{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":9,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9ce6205388fa","filters":{"venue":"Texas law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W278089968","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Privilege (computing); Law; Pleasure; Kindness; Population; Sociology; Bankruptcy; Consumer debt; Political science; Debt; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jacob S. Ziegel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02464110898726997,"gpt":0.243177268170741,"spread":0.218536159183471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001139606,0.0005659989,0.0004857335,0.001187803,0.02107668,0.009059034,0.001196638,0.006256737,0.09010495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002094827,0.0002480995,0.000420275,0.002919938,0.004887064,0.004255848,0.003141808,0.006736638,0.009392324],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05126386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08376557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9201401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9571612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981331,0.0001989601,0.00004019916,0.0002895093,0.0005230586,0.0008151012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986204,0.0001065418,0.00004582423,0.0000492311,0.0005310021,0.000646947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076136,0.00001311277,0.000399482,0.00005879724,0.000002816745,0.0001607934,0.002972115,0.00001936023,0.00005197982,0.1285578,0.8512273,0.01652564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001701439,0.000001362848,0.0005012504,0.00007978093,0.000001483296,0.00004071801,0.002252566,0.000007097788,0.000009472506,0.001644132,0.9954545,0.00000587567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002268239,0.03220355,0.0001820429,0.2922389,0.007933978,0.00002762181,0.0009669344,0.00003860301,0.6641402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05141359,0.02406713,0.0005366034,0.1319561,0.001905542,0.00005231001,0.0004250035,0.000111967,0.7895316],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3719471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96210955","doi":"","title":"New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Constitutionalism; Law; Human rights; Constitutional theory; Legislature; International human rights law; Politics; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Sociology; Democracy; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Janet L. Hiebert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03310356322175908,"gpt":0.3022774806650944,"spread":0.2691739174433353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03973622,0.0005626209,0.0007237418,0.003450138,0.006636245,0.01891714,0.004677252,0.00857761,0.005307516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04890085,0.0005800279,0.0006959567,0.00191076,0.08137126,0.02716085,0.005585683,0.01222423,0.001125459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01442903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008718911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005747458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00817489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9678287,0.0183643,0.001137698,0.003198626,0.007720327,0.001750291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586518,0.02838756,0.002825414,0.004392846,0.004080421,0.00166189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002185147,0.000003186643,0.00002631491,0.00001151234,0.000001161699,0.000007689898,0.0007868629,0.00005713729,0.00001648184,0.9957189,0.001019396,0.002349178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001756968,0.00001148871,0.0001056562,0.000117396,0.000005546374,0.00003175138,0.0009410541,0.0006205143,0.0001035338,0.9218701,0.07616122,0.00001410437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01898981,0.01307589,0.1025369,0.4968057,0.004486023,0.0001093767,0.0001059074,0.0002149568,0.3636754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373476,0.007636812,0.06548575,0.05086241,0.008124337,0.000512665,0.0001317751,0.0002285183,0.02967018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03973622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2101477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W254055643","doi":"","title":"Prospects for a Bilateral Immigration Agreement with Mexico: Lessons from the Bracero Program","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Political science; Immigration law; Free trade agreement; Immigration reform; Economic growth; International trade; Economics; Law; Free trade","authors":[{"name":"Maria Elena Bickerton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04771760523447066,"gpt":0.3754322812899128,"spread":0.3277146760554421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00697943,0.0002854055,0.0002621163,0.0007114744,0.01087825,0.008225398,0.001513629,0.005788144,0.01513517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009352819,0.0002447134,0.0004246247,0.001453891,0.00340611,0.007256396,0.005569666,0.005934168,0.0005381012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007647759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01436241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06729684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07550112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970499,0.001027884,0.00005291081,0.0002498645,0.000446263,0.001173105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968831,0.001738659,0.0003811405,0.0001804019,0.0004138338,0.0004028601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009269078,0.0001496652,0.00560578,0.0002116832,0.00001158223,0.001199705,0.008285074,0.0008251298,0.000145636,0.894891,0.03276421,0.05581777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001194529,0.000218416,0.017447,0.001956609,0.00004608637,0.0004060061,0.04166681,0.00174678,0.0005680954,0.1161379,0.8196197,0.00006701941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09393556,0.01053373,0.003065173,0.1518702,0.0007516948,0.0001999985,0.000175822,0.00006580374,0.7394022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743389,0.01490113,0.003632803,0.01983731,0.0008107094,0.0005247804,0.0002889827,0.00005124207,0.08561422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1338102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W861021641","doi":"","title":"Dismantling