{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":25,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3062939036f9","filters":{"venue":"Syntax"}},"results":[{"id":"W2048820599","doi":"10.1111/1467-9612.00059","title":"The Fine Structure of Cyclic Agree","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Feature (linguistics); Displacement (psychology); Ergative case; Argument (complex analysis); Phrase; Agreement; Head (geology); Space (punctuation); Distinctive feature; Mathematics; Locality; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Psychology; Geology; Philosophy; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01710416292941274,"gpt":0.2231515066143682,"spread":0.2060473436849554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001202081,0.00008648062,0.0001124149,0.00002897625,0.000249952,0.0000622888,0.000127801,0.00003062342,0.00138166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069757,0.00005738632,0.00004657519,0.00002248965,0.0001310391,0.00003380652,0.00001460273,0.00007775901,0.00004497117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001538375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002570118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004122855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005208514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993384,0.00004896001,0.0002060674,0.0001044785,0.000156903,0.0001451237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993207,0.0001731798,0.0001253814,0.000249483,0.0001088427,0.00002235115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004026704,0.00001083885,0.0003188829,0.0000127683,0.00002782466,8.739906e-7,0.006640065,0.000003341464,0.0006724722,0.991014,0.0004261041,0.0008687686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003760972,0.00006657271,0.002300267,0.00004386272,0.00007616983,0.000007019621,0.004840908,0.00006001194,0.01206313,0.8237749,0.1561525,0.0002386018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8660078,0.000331093,0.0002133797,0.007825635,0.005175359,0.0003309564,0.0001133032,0.00008137784,0.1199211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966781,0.000005236647,0.0001930801,0.00004543542,0.0004942652,0.000001760598,0.000005867731,0.00001229417,0.002563985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1672391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016592353","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00074.x","title":"A Modular account of null objects in French","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Syntax; Computer science; Focus (optics); Null (SQL); Typology; Perspective (graphical); Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02058785156923382,"gpt":0.2461406397491947,"spread":0.2255527881799609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008834524,0.00006498441,0.00014044,0.00009976869,0.00003822462,0.00003504612,0.000087834,0.00001972839,0.002931108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003802667,0.00005456424,0.00006026301,0.0000281333,0.00005414889,0.00005388254,0.00002014224,0.00004926753,0.00008967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001896409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000250784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003477466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01520159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994789,0.000009827671,0.000170481,0.0001013277,0.0001199037,0.0001196034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.000017276,0.00005131399,0.0001454582,0.00006068294,0.00002299137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001156467,0.000490123,0.003724887,0.0000691928,0.0001290735,0.00002624738,0.04338101,0.0008150461,0.0005802952,0.9424867,0.003702921,0.004582944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001349284,0.0001485014,0.006191354,0.0002327281,0.0002717202,0.000002353307,0.01381175,0.01293856,0.003641451,0.04099696,0.9195785,0.0008368656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5624549,0.0004636691,0.00001081801,0.000249818,0.0001457644,0.00005394811,0.00002730054,0.00001413174,0.4365796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955645,0.00001792889,0.00009687766,0.0001056194,0.0007947211,0.000004184454,0.000006251889,0.000006487776,0.003403424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086747158","doi":"10.1111/1467-9612.00057","title":"Anaphoric R–Expressions as Bound Variables","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Linguistics; Mathematics; Crossover; Combinatorics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00929937327015266,"gpt":0.2624024794438426,"spread":0.2531031061736899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002231352,0.0001096544,0.0001043266,0.00009204775,0.0001771069,0.0001953862,0.0006971015,0.00007451189,0.000087277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002847639,0.00008997148,0.00003644991,0.0004488284,0.00003230421,0.0004174506,0.0001318775,0.0001563716,0.00009163416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000376076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001122017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006435522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990741,0.00006820155,0.0001221203,0.0002922857,0.000198754,0.0002445303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999222,0.00007086389,0.00005553814,0.0005184101,0.00005107612,0.00008210044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001248216,0.00003840608,0.00007848851,0.00001212214,0.000007930273,0.00004317384,0.0002353551,0.000001195017,0.02629862,0.9591177,0.005438149,0.008727587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034844,0.00004481414,0.00002871648,0.00006548818,0.000005137226,0.000105101,0.00002744516,0.0002152301,0.2053496,0.743527,0.05025876,0.0002692206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008184494,0.006147818,0.9303699,0.0007271039,0.0006897517,0.0002082071,0.000002478359,0.001565206,0.05210504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4765488,0.0000155155,0.5218288,0.0003392202,0.00002568513,0.00001454197,7.69538e-7,0.000008153945,0.001218554],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4683643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3668931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001364423","doi":"10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00066.x","title":"Symmetry in Structure Building","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Specifier; Complement (music); Selection (genetic algorithm); Locality; Head (geology); Computer science; Repertoire; Symmetry (geometry); Composition (language); Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00782222753060681,"gpt":0.2343997856214841,"spread":0.2265775580908773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001018415,0.00009099668,0.0001077144,0.00009679847,0.00005380077,0.00007119677,0.000535445,0.00006391905,0.00001671934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005773043,0.00007675789,0.00003393498,0.0003842433,0.00002014118,0.0002209435,0.0001544356,0.0001431579,0.00005156515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006038316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009337653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001141357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992606,0.0000205648,0.0001066294,0.0002534835,0.0001185214,0.0002401855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995786,0.00002673784,0.00003261169,0.0002873046,0.00001823004,0.00005649354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001767447,0.00003671597,0.005643765,0.00001573757,0.000006358608,0.00007304204,0.001113518,0.0001927197,0.004305162,0.9670352,0.000136833,0.02143917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001943126,0.0001567247,0.0776359,0.0002262756,0.00000869484,0.0002100638,0.0001506988,0.002899604,0.07541535,0.831771,0.008679181,0.0009033931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398871,0.0005799749,0.1404875,0.0005990589,0.0009132581,0.0001164206,0.00000185966,0.0001924199,0.01722245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713299,0.000004695825,0.02834816,0.0001400481,0.00008483649,0.000001992669,4.474163e-7,0.00000484578,0.00008509344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1352642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3130096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081769872","doi":"10.1111/synt.12007","title":"Not Moving Clauses: Connectivity in Clausal Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Semantics (computer science); Movement (music); Variable (mathematics); Linguistics; Computer science; Aside; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02875086554514486,"gpt":0.2452422876100701,"spread":0.2164914220649252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002479379,0.0001563775,0.0002123054,0.0001318587,0.0001590326,0.0002455091,0.0001517661,0.00006221903,0.004082057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789869,0.0001523918,0.00004725796,0.00003487584,0.00008439706,0.0003062348,0.00006332598,0.0001684949,0.001373426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000337477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01839215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009456031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988233,0.00007533491,0.0003069772,0.0002677271,0.0002177551,0.0003088619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992509,0.0002187377,0.0001196975,0.0002393808,0.0001141625,0.00005711379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000254555,0.0002891473,0.02213562,0.00008531337,0.00007610257,0.00001953542,0.04388717,0.00001862125,0.001732477,0.9255764,0.001072643,0.005081501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003462019,0.0003365658,0.1997183,0.0005977405,0.0001416476,0.00001421337,0.03787332,0.009484975,0.005785758,0.7181978,0.02235554,0.002032114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643144,0.0000121231,0.0001695423,0.005444748,0.00180256,0.0003734407,0.00001776734,0.0001088758,0.02775654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967028,0.000002896842,0.0002511098,0.000411788,0.0008806994,0.00005506442,0.00001117627,0.00002580828,0.001658606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2073786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608540995","doi":"10.1111/synt.12135","title":"Little‐v<sup>0</sup>Agreement and Templatic Morphology in Ch'ol","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Ergative case; Morpheme; Agreement; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Subject (documents); Head (geology); Dative case; Possessive; Genitive case; Verb; Predicate (mathematical logic); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Biology; Noun","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03695142632210384,"gpt":0.2607246853155922,"spread":0.2237732589934884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003095739,0.0001538675,0.0002420606,0.0001088874,0.0004445178,0.0002873316,0.000222132,0.00006513749,0.001461448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005583654,0.0001446298,0.00003535543,0.000009725966,0.0002464019,0.0001477005,0.0001205427,0.0001291889,0.0002872793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005036424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002649181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005327249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003758828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989577,0.00004695823,0.0002960528,0.0002772729,0.0001542105,0.0002678112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991325,0.000105192,0.0001747595,0.0004733658,0.00005831096,0.00005586952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004884892,0.0001842865,0.05063379,0.0001693884,0.0001017764,0.0001344716,0.08986839,0.00003350263,0.0001684461,0.8519854,0.0008473451,0.00582436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005884012,0.0006187861,0.2239415,0.0008400201,0.0003397447,0.0001074295,0.03426625,0.01713733,0.0007452099,0.6586367,0.05546588,0.002017151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528749,0.00006921217,0.00006381858,0.01113724,0.0008572229,0.0003048991,0.00003180014,0.00003921469,0.03462168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995987,0.0000153116,0.0002701688,0.0001605085,0.0008468534,0.00002476648,0.00001235106,0.00001865545,0.002664386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1933487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986634806","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2004.00005.x","title":"A Computational Algebraic Approach to English Grammar","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Simple (philosophy); Iterated function; Context (archaeology); Type (biology); Algebraic number; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Grammar; String (physics); Parsing; Mathematics; Element (criminal