{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"0acb7d228714","filters":{"venue":"South African Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2256544311","doi":"","title":"Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction : when is it appropriate, just and equitable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional right; Separation of powers","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Geoff Budlender","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03790536619238992,"gpt":0.2896650696295711,"spread":0.2517597034371812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00170522,0.0002155792,0.0002916119,0.0001189769,0.002242692,0.0005276716,0.0003277455,0.00020053,0.0009474994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001393089,0.0001984644,0.00008048686,0.0002081751,0.000889562,0.0008581035,0.0001741759,0.0006130739,0.0001034132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001848281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001498403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007682623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007495384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974973,0.0002782631,0.0004086342,0.0003678548,0.0006920379,0.0007559684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987031,0.00009718401,0.0002081709,0.0002224122,0.0001606671,0.0006084263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006599516,0.00006659284,0.003534241,0.00002390509,0.00007016553,0.00001625823,0.9490961,0.000003020412,0.00005228128,0.01926154,0.01229806,0.01551187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005101792,0.0000833941,0.0002181098,0.00003438619,0.00007838076,0.00001517031,0.09559638,0.00002793511,0.0000270205,0.004937793,0.8981885,0.0002828017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.411743,0.01202078,0.0004284945,0.02345296,0.001456368,0.0006494314,0.0001176667,0.0002587519,0.5498725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902971,0.0003563508,0.002687678,0.001200936,0.001840824,0.000008406676,0.00000142415,0.00003051254,0.00357681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8858904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503322","doi":"","title":"Equality and unfair discrimination : refining the Harksen test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Rósaan Krüger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07026810988229498,"gpt":0.3092973164572257,"spread":0.2390292065749307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528067,0.0001303029,0.0001611706,0.00004645992,0.002418407,0.0002970979,0.0004755679,0.0000838808,0.0002931003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00137208,0.00008818816,0.00007452442,0.0002807608,0.001152686,0.0004009007,0.0001056519,0.000484722,0.00004439009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001041424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003812523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003357117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997983,0.0004861101,0.000312555,0.0002004889,0.0005637514,0.0004540668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986496,0.0004062121,0.0002827245,0.0002179273,0.0001602115,0.0002833554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001702787,0.00003575353,0.01165226,0.000003862047,0.00001752022,0.00001243892,0.7640874,5.160954e-7,0.000009191988,0.2210618,0.0002163707,0.002885923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005589702,0.0001934633,0.0162832,0.00006502358,0.0001350302,0.0000289257,0.4139902,0.00002493259,0.00005835212,0.03341084,0.5347719,0.0004791761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02146363,0.0004580698,0.0004690502,0.00279399,0.0005459603,0.0001251966,0.00002213829,0.00009237691,0.9740296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962437,0.00001183516,0.001231179,0.0002864118,0.0005414217,0.000005716057,6.380819e-7,0.00001514754,0.001663986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579376339","doi":"","title":"Tracing trends : the impact of science and technology on the law of criminal evidence and procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Discipline; Scientific evidence; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Lirieka Meintjes-Van der Walt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040761947265626,"gpt":0.382098048770539,"spread":0.2780218540439764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002262122,0.00005096242,0.00007568551,0.0001317178,0.001493978,0.00009541358,0.000286637,0.00003119053,0.0001122454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002066986,0.00002570608,0.00002193035,0.001243641,0.004686218,0.0004540222,0.00002428319,0.0003769508,5.432865e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003833398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007837474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003376264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007589306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991856,0.00009983614,0.0001624702,0.00008472226,0.0003119024,0.0001555148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.000292824,0.0002841796,0.000107286,0.0004637212,0.00006301807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002020923,0.00003421794,0.00216828,0.000003145816,0.000009811055,4.111849e-7,0.1957639,5.907537e-7,0.0002450596,0.7996927,0.00008712399,0.001974514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002504804,0.0008644623,0.04323424,0.000223126,0.0001177772,0.0001502787,0.9123065,0.00003220254,0.002403571,0.03749132,0.002724317,0.0002017507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685518,0.0001359395,0.000006739339,0.02448118,0.00006981008,0.00007147432,0.000003166098,0.000007141647,0.1066728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996555,0.00001109291,0.00009804112,0.0001422773,0.00004292183,0.000002272392,1.769759e-8,0.000002265641,0.0000455709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285162040","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4","title":"‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Majority opinion","authors":[{"name":"Owen