{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"6c119ceb7bc0","filters":{"venue":"The Australian Library Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1981045347","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.771764","title":"The continuing relevance of the library as a third place for users and non-users of IT: the case of Canada Bay","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); The Internet; Precinct; World Wide Web; Digital library; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01549577957162124,"gpt":0.2654113793471006,"spread":0.2499155997754794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004539045,0.0001079482,0.0001884125,0.00001757851,0.0007987368,0.0001367872,0.0008120567,0.0000714239,0.00011274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004347387,0.00004909226,0.0001159967,0.0002250268,0.001073366,0.0006939871,0.00008110781,0.0003366421,5.628845e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001693127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001007604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02037502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984457,0.0004311564,0.0003851432,0.00007935239,0.0002855533,0.0003730438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964859,0.00258607,0.0004888609,0.0002366719,0.00005655977,0.0001458748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002131782,0.00003941774,0.06683358,0.0001081858,0.0002992261,0.00004556604,0.1823826,0.00005824932,0.0005662065,0.04482083,0.7011868,0.003446108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298326,0.0002427933,0.0321316,0.0006062962,0.0002230714,0.0003316467,0.5883289,0.00008108086,0.01582025,0.05311555,0.3074378,0.0003826683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125667,0.0001867391,7.13014e-7,0.08409119,0.0005733419,0.0004438261,0.00003982419,0.000005667179,0.002091979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884983,0.0003135857,0.0000897237,0.0006600926,0.0003808599,0.000009248777,3.702443e-7,0.00001534364,0.0100325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4059463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2024264357","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10736059","title":"Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library Websites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; Screen reader; Ranking (information retrieval); World Wide Web; Web Accessibility Initiative; Guideline; Work (physics); Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Web standards; Web page; Internet privacy; Engineering; Political science; Web development; Psychology; Visually impaired; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07150974705608026,"gpt":0.3540025323051733,"spread":0.282492785249093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181048,0.0002450868,0.000505919,0.0003982635,0.0006145903,0.001116916,0.0009092155,0.0001086948,0.007125445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000893754,0.0001780554,0.0003352729,0.001321224,0.001801281,0.01548332,0.0002302106,0.0004308602,0.00004947348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006287161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003719205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009975454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006065433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967482,0.0007376308,0.0007472359,0.0002605225,0.0008660745,0.0006403197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981066,0.0005655618,0.000464843,0.0002759827,0.00007910348,0.0005078889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001060476,0.0002838772,0.9185282,0.00003353716,0.000874051,0.000002069369,0.01919815,0.00004123057,0.00004899532,0.01005884,0.05027696,0.0005480249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000244818,0.00005881254,0.8731694,0.00004432817,0.0003262753,0.000009877252,0.01626592,0.00001743157,0.0006815453,0.02555749,0.083337,0.0002871548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357924,0.0002855951,0.000001670011,0.006893096,0.0002465073,0.0002273264,0.000327798,0.00008508954,0.05614052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960681,0.00006349853,0.0003388813,0.0002205628,0.0005097784,0.000006908915,0.0000434957,0.00001594841,0.03811989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04535888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141362884","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2001.10755938","title":"Losing the quality battle in Australian education for librarianship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Battle; Publishing; Discipline; Political science; Identity (music); Quality (philosophy); Project commissioning; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Social science; Geography; Art; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09317000433473416,"gpt":0.3794563728452389,"spread":0.2862863685105047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002010136,0.0001356092,0.0001409402,0.0001451118,0.001486402,0.001890773,0.001270967,0.00009531025,0.00214362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002091789,0.0000809873,0.0001371175,0.0009093321,0.0003724866,0.02597062,0.00004629855,0.0004500513,0.00008002377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004234763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009601357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001531786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001292037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976733,0.0006122413,0.0006124951,0.0001460088,0.0004093417,0.0005466304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986574,0.0004863777,0.0003126281,0.0002823783,0.00003964518,0.0002215948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130254,0.0001318063,0.09832515,0.00001846036,0.00001879466,0.000004305556,0.03332625,0.0001278196,0.00003546577,0.3789347,0.4534015,0.03554554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000228335,0.00002905689,0.08767275,0.00005011427,0.000005736054,0.00003089328,0.0187235,0.00001760967,0.00008385938,0.03449573,0.8585212,0.0001411899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4166576,0.0001012683,0.00007130174,0.5249485,0.002234034,0.0006790007,0.00001760852,0.00008728294,0.05520339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817264,0.0001876459,0.001142092,0.009978344,0.002859687,0.00002934163,0.00002599115,0.00001945221,0.104031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991917344","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2010.10736025","title":"Assessing