{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8767be12cb6e","filters":{"venue":"Texas A&M Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W4317641772","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.23","title":"The Case of Grace James (1827)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Order (exchange); History; Interpretation (philosophy); Period (music); Political science; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05023674303032503,"gpt":0.3624801892944636,"spread":0.3122434462641385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001811018,0.0003990892,0.0003202082,0.0006292639,0.01798091,0.003615972,0.0008222284,0.007814731,0.009574382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004033878,0.0004769756,0.0004359735,0.0007606438,0.007342382,0.001605366,0.003492289,0.007811697,0.002115208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006200249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006284358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09035588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1982038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976375,0.0004917779,0.00006784719,0.0003051507,0.0005642726,0.0009334289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992604,0.0002783328,0.00006146853,0.00005315713,0.0001082924,0.0002383762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009890719,0.00002878149,0.001630555,0.00007961587,0.000015747,0.00715835,0.05581698,0.0001006936,0.0006942005,0.6123148,0.3052584,0.01680312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928816,0.0000130214,0.0006876065,0.00007134109,0.000006539816,0.0009357751,0.003921312,0.00002228236,0.0001775044,0.006668348,0.9874684,0.0000219417],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05680155,0.008883784,0.000702203,0.0646777,0.00309256,0.00004493128,0.0002234662,0.00006860814,0.8655052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3760382,0.003416893,0.0006502646,0.07943489,0.001401997,0.00007534566,0.00009179238,0.0001080964,0.5387825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09035588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1796599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","authors":[{"name":"Larry T. Garvin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Linzer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hila Keren","is_ca":false},{"name":"Randy E. Barnett","is_ca":true},{"name":"Joseph M. Perillo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022100596165111,"gpt":0.3161855854937112,"spread":0.2940849893286002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01249484,0.0006477105,0.0009563071,0.002769669,0.01072023,0.006629719,0.001341272,0.006235745,0.004615013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01430198,0.0004513586,0.0004820803,0.002241025,0.03759774,0.01120819,0.003175059,0.00971953,0.0009945608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01002918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009965691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02305465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0299724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922714,0.005163084,0.0001706765,0.0006696793,0.001283611,0.000441438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875053,0.01026295,0.0003363252,0.0005589185,0.0008655737,0.0004709147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009446229,0.00001088518,0.00007582434,0.00006130296,0.000005678003,0.00003288441,0.001525026,0.00008239395,0.00001159203,0.88813,0.1027888,0.007266205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001373304,0.00001020162,0.0002058593,0.0005202721,0.000005070789,0.00005949068,0.001057503,0.000107922,0.00004243267,0.6070212,0.3909409,0.00001549902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002888785,0.2514126,0.002650115,0.6286473,0.005243496,0.00001328327,0.00003951571,0.00002715595,0.1090778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3893747,0.2225225,0.005654195,0.2606146,0.01596647,0.0002267924,0.00007852235,0.0001808975,0.1053813],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02305465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07276714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Michael M. O’Hear","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692648365297838,"gpt":0.3373497357116555,"spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111366,0.0003371305,0.0005843451,0.002621613,0.01202096,0.01563743,0.001458139,0.009519406,0.001391398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681333,0.0006844309,0.0005466705,0.002411666,0.03697572,0.01233482,0.00381243,0.01834756,0.000263662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01673338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009776209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06032748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05463462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892927,0.004357425,0.0004596009,0.001676747,0.002977735,0.001235793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915651,0.005652109,0.0004829431,0.0008251925,0.001225049,0.000249571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007575687,0.000007697512,0.0001627503,0.00001200623,0.000002613851,0.0000234018,0.002220905,0.000157066,0.00008232454,0.9850891,0.002807037,0.009427489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002028109,0.00006285813,0.002434946,0.0006080581,0.00003101287,0.00008605309,0.00355749,0.0009573873,0.0008711077,0.7036208,0.2876534,0.00009663147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1331408,0.08348102,0.04476651,0.2988084,0.00355724,0.00006310381,0.0001491447,0.0002039969,0