{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":60,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":60,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"5020f9849411","filters":{"venue":"Second language Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W2114558271","doi":"10.1191/026765800677556046","title":"Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":861,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inflection; Linguistics; Psychology; German; Past tense; Second-language acquisition; Feature (linguistics); Language acquisition; Verb; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06885479596568268,"gpt":0.3685641880680884,"spread":0.2997093921024057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001787672,0.0001580144,0.0001991439,0.0001892513,0.0005239341,0.0004770588,0.0001543449,0.00006837217,0.1717367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001073109,0.0001281966,0.00003981775,0.0001123018,0.0001621876,0.0003779791,0.00006730933,0.0007317742,0.0002909803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001466518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007763878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008738407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02283997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997816,0.0006228828,0.0002652609,0.0003968048,0.0004056043,0.0004934095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988739,0.0006239805,0.00004256695,0.0002778925,0.00005896534,0.0001227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004930708,0.000216784,0.002930224,0.0002713305,0.00007157796,0.0005931887,0.8655978,0.00007202117,0.03187368,0.0001473942,0.004695629,0.09303724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005811364,0.002501867,0.06461966,0.00426751,0.000063171,0.000109486,0.7058274,0.005100249,0.01763066,0.0008118464,0.1912668,0.001990082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744781,0.005796342,0.000001974141,0.0003713879,0.00006529699,0.0002639162,0.00003733899,0.00005922114,0.01892643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271331,0.00007784589,0.0001237653,0.0002061903,0.0003835656,0.00001306115,0.00003016767,0.00002256238,0.07200971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1865711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552285053","doi":"10.1177/0267658316678286","title":"Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Psychology; Moderation; Cognitive psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive flexibility; Cognition; Task (project management); Short-term memory; Developmental psychology; Population; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3460702399124849,"gpt":0.4129310096819246,"spread":0.06686076976943972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001163721,0.0002495123,0.0007380067,0.0007961463,0.0003477841,0.0001143561,0.0004856871,0.0001544557,0.005172808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001164339,0.0001440123,0.0004693659,0.0011389,0.0009233918,0.0001461806,0.0003674328,0.0005126214,0.0001460171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003350367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005604309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001901835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004540518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957928,0.001469114,0.0003316099,0.00102473,0.0005735048,0.0008082464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950643,0.003849414,0.00009252535,0.000639359,0.0001327579,0.0002216477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711477,0.00003911945,0.00003291371,0.00002304341,0.00306132,0.001704888,0.005604031,5.000662e-7,0.9840259,0.0003000466,0.0001732449,0.005007901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008446653,0.0001701357,0.0001461338,0.00001352308,0.006494774,0.0005813364,0.003765338,0.00001992664,0.9781406,0.001107959,0.008183531,0.0005320709],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990876,0.00337835,0.00001780585,0.001089191,0.00007277079,0.0003280187,0.00009159758,0.0001043632,0.004041865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893156,0.00008011174,0.0001432629,0.00168955,0.000163621,0.00003552315,0.000002655338,0.00002889647,0.008540801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008010285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170929445","doi":"10.1177/0267658308098995","title":"Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Second-language acquisition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Contrast (vision); Language proficiency; Language acquisition; Event-related potential; Focus (optics); Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Cognition; Communication; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04346752621197246,"gpt":0.3786879413461903,"spread":0.3352204151342178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001869768,0.0002960773,0.0004905736,0.0004164964,0.0002527463,0.0001097531,0.0009723725,0.000309893,0.0180246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001475474,0.0002627346,0.0002126554,0.0008408415,0.0004594436,0.0004163246,0.0002398416,0.0009716173,0.0002702611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009173153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001715089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004191278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008665951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953097,0.001444674,0.0006859453,0.0009378002,0.0007607352,0.0008611523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966477,0.001826704,0.0002386277,0.0009185871,0.0001491653,0.0002192122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001247291,0.0001382665,0.0001144101,0.00004852833,0.00001960253,0.003542694,0.008186321,0.000007135183,0.9786887,0.000176053,0.001502469,0.00745105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00134401,0.0007884654,0.002009434,0.000323324,0.00002183634,0.0003042298,0.004663916,0.0008230692,0.9852309,0.003568466,0.0003919041,0.000530423],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908974,0.003004943,0.00002887615,0.002196514,0.0002410556,0.0005223828,0.0005374423,0.0001280682,0.002443309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861205,0.00004196564,0.0001276045,0.00165124,0.0002174645,0.000009277095,0.0001908812,0.00002986421,0.0116112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01775434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994561365","doi":"10.1191/0267658306sr268oa","title":"Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Mandarin Chinese; Inflection; Interlanguage; Psychology; Morpheme; Syntax; Past tense; Computer science; Verb","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04400139966417754,"gpt":0.4134376580499297,"spread":0.3694362583857522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002852852,0.0002022408,0.0002942832,0.000776775,0.0001274273,0.0001024187,0.0006625698,0.0002488428,0.01105111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007512026,0.0001814202,0.00008129172,0.0008802294,0.0003973397,0.00006666528,0.000283099,0.00136498,0.001192145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000185832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009293106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007559746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002502105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960085,0.0008684002,0.0003906494,0.0006895801,0.0005856969,0.00145715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986403,0.0002947214,0.00004531588,0.0007823348,0.00008982439,0.0001475155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002327725,0.01082741,0.06086843,0.001284951,0.000506786,0.0120992,0.3452966,0.00004726133,0.3298159,0.04885959,0.08522091,0.1028453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01659108,0.002514139,0.7507945,0.0002896767,0.00002910606,0.0008078164,0.1460762,0.002335784,0.02798051,0.02012216,0.02987663,0.002582381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568141,0.003608037,0.00005990668,0.0001481427,0.0001233977,0.0007754805,0.00004484735,0.00005382305,0.1383722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689685,0.0000105292,0.0004833606,0.00006344821,0.0002127135,0.0004651646,0.0001212589,0.00004576275,0.02962923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6899261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136912484","doi":"10.1177/0267658309337641","title":"Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: the impact of extralinguistic factors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Attrition; Psychology; German; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Predictive power; Language proficiency; Multivariate statistics; Language acquisition; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4346352516203167,"gpt":0.6795897930404406,"spread":0.244954541420124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002204085,0.00007937956,0.0001989422,0.0003666567,0.0001738436,0.00003499546,0.0003518162,0.00006655368,0.004263526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005406213,0.0000512545,0.00008509152,0.0009626081,0.0003793745,0.00005892751,0.00004000746,0.0004887832,0.00000843384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004750895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004567378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3653004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1612319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977624,0.001063505,0.000268074,0.0001553502,0.0004474588,0.0003031434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973904,0.001830149,0.00009854769,0.000277239,0.000312047,0.00009157804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004060052,0.0006112376,0.01749074,0.00002065773,0.0000440196,0.000008039086,0.9298513,0.00001084346,0.04984644,0.00124796,0.00005385096,0.0007742948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004070631,0.0002036842,0.2135485,0.00001478036,0.000005340728,2.114586e-7,0.7832856,0.00008969086,0.002255758,0.0000729908,0.0000519712,0.0000644329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989884,0.0002210168,5.718682e-7,0.00004196071,0.00008235859,0.0004548447,0.00004562252,0.000008441368,0.009261237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989211,0.00000410424,0.00004659839,0.000004283171,0.000114703,0.00001310369,0.000007186241,0.000007518803,0.0008813921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2040684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167337955","doi":"10.1177/0267658307086302","title":"The acquisition of articles in child second language English: fluctuation, transfer or both?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Second-language acquisition; Linguistics; First language; Language acquisition; Arabic; Narrative; Negative transfer; Transfer of training; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03400103385826089,"gpt":0.3540529003377591,"spread":0.3200518664794982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001793193,0.0001238393,0.000188661,0.0003044692,0.0002589791,0.00004290267,0.0003036511,0.0001086285,0.0198837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002076118,0.00008324565,0.00005618579,0.0006199879,0.0002226116,0.0001206772,0.00003806497,0.0004784041,0.0001512702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006246966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009269515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002893184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001643481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997784,0.0005274529,0.0004078011,0.0003018002,0.0004340541,0.0005448439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985509,0.0007246948,0.00003193292,0.0004565468,0.0001488991,0.00008704104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007776759,0.0003822071,0.004532948,0.0001451733,0.0001340986,0.0008056936,0.9176813,0.000003206036,0.01296329,0.002862667,0.01215004,0.04756168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006259281,0.0006971411,0.5294132,0.0002998821,0.00001770037,0.0003374233,0.3045373,0.00008822612,0.101427,0.0003527443,0.05581484,0.0007552233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569805,0.002833533,0.00001576575,0.000178578,0.0001772419,0.0003422474,0.00003724866,0.00003217472,0.03940277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787121,0.0000451185,0.00005059328,0.0001056149,0.0001929751,0.00007978544,0.00003466209,0.00002363138,0.02075556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.613144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090017400","doi":"10.1177/0267658313503467","title":"Bilingual word recognition in deaf and hearing signers: Effects of proficiency and language dominance on cross-language activation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Office of International Science and Engineering; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"American