{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"0db9d6c3275b","filters":{"venue":"The Denning Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Timothy Welch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05462743661749307,"gpt":0.3140624902249177,"spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01532782,0.000494847,0.0005086954,0.004363909,0.0055694,0.01470662,0.001598731,0.005397956,0.003416016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01154342,0.0004429699,0.00057963,0.005521543,0.02427156,0.006489219,0.005889675,0.007691384,0.0003519313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01173349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873935,0.007185886,0.000634029,0.0007523217,0.001948371,0.002085827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915704,0.005521767,0.0007205105,0.0004766343,0.001004703,0.0007060425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885558,0.00005665339,0.001060443,0.0002326764,0.00001117874,0.0001065981,0.02165977,0.0004002519,0.0001920559,0.9549531,0.002223342,0.01907501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182311,0.000346609,0.02779553,0.008051199,0.00009188805,0.0005852539,0.2759217,0.00129167,0.002381392,0.2846125,0.3986735,0.000176882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506229,0.05402511,0.004857799,0.09855411,0.001191066,0.0001497152,0.0001445556,0.0000512047,0.6904035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449139,0.02560821,0.002400202,0.01560874,0.0005728084,0.0001987687,0.0001457797,0.00006073566,0.01049096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01532782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09348983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837475297","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v18i1.310","title":"DOUBLE INVOICING IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE FRAUD AND NULLITY EXCEPTIONS IN LETTERS OF CREDIT – ARE THE AMERICA ACCORD AND THE UCP 500 CROOKS’ CHARTERS!?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Court decision; Status quo; Charter; Business; Accounting; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ademuni Odeke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03424499126394215,"gpt":0.2510262339857747,"spread":0.2167812427218326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007140389,0.0001858718,0.0002695835,0.0009753894,0.004738676,0.01832614,0.001433824,0.00878548,0.001679876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03570206,0.0003038255,0.0003665852,0.001410379,0.01807904,0.009826506,0.00366912,0.01008505,0.0004306018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004967668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007015213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02613046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02725634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882417,0.004363873,0.0007515088,0.0008473771,0.004477448,0.001318098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762049,0.0141936,0.003730639,0.00211841,0.003069337,0.0006830321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006786515,0.00004763812,0.004013771,0.00004972869,0.000006729103,0.0005752268,0.006793675,0.0003104857,0.0002096375,0.9204689,0.03378661,0.03366974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005098641,0.0001650047,0.01772917,0.001226575,0.00005631815,0.001373582,0.01861627,0.003372445,0.002423141,0.3110612,0.6437007,0.0002246528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2638338,0.01319932,0.01091518,0.2917641,0.005262939,0.00006568997,0.00009807015,0.0001399511,0.414721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445795,0.002574612,0.002813986,0.02727398,0.002068087,0.00004338048,0.00004188333,0.00006456576,0.02054004],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02613046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05195671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997765047","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v31i1.1793","title":"Non-Apology in the Age of Apology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Aliza Organick","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235436020793623,"gpt":0.3283755924567253,"spread":0.2860212322487891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00837115,0.0002676606,0.000279315,0.0007545261,0.008256673,0.007070728,0.0009210044,0.005830185,0.005998032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416527,0.0002370926,0.0001796509,0.0003865414,0.04837504,0.009965521,0.004012517,0.00963216,0.0008508345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003647666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003063331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002538075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003208663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940274,0.003685362,0.0001274571,0.0005278005,0.0009546875,0.0006772773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878442,0.007702944,0.001187121,0.001064827,0.001229209,0.000971709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001043485,0.00002092024,0.0005814084,0.00002159796,0.000002632793,0.0002371552,0.02984517,0.00002838814,0.00007756878,0.9491609,0.01232917,0.007684607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141306,0.00003386295,0.001090628,0.0002792277,0.00000473613,0.0005723028,0.01878284,0.0001879087,0.0002124886,0.6794785,0.29932,0.00002341086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07443091,0.01371003,0.0125135,0.2118112,0.002568566,0.00004403463,0.00002903869,0.00009961816,0.6847931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341215,0.002314384,0.0009671577,0.02544327,0.0008823573,0.00002791026,0.000008414487,0.00006096858,0.03617404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00837115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04427135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Dixon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1344060506845135,"gpt":0.3858696663556629,"spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360108,0.0001762181,0.0004776551,0.001016617,0.005793566,0.01021417,0.0007123618,0.004923448,0.009165785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01877154,0.0004393466,0.0004084553,0.001800396,0.006710067,0.007240862,0.005937491,0.004024859,0.0006222533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02023697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01430718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.304626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3812322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936488,0.001769942,0.0004172816,0.0008240548,0.001197045,0.002142773