{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":40,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":40,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"79fc25d0763d","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Courtney Jung","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true},{"name":"Evan Rosevear","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03941342542345785,"gpt":0.3452246130410009,"spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007762611,0.0001900158,0.0005196066,0.006165856,0.002260307,0.004141389,0.0006164334,0.0005877354,0.01345884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03851671,0.0002114629,0.0003607731,0.0122432,0.004250147,0.005376455,0.003522711,0.001677664,0.0009350454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002884305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001995548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01254604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902425,0.004145828,0.001263732,0.001718929,0.001739507,0.0008894834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646446,0.01995339,0.006775907,0.005749373,0.002188691,0.000688064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001007817,0.00006575273,0.08328871,0.0003750194,0.00007072197,0.0001983749,0.01500071,0.001823119,0.0005388678,0.7948362,0.01546105,0.08824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004577296,0.00004764267,0.2164548,0.0007251447,0.00005250869,0.0002271254,0.008874738,0.002040089,0.0008506149,0.2655396,0.505056,0.00008584215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065334,0.004480116,0.02092754,0.007210681,0.000339868,0.0002226067,0.02809651,0.0002161416,0.2319732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694633,0.001015301,0.006469371,0.0003864315,0.0001026567,0.0002060319,0.01540367,0.00007201759,0.006881204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04502434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032899432","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0015","title":"The Legacy of Empire: The Common Law Inheritance and Commitments to Legality in Former British Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Population; Rule of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Sociology; Politics; Demography; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ronald J. Daniels","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael J. Trebilcock","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lindsey D. Carson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03161779720101658,"gpt":0.3712986535816661,"spread":0.3396808563806495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996675,0.00008994337,0.0002249005,0.0008553984,0.00660145,0.003833904,0.0004868184,0.0006449691,0.001360754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006949259,0.0001766496,0.00005411286,0.001369395,0.0109119,0.001633193,0.002881644,0.001542359,0.00009322688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007154417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00456679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4578332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7091487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984037,0.0005084611,0.00005957522,0.0001714442,0.0003243381,0.0005323953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963201,0.001141156,0.0008413937,0.0002069809,0.0006014733,0.0008889118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003691601,0.00003409195,0.05868082,0.0000325084,0.000008586934,0.001176275,0.9065431,0.00008970569,0.0008247728,0.01640423,0.0004659739,0.01570296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006860708,0.00004670035,0.2698199,0.0001429132,0.000008796252,0.0005922411,0.6953464,0.0001572765,0.000234415,0.002146714,0.03146421,0.00003350529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932548,0.0002280771,0.00004870939,0.0005405874,0.000004460667,0.000002427636,0.000004427072,7.240781e-7,0.005915819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986494,0.0001620139,0.00002799266,0.00005490217,0.000001811289,0.000001180643,0.000003564254,0.00000159507,0.001097578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4578332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9103366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Timmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0628466398633027,"gpt":0.313046563790455,"spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01667282,0.0007017296,0.000878871,0.00551538,0.01827046,0.01754831,0.003052241,0.00872728,0.004062573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024754,0.0004028274,0.00075984,0.004601347,0.05550396,0.01543576,0.006656522,0.009760901,0.0004581838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05068175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04882752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8365045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8602208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822073,0.004329207,0.0004718624,0.001314841,0.008574798,0.003101917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989548,0.004799807,0.0004346066,0.0009775095,0.00346396,0.0007761404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169836,0.000004310669,0.0003168413,0.00001249648,0.00000233221,0.0000523176,0.005110081,0.00007272396,0.0000298928,0.981952,0.005732385,0.006710503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176126,0.00001089277,0.003000551,0.0006907091,0.00003192453,0.0001599745,0.01620591,0.0008216603,0.0003461212,0.7276666,0.2509463,0.0001017152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02677345,0.009958463,0.01851466,0.2112797,0.001965103,0.00006505218,0.0002489774,0.00009778732,0.7310967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942785,0.007058602,0.0125878,0.05524679,0.001010459,0.00008040737,0.000164742,0.0001554593,0.02941731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1634955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3677236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121612408","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2012.0017","title":"Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class action; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Civil litigation; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Jasminka Kalajdzic","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter Kenneth Cashman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alana Longmoore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1120902607687087,"gpt":0.3554160378716755,"spread":0.2433257771029668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00498318,0.0002351304,0.0006218342,0.01289218,0.01872314,0.009779372,0.002129129,0.002664173,0.005590919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03158716,0.0003267655,0.0005475954,0.02253974,0.005677995,0.003286961,0.004151045,0.002829975,0.0003224236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1189583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1312359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985823,0.001507894,0.0002582874,0.0004162777,0.00626767,0.005726923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756457,0.006476264,0.002487068,0.000573399,0.01119381,0.003623813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002565074,0.0002901233,0.1438776,0.0006685546,0.0001400643,0.002751687,0.2254474,0.001098989,0.0007321163,0.455698,0.05304113,0.1159978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002557099,0.0001190788,0.5906885,0.0008611675,0.0001589702,0.0007137985,0.1656445,0.001738928,0.000413319,0.007396573,0.2320735,0.0001661316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6396422,0.007529588,0.0004203357,0.01939652,0.0001577198,0.0001247083,0.000713427,0.00003821532,0.3319773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810008,0.003637906,0.0003120311,0.002000318,0.00004767743,0.00004912912,0.0002736977,0.00001846729,0.01265983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1189583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W151487474","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.125","title":"The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Analogy; Political science; Field (mathematics); Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04990095304799595,"gpt":0.3854993611052266,"spread":0.3355984080572306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1906169,0.0006539966,0.001935645,0.005818947,0.009543119,0.01027974,0.00495118,0.004470049,0.007322221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2594813,0.0009694586,0.001326694,0.006521869,0.05870008,0.02041845,0.008294795,0.004773618,0.0006195717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006240555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002257069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002291073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7106696,0.2611105,0.004152674,0.01001777,0.01195358,0.002095756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7068897,0.2643974,0.006542734,0.01589455,0.005385719,0.0008898118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318609,0.00002429324,0.0007515185,0.0001055989,0.00002317401,0.00005261757,0.003037603,0.0001733171,0.00003934216,0.9841722,0.001040692,0.01054652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787666,0.00008843731,0.0006674558,0.0003716175,0.00003015958,0.00009093613,0.002430765,0.001178464,0.0002879114,0.9777048,0.01705113,0.00002039616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08628046,0.01935961,0.4986475,0.07572087,0.002804063,0.003280318,0.0005650464,0.0001789804,0.313163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542098,0.003622824,0.1232186,0.007595673,0.001654586,0.004467877,0.0002383576,0.00008721563,0.00490489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1906169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898009316","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy034","title":"Proportionality and