Rogers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03033979503562933,"gpt":0.2747571318407989,"spread":0.2444173368051696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000686061,0.000111202,0.0002008048,0.00006671529,0.007341352,0.000134528,0.0003840645,0.00002675721,0.0003948779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001809271,0.0001015174,0.0001234282,0.0003367566,0.0002010484,0.00009517154,0.0001996205,0.0003660059,0.00008287805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003090745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002298251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003291927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003923799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979794,0.0002194431,0.0002075491,0.0001753774,0.0009399841,0.0004782302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.00004627441,0.0001539849,0.00008587648,0.0001389839,0.0003480311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001177262,0.0001711661,0.0232673,0.000002593541,0.0001438585,0.0002710939,0.06078298,0.0003888017,0.0000224029,0.8522294,0.0604183,0.002184405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357923,0.00009604832,0.00589822,0.00001114839,0.00003030687,0.00002536765,0.2287135,0.000001217072,0.000002798801,0.02775463,0.7370107,0.0002203305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2677909,0.0009764279,0.0003546839,0.09445389,0.004282007,0.0004900405,0.0003249692,0.0001635577,0.6311635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949907,0.00001110579,0.00007291279,0.002419758,0.001219287,0.0000213681,9.37893e-7,0.000007449743,0.001256488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Dane Ally","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1389801136684364,"gpt":0.3869022606896508,"spread":0.2479221470212145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04997995,0.0002889881,0.0006156624,0.0001306579,0.004220596,0.0009672833,0.001860983,0.0002821227,0.0003311124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06504084,0.0001521533,0.0002851175,0.0005825615,0.00316238,0.0007289192,0.0001089553,0.00392575,0.00000436607],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000823624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006942973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2199811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.718244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889712,0.006793745,0.00139155,0.0004781552,0.001469827,0.0008955615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865681,0.01041289,0.001208542,0.0005996755,0.0006247971,0.0005859731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792423,0.0001904471,0.0376878,0.00005124483,0.00008006287,0.00008776967,0.8202464,0.0001625212,0.0005447733,0.1387442,0.0003832045,0.001342338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389875,0.0002664084,0.03056366,0.002604077,0.000441595,0.00009219792,0.6683799,0.0007024569,0.000400451,0.2785839,0.01560505,0.0009704494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605973,0.0009705889,0.0009213081,0.02624281,0.001021624,0.001509868,0.00009885386,0.00002370315,0.008613978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984338,0.00001227221,0.0005768828,0.0004251992,0.0004631978,0.0000261019,9.814253e-7,0.00001266039,0.00004887543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4982629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401656713","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i3a6","title":"Realizing South Africa’s contribution to the global biodiversity framework’s area-based targets — The potential impact of new screening trends linked to strategic infrastructure projects, corridors and zones","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Business; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Alexander Paterson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02340758260024939,"gpt":0.2397274413844757,"spread":0.2163198587842264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005718895,0.0002063964,0.0002281477,0.00003358212,0.0008183701,0.0004374196,0.00033878,0.0001277043,0.0001458925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009412446,0.00006580431,0.0002094214,0.0007420217,0.0001400505,0.00009380859,0.000116919,0.0003869231,0.000003584387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001904871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001574489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008073877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004553956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985656,0.0001452747,0.000287422,0.0002888528,0.0002696465,0.0004432121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991972,0.0001005408,0.0001335379,0.00007697861,0.0001454701,0.0003462916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006558505,0.0003378629,0.4026361,0.0001433363,0.002110464,0.0003733939,0.144375,0.04341678,0.001396415,0.03172752,0.01673846,0.3501862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007117944,0.002232871,0.8277097,0.0002302615,0.0002644244,0.0001268282,0.1255485,0.001611737,0.00004468028,0.01362526,0.02705157,0.0008423931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840848,0.0003715059,0.002110128,0.01191246,0.0001894683,0.0003307352,0.0007605309,0.00004371285,0.0001966339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988672,0.000002649111,0.0005599728,0.0002994204,0.0002276782,0.000003587992,0.00002457046,8.265629e-7,0.00001413966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4250736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6294324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206161984","doi":"","title":"The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo American case law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Witness; Circumstantial evidence; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Common law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Constantine Theophilopoulos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02762874079782732,"gpt":0.3128767867875584,"spread":0.2852480459897311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105987,0.0001106812,0.0002230174,0.000003367602,0.00205925,0.0001746371,0.0005740896,0.00007260121,0.00002570127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004735868,0.00006178258,0.0001733177,0.0005150734,0.001782849,0.0003748175,0.00009381049,0.0003111032,0.000001074895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004163623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001910823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005193438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005372624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976411,0.000880969,0.0003919787,0.0001811408,0.0006542713,0.0002505101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985917,0.0002570691,0.0005429671,0.0002054833,0.0001790113,0.0002237629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01662558,0.0001555934,0.0001902616,0.00001967506,0.0001392037,0.00002956164,0.6998742,0.00009796701,0.0002674848,0.2794578,0.001591659,0.001551053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04019934,0.00327376,0.0003410972,0.0001415245,0.0004836438,0.0001104303,0.8046836,0.00006606966,0.001899103,0.02288227,0.12533,0.000589236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862149,0.0002744803,0.00005060937,0.007358573,0.000593565,0.0007293356,0.00003599686,0.00001794698,0.004724644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972256,0.00006804926,0.0002858276,0.001048416,0.001321638,0.00001030509,4.462384e-7,0.0000081215,0.00003154143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2565755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394061971","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i2a3","title":"The shareholder’s appraisal remedy under the Companies Act: How should the courts gauge ‘fair value’?