{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"b70262a2638f","filters":{"venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice"}},"results":[{"id":"W2067838808","doi":"10.1002/spip.213","title":"Formalizing cardinality‐based feature models and their specialization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":594,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Feature model; Cardinality (data modeling); Context (archaeology); Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Natural language processing; Programming language; Theoretical computer science; Data mining; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02183396302231302,"gpt":0.2790919630576724,"spread":0.2572580000353594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006648835,0.0002412665,0.0001908082,0.0001025645,0.0002041225,0.0003343186,0.0003107839,0.0001106197,0.0000020917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001017854,0.0002133438,0.0000337126,0.0002358255,0.00003484041,0.003657402,0.0001855493,0.000211781,8.879609e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005418247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007113103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001579446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004576393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987426,0.00005250261,0.0002074576,0.0004552353,0.0002585864,0.0002835521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989234,0.0002149284,0.000167949,0.0003427798,0.0002404337,0.0001105762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000510412,0.0000824501,0.000236505,0.0003086675,0.0000455439,0.000003892957,0.003261086,0.003183798,0.0003201019,0.03371017,0.0004723709,0.9583244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001053856,0.000404274,0.0001132523,0.0001817186,0.00007028877,0.00008880159,0.000138349,0.697745,0.01563036,0.01620045,0.2673948,0.0009789123],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001159193,0.001086871,0.993844,0.002457304,0.00007818688,0.0003541441,0.000007592369,0.0007729689,0.0002396891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3065527,0.0001855949,0.6916276,0.001335913,0.0001355783,0.00007494247,0.0000107374,0.00002289135,0.00005401175],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8699907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995689188","doi":"10.1002/spip.225","title":"Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":420,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Abstraction; Feature model; Computer science; Cardinality (data modeling); Notation; Configuration design; Product (mathematics); Configurator; Process (computing); Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Data mining; Software; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04990267850207869,"gpt":0.3324683825406449,"spread":0.2825657040385662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005806359,0.0001731979,0.0001868947,0.00005760083,0.0001302699,0.0001199562,0.0001728942,0.000101902,0.00000504887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002720436,0.0001652152,0.00001696404,0.0001454867,0.00007182095,0.004801281,0.00007168498,0.0001583627,8.575647e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003012434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000536473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009839005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002609019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988321,0.0001009331,0.000265518,0.0003621708,0.0002669203,0.0001723716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979564,0.001110586,0.0003306792,0.0002167105,0.0003415239,0.00004409066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001426432,0.0001012295,0.00004265041,0.000400834,0.00005449542,0.000002248055,0.01123195,0.0243452,0.0114157,0.04339154,0.0001180292,0.9087535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005353622,0.001517299,0.0009130072,0.0003460972,0.0002437832,0.0001011256,0.003141044,0.1719671,0.5584028,0.2362805,0.0196867,0.002046935],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001556688,0.0008031649,0.9955301,0.00115156,0.0001341783,0.000372211,0.000007657683,0.0002334062,0.0002110483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2464319,0.00041176,0.7524875,0.0003693395,0.00007794659,0.00003288182,0.00001499072,0.00001279476,0.0001608023],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039785095","doi":"10.1002/spip.189","title":"The GNOME project: a case study of open source, global software development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University of Edmonton","keywords":"Software project management; Unix; Software development; Software; Software engineering; Open source software; Computer science; Project management; Premise; World Wide Web; Engineering; Software construction; Systems