{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"0acb7d228714","filters":{"venue":"South African Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2256544311","doi":"","title":"Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction : when is it appropriate, just and equitable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional right; Separation of powers","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Geoff Budlender","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03790536619238992,"gpt":0.2896650696295711,"spread":0.2517597034371812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03807585,0.0004001025,0.001146363,0.001415906,0.008340675,0.01310468,0.003593171,0.01943212,0.007591188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090737,0.00067164,0.0005085723,0.001328274,0.03551791,0.01810255,0.005984513,0.018052,0.001078962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01123233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04874798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09757035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9630967,0.01415633,0.00211411,0.002922941,0.0115322,0.006177706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631693,0.02296416,0.003059461,0.00188891,0.00537342,0.003544829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005121603,0.00006526759,0.001614347,0.0002034054,0.00001621967,0.0003016484,0.004467261,0.0001656021,0.0001715614,0.9072438,0.04308442,0.04261537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001645148,0.0001095059,0.004833947,0.003790024,0.00006131826,0.0005589151,0.008258567,0.0006397329,0.0005978594,0.6804203,0.3004345,0.0001308737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01348258,0.02171219,0.007870127,0.8466114,0.003406895,0.00009696888,0.00009088653,0.00006444426,0.1066645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7358245,0.01395112,0.006225133,0.2191008,0.008515149,0.0002780279,0.000119759,0.0001877625,0.01579769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04874798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2013667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503322","doi":"","title":"Equality and unfair discrimination : refining the Harksen test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Rósaan Krüger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07026810988229498,"gpt":0.3092973164572257,"spread":0.2390292065749307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245518,0.0006561752,0.001716045,0.003635422,0.00874519,0.00960131,0.00385081,0.01091638,0.008365765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07548736,0.000429487,0.001263291,0.002252884,0.0739979,0.02064063,0.01122784,0.01354908,0.0008689355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01137501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01711546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01217265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9668832,0.01330271,0.001339339,0.004004243,0.01069318,0.003777339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548745,0.03298936,0.002096135,0.003304792,0.005436901,0.001298345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009662823,0.000004513709,0.0001626566,0.000007727089,0.000002584309,0.00004197303,0.0003349737,0.0001160638,0.00001710073,0.9968886,0.0005665683,0.001847672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001608432,0.00002106905,0.0003623769,0.00008075406,0.000006612987,0.00005868431,0.0006190292,0.0007532316,0.0001577816,0.9862279,0.01166948,0.00002712654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07264428,0.004425298,0.0847173,0.09075046,0.002971404,0.0002535763,0.0002084965,0.00008435739,0.7439448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584221,0.0007948647,0.0109264,0.01555408,0.0007267752,0.0001750608,0.00003919198,0.00005080528,0.01331063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03245518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1716414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579376339","doi":"","title":"Tracing trends : the impact of science and technology on the law of criminal evidence and procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Discipline; Scientific evidence; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Lirieka Meintjes-Van der Walt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040761947265626,"gpt":0.382098048770539,"spread":0.2780218540439764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0562893,0.0008211742,0.0008840532,0.007738449,0.007177851,0.02383335,0.003035742,0.009786916,0.004409439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11025,0.001110422,0.001263777,0.007519924,0.05712364,0.05745832,0.0104403,0.0171446,0.001065386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01520269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0135118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01315789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01083985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9347469,0.03120635,0.003730444,0.006316512,0.02137487,0.002624976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8127125,0.1500547,0.01053371,0.01055724,0.01424649,0.001895287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003588658,0.00003882681,0.003390136,0.0003992569,0.00002723912,0.0002562125,0.01857496,0.000480857,0.0004440701,0.903406,0.006256567,0.06668997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650843,0.0001965924,0.004984168,0.00211812,0.00004120628,0.0006576758,0.01510928,0.00131025,0.001305098,0.6038268,0.3703203,0.000113942],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04964928,0.1231229,0.06989615,0.5723224,0.004203841,0.0002718189,0.000350378,0.0002587725,0.1799243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936952,0.1224453,0.07139289,0.07759064,0.006680767,0.000476379,0.0002535776,0.0004853816,0.02697987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0562893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2976899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285162040","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4","title":"‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Majority opinion","authors":[{"name":"Owen