the Inevitability of the Local: A Comparative Localist Analysis of Canada and Ireland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scholarship; Legitimacy; Compromise; Law and economics; Political science; Positive economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02403770981125658,"gpt":0.3254768350099044,"spread":0.3014391251986479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002607801,0.000367564,0.0008811778,0.005679241,0.02849773,0.01193377,0.003198028,0.00155354,0.005845509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006691564,0.0003271882,0.0006717799,0.01021215,0.02240978,0.003847221,0.006959708,0.002915794,0.000363601],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1956136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1082812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945475,0.001170053,0.0001053499,0.0004157818,0.001163248,0.002598056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965313,0.000768649,0.0002782954,0.0001497306,0.001533334,0.0007387184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771596,0.0001183726,0.02691881,0.0004371823,0.00007966587,0.002168529,0.2547086,0.001428674,0.000588549,0.6630434,0.01142277,0.03890828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004277668,0.00006492688,0.06237701,0.0006787374,0.0001433358,0.0004691627,0.7454967,0.0009789652,0.0005111036,0.02052625,0.1685249,0.0001861762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5718583,0.004798151,0.001238888,0.01233088,0.00008586803,0.0001134248,0.0003375198,0.00004906649,0.4091878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984932,0.001079427,0.0004252204,0.0009226254,0.00001019977,0.00003549121,0.00009578386,0.00003290558,0.01246629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948548308","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa025","title":"Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility? Legislative Innovation and Judicial Application in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Legislation; Statutory law; Business; Corporate law; Law; Legislature; Fiduciary; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Duty; Corporate governance","authors":[{"name":"Li-Wen Lin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05502441046427409,"gpt":0.2802558946435457,"spread":0.2252314841792716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02292721,0.0002748331,0.0006428252,0.0033939,0.008425171,0.005261761,0.003002967,0.003290917,0.004220002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0268548,0.0005531196,0.0008124979,0.003423918,0.008078332,0.002232805,0.003769374,0.00390303,0.0001940862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01460056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02635331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07869183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08863465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842886,0.003116372,0.0009980658,0.002554127,0.005375324,0.003667599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652926,0.0198967,0.004422443,0.0026506,0.00568421,0.002053409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002306003,0.0009064662,0.3376014,0.0005650637,0.0002242416,0.01143013,0.08304879,0.005134584,0.007512536,0.4364403,0.0127805,0.1041253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003109,0.001022474,0.7282097,0.0007929545,0.0005159961,0.001508683,0.02940731,0.03510604,0.0117203,0.05922456,0.1316295,0.0005515584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718704,0.0006328711,0.001036494,0.004510987,0.00007276376,0.0001372722,0.00005740902,0.00002917171,0.02165273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943369,0.0002020991,0.0003876873,0.000867995,0.00005109633,0.0000439439,0.00003446477,0.000004364363,0.004071518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07869183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1564676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984946490","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0002","title":"Can Class Action Regimes Operate Satisfactorily without a Certification Device? Empirical Insights from the Federal Court of Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Vince Morabito","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jane Caruana","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1135351901416635,"gpt":0.3480042356300905,"spread":0.234469045488427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01865727,0.0001794953,0.0007093617,0.003051989,0.005870047,0.009062639,0.001962708,0.003676281,0.005006919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09369429,0.0005589529,0.0005618822,0.003145879,0.01400957,0.009442465,0.003863294,0.004327936,0.000530039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01237063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1562857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1670266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9768425,0.006894865,0.001497005,0.002158769,0.008024672,0.004582182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903885,0.05529008,0.02369091,0.005822808,0.008842137,0.002469127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000891208,0.0003741649,0.09613862,0.0001981163,0.00007958108,0.0007174045,0.04123519,0.001725211,0.000361658,0.8289437,0.00356856,0.02656884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001978959,0.0003662042,0.6082365,0.001163895,0.0003893955,0.0007135701,0.0683006,0.01064325,0.001196098,0.2456653,0.06292904,0.0001981562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431312,0.001166339,0.001494203,0.008726723,0.00002837845,0.0001007223,0.00007640269,0.00001081866,0.1452653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975368,0.0002784134,0.0001976634,0.0004303503,0.00002123224,0.00001695806,0.0000188732,0.000002613021,0.001497025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1562857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.310752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061848164","doi":"10.2307/840922","title":"The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Sociology; History; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"David M. Beatty","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04431623167121233,"gpt":0.3530826325833741,"spread":0.3087664009121618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622246,0.0004431122,0.00101066,0.003905211,0.007827745,0.02827417,0.002009527,0.006169834,0.02175979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07821646,0.0009883591,0.0007293188,0.00452621,0.06248357,0.03693428,0.01519031,0.008944884,0.003601847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004938126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002521199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002158858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9604156,0.02220747,0.002068039,0.003589238,0.009615198,0.00210442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472755,0.03483964,0.002053176,0.01030616,0.004328367,0.001197204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009732275,0.000003454693,0.0001360505,0.00002464113,0.000003097234,0.00002522885,0.002691536,0.00005539235,0.00005684948,0.9900612,0.002635854,0.004297047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008101759,0.000005333825,0.0002080704,0.0001211061,0.000005927713,0.00005329988,0.001593909,0.0001416579,0.00008547217,0.9587926,0.03897617,0.000008349806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02325667,0.007165549,0.03235905,0.04513351,0.0007166954,0.00005849985,0.0003350292,0.0001707655,0.8908041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480696,0.004240085,0.006440797,0.003575829,0.001697258,0.0002278912,0.0002685731,0.0003653147,0.03511474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02827417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08579361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Richard Stacey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03932392676279167,"gpt":0.3511782601717788,"spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03745685,0.0003059796,0.000636435,0.002658445,0.005348068,0.008563916,0.001465853,0.002988879,0.003621424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04542461,0.0006041425,0.0007699692,0.001588409,0.06242848,0.01130382,0.007151204,0.006186367,0.0002904714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009064019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00447506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003590483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002597461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9461511,0.04683457,0.0009796212,0.001631422,0.003291886,0.001111415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652945,0.02835685,0.001489958,0.002371753,0.001992967,0.0004939779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004178784,0.000002033665,0.00003197692,0.000005321711,0.000001619329,0.000008309617,0.0003155112,0.00009093251,0.00001554239,0.9985822,0.0001352208,0.0008071458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001222274,0.000007635074,0.00008139614,0.00003180283,0.000003097153,0.00001483622,0.0001904746,0.000569245,0.00006381859,0.993986,0.005034355,0.000005133499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08061337,0.005303319,0.2998407,0.05626556,0.00135115,0.0002181904,0.0001119777,0.0001068382,0.556189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748763,0.0004623822,0.01854806,0.00140402,0.0004419021,0.0001946025,0.00001950001,0.00002994649,0.004023338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03745685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1980932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248916952","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw007","title":"Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada but Not in Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Welfare; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Alberto