{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b59149ec0bd2","filters":{"venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice"}},"results":[{"id":"W11550258","doi":"10.1002/mrm.1236","title":"A comparison of South African and Canadian anti-terrorism legislation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Duty; Political science; Legislation; Publicity; Democracy; Listing (finance); Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04988849936487587,"gpt":0.3452407630339255,"spread":0.2953522636690496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001456005,0.0002322439,0.0006349892,0.0005553789,0.0005090958,0.00012763,0.0005865562,0.0001654474,0.0001222236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001253466,0.0002225701,0.0001538408,0.0006029168,0.0007742522,0.00050204,0.00005157318,0.0005413986,0.00002239376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002974524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00106763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009599217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01006796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996771,0.0003715474,0.0009326072,0.0002486269,0.001001217,0.0006750316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967469,0.0002504883,0.001139618,0.0002319879,0.0006950464,0.0009359609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001046137,0.00006788462,0.01085351,0.00007057475,0.00005132092,0.00003401011,0.9819466,0.0003328632,0.00006463704,0.002605574,0.0002349612,0.00363346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007693457,0.0004558829,0.006499916,0.000132876,0.001904465,0.00002319428,0.9089617,0.0003515783,0.0001430132,0.0001738134,0.08016326,0.0004209714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319021,0.002295764,0.001312321,0.002115527,0.0008823283,0.0002700025,0.00006332138,0.00003243182,0.06112628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993835,0.00001692414,0.004444352,0.0001216803,0.001299752,0.000001757147,0.000001309466,0.00002522076,0.0002539514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07992829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258367759","doi":"","title":"Regulating cases of 'extreme hate speech' in South Africa : a suggested framework for a legislated criminal sanction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Incitement; Mandate; Harm; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Botha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04765374763878635,"gpt":0.2697585790390171,"spread":0.2221048314002308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001582416,0.0002875083,0.0005861366,0.0006770967,0.0001833033,0.0001349155,0.0006836122,0.0001666314,0.000009134731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002989677,0.0002646306,0.0002539695,0.0009303949,0.0001167486,0.0004864718,0.00008348336,0.0005459093,0.000005042366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001887829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002401319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007994023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970073,0.0002956099,0.001077609,0.0003840661,0.0006530522,0.0005824362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963454,0.0008117523,0.001420013,0.0004246608,0.0007506368,0.0002475597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01012794,0.001290505,0.001507723,0.005198365,0.0004953077,0.001327451,0.5874462,0.01887874,0.02902186,0.05517244,0.0002990923,0.2892344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01818465,0.03121071,0.01315029,0.01073444,0.01291819,0.008338799,0.4416982,0.3189133,0.08036401,0.05610815,0.003385785,0.004993404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4753555,0.0001330396,0.5234292,0.0000778217,0.0005072536,0.0001610241,0.00000569125,0.00003708995,0.000293446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8414446,0.000002760934,0.1580642,0.00004365879,0.0003729523,0.00000590668,9.63386e-7,0.00002292781,0.00004203874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3660891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287127029","doi":"","title":"'Stacking the odds against the accused' : appraising the curial attitude towards amici participation in criminal matters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Odds; Political science; Jurisprudence; Compromise; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tebello Thabane","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1306880141118046,"gpt":0.3707971402106607,"spread":0.2401091260988561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005121127,0.0002279156,0.0003053514,0.0001510698,0.001359184,0.0003136686,0.001457045,0.00008175184,0.00009368624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847399,0.0001195727,0.0002301379,0.0005485186,0.001124692,0.000552711,0.0001237048,0.0008007427,0.00002297653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001692709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005085173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001145532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007299813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960154,0.001132559,0.0008068048,0.0002198807,0.00113358,0.0006917254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973539,0.0009827999,0.000763837,0.0003327528,0.0003809783,0.0001857749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007522061,0.0001252244,0.001010447,0.000112216,0.00005391786,0.0001138975,0.9677953,0.0004448282,0.0001366439,0.01240332,0.0005233285,0.01652869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004812696,0.0002513922,0.02137753,0.0003560786,0.002664177,0.00004719017,0.9666212,0.0001994262,0.000153774,0.0007235123,0.006822424,0.0003020433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738628,0.0004462089,0.002665841,0.01213891,0.00166375,0.0003069542,0.000004508755,0.00002081368,0.008890164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961174,0.00008574095,0.0002902786,0.002003548,0.001426493,0.000009922464,3.340622e-7,0.00001941124,0.00004685487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02225456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900986889","doi":"","title":"Constitutional