engineering; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04095584641680198,"gpt":0.3574660336794183,"spread":0.3165101872626163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869167,0.0003341483,0.0003142318,0.00009444431,0.0014508,0.001474,0.001727982,0.00008116983,0.000006602035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007096337,0.0002565105,0.00003240271,0.001688544,0.0001052816,0.002734214,0.001325529,0.000279783,0.000007306487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001148906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00112531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006786571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003477542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968866,0.0003250403,0.0008098003,0.0007732011,0.00069503,0.0005103091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953555,0.001503849,0.0007700685,0.000901946,0.001349513,0.0001191112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808205,0.003092975,0.03610104,0.0002552228,0.0005544224,0.0004276755,0.0401967,0.00004346132,0.00001153534,0.004537062,0.001089204,0.9135099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01335181,0.006645862,0.002753092,0.0002820763,0.0005534494,0.00966595,0.2610174,0.0003331407,0.001544602,0.01309704,0.6871269,0.003628581],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3383413,0.0006762983,0.6517109,0.0007209498,0.0006512341,0.006081727,0.0000152588,0.0005158248,0.001286482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7641725,0.00001921136,0.2334609,0.0007584546,0.00003543769,0.0009105611,0.000004284182,0.00003819463,0.0006004497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040225071","doi":"10.1002/spip.146","title":"Findings from Phase 2 of the SPICE trials","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Spice; Usability; Computer science; Empirical research; Software engineering; Dimension (graph theory); Process (computing); Reliability engineering; Systems engineering; Process management; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05926722609592025,"gpt":0.3780309595307635,"spread":0.3187637334348432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002384788,0.0001581321,0.0002650195,0.00007235575,0.0001462385,0.0001859663,0.0009000448,0.00006929503,0.00004343598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02985427,0.0001113749,0.0000654054,0.0005747912,0.00005901112,0.001183333,0.0003563789,0.0002514079,0.000007210316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002869075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001367717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001090793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002780824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981639,0.0001687773,0.0004109919,0.0003831762,0.0005954067,0.000277705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909194,0.00789748,0.0002754119,0.0005507846,0.0002637406,0.00009319051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006757169,0.001006557,0.0281414,0.0003535227,0.0003661061,0.00004018654,0.006234218,0.00005065457,0.01999216,0.001278259,0.001819276,0.940042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03389775,0.005626704,0.04852263,0.001235962,0.001107959,0.0003761727,0.003007713,0.009905506,0.5042951,0.04999761,0.3382014,0.003825495],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5329897,0.001364038,0.459815,0.003869485,0.0006696949,0.0007901861,0.00003272726,0.0002873042,0.0001818469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713162,0.0002271352,0.02735346,0.0006414929,0.0001212041,0.00007112523,0.000004687274,0.00001897467,0.000245692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094978367","doi":"10.1002/spip.273","title":"Release planning process improvement — an industrial case study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Process management; Strategic planning; Engineering; Computer science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04372177011068892,"gpt":0.3482280893731499,"spread":0.304506319262461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995688,0.0004445596,0.0003224038,0.0002760334,0.0005663207,0.0009744286,0.0008600574,0.0001631379,0.0000105087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003341107,0.0004266709,0.00004220968,0.0008583643,0.00006300498,0.004027984,0.0004022143,0.0007405782,0.000008149884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003926841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001128838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003745399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961455,0.0001645245,0.000606353,0.001181175,0.001100287,0.0008021728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963543,0.001589617,0.0003382635,0.0008127266,0.0005665352,0.0003385434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001056895,0.00877448,0.1571846,0.0009385798,0.0004655146,0.01797726,0.02573943,0.003914595,0.001388238,0.0003700007,0.001469384,0.780721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1195574,0.145116,0.02862567,0.001843215,0.003577379,0.04709846,0.3422659,0.1271563,0.08521698,0.03019468,0.03915262,0.03019549],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114193,0.0003657457,0.08475383,0.0003320408,0.0004130638,0.001681844,0.000009210226,0.0009372591,0.00008765134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918363,0.000005430496,0.006856349,0.0002425283,0.0004240925,0.0004442783,0.00001336712,0.00005318449,0.0001244709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7505255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039729958","doi":"10.1002/spip.298","title":"Using Data Envelopment Analysis in software development productivity measurement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Data envelopment analysis; Productivity; Software; Computer science; Function point; Software development; Function (biology); Regression analysis; Process (computing); Linear regression; Industrial