{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b9201f08f64a","filters":{"venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice"}},"results":[{"id":"W4315852544","doi":"10.18356/9789210010641c008","title":"Case concerning fisheries jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) (jurisdiction of the court) judgment of 4 December 1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Original jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02157311159254869,"gpt":0.2207510453214648,"spread":0.1991779337289161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001574766,0.0003479961,0.0003624935,0.00147256,0.01116863,0.006456273,0.001923331,0.006148783,0.01110447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00321229,0.0004659533,0.0007573893,0.002427162,0.002184542,0.0009543897,0.001388963,0.004799977,0.001402463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04841815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07203258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971205,0.0001671522,0.00008259239,0.0002025407,0.001358182,0.001069006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989459,0.0001468032,0.00003249956,0.00002975538,0.0006935486,0.0001515067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867924,0.00003099687,0.002051085,0.00008104843,0.00001961118,0.001337195,0.002727151,0.0005168815,0.0006368186,0.2770923,0.6944947,0.02094363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003964481,0.00001209293,0.005647237,0.0002707147,0.00003858937,0.0002449235,0.001749561,0.0002508405,0.0005907975,0.009395613,0.981698,0.00006193604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01425214,0.006801415,0.0006950631,0.0319585,0.001178552,0.0001284704,0.00221662,0.00007831684,0.942691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2100255,0.004882459,0.001843314,0.0568052,0.0003221931,0.0001053895,0.001202248,0.00009585169,0.7247179],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04841815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3512999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316092844","doi":"10.18356/9789210010641c012","title":"Case concerning legality of use of force (Yugoslavia v. Canada) (provisional measures) order of 2 June 1999","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Business","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04947787858311621,"gpt":0.2764742265397515,"spread":0.2269963479566353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009509329,0.0002900552,0.0002811679,0.0009914605,0.008320557,0.00440234,0.001256271,0.003914336,0.006763127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001439248,0.0004126476,0.000419819,0.00148895,0.003170956,0.000689719,0.001341391,0.004251261,0.0009041797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03154513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04441462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9450855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985268,0.0001407974,0.00004331332,0.0001025481,0.00056223,0.0006242607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995578,0.0001128315,0.00002356837,0.00002279765,0.0002067,0.00007624209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005244635,0.00005464564,0.002712228,0.00009123954,0.00001656886,0.001306837,0.007016746,0.0006025182,0.0006853709,0.5447737,0.4242244,0.01846336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003674538,0.00001937081,0.01313134,0.000388442,0.00003171815,0.0003255105,0.003602205,0.0003266717,0.0006758838,0.01077165,0.9706265,0.00006391089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02703086,0.01066664,0.0005675376,0.02300366,0.001019777,0.0001676419,0.001629963,0.0000653143,0.9358485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2940592,0.005741606,0.001204116,0.02064456,0.0001824014,0.0001348295,0.0007278012,0.00003902455,0.6772664],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05491453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.228877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315852561","doi":"10.18356/9789210010641c004","title":"Questions of interpretation and application of the 1971 montreal convention arising from the aerial incident at lockerbie (libyan Arab jamahiriya v. United States of America) (preliminary objections) judgment of 27 February 1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01212878909595281,"gpt":0.2593466884537783,"spread":0.2472178993578255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003540646,0.0005448462,0.0003416846,0.0009451173,0.009141513,0.009909682,0.001817209,0.007573559,0.008768485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006165864,0.0005612685,0.0005255295,0.00151361,0.007527059,0.002128949,0.001644715,0.008409541,0.001356154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02237455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01940162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3779341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5195422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997816,0.0006191896,0.00009148843,0.0001702776,0.0006646091,0.0006385725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988831,0.0005459583,0.00005753628,0.00004333613,0.0003994023,0.00007072778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003184029,0.00002750139,0.0006685529,0.00006686195,0.000008595669,0.0006134252,0.01037644,0.0003213832,0.0006095998,0.7359279,0.2390475,0.01230047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742685,0.000032846,0.004320064,0.000546573,0.00002344641,0.0001661827,0.007911504,0.0003009642,0.001197515,0.0439053,0.9414995,0.00006865386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01353578,0.008169017,0.0009090896,0.04072778,0.001687841,0.0001861973,0.0003383518,0.00004163852,0.9344043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.364936,0.007373583,0.002616808,0.04484071,0.001537189,0.0003588258,0.0003130117,0.00007162667,0.5779523],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3779341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7514686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315852577","doi":"10.18356/9789210010641c003","title":"Questions of interpretation and application of the 1971 montreal convention arising from the aerial incident at lockerbie (libyan Arab jamahiriya v. United Kingdom) (preliminary objections) judgment of 27 February 1998","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Summaries of judgments, advisory opinions and orders of the International Court of Justice","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Kingdom; Law; Convention; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; History; Philosophy; Geology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0189764565564774,"gpt":0.2717915340664998,"spread":0.2528150775100224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305833,0.0004718326,0.0003507072,0.0008377132,0.009644454,0.01026674,0.0017257,0.008622846,0.007023385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007713999,0.0005433044,0.0004800892,0.001472675,0.008716385,0.002132589,0.001717326,0.007845103,0.001088705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02404404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01832534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.382238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5238117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972141,0.000867708,0.0001338814,0.0002063135,0.0007506537,0.000827354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984054,0.0008692629,0.00008493856,0.00005814256,0.000498287,0.00008390802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003905859,0.00002459104,0.0008364523,0.00008062515,0.000009277105,0.0007642137,0.01557104,0.0003208384,0.0005978217,0.7734172,0.1975099,0.01082899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003410581,0.00003987772,0.006125323,0.0007006769,0.000027039,0.0001988709,0.01355205,0.0003097069,0.001401369,0.04698418,0.9305423,0.00008463403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02504217,0.01137458,0.0009799364,0.0589829,0.001831489,0.0001858748,0.000383744,0.00003735474,0.9011819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4875703,0.007318832,0.002329461,0.0485567,0.001351171,0.0003179915,0.0002475356,0.00005823515,0.4522498],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.382238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7600262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}