{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"bc6751f81c57","filters":{"venue":"The Forum"}},"results":[{"id":"W2316426343","doi":"10.1515/for-2013-0057","title":"The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential election; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008884542104254538,"gpt":0.2741174656200008,"spread":0.2652329235157462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007151408,0.00004708437,0.00004796026,0.000006368926,0.001560055,0.0001047915,0.0002813961,0.00002975434,0.00005035133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007453749,0.00002296218,0.00002822585,0.000170659,0.0005653814,0.0002101037,0.0000221851,0.0001233271,0.00004228494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003582337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003893959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01558051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.0002330744,0.00006987126,0.00008355656,0.0001912763,0.0002612596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999498,0.0002634282,0.00005507183,0.0001397554,0.00002189902,0.00002187631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001050615,0.00004470726,0.008015685,0.000004778022,0.00002084418,2.400065e-7,0.09639524,0.000004362519,0.0007441886,0.02068784,0.8226458,0.05142581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008494317,0.0000225137,0.05578093,0.000003819601,0.00000619723,6.183666e-7,0.03387707,0.00004849458,0.00002493402,0.003037634,0.9070514,0.00006139004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7536285,0.007323027,0.0001477263,0.1161683,0.001385139,0.001316258,0.000001889479,0.00007617895,0.119953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842743,0.0007214858,0.000006637913,0.0009051829,0.000381205,0.00006222311,2.197673e-7,0.000004153273,0.0136446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2306458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119940882","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1067","title":"Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Elite; Politics; Religiosity; Higher education; Political science; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0219145289510505,"gpt":0.3345333581848509,"spread":0.3126188292338004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002674613,0.0000540952,0.00005967499,0.00001175137,0.0007054884,0.00001077024,0.0001524585,0.00006652908,0.00009584925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005082377,0.00003534585,0.00001904573,0.00005350267,0.000471213,0.0001062732,0.00006381978,0.0001205705,0.00003182087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008858807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004756796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008836242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992107,0.00005553561,0.00009640377,0.00007243643,0.0002105426,0.0003543696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996963,0.00007485892,0.00003600243,0.00007245057,0.00002535999,0.00009506303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001850478,0.00001178056,0.005987842,0.000001914481,0.000004222986,2.381694e-7,0.004468472,0.000002695268,0.000003570921,0.938559,0.05000819,0.0009502182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001480277,0.00001067301,0.003248962,0.00001027063,0.000006533113,6.134044e-7,0.01148138,0.00008598732,0.00005141947,0.01919285,0.9656995,0.00006381045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6530325,0.0004615855,0.0001175386,0.1693719,0.000961213,0.0005585251,0.0001972187,0.00008789718,0.1752117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358447,0.00005990523,0.0001878221,0.001865884,0.0005507611,0.000009547902,0.000003802415,0.000004535339,0.06147306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920083923","doi":"10.1515/for-2018-0038","title":"A Trump Effect? Women and the 2018 Midterm Elections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Politics; Democracy; Feeling; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political activism; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01339847863474355,"gpt":0.3037242321890459,"spread":0.2903257535543024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005745284,0.00003269964,0.00004373377,0.00001195708,0.001139143,0.00006380281,0.000103813,0.00002189549,0.00006923966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005282488,0.00001539672,0.00002046315,0.00008066669,0.0007502344,0.00003483952,0.00003103528,0.00004218884,0.00003786677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002322228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002551804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001545732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001493509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993988,0.0001706051,0.00004579946,0.00006039266,0.00009854556,0.0002258498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996931,0.0001300708,0.00002122543,0.0001025204,0.00001841219,0.00003467875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001266227,0.00003044927,0.006708828,0.00000751688,0.00008995563,4.570533e-7,0.29745,0.000001143971,0.0004886919,0.6455367,0.0386399,0.0109198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630326,0.0003259809,0.0206922,0.000007454713,0.00004035375,0.000006773925,0.04555094,0.0003054673,0.001378204,0.5448183,0.385075,0.0001689578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.881611,0.00006566933,0.00006615858,0.02747237,0.0004434026,0.000268934,0.000001716031,0.0000250538,0.09004563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991729,0.00002412887,0.000004325476,0.0004836483,0.0003288499,0.00002936453,2.50237e-7,0.000002873674,0.007397518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3464351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.876148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984426436","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1081","title":"Fundamentals and Fundamentalists: A Reply to Ames et al.