.005503234,0.0001963692,0.00009688088,0.001079459,0.0004638344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963976,0.001819321,0.00009517647,0.00063908,0.0007884478,0.0002604246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005362601,0.0001173713,0.07853533,0.000005253934,0.00004274348,3.001625e-7,0.7929695,3.958208e-7,0.001993523,0.02785055,0.01944173,0.07898968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011663,0.00001732561,0.2911649,0.00002552362,0.00000505377,0.000001046922,0.2246809,5.326323e-7,0.0003077438,0.001171928,0.4824548,0.00006903578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7653722,0.01101496,0.00007768799,0.2163462,0.0001763854,0.0004358531,0.000002118585,0.00001946713,0.006555195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759851,0.02215542,0.0001588008,0.0009305846,0.0003073424,0.0000753822,5.530773e-7,0.000005111284,0.0003817563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5682886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228521282","doi":"10.22230/src.2016v7n1a237","title":"Developing a Knowledge Translation (KT) Strategy for a Centre of Childhood Disability Research: Description of the Process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Strategic planning; Process management; Library science; Management; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.638417548103571,"gpt":0.4549145601184856,"spread":0.1835029879850854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01237763,0.00006374874,0.0001824507,0.0001699315,0.0005965798,0.0001804996,0.0006206345,0.0001084117,0.000005379508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003113942,0.00005698936,0.00004966975,0.0008219226,0.0004983915,0.0009841553,0.0002045288,0.0006124764,0.00000300801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001974176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003210201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005519948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001082591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.0007390194,0.0004276148,0.000140135,0.0001635125,0.0002218512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974612,0.0005901043,0.0001465291,0.0005240067,0.001211867,0.00006631408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000287923,0.001362277,0.3245538,0.0007268023,0.0001252923,4.460888e-8,0.2002334,0.00002625364,0.0003070637,0.3925397,0.0004221021,0.07941547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038139,0.0001328189,0.4415086,0.0002106127,0.000003770563,3.789327e-7,0.01756813,0.0005376291,0.000635191,0.5355153,0.002725936,0.0001235438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861496,0.00463987,0.0003081897,0.002943101,0.00003209171,0.0008305155,0.00003350687,0.000008049058,0.005055083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985273,0.0004961067,0.0007950302,0.00000396112,0.00001428797,0.00003706935,0.00002484532,0.000008405527,0.00009296909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1826652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.458847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849566621","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a191","title":"The Changing Culture of Humanities Scholarship: Iteration, Recursion, and Versions in Scholarly Collaboration Environments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scholarship; Textuality; Digital scholarship; Digital humanities; Context (archaeology); Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Software versioning; Data science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Political science; Art; Literature; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07635481253032111,"gpt":0.3098943763373487,"spread":0.2335395638070276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005547004,0.0001298788,0.0001478842,0.0003695639,0.003803298,0.007404427,0.0004964932,0.00009690219,0.00004191525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00133374,0.00009928203,0.00002729123,0.0001965645,0.001010082,0.008994997,0.0003851434,0.001077709,0.00001087547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007267083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003759194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008567657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001650579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974231,0.001084668,0.000352122,0.000218388,0.0006063154,0.0003153901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980681,0.0005437979,0.00009074635,0.0005309941,0.0006950627,0.00007130983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000661489,0.00008210157,0.002231652,0.00004220176,0.00001936132,4.139054e-7,0.09491077,0.00000143635,0.0006190277,0.893119,0.0004768358,0.00843101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000848093,0.0003946172,0.01039022,0.0004168511,0.00001284138,0.000002495871,0.1211613,0.0001130438,0.0004340653,0.07640485,0.7895724,0.0002492285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434887,0.009162103,0.00001152374,0.002877103,0.0001253055,0.0005476262,0.00002933141,0.00002670709,0.04373167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889457,0.003332153,0.00006920001,0.0001209073,0.00008010567,0.00004789654,0.00005385411,0.00001477219,0.007335444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177291206","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n4a226","title":"The Business of Digital Humanities: Capitalism and Enlightenment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Scholarship; Metadata; Enlightenment; Digital