{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1547eb79837d","filters":{"venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Peverill Squire","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0261224248769182,"gpt":0.3540305868266478,"spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01234585,0.001497469,0.001383504,0.02259369,0.001784288,0.008731869,0.001995326,0.001831907,0.1589707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08008074,0.0007826695,0.001266874,0.0156798,0.0007629596,0.00749808,0.004193378,0.003020181,0.148811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004209062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005639873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01606312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0163316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908513,0.001003459,0.001304973,0.0005622405,0.00569533,0.0005826727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9009447,0.007955426,0.005487342,0.00540264,0.07519992,0.005010097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004661133,0.00003277503,0.001602004,0.0002275331,0.00001150365,0.00001975099,0.000041062,0.00005574242,0.00006262509,0.0019785,0.9415606,0.05436118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001767791,0.00003221596,0.005083825,0.0004107179,0.000009854141,0.00004348535,0.00005072156,0.00009381351,0.0001084431,0.0009382609,0.9931919,0.00001914499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006900785,0.0153022,0.007321571,0.0787647,0.04566295,0.001289263,0.2781711,0.008840247,0.5577472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365301,0.01753343,0.01935366,0.02110386,0.02982946,0.002899719,0.3254946,0.006784121,0.5433481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5318101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498765723","doi":"10.1177/1532440014564984","title":"Polarization without Parties: Term Limits and Legislative Partisanship in Nebraska's Unicameral Legislature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Camerino; McGill University","keywords":"Legislature; Polarization (electrochemistry); Politics; Political science; Campaign finance; State (computer science); Public administration; Political economy; State legislature; NOMINATE; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Seth Masket","is_ca":false},{"name":"Boris Shor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02770360894703285,"gpt":0.3441680048385426,"spread":0.3164643958915098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003419529,0.00005650235,0.0002215251,0.001356074,0.004629219,0.002976609,0.0003879679,0.000372686,0.003960289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01312233,0.0001473106,0.000102889,0.001394284,0.002048414,0.001224054,0.002473027,0.0008849284,0.0001959241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001941336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001141141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01633168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04295668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997499,0.001006906,0.0001093033,0.0002559585,0.0004852734,0.0006434968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871615,0.006049094,0.003454761,0.0005689797,0.00149602,0.001269599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002807486,0.0002062626,0.9001003,0.00006506107,0.00003674552,0.000270101,0.04319961,0.000237453,0.001897261,0.01998591,0.002393837,0.03132665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006670345,0.00008292282,0.9497908,0.00005130503,0.00001152475,0.00008993277,0.03888146,0.0004285741,0.0003730999,0.002239251,0.008031227,0.00001329959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878681,0.00004354645,0.0001498305,0.0004499078,0.000006820189,0.000006185608,0.00004480493,0.000002021789,0.01142873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994743,0.00001685291,0.00002765988,0.00003583409,0.000006164282,0.000005970486,0.00002851268,0.000001072986,0.0004036096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01633168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03247321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297243575","doi":"10.1017/spq.2021.22","title":"Governor Partisanship Explains the Adoption of Statewide Mask Mandates in Response to COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Mandate; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public administration; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Scope (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Politics; Face masks; Law; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Adolph","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kenya Amano","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bree Bang-Jensen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nancy Fullman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Beatrice Magistro","is_ca":true},{"name":"Grace Reinke","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Wilkerson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1811338668690097,"gpt":0.4477988473680835,"spread":0.2666649804990737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001640356,0.0001022216,0.000197182,0.0005481158,0.0007398825,0.0009553309,0.0003736152,0.0003808171,0.008466649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008917501,0.0001708615,0.0003568386,0.0007226408,0.0005107102,0.0004626576,0.0009694,0.0009191143,0.0006318763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000707839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03970883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06085115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987252,0.0004401386,0.00007081629,0.0002569184,0.00009972365,0.0004070232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893104,0.002996509,0.004758828,0.0007576777,0.0008019104,0.001374653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007692911,0.0000432454,0.9931879,0.00001134775,0.00005302763,0.00004572069,0.0007443149,0.0003362709,0.0001417425,0.0007094484,0.001519766,0.003130297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003682716,0.00003041311,0.9954555,0.00001947181,0.00001731932,0.00002274481,0.001741346,0.0006792508,0.00008207053,0.0002586266,0.001683649,0.000005828567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929631,0.0002193839,0.0004369896,0.001119738,0.00003358242,0.00001543543,0.0006161227,0.000006929628,0.004588676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992336,0.00003883784,0.00003976469,0.00005243425,0.00001311789,0.000005176147,0.0001767366,0.000003260205,0.0004370541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03970883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323068698","doi":"10.1177/153244000500500402","title":"The Endogeneity of the Initiative: A Comment on Marschall and