Salazar","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Raggiunti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01370970949055788,"gpt":0.2181846504719424,"spread":0.2044749409813845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172636,0.0004197589,0.0006993829,0.004673497,0.01114084,0.005324661,0.001209074,0.001035006,0.004503459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004446739,0.0004223804,0.0005305917,0.01374639,0.003723376,0.001945253,0.002395761,0.00218655,0.0003972593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02801518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04712582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971678,0.00009630239,0.0001057562,0.000287007,0.0005609263,0.001782222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906693,0.0002585835,0.001495352,0.0002171158,0.00422015,0.003139431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000197177,0.00006012966,0.9454657,0.000113018,0.0001230442,0.0006120243,0.01598417,0.00005663958,0.0003479658,0.00384666,0.01650479,0.01668864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001136488,0.00001437413,0.9561332,0.0001530536,0.00004692866,0.0001402684,0.03163112,0.0000596662,0.00009445756,0.0002376879,0.0114338,0.0000440891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.949194,0.004133882,0.00012893,0.0163326,0.0001952296,0.00003266565,0.002202889,0.00003390392,0.02774597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905846,0.001904143,0.00008951232,0.002511309,0.0000462195,0.00001462542,0.00113655,0.00003637226,0.00367677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02801518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Mota Prado","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marta Rodríguez de Assis Machado","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2108142027829962,"gpt":0.3204444638352548,"spread":0.1096302610522585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009514119,0.0003010468,0.0003567354,0.001784072,0.005364606,0.008141569,0.001258844,0.004643287,0.003015633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01668506,0.0002420103,0.0004317467,0.0008073759,0.01767026,0.003049894,0.003650348,0.004143364,0.0002083264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006192729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007756425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05381015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09578424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936516,0.003445682,0.0001606007,0.0004518056,0.001270095,0.001020196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859029,0.008963547,0.001578021,0.00115427,0.001764817,0.0006364079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002493463,0.00008749287,0.009829025,0.00008950273,0.0000248634,0.0006134651,0.004463586,0.001008263,0.0005324903,0.9589724,0.004690807,0.01966326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373163,0.0004073291,0.03565636,0.0032625,0.0003246458,0.001541375,0.03372306,0.02048602,0.005258856,0.6044566,0.2945479,0.0002416867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3643067,0.007777046,0.01048439,0.1042432,0.000325087,0.0001444342,0.00004983887,0.0000584753,0.5126108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923338,0.0005154472,0.0007296877,0.002211764,0.00004744212,0.00002084097,0.000004458886,0.000006490958,0.004130167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05381015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1069939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145115","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx033","title":"The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal Law†","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Legal history; Comparative law; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"James Stewart","is_ca":true},{"name":"Asad Kiyani","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04864830365117022,"gpt":0.3834991504801774,"spread":0.3348508468290071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008989638,0.000328909,0.0003343366,0.001878646,0.008050735,0.01246433,0.001011363,0.003349062,0.002916618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00997341,0.0003643679,0.0003012556,0.002011498,0.0801695,0.01287743,0.007717607,0.01058812,0.000420669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006472673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004933718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004371911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004982887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935638,0.003298302,0.0003201111,0.000843708,0.001412623,0.0005613611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926813,0.004184489,0.0008359919,0.001160092,0.0006926321,0.0004454029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001547932,0.000003713133,0.0001619489,0.00001014586,5.930048e-7,0.00001668431,0.003123501,0.00003340325,0.00001577757,0.9937795,0.000757892,0.002095314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000504178,0.00001516996,0.0006023579,0.0001567411,0.000002606463,0.0001184686,0.002926266,0.000398502,0.00008221209,0.9263661,0.06931315,0.00001350332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05412491,0.01440741,0.03295393,0.1152385,0.001507705,0.00005617452,0.00006657562,0.00007524118,0.7815695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736153,0.004160548,0.003745425,0.006047793,0.001169055,0.00006693703,0.000029089,0.00007176455,0.01109405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01246433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04754227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242589","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae032","title":"First Nations’ Citizenship and Kinship Compared: Belonging’s Stake in Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Citizenship; Politics; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Fictive kinship; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Aaron L. Mills","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08467716980806435,"gpt":0.3740176755306894,"spread":0.2893405057226251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002961493,0.0001303485,0.0002909947,0.001135789,0.004272681,0.006357426,0.0005696819,0.001542143,0.009416236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009972632,0.0000899427,0.0001932919,0.0009356876,0.01937395,0.006475261,0.006365133,0.002992651,0.0002369717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002721907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009788913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004375209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971319,0.001547232,0.0000915959,0.0002853368,0.0004013355,0.0005425063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899299,0.004475523,0.002077796,0.0005966001,0.0008449059,0.002075363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004258188,0.0001147898,0.02065332,0.00003109014,0.0000160342,0.0003311894,0.02904008,0.0002575057,0.0001556465,0.939668,0.001175181,0.008514464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003303964,0.0001082708,0.08047329,0.000340257,0.00003658655,0.0005703163,0.1080699,0.001649721,0.0005456735,0.7765744,0.03152843,0.00007008101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848005,0.000589787,0.002254848,0.01011778,0.00008378211,0.00001643935,0.00003861263,0.000007902427,0.3020903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.00003890054,0.00003969999,0.00009265643,0.000009913503,0.000002704601,0.000004627324,0.000001076061,0.0008004153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.995819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0315004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's &lt;I&gt;Jus Commune&lt;/I&gt; in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Mélanie Samson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Louise Langevin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06187720364674588,"gpt":0.35406543297975,"spread":0.2921882293330041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002029702,0.0003337503,0.000278897,0.001833959,0.01655594,0.007852946,0.001267251,0.001986442,0.006503453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003599821,0.0001573275,0.0003327765,0.002463986,0.01095121,0.002266744,0.00150877,0.002924439,0.0002437861],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1462809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1490369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978449,0.0005123991,0.00003690508,0.0001944473,0.0006482282,0.0007631289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996843,0.0007554677,0.0001841797,0.0001133172,0.001647476,0.0004565328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003438435,0.000040645,0.00751197,0.0001496398,0.00001819032,0.0008682542,0.0324744,0.00100484,0.0005737689,0.8567587,0.06839507,0.03217015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001857769,0.00003298335,0.04345224,0.0007908669,0.00004500385,0.0002666643,0.06141113,0.002331158,0.0007390502,0.03154813,0.8592386,0.00012566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1964466,0.02216298,0.003569449,0.1557372,0.001673125,0.00009960585,0.001123986,0.0001028311,0.6190842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307681,0.00400552,0.001907862,0.01156804,0.0001750467,0.00003138127,0.0001465224,0.00003994289,0.05135752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1462809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991430525","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa018","title":"Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Enforcement; Sanctions; Business; China; Insider; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Robin Hui