{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8767be12cb6e","filters":{"venue":"Texas A&M Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W4317641772","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.23","title":"The Case of Grace James (1827)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Order (exchange); History; Interpretation (philosophy); Period (music); Political science; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05023674303032503,"gpt":0.3624801892944636,"spread":0.3122434462641385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003357833,0.00006885897,0.0001824005,0.000004260749,0.0006857933,0.00001343722,0.0002166509,0.00005654602,0.0003140586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001500219,0.00004695866,0.0001491122,0.0002093346,0.0006987386,0.00007980737,0.00001933227,0.0001149968,0.00008970595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006092116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005333881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003682926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990826,0.0001581283,0.0002614898,0.000106311,0.0001579396,0.0002334783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992321,0.0002417619,0.0001422262,0.0002275208,0.00006966317,0.00008671404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001437683,0.00001607905,0.0002487655,0.0002846866,0.00001096325,0.00008324105,0.001229739,4.158698e-8,0.000001124256,0.9408222,0.04864923,0.008652537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003052272,0.000009107181,0.0001132726,0.0002709359,0.00003085703,0.0000165831,0.000612392,4.555854e-8,0.00001148123,0.0005149808,0.9983273,0.00006251664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03450511,0.4440745,0.0000822882,0.00939636,0.001057516,0.001613504,0.00001296069,0.0001770002,0.5090808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863551,0.1135089,0.0002675553,0.003443931,0.0002146208,0.000006611579,0.00000137477,0.00001264143,0.01899336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5567507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","authors":[{"name":"Larry T. Garvin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Linzer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hila Keren","is_ca":false},{"name":"Randy E. Barnett","is_ca":true},{"name":"Joseph M. Perillo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022100596165111,"gpt":0.3161855854937112,"spread":0.2940849893286002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964061,0.00005828543,0.000163542,0.000008728316,0.0001312721,0.00002281083,0.0002341197,0.00002810395,0.0001280264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004942838,0.00003692187,0.00004525304,0.0002918098,0.0002918485,0.00004279905,0.00002901309,0.00007894948,0.00002331767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009145694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002542631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001216229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988964,0.0005229068,0.0001988836,0.00010952,0.0001412744,0.000130988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.0003212479,0.00007941785,0.0001982309,0.00001933831,0.00002139893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.783391e-7,0.00002313165,0.001800164,0.00008437321,0.000001969934,5.302428e-7,0.0001927719,2.626598e-7,0.000001519643,0.9928365,0.0004072578,0.004650536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339992,0.000003468401,0.01495516,0.000376472,0.00002085783,4.676008e-7,0.00007650894,9.082229e-8,0.00000287703,0.09764892,0.8868139,0.00005791311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04761995,0.1719396,0.00007937396,0.008103742,0.00003485473,0.001128808,0.000008435591,0.00003870157,0.7710466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821672,0.0152706,0.00005090369,0.001894431,0.00006348912,0.00001890831,0.00000276061,0.000004437907,0.0005272876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1838583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Michael M. O’Hear","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692648365297838,"gpt":0.3373497357116555,"spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002035124,0.0000976142,0.0003039044,0.00001582356,0.0006485293,0.0001332016,0.0005191987,0.00005091737,0.00003333338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003915159,0.00005073877,0.000100885,0.0004756178,0.0002787195,0.000166369,0.00003433766,0.0001449263,0.00001369104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003611404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01561762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01889953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983315,0.0005486553,0.0004200367,0.000142773,0.0003193272,0.0002377455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.0004627707,0.0001763455,0.0002137305,0.0001108076,0.00002559635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007023488,0.00005755928,0.001288641,0.001683074,0.00002616417,0.00000653861,0.003813383,3.784466e-7,0.000004691355,0.9610324,0.02170672,0.01037346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000982956,0.00001539199,0.000451397,0.004337305,0.00002540168,5.336557e-7,0.0015757,8.297773e-7,0.000003731804,0.005498894,0.9879224,0.00007011399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01138327,0.6548363,0.00001221297,0.05178505,0.0007248113,0.001606387,0.000004891752,0.00004555686,0.2796015