{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":9,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9ce6205388fa","filters":{"venue":"Texas law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W278089968","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Privilege (computing); Law; Pleasure; Kindness; Population; Sociology; Bankruptcy; Consumer debt; Political science; Debt; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jacob S. Ziegel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02464110898726997,"gpt":0.243177268170741,"spread":0.218536159183471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017237,0.0001112915,0.0001814218,0.00003494656,0.0001078994,0.00007134013,0.0001899144,0.00002545156,0.001894076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005891277,0.00009761595,0.00007371174,0.0004336043,0.0000272482,0.000486865,0.00003286198,0.00008505877,0.003662751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001197622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005216433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6413597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5630149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993189,0.000004744136,0.000146878,0.0001837516,0.000116585,0.0002291725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995103,0.000007323582,0.0001077002,0.0002214686,0.0001327767,0.00002042492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001776003,0.00001306257,0.002398475,0.0003260578,0.000006885939,0.00006583498,0.000002761092,3.511013e-7,7.467796e-7,0.9544964,0.03977499,0.002912693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006634221,0.000002233065,0.002587793,0.0008989021,0.00003397946,0.000007158679,0.000004826258,0.00001245106,4.820643e-7,0.01250567,0.9837428,0.0001374115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002096111,0.0848777,0.000009025055,0.01684153,0.0002163769,0.0003573171,0.000003171418,0.00008280572,0.895516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448792,0.02406109,0.00004652054,0.1257393,0.001330534,0.00002908686,0.00001770441,0.00003601269,0.003860577],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96210955","doi":"","title":"New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutionalism; Law; Human rights; Constitutional theory; Legislature; International human rights law; Politics; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Sociology; Democracy; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Janet L. Hiebert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03310356322175908,"gpt":0.3022774806650944,"spread":0.2691739174433353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004954318,0.0002091491,0.0004653773,0.00002455063,0.001186452,0.00006422211,0.0003727239,0.00007183877,0.0005506761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001310701,0.0001830043,0.0001827222,0.0002316733,0.001721118,0.0003372037,0.0001041455,0.0001782566,0.0002272006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004143449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001773713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3741628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1287784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.0001145515,0.0004675762,0.0003575328,0.0005713545,0.0004158426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.00008515305,0.0001703707,0.0001691747,0.000103242,0.0002758869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115868,0.00001963125,0.00005334168,0.0000414054,0.0000381625,0.00001414802,0.0003760837,0.00002517301,9.006882e-7,0.971908,0.02369296,0.003818658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002197974,0.00001256536,0.00002320368,0.003143879,0.00006865953,0.000003731427,0.00003479311,3.830879e-7,0.000008059468,0.5356722,0.4606453,0.0001674546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005416307,0.2547981,0.008721633,0.05903748,0.001065968,0.001226841,0.00005143062,0.0002193745,0.6743375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079146,0.05058314,0.007894212,0.02907892,0.002864097,0.0000496697,0.00003514336,0.00001792164,0.001562306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9125346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W254055643","doi":"","title":"Prospects for a Bilateral Immigration Agreement with Mexico: Lessons from the Bracero Program","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Political science; Immigration law; Free trade agreement; Immigration reform; Economic growth; International trade; Economics; Law; Free trade","authors":[{"name":"Maria Elena Bickerton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04771760523447066,"gpt":0.3754322812899128,"spread":0.3277146760554421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004615883,0.0001014409,0.0001557069,0.000006509487,0.0003701687,0.0001193124,0.0002353036,0.0000300273,0.0003837284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003073791,0.00005715921,0.0000763011,0.0001653112,0.0001251011,0.0001682248,0.0000174199,0.00005782548,0.00007054583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007422203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006328565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009496744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06155071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989617,0.00008866029,0.0001813648,0.0001906641,0.0003540721,0.0002235355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994573,0.00008553039,0.00009813991,0.0001643957,0.0001452044,0.00004945443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002197157,0.0001095214,0.002585408,0.00005895314,0.00004590115,0.000002156752,0.0003800393,8.57742e-7,0.000004407763,0.9769955,0.005447115,0.01434823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744628,0.0001012282,0.001608259,0.0007385741,0.00006357476,7.94665e-7,0.00002209949,0.0000102512,0.00003086274,0.00270446,0.9944462,0.00009919183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06732271,0.05987791,0.001289157,0.4710224,0.00111725,0.02529404,0.000262193,0.0007557572,0.3730586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303903,0.02889682,0.002561503,0.02249364,0.0009940128,0.00173406,0.0002724877,0.00003798399,0.01261922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W861021641","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Carceral