the collective wealth of Australian research libraries: measuring overlap using <i>WorldCat Collection Analysis</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"State Library of New South Wales","keywords":"Software; Data collection; Order (exchange); Computer science; Library science; Bibliographic database; World Wide Web; Research data; Database; Business; Sociology; Subject (documents)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1192533248206169,"gpt":0.3409480649430464,"spread":0.2216947401224295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002103702,0.0002824052,0.0004047404,0.001163864,0.00299913,0.006903146,0.002678431,0.000146933,0.0003920716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001561848,0.0001737694,0.000333955,0.01014812,0.0005196613,0.01287181,0.000603586,0.001908435,0.00001612011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009504394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002250544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003855626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009189102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957876,0.0009273181,0.0007935164,0.0004245625,0.001284766,0.0007823049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972804,0.00085939,0.0005706329,0.0007647797,0.0002036084,0.0003211823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007274018,0.0007008504,0.4600154,0.0001475272,0.004624275,0.0002024944,0.02904022,0.008143554,0.01830522,0.06797331,0.4002334,0.009886343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002889938,0.0008163429,0.4843864,0.0004303961,0.0006055681,0.001961606,0.01311297,0.01870346,0.1708873,0.1329445,0.1713365,0.00192495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428156,0.00009606523,0.003316218,0.0243216,0.001481416,0.0006170236,0.000007166924,0.0002149918,0.02712994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481099,0.0000235837,0.01337505,0.0002301915,0.0005025274,0.000009640684,0.000002973162,0.0000313508,0.03771481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2288969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049032469","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2000.10755925","title":"Racist disinformation on the World Wide Web: initial implications for the LIS community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; The Internet; Racism; Pornography; Censorship; Terminology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Computer science; Social media; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1075472137213983,"gpt":0.3752327489862959,"spread":0.2676855352648976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007601595,0.0000902523,0.00008400139,0.00003378694,0.006021606,0.0005928408,0.0009902616,0.00005276232,0.001914041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002267697,0.00004447478,0.000129862,0.0003242104,0.0005765661,0.0007950724,0.00002371488,0.0007611052,0.00009078073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003524882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002220959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001847544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002114729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984634,0.0007213358,0.0002461742,0.00004060931,0.0002067449,0.0003217481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956481,0.003781976,0.0001317548,0.0002840743,0.00003193646,0.0001220964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007452679,0.00005571376,0.003657575,0.000003541074,0.00005315611,4.484095e-7,0.04700033,0.00003378937,0.000005870284,0.1709179,0.7545301,0.02366704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001784695,0.00003728165,0.02328799,0.00002217509,0.00003811973,0.000006539158,0.01695631,0.000008748737,0.0001053344,0.05462707,0.9046468,0.00008523097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3588816,0.00002445705,0.00001088275,0.5598449,0.0005864711,0.0005181279,0.000109408,0.00005864248,0.07996549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743378,0.0001447952,0.00003646548,0.006780106,0.002032069,0.00003281311,0.00001271561,0.00001114237,0.01661215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6154562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968486898","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722684","title":"Scholarship-in-Practice Bridging the literacy gap between boys and girls: An opportunity for the National Year of Reading 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Reading (process); Literacy; Scholarship; Psychology; Reading