engineering; Engineering; Statistics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09050916239602833,"gpt":0.3356399786467488,"spread":0.2451308162507205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005007737,0.0003632277,0.0003836821,0.0006273394,0.0002816124,0.0004410131,0.001410236,0.00009823027,0.000008367368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006226144,0.0003622349,0.00003833402,0.002258237,0.00005401434,0.002946787,0.001319096,0.0003712533,0.000006993152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004902286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008394207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004566809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002979794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953848,0.0001515971,0.0006274632,0.001426211,0.001688082,0.0007218201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968035,0.0008845457,0.0002737424,0.001318591,0.0005719813,0.0001475907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001728463,0.001819786,0.3180989,0.0009551161,0.00119503,0.0001368603,0.002949674,0.006213193,0.001721608,0.0001981931,0.0003870427,0.6661517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008426898,0.0008328243,0.7305554,0.0008791092,0.001998768,0.0002750879,0.001199171,0.07759574,0.05673296,0.005330518,0.1078502,0.008323351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05965584,0.001219082,0.9371561,0.0006044818,0.0001919607,0.0007168528,0.000009386794,0.0004069065,0.0000393377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5306774,0.00002795435,0.4688946,0.0001084098,0.00007110817,0.00009856655,0.00004408599,0.00002618179,0.0000517126],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6578283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253579069","doi":"10.1002/spip.401","title":"Does distance still matter?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; International Business Machines Corporation","keywords":"IBM; Computer science; Jazz; Task (project management); Software; Software development; Data science; Software engineering; Process management; Systems engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0132063072663505,"gpt":0.2708558130445509,"spread":0.2576495057782003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896594,0.0002317223,0.0001860413,0.00007196189,0.0002540205,0.0002213519,0.0005828053,0.0000772177,0.00003644303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001097663,0.0001585339,0.00003572084,0.0002918962,0.00006829848,0.003393457,0.0002296066,0.0002584091,0.00003411277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002740227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006873051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003995626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001954094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984688,0.0000549897,0.0002571485,0.000525619,0.0003585267,0.0003349638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978395,0.001110504,0.0002376338,0.0004940502,0.0001881281,0.0001302031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005848668,0.001129802,0.04795154,0.001827748,0.0003935386,0.001354755,0.01752191,0.00007712217,0.0007946683,0.01287895,0.01612012,0.899365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001391771,0.0009970854,0.0052994,0.0001866804,0.0001195934,0.002062408,0.0004091072,0.002218192,0.008504043,0.02910824,0.9476326,0.002070923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004397496,0.0007093242,0.9888398,0.003511435,0.0004634235,0.0002782166,0.000007594072,0.001024697,0.0007680387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5906399,0.0008728686,0.4045176,0.00282974,0.0001385374,0.0001386742,0.000005466578,0.00003367592,0.0008235615],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6464826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148316074","doi":"10.1002/spip.164","title":"IMMoS: a methodology for integrated measurement, modelling and simulation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Novelty; Process (computing); Component (thermodynamics); Systems engineering; Software; Industrial engineering; System dynamics; Empirical research; Software engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1605950262362506,"gpt":0.3499547941458936,"spread":0.189359767909643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149735,0.0001953973,0.000188926,0.0001001588,0.0002045193,0.0002726932,0.000234076,0.0001032574,0.000006935445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005054947,0.0001794539,0.00002851337,0.0002245915,0.0000284412,0.002050067,0.00009481508,0.0001869188,0.000001286461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003246035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002597962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003388433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001710561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986426,0.0001173634,0.0002632905,0.0004611989,0.0002546035,0.000260975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956996,0.003247715,0.0002423234,0.0002351427,0.0004897254,0.00008546431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000191449,0.0001610682,0.00009310005,0.0005096975,0.0001504742,0.000006665798,0.003365353,0.0155099,0.0004667332,0.002650399,0.000297645,0.9765975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112205,0.000567744,0.00000575492,0.00005228669,0.0000908,0.00004394774,0.0001637888,0.9342864,0.001128058,0.01338241,0.04930728,0.0003603717],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006956634,0.002565113,0.9942551,0.001224254,0.0001489465,0.0005060667,0.000004179329,0.0005319611,0.00006875556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.233874,0.0004413757,0.7649161,0.0005263091,0.00004600222,0.0001368824,0.000002512391,0.00001777542,0.00003903164],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7317917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158691832","doi":"10.1002/spip.411","title":"A