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819365,0.007031523,0.003216305,0.001663884,0.003229648,0.002922068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001493032,0.00004579229,0.02359111,0.0001757279,0.00005154726,0.001771877,0.01504009,0.0005167112,0.0001662787,0.8715729,0.05282433,0.03409426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001440141,0.0001537065,0.09312476,0.002351229,0.0001454484,0.002606739,0.0435397,0.001613407,0.0004488697,0.123252,0.7324151,0.0002050177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4480071,0.04718783,0.003060082,0.1708714,0.001748878,0.00006430956,0.0004931643,0.00004714101,0.3285201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736772,0.002678885,0.0001938003,0.004792472,0.0001263648,0.00001251212,0.00003317024,0.00001264184,0.01847294],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.304626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551401973","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v20i1.336","title":"SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOFTWARE AS COLLATERAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Ninth; Intellectual property; Asset (computer security); Business; Power (physics); Security interest; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Janice Denoncourt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02880097804745789,"gpt":0.2301355294191233,"spread":0.2013345513716654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008960488,0.0005006696,0.0004295488,0.001175365,0.0009688358,0.01016333,0.0005763634,0.002181876,0.03868083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00345836,0.0004019519,0.0002689812,0.002954509,0.005588594,0.01311896,0.002624236,0.001712212,0.006746686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004384923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003082442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006379631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01080008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991692,0.0002498996,0.00004772015,0.00008828743,0.000348164,0.00009664589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982969,0.0008647682,0.0002192717,0.0002579339,0.0002208434,0.0001402365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003014788,0.00001806839,0.0003962201,0.0001967892,0.000008586796,0.0002780532,0.000789783,0.0009324265,0.0004024297,0.8399528,0.05766035,0.09933445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001203976,0.0000249225,0.001011553,0.0009153712,0.00001234196,0.0007448462,0.0009339145,0.001707289,0.0003429578,0.4280451,0.5662281,0.00002163039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01439569,0.1644586,0.02960146,0.02515678,0.001186986,0.00005246285,0.0002591015,0.0003419897,0.7645469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4345958,0.2070162,0.009229959,0.001628656,0.002976434,0.00008782583,0.000404945,0.0002942825,0.343766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03868083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1294003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517602384","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.385","title":"Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (23 February 2007), Docket 30762, 30929, 31178","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Immigration; Terrorism; Political science; State (computer science); Citizenship; Refugee; Human rights; Supreme court; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jocelynne A. Scutt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01823670367789918,"gpt":0.2712016634716855,"spread":0.2529649597937863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022875,0.0004579031,0.0002831122,0.0009170281,0.02417695,0.006412805,0.001368649,0.009734693,0.0290172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004121206,0.0008021141,0.000369708,0.001547959,0.002740736,0.001351897,0.001666558,0.005153884,0.003909953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04810571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1458279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975212,0.0001057508,0.00005136845,0.0001514507,0.001110836,0.001059281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.0002507454,0.00005127188,0.00004173641,0.0008213025,0.0003667531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003033866,0.00003300638,0.002776101,0.00007062432,0.000007641427,0.0005260533,0.002237339,0.0001149891,0.0003128375,0.1388492,0.8428735,0.01216845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003831927,0.00001423304,0.01040888,0.0002308855,0.00001919474,0.0001177162,0.002242684,0.0002040095,0.0003806687,0.005906434,0.9803833,0.00005377961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01392658,0.00594638,0.0003833185,0.05278318,0.0008634576,0.0001907782,0.002844224,0.000140429,0.9229217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1036279,0.003284804,0.0007629913,0.08055955,0.0002031756,0.0001965741,0.0008849975,0.00007566198,0.8104044],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04810571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3490331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mary Welstead","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01882217904289349,"gpt":0.3266879160285018,"spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006384565,0.0008902433,0.001016643,0.005604368,0.02671665,0.0202506,0.003305431,0.009587001,0.009856513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271432,0.0005683857,0.0006957617,0.00818566,0.04932764,0.009469285,0.006859495,0.008028629,0.0004945811],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1666954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1874978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9769601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893717,0.002328192,0.0001912206,0.0007608491,0.003571375,0.003776681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857196,0.003883417,0.000727726,0.0004970856,0.005423991,0.003748126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739461,0.000008395865,0.0003334447,0.00002316716,0.000003900022,0.00008467263,0.004415875,0.0001954374,0.00001670532,0.9871049,0.004910633,0.002897122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004141876,0.00001753112,0.005897652,0.0007604408,0.00005479783,0.0002463131,0.03689151,0.001294613,0.00009184457,0.6910166,0.2635641,0.0001232185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02834968,0.01769446,0.004187448,0.1641599,0.0005535223,0.00004342181,0.0001656818,0.0000278921,0.784818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377617,0.01560982,0.001526931,0.009312822,0.0003956359,0.00004385845,0.00005702606,0.00003588427,0.0352564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1666954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173127874","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v27i0.989","title":"THE