Sign Language; Psychology; Linguistics; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Word recognition; Sign language; Reading (process)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05339823741544533,"gpt":0.4300048969502753,"spread":0.37660665953483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002103624,0.0001162818,0.0001808633,0.0003852071,0.0001065192,0.00005923176,0.0001546622,0.0001317374,0.0001869468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007572501,0.0001099648,0.0000224481,0.0003395201,0.000172818,0.0001362211,0.0001060656,0.0004853964,0.00002561941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004959467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003289192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002259117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981396,0.0006702991,0.0002336328,0.0003413206,0.0002400024,0.0003752132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982985,0.001083514,0.0000693804,0.0004253402,0.00005458217,0.00006865462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003800253,0.0003470996,0.01659899,0.0005566375,0.00001790051,0.00003249575,0.09713467,0.000001448896,0.2386675,0.0006964337,0.00003389853,0.6455329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004157356,0.001576315,0.734791,0.0009192774,0.000008995911,0.00001753448,0.03073098,0.0005564322,0.2263435,0.0003843916,0.0001193993,0.000394709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923555,0.001259877,0.00002577303,0.00006105002,0.00004815503,0.0005308641,0.000003305158,0.00002911439,0.005686421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985229,0.00002376051,0.0001515402,0.00005038824,0.00006833573,0.00006475413,0.00001894201,0.00002006231,0.001079341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7181921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4484236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011950820","doi":"10.1177/0267658312447612","title":"Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Linguistics; Syntax; Dislocation; Focus (optics); Interface (matter); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Comprehension; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04643461902383069,"gpt":0.3978049886188393,"spread":0.3513703695950087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001982348,0.0001283567,0.0001939818,0.0001853972,0.0002450864,0.00005443369,0.0002413982,0.00009165837,0.001192369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007126644,0.00009049266,0.00004038656,0.0002393379,0.0005170328,0.0003061637,0.0003470033,0.0004449666,0.00003402269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006390199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003791746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001266633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004136414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976382,0.0008777597,0.0002877567,0.0003569057,0.0002361528,0.000603267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981984,0.001182308,0.00009341299,0.0003772596,0.0000521469,0.00009648353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009665,0.0001147659,0.003349348,0.00009469289,0.000005689806,0.001402719,0.02827542,0.000001487066,0.9611184,0.0002204186,0.0001185402,0.00519754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006301475,0.0001036844,0.001821133,0.00007006696,0.000009705013,0.003719385,0.02833804,0.000107763,0.9648422,0.0001068124,0.00009994739,0.000151141],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99479,0.00251307,0.00001368282,0.0004124509,0.0001139881,0.0004099115,0.00004509227,0.0000191103,0.001682659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984516,0.00002795935,0.00002230797,0.0001197576,0.0001337971,0.0000156237,0.000006101012,0.00001762403,0.001205243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005046399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884625867","doi":"10.1177/0267658318787231","title":"Input effects across domains: The case of Greek subjects in child heritage language","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Heritage language; Syntax; Linguistics; Realization (probability); Subject (documents); Categorical variable; Psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Phenomenon; First language; Pragmatics; Test (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02146881279526415,"gpt":0.3945863704113138,"spread":0.3731175576160497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714375,0.0002193443,0.0003063463,0.0003019104,0.0003222083,0.00005331809,0.0006049257,0.0002011011,0.006543227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004585048,0.0001564326,0.00009184487,0.001151312,0.00073733,0.0001183429,0.0003087324,0.0007699463,0.0005544682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006386174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007269225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006836258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05513947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967939,0.000884252,0.0003523773,0.0004979769,0.0003728059,0.001098717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997907,0.000853284,0.00007976534,0.0009147903,0.0001175523,0.0001275945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004489985,0.0005060951,0.006335067,0.0004095458,0.0001944101,0.06499238,0.8432716,2.388719e-7,0.006908922,0.001807027,0.004803269,0.07032245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00812865,0.0009737483,0.07315506,0.0002876572,0.00001967361,0.004195626,0.8832357,0.00003135698,0.02544856,0.0004273741,0.003247814,0.00084878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208028,0.005415435,0.000005805849,0.0001520972,0.0002988222,0.0007361949,0.0000472562,0.00004812871,0.07249345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940472,0.000009373095,0.00006199203,0.0003536589,0.0002965468,0.0001156132,0.00002675639,0.00004765948,0.00504123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07324436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465030266","doi":"10.1177/0267658316649998","title":"Prosody–syntax integration in a second language: Contrasting event-related potentials from German and Chinese learners of English using linear mixed effect models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Prosody; German; Syntax; Linguistics; Psychology; Categorical variable; Language proficiency; Sentence processing; Sentence; Psycholinguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03335397762517796,"gpt":0.3670592945840697,"spread":0.3337053169588917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001902201,0.0002675496,0.0004921027,0.0004571748,0.0001333422,0.00005729037,0.0003312544,0.0002461862,0.0008925638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003774803,0.0001761025,0.00009677406,0.0005172036,0.0003609814,0.0004328887,0.000214681,0.0006739716,0.00001197337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006075869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008851598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000716285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001483599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960505,0.001692244,0.0005545793,0.0006732438,0.0003964263,0.0006330133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968919,0.002252926,0.000185906,0.0003935195,0.0001427663,0.0001329878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001509945,0.00005724566,0.0006407188,0.00006822443,0.00001595428,0.0004979633,0.02928165,0.00001981186,0.9601562,0.00001860085,0.000008156597,0.009084503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002559134,0.0002646591,0.0005243643,0.0003609516,0.00001453497,0.00006370016,0.005161379,0.007408367,0.9830467,0.0003058774,0.000007867205,0.0002824487],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974905,0.0008113208,0.00008192423,0.00003922933,0.0002392702,0.0007221319,0.0001984838,0.00006429105,0.0003528134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990468,0.00002038019,0.0001071115,0.00006618274,0.000208676,0.00002165383,0.0000283629,0.00004257883,0.0004582555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02412027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9772947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098576193","doi":"10.1177/0267658310375753","title":"Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Alternation (linguistics); Linguistics; Psychology; Second language; Production (economics); First language; Consonant; Second-language acquisition; Language proficiency; Stress (linguistics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08643860200490655,"gpt":0.4254092643691553,"spread":0.3389706623642488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002022562,0.0001077114,0.0002071972,0.0002861736,0.0002188988,0.00002754697,0.0004095095,0.0001140882,0.03162879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004353331,0.000074907,0.00005427309,0.0005286708,0.001611613,0.00008336063,0.0002213605,0.0005723053,0.0001642998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001305466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005398054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002848654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001844329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976972,0.0008162625,0.0002660211,0.0004129085,0.000329667,0.0004778832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982884,0.0005636097,0.00006424133,0.0008100757,0.0001763549,0.00009734265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006935797,0.0002061597,0.003009816,0.00006955451,0.0001507562,0.0000947412,0.8881363,9.404416e-8,0.08648197,0.006607179,0.008054526,0.006495299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002937626,0.0003928124,0.3635456,0.00004253472,0.00002114417,0.0002430258,0.4766611,0.00002030524,0.1486109,0.003607267,0.003583921,0.0003337939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9081107,0.004150307,0.000002743476,0.0002060164,0.0003248991,0.0004900249,0.00002313173,0.00001974372,0.08667248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534613,0.00006377231,0.00009055742,0.00004225582,0.0001315349,0.000200228,0.000008848594,0.00001865369,0.04598282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4114752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9692565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103289020","doi":"10.1177/0267658313510926","title":"Lexical encoding of L2 tones: The role of L1 stress, pitch accent and intonation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Prosody; Linguistics; Pitch accent; Stress (linguistics); Intonation (linguistics); Psychology; German; First language; Tone (literature); Stress (linguistics); Utterance; Syllable","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03911547804961463,"gpt":0.4133821628893241,"spread":0.3742666848397094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002088659,0.00007243874,0.0001665527,0.0001822733,0.000094435,0.00002068239,0.0003684773,0.0001231598,0.003902386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000274789,0.00005143864,0.00003497812,0.0002528981,0.0004756526,0.00003317365,0.0002349781,0.0005030389,0.00003294513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001593798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004841476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004960281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982101,0.0006318777,0.000213648,0.0002195568,0.0003676066,0.0003571668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983338,0.0009652293,0.00005256117,0.0004056787,0.0001697896,0.00007293217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004823065,0.0005874478,0.0452938,0.0002540863,0.0002501482,0.00001902103,0.1399256,0.000004000775,0.3736843,0.08944191,0.001797216,0.3482601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002038763,0.00119404,0.458028,0.0001228992,0.00001942198,0.00003288305,0.08048964,0.001446961,0.4256992,0.01702168,0.01358824,0.0003182598],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539179,0.003266159,0.00001429468,0.0002677917,0.00006236864,0.000194445,0.00002844032,0.000006317231,0.04224224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986479,0.00007228713,0.00002436176,0.00002358099,0.00009395316,0.00002278625,0.00001076906,0.0000110035,0.001093322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4127342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329620651","doi":"10.1177/0267658313519814","title":"<i>Wh-</i> questions in child L2 French: Derivational complexity and its interactions with L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Inversion (geology); Specific language impairment; Age of Acquisition; Second-language acquisition; Age groups; Language acquisition; Verb; First language; Developmental psychology; Linguistic sequence