{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"de61ba5dec0a","filters":{"venue":"Seattle University law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2611895100","doi":"","title":"Benefit Corporations and Public Markets: First Experiments and Next Steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Commit; Business; Voting; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Duty; Dual (grammatical number); Accounting; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Brett McDonnell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.102877705392649,"gpt":0.2438008351177593,"spread":0.1409231297251103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000861944,0.00007384278,0.0002139287,0.00002890283,0.0008573518,0.0001222034,0.0001442952,0.00002317853,0.0002459561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003651362,0.00008750298,0.00003310791,0.00003805265,0.0001561477,0.0005042542,0.0001602165,0.00003919858,0.00009472838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003237267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004489772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002216824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003022919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995649,0.000005403113,0.0001128446,0.0001982997,0.00001768569,0.0001008256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994012,0.00001344794,0.0002251797,0.0002671955,0.0000277298,0.00006524422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000279982,0.00002435774,0.04457831,0.0002508845,0.00003909625,0.000002594677,0.00006156347,5.462079e-8,2.769829e-7,0.9506769,0.00257517,0.001787995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002462324,0.00001025906,0.06278812,0.0001605623,0.000008686007,0.000001529204,0.00007008472,0.00001252899,5.100449e-7,0.001245245,0.9353499,0.0001062811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04204504,0.3209738,0.0003940063,0.03406776,0.000415551,0.000906938,0.0003541007,0.00008176468,0.600761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7886651,0.2058915,0.0003423716,0.0008322955,0.00002193821,0.000002837526,0.0000116357,0.000007533621,0.004224839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6594143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","authors":[{"name":"Blake A. Watson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04068847619423283,"gpt":0.2877428786015839,"spread":0.247054402407351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001647094,0.00006196285,0.0001950581,0.00001368577,0.0001735936,0.000006362533,0.0002306613,0.00001229625,0.00004236579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001933988,0.00002714,0.00005672149,0.0002761424,0.0006136614,0.00009704675,0.0000370989,0.00008235945,5.433381e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001154565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003085349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.0001841523,0.00008902456,0.00008625475,0.0001492124,0.0001278066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.00007751123,0.0001208179,0.0001293799,0.00004156963,0.00005904982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004552473,0.0001753242,0.1139516,0.0001934085,0.0002466829,0.00003808211,0.004801953,0.00000359681,0.00001898823,0.8563104,0.01674789,0.007056881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003985655,0.0002290963,0.2659824,0.0007697422,0.00005418898,7.921977e-7,0.0000854132,7.446611e-7,0.0001487848,0.001361444,0.7308357,0.0001330143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433712,0.001200705,4.111317e-7,0.001344506,0.00005301759,0.0004072748,0.00005017358,0.000003837696,0.05356887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831684,0.003328697,0.000003475242,0.00004806314,0.00001477414,9.173917e-8,5.541958e-7,0.000001203799,0.01343469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8549489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2261061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117899123","doi":"","title":"BERLE’S CONCEPTION OF SHAREHOLDER PRIMACY: A FORGOTTEN PERSPECTIVE FOR RECONSIDERATION DURING THE RISE OF FINANCE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Praise; Positive economics; Shareholder primacy; Opposition (politics); Shareholder; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Corporate governance; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Fenner L. Stewart","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01704319973087904,"gpt":0.2191669421413415,"spread":0.2021237424104625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001671275,0.0000818009,0.000200221,0.00002504253,0.0001496469,0.00001236307,0.0001588397,0.00003218246,0.00009414596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006597851,0.00006990207,0.0001108432,0.0002045246,0.0001216384,0.0006180854,0.00004973791,0.00008463382,0.00001059354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003025515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008275154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001323822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995102,0.000008062068,0.0001388258,0.0001554553,0.00009115224,0.0000963214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989604,0.00003376964,0.0003955483,0.0002069126,0.0003995346,0.000003785584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327362,0.000110087,0.009734066,0.005684154,0.00005135969,0.000004634827,0.000133384,0.00003084144,0.002302617,0.9666823,0.01084152,0.004292342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001293821,0.00002455244,0.06045802,0.001902826,0.0002515557,0.000002532192,0.0001883971,0.0001884729,0.0006508344,0.002779976,0.9320006,0.0002583758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660828,0.006293883,0.0006094167,0.006693834,0.0003841522,0.002369596,0.0001961639,0.00005310765,0.01731703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996397,0.002129912,0.0002232505,0.000371755,0.0001460224,0.000004231366,0.00001001853,0.000008556981,0.0007093171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2850524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605847761","doi":"","title":"A Critical Canadian Perspective on the Benefit Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Fiduciary; Shareholder; Supreme court; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Law; Shareholder primacy; Corporate social responsibility; Best interests; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Duty; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Carol Liao","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03939928957750191,"gpt":0.2442858631282594,"spread":0.2048865735507575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001527226,0.0001032686,0.0001405126,0.00004399549,0.002036796,0.0003587564,0.0004421587,0.00003273957,0.001122512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005137461,0.00006846777,0.00007977231,0.00006582431,0.0002219957,0.0008469548,0.00008196253,0.0001131746,0.001163993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001532833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004731431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1682327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.450452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994363,0.00001014583,0.00006380991,0.0001928089,0.0001268413,0.0001700614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999086,0.00003140794,0.00009745001,0.0004673368,0.0002888734,0.00002890257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004140551,0.00001092261,0.00007545347,0.00009782196,0.000007765305,0.00003810128,0.000006177497,2.317022e-7,4.327925e-7,0.9892766,0.01029137,0.0001909613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009796034,0.000006256444,0.001482038,0.0005141956,0.00008829537,8.923861e-7,0.00004695462,0.00002525393,0.00000109084,0.1221583,0.8754497,0.0001290238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004430761,0.0005696677,0.000008763685,0.06992592,0.0002782595,0.0004377102,0.00001546234,0.00004952824,0.9242839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859592,0.000375165,0.000009570647,0.009773446,0.0003635018,9.306623e-7,0.00001632477,0.000009885134,0.00349195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ian Langlois","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04818238216236354,"gpt":0.2978198820948689,"spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003515832,0.00003743091,0.00009819939,0.000007001307,0.0003659148,0.000006878382,0.0002352237,0.00002101285,0.0002063474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000270703,0.00002818419,0.00004975529,0.00029168,0.0003339518,0.0001902142,0.00005443542,0.00004301876,0.00005223238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003940595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004947112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007079965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006906787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995167,0.0001159283,0.00006102734,0.00005223126,0.0001253485,0.0001287966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995883,0.00005293126,0.00005279858,0.000163259,0.00009278266,0.00004996613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.203078e-7,0.0000166745,0.0002185326,0.0001313876,0.000004859717,1.247017e-7,0.0005497046,3.514664e-7,0.000003963368,0.9951542,0.003278436,0.0006411561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002498864,0.00000138045,0.001033453,0.0001485244,0.00003763453,2.073768e-7,0.0006492721,1.915515e-7,0.00001053079,0.0001942416,0.997862,0.00003760983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007596379,0.03635335,0.0001149844,0.02857708,0.0001680306,0.0006439676,0.00004882379,0.00006274924,0.9264346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951443,0.04075306,0.0001119927,0.0006004781,0.0001149573,9.396439e-7,0.000006089635,0.000003695805,0.006965818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Lynda L. Murdoch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05105189771214885,"gpt":0.3095755052090106,"spread":0.2585236074968618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004025165,0.00007634405,0.0002420359,0.00001434875,0.0003585671,0.00003305934,0.0001584296,0.0000583895,0.0001803299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001920682,0.00006567062,0.00004913628,0.000232488,0.0008529787,0.0002950105,0.00001789273,0.00009394313,0.000006674909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002791396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007022641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00812147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005771932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999139,0.0002577521,0.0001124802,0.0001808795,0.0001562454,0.0001536662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996749,0.00005197088,0.00007434714,0.00007619274,0.00006497496,0.00005766734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002229115,0.00006880372,0.0001117421,0.001411668,0.00003836044,0.000009221996,0.00250861,0.000005341516,0.000104699,0.9689934,0.00003448973,0.02669141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004677687,0.0002901816,0.0006880796,0.004282779,0.0001923384,0.00001827083,0.016149,0.000005686396,0.00006119655,0.00948219,0.9678218,0.0005406839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0435718,0.04582194,0.0002183858,0.001005287,0.00004028734,0.001143144,0.000009864191,0.0001005938,0.9080887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768113,0.02247427,0.0002483151,0.0001596081,0.00003007458,0.000001490764,6.311126e-7,0.000002967782,0.0002713164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514212257","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Nature of the Firm: The Corporation as a Governance Object","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Social contract; Contract theory; Corporation; Capitalism; Shareholder primacy; Law and economics; Theory of the firm; Project governance; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Peer Zumbansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02341011097736439,"gpt":0.2653391098623182,"spread":0.2419289988849538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008797952,0.00004877537,0.00009795857,0.000002373821,0.0007598025,0.00001127076,0.000460436,0.000068241,0.0001634599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002364766,0.00002523992,0.000104159,0.0001813445,0.0006478489,0.0002388952,0.00009313091,0.000247524,0.00003491945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008990921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002950024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00206419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.000400195,0.00006939366,0.00006756737,0.0001727037,0.0001667522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.0002390532,0.0001204206,0.0002292971,0.00004580658,0.00004105882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001241187,0.000006667336,0.000155272,0.00004487815,0.000006900227,2.08781e-7,0.001046656,1.270334e-7,5.97186e-7,0.9951585,0.003035699,0.0005432788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031937,0.000003876357,0.001121751,0.00025978,0.00004695521,8.337757e-7,0.0002696783,6.371386e-7,0.0000131406,0.008183601,0.9900302,0.00003761358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00881497,0.03668479,0.00001232988,0.06362703,0.0006527731,0.0007320945,0.00002119061,0.00002641641,0.8894284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782625,0.01196581,0.00001267605,0.006090618,0.0001022862,5.159318e-7,8.751604e-7,0.000002088645,0.003562586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481897490","doi":"","title":"Power Without Property, Still: Unger, Berle, and the Derivatives Revolution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Property (philosophy); Political science; Property law; Law and economics; Power (physics); Property rights; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Cristie Ford","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carol Liao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01535117317204325,"gpt":0.2082808429846635,"spread":0.1929296698126203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008080957,0.0001127724,0.0003259962,0.0000416623,0.0002402284,0.00003102727,0.0002312092,0.00005869535,0.0003586115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001966529,0.00008198384,0.00008324804,0.000250298,0.0007080867,0.0002750447,0.0001072876,0.0001756115,0.0000822424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005245139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001985789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003955593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002489695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992083,0.00006247785,0.0002180155,0.0003124595,0.00004277988,0.0001559691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00006743043,0.0001837159,0.0004078702,0.00007526293,0.00004623959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001074919,0.00003325004,0.01497002,0.0001910183,0.00001716565,4.757619e-7,0.0001758402,0.000001097899,0.000004233602,0.9834129,0.0003917306,0.0007914992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006400182,0.00002310084,0.04233501,0.0001996629,0.00002731616,0.000006532054,0.00001696426,0.0001570618,0.000004603861,0.01044998,0.945944,0.0001957247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3682404,0.192368,0.004296668,0.02579251,0.00131399,0.004501986,0.0002237686,0.000298552,0.4029641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840532,0.01271835,0.0006674459,0.0003814296,0.00002503236,0.000001918849,0.000007148269,0.00001207714,0.002133404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3926544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557447601","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Softwood Lumber Dispute","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Lysons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02581549234478739,"gpt":0.274102520784723,"spread":0.2482870284399356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006354616,0.00009155949,0.0001681973,0.0000139154,0.00121774,0.00004405593,0.0005631979,0.0000521985,0.0009671372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001977496,0.00006730619,0.0001308232,0.0003665096,0.0003820834,0.0002493615,0.00006736787,0.0001757674,0.0005398347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000940367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001892003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003367055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998732,0.0004089824,0.00009532709,0.0001862621,0.0002827215,0.0002946605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993357,0.0001356449,0.00004734435,0.0002817707,0.00010645,0.00009308897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005962641,0.0000306231,0.00001030396,0.00007063083,0.00001589007,0.00001900253,0.001368515,5.999154e-7,0.00001081384,0.8926975,0.09199414,0.01377606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005945675,0.00001973591,0.00003570899,0.0004178966,0.00004896539,0.000001625256,0.0001693595,0.000002800637,0.00001036401,0.0006363243,0.998493,0.0001047432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002518382,0.01140519,0.0001271499,0.03059618,0.0001303471,0.0004511956,0.00000309927,0.0001203774,0.9569146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988317,0.1341262,0.000915189,0.04231858,0.0006045984,0.000001296889,0.00001313217,0.00002888266,0.1231604],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951952528","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Criticism; Law; Mediation; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Viewpoints; Empathy; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nathalie Des Rosiers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02463719868965336,"gpt":0.3113668690754152,"spread":0.2867296703857619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086592,0.00008902629,0.0002290865,0.000007810563,0.001238217,0.00001711814,0.0003946929,0.00005393757,0.0009951137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003739536,0.00006045776,0.0001297664,0.000358044,0.0006262281,0.0001148157,0.00008860113,0.0001346168,0.000367196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001767548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007612041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001406601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.0009126848,0.0001310461,0.0001647277,0.0003526047,0.0002609514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990463,0.000409489,0.00004848314,0.0002013669,0.0001668594,0.0001274643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001847749,0.0003185887,0.0003481801,0.0008136312,0.0003597513,0.00008722043,0.06428366,0.000003863503,0.0001483124,0.5557925,0.333766,0.04223049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001083252,0.00003346025,0.0007616939,0.0003793065,0.00003567587,3.190555e-7,0.002060234,1.051958e-7,0.000006122903,0.00004107909,0.9964868,0.00008681941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1448124,0.03641388,0.000005295023,0.4557885,0.0003359379,0.0030847,0.00005688946,0.0001738109,0.3593286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6052744,0.1424687,0.0006286799,0.01433643,0.0001448566,0.00001106045,0.000004299008,0.00002496637,0.2371066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6627208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060960786","doi":"","title":"Panelist