law); Rule-based machine translation; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008785415566468675,"gpt":0.2387966165028332,"spread":0.2300112009363645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001591809,0.0001107817,0.000105946,0.0001167853,0.00008624059,0.0001704573,0.0008351151,0.00005225413,0.000002870242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113518,0.0001005895,0.0000403962,0.0004779009,0.00002547916,0.000338669,0.0002368243,0.0001364523,0.00004760183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000827724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008683546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003923753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002077969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.00001651762,0.000129619,0.0003399966,0.0002798052,0.0002215997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994135,0.00002724084,0.00003807688,0.0002963731,0.0001223563,0.0001024494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002519077,0.00008005561,0.0000167101,0.00001772777,0.000007473585,0.00001104193,0.002113051,0.001243545,0.0002524941,0.9739959,0.0008340044,0.02142549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003697657,0.00007919714,0.0002416992,0.00007383072,0.000004880102,0.00006283486,0.00004418395,0.004231813,0.008331168,0.9831617,0.002948277,0.0004506219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003277931,0.0002327935,0.9920277,0.0007392578,0.0001410976,0.000163137,0.000001830457,0.0009864909,0.002429741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3690297,3.90691e-7,0.6301647,0.0006805119,0.00005853375,0.00001934076,0.000004071851,0.000006099805,0.00003669224],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3657517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4101921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580250905","doi":"10.1111/synt.12030","title":"Superiority in English and German: Cross‐Language Grammatical Differences?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Grammar; Phrase; Computer science; Rule-based machine translation; English grammar; Noun phrase; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Noun; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04273364225269496,"gpt":0.3309188915147008,"spread":0.2881852492620058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002311764,0.0001214068,0.0001860404,0.00006057504,0.0000498987,0.00007284524,0.0001808348,0.0000924533,0.00004736968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001694463,0.00009718156,0.00002587735,0.0001181215,0.000304163,0.0001407841,0.0001138907,0.0002341528,0.00003364313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000166464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003195012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009790754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007463936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.000164002,0.0001793134,0.000348482,0.0001365838,0.0002793643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994336,0.0001804575,0.00003215218,0.0001975127,0.00002091117,0.000135342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002792102,0.0005244619,0.3253855,0.0001437675,0.000009433737,0.01198365,0.1195459,0.000002026153,0.5267623,0.006543248,0.0003551476,0.008465339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008918048,0.001271323,0.1895376,0.0001995738,0.00005482892,0.00346169,0.0114337,0.00115639,0.7591304,0.01549618,0.006767744,0.002572587],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974541,0.0001062324,0.000004682398,0.0001145332,0.0003630636,0.0001229835,0.00001197514,0.00008850106,0.001733913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989492,0.000009634817,0.00008187223,0.0005070352,0.0001481132,0.000007222329,0.000001630176,0.000008399505,0.0002869212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2323681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3962949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891904107","doi":"10.1111/synt.12162","title":"Ergative as Perfective Oblique","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Linguistics; Oblique case; Transitive relation; Computer science; History; Mathematics; Philosophy; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02155881874229492,"gpt":0.2551203978939156,"spread":0.2335615791516207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001991797,0.0001353561,0.0001467201,0.00008507923,0.0003643136,0.000129165,0.0001268294,0.00004849555,0.007534433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007312272,0.0001231853,0.00005541037,0.00003484518,0.0003273156,0.00012613,0.00004380428,0.0001074106,0.003812649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007733231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006714656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003789605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991347,0.00007395969,0.0001719281,0.0002365355,0.0001721715,0.0002107231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990807,0.0001343866,0.0001005615,0.0002056795,0.0004257566,0.00005297108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002024979,0.00003450542,0.0001493028,0.000007681759,0.00004770787,0.000004276286,0.0949053,2.269506e-7,0.0001661683,0.9032755,0.0007095849,0.0006794546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004054698,0.0005140487,0.002056218,0.00008635433,0.00007485859,0.00001036997,0.02030076,0.0002476127,0.00944405,0.9110869,0.05534328,0.0004301047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3413991,0.0000227705,0.0007830966,0.01048351,0.003705977,0.0003131121,0.00003809421,0.0002253888,0.6430289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987041,0.000002407535,0.0002849944,0.0004630884,0.004432134,0.00001816897,0.000009939741,0.00002506796,0.00772321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6456419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020931036","doi":"10.1111/synt.12195","title":"Locality Domains in Syntax: Evidence from Sentence Processing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Southern California","keywords":"Parsing; Computer science; Syntax; Locality; Sentence; Generative grammar; Context (archaeology); Sentence processing; Natural language processing; Sequence (biology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Geology; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06294952772333982,"gpt":0.267152335233901,"spread":0.2042028075105611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002628566,0.0001868019,0.0002723974,0.00005225767,0.0001886316,0.0002519294,0.0002829046,0.00005901402,0.0009201961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001713759,0.0001813652,0.0000583427,0.00008674848,0.0001703387,0.0003524609,0.00009294713,0.0002203344,0.000322108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009790671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009668982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01077248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007135799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983904,0.00010336,0.0004266707,0.0004491116,0.0003422473,0.0002882374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990738,0.0002744267,0.0001779673,0.0002275473,0.0001361601,0.0001100945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004542412,0.0004530253,0.08615744,0.001158594,0.0001539098,0.0004622425,0.6728554,0.0004781172,0.004762835,0.2063064,0.001117783,0.02563998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004095552,0.0006224117,0.09000807,0.01020459,0.0006504835,0.0000223966,0.176602,0.2139508,0.01000019,0.4654169,0.0237351,0.004691417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975444,0.0005769579,0.01515179,0.0776943,0.001465809,0.0005645384,0.0001190851,0.0003646283,0.006518463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961917,0.00001630723,0.00110834,0.0009944057,0.001539037,0.00001617157,0.00001483348,0.00002411609,0.00009512471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4962534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948191145","doi":"10.1111/synt.12115","title":"Causation without a<scp>cause</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causative; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Verb; Causation; Simple past; Alternation (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Noun; Simple (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Event structure; Ellipsis (linguistics); Negation; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Astrophysics; Combinatorics; Physics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05844353163430391,"gpt":0.2647027296126399,"spread":0.2062591979783359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003643138,0.0001563181,0.0001803336,0.0001023113,0.0001750037,0.0002193343,0.0001387741,0.00006230249,0.0002454357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00147075,0.0001471905,0.00004696373,0.00003511384,0.00009765453,0.0001890676,0.00004102529,0.0001119567,0.001401239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009777755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008506913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001626958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002232785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988483,0.00006131748,0.0002654374,0.0002306015,0.0003413568,0.0002530213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990009,0.0001258937,0.0001559151,0.0002745724,0.0003221238,0.0001205852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005733793,0.00007710486,0.00654272,0.00003119614,0.00008561201,0.00001242957,0.09349833,0.00002283358,0.0001297277,0.8878,0.01109034,0.0007040016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001699264,0.0002814433,0.005123456,0.0001442399,0.0003340333,0.00002849342,0.0481793,0.002606394,0.00243648,0.4904003,0.4483687,0.0003979419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6654509,0.0001137441,0.00194024,0.006156136,0.007773031,0.0004821837,0.00005856936,0.0005305135,0.3174947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833162,0.000003367221,0.0005381184,0.0002259375,0.002899462,0.00001827247,0.00004958656,0.00003507032,0.01291394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4372783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527295940","doi":"10.1111/synt.12126","title":"Clause Typing and Feature Inheritance of Discourse Features","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Linguistics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Bundle; Agreement; Variation (astronomy); Natural language processing; Physics; Philosophy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01870506845756174,"gpt":0.2485308896460894,"spread":0.2298258211885277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009963355,0.0001027983,0.0001496889,0.00004780541,0.0001003079,0.00004657999,0.00008346158,0.00004810738,0.0002086273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002798593,0.00006749637,0.00003215167,0.00001613429,0.0002082993,0.0001157138,0.00003253076,0.00006272468,0.0000197743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001802353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001748816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002262798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994441,0.00002517237,0.0001293821,0.0001595858,0.000102491,0.000139235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994799,0.0001080328,0.0001090127,0.0001773318,0.00009093335,0.00003481276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004077848,0.00003740909,0.002930401,0.00008002586,0.00005887278,0.000004769086,0.01971504,2.056002e-7,0.003744002,0.9628341,0.002835647,0.007718765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003778139,0.0004688374,0.1289301,0.003660515,0.0004882953,0.00006160927,0.03415453,0.00005225036,0.0187849,0.6715664,0.1360991,0.001955342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144783,0.0009898857,0.0004039226,0.05691637,0.002978946,0.0002980391,0.0001728824,0.0001276906,0.02363393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992303,0.00004112252,0.0004028204,0.00007482165,0.001000947,0.000004543784,0.000002861806,0.00001653842,0.006153404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2912676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466255002","doi":"10.1111/synt.12123","title":"Evidentiality and Raising to Object as A′‐Movement: A Romanian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Raising (metalworking); Evidentiality; Movement (music); Object (grammar); Linguistics; Subject (documents); Matrix (chemical