Rogers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03033979503562933,"gpt":0.2747571318407989,"spread":0.2444173368051696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03381927,0.0002956257,0.0006354107,0.001535663,0.01215881,0.01203909,0.003369207,0.006979116,0.009168487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.160405,0.0004110624,0.0005140324,0.001965787,0.03321283,0.01667425,0.005673232,0.01329128,0.002800002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005452703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00884315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01039526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9474043,0.02950326,0.00190965,0.004508969,0.01092771,0.005746203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506781,0.01884564,0.008219193,0.005302969,0.01107056,0.005883403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001085356,0.00008867816,0.0273223,0.0002115352,0.0001106991,0.001423161,0.1995677,0.00014074,0.0009264363,0.5178239,0.1588795,0.09339681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000624583,0.0001117464,0.02364776,0.0008664686,0.00005449721,0.001751915,0.2128236,0.0003726301,0.0007930811,0.3057221,0.4536073,0.0001865351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1265383,0.004685575,0.008607557,0.7075636,0.00420635,0.00008421568,0.0001329596,0.00008177455,0.1480997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599237,0.001218183,0.002299089,0.1243504,0.001295526,0.00006321369,0.00006823164,0.00007802351,0.01070368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03381927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1788555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Dane Ally","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1389801136684364,"gpt":0.3869022606896508,"spread":0.2479221470212145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1035357,0.001258721,0.001734972,0.02044435,0.02030022,0.0329079,0.007812288,0.01294565,0.002617395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.176832,0.001705438,0.002357068,0.01117403,0.04866684,0.01380374,0.01187237,0.01134814,0.0003113752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05883431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1455366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5188369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7562141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8695934,0.05871752,0.01005234,0.00560865,0.04478806,0.01124003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8852246,0.07400396,0.007634308,0.004912936,0.0255225,0.002701603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004642754,0.00001961162,0.003134222,0.0002101494,0.0000598086,0.0004443882,0.007712362,0.001107793,0.0003060088,0.9643241,0.001311207,0.02132391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002217071,0.0003912376,0.01913438,0.004100176,0.0007707714,0.001485301,0.02712234,0.01003569,0.003132787,0.8427624,0.09029983,0.0005435369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1603993,0.02143181,0.1571704,0.1820621,0.001021601,0.001774842,0.0005360396,0.000165006,0.4754389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8729417,0.003226445,0.1061501,0.01036358,0.0003304917,0.000370885,0.00007433797,0.00003381872,0.006508633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401656713","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i3a6","title":"Realizing South Africa’s contribution to the global biodiversity framework’s area-based targets — The potential impact of new screening trends linked to strategic infrastructure projects, corridors and zones","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Business; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Alexander Paterson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02340758260024939,"gpt":0.2397274413844757,"spread":0.2163198587842264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007495643,0.0005460284,0.0002461347,0.00117083,0.003270973,0.005856517,0.0008357912,0.001652729,0.004872418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01292017,0.0002858821,0.0004413383,0.001245578,0.00413178,0.005706127,0.004294779,0.003767563,0.000358578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008651463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02491189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05189601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07652847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955479,0.001857189,0.0001343143,0.0002028451,0.00127031,0.0009874372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922261,0.003697946,0.001036697,0.0004631859,0.001997367,0.0005787065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001504398,0.00008013811,0.01589252,0.001983259,0.0001066712,0.002900354,0.03012846,0.005836294,0.009646647,0.5896113,0.0730004,0.2706636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001344772,0.0001087412,0.02241615,0.001702908,0.00006359367,0.0007558041,0.03700775,0.001952514,0.004303468,0.07802797,0.8535215,0.00012613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2113604,0.02527162,0.03804462,0.4062918,0.004028165,0.0006777272,0.001013647,0.0001956282,0.3131165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426425,0.01177154,0.01920779,0.01189512,0.0003204579,0.0001703361,0.0002465415,0.0001149486,0.01363082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05189601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1031879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206161984","doi":"","title":"The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo American case law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Witness; Circumstantial evidence; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Common law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Constantine Theophilopoulos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02762874079782732,"gpt":0.3128767867875584,"spread":0.2852480459897311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01597213,0.000244325,0.0003690538,0.001302919,0.005193762,0.009972431,0.001532319,0.004817171,0.001550369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02905911,0.0004241675,0.000267871,0.0007996366,0.04556702,0.00692456,0.004732864,0.007185463,0.0002667501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007313491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01583449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02106441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879287,0.007108901,0.000561738,0.001120326,0.002052025,0.001228362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672973,0.02699393,0.001400942,0.001310583,0.002453676,0.0005435419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186725,0.000007474023,0.0003673667,0.00002001263,0.000003429214,0.0001706061,0.01079367,0.00007171809,0.000177483,0.9857734,0.0003983607,0.002204594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003758259,0.0001371567,0.005103321,0.001243534,0.000125885,0.001086114,0.02372504,0.001852897,0.00240904,0.8692122,0.09494443,0.0001227311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3480024,0.008437339,0.02936643,0.04102796,0.0004384773,0.00008308756,0.0000738217,0.00003643613,0.5725341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990904,0.0008831038,0.001441845,0.001574208,0.000139793,0.00003366356,0.00001012303,0.000008091822,0.005005147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08446968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394061971","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i2a3","title":"The shareholder’s appraisal remedy under the Companies Act: How should the courts gauge ‘fair value’?