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03083087411529569,"gpt":0.3684567031877559,"spread":0.3376258290724602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000441305,0.00004893797,0.00006067722,0.00002040397,0.0004764466,0.00007454051,0.0001087264,0.000009425735,0.0002221201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000742694,0.00003454227,0.00001951769,0.0000956566,0.0001743343,0.00009203067,0.00006663751,0.0000390329,0.000150116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006275687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003272189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003165168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994279,0.00006476155,0.00007969121,0.0001049227,0.0001392373,0.0001835339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997304,0.00007449735,0.00002671797,0.0001058796,0.00001641859,0.00004606684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005316512,0.00002562768,0.004227604,7.552946e-7,0.00001245315,9.053373e-8,0.06438461,4.68879e-7,0.00008567557,0.06617177,0.8545303,0.01055538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006512742,0.0000175504,0.002807164,0.00000624597,0.000002752759,4.765702e-7,0.08117643,0.000001029406,0.00007602479,0.001080169,0.9147195,0.00004755849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.223145,0.0003757787,0.000007176203,0.6941774,0.0001798124,0.0001638985,0.000004100702,0.00003471608,0.08191209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7849729,0.0003153092,0.0001732944,0.1985756,0.00007381798,0.00002092306,7.854112e-7,0.000003898088,0.01586341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.561828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.366449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383818070","doi":"10.1515/for-2023-2022","title":"Conspiracy Theories in the US: Who Believes in Them?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Realm; Ideology; Politics; Social psychology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03810976948363527,"gpt":0.3346237087106914,"spread":0.2965139392270562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005785,0.00004751674,0.00006303295,0.0000455868,0.0003291515,0.0001008821,0.0003603158,0.0000325506,0.0001923071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004308646,0.00002407403,0.00002328533,0.0006273256,0.0002209327,0.0002573935,0.00003879852,0.0001048419,0.0004755645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002415202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001058756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004512929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991208,0.0001948684,0.0001260879,0.00004551767,0.0002296686,0.0002830156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994547,0.0003304904,0.0000362777,0.0001447014,0.00001258895,0.00002117632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005636885,0.000007681689,0.004730829,0.000001786193,0.000001540146,0.000001254867,0.3281285,0.00001651556,0.000002341661,0.6532491,0.009747832,0.004106995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002856546,0.00001943766,0.09166116,0.00003237887,0.000002299042,0.000001224891,0.4219347,0.0001141557,0.00004482091,0.2074292,0.2783698,0.0001050606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6613262,0.0000263491,0.000003517835,0.04267704,0.00009989281,0.000194924,0.000003468446,0.00004266045,0.295626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926059,0.0001080499,0.000002557865,0.003842314,0.00004130491,0.000004852232,0.000001702072,0.000002855176,0.003390504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6112579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020862767","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1323","title":"Immigration & Immigration Reform in the United States: An Outsider's View","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Legalization; Immigration reform; Political science; Immigration law; Immigration policy; Context (archaeology); Law; Political