complexity; Demography; Cognition; Sociology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05735394863006801,"gpt":0.3336542809895453,"spread":0.2763003323594773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090895,0.0001119101,0.0002299018,0.0002410942,0.0001292143,0.00002721011,0.0001690671,0.00006065405,0.001031443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002776751,0.00007121085,0.0000227646,0.0003230284,0.0006154503,0.0001087766,0.0001026422,0.0003951683,0.000005364369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001471049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005787431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001934457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009917661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984243,0.0005270216,0.0002863816,0.0002363634,0.0002732732,0.0002526835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990574,0.0004294279,0.00007591398,0.0002477012,0.0001333103,0.00005623182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003262836,0.002191961,0.197377,0.001416296,0.0008113711,0.0001679806,0.4701237,0.00003186198,0.01838833,0.2711547,0.003158526,0.03191543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009119929,0.0005674887,0.9494727,0.0003681483,0.00002510021,0.0001134501,0.03219336,0.0001414413,0.002934488,0.001517235,0.003172631,0.0003740281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674903,0.003996673,0.00002691831,0.0003398811,0.00004340682,0.0004290374,0.0000306774,0.00001241762,0.0276307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980874,0.00003484525,0.0001748554,0.00009729827,0.00003727205,0.00007875328,0.00005131652,0.00001335359,0.001424916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7520958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151328700","doi":"10.1177/0267658311413540","title":"The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Vowel; Coda; Context (archaeology); Perception; Stress (linguistics); Foreign language; Consonant; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08345044034886046,"gpt":0.4196726962303149,"spread":0.3362222558814545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00340033,0.0001412712,0.0002256805,0.0004690501,0.0003471011,0.00003777599,0.000630914,0.0002323998,0.03402262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000191823,0.0001117981,0.00005498844,0.0006388286,0.0005815612,0.00005701367,0.00023094,0.001022523,0.0007731716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002497979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003645136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003531542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0362751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997112,0.0008948106,0.0004063393,0.00043411,0.0003570746,0.0007956896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983502,0.0005678365,0.00008126635,0.0006133302,0.0002862113,0.0001011496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004544433,0.0004013242,0.002668041,0.00003592388,0.0001697287,0.0001057585,0.9072766,9.085456e-8,0.06300446,0.007551345,0.001079826,0.01725251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001132918,0.0002517329,0.6282597,0.0000166124,0.000003823612,0.00002302234,0.3589442,0.00002108337,0.007676781,0.002048307,0.001443818,0.0001780555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8566598,0.001642685,0.00002334753,0.0001015599,0.0001748493,0.000408773,0.0000291391,0.00001830322,0.1409416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842651,0.00001698093,0.000451668,0.00003076076,0.00006816522,0.0001632772,0.00001656349,0.00002509663,0.01496233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6255916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200176888","doi":"10.1177/02676583211066413","title":"Phonological redeployment and the mapping problem: Cross-linguistic E-similarity is the beginning of the story, not the end","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Parsing; Linguistics; Equivalence (formal languages); Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Phonological rule; Construct (python library); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Phonology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09682539906898296,"gpt":0.4199282697298051,"spread":0.3231028706608221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007892878,0.0001619009,0.0002670431,0.00006871318,0.001342919,0.0001850219,0.001249239,0.0001882188,0.00559802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001600147,0.00006752951,0.0001422449,0.0005661051,0.004134595,0.00002144852,0.001254544,0.002599493,0.00005173654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005377276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002658902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009251465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005696597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945096,0.003210021,0.0003200998,0.0004895856,0.0006971144,0.0007736245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938282,0.004237828,0.0001012319,0.00141159,0.0003463024,0.00007484806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001549465,0.0006493704,0.01818728,0.0004222337,0.001657481,0.0006435367,0.765801,0.00001447461,0.05374758,0.06185542,0.05735444,0.03811773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007212937,0.0003941261,0.6344101,0.0002083505,0.00009656799,0.0005810485,0.09560078,0.0006267512,0.03738727,0.02571249,0.1971503,0.0006192403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359128,0.01066323,0.000008830711,0.02770443,0.0003284959,0.000790399,0.00006459088,0.00001693267,0.02451032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842138,0.0001326615,0.00003021217,0.001335287,0.0002214632,0.0001495604,0.000004100469,0.00002178074,0.01389108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6702002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002700516","doi":"10.1177/0267658319897786","title":"Acquisition of L2 Japanese WH questions: Evidence of phonological contiguity and non-shallow structures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Contiguity; Phrase; Computer science; Word order; Second-language acquisition; Interlanguage; Rule-based machine translation; Phrase structure rules; Sentence; Psychology; Natural language processing; Grammar","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1082188645143239,"gpt":0.4432651106258548,"spread":0.3350462461115309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218662,0.0001200416,0.000342961,0.0001836817,0.00007926866,0.00002333286,0.0004253928,0.0002423854,0.009949007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007373223,0.0001010404,0.00006009432,0.0004314819,0.000809516,0.00007663407,0.000284034,0.000699471,0.00006391529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001833102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008803095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002063352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977409,0.0007002708,0.0003203395,0.0004104991,0.0003924089,0.0004356149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980423,0.0009648482,0.0000816493,0.0004057783,0.0003082511,0.0001971531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001736775,0.0002632313,0.01193111,0.0009337183,0.0002450479,0.0002513145,0.1316485,0.000002906143,0.8339302,0.003075374,0.003724592,0.01225726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002102075,0.003382746,0.893182,0.0002783051,0.00002680371,0.0000659603,0.02871799,0.0002231216,0.06796923,0.003389235,0.0003177683,0.0003447274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982435,0.01360085,0.00001753553,0.0008405951,0.00006642933,0.0003622512,0.00006993133,0.00001693246,0.002590514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998869,0.0002439209,0.0001258351,0.0001185228,0.0000982096,0.00003014046,0.00001176682,0.00001282479,0.0004897661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087656491","doi":"10.1177/0267658320956704","title":"L2 transfer of L1 island-insensitivity: The case of Norwegian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Restructuring; Dependency (UML); Linguistics; Filler (materials); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07042306849621273,"gpt":0.3162777483681605,"spread":0.2458546798719478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008588266,0.00008400118,0.0001970437,0.00009053821,0.0001673177,0.00005428164,0.0001604831,0.00004070693,0.007490604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000585279,0.00005978762,0.00007502627,0.00008953339,0.0003362477,0.00004893103,0.00004964692,0.0002840772,0.0000490703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001307737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007046141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005493301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02429331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987986,0.0002777691,0.0002426967,0.000166045,0.0002846132,0.0002302482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987145,0.0006054502,0.00003682531,0.0002530734,0.0003287752,0.00006134492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000641924,0.00008345416,0.00005000044,0.0004702308,0.0001120932,0.001154988,0.7775362,0.000002910437,0.007224416,0.2076952,0.0009986815,0.00460767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251237,0.001110554,0.0007429015,0.0002200052,0.0001548451,0.0003131027,0.8768362,0.005070309,0.08333962,0.01378799,0.01529149,0.0006206533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621177,0.0001466313,0.00009800382,0.007683543,0.0001360496,0.0002597226,0.0003011905,0.00001803431,0.0292391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982129,0.000004631745,0.00002012678,0.0001320747,0.0007634341,0.000004455942,0.00001456575,0.00001784825,0.000829914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1939072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053516573","doi":"10.1191/0267658305sr249oa","title":"Quelque chose … de remarquable in English-French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Interlanguage; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Computer science; Grammar; Universal grammar; Semantic interpretation; English grammar; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01930211334490003,"gpt":0.3054044782696033,"spread":0.2861023649247032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093572,0.0001671065,0.0002266751,0.0009302641,0.0002027202,0.0003698152,0.0002777466,0.0001251017,0.02047196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008226091,0.0001796895,0.0000511881,0.0002666734,0.0001312823,0.0007264302,0.00008457282,0.0006073448,0.0002721171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005127409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002653289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00301975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09682664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977626,0.0003472376,0.000607679,0.0002818757,0.0004733275,0.0005272962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985136,0.0005042767,0.0001173951,0.0002868016,0.0004814484,0.00009645666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005280343,0.0002106915,0.000953683,0.0002517537,0.00003592695,0.00007813238,0.937155,0.0008485447,0.0005906149,0.05388958,0.001445891,0.004487364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009955451,0.0004913497,0.08955588,0.001673746,0.00004649309,0.00006060091,0.5561973,0.2515176,0.0054705,0.04238024,0.04058329,0.002067476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152359,0.0004003998,0.0001820268,0.00110287,0.0002590834,0.000490133,0.0001293785,0.00009370417,0.08210655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920769,0.000006961086,0.0007447083,0.0003437974,0.0009110408,0.00006890931,0.0005831997,0.00002660649,0.005237829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3809577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167042673","doi":"10.1177/0267658312463375","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Word (group theory); Language acquisition; Psychology; Word