State: The Future of Penal Policy Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Prison; State (computer science); Mass incarceration; Political science; Realm; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Sanctions; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Marie Gottschalk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01637936038462246,"gpt":0.3261706807195399,"spread":0.3097913203349174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006652023,0.00007188082,0.0001744013,0.00001759126,0.0006017913,0.00004159086,0.0003134812,0.00002179231,0.0001709865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002636121,0.00003365065,0.0001818977,0.0005948428,0.0002545927,0.00007194957,0.00003408699,0.0001191581,0.00003299811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001032142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3342587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1467496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990159,0.0001651128,0.0002321451,0.00009584011,0.000280151,0.0002107956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00006256319,0.000121962,0.0002444771,0.00009104057,0.00003062367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003777714,0.00003439039,0.0001774014,0.0003731675,0.00002928131,0.000001793545,0.002135925,0.00002756254,0.000003182165,0.8373518,0.0027406,0.1571211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002935103,0.00001103849,0.0004435837,0.0002726274,0.000349241,0.000002911483,0.009728874,0.00001495501,0.000006221725,0.001396462,0.9876717,0.0000730634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1069946,0.4501754,0.000106909,0.05888075,0.0005522834,0.001045428,0.00002656569,0.00009717609,0.3821209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8626339,0.1314222,0.00001911113,0.002017979,0.001517006,0.00001332892,0.000005274398,0.000007709792,0.002363518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26938422","doi":"10.7748/ns.30.19.61.s45","title":"Unjust Enrichment by Transfer: Some Comparative Remarks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Pretext; Common law; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); German; Civil law (Civil law); Adversarial system; Political science; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"Gerhard Dannemann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05560637465699839,"gpt":0.3679848318903904,"spread":0.312378457233392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004832777,0.0001009149,0.0002623222,0.000007436547,0.0003551656,0.00004165167,0.0002699506,0.00004111174,0.001251057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001013294,0.00008434726,0.00009238431,0.000253534,0.0001820563,0.0002129869,0.00001794914,0.0001125253,0.0007177601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007712639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005263733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002054489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.0001499795,0.0002440793,0.0001985233,0.0002504063,0.0002413556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995062,0.00005957518,0.00003795388,0.0002146663,0.0000468848,0.0001347186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001054605,0.00006217546,0.00002722536,0.00008251001,0.000009305722,8.795074e-7,0.000261947,2.483062e-7,0.00001701254,0.960019,0.03694455,0.002574118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007863876,0.00001309845,0.00004401889,0.0002516357,0.00003610301,7.138012e-7,0.00004284143,0.000001383633,0.000024054,0.001552236,0.9978406,0.0001146509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001614339,0.1655879,0.0003527967,0.02364432,0.00008438754,0.001358581,0.00003040251,0.0001291105,0.8071982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6519704,0.3213654,0.0001571896,0.01342399,0.0002791515,0.000142459,0.00004597306,0.00001385125,0.01260154],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9608961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296842398","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change: A Rejoinder to McClain and Fleming","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Warren Court; Scrutiny; Social rights; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05993313208784765,"gpt":0.3676803833157433,"spread":0.3077472512278957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008716972,0.0001362384,0.0003989634,0.00002087572,0.0007448905,0.00003722364,0.0001051608,0.00004746542,0.0002733034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003800161,0.0001141024,0.00004845184,0.0002509591,0.001137853,0.0002221374,0.0001103611,0.00009901966,0.0001068864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006293795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001155143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001552474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001541583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987651,0.0001256691,0.0002711064,0.0002709741,0.0003020148,0.0002651979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994138,0.00007285223,0.00009146232,0.00009013371,0.00015719,0.0001745298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002136944,0.00001537972,0.0005783305,0.0006117042,0.00002085808,0.000005633605,0.0002142383,2.767676e-8,5.743582e-7,0.962954,0.006586817,0.02901034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008572702,0.00001520389,0.0009650296,0.007141235,0.0001393651,0.00001467429,0.00001956336,1.298444e-7,0.00000124669,0.002484508,0.9889695,0.0001638346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004385668,0.8505655,0.000007271694,0.06749995,0.00008027806,0.00137061,0.00001606721,0.00005024472,0.07997151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1413027,0.7377795,0.0006257539,0.118434,0.001306965,0.0003010427,0.000007834579,0.000008898103,0.0002333017],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5729171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303607783","doi":"","title":"Hiding in the Hulls: Attacking