{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":75,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":75,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"adfae34e2a45","filters":{"venue":"Science Education"}},"results":[{"id":"W2151605842","doi":"10.1002/sce.10066","title":"How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Literacy; Reading (process); Critical literacy; Information literacy; Common sense; Mathematics education; Psychology; Science education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04961545036757849,"gpt":0.4303022930243701,"spread":0.3806868426567916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214831,0.000124857,0.0001033859,0.0008378241,0.001852788,0.003555366,0.0005303551,0.00004992635,0.0007449334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002459828,0.0001289122,0.00004032202,0.005721925,0.0008928471,0.003524615,0.0000348339,0.0001464627,0.0003341327],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007509575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01019065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005144509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004771082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968777,0.0002532215,0.000215999,0.0007232547,0.00103789,0.0008919754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998253,0.000091102,0.00009191499,0.0003528627,0.0005749482,0.0006361634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006488979,0.000640759,0.04781957,0.00000947268,0.000001197172,0.000001254951,0.7136368,0.000007613231,0.01047202,0.1176567,0.01139299,0.09835514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126926,0.00003060276,0.06809358,0.00005163899,0.000002566007,0.000006190717,0.08623548,0.00006023151,0.005640491,0.00236913,0.8370675,0.0003156663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452904,0.000105321,0.00004626521,0.02321856,0.01058361,0.0004568755,0.000004928548,0.00003178587,0.0202622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620439,0.00001475773,0.001387529,0.00196337,0.0002887324,0.00002826686,0.000004213083,0.000005707995,0.03426357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104305473","doi":"10.1002/1098-237x(200101)85:1<6::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-r","title":"Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":492,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Traditional knowledge; Science education; Indigenous; Sociology; Science, technology, society and environment education; Philosophy of science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Sustainability science; Curriculum; Nature of Science; Relativism; Science studies; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Sustainability; Pedagogy; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0515930161008073,"gpt":0.4628903657198734,"spread":0.4112973496190661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007803485,0.0001719343,0.0001372264,0.001301661,0.01419801,0.001802905,0.002858909,0.00006189146,0.0005951473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002586833,0.0001769502,0.0000590702,0.01103686,0.01205757,0.005527969,0.00007079353,0.0001574961,0.0002040378],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001895332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1724203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003026794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006453975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957501,0.00005654556,0.0003590056,0.00110792,0.001450392,0.001276053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962089,0.0001362124,0.000182472,0.0007952798,0.001870507,0.0008066194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004884342,0.000447583,0.007436546,0.000006044722,8.179672e-7,9.421608e-9,0.0572187,0.00002862225,0.01782165,0.3043911,0.0009037683,0.6117403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002238965,0.0001252272,0.5485681,0.00007848629,0.00002465878,0.00001445306,0.1092329,0.0001304936,0.007495572,0.04922624,0.2839862,0.0008938617],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8593977,0.0001076942,0.0002384384,0.009475059,0.005370178,0.00115585,0.000008445923,0.0001094862,0.1241371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831183,0.00009087641,0.00348919,0.000999036,0.001033036,0.0002650083,0.00001001424,0.00001185533,0.01098268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6108465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117496611","doi":"10.1002/sce.10113","title":"Science education as/for participation in the community","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":471,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Scientific literacy; Sociology; Science education; Everyday life; Pedagogy; Democracy; Literacy; Lifelong learning; Science, technology, society and environment education; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.148866233292499,"gpt":0.5454661895131596,"spread":0.3965999562206606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01374987,0.00007045649,0.00005688475,0.0005861713,0.004687507,0.0005751178,0.0009873548,0.00003339617,0.00004655699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01165416,0.0000594985,0.00001745058,0.005854675,0.002279256,0.002185212,0.00002457449,0.000272068,0.00007056467],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007589631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0535517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008590198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001950195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981221,0.0003623905,0.0001962387,0.0002282256,0.0007305003,0.0003605775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980326,0.000313132,0.0001941057,0.0003269717,0.001043546,0.00008965711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381292,0.0007737282,0.001798723,0.000003868406,3.313114e-7,7.845951e-9,0.1707629,0.00002836915,0.001034074,0.7959141,0.0002692078,0.02941092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001755174,0.000132218,0.3008355,0.00006132263,0.000007568482,0.00000170228,0.4938712,0.00001368118,0.00178579,0.06385885,0.1390573,0.0001993703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8736135,0.00002168141,0.0001405548,0.02922421,0.002450274,0.0005723315,3.713805e-7,0.0000239052,0.09395318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943218,0.00000721706,0.001466137,0.002614181,0.0003367939,0.0001348035,0.000007129013,0.000003684017,0.001108266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7320552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991134452","doi":"10.1002/sce.20435","title":"Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Teacher education; Confusion; Typology; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Ideology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2468886641600222,"gpt":0.4674076080397394,"spread":0.2205189438797172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001636587,0.00008156943,0.00007938462,0.000598527,0.0006020663,0.0001796364,0.0007005986,0.00004958766,0.00157735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009643788,0.00008880502,0.00002617485,0.002222315,0.0005559674,0.0009725847,0.00003021633,0.0001538461,0.0003315025],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003313851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005425368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001088136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983413,0.0001331707,0.0001986259,0.0003810085,0.0005637135,0.0003821618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991076,0.00008221773,0.00009791875,0.0002813563,0.0002019857,0.0002289351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083605,0.001243097,0.05775826,0.00000590237,0.000001243413,2.624062e-7,0.1836256,0.000001498016,0.0002481232,0.2304114,0.01383053,0.5128632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000778859,0.00004145654,0.7511477,0.0000640797,0.000001861917,0.000001053598,0.1373262,0.00001688538,0.0001327302,0.007558214,0.1034441,0.000187841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7528033,0.00003468467,0.00004069437,0.003461708,0.006769569,0.0002697465,6.889362e-7,0.000031941,0.2365877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935751,0.00002743068,0.001110261,0.001670311,0.0004256192,0.00004188473,0.00000310884,0.000003988072,0.003142325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6933895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989803080","doi":"10.1002/sce.1017","title":"Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Science education; Knowledge base; Situated; Knowledge level; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.286509666747529,"gpt":0.4871204783583662,"spread":0.2006108116108373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007107736,0.000149083,0.0001792765,0.0007791661,0.002526052,0.0009096668,0.001508935,0.00008635577,0.001166389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002411266,0.0001397222,0.00006722167,0.006083722,0.009082727,0.005316559,0.0001032778,0.0002175296,0.0001424594],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001508873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02642165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001149063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964895,0.0001986766,0.0003458015,0.0006899365,0.001476264,0.0007998669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.000239932,0.0002235934,0.0003929546,0.0007455244,0.000575099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005966253,0.0003527344,0.007458566,0.000004527273,0.000001619963,1.675825e-7,0.4040668,0.000003269752,0.002274998,0.4488907,0.0006880887,0.1362526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001194886,0.00005727752,0.00630631,0.00008379202,0.000007396828,0.000005563204,0.8873111,0.0000490554,0.0006699161,0.00703721,0.09814029,0.0002125727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8005087,0.001094865,0.001162118,0.01843354,0.009807174,0.0004685048,8.859099e-7,0.00008217885,0.168442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876725,0.0005264933,0.0003194856,0.0003128745,0.0004800685,0.00001866856,0.000001374052,0.000006640062,0.01066191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4832443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115546693","doi":"10.1002/1098-237x(200009)84:5<566::aid-sce2>3.0.co;2-u","title":"The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":360,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03328792092370377,"gpt":0.4476315835287596,"spread":0.4143436626050558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0200209,0.0000696416,0.00007496653,0.0002021136,0.001708186,0.0001200412,0.0003030872,0.00001670963,0.00007069959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008553592,0.00004680355,0.000008543892,0.001235806,0.001214812,0.0002863213,0.00001958361,0.0002793297,0.00001820751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004580904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002884035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004585446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000230421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977745,0.001183037,0.0001411515,0.0003338363,0.0003400195,0.0002274027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991166,0.0003699209,0.00008772493,0.0002642417,0.0001109106,0.00005060663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115055,0.0001232882,0.07530537,0.000002005916,0.000001710111,2.066135e-7,0.03625742,0.00003398212,0.008999998,0.001403306,0.00001329856,0.8778282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002242562,0.002711388,0.9419001,0.00002835784,0.000005822636,0.000006038999,0.05134923,0.000110163,0.002726105,0.0001018238,0.000733768,0.0001029484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849488,0.00003853828,0.00001894897,0.00007144478,0.0006429414,0.0001812154,7.281387e-8,0.00002729645,0.01407073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,6.746905e-7,0.0001522416,0.00002355335,0.00009870247,0.00002062377,3.274571e-7,0.000005187282,0.0007934117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8777253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118257175","doi":"10.1002/sce.20063","title":"A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative network; Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Epistemology; Science education; Conceptual framework; Empirical research; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04740235225820965,"gpt":0.4836371987805916,"spread":0.436234846522382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007025715,0.0000766386,0.0000779776,0.000668755,0.002160459,0.0003635097,0.0008285979,0.00005823684,0.0007247407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009015904,0.00007467296,0.00002352852,0.003846368,0.005938961,0.001928972,0.00002716889,0.0001367111,0.0000546417],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008493604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01670956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002345694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007477154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977998,0.00008789347,0.000201755,0.0004706272,0.0008895554,0.0005503615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984667,0.0003618188,0.00009027447,0.0002185982,0.0006071847,0.0002554252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003188943,0.00009018354,0.0007283604,7.436092e-7,1.257061e-7,8.990192e-9,0.1326836,0.00000965555,0.0003818908,0.8185678,0.0001781476,0.04735635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353959,0.00004777375,0.02125384,0.00004692027,0.000002544213,0.000001156768,0.317013,0.001043773,0.002651534,0.6369061,0.02064856,0.0002494566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8690994,0.00005126964,0.0057551,0.05922979,0.004106367,0.0007915011,0.000001663889,0.00005416059,0.06091069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812055,0.00001258205,0.01646323,0.001047026,0.0007667199,0.0001019424,0.000001760767,0.000003636453,0.0003975758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572117753","doi":"10.1002/sce.21260","title":"Values Underpinning STEM Education in the USA: An Analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Next Generation Science Standards; Creativity; Science education; Underpinning; Mathematics education; Relation (database); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1937836346214989,"gpt":0.4782218818707799,"spread":0.2844382472492809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004062497,0.00008861502,0.0001111756,0.0004044921,0.002028751,0.0007867289,0.001926099,0.00003741738,0.00007676947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004276922,0.00005557841,0.00004763267,0.001897642,0.002104975,0.001471133,0.0000706464,0.0001052736,0.000004905205],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003799775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01044376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005203933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002536445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981413,0.0001453471,0.000254873,0.0004060984,0.0008065996,0.0002457985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975861,0.00006089808,0.0003769573,0.00126702,0.0006622275,0.00004683199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006354956,0.000503285,0.6372576,0.000006983956,0.00001719386,5.100022e-8,0.01984794,0.0005305882,0.00779447,0.2984665,0.0008829386,0.03468611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002875215,0.00002859037,0.9585197,0.00001416813,0.00004166354,0.000002051854,0.03848392,0.0006465252,0.0004573888,0.001561773,0.0001472893,0.0000681723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779262,0.0001135966,0.00005864736,0.002381133,0.003699701,0.0002261731,0.000004516553,0.000005377872,0.01558464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986038,0.000009495386,0.0002180813,0.0002414704,0.0002215519,0.00004051072,0.000006160653,0.000003145213,0.0006557811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054907907","doi":"10.1002/sce.20227","title":"Keeping the local local: Recalibrating the status of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Multiculturalism; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Plural; Traditional knowledge; Curriculum; Phenomenon; Narrative; Environmental ethics; Social science; Pedagogy; Political science; Ecology; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01599429108380354,"gpt":0.2746102994643615,"spread":0.258616008380558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001612906,0.00007883433,0.00006661854,0.00004138635,0.0009664039,0.00003989772,0.0003620084,0.00002192437,0.0001764778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002381972,0.00004244416,0.00001497973,0.001402158,0.01386367,0.0004543798,0.0002079965,0.0001250141,0.00001484242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006631782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004290925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003104531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001468039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985842,0.00003400261,0.000208534,0.0002895149,0.0004893208,0.0003944506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.0001513139,0.00009527509,0.0001337412,0.00002551954,0.0001124782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004112412,0.000361849,0.04467901,0.000003987324,7.360146e-7,6.622205e-8,0.004628344,0.000179147,0.01572902,0.005302826,0.0004656269,0.9286453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004303984,0.00005135272,0.9649894,0.0000174201,0.000002896821,0.000006557515,0.02536706,0.0008299953,0.002811722,0.001955896,0.003843985,0.00008068267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537522,0.0002819914,0.0003885327,0.000925518,0.0005164421,0.0002093528,7.601291e-7,0.000005736405,0.0439195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.00007501704,0.0006627169,0.0005491322,0.00005249382,0.00001645742,0.000001365088,0.000002115172,0.0001048972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772087534","doi":"10.1002/sce.21085","title":"Toward a Theory of <i>Experience</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Affect (linguistics); Space (punctuation); Science education; Epistemology; Learning theory; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08774795456609254,"gpt":0.4348509222700726,"spread":0.3471029677039801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001825334,0.00004214082,0.00005090097,0.0001475035,0.000504987,0.0001292422,0.0003571734,0.00002366391,0.002611464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002591026,0.00003835912,0.00001504785,0.001464068,0.001560773,0.001425424,0.00001805568,0.00007218432,0.0002299585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007953535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003977765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001653229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001240518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989701,0.0001516855,0.0001319145,0.0001557498,0.0004035651,0.0001869766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987083,0.0001333684,0.0001572207,0.0001366139,0.0007840748,0.00008043405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001444689,0.0001175333,0.006513068,0.000003183082,0.00000100094,8.346367e-9,0.1830215,5.221019e-7,0.003958176,0.7307444,0.003048353,0.07259082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005743995,0.00003520659,0.1421416,0.00002903081,0.000004017987,8.259639e-7,0.6119143,0.000008107231,0.006521791,0.02925334,0.2098648,0.000169488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7275658,0.00003964232,0.0001826284,0.00660449,0.001719994,0.0001878976,1.475649e-7,0.00002452642,0.2636749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909928,0.00001198458,0.001444996,0.0005831319,0.0001778233,0.00003519033,7.22677e-7,0.000002424604,0.006750955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1818970564","doi":"10.1002/sce.21135","title":"Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross‐National Analysis Using PISA 2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Science learning; Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Literacy; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09143841100794485,"gpt":0.4992093879492169,"spread":0.4077709769412721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01524335,0.00009759647,0.0001293432,0.002033015,0.002799966,0.001273309,0.0006497534,0.00004369922,0.0002294789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00452563,0.0001005648,0.00003267662,0.01194578,0.0050124,0.003046981,0.00008219315,0.000158941,0.00001774764],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003319244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001215329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996789,0.0002451141,0.0002583863,0.0006750657,0.001522842,0.0005096346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980492,0.000143184,0.0001603491,0.0002348647,0.001145857,0.0002665464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001960932,0.00012349,0.8136863,0.000002108053,0.00000231184,3.399022e-8,0.08259585,0.0001308593,0.001215728,0.09190895,0.0001152701,0.01021715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008615459,0.00001282422,0.9677756,0.00001031025,0.00001066284,6.694293e-7,0.01492208,0.005376644,0.0001075021,0.007979032,0.003569097,0.0001494187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667003,0.00003421348,0.0007561296,0.001165286,0.001970261,0.0001822784,0.00000181216,0.00002372813,0.02916595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958917,0.00001302029,0.002326505,0.0004454957,0.0004813216,0.00001279342,0.000002661949,0.000003305684,0.0008231592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1540893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985646000","doi":"10.1002/sce.20176","title":"Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students' metacognition in an amusement park physics program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Hong Kong Institute of Education","keywords":"Metacognition; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociocultural evolution; Science education; Conceptual change; Pedagogy; Cognition; Sociology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03634436232864654,"gpt":0.4716051382859789,"spread":0.4352607759573324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00270664,0.0000756376,0.00009700668,0.000231076,0.000122043,0.0000507009,0.0002213327,0.00003141086,0.00005249049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001033816,0.0000747267,0.0000182626,0.00118406,0.0003693826,0.0002746547,0.0000266331,0.0001549162,0.00001169227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001067162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002790147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001667443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001534547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986073,0.000465713,0.0002594294,0.0002837924,0.0002067394,0.0001770412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992983,0.00004846274,0.0001848625,0.0001865335,0.000256942,0.00002487931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009992736,0.001717328,0.391679,0.000009703968,0.000004056312,6.978301e-8,0.01047159,0.00001623006,0.00450606,0.02311358,0.00007034562,0.568402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002243412,0.0002336581,0.9809815,0.0001009433,0.00001261373,0.000002699935,0.007265798,0.0001570476,0.004546533,0.005815747,0.000523066,0.0001360388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810353,0.00002799791,0.004703899,0.00003374596,0.001685903,0.0002745317,8.91635e-7,0.00004489521,0.01219286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972279,2.038289e-7,0.02729717,0.00001573033,0.0001804851,0.00007020412,0.00001688701,0.000005837367,0.0001345191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5893025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3047266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975860171","doi":"10.1002/sce.20226","title":"Model‐based inquiries in chemistry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Various Chemistry Research Topics","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Chemistry education; Chemistry; Psychology; Student engagement; Science education; Process (computing); Pedagogy; Computer science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03523210945405817,"gpt":0.3626965241465359,"spread":0.3274644146924777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007529123,0.00008686871,0.00006699565,0.00007500059,0.0001215501,0.00007179237,0.0004753176,0.00007265023,0.0003376102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000549505,0.00009348314,0.00002007129,0.0006204236,0.001048721,0.000222179,0.00005288571,0.0002100139,0.00001455413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004971394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00400388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002368048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001535838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986079,0.000002062033,0.0001764894,0.0003183409,0.0004777667,0.0004174145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992147,0.0000355663,0.00004973138,0.0003877562,0.0001533792,0.000158859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000734749,0.0001492388,0.009918589,0.0000725793,4.847612e-7,0.000001082008,0.0003163664,0.0002827009,0.9804035,0.0004243691,0.0001888904,0.008234889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001131573,0.00000171511,0.0007674656,0.00003725365,0.000001040954,0.000003037106,0.0005843362,0.01377643,0.9827582,0.001231387,0.000605839,0.0001200988],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.909544,0.00003172581,0.001245641,0.0004345347,0.00007207098,0.00003283317,0.000001743953,0.00003780678,0.08859964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926236,0.000001744703,0.002019508,0.00007013017,0.0001346271,0.000009928919,0.00001422538,0.000007139284,0.005119092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08348055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7102711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158278053","doi":"10.1002/sce.21622","title":"Scientific