{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":68,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":48,"predictions_cover":68,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"af0fcc63c032","filters":{"venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2920377922","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3","title":"Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Nutrition Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine","keywords":"Scientific integrity; Transparency (behavior); Engineering ethics; Best practice; Publication; Harmonization; Scientific misconduct; Research integrity; Process (computing); Philosophy of science; Academic integrity; Scientific evidence; Data integrity; Research ethics; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1559152298375802,"gpt":0.3841029606226381,"spread":0.2281877307850579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01873629,0.0001533028,0.0001807345,0.0002873384,0.002647763,0.001970425,0.0005943908,0.0006372292,0.0001070427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0206525,0.0001436727,0.0000288933,0.001208807,0.00364398,0.001797068,0.0002418663,0.004470821,0.00007452969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001520027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006098246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002735912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971929,0.0001725971,0.0002653745,0.0007154839,0.001132056,0.000521597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965155,0.001783548,0.0001942748,0.0003233328,0.000876499,0.0003068312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804736,0.0001594435,0.02592501,0.0001849126,0.00003438337,0.000004920286,0.1584096,0.0001014895,0.02633044,0.7785549,0.001965666,0.008311264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002144895,0.00005091704,0.002869517,0.0004159062,0.00003523625,0.000006819417,0.03012756,0.01519452,0.00121075,0.00570522,0.9436748,0.0004942587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709828,0.0003514658,0.00067432,0.01751079,0.003793447,0.0003033499,0.00006362767,0.0001210421,0.00619914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900523,0.0003720737,0.006282815,0.0002389479,0.0001452413,0.000008995726,0.00001734199,0.000008881978,0.00287343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1982061847","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9265-3","title":"Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical industry; Conflict of interest; Publication bias; Clinical trial; Philosophy of science; Confirmation bias; Variety (cybernetics); Actuarial science; Public relations; Psychology; Positive economics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9134429979255221,"gpt":0.6818156810325046,"spread":0.2316273168930175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06736697,0.0001957437,0.0004598756,0.00006110235,0.0008433067,0.00004464372,0.001509739,0.0008422631,0.0001350225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04289971,0.00007780184,0.0001690377,0.0006497464,0.006290933,0.0001623836,0.0003117067,0.008171551,0.000002859634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002050646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008238252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005528724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001735193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948742,0.002605508,0.0009593095,0.0002938275,0.0007704407,0.0004966851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952047,0.04582446,0.0004832989,0.00069309,0.0005633905,0.0003887501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009185898,0.001235306,0.3357715,0.001091499,0.00248164,0.00003594663,0.1009905,0.002930545,0.01593432,0.2917632,0.02603549,0.2208115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002380207,0.0004999937,0.4846447,0.001078621,0.003005575,0.0001057401,0.02264488,0.1149504,0.07003601,0.002955291,0.2968113,0.0008873641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019382,0.006899164,0.0001895673,0.384563,0.003073406,0.001550276,0.0001416128,0.00006791423,0.001576791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867684,0.004027227,0.00004269976,0.008489669,0.0003052197,0.00006155359,7.458273e-7,0.000009915242,0.0002945476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3848301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2022321973","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5","title":"Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Research England; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Warrant; Multidisciplinary approach; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Business; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9480796414119428,"gpt":0.7291269966411988,"spread":0.2189526447707439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3337831,0.0002947789,0.001870108,0.001497397,0.0003504329,0.00005478527,0.0006603802,0.0008636344,0.000001109015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66653,0.000220188,0.000101791,0.004171376,0.004977546,0.000171271,0.000538545,0.008108822,5.954828e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004131313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01890122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002147265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009791714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917159,0.00131759,0.001906637,0.001371022,0.002510998,0.001177836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8229846,0.1647623,0.001104628,0.001966895,0.00764312,0.001538387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001837469,0.00006721151,0.0001359718,0.915095,0.00001346251,0.000004329619,0.006068765,0.000001405063,0.000004581558,0.03413899,0.0000144272,0.04443752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002929257,0.0009200322,0.0005296283,0.9600006,0.00003994636,0.00002066927,0.0007044249,0.0003945808,0.000006611155,0.01382549,0.02294702,0.0003181068],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002163252,0.9920501,0.00005845167,0.004974781,0.0001251387,0.002510247,0.000009884815,0.0000238301,0.00003129118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001094256,0.9795474,0.01872524,0.000172239,0.00003124398,0.0002827955,0.000001720495,0.00002624355,0.0001188015],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3327468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089994419","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6","title":"Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Psychology; Survey research; Recall; Philosophy of science; Publication bias; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Applied psychology; Law; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2288966979256258,"gpt":0.4437039106443108,"spread":0.214807212718685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07764409,0.0002697625,0.002180726,0.001514805,0.0007418274,0.0002194498,0.001130967,0.001555659,0.00004745154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0197689,0.0002174099,0.0006969963,0.00735109,0.0009652114,0.0002109121,0.0002197498,0.003403087,0.0000140053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001429828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001771373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00181898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000548003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954641,0.0007758982,0.0005951638,0.0006131256,0.001953616,0.0005980919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953203,0.003020309,0.0002668872,0.0003536761,0.0006572473,0.0003816001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001291686,0.00005101263,0.00002416362,0.01455665,0.040513,0.00001135363,0.06918689,0.002194946,0.00001297082,0.2922157,0.0009697952,0.5802622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001023195,0.00001066939,0.00000955829,0.0003944373,0.04345205,9.02896e-7,0.0001379364,0.0005644653,0.000001422827,0.00004726762,0.9550853,0.0002857264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000138275,0.98156,0.0147156,0.0006529504,0.0006509732,0.0003666332,0.00008786611,0.00007212668,0.00188004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000695914,0.9958811,0.002447598,0.0001967417,0.0001262427,0.00002576354,0.00001108822,0.00001794322,0.0005975979],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2767664771","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5","title":"Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Brain–computer interface; Feeling; Perception; Categorization; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychology; Preparedness; Identity (music); Distress; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry; Neuroscience; Electroencephalography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09202295995811535,"gpt":0.3360014869891139,"spread":0.2439785270309985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222406,0.0001114583,0.0001144658,0.00009529731,0.0006349099,0.0005198278,0.000470332,0.00006749937,0.00000260342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001513201,0.00009787859,0.0000151028,0.00008339292,0.0004337218,0.0003280826,0.0002313995,0.0003515565,0.000002704253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003143822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004426458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002793662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007759751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986561,0.00001464966,0.0001831654,0.0004657638,0.0004113746,0.0002689546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991586,0.0003212213,0.00005760025,0.0003310615,0.00002675824,0.0001047552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002432392,0.0005148324,0.001349282,0.0003824376,0.00002731278,0.0002882078,0.06130155,0.01492559,0.8244768,0.07189725,0.0005939578,0.02181032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02531904,0.001186976,0.02341396,0.001167446,0.00002703485,0.00002285175,0.0003806989,0.1611019,0.7529587,0.0050212,0.02810433,0.001295889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958855,0.00003933334,0.0001937321,0.002307578,0.0006629853,0.0001650747,0.00001390194,0.00003651111,0.0006954077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999224,0.0001150395,0.0003511916,0.0001606568,0.00008141277,0.000005546493,4.644929e-7,0.000005333864,0.0000563204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1461763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5012711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2034782841","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9327-6","title":"Hype and Public Trust in Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Philosophy of science; Public trust; Public relations; Science communication; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6613253772258837,"gpt":0.4482507958135379,"spread":0.2130745814123458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004754521,0.00003963702,0.00004350569,0.0002472771,0.0006680953,0.0001553278,0.0002950186,0.00005498855,0.00002970189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001754059,0.00003933631,0.000004197614,0.00114004,0.002124891,0.0006467108,0.0001066719,0.0002260333,0.000003500222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007111701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009222373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.00001941321,0.00006647781,0.0001468439,0.0003620686,0.0002498057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999508,0.00006750127,0.00001366553,0.0001232493,0.0001491363,0.0001384775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002320848,0.00003752726,0.03820661,0.0000349679,7.259819e-7,0.000001202031,0.3823628,0.000005839375,0.01212976,0.5364542,0.0000111313,0.03075291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886125,0.00007913704,0.8329449,0.0001511673,0.000005310344,0.000009423421,0.08164751,0.01440393,0.0005092125,0.00552032,0.06370569,0.0006348253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688164,0.0001132716,0.00005794162,0.002775647,0.0001759052,0.00006250061,6.22652e-7,0.00004878151,0.02794894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967835,0.002153619,0.0008571849,0.0001555792,0.00001672045,0.000003308988,1.862816e-7,0.000002114773,0.00002779554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7829251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948251768","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4","title":"Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Multidisciplinary approach; Hostility; Research integrity; Social