{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0db9d6c3275b","filters":{"venue":"The Denning Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05462743661749307,"gpt":0.3140624902249177,"spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569821,0.0000480609,0.00005787886,0.00002277095,0.001418299,0.0001526053,0.0002419682,0.00003320785,0.000002563322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318396,0.00002343178,0.00003940554,0.0001062854,0.00058163,0.000231687,0.00004459632,0.0001811516,6.00494e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004553969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007141264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008501899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989571,0.0003071974,0.0001779493,0.00004436811,0.0003040191,0.0002093496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994003,0.00027318,0.0001683222,0.00006295413,0.0000545676,0.00004073106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008942824,0.00001593703,0.003858648,0.000001785587,0.000008428777,1.902905e-7,0.02753615,0.00003055093,0.0001323662,0.9652497,0.00007858984,0.003078663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00279298,0.00009937792,0.1642259,0.0006480556,0.0001317342,0.0003987276,0.2762341,0.002479855,0.00258977,0.5267044,0.02319545,0.0004995744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6179782,0.0008652603,0.0001852068,0.01498363,0.000878899,0.0002406607,0.00000174805,0.00001192094,0.3648545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987188,0.00008597858,0.00003614407,0.0001770614,0.0008836855,0.000003874783,3.083351e-7,0.00000407739,0.00009010143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4385453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837475297","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v18i1.310","title":"DOUBLE INVOICING IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE FRAUD AND NULLITY EXCEPTIONS IN LETTERS OF CREDIT – ARE THE AMERICA ACCORD AND THE UCP 500 CROOKS’ CHARTERS!?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Court decision; Status quo; Charter; Business; Accounting; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03424499126394215,"gpt":0.2510262339857747,"spread":0.2167812427218326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001371561,0.0001145489,0.0001548311,0.00007260739,0.0004898416,0.000375972,0.0004733287,0.00002820146,0.00004397529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009904918,0.0000532398,0.00005783568,0.0001335767,0.0008472359,0.0006351214,0.0001432481,0.0004596275,0.000003221883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003221975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005974194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001501583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005061965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989964,0.00006677476,0.0003355777,0.00009790969,0.0002841983,0.000219138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991395,0.000321248,0.000357722,0.0001380072,0.00003096341,0.00001253727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008875162,0.0002208637,0.5562172,0.00007049085,0.0002813424,0.00001622081,0.01519457,0.001269775,0.0008444524,0.4123313,0.007260772,0.005405435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003691982,0.00001225693,0.9110057,0.0002976864,0.0001167509,0.0001248077,0.01484255,0.00634198,0.00003767185,0.012902,0.05036916,0.0002574113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252895,0.0004995376,0.0005782146,0.06812429,0.001128675,0.0002023753,0.000003520957,0.00001128479,0.004162621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928772,0.0001271998,0.00003249878,0.004960548,0.001958967,0.000009722627,0.000002129625,0.00001014236,0.00002161828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3994294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997765047","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v31i1.1793","title":"Non-Apology in the Age of Apology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235436020793623,"gpt":0.3283755924567253,"spread":0.2860212322487891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006091179,0.00009254869,0.0002018047,0.00003859974,0.0002039401,0.00001663285,0.0005620788,0.0001419358,0.0006239954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001455879,0.00004688717,0.00009562264,0.0001812758,0.0003732496,0.00002832148,0.00004551206,0.0009278048,0.00008435123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009845496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001429991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004726177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009533412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988726,0.000331703,0.0003092527,0.0001070292,0.000112506,0.0002669058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994628,0.0001378735,0.000156559,0.000181304,0.00002214092,0.00003926827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001587356,0.0008887032,0.1094275,0.00005152719,0.0008007023,0.01105046,0.3310954,0.001975389,0.02473586,0.4862032,0.01994758,0.01223624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01214805,0.004359111,0.6725096