modeling and translanguaging: A multilingual and multimodal approach to support science learning and engagement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Academy of Education; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Translanguaging; Context (archaeology); Transformative learning; Meaning (existential); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Literacy; Sociology; Psychology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07995701760490695,"gpt":0.462958088960272,"spread":0.3830010713553651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004354658,0.0001054033,0.0001011473,0.0004497276,0.003607743,0.001319585,0.000215985,0.00003472984,0.00002609492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001884728,0.0001115318,0.00001306635,0.001670145,0.002132338,0.0007167959,0.000115035,0.0001662848,0.000004600625],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008272228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009558118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001946329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978532,0.0001067128,0.0001750023,0.0007642673,0.0006403978,0.0004604407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986391,0.00005870556,0.00004550194,0.0001544183,0.0005564872,0.0005458094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003623519,0.0001863623,0.00385309,0.0000283573,0.000001706845,3.294037e-7,0.5808311,0.0002354515,0.02096463,0.01281892,0.0000191911,0.3810572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006378548,0.00009322368,0.01554286,0.0001185761,0.00003840582,0.00004097012,0.8052837,0.1182176,0.01389798,0.0008190172,0.04438702,0.0009228179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789963,0.0002303714,0.0003915521,0.00122372,0.0007601547,0.0002695154,0.000001296977,0.00003848889,0.01808855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874923,0.00004083317,0.009986443,0.0002347598,0.0001604296,0.00001557094,0.000004307336,0.000006151918,0.002059224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131954619","doi":"10.1002/sce.10008","title":"Science, culture, and the emergence of language","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Deixis; Philosophy of science; Gesture; Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Perception; Science education; Focus (optics); Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Pedagogy; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01966548340552375,"gpt":0.2975408528182866,"spread":0.2778753694127628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005941634,0.00004384913,0.00006397946,0.0001704618,0.0007147873,0.0001376957,0.000307947,0.000003799302,0.001079152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002444887,0.00002395107,0.00001858718,0.0004480785,0.008648135,0.0004620218,0.00005639911,0.00003125102,0.00001836767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008375652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001255448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001941655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001238844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993117,0.00001087864,0.00009539674,0.0001436844,0.0003201164,0.0001181626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994996,0.00001538103,0.00006568059,0.0001801986,0.0002133862,0.00002572715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[5.136116e-7,0.00003007274,0.00005445304,0.000002645181,0.000002358777,2.707484e-8,0.213085,4.757397e-7,0.0004764406,0.7747234,0.002500244,0.009124405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002383339,0.00005372166,0.001596749,0.00004561022,0.00007290825,0.000002770034,0.9587938,0.0008645923,0.002736871,0.006980838,0.02840725,0.0002066018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2735879,0.002892087,0.000003358695,0.0007649573,0.0007025562,0.0000844714,0.000001803059,0.000009579613,0.7219533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804457,0.00009303187,0.00007509559,0.000124306,0.0001698335,0.000004864731,2.999348e-7,0.000001427273,0.01908545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7677425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965987765","doi":"10.1002/sce.10127","title":"Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual change; Concept map; Conceptual framework; Concept learning; Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Mathematics education; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2793822736441888,"gpt":0.5087401207422753,"spread":0.2293578470980865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005620535,0.0000744159,0.00008185316,0.0004684821,0.0008165549,0.0001265655,0.0001553403,0.00003711116,0.00002027436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128196,0.00007623634,0.000009887436,0.001511812,0.001655885,0.0008317874,0.00003322404,0.0001807077,0.000002589375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003513156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001464537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000272176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001872408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987401,0.0001057505,0.0001806713,0.0004201075,0.0002254839,0.0003279331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993384,0.0001141889,0.0001443292,0.0001144582,0.000236733,0.00005182163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004556181,0.0001431861,0.06976377,0.00001204966,0.000001808451,3.542277e-7,0.2868734,0.0001558964,0.08061865,0.3933279,0.000005338119,0.169093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000470053,0.00004669323,0.9674235,0.0002496931,0.000003138489,0.00002279248,0.02391791,0.00167272,0.001311873,0.004255314,0.0004329923,0.0001933161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497502,0.0000936155,0.04626367,0.0006968818,0.001349346,0.0002982137,6.354665e-7,0.00002276868,0.001524632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587032,1.321805e-7,0.1408153,0.0001894222,0.0002185203,0.00002593835,0.000002129819,0.000005475122,0.00003985858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6280363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086727866","doi":"10.1002/sce.20359","title":"Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Modalities; Meaning (existential); Multimodality; Social semiotics; Science education; Meaning-making; Discourse analysis; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06896168816452458,"gpt":0.4771639297203849,"spread":0.4082022415558603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549865,0.0001186858,0.0001822617,0.0007505061,0.001124536,0.0002533722,0.0006740555,0.00008500618,0.0001612266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002307181,0.0001164575,0.00006968918,0.005408261,0.001277876,0.001255731,0.00003010634,0.0001802599,0.00002387429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005475862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004529624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006623772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997804,0.000259828,0.0002951946,0.0005162938,0.00050114,0.000623566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989282,0.0002411563,0.0001588439,0.0002979595,0.0002392403,0.0001345652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006054259,0.000335242,0.3003767,0.000001999591,0.000006691007,2.576584e-7,0.2474347,0.0008008553,0.0009368527,0.4136085,0.0001588651,0.0363333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002256903,0.00005935149,0.3939186,0.00004684472,0.00005562977,0.00000128081,0.5051357,0.0117104,0.0002473171,0.08413292,0.004006496,0.0004597152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393934,0.00007972981,0.00365421,0.01110674,0.001811387,0.0002601554,0.000003237332,0.00006146199,0.04362965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909781,0.00002646702,0.006971168,0.0009399627,0.0003330161,0.0000116615,0.000008691366,0.000003350804,0.0007276176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006575403","doi":"10.1002/sce.10042","title":"Scientists as writers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Publishing; Scholarship; Scientific writing; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Perception; Hard and soft science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social science; Linguistics; Literature; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05795170968723685,"gpt":0.3905382827977898,"spread":0.332586573110553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107727,0.00005816936,0.00004422483,0.0001558091,0.0003447267,0.0001472565,0.0003458133,0.00002585607,0.00579217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001141472,0.00005334001,0.00001973778,0.0007890362,0.0005935756,0.0003067156,0.00002173577,0.00005435582,0.004019003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009197259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003514987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002824432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005742083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990921,0.00001889717,0.0001056741,0.0002960937,0.0002323293,0.0002548849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.00003063668,0.00004925938,0.0002697597,0.0001174089,0.00009116493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002966094,0.0005583913,0.02080854,0.000006043971,0.000004254716,0.000001111784,0.008636726,0.000003635772,0.001373772,0.6760969,0.2309418,0.06156586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009727458,0.00009002153,0.8849394,0.00001801454,0.000005283006,0.00009720251,0.01587056,0.00003406965,0.0002845582,0.01134995,0.08699659,0.0002171229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6127794,0.0002664241,0.000007607463,0.003080832,0.005382657,0.00006398295,6.300278e-7,0.00002727813,0.3783912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528725,0.000007916175,0.0003991542,0.0005996866,0.0002085742,0.00002382045,0.000002877186,0.000003315685,0.04588212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8641308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101623045","doi":"10.1002/sce.10114","title":"Are language‐based activities in science effective for all students, including low achievers?