exclusion under s 35(5) of the Constitution: should an accused bear a 'threshold burden' of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dane Ally","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1186084381249842,"gpt":0.3408303341006635,"spread":0.2222218959756793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001773553,0.0002616661,0.0005115804,0.0001765287,0.00139498,0.0001291993,0.00103298,0.0002320345,0.000809559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001576585,0.0001778636,0.0002906571,0.0004360224,0.01552411,0.0008949147,0.0001702488,0.0008809201,0.000005844231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00490195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004647177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006476244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962798,0.0002734561,0.0008997051,0.0002873403,0.001801631,0.0004580719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963259,0.0005619986,0.001207809,0.0003420958,0.001164228,0.0003980243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001345693,0.0003264461,0.003270593,0.0003870276,0.0001210563,0.0001272462,0.04270768,0.00188743,0.009704566,0.9390978,0.0004644587,0.0005600209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007799376,0.002569161,0.00889959,0.005254206,0.01431731,0.003154781,0.7382649,0.0006278256,0.02066786,0.01319456,0.1826897,0.002560675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582778,0.0003292025,0.007725713,0.005107913,0.003129053,0.0005648548,0.0001293121,0.00003725774,0.02469889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965622,0.00001965218,0.002095751,0.000186015,0.0009586063,0.000003909621,0.000002122619,0.000007739073,0.0001639776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9259032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824834794","doi":"","title":"Sentencing the corporate offender in South Africa : a comparative approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Punishment (psychology); Commission; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Corporate crime; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Corporate law; Sentence; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Corporate governance","authors":[{"name":"Du Toit","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1706108760139859,"gpt":0.3380569271859532,"spread":0.1674460511719673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149966,0.0002868916,0.0005811991,0.0003033761,0.0006126047,0.00015515,0.0009946127,0.0001274434,0.00007307684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001213501,0.0002000014,0.0002167596,0.001193276,0.00123057,0.0006569637,0.0001226701,0.001022642,0.00006527756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003082318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005193328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008109603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001973027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952496,0.001293644,0.0008296725,0.000231174,0.001317898,0.001078068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965067,0.0006261424,0.001443944,0.000296589,0.0005613492,0.0005652903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002086281,0.000155552,0.003248864,0.00005271753,0.00005001061,0.00003174118,0.9888933,0.0003014369,0.00002195617,0.006656955,0.0002525025,0.0001263047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005177889,0.0001117656,0.001285399,0.00005770368,0.0008910076,0.00002534878,0.9883467,0.0001316566,0.00002026371,0.0003005108,0.00804624,0.0002656416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8073829,0.006501095,0.01262405,0.0006196389,0.002523536,0.0007382005,0.00003338878,0.00006871406,0.1695085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934494,0.000007547824,0.004356092,0.000146987,0.001590751,0.000009543574,7.605797e-7,0.00002408415,0.0004148371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1860665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8155819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384451809","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v36/i1a5","title":"The adequacy of rape criminalisation in modern South Africa: A comparative study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Law; Criminology; Political science; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Sentence; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","authors":[{"name":"Rinda Botha","is_ca":false},{"name":"Janine Peens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1272580506083708,"gpt":0.3789522234718644,"spread":0.2516941728634937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004864631,0.0002508016,0.0006383971,0.0005397972,0.0006718263,0.0001521005,0.001168172,0.00009863793,0.00002695524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002885851,0.0001891013,0.0002113529,0.002022923,0.0008586631,0.0003960709,0.0001355481,0.0006483119,0.00004096479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002068551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001528545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001740519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945332,0.001490573,0.001222384,0.0002810291,0.001751523,0.0007212761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954301,0.001694014,0.001290951,0.0003460716,0.0009546191,0.0002843162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006017992,0.0001892281,0.001402725,0.00005645054,0.00006939695,0.0001001267,0.9934066,0.000927709,0.00004202605,0.002214096,0.0001410349,0.0008488374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009099061,0.0006535352,0.002954947,0.00007428118,0.001035964,0.000003042499,0.9909878,0.0004373187,0.00003018553,0.001266281,0.001445624,0.0002010842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852547,0.0009484635,0.0006350343,0.0003759998,0.0007693793,0.0005474477,0.00002013251,0.00004496438,0.01140389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987103,0.00002249187,0.0003564514,0.00001985119,0.0004660687,0.00001637585,8.220662e-7,0.00002308066,0.0003845592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7711325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132853333","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v33/i3a5","title":"Revising