{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"de61ba5dec0a","filters":{"venue":"Seattle University law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2611895100","doi":"","title":"Benefit Corporations and Public Markets: First Experiments and Next Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Commit; Business; Voting; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Duty; Dual (grammatical number); Accounting; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Brett McDonnell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.102877705392649,"gpt":0.2438008351177593,"spread":0.1409231297251103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01618696,0.001241703,0.001527157,0.001579814,0.005899634,0.01629234,0.002480072,0.01484688,0.03807596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020627,0.0007307144,0.001378243,0.001572211,0.01755686,0.04745637,0.00752206,0.01397881,0.002625625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009815507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005173708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00565737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928221,0.004228664,0.0001707823,0.0005531731,0.001031389,0.001193906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668555,0.02663129,0.001283949,0.002116805,0.001597962,0.001514512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001109036,0.0003408038,0.0002266624,0.0001375388,0.000008776988,0.00006356266,0.0003282403,0.0002211292,0.0001234785,0.9845023,0.00534335,0.00859328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002036251,0.0002704028,0.0006974239,0.0006135928,0.00002426774,0.00008186341,0.002718648,0.00131293,0.0007346775,0.9120306,0.08125354,0.00005837718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05534716,0.06013939,0.0178028,0.3166261,0.003273671,0.0009373171,0.0002987334,0.0001979066,0.5453771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126159,0.03608616,0.020315,0.05139229,0.00276288,0.002284057,0.000212877,0.0001522535,0.07417858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03807596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1273767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","authors":[{"name":"Blake A. Watson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04068847619423283,"gpt":0.2877428786015839,"spread":0.247054402407351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004862948,0.00022437,0.0003478152,0.002592848,0.01936089,0.006711307,0.001353953,0.003650401,0.002326087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259068,0.0003040426,0.0004121715,0.002974446,0.01694185,0.002573153,0.003976936,0.007050871,0.0001337414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1212791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898511,0.001203577,0.0002309332,0.0006503452,0.005010323,0.003053623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933016,0.00242748,0.0004678264,0.0001870161,0.002665219,0.0009508632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003179,0.0000269202,0.003238557,0.00007157378,0.00002205118,0.0004310939,0.01081265,0.0002638634,0.0003659232,0.9553202,0.01396146,0.01545397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001353317,0.00008646557,0.07450751,0.001038197,0.0001904404,0.0005292358,0.03171993,0.001330658,0.001393468,0.1599528,0.7288371,0.0002787722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1763367,0.01729604,0.0007421584,0.08954215,0.0004109745,0.00006792347,0.0001443835,0.00001919966,0.7154404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430858,0.009002858,0.0005577777,0.01508688,0.0001412596,0.00004635551,0.00004568552,0.0000154858,0.03201781],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06780376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.491953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117899123","doi":"","title":"BERLE’S CONCEPTION OF SHAREHOLDER PRIMACY: A FORGOTTEN PERSPECTIVE FOR RECONSIDERATION DURING THE RISE OF FINANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Praise; Positive economics; Shareholder primacy; Opposition (politics); Shareholder; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Corporate governance; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Fenner L. Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01704319973087904,"gpt":0.2191669421413415,"spread":0.2021237424104625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007578435,0.0004191016,0.0006577282,0.001401524,0.006971315,0.009946157,0.001302695,0.01162728,0.002654471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01312041,0.0003441935,0.0003951408,0.0009933681,0.03606954,0.01514958,0.004152547,0.01249128,0.0004241408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007337254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005591065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007168688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942988,0.00297042,0.0001331134,0.000774228,0.001127576,0.0006958825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939066,0.004608916,0.0003282706,0.0003439478,0.0005405883,0.0002715931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004683218,0.000003315102,0.00004819479,0.000005432824,6.452718e-7,0.0000346961,0.001464024,0.00002281336,0.00002428525,0.9929803,0.004200939,0.001210812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013199,0.00001427883,0.000305909,0.0001355061,0.000002721952,0.0001218238,0.00116964,0.0002351781,0.0001724128,0.8379796,0.1598315,0.00001806842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03245536,0.02890982,0.02514792,0.5180722,0.002038429,0.00003093184,0.00006622225,0.00006433042,0.3932146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943798,0.00525595,0.005513125,0.05885596,0.002254587,0.0001009115,0.00002176711,0.00007564868,0.0335423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01162728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05323577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605847761","doi":"","title":"A Critical Canadian Perspective on the Benefit Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Fiduciary; Shareholder; Supreme court; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Law; Shareholder