the Practice of High Seas Murder of Stowaways through Expanded Criminal Jurisdiction[dagger]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Maritime Security and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Dagger; Political science; Criminology; Crew; International waters; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Elissa Steglich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04693893254150294,"gpt":0.3571703933752078,"spread":0.3102314608337049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003203047,0.0001064504,0.0003289984,0.0000172477,0.0004232251,0.00002599819,0.0004697602,0.00006827046,0.002975788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003308271,0.00007072752,0.0001263563,0.0003908137,0.0005716059,0.0003973927,0.00002706285,0.0002658628,0.00004439875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000643657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001390028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02332177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003007187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973434,0.001268954,0.0004398447,0.0001732333,0.0005554958,0.0002190256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984911,0.0007663492,0.0002622149,0.0003387966,0.0001140558,0.00002747249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245221,0.0002110055,0.00004278625,0.001287441,0.00002761861,0.000007054616,0.04039685,0.000004428199,0.000003210354,0.9264928,0.005330964,0.02617345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001225634,0.00003029106,0.000170791,0.001307062,0.0001769275,0.000006091175,0.001876594,0.000001572268,0.00001222556,0.001745962,0.9944635,0.00008641742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008629368,0.1434181,0.00001776438,0.01070337,0.0001692595,0.0009303141,0.000007828578,0.00003636728,0.8360876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731605,0.1198432,0.0003125961,0.005819647,0.0002005024,0.00002762139,0.000004237933,0.0000116872,0.0006199253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327449872","doi":"","title":"The Cross-Border Trucking Dispute: Finding a Way out of the Conflict between NAFTA and U.S. Environmental Law*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; State (computer science); Common law","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin W. Putnam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03015601117821765,"gpt":0.3809977833983705,"spread":0.3508417722201529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006421956,0.00006805243,0.0001307839,0.000003701674,0.0006968275,0.00006990476,0.0002038163,0.00003487499,0.00008201726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005370596,0.00003923622,0.00007336267,0.0000456886,0.0005300835,0.0001243991,0.00006134192,0.00008239074,0.00001795288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000677924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002249188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001790852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00189342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991526,0.00009037006,0.000212146,0.000107796,0.0003013806,0.0001356774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995607,0.0001271005,0.0001448753,0.0001219045,0.00001676835,0.00002871473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[7.231394e-7,0.000006736431,0.005234892,0.00004675785,0.00001352248,1.855853e-7,0.0004247555,6.753327e-7,0.00001375087,0.989566,0.00001555778,0.004676425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001372229,0.000008775718,0.0195064,0.0006211224,0.00003361472,5.951827e-7,0.00002366797,5.917365e-7,0.0001509735,0.003756047,0.9756894,0.00007155268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5723094,0.07842635,0.0001294856,0.02262221,0.001287537,0.002758242,0.0002250484,0.00008206831,0.3221596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887376,0.009184011,0.0000190413,0.000751503,0.0001281087,0.000006155126,0.00000763888,0.000005606543,0.001160343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.98581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5359505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316779082","doi":"","title":"Luddites No Longer: Adopting the Technology Tutorial at the Supreme Court*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Law of the case; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Precedent; Damages; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Karson Thompson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193479066182143,"gpt":0.3178393855334025,"spread":0.285904594871581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002848512,0.000131131,0.0002945198,0.00001143717,0.001283223,0.00007660167,0.0005832042,0.0001160491,0.00110678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001016217,0.00006582046,0.0001060477,0.0004534642,0.0006620676,0.0002409201,0.0001597782,0.0002183916,0.001809375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000891181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008806506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004569743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002929925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983035,0.0003034174,0.000315803,0.0001584372,0.0004184599,0.0005003577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988742,0.0003251267,0.0002070739,0.0003421016,0.0001724158,0.00007902918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004644063,0.00004174735,0.003576871,0.0006919415,0.00004279385,0.000001635204,0.001226331,1.617499e-7,0.00002413448,0.8673019,0.1121856,0.01490225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000446859,0.00001198575,0.0000544948,0.000592499,0.00005914313,0.000003645932,0.00009588668,1.848658e-7,0.00002396337,0.0004370977,0.9985719,0.0001045482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003280665,0.5870777,0.00000609456,0.03090047,0.003814539,0.001464672,0.00000843107,0.0002527397,0.3731947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299235,0.04852447,0.00005439402,0.004912363,0.01060992,0.0001075654,0.000004350924,0.00002921289,0.005834195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}