motivation; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2237162539941408,"gpt":0.4529279603775506,"spread":0.2292117063834098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006072011,0.00007144441,0.00009814214,0.00006335958,0.0009402242,0.0004484294,0.0004313836,0.00005001414,0.000211981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005648375,0.00003875331,0.0000507908,0.0002088822,0.0001630142,0.006149968,0.00003237138,0.000389958,0.000006179953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002508834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003109651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001992713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004621299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981026,0.0009483625,0.0002855767,0.0000646997,0.0003147861,0.0002839498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997881,0.001385085,0.0003141453,0.0001223966,0.00008745853,0.0002099163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054691,0.00009990198,0.600038,0.00002429867,0.000129342,7.631783e-7,0.1464471,0.000007641974,0.00007858106,0.1682847,0.07350862,0.01132629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002156802,0.00002592044,0.3908112,0.00006923478,0.00004701081,0.00004833308,0.03887148,0.000003956593,0.00006232189,0.006798922,0.5629361,0.0001098826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468975,0.0005285852,0.00003088551,0.1419283,0.0005979284,0.0004098779,0.00005565797,0.00001710704,0.009534186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898282,0.0001314386,0.0003376999,0.000838914,0.005377788,0.000006339558,0.000003288502,0.00001016157,0.003466164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4894274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7231539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576875018","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2015.1017915","title":"Serving remote communities together: a Canadian joint use library study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Space (punctuation); Exploratory research; Project commissioning; Joint (building); Business; Knowledge management; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1970927288597015,"gpt":0.3211138415281947,"spread":0.1240211126684931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089278,0.0001744095,0.0001798104,0.0002261306,0.001974308,0.003658182,0.00140405,0.00009242834,0.001921268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006721823,0.0001250572,0.00009361176,0.0006942845,0.0003607556,0.01670465,0.0001429806,0.0006494948,0.0001175102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005518238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002805796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1132947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04247585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996775,0.001496825,0.0003809175,0.0001404583,0.0005739027,0.0006329051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981274,0.0001231599,0.0001788979,0.0004098521,0.00003591755,0.001124776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007532223,0.0001623741,0.3707538,0.000005981118,0.0000888658,0.0004412468,0.2622291,0.0001528658,0.00001629959,0.007847112,0.3531426,0.005084413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000494943,0.0003922265,0.04507307,0.00008640093,0.00003048505,0.0001392313,0.3989881,0.00009157987,0.0001335274,0.01705767,0.5371179,0.0003948915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.87918,0.00003961527,0.000005322673,0.0860121,0.0007033526,0.0003468327,0.00001880757,0.0001441765,0.03354982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573369,0.00009428541,0.001259877,0.003060678,0.001010259,0.000001757771,0.00001321362,0.000028093,0.03719491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3256808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078823204","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735925","title":"Making a difference –<i>Better Beginnings</i>Family Literacy Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; State (computer science); Literacy; Library science; Publishing; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Media studies; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08315454155804826,"gpt":0.4001604988814232,"spread":0.317005957323375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004244042,0.0001277213,0.0001396204,0.00008887916,0.0009550748,0.00152076,0.0006716445,0.0000724147,0.0006058732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000251868,0.00008488724,0.0001113873,0.0003913629,0.0001726824,0.001321436,0.00002208887,0.000462345,0.00008587223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002515812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000231723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004351024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001052414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.0003668459,0.0003046167,0.0001282469,0.0003358272,0.0004802993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992609,0.00006832404,0.0002262401,0.0002003975,0.00003909836,0.0002050463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003226427,0.0002107573,0.05904455,0.00001129834,0.00004435183,0.00004939126,0.1290966,0.000002981844,0.0003381952,0.05108399,0.4178959,0.3421897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001215821,0.00007370423,0.1771325,0.0001302471,0.00001005386,0.00006784472,0.003976726,0.000002090803,0.0000226293,0.01222511,0.8060913,0.0001461943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7918395,0.0001933569,0.00001350691,0.1713319,0.000631871,0.0002489853,0.000003304598,0.0001519704,0.03558569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958621,0.00006137489,0.001490321,0.008636579,0.003909292,0.000007155506,0.000001683023,0.00001169228,0.02726096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3881954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052299855","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722670","title":"<i>Mentoring in the Library: Building for the Future.