{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3fb327eda124","filters":{"venue":"Studies in choice and welfare"}},"results":[{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","authors":[{"name":"D. Marc Kilgour","is_ca":true},{"name":"Erica M. Marshall","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1341350525014695,"gpt":0.2865264764115325,"spread":0.1523914239100631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01380738,0.0009380544,0.00235102,0.001312164,0.002835465,0.004497961,0.003894331,0.003917578,0.03463924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07500353,0.001190133,0.001771865,0.001797173,0.003109722,0.006100542,0.002413807,0.004735392,0.006303788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00224916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002931103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002398134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003777652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789305,0.01330476,0.00079321,0.001861226,0.002996415,0.002113846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953234,0.03288887,0.002687352,0.006204095,0.003364822,0.001620834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006611196,0.0002758483,0.001474433,0.0002797147,0.00006390376,0.0001045882,0.0005509655,0.02391298,0.0009324418,0.8237978,0.03415895,0.1137873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002152374,0.0001990125,0.001009683,0.00008599522,0.00003563014,0.000123716,0.0002012102,0.07813512,0.0007994394,0.9049636,0.0141845,0.00004687748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1092378,0.002338677,0.6605369,0.004440038,0.0006654079,0.0008539959,0.0005141747,0.0006413034,0.2207717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7090393,0.001335046,0.137022,0.0006528733,0.000745768,0.001333708,0.001077785,0.0005215227,0.1482721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03463924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1158798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Yves Sprumont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05600991476203109,"gpt":0.2603072414461186,"spread":0.2042973266840875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002700145,0.000758575,0.001332318,0.001311911,0.001886624,0.002985187,0.001439803,0.00194356,0.00955354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007171876,0.0007548677,0.0007825166,0.002567538,0.006961116,0.01137387,0.001376446,0.006222312,0.002138088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001706529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001529571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001164269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001067442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985322,0.0006530132,0.00009206605,0.0001969203,0.0004159312,0.0001099949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956939,0.003139098,0.0001777411,0.0003693448,0.0005333886,0.00008646522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000277216,0.000008653988,0.00002825409,0.00002036918,0.000002259837,0.000007049934,0.00004960161,0.0001997091,0.00003094151,0.9923348,0.00250168,0.004813908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001974533,0.000001670218,0.00002906123,0.000009434028,0.000001288268,0.0000140875,0.00001646487,0.0004519758,0.00003418713,0.9939441,0.00549393,0.000001754572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0251588,0.01449518,0.4106667,0.01960772,0.00116001,0.0001280372,0.0004679883,0.0001827383,0.5281329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6211376,0.02024671,0.2071948,0.004704815,0.003656392,0.0009589263,0.0008036372,0.0005186248,0.1407786],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00955354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03195983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Elisabeth Gugl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0785210211365463,"gpt":0.3560741063112804,"spread":0.2775530851747341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061206,0.0009609199,0.001731693,0.001106882,0.003326488,0.004384154,0.00288181,0.003404961,0.00992841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02494396,0.0007896048,0.002077577,0.001423731,0.02152638,0.01206926,0.00313913,0.01334693,0.0007116348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003041403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00211621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001846103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929305,0.004353378,0.0002364735,0.000790659,0.001156564,0.0005323707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842438,0.01311662,0.000563614,0.001326421,0.0005258857,0.0002237172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008635067,0.0000102838,0.00003497539,0.00001373013,0.000005904394,0.00001388857,0.0001678225,0.000378691,0.00003094687,0.9973832,0.0004069794,0.001545019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004039725,0.000002520538,0.00002791324,0.000009620667,0.000002755347,0.000006552484,0.00002231298,0.0004495957,0.00001787002,0.998735,0.000719678,0.00000216267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04522083,0.009057023,0.2835518,0.01723364,0.0008638213,0.0001382089,0.0001749707,0.00005124411,0.6437083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287001,0.003690444,0.02606844,0.002039602,0.00142501,0.0003353996,0.00009771968,0.0001295513,0.03751379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0561226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}