learning; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Vocabulary; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01821692470773011,"gpt":0.3340344044590928,"spread":0.3158174797513627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281037,0.000216224,0.0002711081,0.0005404848,0.0003171207,0.0001281184,0.0005739588,0.0001439804,0.3431952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006624407,0.0001602686,0.00008256162,0.001048272,0.00008959389,0.0001104037,0.000207494,0.0008215978,0.01636804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009278416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005621317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000946065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007423718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971797,0.0004343683,0.0003270566,0.0006026204,0.0006446509,0.0008115938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983826,0.0003707319,0.00006682838,0.0007587485,0.000188734,0.0002323983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000224786,0.0001529858,0.0003447999,0.00006215095,0.00009038498,0.00008665385,0.2124174,0.00002532588,0.004369613,0.0008494918,0.6791985,0.1021779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009235509,0.0008649122,0.02635212,0.00004344585,0.0000072137,0.00001552533,0.1975188,0.000003532236,0.006271251,0.00006385493,0.76758,0.0003558511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7639505,0.0004791367,0.000006089379,0.006505763,0.0007150361,0.0009838997,0.0000149923,0.00005124514,0.2272934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448532,0.000003111552,0.00009094155,0.0006478531,0.008131074,0.0002276228,0.00004170147,0.00004712936,0.1459574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3268271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123413683","doi":"10.1177/0267658314554939","title":"Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Bulgarian; Psychology; Language acquisition; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02627872574575491,"gpt":0.335994523507859,"spread":0.3097157977621041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002833615,0.0003999485,0.0004799772,0.0003533451,0.0002652391,0.0002927864,0.0005945158,0.0002467003,0.007652305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007967145,0.0003823593,0.00005801145,0.0005890284,0.0004846358,0.0003769542,0.000352777,0.0009732976,0.0001445219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002130805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001160772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007903898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08831599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952819,0.0007280796,0.000586054,0.001295898,0.0008755864,0.001232513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972786,0.001096129,0.0001388015,0.00094135,0.0001949236,0.0003502028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006467704,0.0005428005,0.657971,0.0006432838,0.0002779146,0.001223951,0.2346433,0.000008047698,0.002827992,0.006270989,0.01590245,0.07904143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003509445,0.0002628744,0.956799,0.0006772219,0.00001691181,0.000003586143,0.0292981,0.0001588327,0.001114748,0.001402257,0.00594116,0.0008158174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458678,0.03650243,0.001065023,0.0005730106,0.0004656439,0.0008605766,0.00007437509,0.00007421891,0.01451692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859648,0.0004318184,0.0004111504,0.001007066,0.0003037575,0.000175357,0.00008596585,0.00005578373,0.01156431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.298828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400694300","doi":"10.1177/0267658315589656","title":"Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Psychology; Eye tracking; Prosody; Intonation (linguistics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Fluency; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2834098163506495,"gpt":0.4224880641932162,"spread":0.1390782478425667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004225468,0.0001453501,0.000178269,0.0003817373,0.0002802424,0.0001681906,0.0003058469,0.0001036404,0.0009303408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002669876,0.0001103332,0.00005428061,0.0006103469,0.000153903,0.0002431426,0.0001794752,0.0007423201,0.0007247017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006384761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000794156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004237517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002327422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965301,0.001616803,0.0002398902,0.0004327139,0.0005785421,0.000601965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974575,0.001295128,0.00003909941,0.0005670282,0.000301073,0.0003401756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001881769,0.0001840104,0.09882544,0.00008970568,0.0002866426,0.001120876,0.7272323,0.000002058199,0.00221502,0.009934562,0.02530469,0.132923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001260015,0.0003833815,0.7251648,0.0000515585,0.00003963167,0.00002597593,0.2516345,0.000002512941,0.0008467055,0.001610803,0.01867183,0.0003082796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644397,0.001598249,0.00005868925,0.0005560069,0.0005613406,0.000455449,0.00006837119,0.00007612203,0.03218606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810822,0.0000129044,0.0001071348,0.0001352518,0.001510936,0.0001444561,0.00004173817,0.00003655776,0.01692879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6263394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208721842","doi":"10.1177/0267658312473471","title":"Learning exponents of number on first exposure to an L2","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Numeral system; Reduplication; Linguistics; Indonesian; Noun phrase; Second language; Language acquisition; Second-language acquisition; First language; Noun; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04552935394462438,"gpt":0.4080297272235361,"spread":0.3625003732789117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000928399,0.0001104825,0.0001664047,0.0002332878,0.0001495706,0.00006251359,0.0002973591,0.00009594287,0.07201513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001452083,0.00009454096,0.00003800955,0.000295496,0.0000440535,0.00009594706,0.00007985556,0.0004904461,0.009575159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004925287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002148252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001251611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001033489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.0003946911,0.0002301536,0.0003495731,0.0004285993,0.0005237597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988397,0.0002876249,0.00003641901,0.000462767,0.0001492094,0.0002243024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003578034,0.001093137,0.09940036,0.0002184168,0.0002193014,0.0002738582,0.5404568,0.00004133018,0.02120728,0.002241132,0.08925999,0.2452306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00196899,0.002989215,0.6870811,0.0003351053,0.000005626592,0.00004464197,0.09977458,0.00003920035,0.01212113,0.0001585208,0.194817,0.0006648593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569192,0.00007417861,0.000003547533,0.0001512524,0.000143256,0.0002901165,0.000005164027,0.00003173384,0.1423816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921835,0.000001810719,0.0002077331,0.0001296327,0.0001167795,0.0001341589,0.00002250276,0.00002703354,0.07752535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5876807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138273153","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100284","title":"Phonological feature re-assembly and the importance of phonetic cues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Phonological rule; Distinctive feature; Linguistics; Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Phonology; Phonetics; Speech recognition; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480349790245673,"gpt":0.4135032636770934,"spread":0.3654682846525261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002626389,0.0001422008,0.0003309689,0.0001923695,0.0001780673,0.00004676084,0.0005814835,0.0002695856,0.005273127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033634,0.00008799112,0.00007652459,0.0004994103,0.001101588,0.00003610175,0.0001667286,0.001259118,0.0001257238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002079178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000605723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002158474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004341436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997324,0.0008839894,0.0002402706,0.0004238718,0.0004094118,0.0007184705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978802,0.001035187,0.00006354423,0.0007450299,0.0001477421,0.0001283371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008166334,0.001473372,0.02221123,0.000235489,0.0007241171,0.001859086,0.2200664,0.000001667656,0.2393021,0.07449981,0.2728772,0.1585831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008038945,0.002026625,0.9049877,0.00006206876,0.00002798235,0.000283413,0.02557967,0.0001156532,0.01939085,0.02885378,0.01015327,0.0004800475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229107,0.02419255,0.000003213838,0.004798837,0.00009159125,0.0003977209,0.00002106331,0.00002405343,0.04756028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879741,0.0002999687,0.00008232828,0.0004708392,0.0001243694,0.00003595398,0.000009224015,0.00001308354,0.01099013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025612520","doi":"10.1177/0267658310365783","title":"Deriving meaning through context: Interpreting bare nominals in second language Japanese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistics; Noun; Noun phrase; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Verb; Interpretation (philosophy); Second-language acquisition; Meaning (existential); Phrase; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04173028158679807,"gpt":0.3364448511072471,"spread":0.2947145695204491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002564264,0.0002438564,0.0003654887,0.0003948708,0.0004116483,0.000596482,0.0005145386,0.000149254,0.05334963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003548928,0.0002350374,0.00009437279,0.0001414186,0.0003090137,0.0003933163,0.0002752981,0.001425632,0.0003753324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001091394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001048603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3368531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972801,0.000325974,0.0005172539,0.0005153774,0.0005361369,0.0008251424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976187,0.001300007,0.00009534149,0.000550941,0.0003196644,0.0001153898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003096022,0.00006459558,0.000674047,0.0002021534,0.00003848684,0.0002496585,0.9107921,6.862821e-7,0.03158601,0.05147905,0.0003171377,0.004565147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009328732,0.0001043448,0.0008822638,0.0004275315,0.00001432796,0.00003704358,0.9689202,0.001005334,0.01283358,0.00548057,0.008802782,0.0005591153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8531122,0.0004111547,0.000009521474,0.0008865431,0.0008297642,0.0003500668,0.00006409993,0.000081352,0.1442554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905904,0.000002747459,0.0002870079,0.000299666,0.001652382,0.00004293928,0.00005115592,0.00006988343,0.007003846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3232336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095324656","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100294","title":"Some questions about feature re-assembly","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Computer science; Feature selection; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Second-language acquisition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02619002646934909,"gpt":0.37926040457414,"spread":0.3530703781047909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408726,0.0001777889,0.000195122,0.0004782254,0.0003517883,0.0005806794,0.001910861,0.0002081633,0.0001496642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003658706,0.0001497596,0.00007830794,0.001092728,0.00008570381,0.001042643,0.000323966,0.00122088,0.0001449806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001319621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001943637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006022361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007819458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974167,0.0002745985,0.0001798134,0.0005734492,0.0007796268,0.0007757773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981883,0.0001927062,0.00005240272,0.001081483,0.0002807642,0.0002043497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001946945,0.0001914109,0.00002781028,0.00009304632,0.00002230682,0.000986429,0.006252192,0.000001131545,0.1322699,0.4285229,0.1354962,0.2961172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001229001,0.001253808,0.003998031,0.0007107767,0.00001338908,0.0003663208,0.001435824,0.004194671,0.4658187,0.4622904,0.05692797,0.001761078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1933655,0.540924,0.09184945,0.07767482,0.001425831,0.003242299,0.00009632958,0.01105696,0.08036482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7873008,0.0001337381,0.1948055,0.001919521,0.0006411527,0.00003454246,0.00001672943,0.00002493968,0.01512312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6107021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159718161","doi":"10.1191/0267658304sr234oa","title":"Connectionism, HPSG signs and SLA representations: specifying principles of mapping between form and function","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Head-driven phrase structure grammar; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Connectionism; Computer science; Phrase structure grammar; Redundancy (engineering); Grammar; Phrase; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Function (biology); Artificial intelligence; Rule-based machine translation; Mathematics; Artificial neural network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1416231343258111,"gpt":0.3418775068643475,"spread":0.2002543725385364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009042858,0.00008693142,0.0001588273,0.0002903304,0.0004589279,0.0002043002,0.00006847329,0.00005064232,0.0009224478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005697717,0.00008413252,0.0000266039,0.00007780737,0.0002539393,0.000189111,0.00008540127,0.0002056424,0.00001361107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000544879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005214658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00342154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00354536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988964,0.00007781504,0.000273983,0.0002378281,0.0002863683,0.0002275993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989871,0.000444563,0.00008993092,0.000175896,0.0002431712,0.00005938104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002974968,0.00004724841,0.004271826,0.0005000066,0.0001318384,0.00001262215,0.2682946,0.00001026246,0.005226445,0.7121711,0.00003146694,0.009272854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003137186,0.0006922016,0.05691591,0.0005048693,0.00009832461,0.00002450369,0.60334,0.000332275,0.01411143,0.2995746,0.02066586,0.0006028325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669468,0.0004923704,0.000887408,0.001113067,0.000185346,0.0003293097,0.00004194678,0.00004061488,0.02996318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996246,0.00003055673,0.0004006324,0.00001781365,0.0009024694,0.00001465242,0.00003738315,0.00001657421,0.00233389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035501132","doi":"10.1177/0267658320927761","title":"Activation of L1 orthography in L2 word reading: Constraints from language and writing system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Character (mathematics); Reading (process); Orthography; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Pinyin; Writing system; Chinese characters","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04993025680329947,"gpt":0.3775444352111251,"spread":0.3276141784078256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001033825,0.0001082599,0.0002406577,0.0003326523,0.00005734588,0.00004714993,0.0001526186,0.0001063926,0.001656736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000126135,0.000103767,0.0000358963,0.0005801603,0.0001324173,0.00008134267,0.00007674826,0.00045354,0.00004077112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002763075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003755008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007675464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004004417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982224,0.0003951081,0.0003447355,0.0003734654,0.0002741943,0.0003901607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989399,0.0005890138,0.00007492493,0.0002075827,0.00005879878,0.000129827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639761,0.0001122568,0.1958329,0.0007863357,0.0001847266,0.0007712534,0.462435,8.477738e-7,0.07094809,0.005614081,0.0009809886,0.2619695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002261322,0.0001555869,0.362825,0.001043894,0.000009761668,0.00002453682,0.6179233,0.0001540202,0.01394232,0.00002588138,0.001265667,0.0003686724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659668,0.0008436856,0.00002541412,0.0001348419,0.0000488998,0.0002477665,0.00006786342,0.00004139728,0.03262335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991047,0.00000584126,0.0003829799,0.00007828185,0.0001111431,0.00002764232,0.00006399378,0.00001872705,0.0002067348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2616008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088014222","doi":"10.1177/0267658320958742","title":"Intervention in relative clauses: Effects of relativized minimality on L2 representation and processing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Relative clause; Plural; Linguistics; Reading (process); Psychology; Representation (politics); Contrast (vision); Intervention (counseling); Object (grammar); Subject (documents); Noun; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.100782982714866,"gpt":0.4282594826092548,"spread":0.3274764998943888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006794389,0.00009567486,0.0002026147,0.0001900042,0.00007041177,0.00002730082,0.0001491187,0.00008859896,0.0001221039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005145339,0.00008170057,0.00004552309,0.0005523915,0.0002597464,0.0002215089,0.0001169088,0.0005588229,0.000015138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002282219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000303966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006334721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005063798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974656,0.001280788,0.0002667472,0.0004851222,0.0002619776,0.0002397712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979034,0.001730321,0.00009849261,0.0001546087,0.00004366247,0.0000694918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656912,0.0001158795,0.0007213439,0.000500455,0.000004540727,0.0009301227,0.03171851,9.918929e-7,0.9495537,0.0002363389,0.00004673925,0.01580574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001660987,0.0007425144,0.004725758,0.0002578685,0.000004850586,0.00002491554,0.003683749,0.0003377079,0.9878069,0.00059274,0.00005157925,0.0001104071],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960715,0.000629738,0.00002125521,0.0004158378,0.00003076365,0.0004688162,0.00000782555,0.00002690281,0.002327413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992005,0.00001920992,0.00006154316,0.0003058154,0.00004126847,0.00001830315,0.000004596905,0.00001164478,0.0003370679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03825328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187831919","doi":"10.1177/02676583211030604","title":"Spoken word recognition in a second language: The importance of phonetic details","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Nasalization; Nasal vowel; Vowel; Phonetics; Psychology; Linguistics; Duration (music); Word recognition; Vowel length; Mid vowel; Mandarin Chinese; First language; Audiology; Speech recognition; Computer science; Formant; Acoustics; Reading (process)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0694202554861688,"gpt":0.412672592986506,"spread":0.3432523375003372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002978866,0.0001620231,0.0003271656,0.000369798,0.0001129236,0.00005508853,0.0005741442,0.0002384698,0.1125627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004970889,0.0001327635,0.000101176,0.001354459,0.0004152698,0.00006455945,0.0002709918,0.001484005,0.001012714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006899494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002909438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007525497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02279731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961947,0.001371206,0.000453952,0.0005465505,0.0005035338,0.0009300782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973062,0.001174693,0.00008516078,0.001020078,0.0002820184,0.0001318321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009575851,0.001378797,0.03775736,0.0005991948,0.0004941133,0.008109675,0.2632512,0.000002161921,0.4533454,0.0006729967,0.03872505,0.1947064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004820501,0.0004981203,0.6140593,0.0002156385,0.0000270994,0.0005227641,0.1411808,0.0000764163,0.2229938,0.006288519,0.008615221,0.000701847],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385422,0.01551459,0.000002236145,0.0005717915,0.0001905666,0.0004081591,0.0001407457,0.00001727419,0.04461243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739316,0.00009443054,0.00008109782,0.000274867,0.0001532069,0.0001379911,0.00009729656,0.00003619248,0.02519339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5763019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200439699","doi":"10.1177/02676583211044953","title":"L1 phonological effects on L2 (non-)naïve perception: A cross-language investigation of the oral–nasal vowel contrast in Brazilian Portuguese","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Nasal vowel; Vowel; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Consonant; Feature (linguistics); Brazilian Portuguese; Focus (optics); First language; Second-language acquisition; Portuguese; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04105719442720392,"gpt":0.4151737732974187,"spread":0.3741165788702148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002371604,0.0002260631,0.0004157805,0.0003565424,0.0001785937,0.00007466377,0.0007049316,0.0004712931,0.01117571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008328332,0.000171091,0.0001527255,0.001188954,0.000960185,0.00007756831,0.0003713081,0.001965105,0.000549959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003968441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001462262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002338689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950877,0.002062998,0.0004505111,0.0007182891,0.000708302,0.000972131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971578,0.00116319,0.00008774441,0.001081061,0.0002886206,0.0002216568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006704713,0.0005370746,0.04605871,0.0002222138,0.0001375817,0.002391225,0.08717269,0.000004599643,0.821531,0.0004325544,0.006311742,0.03453015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016901,0.0004032883,0.9233793,0.00009315061,0.000005071984,0.00005379965,0.008744342,0.00005619287,0.06444994,0.0004881261,0.0001422806,0.0001676344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847089,0.001975824,0.000003200844,0.0007540603,0.0004222916,0.000665752,0.00007944577,0.00002644816,0.01136407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893611,0.00003460244,0.00004298367,0.0005608132,0.0002181462,0.0001308155,0.00007662531,0.00003561416,0.009539281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308434418","doi":"10.1177/02676583221131256","title":"Can adult learners sense L2 emotional words automatically? The role of L2 use on the emotional Stroop effect","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Automaticity; Stroop effect; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Connotation; Task (project management); Cognition; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04060835386784922,"gpt":0.3379087411937315,"spread":0.2973003873258823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002330315,0.0001749315,0.0001988693,0.0001956507,0.0009253866,0.00008626178,0.0007103911,0.00006512595,0.007243798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003617991,0.00009961442,0.0001506957,0.0006031683,0.0007073232,0.00006324847,0.0004598148,0.001518126,0.0000699827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007808692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001856469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002534889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001611654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934635,0.003978227,0.0002673969,0.0004879504,0.001213137,0.0005897594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921253,0.006944518,0.0000893862,0.0006552521,0.00009230909,0.00009319063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004812383,0.0004682755,0.000803528,0.00007796773,0.00007140985,0.001851048,0.02396104,0.0002743094,0.9310693,0.02681234,0.004582859,0.009546672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002747832,0.004385396,0.006158954,0.0001570181,0.00004501798,0.002748566,0.07295734,0.006825697,0.8897679,0.004300141,0.009007236,0.000898896],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919557,0.00008728825,7.997217e-7,0.003097904,0.0001487869,0.0005601496,0.0003222446,0.00005162745,0.003775483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936866,0.000005402175,0.00001276805,0.002027348,0.0001581961,0.00006737957,0.00002782621,0.00002649036,0.00398797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0489963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970322091","doi":"10.1177/0267658314559573","title":"Perception of non-native consonant length contrast: The role of attention in phonetic processing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Consonant; Psychology; Perception; Speech