.4358299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106616,0.01125812,0.006803642,0.05056592,0.002375215,0.00008011796,0.00005232342,0.00007201947,0.01813102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06032748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1214097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04657244422816689,"gpt":0.2888897015098076,"spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01587983,0.000545489,0.000977417,0.002908912,0.007161852,0.01016746,0.00280731,0.006663847,0.01164963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02835588,0.0003682707,0.0007045419,0.002536995,0.05644857,0.01418561,0.005636617,0.004642371,0.001005493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01089251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005854185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007304583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862677,0.007024071,0.0004431826,0.002953387,0.001809215,0.001502553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779928,0.01232398,0.001952366,0.003247971,0.002780838,0.001702116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007089299,0.00001147304,0.000660316,0.00001649879,0.000008421634,0.00006758051,0.001319847,0.0004837291,0.00002630999,0.9912845,0.001291892,0.004822342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008641018,0.00001167335,0.0007831968,0.00005003082,0.000004140142,0.00006049481,0.0006166271,0.0008144428,0.00002856227,0.9843188,0.01329051,0.0000128802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001886,0.01478741,0.09029565,0.1253936,0.0007484453,0.0002790635,0.0003989729,0.0001983489,0.6878797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563776,0.002813158,0.01219787,0.003732079,0.0004884276,0.0002904098,0.00009859855,0.000080335,0.02392155],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01587983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08398163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Mark Carter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05786004422079469,"gpt":0.3357350044854204,"spread":0.2778749602646257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002489094,0.0002954511,0.0003271751,0.001927721,0.008644489,0.006108614,0.001330923,0.002436146,0.005172435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00486726,0.0001569467,0.0002976186,0.002192328,0.02265514,0.003868318,0.001995067,0.004138965,0.0003177344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03863623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05102303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9133071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971079,0.0006194658,0.00004319579,0.0002389021,0.001323212,0.0006673259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984747,0.0005528991,0.0001156549,0.00007856992,0.0006146831,0.000163535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003414228,0.000002558349,0.0001201362,0.00001971276,0.000002087748,0.00002853259,0.001094448,0.0000618706,0.00002396883,0.9851122,0.008994577,0.004536386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001301424,0.0000117688,0.002847751,0.0003102397,0.00001514765,0.00006004333,0.003028223,0.000284131,0.0001783857,0.5696963,0.4235279,0.00002718391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02743051,0.08561578,0.008876176,0.2659462,0.001997451,0.00005809187,0.0002541184,0.00004539014,0.6097762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8146154,0.03138436,0.004422968,0.0506038,0.001286314,0.00006781355,0.0001717644,0.00004943955,0.09739814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1129907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2803268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Joe Spurlock","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joseph M. Perillo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roy Ryden Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05831587978241727,"gpt":0.3523340298958521,"spread":0.2940181501134349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03040635,0.0006238513,0.001140829,0.0009461723,0.02050483,0.01642326,0.004795802,0.04796556,0.02126086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05865083,0.000713301,0.001469151,0.001519236,0.008857501,0.0202631,0.006968664,0.04964134,0.002659223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01456551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02491692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03508475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06681454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845086,0.006895207,0.0005226025,0.002290659,0.002773609,0.003009311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737105,0.01732012,0.0007292833,0.0005562355,0.003749496,0.003934288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944387,0.00003464478,0.0003569893,0.0001451754,0.00001362984,0.0003806457,0.003474557,0.0000926977,0.0001579867,0.07697532,0.9099309,0.008387985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000487072,0.00004833955,0.0008818023,0.0008377581,0.00002741908,0.0001367647,0.01263547,0.0001004077,0.0002006711,0.03361846,0.9513817,0.00008231401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001259279,0.001971049,0.0001119751,0.9769152,0.006271674,0.00001648385,0.0000392822,0.000008686348,0.01340625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026249,0.002074397,0.0002111332,0.9493432,0.004014129,0.00006265565,0.00003669878,0.00002181235,0.01798706],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04796556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1608061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}