primacy; Corporate social responsibility; Best interests; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Duty; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Carol Liao","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03939928957750191,"gpt":0.2442858631282594,"spread":0.2048865735507575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003675345,0.0004529242,0.0003354636,0.002419186,0.03174006,0.0133971,0.001735042,0.006725107,0.007716715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005948156,0.0003110094,0.0004184094,0.003245428,0.02766794,0.005549849,0.002790016,0.008808227,0.0005322402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1349423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1589563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940801,0.001018964,0.00007330934,0.0005294415,0.002337395,0.001960776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965063,0.001030904,0.0001163481,0.00009823842,0.001665046,0.0005833007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002344705,0.000002759456,0.0001175491,0.0000118632,7.535672e-7,0.00004372824,0.001687341,0.00005094799,0.00002035267,0.9702721,0.0258035,0.001986781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508791,0.000006545844,0.001269641,0.000212644,0.000008771387,0.00008085873,0.008103172,0.0002728269,0.000098422,0.1193945,0.8705059,0.00003716088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00985497,0.0180207,0.002163516,0.2768058,0.001454913,0.00005549718,0.0002173182,0.00003450058,0.6913927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6625365,0.02230768,0.003012246,0.1349616,0.001303901,0.0001231677,0.0001501512,0.00007941615,0.1755253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ian Langlois","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04818238216236354,"gpt":0.2978198820948689,"spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005138229,0.0002830345,0.0003010816,0.001176384,0.009292731,0.009641249,0.001092525,0.006727809,0.004901086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01043535,0.0002295233,0.0003433726,0.0008936108,0.02778323,0.005836576,0.005592184,0.00722386,0.000726453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008141796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00611027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01218498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01258285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935359,0.003537444,0.00009182536,0.0004211557,0.001486303,0.0009274837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971277,0.001737482,0.0002638103,0.000225775,0.0003648402,0.0002804913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000214087,0.000002492426,0.00006512822,0.000004506989,5.814225e-7,0.00005002028,0.001050298,0.00003940158,0.000020031,0.994393,0.003002771,0.001369598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010766,0.00001234547,0.0003561814,0.0001957637,0.000003555616,0.0001998896,0.005191801,0.0005400217,0.0002782119,0.7804408,0.2127527,0.00001788089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03870351,0.01026106,0.008448492,0.2051658,0.0005305973,0.00003323826,0.00002723689,0.00005214899,0.7367778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995602,0.002388769,0.001500607,0.02686115,0.0003762367,0.00007217105,0.000008767374,0.00003547862,0.06919675],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01218498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05907315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Lynda L. Murdoch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05105189771214885,"gpt":0.3095755052090106,"spread":0.2585236074968618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03032685,0.0006423517,0.0004683091,0.001751379,0.01239525,0.007544452,0.002584112,0.008401644,0.00206804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06037864,0.0005625906,0.0005680489,0.0007573044,0.03705527,0.006138505,0.009904359,0.009969356,0.0004368988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003223151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01032111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002726568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004649985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9537289,0.03445717,0.001256799,0.001338424,0.006659903,0.002558882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657479,0.02041391,0.004038644,0.002679553,0.002925,0.004194965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009732992,0.001230861,0.01837476,0.0005560125,0.00009155044,0.004121268,0.2375237,0.0008235549,0.00218457,0.5323352,0.01392733,0.1887339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442115,0.0005314123,0.01517242,0.001815061,0.00009937285,0.01024913,0.3451306,0.003759748,0.001869031,0.5430891,0.07786938,0.0001706021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2718492,0.007465503,0.04122127,0.5894289,0.001343491,0.0004605185,0.00002369822,0.0003584533,0.08784893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728628,0.001533301,0.01080997,0.01239304,0.0002567176,0.0002500323,0.000005539597,0.00002703457,0.001861467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514212257","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Nature of the Firm: The Corporation as a Governance Object","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Social contract; Contract theory; Corporation; Capitalism; Shareholder primacy; Law and economics; Theory of the firm; Project governance; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Peer Zumbansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02341011097736439,"gpt":0.2653391098623182,"spread":0.2419289988849538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008406254,0.000286934,0.0006145079,0.001951481,0.004730764,0.01522623,0.001488852,0.00672079,0.001848161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221908,0.000342561,0.000331423,0.002285511,0.05051867,0.02186496,0.00420157,0.01069754,0.0002641384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009297517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01025452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0156745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926996,0.004236422,0.0002016919,0.0007637849,0.001564692,0.0005338927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921143,0.005947433,0.0004385143,0.0005663726,0.0006384751,0.0002949838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.65209e-7,0.000001413558,0.00004168664,0.00001033535,6.369365e-7,0.00001447248,0.000439687,0.00004435928,0.00001163847,0.9972991,0.0005279456,0.001607826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897173,0.00001519986,0.0006977664,0.0003772368,0.000007754183,0.0001047791,0.002122696,0.0004718195,0.00008643147,0.8570835,0.1390108,0.00001201759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501051,0.1280826,0.04700831,0.3461089,0.002300852,0.00007147799,0.00007821483,0.00004527772,0.4312939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145797,0.04010846,0.004290794,0.02249851,0.001666294,0.0001055264,0.00003968975,0.00004233486,0.01666877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06745857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481897490","doi":"","title":"Power Without Property, Still: Unger, Berle, and the Derivatives Revolution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Property (philosophy); Political science; Property law; Law and economics; Power (physics); Property rights; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Cristie Ford","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carol Liao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01535117317204325,"gpt":0.2082808429846635,"spread":0.1929296698126203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004247599,0.0003425282,0.0004649081,0.0009837473,0.007769005,0.01237208,0.0008238291,0.00596115,0.006707554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008709121,0.0002642736,0.0003178795,0.00125195,0.03535883,0.02016282,0.00571401,0.007278703,0.0008680525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007665396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003193643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005314302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006301503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962972,0.001872471,0.00006569684,0.0005167944,0.0006180144,0.0006298544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953367,0.003295149,0.0003346273,0.0005065352,0.0002374185,0.0002896118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009542884,0.000007700673,0.00007574684,0.000009125626,0.000001144302,0.00006001172,0.002724183,0.0001212275,0.00002598948,0.9840775,0.008520119,0.004367639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001345752,0.00001567175,0.0003162696,0.0001151487,0.000003684756,0.0000971979,0.0043889,0.0002766137,0.0001606389,0.7888522,0.2057351,0.00002501196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06751284,0.03892571,0.006227243,0.2944057,0.0009404205,0.00001801315,0.00004455038,0.00007795657,0.5918477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132859,0.007644,0.0009747169,0.02473755,0.0006839767,0.00003027258,0.00001639328,0.00008105536,0.05254621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01237208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05561662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557447601","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Softwood Lumber Dispute","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Lysons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02581549234478739,"gpt":0.274102520784723,"spread":0.2482870284399356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006265278,0.0002361129,0.0004558985,0.001371542,0.006682835,0.008785497,0.0019867,0.009387072,0.01650684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072939,0.0003231354,0.0006528504,0.0010583,0.004642908,0.004324696,0.004012515,0.005583874,0.003326803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008053218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00652499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02953465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08182704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946628,0.001126899,0.000334424,0.0005382885,0.002338655,0.0009990409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968459,0.001666172,0.0002114196,0.0002310828,0.0008615721,0.0001838339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005270015,0.00003824104,0.001395104,0.000212111,0.00001454069,0.001663624,0.00641467,0.0003970757,0.001300307,0.9061056,0.06493997,0.01746604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000465316,0.00005458102,0.002280415,0.0006304402,0.00002233292,0.0004798123,0.007486331,0.0006629393,0.003040165,0.1031811,0.8820587,0.00005656313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05151478,0.008868045,0.005408482,0.07296067,0.001874837,0.00009055374,0.0001010032,0.00007850207,0.859103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5246287,0.004424661,0.002714632,0.07693293,0.001179383,0.00009680366,0.0001572787,0.0001190549,0.3897466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02953465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie Des Rosiers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02463719868965336,"gpt":0.3113668690754152,"spread":0.2867296703857619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01607697,0.0007453795,0.001906481,0.001147466,0.007991291,0.01153525,0.004710234,0.03057483,0.004378751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04975969,0.0005613458,0.0009889129,0.001190412,0.02837125,0.01602107,0.00563391,0.04856807,0.001819023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008407657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01081967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01133289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860024,0.007973199,0.0005218151,0.001706471,0.002954956,0.0008411631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962019,0.02646171,0.001853453,0.000985345,0.006099959,0.002580615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002259996,0.00002224426,0.0001696819,0.00009789714,0.00001190047,0.0001517292,0.003428019,0.0000752792,0.00009735444,0.1245961,0.8645692,0.006758083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160682,0.00003394741,0.0003232078,0.0005310446,0.000009747621,0.0003274758,0.007371169,0.0002910178,0.0001690097,0.05740142,0.9334406,0.0000697815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001069369,0.002823244,0.00006576495,0.9935774,0.002733556,0.00000115738,0.00000247493,0.000005661251,0.000683789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008984365,0.002949904,0.0003276672,0.9745756,0.007575365,0.00002253335,0.000004766679,0.00002827486,0.005531542],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03057483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08502412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060960786","doi":"","title":"Panelist