{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":11,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"726d9b604ab6","filters":{"venue":"Suffolk transnational law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W99050741","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights - Corporate Liability Claims Not Actionable under the Alien Tort Statute - Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alien Tort Statute; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Tort; Class action; Statute; Liability; Original jurisdiction; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Colin Kearney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635669301774908,"gpt":0.264106770321031,"spread":0.2005398401435402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009100917,0.0003566991,0.0004082445,0.00009191181,0.001149782,0.0002561596,0.0007219489,0.0000957251,0.01270888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003179653,0.0002465283,0.000294848,0.0002090082,0.0003049284,0.001221218,0.000066662,0.0003000779,0.0003928024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001079019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005423405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008627982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003605563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974234,0.00005828601,0.000731739,0.0005520479,0.0008723462,0.0003621596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984054,0.00006080258,0.0005063934,0.0004499902,0.0005359183,0.00004152745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000397045,0.0002321853,0.0004734008,0.0003693598,0.0001000071,0.000008910553,0.00001316424,0.00001829757,0.00001796582,0.9945427,0.004123504,0.0000608279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004127548,0.00001255287,0.01156192,0.0001018947,0.0001425951,0.000003455973,0.000004403052,0.00009985654,0.00003067141,0.2598363,0.727505,0.0002885633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1521004,0.0009121197,0.000712977,0.01829524,0.002590197,0.002395453,0.0002451891,0.0005200519,0.8222284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884,0.00006842116,0.0001186053,0.004849979,0.0008221142,0.0001380688,0.0009476376,0.00003824493,0.00461697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603063009","doi":"","title":"One Turkey, Seven Drumsticks: A Look at Genetically Modified Food Labeling Laws in the United States and the European Union","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified organism; Food and drug administration; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; Law; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; International trade; Economics; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Jessica A. Murray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03610217655925758,"gpt":0.2437632713443218,"spread":0.2076610947850642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00323424,0.0001545591,0.0002211491,0.00001428793,0.0002415295,0.0000640561,0.0005058345,0.00004712154,0.0002256368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001090428,0.00004188772,0.00007792672,0.0004089682,0.0004085693,0.00005163592,0.00009097018,0.0001452665,0.00002681212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002688958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001245196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001524511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962509,0.002189164,0.0003726351,0.0003078874,0.0005757054,0.0003036716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981123,0.001492158,0.00005133995,0.000115305,0.0001443672,0.00008453646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005065545,0.0001452104,0.00008244718,0.0001867861,0.00004451868,0.000004756506,0.0001703375,0.00004371774,0.01406064,0.9402971,0.00008941342,0.04482443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01004963,0.001973837,0.1913752,0.003804924,0.0005551135,0.0001326948,0.0002983944,0.001176723,0.00305941,0.2075137,0.57792,0.002140433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466949,0.01404168,0.0003439883,0.332264,0.00003510546,0.002009093,0.0002472605,0.00005514734,0.004308806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826807,0.01429737,0.0001350941,0.002568754,0.00005109715,0.0000496829,0.0001509716,0.000003264714,0.00006303492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7327834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2470565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256026367","doi":"","title":"International Arbitration - ICSID Jurisdiction under NAFTA - Bayview Irrigation District V. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1, Award 19 June 2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Treaty; Expropriation; Law; Political science; International arbitration; Redress; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Nick