</i>By Marta K. Lee. ALA Guides for the Busy Librarian. Chicago: American Library Association, 2011. 122 pp. US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN9780838935934 (available from In<i>books</i>)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Media studies; Management; Engineering; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0260451652785966,"gpt":0.2580350651730031,"spread":0.2319898998944065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002680921,0.0005403477,0.0005424783,0.0002099054,0.002910814,0.004646167,0.005165824,0.0002575361,0.008905836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000135726,0.0002928241,0.0004729043,0.001321772,0.000690877,0.04789768,0.0004134687,0.001242736,0.0001366615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000787785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008401398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001370254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003057566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943219,0.001032043,0.001406832,0.0005414631,0.001106599,0.001591207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940476,0.003277163,0.001370774,0.0008773737,0.00004933851,0.0003777788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002053533,0.0001079432,0.09658053,0.00001077854,0.0001311345,0.000003941711,0.01537585,0.00006704011,0.00003110419,0.01042406,0.8758279,0.001234378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00106494,0.0001194624,0.02030335,0.00008297295,0.00006396891,0.000008351843,0.01754473,0.0003990646,0.000588142,0.008295245,0.951094,0.0004357431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1994597,0.01536843,0.0005377613,0.6641572,0.00904436,0.008091246,0.001970504,0.0008081342,0.1005626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2735242,0.03911751,0.02748701,0.2252904,0.03366787,0.001680722,0.0009007896,0.0007466613,0.3975849],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4388669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066570519","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735879","title":"<b>Essential and timely text for business case writers:<i>Business cases for info pros: here’s why, here’s how</i>. By Ulla De Stricker. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2008. 107 pp. US$39.50 soft cover ISBN 9781573873352.</b>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Business information; Publishing; Library science; Management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Mechanical engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03496432616785049,"gpt":0.259916594607766,"spread":0.2249522684399155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005834113,0.0006168494,0.0005214156,0.0003158472,0.001141018,0.004923956,0.0008774642,0.0002939622,0.0005479212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003126331,0.0004682193,0.0001856129,0.001143313,0.000249645,0.02008963,0.0002250348,0.0004536083,0.00005938355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005385291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002174323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000368763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002925203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972262,0.00004116108,0.0008703272,0.0003964974,0.0004703591,0.0009954858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976748,0.0001988765,0.0009307209,0.0004578903,0.0006154403,0.0001223042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001166273,0.0001927835,0.004147229,0.0007297899,0.0001065201,0.0002165071,0.0001225804,0.0002956921,0.0004860361,0.0008984283,0.9652118,0.02642634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002366682,0.0001174473,0.005659393,0.0004019488,0.0003685712,0.005692795,0.0008949696,0.001855519,0.0008134872,0.002383707,0.978471,0.0009744962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7874004,0.003524954,0.07359599,0.1220596,0.003342897,0.005662212,0.002469021,0.0007149778,0.001229944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672031,0.001122011,0.002721735,0.01449071,0.006716168,0.000144179,0.001778745,0.0001717393,0.00565156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1798028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314106763","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2008.10722455","title":"<b>Where we came from:<i>Uniting a Profession: The Australian Institute of Librarians, 1937–1949,</i>by Jean P Whyte and David J Jones. Canberra: Australian Library and Information Association, 2007. 279pp. $42.50 soft cover ISBN 978086045658</b>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02189516817607006,"gpt":0.2413584370040974,"spread":0.2194632688280274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055726,0.0005834925,0.0006804002,0.0001609751,0.004033308,0.0009961551,0.001279255,0.0007205445,0.003407343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001650974,0.0004323331,0.0002914166,0.0008237863,0.0017648,0.0242941,0.0002705548,0.002068251,0.0000876159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001457277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001029304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008320592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004177272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947291,0.001263038,0.001343003,0.0004373952,0.001118097,0.00110934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964897,0.0005075674,0.001620802,0.0005274795,0.00009514162,0.0007593209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001220847,0.00006705496,0.08232328,0.00008566219,0.0002146687,0.00003855073,0.03040456,0.00003344947,0.000127766,0.002507688,0.8836008,0.000474395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001104972,0.00009343397,0.02531437,0.0004317731,0.0001507706,0.00009594822,0.01674886,0.0000063364,0.0003327891,0.0006553386,0.9545036,0.0005617921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5572196,0.002894098,0.00003861668,0.4232737,0.00371659,0.001705174,0.001908992,0.0004848613,0.008758352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371242,0.02200406,0.001225626,0.004487269,0.003128632,0.0000359716,0.0004516389,0.0001169566,0.3314256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095443512","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722600","title":"<i>Index It Right! Advice from the Experts, Volume 2.