psychology; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03739747619945206,"gpt":0.3625665209387409,"spread":0.3251690447392889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01143263,0.00008294264,0.0001027707,0.0002810225,0.0005252549,0.0001860599,0.0003505719,0.0003082743,0.00001737405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004117061,0.00007853215,0.00000642268,0.002440132,0.001244848,0.0006901373,0.000102273,0.001335995,0.00001677243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009801249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006809524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002091248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981682,0.00005118117,0.0001318737,0.000342516,0.0008706301,0.000435623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991176,0.0002280847,0.00002436515,0.000102098,0.0002650265,0.0002628526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001037516,0.00002631635,0.04812482,0.00005326291,0.000003333169,0.000007246331,0.4654069,0.000506114,0.09536622,0.3873597,0.00009150758,0.003044151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002260427,0.0007538129,0.5986566,0.002299466,0.00005511915,0.00002909281,0.2068031,0.01945039,0.0267264,0.02623115,0.1132205,0.003513903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903194,0.00007497041,0.00002098553,0.004725791,0.0004804177,0.0002364427,0.000003248356,0.00002873336,0.004110056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983009,0.00006755073,0.000803302,0.0002412898,0.00001452268,0.000004687176,2.812226e-7,0.000003485286,0.0005639857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5505318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5804309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3189026556","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00327-4","title":"Ethical Considerations Associated with “Humanitarian Drones”: A Scoping Literature Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; McGill University; Universität Zürich; Universität St. Gallen; World Health Organization","keywords":"Drone; Humanitarian aid; Harm; Public relations; Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09185619438386419,"gpt":0.4230454729892827,"spread":0.3311892786054185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003384058,0.00009045886,0.000151723,0.00007558248,0.0009252511,0.0000830326,0.0000744108,0.0001876156,0.00004639142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007311769,0.00007393643,0.00001395604,0.00064341,0.0001356106,0.0001752198,0.0001174123,0.001741853,0.00000980036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006300775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00120689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004951845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001683682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986623,0.0001796995,0.0001836101,0.0002373443,0.0004317789,0.0003052988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982776,0.0007725816,0.00004124066,0.0001997845,0.0005988659,0.0001099375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001027742,0.00006644882,0.0002655991,0.01486109,0.00007178012,0.0004373456,0.05356033,0.0002388093,0.002461803,0.9197977,0.007874785,0.0003540958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002858976,0.0004105262,0.01356446,0.7961791,0.0004203377,0.0001856778,0.0104772,0.00545412,0.0003259717,0.009904793,0.1581341,0.00208466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1674175,0.1090527,0.02792114,0.5808753,0.005490163,0.007019008,0.0001160649,0.001948064,0.10016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8239378,0.01948788,0.005734438,0.1450895,0.0002469019,0.0003148181,0.00006433884,0.00006303382,0.005061321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8753399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114618638","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0003-y","title":"Strategies for consulting with the community: The cases of four large-scale genetic databases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public relations; General partnership; Confidentiality; Accountability; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public health; Business; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4760643580412237,"gpt":0.5122928713138475,"spread":0.03622851327262383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009773234,0.00006135531,0.0001000673,0.00003752042,0.0006197151,0.00005311804,0.0002710535,0.00006862495,8.847134e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01969863,0.00003029684,0.00001624252,0.0003239569,0.001635861,0.00008201428,0.0001327016,0.001912548,2.699001e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001887605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00164222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002734949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001396192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987952,0.00003200996,0.0001231673,0.0001114573,0.0007124756,0.0002257058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807246,0.01801266,0.00003459422,0.0004209288,0.0007406626,0.00006649199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002593511,0.0003417731,0.005856612,0.006934536,0.0001292245,0.0000622298,0.07135526,0.05941913,0.06312023,0.7906761,0.000130856,0.001714694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01258575,0.008458259,0.1416957,0.01335791,0.0007494979,0.001911277,0.55703,0.09963588,0.07174344,0.07095308,0.02022082,0.001658357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577484,0.000251374,0.02777363,0.01364371,0.00005000269,0.0002953407,0.00002335109,0.0000243688,0.000189781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871483,0.0001979587,0.01206605,0.0005165161,0.0000297141,0.00001399276,0.000001162717,0.000007082774,0.0000192477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.719723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2600935272","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5","title":"America COMPETES at 5 years: An Analysis of Research-Intensive Universities’ RCR Training Plans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Stony Brook University; Oregon State University; Montana State University; Georgia State University; Dartmouth College; York University; University of Rochester; Georgetown University; University of Central Florida; Johns Hopkins University; Brandeis University; Colorado State University; University of Connecticut; Virginia Commonwealth University; Tulane University; Brown University; Arizona State University; State University of New York; Louisiana State University; George Washington University; California Institute of Technology; Georgia Institute of Technology; Ohio State University; Rice University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Florida State University; Yale University; Vanderbilt University; University of Oklahoma; Washington University in St. Louis; University at Buffalo; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; City University of New York; Iowa State University; Carnegie Mellon University; North Carolina State University; Purdue University; Case Western Reserve University; National Science Foundation; Mississippi State University; Emory University; Harvard University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Training (meteorology); Medical education; Business; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2363368745113985,"gpt":0.4519432389538049,"spread":0.2156063644424065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482126,0.00005052263,0.0001170437,0.0005143341,0.0005780847,0.00006614458,0.0003094681,0.00006273286,0.0001017342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003255578,0.00005117345,0.00001829567,0.0003922785,0.0009269785,0.000193104,0.00008870356,0.0002866002,0.000009575394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006437402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001547858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007487998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990004,0.00003196484,0.00008456288,0.0001761436,0.0004796765,0.0002272472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.0001870511,0.00004883738,0.0002665472,0.000385286,0.00007171042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005064521,0.00002329106,0.04442591,0.00004867624,0.0003023604,0.00002492834,0.9087532,0.0113056,0.007785372,0.01954384,0.0002109263,0.007525239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001402819,0.00008267967,0.8861794,0.00003742521,0.0000463293,0.00000165469,0.04754082,0.06162584,0.0001071944,0.00002635282,0.004100545,0.0001114023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968814,0.00001526759,0.0000946418,0.0002061236,0.0001326797,0.00003427257,0.00000875803,0.00001737748,0.002609459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.00001453288,0.0002694796,0.00005124186,0.00002571174,0.000001479999,0.000009014037,0.000003679211,0.0003968471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8612124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4446219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2948845587","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Mentorship; Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6652650663412806,"gpt":0.638300049848536,"spread":0.02696501649274452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.217933,0.00008940783,0.0002166197,0.02189431,0.0003291951,0.0009881103,0.001594246,0.0004426679,0.0000812314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2452208,0.00006818251,0.00003137432,0.2043707,0.001623228,0.000575219,0.000747631,0.003783335,0.00008458319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003388367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002371044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004307048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811432,0.0006162938,0.0004797746,0.0007141858,0.01617103,0.0008755482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689204,0.01672061,0.00007526873,0.000733106,0.0129708,0.0005798555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980125,0.0002899559,0.3097545,0.0001891896,0.00001133281,0.00001808666,0.02827841,0.006194236,0.2320815,0.3857255,0.003637594,0.03372987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005231964,0.0005225927,0.8404738,0.0001374146,0.00000155956,0.000005326934,0.01407483,0.1084145,0.004155393,0.01883186,0.01255476,0.0003047152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902124,0.0001494009,0.0009585546,0.006231602,0.0002274142,0.0002695744,0.00003266694,0.00001271602,0.001905719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986612,0.0001876591,0.0006199774,0.00003142942,0.00001906328,0.00000895633,0.000002343059,0.00000505187,0.000464345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2090238704","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0017-x","title":"Patients’ health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deferiprone; Drug trial; Academic freedom; Public relations; Clinical trial; Work (physics); Politics; Political science; Drug Company; Medicine; Business; Law; Economics; Management; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8380988232874108,"gpt":0.6669507327016969,"spread":0.1711480905857139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0172024,0.00008874799,0.0001344318,0.0001204773,0.001009156,0.00001819777,0.0003046608,0.0003503833,0.00005301538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003779216,0.00006036611,0.00001410405,0.0009411712,0.001230388,0.0001479771,0.00006929395,0.005012501,0.000006058177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001063441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003855627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008918912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977484,0.000684354,0.0002701762,0.0001927069,0.0005643672,0.0005400105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974105,0.001560499,0.0000612024,0.0001332647,0.0005262721,0.0003082963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003219425,0.0004680819,0.1022194,0.002223108,0.00006621661,0.000005257283,0.04854763,0.004181525,0.02477721,0.7433287,0.01326459,0.0605964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001626187,0.0006667603,0.07461499,0.0002732193,0.00003300196,0.00001980251,0.003106586,0.01882441,0.04709065,0.002375778,0.8509291,0.0004395383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630033,0.0009334996,0.0001112981,0.03245677,0.001257171,0.0007656642,0.00003145277,0.00005444753,0.001386428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956765,0.0007418906,0.00009621229,0.003328367,0.00006163335,0.00001801047,0.000002137832,0.000006575147,0.00006873229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2801725374","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5","title":"Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Marketing; Pharmaceutical industry; Government regulation; Advertising; Medicine; Political