perception; Linguistics; Duration (music); Task (project management); Phonetics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Vowel","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02700242535695914,"gpt":0.3938316675857105,"spread":0.3668292422287514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003071351,0.00009024911,0.0002307629,0.0003215738,0.00008179881,0.00001571663,0.0003411559,0.0001320472,0.002868575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000182206,0.00006543558,0.00004994538,0.000452806,0.0006146808,0.0000406447,0.00009269289,0.0006423072,0.0000732666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003504519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008993217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006005614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976695,0.0009323729,0.0003036652,0.0002584328,0.0003796344,0.0004564404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998642,0.0006217204,0.0000895944,0.0003354795,0.0002590504,0.00005213224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002345455,0.0003003486,0.01103934,0.0001141013,0.00004216505,0.000007627472,0.08082712,0.000002145355,0.696327,0.000649143,0.0001734312,0.210283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001579913,0.0005476394,0.8808259,0.0001229429,0.000007377861,0.00001349001,0.09337409,0.003473082,0.01786098,0.001646737,0.0004235365,0.0001243392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771349,0.001670241,0.00005769285,0.000117099,0.0000485346,0.0003938601,0.00002028425,0.00000532766,0.02055203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864,0.00002674361,0.00003497832,0.00001639889,0.00005628109,0.0000592088,0.00001166492,0.00001507059,0.001139676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8697866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039717457","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941036","title":"Turtles all the way down: Micro-cues and piecemeal transfer in L3 phonology and syntax","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Phonology; Syntax; Learnability; Property (philosophy); Parsing; Phrase structure rules; Computer science; Theoretical linguistics; Grammar; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07132191421363875,"gpt":0.3895627627592164,"spread":0.3182408485455776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258459,0.0001568181,0.0002630478,0.0002043242,0.0001445164,0.00007650255,0.0004152972,0.0002438588,0.006009698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001220149,0.0001130856,0.000035025,0.0003280879,0.0008378671,0.00004689775,0.0002465774,0.001400041,0.0002341972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002107063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005237841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001624307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003727829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973094,0.0008805091,0.0002244428,0.0005435132,0.000217578,0.0008245364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998542,0.000841904,0.00001310762,0.0003381127,0.0000531839,0.0002117036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001401298,0.0002670033,0.01455175,0.0003308601,0.0004142227,0.001400689,0.4572602,8.160862e-7,0.4475984,0.003120843,0.01975216,0.05390179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01054775,0.003358942,0.6085467,0.00009514573,0.000053131,0.0008166814,0.1236759,0.0004702691,0.06551349,0.003914597,0.1816928,0.001314626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597011,0.01958422,0.000004842446,0.01188417,0.00007585537,0.0004063136,0.00006711191,0.00002142741,0.008254985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996462,0.0007419938,0.00002507397,0.001089672,0.0001480694,0.00006883265,0.00001613785,0.00002597862,0.001422202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885637145","doi":"10.1177/0267658318789223","title":"Reassembly of plural and human features in the L2 acquisition of Chinese by adult Korean speakers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plural; Mandarin Chinese; Grammaticality; Linguistics; Psychology; Feature (linguistics); Realization (probability); Language proficiency; Second-language acquisition; First language; Grammar","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02084937051139802,"gpt":0.3245268834582856,"spread":0.3036775129468876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023979,0.00008633311,0.0001532375,0.0001802447,0.0001606949,0.00007545407,0.0002010448,0.0000467194,0.001360078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003905777,0.00005802109,0.00003067558,0.00008763831,0.0004991269,0.00007883966,0.00005112413,0.0001906142,0.000007036063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001967728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002122027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01407424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03863361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988057,0.000222441,0.0002223643,0.0001580657,0.0003781978,0.000213254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990335,0.00025428,0.00008206176,0.0002441809,0.0003574152,0.00002863548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152026,0.0001803353,0.006383261,0.000295743,0.0000533518,0.00001740832,0.6464598,1.193199e-7,0.04230259,0.2994955,0.003540864,0.001155772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003776439,0.002039377,0.3279872,0.0005562386,0.00005215879,0.00003065607,0.5113087,0.0002405455,0.04229712,0.1095116,0.001527545,0.0006724867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650868,0.0001994747,0.000001302189,0.001098842,0.00007990861,0.0001998356,0.0000841074,0.000008310899,0.03324144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980739,0.00000473786,0.00002541079,0.00006425244,0.0006495947,0.000006054602,0.00006813543,0.00001191894,0.001095941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3216039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3058304167","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941560","title":"Lexical fixedness and compositionality in L1 speakers’ and L2 learners’ intuitions about word combinations: Evidence from Italian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies; Victoria University; Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Victoria University of Wellington","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Linguistics; Verb; Noun; Sentence; Psychology; Lexical density; Computer science; Lexical item; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1387673905209539,"gpt":0.4391235601719682,"spread":0.3003561696510143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009606568,0.0001530369,0.0002486209,0.0002273414,0.0002336432,0.0001768132,0.0002149664,0.0001563622,0.07393527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005299831,0.0001577296,0.00004355947,0.0005067401,0.0003991768,0.0002601967,0.0001740405,0.00101072,0.0003172563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005531264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005079622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001992621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006332057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972705,0.001057635,0.000300624,0.0005924413,0.0003485022,0.0004303202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979361,0.001345448,0.00005107686,0.000274281,0.00008717657,0.0003059568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001166856,0.001069749,0.05185413,0.0005109745,0.0003700508,0.003506666,0.7738122,0.00001425615,0.02235698,0.03835029,0.01696389,0.09002393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003390631,0.0003352649,0.7650489,0.0004190006,0.00002024557,0.00007638679,0.2221039,0.0006224423,0.0003710151,0.001341154,0.005754467,0.0005165274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679583,0.01995037,0.0000722023,0.005626826,0.00007901838,0.0003087061,0.0001092903,0.00005807528,0.005837155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949033,0.00004830066,0.0001675087,0.003454854,0.0001863237,0.00005399095,0.0001814309,0.00002240831,0.0009818405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7131948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9269113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172185839","doi":"10.1177/0267658307076544","title":"Acceptable ungrammaticality in sentence matching","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Freedman; Psychology; Computer science; History; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07067264863937919,"gpt":0.3647346799494767,"spread":0.2940620313100976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004681533,0.00009319952,0.0001517265,0.000293639,0.0002228547,0.0002523874,0.0002377548,0.00005357146,0.02105597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009755254,0.00008536448,0.00003630726,0.0001255412,0.000174308,0.0001498575,0.0001056448,0.0004542094,0.0004946137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001233541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005215345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008954989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06968573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998173,0.0001580951,0.0003244928,0.0002356983,0.0004941917,0.0006145412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986845,0.0007020142,0.00004247046,0.0002859898,0.000196039,0.00008897339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004499864,0.0001759908,0.00185171,0.0002241264,0.00002497205,0.0002810988,0.3424962,0.000003493359,0.001946306,0.638013,0.0002387397,0.01469939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080411,0.0001033097,0.01899968,0.0002226085,0.00001175649,0.00001340172,0.6107851,0.001058939,0.005356916,0.3503694,0.01144458,0.0005538333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8646567,0.000113395,0.00049425,0.00133657,0.0003464367,0.0002360283,0.00001400441,0.00003728703,0.1327653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912513,0.000002464696,0.0004433259,0.0000728677,0.0007945141,0.000006398033,0.00001692478,0.00001713335,0.00739501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2876436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068055792","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100289","title":"On parameters, functional categories and features … and why the trees shouldn't prevent us from seeing the forest …","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Feature (linguistics); Focus (optics); Feature selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Generative grammar; Artificial intelligence; Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Appeal; Psychology; Machine learning; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04347339129647482,"gpt":0.295088359937687,"spread":0.2516149686412121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006579768,0.0001138087,0.0001105868,0.00007520946,0.0007811835,0.0005861751,0.0001425013,0.0000455378,0.0009303494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004853732,0.00006173682,0.00003082155,0.00003614607,0.0003288932,0.00007629889,0.0000561393,0.0003788604,0.00001037972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000251683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002755376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005272753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03369395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988163,0.0002084074,0.0001268848,0.0002242417,0.0003749615,0.0002491725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823,0.001347205,0.00003958794,0.0002464238,0.00009227792,0.00004449843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001531037,0.00009246886,0.0008541833,0.0000304301,0.0001435563,0.00003338164,0.2070805,0.00003195132,0.0004043604,0.7661809,0.01175885,0.01323629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008630421,0.0005840833,0.2230312,0.0001193104,0.00008108471,0.00002549066,0.1254205,0.0009744067,0.001122037,0.6298991,0.01748111,0.0003985231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778702,0.002422293,0.00001868514,0.01319471,0.0002511759,0.0003004078,0.00006020311,0.00002584918,0.005856487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995344,0.00002983557,0.00002718089,0.0007686347,0.000880265,0.00001640942,0.00004303695,0.00001138476,0.002879274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.222177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884320097","doi":"10.1177/0267658318782357","title":"The acquisition of object movement in Dutch: L1 transfer and near-native grammars at the syntax–discourse interface","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; German; Computer science; Rule-based machine translation; Object (grammar); Interface (matter); Semantics (computer science); First language; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0382337861115435,"gpt":0.338757952356961,"spread":0.3005241662454176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001957695,0.0001008922,0.0001295236,0.00008659327,0.0006311098,0.000212177,0.000212059,0.00003809496,0.004001897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002823213,0.00005990232,0.00003618206,0.00007610599,0.001325413,0.00007623526,0.0001195527,0.0002436219,0.00004034408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009773935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005792492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005445755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1142047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998465,0.0003543189,0.0002431224,0.0002021041,0.0004142552,0.0003212066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998625,0.000757176,0.0000404384,0.0002786795,0.0002629252,0.0000357579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002644299,0.00008929258,0.0003181494,0.00009202307,0.0001051424,0.00001419682,0.762867,0.000003111998,0.003895591,0.2239791,0.0005881208,0.007783829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001746795,0.0009269325,0.007889277,0.0003198638,0.00004838844,0.000007057079,0.859792,0.002507424,0.06006463,0.05915744,0.007127178,0.0004130288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833655,0.0006505437,0.00004662557,0.005545821,0.0002725034,0.0004592115,0.00006831976,0.00001042974,0.009581002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994194,0.00002893117,0.00001523639,0.00008194004,0.0003634495,0.00002956934,0.000009955949,0.00001578821,0.005261135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1648216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412474950","doi":"10.1177/02676583241270763","title":"Waiting in the wings: The place of phonology in the study of multilingual grammars","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Linguistics; Rule-based machine translation; Phonology; Theoretical linguistics; Optimality theory; Grammar; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07255020060419382,"gpt":0.4681765796075703,"spread":0.3956263790033764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01043866,0.0001095201,0.0002552714,0.0005091308,0.0001370253,0.00002590395,0.001701202,0.0001428328,0.0007958901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008627118,0.00005761549,0.0000508722,0.001505645,0.0005776918,0.00002082118,0.0002819689,0.001780729,0.00002112315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002987548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001333967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01293926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03041481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935409,0.004591359,0.0004478965,0.0003177364,0.0004527261,0.0006493292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926752,0.006212755,0.00006912793,0.0009227883,0.0001020337,0.00001804295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004992371,0.001790577,0.02745797,0.00008665036,0.0001399517,0.0002937298,0.9404544,0.00001641706,0.00571965,0.002591288,0.002676697,0.01827341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001973327,0.0005376639,0.1936294,0.0000344315,0.000007035868,0.00001519128,0.8009434,0.0001707458,0.001021027,0.000919467,0.0006799339,0.00006839701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807222,0.00197634,6.145563e-7,0.001037617,0.0001048282,0.001113799,0.00001361325,0.000004122599,0.01502679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998154,0.00001613066,0.000004873707,0.0001663551,0.00003720949,0.0001691465,0.000003752444,0.000009416196,0.001439075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1661714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049648250","doi":"10.1177/0267658308100286","title":"Re-assembling formal features in second language acquisition: beyond minimalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Minimalism (technical communication); Constraint (computer-aided design); Second-language acquisition; Linguistics; Computer science; Language acquisition; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03508638679686819,"gpt":0.3318592681842706,"spread":0.2967728813874024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001955826,0.0002364381,0.0003218158,0.0007319124,0.0004526971,0.0005796752,0.000413032,0.0001634928,0.02713653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004255997,0.0002266139,0.0001035457,0.0002123363,0.0001468194,0.0004941759,0.0001102429,0.0007902202,0.0002546076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001530872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001040137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001275891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03339177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971742,0.0002563008,0.0004464405,0.0004637603,0.0007129123,0.0009463731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985517,0.0004313542,0.0001003999,0.0004925757,0.0002808791,0.0001431055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882716,0.0002797848,0.0001451312,0.0002484277,0.0000610983,0.0009901373,0.6422036,0.000003597826,0.009914745,0.3240455,0.007776716,0.01414291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005156491,0.00120044,0.02311792,0.0005617655,0.00005672146,0.00008862026,0.8155296,0.0007709563,0.03068926,0.09849861,0.02251032,0.001819332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7949215,0.001524914,0.000009304828,0.004654007,0.0004624612,0.0003810331,0.0001105533,0.00009421149,0.1978421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791169,0.000008864655,0.0002977525,0.0008574249,0.002774336,0.0000225001,0.0001852967,0.0000367668,0.01670016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2255469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242234","doi":"10.1177/02676583231156307","title":"Feature reassembly and L1 preemption: Acquiring CLLD in L2 Italian and L2 Romanian","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Clitic; Romanian; Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Second-language acquisition; Syntax; Computer science; Language transfer; First language; Psychology; Natural language processing; Natural language; Comprehension approach","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07231710467685623,"gpt":0.4476433063479808,"spread":0.3753262016711246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002098746,0.0001442654,0.0002162438,0.0007056004,0.0001895558,0.0001263285,0.0002802605,0.0002999769,0.002344931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001195391,0.0001372802,0.0000285186,0.0008700773,0.0002986464,0.00009317422,0.0003952954,0.001031479,0.0004937364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004051687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005188261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007118077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003556825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975159,0.0005036792,0.0001504142,0.0005715938,0.0003340055,0.0009244346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987895,0.0004212098,0.00002322658,0.0004741361,0.00006305013,0.0002288227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00113708,0.0004310751,0.1850328,0.0009929792,0.0004245107,0.01017469,0.2163631,0.000002165133,0.1718778,0.006727383,0.2479758,0.1588607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001246053,0.0002968475,0.9687788,0.00007109682,0.000003670051,0.0001498253,0.01317243,0.0001106937,0.0008724468,0.0009229746,0.01414685,0.0002283325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674903,0.004914777,6.027573e-7,0.002532284,0.0001319354,0.0003561845,0.00005726244,0.00005841401,0.02445821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950238,0.0002490951,0.00002812622,0.00007367702,0.0001775029,0.00008029985,0.00004753772,0.0000340582,0.0490717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.783746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327399869","doi":"10.1177/0267658313518215","title":"Locatives and existentials in L2 Spanish: The acquisition of the semantic contrasts among <i>ser, estar</i> and <i>haber</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Centres de Recerca de Catalunya","keywords":"Locative case; Linguistics; Morpheme; Syntax; Existentialism; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Cognate; Lexical semantics; Psychology; Lexical item; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02772481047402189,"gpt":0.2938114624024997,"spread":0.2660866519284778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002545346,0.00009144506,0.0001617799,0.00007782852,0.0004396974,0.0002336975,0.0001770234,0.0000383046,0.0005014109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002111844,0.00005264785,0.00003161114,0.00006130315,0.0008865654,0.0001500302,0.0001232499,0.0004803361,0.000004598631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001076171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001906675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002681237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01106997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981845,0.0009315932,0.0001780363,0.0001865043,0.000253716,0.0002656243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988608,0.0007338215,0.000066297,0.0002319103,0.00006736433,0.00003985414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009460158,0.0001794497,0.03347309,0.0009491817,0.0001105682,0.00001925376,0.8046188,0.00002585525,0.01639305,0.1084275,0.001914985,0.03379365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003970462,0.0007401831,0.3635351,0.001945519,0.00007943973,0.00004019486,0.5545145,0.003666051,0.01290282,0.008195854,0.04954043,0.0008694716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976721,0.002079301,0.000005706841,0.0004549513,0.00005916809,0.0002237301,0.00000862191,0.00001250268,0.020435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960794,0.00003344051,0.000005774151,0.0001439522,0.0001669421,0.0000114843,0.000004223815,0.00001349096,0.003541286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.330062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6177301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041989936","doi":"10.1177/0267658320941047","title":"Choosing between theories: Can L3 acquisition really decide?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Transfer (computing); Linguistics; Transfer of training; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09721731650290089,"gpt":0.3928782671099543,"spread":0.2956609506070534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009521934,0.0001816838,0.0002584776,0.0001729034,0.0003911342,0.00015125,0.0006616521,0.0001455939,0.002748125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001351,0.0001548648,0.00008755955,0.0006918982,0.0003782687,0.0001601551,0.0002889809,0.0008520281,0.0003459172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004882861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001471412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001205969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000822232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967924,0.0008932799,0.0002815663,0.0007366364,0.0005320292,0.0007641194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977915,0.001319999,0.00006505953,0.0004154002,0.00008972547,0.0003183293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000624934,0.00002306771,0.0003625762,0.00005781757,0.000009289527,0.002183314,0.01515296,8.192268e-7,0.9711713,0.0008595085,0.00145239,0.008664416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006310821,0.0003739597,0.0006783266,0.00003803385,0.000009349172,0.0001302596,0.0063627,0.00002314786,0.9841188,0.001629506,0.005696605,0.0003082798],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820488,0.0003186409,0.00004066905,0.004540811,0.00009363383,0.0003246268,0.0001530384,0.0001703028,0.01230948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921603,0.00002720599,0.00008500523,0.005679057,0.001023036,0.00001332081,0.00004002637,0.0000376749,0.0009344364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147248643","doi":"10.1177/0267658310397117","title":"The Aspect Hypothesis, defective tense, and obligatory contexts: Comments on Haznedar, 2007","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; Context (archaeology); Past tense; Psychology; Present