customizable pattern‐based software process simulation model: design, calibration and application","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Novelty; Empirical research; Software; Macro; Data mining; Empirical modelling; Software engineering; Industrial engineering; Systems engineering; Simulation; Engineering; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02559263340314474,"gpt":0.2981755064410041,"spread":0.2725828730378594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050282,0.0008881586,0.0007863495,0.0006162488,0.0008136099,0.00161875,0.0003899583,0.0006128917,0.0001096248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00124933,0.0008592821,0.0001046714,0.0009468517,0.00009991418,0.005361262,0.0001332289,0.0006261097,0.00009189433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000738954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003477737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000189707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961558,0.00005194091,0.0008832777,0.001444963,0.0008522734,0.0006117325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955312,0.000469094,0.001780283,0.000464775,0.001684794,0.00006988201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004630006,0.0002911262,0.0001243103,0.005489719,0.0001126865,0.0000027089,0.0001580664,0.7640173,0.00003946305,0.00001141021,0.002822537,0.2264677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001140415,0.00005973861,0.000003908303,0.0004207733,0.001062838,0.000002844359,0.0001805982,0.9854486,0.00008580925,0.00304763,0.007468785,0.00107806],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003987514,0.001850583,0.9936021,0.00141857,0.0001845077,0.001460831,0.00004498474,0.0004254034,0.0006142663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957759,0.0006797507,0.01603856,0.01483978,0.00215752,0.001280773,0.003371087,0.0003618192,0.00351172],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995844596","doi":"10.1002/spip.204","title":"Multi‐project software engineering analysis using systems thinking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Construct (python library); Project management; Architecture; Process management; Engineering management; Systems engineering; Knowledge management; Management science; Engineering; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02858992345188591,"gpt":0.3119905925897418,"spread":0.2834006691378558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001456404,0.0004086911,0.0004139678,0.0005271528,0.0003754879,0.001085613,0.0008174973,0.0001738615,0.000002715635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003555116,0.0003961849,0.0001204984,0.001772056,0.00002989866,0.004027179,0.0003769049,0.0004520783,0.00000354308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001568317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002096469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006701769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000638669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974969,0.00006853297,0.0004805493,0.0007884288,0.0006133477,0.0005522614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972808,0.00114897,0.0004402046,0.0006439777,0.0003366218,0.0001494395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004165432,0.002071537,0.01825009,0.006155352,0.009768059,0.001229842,0.03665079,0.7871748,0.005826995,0.01896609,0.0001983278,0.1132916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007950497,0.002520681,0.002329533,0.00180656,0.008020913,0.002766389,0.00430655,0.907655,0.009019028,0.005280554,0.03950506,0.008839221],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009025583,0.002176852,0.9856621,0.0001707788,0.000459056,0.0005173339,0.00001001221,0.001964145,0.00001412428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1656568,0.0001838923,0.8336259,0.0002756261,0.00009903839,0.00008645694,0.000009881105,0.00004134624,0.00002104155],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1566313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155184480","doi":"10.1002/spip.336","title":"A System Dynamics Simulation Model for Analyzing the Stability of Software Release Plans","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Plan (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Dependency (UML); Software; Stability (learning theory); Productivity; Software release life cycle; Operations research; Strategic planning; Work (physics); Sensitivity (control systems); Focus (optics); Industrial engineering; Systems engineering; Software engineering; Software development; Engineering; Software