economy; Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02370013977965589,"gpt":0.3199757803918679,"spread":0.296275640612212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001308232,0.0000862092,0.00007897856,0.0000739672,0.0005395045,0.0001484064,0.0003204727,0.00006434521,0.0000567925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003888226,0.00004762401,0.00003617187,0.0007070433,0.0000760663,0.0003244666,0.000007349397,0.0001429929,0.00004535372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005910824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0172025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6131179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987235,0.0003990296,0.000206079,0.0001151898,0.000305512,0.0002506883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994839,0.00004636959,0.00008600544,0.0002691527,0.00007492399,0.00003959964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000410521,0.0001686841,0.0006269591,0.000003612298,0.000007289385,0.000001482929,0.4191802,0.0009166114,0.0001085061,0.5383834,0.005991248,0.03457097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003007044,0.0001719929,0.008413794,0.0000271362,0.00001893576,0.000002008983,0.3194355,0.01967455,0.00002456307,0.03898272,0.6126929,0.0002551813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8465977,0.00009966054,0.00205001,0.1429335,0.0001275133,0.000538728,0.00001019722,0.00009135232,0.007551363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893999,0.0005777352,0.00005395303,0.008519687,0.00008244011,0.00001399004,0.0002765433,0.000004838815,0.001070896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135870610","doi":"10.1515/for-2014-0010","title":"The Catholics and the Others: The Denominational Backdrop to Modern American Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Protestantism; Voting; Political economy; Political science; Rhetoric; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Development economics; Law; Geography; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009668335183121617,"gpt":0.2770799841491981,"spread":0.2674116489660765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006669214,0.00008265421,0.00008584532,0.00001030076,0.003013929,0.0002281983,0.0005593778,0.00002004863,0.0000331948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000274876,0.00003212615,0.00004891766,0.0001448161,0.006654124,0.00006421204,0.000109283,0.0001258596,0.0001024728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005989299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004438891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02375211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003109104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987878,0.0002834325,0.0001209587,0.00009392863,0.0003049559,0.0004088794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.001513011,0.00007240735,0.0002559682,0.0001066752,0.00009063601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004096631,0.000004085289,0.0002347572,2.94083e-7,0.00001231099,7.380743e-8,0.006821048,0.00002100558,0.000002106753,0.9857033,0.003617973,0.00357887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001078118,0.00001876849,0.002226276,0.000002889186,0.00001861989,0.000004045724,0.02516514,0.0003869598,0.00000372922,0.1012662,0.8707139,0.000085637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1467023,0.0004125991,0.001039624,0.5951949,0.0002517019,0.0008188782,0.00003813679,0.00003485505,0.255507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786309,0.00007420502,0.00008809567,0.01248443,0.0003447812,0.0000628389,8.420508e-7,0.000007103314,0.008306798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331478975","doi":"10.1515/for-2015-0002","title":"The Segmented Third Rail: The Politics of Social Security from Carter to Obama","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mainstream; Social security; Social policy; Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03465933714711891,"gpt":0.3334273772527603,"spread":0.2987680401056414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008622377,0.00008237204,0.0001292216,0.000009304478,0.002829164,0.00005182643,0.0005156252,0.00006931677,0.000006032769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002744844,0.00003406738,0.00009882858,0.0001835008,0.0009159169,0.00004587975,0.0001880654,0.0001364536,0.00004886629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006632689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01477628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01439567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998636,0.0002910451,0.0001545997,0.00008252613,0.0004114159,0.0004244247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992415,0.0003177577,0.00008077615,0.0001713389,0.0001191952,0.00006947076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002855832,0.00002115822,0.001107837,0.000001253959,0.0001004703,2.409062e-7,0.4766518,7.793824e-7,0.00001183701,0.3478553,0.1734694,0.0007513499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002141461,0.00003745902,0.003601579,0.000004734746,0.00003563075,1.059529e-7,0.3790603,0.000005885018,0.0001201163,0.3473448,0.2694853,0.0000898787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4771406,0.0003126984,0.000009629731,0.3930478,0.001240743,0.0005362373,0.0001010301,0.00006087049,0.1275504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924968,0.00003245658,0.000003813074,0.002422899,0.001457916,0.0000174177,0.000001345878,0.000006381088,0.003560964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5153562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013994103","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1303","title":"The Legitimacy of Inexperience: Leadership from Outside","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Administration (probate law); Quarter (Canadian