Ruhil","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Democracy; Public economics; State (computer science); Economics; Political science; Law; Econometrics; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"John G. Matsusaka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04546561786987586,"gpt":0.3610078193877672,"spread":0.3155422015178914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04867147,0.001408197,0.003214039,0.002287423,0.005816396,0.007063337,0.01019058,0.04001018,0.007648295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1440055,0.0009631847,0.0021385,0.005092287,0.01613648,0.01482684,0.004239954,0.03953154,0.004083547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004851115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005609076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02241557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01928959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9732004,0.01354669,0.002034202,0.004512039,0.005713854,0.0009928677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6959651,0.273283,0.006917199,0.006115089,0.01601104,0.001708656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026134,0.00003209931,0.002092234,0.0002339553,0.00005472094,0.0003462212,0.002122777,0.0001703064,0.0001068045,0.05288092,0.9342355,0.007621811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002737835,0.00009446769,0.009641109,0.003194527,0.0002242248,0.0008273441,0.008171336,0.002554149,0.001615659,0.1701769,0.8028143,0.0004121613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005554196,0.002852043,0.0003035991,0.9924257,0.002775719,0.000005835534,0.0001560563,0.00001794463,0.0009075708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02064612,0.003884437,0.001035584,0.9546341,0.01644751,0.0001007217,0.00009075052,0.00007196182,0.00308876],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04867147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2574024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306672924","doi":"10.1017/spq.2022.1","title":"Using Social Media Data to Reveal Patterns of Policy Engagement in State Legislatures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Craig Newmark Philanthropies; John S. and James L. Knight Foundation; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Charles Koch Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislator; Legislature; State (computer science); Social media; Politics; Political science; State legislature; Public administration; Public relations; Public policy; Data science; Computer science; Law; Legislation","authors":[{"name":"Julia Payson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andreu Casas","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jonathan Nagler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Bonneau","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joshua A. Tucker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1379566079644784,"gpt":0.4222260584234965,"spread":0.2842694504590182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00278322,0.0001942104,0.0002526982,0.004440696,0.0008851435,0.002210706,0.0003629907,0.0008322202,0.002685054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01863368,0.0002493043,0.0003011602,0.006296704,0.0005030015,0.002487579,0.001455068,0.001008675,0.0009924916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009042511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006935532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01111478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02067799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980245,0.001006609,0.0001515069,0.0003268946,0.0003162574,0.0001743396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813492,0.01223805,0.003038006,0.001169084,0.001698463,0.0005072286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000185029,0.0002404784,0.8988508,0.0002218004,0.000189293,0.0001553519,0.01070923,0.003638776,0.001758188,0.00766492,0.01356582,0.06282029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002551245,0.00008944007,0.8666813,0.0002438966,0.0001113368,0.000125406,0.02065778,0.05285091,0.00217813,0.009897946,0.04705306,0.00008508741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718303,0.0003522311,0.005389126,0.002726004,0.0000846612,0.00008661031,0.009313164,0.0001179592,0.0100999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909923,0.0001598249,0.002771602,0.0001644051,0.00009206052,0.000139748,0.004363446,0.00003148236,0.001285142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02210015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308208","doi":"10.1017/spq.2023.11","title":"Dynamics of Gubernatorial Approval: Evidence from a New Database","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honeymoon; Governor; Unemployment; State (computer science); Accountability; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Public administration; Political science; Survey data collection; Actuarial science; Database; Economics; Demographic economics; Law; Politics; Computer science; Economic growth; Statistics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Singer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06767890095729943,"gpt":0.3985266636863819,"spread":0.3308477627290825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01360347,0.0002767,0.0009588607,0.003315259,0.001505602,0.00439495,0.002615631,0.0009927569,0.01009392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08327106,0.0004700419,0.0004331841,0.01040974,0.00103477,0.002205553,0.003666085,0.001640413,0.004066789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002245048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002731508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1735369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1735688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819393,0.00912973,0.001502004,0.002866176,0.003048891,0.001514039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.884348,0.03884129,0.04141353,0.01662509,0.01500391,0.003768129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005781683,0.0002200265,0.9454753,0.0001252544,0.0002011499,0.000115888,0.002018304,0.0005323337,0.00007140973,0.002727492,0.03123157,0.01670308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006596792,0.00007112848,0.9618492,0.0001692857,0.00006410364,0.00007827955,0.002915453,0.002468309,0.0001296246,0.0006439248,0.03150485,0.00003991952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315078,0.002053729,0.0008861563,0.003966697,0.0001522928,0.0001578382,0.04479651,0.0001148367,0.01636422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469517,0.0007787335,0.0006931862,0.0004499187,0.0001080919,0.0001859296,0.04689693,0.00007611292,0.003859379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1735369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3450536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}