Huang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1154731408136518,"gpt":0.3256408916637385,"spread":0.2101677508500867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002451057,0.0002449272,0.0003203132,0.008062388,0.001552361,0.002233736,0.0007506687,0.0004079961,0.003727955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004526848,0.0001531464,0.0003207123,0.009878595,0.00268071,0.001759206,0.001266239,0.0004522615,0.0001216415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004299235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004011278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06202333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05997773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985211,0.0002874412,0.0001240879,0.0001526806,0.0005983997,0.0003163497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958336,0.001426487,0.001440379,0.0002580521,0.0007752966,0.0002661879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009518748,0.0001927297,0.7223742,0.0007902401,0.0001753583,0.003800833,0.03154625,0.002404989,0.001106763,0.1418227,0.003559972,0.0921308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006579547,0.0000903887,0.9646868,0.0002161126,0.00006943965,0.0004307631,0.01461552,0.003388116,0.0005626109,0.002716911,0.01317696,0.00003981967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971283,0.002359792,0.0003326853,0.0007212783,0.00002227379,0.000030472,0.0002086193,0.000007090497,0.02503492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969935,0.001594411,0.0001456911,0.00005590034,0.00002788844,0.000008960556,0.0001853089,0.000001833431,0.0009864419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06202333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1233246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138147771","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac036","title":"The Jurisdictional Vacuum: Transnational Corporate Human Rights Claims in Common Law Home States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; State (computer science); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Hassan Ahmad","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03241961718812068,"gpt":0.2640424747262894,"spread":0.2316228575381687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007094705,0.0001276698,0.0005139717,0.001534582,0.004993703,0.009430644,0.00131115,0.004768626,0.002337503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01525176,0.0004790679,0.0004811883,0.001431016,0.02418583,0.009618827,0.009166638,0.006193624,0.0001288364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004566976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007175401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008320345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939564,0.00229408,0.0004065847,0.0007989835,0.001382913,0.001161145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836999,0.01036895,0.002496207,0.001820632,0.0009267785,0.0006875676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002059557,0.00004115677,0.003976639,0.00001500186,0.000008857488,0.0009618179,0.006740803,0.0004084611,0.0004398275,0.982322,0.0004802043,0.004584529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003704961,0.0001270368,0.01188975,0.0003290309,0.00007067445,0.002225193,0.03619729,0.008172668,0.001900118,0.922556,0.01637858,0.0001166473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201171,0.0009467744,0.01722551,0.007611436,0.00005819536,0.00002974225,0.0000319279,0.00004237916,0.05393689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988713,0.00006654334,0.0004573137,0.0002646314,0.00001530033,0.000006748482,0.000004059046,0.000002769214,0.0003113943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009430644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03752089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W72209951","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157","title":"Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Criminal law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Pamela Jordan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08588962696890812,"gpt":0.396669655413895,"spread":0.3107800284449869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007239984,0.0001275814,0.0003711272,0.001548765,0.009311764,0.005804356,0.0008777769,0.005554943,0.004394765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02221563,0.0002369963,0.0002719471,0.001550835,0.005663836,0.002231849,0.006888539,0.005575424,0.0004730834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006891256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01171584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03246953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05998344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882618,0.005358479,0.0004074121,0.0005446517,0.00214606,0.003281718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865155,0.004840917,0.004777415,0.0005948297,0.001194285,0.002077026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769078,0.0003160773,0.1148388,0.0002356593,0.00008543632,0.00257399,0.09966638,0.0006390043,0.001592286,0.6475846,0.05788442,0.07440637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001091574,0.0003318087,0.3466311,0.001903567,0.0001151672,0.002025821,0.1280983,0.001239581,0.002049521,0.05503581,0.4623073,0.0001528033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6910559,0.003045104,0.0005088167,0.08349675,0.000526121,0.00004624748,0.00009039235,0.00002257542,0.2212081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988896,0.0006486231,0.0000942007,0.004613425,0.0001164094,0.00002216632,0.00002640839,0.000005613637,0.005577126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03246953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093017361","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0036","title":"Social and Economic Rights as Fundamental Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Political science; Constitution; Social rights; Constitutional right; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Social security; Due Process Clause; International human rights law; Constitutional law; Bill of rights; Human rights; National security","authors":[{"name":"Francesca Bignami","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carla Spivack","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03872202326376139,"gpt":0.3542367380312706,"spread":0.3155147147675093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006000154,0.0006293664,0.0004876498,0.001251326,0.003972488,0.008278434,0.001132262,0.005042634,0.01038445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005912975,0.0003429129,0.0005941109,0.001466495,0.02716875,0.008716232,0.005009378,0.005620423,0.001517127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005599345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008192376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928047,0.00285583,0.0003317093,0.0008530808,0.001847481,0.001307145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962763,0.001599094,0.0003477401,0.0008031394,0.0007079611,0.0002658427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[5.881847e-7,0.000001544811,0.00002049908,0.000003798919,3.59797e-7,0.000004082694,0.0002039159,0.00002624997,0.00001048455,0.9981107,0.0008668695,0.0007510026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006193165,0.000008749943,0.0002083149,0.00009968426,0.000004132317,0.0000378445,0.000430334,0.0001358219,0.0001105049,0.805231,0.1937192,0.000008192256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004919408,0.002754128,0.01808792,0.01691777,0.0006863977,0.00007964635,0.000244056,0.00003823289,0.9562724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7751469,0.008986477,0.03062963,0.01660565,0.002944463,0.0009849314,0.0007306159,0.0001319068,0.1638395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04062629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613264","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac016","title":"Multicultural Populations and Mixed Legal Systems in the United States: Louisiana and Puerto Rico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Olivier Moréteau","is_ca":false},{"name":"Luis Muñiz Argûelles","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.056486827888494,"gpt":0.3496001860740446,"spread":0.2931133581855506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007392509,0.0001509803,0.0001526043,0.001268391,0.003679243,0.002281177,0.0007415306,0.0006100612,0.002353905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001520508,0.0001096062,0.0001255686,0.001849619,0.002166261,0.001294652,0.002882684,0.0009372851,0.00009753583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005560839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003508208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5220019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7175593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999574,0.0001604868,0.0000154657,0.00004234848,0.00005572674,0.0001519399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992732,0.0001371979,0.0001867032,0.00002760556,0.0001355946,0.0002397794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845996,0.0002545199,0.5784902,0.0001723858,0.00009061617,0.002564457,0.3095357,0.0001782757,0.0009300596,0.02533942,0.0129118,0.06943431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001236794,0.00004087413,0.5455847,0.0003875031,0.00004036962,0.0005879588,0.4151161,0.0002689906,0.0001966026,0.002475681,0.03525019,0.00003855323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766923,0.002617236,0.00007218646,0.008608222,0.00002492783,0.00002104825,0.000146261,0.00000402228,0.01181392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960107,0.001686248,0.00008500477,0.0009821405,0.00002195272,0.00001903016,0.00009291898,0.000002802872,0.001099166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5220019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9616262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342974016","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx027","title":"Conceptions of Authority and the Anglo-American Common Law Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","authors":[{"name":"Dan