coin); Public administration; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0679411968356947,"gpt":0.3054814644957408,"spread":0.237540267660046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002422784,0.00003762657,0.00006499023,0.000005940152,0.0006813071,0.00002276652,0.0003080086,0.00002579332,0.0001419399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008194083,0.00002059222,0.00004919159,0.00003367829,0.0005552518,0.00006753971,0.00001108583,0.00005847879,0.0000839453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002610204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002297389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008100793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994374,0.00004371822,0.0000995591,0.0000610054,0.00008604744,0.000272281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996248,0.000155127,0.00003285773,0.000122868,0.00001109837,0.00005321198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000272219,0.00002460627,0.0003915999,6.883739e-7,0.000008113851,6.44488e-7,0.04013686,0.000002349692,0.000103289,0.8943426,0.02904834,0.03591368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008889499,0.00003172221,0.002657457,0.000005488936,0.00000448117,1.439989e-7,0.04421414,0.00002177103,0.0001991389,0.1463708,0.806347,0.00005888611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2836294,0.0009697211,0.00003129186,0.1371149,0.0005240224,0.0001152837,0.000007381651,0.00003546434,0.5775726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901853,0.00002762016,0.000009739192,0.001976076,0.000194284,0.000002220133,4.636695e-7,0.000001431729,0.007602818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7772987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5240132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969406695","doi":"10.1515/for-2014-0015","title":"The Hope for Audacity: The Understated Unilateralism of President Obama","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Scholarship; Unilateralism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Executive order; Public administration; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02175595377091949,"gpt":0.2983137833941559,"spread":0.2765578296232364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007845894,0.00004859401,0.00006468847,0.00000600626,0.001425814,0.00004841134,0.0003939422,0.00002432539,0.00001484839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001948995,0.00002123347,0.00005859217,0.00007425113,0.001657024,0.00003978008,0.00004225309,0.00005414263,0.000007515134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002873793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002790794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00385295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003107516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992017,0.000193188,0.0001105867,0.00005732847,0.0001815765,0.0002555835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986002,0.001027915,0.00007984936,0.0001870804,0.00007273551,0.00003216157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044187,0.000003747681,0.0001186788,0.000001311485,0.00001391565,2.992958e-8,0.00111841,0.00002889204,0.000008198113,0.9898449,0.00833457,0.0005169535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007564167,0.00002633088,0.0003250983,0.000004473287,0.00001564977,3.315827e-7,0.003172373,0.00008634439,0.00006223347,0.1026771,0.8935178,0.00003668373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06754133,0.0003582679,0.009702586,0.4237853,0.001305089,0.001439138,0.00008792996,0.00008717978,0.4956932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886669,0.00003838775,0.00002750678,0.001542316,0.0001337134,0.00001375945,0.000002064681,0.000003625402,0.009571716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9211256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041964147","doi":"","title":"G.I.S – Métis","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02477905560705613,"gpt":0.3642613539115738,"spread":0.3394822983045176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001808333,0.0002500416,0.000374204,0.0001324758,0.0002112604,0.00005598686,0.0009810915,0.0003465321,0.05216441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001677259,0.0001776412,0.0003482239,0.0006084868,0.0004128178,0.00006416973,0.0001726764,0.0008123139,0.1251367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003920051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004620077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002648952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000660791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964762,0.0009519529,0.0003540142,0.0005406642,0.0003121002,0.001365075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975775,0.0003626679,0.0001234273,0.001721271,0.0000660871,0.0001490679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002459716,0.0002970249,0.04668897,0.00003279551,0.0005323039,0.00005032362,0.00175106,0.00001090288,0.0003822362,0.1600711,0.5709077,0.2190296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001022512,0.0003075941,0.03354891,0.00004256934,0.00008431986,0.0001743178,0.001227108,0.0001299042,0.00002085858,0.01027131,0.952948,0.0002225348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07957882,0.03706436,0.0001370825,0.1314277,0.01018573,0.0004786622,0.00005325748,0.0000380993,0.7410363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5084518,0.0004703697,0.00002747959,0.002762342,0.0003841214,0.00002524692,0.000008871768,0.00003326401,0.4878365],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4288729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.948702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010502084","doi":"10.2202/1540-8884.1139","title":"Northern