Shapiro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575793599989635,"gpt":0.2602780719203664,"spread":0.2345201359204701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784493,0.0004957162,0.000467898,0.0004341272,0.000739107,0.0002656787,0.0004006073,0.0001545376,0.003585217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001140035,0.0004778391,0.0003425146,0.0009987534,0.000244036,0.002678588,0.00005107295,0.0003747424,0.0006808105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003317681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001607083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008353672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004525862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962332,0.00009556489,0.001258506,0.0006560376,0.00135171,0.000405015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973001,0.0001214221,0.0005958622,0.000324754,0.001563384,0.00009450227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004580963,0.000301345,0.00007255041,0.0005910409,0.0001530541,0.0001344272,0.00001965896,0.0002384397,0.00004947322,0.9697772,0.02842026,0.000196704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103293,0.00003055224,0.0006073727,0.0003412197,0.0002050637,0.0004097855,0.00001423416,0.006394914,0.00003380379,0.01344659,0.9769445,0.0005390434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126087,0.007837486,0.02083337,0.1548921,0.01244303,0.005243664,0.001053056,0.001425268,0.7836633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242316,0.0122814,0.00149234,0.2196246,0.003732944,0.0004749031,0.03482471,0.0001674946,0.003169982],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14063034","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law - a Friend of the Court: An Argument for Prudent Use of International Law in Domestic, Human Rights Related Constitutional Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; International law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jason C. Chandler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08173917450153739,"gpt":0.3428245931507893,"spread":0.2610854186492519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008100636,0.0001357008,0.0003260332,0.00004534647,0.0007799119,0.00001670486,0.0004030136,0.00007809057,0.0004552011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000705,0.00009969627,0.000229895,0.0002402976,0.003300475,0.0003974206,0.00003294009,0.0001048012,0.00000221127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002199523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005976267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04428279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978564,0.0001714695,0.0007363211,0.0002290567,0.0008182928,0.0001885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985888,0.0003835882,0.0002293557,0.000142168,0.0005839297,0.00007217439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178963,0.000371286,0.0003404546,0.00004064369,0.00007968066,0.000002060366,0.0004129181,0.00001465053,0.00001524296,0.998612,0.00004122739,0.0000480518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004974515,0.00004548288,0.001871714,0.0006812632,0.00009806166,0.000004069258,0.00004416506,0.000005553137,0.00006256966,0.711431,0.2851336,0.0001251404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0274645,0.00792384,0.00195189,0.0108005,0.001481303,0.005948149,0.00226459,0.00007616323,0.9420891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979326,0.0003813214,0.0009869576,0.0003917694,0.00003573282,0.0001301581,0.00008504234,0.000004313295,0.00005213952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728114247","doi":"","title":"Trademark Law - Extraterritorial Application of the Lanham Act Saves an American Brand from a Canadian Retail Pirate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lanham Act; Trademark; Law; State (computer science); Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"William Johnston","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03970534395161009,"gpt":0.3163183704445588,"spread":0.2766130264929487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008741993,0.0001492725,0.0003294081,0.00001816892,0.001465681,0.0001483532,0.001037149,0.00008901841,0.0005455986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001266646,0.0001083163,0.0001648914,0.0001315952,0.001374055,0.0004651798,0.00001270381,0.0001710116,0.00001560479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005770657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6360074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.0004800933,0.0003645375,0.0002968824,0.0005787457,0.0002722776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986935,0.0001404644,0.0002527944,0.0005310228,0.0001888664,0.0001933228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001465027,0.00003095238,0.0002104498,0.0000666994,0.00002861732,5.496299e-7,0.0008146014,8.741561e-7,0.0002158573,0.9933383,0.0001648769,0.005113499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001862056,0.00003599134,0.002652724,0.000167923,0.00007609845,5.562311e-7,0.0000313706,0.0000241387,0.0002884512,0.009011517,0.9873437,0.0001813036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0593716,0.008346313,0.0002273278,0.207398,0.002983728,0.005629172,0.001553806,0.0001582389,0.7143319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965897,0.0006646825,0.0001258616,0.001812486,0.0005191602,0.00005411147,0.00006607531,0.00001644959,0.0001514329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256412339","doi":"","title":"International Law - Prohibition on Refoulement - Remedies - Maher Arar V. John Ashcroft","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Torture; State (computer science); Damages; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Daniel P Ryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02890641905913998,"gpt":0.3338505220655628,"spread":0.3049441030064228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009499658,0.0002107705,0.0002623416,0.00007480039,0.0006933813,0.0001180994,0.0004457356,0.00009467916,0.005099748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000333915,0.0001811365,0.0002287584,0.00009935236,0.0002775295,0.000530882,0.000009976417,0.0002032096,0.0002179615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001095824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001472041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001386474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970454,0.000200896,0.0005270071,0.0003815155,0.001537268,0.000307891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990058,0.00009562928,0.0001510117,0.0001766279,0.0004503224,0.0001206355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002279577,0.0001923622,0.000001687888,0.00006417326,0.00004072956,0.000008524145,0.0001525406,0.000002597734,0.00002775013,0.9962003,0.002481159,0.0008054004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002316652,0.00006738482,0.0001526053,0.0004399054,0.00002676329,0.000001951162,0.00000324334,0.000002338102,0.00008760742,0.2727979,0.7260205,0.0001681416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007376399,0.0009977364,0.0000698853,0.114058,0.0007285285,0.0007637381,0.00008442705,0.0001254369,0.8824346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960107,0.001968742,0.0006690803,0.02632115,0.001043673,0.00009011534,0.000528979,0.00001857918,0.009252727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191591966","doi":"","title":"Ninth Circuit Issues Preliminary Injunction Recognizing Activist Conservation Society as Pirates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Ninth; Law; Jurisdiction; International waters; Political science; Commission; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Keefe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01850612360824004,"gpt":0.2602488167959774,"spread":0.2417426931877374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004536251,0.000240266,0.0002687737,0.00001890722,0.0002552569,0.00009464026,0.0002696447,0.0000934275,0.02507001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006443268,0.0002299701,0.0002040768,0.0002582174,0.0002436323,0.00129627,0.00005221748,0.0001902211,0.002461498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002440521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002772304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001908085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001353482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979989,0.0001226496,0.0004721121,0.0004468864,0.0007029364,0.0002565284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.0001839173,0.0001591227,0.0001990899,0.0001396451,0.00008913736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002376806,0.0003225043,0.003696625,0.000909168,0.0001321896,0.000003550175,0.0002899845,0.00005584758,0.004618051,0.9338202,0.03659046,0.0195376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004247423,0.0002461059,0.03308818,0.0008380759,0.0001297741,0.00004428112,0.00002950408,0.0007488217,0.002884311,0.06674315,0.8941746,0.0006484275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2001475,0.02496457,0.002446246,0.265683,0.001302282,0.007496988,0.0001423441,0.000895522,0.4969215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756205,0.003037632,0.002661769,0.01342839,0.0001285212,0.0004656499,0.0004238036,0.00004500108,0.004188744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256446364","doi":"","title":"International Law and Laws of War and International Criminal Law - Prosecution of Child Soldiers - United States V. Omar Ahmed Khadr","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law of war; International law; Commission; Criminal law; Terrorism; Spanish Civil War","authors":[{"name":"Daniel P Ryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01715269293366148,"gpt":0.2991654915437898,"spread":0.2820127986101283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008506025,0.0001884899,0.0003239153,0.0001255995,0.000381734,0.00004825874,0.000385767,0.0001203537,0.001033174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005047925,0.000171564,0.0001269616,0.0001052933,0.001510645,0.000542104,0.00004047624,0.0002473803,0.000002652108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004499499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007107657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001563246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008512533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979051,0.0001223117,0.0006181412,0.0003090728,0.000842527,0.0002028782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984825,0.0001870464,0.0002774201,0.0001255804,0.0008041586,0.0001232456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003935124,0.0001311339,0.00004297552,0.0003330544,0.0001141163,0.000001872971,0.0008341876,0.000002631032,0.000146361,0.9980825,0.00008124853,0.0001905994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007459301,0.00006431024,0.0005587072,0.0004933939,0.0001312383,0.00001719908,0.00008467102,0.0001020282,0.0005107149,0.1843329,0.8127075,0.0002513657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.251005,0.003894104,0.0002092054,0.06718698,0.002811035,0.002262787,0.001845018,0.0001511664,0.6706347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925145,0.002836837,0.0007259775,0.00256888,0.0001864,0.00003369197,0.0007673078,0.0000158171,0.0003505939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8137496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1195034990","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure - Second Circuit Upholds Extraterritorial Reach over Foreign Financial Institution under the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Terrorism; Damages; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; State (computer science); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Yvette