Priel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06470010365945968,"gpt":0.4110856936660992,"spread":0.3463855900066395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577498,0.000283385,0.0003575109,0.004075395,0.007463165,0.008895789,0.0009223748,0.002378524,0.002592804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005812882,0.0002107526,0.0003244767,0.002055426,0.03901824,0.01000439,0.005089831,0.004383302,0.0003239914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004722893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01676858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01241003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952374,0.001754138,0.0001732283,0.0006622691,0.001354369,0.000818547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964069,0.001885732,0.0004250048,0.0002489436,0.0005838451,0.0004496471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001329908,0.000002788336,0.00008995827,0.000002640442,5.775938e-7,0.000007645816,0.002622875,0.00002871438,0.00001198497,0.9961093,0.0001625867,0.0009596834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000879291,0.00001060027,0.001082077,0.00008415019,0.000005852785,0.00004782445,0.004957796,0.0004657111,0.00003665275,0.9484661,0.04482258,0.0000118703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252078,0.008199121,0.01239162,0.02151332,0.0002590289,0.00002473618,0.00003083091,0.00003868284,0.8323349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988862,0.001180575,0.0009978353,0.001420095,0.0001516715,0.0000270189,0.00001468971,0.0000106318,0.007335584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01676858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05957097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329818661","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0013","title":"Book Review Essay","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Sociology; Commercial law","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Valcke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03933635856748258,"gpt":0.3967041834679328,"spread":0.3573678249004502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006634,0.0005614046,0.0008947022,0.004952599,0.003303923,0.006557856,0.001621737,0.003491367,0.1857644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007105755,0.0003244275,0.0005301253,0.009058165,0.001558295,0.00441447,0.001780962,0.002619584,0.08133437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009025335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01123093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05337709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08698749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998621,0.0001580101,0.00005076246,0.0001553346,0.0008696351,0.0001453769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955862,0.0007913932,0.0001432124,0.0002525802,0.002824411,0.0004021812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002746776,0.000004820125,0.0000218257,0.0001150731,0.000001327275,0.00001602462,0.00004100871,0.00001805587,0.00001617628,0.004787756,0.9725531,0.02242203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001102607,0.000001108014,0.0000737482,0.0002324225,0.000001135735,0.00002549484,0.00006063399,0.000005723254,0.000006426781,0.0006336388,0.9989567,0.000001869098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000423194,0.2755052,0.0004537503,0.09543038,0.05095541,0.0000867304,0.001666987,0.0001769827,0.5753013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005616274,0.1583433,0.0005075352,0.025399,0.02154013,0.00009726152,0.001457123,0.0001848901,0.7868544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1857644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6214439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394014678","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae007","title":"Sovereignty, Territoriality, and Private International Law in Classical Muslim International Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Private law; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Law of the sea; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Mohammad Fadel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04818593056536592,"gpt":0.3573031838977954,"spread":0.3091172533324295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001663847,0.00009871837,0.000141729,0.0007539123,0.003418681,0.003958202,0.0003933095,0.001150451,0.002152486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002182565,0.0001222812,0.0001121007,0.0007514883,0.03438842,0.003024266,0.002608945,0.001517878,0.00009409627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004035696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006525556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991022,0.0005301366,0.00002910349,0.00008730901,0.0001364871,0.0001148073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986147,0.0008005516,0.0001565389,0.0001816484,0.0001392208,0.0001074509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002092633,0.000004958062,0.0002340027,0.000004373606,5.975778e-7,0.0000228432,0.004018245,0.00007835328,0.00003001957,0.9944073,0.0002677532,0.0009294426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001344748,0.00003340084,0.003379494,0.0001069135,0.000005581352,0.000166109,0.01461964,0.001560331,0.0002624821,0.9436362,0.03620192,0.00001441897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4647847,0.003478812,0.007961462,0.01258684,0.00009968915,0.00002815487,0.00003285635,0.00002382767,0.5110037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974546,0.0001746765,0.0002773284,0.000157293,0.00002666058,0.000005253727,0.00000391395,0.000001749837,0.00189862],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006525556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02928114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394725099","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae006","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Kingdom; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Graham Mayeda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1278951842932368,"gpt":0.3925559634415649,"spread":0.2646607791483281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03975221,0.0003251548,0.0009749927,0.005667492,0.01532648,0.01990684,0.001895977,0.007528748,0.001990635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09918703,0.0006224369,0.0005971752,0.004009031,0.06868989,0.005965529,0.006380066,0.007541914,0.0002064538],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08408196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08465002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7559122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7471816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9340182,0.03440883,0.002481971,0.002731127,0.02034602,0.00601385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.897786,0.06758398,0.003572048,0.003065389,0.02369882,0.004293711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007329485,0.000005111118,0.0003030612,0.00001738094,0.000007209303,0.00006594479,0.003652534,0.0004790981,0.00004575139,0.992098,0.001201944,0.002116589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003364859,0.00002044381,0.003600192,0.0005385118,0.00005432413,0.00008958304,0.005795754,0.003204928,0.0002940757,0.9489165,0.03732235,0.0001296649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1185118,0.02095776,0.03483156,0.1441711,0.0006505638,0.000266715,0.00009291949,0.00008115696,0.6804363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849235,0.001678919,0.003530366,0.005138081,0.0001173435,0.00005821803,0.00001268398,0.00002118969,0.004519791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6100601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413184867","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf003","title":"Federalism and Vertical Tax Competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tax competition; Competition (biology); Economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Political science; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Rory Gillis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02161520301332562,"gpt":0.2722460669004744,"spread":0.2506308638871488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205783,0.00009910206,0.0002316462,0.000895648,0.003970923,0.003509683,0.0004072874,0.001086096,0.007159493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00477689,0.0001085214,0.0002694349,0.0009637728,0.009160685,0.002227916,0.003648255,0.001725716,0.0002406149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006054054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004710156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01607237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01938342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968425,0.001038621,0.0000875948,0.0003722745,0.0006158813,0.001043133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969982,0.0009254558,0.0008556573,0.0002897255,0.0004863401,0.0004446556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671301,0.000007633685,0.00209124,0.000005303022,0.000003167757,0.00003141453,0.0006083029,0.0004230055,0.00008418853,0.993324,0.0006833355,0.002729937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003575626,0.000105589,0.02453744,0.0001623226,0.00001880177,0.0002592802,0.004227707,0.004776458,0.0007514186,0.8778748,0.08721217,0.00003819375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4681421,0.0009808869,0.01013428,0.01275129,0.00009701043,0.0000300395,0.0001041824,0.00003560553,0.5077245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976713,0.0000500391,0.0001434262,0.0001584147,0.00001434305,0.000003293108,0.000009222888,0.000001707394,0.001948112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01607237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04392546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401976499","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae024","title":"Generality