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425853,0.05296969,0.000004897592,0.003861782,0.0001545331,0.00004553705,9.679668e-7,0.000004210746,0.0003730367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04657244422816689,"gpt":0.2888897015098076,"spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005447481,0.0001273283,0.0003002446,0.00001808568,0.0001508797,0.00008696835,0.0001193138,0.00004921999,0.0008571999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009864531,0.00009889931,0.00006288828,0.00003917322,0.0006335945,0.0002120771,0.00005719719,0.000260847,0.0002799175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003121017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008693254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002500507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003202904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991207,0.0001021955,0.0002812176,0.0001765767,0.0001344434,0.0001848506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995456,0.00007317499,0.00006547992,0.0002139834,0.00003661169,0.00006513348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005266463,0.00004465391,0.0000283274,0.0004540423,0.000006514386,0.000002907411,0.0001382271,1.177913e-7,1.309046e-7,0.9905921,0.0001774535,0.008550243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009720415,0.00001727045,0.00005401917,0.001781066,0.00001913045,0.000001746995,0.000003603029,0.000003870541,7.141589e-7,0.3702183,0.6277073,0.00009576889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003112958,0.4449078,0.000001308401,0.02414566,0.0001264801,0.0003831423,0.000008625339,0.00008405305,0.5272299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778972,0.01146522,0.00003297104,0.009977186,0.0003755736,0.00001647276,0.000006738988,0.00001392287,0.0002147512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Mark Carter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05786004422079469,"gpt":0.3357350044854204,"spread":0.2778749602646257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951518,0.0001354941,0.0003509876,0.000007894792,0.002552462,0.00007813027,0.0003296501,0.00006302269,0.00009731109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700792,0.00006809064,0.00009291261,0.0001933969,0.006519456,0.0001236979,0.00009184155,0.0001799038,0.00003426165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002669611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001457912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7511135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9613271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.0003554477,0.0003799312,0.0001534738,0.0003609891,0.0003528808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987848,0.0005558054,0.0001772733,0.0002013341,0.0001307756,0.0001499489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005640569,0.000008728303,0.0007183203,0.0002489327,0.00003442584,0.000001974345,0.00334021,4.693557e-7,5.88503e-7,0.9938141,0.00104338,0.0007831955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984963,0.000009334285,0.00243462,0.0005537695,0.0001995998,0.000002890124,0.001024243,0.000001039587,0.00000744245,0.0006074919,0.9948562,0.0001048611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110968,0.2646875,0.00000234644,0.04054702,0.0003210208,0.001962814,0.00002342957,0.00004718472,0.6813119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559352,0.03342725,0.00005185469,0.009622071,0.0001202064,0.00001540635,0.000003914701,0.000005001608,0.0008190669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Joe Spurlock","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joseph M. Perillo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Allan C. Hutchinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roy Ryden Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05831587978241727,"gpt":0.3523340298958521,"spread":0.2940181501134349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000621932,0.0001252802,0.0002328945,0.00001276078,0.00007337956,0.00007636171,0.0003578879,0.00006774582,0.003195072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006094756,0.00007882853,0.0001371143,0.0001914741,0.0001773754,0.0002428421,0.00009777055,0.0001523469,0.002784508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007529516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006122424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001139586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002598207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986715,0.0001450361,0.000276854,0.0002636913,0.0003216859,0.0003212081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992394,0.00004590385,0.00009064077,0.0003962048,0.00004375451,0.0001840622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078849,0.0002616115,0.000498859,0.0004801583,0.00003368538,0.00001297999,0.004763726,0.000002322591,0.00002581841,0.7717745,0.0208207,0.2013178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006573639,0.000007250712,0.001667563,0.000500099,0.00004273448,0.000001002388,0.00001763751,0.000004201976,0.000004624866,0.0006179218,0.9969249,0.00014631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03236534,0.2053245,0.0002240651,0.2985129,0.0005206065,0.005171854,0.0002078957,0.0008607333,0.4568121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276229,0.04416443,0.000636571,0.01207753,0.0005391518,0.0001145068,0.00001312958,0.00002312218,0.01480865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}