quality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02657132745440927,"gpt":0.3117158007559024,"spread":0.2851444733014932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003437089,0.0002034232,0.0002122248,0.00009002448,0.0002764639,0.000154974,0.0005179429,0.0001070141,9.046445e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004975853,0.0001600478,0.00006668131,0.0003490928,0.00004730932,0.001596161,0.000152561,0.0002203529,3.480526e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004209451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002640794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984052,0.00005608793,0.0004827844,0.0004154924,0.0003231841,0.0003173076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914677,0.006809912,0.0005484066,0.0005296834,0.0005559197,0.00008840198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001658482,0.0005063069,0.009839468,0.005928661,0.0003411347,0.00001632936,0.009789219,0.09943379,0.0002873986,0.02096521,0.00009718441,0.8511368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003268348,0.00023723,0.00009091163,0.00007188326,0.0001047079,0.00001494003,0.0005802762,0.9946049,0.0009722513,0.002388118,0.0003694198,0.000238565],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007473973,0.0003093656,0.9903108,0.000360606,0.0001277579,0.0007601415,0.00004921235,0.0005768106,0.00003133829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6986144,0.00002269352,0.3011428,0.00009815292,0.00003152147,0.000054439,0.00001050771,0.00001554562,0.000009911185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6526558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034942038","doi":"10.1002/spip.310","title":"Evaluation of a black‐box estimation tool: A case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Estimation; Computer science; Outlier; White box; Black box; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Software; Data science; Data mining; Industrial engineering; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0475530894494392,"gpt":0.3843926142398773,"spread":0.3368395247904381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01267991,0.0001432161,0.000138409,0.0001902204,0.000113005,0.0001479306,0.0002742619,0.00005210038,0.000007740563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01859989,0.00013805,0.00002102376,0.0005980129,0.00003895178,0.001682284,0.0001724133,0.0001765645,0.000004590672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008953248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002496322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001333481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002388362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973555,0.000150147,0.0003598527,0.0003911385,0.0014732,0.0002702161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950467,0.00278235,0.0002181886,0.0004095112,0.001462118,0.00008106966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006086896,0.0006114529,0.004659407,0.0001982341,0.0001022049,0.0002111051,0.01141603,0.0008945608,0.0002483753,0.0001053757,0.00002642605,0.9814659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02044694,0.01375432,0.04116839,0.0004244415,0.002546165,0.006646316,0.0591818,0.8005921,0.03298909,0.01817387,0.0007923862,0.0032842],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4960677,0.0001291175,0.5027755,0.00007414319,0.0000843029,0.0006994881,8.757138e-7,0.0001234141,0.00004550404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429541,0.000004946708,0.05686921,0.00004782194,0.00002969579,0.00006626392,0.000001421558,0.00001190878,0.00001467447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984455889","doi":"10.1002/spip.161","title":"Simulations for very early lifecycle quality evaluations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; West Virginia University; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Computer science; Interdependence; Quality (philosophy); Outcome (game theory); Key (lock); Monte Carlo method; Process (computing); Software engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0773490813847675,"gpt":0.3976941463140998,"spread":0.3203450649293323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001095104,0.0001488628,0.0001372396,0.0001094723,0.0003489242,0.0003645575,0.0004012644,0.00006739735,0.00003404922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01856608,0.0001516812,0.00004146578,0.0004092712,0.00003594153,0.002096901,0.0001379568,0.0001726979,0.00002447936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004823386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006574363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002742694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003293739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983535,0.00008283392,0.0002778723,0.0004394548,0.0005054772,0.0003409095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908201,0.007921867,0.0001323302,0.0004274267,0.0005636769,0.0001346085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001378213,0.00105115,0.02069923,0.000943891,0.0003000835,0.000006244478,0.01027244,0.003001806,0.001848342,0.007137163,0.002922154,0.9516796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01517185,0.006186747,0.108867,0.0003571887,0.0006093415,0.00008825894,0.001295168,0.6461375,0.0121935,0.08004051,0.1238701,0.005182855],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04994415,0.0006284246,0.9448841,0.002757718,0.0002659785,0.0008492918,0.00003048476,0.0005008013,0.0001390135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168612,0.00003566356,0.0818416,0.0004593932,0.0001070375,0.0002387126,0.000008296989,0.0000198341,0.0004282189],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086386816","doi":"10.1002/spip.143","title":"View‐based process elicitation: a user's perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Personalization; Order (exchange); Software engineering; Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02272363878601184,"gpt":0.3046367525709577,"spread":0.2819131137849459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008123047,0.000412061,0.0003637494,0.0003744263,0.0006432361,0.0008443367,0.0003256812,0.0001274237,0.0001843282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002733311,0.0003752059,0.0000915144,0.001538048,0.0001066102,0.005039838,0.00008784568,0.0002958899,0.00008588105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005354976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001444671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005515423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006052558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976084,0.0000219495,0.0004530252,0.0007754583,0.0006520212,0.0004891357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962425,0.0002728029,0.0005967672,0.0002890612,0.002553656,0.00004524756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006400433,0.005238733,0.07104237,0.01244727,0.001600494,0.0003285086,0.006484037,0.01006666,0.001108634,0.02655936,0.0037366,0.8549869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01551248,0.0006896689,0.003335713,0.001812372,0.006666937,0.0001778681,0.09498201,0.1735226,0.001150679,0.1914868,0.5028238,0.007839025],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3950208,0.009957774,0.4328412,0.09620599,0.001448609,0.003601933,0.00003441392,0.004035818,0.05685356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834425,0.0001648353,0.001879406,0.01292467,0.0009164129,0.0002303454,0.00005405418,0.00006981981,0.0003179485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8471479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240056776","doi":"10.1002/spip.360","title":"A method for re‐planning of software releases using discrete‐event simulation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Universität Ulm","keywords":"Planner; Computer science; Task (project management); Process (computing); Operational planning; Software release life cycle; Software; Operations research; Event (particle physics); Plan (archaeology); Phase (matter); Discrete event simulation; Work (physics); Product (mathematics); Realization (probability); Industrial engineering; Simulation; Systems engineering; Engineering; Software system; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07030822308933612,"gpt":0.411553605923078,"spread":0.341245382833742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001115658,0.0002196842,0.0002715102,0.0001792873,0.0003190041,0.00008943309,0.0004170662,0.00009356509,0.000004534334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01404196,0.0002124422,0.0000715796,0.0004625511,0.00005285422,0.001649079,0.000216531,0.0001950668,8.2779e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006334583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002335737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005264216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.858449e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979954,0.0000951832,0.0004156419,0.00053601,0.0005621299,0.0003956524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898396,0.008691275,0.000346734,0.0003850577,0.0006093765,0.000128012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001272371,0.0007202487,0.03521986,0.004507634,0.0005108429,0.0001002326,0.01760999,0.4040931,0.004994363,0.0005155903,0.0003933766,0.5300623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003388796,0.002292555,0.003476814,0.000700152,0.0002398654,0.0002442504,0.001067572,0.9529547,0.02246653,0.005004745,0.006728433,0.001435557],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02439218,0.0009022315,0.9734575,0.0001762733,0.0001241377,0.00064601,0.00001403057,0.0002798731,0.000007746285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3906491,0.00002629972,0.6090204,0.0001132855,0.00005585369,0.0000651251,0.000006896876,0.00002395842,0.00003903346],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5488616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230500706","doi":"10.1002/spip.374","title":"Optimized mismatch resolution for COTS selection","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Embedded Systems Design Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Reliability engineering; Software; Systems engineering; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Domain (mathematical analysis); Product (mathematics); Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03436764899921617,"gpt":0.3129931203933215,"spread":0.2786254713941053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059931,0.0001696534,0.0001832863,0.00009329747,0.0004266696,0.0001359568,0.0003098392,0.0001091776,0.000002881852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001363975,0.0001637515,0.00004004169,0.0002888213,0.00003797776,0.002035834,0.00007746873,0.000137759,0.00000414574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006411455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001477037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003783232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001753244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998535,0.0001076234,0.0003051635,0.0004649044,0.0002990861,0.0002882557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