,0.0002996805,0.0008977067,0.02167329,0.09699793,0.0003871174,0.001833326,0.01904484,0.1687213,0.001128043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710272,0.0005529491,0.0001358472,0.008449288,0.0007717795,0.00009133101,0.000001458611,0.000008644865,0.01896152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977164,0.00002019601,0.00003483261,0.001923436,0.0002140706,0.000004572159,0.000001412736,0.00001240588,0.00007265157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.563082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6832312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1344060506845135,"gpt":0.3858696663556629,"spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006451923,0.0001008934,0.00009621405,0.00004674108,0.004644339,0.0007801651,0.00112469,0.00005991632,0.000105624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001989343,0.0000456022,0.00008553694,0.0005559265,0.0004563861,0.0004781689,0.00004296644,0.0008983067,0.00006415324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009520264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006689662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008322498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001995871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977354,0.0008955267,0.0002405471,0.00008262663,0.0004973406,0.0005485526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985812,0.0008220294,0.0001812095,0.0002560933,0.00005062227,0.0001087985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008696431,0.00003457084,0.006497792,0.000001244935,0.00001659093,0.000004261624,0.06429382,0.0001545706,0.0000871745,0.9268094,0.001349767,0.0007420635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002789917,0.0000126086,0.01926222,0.00004407598,0.00004488445,0.0001121521,0.0542908,0.0001224746,0.00006168847,0.005751331,0.9198687,0.0001500566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983741,0.0003007045,0.0002743143,0.02921833,0.0002892007,0.0002316973,0.00000123512,0.00003367841,0.07127672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995773,0.00002656255,0.00008224716,0.002222835,0.001670697,0.00001358814,0.000001334533,0.00001123685,0.0001985608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551401973","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v20i1.336","title":"SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOFTWARE AS COLLATERAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Ninth; Intellectual property; Asset (computer security); Business; Power (physics); Security interest; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02880097804745789,"gpt":0.2301355294191233,"spread":0.2013345513716654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007161516,0.0001750791,0.0001774631,0.0001514981,0.0008936072,0.0005589521,0.0003363795,0.00006600305,0.01077718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002125458,0.00008622314,0.000108607,0.0004098215,0.0001035118,0.001662819,0.00005066278,0.0006266522,0.001125336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006791933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002827402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001177289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005568522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987845,0.00003828498,0.000308939,0.0001199658,0.0002556332,0.0004926233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994705,0.0001374698,0.0001030133,0.0001417921,0.0001158783,0.00003131523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00442606,0.002219456,0.00908081,0.0004054949,0.0009677544,0.000306992,0.1031082,0.001251289,0.006056633,0.01503399,0.5091159,0.3480274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009354217,0.00005217428,0.0003325988,0.0001842915,0.00009232446,0.0005662322,0.002659746,0.008968735,0.0005835107,0.002206015,0.9829763,0.0004426627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.669868,0.001423597,0.00739698,0.004027932,0.003534289,0.0006291164,0.000001641384,0.0002866586,0.3128318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936651,0.0000184099,0.0001070446,0.00214577,0.001703536,0.000008444289,0.000001971039,0.0000315224,0.002318191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4738604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517602384","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.385","title":"Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (23 February 2007), Docket 30762, 30929, 31178","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Immigration; Terrorism; Political science; State (computer science); Citizenship; Refugee; Human rights; Supreme court; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01823670367789918,"gpt":0.2712016634716855,"spread":0.2529649597937863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001894451,0.0001063706,0.0001106255,0.00003117468,0.002380142,0.0002407823,0.0002404556,0.00006068882,0.0005322433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000130816,0.00007962292,0.00004637604,0.00008755091,0.0001586678,0.0003965212,0.00003093894,0.0003285348,0.00004813763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002378593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002557802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.406642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983359,0.0002650324,0.0002368771,0.00009268036,0.0006386465,0.0004308775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991027,0.0002317855,0.0001896958,0.00008360214,0.000168824,0.0002233542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004488271,0.00003051481,0.0654567,0.000006389042,0.0001148742,0.00002532243,0.006478669,0.00002870777,0.0001528989,0.7389855,0.1871893,0.001486148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276072,0.00007995024,0.4069321,0.000240011,0.0001815037,0.0005439568,0.01239554,0.000222202,0.0007270219,0.03570972,0.5407784,0.0009135387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699756,0.001901827,0.0002233527,0.008515671,0.003712292,0.0001622095,0.00001791835,0.00003534457,0.1154558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909678,0.0001453604,0.0001279475,0.001646356,0.00388727,0.000003269386,0.000007625867,0.00001088641,0.003203507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7032759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01882217904289349,"gpt":0.3266879160285018,"spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001266047,0.00004513799,0.00005291263,0.00001528797,0.00598972,0.0002496685,0.0001575634,0.00003420946,0.00005254177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002076261,0.00002503328,0.00002621786,0.0001019457,0.0007617136,0.0001886896,0.00001771091,0.0002972965,0.00001525811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001933858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3448277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.472674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992638,0.000175686,0.00007633185,0.00004724098,0.000150536,0.000286455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993145,0.0001962999,0.00006789447,0.0000658787,0.0001481579,0.0002072334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001927353,0.000002615032,0.001778229,1.070969e-7,0.000013361,8.066421e-7,0.01730757,0.000002570026,0.000006416021,0.9805366,0.00009400743,0.0002557599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004810513,0.00002402736,0.06437167,0.00002726866,0.0001323234,0.0006880508,0.1712544,0.00006534981,0.00003348228,0.2459977,0.5167131,0.0002116256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958044,0.003427214,0.0006156679,0.0912901,0.0007683059,0.0005389761,0.00002252373,0.00003855115,0.3074942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.0000398776,0.00006105001,0.0004146656,0.0006842586,0.000004931449,2.447191e-7,0.000003127029,0.00006609396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.734539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173127874","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v27i0.989","title":"THE MODEL FOR A PATH FORWARD. A PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL LAW DEALING WITH CYBER-SQUATTING AND OTHER ABUSIVE DOMAIN NAME PRACTICES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Goodwill; Domain Name System; The Internet; Cyberspace; Law; E-commerce; Intellectual property; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09352065687713078,"gpt":0.3500815640146488,"spread":0.256560907137518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006518214,0.0001736511,0.0001971516,0.00002078404,0.005758499,0.0008999164,0.0004587926,0.00008543399,0.000002644073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001039919,0.00008544612,0.00008849204,0.00007317395,0.0007493099,0.0004987849,0.00006221297,0.0003724283,0.000002235808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005883392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001658366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01620742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981037,0.0002532308,0.0002976083,0.0002089474,0.0005302387,0.0006063235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973434,0.001142017,0.0006163511,0.0001574976,0.0005535295,0.0001872526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008117871,0.00001941837,0.000009833617,0.00001016809,0.00009526751,0.000002659523,0.1016352,0.01602194,0.00007684558,0.8801172,0.0003186689,0.0008809688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008931874,0.0002177763,9.263119e-8,0.0001080833,0.00008943368,0.00009867067,0.02477618,0.647111,0.00004995632,0.3074084,0.01906593,0.0001813356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08702134,0.001236805,0.8256537,0.02457403,0.0002842614,0.003230004,0.00002519882,0.0001242635,0.05785039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103199,0.00001914984,0.0870668,0.001222253,0.0005032552,0.0001023984,4.055506e-7,0.00005467432,0.0007111466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8232986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558716678","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.384","title":"JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES – MEDICAL CARE, MINORS AND THE RELIGIOUS RITE/RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Contempt; Rite; Context (archaeology); Convention; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01314224417028086,"gpt":0.2907448767332203,"spread":0.2776026325629394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003953392,0.0001162675,0.000172398,0.000019085,0.003465678,0.000260085,0.0004684753,0.0001173037,0.00008120298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002950524,0.00005641545,0.0001076323,0.0001573547,0.001507909,0.0001874894,0.00008573413,0.0004450821,0.00002617923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008695009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001880793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009340535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001335463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977075,0.0004855486,0.0002575773,0.00009869046,0.0009704,0.0004802861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987386,0.0005563029,0.000140757,0.0001345386,0.0001222234,0.0003075155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807789,0.00002307316,0.004233412,0.000009205336,0.00008695338,0.00002071497,0.8379864,0.000002378017,0.000002660315,0.07698596,0.07961698,0.000994151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002146919,0.00003154383,0.008719238,0.0001864999,0.0001562788,0.0009352239,0.4259081,0.00001197803,0.00007796501,0.04233379,0.5190896,0.0004027904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.843193,0.1090317,0.0001487269,0.01140165,0.001963396,0.0001770695,5.415602e-7,0.00005022137,0.03403371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652677,0.03099817,0.000232124,0.001574644,0.001803919,0.000005785874,4.635475e-7,0.00001053651,0.0001066504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4394726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152637","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2230","title":"Role for Parliament in Independent Judicial Appointments: Insights from the Comptroller and Auditor General","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Audit; Accounting; Business; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01229456345914291,"gpt":0.2346362294416603,"spread":0.2223416659825175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107632,0.0001036625,0.0001142791,0.00006242821,0.0006627371,0.0005337688,0.0002419579,0.00003179212,0.00006726495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002773221,0.00005857769,0.00005599632,0.00008465673,0.00006741966,0.0003614061,0.00009614613,0.0001997422,0.00001776822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005571884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001243117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00161278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992328,0.00002618936,0.0002673327,0.000116584,0.0002159027,0.0001411805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999579,0.00008858427,0.0001588807,0.0000838238,0.00008136325,0.000008401365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001535913,0.00006671334,0.001989299,0.000004934193,0.0001191194,0.00000331391,0.0002152479,0.0003843577,0.0008353401,0.98309,0.01260193,0.0005361072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003991859,0.00002547513,0.04136728,0.0001895023,0.0001130831,0.000005275533,0.001108053,0.0332428,0.0002658492,0.4522059,0.467272,0.0002129473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132622,0.0006555961,0.001346902,0.01483906,0.00228235,0.0005679569,0.000004211207,0.00002715155,0.06701453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612301,0.00001352675,0.0001956678,0.03551206,0.002817735,0.00003155357,0.00001129227,0.000007951522,0.0001801245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5308841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5147145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549923724","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v1i1.151","title":"It all started with Gunner James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1107921024450171,"gpt":0.3836954479685347,"spread":0.2729033455235176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00229186,0.0000558915,0.00005707164,0.00001825422,0.001387468,0.0002215003,0.0002274948,0.00003256564,0.0008086881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001265143,0.00003197595,0.00002830977,0.00009550706,0.0002448058,0.000770884,0.000009034425,0.000326527,0.0001173861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004022232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009763383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001219516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001829409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988009,0.000371455,0.0000957387,0.00004634604,0.0003685171,0.0003170611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990533,0.0005108583,0.0001293661,0.00007500594,0.0000803101,0.00015114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045837,0.0001377679,0.02637964,0.000005059181,0.0002208882,0.000008820001,0.5554914,0.00004308138,0.00008127947,0.3484909,0.06646845,0.00256807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008665559,0.00001880294,0.001839915,0.00001941522,0.00004147282,0.00006357182,0.09619891,0.000001572846,0.00002302964,0.001158296,0.9004785,0.00006982041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3151062,0.002007146,0.0001187993,0.2755137,0.001215475,0.000103809,9.936366e-7,0.00004134593,0.4058924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904966,0.00005977712,0.000617991,0.0051338,0.001905391,0.000001871303,6.26375e-7,0.000006872635,0.001777012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8340101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION & REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05316565827189108,"gpt":0.3410890433586621,"spread":0.2879233850867711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402929,0.0001132425,0.0001293552,0.00002530454,0.005039061,0.0004748171,0.0002852819,0.00007255175,0.0003351105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003599399,0.00005312135,0.00008808297,0.0002536961,0.0005034039,0.0008445066,0.00003190164,0.0003709373,0.0002860587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003012944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005775264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004316551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983475,0.0004819871,0.0002964315,0.0001305317,0.0004972738,0.00024632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987287,0.0003584853,0.0002821252,0.0001423622,0.0004272376,0.00006106938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003106216,0.00006923066,0.0105586,0.00001878878,0.0003767674,0.000009674988,0.4852335,0.0003877227,0.001433118,0.4779676,0.01537518,0.00825918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000618759,0.00004525829,0.02231907,0.0001831991,0.0001145444,0.00009173089,0.02146485,0.000508612,0.00005092188,0.002987522,0.9513392,0.0002762731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.781815,0.001051948,0.002202499,0.06113901,0.00491105,0.001783756,0.000006915295,0.0002559064,0.1468339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943709,0.00008414993,0.0002362317,0.000758441,0.001028472,0.00001961238,0.000005387751,0.000006164601,0.003490631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03568255744726168,"gpt":0.3381746291294324,"spread":0.3024920716821707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001416115,0.0000992002,0.0001991529,0.00009283303,0.002679504,0.00191475,0.0003186291,0.00006073435,0.000003062996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003086394,0.00007546336,0.00003251587,0.0002166052,0.0002841281,0.001560533,0.0001437434,0.0002033644,5.458108e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003148474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01863668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03266336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.0001600933,0.0001373142,0.0001322526,0.0002557726,0.000267623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990506,0.0005608302,0.0001061861,0.0000684593,0.0001284394,0.00008550117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006045562,0.00002498911,0.2524655,0.00004910435,0.0000814278,0.00001066239,0.053563,0.00009506098,0.000009255447,0.6929043,0.000478838,0.0002574113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000569349,0.00005573996,0.06003446,0.0006906424,0.00005207211,0.000003661054,0.8622928,0.000003673943,0.00003009328,0.008599726,0.06753501,0.0001328217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854627,0.00199392,0.0002761039,0.006153024,0.0002612552,0.0002840618,0.000005791513,0.00001608516,0.005547096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960821,0.000115322,0.00002948621,0.0003678748,0.00019618,0.000003453938,5.737306e-7,0.000005661713,0.003199336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8087298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03659715602216373,"gpt":0.3503688528253154,"spread":0.3137716968031516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131054,0.00005344503,0.00008992555,0.00002210235,0.00216396,0.0001338277,0.0004581349,0.00004409455,0.0001906068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001595898,0.00003652061,0.0000554213,0.0002569417,0.001311913,0.0002191216,0.00006344993,0.0002337789,0.00002461934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005969072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002424239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005974226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003384137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999038,0.0001533919,0.0002051336,0.00007353193,0.0003194508,0.0002104815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.0001104538,0.0001723758,0.0001403869,0.0003056936,0.00009161457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006178771,0.00001432526,0.0005596213,0.000001739251,0.00001888533,0.000001630076,0.02029398,0.00008598376,0.0005781075,0.9750342,0.0004074392,0.002997855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004865348,0.0001029939,0.007213117,0.0001377479,0.00005799742,0.00006327307,0.02413176,0.0001047841,0.004442309,0.102377,0.8606483,0.0002341727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8542905,0.0001973064,0.001034961,0.007461163,0.0002555835,0.0001183038,0.000006320333,0.00003308046,0.1366027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979874,0.00001879453,0.0005162152,0.0004200969,0.0006749516,0.000002004922,2.48646e-7,0.000004777621,0.0003754503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}