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Mathematics education; Psychology; Science education; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0509294244549395,"gpt":0.4887258419313976,"spread":0.437796417476458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006733169,0.0001029383,0.0001127222,0.0007462682,0.0005227081,0.0001291007,0.0005523147,0.00003891204,0.00001776666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001829459,0.00009838228,0.00002350167,0.001773135,0.0007543345,0.0004401224,0.00005296144,0.00024363,0.00001568507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007717988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003485233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003624276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984067,0.0001938335,0.0001316754,0.0004729589,0.0003962002,0.0003986204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.0002415793,0.0001859124,0.0002523637,0.0001389916,0.00005571558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000192526,0.00259959,0.219788,0.00008032283,0.000017242,0.000004059684,0.2534272,0.001516416,0.3082834,0.02832348,0.000296136,0.1854717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006571416,0.0001212616,0.9465275,0.0001396694,0.000004836344,0.000002199497,0.02836484,0.0000455236,0.02284493,0.0008549534,0.0002638812,0.0001732505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98656,0.00002956799,0.008484122,0.0006311001,0.001957543,0.0004828059,0.000001827671,0.00004398257,0.001809034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902971,1.227248e-7,0.008475024,0.0006076121,0.0001227618,0.0001395555,0.000002812003,0.000008763564,0.0003462067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7267396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4020301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022547046","doi":"10.1002/sce.20356","title":"Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Field trip; Perception; TRIPS architecture; Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03950976871756776,"gpt":0.356183160474939,"spread":0.3166733917573712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425749,0.00004311511,0.00004622391,0.00003253159,0.0003724369,0.0001393298,0.0001435581,0.00001079108,0.00008875945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000231226,0.00002188318,0.00001412616,0.00006472646,0.0002045706,0.0003653343,0.00001869045,0.0001036306,8.844465e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001449535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009328503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001046738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995329,0.00003888036,0.00009608863,0.00009940137,0.0001722849,0.00006042967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995399,0.00006345884,0.0002287787,0.00009067936,0.00005884231,0.00001834241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003023676,0.0004681205,0.01964962,0.00003090033,0.00001176926,4.090433e-8,0.5864963,0.000004398828,0.005112229,0.08487014,0.005008913,0.2983173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001333607,0.0006214699,0.2876679,0.000190697,0.00003617811,0.000003610269,0.5761701,0.00003205898,0.004339214,0.001107133,0.1295689,0.0001294083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836881,0.0001242117,1.632378e-7,0.003941604,0.0005802524,0.0001028724,3.203353e-7,0.000003494001,0.01155897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966708,0.00004487692,0.000009994054,0.0002719516,0.0001276551,0.000002147877,4.172428e-7,0.000001235805,0.00287089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2981879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2864522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344527225","doi":"10.1002/sce.21217","title":"Development of Mechanistic Reasoning and Multilevel Explanations of Ecology in Third Grade Using Agent‐Based Models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Conceptual change; Cognitive science; Computer science; Ecology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3140779187697779,"gpt":0.4513890374753769,"spread":0.137311118705599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003208957,0.00006721591,0.0001760025,0.0009195892,0.0001677119,0.00004418159,0.0003756838,0.00002968752,0.00002982393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002485716,0.00004462977,0.00001989053,0.0008769463,0.0001851003,0.0004298259,0.00009068425,0.00002699219,0.000003521845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001265194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006814679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001632071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978864,0.00007253006,0.0006862836,0.0003471753,0.0008488516,0.0001587894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981219,0.0007218124,0.0004046897,0.0002725047,0.0004129836,0.00006614585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002542767,0.0004110854,0.02558488,0.00002214733,0.000004218854,7.336393e-7,0.01229787,0.00487159,0.4710172,0.2931549,0.0001626486,0.1924473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005369051,0.00003665523,0.2644247,0.0004933781,0.000005394909,0.000009167542,0.005430245,0.5049793,0.01746907,0.2061845,0.0002047331,0.0002259454],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7826136,0.00003612071,0.21656,0.00005073924,0.0003728785,0.0001224274,0.000002875731,0.00000349687,0.0002378423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940613,4.557728e-7,0.105829,0.00001364783,0.000009214811,0.000006408401,2.006553e-7,0.000002345071,0.00007746205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5001077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3203879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234195411","doi":"10.1002/1098-237x(200101)85:1<6::aid-sce3>3.3.co;2-i","title":"Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Traditional knowledge; Science education; Indigenous; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Philosophy of science; Sustainability science; Curriculum; Nature of Science; Science studies; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Sustainability; Pedagogy; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01038175446730776,"gpt":0.3010307846066088,"spread":0.290649030139301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007881037,0.000143761,0.00009358613,0.0001464683,0.004101893,0.0002728622,0.001111959,0.00002175777,0.0002550738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001985964,0.0001172283,0.00003745545,0.003561676,0.007583771,0.002187819,0.000371627,0.00007223125,0.0001521084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00133779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001860223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002898666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003210208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977404,0.000006374955,0.0002053826,0.0007542599,0.00065562,0.0006379215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990923,0.00002050947,0.0001298308,0.0004168247,0.00007791651,0.0002626406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004468347,0.0004363658,0.1121783,0.000003888815,0.000001035472,2.527633e-8,0.002439532,0.0001097002,0.4273713,0.005264079,0.0006815303,0.4515097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007587657,0.00009320831,0.9566852,0.00001553178,0.00001000177,0.00002308269,0.003513807,0.00007112785,0.01090293,0.005327594,0.02299085,0.0002907832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292725,0.00007181468,0.0003514606,0.001256639,0.001183161,0.0005592128,0.000003869677,0.00003237956,0.067269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916483,0.00007159295,0.004940363,0.0005236298,0.0001549289,0.0001551327,0.000007094771,0.000007040414,0.002491964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041227836","doi":"10.1002/sce.20440","title":"Reproducing successful rituals in bad times: Exploring emotional interactions of a new science teacher","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Dialogical self; Attrition; Psychology; Pedagogy; Teacher education; Mathematics education; Ethnography; Science education; Professional development; Teaching method; Social psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1584492067634728,"gpt":0.4159996860956687,"spread":0.2575504793321959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012339,0.00006807029,0.00008618981,0.0004477331,0.0003076829,0.00002822476,0.0004297986,0.0000128078,0.001541408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003273948,0.00006664585,0.00002110121,0.002064456,0.0006331851,0.0005412779,0.00007688446,0.0001054989,0.0001404454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001351588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001208534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002505227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001122637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987249,0.00001837772,0.0002505569,0.0005152029,0.0002401987,0.0002507094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991274,0.00002598948,0.0001195792,0.0004862952,0.0001514164,0.00008925948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000190993,0.002343435,0.1787877,0.0000136371,0.00001195862,4.732376e-7,0.2796417,0.00002080247,0.03053341,0.3476111,0.005943917,0.1550727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009640799,0.00002973294,0.9542944,0.00006702386,0.000005119339,0.000007366009,0.03580256,0.00003260914,0.004127757,0.002916805,0.002505964,0.0001142501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881271,0.00005101224,0.0001470532,0.0007011294,0.001353302,0.0001657118,9.653149e-7,0.000018478,0.1094352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931898,0.000005173935,0.003110336,0.00003483854,0.0001690319,0.00008994187,0.000001057639,0.000004601567,0.003395265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096070817","doi":"10.1002/sce.10117","title":"Multiple modes of meaning‐making in a science center","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Meaning-making; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Epistemology; Action (physics); Science education; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04408891522742939,"gpt":0.2913865670845031,"spread":0.2472976518570737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002938793,0.0000437163,0.00004842153,0.0001589163,0.0002910844,0.0001384839,0.0002426344,0.000006611848,0.00009654631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007866649,0.00003386915,0.00001320274,0.0002516299,0.0009930687,0.0009423611,0.00003001386,0.00003658024,0.00001034248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001114196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006594139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006821681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001754849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993094,0.000003524459,0.0001119403,0.0001635585,0.0002458286,0.0001657585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996479,0.000005107328,0.00004968528,0.0001060765,0.0001612872,0.00002998771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000203829,0.0001448166,0.001425206,0.000009099362,2.528692e-7,7.561038e-8,0.09636337,0.00006955914,0.02949813,0.8683888,0.00001621712,0.004082458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002175978,0.0004165316,0.1470048,0.002326167,0.00001479418,0.00001640467,0.5347802,0.00386309,0.1426607,0.1319643,0.03339028,0.001386797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089984,0.00001793793,0.00000637379,0.0002427565,0.0004840619,0.0000765978,0.000001510303,0.000009271996,0.09016303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991426,0.000001470394,0.0004532185,0.00008323962,0.00007998738,0.000004763407,7.322952e-7,0.000002016778,0.0002319002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3659003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103482819","doi":"10.1002/sce.20389","title":"Reconstruction of the history of the photoelectric effect and its implications for general physics textbooks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"University of Manitoba; Louis and Harold Price Foundation","keywords":"Einstein; Photoelectric effect; History of science; Planck; Epistemology; History of physics; Philosophy of science; Presentation (obstetrics); Theoretical physics; Interpretation (philosophy); Physics; Phenomenon; History and philosophy of science; Perspective (graphical); Presupposition; Modern physics; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01127597423243822,"gpt":0.2593852475225996,"spread":0.2481092732901613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000361123,0.0000420415,0.00004704732,0.0000171337,0.0002941306,0.000006406573,0.0002972962,0.00001482846,0.00001850771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001661672,0.00002389311,0.00002919633,0.0003995724,0.001128754,0.0001785906,0.00006972313,0.00004768699,0.000001640483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002788379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006807115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005567795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995061,0.00001335714,0.00008777552,0.0001520764,0.0001384069,0.0001022833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995788,0.00003806552,0.0001228788,0.000202963,0.00003731667,0.00002001831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[8.933355e-7,0.00001783143,0.06445436,0.000004142162,5.21433e-7,1.597627e-10,0.0004186889,0.000004393926,0.8799151,0.002213571,0.0003967201,0.05257376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044506,0.00002819551,0.8276168,0.000005825205,0.00001031462,0.000003063585,0.00007156234,0.000443315,0.1675397,0.003637111,0.000556539,0.00004306621],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933608,0.0000356214,0.00001079461,0.000374817,0.001620664,0.0003171484,0.000002064459,0.000002884663,0.004275176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988988,0.000006523219,0.0002245085,0.0000510918,0.00003482561,0.00003622042,1.473725e-7,0.000001669335,0.0007461889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4158941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012328960","doi":"10.1002/sce.20172","title":"On performing concepts during science lectures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Meaning (existential); Nonverbal communication; Modalities; Point (geometry); Psychology; Body language; Class (philosophy); Modality (human–computer interaction); Multimodality; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Computer science; Communication; Cognitive