scholarship; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2168502402791727,"gpt":0.3281890797734098,"spread":0.1113388394942371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002172854,0.00008940342,0.000109391,0.0001007954,0.001509911,0.006446234,0.0004578165,0.00003767423,0.00002409802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005670094,0.000059051,0.00002069602,0.00005803859,0.001871238,0.003575939,0.000499317,0.0004175394,0.00001203107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003489926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006365844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003160936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006621163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986517,0.0002097652,0.0002245935,0.0001251422,0.0005717376,0.0002169977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.0004233841,0.00006337833,0.0004741112,0.001588893,0.00008990886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003918587,0.0000551782,0.0002965133,0.00002577701,0.0000230707,0.00000106499,0.03865377,1.029799e-7,0.000008615782,0.9479269,0.002110963,0.01085886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908382,0.0001926936,0.001603081,0.00008322052,0.000007489677,0.000006488405,0.09865442,0.0000116421,0.00003003971,0.1642099,0.734681,0.0001291686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7314317,0.01378431,0.000001325391,0.002667076,0.00009605179,0.0002546696,0.00003594136,0.00002614943,0.2517028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864647,0.001401539,0.00001450363,0.00003644645,0.00008140733,0.00002414679,0.00002428652,0.00001106299,0.01194188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.783717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599928621","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n3a126","title":"Cracking the Agrippa Code: Cryptography for the Digital Humanities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital and Cyber Forensics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptanalysis; Encryption; Cryptography; Subject (documents); Art; Computer science; Code (set theory); Computer security; World Wide Web; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08145940100144249,"gpt":0.3170021528209843,"spread":0.2355427518195418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001538495,0.00007001508,0.00005794748,0.00006879889,0.002065964,0.01102005,0.002178092,0.00003710757,0.000003795016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003275214,0.0000357501,0.00005097448,0.0003520752,0.0006381182,0.004864589,0.00103475,0.0005119776,0.00003206679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001221808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003342207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006836606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.0001584667,0.0001307336,0.000147078,0.0004235551,0.0002501092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966738,0.001446554,0.00003918518,0.001080136,0.0007189561,0.00004141418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003029877,0.00003053162,0.0003660371,0.000007331068,0.00002190198,8.943492e-8,0.001508642,0.00000142825,0.00005969434,0.7154445,0.006217349,0.2763394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002560322,0.0001411557,0.02948541,0.00005359938,0.00000472189,0.000007285992,0.002780911,0.005107654,0.0001943166,0.695649,0.2661622,0.0001577518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899454,0.04153168,0.1987013,0.2499919,0.0007384175,0.007557484,0.00008193056,0.0006835269,0.2107684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971499,0.0005165497,0.001136743,0.0003050143,0.00003719285,0.0002076659,0.000007642569,0.000006004896,0.0006332579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7072046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196480854","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n4a198","title":"“INKE-cubating” Research Networks, Projects, and Partnerships: Reflections on INKE’s Fifth Year","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Warwick","keywords":"General partnership; Work (physics); Public relations; Knowledge management; Humanism; Scale (ratio); Sociology; Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6952270596567346,"gpt":0.4642323520373695,"spread":0.2309947076193651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01081614,0.00014913,0.0001685131,0.0004830245,0.003205897,0.006579493,0.0005868219,0.0001305878,0.00009708491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002040043,0.0001271358,0.00003318194,0.0002756969,0.001462374,0.002778672,0.000628269,0.002753156,0.0000956845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001395684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001677403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005235525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003598098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957526,0.001969027,0.00027384,0.0003541776,0.001063795,0.0005865582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996046,0.0009334569,0.00005679627,0.0008266086,0.001831204,0.000305943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423096,0.0001503529,0.0005870705,0.00003030681,0.00002439482,0.000002717149,0.04694637,0.000002549905,0.000007350197,0.9322634,0.01466133,0.005181878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007006429,0.001167251,0.001042872,0.0002840647,0.00000789053,0.000005859587,0.09353922,0.0001731334,0.00001158499,0.0941781,0.8086373,0.0002520447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3669746,0.005442951,0.000007811917,0.007991198,0.0001951509,0.0009428054,0.00002280605,0.0001635608,0.6182591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784188,0.001187319,0.0001698421,0.0001684924,0.0004004541,0.0001222521,0.00005618824,0.00003050447,0.01944619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8380853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566708345","doi":"10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a252","title":"Digital Theoria, Poiesis, and Praxis: Activating Humanities Research and Communication through Open Social Scholarship Platform Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Scholarship; Transformative learning; Digital scholarship; Scholarly communication; Digital humanities; Sociology; Digital transformation; Publishing; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Computer science; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4785437719778849,"gpt":0.4197225245078984,"spread":0.05882124746998652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01143131,0.0002473069,0.0003010717,0.000346357,0.009896345,0.0282544,0.001756321,0.000184731,0.0001762996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002149163,0.0001834189,0.00003629004,0.0001700999,0.004540809,0.02874748,0.003667526,0.001846376,0.00003209784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000132587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004184885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007386861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956246,0.001749911,0.000458994,0.00047884,0.000995744,0.0006919106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992853,0.004060098,0.00015207,0.0009612904,0.001836124,0.0001373649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002243174,0.0001140565,0.0004051901,0.0000455062,0.00005115132,0.000001179213,0.03399134,1.382451e-8,0.0001575421,0.9061331,0.001018149,0.05785851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001067309,0.000491497,0.00272778,0.0005759058,0.000008127844,0.000009510329,0.05413474,0.00000325597,0.0001951773,0.7778339,0.1626196,0.0003331968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5774339,0.009490272,0.00006599109,0.01005541,0.00006959507,0.001875181,0.0001294898,0.0001452498,0.4007349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820125,0.003347853,0.000436391,0.0001136933,0.00017481,0.0002013997,0.00004776534,0.0000488334,0.01361681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4045785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900177705","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n2a158","title":"Academic Prototyping as a Method of Knowledge Production: The Case of the Dynamic Table of Contexts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Mount Royal University; McMaster University; University of British Columbia; University of Guelph; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Production (economics); Rapid prototyping; Ethnography; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Software engineering; Engineering; Programming language; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07403107913765114,"gpt":0.4902902739774884,"spread":0.4162591948398372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01596739,0.00003780265,0.0000882275,0.00007971715,0.001146078,0.00006056728,0.0005870551,0.00008841685,0.00001465712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007578999,0.00002429435,0.00002129875,0.001088161,0.0009312953,0.000547907,0.0001622197,0.0005956752,0.000001571474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004865351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005621923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001710187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002898635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941435,0.005100948,0.00023539,0.00009935733,0.0003116043,0.0001092051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963593,0.0007938864,0.0001898973,0.0006059759,0.002019879,0.00003103311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007588769,0.0002188968,0.002919196,0.0001707546,0.00003144911,7.078307e-8,0.1230179,0.00001248736,0.01880492,0.5794014,0.0006771021,0.2746699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001338099,0.0005003496,0.05794976,0.001672921,0.00008180219,0.00006354787,0.2959325,0.00250771,0.07691021,0.2862617,0.2763972,0.0003842184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349902,0.005987452,0.0003281953,0.03170125,0.0002097654,0.002367351,0.00000375315,0.00001422189,0.02439782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969932,0.0009244976,0.0006398052,0.00001492577,0.00003407048,0.0000997454,0.000001088167,0.000003572237,0.00128913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2931397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594269662","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n2a103","title":"Implementing a health research communication program in a low resource country: Experience from Uganda’s Makerere University School of Public","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Institution; Public health; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1596983410640908,"gpt":0.4447915094788102,"spread":0.2850931684147193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01933683,0.00008667862,0.0001915225,0.0004788622,0.003561988,0.001189537,0.001586449,0.0001492659,0.0003070362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00363963,0.00009200121,0.00002837892,0.001854446,0.0004559026,0.003354505,0.00120289,0.001694229,0.00003034279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005263781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001021225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0909903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07017016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880421,0.009197557,0.0003737537,0.0002951285,0.001236033,0.0008554946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952627,0.001209535,0.0001538356,0.001174335,0.001885653,0.0003139852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115238,0.0009578248,0.6514574,0.0001306402,0.00004117047,0.000003068316,0.1101628,0.000001009115,0.0007581856,0.04634421,0.01072989,0.1793022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000994596,0.0001770979,0.4684445,0.0005864569,0.000002299399,3.784811e-7,0.2282998,0.0001506132,0.00005319043,0.008424646,0.2927005,0.0001659674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.958236,0.005575935,0.00001473417,0.02446254,0.000007590897,0.001484022,0.00001203649,0.00004595283,0.01016123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877396,0.01001208,0.001522185,0.00005966358,0.00002543241,0.00008445184,0.000076162,0.000009632406,0.0004707638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2819706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221053130","doi":"10.22230/src.2015v6n3a111","title":"Playing