Biographies, Editor's Note","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Object (grammar)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008217772754344817,"gpt":0.2389633252696697,"spread":0.2307455525153249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006907488,0.001637156,0.002126234,0.003808072,0.01300155,0.009666295,0.005856967,0.05428059,0.03834235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170164,0.002193132,0.002267677,0.003300006,0.001861699,0.004924646,0.002279955,0.03303257,0.0231953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006987078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01844916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06076229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1401931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959177,0.000447557,0.0002968489,0.0009142418,0.001529153,0.000894559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987156,0.007355952,0.0005167909,0.0003664933,0.003737877,0.0008668191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001593726,0.00001890911,0.00006092375,0.00003108421,0.000006429834,0.00007786553,0.00004424235,0.00002766483,0.00006370145,0.00147543,0.9962148,0.001962953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001090066,0.00003907362,0.001507918,0.0003374707,0.0000771928,0.0000630919,0.0002897479,0.0003338601,0.0003148894,0.002743239,0.9941251,0.00005934884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001254212,0.004785136,0.0006914224,0.7946405,0.1121243,0.0005877939,0.00166968,0.0004091535,0.08383784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005904974,0.002507119,0.0008309721,0.7272359,0.03839875,0.001256759,0.0004526987,0.0001542277,0.2232587],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06076229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1282679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Vincent D. Rougeau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01273899358870661,"gpt":0.2861739003272085,"spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003397263,0.000157823,0.0002748163,0.0008196649,0.002819376,0.002657119,0.0005360898,0.001777601,0.003535098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00368294,0.00009283141,0.0001569126,0.0009353248,0.01409084,0.002527594,0.002672697,0.002737124,0.0001407363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004137435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006513936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01682245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03115344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973804,0.001649109,0.00004518769,0.0001235822,0.0004416422,0.000360104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972976,0.001641245,0.000294736,0.0001282719,0.0003084739,0.0003297071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001146065,0.00004125053,0.001166987,0.0003051244,0.000009454174,0.0001367596,0.006486068,0.0001959649,0.00005678399,0.9363358,0.01333273,0.0419216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005466343,0.00009101572,0.01141085,0.001451886,0.0000234892,0.0003263625,0.02081414,0.0002872872,0.0001746391,0.2514514,0.7138969,0.00001736282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1043312,0.1866682,0.002134693,0.2201244,0.001641494,0.00003471845,0.00003247366,0.00001882,0.485014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269631,0.04054305,0.0003915844,0.01509644,0.0009551469,0.00002692298,0.00002170137,0.00001244021,0.01598967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01682245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03344905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030308966","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Criticism; Power (physics); Empathy; Unilateralism; Constitutional law; Adversarial system; Economic Justice","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01636689355576902,"gpt":0.2395097479703979,"spread":0.2231428544146289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01579594,0.0006976743,0.00173552,0.001115361,0.009548624,0.01224457,0.004606348,0.03592987,0.004553744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04600085,0.0005839958,0.0009946858,0.001085492,0.03433005,0.01500916,0.005510439,0.05148413,0.001692776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009548029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01132678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02042509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985775,0.00788488,0.0004744823,0.001770873,0.003123711,0.00097097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968186,0.02281222,0.001430788,0.0008294382,0.004761854,0.001979686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001978897,0.00002362281,0.0001645731,0.00007645415,0.00001118779,0.0001794721,0.003945549,0.00009079085,0.0001116182,0.2249184,0.7642049,0.006253625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003379444,0.00003224362,0.0003033774,0.0004655559,0.00000894124,0.0002965091,0.00742237,0.000325663,0.0001733583,0.0817576,0.9091114,0.00006929872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001316849,0.00256799,0.00008796251,0.9937942,0.00214323,0.000001507413,0.000002651983,0.000006127958,0.001264629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01039674,0.002242448,0.000331,0.9748765,0.005849674,0.00002350406,0.000004379718,0.00002429998,0.006251442],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08353788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549083991","doi":"","title":"Application of Patent Law Damages Analysis to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Apportionment, Alternatives, and Other Common Limitations on Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Damages; Trade secret; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Apportionment; Law; Intellectual property; Jury; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Douglas G. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1846368190608646,"gpt":0.2388600642530556,"spread":0.05422324519219102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02467349,0.001016839,0.001643334,0.004434755,0.005695682,0.01171922,0.004119645,0.01507449,0.005050997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04512054,0.001113149,0.00355178,0.001823432,0.02662157,0.01493304,0.006389843,0.01244451,0.000684142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007453542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00544666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003551328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003418996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9752255,0.005741902,0.002274587,0.003342836,0.01130254,0.002112648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606022,0.02895485,0.003021147,0.00382939,0.003203653,0.0003888732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001726301,0.00003098815,0.0002715173,0.00005216855,0.00001482904,0.0003875184,0.0003827941,0.00215974,0.0004203846,0.9915644,0.0007174453,0.003981019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003003118,0.0001245168,0.001011796,0.0002366396,0.0000577438,0.0007010979,0.0004042302,0.006510548,0.00204975,0.9644444,0.02431737,0.0001117981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382114,0.009749829,0.3641286,0.0422891,0.001200441,0.0009588826,0.0004938968,0.0002378492,0.4427301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257606,0.002258387,0.04959031,0.004243322,0.0008046962,0.0005485765,0.00006548941,0.00005865956,0.01666997],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02467349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1304874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124450235","doi":"","title":"Hostile Takeovers and Overreliance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Breach of contract; Law; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Investment (military); Payment; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03759961539685073,"gpt":0.2018899413842189,"spread":0.1642903259873681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02287695,0.0004263253,0.0007018694,0.001670999,0.003490982,0.005895337,0.002798746,0.01317295,0.008102095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0516644,0.0004965613,0.001092432,0.001383895,0.0162601,0.007082382,0.005108644,0.009844849,0.001223488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003687608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003225639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005981388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006100675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9656385,0.01173477,0.002093053,0.005229649,0.01013448,0.005169483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542598,0.02453316,0.007816999,0.006518955,0.005725337,0.001145666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004777944,0.00005418789,0.005318135,0.0001507909,0.00007714929,0.0008206858,0.002565759,0.0006882539,0.0004310665,0.9307882,0.03955862,0.01949957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001375674,0.0003142261,0.03216299,0.001690955,0.0001939787,0.002085589,0.004033934,0.002107781,0.003899277,0.4640687,0.4890671,0.0002379101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1348728,0.01543382,0.0122119,0.1432401,0.001242269,0.0001523852,0.0003664756,0.0002538103,0.6922265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124983,0.003113339,0.001107437,0.05564903,0.001153646,0.0001279272,0.00007030719,0.00006624379,0.02621383],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02287695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1209863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W400786494","doi":"","title":"An Unfinished Joruney: Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Opposition (politics); Arctic; Indigenous rights; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Federal jurisdiction; Geography; Public administration; Oceanography; Ecology; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Tony Penikett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01559419747224424,"gpt":0.3093551494202659,"spread":0.2937609519480217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007788805,0.000182264,0.0003820954,0.0009284547,0.01489428,0.01018804,0.001336319,0.00552439,0.002635953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006834777,0.0002645804,0.0003259022,0.0009025025,0.0244047,0.006264415,0.004040412,0.006804108,0.0003686216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009229301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02565471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2721074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3624302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993993,0.003170288,0.0001434227,0.0003356648,0.00118224,0.001175441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953159,0.002885676,0.000200865,0.0001754922,0.0008067068,0.000615394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001125519,0.00001730593,0.001051463,0.0001107266,0.000007072659,0.0003327593,0.02624245,0.00009713112,0.00008680007,0.9138691,0.04169805,0.0164759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001256268,0.00003806314,0.004045804,0.001547435,0.00002335495,0.0004068902,0.07585851,0.0001368498,0.0001745355,0.117866,0.7998434,0.0000465429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0317537,0.1122774,0.001207215,0.4494575,0.003986479,0.0000200507,0.0000524989,0.0000205624,0.4012246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6835954,0.07387203,0.001172219,0.1702854,0.004357433,0.0000657858,0.0000549049,0.00003975699,0.06655715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2721074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}