M. Kosoy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02319276197511649,"gpt":0.2854697569323346,"spread":0.2622769949572181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566516,0.000210339,0.0003726109,0.00003216324,0.001089479,0.00015861,0.0004102218,0.0002151054,0.0008497736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001448119,0.0001534962,0.0002014964,0.0003912115,0.0003441738,0.0007161643,0.00001360218,0.000261082,0.00002311192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000814756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001419343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02071376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975359,0.0003357237,0.000495484,0.0003567703,0.0009161889,0.0003599654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.000142061,0.0001805715,0.0001862978,0.0002510076,0.0001137509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005382266,0.00004704,0.0001202212,0.0006635505,0.00001405451,0.000001015606,0.0003869459,0.000003687734,0.00004439851,0.9956851,0.002520815,0.0005077943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003264611,0.00003477438,0.002631502,0.0003910768,0.00006335694,0.00000406803,0.0000372861,0.000004826667,0.000026678,0.0720357,0.9242143,0.0002299721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04156826,0.03078322,0.003329554,0.03675571,0.008385152,0.004753239,0.0002108925,0.0003789912,0.873835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992739,0.0008888305,0.000009755001,0.002794245,0.003118368,0.0001072086,0.00005202907,0.00001616891,0.0002743817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275514020","doi":"","title":"Immigration Law - Alien Denied Entry to Another Country and Returned Involuntarily to United States, Not \"Found In\" United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Law; Alien; Statute; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Lawsuit; Federal law; Conviction; Legislation; Citizenship; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Maurica D. Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01741493075754483,"gpt":0.2883466331919541,"spread":0.2709317024344092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526155,0.0002018999,0.0003841806,0.0001557645,0.0003834754,0.0001792938,0.0002280451,0.0001114213,0.0001330261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001386844,0.0001857439,0.00004315405,0.001624521,0.0001673707,0.0003917461,0.00001923469,0.0001369481,0.00002205426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001619342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001382278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1015798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3416742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976073,0.0004286935,0.0005497852,0.0003620245,0.0007031222,0.0003490935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987587,0.0003151775,0.000111439,0.0001440802,0.0004586531,0.0002119137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004551624,0.00004745689,0.000273917,0.0006463354,0.00002051515,0.000001646527,0.003586239,0.000133546,0.00003251717,0.9939612,0.001041841,0.0002093226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003918063,0.00006937941,0.0006420196,0.0008582686,0.000037131,8.468122e-7,0.0002635614,0.00008979195,0.00002612529,0.006115353,0.9912428,0.0002629711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4430384,0.0301447,0.003773838,0.4263474,0.001617057,0.01205064,0.001400584,0.000700142,0.08092717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433728,0.003189302,0.0001726859,0.05184312,0.0001436984,0.00009851817,0.0008472425,0.00002559111,0.0003069748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9044028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483085334","doi":"","title":"Neighbors Up North: Nunavut’s Incorporation In Canada As A Model For Multicultural Democracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jason Wiener","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03626084878589254,"gpt":0.3163796736596164,"spread":0.2801188248737239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002966122,0.0001284236,0.0002448768,0.00002269178,0.0005066584,0.0000149363,0.000156952,0.00003805734,0.0000924587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001093233,0.0001060542,0.00009373817,0.0002102059,0.0001116811,0.0003156197,0.000008152885,0.00008673224,0.000006597382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006258115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001661395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5050933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986535,0.00007961511,0.0003802334,0.0001957527,0.0004205282,0.0002703653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994028,0.0001681898,0.00009902495,0.00007162523,0.0001594301,0.0000989477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006961938,0.00002198412,0.0005786861,0.0001646513,0.00001535259,6.230626e-7,0.001948542,0.0006540852,4.915475e-7,0.9919491,0.002413889,0.002245592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001136951,0.00002362467,0.008498886,0.0004306969,0.0001322783,0.000002797165,0.0006031409,0.02345303,0.000006911149,0.03398725,0.9311005,0.0006238995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02141498,0.0122777,0.001537433,0.9305602,0.0004020109,0.003433346,0.0003159231,0.00007369697,0.02998467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986759,0.003742818,0.001457997,0.006885044,0.0001280049,0.0001429705,0.00007153191,0.000008580382,0.0008040175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4982023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}