science; China; Pharmacology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3931380139997239,"gpt":0.5420961286810932,"spread":0.1489581146813693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005044029,0.00006323598,0.00009982125,0.00005534951,0.0003179066,0.00001053061,0.0001618043,0.0001843399,0.0000268414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001642368,0.00003546199,0.00001469887,0.0004166013,0.003202775,0.0002466828,0.00008279063,0.0007959483,0.000001039694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000154325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001567517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001992789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999123,0.0001251141,0.0002324893,0.00007807059,0.0002855346,0.0001557678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988436,0.0004675466,0.00009193196,0.00009675422,0.0004110618,0.00008918314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004973093,0.00009458651,0.01153682,0.001842931,0.00007820577,3.052796e-7,0.031548,0.00134884,0.428528,0.4517688,0.0007561353,0.07200012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002704406,0.0002059101,0.08161335,0.0002650442,0.0001844452,0.00003686181,0.000647675,0.309029,0.5347555,0.005816931,0.06452757,0.0002132436],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603211,0.0003402998,0.0003654586,0.03626867,0.001025401,0.0004462398,0.00001202268,0.00002552336,0.001195349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983329,0.0002131466,0.00006382479,0.001278546,0.00008729702,0.000005624335,5.909657e-7,0.000002021493,0.00001605863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4459518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3138108488","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w","title":"Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Universität zu Köln; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Flourishing; Neuroethics; Psychology; Cognition; Autonomy; Mental health; Human enhancement; Social cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Political science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1269012850138401,"gpt":0.4184645953661176,"spread":0.2915633103522776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008278402,0.00012954,0.0001259563,0.0001796276,0.001097889,0.0001538791,0.0001770419,0.0001464956,0.00004320846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002654147,0.0001410261,0.00001639677,0.0008947569,0.002151238,0.0002519905,0.0001609422,0.0009031733,0.000008071408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003014256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002109152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005370465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008415734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982287,0.00005514677,0.0002202605,0.0005703014,0.0005603606,0.0003652832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.0003106187,0.0000545415,0.0001429902,0.0003412635,0.0001029795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001007943,0.00005621545,0.000031154,0.00003095921,0.000001488522,0.0000183681,0.001122244,7.537651e-7,0.9135589,0.0837193,0.00002862096,0.001431009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001112765,0.0003079289,0.02857517,0.0002550827,0.00006587521,0.0001284537,0.0003983031,0.0005465365,0.9504957,0.006855079,0.01049259,0.0007664985],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841868,0.00008442701,0.006165747,0.006898414,0.0007470483,0.000207501,0.00003710847,0.0001409507,0.001532045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949558,0.0002099228,0.0004139972,0.004060447,0.00006918386,0.00004476247,0.000004920648,0.00001220864,0.000228799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07686421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2566481544","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3","title":"The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Slippery slope; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04229210686061018,"gpt":0.3378338198720225,"spread":0.2955417130114123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087913,0.0000840088,0.00009089197,0.00007778998,0.0007947267,0.0001787578,0.0005461002,0.000230158,0.00000210923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008107865,0.00004322876,0.00002735162,0.0004587968,0.001077195,0.0001401181,0.00005211979,0.0009394269,0.000002194062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000805909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004303986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003211699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004400333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.00009323005,0.0001664054,0.0001593784,0.001018137,0.0004066647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968844,0.002606979,0.00003378939,0.0001847278,0.0001998073,0.00009029303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515558,0.00001946623,0.0003013587,0.00002813974,0.000006443876,0.000004834097,0.0655739,0.001526256,0.008649843,0.9182774,0.00009143748,0.005516448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352396,0.001441986,0.3783831,0.003627698,0.00008378742,0.0000155422,0.04412191,0.01200447,0.009210818,0.1273688,0.4186142,0.00277527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261869,0.0002964119,0.0009532864,0.1672396,0.0008234253,0.0002865144,0.000003120514,0.00005530987,0.004155422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975442,0.00125498,0.0001824454,0.0008650096,0.00009576444,0.000007372206,4.478149e-8,0.000005929501,0.00004430654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200063599","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00338-1","title":"Touching at a Distance: Digital Intimacies, Haptic Platforms, and the Ethics of Consent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Haptic technology; Informed consent; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy; Simulation; Medicine; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06301642748980016,"gpt":0.3519940393426723,"spread":0.2889776118528722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006573248,0.00008081736,0.0001440939,0.00003894837,0.001573941,0.0005054986,0.0001899862,0.0002005154,0.00000381751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02643112,0.00006088517,0.00002892,0.0004272137,0.004616374,0.0005217683,0.0002008921,0.001015532,6.361686e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007822677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001536939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003635405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009018821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984314,0.00003918928,0.0001541461,0.0001770745,0.0009117596,0.000286379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960671,0.003026524,0.00005264653,0.0001287012,0.0005813271,0.0001436922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005654398,0.000005822529,0.0001882448,0.0000871943,0.000006364608,0.000003358444,0.1098938,0.00006526502,0.0005415935,0.8887102,0.00002653878,0.0004659383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003511632,0.0001965114,0.005627941,0.002009556,0.000162527,0.00008313656,0.1734685,0.02142433,0.003550725,0.5576998,0.2303076,0.001957788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.845032,0.003184397,0.004821312,0.1239736,0.001126047,0.000319058,0.00003752496,0.0001161394,0.02138999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964885,0.00223397,0.0003029768,0.0006599762,0.00004881167,0.000001635968,8.69191e-7,0.000005192333,0.0002580677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3310104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2918136568","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00097-0","title":"Solutions to Gender Balance in STEM Fields Through Support, Training, Education and Mentoring: Report of the International Women in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Task Group","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Balance (ability); Gender balance; Work (physics); Women in science; Philosophy of science; Medical education; Work–life balance; Working group; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Mechanical engineering; Physical therapy; Law; Gender studies; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05462969082667192,"gpt":0.3207164155603712,"spread":0.2660867247336993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004008157,0.00004521228,0.00008198543,0.00006947032,0.00007241363,0.00003221362,0.0002285829,0.00008569015,0.000008181703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008012988,0.00003986396,0.000006662018,0.000399481,0.0002570856,0.0001902385,0.0001397222,0.0002808262,2.042112e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001056425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005047151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002229808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006605606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986233,0.00001277626,0.0001147998,0.0001508174,0.000875809,0.0002225301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999641,0.00009761594,0.00002206965,0.00007035963,0.00004760853,0.0001213598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000602533,0.0001057743,0.07895929,0.0002327676,0.00001617331,0.00001991326,0.7742243,0.0008979862,0.002589432,0.1319098,0.0002996114,0.01073897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002123219,0.0003909607,0.3745424,0.002491202,0.00003290854,0.0001636569,0.3435424,0.03624636,0.0003897977,0.007780652,0.2311236,0.001172878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917674,0.00005146045,0.001015061,0.004783379,0.001073528,0.00009736668,0.000001710113,0.00001084809,0.00119925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999261,0.00008897293,0.0001972379,0.0002789114,0.00006809994,0.000005264136,7.043189e-7,0.000001862816,0.00009792038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4306819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1625605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2024048799","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9","title":"On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Agency (philosophy); Computer ethics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information ethics; Computer science; Medical education; Sociology; Engineering; Meta-ethics; Medicine; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02297975660374577,"gpt":0.2808874631245052,"spread":0.2579077065207594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01423546,0.0002311355,0.0001707917,0.0004677332,0.002102264,0.001452434,0.001346949,0.0001558369,4.947537e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009267136,0.0002055791,0.0000360239,0.001061222,0.0008114761,0.0008910876,0.000558044,0.00305477,0.00001482795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001744152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006660938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001076991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005996601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962978,0.00009967131,0.0002616238,0.0008504839,0.001764033,0.0007263781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981131,0.0007694099,0.00008551217,0.0005591654,0.0002518624,0.0002209474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001670091,0.00006227328,0.0001613861,0.00004876064,0.00000371981,0.00001687924,0.008327045,0.2001958,0.001369535,0.7458795,0.00008102099,0.04385242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002062557,0.0002556431,0.003722209,0.0002198991,0.000004345042,0.00006308519,0.00002382515,0.9805331,0.0007897055,0.001216053,0.01251608,0.00044982],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.120577,0.00003301583,0.8747137,0.002518196,0.00131935,0.0001093228,5.630943e-7,0.0005615997,0.0001672701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672921,0.00000170831,0.3317316,0.0007819775,0.0001565486,0.000004638031,6.66351e-7,0.000009573157,0.00002120575],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7803373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1981764105","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0010-9","title":"Animal spare parts? A Canadian public consultation on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Animal welfare; Animal rights; Government (linguistics); Bioethics; Public relations; Political science; Public health; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Engineering; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07493330756461404,"gpt":0.2848848608729474,"spread":0.2099515533083334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000553364,0.00007378728,0.00007368886,0.0002829708,0.000229872,0.00006546891,0.0000485809,0.00007815612,0.00004902787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007615371,0.00006876098,0.0000107717,0.0004810172,0.0001306006,0.0001798326,0.000002320368,0.0003009534,0.00003349023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007475424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003245061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006743735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008626934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999153,0.00001273001,0.00009681999,0.0001532236,0.0003472009,0.0002370942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993089,0.000133757,0.00001337043,0.00008577116,0.0002018491,0.000256362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009224613,0.0004401492,0.01329836,0.002594576,0.0001559582,0.0008262931,0.1345303,0.007077086,0.5576181,0.2371753,0.00216427,0.04319723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005763888,0.002005862,0.431392,0.001361331,0.0001731962,0.001236293,0.002551459,0.3616186,0.03770717,0.00006249378,0.1548074,0.00132027],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744207,0.0001802926,0.0005587484,0.02085486,0.0002015262,0.0002222842,0.00002433317,0.0001062237,0.003431025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981412,0.0003129897,0.0002796778,0.001106671,0.00002056583,0.000005481291,0.00001235951,0.000006850461,0.0001142202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5199109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2803991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2073764531","doi":"10.1007/s11948-006-0030-y","title":"Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Role playing; Engineering ethics; Group (periodic table); Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Epistemology; Anthropology; Chemistry; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02128178250837752,"gpt":0.2844043613292092,"spread":0.2631225788208316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404432,0.0003110556,0.0002239369,0.0005026819,0.0003167792,0.0002273254,0.0003407671,0.0002558316,0.000003677222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000323878,0.0003258452,0.00003661879,0.0008176838,0.00007846623,0.000540579,0.0001147383,0.002099345,0.000004441983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005244842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001373061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003420823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006053166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977953,0.00001978689,0.0003610893,0.0003632677,0.0008049062,0.0006556414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.0001877568,0.00002945033,0.0002021944,0.0001140424,0.0001665187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[6.955328e-7,0.00003111182,0.002328405,0.0002753175,0.00001090413,0.00001161114,0.007900018,0.8643621,0.1112267,0.01346071,0.0000175923,0.000374837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003598116,0.0000187229,0.05434232,0.0005491077,0.00001734103,0.00005129412,0.001790538,0.9349852,0.001226645,0.00005809524,0.005708913,0.0008920532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862995,0.0005248267,0.01030715,0.0002009914,0.001217689,0.0001875578,0.000003113255,0.000611806,0.0006474196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809902,0.00007216257,0.01862484,0.00006510678,0.0001473505,0.00002133864,0.000005150417,0.00004469192,0.00002915839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1100001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3194337055","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2","title":"Ethics and Values in Design: A Structured Review and Theoretical Critique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's College Hospital; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Vision; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Philosophy of science; Research design; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09348655421781756,"gpt":0.4123572479356579,"spread":0.3188706937178404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007637224,0.0002682761,0.0007339239,0.0004189268,0.0002329748,0.0002643594,0.0005507657,0.0006626494,0.000002381037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207904,0.0002256583,0.00002949915,0.001427202,0.001206889,0.0004389621,0.0005160494,0.004511776,6.680328e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007786715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003157271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001838847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979659,0.0003118732,0.0003492071,0.0006682768,0.0003950051,0.000309721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974203,0.001652355,0.00008557277,0.0003770348,0.000394025,0.00007072991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[1.237286e-7,0.000003759508,3.172831e-7,0.01388146,0.000008273829,0.00002110925,0.000795589,0.00000267031,0.00001376641,0.8943632,0.00002146067,0.09088823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003836631,0.0003875163,0.00006282511,0.2887433,0.0005346007,0.00429408,0.0002256399,0.02263766,0.0002795332,0.09719548,0.5821213,0.003134481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062037,0.9399024,0.05729094,0.002185911,0.0002242405,0.000285866,0.000001769264,0.00007431604,0.00002840768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001533317,0.9743652,0.02467012,0.0007406534,0.00001868019,0.00003263961,0.000001260339,0.00001197212,0.000006126102],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7971677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765321797","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9990-3","title":"The Dawning of the Ethics of Environmental Robots","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Robotics; Robot; Artificial intelligence; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07036142559014377,"gpt":0.3729460915220945,"spread":0.3025846659319508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01079512,0.00005032255,0.00007346804,0.00001879563,0.005174836,0.0002342603,0.0009004291,0.0001779109,0.000001481269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01640524,0.00003201807,0.00003107669,0.0001021205,0.005729557,0.0003217945,0.000221743,0.0009246177,3.017299e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003420446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006188426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007931157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004422872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985157,0.00006061894,0.0001144394,0.00009618167,0.0009933291,0.0002197203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984072,0.0009417891,0.000127354,0.0002996098,0.0001570475,0.00006699593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002096337,0.0000135942,0.003121011,0.00004195371,0.00001014915,3.521533e-7,0.1320936,0.0005699058,0.02297181,0.8381523,0.00002474088,0.002998473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000628843,0.0001967716,0.7047814,0.001025525,0.00008306056,0.000003352735,0.06359109,0.004994088,0.02609285,0.1108549,0.08681688,0.0009313349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8417525,0.0005692156,0.0002728233,0.1376378,0.00226297,0.0002742419,0.00001423312,0.00003042919,0.01718573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998598,0.0009449953,0.0001554319,0.0001298124,0.0000507648,7.479888e-7,3.659845e-8,0.000003455255,0.0001166997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7272974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2016124933","doi":"10.1007/s11948-004-0071-z","title":"The biochemical bases of the placebo effect","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Placebo; Medicine; Chemistry; Computational biology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05390424995610835,"gpt":0.3315131796453785,"spread":0.2776089296892701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01065667,0.0002169862,0.0003387209,0.00009561735,0.0004463182,0.0001289601,0.001061352,0.0001662096,0.000001035334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02375959,0.0001023011,0.0001325286,0.001105766,0.001043135,0.00007455505,0.0003185917,0.0009813822,0.000005940064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000649194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004076968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004627798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.285839e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979904,0.0004079516,0.000198203,0.0003422356,0.0007381774,0.00032305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871505,0.01223506,0.0001017821,0.0004256418,0.00002864216,0.00005836667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002035755,0.00003439346,0.000008107156,0.09053722,0.00004388204,0.00001605245,0.0006521334,0.0009478293,0.01129738,0.04049145,0.0008599164,0.8550913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099554,0.00003666086,0.000002891131,0.00954475,0.0001104273,0.00001714549,0.000003922126,0.001210323,0.006030967,0.00006839007,0.9826297,0.0002452482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000959043,0.9970585,0.0001724622,0.0002902967,0.0009465313,0.0008617398,0.000009367152,0.00006202287,0.000503147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001901907,0.9978352,0.00002319836,0.00005928831,0.00004450038,0.00003729826,4.119898e-7,0.00001491712,0.00008330289],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2723878059","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9928-9","title":"Keeping Disability in Mind: A Case Study in Implantable Brain–Computer Interface Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Brain–computer interface; Interface (matter); Computer science; End user; User experience design; Qualitative research; Neuroethics; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1889788265577246,"gpt":0.4442515457961687,"spread":0.2552727192384441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009039242,0.0001241557,0.000173282,0.0002565368,0.0006663946,0.0006985244,0.0008284457,0.00008290769,0.000001669767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003886351,0.0001132668,0.00001349969,0.0004897933,0.0009131065,0.0007557122,0.0008181257,0.001300066,0.000004029027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001299637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001249218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001511184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977514,0.0001453684,0.0002443912,0.0006816943,0.0005847508,0.0005924384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977766,0.001458057,0.00003810831,0.0005484113,0.00006909329,0.0001097399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008438994,0.001534013,0.2945203,0.0006677589,0.00000928496,0.007327226,0.2118698,0.03568405,0.3860854,0.002123543,0.0002117352,0.05988253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001669852,0.0008634177,0.1194619,0.0008614515,0.000003614691,0.002598636,0.00804598,0.7808995,0.08284598,0.0005288391,0.001293339,0.0009275146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976581,0.00001326101,0.0003564541,0.001125372,0.0003757429,0.0002654778,0.000002069382,0.00002350927,0.0001799843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.000005194152,0.0005420978,0.0001020845,0.00004653327,0.00001170784,4.022437e-8,0.000007508082,0.0000191975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6735887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3130901445","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w","title":"Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Dementia; Philosophy of science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1067632534230264,"gpt":0.4510757089873531,"spread":0.3443124555643267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004468122,0.00005628952,0.00005791113,0.0001740713,0.0005030393,0.0001620135,0.0001597383,0.0001052926,0.000003807021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002276865,0.00005836223,0.000006890571,0.000802375,0.0004390196,0.0001989395,0.0001029341,0.0003605523,4.266811e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003564252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002582041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002983835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986913,0.00008987758,0.00009933928,0.0002323101,0.0005918577,0.0002952662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.0004711172,0.00002143678,0.0001043164,0.0001560948,0.00004838004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009190744,0.00004581856,0.03326295,0.0002506336,0.00001862774,0.0001137294,0.327876,0.00313004,0.1125046,0.2658816,0.0003144078,0.2565924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005180379,0.0001690417,0.008270762,0.0004682644,0.000009112092,0.000006003968,0.8392386,0.00377117,0.1104288,0.02106634,0.01551025,0.0005435604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674125,0.0009666762,0.02322717,0.006676206,0.0001387193,0.0004099807,0.000003096876,0.000292292,0.0008733588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541799,0.0009061809,0.04481289,0.00004806601,0.00001075126,0.00003394176,4.671979e-7,0.00000440808,0.000003358482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5113626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3869022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2031584713","doi":"10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4","title":"Ensuring PhD Development of Responsible Conduct of Research Behaviors: Who’s Responsible?