and Exception in Islamic Legal Theory: Intent, Language, and the Jurist’s Role","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Generality; Islam; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Omar Farahat","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01102668127223692,"gpt":0.2648492141970209,"spread":0.253822532924784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01058211,0.0002734301,0.000544322,0.00313086,0.003485776,0.009298531,0.001197186,0.002250463,0.001389901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008763347,0.0002800142,0.0004015049,0.002022075,0.06973099,0.007280821,0.005689758,0.00432539,0.0001649781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003248263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002361363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001529533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00126335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931705,0.004599833,0.0003728929,0.0004619171,0.00104933,0.0003455165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882597,0.008188998,0.001140743,0.001198409,0.0007818782,0.0004302459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002162377,0.000003300135,0.0002004495,0.000007823532,0.000001295836,0.00002761921,0.003297801,0.0001235373,0.00002353664,0.9948109,0.0001181263,0.001383431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007388948,0.000009908856,0.000459603,0.0001299206,0.0000052153,0.00007051212,0.002339251,0.0006972663,0.00007179301,0.9878934,0.008306163,0.000009591545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.209695,0.009592828,0.06767861,0.03962094,0.0004192669,0.00007378689,0.00004888606,0.0001202382,0.6727504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960716,0.000449879,0.001551622,0.0005230092,0.0001110874,0.00001136217,0.000005209458,0.000007991573,0.001268255],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01058211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05596417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396882761","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae005","title":"The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Netta Barak-Corren","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07249932966153845,"gpt":0.4199657214669349,"spread":0.3474663918053965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04039659,0.0003655012,0.0005388057,0.003248765,0.01278419,0.01281028,0.003340931,0.006176917,0.005857858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03832705,0.0004218468,0.0003708804,0.001779287,0.05132437,0.01985326,0.01466173,0.01109584,0.0003133499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01446284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01022796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02258447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662252,0.02962916,0.0005267233,0.0008068356,0.00170268,0.001109417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608058,0.03077049,0.002419448,0.00222624,0.002173522,0.001604481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001987363,0.0001803431,0.002030178,0.0001906555,0.00001091931,0.0003306683,0.1642044,0.0004690851,0.0004777441,0.8040392,0.003694776,0.02435215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005532001,0.00006895641,0.003380952,0.001913801,0.00001815155,0.0002350531,0.3383082,0.001352749,0.0009717214,0.5203,0.133351,0.00004399075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3186477,0.01006051,0.0606192,0.2891559,0.001176774,0.0003885558,0.00006315457,0.00005839367,0.3198297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752298,0.001483738,0.01131474,0.009446681,0.0001208442,0.0001244785,0.00002102683,0.00001700257,0.002241713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04039659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2136401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409111837","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae029","title":"The Legal Innovation Sandbox","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Sandbox (software development); Computer science; Library science","authors":[{"name":"Cristie Ford","is_ca":true},{"name":"Quinn Ashkenazy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03840725836824652,"gpt":0.3082105120734015,"spread":0.269803253705155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01009798,0.0004566292,0.0005520331,0.002090821,0.00597228,0.01515148,0.001854127,0.01010738,0.01034329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02055163,0.000398394,0.0008605533,0.001055226,0.02418714,0.009725013,0.007963859,0.01112541,0.001937309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01027774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01772581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006701231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005108237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828973,0.006683277,0.0006104269,0.002101417,0.006151465,0.001556104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833493,0.009383663,0.001118333,0.00248335,0.002543468,0.001121933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003986384,0.000007015658,0.0000561156,0.00001481947,0.000001201673,0.00002307214,0.0002489119,0.0001220738,0.00004638055,0.991464,0.004171488,0.003841101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002939143,0.00006442187,0.0003973558,0.000512139,0.00001736251,0.0001454416,0.0007789132,0.002769262,0.001221932,0.5594615,0.4345442,0.00005803924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01907854,0.004853369,0.0812993,0.1539761,0.003413194,0.0002732659,0.000151991,0.0008992744,0.736055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7995876,0.003237055,0.02997154,0.0476776,0.001932828,0.0006770816,0.0001080629,0.0002636079,0.1165446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01515148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07457066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253309197","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx014","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Honor; Excellence; Publishing; Pleasure; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz Werro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07094385192861155,"gpt":0.4255015243537143,"spread":0.3545576724251027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00850496,0.001786383,0.001813391,0.002729122,0.004981632,0.01118125,0.004950581,0.01256642,0.1171646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0886526,0.0008669697,0.002162885,0.002380546,0.002212584,0.00746249,0.003872572,0.01605419,0.1014203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003991776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002565852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005824951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867455,0.001081239,0.001284156,0.002898773,0.00691908,0.001071273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479278,0.009941352,0.002558259,0.002859673,0.03147497,0.00523801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005706681,0.000004378182,0.00003427999,0.00003900821,0.000001712393,0.00003747224,0.0000284682,0.000007420711,0.00002738549,0.0006737765,0.9943188,0.004821573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000412905,0.000004949457,0.00006718188,0.0000837205,0.000002751335,0.00008219521,0.00004388199,0.00002414871,0.00006109727,0.0004602979,0.9991589,0.000006818308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001663663,0.003744951,0.000464492,0.2276332,0.740559,0.00007696013,0.000555295,0.0004298005,0.02636984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003860807,0.004519901,0.001623677,0.3626583,0.3708504,0.0002963625,0.0006170284,0.0007414485,0.2548321],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1171646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3919545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813508657","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0017","title":"The Chinese “Oppression” Remedy: Creative Interpretations of Company Law by Chinese Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Law; Political science; Chinese law; Sociology; Law and economics; Common law; Sources of law","authors":[{"name":"Colin Hawes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kun-Luen Alex Lau","is_ca":false},{"name":"Angus Young","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02184111260953948,"gpt":0.2928900019215718,"spread":0.2710488893120323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941679,0.000514312,0.0004111759,0.003515483,0.005783571,0.008167041,0.001588345,0.002589883,0.003306638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007195116,0.0003832008,0.0007125944,0.00254973,0.02046843,0.007225194,0.005221334,0.003374921,0.000190605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01129217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01265701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02334651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03037279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937211,0.002760272,0.0002844001,0.0005417885,0.001941633,0.0007507522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967854,0.001946851,0.00022828,0.0004723869,0.0004642376,0.0001028894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005160521,0.000005001328,0.0004061897,0.00002357539,0.00000356859,0.0002275441,0.01123989,0.0002607263,0.0002198364,0.9779198,0.001558357,0.008130347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005197432,0.00005035699,0.004240322,0.0005729954,0.00009011087,0.0003550859,0.01625157,0.01159861,0.002775457,0.7818211,0.1820928,0.00009965209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2472259,0.00621267,0.06796022,0.03594511,0.0006410633,0.0003626145,0.0001305769,0.000171387,0.6413505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723384,0.001410758,0.007716251,0.00285055,0.0002474428,0.0001245855,0.00003771501,0.00003259995,0.01524172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02334651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08193082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246971983","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy012","title":"Preface","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Franklin