the Carceral State: The Future of Penal Policy Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Prison; State (computer science); Mass incarceration; Political science; Realm; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Sanctions; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Marie Gottschalk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01637936038462246,"gpt":0.3261706807195399,"spread":0.3097913203349174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008743495,0.000470509,0.0006407654,0.001893243,0.008499344,0.01146037,0.002006046,0.01586472,0.01308884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569666,0.0002851993,0.0005570531,0.001793893,0.02085962,0.01504327,0.005658373,0.01363344,0.00149964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01785896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04186004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02501622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03401166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920677,0.003705149,0.0001815028,0.000523505,0.00120852,0.00231358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989435,0.004374733,0.0007254036,0.0003676992,0.001924689,0.003172516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003246878,0.0001402244,0.0009555742,0.0002784937,0.000008723808,0.000108218,0.001737412,0.0008620084,0.0000936598,0.7949814,0.112511,0.08829082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004480819,0.00008858258,0.003178313,0.002623704,0.0000158772,0.00008010856,0.00484826,0.002295144,0.0001308911,0.4877378,0.4988929,0.00006351175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003808525,0.05320494,0.001030968,0.9064894,0.001991094,0.00001774423,0.00003452866,0.00004800079,0.03337489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5587481,0.130585,0.003678789,0.2597112,0.01456321,0.0002094635,0.0001362393,0.0001088796,0.03225902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02501622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1295764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26938422","doi":"10.7748/ns.30.19.61.s45","title":"Unjust Enrichment by Transfer: Some Comparative Remarks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Pretext; Common law; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); German; Civil law (Civil law); Adversarial system; Political science; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; History","authors":[{"name":"Gerhard Dannemann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05560637465699839,"gpt":0.3679848318903904,"spread":0.312378457233392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007176253,0.0007872937,0.001108751,0.006035922,0.008077595,0.01171955,0.002652142,0.006793492,0.01106173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01251933,0.0004520672,0.001444638,0.004817464,0.02281674,0.01832468,0.005482552,0.006693523,0.001089438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01220661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01304006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927469,0.003868541,0.0002931875,0.0006934148,0.001351828,0.001046149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939726,0.0042998,0.0003359432,0.0003933514,0.0008088429,0.0001895045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001187925,0.00001431357,0.0001263276,0.00004273814,0.000003367981,0.00007321922,0.001410189,0.00007134856,0.00004243014,0.9921861,0.002711222,0.003306826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003190994,0.00007047901,0.003068167,0.0005605018,0.00002726607,0.0002689985,0.01032255,0.0009854999,0.0005617086,0.7812746,0.2027902,0.00003812994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01855907,0.03054668,0.01662181,0.07565828,0.001370259,0.00011149,0.0001562044,0.0000739445,0.8569023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8565797,0.0263093,0.009068896,0.02994983,0.005218687,0.0005498166,0.000332949,0.0001498197,0.07184093],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01304006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08856559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W296842398","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and Progressive Change: A Rejoinder to McClain and Fleming","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Warren Court; Scrutiny; Social rights; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05993313208784765,"gpt":0.3676803833157433,"spread":0.3077472512278957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0457607,0.0006117037,0.001816725,0.003649751,0.01197899,0.02139544,0.00563739,0.04511651,0.002436625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1294059,0.0009963006,0.001546476,0.002400288,0.0558061,0.01711729,0.005717842,0.03216001,0.000667694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01921055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02939183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03371362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03363862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.941267,0.02614792,0.002740536,0.007844926,0.01830258,0.003697038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.876106,0.1024944,0.002785051,0.005671635,0.01075088,0.002191993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001152068,0.00001322546,0.00007521486,0.00006606,0.00001022295,0.0001037969,0.001701246,0.0001412669,0.00004715677,0.8775164,0.111991,0.008323011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007061877,0.00002217029,0.0003606816,0.0004829939,0.00001689302,0.0001262298,0.0009001382,0.0004982941,0.0001252381,0.5523871,0.4449528,0.00005683997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00190055,0.04104199,0.002859174,0.9180192,0.006056488,0.00004993411,0.0000382968,0.00004715976,0.02998715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1986678,0.02977794,0.008507477,0.6684551,0.04998003,0.000596477,0.00007541718,0.0002285661,0.04371123],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0457607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2420086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303607783","doi":"","title":"Hiding