Strategy and Anti-South Polemics: A Review Essay of Thomas Schaller's Whistling Past Dixie","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Forum","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Power (physics); Politics; Symbol (formal); History; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Economic history; Political economy; Sociology; Philosophy; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07451744663704749,"gpt":0.3748169810085455,"spread":0.300299534371498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112687,0.0002406374,0.001009916,0.00005116446,0.0004623762,0.00003116711,0.0004449151,0.0001591511,0.00004222913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001139774,0.0001553358,0.0002756378,0.0002829921,0.00148178,0.00005417745,0.00009764953,0.0003032675,0.00002482938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001060049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002669833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00105068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007425966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981767,0.0002897914,0.0005104238,0.0002178779,0.0003479342,0.0004572645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986439,0.0003217227,0.0005170034,0.0002883104,0.0001270884,0.0001019913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.068407e-7,0.00001196426,0.00004082199,0.004520346,0.00007213984,0.000003419751,0.000303603,3.25943e-7,1.64337e-8,0.686412,0.0001637544,0.3084708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002895598,0.00001318872,0.000001228758,0.01319758,0.0003201802,0.00000866044,0.0007269178,1.443595e-7,2.457352e-8,0.0003154733,0.9852133,0.0001743869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003195871,0.8484437,0.00005852372,0.0004091855,0.0001184152,0.0004662127,0.0001159336,0.00002281347,0.150362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008592102,0.9967762,0.00003617389,0.0002586696,0.0002777369,0.00001086909,0.00002355107,0.00002021715,0.001737431],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245542905","doi":"10.1515/1540-8884.1002_int","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Politics; Power (physics); Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Bureaucracy; Law; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Reform movement; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01634203573445004,"gpt":0.2946827343840944,"spread":0.2783406986496443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002205009,0.00001645272,0.00001901907,0.000004607136,0.0003926973,0.000007270021,0.00005731933,0.00001088354,0.0004072546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005002884,0.00001084484,0.00001350327,0.00004731246,0.0003532341,0.00008085313,0.000009405724,0.00002955658,0.0003033468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000222836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008899548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007032996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007539721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996592,0.00003919868,0.00002640727,0.00002087283,0.00007785198,0.0001764067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998561,0.00003070353,0.00001173981,0.0000524623,0.00001218021,0.00003682334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.825019e-7,0.000004002482,0.001104267,1.133694e-7,0.00000137243,1.13083e-8,0.0004681241,5.909508e-7,0.000005147892,0.9523373,0.04546874,0.0006097254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008446069,0.000002167519,0.0004306032,2.364823e-7,0.000002570051,6.38614e-7,0.001794635,2.788566e-7,0.00001993889,0.001668309,0.9960542,0.0000179256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01185407,0.0001567064,0.0004226126,0.09693771,0.001140159,0.00004756914,0.000001954395,0.00003448037,0.8894047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808552,0.000008003311,0.00005089107,0.0008220782,0.003247345,0.000001776284,8.321791e-7,0.000001073922,0.01501285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4459152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327950701","doi":"10.1515/1540-8884.1440","title":"The End of the Reform Era? Campaign Finance Retrenchment