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Focus group; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4910987540531701,"gpt":0.5198793828953219,"spread":0.02878062884215182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02122246,0.0000804601,0.0002263597,0.0007380206,0.0001761984,0.00002212166,0.0001735259,0.0001481057,0.00003388113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09084322,0.0000639599,0.00001654561,0.001349098,0.0009469472,0.0001900297,0.0001340048,0.001119478,0.000008382549],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001387503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02147148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001568132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006982414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963547,0.00007528382,0.0003329571,0.0002157894,0.002195712,0.0008255421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934618,0.001621523,0.0000462766,0.0003618978,0.00213277,0.002375737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007131728,0.00005726275,0.0008273108,0.00142399,0.000006396087,0.00001047415,0.006879364,0.00001414744,0.9788592,0.001527985,0.0005848915,0.009737615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008984155,0.0007989227,0.1052096,0.003111201,0.000009355357,0.00003690249,0.001706852,0.00155496,0.8707335,0.0002727955,0.01547941,0.0001880633],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925345,0.0001805596,0.00006958981,0.006188673,0.00007072456,0.0003217469,0.000001435774,0.00002095901,0.0006118033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881541,0.0001734507,0.01108146,0.0001699484,0.00002820137,0.00001937539,8.029506e-7,0.00000995929,0.0003627698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1081257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2021748399","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9543-y","title":"Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Judgement; Warrant; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Individualism; Emerging technologies; Computer science; Business; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07420019703060639,"gpt":0.4238310733548674,"spread":0.349630876324261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006558309,0.00006835347,0.0001698067,0.0003490524,0.0005079694,0.000112664,0.0004310952,0.0003023135,0.000001073316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008020937,0.00004860597,0.00003549371,0.001739169,0.00150111,0.0001662193,0.0003676317,0.0004355014,4.198388e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003468297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007829836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009716783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001078033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.00002561121,0.0001489656,0.0002302191,0.0003923037,0.0002003651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986185,0.0008411056,0.00005284678,0.0002660322,0.000170109,0.00005141224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007759145,0.00005754175,0.0006376802,0.0001944336,0.00006898981,3.565288e-8,0.06036325,0.01260202,0.008380616,0.7520986,0.000008008637,0.1655811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000224223,0.0002864459,0.1736925,0.0001832964,0.0004592532,6.744841e-7,0.3178449,0.4761793,0.00411029,0.02349986,0.003022978,0.000496274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4028939,0.00003103316,0.5849254,0.01159371,0.00007386588,0.0001856095,0.000003275726,0.0001031351,0.0001900269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040555,0.00009426724,0.09572642,0.00009553528,0.000008858087,0.00001434812,3.228963e-7,0.000002907607,0.000001813062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7285987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2127227470","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9294-y","title":"Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Human enhancement; Premise; Perception; Philosophy of science; Task (project management); Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Subject (documents); Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1784912865629168,"gpt":0.3496085142931931,"spread":0.1711172277302763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205293,0.0001434703,0.0001057609,0.0002384844,0.0006141626,0.0001007118,0.0004190543,0.00009423474,0.0005161888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008998719,0.0001380178,0.00002212445,0.0008216691,0.001347176,0.0003362909,0.0001871579,0.0007675682,0.0001226085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005507282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001364563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002197991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001619813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978586,0.00002084649,0.0002196948,0.0005212713,0.0009398879,0.0004397031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992696,0.0001351161,0.00005559395,0.0002372242,0.0001443631,0.0001580733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001274201,0.00003969744,0.00008869869,0.00004795619,0.000001507603,0.000005315158,0.007152465,7.438789e-7,0.9612042,0.03090954,0.0003771581,0.0001714498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001676867,0.0001252319,0.003245478,0.00007959284,0.00000641772,0.0000161204,0.0001257499,0.001519696,0.9853775,0.002824931,0.006206783,0.0003047922],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97492,0.00002295929,0.006659371,0.00526767,0.0009141421,0.0002448738,0.0000138574,0.0001856637,0.01177141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898497,0.00003051198,0.001016036,0.00836568,0.00005037847,0.00001956236,4.685934e-7,0.00001370206,0.00065389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02808461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5651906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2898089001","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0072-y","title":"Challenges in Collecting Big Data in A Clinical Environment with Vulnerable Population: Lessons Learned from A Study Using A Multi-modal Sensors Platform","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University Health Network; Université TÉLUQ; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Dementia; Anxiety; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Modal; Unit (ring theory); Medicine; Nursing; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5854542827328871,"gpt":0.4822363153806349,"spread":0.1032179673522522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005666858,0.00009299802,0.0001784654,0.0002311293,0.0001833091,0.00004736037,0.0001328628,0.00007382993,0.00000455058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001134265,0.00007671412,0.000007836944,0.000444951,0.0002131687,0.0001974868,0.0002055266,0.0007659072,0.000001510106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009872564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002354839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009255843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00147468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983562,0.00005887026,0.0002112382,0.0004810278,0.0005928039,0.0002998244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992514,0.0002686693,0.00002919294,0.000287652,0.00006041923,0.0001027236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579858,0.0006049839,0.9572346,0.00005820432,0.00003006755,0.00009868773,0.008474607,0.0008096729,0.002053764,0.00002598014,5.008284e-7,0.03045093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001710373,0.0004717728,0.8298278,0.0002056067,0.00001568495,0.000008394433,0.004500272,0.1630035,0.00009008477,0.00001417137,0.00005648668,0.00009587355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982371,0.00008598315,0.0004447129,0.0007744953,0.00006696895,0.0003089736,0.000002976499,0.00001447055,0.00006434384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970324,0.0002177044,0.002596501,0.00002875682,0.00008441452,0.000007972008,0.00000404528,0.000008756969,0.00001945832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1621938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3327529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307449677","doi":"10.1007/s11948-022-00397-y","title":"Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Ageing; Equity (law); Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03575920895952774,"gpt":0.3446988846284218,"spread":0.3089396756688941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004839285,0.00009699054,0.0001772957,0.0009521344,0.0006723156,0.00003244927,0.0008830639,0.0002876479,0.000001030904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003738318,0.00009428051,0.00001949755,0.002898854,0.001513312,0.0001668286,0.0004306049,0.001243174,1.41948e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004345812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006962345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004032696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004856349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984212,0.00006053785,0.0002200575,0.0002925298,0.0004439612,0.000561721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991564,0.0005298718,0.00007888897,0.0001392231,0.00007821852,0.00001737496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001253509,0.0003275527,0.3875438,0.0003982921,0.00001509043,0.0001222739,0.1423911,0.06205833,0.1033886,0.1095338,0.0000224436,0.1940733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003016656,0.0005643769,0.09020971,0.0009489454,0.00002698872,0.000008110817,0.3550655,0.2975986,0.1654577,0.07535297,0.01033935,0.001411023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924434,0.0002321103,0.001081282,0.005140658,0.0001050896,0.0005505757,0.00000799339,0.0002531018,0.0001857406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977074,0.00001862921,0.002040682,0.00003688472,0.000004474562,0.0001814989,2.344123e-7,0.000007085559,0.000003060951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2973341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5575861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056397681","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9558-4","title":"Towards Improving the Ethics of Ecological Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Otago","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Information ethics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ecology; Management science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08737308156140079,"gpt":0.3292215824416627,"spread":0.2418485008802619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02580597,0.00009002722,0.0000921141,0.00003736742,0.0007512836,0.00005165492,0.0005595642,0.0002480522,0.0000407571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157734,0.000060628,0.00002192912,0.0005567885,0.003875516,0.0002068963,0.0006920247,0.002527209,0.00002695756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000162821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002340061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002958054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971655,0.0001458947,0.0001485123,0.0002919992,0.001877206,0.0003708726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980913,0.001404862,0.00003153673,0.0002976057,0.00006116463,0.0001135463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937482,0.0001714746,0.005914277,0.0003468951,0.00001062512,0.000004740559,0.03166566,0.03958968,0.4437145,0.4574295,0.0002841152,0.0208491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008138239,0.001557891,0.4142966,0.0002543016,0.00004432827,0.00007040373,0.002634786,0.2311476,0.07879455,0.1724622,0.09651346,0.001410027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345171,0.00008147244,0.003042326,0.03165548,0.0004102266,0.0002603493,0.00000294554,0.00006773343,0.02996236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972636,0.00007201933,0.001916204,0.0006474836,0.00004583094,0.000006236138,1.962958e-7,0.000006678941,0.00004173109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4083824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2556066278","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9845-3","title":"Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Free will; Philosophy of science; Credibility; Agency (philosophy); Neuroethics; Psychology; Social