</i>Ed. by Janet Perlman and Enid L. Zafran. Medford, NJ: Information Today in association with the American Society of Indexers, 2010. 170 pp. A$40.00 (A$32.00 ASI members) soft cover ISBN 9781573873963","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Library science; Management; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Economics; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678444859157707,"gpt":0.2000597016454284,"spread":0.1832752530538514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001187025,0.0002532114,0.0002946075,0.00005340229,0.0008937898,0.001885151,0.001169803,0.0001096957,0.002814845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003317358,0.0001313338,0.0001293466,0.0001574988,0.0004994253,0.009074341,0.0001417681,0.001213247,0.00002236559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007118854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001186485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004429697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003250399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977362,0.0005897662,0.0005658264,0.0001529441,0.0005888431,0.0003664893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977995,0.0003633786,0.001089563,0.000514469,0.0001248871,0.000108246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001758744,0.00004842913,0.04169731,0.000005431274,0.000146149,6.933753e-7,0.06808019,0.00001650993,0.00001775855,0.000418897,0.888594,0.0007986972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007627548,0.0001434519,0.06498218,0.00007739524,0.00006230146,0.0000152653,0.04548227,0.000323638,0.00007161639,0.0004922921,0.8873403,0.0002465484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909909,0.001468295,0.00005318465,0.08734099,0.0004190753,0.0005334933,0.0004159154,0.0001090677,0.01866907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979116,0.001663395,0.0001992289,0.005367177,0.0004190804,0.00001788513,0.0001941954,0.00003270117,0.01299038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08812504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170630960","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721878","title":"Providing library resources to 37 medical students at eight remote sites across 2600 km","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Metropolitan area; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); The Internet; Medical education; Internet access; Library science; Geography; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02267217345405012,"gpt":0.32312517040554,"spread":0.3004529969514899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009280828,0.0003075718,0.0004781944,0.0001193384,0.0007666942,0.0005023035,0.0009627717,0.0002315307,0.003745801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009754752,0.0001931578,0.0002464584,0.0005403178,0.0001637856,0.001009569,0.0005650604,0.0009849463,0.0004391369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006515448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003292008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003488443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003985799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957173,0.0002735673,0.000846769,0.0003389457,0.001599817,0.001223537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997549,0.000205929,0.0002239756,0.0004314775,0.00002649978,0.001563115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008169641,0.0001110497,0.3249941,0.00006797486,0.00004613444,0.001597132,0.0003791786,0.000005667905,0.0001713237,0.00005890864,0.6693987,0.002352932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001084827,0.0002470941,0.4031136,0.0005660286,0.00003742289,0.003458654,0.0002564343,0.00002230345,0.001375342,0.0006551666,0.5889611,0.0002219888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891948,0.0007210911,0.000002852518,0.1035712,0.000450153,0.0003565287,0.00004909393,0.0001570147,0.005497249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8450454,0.0002984485,0.001016944,0.02081143,0.004567011,0.00000457688,0.0001058611,0.00009661952,0.1280537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1225564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014573773","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10756004","title":"Business, knowledge, information: where's the value proposition?