science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01561807554291991,"gpt":0.3867030684309833,"spread":0.3710849928880635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007414464,0.00006393101,0.00004402046,0.000304797,0.0009545028,0.0001310691,0.0005270401,0.00002221725,0.000202054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001149977,0.00005919785,0.00001421928,0.001031813,0.0007582675,0.0003991722,0.0000463489,0.0001001562,0.0002439018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002326434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009006686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003076167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001032947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989174,0.00002351662,0.0001163839,0.0002856021,0.0003452176,0.0003118616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992751,0.00003240283,0.00005620594,0.0004656323,0.0001100492,0.00006064899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003352425,0.0009702853,0.04841004,0.00001133107,0.000002322477,5.384445e-7,0.01191685,0.0001993595,0.3262777,0.5030255,0.002538509,0.1066141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001094769,0.0000564753,0.9694996,0.00002468382,0.000001895284,0.000008160087,0.0008964174,0.00008423632,0.02515774,0.003382337,0.0006716485,0.000107333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905534,0.00004374825,0.00002496262,0.0004925938,0.001160713,0.0001100691,1.578228e-7,0.00004367787,0.1075707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964061,8.091803e-7,0.0002557637,0.00013337,0.0001532253,0.0000205319,0.000001776009,0.000004251169,0.003024144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.734136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056441156","doi":"10.1002/sce.20291","title":"The unintended effects of interactive objects and labels in the science museum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Clothing; Frame (networking); Science education; Informal learning; Psychology; Visual arts; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics education; Art; Pedagogy; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01910420527330958,"gpt":0.2604098290636315,"spread":0.2413056237903219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004796106,0.00004630486,0.00004400768,0.00006824418,0.001067218,0.0001619554,0.0003318915,0.000005985359,0.00001287489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002619008,0.00002179871,0.000009864224,0.0002644373,0.003905296,0.0006175817,0.00003350531,0.00006643264,0.000003622783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003322996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004527956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004384323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005362478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993737,0.00002635803,0.00008387741,0.0001311069,0.0002418029,0.0001431955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994928,0.00011285,0.00005409596,0.0001375839,0.0001779428,0.00002478673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000596185,0.0001173609,0.000236304,0.00001624082,0.00000125873,5.810342e-7,0.4933793,3.854107e-7,0.01365358,0.482937,0.0005816871,0.009070271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004415853,0.0004761539,0.3284601,0.0003527675,0.00001398053,0.00004841684,0.5847843,0.0002540021,0.04205813,0.01605815,0.02667139,0.0003811164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724756,0.0001227645,2.704383e-7,0.001091939,0.0008264995,0.0001675025,4.089176e-7,0.000004515797,0.02531046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990057,0.00003855984,0.00001346327,0.0001529298,0.00006547027,0.00001344726,2.493656e-7,0.00000135368,0.0007088064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324351357","doi":"10.1002/sce.21791","title":"Science education with multilingual learners: Equity as access and equity as transformation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Academy of Education; Purdue University; Educational Testing Service; York University; Vanderbilt University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Science education; Higher education; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1404253857071343,"gpt":0.5778252653801256,"spread":0.4373998796729913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692578,0.0001573944,0.0001252924,0.001177925,0.003000302,0.00152788,0.001111831,0.0000755677,0.0001788642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002865257,0.0001468449,0.00002672148,0.006925952,0.003307093,0.004301604,0.0002068829,0.0001868294,0.0002960692],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006218799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07468617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01338306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001695667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967813,0.00009864209,0.0002725661,0.000608777,0.001519817,0.0007188982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978877,0.0001063633,0.0001825021,0.0003347389,0.000899418,0.0005893349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641433,0.0002288499,0.001480033,0.00003159295,0.000001793636,1.215133e-7,0.1634759,0.00002627181,0.002607228,0.1858978,0.0003222174,0.6459118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008801545,0.0004894896,0.1486421,0.0004505451,0.0000683997,0.00003660493,0.6240406,0.001871696,0.02982146,0.05143353,0.1406961,0.001569294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7541515,0.00002828281,0.00001517462,0.00633955,0.001771675,0.0005080063,0.000001876796,0.0001440206,0.23704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911271,0.0001317028,0.0002741878,0.001046617,0.0005088596,0.00004320969,0.00001746977,0.00001021781,0.006840579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6443424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094922081","doi":"10.1002/sce.20274","title":"Students' inventory of social actors concerned by the controversy surrounding cellular telephones: A case study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Ethnography; Public relations; Sociology; Relevance (law); Representation (politics); Process (computing); Subject (documents); Political science; Law; Computer science; Politics; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07593601771687164,"gpt":0.4298023024891898,"spread":0.3538662847723181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004058653,0.0001007227,0.0001387634,0.0001693623,0.004096833,0.0001686551,0.0009706113,0.00004494474,0.0002550015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009433753,0.0000817971,0.00004985172,0.001729256,0.00319168,0.0007186795,0.00005646202,0.0001404557,0.00002117649],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004061557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00696446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02209219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971487,0.0004609364,0.0002760395,0.0003376051,0.001408033,0.0003687115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986918,0.0002378818,0.0002632053,0.0002373954,0.0004011527,0.0001685739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006010817,0.0009474399,0.2658982,0.000002393553,0.000007227425,0.000004826134,0.717762,8.276792e-7,0.002934831,0.002968264,0.007525869,0.001942124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002417745,0.00005974711,0.02193162,0.000004026075,0.00001359353,0.00002108882,0.96548,0.000006680663,0.0006216755,0.00008707924,0.01140304,0.0001296773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913551,0.00007277601,0.00002127357,0.001218423,0.003491708,0.0006037483,0.00000220387,0.00002490997,0.003209888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996208,0.00001088508,0.00001160259,0.0002166805,0.000405536,0.0000339844,0.000001750152,0.000005067994,0.003106554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.247718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967394179","doi":"10.1002/sce.20304","title":"Social barriers to meaningful engagement in biology field trip group work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Cognition; Perception; Task (project management); Group work; Collaborative learning; Cooperative learning; Social cognition; Social learning; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Teaching method","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08675005819703671,"gpt":0.4672496893736326,"spread":0.3804996311765959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004271692,0.00007161716,0.00009076505,0.000400236,0.0006010808,0.00001580243,0.0002654265,0.00005773398,0.0005408177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093924,0.00007020694,0.0000183405,0.001769743,0.0001942286,0.00007220641,0.000032824,0.00031887,0.00009859238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001479404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004875007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002383995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006227985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984273,0.0006676144,0.0001603621,0.0003281326,0.0001204252,0.0002961348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994875,0.0001499165,0.00005931397,0.0001568237,0.00006352944,0.00008294561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006707641,0.000205038,0.3239766,0.000002482647,0.000006182129,0.000001519294,0.2407092,0.000008484365,0.006397975,0.1167125,0.02162959,0.2902834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002014782,0.0001874146,0.938377,0.00001401416,0.000002191578,0.000003619298,0.007775329,0.000003656243,0.0003934116,0.001739146,0.05112686,0.0001758471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547122,0.00001562369,0.006664494,0.003241793,0.002778275,0.0001409849,1.982809e-7,0.00003314611,0.03241326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902252,4.118568e-7,0.005839797,0.002031482,0.0003021277,0.00004005255,0.000002522185,0.000005185422,0.001553222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6144004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5921575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759609948","doi":"10.1002/sce.21314","title":"Learning progressions in context: Tensions and insights from a semester‐long middle school modeling curriculum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Mathematics education; Diagrammatic reasoning; Science education; Articulation (sociology); Concept learning; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08587327576219579,"gpt":0.4189616741269486,"spread":0.3330883983647528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095556,0.00009018866,0.0001048716,0.0002691048,0.005322204,0.0009760408,0.000630827,0.00006401401,0.00006698269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006437168,0.00008108437,0.00001999745,0.0004946169,0.001130324,0.002037676,0.0001073297,0.0002568074,0.00003848292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001678413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004961911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02491832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03207985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983882,0.0001510104,0.0001886254,0.0004553901,0.0004785343,0.0003381988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986855,0.00007779965,0.0001607999,0.0003323869,0.0003684152,0.0003750644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000256158,0.0002409006,0.7779291,0.000003493,0.00000139668,7.640842e-7,0.1479623,0.0000873391,0.000772977,0.009276896,0.0001770808,0.06354529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001778156,0.00002530253,0.4272394,0.0003166535,0.000006454905,0.000001258949,0.5483063,0.01398813,0.00006273386,0.007513593,0.002110314,0.000252053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872718,0.0002838855,0.0000460843,0.00478547,0.002347944,0.0002700104,5.340494e-7,0.00003298309,0.004961271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978971,0.00007767828,0.0004990651,0.0001911346,0.0003213032,0.0000350905,0.000003241206,0.000004465579,0.0009709516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4003441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152602048","doi":"10.1002/sce.20266","title":"Learning to read scientific text: Do elementary school commercial reading programs help?