media; Incompatibilism; Epistemology; Sense of agency; Social psychology; Compatibilism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Neuroscience; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05317736546638603,"gpt":0.2736203045722404,"spread":0.2204429391058544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008769624,0.000108892,0.0001069861,0.0001426439,0.0001516179,0.00003255248,0.0005521278,0.00005635473,0.000009608469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007374048,0.00006794428,0.00002228874,0.0005200252,0.000859784,0.0003565614,0.0001373391,0.0001900295,0.000003594132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002391016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001349407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007749188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001474491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982389,0.00001780004,0.0001473899,0.0003926846,0.0008809703,0.0003223197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989415,0.000477489,0.00004039175,0.0003309207,0.00005823981,0.0001514963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000349346,0.0000166471,0.00007697582,0.00001065621,1.481056e-7,0.000006937023,0.000481376,0.00006337003,0.9666475,0.03148432,0.00004442228,0.001164174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002831742,0.0001774966,0.00554149,0.0001397568,0.000002053903,0.00001864613,0.00002679887,0.00118534,0.9861451,0.000869714,0.00540815,0.0002022904],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910651,0.00006330968,0.001375922,0.003985022,0.00129756,0.0001109527,0.00002614906,0.0001073867,0.001968643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.0001081701,0.0002761117,0.0004330187,0.00004269827,0.000004980927,4.867474e-8,0.000007024184,0.00008573232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03061461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3033000849","doi":"10.1007/s11948-020-00226-0","title":"Back to Basics: Application of the Principles of Bioethics to Heritable Genome Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Bioethics; Genome editing; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Genome; Psychology; Genetics; Biology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249032526698406,"gpt":0.3511151267258689,"spread":0.2262118740560282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001072265,0.00004464261,0.00009778123,0.00005785414,0.00005722568,0.000008439215,0.0001370011,0.00009907461,0.00000466405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007915024,0.00003123775,0.0000323499,0.0009060674,0.0005914822,0.00003390485,0.0001271919,0.0003039509,0.000003158711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001957499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001892995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002328376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007874182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991828,0.000007407149,0.0001742866,0.0001306468,0.0004101202,0.00009475989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993144,0.00005129241,0.00003513601,0.0001464522,0.0002967452,0.0001559418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001331347,0.00004646317,0.0006773505,0.00264328,0.00001352609,1.782841e-7,0.009948866,0.0123132,0.7973182,0.174202,0.00001535371,0.00280829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001285278,0.001974291,0.2397144,0.004539419,0.000196122,0.00001750147,0.002937054,0.2950745,0.2250651,0.001640472,0.2267956,0.0007602873],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2398106,0.0003131242,0.3779967,0.3794368,0.00035427,0.001049584,0.00003228473,0.00004420468,0.0009624264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895568,0.00002244507,0.009313445,0.001022827,0.00002889962,0.00000441781,0.000001191881,0.000004627716,0.0000452912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7497463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2179341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335161676","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y","title":"Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Risk management; Nexus (standard); Engineering education; Duty; Health systems engineering; Information ethics; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Engineering management; Management; Epistemology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1393891765149131,"gpt":0.5482979568832049,"spread":0.4089087803682919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01927967,0.000265906,0.001151772,0.0006761315,0.0004063449,0.00001974536,0.0004787011,0.0007758079,0.00001780008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01321637,0.0001794133,0.00008047043,0.00131986,0.00009963849,0.0001104641,0.0002205905,0.005423445,0.0002015069],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007289776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006286316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003120977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000571756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961447,0.0005401359,0.001051239,0.0004591201,0.001086361,0.0007184737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944395,0.004117462,0.0002481815,0.0004901707,0.0003677028,0.0003369843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[5.509971e-7,0.000007105812,0.000004263137,0.934989,0.0000077167,0.000001603723,0.00007713463,0.000001691994,1.983993e-8,0.01391475,0.000112454,0.05088371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042477,0.000009460553,0.00003485411,0.6615124,0.0000774912,0.000003218643,0.00001366586,0.0001205215,3.85168e-9,0.00003755948,0.3380054,0.0001428963],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[5.030639e-7,0.9933364,0.000295475,0.0007805278,0.0007760139,0.003834186,0.00002047577,0.00005639455,0.0008999759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003829077,0.9965968,0.0006033912,0.0005578211,0.0001161941,0.001726346,0.00001075461,0.00002883461,0.0003560477],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3378929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121935654","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0025-0","title":"Emotional engagement in professional ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy of science; Reputation; Professional ethics; Mechanism (biology); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2106752650302508,"gpt":0.3646740833459022,"spread":0.1539988183156514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00346832,0.00008600381,0.00006761009,0.0001720581,0.0003385343,0.00003525934,0.0002270702,0.0001255404,0.00002889089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002234441,0.00007554788,0.00001329117,0.0004019554,0.000388079,0.0002872556,0.0001093066,0.001439468,0.00003250481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000775661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000248453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004140355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005432595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983668,0.00005867659,0.0001364427,0.000322514,0.0008268021,0.0002888209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992738,0.0004521262,0.00002017588,0.00009685491,0.00006092205,0.00009606408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001930947,0.0003175986,0.001285901,0.0001147985,0.000002350919,0.00002329456,0.00911804,0.0286096,0.5191344,0.4338374,0.0009265306,0.006610822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002337853,0.000307113,0.4007516,0.001015673,0.00001029681,0.0002485125,0.0006468103,0.1609789,0.1276929,0.01299442,0.291505,0.001510871],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358295,0.00004177856,0.0003856324,0.06049335,0.001329158,0.0001146801,0.000004173169,0.00006752742,0.001734163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924155,0.00008224362,0.001628438,0.005424054,0.00009717377,0.000008696236,6.129096e-7,0.000004679493,0.0003385401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4208429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6253853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1985574895","doi":"10.1007/s11948-002-0048-8","title":"Funding, objectivity and the socialization of medical research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy of science; Socialization; Medical research; Relation (database); Public funding; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.867341102438921,"gpt":0.7027063626572796,"spread":0.1646347397816414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03508635,0.0001700973,0.0005649715,0.0002282286,0.0008729651,0.00005231754,0.0005111088,0.001673932,0.0001115204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007741681,0.0001142597,0.00005820278,0.001111833,0.004297072,0.00009980352,0.0003313163,0.00871792,0.000005429631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001154321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004790562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007370475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964464,0.00116381,0.0003495963,0.0003174603,0.00120499,0.0005177104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936052,0.005430501,0.00009351422,0.0001476128,0.0003123546,0.0004108009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001017961,0.00003869577,0.00001820036,0.01503557,0.00005517857,0.000008615328,0.002576107,0.00001262273,0.00000548818,0.1470963,0.0005081871,0.8346348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024427,0.00002033319,0.000008769983,0.001517406,0.0001133564,0.00003314719,0.00006695248,0.006924376,0.00001071736,0.0003049345,0.9906348,0.0001209539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010058,0.9942598,0.00003580115,0.003620505,0.0006682213,0.0004061705,0.00001822043,0.00002869763,0.0008620457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00386973,0.9954391,0.0000118761,0.0002703533,0.0002595159,0.00003585534,0.000002290586,0.00001239853,0.00009888363],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059619485","doi":"10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z","title":"Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Philosophy of science; Process (computing); Peer review; Cover (algebra); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8245981317172449,"gpt":0.5811456072251607,"spread":0.2434525244920842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03730075,0.00007797519,0.0001860786,0.01231716,0.0001507742,0.000708714,0.0008152829,0.00008396127,0.00005645334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1000989,0.0000554531,0.00002067938,0.05780548,0.0004479041,0.0008697727,0.0004751205,0.00047675,0.00003007743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005356577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000290447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002078002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002537646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952165,0.00003537156,0.0003612603,0.000356849,0.003627484,0.0004025488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897457,0.002354812,0.00008495802,0.0003724906,0.007082438,0.0003595666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008385509,0.0003341664,0.08476622,0.001806552,0.00002464558,0.00002077107,0.00706814,0.001302737,0.1848603,0.4943689,0.05365729,0.1717819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006622148,0.0003004806,0.5518294,0.001183044,0.00001012753,0.00004447292,0.001018207,0.2435316,0.006240106,0.007649929,0.1868517,0.000678669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968424,0.01125224,0.001054736,0.01695028,0.0003817685,0.0003247559,0.00001451143,0.00001889366,0.001578862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925709,0.006036194,0.0006138901,0.0002197407,0.00001160854,0.00000844451,3.795758e-7,0.000003378535,0.00053542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.486719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2022118021","doi":"10.1007/s11948-003-0005-1","title":"Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of science; Emulation; Information ethics; Incentive; Public relations; Conflict of interest; Political science; Applied ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Law; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2937312548326219,"gpt":0.5236246500689055,"spread":0.2298933952362836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03440851,0.00008700358,0.0001289208,0.0001036979,0.001982954,0.0000128328,0.0002302219,0.0002765273,0.00005646922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0174007,0.00006080464,0.00001162304,0.0003277929,0.0002330419,0.0001661739,0.00009532894,0.002633889,0.00001374664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001487693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001014458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002074292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002744296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972485,0.0009678743,0.0003813526,0.0002267971,0.000307333,0.000868123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904627,0.009048858,0.00008951453,0.0002342325,0.00004163526,0.0001230479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002625671,0.00005353488,0.1588859,0.0002892623,0.000005248536,0.000001086698,0.3457402,0.0001673528,0.002355801,0.4890145,0.001811352,0.001673083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002277838,0.00002518106,0.3073345,0.0002083408,0.000004845561,0.00000262836,0.08625762,0.001643451,0.00002275252,0.008775274,0.5953234,0.0001742464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433344,0.0004725901,0.0009696059,0.05195181,0.001303812,0.0004237524,0.0000152772,0.00003886913,0.001489855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825019,0.0005129592,0.001947008,0.01471916,0.0001649903,0.0000820466,0.00001045934,0.000008375271,0.00005305921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5935121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559047598","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9833-7","title":"Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Decision maker; Management science; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1236640264071432,"gpt":0.3883477087821071,"spread":0.2646836823749639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006435114,0.0001188313,0.0001428707,0.0001483854,0.001242044,0.0006176784,0.0005139369,0.0002870403,0.0000121772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02154207,0.00008333897,0.00003731983,0.0006144163,0.001367094,0.0008433831,0.000127323,0.0005203647,0.000007727929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000761812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004713797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001274485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977039,0.00005252778,0.0001173291,0.0002782196,0.001320207,0.0005278779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997221,0.001547303,0.0000385161,0.0001927289,0.0006339534,0.0003664777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006621341,0.00002013752,0.003019793,0.00002187582,0.00001377203,0.0000159057,0.02771175,0.00007848584,0.01510469,0.8932258,0.001671546,0.05910958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00127046,0.0003008079,0.09921926,0.001722007,0.00005990733,0.00001722211,0.009468492,0.002813873,0.002681623,0.2106249,0.6695083,0.002313148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4707684,0.0004915085,0.01055657,0.5014008,0.001710539,0.0002926608,0.00002232163,0.0003883229,0.01436885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932547,0.001650222,0.001938636,0.00147073,0.0002603878,0.000003866971,2.370982e-7,0.00001292727,0.001408247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.682601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789682559","doi":"10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2","title":"Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering education; Ethical responsibility; Risk management; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Perception; Medical education; Engineering; Engineering management; Medicine; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1643919798509486,"gpt":0.485435728845014,"spread":0.3210437489940654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313736,0.0001713448,0.0001835228,0.0007404468,0.0004882207,0.0008327116,0.001173881,0.0002187202,0.00001965775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006416325,0.0001508871,0.00001951647,0.002143183,0.0004037565,0.0007756279,0.000493997,0.001453303,0.00002310785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001120271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001298897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001078179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008870287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954185,0.00008746281,0.000423292,0.0007173643,0.002922272,0.0004311257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979393,0.0007686827,0.00006983624,0.0005701791,0.0004588279,0.0001931154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008700509,0.00267718,0.4202234,0.0001685051,0.00005910557,0.0001018188,0.3990993,0.03757235,0.02180232,0.107388,0.0001482008,0.01067283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009935825,0.0007373789,0.8664213,0.000231656,0.00001851825,0.00001460617,0.0376295,0.08433054,0.002656095,0.003633191,0.002497727,0.0008359362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958516,0.00004991134,0.001734438,0.0002861722,0.001464499,0.0001992303,0.000001062908,0.00006772194,0.0003453902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958798,0.00003530068,0.003709099,0.0001644814,0.0001431316,0.00002256974,3.542638e-7,0.00001445553,0.00003078144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4461979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8029857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606332673","doi":"10.1007/s11948-017-9911-5","title":"Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy of technology; Development (topology); Knowledge management; Business; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1197693854516285,"gpt":0.3297640734103675,"spread":0.2099946879587389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005835131,0.00007123305,0.00008755204,0.0001736007,0.002839942,0.0001682614,0.0005087617,0.0001365876,0.000001735286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005874482,0.00005226761,0.00001154639,0.0004972451,0.001141892,0.0004081109,0.0003898301,0.000293045,0.000001209759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002419268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002678675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002976499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004588796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992361,0.000001601077,0.0001824012,0.0001464267,0.000242833,0.0001906116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990965,0.0001097353,0.0001473697,0.000139227,0.000504402,0.000002804738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003561839,0.00001056906,0.00116963,0.00009950399,0.00000860407,1.816031e-7,0.0009170666,0.000003171635,0.004582352,0.9771317,0.0000349927,0.01603863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001003948,0.00004437637,0.468352,0.0002777615,0.0000566567,0.000003887512,0.007362498,0.01347305,0.08148599,0.09647668,0.33037,0.001093121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216101,0.00002802079,0.04454348,0.02687919,0.0005696553,0.0007700848,0.000002436182,0.0003081285,0.005288909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833513,0.00000170307,0.01630755,0.0001886304,0.00005842813,0.00005430726,0.000001155184,0.000005137952,0.00003180523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8806551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968126248","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9259-1","title":"Fairness in Technological Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Computer science; Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Distributive property; Design science; Abstraction; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Sociology; Knowledge management; Economics; Law; Business; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1271952581912616,"gpt":0.3458121242104287,"spread":0.2186168660191672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126154,0.00006689781,0.00008343344,0.0002630731,0.0004191383,0.00006408746,0.0003353749,0.0001425849,0.000008428064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006541488,0.00006128701,0.000008480705,0.00158924,0.001316707,0.0003385213,0.00006188328,0.0004523646,0.000002522554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004886749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001247801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002301672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987476,0.00007543051,0.0001416694,0.0002127513,0.000485123,0.0003374475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992896,0.0001819669,0.00002406584,0.0001334704,0.000316796,0.00005410546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000139377,0.0000163499,0.004722466,0.00003026228,6.883996e-7,0.000005520621,0.03770037,0.0003088577,0.0003277493,0.956068,0.000007431134,0.0008108875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001055494,0.0004143771,0.3689481,0.0004933419,0.00001812328,0.00003176169,0.1493373,0.04312587,0.006423082,0.3944183,0.03323038,0.002503847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676148,0.0001239556,0.1046027,0.003811934,0.0009214654,0.0008720531,9.099799e-7,0.000677362,0.02137481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970919,0.00001026435,0.002755328,0.00004479615,0.00002689673,0.00001560854,1.027481e-7,0.000003890239,0.00005119158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7831245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2087963666","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9260-8","title":"A Tale of Two Perspectives: Regulation Versus Self-Regulation. A Financial Reporting Approach (from Sarbanes–Oxley) for Research Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Accounting management; Misconduct; Accounting research; Accounting standard; Financial accounting; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Accounting information system; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2612916037780104,"gpt":0.4272625517293991,"spread":0.1659709479513887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02970939,0.00008819889,0.0001478854,0.0002034255,0.001253991,0.00006339454,0.0003103795,0.0007139884,0.000009860878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0451181,0.00008958717,0.00003939952,0.0009416218,0.001181622,0.0004532459,0.00006552156,0.00242722,9.362047e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001827946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004119846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002378197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974667,0.0001527459,0.0003573449,0.0003521747,0.00126403,0.0004070442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996002,0.001878349,0.0002202588,0.0001695424,0.001618529,0.0001113863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002877752,0.00002511399,0.0002044084,0.00005902065,0.000007309175,4.616278e-7,0.4054803,0.000375216,0.002138574,0.5913014,0.00007045017,0.0003089416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003307957,0.0007793473,0.04550539,0.001037666,0.0001989728,0.00001422809,0.3073009,0.3069313,0.01918781,0.2768565,0.03689247,0.00198755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420334,0.000643577,0.1119713,0.003788027,0.001742578,0.001275124,0.00003563189,0.0003431195,0.03816723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545411,0.0000717635,0.04494404,0.00002373344,0.0002953637,0.00001668025,0.000003476665,0.000007724298,0.00009611133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.314445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2067553056","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9282-2","title":"More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers’ Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3612291058175208,"gpt":0.4907204549936035,"spread":0.1294913491760827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002546766,0.0001346917,0.0001162414,0.0001774924,0.0008875479,0.0001028395,0.0005502689,0.0001181361,0.00001022932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551589,0.0001118476,0.00002320446,0.002025058,0.002269141,0.0004692756,0.0001489148,0.001382981,0.000004972401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004909158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001260323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007870168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004116831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978772,0.0001368549,0.0003233264,0.0004318967,0.0009547648,0.0002759256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971573,0.001542705,0.0001145286,0.0003727307,0.0007108274,0.0001018551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007302485,0.0001013047,0.0000191118,0.0001181108,0.000003415052,0.000001728514,0.1837815,0.0001078121,0.3037447,0.5117861,0.0001213803,0.0002075722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002201453,0.0006621606,0.004639693,0.0004556928,0.00003547404,0.00005874086,0.03431655,0.0006345485,0.9207957,0.02280373,0.01470238,0.0006752234],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7253383,0.00008661264,0.1346945,0.1203142,0.004860836,0.001257665,0.00005648983,0.0004235719,0.01296788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864148,0.00004816325,0.006331065,0.006929243,0.00006300377,0.0000390763,7.57177e-7,0.00001326185,0.0001606636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.617051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170023695","doi":"10.1007/s11948-021-00315-8","title":"A