{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"56137c38f03e","filters":{"venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W1944898984","doi":"10.1387/theoria.12697","title":"Complex Underdetermination and the Units of Clinical Translation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; McGill University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Underdetermination; Ontology; Biomarker; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Translation (biology); Computer science; Data science; Cognitive science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Biology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Spencer Phillips Hey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2016846829521373,"gpt":0.4302379736427979,"spread":0.2285532906906606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2697447,0.0009996473,0.002589357,0.007924037,0.008582463,0.02439556,0.005221991,0.009899694,0.007292847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3569403,0.00173633,0.001893603,0.005229358,0.1396724,0.04319901,0.02194967,0.0140199,0.001732353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01353961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01815043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004817128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001931883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7125205,0.2205168,0.01895473,0.01973144,0.02387214,0.004404323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.497865,0.3868414,0.01691543,0.07087857,0.02249732,0.005002286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005866629,0.00001944364,0.0007133799,0.0002736294,0.00004791514,0.0001036508,0.007393241,0.0002418555,0.0001359513,0.9644933,0.005223768,0.02129528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003299733,0.00001353877,0.0003093473,0.0002266495,0.00001904241,0.00006234746,0.001360163,0.0005155717,0.0001720846,0.979677,0.01758702,0.00002411674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02070901,0.0162065,0.2108289,0.6378218,0.005052403,0.000663795,0.0003849425,0.0005299581,0.1078027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799878,0.006208537,0.1290895,0.05090372,0.005206294,0.002209637,0.0003008862,0.000678943,0.00552451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9005348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117025342","doi":"10.1387/theoria.6918","title":"The Barcan Formula in Metaphysics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Schematic; Clearance; Modal; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ori Simchen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03239838229679271,"gpt":0.3528218299299832,"spread":0.3204234476331905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001897773,0.0005406528,0.0005204726,0.001229282,0.002362532,0.004138146,0.001153743,0.002437698,0.01129567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003698353,0.0004016525,0.0005238556,0.001563156,0.008973831,0.007202232,0.002096946,0.004740691,0.001839881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003443816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001354649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006543237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00360707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998639,0.0005541217,0.00004594025,0.0002455282,0.0003976441,0.0001177861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991301,0.0004480818,0.0000565537,0.0001232281,0.000199351,0.00004265113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002474584,9.786606e-7,0.00001121611,0.000008513572,9.067201e-7,0.000005077208,0.00005891234,0.00006335954,0.00002371688,0.9966973,0.00158925,0.001538294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003733084,0.000003690549,0.00004861434,0.00001592344,0.000002481899,0.00001741339,0.00004103842,0.0006287144,0.00007361219,0.9805086,0.01865133,0.000004772721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0150008,0.01659975,0.2047101,0.03435513,0.002077069,0.00005673396,0.0006193708,0.0007121284,0.7258689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8595082,0.0055098,0.05220635,0.009398932,0.002726563,0.0002295696,0.0004943392,0.0003579972,0.06956831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0377878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394771911","doi":"10.1387/theoria.24823","title":"Wright’s path analysis: Causal inference in the early twentieth century","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Causal inference; Wright; Epistemology; Inference; Milestone; Path analysis (statistics); Causal analysis; Statistical inference; Context (archaeology); Causal model; Formalism (music); Sociology; History; Computer science; Philosophy; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Zili Dong","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04965557298261662,"gpt":0.3133671272896557,"spread":0.2637115543070391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01949223,0.0008337155,0.0007644333,0.00378665,0.002367298,0.004493595,0.001313915,0.002957041,0.004072514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04588798,0.0008031551,0.0008584511,0.003927081,0.0195904,0.01141068,0.003188501,0.005948271,0.0005825277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005457755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004542249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007168233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005759092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913116,0.006454374,0.0002488214,0.0008777328,0.0009056848,0.0002018079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686975,0.02781546,0.001012105,0.001028073,0.001163718,0.0002830456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009765373,0.000004341142,0.0002793491,0.00005681083,0.00001235712,0.00005411976,0.0009012436,0.001324728,0.0000221193,0.9839042,0.001560102,0.01187083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006408853,0.000007501846,0.0002114785,0.0001446148,0.00000800314,0.00004922504,0.0001743396,0.001841558,0.00007367261,0.9692742,0.02819547,0.00001348076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268471,0.05424985,0.8008713,0.0680629,0.002441039,0.000117858,0.0003507609,0.0002018369,0.0610198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5246078,0.06421006,0.3757088,0.01008954,0.003331015,0.0006238363,0.0002769868,0.000305578,0.02084631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1030859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995194683","doi":"10.1387/theoria.20040","title":"The philosopher’s paradox: How to make a coherent decision in the Newcomb Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Swing; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Carl Hoefer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher Viger","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Viger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1115430744969728,"gpt":0.4157746412767543,"spread":0.3042315667797815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00910595,0.0004669912,0.00103519,0.0007960011,0.003088091,0.00521318,0.00163627,0.005681256,0.009682463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02609646,0.0004203191,0.001083185,0.000812158,0.0127389,0.01668846,0.005577778,0.007053612,0.000919516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001749863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002036013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002246383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960753,0.001970263,0.0001962931,0.0007184512,0.0007029319,0.0003367236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900749,0.006411507,0.000768266,0.001427608,0.0006017085,0.0007160371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239408,0.00002167408,0.00013882,0.00002486078,0.00001100155,0.00008342402,0.0003092908,0.000810718,0.00008290556,0.9929381,0.002124051,0.003432772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002499237,0.000004592868,0.00006838875,0.00001114927,0.000002886702,0.00002476576,0.0001100831,0.001780867,0.00005350961,0.9952071,0.002705777,0.000005777957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2094956,0.002908976,0.2906931,0.2032408,0.001237518,0.0002302545,0.0002643907,0.0002512102,0.2916783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481818,0.0005395133,0.03682882,0.004343794,0.0002953863,0.0001408457,0.0000746217,0.00008730178,0.009508058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009682463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04815745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387979025","doi":"10.1387/theoria.24471","title":"Every view is a view from somewhere: Pragmatist laws and possibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Philosophy; Modal; Situated; Character (mathematics); Content (measure theory); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Holly Andersen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06318531831958794,"gpt":0.33185142455952,"spread":0.268666106239932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002761482,0.0002627351,0.0003842663,0.001038503,0.003965851,0.005474186,0.0008916071,0.002429229,0.002802203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418413,0.0003195973,0.0005674195,0.0007617464,0.03405977,0.01030808,0.004884017,0.004078252,0.0004400704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003070548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001573484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002615075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002965291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971691,0.001655718,0.00006731358,0.0004076428,0.0004876761,0.0002125858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970199,0.001893532,0.0002425265,0.000481268,0.0001979417,0.0001647958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004396333,0.000002755235,0.00006805606,0.000006964794,0.000001328861,0.0000355725,0.002935912,0.00008623415,0.00005470362,0.995037,0.0003482699,0.001418783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003922705,0.000004713013,0.0000934325,0.00001787326,0.00000163867,0.00003690254,0.0009025685,0.0002340572,0.00006772202,0.9909011,0.007732128,0.000003942274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1337819,0.007715855,0.1882052,0.08049405,0.0004974267,0.00006078669,0.0001245303,0.0002913668,0.588829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812929,0.0006029358,0.009884729,0.001173261,0.0001676935,0.00004554261,0.00002196539,0.00004864455,0.006762214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005474186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02227849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}