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Value proposition; Proposition; Power point; Project commissioning; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Management; Point (geometry); Power (physics); Library science; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Physics; Philosophy; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03880395425120205,"gpt":0.3094526200898139,"spread":0.2706486658386119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005338636,0.0000856343,0.00007996344,0.00005672151,0.001912232,0.001052467,0.0006082615,0.00005970383,0.006949167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003642878,0.00004505982,0.00006508268,0.0006152671,0.000246563,0.003269499,0.00002947,0.0002951925,0.001433821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003401308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002454499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001726402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001373197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986939,0.0004478589,0.000285916,0.00004980281,0.0002647785,0.0002576861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993061,0.00008172572,0.0001954448,0.000186772,0.00009658845,0.0001333659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002148815,0.00002428128,0.001718898,0.000007182169,0.00001491936,7.771499e-7,0.05343268,0.0000126368,0.00000128898,0.08563992,0.8563759,0.002769313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000935653,0.000009429365,0.009826832,0.00004059115,0.000009821918,0.00008129386,0.01197256,0.000006027429,0.000007794381,0.002488652,0.9753899,0.00007354488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03461399,0.0008936242,0.00002591892,0.6132142,0.002162845,0.0003794339,0.000009930225,0.00009727791,0.3486028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8410565,0.0008435128,0.0001416706,0.002101235,0.00708089,0.00001459957,0.000003411029,0.00001309642,0.1487451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089528207","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.878269","title":"Developing community-led public libraries: Evidence from the UK and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.106234903302902,"gpt":0.2983522930130961,"spread":0.192117389710194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441031,0.0001209843,0.0001216159,0.00002590235,0.00453971,0.002791672,0.001647128,0.00005678581,0.0007773808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000485541,0.00006819947,0.00003689713,0.0003317944,0.0006269318,0.006597232,0.0001663145,0.0006962867,0.000009052973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003401183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002897084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2169074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2361718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969005,0.00186356,0.0002653973,0.0001185112,0.0004659383,0.0003860726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973743,0.001867305,0.0001829907,0.0002908781,0.00002459141,0.0002599229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003136312,0.00001635765,0.4958075,0.000007671673,0.00005407624,0.00001507487,0.03108833,0.000007013331,0.00007924579,0.1624388,0.3031901,0.007264506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002065339,0.00006724009,0.3125883,0.0002075842,0.00001947316,0.00003594189,0.04296507,0.00002284234,0.0004226537,0.07624308,0.5669239,0.0002974047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.663684,0.0001250971,0.00006797419,0.3327639,0.0003855732,0.00009345823,0.00000642382,0.00003142275,0.002842118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879462,0.0002264239,0.0008103639,0.006834,0.0009303834,0.000002192584,0.000006410838,0.000008317325,0.003235691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3259299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977745968","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721863","title":"<b>Focuses on the benefit to the individual: Rubin, Rhea J<i>Demonstrating results: using outcome measurement in your library.</i>PLA results series. Chicago: American Library Association, 2006. 176p US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN 0838935605</b>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Outcome (game theory); Cover (algebra); Library science; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; History; Engineering; Psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05051649923834206,"gpt":0.2425108533763778,"spread":0.1919943541380358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001964937,0.0007621087,0.0006476495,0.0005659507,0.001769049,0.008038182,0.004150005,0.0002103559,0.0003759782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003128866,0.000452936,0.0003569559,0.003592691,0.0002387718,0.01354955,0.001093371,0.001639738,0.0001573024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008190521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000201885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002670479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922571,0.0009404796,0.002192297,0.0008854856,0.002374437,0.001350252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957481,0.0009440557,0.001646056,0.001133522,0.00008104047,0.000447233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006897254,0.0002241605,0.1435118,0.00001315672,0.0002045869,0.00007676957,0.001651252,0.01421058,0.00005556906,0.003354579,0.8349147,0.001093057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001967172,0.0004104248,0.2356876,0.000413584,0.00004658354,0.0002233103,0.001121047,0.0007931571,0.00289401,0.003906617,0.7514383,0.001098179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5503001,0.0005806383,0.0002486647,0.3757493,0.001592458,0.001679885,0.0007564233,0.0009780026,0.06811445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8621889,0.0002732486,0.01138088,0.02560249,0.002700717,0.00007684798,0.0001219389,0.0002666492,0.09738826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3501469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244472377","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10755972","title":"Letters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04663930841805503,"gpt":0.2302576674741694,"spread":0.1836183590561144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000231702,0.0