analysis); Perception; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Geometry; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04172046842393937,"gpt":0.2878570891116801,"spread":0.2461366206877407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004755116,0.0001550011,0.0001903038,0.0001106468,0.000386192,0.0003032045,0.00009394004,0.00002677068,0.001110218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006429175,0.0001160629,0.00003943661,0.00002944475,0.00006212511,0.0001706803,0.0001086094,0.00004759957,0.0002682164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002939475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02623921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03442468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988006,0.0001061102,0.0002918968,0.0003352657,0.0002349874,0.0002310805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.000165419,0.00009584693,0.0002979896,0.0001208329,0.0001058446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001284715,0.0007652308,0.02502429,0.0001187239,0.0004568256,0.003342553,0.5337773,8.380438e-7,0.002370689,0.3907624,0.0006205661,0.04263204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00824229,0.003978012,0.04428638,0.001503409,0.001369463,0.001344599,0.4031408,0.00008027197,0.003931698,0.4876763,0.04110125,0.003345485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987542,0.00002042976,0.0004156278,0.005271994,0.001107006,0.0005492871,0.00002286108,0.00008975206,0.004980994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966891,0.000001906757,0.0000817867,0.0003325367,0.0009897548,0.00002513021,9.859543e-7,0.00002360824,0.001855143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1306365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147485593","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00104.x","title":"On the Topic of Pseudoclefts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Predicate (mathematical logic); Verb; Inversion (geology); Computer science; Focus (optics); Natural language processing; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04002802598177866,"gpt":0.2271638087990478,"spread":0.1871357828172691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009770291,0.00006572488,0.00009488709,0.00003314771,0.0001944357,0.00001619165,0.0001184193,0.00001923257,0.002328992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003362618,0.00004367605,0.00004598386,0.00001525268,0.000133384,0.00002611887,0.00001717217,0.00006274086,0.0002326917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001359268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001899617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006151984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002313268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994754,0.00003014958,0.0001493794,0.00008935462,0.0001568414,0.00009891881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.0002162362,0.00007641152,0.0002122741,0.000072192,0.00001568825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004503724,0.00002912654,0.000263854,0.000007192636,0.00001447823,0.000003357307,0.01639317,0.000002063704,0.00004956094,0.9817439,0.001322984,0.0001658391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005918199,0.0002868573,0.01461303,0.0001532778,0.00007066172,0.00002137427,0.007022941,0.000410495,0.006469281,0.9336109,0.03633011,0.0004192149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603356,0.00001319184,0.00005424106,0.01072109,0.001059862,0.0001136827,0.00001074022,0.00003617329,0.1276554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948761,0.000005004687,0.00005256058,0.0002923656,0.0005920674,0.000004892639,0.000002229136,0.000008482695,0.004166293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1345405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126926728","doi":"10.1111/synt.12014","title":"Multiple Focus Strategies in<i>Pro</i>‐Drop Languages: Evidence from Ellipsis in Spanish","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Focus (optics); Word order; Linguistics; Syntax; Subject (documents); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03324564924942823,"gpt":0.2582864371449284,"spread":0.2250407878955001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003868966,0.0001874609,0.0002828685,0.0001434303,0.00009084729,0.0002935827,0.00024999,0.00007851316,0.0008436358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001428356,0.0001824329,0.00005386429,0.00005929749,0.00009746417,0.0003412909,0.00005642286,0.0001931462,0.0003255293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007997816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005187117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08843738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2471351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985706,0.0001372017,0.000394009,0.0003554177,0.0002372289,0.000305529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986254,0.0007738789,0.0001337138,0.0003438239,0.00007692666,0.00004626841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001440644,0.0003776059,0.1398831,0.0002153981,0.00008372335,0.0001137377,0.261241,0.0003908166,0.004355039,0.5795977,0.000430309,0.01316749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003027284,0.0003340484,0.1314612,0.00287145,0.000149696,0.000005050603,0.1802196,0.02445674,0.006325617,0.6363406,0.01286456,0.001944278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775741,0.000327052,0.001305158,0.003333619,0.001037903,0.0003105328,0.00004648934,0.0001308035,0.01593436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731,0.00003052721,0.0009481505,0.00009226803,0.001160431,0.00003002843,0.00002071108,0.00002919361,0.0003786799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.923722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067042734","doi":"10.1111/synt.12015","title":"The Syntax of Null Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Null (SQL); Subject (documents); Syntax; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01717351247642742,"gpt":0.2211104485991966,"spread":0.2039369361227692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005277034,0.0001233601,0.0001777985,0.00004946579,0.0003748839,0.0001197603,0.0002529628,0.00004012409,0.0004956212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001151907,0.00008714806,0.00008024452,0.00002801762,0.0002295961,0.00005964301,0.0000471237,0.00009660765,0.0002740468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002504329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002953873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001576812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003337966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989612,0.00009256861,0.0003045,0.0001636166,0.0002479093,0.0002302312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986112,0.0005802171,0.000199915,0.0003832023,0.0001842088,0.00004125877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001382471,0.00002616382,0.0002989384,0.00002988042,0.00003280046,7.273736e-7,0.008206345,0.000002461605,0.0001891962,0.9876431,0.0006794784,0.002877137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007129721,0.000263711,0.003784856,0.0001920429,0.0001705476,0.000008120631,0.01020265,0.00169702,0.007900978,0.6515509,0.3229547,0.0005615075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4849069,0.0002485937,0.001876754,0.02810115,0.01006299,0.0006265236,0.00006515792,0.0002954681,0.4738165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948463,0.00001053361,0.000157637,0.0001154239,0.001431854,0.00001052964,0.000006168436,0.00002254604,0.003398954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5099395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573472303","doi":"10.1111/synt.12129","title":"On the Positional Distribution of an Armenian Auxiliary: Second‐Position Clisis, Focus, and Phases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Amgen (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Phrase; Clitic; Parallelism (grammar); Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Linguistics; Phase (matter); Weighting; Mathematics; Natural language processing; History; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02263896057259106,"gpt":0.2553066879666166,"spread":0.2326677273940255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002486394,0.000110927,0.0001278674,0.00003132056,0.000966548,0.0002893096,0.0001571809,0.00004076777,0.00110404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002878756,0.00008458878,0.00004351246,0.000007279242,0.0002730419,0.0002347413,0.00003346172,0.0000828113,0.00001776058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000349581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002438734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001607905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992598,0.00005821744,0.0001934661,0.0001770745,0.0001845141,0.0001269177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990953,0.0001535247,0.0002417612,0.0003400386,0.0001283981,0.00004099158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005330831,0.0001140569,0.0002252455,0.00001482561,0.00003417884,0.000002866919,0.002236205,7.817376e-7,0.0004519118,0.9951898,0.0004577082,0.00121911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009214244,0.0005630755,0.07598721,0.0002207699,0.0001609351,0.00001767186,0.002375272,0.0009833052,0.01144952,0.9039866,0.002972278,0.0003619844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777793,0.00001848693,0.0001954656,0.01284956,0.0005239327,0.0001937337,0.0009611102,0.00002898621,0.007449382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986489,0.000004114476,0.00004990296,0.0001100776,0.0006416069,0.00001278706,0.0002853275,0.00001029413,0.0002370066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09120325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293248289","doi":"10.1111/synt.12232","title":"Licensing unergative objects in ergative languages: The view from Polynesian","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ergative case; Samoan; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Syntax; Subject (documents); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02051501605603373,"gpt":0.2428104405939215,"spread":0.2222954245378877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003043734,0.000145427,0.0001952583,0.00009268927,0.0005968987,0.0001113095,0.0002231013,0.00002231803,0.00332437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003293343,0.0001168039,0.0000530909,0.0001002922,0.0001181664,0.00008099079,0.000133123,0.0002719642,0.00009407739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000166714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006445029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02896899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02868276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998684,0.0003158131,0.0002522751,0.0002463956,0.0002767557,0.0002247881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990553,0.0004448575,0.0001596169,0.0002534009,0.00005812477,0.00002874395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002739867,0.00008040471,0.0006238542,0.00001287418,0.00007708317,0.00005415619,0.6391838,0.00006193123,0.0002170011,0.3570105,0.000306608,0.002344342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007734213,0.0001176182,0.008913756,0.000164464,0.0001115267,0.000007201027,0.8146089,0.001173812,0.0009288137,0.1532041,0.01942202,0.0005742848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.842416,0.001093118,0.0001292896,0.0417884,0.00406698,0.0009318973,0.0003775514,0.0002373925,0.1089593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970481,0.000005771387,0.0001271015,0.0007623609,0.0009070345,0.00004312143,0.00005593298,0.00002717903,0.001023434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2038064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376503946","doi":"10.1111/synt.12251","title":"A tale of two inverses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inverse; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Linguistics; Computer science; Phenomenon; Psychology; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03946337988951376,"gpt":0.2649810280664038,"spread":0.2255176481768901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001406311,0.00006705785,0.0001172162,0.0001070743,0.0000878741,0.00003441102,0.00009014826,0.00001737058,0.001616694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002750132,0.00006359796,0.00004757788,0.00005174554,0.0001002566,0.00005578814,0.00003842407,0.00004076634,0.0009302707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001347606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002320173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00232861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001702164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994271,0.00002025499,0.0001680416,0.0001078368,0.0001451467,0.0001315829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.0000943026,0.00008046156,0.0001528577,0.0000859528,0.00002410398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004800247,0.00002372901,0.0008856729,0.0000486438,0.00003241037,0.000007466786,0.02840711,0.0000123487,0.0005279284,0.9665385,0.00279224,0.0007191295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001201045,0.0001451943,0.003281247,0.000211406,0.0001473999,0.000004950693,0.03456345,0.003437377,0.008501638,0.8602333,0.08772501,0.0005479791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8688104,0.00002160166,0.0000891139,0.005544442,0.003126083,0.0001819556,0.00009571014,0.0003194991,0.1218113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933832,0.000004463714,0.0001341622,0.00006556611,0.0007274273,0.000006721657,0.00002173562,0.00001385445,0.005642908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1245728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399532014","doi":"10.1111/synt.12289","title":"The