in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Repeal; Retrenchment; Deregulation; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009858362350397196,"gpt":0.2302781705796807,"spread":0.2204198082292835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242239,0.00006068486,0.00006730311,0.000008921153,0.0009834892,0.00002905642,0.0005093203,0.00002705545,0.00001348357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003904834,0.00001964311,0.00002164967,0.0002296764,0.003327413,0.0000672739,0.00005757996,0.0001212306,8.541738e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001243336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001715878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8083848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9553102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989347,0.0002182665,0.0001224997,0.00005761046,0.0003127918,0.0003540894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993113,0.0002886131,0.00008021395,0.0002704834,0.00002446855,0.0000249239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000984829,0.00001878077,0.01176838,0.000002558428,0.000009504743,3.503166e-7,0.03990774,0.000008522992,0.000003786943,0.9341616,0.01258986,0.001519081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001645241,0.00002706228,0.02183753,0.00001894041,0.00001230673,0.000001204311,0.06675746,0.00005287001,0.0001835879,0.03342748,0.8774279,0.0000891377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293602,0.00113578,0.00001611881,0.04549659,0.0006295103,0.0004077403,0.00002736102,0.000007562932,0.02291913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965782,0.0006070379,0.000003398034,0.0007316626,0.00007774518,0.00001050244,0.00000197982,0.000002787186,0.001986756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941691917","doi":"10.3280/foru2006-001002","title":"The clash between two pioneers: its effect on the development of group psychotherapy in the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Function (biology); Group psychotherapy; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01745311766508229,"gpt":0.3101499658955486,"spread":0.2926968482304663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009596977,0.0001386684,0.000116166,0.00003834936,0.0003831274,0.00002879899,0.0005572991,0.00003974595,0.0000296967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002444408,0.00005459859,0.00002976512,0.0002953541,0.0001079621,0.00001268251,0.00001005595,0.0002074956,0.000004966168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003013149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002909911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07981729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3231904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988303,0.0002920607,0.0002608748,0.000153934,0.0001804553,0.0002823617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981397,0.001213045,0.0001106966,0.0005016653,0.00001784188,0.0000169974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005556692,0.0003658361,0.03100643,0.00001583764,0.0003622186,0.000001743349,0.01055676,0.00004618963,0.001662886,0.5561837,0.3317113,0.06753144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073996,0.0002872889,0.1060794,0.00004004146,0.00001587577,0.000003005669,0.00180155,0.00005220749,0.001572852,0.02960459,0.8592716,0.0001975898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683518,0.0003047971,0.0006269686,0.02567182,0.00007647029,0.0009876025,0.00002562881,0.00002686818,0.003928058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966125,0.0001204245,0.00005360257,0.002287589,0.00005255655,0.0004346054,0.00002637338,0.00002026721,0.0003920819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5275603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9263103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584695267","doi":"10.1515/for-2021-0008","title":"Nazita Lajevardi’s: Outsiders at Home: The Politics of American Islamophobia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Presidential system; Public policy; Political science; Supreme court; Public relations; Policy analysis; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02199008583233095,"gpt":0.3006287643565596,"spread":0.2786386785242286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003829491,0.0001257972,0.0001805683,0.00003525099,0.0004781445,0.00005658528,0.0003252927,0.00004140804,0.0001116904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002631849,0.00008220805,0.0001163754,0.0003325468,0.0005240827,0.00009074342,0.00003091358,0.0002347798,0.0001122438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001163713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005866126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003650862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985711,0.0003356335,0.0002101924,0.0001799566,0.0002770398,0.0004260912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982467,0.0006596597,0.000195156,0.0007275756,0.0001181945,0.00005267854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004790363,0.0006161827,0.04080734,0.0001537426,0.000326841,0.00001025571,0.1317422,0.00007163964,0.009183591,0.02293355,0.7798529,0.0138227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008493926,0.0003422369,0.0719863,0.0001351889,0.0005293688,0.0002283664,0.3550705,0.0000992984,0.04425143,0.03024959,0.4957229,0.0005354622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6273295,0.001077873,0.00003019564,0.3592532,0.003222653,0.0001733157,0.00001746703,0.00005596641,0.008839875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865446,0.00001920001,0.0001293836,0.005613016,0.0003232666,0.00000607267,0.0000138193,0.00003144829,0.007319159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3592151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3677549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}