tense; Counterexample; Verb; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09506371752583297,"gpt":0.313777610577532,"spread":0.218713893051699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001605919,0.0001365166,0.000155081,0.0001576267,0.0009012657,0.0002568045,0.0002407141,0.00005576426,0.005012568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001450794,0.00009426472,0.00004730464,0.00004473428,0.0005441225,0.00007834708,0.00009547015,0.000401717,0.0004389998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000817781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005724996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002068912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007600676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99833,0.0003611141,0.0001979388,0.0002680459,0.00040325,0.0004396685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997524,0.001646723,0.00006664238,0.0003696938,0.0002935053,0.00009938234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000230595,0.0002121937,0.0007865799,0.0000642243,0.0002417997,0.00009778727,0.2596032,4.093093e-8,0.000174942,0.7021934,0.01654999,0.01984531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002999217,0.001633633,0.04255956,0.000331698,0.00008897015,0.00002631297,0.451343,0.0001095044,0.008871903,0.3298742,0.1611661,0.0009960077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5573939,0.001934572,0.000005191803,0.001983823,0.000772294,0.000627983,0.00009143819,0.00007256145,0.4371182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905995,0.00004326759,0.00004025453,0.000453442,0.0007011166,0.00003639839,0.000005753141,0.00003093631,0.008089363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4332055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383535794","doi":"10.1177/02676583231172918","title":"Filler–gap dependencies and islands in L2 English production: Comparing transfer from L1 Norwegian and L1 Swedish","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Norwegian; Linguistics; Restructuring; Dependency (UML); First language; Filler (materials); Production (economics); Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06969445365370415,"gpt":0.3627871324802663,"spread":0.2930926788265622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068534,0.0001586721,0.0002451519,0.0004659563,0.0001661632,0.0001187601,0.0001895163,0.0001285063,0.006536681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002380828,0.0001462146,0.00002830285,0.0006757713,0.0001786315,0.0001694487,0.000132342,0.0005506928,0.0001385105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003269304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005210489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001063195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01025504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979945,0.0002334921,0.0002262081,0.0005760767,0.0003482093,0.00062146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991801,0.000307559,0.0000142835,0.0002953524,0.00007591015,0.000126772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003093687,0.0001356582,0.2734519,0.0001956627,0.0001606581,0.0009694422,0.6602179,0.000001832857,0.001832992,0.0003618328,0.02773809,0.03462461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002665999,0.00008691298,0.6329275,0.00008288791,0.00001051,0.0000211548,0.3563635,0.00004922391,0.00103117,0.0004253348,0.005894055,0.0004417194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529586,0.003494623,0.000002102224,0.0002744546,0.0004175347,0.0003285844,0.00004185105,0.000104615,0.04237758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884409,0.0001251259,0.00002887793,0.00006406751,0.0003191679,0.00007437512,0.0001681255,0.00002806754,0.01075133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3594756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001740453","doi":"10.1191/0267658305sr251ra","title":"A survey of SLA doctoral programs in Canada and the USA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Second-language acquisition; Focus (optics); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1229413616257703,"gpt":0.329385095634489,"spread":0.2064437340087186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002918822,0.0000840904,0.0001887985,0.0001113888,0.0001619726,0.000119084,0.0002075601,0.00002378898,0.007677686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002750282,0.00005335036,0.00002346838,0.00009554693,0.0003681584,0.00008565506,0.00007471243,0.0005858828,0.00001300457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008539989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003183283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981723,0.0007769176,0.0002080726,0.0001641657,0.0003171127,0.0003614142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988393,0.0007685091,0.00004307019,0.0002080893,0.0000867193,0.0000543367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001822478,0.00008165542,0.1732259,0.0001345149,0.00006449145,0.0000756845,0.3567327,0.000009086899,0.00005167357,0.01328449,0.001218016,0.4549396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007062265,0.000256883,0.4932556,0.0002362744,0.00001648185,0.00002886105,0.3723003,0.002587483,0.0003101803,0.0001158194,0.1231128,0.0007171829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774446,0.002857372,1.625034e-7,0.0001447454,0.00005062886,0.0001898451,0.00002351651,0.000007261955,0.01928186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906567,0.000007010821,0.000009381603,0.0001221753,0.0001566167,0.00001665142,0.00002095445,0.00001164211,0.008998891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4542224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407231470","doi":"10.1177/02676583241311789","title":"Activating L1-attrition: A priming experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Attrition; Estonian; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Morpheme; Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1257564320457226,"gpt":0.4587950215324075,"spread":0.3330385894866849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008067337,0.0001308759,0.0001681558,0.0003654974,0.0004498678,0.0001062229,0.0004306013,0.0001012793,0.002156084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001367984,0.0001149261,0.00006759395,0.0006598302,0.0002400521,0.0001287517,0.0002965646,0.0006301902,0.0001124994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007592437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001299513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005492615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001855742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977689,0.0005204359,0.0002178888,0.0005655209,0.0003286256,0.0005986242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998276,0.001119731,0.00003691595,0.0004255285,0.00006466097,0.00007714675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003002255,0.00007489885,0.00001681839,0.00005715307,0.000004345655,0.0007813511,0.003904711,3.963233e-7,0.980408,0.0007272922,0.00153635,0.0124587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003721884,0.00006292164,0.00004628654,0.00006737633,0.000001529562,0.00007485822,0.005760439,0.00002104167,0.9824594,0.0002370307,0.01078677,0.0001102142],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404379,0.001145601,0.00002593022,0.0006953395,0.0002052127,0.0003321383,0.00001021274,0.0001066127,0.05704109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823027,0.0000174937,0.0002041137,0.001563259,0.0001834382,0.00005915424,0.000005030596,0.00001480261,0.01565006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04186479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924016010","doi":"10.1177/026765830101700304","title":"Minimalism and beyond: second language acquisition for the twenty-first century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Minimalism (technical communication); Second-language acquisition; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06635020138870559,"gpt":0.4746037284239534,"spread":0.4082535270352479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002458678,0.0001050376,0.0001228911,0.0001757638,0.001272037,0.0002566754,0.0003346307,0.0001209482,0.01670318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000534863,0.0000819856,0.00006441803,0.0003703071,0.0003922741,0.0001619906,0.0000737538,0.0002950669,0.00009505932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009128577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002360666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003703826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02230397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.0003091109,0.0001684345,0.0002728431,0.0004309445,0.0006315887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979057,0.00137417,0.00004748028,0.0002808958,0.0001665131,0.0002252706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032095,0.0001319016,0.0005497367,0.0001259149,0.00004976289,0.00002774027,0.8181676,4.865651e-7,0.002386515,0.01858994,0.03962011,0.1202471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003891878,0.00003735006,0.001936024,0.00001093951,0.000006023955,0.000005213218,0.242713,0.00004922298,0.000423976,0.0002018503,0.7541149,0.000112336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8811986,0.007763405,0.000007356149,0.006875636,0.0003642146,0.000802171,0.0001056412,0.00004840744,0.1028346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416111,0.000638896,0.0001015745,0.001567913,0.001591979,0.0001029352,0.00004423079,0.00002062048,0.05432081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7144948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386001447","doi":"10.1177/02676583231191611","title":"Orthographic influence in the distributional learning of non-native speech sounds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University","keywords":"Orthography; Orthographic projection; Contrast (vision); Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05258751661107422,"gpt":0.4485349752536292,"spread":0.395947458642555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005289098,0.00009238041,0.0001616387,0.0007055037,0.0001807405,0.00003651388,0.0006370355,0.0001406064,0.003331588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006006841,0.00006999628,0.00006264928,0.003044132,0.0005885757,0.00004889773,0.0001961982,0.00158676,0.0005086983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002585378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001174574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970179,0.001096398,0.0002297069,0.0002996671,0.0006412099,0.000715122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974887,0.001787063,0.00004165603,0.0003885937,0.0002328575,0.00006113441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005533282,0.0007541643,0.5355381,0.0002565819,0.0003442258,0.002857189,0.3051141,0.0001352122,0.08875631,0.01911082,0.01747158,0.02910835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004897122,0.0002298862,0.9705207,0.00002051918,0.000001773239,0.00002351637,0.02412228,0.0001725775,0.000958619,0.00166083,0.001711716,0.00008784964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798976,0.0004145732,0.000007341402,0.0003196886,0.00005723879,0.0002746307,0.00007686138,0.00001893515,0.01893316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954246,0.00003755748,0.000008041463,0.00003055936,0.0000583325,0.0001002733,0.0001052118,0.00001234531,0.004223041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4349826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012970202","doi":"10.1177/0267658320914962","title":"Visual cues during interaction: Are recasts different from noncorrective repetition?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gaze; Corrective feedback; Eye tracking; Fluency; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1161080931058013,"gpt":0.3925278262213133,"spread":0.276419733115512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201051,0.0001784494,0.0002437986,0.0001438604,0.0005411149,0.000580275,0.0004107872,0.00005739638,0.04456886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001778882,0.0001485508,0.00009757381,0.0001012677,0.0002863547,0.0004595255,0.0003016522,0.0008100203,0.000691806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001164524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000519956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009509473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008981325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.000471606,0.00026729,0.0003973431,0.0004746399,0.0003597561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986059,0.0003853547,0.0001415951,0.0004391544,0.0002655565,0.0001624513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005803903,0.0005301476,0.002712162,0.0002704895,0.0004922944,0.0005143865,0.9408224,0.000005310342,0.01649587,0.01557742,0.0156903,0.006308868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007888306,0.0002087204,0.0118713,0.0002219836,0.00002247611,0.000006751665,0.9477246,0.0001400754,0.0166753,0.0007263716,0.02120917,0.0004044042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961661,0.0009664302,0.000003783446,0.001508083,0.000257682,0.0002283485,0.0002231299,0.0001505153,0.1004959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915535,0.00007904038,0.00001889709,0.0002136393,0.001850957,0.00006808834,0.0001787509,0.0000361496,0.006000979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09538738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}