in the Hulls: Attacking the Practice of High Seas Murder of Stowaways through Expanded Criminal Jurisdiction[dagger]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Maritime Security and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Dagger; Political science; Criminology; Crew; International waters; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Elissa Steglich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04693893254150294,"gpt":0.3571703933752078,"spread":0.3102314608337049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361255,0.0005015126,0.0001740555,0.00181464,0.01234793,0.005205732,0.002393699,0.007642047,0.007409418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006487507,0.0004217083,0.0002955956,0.0009988667,0.01776018,0.003823662,0.005623585,0.004885123,0.0007978612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004088845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004298647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07433388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1800517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998197,0.0008719806,0.00005152301,0.0002206316,0.0002182355,0.0004405805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998114,0.0006314114,0.0005430292,0.000163784,0.0002139926,0.0003338638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008380644,0.0001774702,0.04365271,0.0004383047,0.00003679034,0.02506747,0.4984346,0.0005895766,0.001287528,0.2150967,0.1124866,0.1026484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001894179,0.0002687792,0.03461779,0.002635387,0.00005855217,0.02583854,0.4610018,0.001161096,0.001166603,0.02053262,0.4525838,0.0001161329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5094329,0.01150069,0.003941351,0.06500697,0.001146683,0.0001615244,0.00008334496,0.0002382356,0.4084882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955299,0.003562255,0.001032118,0.008102693,0.0002479277,0.00004653757,0.00002572761,0.00003549479,0.03164815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07433388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1478024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327449872","doi":"","title":"The Cross-Border Trucking Dispute: Finding a Way out of the Conflict between NAFTA and U.S. Environmental Law*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; State (computer science); Common law","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin W. Putnam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03015601117821765,"gpt":0.3809977833983705,"spread":0.3508417722201529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064395,0.0002844314,0.0004065727,0.001889271,0.01169997,0.01527657,0.001738293,0.01817298,0.007025674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01576437,0.0003463977,0.000343335,0.003975459,0.013923,0.01167019,0.004852867,0.007693,0.0004702091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00873511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007704876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02331016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03923281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945555,0.002497017,0.0002698973,0.0006105727,0.001278558,0.0007884995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861017,0.01037952,0.001189706,0.0003462214,0.001455076,0.0005276684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499634,0.00003177413,0.001468578,0.00007064756,0.000003987419,0.0006898581,0.01276728,0.00008188565,0.000111915,0.9105703,0.05884485,0.01534397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002107012,0.00003790441,0.002850347,0.001087266,0.00001569275,0.0006519822,0.03989534,0.0007278578,0.0002423735,0.2435071,0.7109249,0.00003815786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06720529,0.04336442,0.003312516,0.5354781,0.003254137,0.00004065877,0.0001034323,0.00005725304,0.3471842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711869,0.01304778,0.002496459,0.07862304,0.00361842,0.0000933294,0.0001391295,0.00004784151,0.0307471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06337792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316779082","doi":"","title":"Luddites No Longer: Adopting the Technology Tutorial at the Supreme Court*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Law of the case; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Precedent; Damages; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Karson Thompson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03193479066182143,"gpt":0.3178393855334025,"spread":0.285904594871581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004276649,0.0003057209,0.0002433876,0.0009867286,0.01074246,0.01208924,0.00180035,0.01020549,0.01910692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117029,0.0004268501,0.0003565601,0.0007772219,0.007026416,0.0121513,0.004407731,0.01167414,0.004732832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006872003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009432645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01020201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03304642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954212,0.001455733,0.0001777695,0.0005367224,0.001628899,0.0007796974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958413,0.002467739,0.0001851054,0.0002334633,0.0005869535,0.0006855013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008810985,0.00007403721,0.0008526642,0.00005830043,0.000003137818,0.0008832531,0.006445286,0.0002378709,0.00061691,0.5278149,0.4019955,0.06100926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004968371,0.00004100784,0.0006319718,0.0002413886,0.00000599,0.0003735713,0.003277553,0.0003392912,0.0004523603,0.04570088,0.9488981,0.00003280492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0169254,0.007882208,0.013273,0.4109216,0.006405571,0.00008124194,0.0001126155,0.0008163451,0.543582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3973881,0.01007844,0.009346248,0.195121,0.004593278,0.0002248466,0.0001812891,0.0004300956,0.3826368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01910692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}