{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3fb327eda124","filters":{"venue":"Studies in choice and welfare"}},"results":[{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","authors":[{"name":"D. Marc Kilgour","is_ca":true},{"name":"Erica M. Marshall","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1341350525014695,"gpt":0.2865264764115325,"spread":0.1523914239100631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007731176,0.0003419494,0.0009737738,0.0001395652,0.0002643233,0.00003097673,0.0002200714,0.0002661663,0.0001384697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004294205,0.000363927,0.0001640506,0.00002849026,0.0002007118,0.0000795517,0.0001764757,0.0002864149,0.00005202466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006365042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000527403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008897968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001403055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.00001021716,0.0007266094,0.000556101,0.00002987235,0.0003082202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986618,0.0004710847,0.0004855459,0.0002868331,0.00005073091,0.00004405134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147955,0.00001480725,0.007274039,0.0008413531,0.0002730241,0.00000307792,0.001767369,8.869225e-7,1.567793e-7,0.9868094,0.001522819,0.001478252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006384106,0.0001100769,0.001418052,0.0004539808,0.00002950388,0.000004378492,0.0008088239,0.000007347287,0.000001072736,0.2461998,0.7498083,0.0005202236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002621002,0.04263039,0.00005181899,0.0006242563,0.002232769,0.0008739026,0.0004832666,0.00007639972,0.9504062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6914055,0.00238247,0.0002408558,0.0002531695,0.001073192,0.0001443812,0.00002651337,0.0001182111,0.3043557],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Yves Sprumont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05600991476203109,"gpt":0.2603072414461186,"spread":0.2042973266840875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008074486,0.0003600239,0.001086122,0.0002920191,0.0001606236,0.00003932817,0.0001178682,0.000322108,0.00001808133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001271814,0.0004011065,0.00006152032,0.00003137765,0.0005474172,0.0001333821,0.0002688048,0.0004276765,0.00001091824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001046078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009507906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002388348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000657871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982839,0.00002616346,0.0007042336,0.0006813548,0.00002043578,0.000283929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990493,0.000263402,0.0003455817,0.0002595193,0.00001893208,0.00006324545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000340931,0.00002062308,0.02357091,0.0003412065,0.0001718612,0.00001882065,0.005100504,0.00001013495,7.425487e-8,0.9665999,0.00005295856,0.004078946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002058439,0.0001672458,0.04465493,0.0005850834,0.00003409828,0.00006797346,0.00203001,0.0001813542,0.00000140139,0.5622306,0.3866945,0.001294328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.494741,0.1650251,0.000006586487,0.0007677525,0.0008023219,0.0007039962,0.0003625766,0.00004000492,0.3375506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789414,0.1063428,0.00001093722,0.0001192125,0.0001455242,0.00002199191,0.000006790377,0.00003751968,0.01437386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4043692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Elisabeth Gugl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0785210211365463,"gpt":0.3560741063112804,"spread":0.2775530851747341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001705425,0.0003923251,0.0009529092,0.0002368351,0.0002637708,0.000016817,0.0006347803,0.0003667623,0.00001070042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001445888,0.0003086276,0.0001044168,0.0002290092,0.001951485,0.000182725,0.0003647275,0.0008350293,0.000002264597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000250144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002819128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002032503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01223621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969257,0.0001620409,0.0008781819,0.0005604113,0.001020284,0.0004534046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971241,0.001096359,0.0006416223,0.0004144524,0.0006478832,0.00007552014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082887,0.0001104862,0.07514256,0.0009599635,0.000576218,0.0000850388,0.1751298,0.0004075047,0.00004044064,0.729593,0.001048789,0.01679794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002447701,0.0004357633,0.08476963,0.005841486,0.0002131334,0.000004798466,0.3787446,0.0001283706,0.00000656492,0.2811624,0.2447416,0.001503957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09322182,0.2288082,0.00002373874,0.001656548,0.002436036,0.001505822,0.0002968742,0.00005708298,0.6719939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611639,0.1249964,0.0001597784,0.00009473492,0.0002354194,0.00002787285,0.00000680835,0.00004341041,0.01327169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.767942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}