Biographies, Editor's Note","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Magnetic confinement fusion research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisprudence; Object (grammar)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008217772754344817,"gpt":0.2389633252696697,"spread":0.2307455525153249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001136654,0.0001060711,0.0001815424,0.00005489869,0.0001586069,0.00002035452,0.0002625843,0.00002076952,0.06134371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003006128,0.0001047471,0.00014047,0.0003960954,0.00008170779,0.0000330061,0.00006866913,0.0001234259,0.0002252845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008147981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000405194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000573885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992355,0.00005758912,0.00009906251,0.0001934706,0.000206222,0.0002081585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.00002981865,0.00004209177,0.0002941712,0.0000834875,0.0001178286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006882311,0.0001145507,0.0001863877,0.0001686146,0.00002134745,0.00001037462,0.000008878609,2.765656e-7,0.00009267958,0.1635881,0.6282797,0.2075222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002016922,0.0000410476,0.0003588106,0.0002676059,0.0000409844,2.065153e-7,0.00001787144,0.000007971606,0.00002515699,0.000113971,0.9988118,0.0001128908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001731875,0.003677601,0.0004886198,0.01038829,0.0003582524,0.0005594199,0.00006678163,0.00005929701,0.9842286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4921245,0.1332284,0.007263233,0.01992602,0.01687293,0.00001659459,0.00184133,0.0001146837,0.3286122],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6556163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9395143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Vincent D. Rougeau","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01273899358870661,"gpt":0.2861739003272085,"spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003947137,0.00006656847,0.0001329956,0.00001889544,0.001617263,0.00003606122,0.0001136398,0.00004968686,0.000003388466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001457825,0.00005830845,0.00004379465,0.0001005451,0.0002332789,0.0002700564,0.00002292749,0.00007428725,7.082237e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001150026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002985755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01815542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01079357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991732,0.0003274455,0.00008819813,0.0001249598,0.0001831758,0.0001030593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997159,0.00003348639,0.00008936158,0.00006323632,0.00005576027,0.00004220668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004868955,0.00002890107,0.0001468431,0.0000966679,0.000007012545,0.000004479441,0.006430781,1.179469e-7,0.00001471441,0.9814905,0.001849187,0.009925909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001252212,0.0001776749,0.00984979,0.0008381606,0.0006372094,0.00001286564,0.00198842,0.00007139045,0.00002083255,0.02458096,0.9601533,0.000417229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713761,0.007518703,0.0003487768,0.01973665,0.0005300451,0.001308812,0.00003873508,0.0002328451,0.2989093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980631,0.001286379,0.0001292517,0.00009599422,0.0002642738,1.289068e-7,0.000006887594,0.000001339246,0.0001526053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.958304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030308966","doi":"","title":"The Mythical Power of Myth? A Response to Professor Dauer","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Criticism; Power (physics); Empathy; Unilateralism; Constitutional law; Adversarial system; Economic Justice","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01636689355576902,"gpt":0.2395097479703979,"spread":0.2231428544146289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004793586,0.00008881694,0.0001973448,0.00000301651,0.0002777486,0.000005967714,0.0003970098,0.00004165586,0.001016028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048523,0.00003083471,0.0001060877,0.0003158355,0.0002644105,0.0000709563,0.0000903531,0.0001185469,0.0003086033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002631779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005216362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002314484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987642,0.0005487495,0.0001179342,0.0002565627,0.0001342414,0.0001783673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.0003559675,0.0000458738,0.0001671463,0.00009587797,0.00007606421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009869642,0.001144886,0.0006168925,0.0006640999,0.0003962144,0.00009315574,0.0009868199,0.00001557273,0.3915837,0.1568049,0.2437508,0.1940733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004977554,0.0004061963,0.02051979,0.0002060117,0.00001896927,0.000003960281,0.0000602787,1.259726e-7,0.0001605355,0.0002236285,0.9782656,0.0000850803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408487,0.003503617,2.420284e-7,0.04661198,0.00005518954,0.0005950701,0.00002795393,0.0000290463,0.008328174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527199,0.01132093,0.0001846029,0.007794668,0.0001221741,0.000007330505,0.00001624164,0.00000243199,0.02783168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549083991","doi":"","title":"Application of Patent Law Damages Analysis to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Apportionment, Alternatives, and Other Common Limitations on Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Damages; Trade secret; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Apportionment; Law; Intellectual property; Jury; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Douglas G. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1846368190608646,"gpt":0.2388600642530556,"spread":0.05422324519219102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001710122,0.0001186,0.000242226,0.0001358293,0.000189,0.00003444023,0.0001539828,0.00003664151,0.0003152006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000158951,0.0001078192,0.00009040713,0.000557342,0.00007185244,0.0003103395,0.00005824186,0.00007111904,0.0001181705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003285325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001803794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001096852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004807909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992596,0.00004760846,0.0001805092,0.0002255515,0.0001766933,0.0001100366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994892,0.00004328274,0.0001787658,0.0002082065,0.00005958727,0.00002092192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001378195,0.001051088,0.009187581,0.003808433,0.001373228,0.00001136421,0.001043291,0.001244726,0.0005658664,0.901232,0.01181339,0.06853119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000411536,0.00005935744,0.004881452,0.0004345904,0.001249145,5.175588e-7,0.000193468,0.007572622,0.0001521527,0.0004206494,0.9843253,0.0002991659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1541433,0.008798301,0.0236557,0.02426001,0.0002852569,0.006513536,0.0003287891,0.0004276007,0.7815875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922328,0.002334791,0.0001133225,0.004713943,0.00003696881,0.000003795848,0.0001086183,0.000009998519,0.0004457781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.439674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124450235","doi":"","title":"Hostile Takeovers and Overreliance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Breach of contract; Law; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Investment (military); Payment; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03759961539685073,"gpt":0.2018899413842189,"spread":0.1642903259873681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001190835,0.0001023953,0.0001779371,0.00003541797,0.0001413132,0.00005951186,0.0001426041,0.00002738469,0.0002524781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007831944,0.00009502778,0.00004327429,0.000180734,0.0001002871,0.0007667409,0.0001287301,0.00006327676,0.0006069838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003254512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002003807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006047638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004169497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999468,0.000007868563,0.00007276359,0.0001870046,0.0001293265,0.0001350759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.000009676,0.00007790112,0.00017114,0.0001064124,0.00003011964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001010764,0.00001692441,0.0004255132,0.0007199579,0.000009291683,0.00004448965,0.000006449122,8.362155e-7,0.000001715771,0.9169505,0.08097751,0.0008367321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003027987,0.000005239945,0.0002854359,0.0004633949,0.00007150076,0.000001887954,0.00001737346,0.00002314023,0.000001056022,0.004938529,0.9937543,0.0001353636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05752099,0.03057798,0.00009130358,0.004529589,0.0006753407,0.0008075263,0.00001778115,0.0003571974,0.9054223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070009,0.02169498,0.0004797447,0.03270813,0.001567981,0.000002257572,0.0001757673,0.00007362626,0.03629662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W400786494","doi":"","title":"An Unfinished Joruney: Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Opposition (politics); Arctic; Indigenous rights; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Federal jurisdiction; Geography; Public administration; Oceanography; Ecology; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Tony Penikett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01559419747224424,"gpt":0.3093551494202659,"spread":0.2937609519480217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006877835,0.0001411946,0.0004325292,0.00004380709,0.005096474,0.000005401631,0.0001720002,0.0001386604,0.0007881787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002446265,0.0001238151,0.00005542494,0.0001426999,0.0001174272,0.0001225506,0.0001315487,0.0003316707,0.0004171093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002137243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001064208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01176232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03670436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982082,0.0005995335,0.0002009843,0.0002842701,0.000103338,0.0006037282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990577,0.0001363505,0.0001252101,0.0003299743,0.000179559,0.0001712129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001830125,0.0008173624,0.2478652,0.02397324,0.0006668699,0.0001618412,0.05372066,0.000005175672,0.00001775129,0.6184313,0.04598582,0.008171788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004954252,0.0001999294,0.00931538,0.0005186789,0.000150512,0.000005444298,0.0006296826,0.000005434638,3.924421e-7,0.0004686351,0.9880501,0.0001603573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3980042,0.03891015,0.0005442589,0.008877651,0.002824471,0.00741127,0.0002158618,0.0008539489,0.5423582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271299,0.05851698,0.0003474315,0.009124737,0.0003973803,0.00001214816,0.0001328162,0.00003218922,0.004306409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}