syntax of Greek split reciprocals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universität Potsdam; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768296171259737,"gpt":0.2534584907573456,"spread":0.2257755290447482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005370633,0.0001405574,0.0001799409,0.00007739187,0.0002970028,0.0003132079,0.0002395314,0.00004716827,0.001074259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000566098,0.00009601632,0.0001148664,0.00005589641,0.0002472063,0.00009946118,0.00005647719,0.0001458851,0.0005779642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004639079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006827366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001211704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001301945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987975,0.00005677767,0.0003908535,0.0002285804,0.0002876601,0.0002386248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987541,0.0006248201,0.00009781075,0.0003322735,0.0001494932,0.00004150072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001202247,0.00001863798,0.00003872184,0.0001200215,0.00008757273,0.00001618592,0.01249965,0.000001498173,0.000161603,0.9728677,0.002083692,0.01209272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001519322,0.0001114278,0.0003007078,0.0004933269,0.0001721227,0.00002053816,0.007027959,0.001579003,0.001921908,0.5859942,0.4018923,0.0003345151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2370134,0.006944832,0.002701691,0.1171234,0.03596856,0.00169192,0.0005079761,0.001253246,0.596795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866649,0.00005761311,0.0002100206,0.00007712116,0.001759407,0.00002338329,0.00000970051,0.00003296638,0.01116488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380684859","doi":"10.1111/synt.12256","title":"Agree and the subjects of specificational clauses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; McMaster University","keywords":"Noun phrase; Subject (documents); Linguistics; Feature (linguistics); Agreement; Modal; Computer science; Phrase; Dependent clause; Non-finite clause; Noun; Set (abstract data type); Simple (philosophy); Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy; Sentence; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04199767603881813,"gpt":0.2424450439981344,"spread":0.2004473679593163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002827187,0.00005775121,0.000103911,0.00005826072,0.0001429896,0.00005081273,0.00008925701,0.0000176023,0.0004851284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231654,0.00003942382,0.00003098833,0.00003798561,0.0003062143,0.00003624761,0.00003283086,0.00004346605,0.0001680778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007272986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001788137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000569524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007293145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994597,0.00003643623,0.0001605911,0.00009909778,0.0001537332,0.00009045112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992505,0.000407712,0.00008669794,0.0001475918,0.00009217487,0.00001530009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001737963,0.000007975953,0.0004706597,0.00001806783,0.00002194409,8.334559e-7,0.01651843,0.000001374671,0.00006151693,0.9816002,0.0008872137,0.0003944038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001135943,0.00003587648,0.04858914,0.00006533969,0.0000813394,0.000004305725,0.01602848,0.0007401645,0.0008762802,0.9028748,0.02936659,0.000201788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8363229,0.0001936134,0.000125101,0.05262894,0.002457808,0.0004559355,0.0001126293,0.0001975703,0.1075055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965361,0.0000337626,0.00005999497,0.00006189979,0.0007839981,0.000008898503,0.000015806,0.000008578707,0.002490897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1602132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389790859","doi":"10.1111/synt.12262","title":"Island effects and amelioration by resumption in Jordanian Arabic: An auditory acceptability‐judgment study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Dependency (UML); Arabic; Point (geometry); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0205801405639312,"gpt":0.2641461433125513,"spread":0.2435660027486201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000724653,0.0001529325,0.0001963928,0.0002011162,0.0002241121,0.0002155785,0.00009056428,0.00005646844,0.0002309964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003392024,0.0001483173,0.00002271143,0.00008133514,0.00006991612,0.000279302,0.00004367232,0.0001342962,0.0001159281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009582334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001939643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003268939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03271129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986095,0.0002500654,0.0003044217,0.0003627102,0.0002594313,0.0002138758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.0001726488,0.000104293,0.0002521145,0.00006543194,0.00005628019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003498064,0.002909182,0.2943862,0.00080932,0.0002037195,0.00009550942,0.6060685,0.0001192755,0.006491637,0.04940489,0.01121151,0.02795048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002141354,0.00104228,0.9134368,0.00009972777,0.0001004922,0.000001393405,0.04078552,0.002726541,0.0003883978,0.03475796,0.003919382,0.0006001175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953726,0.0000194607,0.00004655425,0.001305644,0.001602257,0.0007552266,0.00003004561,0.0001373168,0.000730882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982184,0.00001123396,0.00002987198,0.00005259651,0.001028819,0.00009041649,0.00009399638,0.0000227882,0.0004518677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6190507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195257628","doi":"10.1111/synt.12219","title":"The <i>Done</i>‐State Derived Stative: A Case Study in Building Complex Eventualities in Syntax","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Syntax; Participle; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Object (grammar); Causative; Grammar; Verb; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Psychology; Programming language; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05861532339046138,"gpt":0.3051180923274434,"spread":0.246502768936982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008944469,0.0002380039,0.0003529635,0.0001390574,0.0005284437,0.0004145783,0.0001922917,0.0000327956,0.0003596925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009468654,0.000205633,0.0000653384,0.0001386414,0.0001841476,0.0001655783,0.0001504961,0.0002648434,0.00003109099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001362808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02957878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.313143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975012,0.0006362274,0.000684098,0.0003917225,0.0003251873,0.0004615473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998081,0.001081067,0.0001953948,0.0003615391,0.0002251154,0.00005592995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009509364,0.0008445848,0.01479505,0.0001133161,0.0002007785,0.01003812,0.7411661,0.0001761581,0.0008608089,0.2287772,0.0001241758,0.002808566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001792633,0.0001334111,0.01106139,0.0002013988,0.00005956165,0.0002744434,0.8968236,0.00131481,0.0005843429,0.08451226,0.002685069,0.0005571058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934463,0.0001439881,0.0001814362,0.002976195,0.0008751936,0.0005403911,0.00007340634,0.00005782968,0.001705284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981863,0.00002694228,0.0003409953,0.0001318166,0.0002516743,0.00009066534,0.00001506323,0.00003659377,0.0009199224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2835643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392372257","doi":"10.1111/synt.12277","title":"Gilaki reverse <scp>Ezafe</scp> : The two faces of a nominal linker","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Amorfix (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Linker; Computer science; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0272102090236424,"gpt":0.2552774072754818,"spread":0.2280671982518394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003944674,0.00015388,0.0001910129,0.00009454868,0.0001969235,0.000229586,0.0002227255,0.00004438947,0.0008085159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005552324,0.0001074736,0.0001226959,0.00005593836,0.0002240296,0.0001140347,0.00006641832,0.0001873291,0.0005903742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003602867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000727132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002148273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001999139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989153,0.00005994266,0.0003185591,0.0002317868,0.0002546063,0.0002198095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988781,0.0005548437,0.0001094176,0.0002889309,0.0001306172,0.00003808134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000516102,0.00003731898,0.0001261922,0.000154722,0.0001290325,0.00002089792,0.06137562,0.00001351235,0.0005224564,0.9278432,0.008130352,0.001641532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003607543,0.0001375593,0.0006535766,0.0004804957,0.0003834266,0.00002193962,0.02820017,0.003158731,0.002332021,0.1734553,0.7906293,0.000186779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085097,0.001781014,0.001158623,0.0386563,0.01435146,0.0009560487,0.0004148411,0.0005164947,0.2336555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818785,0.00001447739,0.0002797033,0.0001693009,0.0021653,0.00001679013,0.00001307103,0.00002842792,0.01543441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7824989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360945714","doi":"10.1111/synt.12249","title":"A Command Theoretic approach to prosodic smothering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet; McGill University; National University of Singapore; Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Smothering; Phenomenon; Prosody; Computer science; Linguistics; Syntax; Element (criminal law); Speech recognition; Natural language processing; Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03477120998099641,"gpt":0.2406907034026956,"spread":0.2059194934216992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003170586,0.0001245783,0.0001512607,0.0001366108,0.000259962,0.0001875139,0.0001801647,0.00003186638,0.0004257667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002426305,0.0001110841,0.00004662344,0.00008646426,0.00009335383,0.0000506519,0.00007158861,0.00008398362,0.001310085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003280676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001833836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000439418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001747069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990868,0.00003878986,0.0001856753,0.0002247195,0.0001961494,0.0002678919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994809,0.00008232113,0.00005088915,0.0002616219,0.00006076698,0.00006346849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008091453,0.00003422234,0.0002143563,0.000068413,0.00002130265,0.000003202365,0.0643844,0.00003922652,0.00008293123,0.9336017,0.0008011207,0.0007410593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009010492,0.0002079518,0.003836964,0.0002901474,0.0001332163,0.00001349011,0.04107819,0.01229519,0.0007948315,0.8683688,0.07100154,0.001078652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4231584,0.00002844449,0.003640875,0.01297452,0.002624463,0.001057162,0.00005722283,0.001082466,0.5553765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931114,0.000002587536,0.0005285138,0.0002255285,0.0009370162,0.00007195829,0.00002099746,0.00003758279,0.005064433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}