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Gauge (firearms); Value (mathematics); Business; Law; Law and economics; Companies Act; Accounting; Corporate law; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; History; Finance; Corporate governance; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Maleka Femida Cassim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04683544862480897,"gpt":0.2554658100018898,"spread":0.2086303613770808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05728869,0.0006562002,0.001235993,0.002510878,0.01194826,0.02571659,0.004354935,0.0279129,0.002731517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1666263,0.0007465848,0.001187741,0.002381915,0.02966333,0.02472639,0.004693166,0.02721453,0.0007199466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01212344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02826251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06408653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06049034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9471689,0.02250014,0.002821174,0.003931616,0.01748057,0.006097572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9287702,0.05521081,0.002986397,0.002152613,0.009658146,0.00122183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001897843,0.00001690167,0.000892401,0.00006958213,0.00001036082,0.0002696042,0.006479583,0.0001858316,0.0003365358,0.9718963,0.01072845,0.009095431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000134604,0.0001995502,0.007026461,0.002236672,0.0001436666,0.0004913685,0.01687019,0.002968578,0.004106773,0.7404993,0.2249425,0.0003804791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09655314,0.02063095,0.02105563,0.6047034,0.00335732,0.0003633957,0.000147283,0.0001046378,0.2530844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530568,0.006369446,0.009038169,0.1090237,0.002353051,0.0003042269,0.00005239515,0.0000766417,0.01972553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06408653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3029752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260124866","doi":"","title":"Suing anonymously : when is the personal price to pay for justice too high?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Anonymity; Law; Economic Justice; Harm; Political science; Test (biology); Confidentiality","authors":[{"name":"Donrich W Jordaan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02592394508362544,"gpt":0.2897686665710277,"spread":0.2638447214874022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01330376,0.0003053908,0.0007269277,0.001030417,0.00765729,0.009615934,0.001611696,0.0133359,0.006664195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398829,0.0003066109,0.0005215073,0.0006313744,0.02428316,0.01088368,0.004519322,0.008785261,0.0008855134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004866831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007199652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01732106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02370134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984698,0.004956921,0.0005445418,0.001504536,0.004136813,0.004159219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979818,0.01120891,0.002342359,0.001595057,0.002536141,0.002499529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004604999,0.00004667759,0.005775331,0.00003767427,0.00002944615,0.001091183,0.00686106,0.0001164825,0.0004151668,0.9515893,0.01722428,0.01676748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006425094,0.0001789666,0.01164171,0.0005102994,0.00009032003,0.002563119,0.0295316,0.001749074,0.00130136,0.8352841,0.1169078,0.0001776314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2011752,0.00285089,0.01833724,0.4097889,0.002296627,0.0001567419,0.0001675843,0.0001198071,0.365107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558933,0.0005659481,0.001740907,0.02897964,0.000611913,0.00005553413,0.00001910565,0.00003352327,0.0121001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01732106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07035786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512674864","doi":"","title":"Interdicts seeking to preserve constitutional rights - of losing litigants, interim interdicts pending appeal, and lessons from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Interim; Political science; Constitution; High Court; Government (linguistics); Status quo; Legislation; Supreme court; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Glenn Penfold","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02942367857234781,"gpt":0.3192401797264142,"spread":0.2898165011540664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005894077,0.0004079334,0.0007299285,0.001421051,0.0338703,0.0155805,0.004054873,0.009156436,0.00894759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02109342,0.0004868822,0.0007700492,0.001917668,0.020403,0.005930124,0.005933046,0.02066804,0.0004867486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08723085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1551077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908602,0.0008405187,0.0002162702,0.0009036022,0.002519226,0.004660108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928219,0.002385689,0.0003033506,0.0004431636,0.00234187,0.001704098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848529,0.0000439332,0.002310779,0.00006266071,0.0000223394,0.001082008,0.009461044,0.0006057274,0.0003144986,0.9476062,0.02165325,0.0167691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001670349,0.00009609834,0.01353153,0.001210914,0.000283675,0.000829783,0.05704604,0.004256763,0.002208376,0.4398893,0.4800967,0.0003836488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1035844,0.005342847,0.002629002,0.2141927,0.0006730062,0.0001063284,0.0001333114,0.00006657947,0.6732718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061182,0.00362587,0.0023013,0.02643182,0.0001675096,0.00005844243,0.00005224949,0.0000681356,0.06117648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08723085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.632907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160769704","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination, private