Politics of Objectivity: Biomedicine’s Attempts to Grapple with “non-financial” Conflicts of Interest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Objectivity (philosophy); Credibility; Scrutiny; Politics; Biomedicine; Public interest; Political science; Public relations; Accountability; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5250798463940783,"gpt":0.543444059475554,"spread":0.01836421308147562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001752394,0.0001198054,0.0002448602,0.0001701227,0.0001670622,0.000009524877,0.0001735901,0.0003064182,0.00002459012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001225261,0.0001066126,0.00002071546,0.001020301,0.0007606695,0.00008753343,0.0001098328,0.001342925,0.000001934765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003942282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009304445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006750021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004130323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988353,0.00005767094,0.000230089,0.0002392824,0.0002514389,0.0003861961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982983,0.0004383872,0.00005440884,0.0001529627,0.000603809,0.0004521121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104858,0.0002446994,0.01114364,0.00182722,0.00006269917,0.00008847845,0.009513686,0.001275724,0.9089642,0.06175778,0.0004549164,0.004562065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009023554,0.0004867261,0.02022434,0.0004736625,0.00007847971,0.00007731809,0.0006592936,0.003604576,0.9127776,0.0004374857,0.0599835,0.0002946751],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924617,0.0002070297,0.0006302246,0.005596415,0.0004425326,0.0001460576,0.0000486895,0.00002231618,0.0004450092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.00009223829,0.0004666631,0.002264889,0.00007582937,0.00000776962,0.000002351572,0.000007885972,0.00008295783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0613203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5834413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990854685","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9545-9","title":"A Room with a View of Integrity and Professionalism: Personal Reflections on Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research in the Neurosciences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"University of Queensland; McGill University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Academic integrity; Scientific integrity; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Reflection (computer programming); Research integrity; Scientific misconduct; Critical reflection; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4980721155492058,"gpt":0.5166400519386172,"spread":0.01856793638941134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01373179,0.00007422366,0.0001083506,0.0004757547,0.0005584136,0.00005860463,0.0003560163,0.00006003546,0.000001552003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01531998,0.00004582901,0.000008023543,0.002132823,0.002875923,0.0002168892,0.0001019991,0.002366415,3.233521e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001941995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004371241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002020598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974118,0.0004757739,0.0001859402,0.0003379901,0.00134715,0.0002413054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955065,0.004017217,0.0000557397,0.0001800926,0.0001974759,0.00004298863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001296197,0.00005795336,0.00006085068,0.0001116101,3.374027e-7,0.000001387076,0.005504512,0.00003605915,0.7330731,0.2607932,0.0000123975,0.0003356066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001813428,0.00728167,0.03956491,0.006838949,0.00002353758,0.0002706684,0.01585058,0.06487569,0.7777537,0.06343151,0.02124957,0.001045811],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835624,0.00001587134,0.0004966334,0.01486456,0.0002178745,0.0001829787,0.000003751888,0.00001597198,0.0006400326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984264,0.00003358467,0.0006644012,0.0008023827,0.00001374841,0.00001374973,1.13231e-7,0.000004041769,0.00004156752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1973617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2092137306","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9063-8","title":"The Emergence and Evolution of the Expression “Conflict of Interests” in Science: A Historical Overview, 1880–2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Conflict resolution research; Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Conflict resolution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4400060708945437,"gpt":0.4390712794931673,"spread":0.0009347914013764225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003375357,0.00003759901,0.00005691745,0.00008802145,0.0008923708,0.00001778131,0.000408336,0.00004917824,0.000003051979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001812136,0.00002455608,0.00001231164,0.001015692,0.002248505,0.0002052287,0.0001569177,0.000206608,1.781313e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001893255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003211292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008210458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990487,0.00005028358,0.0001343759,0.00010252,0.0005252242,0.0001389689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993503,0.0001781326,0.00005310961,0.0001800497,0.0001955863,0.00004283898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143616,0.00006743037,0.08190805,0.0001348237,0.000001652893,3.391228e-7,0.3618934,0.0004548139,0.4236152,0.125656,0.000288152,0.005965715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002143495,0.00005759353,0.9249945,0.0004749878,0.000004932061,0.00000543626,0.01606561,0.009146501,0.003813273,0.0009328093,0.04407537,0.0002145768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994907,0.001629572,0.00008142174,0.002188876,0.0003080449,0.00008293323,9.24428e-7,0.000008907877,0.0007923094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898457,0.009982564,0.00008888071,0.00001828491,0.000013269,0.000002810807,5.507757e-8,0.000001403279,0.00004706752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8284711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2022009738","doi":"10.1007/s11948-005-0042-z","title":"Intellectual property and the commercialization of research and development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury; Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Openness to experience; Business; IP address management; New product development; Public good; Product (mathematics); Exclusive right; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; The Internet; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5396202251358568,"gpt":0.379441033451053,"spread":0.1601791916848039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005881981,0.0001416185,0.0003262482,0.0003696115,0.0005507452,0.0002913547,0.000245769,0.0001452331,0.000008993837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003198514,0.00006814186,0.00001524431,0.000827406,0.001213475,0.0002915491,0.0004207552,0.0007149907,0.0000104369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002539697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002312073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001521308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987926,0.00002479868,0.0002428761,0.0002280765,0.0004913112,0.0002203752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987924,0.0005876884,0.00006140421,0.0001107129,0.0004334756,0.00001438763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001134787,0.00001328247,0.000003043996,0.0129942,0.00001728027,5.131553e-7,0.00305902,0.00001014017,0.000001946622,0.00997286,0.0002932964,0.9736231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008639848,0.000007063886,0.000003185567,0.002697713,0.00002107954,0.000004541841,0.00008822622,0.002954825,0.000002514534,0.00004433794,0.9939768,0.0001133232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014369,0.9965521,0.0002869528,0.0004093548,0.0002068024,0.0005772934,7.521718e-7,0.00003105491,0.00179201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001687433,0.9975949,0.0001390816,0.0001394823,0.000185023,0.00001988356,0.000004237374,0.00001482665,0.0002151371],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051051418","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9262-6","title":"Framing Ethical Acceptability: A Problem with Nuclear Waste in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Harm; Engineering ethics; Precautionary principle; Ethical code; Philosophy of science; Corporation; Radioactive waste; Ethical issues; Responsible Research and Innovation; Social responsibility; Business; Political science; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03686041611524793,"gpt":0.2732054419422544,"spread":0.2363450258270064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491159,0.0000561792,0.00006650497,0.00007312682,0.0003011411,0.00005942972,0.0001989677,0.00008540118,0.00006606051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003087867,0.00004873959,0.000005764532,0.0005098022,0.0004016992,0.0001939397,0.00005783849,0.0006384805,0.000001791934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002853179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001507654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.782448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9224896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988183,0.0000301805,0.00008576484,0.0001838696,0.0005970302,0.0002848296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996338,0.00005231527,0.00001488822,0.00009350583,0.0000793201,0.000126098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001732538,0.00004167798,0.01881358,0.000194412,0.000008396967,0.00003147545,0.5069612,0.002388632,0.000519558,0.4466568,0.00023358,0.0241333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078714,0.0002040513,0.3387521,0.0003622947,0.00002456299,0.000006022621,0.2971431,0.02833096,0.0001976616,0.002780705,0.3301017,0.00130966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668968,0.00001522381,0.0005322124,0.005638783,0.0001964059,0.0002073244,6.944389e-7,0.00006775315,0.02644482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953338,0.00007532314,0.003863942,0.000666447,0.00001655477,0.000004707466,7.160739e-8,0.000004502905,0.00003465162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4438761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2773916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2074375570","doi":"10.1007/s11948-008-9083-4","title":"Good Ethics Can Sometimes Mean Better Science: Research Ethics and the Milgram Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Milgram experiment; Philosophy of science; Soundness; Epistemology; Research ethics; Dishonesty; Applied ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Obedience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.249268742446562,"gpt":0.4868872600922879,"spread":0.2376185176457259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06775386,0.0001698945,0.0002068637,0.0004010575,0.01395538,0.0004466214,0.001356894,0.0006211514,0.000007357158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02463844,0.0001371926,0.00003325067,0.002917247,0.0571587,0.0006744761,0.000402023,0.006544351,0.000008813584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002314157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003698477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004872261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931197,0.0007148799,0.0002390421,0.0006517507,0.004123963,0.001150722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931456,0.004587837,0.00005946116,0.0003925534,0.001403483,0.0004111077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009027212,0.00002347978,0.00133319,0.0000278332,0.000009271866,0.00000879477,0.7586863,0.00004256472,0.006516884,0.2326469,0.0001792722,0.0005164341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007025802,0.000896404,0.1465964,0.001430702,0.0001167473,0.0002538631,0.4092879,0.005903016,0.03095402,0.1386257,0.2539372,0.004972341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8708581,0.0009042914,0.0001024336,0.1178457,0.001031438,0.0004106738,0.000004226778,0.0001447526,0.008698417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918802,0.002092873,0.001584109,0.003936225,0.0002064017,0.00002821116,2.813476e-7,0.00001334246,0.0002582987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}