{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d33b9b63ed4e","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology"}},"results":[{"id":"W4392525383","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume05issue08-05","title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTS ON PERMISSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FREEDOM OF SCIENCE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Education, Law, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CITES; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Creativity; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Aslonova Laylo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1398062723332942,"gpt":0.4264828789694871,"spread":0.2866766066361929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008428175,0.0002457708,0.000611816,0.006269869,0.003590183,0.004999145,0.0009331982,0.001456613,0.008832657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03254528,0.0002582003,0.0007155061,0.005575512,0.004995876,0.002413071,0.002540596,0.002383564,0.0006349924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004893154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02075017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02760453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804,0.0085878,0.0009440888,0.0009238281,0.007045686,0.002098684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580674,0.02957257,0.00431698,0.002035748,0.005314969,0.0006923401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002183055,0.0001238603,0.01019328,0.0001703583,0.00008050058,0.0003521037,0.006026648,0.001986126,0.0004936524,0.9592404,0.00222274,0.01889214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002467346,0.001042037,0.3582685,0.002056459,0.0008553232,0.001586301,0.04451977,0.007923713,0.006463055,0.2670108,0.3097486,0.0002787117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3774931,0.003948687,0.005437784,0.001433556,0.0001235857,0.0001950375,0.0007910922,0.00002252258,0.6105546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817058,0.001797509,0.001600039,0.0002886945,0.00004356924,0.0001561376,0.0003385103,0.00002439886,0.01404541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04457295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395462426","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue04-03","title":"EXAMINING PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY: THE JANUARY 6 RIOT, TRUMP, AND THE 14TH AMENDMENT - AN IMPERATIVE CONSIDERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Law; Federalism; Presidential system; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Sovereign immunity; Politics; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Pelekeh H. Tapang","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05564887340956004,"gpt":0.3485717218476574,"spread":0.2929228484380973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008475592,0.0002658113,0.0004409666,0.002395784,0.01333821,0.01216471,0.00129003,0.00451943,0.002758527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01547703,0.0003095138,0.0004280585,0.001896154,0.0404737,0.01036058,0.004718055,0.007438452,0.0001592616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007131453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01419479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03711405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941074,0.004065237,0.00008773576,0.0004191815,0.0005160403,0.0008044612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881132,0.009589125,0.001016023,0.0003006589,0.0004920867,0.0004888208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001663258,0.00002735249,0.001364727,0.00002933694,0.000004728731,0.0001662872,0.0288938,0.0001212351,0.0000762897,0.9612851,0.003876782,0.004137731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004068086,0.0001175189,0.01993982,0.0006116077,0.00005120794,0.0003085351,0.1762966,0.001026791,0.0007686105,0.5437663,0.2570146,0.00005780317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3500465,0.01395959,0.005664448,0.1478554,0.001596712,0.00006745315,0.00006432675,0.00002324193,0.4807222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888154,0.001477366,0.0005482882,0.003784948,0.0004852542,0.00004191657,0.00001504269,0.00001200498,0.004819841],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01419479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07720399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403267736","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue09-14","title":"BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THESE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES IN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Burden of proof; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Malikabonu ABDULLAEVA","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.177318041511529,"gpt":0.4360965422068653,"spread":0.2587785006953364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006946199,0.000894827,0.001775174,0.007589553,0.001034645,0.004687314,0.001232312,0.002333711,0.003054784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01495561,0.0008156255,0.0007402826,0.007487502,0.002988115,0.005188263,0.001722297,0.003032156,0.0008335309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01193167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01129109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960144,0.001430125,0.0006370665,0.0003016219,0.00146125,0.0001556839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852857,0.01104694,0.001084442,0.0002327768,0.0021755,0.000174587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978583,0.00006345638,0.0007634063,0.04698001,0.0001869164,0.0001408173,0.001035341,0.0009518026,0.0003616041,0.103016,0.02672326,0.8197376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001028678,0.0001066978,0.004013819,0.07629476,0.0002361332,0.0004168962,0.0006433552,0.0002561433,0.0002371327,0.02783818,0.8898877,0.00005885894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001034784,0.9970117,0.0002509086,0.0008167272,0.0001084005,0.000007904641,0.00001288676,0.000002207354,0.001685729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001919925,0.996849,0.0004249287,0.0004144571,0.0001431264,0.00001284388,0.00001767624,0.000002377948,0.0002156946],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03673548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}