records, and required reporting in regulatory statutes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Privilege (computing); Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Self-incrimination; Waiver; Political science; Business","authors":[{"name":"Constantine Theophilopoulos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02234647486807,"gpt":0.2916551616949299,"spread":0.2693086868268599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03461194,0.0004936866,0.0005344943,0.004109219,0.007938077,0.01363612,0.002826463,0.01282295,0.004104396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06481078,0.001052938,0.001018193,0.003789317,0.03583939,0.009543151,0.005029053,0.008655958,0.0008778375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01765199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04690095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03076193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9548053,0.02027332,0.004181766,0.003873832,0.01235746,0.00450828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169853,0.06054772,0.006931762,0.007877092,0.006410226,0.001247941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060685,0.0000121621,0.0003819412,0.00001809399,0.000001537474,0.00007160571,0.0009072059,0.0001355798,0.00005024627,0.9948375,0.001147225,0.002430736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008481426,0.0001515564,0.004068939,0.001104958,0.00005312351,0.0006917036,0.002263901,0.003126794,0.002315718,0.8291453,0.1568441,0.0001491491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1082507,0.0123667,0.06419777,0.05241969,0.00113494,0.0005617067,0.0005509153,0.0002680939,0.7602495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317155,0.003418693,0.01552786,0.01406926,0.001368342,0.0005771535,0.0002042488,0.00007688576,0.03304205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04690095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1830477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262056843","doi":"","title":"Twelve years after Canada's access to medicines regime : should South Africa follow the path?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Exportation; Order (exchange); Business; Mechanism (biology); Drug industry; International trade; Developing country; Economic growth; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Mélanie Bourassa Forcier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Beatrice Stirner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09757953290351798,"gpt":0.2845823280157346,"spread":0.1870027951122167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003239476,0.0003048771,0.0004336201,0.001056765,0.009292196,0.009452951,0.001258909,0.008167702,0.008233964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01240536,0.0002661475,0.0007481759,0.002410328,0.005254949,0.005208832,0.002221426,0.008157514,0.0005697559],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06620128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1806558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9496318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9633765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955187,0.0004130481,0.0001201166,0.0002663343,0.001362989,0.002318772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947959,0.001307205,0.0004121053,0.0001266303,0.001926622,0.001431636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001814185,0.00007000414,0.007565984,0.0009582024,0.00008288072,0.003194212,0.01206571,0.0005943177,0.00142318,0.7377234,0.1616004,0.07454028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005069981,0.00006094268,0.01350964,0.001089009,0.00006548005,0.0004512654,0.008665858,0.0002039204,0.0007697058,0.01882066,0.9562137,0.0000991778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03608037,0.04113867,0.0007122269,0.790502,0.001796287,0.0000820967,0.0005990235,0.00002841383,0.129061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5629314,0.05365102,0.002548574,0.2778723,0.0007086956,0.00007702721,0.0004364001,0.00008699764,0.1016876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4803261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375833626","doi":"10.47348/salj/v140/i2a9","title":"Book Review: David Cluxton Aviation Law Cause of Action Exclusivity in the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions (2022)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Aerospace engineering; Physics","authors":[{"name":"William Kiema","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philippe‐Joseph Salazar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03036980976792276,"gpt":0.327200031896864,"spread":0.2968302221289412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001568647,0.0008251345,0.001001399,0.003731114,0.002728477,0.005324199,0.001941446,0.009040912,0.05506646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007549348,0.0006673173,0.0005888534,0.003483476,0.002591412,0.004629533,0.002023482,0.007160707,0.02440399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00801323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008247791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05921232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1485264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987574,0.000231248,0.00006461289,0.0001465712,0.000692988,0.0001071866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958526,0.001680801,0.0001511284,0.0001394676,0.001845695,0.0003304167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001325701,0.00000125714,0.000008528782,0.0000505866,9.553045e-7,0.000005893522,0.00001239183,0.000009591235,0.000004001223,0.002136154,0.9932707,0.004498652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002293458,0.000001539068,0.000070919,0.0002531171,0.000001760153,0.00001613169,0.00002564088,0.000007963093,0.000006379016,0.00115522,0.9984554,0.000003580584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001350873,0.3692177,0.0003601229,0.3386068,0.145408,0.00005352416,0.0005938776,0.00006459036,0.1455603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003052075,0.1399205,0.0002808139,0.1859306,0.0604115,0.0001213154,0.0004056526,0.0001075141,0.6097701],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05921232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1842156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}