Well With Others: The Social Edition and Computational Collaboration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Relation (database); Encoding (memory); Value (mathematics); Data science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1047453109849456,"gpt":0.378835153910937,"spread":0.2740898429259914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274949,0.00005092392,0.0000575997,0.00008030894,0.001292444,0.001520463,0.0004636107,0.00005001421,0.000001086071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002226346,0.00003292434,0.000005955747,0.000377423,0.000329699,0.002117844,0.0002819524,0.0003484134,0.000006909248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003537254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000143046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001011285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001199253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985026,0.0006464195,0.00009112096,0.0001419786,0.0004895839,0.0001283463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984854,0.0003868406,0.00004364305,0.0002875323,0.0007473645,0.00004919919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021564,0.0001791645,0.01984009,0.00004571042,0.00007653254,0.000005888295,0.06313439,0.000300818,0.0005187105,0.8308416,0.01274825,0.07209321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003588808,0.0008580623,0.4929945,0.000170582,0.00002027277,0.00009006888,0.04757444,0.1356704,0.0004390215,0.3001832,0.01791774,0.0004928754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7170838,0.004826115,0.1281849,0.1352577,0.000132201,0.0008166764,0.000004231662,0.0001830897,0.01351134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859068,0.0001077448,0.01372142,0.0001536194,0.00004236308,0.00002136853,0.000008187956,0.000003179733,0.00003536812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5306584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536061629","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a44","title":"A Field Note Describing the Development and Dissemination of Clear Language Research Summaries for University-Based Knowledge Mobilization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Recommender Systems and Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University; Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Field research; Research development; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2198368311584818,"gpt":0.4367255397528555,"spread":0.2168887085943737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00801798,0.00004519289,0.0000697816,0.0001855257,0.002702424,0.001003524,0.001122982,0.00006841423,5.591413e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001867751,0.00003522375,0.00001412702,0.000165545,0.000228412,0.001207207,0.0008343193,0.0003461119,4.822252e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004794746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002581993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006001143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.0007136164,0.0001203226,0.0001531178,0.0002567271,0.0001457875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960638,0.002117104,0.00007165126,0.0008891095,0.0008213149,0.00003700846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001311021,0.0001445291,0.006648199,0.0002893985,0.00002233907,8.803558e-7,0.04090142,7.740919e-7,0.007941921,0.2118237,0.00121111,0.7308846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002367489,0.00236497,0.1412375,0.005851203,0.00002459374,0.000008149455,0.03601681,0.10234,0.4784431,0.02530096,0.2051625,0.000882693],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4318313,0.003823677,0.5345293,0.02114784,0.00007743242,0.002200339,0.000007974905,0.0001008911,0.006281283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729019,0.0002122479,0.02665492,0.000005301139,0.000007374911,0.00002420051,0.000004548532,0.000003637681,0.0001858057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7300019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293192144","doi":"10.22230/src.2022v13n2a423","title":"Ten Key Factors for Making Educational and Instructional Videos","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interactivity; Humanities; Scripting language; Sociology; Pedagogy; Library science; Computer science; Multimedia; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2386819895122553,"gpt":0.4907667194371567,"spread":0.2520847299249013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006479691,0.0001319444,0.0001538968,0.0003537544,0.008715997,0.0004655552,0.000423769,0.000191352,0.0005797382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003021663,0.0001436359,0.00004391443,0.0004421659,0.0005203964,0.001720982,0.0007950813,0.002760276,0.00002254085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006118214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006866347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001274234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954256,0.002705764,0.0003823183,0.0003379876,0.0006500923,0.0004981686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937701,0.004479185,0.0001559223,0.0004868777,0.0009093899,0.0001984919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003298493,0.0009054355,0.09128688,0.0009702307,0.000131715,3.372878e-7,0.05316632,0.00005250053,0.0001856836,0.5388138,0.06381489,0.2503424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004765765,0.0002101215,0.1329344,0.0002808636,0.00001858781,0.00001180495,0.03255937,0.0003694811,0.00000736843,0.09798902,0.7349625,0.0001798993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8057506,0.04350573,0.0001604676,0.1384449,0.002026191,0.001543951,0.0003372424,0.00003705312,0.008193879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707421,0.002565276,0.004160747,0.0002817237,0.0003802222,0.0006584122,0.0004986886,0.00003155737,0.02068124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6711476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}