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Gauge (firearms); Value (mathematics); Business; Law; Law and economics; Companies Act; Accounting; Corporate law; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; History; Finance; Corporate governance; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Maleka Femida Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04683544862480897,"gpt":0.2554658100018898,"spread":0.2086303613770808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419662,0.0003126292,0.0002267654,0.00005766354,0.002925213,0.005923007,0.001123849,0.0000711941,0.0002039313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001254511,0.0001346756,0.0002911549,0.0005312939,0.0005472012,0.0009851225,0.0002971884,0.001036182,0.0001921639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000609751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009918342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003928576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001497467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977575,0.0000669243,0.0003392059,0.0002942222,0.0009207741,0.0006213805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983444,0.0005452865,0.0004029993,0.0004962854,0.0001722753,0.00003879721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004697386,0.00002661203,0.0003116507,0.00003254696,0.0001600795,0.00006250411,0.000950196,0.0002181646,0.00002027625,0.8289764,0.1671407,0.002053898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002383591,0.00001610239,0.002232957,0.0001014877,0.0001604419,0.00006225853,0.01592058,0.001655326,0.000005640314,0.02282112,0.95654,0.0002457599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946455,0.01046496,0.001768235,0.5147972,0.01482129,0.001407674,0.0001357561,0.0008348462,0.2611246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884002,0.00004959153,0.00001005357,0.004467397,0.005669091,0.00001749567,0.000006946324,0.00005811443,0.001321069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8061553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260124866","doi":"","title":"Suing anonymously : when is the personal price to pay for justice too high?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Anonymity; Law; Economic Justice; Harm; Political science; Test (biology); Confidentiality","authors":[{"name":"Donrich W Jordaan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02592394508362544,"gpt":0.2897686665710277,"spread":0.2638447214874022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139729,0.00009811758,0.000124057,0.00002728474,0.003156157,0.0003991394,0.0005046442,0.00004870803,0.0002119569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003704179,0.00006013207,0.0001151373,0.0001860638,0.0001472979,0.0001362398,0.00005370894,0.0002559369,0.00007387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009541657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001491564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001314417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009627255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986367,0.0001259601,0.0002010208,0.0001815737,0.0004050851,0.0004496789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987761,0.0004124548,0.0001470124,0.0001517524,0.0002005559,0.0003121122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002468742,0.00003008665,0.0002013946,0.000008414984,0.00002752457,7.686614e-7,0.2335269,0.00003213354,0.00006137819,0.7429298,0.01848909,0.004667837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001917916,0.00005463368,0.0002749818,0.000008451913,0.00006412375,0.00000390111,0.02989704,0.0001293705,0.00001542848,0.01656891,0.9526631,0.0001283078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1280927,0.0001096591,0.1550686,0.4017413,0.001623791,0.001901748,0.0002648249,0.0001899545,0.3110074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852858,0.000002551592,0.003638681,0.005808193,0.002185468,0.00003505965,8.606156e-7,0.00001393552,0.003029458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512674864","doi":"","title":"Interdicts seeking to preserve constitutional rights - of losing litigants, interim interdicts pending appeal, and lessons from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Interim; Political science; Constitution; High Court; Government (linguistics); Status quo; Legislation; Supreme court; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Glenn Penfold","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02942367857234781,"gpt":0.3192401797264142,"spread":0.2898165011540664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461411,0.0002327902,0.0004134795,0.0001899345,0.001515056,0.0002942227,0.0006384844,0.0001160915,0.0002742827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005899992,0.0002189813,0.00009835959,0.0003834533,0.001584488,0.0004108077,0.0003416246,0.0005973437,0.000007227524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006854752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007125733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4684504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6764623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969252,0.0002592084,0.0006911409,0.0003575683,0.0009764827,0.0007904178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.0005288792,0.0004214792,0.0002110759,0.0002677631,0.0008949894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003831451,0.0001182613,0.02650014,0.00004424653,0.0004142815,0.0007959465,0.6149119,0.00005309262,0.001161669,0.3509631,0.002132887,0.002521353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002546077,0.0004106475,0.007560716,0.003385252,0.0003242557,0.0001552839,0.3108619,0.00009979714,0.004595018,0.02125405,0.6469487,0.001858322],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182095,0.000982991,0.01753805,0.002328547,0.003099903,0.0004193722,0.000456163,0.00008427501,0.2568812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967855,0.000003179493,0.001974256,0.000263739,0.0008640147,0.000001964145,0.000005167537,0.00001618263,0.00008598191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160769704","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination, private