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Science education; Computer science; Science learning; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05843970476142608,"gpt":0.3799346837971355,"spread":0.3214949790357094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064237,0.0001223907,0.0001062415,0.0003323042,0.001815718,0.0003822659,0.0005346863,0.00004547264,0.001051427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003274626,0.0001180144,0.00003560145,0.001635799,0.001062756,0.0004956651,0.00007859776,0.0001957318,0.001249799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002934884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001903518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006199376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.00007355642,0.000247103,0.0005972478,0.0004388182,0.0005097871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998889,0.00004956501,0.0001065351,0.0003838956,0.0003208804,0.0002501797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003234535,0.0007309487,0.6922479,0.00001327012,0.00001062679,0.000002590387,0.02420512,0.00003833826,0.002415144,0.04223518,0.05635719,0.1817113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343903,0.0002078309,0.8914151,0.00004459518,0.000005688165,0.00005537589,0.04889811,0.000004509925,0.0001660205,0.0009851276,0.05792215,0.0002120739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561231,0.000102539,0.00003212781,0.003271703,0.005952138,0.000373324,0.00000130119,0.00007931459,0.03406447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981932,0.000005749925,0.002075756,0.0003534622,0.0005677689,0.0001317131,0.00004768108,0.000009958218,0.01487588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997368359","doi":"10.1002/sce.20113","title":"Do teachers ask students to read news in secondary science?: Evidence from the Canadian context","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Scientific literacy; Curriculum; Science education; Reading (process); Media literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07404147935829504,"gpt":0.4440148947042607,"spread":0.3699734153459657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008660187,0.0001227644,0.000108588,0.0007294947,0.003827882,0.002077336,0.00312834,0.00006216989,0.0008837206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004488047,0.0001027473,0.00002832093,0.006166966,0.004506043,0.002324072,0.00009562848,0.0002725307,0.000460159],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002639242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06667595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960299,0.0002022712,0.0002845904,0.0007373935,0.001904284,0.000841574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979706,0.000306054,0.000111784,0.000544282,0.0005078136,0.0005594296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002856611,0.0001049323,0.6361948,6.177205e-7,5.921208e-7,4.031377e-7,0.1652221,0.00001337841,0.0006944948,0.02834181,0.01795943,0.1514647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004622793,0.0000110592,0.7713943,0.00004922496,0.000002071285,4.31109e-7,0.15771,0.000003476009,0.00009729819,0.003106501,0.06744118,0.0001382414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8874385,0.0002142256,0.000007615231,0.05264522,0.004586422,0.000546304,0.000003839331,0.00002273252,0.05453513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908782,0.00001438111,0.000253392,0.005042262,0.0007813535,0.00005052382,0.000002845196,0.00000510135,0.00297192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1513264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610651657","doi":"10.1002/sce.21277","title":"Temporality of Emotion: Antecedent and Successive Variants of Frustration When Learning Chemistry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Temporality; Frustration; Psychology; Science education; Mathematics education; Chemistry; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03054390314441387,"gpt":0.4026603643151626,"spread":0.3721164611707487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004952883,0.00005059608,0.00009827192,0.00004636271,0.0002965008,0.00001667617,0.0003008269,0.00008291341,0.0003113636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005003921,0.00004963314,0.00001532242,0.00007826197,0.001188352,0.0002600664,0.00003963681,0.0001444435,0.000004094666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000647035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002413518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003415568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001545262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992883,0.00003156287,0.0001799065,0.0002579222,0.0001413881,0.0001009332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998992,0.00002748262,0.0004613741,0.0002957398,0.0001746392,0.00004877198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001216491,0.0009842173,0.500443,0.000113688,0.00003458631,0.000001027359,0.05195691,0.000003300563,0.1682292,0.188963,0.004213629,0.08493578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001916723,0.00006530763,0.9766797,0.00003571649,0.00001014975,0.000008707402,0.006232518,0.00002279566,0.002337741,0.01383496,0.0005016652,0.00007899899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955955,0.0001513843,0.0008226222,0.001064064,0.001234314,0.00007975097,0.00000164278,0.000006546632,0.1010442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967858,0.00001089367,0.0003052395,0.00001319386,0.0001262959,0.000003906942,0.000001677152,0.000002431394,0.002750569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4762368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4378532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163508249","doi":"10.1002/sce.20401","title":"Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Praxis; Unit (ring theory); Life span; Lifelong learning; Learning sciences; Psychology; Science education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Educational technology; Epistemology; Gerontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02418729754567454,"gpt":0.3525435737983368,"spread":0.3283562762526623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143509,0.00009850189,0.0001115495,0.0002892881,0.0007008701,0.000151889,0.0007199698,0.0000796932,0.00008052584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002112238,0.00007224726,0.00001670828,0.001938346,0.003554246,0.000251348,0.0001242998,0.0002991864,0.00003592201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001809228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002673867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001238821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001521326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988474,0.00001303429,0.0002228399,0.0002924188,0.0002804288,0.0003438483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988537,0.0001422367,0.0001768581,0.0003693811,0.0003054592,0.0001523531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008113103,0.0002952982,0.1135577,0.00005795842,0.00001377045,2.348716e-7,0.01928517,0.0001066265,0.03511205,0.8248426,0.0004898541,0.006230633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001545893,0.0001799168,0.7141327,0.00004799896,0.00001848722,0.0001092536,0.2667176,0.0005141683,0.003862794,0.0039562,0.01001637,0.0002899544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884554,0.0001686062,0.00002581568,0.003539455,0.002440926,0.000149624,0.000001432649,0.00004209887,0.005176667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978942,0.000006565847,0.001024293,0.00007622762,0.0001319746,0.00003485893,9.183702e-7,0.000006474576,0.0008244537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947838065","doi":"10.1002/sce.21150","title":"The Joint Work of Connecting Multiple (Re)presentations in Science Classrooms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Praxis; Phenomenon; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Perspective (graphical); Science education; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.162060641049644,"gpt":0.4724616463159159,"spread":0.3104010052662719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126081,0.00005297539,0.00006716452,0.0003490374,0.0005827137,0.00007466586,0.0004226045,0.00002124163,0.00002778032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009539565,0.00003989708,0.00001308863,0.00367568,0.001318188,0.0002375049,0.00005168436,0.0002144908,0.00002987843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000154243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00165886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006100477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004456119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985679,0.0003268974,0.0002239294,0.0002551075,0.000352731,0.000273431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985854,0.0004183321,0.0001719509,0.0003145101,0.0004463483,0.00006347308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002850992,0.000321529,0.4119252,0.000003390623,0.000003220675,2.333251e-7,0.196116,0.0005549327,0.02042681,0.07651037,0.001927007,0.2921828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001788845,0.00004146565,0.870029,0.00002709992,0.000001665619,0.000002404393,0.1218498,0.0003771627,0.001879462,0.002498089,0.003035117,0.0000798266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587696,0.00006275433,0.0030204,0.00113823,0.00333141,0.0001321099,2.340362e-7,0.00001855391,0.0335267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917596,3.387563e-7,0.007199914,0.00005356947,0.0000780453,0.00001541377,7.769551e-7,0.000004030101,0.0008883377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206385388","doi":"10.1002/sce.21700","title":"Humanistic science education: The history of science and other relevant contexts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Science education; Science, technology, society and environment education; Social science education; Context (archaeology); Graduation (instrument); Nature of Science; History of science; Outline of social science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy of science; Social science; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0637083501107778,"gpt":0.3986296463628361,"spread":0.3349212962520583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0161575,0.0001051553,0.0001090486,0.0008282479,0.008811505,0.0002680524,0.00245694,0.00001897961,0.001014328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004606103,0.00009011765,0.00002457325,0.005363651,0.0415913,0.001233003,0.000288766,0.0002204279,0.00002094404],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003573595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.196887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003947875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003973597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953384,0.0002053098,0.0002842902,0.0006619138,0.002958773,0.0005513392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970154,0.0002033866,0.0003064213,0.0006070646,0.001543981,0.0003237944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000479936,0.0003271764,0.003820825,0.000006250431,7.871643e-7,4.957989e-8,0.1440837,0.000005701354,0.01288831,0.7739263,0.01685141,0.04808469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006631832,0.00007055116,0.02801003,0.00001716365,0.000008797332,0.00001217427,0.1946372,0.00010461,0.0004522361,0.006502843,0.7699146,0.0002034625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6839409,0.001837222,0.00002806198,0.01953368,0.03413698,0.0009001876,0.00000549891,0.00005751859,0.25956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800816,0.0000204493,0.0002638335,0.002767663,0.0002816746,0.00007621752,5.334641e-7,0.000005746909,0.01650224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1593697085","doi":"10.1002/sce.21047","title":"Constituting Identities That Challenge the Contemporary Discourse: Power, Discourse, Experience, and Emotion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Discourse analysis; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Civil discourse; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Work (physics); Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08644283956418915,"gpt":0.4273373954366746,"spread":0.3408945558724855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001933504,0.0001095692,0.00009370135,0.0001845399,0.003515344,0.001038774,0.0006233231,0.0000459398,0.0006615896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007079527,0.00008004433,0.00002768103,0.0007773997,0.00800295,0.003593174,0.00006868708,0.0001382552,0.0001031196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001178561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004549603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003956752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002310254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981042,0.0001681193,0.0001852877,0.0003815634,0.0007612534,0.0003996298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989253,0.0001410113,0.0001614774,0.000280108,0.0002613408,0.000230802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001628722,0.0001348923,0.0313838,0.000004614027,0.000002185239,1.547203e-7,0.3954199,9.795021e-7,0.000286523,0.5309607,0.008721125,0.03308349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005655522,0.00001746592,0.05699455,0.00003244725,0.000002841221,0.000003837811,0.9230508,0.00003176331,0.0001619667,0.00872548,0.01076557,0.0001567827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7827954,0.0004312813,0.00008729511,0.03287388,0.004740192,0.000465782,0.000001120486,0.00004332731,0.1785617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935824,0.0001496174,0.00007614134,0.0005596397,0.0003693842,0.00008318249,0.000002294264,0.000004323507,0.005173023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5276308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997101122","doi":"10.1002/sce.20322","title":"Translations