spousal testimonial privilege and marital communications privilege in South African criminal procedure: Is abolition or extension the answer? Part 2","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; History; Business; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Samantha Goosen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicci Whitear-Nel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07818039969400453,"gpt":0.3359840769126949,"spread":0.2578036772186904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002158758,0.0003897472,0.000666678,0.000229451,0.001131212,0.0003901163,0.001508611,0.0001922437,0.0001164241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006656817,0.0002917117,0.0001851878,0.001199142,0.001701948,0.0007196247,0.0003936705,0.001327493,0.0000248968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002196113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001093767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001208084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001065883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952015,0.0009723164,0.001184649,0.0005065448,0.001305311,0.0008296994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958844,0.0009645849,0.001080515,0.0005940392,0.0007366317,0.0007398311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001108513,0.0001694141,0.002819602,0.0003925249,0.00004137721,0.000253889,0.9886606,0.0000269892,0.00008947369,0.003470072,0.0006724394,0.002295072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001520831,0.001202238,0.007609649,0.0007908777,0.003080716,0.0001908257,0.9223133,0.0008801224,0.00004019481,0.0004735107,0.06114566,0.0007520252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423029,0.005987633,0.001739548,0.03419377,0.001349486,0.001728333,0.0002878586,0.0001825086,0.01222799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898646,0.0001673405,0.00637348,0.001431626,0.002002086,0.00001442681,0.000003931807,0.00004920023,0.00009329874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211268824","doi":"","title":"Quantification of damages for malicious prosecution: A comparative analysis of recent South African and Commonwealth case law (2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Tort; Plaintiff; Confusion; Political science; Commonwealth; Cause of action; Action (physics); Element (criminal law); Liability; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1150550030177364,"gpt":0.4004993345167652,"spread":0.2854443314990289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002344595,0.0002075352,0.0009021338,0.0004951953,0.0005904388,0.00007262486,0.0004317345,0.0001091152,0.00005805385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009665647,0.0001849751,0.0002273024,0.001552674,0.002447889,0.0002450488,0.00005959668,0.0002382503,0.00000175962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001279394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003662983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008283769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001006887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968435,0.0006314348,0.001104869,0.0002815793,0.0007293394,0.0004092979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993605,0.0007004896,0.002236108,0.0003223724,0.002785708,0.0003503814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001068094,0.0001885594,0.0006854558,0.0002566843,0.0005670461,0.0000426419,0.948871,0.000121699,0.0002353182,0.04743726,0.00007317855,0.0004531076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008248093,0.001702729,0.0006983856,0.00008293892,0.0151659,0.00004995388,0.9710163,0.0005321782,0.001029397,0.0004094576,0.008210016,0.000277921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708825,0.0009338382,0.01337253,0.000644671,0.0004690014,0.0006992265,0.0004982922,0.00002443,0.01247556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928194,0.00002895496,0.006642047,0.00006106289,0.0003711841,0.000008256647,0.000005752847,0.00001295118,0.00005041189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0470278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9019349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189665483","doi":"","title":"Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s 35(5) of the Constitution : S v Hena 2006 (2) SACR 33 (SE) : comments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Discretion; Political science; Section (typography); Judicial discretion; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Business","authors":[{"name":"Wouter De Vos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07030531263123174,"gpt":0.3675662191141264,"spread":0.2972609064828947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001840799,0.0001661716,0.0004462053,0.0002466299,0.0002400946,0.00004171661,0.0009074698,0.00009853272,0.0000492254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002992328,0.0001268779,0.0001795917,0.0008879917,0.0008241883,0.0004087291,0.00006765409,0.0003998306,0.000005785734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002619174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005573976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001726127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966456,0.0005559649,0.0009562545,0.0001813612,0.001254557,0.0004062326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977167,0.0003480766,0.00105456,0.0002581723,0.0003853951,0.0002371121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001713897,0.0004716467,0.01552881,0.000241201,0.00004428806,0.00006610568,0.9511866,0.001730942,0.003317975,0.01745237,0.0006495051,0.007596679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004520466,0.005328595,0.1412754,0.01110077,0.006401751,0.00007829796,0.785997,0.0001735556,0.008179709,0.01431165,0.02102011,0.001612635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586641,0.0007550444,0.007041169,0.003815884,0.001591003,0.0006266868,0.00007096275,0.00001697128,0.02741814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978916,0.00003159604,0.001282571,0.0003399388,0.000377284,0.00000174758,3.328675e-7,0.000006479118,0.00006842806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1651895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282477943","doi":"","title":"The