MODEL FOR A PATH FORWARD. A PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL LAW DEALING WITH CYBER-SQUATTING AND OTHER ABUSIVE DOMAIN NAME PRACTICES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Goodwill; Domain Name System; The Internet; Cyberspace; Law; E-commerce; Intellectual property; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"James Plotkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09352065687713078,"gpt":0.3500815640146488,"spread":0.256560907137518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006287968,0.0008617517,0.000880915,0.001670018,0.006691995,0.0101793,0.003262183,0.02100656,0.0239925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01124889,0.0005742228,0.002172645,0.001090552,0.01956706,0.01664132,0.005194804,0.01695728,0.004228424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008035784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01182636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01374932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009887172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962393,0.0009631908,0.0001199171,0.000952373,0.001126245,0.0005989786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954282,0.002154703,0.0003799825,0.0006225224,0.0009033828,0.0005111654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002906101,0.000007817702,0.00004090912,0.000004625258,0.000001244294,0.00002920692,0.00008429657,0.0001403309,0.00001241202,0.9962183,0.002934561,0.0005234206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002096579,0.00001201748,0.00004666756,0.00004112103,0.000003570254,0.00007288943,0.0001112007,0.001350371,0.00003402934,0.9569503,0.04134506,0.00001194479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008510906,0.001963539,0.1114607,0.2693536,0.002133059,0.0004179139,0.0005272437,0.0002419007,0.6053912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5581927,0.002431775,0.07049001,0.09487458,0.003310315,0.001945667,0.0003226117,0.0003152152,0.2681172],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0239925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08026296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558716678","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.384","title":"JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES – MEDICAL CARE, MINORS AND THE RELIGIOUS RITE/RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Contempt; Rite; Context (archaeology); Convention; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; History","authors":[{"name":"David A. Ziebart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01314224417028086,"gpt":0.2907448767332203,"spread":0.2776026325629394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001498016,0.0001396214,0.0001549858,0.0003405839,0.008351015,0.003073747,0.000398942,0.003071818,0.003053121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00449622,0.0002587563,0.0001255062,0.0003041872,0.01197817,0.002453813,0.004286537,0.003742635,0.0001470125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001718228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03213858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06232475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989215,0.0005634718,0.00004153265,0.00007681577,0.000102923,0.000293736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982612,0.0008578176,0.000259308,0.0001033241,0.0001085569,0.0004098437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932358,0.0000511426,0.01177232,0.0001508605,0.00001690559,0.004016368,0.1796818,0.00005377855,0.001454619,0.753244,0.017503,0.03201583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002068164,0.00008473278,0.02415492,0.001398617,0.00002388433,0.006672519,0.2739714,0.00008893422,0.0008053412,0.05676335,0.6359614,0.00005416401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5968636,0.01529208,0.001113297,0.1051693,0.00097255,0.00006512945,0.00005991035,0.00001394161,0.2804502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977442,0.002325921,0.000194532,0.008959936,0.00009312878,0.00001297765,0.000008058514,0.000004828756,0.01095865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03213858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06390303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152637","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2230","title":"Role for Parliament in Independent Judicial Appointments: Insights from the Comptroller and Auditor General","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Audit; Accounting; Business; Politics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01229456345914291,"gpt":0.2346362294416603,"spread":0.2223416659825175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00958409,0.000184691,0.0003826729,0.00131226,0.01566322,0.01232844,0.001630303,0.005110865,0.004705708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01426574,0.0004491129,0.0004371375,0.001764733,0.02062835,0.00625481,0.004384578,0.006101308,0.0007855491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01713516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07789055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1336345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9818681,0.01203032,0.0002482632,0.0006784931,0.001370256,0.003804495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864725,0.009652155,0.001156537,0.000483103,0.001057145,0.001178481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004136005,0.00004139541,0.002415711,0.00003732715,0.000004137005,0.0008095856,0.06827212,0.0001624912,0.0001109325,0.9161755,0.005790324,0.006139038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001378851,0.0001603337,0.02253208,0.000586445,0.00005807766,0.0008781396,0.2174994,0.002069151,0.000570809,0.2105854,0.5448177,0.0001046282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3220147,0.003862538,0.004168235,0.07815775,0.0004701366,0.0000508284,0.00004167813,0.00003030405,0.5912037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327,0.0005145111,0.0002614317,0.00281675,0.0001123118,0.00001053692,0.000008882496,0.00001811416,0.01298743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07789055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549923724","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v1i1.151","title":"It all started with Gunner James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Cameron