records, and required reporting in regulatory statutes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Privilege (computing); Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Self-incrimination; Waiver; Political science; Business","authors":[{"name":"Constantine Theophilopoulos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02234647486807,"gpt":0.2916551616949299,"spread":0.2693086868268599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006572203,0.0001691848,0.0003303093,0.0001693379,0.001135638,0.0003340246,0.0003279358,0.0001339515,0.00005876532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004975935,0.0001626923,0.00007544,0.0004439912,0.0005082597,0.0005686434,0.00009081161,0.0004799213,0.00001523993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002781152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001817179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007125243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965303,0.0006854197,0.00112455,0.0003299456,0.0006934153,0.0006363938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973359,0.0002848317,0.001514843,0.0002640785,0.0002179935,0.0003823501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004573954,0.00007461117,0.10386,0.0000445862,0.0000418476,0.00009913305,0.5362133,0.0000162863,0.0000409678,0.3529137,0.0003990483,0.006250798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161444,0.0001754265,0.0184776,0.0001690007,0.00007212967,0.00005438967,0.05705644,0.0002031647,0.0001015547,0.06398283,0.8578418,0.0007041669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134768,0.0005951687,0.0004475139,0.001944702,0.0009630825,0.0003339242,0.000005731609,0.0002461592,0.2819869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880565,0.0000263781,0.01056926,0.0001650616,0.0007298497,0.000006495653,0.000001056432,0.00002588075,0.0004194763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262056843","doi":"","title":"Twelve years after Canada's access to medicines regime : should South Africa follow the path?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Exportation; Order (exchange); Business; Mechanism (biology); Drug industry; International trade; Developing country; Economic growth; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Mélanie Bourassa Forcier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Beatrice Stirner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09757953290351798,"gpt":0.2845823280157346,"spread":0.1870027951122167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064777,0.0002472094,0.0004898432,0.0001551685,0.0002344129,0.0004034775,0.0009420434,0.00008868559,0.0004464948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003014897,0.0002034024,0.0001733032,0.0003576081,0.0001342847,0.0002185304,0.0002254827,0.0005519895,0.0003106659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003737399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003558504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01732383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04584157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979803,0.00004531578,0.0007302589,0.0003638725,0.0001501771,0.000730074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979143,0.00008689641,0.0004013659,0.0004378521,0.00008111312,0.001078466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008253634,0.0001604634,0.0770499,0.00003511528,0.000735053,0.0005441587,0.07158045,0.001204883,0.000003013275,0.1188112,0.7267318,0.00231853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008955873,0.00008033023,0.005310139,0.00001688227,0.00002838404,0.00003141582,0.001906692,0.0002284651,0.000003853368,0.01608591,0.9750364,0.0003758904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3438256,0.007013043,0.001132856,0.1796537,0.006906444,0.001151476,0.002320555,0.0001068773,0.4578894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744147,0.00001579343,0.0001073279,0.02379139,0.001131629,0.00003020041,0.000002370984,0.00004456271,0.0004620477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6305891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375833626","doi":"10.47348/salj/v140/i2a9","title":"Book Review: David Cluxton Aviation Law Cause of Action Exclusivity in the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions (2022)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Aerospace engineering; Physics","authors":[{"name":"William Kiema","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philippe‐Joseph Salazar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03036980976792276,"gpt":0.327200031896864,"spread":0.2968302221289412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729323,0.00006769792,0.0001247705,0.00006849878,0.000725463,0.00006712895,0.0001475453,0.00004817912,0.0001579415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001572938,0.00005317949,0.00007166631,0.0003252319,0.0001921943,0.0003730459,0.00002260443,0.0002119146,0.00001570881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009689611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006292391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007002627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02684647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984753,0.0004347507,0.0002857606,0.0001076074,0.0005186791,0.0001778606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992768,0.0001629433,0.0002736679,0.00008237403,0.0001464863,0.00005769495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004691679,0.0001203698,0.00319442,0.00009125144,0.00005544909,0.00002740242,0.03955805,0.00003579078,0.0001083865,0.9245292,0.03027792,0.001954827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001278506,0.000174634,0.06284636,0.0007510695,0.0002099597,0.00004049087,0.02149213,0.000204824,0.0001272741,0.042052,0.8704601,0.000362657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4181555,0.04126563,0.001320373,0.1470544,0.004348643,0.003818163,0.0005166639,0.0003472833,0.3831733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924691,0.004283671,0.000009635213,0.001910952,0.000241216,0.00001114053,0.0000170802,0.00000545271,0.001051799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}