role of pathological gambling in the sentencing of a person convicted of armed robbery : a comparative discussion of the South African, Canadian and Australian jurisdictions : comments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Criminology; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0816407160527359,"gpt":0.3236185034298723,"spread":0.2419777873771364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649964,0.0001653835,0.0005118757,0.0002076895,0.0006515119,0.00002236817,0.000760407,0.00009555252,0.00001297502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001081866,0.00007909324,0.0001906755,0.0008440848,0.002205803,0.0001238709,0.00006402953,0.0005635029,3.478301e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001222924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006835798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01298814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007614282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965027,0.001214264,0.0008379094,0.0001506583,0.0008875933,0.0004068498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968584,0.0007612382,0.001374081,0.0002398734,0.0005518587,0.0002145814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002033448,0.00008934135,0.02139112,0.00004272308,0.00004360087,0.00001726693,0.9769186,0.0001578535,0.0005102868,0.0004700944,0.00002822493,0.0001275815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239368,0.0002626267,0.03682496,0.0001963289,0.0005603931,0.00002522645,0.9604743,0.00008791257,0.0002668787,0.0001104302,0.0006768921,0.0000900771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938197,0.0003545575,0.00003365799,0.001807899,0.0001590437,0.0002906696,0.00008638993,0.000003191193,0.003444907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995081,0.0000236202,0.0002894953,0.00003598376,0.00007923371,0.000003826848,5.946804e-7,0.000007486435,0.00005166676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01644422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930724199","doi":"","title":"Pillay and Others v S : trial fairness; the doctrine of discoverability; and the concept of 'detriment' - the impact of the Canadian s 24 (2) provision on South African s 35 (5) jurisprudence : comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Dane Ally","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0259280608459404,"gpt":0.3247955542952449,"spread":0.2988674934493045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004217736,0.0002670574,0.00061713,0.0001372292,0.0008727753,0.0001304211,0.001331204,0.00009275554,0.00004585695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002515636,0.0001090954,0.0004006907,0.0006461755,0.004995409,0.0001880387,0.0001624605,0.0006513127,6.52951e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003388482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001445448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03721441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00617249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953369,0.001597961,0.0009692851,0.0002382563,0.001371493,0.0004860541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948503,0.002116808,0.001721693,0.0005706302,0.0004361022,0.0003044369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0102311,0.0001581669,0.001138004,0.00005928556,0.0002214652,0.000003140399,0.9736727,0.001024446,0.00003193463,0.01074577,0.000289713,0.002424277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01837553,0.004086616,0.004987581,0.0003983523,0.003909844,0.0000179228,0.9537827,0.0002120308,0.0007691482,0.001276941,0.01173711,0.0004462463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793216,0.001793068,0.00006074774,0.01248306,0.0004400642,0.001362258,0.0001639834,0.000005482133,0.004369722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999136,0.00003813927,0.00007764657,0.0002058015,0.0004271136,0.000007702016,3.1632e-7,0.00001582875,0.00009147019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03104191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106245212","doi":"","title":"Should legal professional privilege be limited to exclude in-house lawyers under South African criminal law? : comment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legal profession; Common law; Criminal law","authors":[{"name":"Wium P. De Villiers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1794632987499983,"gpt":0.3903842138655562,"spread":0.2109209151155579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560023,0.0003016309,0.0004358659,0.0006384413,0.0007826224,0.0002439571,0.0008518876,0.0001700768,0.0007164109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001753476,0.0002752301,0.0001718601,0.001284813,0.0004940932,0.00114124,0.0001161003,0.00142903,0.00006779642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000454023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002386904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001589839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956939,0.0007800006,0.001041737,0.0003400616,0.0013683,0.0007759735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963378,0.0005845412,0.0009068944,0.0003133451,0.001062038,0.0007953342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009981835,0.0008449728,0.000536455,0.00008508612,0.00006462926,0.0001096626,0.7747476,0.00008044774,0.00007569897,0.2170981,0.005007029,0.0003520981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000686361,0.0004526046,0.003557622,0.0001258599,0.000938764,0.0000363655,0.8897504,0.00000917546,0.00008693435,0.0004610152,0.1035205,0.0003743938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7524632,0.0000966916,0.003005027,0.1117336,0.00497445,0.0008892492,0.00007066663,0.0001486135,0.1266186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783174,0.000006773719,0.005193473,0.01493338,0.0007970597,0.00002201829,0.000002611126,0.00004770726,0.0006795989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2258542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}