001844496,0.0001437186,0.0001308578,0.000401409,0.0005281594,0.0009179449,0.000043466,0.03421512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000136462,0.0001149598,0.0001672856,0.0003921886,0.0001857541,0.002330462,0.00007052277,0.0007889314,0.02065461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002350757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001161119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001338238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.041535e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998391,0.0002529421,0.0003124464,0.0001386765,0.0003655946,0.0005393212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991065,0.00004897168,0.000182904,0.0003813496,0.000008872406,0.0002714326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001842058,0.00003554912,0.004104271,0.000001812996,0.000051647,0.0002001127,0.0003748472,0.00009664789,0.007780396,0.0004941156,0.9858936,0.000948575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129018,0.00009322521,0.03864675,0.00006708368,0.0000755646,0.007839248,0.0002912724,0.0001537241,0.00699993,0.002526005,0.9416869,0.0004912714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598303,0.0002419812,0.00001013236,0.1171733,0.0005981175,0.0001293217,0.00002792345,0.0002990148,0.02168998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419422,0.00005280365,0.0008450388,0.003475097,0.001671415,0.000002302686,0.000003036991,0.0001187622,0.05188932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1136982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241707088","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722697","title":"<i>Implementing Technology Solutions in Libraries: Techniques, Tools and Tips from the Trenches.</i>By Karen C. Knox. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2011. 173 pp. US$35.00 soft cover ISBN 9781573874038","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02162021483211617,"gpt":0.2230319401333269,"spread":0.2014117253012107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007747403,0.0003246931,0.0002890214,0.0002210482,0.0008635994,0.00206541,0.002444628,0.0002237016,0.0009333657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002703957,0.0002087564,0.00009590309,0.0007128358,0.0002110355,0.03164126,0.001352582,0.000879934,0.0001056911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000260529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001877411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001101803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001351116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972799,0.0002778149,0.0007794305,0.0002439776,0.0003607068,0.001058208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.0003353127,0.0004692798,0.0007041467,0.00002322379,0.0002206791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003121108,0.00008502924,0.1065257,0.00001759336,0.0000885071,0.000007682498,0.003924485,0.00001086382,0.0002885702,0.02534459,0.8310035,0.03267226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004755066,0.00008448671,0.02671997,0.00009711353,0.00002355806,0.0002307797,0.0009288083,0.000340157,0.003113343,0.01571179,0.951923,0.000351491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4679529,0.02138245,0.02121295,0.4575855,0.00296376,0.002801858,0.001479268,0.002465987,0.02215526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386051,0.003116745,0.034567,0.0153552,0.002158796,0.000133191,0.0004961735,0.00009910703,0.00546874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4706521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047275852","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2003.10721576","title":"<b>Fresh and original in a well-trodden field: Eva Hemmungs Wirten<i>No trespassing: authorship, intellectual property rights, and the boundaries of globalization.</i>University of Toronto Press ISBN: 080208835X (hard cover) [2003?] np</b>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Globalization; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01791934152430881,"gpt":0.2038611926969368,"spread":0.185941851172628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006108026,0.0002279024,0.000361183,0.00005941678,0.0006116549,0.0008098777,0.0005026003,0.0001077728,0.007982306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003163831,0.0001131116,0.00008500885,0.0002618815,0.0008657454,0.002940533,0.0001866074,0.000383248,0.00001934664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002597668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001345297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006260197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004100231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986004,0.0002192684,0.0004106665,0.000217094,0.0002564641,0.0002961227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990665,0.0001530846,0.0003211018,0.0002467603,0.000171428,0.00004116977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002738243,0.00009333769,0.002690088,0.0001193928,0.0001123764,0.00001518988,0.002985184,0.000007512051,0.0001226129,0.01527495,0.9752104,0.0006307106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00176506,0.0001025995,0.0005287154,0.0001546224,0.0001118839,0.00007321921,0.0005525266,0.00140797,0.0006519685,0.005754681,0.9886919,0.0002048488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596523,0.01171552,0.0005905172,0.02394766,0.001915532,0.002076771,0.00003614197,0.0001569603,0.3999086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504682,0.00107388,0.0003652865,0.000705361,0.0004418828,0.000001752559,0.000007772643,0.00002828396,0.04690758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3908159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}