of scientific practice to “students' images of science”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Science education; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Point (geometry); Nature of Science; Philosophy of science; Sociocultural evolution; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics; Philosophy; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07637427313264532,"gpt":0.4980064564590428,"spread":0.4216321833263975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008315905,0.00007717949,0.0001184047,0.001296012,0.003727693,0.0002037567,0.001700405,0.0000304667,0.0002239064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007199167,0.00007765282,0.00003999424,0.01095422,0.01706239,0.002578687,0.00006366205,0.00008456371,0.00006247635],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002061441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03049561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002006302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959776,0.0001194377,0.0003403111,0.0004748881,0.002662642,0.0004250851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959119,0.0002269034,0.0002371158,0.0004410986,0.002809196,0.0003737865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001668676,0.001708336,0.05074226,0.0000125458,0.000003634541,2.383853e-7,0.576174,0.00006549592,0.188346,0.1423523,0.005541876,0.0350366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002164692,0.0001579882,0.4695572,0.00007596135,0.00002620462,0.00001394749,0.3051085,0.00002264489,0.1175387,0.002745344,0.1041294,0.0004076152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.927027,0.00005132592,0.0003025176,0.007231201,0.004279337,0.0003715657,0.000004564068,0.00002194887,0.06071053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895207,0.00002284699,0.007008658,0.0002026467,0.0001297525,0.00001429863,0.000001401782,0.000003445961,0.003096271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.418815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113661225","doi":"10.1002/sce.20308","title":"Rethinking the notion of technology in education: Techno‐epistemology as a feature inherent to human praxis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Science education; Sociology; Epistemology; Social epistemology; Science, technology, society and environment education; Technology education; Philosophy of science; Pedagogy; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06163350089075649,"gpt":0.4282919607542807,"spread":0.3666584598635242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002425545,0.00008264719,0.0001047128,0.0009431745,0.001520616,0.00005234551,0.0006562839,0.0001268833,0.00009579798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003849488,0.00007048051,0.00001949343,0.005923946,0.001598311,0.0004644926,0.00005462855,0.0003737635,0.00005123764],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004390746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009279775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003089946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009893377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985295,0.0001993318,0.0002339764,0.0003112416,0.0004684861,0.0002574415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998399,0.00009552818,0.0003011005,0.0003181325,0.0008293471,0.00005684462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000669478,0.0004843149,0.03642283,0.000009152463,0.000002300062,2.37565e-7,0.1648638,0.000008453956,0.007581379,0.7243068,0.003576946,0.06273706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001260545,0.0002157301,0.3466979,0.0002141421,0.000007868683,0.00003723289,0.204593,0.000004085037,0.005776315,0.06288209,0.3791459,0.0002997131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306481,0.0001106988,0.00001942356,0.1282509,0.001622898,0.0004726301,1.940749e-7,0.00003957485,0.03883553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911556,0.00002242616,0.001837345,0.0008812827,0.0002236139,0.000106923,0.000002901888,0.000005104776,0.005764749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6614247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015747691","doi":"10.1002/sce.20289","title":"Lab technicians and high school student interns—Who is scaffolding whom?: On forms of emergent expertise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fieldnotes; Dialogical self; Conversation; Internship; Apprenticeship; Process (computing); Sociology; Pedagogy; Product (mathematics); Ethnography; Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Linguistics; Communication; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04540109121443749,"gpt":0.4253994138264853,"spread":0.3799983226120478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392699,0.00009543473,0.0001211061,0.0003473766,0.0003916258,0.00002771384,0.000260326,0.00004322303,0.0003004835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002416969,0.00007944112,0.0000219116,0.0006384584,0.0004021359,0.0001530741,0.00004985182,0.0001670585,0.00003966304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001408011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002749428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002615359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002603575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988145,0.0001211148,0.0002193856,0.0003377138,0.0002940159,0.0002132724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993014,0.0000335445,0.0001451271,0.0003030972,0.0001489256,0.00006793369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006311025,0.001273019,0.3252455,0.00002297674,0.00003199245,0.00000201177,0.2122882,0.00001459186,0.09189666,0.04867208,0.01274726,0.3077427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001777171,0.000288087,0.9742916,0.0001161164,0.000004951934,0.00001284749,0.00826198,0.00002091334,0.01438832,0.0003417355,0.001955987,0.0001397991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894533,0.0001010626,0.001721849,0.0006808448,0.001409328,0.0001541628,0.000001122777,0.00003410179,0.006444223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943367,0.00001558357,0.001984936,0.000438726,0.0001109662,0.00002401109,0.000001254763,0.000008984852,0.003078785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3290083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140173361","doi":"10.1002/sce.20376","title":"Re‐presenting the social construction of science in light of the propositions of Bruno Latour: For a renewal of the school conception of science in secondary schools","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science and Education Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conceptualization; Sociology; Ethnomethodology; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Science education; Nature of Science; Philosophy of science; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0303635980372774,"gpt":0.4115908404841333,"spread":0.3812272424468559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008890316,0.00007224367,0.000160602,0.0006587958,0.001603211,0.00007109255,0.002047439,0.00004999863,0.00003519832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00502288,0.00004667725,0.0000746818,0.01148559,0.02113107,0.001297954,0.0001214069,0.0002060477,4.091182e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003332109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03042774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002149616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008644637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967269,0.0001962327,0.000582336,0.0003222164,0.001777965,0.0003943099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968783,0.000148137,0.0007122994,0.0004022084,0.001787616,0.00007141717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002044394,0.000377648,0.1220067,0.00004212658,0.000001311626,9.27632e-9,0.07254631,0.00006814045,0.7048302,0.08859891,0.0002327901,0.01127541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001448335,0.00004562761,0.585954,0.0001813505,0.000005271523,5.021734e-7,0.1509176,0.0001164991,0.2474669,0.01506953,0.00003884325,0.00005907594],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809633,0.00002601867,0.00001460042,0.01104398,0.0009196943,0.0008869815,0.000006287423,0.000003037298,0.006136112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990034,0.00001091201,0.0007171081,0.00003998648,0.00008281972,0.00002174589,3.755596e-7,0.000001909451,0.0001217238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4639472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004751115","doi":"10.1002/sce.21567","title":"Evaluating a learning progression for the solar system: Progress along gravity and dynamical properties dimensions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Construct (python library); Mathematics education; Discipline; Domain (mathematical analysis); Psychology; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1563339734596116,"gpt":0.4737784806911266,"spread":0.3174445072315151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004398203,0.00008190393,0.0000861935,0.00006473278,0.005330817,0.0004802636,0.0003946342,0.00004056858,0.000009732705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004021943,0.00005409475,0.00002710938,0.0008881347,0.001782314,0.0005589857,0.00006789153,0.0001622277,0.00000924113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001379057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004295769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003601961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001157535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998115,0.0002733967,0.0001743408,0.0003928653,0.0006979111,0.0003464906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998808,0.0002312039,0.0001330914,0.0001251244,0.0004524335,0.0002502048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390645,0.000160096,0.04842526,0.0001201998,0.000005975958,1.299935e-7,0.2567998,0.0001557243,0.009398835,0.05737556,0.000405346,0.627114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003598245,0.0004798097,0.05644999,0.0003964277,0.0000793169,0.000009116144,0.6945442,0.2260722,0.00147526,0.001012545,0.01859623,0.000525073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572564,0.0006327289,0.0007406223,0.03814897,0.001481017,0.001298964,7.879287e-7,0.0001021081,0.0003384203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.00001452171,0.002617887,0.0002378697,0.0004278014,0.0002097337,0.000001986185,0.000005448107,0.0001540008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6265889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408321245","doi":"10.1002/sce.21963","title":"Transformative Climate and Environmental Education for a Just Future","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Environmental education; Science education; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004070513936564116,"gpt":0.2781424258640225,"spread":0.2740719119274584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004799683,0.0001179063,0.00008120011,0.0001009766,0.0006249821,0.00007162605,0.0002042493,0.00004484541,0.0003252334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004575539,0.0001131597,0.00003108894,0.0003905699,0.0008152238,0.0007382506,0.00007263137,0.00007276229,0.00003424238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008120821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005467494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004687796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000182711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989147,0.00002496616,0.0001817403,0.000407258,0.0001979977,0.0002733538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995561,0.00002547152,0.00005694824,0.0002288391,0.000009943986,0.0001226971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000393369,0.001390319,0.1101229,0.00009727033,0.000004229764,2.527558e-8,0.01057121,0.00002768426,0.01191486,0.01888452,0.007446664,0.839501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002828433,0.00006979658,0.7951398,0.00003035676,0.00002765475,0.000004533678,0.08591118,0.0005443071,0.004275861,0.007816008,0.1056136,0.0002839448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737005,0.0001855617,0.0004099746,0.004988933,0.001349928,0.0009624783,0.00001525539,0.00002210608,0.01836525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993843,0.0001249441,0.002358935,0.001404844,0.00006841111,0.0002203355,0.00004455247,0.000005271124,0.001929692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.839217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.480692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118312966","doi":"10.1002/sce.21044","title":"Undoing