A. Gevurtz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vivian Grosswald Curran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06992255438205475,"gpt":0.4113477735025587,"spread":0.3414252191205039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488209,0.0008049499,0.0007109366,0.002693161,0.003400319,0.004196601,0.001719731,0.001378848,0.5423339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01059463,0.0003010612,0.0004817799,0.002427206,0.0009308534,0.004222463,0.002400959,0.003483501,0.3145137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002140471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002036067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003901785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004203379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987469,0.0002211986,0.00009150481,0.0002279859,0.000603359,0.00010902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951853,0.001019735,0.0001885472,0.0005085897,0.002584208,0.0005135832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001113912,0.000008747726,0.00006220203,0.00005668546,9.617688e-7,0.00002231664,0.0001177602,0.00001774002,0.00004805463,0.005106664,0.9771262,0.01742155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001185688,0.000004853322,0.0001325934,0.00005863658,5.991889e-7,0.00003038633,0.0001041587,0.00001144884,0.00002389602,0.001282944,0.998347,0.000002244368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001204971,0.00748307,0.004671195,0.03029607,0.09360621,0.0003724846,0.01361043,0.001512302,0.8472434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008367421,0.005488601,0.003081274,0.009281928,0.02046395,0.0003547504,0.01337429,0.001253955,0.9383337],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4576661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251059082","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz011","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Mandate; Political science; Pleasure; History; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz Werro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03770292218767671,"gpt":0.3814900266924708,"spread":0.343787104504794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007773659,0.001782231,0.001828381,0.00288871,0.004817066,0.01198478,0.004705969,0.01018554,0.1348183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07802989,0.0008377503,0.001967598,0.002850431,0.002010212,0.008406727,0.004071114,0.01529772,0.1217954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002684571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006265127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871252,0.0009835322,0.001159798,0.002770105,0.006938027,0.001023366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94389,0.008117594,0.002625836,0.00281556,0.03706157,0.005489416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004496077,0.000003633514,0.00002893832,0.00003778705,0.000001511264,0.00002784041,0.0000251687,0.000006620381,0.00002353934,0.0006510318,0.9944046,0.004784924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003165964,0.000003572366,0.00005585099,0.00007511066,0.000002324177,0.00006006091,0.00004100198,0.00001804436,0.00004644255,0.0003596556,0.9993294,0.000005320784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001503815,0.004780496,0.0004715007,0.2038764,0.7556696,0.00006838477,0.0005863599,0.0004283213,0.03396854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003370207,0.006068273,0.001578988,0.2952148,0.3607946,0.0002601127,0.0006911622,0.0007902294,0.3312316],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4510121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313304229","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac039","title":"Differences in a Minor Archive: Feminist Activists and Scholars on Cohabitation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Autonomy; Minor (academic); Common law; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03076843154152714,"gpt":0.3074869608467308,"spread":0.2767185293052036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007551539,0.0004518502,0.0006127526,0.002840825,0.05188614,0.009186091,0.002288431,0.003061229,0.006284885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009822892,0.000305332,0.0002381266,0.002683196,0.05497668,0.004819047,0.009522567,0.006648799,0.0001885627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04794154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02387449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.794637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933627,0.003586163,0.00007887997,0.0004095419,0.0007534676,0.001809303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907048,0.005561119,0.000533212,0.0003516402,0.001184903,0.001664314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002308193,0.00001343497,0.001241939,0.00002265484,0.000002136419,0.0002365937,0.9330345,0.00001745975,0.0001324285,0.05809038,0.00303175,0.004153782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004555495,0.00001061735,0.002496059,0.0001539078,0.000003813223,0.00009832154,0.9286836,0.00004291787,0.0001591707,0.003385576,0.06495024,0.00001111488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6818823,0.00920833,0.001120826,0.07881043,0.0007994954,0.00005905635,0.0001026481,0.00003118046,0.2279857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.0007283171,0.0001082594,0.002670745,0.00009211085,0.00001604532,0.00001609457,0.00001908928,0.008988865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412894107","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf017","title":"Daphne Barak Erez, Biblical Judgments: New Legal Readings in the Hebrew Bible","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew Bible; Philosophy; Hebrew; Literature; Biblical studies; Linguistics; Art; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04481111885028161,"gpt":0.3184890451717636,"spread":0.273677926321482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003387624,0.0006189446,0.0006271435,0.002273518,0.007031324,0.007216095,0.001679151,0.008894281,0.008175682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009452876,0.0006265478,0.0003279712,0.002536463,0.01586515,0.01271152,0.002731503,0.01056974,0.001929485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004104653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002456047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02224284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05505591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99735,0.001485114,0.000133069,0.0003055367,0.0005535748,0.0001727574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949891,0.004053166,0.0001545733,0.0001496103,0.0005261167,0.000127354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003240424,0.00002540193,0.0001481319,0.0001336601,0.00001071665,0.00007673226,0.005751398,0.0001062238,0.0001209627,0.7860994,0.1952435,0.01225156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006581249,0.00001366075,0.001854592,0.0006811759,0.0000153186,0.0001206346,0.005078913,0.0002456804,0.0003851947,0.5130433,0.4784356,0.00006014522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005664866,0.2793285,0.006248727,0.5159678,0.01011757,0.00004241969,0.0005575865,0.00008631765,0.1819862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3678339,0.1820962,0.01239475,0.2538257,0.03017405,0.0003284081,0.0002897071,0.0004010919,0.1526562],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02224284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04422677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591481740","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/62.3.809","title":"Jacco Bomhoff, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Valcke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02272614901359631,"gpt":0.3270274343780725,"spread":0.3043012853644762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002343136,0.0005376114,0.0003819164,0.003694966,0.008166902,0.007868732,0.001444771,0.006635927,0.01269094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009265474,0.0003660732,0.0002052584,0.006372918,0.01383841,0.01543843,0.002974471,0.00618812,0.002250582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005612777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005636363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03555319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04337789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981036,0.0009705679,0.00005185297,0.0001640793,0.0005661894,0.0001436326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995027,0.003403847,0.0002961329,0.00016147,0.000800266,0.000311194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002001642,0.00002004892,0.0002337952,0.0001402272,0.000005841746,0.00008656242,0.006576699,0.00006898904,0.00008307838,0.6232273,0.3519374,0.01760005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001785511,0.000005659456,0.001262364,0.0006606282,0.000007818664,0.0001540807,0.004566101,0.0001283796,0.0002278321,0.3062762,0.6866651,0.00002789547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005456829,0.2139972,0.002594191,0.5408368,0.006423042,0.00004457915,0.0003438572,0.0000610672,0.2302425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3625837,0.3252866,0.005043168,0.1165268,0.02424966,0.0002959488,0.0005330621,0.0004601407,0.1650209],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03555319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07069248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335530575","doi":"","title":"Aline Grenon and Louise Bélanger-Hardy, eds. Elements of Quebec civil law: A comparison with the common law of Canada / Éléments de common law canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Valcke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02019686419435443,"gpt":0.30882088386877,"spread":0.2886240196744156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002237633,0.0009790559,0.0007229135,0.004788188,0.005800189,0.00806206,0.001361619,0.002859985,0.01966313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002942824,0.0005940639,0.0003478064,0.01007519,0.004414479,0.006478069,0.001253466,0.002197795,0.002594632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03107831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02713113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9631551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.0002809388,0.00003018001,0.0001042454,0.000599212,0.0001567567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0008595724,0.0001195691,0.00004181999,0.001136847,0.0003509531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005934575,0.00005467792,0.003616916,0.0009734438,0.00002869866,0.0002212512,0.01171498,0.0007603233,0.000136327,0.07832107,0.6867836,0.2173294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001039963,0.00001211138,0.01700245,0.001944265,0.00002601442,0.0001929418,0.01750282,0.0004873517,0.0001000098,0.008613811,0.9540615,0.00004625875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004197156,0.8151394,0.001137878,0.09599313,0.003385357,0.00003258765,0.0003760973,0.0000451029,0.07969333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05261383,0.8788384,0.001421868,0.004151397,0.002048553,0.00003463135,0.0002748509,0.00006563833,0.06055081],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08254427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237230563","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa002","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Scholarship; Pleasure; Editorial board; Publication; Library science; Wish; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz Werro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07109406723988082,"gpt":0.3913221393406159,"spread":0.3202280721007351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008637381,0.001628955,0.001971256,0.00256471,0.004429562,0.01076167,0.004506666,0.01091469,0.06579754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08877754,0.0008405837,0.002094537,0.002679348,0.001935586,0.007990217,0.003204082,0.015565,0.06417024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004014619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01015779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003016032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007514112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877175,0.0009815082,0.001216381,0.002472675,0.006800995,0.000810844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358925,0.01031471,0.002838645,0.002463573,0.04411892,0.004371735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003940461,0.000003396025,0.00003286047,0.00003428313,0.000001618955,0.00003284822,0.00002457915,0.000007983136,0.0000206438,0.0005215615,0.9955174,0.003798909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004010866,0.000004519457,0.00008579862,0.0000917842,0.000003317592,0.00008785715,0.00004977131,0.00003122854,0.00005288975,0.0004361055,0.9991447,0.00000796742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001284473,0.003570288,0.0003689906,0.2140837,0.7627679,0.00005897721,0.0003701,0.0002774037,0.01837426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002924561,0.004886988,0.001468565,0.3605631,0.4519997,0.0002425237,0.00037632,0.0004817023,0.1770565],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2201147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415769809","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf016","title":"Standard Form Contracts and the Erosion of Consent: Is There No Turning Back?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of care; Erosion; Unconscionability; Force majeure; Common law","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Cumyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03246670550124787,"gpt":0.3525477259278332,"spread":0.3200810204265853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03469043,0.0002929486,0.0008679632,0.00237004,0.005084917,0.01246616,0.002772095,0.0104819,0.007449367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09028998,0.0005469475,0.0008600451,0.002784404,0.05283104,0.02039744,0.005740481,0.01132482,0.0005858614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01639949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01663327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04804584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02643683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.965902,0.01628905,0.001942369,0.00242275,0.01061642,0.002827386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206614,0.05570063,0.003645916,0.0082401,0.01061263,0.001139308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007130306,0.000003828326,0.0001326491,0.00001598851,0.000001448871,0.0000265217,0.001264201,0.00007342036,0.00001583331,0.9918593,0.001481041,0.005118817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000183004,0.00001393022,0.0006070209,0.0005393479,0.000009254859,0.0001185235,0.001691709,0.0006039342,0.0001731074,0.9287792,0.06741967,0.00002607608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721681,0.02133999,0.06468489,0.3048435,0.001460716,0.0001226234,0.0001980541,0.0001508964,0.5350312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487346,0.004845232,0.007684383,0.02475421,0.0007212523,0.00009336124,0.00006185637,0.0001117913,0.01299333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04804584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1834627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605280893","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw016","title":"Po Jen Yap, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press, 2015)†","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Commonwealth; Law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Political science; High Court; Constitutional theory; Common law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Yvonne Tew","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04189211310654754,"gpt":0.3159830100710068,"spread":0.2740908969644592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001569356,0.000673582,0.0003036055,0.00096069,0.003327197,0.006187496,0.0007275562,0.003517763,0.01541128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002890511,0.0003763219,0.0002618935,0.001713839,0.005221991,0.01053332,0.002094716,0.004090056,0.003210278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004213067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005530605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01994575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990385,0.0004384581,0.00004869843,0.0001267676,0.0002412519,0.0001063202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.0005455251,0.0001010026,0.00005274615,0.0001134896,0.0001120643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695011,0.00001556275,0.0002391088,0.0001672852,0.000005349726,0.0001142716,0.003211578,0.0002325161,0.00007417056,0.5843509,0.3795538,0.03201863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006563745,0.000006856085,0.0007607219,0.0003248543,0.000002974521,0.00007979892,0.001419823,0.000150265,0.00006715105,0.1080833,0.8890862,0.0000113851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003473672,0.3901946,0.003461917,0.2725459,0.006215681,0.00004163061,0.0004211122,0.0001015706,0.3235439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2379389,0.2682164,0.003412033,0.04904739,0.006649126,0.0002604604,0.0005375958,0.0001933258,0.4337448],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01541128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05155587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248731791","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy009","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Pleasure; Reading (process); Transition (genetics); Library science; Media studies; Center (category theory); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Helge Dedek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz Werro","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05336813201102857,"gpt":0.4064143823515282,"spread":0.3530462503404996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009128475,0.001830147,0.001989689,0.002486248,0.004867726,0.01046735,0.005054372,0.01318513,0.1024705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09567255,0.0009024049,0.002232181,0.002276774,0.002281541,0.007307336,0.003966876,0.01752162,0.09134402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01214748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00277501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006912353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857025,0.00117589,0.001409102,0.003284535,0.007270671,0.001157421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401853,0.01067492,0.002887342,0.003174876,0.03736656,0.005710988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005897963,0.000004228871,0.00003746574,0.00003915569,0.000001933465,0.00004130746,0.00003013154,0.000007582226,0.0000273028,0.0006381089,0.9943547,0.004812289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005376786,0.000005652925,0.00008318225,0.00009866171,0.000003450631,0.0001048851,0.00005040819,0.00003049276,0.00006877838,0.0005333756,0.9990072,0.000008701431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001851038,0.003916482,0.0005087513,0.2640873,0.7056361,0.00008261026,0.0005846046,0.0004400755,0.02455889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004220032,0.004547102,0.001869269,0.4259173,0.3358757,0.0002962562,0.0005972122,0.0006715835,0.2260056],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3427978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}