Harvey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1107921024450171,"gpt":0.3836954479685347,"spread":0.2729033455235176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825805,0.0008155121,0.0006832266,0.001551582,0.01086542,0.009797166,0.001107778,0.00687887,0.04226272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01570623,0.0006049927,0.0005205629,0.0008216414,0.00565081,0.006831913,0.007031807,0.01972448,0.01856265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006881571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01804037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03240571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99575,0.0008411171,0.0001320314,0.0008386929,0.001678011,0.0007602586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888436,0.001079394,0.000299022,0.0003688027,0.003511494,0.005897644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002745825,0.00004335853,0.0003370385,0.00004292382,0.000008217225,0.0001549681,0.001512343,0.00003695687,0.0002316434,0.04471079,0.9307418,0.02215257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008962366,0.00001708008,0.0002229827,0.000136912,0.000005076894,0.00008594617,0.001639566,0.00004191595,0.000181833,0.0102203,0.9874136,0.00002582931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002824148,0.009109925,0.002913401,0.7054633,0.09769988,0.00007661733,0.0001074284,0.0003659019,0.1814395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02855329,0.002200243,0.00151773,0.2469716,0.009049257,0.00006500939,0.00004557223,0.0004166988,0.7111806],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04226272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION & REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","authors":[{"name":"Jocelynne A. Scutt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05316565827189108,"gpt":0.3410890433586621,"spread":0.2879233850867711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02628643,0.0008381172,0.0006973572,0.001653845,0.007642741,0.01601569,0.00279901,0.0108235,0.007156515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06794318,0.0006258267,0.0005877911,0.001711897,0.06415734,0.01899496,0.007118058,0.01801526,0.00342548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009529022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01373363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9458409,0.03347389,0.002076463,0.0046213,0.01118245,0.00280494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753733,0.01548665,0.001683331,0.004115953,0.002867307,0.0004735982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005772222,0.000004052777,0.00009058409,0.00004331359,0.000004314817,0.0001055438,0.01144295,0.00005691445,0.00008789647,0.9267496,0.05273082,0.008678187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001047546,0.000006899025,0.0001801595,0.000294722,0.000007087487,0.0002129219,0.006387048,0.0002166552,0.0004743064,0.3882668,0.6039011,0.00004177622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007978489,0.01168443,0.03092803,0.5824643,0.01614795,0.00008419725,0.0001542721,0.0003053166,0.350253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6345513,0.007131553,0.02318887,0.1729447,0.01022907,0.0003178715,0.0001936427,0.001282696,0.1501601],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02628643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1390176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David M. Sykes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03568255744726168,"gpt":0.3381746291294324,"spread":0.3024920716821707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01120328,0.0001760297,0.000471901,0.001674133,0.0112622,0.01507722,0.001588793,0.005851622,0.004785158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05168794,0.0002750884,0.000389832,0.00156103,0.02721879,0.009264057,0.009478489,0.006529898,0.0008683958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008580568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01307777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01333181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9757263,0.01471142,0.001069341,0.001448318,0.003521459,0.003523155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700031,0.01032367,0.008546598,0.0018531,0.003463539,0.005809977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004728252,0.0001440233,0.04453765,0.00007064478,0.00003987173,0.001061966,0.07714267,0.0004664639,0.0004274307,0.8348207,0.0061473,0.03509409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019674,0.0003294142,0.0548922,0.001082337,0.00008692456,0.002440624,0.2154922,0.002583199,0.001336921,0.5609495,0.1604595,0.0003069975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.630393,0.004218436,0.01276637,0.1678536,0.0005540545,0.00008598324,0.00007693344,0.00006137636,0.1839902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933121,0.0003401579,0.0003335841,0.002957545,0.00008059519,0.00001312532,0.000007260093,0.000004871189,0.002950812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01628531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06225663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Mark Pawlowski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03659715602216373,"gpt":0.3503688528253154,"spread":0.3137716968031516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01015657,0.0006061372,0.00113676,0.003284884,0.00581356,0.01373859,0.004111642,0.01102183,0.003408861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02463719,0.0004507522,0.000834033,0.002048131,0.08080766,0.01832679,0.01079321,0.00940399,0.000457417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006092336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005716418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004591945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98583,0.005447015,0.0006823914,0.001568311,0.00449986,0.00197235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866679,0.008350234,0.00151212,0.001367674,0.001317994,0.0007840229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002112458,0.000003739966,0.000172676,0.000006303953,0.000001952174,0.00005223015,0.0009885929,0.00006840459,0.00001844677,0.9970872,0.0001767771,0.001421632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008419197,0.0000231329,0.0006633908,0.0001176117,0.00001181841,0.000158428,0.001581646,0.0007147297,0.0001216532,0.9777154,0.01885975,0.00002418515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06020231,0.009997769,0.1359439,0.07411153,0.001325295,0.000185561,0.00006624748,0.00008768218,0.7180798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820216,0.00154191,0.003964427,0.004758705,0.0007769751,0.0001361403,0.0000152179,0.00003606345,0.006748978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01373859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}