980934,0.0007420211,0.0003123573,0.0002441141,0.0005258878,0.00008218685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005266751,0.002583067,0.002431502,0.005203763,0.000864461,0.0001006189,0.03846628,0.0008019785,0.07040875,0.03560401,0.105002,0.7332668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01572637,0.01107214,0.0004660303,0.000629804,0.0004615389,0.003786718,0.001794387,0.2402724,0.4376045,0.08359318,0.1999739,0.004619048],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001414358,0.0003883099,0.9947855,0.0009748234,0.0001684162,0.001040173,0.000003223298,0.0007820271,0.0004431113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.126715,0.0001856929,0.8709362,0.0008026565,0.0001113503,0.0005977763,0.00000750044,0.0000223508,0.0006214711],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7286478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6677593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236348706","doi":"10.1002/spip.433","title":"Strengthening maturity levels by a legal assurance process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Capability Maturity Model Integration; Maturity (psychological); Process (computing); Process management; Capability Maturity Model; Engineering; Business; Engineering management; Computer science; Software development process; Law; Software development; Political science; Software","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01629576416148724,"gpt":0.3120156411751855,"spread":0.2957198770136983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128122,0.0003131013,0.0002488399,0.0001132745,0.0002913658,0.0007604372,0.0009288151,0.0001191484,0.00001248162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007411954,0.0003007566,0.00004000141,0.000633865,0.00004863557,0.004077623,0.0001421078,0.0005670495,0.00001230546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005682138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002394262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002209107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001599467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972917,0.0000753827,0.000352872,0.0007700631,0.0008605114,0.0006494244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996687,0.001957071,0.0002157905,0.000488231,0.0004227452,0.0002291579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002486316,0.000755916,0.002397408,0.000920568,0.0001377199,0.00009249697,0.004502373,0.0001570154,0.005677947,0.001821799,0.004274796,0.9790133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02431951,0.01741357,0.056937,0.003077921,0.0006962723,0.002911921,0.005521893,0.05118513,0.4350482,0.09270424,0.2928397,0.01734467],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1116267,0.003320087,0.8718458,0.009037146,0.0004278692,0.0009680086,0.00004386642,0.001921849,0.0008087077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599882,0.00006588057,0.03833633,0.00114512,0.00008774699,0.00006732089,0.000007080646,0.00002225424,0.0002801095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240378625","doi":"10.1002/spip.381","title":"Performing operational release planning, replanning and risk analysis using a system dynamics simulation model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Process Improvement and Practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Software release life cycle; Computer science; Operational planning; Process (computing); Task (project management); Plan (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Strategic planning; Software; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability (semiconductor); Resource allocation; Process management; Systems engineering; Software development; Engineering; Software quality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03016757142866593,"gpt":0.3144105149392518,"spread":0.2842429435105858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009401939,0.0002095372,0.0002216187,0.0002313213,0.0007524241,0.0002877903,0.0002058925,0.00009568081,0.00000121166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001432086,0.0002053129,0.00004131258,0.0005164996,0.00003339077,0.003213277,0.0001613476,0.0002802635,4.325402e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009304337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001257282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002062777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985032,0.00007445682,0.0003249729,0.0005077512,0.0003545115,0.0002351253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997847,0.001079893,0.000411347,0.0002939309,0.000255546,0.0001122726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008813164,0.00004051568,0.03173994,0.0001928173,0.0002969063,0.00004898874,0.003378961,0.9478487,0.00001951058,0.0005966,0.000009119218,0.01573982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002094533,0.00009843512,0.000418564,0.00004804539,0.0003750551,0.000184654,0.0003043219,0.9978138,0.00004122201,0.0001480358,0.00009496398,0.0002634957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2081732,0.0004740559,0.790593,0.00005228474,0.0000451289,0.0001793631,0.00001015296,0.0004240463,0.00004871755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6676208,0.0001095416,0.3321017,0.00007721294,0.00002973733,0.00001777426,0.0000119818,0.00001182142,0.00001943667],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8372419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}