decontextualization or how scientists come to understand their own data/graphs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science; Objectivity (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Ethnography; Epistemology; Data visualization; Process (computing); Data science; Cognitive science; Visualization; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1095143888564069,"gpt":0.3858010519737852,"spread":0.2762866631173783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001597645,0.0001195065,0.00009961492,0.0005350436,0.0005945343,0.001367363,0.002287021,0.00002697545,0.00003154042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006214261,0.00009351646,0.00001693332,0.00414192,0.0002237899,0.006215701,0.0005698224,0.00004968824,0.00007846117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001637301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001695522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006606852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982536,0.00005248078,0.0001766732,0.0005290436,0.0005499145,0.0004383197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997987,0.0000623628,0.0001206384,0.001204179,0.0002633717,0.0003624117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003391528,0.000349117,0.00499987,0.00001963176,0.000005989805,2.31047e-7,0.009138986,0.00003644279,0.001991719,0.881106,0.04415571,0.05819289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001472064,0.0004510725,0.1027879,0.00060815,0.00007126654,0.0001694834,0.050088,0.383098,0.01893483,0.02525258,0.4138329,0.003233753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02225641,0.0001014398,0.9695676,0.00303945,0.003387508,0.0002643119,0.00002332584,0.0001170642,0.001242924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780999,0.00001289502,0.01876005,0.001520706,0.0001252349,0.000003298942,0.00008015631,0.000007155312,0.001390635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019979212","doi":"10.1002/sce.20099","title":"Comments on “Thinking differently about cultural diversity: Using postcolonial theory to (Re)read science education”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Indigenous and Place-Based Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Diversity (politics); Media studies; Anthropology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0344490038261459,"gpt":0.3745132054442575,"spread":0.3400642016181116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003525691,0.0001657166,0.0001207231,0.0006132608,0.01192273,0.000829272,0.001282227,0.00006928428,0.0003095839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007343899,0.0001592303,0.00004451061,0.00219276,0.001256876,0.001823927,0.0001887121,0.0001746888,0.0001945316],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004686863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03073085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00893196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002035057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967947,0.0001688359,0.0002180961,0.0005746566,0.001475827,0.0007679056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980657,0.0001083169,0.0001757799,0.0003451802,0.0008558242,0.0004492733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479359,0.001288084,0.01620236,0.000008774189,0.000005367579,1.333564e-7,0.5630499,0.0002027119,0.004823111,0.1827703,0.002384236,0.2292204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006823107,0.0005363314,0.4271478,0.0008072188,0.0001329444,0.0000102949,0.3750973,0.0005919294,0.01376999,0.03503417,0.1439945,0.00219518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.95863,0.00004439969,0.0001042985,0.008794377,0.005790524,0.0006328837,0.000005288024,0.00005483333,0.02594337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883872,0.00001225873,0.003013766,0.004597778,0.001375517,0.00001481546,0.00001195355,0.00000805988,0.002578676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4109455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892707270","doi":"10.1002/sce.21476","title":"Engaging students in computational modeling: The role of an external audience in shaping conceptual learning, model quality, and classroom discourse","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Audience response; Science education; Argument (complex analysis); Artifact (error); Psychology; Conceptual model; Target audience; Conceptual change; Strict constructionism; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Conceptual framework; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1365364319507412,"gpt":0.5162229014373076,"spread":0.3796864694865665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007878546,0.00007424271,0.00009874437,0.0002466295,0.0003028963,0.00005365221,0.0003720381,0.00002993055,0.00001467306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004956171,0.00006225814,0.000009488765,0.0005305537,0.00107146,0.0003112988,0.00007324469,0.000387915,0.000002711769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007137657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004045505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005150544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.000851401,0.0002773823,0.0003248736,0.0003593711,0.0002141392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.0001380345,0.0001518716,0.0001391432,0.0001654136,0.00003539667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002427846,0.0002827824,0.5006255,0.000002449532,0.000001935591,1.141602e-7,0.2381836,0.1110248,0.004825318,0.07311971,0.000001370947,0.07190819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001457152,0.000049938,0.3994707,0.00004173059,0.00000117509,0.000001719971,0.05581627,0.5295765,0.00004111329,0.01478842,0.000003341457,0.00006344072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477586,0.00006709955,0.05031801,0.0001828158,0.0002458672,0.00009589796,4.033201e-7,0.000009892262,0.001321435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887689,5.90326e-7,0.01094115,0.0001040648,0.00007979471,0.000009515486,0.000001671302,0.000005065544,0.00008919182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4185517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3947841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993111279","doi":"10.1002/sce.21550","title":"“We're taking their brilliant minds”: Science teacher expertize, meta‐discourse, and the challenges of teacher–scientist collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","keywords":"Psychology; General partnership; Science education; Apprenticeship; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08375919221236156,"gpt":0.4391600624364597,"spread":0.3554008702240981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01334347,0.0001581589,0.0002566155,0.0003995615,0.0006979094,0.0001845442,0.0006461747,0.00005634934,0.0003234624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092257,0.00009614899,0.00004714422,0.002070805,0.00371592,0.0005929082,0.00008986892,0.0002629905,0.00002603557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001033883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001110213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001999963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002232676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974133,0.0007310184,0.0002870697,0.0006511518,0.0005517643,0.0003657411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981943,0.0002062107,0.00046749,0.0006253095,0.0004400256,0.00006663617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006254826,0.0003440312,0.004355881,0.00002487589,0.00006667073,1.46427e-7,0.3187784,0.00002006828,0.05572785,0.4108019,0.0006262687,0.2091913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00145935,0.000301051,0.3423802,0.0002024725,0.0001942858,0.0000334286,0.6222621,0.00122275,0.01177813,0.005603921,0.01389909,0.0006632749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195618,0.004314901,0.0003020538,0.00738105,0.002787134,0.0004458821,0.000001738579,0.00002843788,0.06517697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926124,0.00002586491,0.002166508,0.0001123813,0.0001490757,0.00004575984,0.000001256459,0.00001092267,0.004875879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4051979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048819367","doi":"10.1002/sce.20181","title":"Co‐op students' access to shared knowledge in science‐rich workplaces","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Curriculum; Pedagogy; Science education; Knowledge transfer; Gatekeeping; Accountability; Work (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08159113517722968,"gpt":0.5254715212901008,"spread":0.4438803861128711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007607094,0.0001048663,0.0001017124,0.00139102,0.00206763,0.002373431,0.002033125,0.00004214262,0.0004929436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002438551,0.0001061433,0.00001448802,0.01300515,0.001554276,0.004105304,0.0001014681,0.0001855036,0.000435586],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009513868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01284911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003334791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003081224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971724,0.0001787413,0.0002633723,0.0005517708,0.001249537,0.0005841492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982426,0.0001719343,0.0001728159,0.0002423875,0.0009908251,0.0001793978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238417,0.001269034,0.7664893,0.000007711778,0.000001308912,2.502726e-7,0.09724798,0.00005825546,0.003259631,0.081348,0.02992344,0.02038272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007661768,0.00001706301,0.8269659,0.00004202098,0.000001808066,2.969413e-7,0.03590527,0.000006583774,0.001274772,0.0006572133,0.1348857,0.0001667757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.788477,0.00004410064,0.00002717882,0.007746731,0.00274677,0.0003772444,9.192607e-7,0.00004297014,0.2005371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863979,0.000005200766,0.0006153971,0.0005544121,0.0006027725,0.00006617961,0.000005237713,0.000005894923,0.01174698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1979209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304687458","doi":"10.1002/sce.21774","title":"Humanistic school science: Research, policy, politics and classrooms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Education","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Politics; Sociology; Normal science; Diversity (politics); Science, technology, society and environment education; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5682367544309505,"gpt":0.5941662937649144,"spread":0.02592953933396391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337478,0.00005313571,0.00005318644,0.001057777,0.01480217,0.0005591358,0.0010538,0.00002058025,0.001506242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003413449,0.00005997558,0.00001297951,0.004499756,0.006389903,0.0006517098,0.000521201,0.0002856147,0.00007110195],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002715668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01754674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007093259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007955499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971012,0.0003175505,0.0001302946,0.0003162745,0.00158902,0.0005455864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983569,0.0001161504,0.0000562222,0.0004023139,0.0006913152,0.0003770583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001490164,0.0001160728,0.003007743,0.000003780153,3.247386e-7,6.051298e-8,0.04200255,0.000001886141,0.00353456,0.9314013,0.001904507,0.0180257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001135172,0.0001044924,0.1178242,0.00001703063,0.000003712635,0.000006648107,0.3195817,0.0002020353,0.00006105837,0.09079818,0.4710641,0.0002232629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7034875,0.0001431274,0.00000756903,0.03198943,0.001100177,0.0003754215,0.000008402018,0.00005993947,0.2628285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925228,0.0003339809,0.0001864363,0.0006353261,0.0003714166,0.00005955707,0.000007753302,0.000004794866,0.005877911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}